A bold strategy for autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability
Transcription
A bold strategy for autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability
Developed with the support of McKinsey & Company A bold strategy for autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability October, 2014 © Miriam Foundation CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY Any use of this material without specific permission of the Miriam Foundation is strictly prohibited 1 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary 2. Introduction to the Miriam Foundation 3. The need to act: Autism Spectrum Disorders and Intellectual Disabilities: Prevalence and trends The life journey of individuals with an ASD and/or ID and their families 4. Introduction to the McKinsey study: Mandate and process 5. Study Findings 6. See Things My Way: Vision, campaign and short-term priorities 7. Acknowledgments 8. Bibliography 2 2 2 © Miriam Foundation 1. Executive Summary ▪ The Miriam Foundation is dedicated to serving individuals with Autism Spectrum ▪ ▪ Disorders (ASDs) and Intellectual Disabilities (IDs) and has a proven track record in doing so. Individuals with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or an intellectual disability (ID) have lifelong conditions that 40 years ago would have either gone unrecognized or would have sent them to institutions. Today, thanks to significant developments in early intervention therapy for young children, specialized education and work programs, and adapted residential services, these individuals can live long and productive lives if access to the right services is made possible. Collectively, we need to make sure that happens. 150,000 Quebec residents live with an ASD and/or an ID. Those in need of lifealtering services currently face a succession of long waitlists, incomplete information, variable quality of services and financial difficulties which can ruin both them and their families. 3 3 3 © Miriam Foundation 1. Executive Summary (continued) Miriam Foundation has undertaken a careful study of the service gaps that individuals and their families face throughout their lifetime. After reviewing 225 documents and conducting 55 interviews with experts and stakeholders, a fact-based picture of the situation across Quebec has emerged: ▪ Diagnosis: Over 1,000 children are waiting up to 2 years for a diagnostic evaluation. Early childhood intervention: Over 800 children are waiting on average 1 year, but up to 3 years for early intensive behavioural intervention (EIBI), a critical service they are only eligible for before age 6. Education: Schools do not have sufficient specialized programs (more pronounced for certain sub-populations), trained teachers or dedicated professionals for this growing student population. Employment or daytime activities: 500 adults are waiting up to 4 years for employment programs and over 300 adults are waiting up to 3 years for daytime activities. Residential services: Adults who need a place in residential homes face wait lists of up to 11 years. Parent support and guidance: Few parents have ready and continuous access to service navigators to guide them through the complicated ASD/ID system, and when they do have access, many of them lack ASD/ID-specific training. Parent respite: Only 8% of parents have access to specialized respite resources and current subsidies for respite are insufficient to meet families’ needs. Specialized medical services: The medical and dental establishments have very few practitioners willing or able to treat individuals with an ASD or an ID despite their high rate of co-morbidities and health issues. We want to work with stakeholders across sectors to change this by: – Intervening directly to fix the most pressing issues. – Convening key shapers together in a collaborative effort to advocate for changes. – Assess progress as well and support applied research to create accountability. 4 4 4 © Miriam Foundation 2. The Miriam Foundation © Miriam Foundation CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY Any use of this material without specific permission of the Miriam Foundation is strictly prohibited 5 The Miriam Foundation’s mission is to help children and adults with an ASD and/or an ID lead fulfilling lives What we do What we support Founded in 1973, the Foundation is involved in a wide range of activities Funding programs that help increase independence and quality of life in children and adults with an ASD/ID. Supporting recreation and leisure activities through which people have the opportunity to meet friends and develop skills and competencies. Providing direct funding and support to families. Bringing the people who are touched by ASD/ID together to advocate for better care and better services (e.g. task force to pass Bill 21). Creating a best practices document for doctors and patients. Supporting higher education programs through the funding of a post-doctoral fellowship in developmental psychology at McGill University. Miriam Home and Services: One of Quebec’s leading public organizations providing early intervention, rehabilitation and residential services, and community and work integration for individuals with ASDs and IDs. Gold Centre: A not-forprofit centre that offers direct services to individuals, and education and training to professionals, paraprofessionals and families. It also supports research to help improve diagnosis, treatment and interventions. Lou Greenberg-Miriam Association: A charitable organization that purchases and maintains community homes adapted to meet the changing needs of adult residents living with ASDs and IDs. The association also manages the Lori Black Community Centre that serves as the head office and client hub for Miriam Home and Services. 6 6 6 © Miriam Foundation We help individuals with autism spectrum disorders, intellectual disabilities, and global developmental delay and their families Intellectual Disability1 (ID) ▪ Deficits in general mental abilities (IQ<65-75) ▪ Impairment in everyday conceptual, social, and practical functions ~74,000 individuals in Quebec ▪ Occurs during the developmental period Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) ▪ Persistent impairment in social communication and interactions ▪ Restricted, repetitive patterns of behaviours, interests, or activities ~76,000 individuals in Quebec and growing 1 in 100 individuals are diagnosed with an intellectual disability in North America1 1 in 68 children are diagnosed with autism in North America2 ASD is 7 times more prevalent in children than diabetes, 8 times more prevalent than cerebral palsy, and 41 times more prevalent than cystic fibrosis ▪ Present from early childhood 1 The diagnosis of global developmental delay is assigned for a period of time when the clinical severity level cannot be reliably assessed during the childhood 2 Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2010 data SOURCE: DSM-5; Public Health Agency of Canada; Ontario Federation for Cerebral Palsy; Cystic Fibrosis Canada 7 7 7 © Miriam Foundation 3. The need to act: Autism Spectrum Disorders and Intellectual Disabilities: Prevalence and trends The life journey of individuals with an ASD and/or ID and their families © Miriam Foundation CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY Any use of this material without specific permission of the Miriam Foundation is strictly prohibited 8 Dramatic increase in ASD prevalence among children will translate in increased demand for services Change in prevalence rates Cases per number of children 1/150 1/150 1/125 1/110 1/88 1/681 Impact is felt on diagnostic and early childhood intervention wait lists Demand for services in schools will grow tremendously in the next 10 years 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 Pressure in the system will continue to build at employment and day activities as well as residential Average birth year of children in study 1 Preliminary investigation from the CDC’s Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network Surveillance released March 28, 2014 SOURCE: Statistics Canada, US CDC Autism Data and Statistics combining data from all ADDM Network sites 2000-2008 Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 9 9 9 © Miriam Foundation PREVALENCE RATES AND SEGMENTATION ASD prevalence studies show an increase of 71% over 10 years, while there is no clear consensus on the trend of the ID prevalence rate Selected main references of prevalence rates1 Prevalence ASD Year Source 1/165 2005 Fombonne 1/100 2012 DSM-5; Fombonne 1/88 2012 US CDC2 Higher prevalence in children than in adults; best prevalence estimates at age 8 Many factors can explain the increase in the ASD prevalence rate ▪ Increased public awareness ▪ Differences in ascertaining diagnosis ▪ Revised diagnostic criteria ▪ Improved diagnostic tools ASD prevalence rate - CDC, 2000-2008 1 150 150 2000 1 150 150 2002 1 125 125 2004 1 110 110 1 88 71% 2006 2008 Many factors can explain the wide range in the ID prevalence rate ▪ New diagnosis criteria i.e. support needed vs. IQ based ▪ Reduction in genetically related ID with prenatal screening ▪ Improved diagnosis of an ASD instead of an ID Range of ID prevalence rate ID 3/100 2013 Qc Auditor Gen. 1/100 2013 DSM-5 0.5/100 2006 OPHQ 3/100 1994 DSM-IV Approximately 40% of individuals with an ASD will also have an ID 1/33 1/33 1/100 1/200 1994 2006 2013 1 Proportion of a population found to have a condition at any point in time 2 In April 2014, CDC released new 2010 data showing a prevalance rate for an ASD of 1/68 SOURCE: DSM-5; US CDC; Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee, E. Fombonne, interviews; Quebec Auditor General Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 10 10 10 © Miriam Foundation THE JOURNEY OF AN INDIVIDUAL WITH AN ASD OR ID General Psychosocial Services Education and work Specialized services Medical Supervision/ accompaniment Day Care Intervention Services Early intervention Age 1 Work Residential Leisure 13 Leisure 18 Long-term care Residential Medical specialists Leisure 5 Work Family Medicine 21 Leisure 45 65 Parents are the natural caregivers; they need support, education and respite services across the life span Education Pediatrician Pediatrician Education Pediatrician Dentist Assessment/ diagnosis 22/12/2014 Supervision/ accompaniment Therapeutic Services Supervision/ accompaniment Family Medicine Dentist Therapeutic Services Dentist Dentist Intervention Services for Adults 11 Geriatric Intervention Services for Adults 11 11 © Miriam Foundation 4. Introduction to the McKinsey study: Mandate and process © Miriam Foundation CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY Any use of this material without specific permission of the Miriam Foundation is strictly prohibited 12 We conducted over 55 interviews and reviewed over 225 documents to understand the current landscape and critical service gaps 7 Interviews with key academics ▪ Sick Children ▪ Mtl Children ▪ ABA Clinic ▪ Gold Center ▪ Ste-Justine Interviews with Hospital health ▪ CSDM professionals ▪ Montreal General Hospital ▪ Douglas Hospital ▪ Clinique des troubles complexes de la Montérégie ▪ Holland-Bloorview Rehabilitation Centre • Define strategic vision and priorities to address gaps and improve services 25+ Interviews with key stakeholders • Design high-impact projects and identify potential partners Literature reviewed ~225 ▪ Academic research ▪ Clinical studies ▪ Government reports ▪ Action plans 22/12/2014 ▪ McGill University ▪ York University ▪ U of Alberta ▪ Nisonger Ohio ▪ U of Calgary ▪ Queens University ▪ UQAM • Study the current landscape and learn from innovative models 12+ # of organizations interviewed or documents reviewed ▪ Annual reports ▪ Surveys ▪ Guides and evaluation tools ▪ CSSS Montagne ▪ FQCRDITED ▪ CRDITEDs ▪ FQA ▪ Giant Steps ▪ Autism Community Training BC ▪ American Assoc. of Intellectual ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ & Developmental Disabilities Emergo Geneva Center Surrey Place ATEDM Centre Francois-Michelle Fond Y. Lamarre CRDITED de la Montérégie Agence SSS Mtl 10 parents incl. 2 focus groups Ecole Lajoie Revanou Centre Philou Thomas House, Netherlands MP CPC 13 13 13 © Miriam Foundation 5. Study Findings © Miriam Foundation CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY Any use of this material without specific permission of the Miriam Foundation is strictly prohibited 14 Note About Study Findings We have pieced together available evidence from peer review journals, grey literature, and many interviews. All of this together represents the best available data we could find within the scope of this study. Some of the data represents our best estimates based on the triangulation of multiple sources. Our findings in no way imply the availability of perfect data and we sincerely hope that much-needed research continues to evolve in this domain. Furthermore, we welcome any direction from our stakeholders with respect to data that may not be included here-in or for which updates may now be available. 