Theory of pulsar`s electrosphere
Transcription
Theory of pulsar`s electrosphere
Theory of pulsar’s electrosphere 10 mai 2005 - Cargèse Jérôme Pétri [email protected] Max Planck Institut für Kernphysik - Heidelberg Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 1/?? Outline 1. What is a pulsar ? Observations Theory 2. Structure of the magnetosphere Polar cap Outer gap 3. Electrosphere of a pulsar Equilibrium state Stability analysis Pair creation 4. On the pulsar wind 5. Conclusions & Perspectives Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 2/?? Discovery First pulsar discovered fortuitously at Cambridge Observatory in 1967: Radio signal measured from PSR1919+21 (Bell & Hewish, 1968) * signal made of a series of pulses separated by a period P = 1.337 s ; * pulse profile changes randomly but arrival time stable in time ; * duration of a pulse ∆t ≈ 16 ms ⇒ size of the emitting region: L ≤ c ∆t ≈ 4800 km ⇒ compact object. Pulsar = strongly magnetised rotating neutron star. Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 3/?? Observations: general aspects to date about 2000 pulsars are known ; identified as galactic objects concentrated in the equatorial plane of the Milky Way ; rotation period P between 1.5 ms and a few seconds (8 s) ; pulse arrival time extremely stable but increases slowly (Ṗ > 0) ⇒ interpreted as a rotational braking of the neutron star. P − Ṗ diagram for 539 pulsars -12 Log10 P’ -14 -16 -18 -20 0.001 0.01 0.1 Période P Hen sL 1 10 Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 4/?? Observations: radio emission Mean profile of PSR 1133+16 and a sample of 100 individual pulses the structure of the pulse change randomly but the mean profile remains extremely stable ; the spectral flux density for radio pulsars decreases like a power law ⇒ non thermal emission ; the radio luminosity is three to five orders of magnitude lower than the total rotational energy losses (mostly released in particle acceleration forming a wind illuminating the supernova remnant by synchrotron radiation) ; the brightness temperature for the radio emission is T=1023−25 K ⇒ coherent emission mechanism ; * for incoherent emission : intensity ∝ N ; * for coherent emission when size of emitting region L ≪ λ : intensity ∝ N 2 . Radio emission = non thermal coherent radiation mechanism. Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 5/?? Variety of mean profiles Classification due to Rankin (1983) 120 PSR1642-03 à 1.42 Ghz 100 PSR0809+ 74 à 4.85 Ghz 1 St 80 0.8 60 0.6 40 0.4 20 0.2 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 37.5 40 Phase du pulse Hen degréL PSR0329+ 54 à 2.25 Ghz 300 100 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 Phase du pulse Hen degréL PSR525+ 21 à 1.61 Ghz 120 250 D 200 60 150 40 100 20 50 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 Phase du pulse Hen degréL 120 PSR1237+ 25 à 1.4 Ghz 100 80 Sd T 230 240 250 260 270 280 Phase du pulse Hen degréL 120 PSR0355+ 54 à 1.4 Ghz 100 M 80 60 60 40 40 20 20 45 55 40 50 60 65 Phase du pulse Hen degréL T12 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 Phase du pulse Hen degréL Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 6/?? Some useful definitions An empty magnetosphere Ω : rotation axis of the pulsar ; µ : magnetic moment ; α : angle between the magnetic moment and the rotation axis ; the light cylinder : surface where the speed of a particle corotating with the star at a rate Ω∗ reaches the speed of light c ; ⇒ radius of the light cylinder RL = c/Ω∗ . energy losses by dipolar magnetic radiation Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 7/?? Typical neutron star parameters mass M∗ = 1.4 M⊙ ; radius R∗ = 10 km (R⊙ = 700.000 km) ; mean density ρ∗ = 1017 kg/m3 (ρ⊙ = 1.410 kg/m3 ) ; crust temperature T∗ = 106 K ; moment of inertia I∗ = 1038 kg m2 ; magnetic field strength at the stellar surface B∗ = 105−8 T (B⊙ = 5 × 10−3 T). Magnetic field intensity at the stellar crust estimated from dipolar magnetic radiation in vacuum, assuming a dipolar magnetic field : p B ∝ P Ṗ For typical values of P and Ṗ : P = 1 s and Ṗ = 10−15 implying B∗ = 108 T for s pulsars ; P = 1 ms and Ṗ = 10−18 implying B∗ = 105 T for ms pulsars. Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 8/?? Phenomenological model The hollow cone model (Radhakrishnan & Cooke, 1969) What does the magnetospheric structure look like to explain this model ? Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 9/?? Polar cap model The magnetosphere (Goldreich-Julian, 1969) Assumptions : ~∗ k µ an aligned rotator (Ω ~) ; a closed magnetosphere entirely filled with the corotating plasma up to the light cylinder ; in electrostatic equilibrium : ~ + ~v ∧ B ~ =0; E the Goldreich-Julian charge density at equilibrium ; the null surface: region where the charge ~ ·B ~ = 0) ; density vanishes (Ω Extracting charges from the stellar surface ⇒ non vacuum solution particles follow a electric drift motion in the ~ ∧B ~ direction ; E Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 10/?? Charged wind Pair creation cascades (Sturrock 1970, Ruderman & Sutherland 1975) the corotation impossible outside the light cylinder RL ; a charged wind emanating from the polar caps the charged particles (e+ e− ) are produced by γ + B → e+ + e− in the polar caps. the open field lines sustain a wind made of particles of both signs ⇒ increase or decrease of the total charge of the system (star+magnetosphere) ; ⇒ problem of the current closure. Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 11/?? Solution for the axisymmetric rotator (Contopoulos et al.,1999) Closure of the electric circuit : by following the last open magnetic field line : current sheet ; by violation of the electric drift approximation. Particles follow the surface of the light cylinder (Beskin, Mestel). Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 12/?? Outer gap model Aim: to explain the high energy component of the pulsar’s spectrum (gamma emission) (Cheng, Ho & Ruderman 1986) Assumptions : the outer gaps are located between the light cylinder and the null surface ; the photon disintegration is impossible because B too weak ; the pair cascade initiated by photon-photon interaction in the outer gaps, γ + γ → e+ + e− ; the curvature photons emitted tangentially to the local magnetic field lines. An alternative model: the two pole caustic = slot gap from the light cylinder down to the stellar surface (Dyks & Rudak 2003). Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 13/?? Summary of the “standard” model Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 14/?? Collaboration with Silvano and Jean Electrosphere with gaps : what is a gap ? Construction of an electrosphere finite in extend and in electrostatic equilibrium Charge transport and stability diffusion of particles by turbulence Stability study : by a linear analysis ; by non linear numerical simulations ; by quasilinear modeling. Associated emission pair cascade in the gaps Cascades pairs in the gaps Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 15/?? Electrospheric model Aim Construction of a self-consistent electrosphere for a charged and aligned pulsar. Assumptions : the neutron star = perfect spherical conductor of radius R∗ , generating a dipolar magnetic field of strength B∗ and in solid body rotation with speed Ω∗ ; an aligned rotator, i.e., magnetic moment and spin axis are parallel ; particles located well within the light cylinder ; charges extracted freely from the stellar crust whatever their nature ; magnetic field induced by the electrospheric currents are neglected ⇒ constant and dipolar ; any force other that electromagnetic are neglected (even the gravitational attraction !!) ; the electric drift approximation ; the spacetime curvature neglected (frame dragging effect). Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 16/?? Iterative scheme Qualitative picture Algorithm : 1. Transfer a fraction p of the stellar surface charge ; 2. Evaluate the total electric potential φ (star+electrosphere) 3. Find the differential rotation speed Ω din the non corotating region ; 4. Deduce the associated differential charge density ρ6= ; 5. Find the new volume occupied by the plasma ; 6. Return to step 2 until self-consistency is achieved between φ, Ω et ρ6= ; Total charge Qtot = only parameter of the model 7. Return to step 1 until total vanishing of the stellar charge. Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 17/?? Results: electrospheric structure (Pétri, Heyvaerts & Bonazzola, A&A 2002a) Structure 3D de l’électrosphère 3 Vitesse de rotation 3 2.5 2 WHrL Axe polaire 2.5 1.5 2 1.5 1 1 0.5 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Plan équatorial 3.5 2 4 Charge stellaire 2.5 Rayon r 3 3.5 4 3.5 4 Densité de charge 1.2 0.8 1 0.6 0.8 rHrL ss HqL 1 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0 20 40 60 Colatitude q en degré 80 1.5 2 2.5 Rayon r 3 Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 18/?? Results: electrospheric structure Main features : electrosphere of both sign ; is finite in extent for Qtot ≤ 3 Qc . Moreover, if Qtot ≪ 3 Qc , plasma is confined well inside the light cylinder ; has large gaps appear between the equatorial belt and the polar domes ; there is no electric current circulation in the gaps ; a differential rotation of the disk, overrotation ⇒ induce a shearing between magnetic surfaces responsible for the growing of an instability ; the same qualitative conclusions whatever apply the total charge Qtot . The electromagnetic field acts as a Penning trap, confinement of the non-neutral plasma: in the radial direction by the magnetic field : in the “axial” direction by the electric field. Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 19/?? Results: electrosphere with charge loss Structure 3D de l’électrosphère 4 3.5 Vitesse de rotation 3 3 WHrL Axe polaire 2.5 2.5 2 2 1.5 1.5 1 1 1.5 2 0.5 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Plan équatorial 3.5 2.5 Rayon r 3 3.5 4 3.5 4 4 Charge de surface Densité de charge 1.2 0.8 1 0.6 0.8 rHrL ss HqL 1 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0 20 40 60 Colatitude en degré 80 1.5 2 2.5 Rayon r 3 Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 20/?? Results: electrosphere with charge loss Main features : the global geometric and cinematic structure unchanged ; the differential rotation of the disk is preserved ; there is no static equilibrium state due to the stellar charge loss ; only negative charges are expulsed from the polar caps ⇒ increase of the total charge of the system ; it prevents an ongoing escape of other particles when the system has reached a sufficiently high charge. Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 21/?? Diocotron instability: assumptions Goal Study the electrodynamic stability of the differentially rotation disk. Simplifications : the thin disk approximation, differential rotation ; we lift the domes, replaced by a charge density on the stellar crust ; equilibrium rotation rate electrodynamically self-consistent ; the dipolar magnetic field is produced by the neutron star ; motion in the plasma only allowed in the equatorial plane, non warping ; cold plasma, charge separated, and non relativistic ; no relevant effect due to the current in the plasma on the external magnetic field ⇒ perturbation essentially electrostatic ; in the electric drift regime, (RLarmor ≪ RL ) ; the diocotron instability ≈ Kelvin-Helmholtz for a non neutral plasma. Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 22/?? Diocotron instability: linear analysis Equations governing the motion in the disk : 8 ∂σ > div (σ ~ v ) + > > > > σ ∂t > > < ∆Φ + δ(z) ε0 > ~ > E > > > > > : ~v = 0 = 0 = ~ Φ −∇ ~ ∧B ~ E B2 = (1) Fourier analysis : χ(r, ϕ, t) = χ̃(r) ei (m ϕ−ω t) (2) Fredholm integral equation for the Fourier components of the perturbation σ̃1m : ωm σ̃1m (r) = m Ω0 (r) σ̃1m (r) + Z r2 Km (r|r′ ) σ̃1m (r′ ) dr′ (3) r1 It is eigenvalue problem with the unknown eigenfunctions σ̃1m and eigenvalues ωm . Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 23/?? Linear analysis: results Main features : for a given charge, the growth rate increases from m = 2 to a maximum at m ≈ 18 and then decreases slowly when m increases ; Eigenvalues for the diocotron instability (Pétri, Heyvaerts & Bonazzola, A&A 2002b) Carte des valeurs propres 7 Charge totale 18 16 1420 6 12 0 Q = 0.5 Qc 10 5 9 8 7 g=ImHwL 4 6 3 Q = Qc 25 30 Q = 1.5 Qc 35 5 Q = 2 Qc 4 2 3 instability disappear for large values of m (>40), γm = 0 (collective behavior lost) ; for a given value of the azimuthal mode m, the growth rate decreases for an increasing total charge Qtot of the system ; m=2 1 1 1.5 Re HwL Wp = m 2 2.5 the growth rate is of the same order of magnitude than the pattern speed of the perturbation ⇒ instability develops on a very short timescale, much less than any other instability. Need to study the saturation of the instability due to non linear effects in order to obtain correct picture of the development on a long timescale ⇒ numerical simulations. Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 24/?? Diocotron instability: non linear evolution Goal Determine the regime reached due to the diocotron instability two problems : isolated disk ; disk feeded with charges by pair creation. Solving the equations by means of numerical simulations: the continuity equation in cylindrical coordinates with a source term s : ∂σ 1 ∂ 1 ∂ + (r σ vr ) + (σ vϕ ) = s ∂t r ∂r r ∂ϕ (4) Integration done by a fluid dynamics code ClawPACK available on the net. the Poisson equation with help on Green functions G : ΦD (~ r) = ZZ G(~ r|~ r ′ ) σD (~ r ′ )dS (5) Disk Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 25/?? Non linear evolution: results (1) Disk without any source Bidimensional structure Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 26/?? Diocotron instability: quasilinear model Model applies only when a few modes m are excited and incoherent. Description of the mean density profile < σ > (t) (1D problem). Idea Decompose all physical quantities ψ(r, ϕ, t) in a mean value < ψ > (r, t) and a fluctuation δψ(r, ϕ, t) around this average as follows : ψ(r, ϕ, t) =< ψ > (r, t) + δψ(r, ϕ, t) non linearities kept in the evolution of < σ > ; non linearities ignored for the perturbations. Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 27/?? Quasilinear model: results Disk with an external source of charges (Pétri, Heyvaerts & Bonazzola, A&A 2003) Vitesse de rotation moyenne Densité moyenne 10 4 0 <s> <W> 3 -10 2 -20 1 -30 0 4 2 6 8 10 4 2 6 r Courant radial moyen 10 coefficient de diffusion 40 0 20 -2.5 log10 HDL <i>HrL 8 r 0 -20 -5 -7.5 -10 -12.5 -40 -15 4 2 6 8 10 4 2 r 6 8 10 r Taux de croissance Charge du disque 0.2 100 0.175 Qd Hen Qc L 0.15 gm HtL 0.125 0.1 0.075 0.05 80 60 40 20 0.025 20 40 60 Temps t 80 100 0 20 40 60 Temps t 80 100 Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 28/?? Conclusions of the simulations Non linear simulations: without charge feeding, particles tend to accumulate to form supercharges of high density and rotating at a high speed around the neutron star ; with an external source of charges, the initial extension of the disk grows slowly in time ; there is no significant current sustained at this stage. ⇒ simulations on a longer timescale are necessary ⇒ quasi linear model. Quasi linear model: model in agreement with the full non linear evolution ; there exists a situation for which the diocotron instability generates a net flux of charges radially outwards ; A positive equatorial current exists It is an alternative solution to the current closure problem. Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 29/?? Cylindre lumière e− Vent polaire négatif Ligne polaire Current circuit within the closed magnetosphere Dôme e− Zone de formation de paires e+ e− e+ Étoile Disque Plan équatorial e+ Courant équatorial positif RL Observational signature resulting from the pair creation activity in the gaps ⇒ high energy component of the spectrum. Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 30/?? Pair creation e+ e− (1) a quantum electrodynamics process in a strong magnetic field of the order of critical magnetic field Bc ≈ 4.4 · 109 T : γ + B → e+ + e− R⊥ L k′ k ξ ~ B ~ B x y In the frame R⊥ , the threshhold energy is given by k′ = k sin ξ ≥ 2 me c2 . (Eγ = k me c2 ) for a given photon energy, the efficiency increases with the magnetic field intensity ⇒ occurs solely in the innermost regions of the electrosphere ; the photons are produced by : * curvature and synchrotron radiation ⇒ constraint on the maximum energy reached by the charges, γ < 107 ; * inverse Compton diffusion ; Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 31/?? Optical depth for γ + B → e+ + e− For the s pulsars B=108 T 1. ´ 10 Profondeur optique t 12 Energie Eg 1. ´ 108 100 MeV 1 GeV 10000 10 GeV 100 GeV 1 1 TeV 10 TeV 0.0001 100 TeV 1 PeV 1 5 10 50 100 Position d’émission R0 Hen R*L 500 For the ms pulsars Profondeur optique t B=105 T 1. ´ 107 Energie Eg 10000 100 GeV 1 TeV 10 10 TeV 0.01 100 TeV 0.00001 1 PeV 1 1.5 2 3 5 Position d’émission R0 Hen R*L Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 32/?? Pair creation e+ e− (2) photon-photon interaction via the process : γ + γ → e+ + e− interaction between a gamma photon emanating from the outer gaps and a thermal photon created by the black body radiation from the hot stellar crust ; Optical depth for the process γ + γ → e+ + e− Profondeur optique t 10000 Interaction g-g Température T 100 106 K 1 107 K 0.01 108 K 0.0001 109 K 1. ´ 10-6 100 10000 1. ´ 106 1. ´ 108 Enérgie Eg du photon g Hen me c2 L Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 33/?? Consequences on the electrospheric structure Electrosphere with a charge source Structure 3D de l’électrosphère WHrL Axe polaire 4 3 Vitesse de rotation 2.5 2.25 2 1.75 1.5 1.25 1 5 2 1 2 4 6 8 Plan équatorial 10 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 Rayon r Charge de surface ss HqL SrcHr,WHrLL 1 0.8 Fonction source Src 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 20 40 60 80 Colatitude q en degrés 0.175 0.15 0.125 0.1 0.075 0.05 0.025 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 Rayon r Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 34/?? Cylindre lumière e− Vent polaire négatif Ligne polaire Conclusion Dôme e− Zone de formation de paires e+ e− e+ Étoile Disque Plan équatorial e+ Courant équatorial positif RL in the aligned rotator, electrosphere do exist, finite in extension and in electrostatic equilibrium ; a instability of electrostatic nature (diocotron) develops in the equatorial belt allowing particles to diffuse across the magnetic field lines ; numerical simulations have shown the formation of an equatorial current carrying a net flux of charges towards the light cylinder ; a pair cascade can only take place in the innermost regions of the magnetosphere, very close to the neutron star surface. It is a source feeding the disk with charged particles. the striped wind model in very good agreement with recent optical polarisation properties of the Crab pulsar Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 35/?? Perspectives study in detail the pair creation process with Monte Carlo simulations ; close the electric circuit via a negatively charged polar wind ; generalise the diocotron instability by taking into account the perturbation in the magnetic filed ⇒ magnetron instability ; study the oblique rotator ; theory of charged wind with gaps : quantitative theory of Cheng, Ho et Ruderman. Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 36/?? Physics of pulsars Apart from the obvious need of : the general relativity (neutron star equation of state, gravitational waves, electromagnetic field enhancement by frame dragging effect) ; the quantum electrodynamics (pair creation), the physics of pulsar needs two essential ingredients : 1. non neutral plasma physics ; trapping of particles in Penning like traps ; stability properties of this equilibrium ; diocotron and magnetron instability. 2. plasma distribution does not overlap with the magnetosphere ⇒ large vacuum gaps and thus “electrospheric solution” and NOT magnetospheric one. 1967-2005 = 38 years with little progress !! Cargèse, 9-13/5/2005 – p. 37/??