EU Funding- How to Apply

Transcription

INTERREG Opportunities
Welcome
INTERREG Opportunities
Matt Jones
6th May 2016
Welcome…
•
•
•
•
Housekeeping
Purpose of the event
This is not a BREXIT discussion!
Afterwards..
of EU funding
•
Advantages
•
•
•
•
•
Test and trial new ways of delivering services
Opportunity to engage universities, private sector and public sector
in a joined up way
Gain comparative perspectives from cooperation with EU partners
Receive external funding from EU sources at a time when internal
budgets are constrained
Disadvantages
•
•
•
•
6-7 month (2 stage) application process and lead in time
Investment in project and application development
Funding retrospective (typically six months)
Bureaucracy and claims management
Challenges
match funding
weight of expectation
resources
additionality
need and demand
It’s all about the project…
• Don’t just chase the money.
• Don’t amend your project just to fit a particular fund
• External Funding team can help you identify the RIGHT
fund for your project
Need
Project
Fund
What is Interreg?
What is INTERREG?
European Territorial Cooperation (ETC), better known as Interreg, is one of the
two goals of the EU Cohesion Policy and provides a framework for the
implementation of joint actions and policy exchanges between national, regional
and local actors from different Member States.
The overarching objective of (ETC) is to promote a harmonious economic,
social and territorial development of the Union as a whole.
Interreg is built around three strands of cooperation:
Cross-border (Interreg A)
Transnational (Interreg B)
Interregional (Interreg C)
Five programming periods of Interreg have succeeded each other from 1990
onwards.
Cross border added value
What is Cross border Added-Value?
? It’s where you couldn’t achieve the type of result with
out a CB project
? You demonstrate that a CB approach is more cost effective than both countries developing their own
outputs
? There is a strong link between partners, their expertise and experience are complementary and they can
deliver the outputs
What Cross-Border Added-Value isn’t:
? It’s not because you have common topic of interest that it is CB
? Cross border actions appear to be largely limited to data and experience sharing, and producing joint
reports, so there is no joint implementation
? If there is not benefit for the programme area for your CB work
? If CB work already exists like for example through OSPAR there is no more Added
-Value to work in a Cross
border fashion.
What do European Territorial Cooperation
programmes have in common?
+
All are ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT programmes
+
All operate in a defined GEOGRAPHICAL area
+
All have strengthened focus on IMPACT and RESULTS
+
All can help you unlock opportunities through NEW and DIFFERENT
partnerships across a wide range of ACADEMIC disciplines
+
Can be used STRATEGICALLY to complement the use of European
Structural and Investment Funds and thematic funds from the EU or
other sources
+
Similar APPLICATION process
EU 2020 priorities
– for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth
What differs between the programmes?
+
INTERPRETATION of ERDF and ETC regulation
+
EU 2020 objectives TAILORED to territorial requirements
+
LOCAL secretariats
+
Intervention or grant RATE
Project requirements
+ Based on the shared or
+ Based on
complementary needs
of all partners
+ Reliant on joint
implementation
+ Focused on delivering
progress on core
programme goals
+ Innovative
demonstrating and
proving what is possible
+ Limited and specific in
the change they wish to
generate
+ Implementing EU and
national policy
Application Process
• The option to submit a project idea
• A two stage application process
• Online monitoring system
From expression of interest to
project approval
Find out more
Thanks for listening!
• [email protected]
• Tel: +44 (0)7860 917014
INTERREG VA
France (Channel) England
Programme
INTERREG VA
Programme France (Manche)
Angleterre
The Interreg VA France (Channel) England Programme is financed by European Regional
Development Funds/
Contents Sommaire
1. Eligible area Territoire éligible
2. Funding priorities Priorités de financement
3. What makes a good project Qu’est ce qu’un bon
projet?
4. Lessons learnt Leçons tirées des premiers appels
5. Next steps Prochaines étapes
6. Contact details Contacts
The Interreg VA France (Channel) England
Programme is financed by European Regional
Development Funds/
Eligible area
Territoire
éligible
Development Funds/
objectives
5 objectifs
spécifiques
Development Funds/
Increase the delivery and uptake of innovative
products
in shared smart specialisation sectors
Accroître le développement et l’adoption de produits
innovants dans les secteurs de spécialisation
intelligente partagés
Project has to deliver Le projet doit
produire :
 Number of innovative products, services, processes or
systems designed/produced
 Nombre de produits, services, procédés ou systèmes innovant

