proje ct title

French Global Environment Facility - 2007
FRENCH GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY
COMPLETION REPORT
P R O J E CT T I T L E
IMPLEMENTATION
Period of implementation:
French Global Environment Facility - 2007
Template comments are in italics.
PROJECT TITLE:
______________________________________
COUNTRY(IES):
______________________________________
INSTITUTIONAL MEMBER
PROMOTER OF THE PROJECT:
______________________________________
FOCAL AREA:
______________________________________
FINANCING CONVENTION:
REF: _________________________________
SIGNED: _____________________________
BETWEEN
THE AGENCY
AND: ________________________________
TOTAL COST OF THE PROJECT:
______________________________________
CO-FINANCINGS:
______________________________________
FGEF REQUESTED CONTRIBUTION:
_____________________________________
BENEFICIARIES:
______________________________________
PROJECT STARTUP DATE:
______________________________________
PROJECT DURATION:
______________________________________
CLOSURE DATE:
______________________________________
2
French Global Environment Facility - 2007
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The executive summary should not exceed 5 pages and can include the following content:
1. General presentation of the project
2 – Implementation organization
3. Significant evolutions of the context
4. By component: results obtained, significant facts and encountered difficulties,
variations with the initial programming
5 - Post project perspectives
6. Lessons learnt which can be applied generally
7. Take aways / Feed back
8. Recommended actions for information diffusion and communication (to disseminate
most relevant results of the project)…
ABBREVIATIONS
3
French Global Environment Facility - 2007
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I – CONTEXT OF THE PROJECT
1. _________________________
1.1. ____________________
a) ____________________
Brief description of the initial context of the project (can be extracted from the executive
summary of the presentation report).
Geographical and socio-economic context (reference to the map in appendix)
Institutional context and public policies
Other interventions and projects in the area
Description of the project contracting authority and implementing agency
Significant evolutions of the context during the time covered by the report, and events
having influenced significantly on the execution of the project positively or unfavourably
(commodities costs and market, political reforms and elections, macroeconomic issues,
etc…).
II. INITIAL OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT (according to the logical framework)
1. _________________________
1.1. ____________________
a) ____________________
Summarize the objectives, possibly under-objectives and results expected in coherence with
the initial logical framework of the project (replace it in appendix).
III. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT AND COMPONENTS
1. _________________________
1.1. ____________________
a) ____________________
1. Project stakeholders
Clearly identify the stakeholders of the project and target groups
2. Description of the components
For each component, clearly identify the actors and their responsibilities for the
implementation.
4
French Global Environment Facility - 2007
3. Supervision
Describe the supervision mechanisms and steering bodies which have been implemented
(steering committee, composition, etc…)
4. Resources
Describe the material, financial and human resources of the project
IV. CONDITIONALITIES AND ADDITIONAL SUPPORTING MEASURES
Assessment of the compliance with the conditionnalities identified during the project design.
V. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION ASSESSMENT
The implementation assessment is to be presented by component. For each component:
1. Results achieved
Draw up a table expected results/obtained results. For each result, the sustainability should
be rated from 1 to 4.
2. Actions implemented
If the semi-annual reports are produced on a regular basis, just refer to them when filling this
part (copy and paste the action tables). The actions are to be presented by chronological
order, possibly using the same format as the table provided with the semi-annual format of
reports. If there are too many actions at the end of the project, enclose the tables in appendix.
3. Analyze differences between the expected results and the results obtained
External factors related to the evolution of the context (it will be specified if these factors
were foreseeable at the stage of the project design)
Internal factors related to the implementation of the project (it will be specified if these
factors were foreseeable at the stage of the project design)
4. Flexibility and reorientations linked with implementation context
Measures taken to inflect the implementation of the component during the duration of the
project.
5. Noticeable effects initially not planed
VI – ASSESSMENT OF THE FINANCIAL EXECUTION
Enclose a detailed table presenting the initial budget and indicating for each heading the
committed/withdrawn amounts.
5
French Global Environment Facility - 2007
A second table will indicate the dates of filing of the expenses memories and dates of the
various reconstitutions of the account project.
A third table will indicate the effective mobilization of co-financings (dates and amounts), like
their use and assignment.
VII – PARTNERSHIPS ASSESSMENT
Presentation and evaluation of the initial partnerships and the partnerships engaged in the
course of project.
VIII – SUPERVISION AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
Description of the mechanisms of project supervision, missions of technical assistance,
meetings of the steering committee (enclose the reports in appendices).
IX –POST PROJECT PERSPECTIVES
Describe the strategy to adopt when exiting the project, the destination of the materials and
equipments (enclose an inventory), measures taken to guarantee the sustainability of the
outcomes and/or their replication.
Describe the actions of communication and dissemination programmed before the project
closure (seminars, workshops, capitalization).
X – CONCLUSIONS
1. Lessons to be learnt for the design of future projects
2. Replicable results of the project
3. Recommended actions for information dissemination and communication (to
disseminate most relevant results of the project) – if possible, append the ToR.