15 15 15 © Miriam Foundation PREVALENCE RATES AND SEGMENTATION The levels of severity or required support vary substantially along the ID and ASD spectrums Levels of severity or required support Proportion Co-morbidity Mild - With sufficient support, can meet elementary academic levels or beyond, is self-sufficient, and can live independently with minimal support for more complex life decisions ID Moderate - Adequate communication skills, but needs support with social cues and decisions, can perform most self-care activities, may achieve independent employment requiring limited conceptual or social skills, and typically lives in group homes ~85% ▪ ~20-40% of individuals will have challenging behaviours throughout their life ▪ 3 to 4 times higher rates of co-morbid disorders (e.g, cerebral palsy, epilepsy) than in general population ~ 10% Severe - Very basic communication skills, requires daily assistance with self- ~ 3-4% care activities and safety supervision, and lives in a residence with full support Profound - Communication skills are limited, is dependent upon others for all aspects of daily care, and needs 24-hour care and support ASD ~ 1-2% Requiring support - Able to communicate in full sentences, but difficulty initiating social interactions, switching between activities, as well as organizing and planning ~ 30% Requiring substantial support - Marked deficits in verbal and non-verbal social communication skills with limited social interactions and difficulty coping with change and focus ~ 65% Requiring very substantial support - Severe deficits in verbal and nonverbal social communication skills with rare interactions with others and restricted behavior markedly interfering with functioning in all spheres ~ 5% ▪ ~10-20% of individuals will have challenging behaviours throughout their life ▪ 70% may have one co-morbid mental disorder and 40% may have 2 or more SOURCE: DSM-5; Interviews; Willaye and Magerotte 2008 Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 16 16 16 © Miriam Foundation Given the broad spectrum, it is critical to understand the different levels of functionality by type of diagnosis PRELIMINARY ESTIMATES Segmentation of individuals with ASD and/or ID in Quebec Average number of individuals in thousands, 2013 Diagnosis Segment C: Require support throughout their lifetime (EIBI for ASD is critical) ASD only Potential level of functionality Segment A: Mild form of ASD (e.g., Asperger), can integrate normal environments with a shadow or other support ASD with ID ID only TOTAL High functionality 20 2 63 85 Moderate functionality 31 18 7 56 Low functionality 2.2 1.3 3 7 Serious challenging behaviours 0.5 0.2 1.4 2.1 TOTAL 54 22 74 150 An individual’s functionality level may fluctuate throughout their lifetime Segment B: Highly functional, requiring targeted childhood stimulation but able to integrate employment with support Segment D: Specialized care required throughout lifetime for daily living (e.g. dressing, feeding, bathing) Segment E: Behavioral issues require very substantial supervision, often at risk of being rejected from school system SOURCE: DSM-5; US Center for Disease Control and Prevention; Statscan; Interviews; McKinsey analysis Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 17 17 17 © Miriam Foundation Case examples of each segment (1/2) A ASD High functionality ID B High functionality with mild ID ASD and/or ID concurrent C disability Moderate functionality Jonathan was diagnosed with a mild form of ASD (what we know as Asperger syndrome). His IQ is in the normal range (approximately 100) and he has no language delay. However, Jonathan has difficulty adjusting to social norms and developing relationships, and has had issues at work related to this. He has an exceptional ability to identify patterns across various different settings, and is very good at drawing 3D models. He likes routine and becomes anxious when changes in his environment occur. He needs support with social skills coaching and is using medication for anxiety. Jonathan lives alone in a small apartment located close to his parents and has recently met a woman at work with whom he shares similar interests. Anita has a mild ID. Her adaptive behaviour shows that she has difficulty understanding concepts. Anita graduated from a modified high-school curriculum, and successfully completed a work-integration stage. Her IQ is just under 65. She can communicate verbally, and expresses her needs well. But, she requires supervision for budgeting and around sexuality, as she can be easily taken advantage of by men in her neighbourhood. She has a day job requiring limited conceptual knowledge. Anita lives in an apartment, but her parents help with managing her budget. Claire has an ASD and requires substantial support. She has very limited communication skills and needs substantial support with social cues and life decisions. She can perform most self-care activities. She communicates using a PECS system, and at times, her iPad. She lives in a residential intermediary (RI) home with 4 other people, managed by staff, and attends daily activities at the local community center. She has one topic of interest (i.e., dolls) and tends to speak repeatedly, and show interest in pictures of dolls. She enjoys looking at cartoons on YouTube, with the use of an iPad. SOURCE: N. Garcin; Dudley, C. and Emery, J.C., The Value of Caregiver Time, SPP Research Papers, U. of Alberta, 2014; McKinsey 18 18 18 © Miriam Foundation Case examples of each segment (2/2) Severe ASD and/or severe, D profound ID Low functionality with or without physical disability George is a profoundly affected individual with both an ASD and a concurrent ID. He has significant limitations in all domains of adaptive behaviour (conceptual, social, and practical domains) with an IQ ranging between 35 and 45. He has physical co-morbidities and uses a wheelchair. George is non-verbal and noncommunicative, has significant self-injury behaviours, and wears a helmet to protect his ears and head. He requires very substantial support for all aspects of daily care, such as bathing and eating ASD and/or ID E with serious challenging behaviour Daniel is a young adult with a severe ID. His IQ ranges between 45 and 59. Daniel is non-verbal and non-communicative. Recently, he was moved to a specialized continuous support residence (RAC), because of his serious challenging behaviour. He has significant self-injury behaviours and now wears a helmet to protect his ears and head. Daniel requires very substantial support due to his aggressive behaviour SOURCE: N. Garcin; Dudley, C. and Emery, J.C., The Value of Caregiver Time, SPP Research Papers, U. of Alberta, 2014; McKinsey 19 19 19 © Miriam Foundation PREVALENCE RATES AND SEGMENTATION Out of the 150K individuals with an ASD and/or an ID in Quebec, only ~80K of them receive services, leaving 46% underserviced Individuals with an ASD or an ID based on prevalence Individuals receiving services from major service providers Number of users1, 2012 Number of individuals, 2013 Segment A 20k Segment B 63k Segment C 58k Segment D 7k Segment E 2.1k ~150k ~70k (46%) under serviced ▪ Turning to private ▪ sector or community organizations Not needing services? 27k CSSS 30k CRDITED 11k ~5-10k not identified Schools 1,065 Child dev. center/ Clinic ~80k 1 Does not take into account overlap of users SOURCE: Interviews; Quebec Auditor General,; MSSS Form AS-485; MELS; McKinsey analysis Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 20 20 20 © Miriam Foundation PREVALENCE RATES AND SEGMENTATION Among those ~80K individuals receiving services, 75% of them require a medium to a high level of support for a total of 60K ESTIMATES Segmentation of individuals with an ASD and/or an ID in Quebec Average number of individuals age 0-72 in thousands, 2013 Diagnosis Includes undiagnosed individuals Potential level of functionality1 High functionality ASD only A 20 Mild ID / Requiring support Moderate functionality Moderate ID / Requiring substantial support 31 Low functionality Severe, profound ID / Requiring very substantial support D Serious challenging behaviours Requiring very substantial support E TOTAL 2.2 TOTAL ASD with ID ID only C B 2 18 1.3 Level of support No support People not receiving public services Total of 70K people 63 7 3 85 Low support ~25% of people receiving services Total of 20K people 56 Medium support ~60% of people receiving services Total of 48K people 7 High support 0.5 0.2 1.4 54 22 74 ~15% of people receiving services Total of 12K people 2.1 ~150 1 Total numbers have been rounded to the nearest decimal SOURCE: Support intensity scale; Interviews; McKinsey analysis Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 21 21 21 © Miriam Foundation Critical transition points and transversal needs across the lifespan of a person with an ASD or an ID 1 Diagnosis Access to a diagnosis by a qualified interdisciplinary team within 3 months of concerns Age 1 2 3 5 School Integration into the right school setting with quality education and therapist continuity inside and outside of school 5 Residential services Transition from parents’ home to the right residential environment 20 2 Early childhood intervention Access to early, evidencedbased quality intervention adapted to the child’s needs 4 6 Parent support , guidance Guidance through their child’s life to navigate services and financial support 7 45 Employment and/or day activities Proper planning and smooth integration from school into adapted and fulfilling employment and/or day activities Parent respite Variety of respite options adapted to each family’s needs 8 Specialized medical care Access to specialized medical services (e.g., dental, family medicine, gynecology) 22 22 22 © Miriam Foundation Service gaps, both in terms of access and quality/intensity, vary substantially for each segment at every transition point ILLUSTRATIVE Diagnosis Time needed to access service Segments 1 Early childhood intervention 2 School Over 1 year 0.5-1 year < 0.5 year Low Medium High 3 Employment and/or day activities 4 Residential services Parent support, guidance 65 Parent respite 7 Specialized medical care 8 A B C D E Quality of service A B C D E SOURCE: Interviews; Quebec Auditor General; FQCRDITED; CRDITED Form AS-485 2013; reports from Protecteur du Citoyen 2009 and 2012; McKinsey analysis Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 23 23 23 © Miriam Foundation LIFE PATHWAY AND SERVICE GAPS Time needed to access services: a comparison across key transition points and transversal areas Diagnosis 1 Segments A 20K B 63K Waiting 0.2-1 year for pediatrician referral Once referred, >1000 children waiting 0.3-2 years for diagnosis from clinic/center Early childhood intervention 2 School 3 Less demand because often diagnosed later ~250 children aged 0-5 waiting 0.2-1.2 year for early intervention No wait time for children attending regular or special classes in public schools Total wait time of up to 0.5-3 years C 58K D 7K Due to more apparent signs, pediatrician referral is faster, hence reducing wait time to 0.3-2 years for diagnosis Segments C to E included in > 1,000 children 2.1K waiting for a diagnosis E Employment and/or day activities Residential services Find employment, but can have challenges Live in a natural environment i.e., autonomous apartment or with parents/ family 4 ~495 adults with an ID wait 0.52.2 years and ~125 adults with an ASD wait 0.34 years2 Limited availability of jobs >8801 children aged 0-5 waiting for 0.3-21 years for EIBI or other intervention 0-3 years of wait time for private specialized school Up to 300 students on wait list of some private schools ~312 adults with an ASD and/or an ID wait between 0.4-2.8 years for day activity programs 5 Parent support, guidance 6 (current access mostly in crisis situation) 0.5-1 year Over 1 year Parent respite 7 Less demand from high functional people with an ASD Access to a service navigator: ~1,400 people waiting between 1-43 years for RNI < 0.5 year Overall, 75% of parents have access 50% of parents have access quickly 25% of parents have access, but with long wait list Less wait time for RAC/RIC Many weekend and summer camp respites, but very few caretaking and emergency support options Limited access, e.g., 4 wkds + 1 week per year For specialized respite4: Only 8% of parents have access When available, 50% of parents face long wait times Specialized medical care 8 Use services from regular medical centers Greater medical needs due to higher % co-morbid conditions Limited access especially for adults, very few physician or specialist ready to receive clientele (current access through personal contacts) ID have avg. 2.3 unrecognized conditions and 2.7 unmanaged conditions 1 Does not include children receiving only 1hr/week of service but waiting for EIBI at 20hr/week; Auditor General reported up to 3-year-long waits 2 High range mostly driven by CRDITED Montreal with an ASD 22-44 age group waiting for 8 years, data to validate 3 Up to 11 years based on the Auditor General report 4 Respite offered to individuals with specific conditions requiring a high level support (e.g. serious challenging behaviour, wheelchair) SOURCE: Interviews; Quebec Auditor General; FQCRDITED; CRDITED Form AS-485; Reports from Protecteur du Citoyen 2009 and 2012; McKinsey analysis Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 22/12/2014 24 24 24 © Miriam Foundation LIFE PATHWAY AND SERVICE GAPS High Quality of service: a comparison across transition points and transversal areas Diagnosis 1 Early childhood intervention Quality functions SegAccuracy of Intensity of ments diagnosis services A 20K B 63K Good accuracy of diagnosis C High proportion 58K from D 7K E 2.1K interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary teams 2 School 3 Employment and/or day activities 4 Residential services Ratio of qualified Opportunity to Fulfill individual’s resources per child develop skills specific needs Regular classes : Disagreement on Teachers: Medium type and intensity 1 per 29-34 opportunity to of intervention Professionals: develop due to needed Living in natural 1 per 14 unadapted work environment environments Special classes: ▪ Teachers: 1 per 6-15 Medium quality ▪ Professionals: 1-5 hrs/week of of employment 1 per 14 early intervention opportunity : Limited nb. Of RTF and RI Lack of training resources to residences meet shadow the general No specific needs, but Limited work program for an quality of care opportunities ASD and a mild highly variable ID Secluded work based on home settings Avg 12.8 hrs/ manager week vs. target 20hrs/week Medium quality Special schools: of day activities: Teachers: • Lack of 1 per 1-10 training RAC/RIC meet specific needs Tailored • Insufficient program for outings an ASD and an ID Parent support, guidance Medium Low 65 Parent respite 7 Fulfill parent’s specific needs Fulfill individual’s specific needs Service navigators are generally seen as ineffective : “one size fits all” approach mixing groups of different age and functionality level No real authority to make things happen Some educators lack training No ASD/ID expertise Specialized medical care 8 Quality of services Use services from regular medical centers Occupational, insufficient outings Not recognized by ASD/ID professionals Highly variable, depends on the individual Too large workload Medical staff not trained to intervene with patients with an ASD or an ID Not there at critical point such as receiving diagnosis For specialized respite, special needs are met SOURCE: Interviews; Quebec Auditor General; FQCRDITED; CRDITED Form AS-485; Reports