report on vlf em-16 survey

31C12NW8602 2.15132 LAKE
010
REPORT ON VLF EM-16 SURVEY
Crowe River Property
Claims 1150996 and 1150997
Lake Township
Southeastern Ontario
\
UJ
o:
o
(Z
U)
(T*
"z
D. 5
hLJ
o~
1.0
Introduction.
1.1
Property description, location and access
Claims 1150996 and 1150997 are located in the northeast part of Lot 16 and 17,
Concession IV of Lake Township In the central part of Hastings county In
southeastern Ontario. The claims are located in a surveyed township with surface
rights patented and measure
600 m easterly by 600 m northerly more or less.
The claims are covered by the Bannockburn map of the National Topographic
Series with NTS designation of 31C/13. It is situated at Latitude 44 degrees, 41
minutes north and Longitude 77 degrees, 45 minutes west.
Generally the property lies approximately 57.9 kilometers (36 Miles) southeast of
Bancroft or 80.5 kilometers (50 miles) northeast of Peterborough.
Access, because of isolation is difficult, a series of highway, 4 wheel drive dirt
sideroads and water travel is required. Highways 7 and 62 are used from
Peterborough, then west from Millbridge on a gravel road which deteriorates into
a 4 wheel drive road and which leads to Whetstone Lake, then a short distance
south by canoe to the claims.
1.2
Physiography
The property is situated within the Central Metasedimentary Belt, Hastings Basin
subdivision of the Grenville province of eastern Ontario. Generally, the terrain is
rugged with numerous streams, ponds and lakes; the Crowe River drains the area.
Relief fluctuation varies from 500 feet to 750 feet, usually the result of a series of
anticlines and synclines whose axes trend approximately northeast-southwest.
The property is covered by Bannockburn (GSC, 1950b). Due to this topographical
nature, lumbering rather than farming is practised and as observed, fishing has
declined over the years.
Vegetation consists of a predominance of mixed growth. The area has been cut
over and consists mostly of secondary growth hardwood with some pine and
spruce.
Precambrian rock exposure is excellent; pleistocene deposits minimally cover
bedrock.
2.0
Previous work/current exploration activity
Available documented work completed on the property Is limited. This
documentation indicates the majority of previous exploration was directed at base
metal or iron deposits. A summary of this work and that of the immediate area
follows:
1956-60:Merlin Mines Ltd.
Fifty-eight d.d.h. 36 to 90 feet in depth and averaging 85 feet were
completed within a large portion of the immediate area during this time.
Lithology encountered included: slate, quartzite, porphry, garnet gneiss,
augen gneiss, staurolite and greenstone with rare stringers of py, cpy.
Notably, ddh.11 encountered metagabbro, slate, magnetite (53*ft Fe),
augen gneiss, cpy and greenstone. Additionally, mag. and EM surveys
were completed in 1959. Noteworthy, Alsof Mines Ltd. held possession of
ground in 1957. Several large trenches were dug and blasted to better
expose the Cu mineralization. Refer to 63.10358.
1960:Selco Exploration Co. Ltd. completed EM and magnetometer surveys as
well as some drilling on 9 claims over Mud Turtle Lake. Survey results
indicated evidence of north-trending shear zones on the east shore at the
north end of the lake. Disseminations of cpy, po, py and bornite in quartzbiotite paragneiss was discovered; this appears associated with several EW cross fractures. The magnetometer survey delineated 3 anomalies in the
area of a dioritic outcrop. This implies that these may be the result of many
small dioritic intrusives which are not generally favourable hosts to
economic mineralization. Ddh #3 drilled in a weak conductor indicated a 12
ft. wide wet shear with minor sulphides. E-W shearing was confirmed by
ddh #4. Drilling progressively encountered mineralization to occur
sporadically over very narrow widths. Refer to 63.1057.
1961-.Sharpe Instruments Canada Limited completed a mag. survey over
ground which included 2 claims over Whetstone Lake. It was found that
lithology included sheared, and granitized intrusions that highly altered the
surrounding rocks to form the paragneiss striking N-S, and having a steep
to westerly foliation. The paragneiss caused marked zones of weakness
or shear zones, the major zone represented by the Crowe River. This
shear zone was drilled one mile south of the lake; Copper mineralization
was exposed on the shear zone. This shear-associated copper
mineralization resulted In an EM survey for investigation of zone and
conductor presence over Whetstone Lake.
1965:Whetstone Lake Mines Ltd. acquired 14 contiguous unpatented mining claims
totalling 800 acres in Cone. Ill and IV, Lots 15, 16 and 17 east of
Crowe River immediately south of Whetstone Lake called the Lake
Township property. Two mag. anomalies were tested by four holes:
two, 244 feet in depth; two 324 feet deep. Disseminated suphides
in magnetite was intersected; the best Cu mineralization reported
,40^o over 3.0 feet., Fe ranged 13.4 to 27.76*^. Irregular, jointed
and fractured dark grey quartzite, biotite gneiss, minor greywacke
containing epidote, and chlorite zones as well as the suphides
chalcopyrite and pyrite were encountered. It was felt that because
of the sill-like attitude and the degree of metamorphism confusing
the issue, the diorite and quartz diorite may or may not be a true
intrusion. Refer to 63.4050.
