dba-working paper - Hervé Saulnier Conseil
Transcription
dba-working paper - Hervé Saulnier Conseil
HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE ESC GRENOBLE associate : Hervé Saulnier DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER WORKING PAPER A REVIEW OF FACTORS INFLUENCING THE FRENCH WINTER SPORTS HOLIDAY MARKET HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER 22/10/12 PAGE.2 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER Context of the research As the most popular world tourist destination, France has developed know-how in this specific service industry. By its economic weight, tourism is the third industry after building and agriculture and before manufacturing of electric and electronic devices. The ski resorts are major participants since the 60’s with gross added value of 186,7 billions FF. Since the end of the 80’s, the 442 French tourist skiing resorts have been experiencing poor financial results. 45 have even been declared bankrupt and have been placed under governmental control. The government launched several campaigns since 1990 to help ski resorts in a financial crisis or in a poor marketing position. Of course situations are very different from one resort to another as pointed by J.F. Lory 1990: • Fifteen are major contributors to the overall turnover (La Plagne, Val Thorens, Les Arcs, Tignes, Val D'Isère, Méribel, Courchevel, Les Menuires, Deux Alpes, Alpes D'Huez, Avoriaz, Chamonix, Châtel) and propose 29% of all the accommodation capacity • Forty five other resorts of medium size offers 36% of available accommodation. • There are one hundred and four small resorts with 28% of capacity. • And two hundred and eighty snow stadiums with 7% of accommodation which have been originally created for the leisure of neighbouring cities and for the teachnig of skiing. While generally at a low altitude they face snow problems and poor variety of slopes. They are directly competing with the major resorts for their traditional customers who demand more varied and difficult slopes. Because clients possess a car they can easily go to the biggest resorts. Current areas of research A lot of research is made in the matter of geography, development economics and 22/10/12 PAGE.3 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER consumer behaviour to explain and to lead the development of the resorts. Few management researchers are involved in this area in France. This situation is different in the USA where marketing and are the major subject of research. We agree with G.Turpin 1989 in his analysis of the management of French resorts. « You have to consider the resort as a self managed aggregate. .. To manage a resort is an ambition not so far from pretentiousness... You need more a coach than a chairman ». Managing a self-managed aggregate leads to the research done in the matter of co-operative alliances (A.L.Larson 1989, S.D.Hunt 1996) or the commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing (R.Morgan & S.D.Hunt 1994). Ski resorts (and more generally tourist equipment) are very unique cases of service industry which need heavy investment. Skilifts generate 1 FF. of turnover with 2 FF. of assets (SNTF 1996) and an accommodation valued at 400 000 FF. makes 5 tourists within 15 weeks a year spend a general turnover (except skilifts) of (5x15x 2200 FF.) 165 000 FF. (SEMA METRA 1992). As we see below, management of the resorts is responsible for the current difficulties. Bad choices of investment, inadequate credit engagement and unsuitable organisation for the variation in numbers of visitors are some of the major errors in management described in articles and theses that deal with the ski resorts crisis. We do not want to study the way towards better management in this paper, but it seems to us that it is necessary to identify limiting factors of the market. This information could help regulation and adaptation of the management process. 22/10/12 PAGE.4 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER 22/10/12 PAGE.5 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER Goal of the working paper Our goal in this paper is to point out the lack of analysis and causality links between limiting factors, driving forces, and the fluctuations of the market. We first made a literature review of the factors of the ten year crisis. We see that the general concept of crisis is sub-divided in four area : structural, functional, demand, factual. Development economics has produce large studies on the structural and functional problems of the resorts (cf. chapter 1). The thesis of J.Perret 1989 makes a complete review of the mechanism used for the development of the sites. This branch is very active and makes a good contribution to tourism knowledge. All authors identify demand and underlying factors. They do it in two ways. Economics researchers use logical deduction and work on the components of the resort. The ski resort is made for skiing practice ergo the snow is a key factor of success. Marketing researchers use behavioural studies to identify the choice criteria of the customers. This is one of the more active area of research in the management of resorts. Research impact We notice that little research is conducted to prove the reliability of variables in the variation of the market. Many of those variables are identified through assumption or logical deduction. The quantitative studies on customer motivation give a more precise idea, but we know that there are differences between perception and personal evaluation of criteria and the general behaviour of the mass of customers. We restrict this research to the evolution of the French winter sports holiday market. We do not take into account the foreign skiers coming in France. There are no relevant data over a long period and they do not exceed 15-20% of the stays in the French resorts. We will assume that the study conducted on the French tourist can be applied to the foreign people coming in France. 