from Protecteur du Citoyen 2009 and 2012; McKinsey analysis Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 25 25 25 © Miriam Foundation LIFE PATHWAY AND SERVICE GAPS 1 Diagnosis: summary of key facts and main issues Key facts Main issues Over 5,000 diagnostic evaluations for a potential ID or an ASD are estimated to be performed annually across Quebec Wait times in Montreal have been increasing Average number of months 12-24 Quotes ▪ Delayed referral 6-12 ▪ ▪ Lack of resources 2007 ▪ 2013 Wait times vary across regions Average number of months, 2014 12-18 3-9 Unclear roles and responsibilities ▪ ▪ Parents, daycare educators, and teachers are unaware of signs and behaviours to “watch for” Some primary care physicians and pediatricians have a “wait and see” approach before referring for diagnosis – Parent Funding allocations have not coped with increasing demand, especially from growing an ASD population In some regions there is a lack of experienced diagnosticians, including trained psychologists, psychiatrists, or audiologists No clear roles and responsibilities and process flow regarding diagnosis between 1st and 2nd line Multiple parallel diagnostic center initiatives under development 0-3 ▪ No common standards Bas-SaintLaurent Laurentides “My pediatrician dismissed my concerns regarding my child’s social behaviour.” No common and uniform diagnostic requirements between hospitals, CSSS, CRDITED and school boards Montérégie “ 80% of diagnostic evaluations can be easily performed. Hospitals should only deal with complex cases.” – DG CSSS “I waste so much time filling out the different diagnosis paper work required from the school, the CSSS, the CRDITED, etc.” – Head hospital diagnostic center SOURCE: Interviews; MSSS; Plan action Montréal 2009-2012; Québec Auditor General; McKinsey analysis; Protecteur du citoyen 2009 Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 26 26 26 © Miriam Foundation LIFE PATHWAY AND SERVICE GAPS 2 Early childhood intervention: summary of key facts and main issues Key facts Key issues ▪ ▪ Intensity of service provision varies Intensity of EIBI interventions in CRDITEDs Hours/week per child, 2012 20.0 -36% 12.8 Quotes Disparity in intensity and quality of EIBI ▪ ▪ ▪ Average ▪ MSSS Target Lack of resources Waiting lists are too long Number of people1 Adapt/ readapt Total ▪ ▪ Waiting list data, 2012 EIBI ▪ Average time 880 250 ▪ 2-3 years 0.5-1 year Lack of research 1,130 ▪ Disparity in quality and methods Trade-off between waitlist and intensity of services Target of 20 hours per week for EIBI is not inforced Private providers offer different intensities based on parent’s financial means Lack of standardization and accreditation Funding allocations have not coped with increasing demand The per capita cost of intervention is extremely high Limited availability of ABA training Limited number of ABA board certified therapists “It’s a difficult trade-off, but I prefer offering less intensive EIBI to more children.” – DG CRDITED “It is so difficult to find ABA board-certified therapists.” – DG CRDITED No consensus/standard on appropriate intervention intensity required for children with different ASD severity levels Confusion for parents as to what types of intervention are appropriate for their child and available in Quebec “Some children with a mild ASD don’t need the 20 hours/week of EIBI and would benefit much more from 4 hours/week of speech therapy.” – Pediatrician 1 For EIBI, "number of people" refers to children aged 0-5 SOURCE: MSSS Form AS-485; Quebec Auditor General; interviews; McKinsey analysis Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 27 27 27 © Miriam Foundation Quebec is behind other provinces in terms of number of spaces for EIBI and of direct funding options Number of children receiving EIBI treatment 2012 Children receiving EIBI per 100,000 population1 Children receiving EIBI per year 2,000 1,300 900 Quebec 29 Not available Ontario +122% British Alberta Columbia 15 11 Not available Quebec Ontario Annual amount provided under direct funding $, 2012 31,2001 +164% British Alberta Columbia Direct funding works elsewhere and deserves serious attention in Quebec 40,000+ 22,000 0 % of users with direct funding Quebec3 Ontario4 British Columbia Alberta2 0% 40% 100% 100% The number of additional spaces called for is justified when compared to other provinces 1 Estimated for a child receiving 20 hours of intervention per week for 40 weeks a year 2 Based on 2006 figures 3 Quebec users obtain direct services through CRDITEDs but receive no public money to purchase services in the private sector 4 Direct services and direct funding are both available in Ontario SOURCE: MSSS Form AS-485; Ontario Auditor General; BC Ministry of Child and Family Operational Performance Report 2013; StatsCan; Parliament of Canada: “Provincial and territorial funding programs for autism therapy” Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 28 28 28 © Miriam Foundation Multiple studies have shown that intervening as soon as possible with 20 hours of treatment a week improves outcomes for children with and ASD Intervening assertively and early is critical High treatment intensity maximizes impact 48 children between 18 and 30 months, diagnosed with an ASD, were randomly assigned to receive 20 hours of treatment a week or to receive regular community services 27 children between 2 and 4 years old, diagnosed with an ASD, randomly assigned to receive high (20-40 hours a week) or low (11-20 hours a week) intensity home-based ABA treatment 20-hour treatment Control group Mullen Scales of Early Learning Mean score Standard score 110 High Low 20 15 100 Change (follow-up 10 minus 5 baseline) 0 90 80 70 60 -5 50 Intellectual (PEP-R)1 40 Baseline Time 1 Educational (BAS) 2 Time 2 Results ▪ Average IQ increase of 15.4 pts in treatment group compared with 4.4 pts in the control group ▪ Treatment group gained 17.8 pts on receptive language compared with 9.8 pts in the control group Adaptive behaviour3 (Vineland) Results Stronger gains in intellectual functioning and educational functioning for high-intensity group The same study showed that there is a diminishing return after ~20 hours/week 1 Psycho-educational Profile Revised: Measures functioning in 7 developmental domains 2. British Abilities Scale is a battery of tests of cognitive abilities; 3. Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale assesses children’s adaptive functioning communication, daily living skills, socialization and motor skills SOURCE: Geraldine Dawson and al., Pediatrics Volume 125, Number 1, Jan 2010, Department of Psychology, University of Wales Swansea, UK 2006 Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 29 29 29 © Miriam Foundation OPTIMAL PATHWAY – FACT BASE Intensive intervention can have positive repercussions on school placement and integration, as well as cognitive and language skills Description Results ▪ Study randomly assigned 38 children to: – An intensive-treatment group that had First grade placements for intensive treatment group Percent 47 42 40 hours of one-on-one treatment a week following the Lovaas treatment – A minimal-treatment group that had 10 hours or less of one-on-one treatment a week following the Lovaas method – A control group of 21 other children did not receive any Lovaas method treatment ▪ Treatment lasted two years, during which student therapists worked in subjects’ homes, schools or communities ▪ Note that children who ended up in normal classes showed no permanent intellectual deficits and their language appeared normal 11 Normal classroom Aphasic classes Special education First grade placements for minimal treatment group Percent 57 42 0 Normal classroom Aphasic classes Special education SOURCE: Lovaas 1987 Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 30 30 30 © Miriam Foundation Quebec needs a strategy for training more board-certified therapists to meet the demand for services and improve their quality FTE needed per 30 children Number needed in QC based on 1,300 places Degree requirement Specialized training Training currently available in QC Therapist Team leader Certified supervisor Clinical supervisor Total 15 2 1 0.5 18.5 ~650 ~90 ~45 ~22 ~807 CEGEP Special CEGEP/DESS/ PhD care counselling Bachelors/BCaBA Masters/ BCBA On-site apprenticeship On-site apprenticeship BCBA-certification program and continuing education Doctorate in psychology Yes Yes No Yes Potential staffing bottlenecks ▪ Finding an adequate number of certified therapists will be difficult in the first years ▪ Requirements for board certification should be introduced gradually ▪ A Quebec-based program offering a Masters in psychology with an accompanying BCBA certification is needed SOURCE: BCBA website; interviews with ACT and Surrey Place; McKinsey analysis Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 31 31 31 © Miriam Foundation LIFE PATHWAY AND SERVICE GAPS 3 School: summary of key facts and main issues Key facts Main issues ▪ From 2002 to 2010, the representation of EHDAA students in schools increased from 1.8% to 3.3% Integration in regular classes varies substantially according to the type of diagnosis %, 2010 42 No ASD and mild ID programs 1-11 ID Quotes ▪ MELS has no specialized program s for individuals with a mild ID or with an ASD, leaving it to each professor to decide what is best to teach ▪ Students with a mild ID are not “handicapped” according to the MELS and hence, don’t receive financial support ▪ The quality of the individual intervention plans varies extensively across schools and is generally low ▪ Most teachers in regular or specialized class rooms are not trained in ASD or ID, nor are they required to have prior experience in ASD/ID Average ratio of professionals to EHDAA students is low at 1:15 75 56 -19% Lack of qualified resources ▪ ▪ People with handicap Lack of continuum of services “The teacher of my son’s special class room was not qualified to hold that role. He had no idea what TEACCH was all about.” – Parent “ There are no standards of quality nor any definition of success. The only measure is the level of complaints.” – School psychologist ASD Students graduating from high school %, 2006 People with no handicap Schools’ academic mandates conflict with adaptation and rehabilitation Despite the MSSS-MELS agreement, many publicly or privately funded educators are refused access to the classroom because of collective bargaining agreements “There is no specific program for students with a mild ID. These students have the best chances to become autonomous and functional.” – Director, specialized school SOURCE: Interviews; MELS; OPHQ; Protecteur du citoyen 2009 and 2012; McKinsey analysis Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 32 32 32 © Miriam Foundation 3 School: 68% of children with an ASD and/or an ID are in a special classroom or specialized school Social integration by diagnosis – all levels of education Percent (2002-2010) N = 100% 11% Difficulty code Key takeaways Integrated in regular class Non-integrated (special class or school) 229 617 1% 11% 32% 8,138 42% 2,834 89% 68% 58% ▪ 89% 99% Mild ID1 Profound ID Moderatesevere ID ASD 90 23 24 80 Total ▪ Integration of ASD students in regular class Integration of ASD students in special class by level of education Number of ASD students 2002 & 2010 Number of ASD students 2006 & 2010 8,138 n = 100% Pre-school 42% +7% 2,284 65% 2002 35% 58% 2010 All levels ▪ 11,998 Elementary High school 1,772 12% 59% 29% 2006 3,273 8% Variation +85% -4% 50% -9% 42% +13% 2010 Only 1-11% students with an ID are integrated in regular class room compare to 42% of students with an ASD From 2002 to 2010, the number of children with an ASD increased by 7% across all levels When looking at the variation by level from 2002 to 2010, we observe – An increase of 13% of ASD students in special classes at the high school level – A decrease of 4% and 9% of ASD students in special classes at the preschool and elementary levels 1 Represents only 10% of all students with mild ID since the remaining 90% don't have the “élève at risque” status versus the “handicapped” as per the MELS' guidelines SOURCE: MELS; OPHQ; McKinsey analysis Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 33 33 33 © Miriam Foundation 3 School: while there is no wait list in public schools, some specialized schools have up to 3 years of wait time Distribution and wait times by type of classes Key takeaway 2010 ▪ Out the 68% of non-integrated Breakdown of students Ratio1 Wait time Wait list Regular class 32% 1:29-34 None None A-B Special class 50% 1:6-15 None None A-B-C-D Special schools 18% 1:1-10 0-3 Up to years 300 B-C-D-E 2010 ASD and ID students, 50% of are in a special class and 18% in a special schools Segments ▪ There are only 3 private specialized schools for ASD students and only 3 for ID students ▪ The ratio of professor to students is 1 to 5 times higher in regular class compared to special class or specialized schools Number of EHDAA students Number of students 2002-2010, thousands 1,000 N= 100% ▪ While public schools should be 886 Regular students Handicap students 98.2% accessible to everyone, some specialized schools have up to 3 years of wait time 96.7% 1.8% 3.3% 2002 2010 +1.5% ▪ From 2002 to 2010, the number of EHDAA students has increased by 1.5% 1 Ratio of professor to students SOURCE: MELS; Fédération des établissements d’enseignement privés; interviews; McKinsey analysis Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 34 34 34 © Miriam Foundation 3 School: overview of specialized education programs Mild Moderate to severe Elementary level High school level Post-secondary level ▪ No specialized education program – i.e., regular secondary program ▪ No specialized education program – i.e., regular secondary program ▪ Formation préparatoire à l’emploi (FPT) ▪ Formation menant à l’exercice d’un métier (FMS) Education program for students with a mild or severe intellectual impairment ▪ 12-15 year-old: Programmes d'études adaptés avec compétences transférables essentielles (PACTE) ▪ 16-21 year-old: An educational approach that facilitates social integration (DEFIS) ▪ 16-21 year-old: An educational approach that facilitates social integration (DEFIS) ▪ ID Profound ▪ Education program for students with a profound intellectual impairment All levels of support ▪ No specialized