student loan programs alternative financing for higher education
Transcription
student loan programs alternative financing for higher education
Student Support Programs Student Loans and Grants Findings from IIEP/UNESCO studies Les programmes d’aide aux étudiants Prêts et Bourses Resultats des Etudes par L’IIPE/UNESCO Case studies and comparative analyses In Asia: China (Mainland and Hong Kong), the Philippines, South Korea, Thailand In Europe: the UK, Finland, Spain, Sweden, Poland, Russia, Moldova Key observations: Contrasting experiences, country-specific policies, sensitive to change due to intertia OECD average Poland1, 2 Mexico Hungary1 Slovenia Korea Czech Republic2 New Zealand Israel2 Italy2 Belgium Ireland Iceland France Australia2 Spain Japan Germany Finland Austria United Kingdom Switzerland1 Netherlands Denmark 100 000 90 000 80 000 70 000 60 000 50 000 40 000 30 000 20 000 10 000 0 Sweden In equivalent USD converted using PPPs Chart B1.5. Cumulative expenditure by educational institutions per student over the average duration of tertiary studies (2007) Note: Each segment of the bar represents the annual expenditure by educational institutions per student. The number of segments represents the average number of years a student remains in tertiary education. 1. Public institutions only. 2. Tertiary-type A and advanced research programmes only. Countries are ranked in descending order of the total expenditure by educational institutions per student over the average duration of tertiary studies. Source: OECD. Table B1.3b. See Annex 3 for notes (www.oecd.org/edu/eag2010). Need for Additional Resources Un besoin de revenus complémentaires Government budget-limited vs. massification Budget du gouvernement : limité Efficiency gains, savings, cost-cutting Gains de rapport, économies, reduction des couts Diversify resource base with private funds Diversification de la base de revenus grâce à des fonds privés Primary beneficiary: students Les premiers bénéficiaires en sont les étudiants Extra individual income for university graduates in US$ (OECD, 2009) Cost-sharing using Private Funding (fees) Partage avec les Fonds Privés (frais) Family resources Les ressources des familles Student earnings Les revenues des étudiants Students’ future earning/foreign students Les revenues futures des étudiants/les etrangers The economic implications of fewer international higher education students in Australia 26 September 2010.This report argues that economic output associated with Australia's third largest export industry will shrink by as much as $600 million in 2011 and by $1.2 billion to 2012, unless urgent action is taken on pressing policy concerns. The report, commissioned by the John Curtin Institute of Public Policy (JCIPP) at Curtin University shows that: Higher education is the most significant part of the sector. With 32% of the international student market it generates 57% of the export revenue. International on-shore education is now a billion dollar industry in its own right in New South Wales and Victoria, generating value-added of around $3 billion in each state. It has an overall economic impact of $1.4 billion in Queensland. On average each International student in higher education generates $50,874 for Australia, 36% of this being spent on fees with the remainder mainly on accommodation, food, restaurants and retail. For every two International students enrolled in an Australian university one extra job is created. This value add from International university students in 2009 saw an additional 102,387 jobs created, of which 83,050 were created outside the education sector. Publication type Report Publisher Type Academic research centre Coverage Australia Permanent URL http://www.apo.org.au/node/22681 Cost Recovery (student loans) Recouvrement des Couts (prets aux etudiants) Increases efficiency Accroît l’efficacité Enhances equity Renforce l’équité Expands source of revenue Développe la source des revenus Equity Issue La question de l’équité What if qualified students cannot pay? Et si des étudiants qualifiés ne peuvent pas payer ? Mix with grants Possibilités des bourses - - Student Loans Les Prets aux étudiants Mortgage-type: specified time period, fixed payments de type crédit immobilier : durée déterminée, paiements échelonnés Problems Problèmes Harms access Nuisible quant à l’accès Costly Cher Defaults Des inconvénients No private funding Pas de financement privé Alternative Alternative Income-contingent student loan Prets aux étudiants ordonné aux revenues Or/ou Graduate Tax Impot sur les revenues des diplomes Income Contingent Student Loan Emprunt étudiant ordonné aux revenus Enables students to defer payments until they are working Permet à l’étudiant de différer le remboursement juqu’au premier salaire Allows needy access to higher education Facilite l’accès des plus démunis à l’enseignement supérieur Reforming the Funding System La réforme du système de financement Share costs Coûts répartis Minimize deterrent effect on poor Effet dissuasif pour les pauvres diminué Benefit adults and young Adultes et jeunes sont concernés Income contingent repayments Paiements