1991:M. Osiel of Etobicoke, Ontario completed assessment work credits of
sampling, and geochem survey on 6 claims.
Highly
carbonate/sulphide rocks reported only trace amounts of gold. Refer
to 2.13953 and R. 13001.
The original discovery of copper mineralization was made in 1955 at the rapids on
Crowe River by Mr. Ivan Sopha of Cordova Mines, Ontario. Several zones of
copper sulphide mineralization was delineated; magnetite, chalcopyrite, chalcocite
and bornite were found in sheared phases of altered metasediments and
metavolcanics. Trenching and blasting ensued.
In 1957, Alsof Mines Ltd. acquired the ground; additional trenching and blasting
better exposed the mineralization. A portion of the property was then optioned to
Merlin Mines Ltd. in 1959 who conducted mag and EM surveys and drilled beneath
the main showing.
3.
Geology
3.1
Regional geology
The general geology of Lake Township is suitably explained and presented by R.K.
Laakso, 1968 in the ODM Geological Report 54, Geology of Lake Township
Lake Township is within the Hastings Basin structural subdivision of the
Haliburton-Bancroft area of the Grenville province of the Canadian Shield (Laakso,
p.3). Lithology is stratigraphically Paleozoic and Precambrian. Metasediments
consisting of marble, paragneiss, paraschist and meta-arkose and metavolcanics
predominantly amphibolites, rhyodacite flows and tuffs and greenstone schists
comprise the Precambrian. Subsequent folding and metamorphism during the
Grenville orogeny occurred conjoint with gabbro/syenite/granite intrusion resulting
in northeast-southwest axial fold trends which parallel regional fold pattern.
Crossfolding at right-angles to the fold axis later developed.
In the OGS Misc. Paper 96, Summary of Field Work, 1980, T.R. Carter in his
paper "No. 24 Metallic Mineral Deposits of the Grenville Province, Southeastern
Ontario" summarizes the known types of deposits with examples to assist In
delineating areas of economic interest.
Carter denoted the following
classifications; table 1 documents deposits examined in classification.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Statiform Volcanic/Volcaniclastic Hosted Pyrite Deposits.
Stratabound Skarn-Hosted Magnetite Deposits.
Intrusion-Hosted Iron-Titanium Deposits
Stratiform Marble-Hosted Zinc Deposits
Stratiform Clastic-Hosted, Copper-Zinc-Silver (Rusty Schist) Deposits.
Intrusion-Hosted Copper-Nickel Deposits.
Unconformable Quartz (*-Ankerite) Vein-Hosted Gold-Silver4~Arsenic
Deposits.
Stratabound Quartz-Dolomite Vein-Hosted, Gold-Copper-Zinc-LeadAntimony Deposits.
Unconformable Calcite Vein-Hosted Lead Deposits
In evaluating regional geology immediate to Lake Township, it is apparent that it
is quite complex and variable, in some cases inconsistently documented. The
adjoining township southwest, Belmont, and west, Methuen Township, exemplify
this. About half of Belmont is underlain by Paleozoic rocks, predominantly
limestone with minor basal sandstone and conglomerate. Where underlain by
Precambrian rocks of the Grenville Supergroup, predominantly metavolcanics,
three distinct mafic to felsic volcanic cycles are assignable with two additional
cycles present but incomplete. Deposits are frequent as documented after Bartlett,
J.R. et al.
Further evaluation of available information emphasizing adjoining townships
reveals a consistent frequency of mineral deposition in various styles within
different lithological units. The obvious question of whether the broad area of the
Grenville is only host to small, uneconomic mineral deposition or whether there is
something being overlooked to get such unusual frequency and variable mineral
'teasers' still remains unanswered.
Moreover, a preponderance of geophysical anomalies which suppose the same
geological environment with volcanogenic massive Cu-Zn-Pb-Ag sulphide
deposits but economically are worthless themselves may, in fact, be "sulphide
ironstones" or interflows. Unequivocally, a preponderate of Proterozoic cover may
reasonably be supposed.
4.0 VLF EM-16 Survey
A VLF EM-16 survey was completed over grid lines spaced at 100 metres on
claim SO-1 150996 and 1150997 on stations at 25 metre intervals. The station
used was MSS, located at Annapolis, Maryland and broadcasting at 21 .4 kHz.
4.1
VLF Electromagnetics
This method uses VLF navigation signals as a primary source. The receiver
measures the dip angle and vertical quadrature of the resultant magnetic field at
the station. The method is capable of detecting weak conductors and has
moderate to great depth penetration, but conductive overburden greatly diminishes
its capability.
Data are plotted as staked profiles of dip angle and vertical quadrature. Conductor
axes are identified where the dip angle crosses from negative to positive. Multiple
conductors may distort the strength of the primary VLF-EM field resulting with an
incomplete cross-over for a particular conductor. There are fee methods of
quantitative Interpretation of the data; conductors for this reconnaissance survey
are merely identified and described.