Number of businesses and business intermediaries cooperating with
conçus/produits
research institutions
 Nombres d'acteurs économiques coopérant avec des institutions de
recherche
Number of research institutions participating in cross-border research projects
 Nombre d'établissements de recherche participant à des projets de recherche
transfrontaliers
 Private Investment Matching support in innovation or R&D projects
 Investissements privés complétant un soutien public aux projets dans les domaines
de l’innovation ou de la R&D
Increase the quality and effectiveness of service delivery
to the most socially or economically disadvantaged
groups through social innovation
Améliorer la qualité et l’efficacité des services pour les
groupes les plus désavantagés socialement et
économiquement,
Project has to deliver
Le projet doit grâce à l’innovation sociale
produire
 Number: of socially innovative services designed
 Nombre de services socialement innovants conçus
 Number of Participants in projects promoting gender equality, equal
opportunities and social inclusion
 Nombre de participants à des projets favorisant l'égalité entre les hommes et les
femmes, l'égalité des chances et l'inclusion sociale
 Number of skill development and professional training schemes for
disadvantaged people
 Nombre de programmes de requalification de compétences ou de formations à
destination des publics défavorisés
 Number of institutions (public or private) supported to increase the quality and
effectiveness of service delivery to disadvantaged population
 Nombre d'institutions (publiques ou privées) soutenues pour améliorer la qualité
et l'efficacité des prestations de services destinées aux personnes défavorisées
Increase the development and uptake of LCT in the
sectors that have the highest potential for a
reduction in greenhouse gas emissions
Accroître le développement et l’adoption de TBC dans
les secteurs ayant le plus grand potentiel de
réduction
des doit
émissions de gaz à effet de serre
Project has to deliver
Le projet
produire :
 Number of new or enhanced low carbon products, services, processes or
systems designed
 Nombre de produits, services, procédés ou systèmes bas carbone, nouveaux ou
 améliorés,
Number ofconçus
new or enhanced low carbon products, services, processes or
systems produced
 Nombre de produits, services, procédés ou systèmes bas carbone, nouveaux
améliorés,
produits LCT multisectoral networks
 ou
Number
of supported
 Nombre de réseaux multisectoriels sur les technologies bas
carbone financés
 Number of participants in awareness raising of training events for take up and
development of LCT
 Nombre de participants à des actions de sensibilisation ou de formation en
faveur de l'adoption et du développement des TBC
Realise the potential of the common natural and
cultural assets
to deliver innovative and sustainable growth
Valoriser les atouts du patrimoine naturel et
culturel commun pour soutenir une croissance
économique innovante et durable
produire :
 Increase in expected number of visits to supported sites of cultural or
natural heritage and attractions
 Augmentation du nombre escompté de visites aux sites recensés au titre
du patrimoine culturel et naturel et aux attractions bénéficiant d'un
soutien
 Number of innovative products/services that result from projects
enhancing common cultural and natural assets
 Nombre de produits/services innovants issus de projets sur la valorisation
du patrimoine culturel et naturel commun
Enhance and protect coastal and transitional water
ecosystems
Améliorer et protéger les écosystèmes côtiers et les eaux
de transition
produire :
 Number of institutions (public or private) supported to enhance and protect
the coastal and transitional water ecosystems
 Nombre d'institutions, publiques ou privées, soutenues pour améliorer les
écosystèmes côtiers et des eaux de transition
 Number of pilot operations aimed at the enhancement and protection of
the coastal and transitional water ecosystems
