Early Automated CPR Devices
Transcription
Early Automated CPR Devices
Réanimation cardio-respiratoire et planches à massage automatiques Patrice Gosselin, MD, FRCPC Résident en soins intensifs Stéphane Delisle, Ph.D., RRT & les chercheurs du groupe CAVIAR Conflits d’intérêts • Intérêt dans la ventilation • Intérêt dans la réanimation • Financé par le fond de « Soutien au démarrage de projets en collaboration » du CIUSSS MCQ avec UQTR • Air Liquide France – Contribution $ – Ventilateur Monnal T-60 – J.-C. Richard, M. Rigollot • Schiller AG – Contribution $ • …et j’aurai peut-être besoin de vous bientôt Plan • • • • • • • RCR et ventilation Historique Concepts de la RCR Recommandations de l’AHA Les planches à massage Le modèle CAVIAR Conclusion LIGNES DIRECTRICES Lignes directrices de la RCR • Therefore, rescue breaths are less important than chest compressions during the first few minutes of resuscitation from witnessed VF • In theory…oxygen supplied by passive delivery is likely to be sufficient …with a patent upper airway • At this time there is insufficient evidence to support the removal of ventilations from CPR Neumar et al.: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care et Update 2015 dans Circulation 2015;132[suppl 2]:S444–S464 Débat sur la ventilation • Saturation maintenue les 1ères 4 minutes sans ventilation Chandra NC et al. Circulation 1994 • Désaturation rapide et ↓ ROSC si pas de ventilation après no flow Dorph E et al. Resuscitation 2004 • Installation acidose respiratoire Idris and Banner, Resuscitation 1994 • ROSC et meilleure survie si ventilation après ACR suite à asphyxie Robert A et al. Circulation 2000 • Autres bénéfices physiologiques de la ventilation Idris HA et al. Circulation 1994 • Ventilation passive du MCE = 60ml max très précocémment Deakin C et al. Resuscitation 2007 • Pas de différence sur mortalité MCE continu vs 30:2 en OHCA Nichol et al. NEJM 2015 RCR: HISTORIQUE Petit historique… • Importance de la ventilation dans la réanimation connue depuis des années… – Première description dans l’ancien testament! Kings 4:32–37 When Elisha came into the house, he saw the child lying dead on his bed. So he went in and shut the door behind the two of them and prayed to the LORD. Then he went up and lay on the child, putting his mouth on his mouth, his eyes on his eyes, and his hands on his hands. And as he stretched himself upon him, the flesh of the child became warm. Then he got up again and walked once back and forth in the house, and went up and stretched himself upon him. The child sneezed seven times, and the child opened his eyes. Then he summoned Gehazi and said, “Call this Shunammite.” So he called her. And when she came to him, he said, “Pick up your son.” She came and fell at his feet, bowing to the ground. Then she picked up her son and went out. • 1744: Description chez un mineur de charbon • 1796: Démonstration que l’air expiré est sécuritaire • 1950: Étude de Safar et Elam: obstruction des voies respiratoires par la langue et le palais mou chez les personnes inconscientes – Techniques de ventilation pré-1950 inefficaces – Adoption du chin-lift et jaw-thrust Markus Figl, Linda E. Pelinka, Walter Mauritz Franz Koenig and Friedrich Maass Resuscitation, Volume 70, Issue 1, 2006, 6–9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.05.004 William B. Kouwenhoven Demonstration of the technique of closed-chest cardiac massage. Jonas A. Cooper et al. Circulation. 