4.2
Field Procedure
A Geonics EM-16 was employed to measure the In-phase and Quadrature
components of the EM field. The survey used VLF transmitter MSS at Annapolis,
MD., U.S.A. (21 .4kHZ) as a source. The stations were 25m apart and the Inphase (percent slope of the dip angles) and quadrature were measured facing
east. The data was hand recorded in a field book, that was later hand plotted in
the office. A total of 109 readings were taken on a 5 line flagged grid.
4.3
Geonics EM-16 Specifications
Measured Quantity
In-phase and quad-phase components of vertical
magnetic field as a percentage of horizontal primary
field, (i.e. tangent of the tilt angle and ellipticity)
Sensitivity
In-phase I+/Quad-phase :+/-40%
Resolution
W-1%
Output
Nulling by audio tone. In-phase indication from
mechanical inclinometer and quad-phase from a
graduated dial.
4.4
Operating Frequency
15-25 KHz VLF Radio Band. Station selection done
by means of plug-ins.
Operator Controls
On/Off Switch, battery test push button, station selector
switch, audio volume control, quadrature dial,
inclinometer.
Power Supply
6 disposable 'AA' cells
Dimensions
42 x 14 x 9 cm
Weight
instrument: 1.6 kg
Shipping: 5.5 kg
Survey, Results and discussion
See JVX addendum
REFERENCES
Chapman, D.
1968:
Petrology, Structure and Metamorphism
Granodiorite Gneiss in the Grenville.
of a
Concordant
Easton, R.M.; Carter, I.R.; Springer, J.S.
1986:
Mineral Deposits of the Central Metasedimentary Belt, Grenville
Province, Ontario and Quebec, Ottawa. Guidebook #3.
G.A.C.
1984:
GAG 1986 Special Paper 31, New Prospectives on the
Grenville Problem, The Grenville Province, London, Ontario.
GAG/MAC 1986 Guidebook #15, A New Look at the Grenville Front
in Ontario, Ottawa.
1984 #9A710A GAG/MAC Guidebook, Grenville Traverse A, Crosssections of Parts of the Central Metasedimentary Belt, Ottawa.
O.D.M.
1968:
Geological Report 54, Geology of Lake Township
by R.K.Laakso, 36p.
O.G.S.
Assessment Files, Mining Lands Section
Geoscience Research Grant Program, Summary of Research 1978 1979, Miscellaneous Paper 87, p. 104-107.
Summary of Field Work and Other Activities 1987, Miscellaneous
Paper 137, p.316-323.
Summary of Field Work, 1980, Misc. Paper 96.
ADDENDUM
REPORT ON GROUND VLP
SURVEY, LAKE TWP.
SOUTHEASTERN, ONTARIO
On Behalf Of :
ULDIS ABOLINS.
340 Burnet Ave.
Willow dale, Ontario
M2N 1W4
By:
JVX Limited
60 West Wilmot St., Unit #22
Richmond Hill, Ontario
L4B 1M6
Contact: Blaine Webster
Telephone: (416) 731-0972
Pax: (416) 731-9312
JVX Ref: 9148
December, 1991
VX
TABLE OP CONTENTS
Page No.
1.
INTRODUCTION
l
2.
LOCATION
l
3.
SURVEY GRID AND COVERAGE
l
4.
DATA PROCESSING AND PRESENTATION
3
5.
INSTRUMENTATION AND FIELD PROCEDURE
3
5.1
5.2
3
3
6.
7.
VLP Electromagnetics
Field Method
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4
6.1
6.2
4
4
North Claim
South Claim
SUMMARY
TABLES
Table:l
Production Summary
APPENDICES
Appendix 1:
Appendix 2:
Instrument Specification Sheet
Plates
5
VX
A REPORT ON A GROUND VLP SURVEY
CONDUCTED IN LAKE TOWNSHIP,
SOUTHEASTERN ONTARIO
On Behalf Of
ULDIS ABOLINS
1. INTRODUCTION
Between December 28th and 30th, 1991 JVX Ltd. conducted a Very Low Frequency
(VLP) Electromagnetic survey on two claims held by Abe Abolins in Lake Twp.,
Southeastern Ontario.
The object of the VLP geophysical survey was to find and delineate EM
conductors that may be mineralized.
2. LOCATION
The properties surveyed are located approxiniatly 12 km west of highway 62, 24
km north of Madoc, Ontario. The aurvey area l a accessible by a logging road
via four-wheel drive vehicle.
3. SURVEY GRID AND COVERAGE
The survey area consists of two separate claims indicated as South Claim
{claim no. 1150996) and North Claim (claim no. 1150997). The survey lines
strike EW and are 100m apart.
A total of 389 readings were taken over 9.35 line-kin.
the survey coverage follows in Table 1.