 Nombre d'opérations pilotes visant une amélioration des écosystèmes
côtiers et des eaux de transition.
What makes a good project?
Qu’est ce qu’un bon projet ?
• Need Besoin
• Cross-border Added Value Valeur ajoutée
transfrontalière
• Change Delivered Changement obtenu
• Sustainability/Transferability
Pérennité/
Transférabilité
• Partnerships Partenariats
• Economic Impact Impact économique
• Value for money
Rapport qualité/prix
Development Funds/
Lessons learnt from the first calls
Leçons tirées des premiers appels à
projets
• Intervention logic Logique d’intervention
• Clear application form Formulaire de
candidature clair
• Strategic fit with the Programme
Ajustement aux priorités du Programme
• Justification of the projects Justification du
projet
• Partnership relevance Pertinence du
partenariat
• Quality of
translation
Qualité de la
Development Funds/
traduction
Next Steps
Prochaines étapes
Two calls for project per year Deux appels à
projets par an
 13/09/16 - 13/10/16 4th call/ 4ème appel
Contact your facilitator as early as possible, they
can:
Contactez votre animateur le plus tôt possible, il
peut:
 Help you find partners Aider à trouver des
partenaires
Le Programme Interreg VA France (Manche)
Angleterre est financé par le Fonds Européen de
 Feedback
on
your project Commenter
Développement Régional
votre projet
Social Networks
Réseaux Sociaux
Find us on Retrouvez nous sur:
 Linked In
 Twitter @Channel_Manche
 Our website : www.interreg5a-fce.eu
 Notre site internet: www.interreg5a-fma.eu
Contacts in the UK
Contacts au Royaume-Uni
Julie BECEL (Exeter)
julie.becel@norfolk.
gov.uk
+44 7787 523070
Christelle
PEREIRA
(Southampton)
Christelle.pereira@norf
olk.gov.uk
+44 7787 542495
Hélène
GENTILS
(Norwich)
helene.gentils@norfo
lk.gov.uk
+44 7766 205976
Aiste
PETRAITYTE
(Brighton)
aiste.petraityte@norfol
k.gov.uk
+44 7717618939
Contacts in France
Contacts en France
Aurelie NOLLET (Rennes)
[email protected]
ov.uk
+44 7775 012523
Vincent
HAGNERE
(Amiens)
vincent.hagnere@norfo
lk.gov.uk
+44 7500 998996
Brendan RIOU (Rouen)
brendan.riou@norfolk.
gov.uk
+44 7788 737759
Judith de SAINT LAURENT
(Caen)
judith.de.saint.laurent@norf
olk.gov.uk
+44 7500 999527
Ipswich Interreg Event, 6/5/2016
Michelle Armstrong
Interreg 2 Seas area
2 Seas Programme in a nutshell
•
•
•
•
•
Total Programme budget available for projects: 241 M € ERDF
ERDF rate for projects: 60%
Cooperation between at least 2 partners from 2 different 2 Seas
Member States, with at least 1 UK partner
No minimum or maximum duration for projects
No minimum or maximum budget
Overview of 2 Seas strategy 2014 – 2020
Overall objective of the 2 Seas Programme 2014 – 2020:
To develop an innovative knowledge and research based, sustainable and inclusive 2 Seas area
where natural resources are protected and the green economy is promoted
Priority Axis 1:
“Technological and social innovation”
Priority Axis 2:
“Low carbon
technologies”
Priority Axis 3:
“Adaptation to
Climate Change”
Priority Axis 4:
“Resource efficient economy”
S.O 1.1:
S.O 1.2:
S.O 1.3:
S.O 2.1:
S.O 3.1:
S.O 4.1:
S.O 4.2:
Improve the
framework
conditions for the
delivery of
innovation, in
relation to smart
specialisation
Increase the
delivery of
innovation in
smart
specialisation
sectors
Increase the
development of social
innovation applications
to make more efficient
and effective local
services to address the
key societal challenges
in the 2 Seas area
Increase the adoption
of low-carbon
technologies and
applications in sectors
that have the potential
for a high reduction in
greenhouse gas
emissions
Improve the
ecosystem-based
capacity of 2 Seas
stakeholders to
climate change and
its associated waterrelated effects
Increase the
adoption of new
solutions for a
more efficient
use of natural
resources and
materials
Increase the
adoption of new
circular economy
solutions in the 2
Seas area
Cross-cutting themes: Support to SMEs and Maritime dimension
107,8 M € of ERDF
51,3 M € of ERDF
38,5 M € of ERDF