22/10/12 PAGE.6 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER Our goal in this paper is to point out the lack of analysis and causality link between driving and limiting factors and the fluctuations of the market. Doing that we can open the field for further research that can give more robust bases to manage resorts. Our future aim could be to identify the key factors explain on demand and underlying trends of the market, and to measure correlation. Management impact What is in store for the future of this holiday and leisure industry? One answer to the puzzle could be provided by identifying influential external factors on the winter skiing holidays. This should help forecast, to a certain extent, events for the coming decade. The rules for competition could be very different regarding the nature of the limiting factors. According to R.Perdue 1996 managers have to put efforts on the following aspect of their mix: • level of quality and product differentiation • efficiency of targeting the markets • type, method and cost of sales • price policy, advertising... The aim is to identify external influencing factors -acting as driving forces- that can explain past variations of attendance during the winter season. Giving this evidence we can help the resort managers to overcome them and to forecast their organisationan needs. 22/10/12 PAGE.7 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER 22/10/12 PAGE.8 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER Chapter 1: Crisis, what crisis ? 1.1 - the nature of the crisis The ski tourist industry is in crisis but of what kind ? The oldest identification has been pointed out by F.Di Ruzza and B. Gerbier in « Ski en crise » 1977 presses universitaires de Grenoble ISBN 2706101113. In their case they show that the change that led from an agricultural based mountain to a tourist developed mountain has transformed the recruitment and status of ski teacher and champion. They therefore identify a crisis that comes from the unsuitable nature of the services offered in resorts relative to the demand. They predict a shortage in the demand for skiing vacation in the short term. 1987/88 and 1988/89 were two winter very poor in snow falls. This has been the official beginning of reports evaluating the nature and the factors of the crisis. These events made it more visible but it was in the latent state since 1985 and has lasted until now. We start with the systemic analysis done by D.Clary 19989. His major contribution is to give a general view of the interaction that helps us to detail limiting factors. He identifies three levels of systems that interact. • The first one is the resort system. The combination of private interest that can be opposed to general functioning of the resort may result in a functional crisis. • The second level market and resort system may dysfunction when attitude and motivations of the customers are not according to the resort offers. This can generate a market crisis. • At the third level (resort and area system) there can be a crisis of relationship due to excess offer or political pressure on development. This crisis generates a process that will lead from a regional system (North Alps) to a technical system (club med) and destroy the resort system. 22/10/12 PAGE.9 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER 22/10/12 PAGE.10 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER Table 1 : systemic analysis of the resorts D.Clary 22/10/12 PAGE.11 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. terrorism, technology, ... HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE : age, associate : Hervé SaulnierConsumers System : resort earning, behaviours and its market Dealing network ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING C PAPER o m p e ti t o r System resort : and its interaction sytem : resort and its area 22/10/12 PAGE.12 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER This theory gives a global vision of the system. We want now to explore those sublevels : level 1 - resort system, level 2 - market and resort system, level 3 - resort and area system The works we find are structured under different approach of the crisis. Authors use generally many point of view to carry out their work. 1.2 - Crisis of offer and resort differentiation factors In the USA, Targeting has become important only in the last years (Dallas 1995, Marcella 1996, Perdue 1996). According to these authors the crisis can emerge from a lack in the offer. The differenciation approach deals with the level 2 and 3. The difficulties of the resorts give room to build competitive advantage. Resorts may engage in more target oriented strategies. But managers seem to have difficulties making a choice and to customise their resorts. There is not any evidence that targeting can increase the size of the global market while there is evidence that it increases the market share. The applicability of the marketing-mix concept to ski resorts is difficult. We present some elements of the Mix that can be used to be more competitive. Those element are compiled from the following works : R.Knatou 1989, L.Blanchard 1996, Pascal 1993, Moutinho 1985 . • New kinds of glide (carving, surfing, squale, etc.) and more general innovation in concept of service and liveliness. The development of artificial snow is promoted but we are not sure that it can create a competitive advantage while this is a basic demand of customers. • The landscape doesn’t make great differences between competitors. The architecture varies from one area to another and from one owner to another. Activities and shops belong to private entrepreneurs. It looks very complicated to harmonise the