A detailed listing of
VX
TABLE l
PRODUCTION SUMMARY
NORTH CLAIM
LINE
FROM
5400N
5350N
5300N
5200N
5100N
5000N
4900N
4800N
2775E
2800E
2825E
2800E
2800E
2800E
2800E
2775E
TO
3425E
3150E
3500E
3500E
3425E
3425E
3425E
3425E
TOTAL
LENGTH
625.0ro
375.0m
675.0m
700.0m
625.0m
625.0m
625.0m
650.0m
4900.0m
NO. READINGS
26
16
28
29
26
26
26
27
204
SOUTH CLAIM
3600N
3500N
3400N
3 SOON
3200N
31 DON
3000N
650.0
650.0
650.0
650.0
625.0
600.0
625.0
27
27
27
27
26
25
26
TOTAL
4450.0m
185
TOTAL VLP COVERAGE
9350.0m
389
2775E
2775E
2775E
2775E
2800E
2800E
2800E
3425E
3425E
3425E
3425E
3425E
3400E
3425E
VX
4. DATA PROCESSING AND PRESENTATION
After the completion of the survey the data was manually entered and
stored on floppy diskette, employing an IBM compatible microcomputer.
The data was edited and reformatted to conform to the specifications of the
Geopack software. The VLP data were ink-plotted as profile plan maps with
a Nicolet Zeta drum plotter interfaced to an IBM compatible microcomputer.
A map of each claim block is plotted at a scale of 1:2500, of the
idealized grid lines, with profiles and posted values. The interpreted
conductor axes are indicated on the maps.
5. INSTRUMENTATION AND FIELD PROCEDURE
5.1 VLP Electromagnetics
This method uses VLP navigation signals as a primary source. The receiver
measures the dip angle and vertical quadrature of the resultant magnetic
field at the station. The method is capable of detecting weak conductors
and has moderate to great depth penetration, but conductive overburden
greatly diminishes its capability.
Data are plotted as stacked profiles of dip angle and vertical
quadrature. Conductor axes are identified where the dip angle crosses
from negative to positive. Multiple conductors may distort the strength
of the primary VLF-EM field resulting with an incomplete cross-over for a
paticular conductor. There are few methods of - quantitative interpretation
of the data; conductors are merely identified.
5.2 Field Procedure
A Geonics EM-16 was employed to measure the In-phase and Quadrature
components of the EM field. The survey used VLF transmitter NSS at
Annapolis, MD., U.S.A. (21.4kHz) as a source. The stations were 25m apart
and the In-phase (percent slope of the dip angles) and quadrature were
measured facing west. The data was hand recorded in a field book, that
was later entered into an IBM compatible PC for processing.
+J VX
6. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1 North Claim { L4800N lo L5400N )
InspecLion of Ihe VLP, North Claim profile map (plate 2) surveyed by JVX
Ltd. reveals three main NS striking anomalies. These anomalies are
expressed aa conductor axes A, B, and C and are identified by the Ip-phase
component crossing from negative to positive or by a sharp decrease in
amplitude, adjacent lo a cross-over, for multiple conductors.
Anomaly A
Anomaly Al is a moderate/weak VLF-EM conductor trending NS, decreasing to
the north, from L4800N sta. 2850E to L5100N sta. 2825E.
Anomaly A2 is a moderate/weak VLP-EM conductor trending NS, 25m east of
Al, from LSOOOn lo L5100N.
Anomaly B
Anomaly B2 is a moderate/weak VLF-EM conductor trending NS Ihroxigh L5400N
sta. 2825E, L5350N sta. 2900E, L5300N sta. 2925E, L5200N sta. 2925E with a
questionable response at L5100N sla. 2925E.
Anomaly Bl is a moderate/weak VLF-EM conductor trending NS, 25m east of
B2, from L5350N sta. 2925E to L5300N sta. 2975E.
Anomaly C
Anomaly C is interpreted at the east claim edge trending NS from L5000N
sta. 3425E to L5100N sta. 3425E.
The VLF-EM conductors are in the proximity of lakes and swamps which gives
uncertainly as lo Ihe response from a geological conduclor and thai of Ihe
clays associaled wilh lakes. Further geophysical and geological
invesligalion is warranled.
6.2 South Claim ( L3000N to L3600N )
Inspection of the VLF, South Claim profile map {plate 1) surveyed by JVX
Lid. reveals Iwo main NS slriking anomalies. These anomalies are
expressed as conductor axes A and B and are identified by the In-phaee
crossing from negative to positive.
Anomaly A
Anomaly Al transectes the north half of the grid striking NS wilh a
strong/moderate VLF-EM conduclor, decreasing lo Ihe aoulh from L3600N
sla. 3000E, L3500N sla. 3025E and L3400N sla. 3025E..
vx
Anomaly A2 trending NS from L3200N sta. 2950E to L3300N sta. 2950E is a
weak Lo questionable VLF-EM conductor.
Anomaly B
Anomaly B transects the entire grid from L3000N sta. 3250E to L3600N sta.
3250E. The VLF-EM conductor is strong through L3600N sta. 3250E to L3500N
sta. 3225E, L3400N sta. 3200E and L3300n sta. 3200E. The conductor
becomes moderate at L3200N ala. 3225E, questionable at L3100N sta, 3225E,
and weak at L3000N sta. 3250N.