education program – i.e., regular secondary program ASD ▪ No specialized education program – i.e., regular secondary program ▪ Formation préparatoire à l’emploi (FPT) ▪ Formation menant à l’exercice d’un métier (FMS) SOURCE: MELS Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 35 35 35 © Miriam Foundation LIFE PATHWAY AND SERVICE GAPS 4 Employment and day activities: summary of key facts and main issues Key facts Key issues 620 people are waiting anywhere between 4 months to 4 years for employment integration services Employment integration ▪ 5.9 Work cell support Internship support 3.5 1.7 ▪ “Her work is really important to her, it is rewarding to have a schedule and somewhere to go each day.” cuts in funding for employment activities by 36% and for community integration by 29% over the past 3 years Not enough money to subsidize salaries for ASD/ID people – Sibling ▪ Lack of large employers hosting employment programs and community centres hosting day activities ▪ Program hours often do not align with the working day, making planning complicated for parents and caretakers Lack of job opportunities 1.1 Community integration has a waitlist of 312 people and costs an average of $5,864 per user ▪ ▪ Programs lack resources due to Lack of resources Average annual cost per user $ Thousands, provincial average, 2012 Training workshops Quotes Schedules Activities include leisure, elderly programs, voluntary work programs and school integration ▪ Preparations A variety of community organizations offer activities, ▪ Adolescents do not start vocational training early enough Schools could better integrate in their adapted programs life skills teaching and vocational training “Having to get home at noon on Wednesdays for her makes life very complicated for us.” – Sibling “Even with behavioural problems, she works in a kitchen with a shadow and it is going really well.” – Parent SOURCE: Interviews, MSSS Form AS-485; MSSS DI-TED program spending Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 36 36 36 © Miriam Foundation 4 Employment integration: 620 people are waiting anywhere between 4 months and 4 years for employment integration services Wait time by age group Service offering Number of users, 2012 Training workshops 7,895 1,598 Work stage support 2,864 Intership support Employment integration 3,123 310 New users Number of individuals on waiting list, 2012 173 465 19 12 531 39 235 59 266 53 176 213 18-21 22 à 44 7 5-17 Costs 7 93 45+ 1,458 1,087 665 5.932 188 3.450 1.697 1.065 92 5-17 624 296 18-21 22-44 564 45+ Average wait time of 560 days (1.5 yrs) Issues ▪ ▪ ▪ 100 Number of days, 2012 Average annual cost per user (provincial average), 2012 ▪ ASD Total of 620 (126 ASD, 494 ID) individuals on waiting list ID and ASD Training workshops Work stage support Intership support Employment integration ID Limited capacity of resources to shadow employee in his work environment Limited availability of internships with employers Limited budget to subsidise salary Adolescence do not start planning early enough for their future vocation Trends ▪ ▪ Program funding has reduced 36% over the past 3 years (from $39M to $25M) Demand for employment services will increase with the growing ASD population SOURCE: Form AS-485 Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 37 37 37 © Miriam Foundation 4 Community integration: 312 people are waiting anywhere ID between 0.4 to 2.8 years ASD Service offering Wait time by age group Number of users, 2012 Description ▪ Leisure ▪ Elderly program ▪ Voluntary work prog. ▪ School ASD 4,902 481 4,871 508 New users Number of individuals on waiting list, 2012 74 6 ID 4,421 4,363 5 508 1 5-17 77 18 59 18-21 112 20 117 6 92 111 22 à 44 45+ Total of 312 (45 ASD, 267 ID) individuals on waiting list Beginning End of year of year Number of days, 2012 717 Costs 390 138 Average annual cost per user (provincial average), 2012 ▪ 5,864$/user ▪ 491 417 18-21 22-44 45+ Average wait time of 527days (1.4 yrs) Trends ▪ 5-17 201 987 885 Service offering is slowly increasing for people with an ASD Reduction by 29% of funding in the last 3 years ($40.2M to $28.5M) Issues ▪ ▪ Unclear role between 1st and 2nd line Lack of coordination with community organizations SOURCE: Form AS-485; MSSS DI-TED program spending Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 38 38 38 © Miriam Foundation LIFE PATHWAY AND SERVICE GAPS 5 Residential services: summary of key facts and main issues Key facts Key issues ▪ 1,350 people have been waiting anywhere between 1 to 4 years for one of the 12,000 beds in a RNI or RAC/RIC User distribution, 2012 Quotes Cost RAC/RIC & other ▪ 5% Residential services currently take up nearly half of the MSSS’ CRDITED budget and demand is still not being met Private options, costing anywhere between $30,000 and $40,000 a year, are beyond the reach of most families “Many parents come to see me to purchase a house for their child, but they can’t afford the annual operating costs.” – Foundation Director RNI 36% 59% ▪ Natural living Future demand Annual cost per type of residential service, 2012, provincial average $ Thousands RTF RI RAC ▪ 22 Service quality 35 91 System not ready to deal with upsurge in clients with an ASD diagnosed in past 20 years ▪ ▪ ▪ Increasing demand requires new models that are both scalable and cost-effective Difficulty in finding adequate staff will only be exacerbated “What keeps me up at night is not knowing what will happen to my child when I am gone.” – Parent The foster home model can break up too easily Caretakers are not required to be trained Parents have to stay involved every step of the way to maintain services “Even though our son is no longer at home, we have to constantly fight to get him adequate services.” – Parent SOURCE: Interviews, MSSS Form AS-485; Quebec Auditor General Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 39 39 39 © Miriam Foundation 5 ▪ ▪ Residential integration: autonomy insurance favors home care, user choice, and private sector options By 2050, Québec could be spending between 2 and 3% of GDP in long-term care costs alone A lower portion of long-term care public funds go towards home care than in other countries Long-term care funds allocated to home care Percent 43 41 32 73 17 Québec Netherlands Sweden France Denmark Funding gap for status quo $ Millions 91 100 2019 20 111 21 115 124 22 23 133 24 139 25 148 157 26 27 160 2028 Autonomy insurance could help provide patients with more choice and insure continuous funding. It will provide ▪1 Basic professional care and nursing (nutrition, rehabilitation) ▪2 Assistance with the activities of daily living (dressing, washing, eating) ▪3 Assistance with instrumental activities of daily living (housework, cooking, shopping) User receives an autonomy support benefit ▪ Allocated in either hours of service or financial contribution based on needs ▪ Private providers will be allowed to contract through the CSSS system Short-term funding ▪ Current long-term care funding and user fees equivalent to the tax credit for home support services for seniors Long-term funding ▪ Set up fund to insure long-term care ▪ Contributions will be based on disability level and income SOURCE: MSSS “Autonomy for all: white paper on the creation of autonomy insurance” Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 40 40 40 © Miriam Foundation LIFE PATHWAY AND SERVICE GAPS 6 Parent summary and guidance: summary of key facts and issues Key facts Main issues Parents want access to service coordinators to guide them through the system and they technically exist Availability of service coordinators across agencies % Inefficient service navigators Unavailable due to extraneous circumstances Unavailable due to agency choice Quotes ▪ Service navigators are not accessible in all regions and when so, there are long wait times to see them ▪ When available, services are inadequate to meet parent needs ▪ Often, they do not have expertise in ASD or ID ▪ They do not have the authority to push cases through the system ▪ High turnover does not allow for continuity ▪ Parents do not know where to turn for reliable information and often rely on word of mouth ▪ No standardized information provided to parents following diagnosis ▪ Impossible to know how many families do not even sign up at their local CLSC ▪ Insufficient budget to hire, train, and retain competent resources ▪ Case workers are overloaded 5 15 50 Readily available 25 Insufficient information Available but with long waitlist In reality, only half the CRDITEDs even have them readily available, and parents are generally dissatisfied with their help Lack of resources “A bi-annual intervention plan that is filled with objectives but not concrete plans does not help me at all.” – Parent “During the past 10 years, I’ve had 7 different service navigators and only one was qualified and somewhat helpful.” – Parent “Social workers are important for crisis situations, but we really need someone involved throughout their lifetime to get to know them, their families, and their needs.” – Sibling SOURCE: Interviews; Quebec Auditor General; Protecteur du citoyen 2010 Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 41 41 41 © Miriam Foundation 6 Parent guidance: Current service navigators are not able to guide parents through the government services related to ASD/ID Service navigators were generally available However, quality of service may be lagging Availability of service coordinators across agencies Percent Service navigators are generally seen as ineffective because they Unavailable due to agency choice Unavailable due to extraneous circumstances 5 • Have no real authority to make things happen • Continue working in their field of expertise, which confuses parents ▪ Do not have a clear role that is separate from 15 that of the individual service planner, who oversees treatment choices 50 Readily available Available but with long wait list 25 ▪ Often do not have any ASD/ID expertise ▪ Are not recognized by ASD/ID professionals, who either do not know that they exist or see them as interfering in their work As a result, parents often overlook them and deal directly with the CRDI-TED 1 Here referring to the "intervenant pivot" SOURCE: Rapport du protecteur citoyen 2012, 2009 Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 42 42 42 © Miriam Foundation 6 Parent financial support: A wide range of financial support options are directly available to families, but amounts are small Type Cash benefits Parents Tax credit Material benefits Program Source Amount1 Description Child assistance payments Revenu Québec Revenue Canada $3,769/year ▪ Available to all families with children Child disability benefit Revenu Québec Revenue Canada $403/month ▪ Eligible the month the child is diagnosed Tax credit for caregivers Revenu Québec Revenue Canada $3,171/year ▪ Credit for housing eligible relative Tax credit for childcare expenses Revenu Québec Revenue Canada n/a ▪ Eligible expenses include boarding school or camp Tax credit for volunteer respite services Revenu Québec $1,000/year ▪ Eligible service is minimum Tax credit for respite caregivers Tax credit for medical expenses Revenu Québec Revenu Québec Revenue Canada $1,560/year n/a ▪ Domestic help for respite Domestic help for home care and adapting environment MSSS MSSS $6,600/year3 n/a ▪ Administered through CSSS, ▪ Administered through CSSS, Technical assistance for communication MSSS n/a ▪ 400 hours For Québec, any amount over 3% of annual income2, includes therapy dog Computer, speaking/writing assistance, adapted phones, etc. Creates a substantial administrative burden for families 1 Estimated for family with 1 child, $40,000 income 2 Can alternatively be claimed by adults with ASD/ID 3 Maximum amount including babysitting, additional help for troubled behaviours and emergency respite SOURCE: Fédération de l’autisme du Québec “Ressources financières”, Revenue Québec, Revenue Canada, MESS, Régie des rentes du Québec, Vérificateur Général Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 43 43 43 © Miriam Foundation 6 Financial support: Independent individuals with an ASD/ID rely mainly on social assistance Type Cash Benefit Individuals with ASD/ID Tax credit Material benefits Program Source Amount1 Description Social assistance MESS $927/month ▪ Reduced amount if individual lives with parents Home improvement fund SCHL n/a ▪ For individuals with disabilities to make their homes more accessible Home buyer tax credit Revenue Canada $5,000 Tax credit for medical expenses Revenu Quebec Revenue Canada n/a Exemption from paying the Québec prescription drug insurance premium MSSS n/a Amount for severe and prolonged impairment in mental or physical function Revenu Québec $2,545/year Disability supports deduction Revenu Québec Renenue Canada n/a Domestic help for home care and adapting environment MSSS n/a ▪ Administered through CSSS, Technical assistance for communication MSSS n/a ▪ Computer, speaking/writing assistance, adapted phones, etc. ▪ For buying first home ▪ For individuals incurring significant medical expenses ▪ Can be applied to dependents ▪ Adaptation costs for work or higher education SOURCE: Fédération de l’autisme du Québec “ Ressources financières” , Revenue Québec, Revenue Canada, MESS, Régie des rentes du Québec; interviews Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 44 44 44 © Miriam Foundation LIFE PATHWAY AND SERVICE GAPS 7 Parent respite: summary of key facts and main issues Key facts Main issues 33% of families face long wait times One size fits all 92% of parents cannot readily access specialized services Percent, 2010 92 8 Readily available Not available or long wait time There is an important gap for caretaking and emergency support services Number of providers of respite, caretaking and emergency services across Quebec, sample 2014 Weekend/ 7 13 2 summer Babysitting/ caretaking Emergency support 1 2 1 1 0 Both ▪ Individuals have different needs and most services have a “one size fits all” approach ▪ Many respites put limits on the number of weekends per family ▪ Weekends can cost $70 to $150 per day while caretaking can amount to $75 to $160 per day ▪ Direct governmental allocations are not sufficient to cover parent’s needs ▪ Uneven level of service across regions due to difference in special needs, governance structure, growth of demand, lack of resources, and