production of the service. • Lowering the level of price in order to attract less fortunate people is a solution that comes typically in matured market (J.Perret 1993). We are not sure that this a long term solution according to R.Perdue 1996. • The channel of distribution can be of some help but the best one reaches 17% of the customers. In fact channels are very diverse except in some integrated resorts. French people so rarely use travel agents. In the USA travel agents are 22/10/12 PAGE.13 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER the key to nonresident skiers (NSAA 1993). • The advertising and image of the resorts are also promoted as competitive advantages to the targeted market (R.Perdue 1993). We do not totally agree with him with because medium size resorts do not have enough money to pay TV or radio spots. Furthermore, 75% of the destinations are chosen through personal recommendations and word-of-mouth (Minos survey 1995). The impact of commercials is not certain for medium or small resorts unless in the long term. The return on investment seems very hazardous. As L.Montinho 1985 we agree that there is still a « lack in the determinant of repeat visitation and the tourist word-of-mouth communication ». It is interesting to notice that this approach of differentiation is illustrated by the clustering of the resorts more focused on level 2 of the Clary table. • SEATM classified the resorts through their generation (first, second, third). • SCARAFIOTTI 1992 makes a multi-criterial approach on characteristics of wide or short range of shops, , altitude, skilift, ... which gives 6 clusters. • The last one is used by skilift owners and make the difference through size of skiing area and Moment of Power of the lifts: leaders, isolated major resorts and other small resorts. There are also three classifications of ski resorts and there are four different classifications for the consumers which do not seem perfectly related. This clustering does not give a clear view of its usefulness in time ofcrisis. Otherwise authors would have try to make clusters corelate with the probability of surviving. The first (third generation) and last classifications (leaders and majors resorts) are groups containing the leading resorts. They also maybe the strongest. But the clustering was not made for that purpose. Differentiation between the resorts cannot explain the crisis. We close this area of investigation since it cannot help us in our goal. The marketing mix approach is until now more focused on internal competition either in France or USA. 1.3 - Analysis of reasons for the crisis and proposition of clustering The main distinction made in the works of E.Flamert 1989, Pascal 1993, Lory 1990, 22/10/12 PAGE.14 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER L.Blanchard 1996 is between structural crisis and demand crisis. Structural crisis deals with the level 1 and 3 described by D.Clary. Studies done by the government have been very deep in this area. It comes also directly in the fields of research of development economics. We feel that the structural crisis must be divided in two parts. • On one hand one should consider the elements that build the skeleton of the resort. Managers cannot act precisely and in a short term on that problem. Furthermore the level of investment maybe prohibiting any change. We can call this structural crisis. • On the other hand you can have adaptation to the demand that remains in line with existing development. The dysfunction noticed needs little change to be corrected. It comes in the field of decisions that may be engaged. It comes more from a functional crisis than structural one. The study in demand crisis shows two kind of criteria. • On one hand the controllable and underlying change in consumption. The different studies done by SEMA-METRA 1987, BIPE CONSEIL 1991, COFREMCA 1993 show clearly a great evolution in the behaviour and attitude of the customers. COFREMCA identified six sociocultural streams that are unsatisfied by the actual context of winter sports holidays. These changes in consumption can be followed by the resort at little costs. We can notice those criteria as factors of the demand crisis. • On the other hand the uncontrollable factors of variation in the volume of demand - as the lack of snow, economical crisis- are factors of what we will call the factual crisis. We made a empirircal investigation through the three level described in the model. We analyse that researchers did not really follow this approach in their investigation. The researchs are merely conducted in one academic disciplin while 22/10/12 PAGE.15 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER Clary’s approach is transversal. We build our on referential for our investigation. The building of four cluster appears to us as a new way of pointing out the previous work. We see in the following chapter that it make sense to identify a cluster of homogenous factors that have not been investigated out of a pure logical approach. 22/10/12 PAGE.16 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER 22/10/12 PAGE.17 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER Chapter 2 : clustering of variables by their nature After specifying four different aspects of crisis we can explore in detail the limiting factors and the driving forces at work in these clusters. 