2006;114:2839-2849 Reproduced from Kouwenhoven et al., with permission. Copyright © American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. RCR: CONCEPTS • Une bonne proportion des ACR à l’hôpital ne sont pas des TV/FV… • Durée moyenne entre ACR et massage = 4-5 minutes! • 17 minutes avant l’intubation Question en suspens • Techniques développées sur des patients anesthésiés avec circulation normale – Définitivement pas le cas en ACR • Besoins en oxygénation et ventilation altérés en ACR – Le débit (cardiaque et pulmonaire) maintenu par un bon massage ≠ débit normal • Bas débit = organes cibles ischémiques – extraction O2 ↑ – Accumulation CO2 – Gaz sanguin = reflet des conditions tissulaires? • As a result, the goals of oxygenation and ventilation during CPR have not been established, and interpretation of arterial blood gases is not clear. Therefore, it is difficult to evaluate current techniques. oxygenation:ventilation Débat sur la ventilation • Saturation maintenue les 1ères 4 minutes sans ventilation Chandra NC et al. Circulation 1994 • Désaturation rapide et ↓ ROSC si pas de ventilation après no flow Dorph E et al. Resuscitation 2004 • Installation acidose respiratoire Idris and Banner, Resuscitation 1994 • ROSC et meilleure survie si ventilation après ACR suite à asphyxie Robert A et al. Circulation 2000 • Autres bénéfices physiologiques de la ventilation Idris HA et al. Circulation 1994 • Ventilation passive du MCE = 60ml max très précocémment Deakin C et al. Resuscitation 2007 • Pas de différence sur mortalité MCE continu vs 30:2 en OHCA Nichol et al. NEJM 2015 Pompe cardiaque La circulation est générée par la compression des B cavités cardiaques entre le sternum et la colonne vertébrale Jeux de pressions Rudikoff et al. Circulation 1980 22 Questionnement sur cette théorie • Pression veineuse intra-thoracique = Pression aortique au cours du MCE McKenzie et al. Lancet 1964 • RCR impossible sur patients avec un flail chest Weisfeldt et al. Circulation 1986 • « Cough CPR » Criley et al. JAMA 1976 23 Pompe Intra-Thoracique • • • Valve d’entrée = valve pulmonaire Chambre de compression = vascularisation pulmonaire + OG + VG Valve de sortie = Valve aortique Shaw et al. Resuscitation 1997 Techniques et mécanismes de massage cardiaque Jonas A. Cooper et al. Circulation. 2006;114:2839-2849 Copyright © American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Stratégies d’augmentation du débit Débit = fréquence X volume Pompe cardiaque ↑ Fréquence de compression ↑ Force de compression ↑ Volume comprimé ↑Temps compression/décompression Pompe thoracique Schleien et al. Anesthesiology 1989 26 Amélioration de la systole • Contention abdominale Harris et al. Anesthesiology 1967 • Compression + ventilation simultanée Chandra et al. Am J Cardio. 1981 • Compression pneumatique sous-diaphragmatique Lilja et al. Ann Emerg Med 1981 • Veste pneumatique Beattie et al. J Appl Physiol 1991 Amélioration de la diastole • Compression abdominale alternée (Mateer et al. Am J Emerg Med 1985) • Compression-décompression active – Hémodynamique chez l’homme (Rivers et al. Circulation 1995) – Survie chez l’homme (Plaisance et al. NEJM 1999) • Valve d’impédance inspiratoire – Hémodynamisme chez l’homme (Plaisance et al. Circulation 2000) – Survie chez l’homme (Aufderheide et al. CCM 2005) • Association CDA + VII – Survie chez l’homme (Wolcke et al. Circulation 2003; Plaisance et al. CCM 2005) Landmark paper • But de la RCR: – Garder un débit sanguin au cerveau/organes – Du sang oxygéné? • PPC = facteur de ROSC le + important • Ventilation excessive est nuisible – perte de PPC par trop de temps à ventiler – ↑ P intrathoracique et ↓ remplissage VD = ↓ CO Pression de perfusion coronarienne Pression oreillette droite (POD) Pression Aortique (PAo) PPC = PAo - POD (Durant la phase de relaxation) PPC et ROSC 90% 79% % of patients w/ ROSC 80% 70% 60% 46% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 0% <15 15-25 >25 CPP (mm Hg) n=44 n=28 n=14 Paradis NA et al. JAMA. 1990;263:1106-1113 PPC et PbrO2 RCR & TRUCS WEIRD Le coup de poing précordial • However, 2 larger case series found that the precordial thump was ineffective in 79 (98.8%) of 80 cases and in 153 (98.7%) of 155 cases of malignant ventricular arrhythmias. • Case reports and case series have documented complications associated with precordial thump including sternal fracture, osteomyelitis, stroke, and triggering of malignant arrhythmias in adults and children. Rêve brisé… • The precordial thump should not be used for unwitnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (Class III, LOE C). • The precordial thump may be