The VLF-EM cross-overs, of the South Grid, are significant but, it should
be noted that these conductors are coincident with lakes and swamps
warranting further geophysical and geological investigation.
7. SUMMARY
The VLF survey revealed relatively strong EM conductors with significant
strike length. The two EM conductors of the South Claim are strongest at
the north half of the grid, but correspond with the lake shore. The North
Claim reveals multiple anomalies at its west that run somewhat parallel to
the lake shore. Due to the clays in lakes and swamps responding to EM
fields the anomalies warrant further investigation.
Any questions with regard to this report or the interpretation should be
directed to the undersigned at JVX Limited.
Respectfully submitted,
JVX Limited
Albert Vickers
Geophysicist
Blaine Webster,
President
B.Se.
B.Se.
Appendix l
Specification Sheet
VLF (PLANE WAVE) EM INSTRUMENTS
EMI6
On* ot the most popular and widely used electromagnet* instruments, the EUt6
VLF receiver makes UM ideal reconnaissance EM. This can bt attributed to its hett
reiubirty. operational Hmptoty. compactness and mutual compatibility with other
loconnaissanc* Instruments such as portable magnetometers and iidionuuic (KMtors.
kTh* VLF mtilnd ol EM surviying. pionMfw) by Cwmcs, has provtn to be a sunpit
Ftconomiut mwns ol mapp^g oMtogiul si/ueiu* and laufi incng. The appucabons
ai* many and varitd, ranging Irom dccct d*i*cbon ol massivt suipfwu conduciors
to UM nduKl dtuction ol precious meuis and radioactive Ooposiu.
FEATURES
The EM 16 is the only VLF Instrument that measures the quad phase as well as
the in phase secondary held. Tius has the advantage ol pioviding an additional
piece ol dau tor a more comprehensive interpretation and also allows a moie
accurau determination ol we Ut angle.
The secondary fields are measured as a (alio lo the primary Uid making the
measurement independent ol absolute held strength.
The EUtl Is the only VLF leceiver that can be adapted to measure VLF resistivity.
Specifications
MEASURED QUANTITY bvphase and quad phase components ol vertical mag
netic held as a percentage ol horuontal primary held.
(I.e. tangent ol the Ut angle and eUipucity)
SENSITIVITY
Ifrpnase :xiSW.
Ouadphasers 40V.
RESOLUTION
OUTPUT
KuOcM) by audio tone. In phase indication Irom mechan
ical inclinometer and quad-phase Irom a graduated dot.
OPERATING FREQUENCY IS 2S UU VLF Radio Band. SUUon selection done by
means ol piug-n unis.
OPERATOR CONTROLS On/Otl switch, battery lest push button, station selector
twitch, auto mum* control. Quadrature dial, tncUnomeujr.
POWER SUPPLY
6 disposable 'AA' ceUs
IMENSIONI
OiUilcm
EIGHT
'
lnsUum*nl:1.ikg
:S.Skg
Appendix 2
Plates
Plate l : VLF-EM Profile Map, North Claim, scale 1:2500
Plate 2 : VLF-F.M Profile Map, South Claim, scale 1:2500
31C12NW8682 2.15132 LAKE
tario
Ministry of
Ministere du
Northern Development Developpement du Nord
and Mines
et des Mines
300
Mining Lands Branch Section
Geoscience Approvals Section
933 Ramsey Lake Road
6th Floor
Sudbury, Ontario
P3E 6B5
Telephone:
Fax:
(705) 670-5853
(705) 670-5863
Our File: 2.15132
Transaction #: W9390.00053
November 26, 1993
Mining Recorder
Ministry of Northern
Development and Mines
MacDonald Block, Room M2-17
900 Bay Street
Toronto, Ontario
M7A 1C3
Dear Sir/Madam:
Subject: APPROVAL OF ASSESSMENT WORK CREDITS ON MINING CLAIMS
S01150996 i 1150997 IN LAKE TOWNSHIP
The deficiencies in the original submission have been rectified.
The assessment work credits for the Geophysics(VLF) filed under
Section 14 of the Mining Act Regulations have been approved as
originally filed.
The approval date is November 24, 1993.
If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please
contact Lucille Jerome at (705) 670-5855.
Yours sincerely,
Ron C. Gashinski
Senior Manager, Mining Lands Section
Mining and Land Management Branch
Mines and Minerals Division
.LJ/ls
cc:
Resident Geologist
Tweed, Ontario
v Assessment Files Office
Toronto, Ontario
Ministry of
Northern Development
Ontario
and Mines
Statement of Costs
for Assessment Credit
Min ^txdu
Deve^Plment du Nord
et des mines
ttat des couts aux fins
du credit devaluation
Transaction No./N* de transaction
1093^0-00063
Mining Acl/Loi sur les mines
Personal inlormation collected on this form Is obtained under the authority
of the Mining Act. This Information will be used lo maintain a record and
ongoing status of the mining claim(s). Questions about this collection should
be directed to the Provincial Manager, Minings Lands, Ministry of Northern
Development and Mines, 4th Floor, 169 Cedar Street, Sudbury, Ontario
P3E 6A6, telephone (706) 670-7264.