2.1 - First cluster : factors of the structural crisis. This deals with the economic and political interaction inside the resorts. It is inbetween the system of D.Clary ( level 1 and 3). These factors and forces of the structural crisis are described in the works of E.Flamert 1989, Pascal 1993, Lory 1990, L.Blanchard 1996. There is a great similarity in the analysis made by the researchers. It is one of the major initiatives of the French government. These factors are defined by means of quantitative survey based on balance, interviews, statistics. Those elements are robust. The key elements are: • lack of initial capital and a high level of credit as a consequence • unsuitability of the financial system that leads to a vicious circle (skilifts financed by the development of real assets) • the shortness of the holidays period (12 weeks) that makes any climatic incident very dangerous and the profitability hazardous (J.Perret 1992). • an inhere frailty due to a service industry that need heavy investment and that cannot be stocked or consumed in an other place and with low variation of production. The investments are made to accept a level of activity which is reached only during 5 weeks a year. 2.2 - Second cluster : factors of adaptation of the product to the demand or the functional crisis According to E.Flament the adaptation capabilities of the resorts are low because of the investment weight. But the COFREMCA 1992 or P.Py 1996 show that adaptation requested by customers could be satisfied by the nature of activities and the style of liveliness in the resort. The evolution of consumer behaviour is a permanent characteristic of the market. It is a permanent characteristic, not by its nature but by the fact that it is a continuous evolution. The resort managers are extremely loath to make such adaptations and also to differentiate from each 22/10/12 PAGE.18 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER other. This is a sign for us of the lack in management capabilities. F.Gerbaux 1989 draws out the weakness in learning and training in this sector. This touches highly seasonal workers but also private entrepreneurs who have difficulties adapting themselves to the new attitude and behaviour of the customers. In the Lory and Pascal reports, this subject is not directly treated but mayors and government technical operators in many cases are guilty of ignoring the basic rules of the market that is adaptation. They use a fixed development model that ignores the obligations of adaptation. They also prove that resorts do not have reliable data to know how many people came, their satisfaction or dissatisfaction . This is a lack in the management ability that limits adaptation. This presents difficulties in passing from a developing period to a stable one, sign of a mature market. We can summarise the different factors concerned by the functional crisis : • adaptation of style of holidays, of services and liveliness • training and education of manager and entrepreneur • training and education of seasonal workers • system of information dedicated to management • the transport problems (traffic jam) • use of media by the resort to manage communication on snow, accident, etc. 2.3 - Third cluster : The controllable and underlying change in consumption and the demand crisis In this cluster we have to split researchers in two kind. The first group works on the theory of tourist demand. The second one works on behaviour and motivation of the tourist. The research done before the context of crisis of 1988 has concentrated more on a general analysis of what creates the motivation of departures on vacation from a macro economic point of view. 22/10/12 PAGE.19 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER Baretje René , Defert Pierre (1972) concluded that winter sport demand is dependant on demographic pressure, urbanisation degree, length of leisure time, length of paid vacations, earning of social classes. Magnone Guido 1982 identified a restriction in the demand and a shortage in the length of vacation. He assumed that it has the consequence of raising the cost of snow vacation. Lanquar Robert (1983) completed the list of Baretje by introducing variables that were orienting the demand on targeted tourism : Relative level of price (as exchange rate and cost of transportation) that influence the choice of site. He introduced also internal factors that mean that he took care of the evolution of the accommodation offer, lifts, sale network. The preceding authors work on the general structure of purchase. This paragraph deals with tourist behaviour. Three nation-wide studies were ordered by the tourism ministry (SEMA-METRA 1987, BIPE CONSEIL 1991, COFREMCA 1993). The most important tendencies shown are the evolution in psychographic motivations and behaviour for winter holidays vacations. Those study are showing the same direction as their American counterpart L.Moutinho 1985, Marcella 1996, Perdue 1996. All these researchers work on the criterion of choice at an individual level. After looking at their generation we can summarise the individual criteria that can become trends in two groups : 22/10/12 PAGE.20 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER 22/10/12 PAGE.21 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER first group of economic criteria • demographic pressure, • urbanisation degree, • length of leisure time, • length of paid vacations and dates of school holidays, • earning of social classes. • Relative level of price on an internal market These second group of criteria deals with sociocultural changes • satisfaction feed-back on accommodation offer, lifts, sales network. • personality • personal taste • distribution of age • lifestyle • perceived role set • behaviour 2.4 - Fourth cluster : The uncontrollable factors of variation in the volume of demand and the factual crisis According with the figure 1 of D.Clary we deal in this paragraph with what are called external factors and describe the environment (economic, laws, technology, sociocultural) according to Kotler 1988. Those elements can be either driving forces or limiting factors depending on their own logic. L.Moutinho in his figure 9 - a vacation tourist behaviour modelincluded what he calls the « internalised environmental influences ». P.Py 1996 