considered for patients with witnessed, monitored, unstable ventricular tachycardia including pulseless VT if a defibrillator is not immediately ready for use (Class IIb, LOE C), but it should not delay CPR and shock delivery. • There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against the use of the precordial thump for witnessed onset of asystole. Percussion pacing • Percussion (eg, fist) pacing refers to the use of regular, rhythmic and forceful percussion of the chest with the rescuer's fist in an attempt to pace the myocardium. There is little evidence supporting fist or percussion pacing in cardiac arrest based on 6 single-patient case reports Compression abdominale alternée Le Lifestick 37 37 Compression abdominale alternée • Evidence from 1 prospective randomized clinical study of adults in cardiac arrest demonstrated no improvement in survival to hospital discharge with use of PTACD-CPR during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against the use of this device. LES QUALITÉS D’UNE BONNE RCR Une RCR de qualité • Components of high-quality CPR include: – Ensuring chest compressions of adequate rate – Ensuring chest compressions of adequate depth – Allowing full chest recoil between compressions – Minimizing interruptions in chest compressions – Avoiding excessive ventilation 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care RCR: FRÉQUENCE Lignes directrices de la RCR • These 2010 AHA Guidelines for CPR and ECC recommend compressions at a rate of at least 100/min. • There is insufficient evidence to recommend the routine use of high-frequency chest compressions for cardiac arrest. However, high-frequency chest compressions may be considered by adequately trained rescue personnel as an alternative (Class IIb, LOE C). Figure 2 Chest Compression Rates and Survival Following Outof-Hospital Cardiac Arrest*. Idris, Ahamed; Guffey, Danielle; Pepe, Paul; Brown, Siobhan; Brooks, Steven; Callaway, Clifton; MD, PhD; Christenson, Jim; Davis, Daniel; Daya, Mohamud; Gray, Randal; BS, MA; Ed, NREMT-P; Kudenchuk, Peter; Larsen, Jonathan; Lin, Steve; Menegazzi, James; Sheehan, Kellie; Sopko, George; MD, MPH; Stiell, Ian; MD, MSc; Nichol, Graham; Aufderheide, Tom Critical Care Medicine. 43(4):840-848, April 2015. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000824 Figure 2 . Chest compression rate versus chest compression depth. The stacked bar graph shows the distribution of three categories of chest compression depth (gray, 38-51 mm indicated in white, and > 51 mm indicated in black) across five categories of chest compression rates (= 140 chest compressions/min) (n = 6,399; chi-square test, p < 0.0001). Copyright © by 2015 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. 5 Figure 3 Chest Compression Rates and Survival Following Outof-Hospital Cardiac Arrest*. Idris, Ahamed; Guffey, Danielle; Pepe, Paul; Brown, Siobhan; Brooks, Steven; Callaway, Clifton; MD, PhD; Christenson, Jim; Davis, Daniel; Daya, Mohamud; Gray, Randal; BS, MA; Ed, NREMT-P; Kudenchuk, Peter; Larsen, Jonathan; Lin, Steve; Menegazzi, James; Sheehan, Kellie; Sopko, George; MD, MPH; Stiell, Ian; MD, MSc; Nichol, Graham; Aufderheide, Tom Critical Care Medicine. 43(4):840-848, April 2015. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000824 Figure 3 . Cubic spline curves of the interaction between chest compression rates and the active (solid gray line) versus sham (solid black line) impedance threshold device (ITD) and the probability of survival to hospital discharge (A) and the probability of functionally favorable survival (survival with a modified Rankin score [mRS] B) after adjustment for sex, age, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), arrest location, study site, first emergency medical services rhythm, witnessed status, and quality of CPR (chest compression fraction and depth) for survival (p = 0.09, n = 4,170) and for functionally favorable survival (p = 0.036, n = 4,170). Copyright © by 2015 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. 