lack of collaboration Disparity across regions ASD ID 4 Too expensive for some parents Quotes Lack of resources ▪ Insufficient budget to hire, train, and retain competent resources ▪ High turnover of employees since they are students “Due to an increase in demand, ASSS have reallocated budgets for parental support to other programs.” – Director CSSS “Respite weekends cost close to $600, it is a luxury that I cannot afford more than once or twice a year.” – Parent “The greater and more specific the needs, the less qualified respite options. It’s really difficult to find some respite for a child with challenging behaviours.” – Founder community org SOURCE: Interviews; Quebec Auditor General; Protecteur du citoyen 2010, Conseil de la famille et de l’enfance (2007); I. Picard; OPHQ; McKinsey analysis Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 45 45 45 © Miriam Foundation 7 Parental respite: there is a lack of specialized services, mainly for parents of children with an ASD living outside of urban areas Overview of service providers Availability of services across Quebec Service offer by a sample of providers of respite, caretaking and emergency services, 2014 ASD ID DETAILS IN ANNEX Parent survey on availability of regular vs. specialized respite, caretaking, and emergency services, 2010 Number of organizations Both Regular 50% Weekend/ summer1 Babysitting/ Caretaking Emergency support 2 7 13 Specialized 50% 22 33% 25% 17% 4 1 2 1 1 0 5 4 9% 8% Quickly available Available, but long wait list 8% Not available Not available as per decision but beyond of ASSS control of ASSS Roles and responsibilities Sources of funding Service provider survey on the responsibility to provide respite, caretaking and emergency services, 2012 ASSS Breakdown of cost funding for 1 week of camp at Emergo, 2013 Parents’ contribution 8% CRDITED 12% 31% 37% Government subsidies 48% CSSS Community organizations 32% Private foundations 32% 1 Refers to overnight respite taking the form of week-end retreats and summer camps SOURCE: Protecteur du citoyen (survey 2010); Interviews; FQA; Centre Philou; Emergo; McKinsey analysis Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 46 46 46 © Miriam Foundation LIFE PATHWAY AND SERVICE GAPS 8 Specialized medical services : summary of key facts and main issues Key facts Key issues Quotes ▪ Gastrointestinal problem prevalence rate % 57.0 Regular population 85.0 +49% Training of the medical professionals Population with ASD ▪ ▪ Hospitalizations for conditions that are manageable 1.00 % +186% 0.35 Regular population Compensation for the additional time ▪ Patients with an ID ID patients had on average 2.3 unrecognized conditions and 2.7 unmanaged conditions ▪ Availability medical professionals ▪ ▪ Interacting with patients with an ASD or an ID is difficult in unfamiliar settings but can be helped with proper training Poor communication complicates diagnosis, which can lead to a higher rate of undiagnosed diseases among the ASD/ID population Some specialities (dentistry, ophthalmology) require specialized knowledge and techniques ”I was told that the only way to get services for my daughter is to go to the emergency room.” – Parent “We need to find doctors who are able to interact with people who are different.” Visits with patients with ASD/ID take more time, and only family doctors and emergency doctors are compensated accordingly – Parent No directory of medical professionals who see individuals with an ASD or an ID Difficulty obtaining follow-up visits with specialists Even less availability for adult care “I am sure there are professionals who are sensitive to these issues, we just need to bring them together.” – Parent SOURCE: Interviews; Ouellette-Kuntz et al. 2005; Balogh et al. 2005; Croen et al. 2006; Epilepsy Canada; Canadian Digestive Health Foundation, Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 47 47 47 © Miriam Foundation 8 The medical needs of patients with ASD/ID cannot be met without specialized training and resources ASD/ID have greater medical needs Epilepsy Prevalence Rate Percent 39.0 0.6 Regular population Specialists do not receive a bonus for treating ASD/ID patients, even though their visits take more time ▪ ASD/ID patients have difficulty discussing their symptoms, leading to diagnostic over-shadowing Lack of time Communication Problems ASD patients Children hospitalized annually1 Percent 5 3 2 1 Impatient ▪ ASD patients Gastrointestinal Problem Prevalence Rate Percent 85.0 57.0 Regular population Several issues impede service quality ▪ Lack of training Few doctors receive training on how to adapt their habits for ASD/ID patients Non-ASD ASD Resulting in a population that is generally underserved Hospitalizations for conditions that are manageable2 Percent 1.00 0.35 Regular population ▪ Patients with an ID An Australian study found that ID patients had on average 2.3 unrecognized conditions and 2.7 unmanaged conditions Outpatient 1 Kaiser Permanente 2 Manageable conditions are conditions the patient is expected to treat his/herself (ex. diabetes, asthma) SOURCE: Ouellette-Kuntz et al. 2005, Balogh et al. 2005, Croen et al. 2006, Chebuhar et al. 2013, Epilepsy Canada, Canadian Digestive Health Foundation, interviews Source : McKinsey & Company report 2014 48 48 48 © Miriam Foundation 6. See Things My Way: • Vision, campaign and short-term priorities © Miriam Foundation CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY Any use of this material without specific permission of the Miriam Foundation is strictly prohibited 49 There are major issues at each transition period that we want to address (1/3) From To Diagnosis performed within 3 months of referral and average age of diagnosis of 2.5 for all segments “Too often children get their diagnosis too late and are no longer eligible for EIBI.” – DG CRDITED 1 Diagnosis Over 1,000 children waiting 0.5 to 31 years for a diagnosis during a critical time for intervention Early 2 childhood intervention Over 1,000 children waiting 0.2 to 2 years for early intervention Lack of intensity with average 12.8 hours/week vs. recommended 20 hours/week Average of 20 hours/week of EIBI for children with an ASD (segment CDE) and early childhood stimulation for other segments (A and B) accessible under 3 months of wait time “I had to lock my screaming child in a room and cry on the phone to get service.” – Parent 3 School No specific ASD and mild ID programs Insufficient training and professional support (1 to 14 ratio) Large wait lists for some special schools Evidenced-based educational and vocational programs adapted for children with an ASD and for children with a mild ID taught by trained teachers and professionals “There are no standards of quality nor any definition of success. The only measure is the level of complaints.” – School psychologist 1 Includes potential 1-year delay related to pediatrician referral SOURCE: Interviews; parent focus groups; Quebec Auditor General; FQCRDITED; CRDITED Form AS-485 2013; reports from Protecteur du Citoyen 2009 and 2012; McKinsey analysis 50 50 50 © Miriam Foundation There are major issues at each transition period that we want to address (2/3) From ~500 people waiting up to 4 years for employment programs and over 300 people waiting nearly 3 years for daytime activities Enrolment in an employment program for segments A, B, and C, or in a daytime activity program for segments C, D, and E within 3 months of completing school “Her job is so important to her, it was terrible when she had nowhere to go once school ended.” – Sibling 1,400 individuals waiting up to 11 years to access residential services Limited number of private alternatives 70% of CRDITED users living in a natural environment with proper home support, and creation of 1,000 new places in affordable residential settings “What keeps me up at night is not knowing what will happen to my child when I am gone.” – Parent Only half of the parents have readily access to service navigators Social workers lack an ASD/ID-specific training and time Within 15 days of diagnosis confirmation, access to a service navigator trained in ASD and ID, useful documentation, and proper support across all transition points “During the past 10 years, I have had 7 different social workers and only one was qualified and somewhat helpful.” – Parent Employment and/or 4 daytime activities 5 6 Residential services Parent guidance To SOURCE: Interviews; parent focus groups; Quebec Auditor General; FQCRDITED; CRDITED Form AS-485 2013; reports from Protecteur du Citoyen 2009 and 2012; McKinsey analysis 51 51 51 © Miriam Foundation There are major issues at each transition period that we want to address (3/3) From 7 Parent respite Specialized 8 medical care Only 8% of parents have readily access to specialized respite Government subsidy is based on an average salary of $3.50/hour Despite greater medical needs due to higher % of comorbidity, very few physicians/specialists are trained and willing to treat adult ASD/ID patients To Access for all segments to a minimum of 12 overnight week-end respites per year (inside or outside of the home) and access to emergency respite within 24 hours “Due to an increase in demand, CSSS have reallocated budgets for parental supports to other programs.” – Director CSSS Access to a dentist, a primary care physician, and specialists trained to treat people with an ASD or ID for all segments “I was told that the only way to get services for my daughter is to go to the emergency room.” – Parent SOURCE: Interviews; parent focus groups; Quebec Auditor General; FQCRDITED; CRDITED Form AS-485 2013; reports from Protecteur du Citoyen 2009 and 2012; Ouellette-Kuntz 2005; McKinsey analysis 52 52 52 © Miriam Foundation We will intervene across the system in order to have a lasting impact Vision A world where every person with an ASD or ID develops his or her potential and leads a fulfilling life Assess Advocate Support Build Outline important gaps and track system-wide performance Convene stakeholders to increase awareness, promote individuals’ rights, instigate change, and improve services delivery Support partners to enhance their service offering through funding, training, research, and knowledge transfer Pilot innovative and high-impact social initiatives Mission Enable an integrated, seamless system across the lifespan for individuals with an ASD or ID and their families 53 53 53 © Miriam Foundation See Things My Way is an innovative campaign with a novel concept – a pair of glasses - to portray how different individuals, can see the world in their own way. The campaign reflects the importance of empathy and individuality in treatment, support, care, awareness, advocacy, and mobilization. © Miriam Foundation CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY Any use of this material without specific permission of the Miriam Foundation is strictly prohibited 54 Co-chairs and Spokesperson of the Capital Campaign A dedicated team that brings changes Aldo Bensadoun, Founder and Executive Chairman, The ALDO Group 22/12/2014 Jean Coutu, Chairman of the Board, The Jean Coutu Group Inc. Charles Lafortune, Father of an autistic child and Quebec television celebrity 55 55 55 © Miriam Foundation 56 56 56 © Miriam Foundation 57 57 57 © Miriam Foundation Our first proposed major initiative: solve diagnosis wait lists Objective Diagnosis performed within 3 months of referral Montreal initiative Rest of Quebec initiative Sustainability measures ▪ ▪ ▪ Provide continuous training to professionals in the field ▪ Use tools and case examples to develop a diagnosis model customized to the region’s needs Evaluate the quality of diagnostics (e.g., false positives) to optimize processes and tools ▪ Reinforce diagnostic capabilities and help optimize the diagnosis process in health network through training and shared learning Help to simplify and standardize diagnostic requirements across health, social services, and education ▪ Track the diagnostic wait lists and reinforce (e.g., include in the Plan d’Accès aux Services pour les personnes ayant une déficience) Build an assessment centre that brings together resources from the health network and implements optimized diagnostic processes ▪ Provide navigation support to ▪ parents at this critical moment ▪ Simplify the information flow among the CSSS, the diagnostic clinic, and the hospital centres ▪ Assess wait lists across Quebec and target regions with the longest wait times Guiding Principle Inter-disciplinary process that is highly effective and efficient, with personnel who have deep expertise and experience 58 58 58 © Miriam Foundation See Things My Way Assessment Centre In complementarity with the health and social services network ▪ ▪ ▪ Hospital centres Specialty developmental clinics ▪ ▪ Guiding principles Complex diagnoses Specialized medical tests 3 line Referrals ages 0-5 From hospital centres (wait lists) Differential diagnoses or more in-depth assessments Referral for services Assessment centre ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ Reinforce network capacity Respect local service networks Promote best practices in assessment of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), intellectual disability(ID) and global developmental delays (GDD). Offer support for family Support applied research for continuous service improvement Children at high risk for ASD, ID, GDD Needs assessment Interdisciplinary Diagnostic profile Navigation services Referral / Guidance ▪ Local service network ▪ Family support services ▪ General and specific services ▪ “Intervenant pivot” Clear diagnostic profile Treatment Re-adaptation centres ▪ ▪ CRDITED and CRDP Intervention clinics 2 line 1 line Educational support 2 line ▪ ▪ ▪ Support to family members Training Knowledge transfer 1 line 59 59 59 © Miriam Foundation Our second proposed major initiative will be early childhood intervention Objective Ensure access to intensive early intervention services (Early Intensive Behavioural Intervention) Boost capacity to provide highquality behavioural intervention Advocate to increase the number of children in services and to increase intensity of services. Sustainability measures ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ Help to increase capacity and accessibility to early intensive intervention services Enable continuous high-quality training in applied behavioural analysis (ABA) in Quebec for therapists. Establish a partnership with the local service networks in Quebec to offer intensive intervention services (EIBI) so as to quickly reduce wait lists and increase intensity of services in a cost-efficient manner. Support the creation of a program or scholarship to increase the number of ABA board-certified therapists • Promote research on best practices with a view to informing network providers on: Intervention models; Intervention intensity; and the nature of support required by the different sub-groups of individuals living with TSA/ID 60 60 60 © Miriam Foundation 7. Acknowledgment The Miriam Foundation would like to thank the many individuals who agreed to be interviewed for this study, without whom it would not have been possible. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Dr. Evdokia Anagnostou Daniel Amar Henriette Angers Claude Belley Marie-Claude Bénard Daniel Bilodeau Karine Boivin Dr. Stéphane Borreman Dr. Jessica Brian Marie-Christine Brosseau Manon Carle-Dagenais Dr. Lionel Carmant Jacques Chartrand Sophie Clermont Isabelle Cohen Dre. Guylaine Côté Dre. Dominique Cousineau Sylvie Coutu Dre. Sylvie Donais Carolyn Dudley Steven Finlay Nancy Freeman Dr. Abraham Fuks 22/12/2014 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Dre. Nathalie Garcin Sally Ginter Dr. Brian Greenfield Warren Greenstone Diane Guerrera Salvatore Guerrera Debbie Irish Karen Kalynchuk Manon Lacroix Carmen Lahaie Mike Lake Jo-Ann Lauzon Normand Lauzon Marie-Claude Leblanc Daniel Lévesque Francis MacNeil Ravita Mahara Louis-Marie Marsan Dr. André Masse Dr. Vitor Mathias Nancy Ménard-Cheng Pascale Michaud • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Lucie Mongrain Dre. Diane Morin Dre. Katherine Moxness Jeanne Pascal Ngoujou Manon Noiseux Dre. Hélène Ouellette-Kuntz Joël Paquin Josie Primiani Garry Pruden Deborah Pugh Dre. Marie-Claire Richer Dre. Mélina Rivard Andrée Robert Pierre Simard Marc Sougavinski Dr. Lara Stern Dr. Marc Tassé Luc Thériault Dr. Yves Tremblay Jeanette van Beek Dahlia Waisgrus Dr. Michael Weinstein Dr. Jonathan Weiss Please note: We apologize if we have unintentionally left out any individuals. Please let us know if we have done so. We will have happy to add them. 61 61 61 © Miriam Foundation 8. BIBLIOGRAPHY © Miriam Foundation CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY Any use of this material without specific permission of the Miriam Foundation is strictly prohibited 1- Government documents Québec: • Fédération Québécoise de l’Autisme (2013) “Résumé du chapitre 2 du rapport du Vérificateur général du Québec, printemps 2013 ” • Gouvernement du Québec (2012) “Bilan 2008-2011 et perspectives, un geste porteur d’avenir.” • Gouvernement du Québec (2013) “Livre blanc sur la création d’une assurance autonomie ” L’autonomie pour tous • Mercier, Céline (2013) “L’efficacité des interventions de réadaptation et des traitements pharmacologiques pour les enfants de 2 à 12 ans ayant un trouble du spectre de l’autisme (TSA) Septembre 2013 ” INESS • Rapport spécial du protecteur du citoyen (2009) “Les services gouvernementaux destinés aux enfants présentant un trouble envahissant du développement ” www.protecteurducitoyen.qc.ca • Rapport spécial du protecteur du citoyen (2012) “ Les services aux jeunes et aux adultes présentant un trouble envahissant du développement: De l’engagement gouvernemental à la réalité ” www.protecteurducitoyen.qc.ca • Vérification de l’optimisation des ressources (2013) “Services de santé et services sociaux Déficience intellectuelle et troubles envahissants du développement ” Rapport du Vérificateur général du Québec à l’Assemblée nationale pour l’année 2013-2014 Federal: • Economic action plan (2014) “Supporting Jobs and Growth Connecting Canadians With Available Jobs” • Parliamentary information and research services (2006) “Provincial and territorial funding programs for autism therapy” • Parliamentary information and research services (2009) “Childhood autism in Canada some issues relating to behavioural intervention” • The Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology (2007) “Final Report on: The Enquiry on the Funding for the Treatment of Autism: Pay now or pay later - Autism families in crisis” www.parl.gc.ca Ontario: • Ministry of Children and Youth Services (2013) “Autism Services and Supports for Children” Other provinces: • Alberta Government (2004) “Family Support for Children with Disabilities Policy and Procedures Manual” • British Columbia Ministry of Children and Family Development (2012) “Autism Funding Eligible Expenses” • Dudley, Carolyn, and Emery, J.C. Hubert (2014) “The Value Of Caregiver Time:Costs Of Support And Care For Individuals Living With Autism Spectrum Disorder” • PEI Education and early childhood development (2012) “A guide to early years autism services” Other countries: • European Social Enterprise Network. http://www.socialfranchising.coop/members-directory 63 63 63 © Miriam Foundation 2- Key Statistics on ASD and ID Prevalence of ASD: • Fédération Québecoise de l’Autisme. “Répartition des TED en milieu scolaires.” 2014. http://www.autisme.qc.ca/TSA/lautisme-en-chiffres/repartitiondes-ted-en-milieu-scolaire.html2/17/2014 • Fombonne, Eric. (2012) “Epidemiology of Autism” Encyclopedia of Early Childhood Development. July 2012. • National Epidemiologic Database for the Study of Autism in Canada (NEDSAC). (2012) “Changes in the Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorders in Newfoundland and Labrador, Prince Edward Island, and Southeastern Ontario” Co-morbidity: • Crocker, A.G. et al. (2006) “Prevalence and types of aggressive behaviour among adults with intellectual disabilities” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research • Dekker, Marielle C. et al. (2002) “Emotional and behavioral problems in children and adolescents with and without intellectual disability” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry • Department of Health. (2007) “Services for people with learning disabilities and challenging behaviour or mental health needs” • Einfeld, Stewart L. et al. (2006) “Psychopathology in Young People With Intellectual Disability” JAMA. • Emerson, Eric. et al. (2001) “The prevalence of challenging behaviors: a total population study” Research in Developmental Disabilities • Gardner, William I. & Moffatt, Courtney W. (1990) “Aggressive behaviour: definition, assessment, treatment” International Review of Psychiatry • Govreau, Claude (2014) “Autisme, Agir tôt et intensivement” Actualités UQAM http://www.actualites.uqam.ca/2014/4419-autisme-agir-totintensivement#.Ux53If2V-Ao.gmail • Mérineau-Côté, J. et al. (2012) “Challenging behaviour and physical health in intellectual disability” • Méthot, Sophie. (2004) “Les troubles de l’humeur et les troubles anxieux chez les personnes présentant un retard mental: traduction d’un instrument de dépistage et études de comportements problématiques associés à ces troubles.” Thesis. • Mouridsen, Svend Erik et al. (2007)” Psychiatric Disorders in the Parents of individuals with Infantile Autism: A Case-Control Study “ Psychopathology • Rojahn, Johannes and Tassé, Marc J. “Psychopathology in Mental Retardation” in Jacobson, John W. (Ed); Mulick, James Anton (Ed), (1996). Manual of diagnosis and professional practice in mental retardation. • Tassé, Marc et al. (2012) “Définition d’un trouble grave du comportement chez les personnes ayant une déficience intellectuelle.” Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science • The Developmental Consulting Program. (2001) “Building Resource Systems for Persons with a Dual Diagnosis” Southeastern Ontario District Health Council. Intellectual Disability: • American Psychiatric Association (2013) “Intellectual Disability Fact Sheet” • Rêvanous. “Définition des besoins du marché et de la clientèle cible“http://revanous.org/crbst_17.html • Reynolds, Tammy et al. (2013) “Intellectual Disability and Severity Codes.” Seven Counties Services Inc. 64 64 64 © Miriam Foundation 2- Key Statistics on TSA and ID (cont’d) Life expectancy: • Hogg, J. et al. (2001) “Healthy Ageing – Adults with Intellectual Disabilities: Ageing and Social Policy” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities • Payeur, Frédéric F. (2013) “La mortalité et l’espérance de vie au Québec en 2012” Institut de la Statistique du Québec • Rioux, Sonia. (2013) “Le vieillissement des personnes qui présentent une incapacité intellectuelle” • Thorpe, L., Davidson, P., & Janicki, M.P. (2000). “Healthy Ageing - Adults with Intellectual Disabilities: Biobehavioural Issues”. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. • Woolfenden, Sue et al. (2011) “A systematic review of two outcomes in autism spectrum disorder –epilepsy and mortality” Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology Ontario: • Lunsky, Yona et al. (ed.) (2013) “Atlas on the Primary Care of Adults with Developmental Disabilities in Ontario” Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) Québec: • Des Rivières-Pigeon, Catherine et al. (2012) “Augmentation de la prévalence du TED: causes multiples.” L’Express. • Direction de la Santé Publique de la Montérégie. (2009) “Le trouble envahissant du développement (TED) : l’augmentation de la prévalence poursuit son cours – données finales” Agence de santé et de services sociaux de Montérégie • Noiseux, Manon (2009) “Surveillance des troubles envahissants du développement chez les enfants de 4 à 17 ans de la Montérégie, 2000-2001 à 2007-2008” Agence de santé et de services sociaux de Montérégie. 65 65 65 © Miriam Foundation 3- Diagnosis • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • A. Baghdadli et al. (2013) “Recommandations pour la pratique Clinique du dépistage et du diagnostic de l’autisme et des troubles envahissants du développement” Archives de pédiatrie. Allen, R. et al. (2008) “Autism Spectrum Disorders: Neurobiology And Current Assessment Practices”. Psychology in the Schools British Columbia Ministry of Child and Family. “Diagnosis and Assessment” http://www.mcf.gov.bc.ca/autism/assess_diagnosis.htm?WT.svl=Body Collège des médecins du Québec et de l’Ordre des psychologues du Québec (2012) “Les troubles du spectre de l’autisme l’évaluation clinique ” CSSS Montérégie. (2007) “Coût d’évaluation diagnostique TED ” Dua, Vikram (2003) “Standards and Guidelines for the Assessment and Diagnosis of Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder in British Columbia: An Evidence-Based Report prepared for The British Columbia Ministry of Health Planning” British Columbia Ministry of Health Planning. Dua, Vikram. (2008) “The Diagnostic Process in British Columbia” Living & Working with Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder in British Columbia. Autism Community Training. Échelle salariale réseau CRDITED. (2014) Evdokia Anagnostou et. Al. (2014) “Autism spectrum disorder: advances in evidence-based practice” CMAJ Falkmer, Torbjörn. (2013) “Diagnostic procedures in autism spectrum disorders: a systematic literature review” Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Garcin, Nathalie. (2013) “Plan de résorption: Listes d’attentes diagnostiques pour les jeunes soupçonnés de présenter un TSA à Montréal” Fondation Miriam. Goin-Kochel, Robin P. et al. (2006) “How many doctors does it take to make an autism spectrum diagnosis?” Autism Huerta, Marisela and Lord, Catherine. (2012) “Diagnostic Evaluation of Autism Spectrum Disorders” Pediatr Clin North Am. Lacroix, Manon et Ricard, Jean-Marc. (2006) “Lignes directrices d’évaluation diagnostique des troubles envahissants du développement (TED) en Montérégie 0-18 ans ” Agences de la santé et des services sociaux de la Montérégie. New York State Department Of Health Bureau Of Early Intervention (2013) “Best Practice Protocol for Early Screening of Young Children for Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASDs) by Pediatric Primary Care Providers” Ontario Ministry of Children and Youth Services. (2006) “A Shared Responsibility Ontario’s Policy Framework for Child and Youth Mental Health” Perry, Adrienne and Condillac, Rosemary. “Evidence-Based Practices for Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorders:Review of the Literature and Practice Guide” Children’s Mental Health Ontario. Perry, Adrienne et al. “Best Practices and Practical Strategies for Assessment and Diagnosis of Autism” Ontario Association for Developmental Disabilities Plauch, Chris et al. (2007) “Identification and Evaluation of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders” Pediatrics. 66 66 66 © Miriam Foundation 3- Diagnosis (cont’d) Diagnostic tools: • Autism Victoria (2009) “The diagnostic process for children, adolescents and adults referred for assessment of autism spectrum disorders” • Child Health & Development Interactive System. www.chadis.com • Miriam Foundation (2008) “Screening, Assessment and Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorders in Young Children: Canadian Best Practice Guidelines” • National and international ASD screening, assessment and diagnotic guidelines – environmental scan (2014) • National Collaborating Centre for Women and Children’s Health (2011) “Autism: Recognition referral and diagnosis of children and young people on the autism spectrum” • National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence. (2011) “Autism Recognition, referral and diagnosis of children and young people on the autism spectrum” • Volkmar, Fred et al. (2014) Practice Parameter for the Assessment and Treatment of Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder 67 67 67 © Miriam Foundation 4- Early Intervention Intervention: • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2011) -“Effective health care program - Therapies for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders”. Comparative Effectiveness Review • Aldred, Catherine. et al. (2004) “A new social communication intervention for children with autism: pilot randomized controlled treatment study suggesting effectiveness”. Association for Child Psychology and Psychiatry. • Cohen, Haward. et al. (2006)”Early Intensive Behavioral Treatment: Replication of the UCLA Model in a Community Setting”. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics • Comité stimulation précoce issu du Comité régional des associations pour la déficience intellectuelle (2009) “Stimuler tôt, agir ensemble, une intervention porteuse d’avenir ! Pour une vision renouvelée de la stimulation précoce des enfants présentant une déficience intellectuelle” • Dawson, Geraldine (2010) “Randomized, Controlled Trial of an Intervention for Toddlers With Autism: The Early Start Denver Model” Pediatrics • Diggle, T et al. (2005) “Parent-mediated early intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorder (Review)” The Cochrane Collaboration. • Drew, Auriol and al. (2002) “A pilot randomised control trial of a parent training intervention for pre-school children with autism Preliminary findings and methodological challenges” European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. • Easton, Harper Grey. et al. (1999) “Cost-Benefit Analysis of Lovaas Treatment For Autism and Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)”. Colombia Pacific Consulting. • Eikeseth, Svein . et al. (2012) “Outcome for children with autism receiving early and intensive behavioral intervention in mainstream preschool and kindergarten settings”. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders • Eldevik, Sigmund. et al. (2012) “Outcomes of Behavioral Intervention for Children with Autism in Mainstream Pre-School Settings”. J Autism Dev Disord. • Els for Autism Foundation Centre of Excellence. http://www.elsforautism.com/site/PageServer?pagename=center_excellence. • Hayward, Diane (2009) “Assessing progress during treatment for young children with autism receiving intensive behavioural interventions”Autism • Howard, Jane S. (2005) “Research in Developmental Disabilities-A comparison of intensive behavior analytic and eclectic treatments for young children with autism” Elsevier Ltd. • Reed, Phil. (2006) “Brief Report: Relative Effectiveness of Different Home-based Behavioral Approaches to Early Teaching Intervention”. J Autism Dev Disord • Smith, Tristram. et al. (2000) “Randomized Trial of Intensive Early Intervention for Children With Pervasive Developmental Disorder”American Association on Mental Retardation. • Warren, Zachary. et al. (2011) “A Systematic Review of Early Intensive Intervention for Autism Spectrum Disorders”. Pediatrics. 68 68 68 © Miriam Foundation 4- Early Intervention (cont’d) Socialization: • Fletcher-Watson, S. et al. (2009) “Eye-movements reveal attention to social information in autism spectrum disorder”. Neuropsychologia. • Landa, Rebecca J. “Intervention targeting development of socially synchronous engagement in toddlers with autism spectrum disorder: a randomized controlled trial”. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. • Levy, Florence. (2013) “The autism spectrum disorder 'epidemic': Need for biopsychosocial formulation”. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. • MacFabe, Derrick F. et al. (2011) “Effects of the enteric bacterial metabolic product propionic acid on object-directed behavior, social behavior, cognition, and neuroinflammation in adolescent rats: Relevance to autism spectrum disorder”. Behavioural Brain Research • Noriuchi, Madoka. et al. (2010) “Altered white matter fractional anisotropy and social impairment in children with autism spectrum disorder”. Brain research • Yoder , Paul. et al. (2009) “Predicting Social Impairment and ASD Diagnosis in Younger Siblings of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder”. J Autism Dev Disord 69 69 69 © Miriam Foundation 5- School Academic research: • Brennand, Richard. et al. (2011) “Vocal emotion perception in pseudo-sentences by secondary-school children with Autism Spectrum Disorder”. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders • de Bruin, Catriona L. et al. (2013) “Public School–Based Interventions for Adolescents and Young Adults With an Autism Spectrum Disorder: A MetaAnalysis”. AERA • Eapen, Valsamma. et al. (2013) “Clinical outcomes of an early intervention program for preschool children with Autism Spectrum Disorder in a community group setting”. BMC Pediatrics. • Fernell, Elisabeth and Gillberg, Christopher. (2010) “Autism spectrum disorder diagnoses in Stockholm preschoolers”. Research in Developmental Disabilities. • Fernell, Elisabeth. et al. (2011) “Early intervention in 208 Swedish preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder. A prospective naturalistic study”. Research in Developmental Disabilities • Georgiades, Stelios. et al. (2011) “Phenotypic Overlap Between Core Diagnostic Features and Emotional/Behavioral Problems in Preschool Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder”. J Autism Dev Disord. • MacDonald, Megan Iola. (2011) “The Influence of Motor Skills on the Social Communicative Skills of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder “. Dissertation. • MacDonald, Megan. et al. (2013) “The Relationship of Motor Skills and Social Communicative Skills in School-Aged Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder”. Human Kinetics. • Odom, Samuel L. et al. (2009) “Evidence-Based Practices in Interventions for Children and Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorders”. Preventing School Failure. 70 70 70 © Miriam Foundation 5- School (cont’d) Policy Documents: • Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality. “Interventions for Adolescents and Young Adults With Autism Spectrum Disorders” (2012). • Comité patronal de négociation pour les commissions scolaires francophones (CPNCF). (2011). “Entente intervenue entre d'une part, le comité patronal de négociation pour les commissions scolaires francophones (CPNCF) et d'autre part, la centrale des syndicats du québec (CSQ) pour le compte des syndicats d'enseignantes et d'enseignants qu'elle représente”. • Commission scolaire de la Capital (2008) “Politique relative à l’organisation des services éducatifs complémentaire aux élèves à risque et aux élèves handicapés ou en difficulté d’adaptation ou d’apprentissage ” • Commission scolaire de Montréal. (2013) “Liste des points de service pour élèves handicapés ou en difficulté d’adaptation ou d’apprentissage” • Direction de l’adaptation scolaire et des services complémentaires. (2002) “ Les services Educatifs complémentaires : essentiels à la réussite” • Fédération des comités des parents du Québec. (2010) “Guide d’accompagnement à l’intention des parents d’un enfant ayant des besoins particuliers”. • Fédération des comités des parents du Québec. (2010) “L’intégration scolaire: position de la FCPQ! ‘L’éducation des enfants, ce n’est pas une question d’étiquette, c’est une question de besoins et de droits’” • Fédération québécoise de l’autisme. (2013) “Favoriser l’accessibilité des personnes autistes aux études supérieures”. • Fédération québécoise de l'autisme(2011) “Répartition des TED en milieu scolaire” • Gouvernement du Québec Ministère de l’Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport. (2008) “Règles budgétaires pour l’année scolaire 2008-2009”. • Gouvernement du Québec Ministère de l’Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport. (2013) “Règles budgétaires pour l’année scolaire 2013-2014”. • Gouvernement du Québec Ministère de l’Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport. (2011) “Programme éducatif destiné aux élèves ayant une déficience intellectuelle profonde” • Gouvernement du Québec Ministère de l’Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport. (2013) “Règles budgétaires pour l’année scolaire 2013-2014”. • Gouvernement du Québec Ministère de l’Enseignement supérieur, de la Recherche, de la Science et de la Technologie (2013) “Modèle d’organisation des services aux étudiantes et étudiants ayant un trouble d’apprentissage, un trouble mental ou un trouble de déficit de l’attention avec ou sans hyperactivité”. • Gouvernement du Québec Ministère de l'Éducation (1998) “ Programmes d'études adaptés” • Gouvernement du Québec Ministère de l'Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport. (2010) “Document d'appui à la réflexion Rencontre sur l’intégration des élèves handicapés ou en difficulté” • Gouvernement du Québec Ministère de l'Éducation. (1999) “Une école adaptée à tous ses élèves”. • Gouvernement du Québec, Ministère d’Éducation, Loisir et Sport “Individualized Education Plan ” • Gouvernement du Québec, Ministère d’Éducation, Loisir et Sport “Plan d’action pour soutenir la réussite des élèves handicapés ou en difficulté d’adaptation ou d’apprentissage (EHDAA) ” • Gouvernement du Québec, Ministère d’Éducation, Loisir et Sport. (2008)”Rapport d’évaluation de l’application de la politique de l’adaptation scolaire” • Gouvernement du Québec, Ministère de l’Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport. (2010) “L’offre de services pour les étudiants des cégeps ayant un problème de santé mentale ou un trouble mental”. • Gouvernement du Québec. (2007)‘ “L’organisation des services éducatifs aux élèves à risque et aux élèves handicapés ou en difficulté d’adaptation ou d’apprentissage (EHDAA)”. 71 71 71 © Miriam Foundation 5- School (cont’d) Policy Documents • Gouvernement du Québec. (2011). “Français, Mathématique Sciences humaines: Enseignement primaire”. • Gouvernement du Québec. (2013) “On s'élève! Outils de sensibilisation au potentiel éducatif des personnes handicapées” • Gouvernement du Québec. (2013) “Un avenir sans limites ! La formation professionnelle et technique (FPT) et les personnes handicapées”. Camo • Gouvernement du Québec. (2004) “Le plan d’intervention au service de la réussite de l’élève”. • Gouvernement du Québec. (2007) “La participation sociale des personnes handicapées au Québec : les activités éducatives pour la petite enfance”. • Gouvernement du Québec. (2007)”L’organisation des services éducatifs aux élèves à risque et aux élèves handicapés ou en difficulté d’adaptation ou d’apprentissage (EHDAA)” • Gouvernement du Québec. (2009) “À la même école. Les élèves handicapés ou en difficulté d’adaptation ou d’apprentissage : évolution des effectifs et cheminement scolaire a l’école public.”. • Gouvernement du Québec. (2011) “2Deux réseaux, 1un objectif : le développement des jeunes Cadre de référence pour soutenir le développement et le renforcement d’un continuum de services intégrés pour les jeunes, aux paliers local et régional”. • Gouvernement du Québec. (2011) “Démarche éducative favorisant l'intégration sociale”. • Gouvernement du Québec. (2011)”Lignes directrices pour l’intégration scolaire des élèves handicapés ou en difficulté d’adaptation ou d’apprentissage”. • Gouvernement du Québec. (2014) “Information et traitement relatifs au programme réussir (PAAS – réussir)”. • Government du Québec. (2004) “Guide to using the framework for developing individualized education plans (IEPs)”. • L’Office des personnes handicapées du Québec (2011) “La transition des études postsecondaires vers le marché de l’emploi”. • L’Office des personnes handicapées du Québec. (2006) “Les approches adaptatives et inclusives visant l’intégration scolaire, professionnelle et sociale des personnes handicapées”. • L’Office des personnes handicapées du Québec. (2009) “Consultation sur l’accès à l’éducation et l’accès à la réussite éducative dans une perspective d’éducation pour l’inclusion”. • Membres du réseau éducation formation handicap (2013) “Pour des études accessibles du préscolaire à l’université”. Camo • Ministère de l’Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport (2010) “Guide pour soutenir une première transition scolaire de qualité”. • Ministère de l’Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport (2012) “Guide pour soutenir une transition scolaire de qualité vers le secondaire”. • Ministère de l’Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport (2013) “Identification administrative des élèves handicapés et des élèves en difficulté d'adaptation ou d'apprentissage”. • Office des personnes handicapées du Québec . (2009) “À part entière un véritable exercice du droit à l’égalité” • Québec education program “Chapter 5, Work-Oriented training path. Prework training. Training for a semiskilled trade” • Réseau des écoles spécialisées pour les EHDAA (2013) “Le plan d'intervention adapté aux besoins et aux capacités de l'élève ” • Réseau Éducation Formation Handicap(2013) “Pour des études accessibles Du préscolaire à l’université”. Camo • Service des communications en collaboration avec les conseillers des services aux membres (2013) “Règles de formation des groupes”. • TÉVA (2012) “Transition école-vie active, un outil de planification île de Montréal – Le jeune et son projet de vie au cœur de la démarche ! ” • Vérificateur Général du Québec (2000) “Gestion des services visant l’adaptation scolaire des élèves en difficulté” 72 72 72 © Miriam Foundation 6- Work and Day Activities • Seltzer, Marsha and al.(2004) “Trajectory of development in adolescents and adults with autism” MRDD Research Reviews Professional Training: • American Academy of Pediatrics (2012) “A Systematic Review of Vocational Interventions for Young Adults With Autism Spectrum Disorders” Pediatrics • National institute of health public access author manuscript (2011) “Changes in the Autism Behavioral Phenotype during the Transition to Adulthood” J Autism Dev Disord • TÉVA (2012) “Transition école-vie active, un outil de planification (île de Montréal) – Le jeune et son projet de vie au cœur de la démarche” Work Integration: • (2011) “5.13 Programme d’aide et d’accompagnement social (PAAS) action” EMPLOI-QUÉBEC Direction des mesures et des services aux individus • Commission scolaire de la Pointe-de-l’Île, École secondaire Antoine-de-Saint-Exupéry (2014) “En Vue de… mon parcours de formation axée sur l’emploi : Guide d’information - Année scolaire 2013-2014” • Fédération des comités de parents du Québec (2012) “Guide d’accompagnement à l’intention des parents d’un enfant ayant des besoins particuliers” www.fcpq.qc.ca • Fédération québecoise de l’autisme (2013) “Portrait des services socioprofessionnels chez les personnes autistes de 21 ans et plus” • Office des enfants handicapés du Québec (2011) “La transition des études postsecondaires vers le marché de l’emploi” www.ophq.gouv.qc.ca • Quebec Education program (??) “Chapter 5, Work-Oriented Training Path – Prework Training, Training for a semiskilled Trade” • Research Snapshot (2013) “What types of activities do young adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder do after high School?” A S D Mental Health 73 73 73 © Miriam Foundation 7- Residential • • • • • • • • • Association du Québec pour l’intégration sociale (2010) “Du rêve à la réalité. 