does not include these kind of criteria on the « driving forces of tourist consumption » P.32. . As the other consumer observers, he take the climatic factors as a criteria of choice for the destination but not as a determining factors for the departure. The group constituted by development economics researchers that try to 22/10/12 PAGE.22 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE ESC GRENOBLE associate : Hervé Saulnier DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER understand the reasons for the crisis analyse those kind of factors. Their analyses are based on deduction and logical construct (E.Flamert 1989, Pascal 1993, Lory 1990, L.Blanchard 1996 or J.Perret 1993). Their main remarks are that lack of snow is responsible but it may be balanced by artificial snow, M.Delphino 1994 in his work on Mediterranean tourism noticse that « sun is a key factor for the bathing tourist as snow is for winter sport holidays ». The economic difficulties that generate a decrease in purchasing power, unemployment and a lack of confidence, both factors that lead people to change their habits and ways of thinking J.Perret 1993 . Terrorism or natural disaster as a fatal avalanche P.Py 1993 The increase in the quality of competitors, their commercial pressure and the relative level of price due to exchange or parity fluctuations are limiting factors that are identified by the different kinds of researchers. We can summarise the list of uncontrollable factors : • climatic factors (sun and snow) • economic difficulties (purchasing power, confidence in the future, unemployment) • Personal security preoccupation (terrorism, natural disaster) • unexpected competitive advantage to external competitors (commercial pressure, relative level of price. 22/10/12 PAGE.23 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER 22/10/12 PAGE.24 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER Chapter 3 : Factors that need deeper analysis In the preceding chapter we group factors on the basis of the aspect of crisis they can explain. In this chapter we go deeper in our clustering approach. We can determine if there is some lack in analyses and causality links between limiting factors, driving forces, and the fluctuations of the market. 3.1 - reliability of the factors identified • 3.1.1 - In the structural crisis . Managers cannot act precisely and in a short term on that problem. This is a matter largely treated by development economics researchers. The economic characteristics of skiing resorts are inhertly frail arising from service industry that needs heavy investment and where the product cannot be stocked or consumed in an other place and with low variation of production and an unsuitability of the financial system. These factors has been analysed by government surveys and case studies. The conclusions are almost the same and researchers agree on the grounded reasons. the shortness of the holidays period (12 weeks) that makes any climatic incident very dangerous and the profitability hazardous (J.Perret 1992). No study has been made on the impact of those factors on the market. Until now tourists did not suffer any impact of that situation. Thanks to public financing, all services of the resorts have been assured. We do not take these factors into account for our future development. • 3.1.2 - In the functional crisis : It concerns adaptation to the demand that remains in line with existing development. The dysfunction noticed needs little change to be corrected. It comes in the field of decisions that may be engaged because it is necessary to increase the competitive level of each resort. The system of information dedicated to management and the adaptation to the style of holidays, of services and liveliness needed, are important in the long term. These factors have been identified by development economics researchers 22/10/12 PAGE.25 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER as being the solution. There is no evidence that it can generate variation in the demand from one year to another. The need for training and education of managers, entrepreneurs and seasonal workers is neither demanded by the concerned people nor by the tourist. This evaluation is done on the basis of the errors that lead to the structural crisis. This may be the result of poor management but it is also the responsibility of government technical advisors that recommended ( and promoted ) one way of thinking. We have no evidence that the need for training has an impact on the market fluctuation. We think that the factors of the two preceding paragraphs have an influence but only on a medium or long range. We think they influence word-to-mouth recommendations but there no evidence of the nature and timing of the impact. The transport problem and mainly the traffic jams is a very important dissatisfaction criterion, 92% of the tourists are coming by car . But this is a usual problem that affects also summer vacations at the seashore. We do not know its general impact mainly in the process of feed-back, but the COFREMCA study 1993 and the last INSEE study 1994 do not notice it as a significant reason not to come back. The use of media by the resorts should lead to a better management on the communication on snow, accident, etc. We rate factor at the same level as the training. Media can not create snow but of course it has an impact on the way falls are announced on individual behaviour according to M.Delphino 1996 or L.Moutinho 1985. The nature of its impact on the level of stay is not clearly determined in a statistical way 22/10/12 PAGE.26 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER 22/10/12 PAGE.27 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER • 3.1.3 - In the demand crisis : We analyse the controllable and underlying change in consumption. These changes in