Les renseignements personnels contenus dans la presente formule sont
recueillis en vertu de la Lo) sur les mines el serviront a tenir A jour un registre
des concessions minleres. Adressor toute quesiton sur la collece de ces
renseignements au chef provincial des terrains miniers, ministere du
Developpement du Nord et des Mines, 159. rue Cedar, 4* etage Sudbury
(Ontario) P3E 6A5, telephone (705) 670-7264.
1. Direct Costs/CoQts directs
2. Indirect Costs/CoQts indirects
Typ*
Amount
Montant
Description
Totals
Total global
Labour
Main-d'oeuvre
Wagea
Salalres
Field Supervision
Supervision sur le terrain
Type
Contractor's
and Consultant's If. f ^o *'^y
Fees
Drolls de
('entrepreneur
et de ('experteonsell
Supplies Used
Fournltures
utlllsees
Type
•^
/, z'c'it . :1
Description
Amount
Monianl
Totals
Total global
Type
Transportation
Transport
(X4.tf
Typ.
t
,
Equipment
Rental
Location de
material
* * Note: When claiming Rehabilitation work Indirect costs are not
allowable as assessment work.
Pour le remboursemenl des travaux de rehabilitation, les
couts indirects ne sont pas admissibles en (ant que travaux
d'evaluation.
Typ.
Food and
Lodging
Nourriture el
heb.rgem.nl
Mobilization and
Demobilization
Mobilisation et
demobilisation
Sub Total of Indirect Costs
Total partial des coOts Indirects
i .i-' :' \ Total Direct Costs
Total des coOts directs
*,'0f6rt
Amount Allowable (not greater than 20M of Direct Costs)
Montant admissible (n'excedant pas 20 H des coats directs)
Tola! Value of Assessmenl Credit
(Total of Direct and Allowable
Indirect cotlt)
Valtur lolals du credit
d'evalultion
(Tetel de* couU dktcti
tt Indirect! tdmlMMe*
Note: The recorded holder will be required lo verify expenditures claimed In
(his statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification. If
verification Is not made, the Minister may reject for assessment work
all or part of the assessment work submitted.
Note : Le litulaire enregislre sera lenu de verifier los depenses demandees dans
le present dial des couls dans les 30 jours suivant une demands a eel
effel. SI la verification n'est pas effectuee, le ministre pout rejeier tout
ou une partie des travaux devaluation presenters.
Filing Discounts
Remises pour depfit
1. Work filed within two years of completion is claimed at 1000A of
the above Total Value of Assessment Credit.
1. Les travaux deposes dans les deux ans suivant leur achdvemont sont
remboursos a 100 tto de la valour loiale susmentionnee du crbdil d'evaluation.
2. Work filed three, four or five years after completion is claimed at
50*b of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit. See
calculations below:
2. Les travaux deposes trois, quatre ou cinq ans apres leur achevement
sont rembourses a 50 "to de la valeur totale du credit devaluation
susmentionne. Voir les calculs ci-dessous.
Total Assessment Claimed
Total Value of Assessment Credit
x 0.50 -
Valeur tolale du credit devaluation
x 0.50
Evaluation tolale demand*.
Attestation de I'etat des couts
Certification Verifying Statement of Costs
J'atteste par la presente :
l hereby certify:
that the amounts shown are as accurate as possible and these costs
were Incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands shown
on the accompanying Report of Work form.
que les montants indiques sont le plus exact possible et que ces
depenses ont 616 engagees pour effecluer les travaux d'evaluation
sur les terrains indiques dans la formule de rapport de travail ci-joint.
that as ___f f--., t v
Et qu'a litre de
IIIQI If |0 OIIIWUI Ilw 9 * *W9t P
**i ** **** **w****i w* w
™-^
f — — — -— -—
^ —-, *w ;—Li——— . l am authorized
(Recorded Holder. Agent, Position In Company)
to make this certification
—— --^.--^-----
,
je suis autorise
(litulaire umegisud. represenlanl. posie occupo dans la conipagmo)
a faire cette attestation.
Signature
'
0212 (04/91)
Datu
-~'
-' '
f . ~
'
,/
/ . -.-**l
'1/1
//- ik
Nola : Dans cello lotniulo. (orsqu'il Oesigne dos porsonnas, lo mascuhn ost uiiliso au tons nuuire.
140.
Report of Work Conducted
After Recording Claim
- Ministry of
Northern Development
am*
Ontario
Ji0P.
Transaction Number
. ooo S3
Mining Act
Personal Information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This information will be used for correspondence. Questions about
this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager, Mining Lands, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, Fourth Floor, 159 Cedar Street,
Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 6A5, telephone (705) 670-7264.
f* * C\ Ci
1^ 5 l o ^
2
.
