17Jun08 ITER cooperation innovation

INNOVATION TEAM
Results report
for the Open Innovation event
held during the
Finland / France ITER networking meeting
organised on 16-18 June 2008 in Finland
Meeting organisers:
1
25/11/2008
Event structure
• Participants:
• French and Finnish industrialists interested in ITER,
• French and Finnish trade promotion agencies (Finpro,
Ubifrance)
• Specialists of fusion-related technology, including one member
of the F4E steering committee
• Contributors to other Big Science projects such as CERN
• Goal:
• Leverage the knowledge and creativity of the French/Finnish
meeting participants to identify potential solutions to some of
the ITER and Big Science challenges
• Scope:
• Two topics: ”How to handle the ITER/F4E contractual
mechanisms?” and ”How to find business opportunities in Big
Science projects?”
• Other challenges and ideas than those presented at the start of
the workshop may be added, as long as they are relevant to
the two topics
• There are no limitations to the type of solutions that can be
proposed, other than what has already been decided / agreed
by the responsible organisations: actions by industry, action by
the agencies, optimisation of the processes, etc… are all valid
• Agenda and methodology :
• Morning session: subtopic detailing (what are the concrete
issues) and idea generation in a “walk-in” setting: people
coming in and out of their on-on-one business meetings are
paired and, assisted by topic experts, mark up the posters
presenting the topics.
• Afternoon session: Selection of a few solution ideas for further
work; solution concepts enrichment; action definition for
selected concepts
2
25/11/2008
Results summary
I
D
Proposed action
Who
could
drive
Who
could
support
• Become familiar with the three-tiered program organisation,
described in the web sites of ITER Organisation (IO), of the
National Agencies, and in the case of Europe of Fusion for
Energy (F4E).
Industry
"ITER"
• Support strong liaison between ITER and industry by the
Industry Liaison Officers (ILO) and the intermediary
organisations.
Industry
"ITER"
• Share industry project communications best practices with IO,
F4E and the national agencies
Industry
"ITER"
ILOs
“Trade
agencies”
Industry
"ITER"
1. ITER project information and ecosystem building:
• Continue action enrichment and planning in other meetings
like this one with other project stakeholders
2. ITER shared procurement process:
• Increase monitoring of and involvement in the early phases of
the procurement process, so the required partnerships can be
put in place early and so the solutions selected reflect the
technology state of the art.
• Leverage industry and other Big Science project best practices Industry,
(IRC, CERN, etc…)
Tr.agencies
"ITER"
3. ITER and Big Science contract referentials:
4.
• Share industry risk management and procurement best
practices with F4E and IO owners.
Industry
"ITER"
• Adopt common referentials (measurement scales, processes,
tools) in the areas of contract uncertainties, such as risk and
cost management, to enable more flexibility in the contracts
based on commonly accepted, dynamic evaluation of these
parameters and of their impact.
"ITER"
Industry
• Focus on technology transfer and value network building
outside the Big Science projects
Industry
Trade
agencies
• Mutualise resources to create the capability to prototype and
demonstrate complex solutions.
Industry
Trade
agencies
ITER and Big Science market focus:
3
25/11/2008
Networking meeting
registered participants
• Note: the Open Innovation event used an “open doors”
format where attendance records were not kept.
Approximately 20 of the registered networking meeting
participants took part in the event.
• Francois Henrion, Acrotecna
• Patrick Geraud, APAVE
• Christian Anglade, EADS Astrium
• Jean-Claude Morey, EADS Astrium
• Olivier Reuther, EADS Astrium
• Olli Virtanen, Bureau Veritas
• Didier Bienfait, Bureau Veritas
• Gabriel Marbach, CEA
• Yvan Measson, CEA
• Philippe Lavocat, CEA
• Francois Le Breton, Cefival
• Philippe Gros-Jean, Comex Nucléaire
• Denis Marty, Comex Nucléaire
• Francois Meyer, D’Huart Industries
• Sabine Portier, C2I
• Claude Jablon, C2I
• Thierry Hovsepian, Sagem Défense Sécurité
• René-Paul Bénard, Sagem Défense Sécurité
• Francis Muel, SOM
4
• Buhot, Ubifrance
• Arto Laasanen, Adiabatix
• Antti Lyytikäinen, AL Safety Design
• Jarko Niittylahti, Atostek
• Sampo Ahonen, Beneq
• Juha Palmen, CLS Engineering
• Sophie Schlichter, CLS Engineering
• Tommi Ullgrén, Codento
• Heikki Aalto, Delfoi
• Mikko Juntunen, Detection
Technology
• Pekka Tolonen, Finpro
• Ulf Sarelin, Japrotek
• Sami Mansner, Mansner Precision
Mechanics
• Tero Eskola, Mevea
• Erkki Heikkola, Numerola
• Heikki Sipilä, Oxford Instruments
Analytical
• Tapani Bastman, Sweco
• Mikko Siuko, VTT
25/11/2008
Notes
•
Terminology
•
•
•
•
Workshop notes:
•
•
“ITER”: ITER Organisation, European and national
agencies including f4e, ILOs and other ITER liaison
officers
“Trade agencies”: national, regional and professional
business development and networking agencies (Finpro,
Ubifrance, etc...)
Industry: current and prospective industry contributors to
the ITER project
Because Iter Organisation and the national agencies
were not strongly represented, most of the actions
identified focused on the role of industry
Detailed results
•
are available from Finpro or Innotiimi upon request:
•
•
[email protected]
[email protected]
Innotiimi France,
Espaces Antipolis, Valbonne
www.innotiimi.com
[email protected]
Innotiimi Oy,
Vapaalantie 2, Vantaa
www.innotiimi.com
[email protected]
+33 4 89 61 01 36
+358 9 855 3370
5
25/11/2008