en fonction du revenu Payments equal cost of loan Paiements équivalents au coût de l’emprunt Payments over lifetime Paiements échelonnés sur la vie Minimize default Défauts de paiements réduits Loan not public expenditure Un pret, pas une dépense publique Improving the Performance of Deferred Payment Programs Amélioration de la performance des programmes de paiement différé Student loan programs should be targeted Les programmes de prêts aux étudiants doivent être ciblés Hidden subsidies limited Subventions cachées limitées Likely pattern of graduate earnings taken into account Prise en compte de schémas semblables pour les revenus des diplômés Program management by banks Gestion des programmes par les banques Successful loan programmes require specific conditions: Les programmes de prêts réussis requièrent en particulier : Adequate initial capital un capital initial suffisant Realistic interest rate to cover inflation and administrative costs un taux d’intérêt réaliste qui couvre les coûts d’inflation et la gestion Effective targeting to identify needy students un ciblage précis pour identifier les étudiants nécessiteux Efficient loan recovery mechanisms, using banks, tax or social security system des mécanismes efficaces de recouvrement, via les banques, les impôts ou le système sécurité sociale Effective publicity to change attitudes of students/employers une communication efficace pour changer le comportement étudiants/employeurs de Student Loans may be feasible Les prêts étudiants pour être but have to be well designed réalisables doivent être bien conçus Effective loan programmes require: Les programmes de prêt efficaces exigent des conditions générales comme : Sound institutional structure une structure institutionnelle solide Sound financial management une gestion financière saine Sound legal framework un cadre juridique sain Effective machinery to support target groups un mécanisme pour cibler les groupes prioritaires Effective machinery for loan recovery to minimize default un mécanisme efficace pour optimiser le recouvrement des prêts Public campaigns to ensure understanding & acceptance une campagne d’information pour expliquer et faire accepter Tuition fees in the UK Full-time courses If you’re a new student (or a continuing student who started your course in or after September 2006) the maximum tuition fees you’ll be charged are £3,290 for the 2010/11 academic year. For 2009/10, the maximum is £3,225. Exactly what you’re charged depends on the university or college you attend, your course, and where in the UK you study. You can get a Tuition Fee Loan to cover the full cost of your tuition fees. This is paid directly to your university or college. The amount you get does not depend on household income. If you're a new student starting a full-time course in 2010/11, you can use the Student Finance Calculator to work out a budget. Remember that if you take out the student loans available to full-time students, you don’t have to start paying them back until you’ve left your course and are earning over £15,000. Student loans accrue interest from the date they are paid out, up until they are repaid in full. Tuition fees in France The fees are determined by the government, and not by the institution itself. A basic fee for an undergraduate course in 2010/2010 is Euro174 per year; for a Master’s course it is Euro237 per year; for a Ph.D it is Euro359 per year. In addition, students pay social security charges of Euro200 per year. Fees at the Grandes Ecoles vary but are generally high. Fees for a classic business school costs between Euro5,000 and Euro10,000 per year, whilst an engineering school can cost up to Euro15,000. Universities are trying to overcome the government restrictions by charging higher fees for new courses and extra-curriculum activities. Examples of fees at private universities – US$30,260 In public universities – US$7,170 USA: - In Japan: US$4,500 - In China: US$3,000 - In India: US$600 - Chart B5.3. Relationships between average tuition fees charged by public institutions and proportion of students who benefit from public loans Average tuition fees charged by public institutions in USD 6 000 United States2 4 500 Japan Australia 3 000 New Zealand Netherlands2 1 500 Italy2 Austria Spain Belgium (Fl.) 2 France1,2 Finland 0 0 25 50 Iceland Norway2 75 % of students who benefit from public loans AND/OR scholarships/grants 1. Average tuition fees from USD 179 to USD 1 206 for university programmes dependent from the Ministry of Education. 2. Year of reference 2007-08. Source: OECD. Tables B5.1 and B5.2. See Annex 3 for notes (www.oecd.org/edu/eag2010). Sweden2 100 Panel Discussion: -An overview of ASEM countries with student loan and grant system in place; -Similarities & differences of various approaches; -Need for studies on future demand for higher education and related trends in higher education finance; -Possible other forms of cost-recovery (graduate tax?), to what extent it is possible to resolve problems associated with student loans? -Suggestions, criteria and issues for possible improvements Thank you! Igor Kitaev IIEP/UNESCO, Paris [email protected]