synthesis of the main studies carried out since 2005 by institut
Transcription
synthesis of the main studies carried out since 2005 by institut
SYNTHESIS OF THE MAIN STUDIES CARRIED OUT SINCE 2005 BY INSTITUT MARITIME DE PRÉVENTION UPON REQUESTS BY THE REGION OF BRITTANY. Brussels, 07 November 2011 Yvon LE ROY [email protected] Ergonomical engineer, Institut Maritime de Prévention, 60 avenue de la Perrière 56100 Lorient www.imp-lorient.com Since 2005, the Regional Council of Brittany requested Institut maritime de prevention to carry out studies aimed at assessing the impact of the decisions related to protection of marine resources on safety and living/working conditions onboard fishing vessels. These studies mainly deal with the gross tonnage constraints and the limitation of discards at sea. A further study aims at verifying the practical applicability of the European directive on noise onboard fishing vessels. This document intends to briefly introduce the link between these different studies and their main results. Each of them is more detailed in separate memos. THE LINK BETWEEN THE DIFFERENT STUDIES The technical solutions aimed at reducing the noise, using more selective fishing gear, handling end storing nonmarketable species that cannot be discharged at sea any more, are all of them space consuming. The present condition of the fishing fleets is characterized by a high average age (>25 years), limited usable volumes onboard for living and working due to the gross tonnage limits, dis-optimized vessels due to an important second hand market and a lack of new constructions. The implementation of appropriate technical solutions is therefore much more expensive than for new built vessels, and they would require much of the already restricted space onboard, detrimentally to living and working onboard, and even to intrinsic ship safety. MAIN RESULTS Ergospace (period 2005-2007) Exploiting the available data on the circumstances of reported occupational accident onboard fishing vessels in France, this study first searched correlations between accident rates and space available onboard. In a second step, from the analysis of the set of different constraints of all kinds that apply to the design and construction of fishing vessels, the detrimental role of the regulatory dimensional constraints was strongly highlighted, and particularly the length and gross tonnage limitations. A comparison was made with the fisheries situations in Denmark, Alaska and Iceland, which are more or less comparable with France, with the result that the tonnage constraints are not so critical in these countries as they are in France. As a conclusion, the Ergospace authors recommend new fishing vessels, free from dimensional constraints, to be built, which would significantly improve their safety and fuel consumption, while they would comply with the resource protection objectives of the common fisheries policy. More recently, a similar investigation in Spain (2011) did not bring different views. Noise abatement onboard fishing vessels (period 2009-2010) On the basis of noise measurements done onboard a reference fishing vessel, the authors propose defined technical solutions techniques aimed at reaching compliance of that vessel with the new regulatory framework (EU directive – 2003/10/EC of 06/02/11) applicable to the maritime sector as from 14/02/11. As a matter of fact, noise levels in the sleeping rooms do not allow for acceptable rest conditions, which should be a priority for ships engaged in several days fishing trips. Furthermore, the noise levels measured in the main working positions are liable to generate ear lesions; if the use of ear protection devices can be envisaged for working at the catch processing positions, for the fishing gear operations the coordination between the different crew members requires them to communicate by oral and gesture signals, which is compromised if they wear ear protections. On the basis of the diagnosis made onboard the reference vessel, different improvement tracks were considered: flexible mounting of engine, exhaust, vents, hydraulics; sleeping room insulation; active noise control at the beds’ heads; ... All these solutions require some space, and their implementation is more costly onboard existing vessels than for new vessels, whose design may include architectural solutions. New trends regarding discard limitation: impact on occupational safety and working conditions (example of high sea fresh fishing in Brittany) - (period 2009-2010). The Britton fishing fleet comprises numerous high seas fresh fishing vessels with 20 to 25 m lengths, manned with 5 or 6 crew members, engaged in 5 to 6 days fishing trips. The problems with regard to keeping onboard all the catches, or part of them, are particularly complex for this category of fisheries. Following observations he made onboard during several fishing trips, the author set up scenarios demonstrating that the ship safety, the working time, the number of heavy loads to be handled and work organization onboard are more or less impacted by the search for selectivity and the discard prohibition. The author recommends “sorting on sea bottom” (i.e. selectivity) to be privileged more than “sorting on the deck” (i.e. storage onboard), for available space reasons as well as for the sake of protecting the profession’s attractiveness. He also underlines the insufficient mechanization of fish processing with regard to the amounts of fish to be brought to shore. Facilitation of handling onboard and subcontracting unloading operations will be unavoidable. Onboard some vessels, the disruptions of work organization will significantly impact resting times, and therefore will damage the quality of the watch. Bibliography ANDRO M., DORVAL P., LE BOUAR G., LE BOURSER B., LE ROY Y., REPECAUD M. (1989) ; Nuisances sonores et lutte contre le bruit ; Laboratoire « Sécurité et conditions de travail à la pêche maritime ; Université de Bretagne Sud ; Lorient ; 145 p. BABIN G. (2007) ; Amélioration du confort à bord des navires de pêche – Phase 1 – Campagne de mesure à bord du navire de référence ; Service Acoustique et Vibration Aker Yards ; Saint-Nazaire ; 17 p. BABIN G. (2009) Principes de réduction des niveaux de bruit à bord des navires de pêche ; Service Acoustique et Vibration STX Europe ; Saint-Nazaire ; 27 p. Directive 2003/10/EC of the European parliament and of the Council of 6 February 2003 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (noise) (Seventeenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC). Official Journal n° L 042 of 15/02/2003. LE BERRE N. (2005). Impact de l'introduction de répulsifs acoustiques à cétacés « pingers » sur la sécurité et les conditions de travail à bord des fileyeurs de Manche-Ouest. Institut Maritime de Prévention. Lorient. 30 p. LE DU S., LE ROY Y. (2009). Étude des aspects ergonomiques et de sécurité des prototypes d'engins de pêche développés dans le cadre du projet OPTIPECHE. Étude réalisée par l'Institut Maritime de Prévention pour le compte de l'IFREMER. Lorient. 55 p. LE DU S., LE ROY Y. (2010). Étude des aspects ergonomiques et de sécurité de prototypes de nasses à poissons développés dans le cadre du projet ITIS (Sélectivité, qualité et techniques alternatives). Institut Maritime de Prévention. Lorient. 68 p. LE ROY Y. (2009). Nouvelles tendances en matière de limitation des rejets à bord des navires de pêche : impact sur les conditions de sécurité et de travail – Cas de la pêche fraîche hauturière bretonne. Institut Maritime de Prévention. Lorient. 58 p. [5] RENAULT C. (2010) ; Réduction du bruit à bord des navires de pêche – Working document in view of the elaboration of a technical guide ; Institut Maritime de Prévention ; Lorient ; 46 p. [1] RENAULT C., PINON H., DOULIAZEL F. (2007) ; ErgoSpace – Recherche sur les interactions entre espace de travail, ergonomie et prévention des accidents du travail à bord des navires de pêche – Dégagement de solutions nouvelles propres à réduire l'importance et la récurrence de ces accidents ; Institut Maritime de Prévention ; Lorient ; 175 p.