4. Topics to be focused and capitalized more particularly from the experience of the project
(to be included in the evaluation questions of a possible final evaluation)
XI – APPENDIX
Appendix 1 – Map of the project area
6
French Global Environment Facility - 2007
Appendix 2 – Logical framework
Appendix 3 – Financial reporting
Appendix 4 - Inventory of the materials and equipment
Appendix 5 - Detail of the contents of the CD-ROM which could be joined to the semiannual report (including in electronic version the ToR of technical assistance,
missions reports, Steering committees proceedings, GIS files and cartography,
selected iconography to be used in publication, etc…)
Appendix 6 - List and coordinates of the persons in charge for the project
Appendix 7 - Final monitoring & evaluation report.
Appendix 8 – Eligibility criteria sheet (see below).
7
French Global Environment Facility- 2007
PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT
DATE: …………………………
APPENDIX - ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA SHEET
PROJECT TITLE
COUNTRY(IES)
FOCAL AREA
BENEFICIARY
FGEF INSTITUTIONAL
MEMBER
PROMOTER OF THE PROJECT
Contribution Modalities to
eligibility criteria
Main results and outcomes
Effects
Impacts
(magnitude of the
effects)
Diferred impacts
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT
CONSERVATION
Direct contribution
Improving governance
Capacity building
Scientific and methodological
knowledge
LOCAL, REGIONAL
DEVELOPMENT
Direct contribution
Improving governance
Capacity building
8
French Global Environment Facility- 2007
Innovative features of the project (describe the main innovation in 3 lines)
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………
Nature of the innovation
Local/Transfer: Innovation at the local, regional, national level by transfer and adaptation of solutions proven elsewhere………..…. YES / NO
Absolute: Innovation on a worldwide scale, could be patented……………………………………….………………………………...YES / NO
DEGREE OF VALIDATION OF
THE INNOVATION
Modalities
Check
Validated innovation
Validation to be consolidated
Uncertain validation and/or subjected to assumptions and many risks or difficult to implement
REPLICABILITY
Geographic
Social
Economic
At the local scale of the countries concerned
At the multinational or sub-regional scale or close /similar context
Of general interest
Validated by the major part of the stakeholders and compatible with their short-term interests
Many risks and issues (motivation, subsidies, mediation of the conflicts, etc.)
Validated innovation
Validated but with a high economic risk (dependence to commodities market and costs, monetary
risk, etc)
Contribution to FGEF aggregated indicators: Place here the relevant indicators’ references (example: A-2) identified during the project
design process (from the table enclosed in the FGEF evaluation guidelines). For each indicator please mention the respective expected values.
9
French Global Environment Facility- 2007
Additionnality of FGEF contribution and “lever effect” besides the main financing:
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Contribution to biodiversity mainstreaming:
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………
Contribution to the mainstreaming of the adaptation to climate change:
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………
10
French Global Environment Facility- 2007
PROJECT RATING
If the project is not the object of a final evaluation, the final rating could be amended by the project supervision authorities.
Criteria
Insufficient*
(1)
Weak
(2)
Meeting
requirements
(3)
Very
satisfactory
(4)
A. Project design
1. Relevance of goals and objectives in the context
2. Satisfactory anticipation of risks and difficulties
3. Stakeholders correctly informed on the project when starting up
4. Effectiveness of implementation arrangements, adequate implementation capacity
5. Realistic estimation deadlines
6. Realism in the choice and quantity of inputs (financial, human and administrative resources)
7. Objectives, outcomes and outputs clearly defined
8. Flexibility and reorientation (4=none ; 3=minor changes from the initial project design ; 2 : any
components abandoned; 1= more than a half of components modified during the implementation)
A. Global appreciation
A. Remarks :
B. Compliance with requirements
1. Compliance with requirements and implementation of supporting measures.
2. Compliance with institutional, legislative and legal requirements
3. Effective mobilization of co-financing
4. Compliance with implementation monitoring procedures
5. Semi-annual reports meeting deadlines and complying with standard requirements
B. Global appreciation
B. Remarks
C. Implementation, implication of stakeholders and partnership
1. Contractualization of partnerships
2. Satisfactory implication of partners
3. Satisfactory implication of technical assistance
4. Satisfying functioning and implication of the project Steering committee.
5. Satisfactory implication of project supervision bodies (Institutional member and FGEF Secretariat)
11
French Global Environment Facility- 2007
C. Global appreciation
C. Remarks
D. Implementation administrative and financial management
1. Effective and transparent management of disbursements, payments, expenses
2. Compliance with procurements procedures
D. Global appreciation
D. Remarks
E. Implementation – effectiveness
1. Achievement of objectives, outputs and outcomes (4= all the outcomes achieved ; 3= most of the
outcomes achieved ; 2= half of the outcomes achieved ; 1=less than a half of the outcomes achieved)
2. Environmental impacts
3. Economic impacts
4. Social impacts
5. Institutional and governance impacts
E. Global appreciation
E. Remarks
F. Implementation – Efficiency
1. Efficiency and costs-effectiveness in the context
F. Global appreciation
F. Remarks
G. Sustainability
1. Economic and financial sustainability
2. Technical sustainability
3. Socio cultural and organizational sustainability
4. Environmental sustainability
5. Gender distribution role sustainability (adequate role distribution according to ages and sex)
G. Global appreciation
G. Remarks
12