7 Relationship Between Chest Compression Rates and Outcomes From Cardiac Arrest Ahamed H. Idris et al. Circulation. 2012;125:3004-3012 Copyright © American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Adjusted cubic spline of the relationship between chest compression rates and the probability of survival to hospital discharge. Ahamed H. Idris et al. Circulation. 2012;125:3004-3012 Copyright © American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. RCR: PROFONDEUR Profondeur des compressions “Performing CPR without measuring the effects is like flying an airplane without an altimeter” Dr. Max Harry Weil at the Fourth Wolf Creek Conference, April 1996 Moniteur de compression • Permet de suivre l’efficacité du massage en temps réel • Enregistrement des données What is the role of chest compression depth during outof-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation?*. Stiell, Ian; Brown, Siobhan; Christenson, James; Cheskes, Sheldon; Nichol, Graham; Powell, Judy; Bigham, Blair; Morrison, Laurie; Larsen, Jonathan; Hess, Erik; Vaillancourt, Christian; Davis, Daniel; Callaway, Clifton Critical Care Medicine. 40(4):1192-1198, April 2012. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31823bc8bb ROSC, survie et profondeur des compressions Figure 2 . A-C, Plots of outcomes vs. average compression depth. ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation. © 2012 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. 6 What is the role of chest compression depth during outof-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation?*. Stiell, Ian; Brown, Siobhan; Christenson, James; Cheskes, Sheldon; Nichol, Graham; Powell, Judy; Bigham, Blair; Morrison, Laurie; Larsen, Jonathan; Hess, Erik; Vaillancourt, Christian; Davis, Daniel; Callaway, Clifton Critical Care Medicine. 40(4):1192-1198, April 2012. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31823bc8bb Table 4 . Univariate comparison of clinical characteristics of patients who did and did not survive to hospital discharge © 2012 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. 7 What Is the Optimal Chest Compression Depth During Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation of Adult Patients? Ian G. Stiell et al. Circulation. 2014;130:1962-1970 Copyright © American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Lignes directrice de la RCR • There is consistent evidence that achieving compression depth of approximately 5 cm is associated with greater likelihood of favorable outcomes compared with shallower compressions. • In the largest study to date (n=9136), the optimal compression depth with regard to survival occurred within the range of 41 to 55 mm (4.1 to 5.5 cm, or 1.61 to 2.2 inches). • Less evidence is available about whether there is an upper threshold beyond which compressions may be too deep. During manual CPR, injuries are more common when compression depth is greater than 6 cm (2.4 inches) than when it is between 5 and 6 cm (2 and 2.4 inches). • Importantly, chest compressions performed by professional rescuers are more likely to be too shallow (ie, less than 40 mm [4 cm] or 1.6 inches) and less likely to exceed 55 mm (5.5 cm or 2.2 inches) RCR: INTERRUPTIONS Risques associés à l’interruption des compressions Ventilation / Fatigue / Analyses du rythme Survival to hospital discharge and duration of longest overall pause (black), longest perishock pause (light gray), and longest nonshock pause (dark gray). Tom F. Brouwer et al. Circulation. 2015;132:1030-1037 Copyright © American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Défis du RCR: Qualité Défis du RCR: Qualité Rythme lent 0,281 Pas assez profond 0,374 Fréquence ventilatoire trop élevée 0,609 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% Rate Abella BS et al. JAMA. 2005;293:305-310. 50% Depth 60% 70% Ven la on 80% 90% 100% RCR: LES PLANCHES À MASSAGE AUTOMATIQUES • There are four main needs for mechanical ECC: 1. 2. 3. 