Overall budget available for projects: 241 M € of ERDF
43.6 M € of ERDF
S.O. 1.1 Framework conditions for innovation
related to smart specialisation
•
What?
Improve the framework conditions increasing the capacities of stakeholders
to deliver innovation in smart specialisation sectors
•
How?
o Quadruple helix cooperation
o Introducing and adopting
–
–
–
–
Common approaches
Collaboration arrangements
Joint structures
Policy tools supporting capacity for delivering innovation
• Who?
 All key stakeholders of the innovation chain:
o
o
o
o
o
Local, regional and national authorities and their affiliated bodies
Universities and research centres
SMEs and organisations representing SMEs
Incubators
Innovation agencies, intermediary bodies in charge of innovation and
economic development
o Regional development agencies, Chamber of Commerce
o Cluster organisations
o Business support centres and agencies, technology intermediary and
technology/knowledge transfer institution
•
Programme outputs:
o Joint strategies and action plans
o Networks and structures established
o Solutions (methods/tools/services) established
•
Planned result:
o Increased capacity for technology transfer
o Development of clusters
o Increased capacity of innovative companies to engage in international
activities
S.O. 1.2 Increase the delivery of innovation in
smart specialisation sectors
•
What?
Increase the delivery of innovation, exploit high potential for innovation by
better exploiting the research outcomes for development of new
technologies, products and services generating an impact on smart
specialisation sectors
•
Smart specialisation sectors:
o
o
o
o
o
o
Transport and ports
Environmental and marine technologies
Agro-food
Life sciences & health
Communication, digital and creative industries
Manufacturing
! Not exhaustive
•
How?
o Enhance technology transfer and uptake, in particular by SME’s
o Testing and developing pilot actions
o Promoting a closer, more effective and operational cooperation among
key stakeholders of innovation chain
•
Who?
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Incubators
Innovation agencies, intermediary bodies in charge of innovation and economic
development
Regional development agencies, Chamber of Commerce
Cluster organisations
Business support centres and agencies, technology intermediary and
technology/knowledge transfer institution
Technology parks
Civil society
•
Programme outputs
o Number of joint tests, pilots, demonstration actions and feasibility studies
o Number of small scale physical or e-infrastructure/equipment
o Number of research institutions participating
•
Planned result
o Increased delivery and uptake of technological innovation
•
Important to keep in mind:
o
o
o
o
TRL 3 – 7 (TRL scale as used in Horizon2020 Programme)
Not: purely fundamental research
Link with market should be demonstrated to ensure uptake and durability
Attention to and if necessary, corrective measures to tackle IPR and
State aid.
TRL 9:
System ready for full scale deployment
TRL 8:
System incorporated in commercial system
TRL 7:
Demonstration system in operational environment
at pre-commercial scale.
TRL 6:
Prototype system close to expected performance
TRL 5:
Large scale prototype tested in intended environment
TRL 4:
Small scale prototype built in a lab environment
TRL 3:
Applied research. Proof of concept established
TRL 2: Technology concept and application formulated
TRL 1: Basic research - Principles postulated and observed
TRL 0:
Idea - Unproven concept
2
Seas
focu
s
S.O. 1.3 Increase the development of social
•
What?
Increase the development of social innovation applications to make more
efficient and effective local services to address societal challenges
•
Which societal challenges:
o
o
o
o
o
o
Social exclusion
Unemployment, particularly youth unemployment
Poverty
Health, demographic change and well-being
Inclusive, innovative and reflective societies
Protecting freedom and security
•
How?
o Exploiting and adopting results of research