- Refer to the Mining Act and Regulations for requirements of filing assessment work or consult the Mining
Recorder.
- A separate copy of this form must be completed for each Work Group.
- Technical reports and maps must accompany this form in duplicate.
- A sketch, showing the claims the work is assigned to, must accompany this form.
Client No.
Recorded HoWerfs)
/o /o / "7
S?A*/.
Address
Mining Division
Dates
Work
Performed
) 3V -
'C/ v
Township/Area
From:
M or G Plan No.
sf //o
To:
. . .--cj,
( /V?/
Work Performed (Check One Work Group Only)
Type
Work Group
Geotechnical Survey
(/Z-/^ Z'rf-rt- S ^re-y
Physical Work,
Including Drilling
x-s .
? .14" /C*
,
6'*\
j . 1 -
JOT7/ f/-
Rehabilitation
RECEIVED
Other Authorized
Work
Assays
•*'. AUG 1 6 1993
Assignment from
Reserve
MINING LANDS BRANCH
X.
Total Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of Costs
Note: The Minister may reject for assessment work credit all or part of the assessment work submitted If the recorded
holder cannot verify expenditures claimed in the statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification.
Persons and Survey Company Who Performed the Work (Give Name and Address of Author of Report)
Address
Name
SPR.urc L.
(attach a schedule If necessary)
Certification of Beneficial Interest * See Note No. 1 on reverse side
1 certify that at the time the work was performed, the claims covered in this work
report were recorded in the current holder's name or held under a beneficial interest
by the current recorded holder.
Date
Recorded UeMer or Agent (Signature)
nUQiutX 3/^3
U
<:x^-*"<**
'
c^fcrt~—
-
l
Certification of Work Report
1 certify that 1 have a personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this Work report, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after
Its completion and annexed report Is true.
Name and Address of Person Certifying
fy'/C'/'cS
Telepone No.
///O/.
'~* ^/' "
/- //*C^-*-:, ^''/C
'
Date
j
f\~^^y^'t
/~-~^/ ( ?,,
^X.'s-'iv'/f /-^!~* , A/y/-/^' H"~^,
Certified By (Signature)
5 X.3f:-
•^ 4/cS^^
For orrice use only
Total Value Cr. Recorded
*|,SUo
Mining Recorder
DeempdjApprow Date
Date Approved
(LA cjqs
fooo Ste
Date Notice (or Amendments Sent
0041 /rn/oo
i
/'
Date Recorded
Sf.3sJ /t-S/
^/A. ^
R
fSZtZ
'
V
SnilJHFRN ONTARIO MINING DIVI0inn
RECEIVED
AU3 - 5 1993
AM
rM
-liSiMiUiMiSiMiM..
*
\
ty
\
r
:'
r
0
t )
( \
^
r
f
f
W
8^
j\
3A
*
x
K
S*
i
s
3
O
t
f
(
C.
s^
J
t H
Ofcrt
iff!
|f aTLE.
^V
b
.g
li
r
'
\
H
3 Sf s *
io 4
f
O J* \5^ QS^^
"
1i
f,
\
-A
Q
'•O
4
D Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards.
D Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims contained in this report of work.
D Credits are to be cut back as priorized on the attached appendix.
l certify that the recorded holder had a beneficial interest in the patented
or leased land at the time the work was performed.
Signature
Note 2: If work has been performed on patented or leased land, please complete the following:
Date
Note 1: Examples of beneficial Interest are unrecorded transfers, option agreements, memorandum of agreements, etc., with respect
to the mining claims.
In the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option one will be implemented.
1.
2.
3.
Credits you are claiming in this report may be cut back. In order to minimize the adverse effects of such deletions, please indicate from
which claims you wish to priorize the deletion of credits. Please mark (*") one of the following:
l
s jf
^
f
gis
ir
i
i
^
L
f,
Ontario
(Ministry ol
Northern Development
and Mines
Statement of Costs
for Assessment Credit
Mln
ttat des couts aux fins
du credit devaluation
•l des mines
ml du Nord
Transaction No./N* de transaction
1x393^0-00063
Mining Act/Lol sur les mines
Personal Information collected on this form Is obtained under the authority
ol the Mining Act. This Information will be used to maintain a record and
ongoing status of the mining claim(a). Questions about this collection should
be directed to the Provincial Manager, Minings Lands, Ministry of Northern
Development and Mines, 4th Floor, 169 Cedar Street, Sudbury, Ontario
P3E 6A6, telephone (706) 670-7294.
Les renseignements personnels conlenus dans la prosome formule sont
recueillis en vertu de la Lol sur les mines et serviront a tenir a |our un registre
des concessions minieres. Adressor toute quesiton sur la collece de cos
renseignemenls au chef provincial des terrains miniers, ministere du
Developpemenl du Nord el des Minos. 159. rue Cedar. 4* etage. Sudbury
(Ontario) P3E 6A5, telephone (705) 070-7264.
1. Direct Costs/Couts directs
2. Indirect 'Costs/CoQts Indlrects
Description
Type
Amount
Montan l
*' Note: When claiming Rehabilitation work Indirect costs are not
allowable as assessment work.