4. For the scientific study of CPR to provide consistent levels of support according to a protocol. To optimise CPR performance based on the present standards for ECC. To perform CPR using new protocols, optimised for machine resuscitation. To provide basic life support (BLS), and allow the rescuer to concentrate on advanced life support (ALS) and start post resuscitative brain-oriented protective therapy Fig. 1. Thumper gas powered. Lars Wik Automatic and manual mechanical external chest compression devices for cardiopulmonary resuscitation Resuscitation, Volume 47, Issue 1, 2000, 7–25 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9572(00)00190-8 Fig. 4. Iron Heart gas powered. Lars Wik Automatic and manual mechanical external chest compression devices for cardiopulmonary resuscitation Resuscitation, Volume 47, Issue 1, 2000, 7–25 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9572(00)00190-8 Fig. 5. Beck–Rand electricity powered. Lars Wik Automatic and manual mechanical external chest compression devices for cardiopulmonary resuscitation Resuscitation, Volume 47, Issue 1, 2000, 7–25 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9572(00)00190-8 Fig. 6. Vest cardiopulmonary resuscitation gas powered. Lars Wik Automatic and manual mechanical external chest compression devices for cardiopulmonary resuscitation Resuscitation, Volume 47, Issue 1, 2000, 7–25 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9572(00)00190-8 Fig. 9. Rentsch Cardiac Press. Lars Wik Automatic and manual mechanical external chest compression devices for cardiopulmonary resuscitation Resuscitation, Volume 47, Issue 1, 2000, 7–25 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9572(00)00190-8 RCR: LE MODÈLE DES CORPS THIEL Objectif du projet • Comprendre les interactions Ventilation ↔ Pression Intra-Thoracique lors du massage cardiaque externe (MCE) chez un modèle humain • Corps Thiel = modèle d’exploration physiologique Roos Eisma* and Tracey Wilkinson; From “Silent Teachers” to Models PLoS Biol. 2014 Oct; 12(10): e1001971. Méthode • • • • Sujets Âge Cause du décès 1M 74 Alzheimer 2F 76 Infarctus myocarde 3F 81 Insuffisance rénale 4M 83 MVAS IET 7,5 F Installation ballon oesophagien RX poumons Ventilation/recrutement PEEP 15 x 30 min 6 cc/kg Mécanique respiratoire du Thiel • Compliance moyenne autour de 40-42 – Idem a celles observées en ACR – Reproductible dans le temps THIEL # 1/2/3/4 T 45 min T 90 min T 135 min PEEP (cmH2O) 10.0 ± 0.0 9.3 ± 0.9 9.5 ± 0.9 Resistance (cmH2O/L/sec) Respiratory systems Compliance (mL/cmH2O) CW Compliance (mL/cmH2O) Closing P (cmH2O) 10.5 ± 0.5 38.3 ± 3.9 137.0 ± 16.9 7.3 ± 3.3 11.3 ± 0.4 41.8 ± 5.8 11.8 ± 0.4 44.5 ± 9.3 MCE manuel et ventilation à Ambu Paw cmH2O 60 40 20 0 Pit cmH2O 50 30 10 0 RCR 30:2 tests in Thiel human cadavers CPV et LUCAS Mesures lors MCE (Autopulse) et ventilation Flow Paw Pit Lucas 2 versus Autopulse Tests sur corps Thiel Pit moy. (cm H2O) 90 80 70 60 thiel1 Thiel2 50 Thiel3 Thiel4 40 Thiel5 30 Manuel 20 10 0 ZOLL Autopulse LUCAS Lucas 2 Apport du modèle • Permet – Intubation et ventilation – Mesure de compliance/résistance – Mesure de Poeso (et donc de Pit) • Corrélable avec un sujet humain en ACR, (l’hémodynamie en moins) – Tester différentes stratégies en ACR – De manière systématique et répétée – Comparer l’effet de différentes techniques de massage cardiaque sur la physiologie pulmonaire • Limites – Oedème des tissus, affaissement du thorax, etc.. Entre les deux, mon cœur balance Pompe cardiaque Compresses only Compresse Compresses only the heart the heartle coeur Principalement Pompe thoracique Compresses the Compresses Compresse entire chestmuch of the chest entièrement le thorax Lund University Cardiac Assist System Vidéo Lucas Compression-décompression active l’ancêtre du LUCAS Compression-décompression active • The application of external negative suction during the decompression phase of CPR creates negative intrathoracic pressure and thus potentially enhances venous return to the heart. When used, the device is positioned at midsternum on the chest. • Results from the use of ACD-CPR have been mixed. In several studies