o Promoting a closer, more effective and operational cooperation between
third sector and social entreprises, private and public sector
•
Who?
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Public stakeholders which are in charge of developing and delivering
social innovation and welfare policies
Business sector organisations
Chambers of commerce
Social entreprises and non-for-profit organisations
Civil society
•
Programme outputs:
o Number of tests, pilots, demonstration actions and feasibility studies
o Number of small scale physical or e-infrastructures/equipment
o Number of research institutions participating
•
Planned result:
o An increased efficiency and effectiveness of local services to address
key societal challenges
•
o Social innovation is not social inclusion
o Illustrate there is a need for the project
o Open up your partnership, involve all relevant stakeholders
from the beginning (co-creation)
o Aim for a structural impact
o Explain why you apply for a CBC project, not for ESF or
national funding
S.O. 2.1 Increase the adoption of low-carbon
technologies and applications in sectors with high
potential of reduction of GHG emissions
•
•
•
What?
Increase the adoption of low-carbon technologies and applications,
especially in sectors that have the potential for a high reduction in
greenhouse gas emissions
Exhaustive list of sectors:
o
o
o
o
o
Renewable energies
Transport
Agriculture
Manufacturing industries
Building
S.O. 2.1 Increase the adoption of low-carbon
•
How?
o Enhance the uptake of state-of-the art solutions
o Testing and demonstrating of these technologies and applications to
pave the way for their further uptake
o Promoting a closer, more effective and operational cooperation of
businesses, knowledge institutes and public sector
S.O. 2.1Increase the adoption of low-carbon
•
Who?
o
o
o
o
Public and private energy suppliers
Companies, in particular small and medium sized entreprises developing
low-carbon technology
o Economic operators (energy, building, transport, logistics, fisheries,
ports, …)
o Energy agencies and non-governmental bodies in acting in support of the
transition to a low-carbon economy
o Non-for-profit organisations
•
Programme outputs
o Number of solutions (methods/tools/services) established
o Number of tests, pilots, demonstration actions and feasibility studies
implemented
o Number of small scale physical or e-infrastructure/equipments
•
Planned results:
o Reduction in emission of greenhouse gases
o Reduction in carbon dependency
o Exploiting potential of new, renewable technologies and reinforcing public
acceptance
•
o This S.O. is about the actual adoption of low-carbon
technologies, no research and development (S.O. 1.2)
o No direct retrofitting of private houses
o Attention to and if necessary, corrective measures to tackle
IPR and State aid.
o Clearly explain relevance of each partner
S.O. 3.1 Improve eco-system based capacity to cope
with climate change
•
What?
Increasing the eco-system based adaptation capacity to climate change and
associated water-related effects
The main expected effects of climate change for which adaptation capacity to
be developed:
o Sea level rise
o Flooding (both coastal and inland areas)
o Accelerated coastal erosion
o Acidification of the marine waters
o Increasing water temperatures
o Increased occurrence of heavy rainfall and severe droughts
with climate change
•
How?
o Increasing awareness on the potential consequences of climate change
o Enabling stakeholders in the area to develop a collective approach and
innovative solutions
o Improving the coherence and coordination between adaptation
strategies and actions, and the mechanisms for the cross-border
exchange of information and data
with climate change
•
Who?
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Environmental agencies
Organisations involved in water management and coastal zone
management
Organisations involved in managing natural areas and protected areas
Non-for-profit organisations