consumption can be followed by the resort at little costs. We can notice those criteria as factors of. The first group of economic criteria is composed of demographic pressure, urbanisation degree, length of leisure time, length of paid vacations and dates of school holidays, earnings of social classes and the relative level of price on an internal market All of these economic criteria identified can decrease or increase the demand but in the medium term. Demographic pressure will not change from one day to another. Length of leisure time remains stable with five weeks of paid vacations since 1984. We have not found an econometric model that gives an explanation between rate of stay and economic factors. But we assume that one needs external cause to make a change. As an exemple a economic crack is needed to to move down to 20% the average earnings of middle class workers. There is one exception as noticed by J.Perret 1993 which are « dates of school holidays ». This last criteria can be a factor with a fast effect from one year to another. The second group of individual factors includes satisfaction feed-back on the accommodation offer, lifts, sales network and other key factors of personality, attitude, motives, personal taste, age, lifestyle, perceived role set, behaviour. This second group of criteria deals with sociocultural changes and individual behaviour. Lifestyle and behaviour need usually decades to evolve. They cannot generate a drop in demand in one year. But they can build a trend adverse to the ski resorts if they do not take into account these evolutions. The studies done are based on quantitative and qualitative surveys. The knowledge of individual behaviour is clearly determinant. But this gives no indications concerning volume of market trends generated. We are not sure that one sociocultural demand generates a correlated business demand. • 3.1.4 - In the factual crisis : the uncontrollable factors of variation in the volume of demand - such as the lack of snow, economic crisisThe climatic factors (sun and snow) are unanimously pointed out as responsible 22/10/12 PAGE.28 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER for variations. They are fast effect factors by nature. METEO France forecasts an increase of 1,8° for year 2020. This slow effect will affect the trend of the market but until now variations remain in usual observed tolerances. The economic context showing a growth in unemployment within the middle class could provide one significant factor towards a decrease in attendance. Whereas, the creation of a fifth holiday week in 1984 might have enabled more people to take advantage of winter holidays. The main variables named by the researchers indicating a difficult economic context are purchasing power, confidence in the future, unemployment. We have not found a correlation research into the correlation between the trend of the market and those criteria. Over the last ten years the economic climte did not have a huge crisis or crash. We classify it as a slow effect factor even if a sudden event could generate a fast one. Personal security preoccupations (terrorism, natural disaster) are fast effect events. There are no academic studies on that but examples are frequent and evident such as Egypt, Algeria or Paris -30% of decrease in attending during the period of terrorism threat-. Unexpected competitive advantage to external competitors, like unexpected commercial pressure or relative level of price due to parity fluctuation, can generate variations in one year. The growth of competition is normally a slow effect factor of the market. All competitors face the same constraint in their development. We think that only an important parity fluctuation between two direct and important competitors can really be classified as a fast effect. 22/10/12 PAGE.29 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER 22/10/12 PAGE.30 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER 3.2 - Conclusions on our goal Our goal in this paper is to point out the lack of analyses and causality link between driving and limiting factors and the fluctuations of the market. We first made a new clustering of variables coming from multidisciplinary research. The definition of the nature of crisis is more global and in the same time observed simultaneously from four different point of view : Structural, functional, demand and factual . Doing that we notice that few observations were combined to research the causality link between the market and those factors. Our second task was to select between slow effect factors that can act on trends and fast effect factors that can explain variations. This distinction appears very important for the management of resorts. It is a heavy investment industry. Trends are crucial to make investment in the right direction. If we can create advance signals of variation, this can help to correct the effect of an unexpected increase or decrease. Further research could be to identify key factors that explain demand and underlying trends of the market, and to measure their correlation. Doing that we can open the field for further research that can give more robust bases to manage resorts. 