ACD-CPR improved ROSC and short-term survival compared with conventional CPR. Of these studies, 3 showed improvement in neurologically intact survival. In contrast, 1 Cochrane meta-analysis of 10 studies involving both in-hospital arrest (826 patients) and out-of-hospital arrest (4162 patients) and several other controlled trials comparing ACD-CPR to conventional CPR showed no difference in ROSC or survival. Fig. 9. The coronary perfusion pressure obtained during manual CPR vs. LUCAS-CPR in pigs (Group I). The coarse line shows the mean value. S.E.M. (thin line) is shown only on one side for the sake of clarity. n=6 in both groups. Stig Steen, Qiuming Liao, Leif Pierre, Audrius Paskevicius, Trygve Sjöberg Evaluation of LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation Resuscitation, Volume 55, Issue 3, 2002, 285–299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9572(02)00271-X Fig. 3. Cortical cerebral blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation measured by continuous Laser-Doppler flowmetry. The blood flow, mean ± S.E.M. is presented as a fraction of the baseline flow value in the group treated with the LUCAS device (n = 7) vs.... Sten Rubertsson, Rolf Karlsten Increased cortical cerebral blood flow with LUCAS; a new device for mechanical chest compressions compared to standard external compressions during experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitation ☆ Resuscitation, Volume 65, Issue 3, 2005, 357–363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.12.006 Fig. 4. End-tidal CO2, mean ± S.E.M., during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the group treated with the LUCAS device (n = 7) vs. standardised manual compressions (n = 7). Sten Rubertsson, Rolf Karlsten Increased cortical cerebral blood flow with LUCAS; a new device for mechanical chest compressions compared to standard external compressions during experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitation ☆ Resuscitation, Volume 65, Issue 3, 2005, 357–363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.12.006 From: Mechanical Chest Compressions and Simultaneous Defibrillation vs Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: The LINC Randomized Trial JAMA. 2014;311(1):53-61. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.282538 “CPR with this mechanical device using the presented algorithm can be delivered without major complications but did not result in improved outcomes compared with manual chest compressions.” Volume 385, Issue 9972, 14–20 March 2015, Pages 947–955 4471 patients Randomisation par ambulance AutoPulse® LDB RCR Fréquence de 80 compressions/min Profondeur de 20-30% de la circonférence thoracique Vidéo Autopulse Veste circonférentielle l’ancêtre de l’Autopulse Automatic and manual mechanical external chest compression devices for cardiopulmonary resuscitation Wik, L.: Resuscitation, Volume 47, Issue 1, 2000, 7–25 Fig. 2. Phasic vascular pressure traces during manual and A-CPR in two patients (A, B) reproduced from digital recordings. Record A shows one of the largest changes observed in aortic pressure and the diastolic aortic and right atrial pressure difference (coro... Sergio Timerman, Luis Francisco Cardoso, Jose A.F. Ramires, Henry Halperin Improved hemodynamic performance with a novel chest compression device during treatment of in-hospital cardiac arrest Resuscitation, Volume 61, Issue 3, 2004, 273–280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.01.025 Coronary Perfusion Pressure (CPP) mmHg RÉSULTATS: La perfusion de pression coronarionenne (CPP) générée par l’Autopulse, était 33% plus élevée que le massage manuel *p=0.015 25 20 20 15 15 10 5 0 Manual CPR Timerman S et al. Resuscitation. 2004;61:273-280. AutoPulse PPC diminue rapidement lorsque les compressions avec AutoPulse arrête PPC revient après plusieurs compressions avec AutoPulse AutoPulse Timerman S et al. Resuscitation. 