Emergency services
Coast guard centres
Local communities
with climate change
•
Programme outputs
o Number of strategies and action plans developed
o Number of solutions (methods/tools/services) established
o Number of small scale physical or e-infrastructure/equipments
with climate change
•
Planned result
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Reduce damage to the environment and infrastructure
Increase resilience of environment and infrastructure
Decrease future pressure on water resources
Result in better and more robust flood and coastal defences
Protect biodiversity
Decrease vulnerability of ecosystems, increase ecosystem resilience
Enable ecosystem-based adaptation
with climate change
•
o Increase the adoption of solutions, no research and
development
o Strong territorial dimension for coastal areas
o Focus on implementation projects: strategies, action plans,
data gathering/modelling are not final results
o No environmental/biodiversity projects
S.O. 4.1 Increase adoption of new solutions for
a more efficient use of natural resources
•
What?
An increased adoption of new solutions for a more resource – efficient
economy
•
How?
o Reinforcement of the institutional framework conditions
o The capacity of businesses, public bodies and other stakeholders to
adopt and implement new models and collaborative approaches,
structures and policy tools
•
Who?
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Social enterprises and non-for-profit organisations
Regional development agencies, Chambers of Commerce
Policy makers and economic actors
•
Programme outputs:
o
o
o
o
Number of strategies and action plans developed
Number of solutions (methods/tools/services) established
Number of tests, pilots, demonstration actions and feasibility studies
Number of small scale physical or e-infrastructures/equipments
•
Planned results
o To decrease the use of
–
–
–
–
land and soil,
minerals and metals,
water,
marine resources
•
o
o
o
o
Particular attention to the EU Blue Growth strategy
No research and development
Focus, narrow down issues you want to tackle
Propose a coherent and realistic project
S.O. 4.2 Increase adoption of new circular
economy solutions
•
What?
Achieving an increased adoption of new solutions for a circular economy
•
How?
o Reinforcement of the institutional framework conditions
o Capacity of businesses, public bodies and other stakeholders in society
to adopt and implement new models and collaborative approaches,
structures and policy tools to facilitate transition towards circular
economy
economy solutions
•
Who?
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Social entreprises and non-for-profit organisations
Regional development agencies, Chambres of Commerce
Policy makers and economic actors
economy solutions
•
Programme outputs:
o
o
o
o
•
Number of strategies and action plans developed
Number of solutions (methods/tools/services) established
Number of tests, pilots, demonstration actions and feasibility studies
Number of small scale physical or e-infrastructures/equipments
Planned results
o Boost recycling
o Prevent the loss of valuable material
o Showing how new models, eco-design and industrial symbiosis to move
towards zero-waste
economy solutions
•
Important to bear in mind:
o Adoption of new circular economy solutions, no research
and development
o No sectoral focus
o Propose a coherent and realistic project, narrow down
number of challenges, focus
Programme intervention logic
PROGRAMME
Specific
objective
Situation
Needs
Expected
result
PROJECTS
Result
indicator
Change
Objectives
Results
Actions
Output
indicators
Outputs
Programme intervention logic
Projects need to demonstrate how they contribute to the Programme
intervention logic at different levels by:
•
•
•
Addressing a cross-border territorial challenge identified in the C.P
Contributing to the Programme expected result under a given
Specific Objective
Delivering outputs that deliver against the Programme output
indicators