3.2.1 - The need for the study of fast effect driving forces We can distinguish between the trend and the annual variations of the market. We assume that the trend is explained by slow effects factors and annual variations can be due to fast effect factors. One of the major problems for management of the resorts is the limited variation of production as soon as the season has started. If we are able to identify early factors that can allowed an anticipation of the variation from the general trend, we can help to save lots of money. This adaptation can be done in two ways : the first one by keeping equipement closed and the second one by using more incentives to 22/10/12 PAGE.31 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER balance the negative effects of the limiting factors. The choice of factors can be as follows : a - climatic factors Of course this factor should have a great influence on the purchase of ski holidays. The level of snow should work as a threshold factor instead of a correlated factor. If the snow falls are too high it can even be a limiting factor. No researchers have studied the impact of sunny days on winter holyday. We think this can be as important as for Mediterranean tourism. Those two elements need a correlation research with resort attending level. b - Security and safety Personal security and safety preoccupation (terrorism, natural disaster) must be considered. We can study their impact on the level of stays. c - Competition unexpected competition due to a exchange fluctuation can also be analysed regarding the evolution of exotic destinations that are largely promoted during the cold season. For Lory and Pascal these destinations appear as important direct competitors d - The dates and length of school vacations in France This criteria is regularly pointed out by the professional press. It is true that the dates are regularly moved each time a new education minister is named. We have to measure the real correlation of the length during the winter season, the correlation of the dates with snow falls or sun and the grouping of areas of vacations that can generate a concentrated demand in few weeks. 3.2 - Economic implication from lack of knowledge of limiting factors Researchers have not clearly identified factors whose variations prove the fluctuations in the French market. That could mean there is no theoretical, limit to an increase in the market except the accommodations capacity or the desire of people to spend holidays in the ski resorts. 22/10/12 PAGE.32 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER We suspect that the variation of the purchasing power can be an economic limit because potential customers may not have enough earnings to go. But the economic situation for the coming years should not provide further purchasing power. The confidence level and purchasing power should remain down in the immediate future. Economic predictions, creation of the EURO, will keep France under high economic constraints. It seems unlikely that people interested in mountain resorts, but without sufficient income, will have any higher a standard of living over the next few years. These people cannot contribute to market growth. The renewal of lift equipment has remained stable for the previous two or three years, and the "lift stock" is sufficient to cope with a 30% growth without reducing comfort. We are unable to speculate on accommodation, however the recent poor attendance suggests an existing but unemployed capacity The Haute-Savoie tourism board calculated an average 28% of filling of accommodations during the last three winter seasons 1994/95 1995/96, 1996/97. Both can also appear as slow effect factors. The snow should have impact, maybe a threshold effect. But it is not clearly identified. In the long term (year 2020), if meteorological predictions on global warming become true, the lowering of snow falls might happen , but we will not take this hypothesis into account for the present analysis. The sunny or rainy days can generate a demand for holiday. They can be fast effect factors In fact if the studied factors do not lead to any growth limitations, how can we explain the flat tangent over the period from 1986 to 1994. The competition effects analysed above are currently described in marketing literature as signs of a matured market. If we are unable to find limited external factors, the stagnation of the number of French consumers must be due to the fact that there are no more relative non-consumers. If there are, then their income must be so low and the economic crisis so hard that they can be classified as absolute non-consumers for 22/10/12 PAGE.33 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER the coming years. In this hypothesis, we could conclude the maturity of this market based on the length of stay for French winter sports. The major economic effects of that situation could be the following according to J.Lendrevie, D.Lindon R.Laufer in Mercator 1983 P.135-136. • Disappearance of the weakest product and competitor. This would normally be the case, however many ski resorts are managed by the district and it would be almost impossible for a Mayor to justify to his community the closing of this, sometimes unique, local economic activity. • Lowering of prices. Lift ticket prices have remained constant over recent years. The major effect of strong competition would be the dropping of prices. On the bases of the SNTF sources, the best attendance year was 1985. We can therefore assume that the best price was at this level meaning, on average, 20% less than today. • Increasing commercial incentives. Sales structures are very rare in ski resorts in comparison with other businesses generating a similar turnover. We can expect an increase in the employment of professional sales staff. • Increase customer satisfaction. This can be achieved with quality products, architecture, improved comfort in payment, purchase and reservation services. • Segmentation of the market. Based on different meeting with representatives of resorts or consultant We think that no resorts have adopted a segmentation or customer targeting policy. This would be one solution for maintaining high prices and margins. These resorts would work more on their competitive advantages as opposed to their general 22/10/12 PAGE.34 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER qualities which means nothing. • Improved investment policy. This appears to be a consequence of the above stated comments. Managers will develop better purchasing techniques, not necessarily on general quality, but on the right level of quality and efficiency required. 