Pour le remboursemen! des travaux de rehabilitation, les
couts indirects ne sont pas admissibles en lant que travaux
devaluation.
Totals
Total global
Labour
Main-d'oeuvre
Wage*
Salalres
Field Supervision
Supervision sur le terrain
Type
Contractor's
od Consultant's i-lf ^-jtff\'*y
Fees
Drolls de
('entrepreneur
t de I'expertoonsell
Supplies Used
Foiimltures
utilities
Type
•fi
/, *t'x .''r,'
Transportation
Transport
Amount
Montan!
Totals
Total global
Type
/tf4f.0?
Type
t -
Food and
Lodging
Nourrlture et
hebergemenl
Mobilization and
Demobilization
MoblllMtion et
demobilisation
,
Equipment
Rental
Location de
materiel
Description
Typ*
Sub Total of Indirect Costs
Total partlel des coOts Indlrects
': '-' '
Total Direct Costs
Total des couts directs
J
'
3r,866.o*
Amount Allowable (not greater than 20H of Direct Costs)
Montant admissible (n'excedant pas 20 H des couls directs)
Total Value of Assessment Credit
(Total ol Direct and Allowable
Indirect eoiti)
Vsltur totals du credit
d'evalualion
fTolil de* couU dlrecli
K Indirect! MmlMfelM
Note: The recorded holder will be required to verify expenditures claimed In
this statement of costs within 30 days ol a request for verification. If
verification Is not made, the Minister may reject lor assessment work
all or part of the assessment work submitted.
Note : Le tilulaire enregistre1 sera tenu de verifier (os depenses demandees dans
le present olal des couts dans les 30 jours suivant une demande a col
effet. Si la verification n'est pas etlectuea, le ministre pout reieter tout
ou une partie des travaux devaluation presenters.
Filing Discounts
Remises pour dep6t
1. Work filed within two years of completion is claimed at 1000A of
the above Total Value ol Assessment Credit.
1. Les travaux deposed dans les deux ans suivanl leur achbvemonl sont
rernboursos a 100 "to de la valeur lolale susmemionnee du cr6dit devaluation.
2. Work tiled three, four or five years after completion is claimed at
SO^b of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit. See
calculations below:
2. Les travaux deposes trois, quatre ou cinq ans apres leur achevement
sont rembourses a 50 "Vb de la valeur totale du credit devaluation
susmentionne. Voir les calculs ci-dessous.
Total Assessment Claimed
Total Value of Assessment Credit
Valeur lolale du credit d'evalualion
Evaluation totale demandee
x 0.50 -
x 0.50 -
Certification Verifying Statement of Costs
Attestation de I'etat des couts
l hereby certify:
J'atteste par la presente :
que les montants indiques sont le plus exact possible et que ces
depenses ont ete engagees pour effectuer les travaux devaluation
sur les terrains indiques dans la formule de rapport de travail ci-joint.
that the amounts shown are as accurate as possible and these costs
were incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands shown
on the accompanying Report of Work form.
that as
(Recorded Holder. Agent, Position In Company)
to make this certification
. l am authorized
mio de
Et qu'a, litre
a faire cede attestation.
Signature
0212 (04711)
_______________- jo suis autorisd
(lilulaire onregislre. lepresentant. potle occupe dans la conipugnie)
Oalo
Nota : Dans cotte lormulo, (orsqu'il designs dos porsonnes. le mosculm ost ulilisd au sons nouue.
CsJ
O')
(T)
u
o
LU
O.
-
O
v
x
03
5400 N
5400 N
5350 N
5300 N
5300
5200 N
5200 N
5100 N
5000 N
4900 N
4800 N
CLAIM
1150997
ABE ABOLINS
NORTH CLAIM
SOUTHEASTERN M.D., ONTARIO
VLF-EM (21.4kHz) PROFILE
UJ
UJ
o
o
O
O
(-j
CO
L NI
CO
o
00
(XI
LU
LU
O
o
PROFILE SCALE : 1 cm = 20 %
VLF STATION : NSS Annapolis, MD
GEONICS EM- 16
o
^r
4D
?
5^B
SCALE
i
31CI2NW86a2 2.15132 LAKE
200
SURVEY BY
JVX LTD.
DECEMBER 1991
/PO
/-SQift'
1:2500
Lake Twp.
Sj./
.
i sSfs./f/rz
PIATE
2
C/3
N
Q
01
o
o
CO
03
S ^^
O
o
O3 ffi w
t*
w
R
E
C/J
O
SO
M
tn
M
H dd
.
-a
C o
o S
N
;
Ov
^p
3400 E
3200 E
3000 E
Z800 E
V
4
l
li
CO
CD
O
O
o
o
00
I\)
o
o
UJ
o
o
CjO
-^
o
o
CO
-co
en
o
o
o
CO
CD O
l
,
-^fa -go'fri.
IP
t -17
I-
o
LEGEND
True crossover
f-40%
3400 E
3200 E
3000 E
2800 E