2004;61:273-280. Manual CPR AutoPulse From: Manual Chest Compression vs Use of an Automated Chest Compression Device During Resuscitation Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Trial JAMA. 2006;295(22):2620-2628. doi:10.1001/jama.295.22.2620 Volume 85, Issue 6, June 2014, Pages 741–748 RCR: LE VERDICT SUR LES PLANCHES ROSC Survie de l’évènement initial ad hôpital Survie ad sortie hôpital ou 30 jours Survie avec mRS 0-3 Remarques sur les planches • Les principales remarques que l’on puisse faire sont : – le délai de pose des machines à masser doit sûrement être précoce – la durée de pose doit être la plus courte possible – les protocoles d’investigation clinique ne doivent pas modifier les indications de prise en charge et de réanimation des patients • Ont une place réelle dans la prise en charge des patients en ACR – Efficacité au moins équivalente à celle du massage cardiaque manuel – Qualité reste constante au fil du temps et permet ainsi une durée de massage prolongée – Libère du personnel soignant qui peut s’acquérir d’autres tâches – De plus en plus légers et autonomes, permettant leur utilisation à la fois en pré- et en intrahospitalier P. Plaisance · N. Segal · C. Fulleda: Massage cardiaque externe automatisé Réanimation (2012) 21:S384-S390 DOI 10.1007/s13546-011-0428-7 LUCAS 2 • • • The evidence does not demonstrate a benefit with the use of mechanical piston devices for chest compressions versus manual chest compressions in patients with cardiac arrest. Manual chest compressions remain the standard of care for the treatment of cardiac arrest, but mechanical piston devices may be a reasonable alternative for use by properly trained personnel (Class IIb, LOE B-R). The use of mechanical piston devices may be considered in specific settings where the delivery of high-quality manual compressions may be challenging or dangerous for the provider (eg, limited rescuers available, prolonged CPR, during hypothermic cardiac arrest, in a moving ambulance, in the angiography suite, during preparation for extracorporeal CPR [ECPR]), provided that rescuers strictly limit interruptions in CPR during deployment and removal of the devices (Class IIb, LOE C-EO). Part 6: Alternative Techniques and Ancillary Devices for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Steven C. Brooks, Chair; Monique L. Anderson; Eric Bruder; Mohamud R. Daya; Alan Gaffney; Charles W. Otto; Adam J. Singer; Ravi R. Thiagarajan; Andrew H. Travers Autopulse • • • The evidence does not demonstrate a benefit with the use of LDB-CPR for chest compressions versus manual chest compressions in patients with cardiac arrest. Manual chest compressions remain the standard of care for the treatment of cardiac arrest, but LDB-CPR may be a reasonable alternative for use by properly trained personnel (Class IIb, LOE B-R). The use of LDB-CPR may be considered in specific settings where the delivery of high-quality manual compressions may be challenging or dangerous for the provider (eg, limited rescuers available, prolonged CPR, during hypothermic cardiac arrest, in a moving ambulance, in the angiography suite, during preparation for ECPR), provided that rescuers strictly limit interruptions in CPR during deployment and removal of the devices (Class IIb, LOE C-EO). Part 6: Alternative Techniques and Ancillary Devices for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Steven C. Brooks, Chair; Monique L. Anderson; Eric Bruder; Mohamud R. Daya; Alan Gaffney; Charles W. Otto; Adam J. Singer; Ravi R. Thiagarajan; Andrew H. Travers CONCLUSIONS • La RCR de qualité: – – – – – Fréquence > 100/min Profondeur 4-5 cm Minimiser les interruptions Décompression complète Ventilation??? • Pompe cardiaque VS pompe thoracique • Importance de la PPC et comment la générer – Systole VS diastole • Planches de massage automatiques – Avantages • • • • Standardisation des compressions Épargne du personnel Génération de pressions plus élevées Bénéfice de survie? – Inconvénients • Délai de mise en place • Timing de l’initiation? • Affaissement du thorax • Recommandations « soft » pour les situations spéciales • Une paire de bras vaut autant que auto tu auras! Merci!