3 key components to answer at early
stage
1. Why a cross-border project?
2. Is what I am proposing based on a
need on the ground, is there a demand
for my project?
Crossborder
3. What is new about my project?
Need
and
demand
based
Innovative
character
Added value of cooperation
•
•
•
Crossborder
Need
and
demand
based
Innovative
character
How to choose my partners? Expertise,
complementarity,
stakeholder
networks,
geographical coverage.
Do I need my partners to reach the planned
result? How do they add value to the project?
What is the cross-border added-value for the
results I am planning to achieve? Better
reach, more pertinent, inclusion of different
sectors, different levels of government?
Based on a clearly identified need
•
•
•
Crossborder
Need
and
demand
based
Innovative
character
Is there a demand for my project?
Who is demanding? How can I integrate them
in my project development/ implementation?
 see target groups
Programme bodies are not experts in all
subjects so convince them with a clear and
concise description of the demand!
What is new about my project?
•
•
•
Crossborder
Need
and
demand
based
Innovative
character
What is new about my project to what is
already existing?
Have I taken into account previous
experiences and how have these led to what I
am proposing today?
Follow-on projects: identify elements that you
are building on. What are the gaps you are
addressing? The link between the past project
and the origin of the current should be clear.
What is a balanced partnership
Different ways of proposing a pertinent partnership, the key principles are:
1. Thematical experience: all PPs need to contribute to the project and get a
clear benefit from their participation
2. Geographical coverage: wide geographical coverage, by the partnership,
by including observer partners or by identifying specific actors, strategies,
networks that you will liaise with
3. Sectoral coverage: are my partners the right partners to tackle the
challenge + to deliver the planned outputs? Have I covered all necessary
sectors; public, private, research, others?
Project intervention logic
•
•
•
•
What do I want to change with my project idea?
= project result
How do I want to realise these changes?
= overall objective, further broken down in specific objectives
What are the concrete, tangible outputs I want to deliver and how
will I achieve them
= outputs and deliverables
Why are these outputs needed
=specific result
Long term effect
•
Define the long term effect(s)/changes that
you are aiming to achieve
•
Keep in mind their measurability!
 Result oriented approach
2 Seas Cooperation Programme (CP)
Document approved officialy by the European
Commission on 03/06/2015 that details the 2 Seas
Programme strategy.
To be downloaded from Programme website
 Section 2 on priority axes is particularly important
for projects in development
Programme Manual
A comprehensive document containing detailed
information for potential project applicants and
approved projects.
Structure of fact sheets per phase + specific fact
sheets on horizontal topics
To be downloaded from Programme website
Territorial Facilitators Network
FRANCE
THE NETHERLANDS
Inland area
Zeeland / Noord-Brabant
Julie DELBARRE | Lille
Wieteke WOLTERBEEK | Middelburg
Tel: +33 3 28 82 70 78 - [email protected]
Tel: +31 118 631068 - [email protected]
Coastal regions
Noord / Zuid Holland
Charlotte NOBLOT | Dunkerque
Marjolijn LINDEMAN | Den Haag / Haarlem
Tel: + 33 3 28 51 92 30 - [email protected]
Tel: +31 6 316 88 180 - [email protected]
UNITED KINGDOM
BELGIUM/FLANDERS
Sallyann STEPHEN (Temporary Contact)
Dries DEBRUYNE | Brugge
Department for Communities and Local Government
Tel: +32 50 40 33 73 - [email protected]
[email protected]
Matthias VERHEGGE | Brussel
Tel: +32 2 553 37 16 – [email protected]
Joint Secretariat
45/D, rue de Tournai
5th floor
F-59000 Lille
France
Tel: +33 (0) 3 20 21 84 80
Email:
[email protected]
Next…
We’ve covered so far…
And then…
Programme vision
