(12) International Application Status Report
Transcription
(12) International Application Status Report
(12) International Application Status Report Received at International Bureau: 21 February 2009 (21.02.2009) Information valid as of: 18 February 2010 (18.02.2010) Report generated on: 23 February 2017 (23.02.2017) (10) Publication number: (43) Publication date: (26) Publication language: WO2009/102897 20 August 2009 (20.08.2009) English (EN) (21) Application Number: (22) Filing Date: (25) Filing language: PCT/US2009/033966 12 February 2009 (12.02.2009) English (EN) (31) Priority number(s): (31) Priority date(s): (31) Priority status: 12/030,820 (US) 13 February 2008 (13.02.2008) Priority document received (in compliance with PCT Rule 17.1) (51) International Patent Classification: H04N 7/26 (2006.01); G06T 5/50 (2006.01); H04N 7/36 (2006.01) (71) Applicant(s): QUALCOMM INCORPORATED [US/US]; Attn: International IP Administration 5775 Morehouse Drive San Diego, California 92121 (US) (for all designated states except US) HWANG, Hau [US/US]; 5775 Morehouse Drive San Diego, California 92121 (US) (for US only) LI, Hsiang-Tsun [CN/US]; 5775 Morehouse Drive San Diego, California 92121 (US) (for US only) ATANASSOV, Kalin [BG/US]; 5775 Morehouse Drive San Diego, California 92121 (US) (for US only) (72) Inventor(s): HWANG, Hau; 5775 Morehouse Drive San Diego, California 92121 (US) LI, Hsiang-Tsun; 5775 Morehouse Drive San Diego, California 92121 (US) ATANASSOV, Kalin; 5775 Morehouse Drive San Diego, California 92121 (US) (74) Agent(s): DEHAEMER, Michael; Attn: International IP Administration 5775 Morehouse Drive San Diego, CA 92121 (US) (54) Title (EN): SHARED BLOCK COMPARISON ARCHITECTURE FOR IMAGE REGISTRATION AND VIDEO CODING (54) Title (FR): ARCHITECTURE DE COMPARAISON DE BLOC PARTAGÉE POUR UNE MISE EN CORRESPONDANCE D'IMAGE ET UN CODAGE VIDÉO (57) Abstract: (EN): This disclosure describes an efficient architecture for an imaging device that supports image registration for still images and video coding of a video sequence. For image registration, the described architecture uses block-based comparisons of image blocks of a captured image relative to blocks of another reference image to support image registration on a block by block basis. For video coding, the described architecture uses block-based comparisons, e.g., to support for motion estimation and motion compensation. According to this disclosure, a common block comparison engine is used on a shared basis for both block based image registration and block-based video coding. In this way, a hardware unit designed for block based comparisons may be implemented so as to work in both the image registration process for still images and the video coding process for coding a video sequence. (FR): L'invention concerne une architecture efficace pour un dispositif d'imagerie qui prend en charge une mise en correspondance pour des images fixes et un codage vidéo d'une séquence vidéo. Pour une mise en correspondance d'image, l'architecture décrite utilise des comparaisons sur la base de blocs de blocs d'image d'une image capturée par rapport à des blocs d'une autre image de référence pour prendre en charge une mise en correspondance d'image bloc par bloc. Pour un codage vidéo, l'architecture décrite utilise des comparaisons sur la base de blocs pour prendre en charge, par exemple une estimation de mouvement et une compensation de mouvement. Selon la présente invention, un moteur de comparaison de bloc commun est utilisé de manière partagée pour une mise en correspondance d'image sur la base de blocs et un codage vidéo sur la base de blocs. De cette manière, une unité de matériel conçue pour des comparaisons sur la base de blocs peut être mise en œuvre afin de fonctionner dans le processus de mise en correspondance d'image pour des images fixes et le processus de codage vidéo pour coder une séquence vidéo. International search report: Received at International Bureau: 09 April 2009 (09.04.2009) [EP] International Report on Patentability (IPRP) Chapter II of the PCT: Chapter II demand received: 23 July 2009 (23.07.2009) (81) Designated States: AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PG, PH, PL, PT, RO, RS, RU, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW European Patent Office (EPO) : AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, LV, MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, SE, SI, SK, TR African Intellectual Property Organization (OAPI) : BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI, CM, GA, GN, GQ, GW, ML, MR, NE, SN, TD, TG African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO) : BW, GH, GM, KE, LS, MW, MZ, NA, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, ZM, ZW Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO) : AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ, TM Declarations: Declaration made as applicant's entitlement, as at the international filing date, to apply for and be granted a patent (Rules 4.17(ii) and 51bis.1(a)(ii)), in a case where the declaration under Rule 4.17(iv) is not appropriate Declaration made as applicant's entitlement, as at the international filing date, to claim the priority of the earlier application, where the applicant is not the applicant who filed the earlier application or where the applicant's name has changed since the filing of the earlier application (Rules 4.17(iii) and 51bis.1(a)(iii))