22/10/12 PAGE.35 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER 22/10/12 PAGE.36 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER bibliography 1. Baretje René , Defert Pierre (1972 : "aspects économiques du tourisme" Bergerlevraut, l'administration nouvelle paris 1972, 355 p 2. Lanquar Robert (1983): "l'économie du tourisme", que sais-je PUF 127 p. 3. Balseinte R "les stations de sport d'hiver en france" revue de géographie alpine 1959 tome XLVI pp 129-181 4. Balseinte R "le nouveau classement typologique des stations de sport d'hiver" Aménagement et montagne N°8 décembre-janvier 1977 pp32-37 et N°9 févriermars 1977 pp52-53 5. Magnone Guido : les besoins de loisir en montagne rapport au ministre du temps libre . la documentation française paris décembre 1982 150 p 6. L.Moutinho « consumer behaviour in tourism » European Journal of Marketing 21.10 P.5-44 1986 7. SEMA-METRA 1987, National survey of tourist motivations, 8. BIPE CONSEIL 1991, National survey of tourist motivation 9. Bonnel&Morin 1988, 10.Ski France 1994 11.P.Arnaud & E.Dufau « la neige de culture » mémoire de maîtrise Université Pierre Mendès Frenc Grenoble 1995 12.Debas 1995 13.COFREMCA 1993 and CCA 1990 14.Bonnel 1987, 15.Entretiens de la montagne 1994+1995, 16.J.Scarafiotti « Potentiel d’attractivité des stations de sport d’hiver : une analyse typologique » Note de recherche N°92-06 du GEREG octobre 1992. 17.Dallas 1995, 18.M.Marcella, U.Yucelt « services marketing in the lodging industry : an empirical investigation » Journal of Travel Research spring 1996 P.32-38, 19.R.R.Perdue « Target market selection and marketing strategy : the colorado downhill skiing industry » in Journal of Travel Research spring 1996 p.39-46 20.S.Weber « Trends in tourism segmentation » in Marketing & research today 22/10/12 PAGE.37 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER may 1992 P.116-123 21.J.Thépot « la modélisation enscience de gestion ou l’irruption du tiers » Revue Française de Gestion Janvier-février 1995 P.66-70 22.INSEE (governmental agency for economical statistics) Annual Survey on the French holiday’s), 23.SNTF (Federation of lift owners) Annual buletin, 24.G.Mermet « Francoscopie 1995 » éditions Larousse ISBN 2-03-503094-3 436p 25.SEATM (ministry of tourism), 26.METEO FRANCE (French meteorological office). 27.P.Py « le tourisme : un phénomène économique » les études d la documentation française 1996, ISBN 2-11-003530-7 28.« stations de sprots d’hiver: difficultés conjoncturelles ou structurelles » Association Nationale des Elus de la Montagne congrès d’Albertville 1991 29.J.Perret « le developpement touristique local : les stations de sports d’hiver » thèse de doctorat CEMAGREFF éditions ISBN 2-85362-370-X 01994 337 pages 30.J.Perret « la crise des stations de sports d’hiver » L’isère économique et sociale N°3 1993 P.59-65 31.Mission « problèmes structurels des statons de moyenne montagne » Rapport R.Pascal au ministre de l’équipement, des transports et du tourisme 1993 32.L.Blanchard « les modes d’adaptation des stations de sports d’hiver » mémoire DESS université Pierre Mendès France Grenoble 1996 33.E.Flament « tourisme et crise :matériaux pour une réflexion » in Dossiers de la Revue de Géographie Alpine N°6 1991 , 18° colloque de Grenoble 1989. 34. R.Knafou « crise du tourisme dans les montagnes françaises : un système qui a fait ses preuves et son temps » in Dossiers de la Revue de Géographie Alpine N°6 1991 , 18° colloque de Grenoble 1989. 35. J.P.Guerin « motivations touristiques et crise des sports d’hiver ? » in Dossiers de la Revue de Géographie Alpine N°6 1991 , 18° colloque 1989. 36.F.Gerbaux « entreprises et emplois touristiques : les enjeux face à la crise de demain » in Dossiers de la Revue de Géographie Alpine N°6 1991 , 18° colloque de Grenoble 1989. 37. D.Clary « le tourisme et la crise, ou la mutation du système touristique » in 22/10/12 PAGE.38 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord. HENLEY MANAGEMENT COLLEGE associate : Hervé Saulnier ESC GRENOBLE DBA 9-4 WORKING PAPER Dossiers de la Revue de Géographie Alpine N°6 1991 , 18° colloque de Grenoble 1989. 38.O.Souveyran « à la croisée du tourisme international et de la gestion de l’environnement local : la crise? l’exemple de la martinique » in Dossiers de la Revue de Géographie Alpine N°6 1991 , 18° colloque de Grenoble 1989. 39.F.Di ruzza & B.Gerbier « ski en crise 1977 Presse universitaires de Grenoble ISBN 27061101113 40.M.Delphino « le tourisme en méditerranée : situation et prespectives économiques du tourisme » thèse de doctorat université d’Aix 3 1994 41.Starmberg « Studienkreis für Tursismus » im Urlaubreisen P.30 1986 42.T.Trove « tourism fights an identity crisi » The European May 5 1995 N°260 P.19 43.G.Haedrich, F.Gussek, T.Tomczak « Differenzierte Marktbearbeitung und Markterfolg imReiseveranstlatermarkt der Bundesrepublik Deutschland » inMarketing ZFPHeft 1.I Quartal 1989 P.11-18 44.J.C.Fuhrer « do consumer behave as the lyfe-cycle permanent-income theory of concumption predicts ? » New England Economic Review september/october 1992 p.3-14 45.W.D.Shaw « searching for the opportunity cost of an individual’stime » in Lands Economics february 1992 P.107-115 46.J.C.McCune « a downhill battle : Ski resorts fight for survival » in Management Review February 1994 P.38-45 47.S.G.Amin, A.F.Hagen, C.R.Sterrett « Cooperating to achieve competitive advantage in a global economy : review and trends » in Advanced Management Journal autumn 1995 V60 N04 P.37-42 J.Lendrevie, D.Lindon R.Laufer in Mercator 1983 P.135-136 22/10/12 PAGE.39 © Ce document est la propriété exclusive de Hervé SAULNIER et ne peut être diffusé ou copié sans son accord.