12 modèles de milieux de vie alternatifs, 12 histoires. Mode d’emploi pour le développement de milieux de vie novateurs et sécuritaires” Autism speaks (2013) “National Housing and Residential Supports Survey” Community Living Toronto Lights (2012) “Initial Program Evaluation: September 2010 - October 2011” Community Living Toronto LIGHTS (2013) “Final pilot program evaluation: Milestones achieved and client satisfaction” CRDI Montérégie-Est et Chaire de déficience intellectuelle et troubles du comportement UQAM (2010) “L’évaluation de l’implantation et de l’efficacite de la maison Lily Butters – rapport d’activités 2008-2010 ” Liste de résidence des usagers Ministère de la santé et des services sociaux du Québec (2013) “Services sociaux “Guide des responsabilités des agences de la santé et des services sociaux au regard des ressources intermédiaires et des ressources de type familial - Orientations ministérielles” Morin, Diane (2011) “Guide d’implantation d’une ressource spécialisée pour les personnes présentant des troubles graves du comportement ” National Disability Authority (2011) “Health and Personal Social Services for People with Disabilities in The Netherlands” 74 74 74 © Miriam Foundation 8- Parent guidance • • • • • • • • • • Baker, Jason K. et al. (2011) “Change in Maternal Criticism and Behavior Problems in Adolescents and Adults with Autism Across a 7-Year Period” Journal of Abnormal Psychology Bromley, Jo et al. (2004) “Mothers supporting children with autistic spectrum disorders Social support, mental health status and satisfaction with Services” Autism Hall, Heather R. and Graff, J. Carolyn (2011) “The Relationships Among Adaptive Behaviors of Children with Autism, Family Support, Parenting Stress, and Coping” Informa health care Hare, Douglas Julian et al. (2004) “The health and social care needs of family carers supporting adults with autistic spectrum disorders” Autism Hartley, Sigan L.et al. (2011) “Marital Satisfaction and Parenting Experiences of Mothers and Fathers of Adolescents and Adults with Autism” AJIDD IACC (2012) “The Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee STRATEGIC PLAN for Autism Spectrum Disorder Research 2012 UPDATE” Website: http://www.iacc.hhs.gov Kelly,Adrian B. et al.(2008) “Autism Spectrum Symptomatology in Children:The Impact of Family and Peer Relationships” J Abnorm Child Psychol Organisation mondiale de la Santé (2001) “Rapport sur la santé dans le monde 2001 : La santé mentale : nouvelle conception, nouveaux espoirs ” Patterson, Stephanie (2011) “A systematic review of training programs for parents of children with autism spectrum disorders: Single subject contributions” Autism. Sénéchal, Carole et des Rivières-Pigeon, Catherine (2009) “Impact de l’autisme sur la vie des parents “ Érudit 75 75 75 © Miriam Foundation 9- Parent respite Recherche académique: • Hayden, Mary F. and Heller, Tamar (1997) - “Support, Problem-solving/coping Ability, and Personal Bureden of Younger and Older Caregivers of Adults with Mental Retardation” Mental Retardation • Heller, Tamar and Caldwell, Joe (2005) - “Brief Research Report Impact of a Consumer-Directed Family Support Program on Reduced Out-of-Home Institutional Placement” Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities • Mouridsen, Svend Erik and al. (2007) – “Psychiatric Disorders in the Parents of Individuals with Infantile Autism:A Case-Control Study ” Psychopathology Documents politiques: • Centre de santé et de services sociaux de Québec-Nord (2009) “Bottin des ressources de répit, dépannage et gardiennage de la Capitale-Nationale pour les personnes présentant une déficience physique (DP), intellectuelle (DI) ou un trouble envahissant du développement (TED) ” • Définition du problème, description de la clientèle et proposition d’un plan d’action ” • Définition du projet, description de la clientèle et proposition d’un plan d’action ” • Emergo Respite Services, Autism and other PDDs (2013) “Annual Report Fiscal Year 2013” • Fédération de l’autisme du Québec. “Ressources financières” http://www.autisme.qc.ca/ressources/ressources-financieres.html • Fondation Miriam (2013) “Projet de création de maisons de répit • Fondation Miriam (2013) “Projet de garderie spécialisée pour que les enfants ayant des troubles du développement en harmonie avec leurs pairs • Gouvernement du Quebec. Commission des normes du travail “Les gardiens et gardiennes de personnes et les normes du travail ” Centre d'information et de référence de la Capitale-Nationale et de la Chaudière-Appalaches Résultats de la recherche • Gouvernement du Quebec. Ministère de la famille (2013) “Rapport annuel 2012-2013 ” • Lauzon, Jo-Ann (2007) “Fédération québécoise de l'autisme et des autres troubles envahissants du développement : Cueillette d’information sur le degré de satisfaction des parents ” • Liste de différentes ressources de répit 76 76 76 © Miriam Foundation 10- Medical and dental care • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Balogh, R. S., Hunter, D. and Ouellette-Kuntz, H. (2005), Hospital Utilization among Persons with an Intellectual Disability, Ontario, Canada, 1995– 2001. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 18: 181–190. Boulenger, Stéphanie and Castonguay, Joanne. (2012)”Portrait de la rémunération des médecins de 2000 à 2009”. Cirano. Chebuhar, Amy. (2013) “Using Picture Schedules in Medical Settings for Patients With an Autism Spectrum Disorder”. Journal of Pediatric Nursing. Croen, Lisa A. et al. (2006) “A Comparison of Health Care Utilization and Costs of Children With and Without Autism Spectrum Disorders in a Large Group-Model Health Plan”. Journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. Farrugia, David. (2009) “Exploring stigma: medical knowledge and the stigmatisation of parents of children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder”. Sociology of Health & Illnes. Frazier, Thomas W. et al. (2011) “Prevalence and Correlates of Psychotropic Medication Use in Adolescents with an Autism Spectrum Disorder with and without Caregiver-Reported Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder”. Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology Freitag, Christine M. et al. (2009) “Total Brain Volume and Corpus Callosum Size in Medication-Naïve Adolescents and Young Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder” Biol Psychiatry. Haveman, Meindert. et al. (2010) “Major Health Risks in Aging Persons With Intellectual Disabilities: An Overview of Recent Studies” Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities Henny M. et al. (2008) “Managing Health Problems in People with Intellectual Disabilities”. British Medical Journal. Hogg, J. et al. (2001) “Healthy Ageing – Adults with Intellectual Disabilities: Ageing and Social Policy”. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. Joint Advisory Committee in Special Care Dentistry (2003) “A Case of Need Proposal for a Specialty In Special Care Dentistry” Kancherla, Vijaya. et al. (2013) “Dental care among young adults with intellectual disability” Research in Developmental Disabilities Lennox, N. G. and Kerr, M. P. (1997) “Primary health care and people with an intellectual disability: the evidence base” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. Lennox, Nicholas. et al. (2007)”Effects of a comprehensive health assessment programme for Australian adults with intellectual disability: a cluster randomized trial”. International Journal of Epidemiology. Levy, Susan E. et al. (2010) “Autism Spectrum Disorder and Co-occurring Developmental, Psychiatric, and Medical Conditions Among Children in Multiple Populations of the United States’. JDBP. Nombre de médecin et montant moyen en 2010 selon le mode de rémunération et la spécialité. http://medecinquebec.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/tab4-1024x923.jpg Ouellette-Kuntz, Hélène. (2003) “Addressing Health Disparities Through Promoting Equity for Individuals with Intellectual Disability”. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Ouellette-Kuntz, Hélène. et al.(2005) “Addressing Health Disparities Through Promoting Equity for Individuals with Intellectual Disability”. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 77 77 77 © Miriam Foundation 10- Medical and dental care (cont’d) • • • • • • • • Patja, K. et al.(2001) “Cause-specific mortality of people with intellectual disability in a population-based, 35-year fallow up study”. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. Racine, Eric. et al. (2014)”Ethics challenges of transition from paediatric to adult health care services for young adults with neurodevelopmental disabilities”. Pulsus Group Inc. Shea, Lindsay et al. (2013) “Genetic testing and genetic counseling among medicaid-enrolled children with autism spectrum disorder in 2001 and 2007”. Human genetics. Sullivan, William F. et al. (2011) “Primary care of adults with developmental disabilities”. Canadian Family Physician - Le Médecin de famille canadien. Thorpe, L. et al. (1999) “Healthy Ageing - Adults with Intellectual Disabilities Biobehavioural Issues”. Aging Special Interest Research Group of the International Association for the Scientific Study of Intellectual Disabilities. Wang, Li. et al.(2012) “Healthcare Service Use and Costs for Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Comparison Between Medicaid and Private Insurance”. J Autism Dev Disord Wilkinson, Joanne E. and Cerreto, Mary C. (2008) “Primary Care for Women with Intellectual Disabilities”. JABFM. Wong, V. C. N. (2008) “Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): Comparison of Chinese and Western Culture (Part A)” J Autism Dev Disord. 78 78 78 © Miriam Foundation 11- Other challenges • • • • Deputy Ministers’ Review of Community Living British Columbia (2011) - “Improving Services to People with Developmental Disabilities” Dudley, Carolyn and al. (2012) “Mind the Gap: The Missing Discussion Around Transportation for Adolescents and Adults With Autism Spectrum Disorder - Policies across the Provinces from a Lifespan Perspective: Transportation Report” Middletown Center for Autism “Transition ” www.middletownautism.com 79 79 79 © Miriam Foundation 12- Case Studies Colombie Britanique: • “Auton (Guardian ad litem of) v. British Columbia (Attorney General)” www.GlobalHealthRights.org • ACT – Autism Community Training Society (2008) “The Diagnostic Process in British Columbia” • Attorney General of British Columbia and Medical Services Commission of British Columbia (2004) “Appellants/Respondents on cross-appeal” • BC Ministry of Children and Family Development (2013) “MCFD Operational & Strategic Directional Plan ” • BC Ministry of Children and Family Development (2013) “New funding option supports transitions to adulthood” www.gov.bc.ca/connect • Manfredi, Christopher P. and Maioni, Antonia (2005) “Reversal of Fortune: Litigating Health Care Reform in Auton v. British Columbia” Reversal of Fortune Ontario: • Geneva Center for Autism (2014) “Autism training event” Autism • Housing Study Group (2013) “Ending the wait -An Action Agenda to address the Housing Crises confronting Ontario Adults with Developmental Disabilities” • McMorris, Carly and Schroeder, Jessica (2012) – “March break and summer funding for children and youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A report on parent views of the programs” Autism Ontario • Ministry of Children and Youth Services “The Estimates 2012-13” • Ministry of Community and Social Services “The Estimates, 2012-13” • Ministry of Education (2013) “Education Funding -Technical paper 2013-14” 80 80 80 © Miriam Foundation 13- CRDITED data • • • • • Carte CRDITED au Quebec Cohn & Wolfe. “ASD: Canadian Organizations – Part one of a traditional stakeholder audit” CRDITED (2013) “Cotisation 2013-2014” CRDITED / MSSS (2012) “Dépenses par programme, par centre d'activités, 2011-2012” MSSS. (2013) “Mode d’allocation des ressources : Présentation aux directeurs généraux de la région de Montréal.” Bas Saint-Laurent: • CRDITED Bas Saint-Laurent. Tables and financials CROM: • CROM (2013) “Annual report ” • CROM (2014) “Une liste d’attente démesurée” Nouvelles du conseil • Moxness, Katherine and Vincelli, Frank (2009) “Access Plan 2009-2012” West Montreal Readaptation Centre Flores: • Centre du Flores. (2013) “Synthèse planification stratégique : S’allier pour faire la différence” • CRDITED Flores (2011) Rapport Annuel. • CRDITED Flores (2012) Rapport Annuel. • CRDITED Flores (2013) “Portrait des services offerts” FQCRDITED: • FQCRDITED (2012) “Le réseau en chiffres ” • FQCRDITED (2012) “Présentation au Ministre Dr. Hébert ” • FQCRDITED (2013) “Distribution du personnel de fonction 2008 à 2013 ” • FQCRDITED (2013) “Évaluation des coûts pour éliminer les listes d'attentes basé sur les données au 31 mars 2013 (AS 485) ” • FQCRDITED (2013) “Lieu résidence inscrits DI-TED ” • FQCRDITED (2013) “Liste d’attente par âge : Communautaire ” • FQCRDITED (2013) “Liste d’attente par âge : Intégration au travail ” • FQCRDITED (2013) “Liste d’attente par âge : RNI ” • FQCRDITED (2013) “Liste d’attente pour un premier service par âge 2008 à 2013 ” • FQCRDITED (2013) “Total des usagers desservis ” • FQCRDITED (2014) “Budget du Québec 2014-2015 : Les CRDITED préoccupés par l’accès aux services et le maintien de l’offre de services spécialisés en DI et en TED ” • FQCRDITED (2014) “Cotisation 2013-2014 ” • FQCRDITED “Sommaires des retributions RI-RTF ” 81 81 81 © Miriam Foundation 13- CRDITED data (continued) Centre Miriam: • Benezra, Esther. (2010) “Miriam Homes and Services” • Miriam Homes and Services (2006) “Autism Specific Services for Children and Adolescents Aged 6-21” • Miriam Homes and Services (2012) “Annual Report” • Miriam Homes and Services (2013) “Annual Report” • Miriam Homes and Services (2014) “Liste d’attente” Montreal: • CRDITED de Montréal (2013) “Rapport annuel de gestion” • CRDITED de Montréal (2014) “Organigramme” Saguenay: • CRDITED Saguenay Lac-Saint-Jean. (2013) “Rapport annuel de gestion” 82 82 82 © Miriam Foundation Contact Malvina Klag Chief Strategy Officer, See Things My Way Centre for Innovation Montreal (QC) [email protected] 22/12/2014 83 83 83 © Miriam Foundation