Joining efforts to lead the
way to stronger, more
sustainable economies
and societies around the
North Sea.
ERDF by priority
Priority
ERDF Funding (€)
1. Thinking Growth
€46,831,112
2. Eco-Innovation
€45,158,572
3. Sustainable North Sea Region
€18,397,937 / €18,397,937
4. Promoting Green Transport
and Mobility
€28,493,175
Total
€157,218,733
A good ‘intervention logic’
+ Market failure
+ Transnational need
+ Objectives
+ Actions
+ Results
Preparation costs
+ Only available for full applications, which are
approved by Steering Committee
+ Applicant must request preparation cost
reimbursement in application (tick box)
+ Lump sum budget of 40.000 Euro with 50%
reimbursement = 20.000 Euro paid out
Outcomes from Call 1
+ 27m euro allocated to approved projects
+ Approx 50% success rate
+ 81 projects submitted
+ 12 Full Applications approved
+ 25 Expressions of Interest invited to submit a
Full Application
Allocated funding split
€ 7.39m
€ 5.13m
€ 12.96m
€1.62m
Key dates
Call 2
January – March 2016
North Sea Region Conference
15th / 16th June 2016
Call 3
January – March 2017 (anticipated)
95
Find more at www.northsearegion.eu
Questions?
North Sea Programme Facilitator
[email protected]
Tel: +44 (0)7917722319
Suffolk CC External Funding Tea,
[email protected]
Tel: +44 (0)7917722319
Timeline
A short video
Sample budget
BL 1 – Salaries
BL2 – External Expertise
BL3 – External Suppliers
BL4 – Travel & Accommodation
BL7 – First Level Control
Sample budget
Per year
BL1 Salaries
Salaries (claim handling)
15% overheads
three years
North Sea / N.W.E
50%
50%
2 Seas
60%
40%
FCE
69%
31%
40,000
5,000
6,750
120,000
15,000
20,250
60,000
7,500
10,125
60,000
7,500
10,125
72,000
9,000
12,150
48,000
6,000
8,100
82,800
10,350
13,973
37,200
4,650
6,278
4,000
12,000
6,000
6,000
7,200
4,800
8,280
3,720
10,000
30,000
15,000
15,000
18,000
12,000
20,700
9,300
BL4 Travel and Accomodation
1,000
3,000
1,500
1,500
1,800
1,200
2,070
930
BL7 FLC
4,000
12,000
6,000
6,000
7,200
4,800
8,280
3,720
0
0
0
0
0
0
106,125
106,125
127,350
84,900
146,453
65,798
BL2 External Expertise
FLC
BL 3 Suppliers
SUBTOTAL
Shared Costs @ 10%
TOTAL GBP
Total EURO
70,750
212,250
7,075
21,225
77,825
98,838
233,475
296,513
300,000 upwards to make a project worthwhile?
10,613
106,125
134,779
116,738
148,257
8,490
127,350
161,735
93,390
118,605
6,580
146,453
185,995
72,377
91,919
Thank you
Workshop exercise
Group 1 (RED)
(Facilitator Hannah
Dunnett)
Group 2 ( YELLOW)
(Facilitator Matt Jones)
Group 3 ( GREEN)
(Facilitator Helene Gentils)
Group 4 ( BLUE)
(Facilitator Dominic Munro
McCarthy )
Sharon Barber
Simon Charlesworth
Cristian Dogaru
Nicola Groom
Lesley Hood
Bruce MacGregor
Justine Oakes
Hannah Reid
Phil Stittle
William Todd
Frances Bedding
Sue Clements
Yvonne Edge
Robert Gunn
Will Humpington
Julien Mery
Maxine Narburgh
Kurt Scheepers
Richard Stittle
Andreea Tocca
Sara Noonan
Tracey Brinkley
Beccy Coombs
Mabel Encinas
Sue Hayes
David James
William Millar
Kris Radley
Abi Singleton
Julie Stokes
Jeremy Brown
Jenni Carberry
Helen Cutting
Kate Gornall
David Heatley
Karen Lawson
Phanuel Mutumburi
Aida Rajic
Aurele Soules
Anita Thornberry
Michelle Armstrong
Questions?
Thanks for coming
• Please complete your evaluation forms
• Please leave your badges!

EU Funding- How to Apply

Transcription

Documents pareils

[Descartes e il Seicento 5] Jean-Robert Armogathe, Vincent Carraud

4228 Holland Dr Des Moines, IA 50310 | Home for Sale | Real

Conference Conclusions - Mental Health and Wellbeing

Imagine you are working for the Scottish Tourist Board and you are

Journée du GERPISA n°223 Thomas KLIER Vehicle fuel economy

Diapositive 1 - WordPress.com

Posting #T-1416 CONTINUING EDUCATION

BSc (Hons) Facilities Management of Hotels and Real Estates

Tips for the successful participation in Horizon 2020

3 INTERREG CONFERENCE EM Normandie and University of

Adoption Services Directory

ProvIncIAL rESourcES - Government of Nova Scotia

table of contents

Strategic Adoption of a New Technology under Uncertain

PDF