WP4A25 – Mastercourse for Universities
Transcription
WP4A25 – Mastercourse for Universities
... ..· ....··· . PRO -TIDE Master course on Tidal Energy WP4A25 REPORT Alexei Sentchev Laboratoire d'Oceanologie et Geosciences (LOG) Universite du Littoral - Cote d'Opale (ULCO) 32 avenue Foch, 62930 Wimereux, France {http://log.univ-littoral.fr/} {[email protected]} November 2015 CJ-e l PRO -TIDE - " -.all.a-,._.,.llll'\llrfl4.t.'t IIIITI(II I!;Gl/l"f SUMMARY A Master Course on Tidal Energy was created and introduced into education program at the regional university level (Nord - Pas de Calais region). Master Course is given by Mr A. Sentchev at the University of Sciences and Technology of Lille (USTL), U. de Bethune (U. d'Artois) and U. du Littoral - Cote d'Opale (ULCO). The Master Course is also given at the U. of Sci. and Tech of Hanoi (Viet Nam). This is a part of an international education network. In this re ort all the ntations of the course are resented. PRO-TIDE ............,.,,,.,,.,...,...,...,..,,.2............,.,,.,,.,,,.,,.,,,,..,,....................,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,...,,,, ===----..a PRESENTATIONS MASTER COURSE PRO-TIDE .......... ...................................... " ......J. ...................... ...................... ....... ........................ . .... UNIVERSITE DU LITTORAL COTE D'OPALE PRO-TIDE Marine Renewable Energy (MRE) Alexei Sentchev, Lab. d'Oceanographie & Geosiences, Univ. du Littoral- Cote d'Opale, FR [email protected] MASTER Course on Marine Renewable Energy Plan of the course Introauct:IOn (Population growth, Energy production &REproduction) Status of MRE in Europe, in the world (some specific cases) Economic motivation, cost, evolution 00 0 Basic understanding in Fluid Mechanics (Frictionless Flow,Geophyso FL Dynamics, Tides & Tidal currents, Waves) Evaluation of Energy Potential and Advances on free stream turbine hydrodynamics Tidal Power Conversion Technology - Tidal Range - Tidal Stream -Other Introduction - Dt-tllft&IO (Uftreoctl --- O.!NftdttnerllJO {C--) ProQu<bOn tltctnc t {lltNrtn<t) Producllon 61tt1rltllt (Con,_I The demand of electricity production is due to population growth We expect production of 55 000 TWh in 2050 (170% increase) but it is strongly constrained but 3 priorities: • to garantle the power supply • to limit the impact on climate and envlronnement • to control the cost of power production in order to avoid the Inequality between countries Introduction The energy consumed by one person in different parts of the world varies dramatically... Country USA kW hours per person per day 250 UK&EU 125 Hong Kong 80 China 42 India 12 Africa 2 (poorest countries) There are a whole range of solutions being considered and implemented to reduce our energy consumption.Solutions include lifestyle I behavioural changes, technological developments in many areas, design innovations and attempts to change the consumption mindset of modem civilised society. The solutions for our future energy production seem to come down to: • The maximum amount of Renewable Energy • The balance from Nuclear Power For every 2 KWh of electricity produced from fossil fuels 3 KWh are lost in the generating process. The losses associated with WIT/H power are much less because there is no heat loss in the process Electricity production resource Energy production from fossil are dominant and even in progress, but why? A) boom in USA 19998-2002 (gaz), B) in China (coal/charbon) But the fraction of green energy increases (4% in 2011) ... Nuclear power decreases after 2011 (80% of elec. in France) Subjects of the course Panorama in Europe Potential of Electricity production (RenEn) by country RenEn Resources in Europe in 2020 (cf GreenNet Europe) 0.------------------------------ :250 +------1--- •Additionalpotential 2020 •Achieved potantial 2004 .?: ·E 200 +------IR•------ ._r... ii 150 +---- --IR--- --.- --- f-... .. w. oc. 100 +---- --IR--- -;- ---1! :! 50 .... < w ., 0 "" u:: IE UJ 0 "' !!! C) -' !:: :::> z -' ... "' Q. UJ w "' :::>"" ¥!!!. .... .... = "'i 2 Cl "' ll Electricity production in Europe ·..,..-,.· 0·-··--·- -····-··--- --- Since 1990, the majority of power convertors in EU are gaz turbines Europe needs tidal Ocean Energy Europe No control of energy in fossil fuel economy 53% energy imports €400bn a year 94% of transport relies on oil (90% imported) €120 bn in energy subsidies (excluding transport) a year €70 bn in subsidies to fossil fuels and nuclear Europe needs all renewable technologies 2020 2050 20% renewables 35% RES power I 27% renewables 80%- 95% decarbonisation 45%-50% RES power 99% decarb (RES) power Le potentiel des energies marines renouvelables Potentiel nature! theorique (dont celui non exploitable techniquement) Potentiel techniquement exploitable (sous contraintes environnementales et societales, variables et dependantes du developpement des filieres) (ex: eolien flottant, totalement absent il y a 10 ans, ouvre un vaste nouveau potentiel exploitable) Pour !'ensemble des EMR: Potentiel nature! theorique de l'ordre de 100 000 lWh/an (d'apres IPCC) • Eolien offshore pose: potentiel de lSOGW en Europe pres des cotes (500 lWh/an) • Eolien offshore flottant: potential N x1000 lWh/an • Maremoteur: ressource mondial 380 lWh/an • Hydrolien: potential mondial techniquement exploitable 450 TWh/an • Houle: potential techniquement exploitable en Europe 1 400 TWh/an • ETM: potential nature! (difference de temperature 20j 80 000 TWh/an Production globale: energie tidale- 0.5 GW, energie renouvelable 0.5 TW, toute energie 2.5TW Energies marines 5 ressources- 5 technologies-5 opportunites Tidal stream Gestion des ressources marines•.• •.• de Ia diversite des EMR Eo/len flottant Hydro/len iollenpose Mat&moteur Houlomoteur t I _J_ _ _ _ ETH ,-------- ... 5 segments strategiques M _ _ _ ------------T·---------------------1 I I I Pression osmotlque Haturltes et potentlels echelonnes Avant2005 Date de demmaae eommerrial .....,.aw I'O Rn&l T11dm/qu11met fitploltabl11 (PTfJ • •aw l Energie eolienne offshore Perspectives vent plus fort, plus constant, mieux previsible qu'a terre moins de conflits d'usage et d'espoce qu'a terre besoin de R&D : prevision de Ia production.notamment a court terme Contraintcs coOt d'installotion et d'exploitation aujo1.1rd'hui plus tleves que le terrestre:au global, on posse de <80€/MWh a >200€/MWh actuellement, objectifs 2020 -> deti : reduction des coOts autres usages dans Ia zone cotiere :poysoges, peche, nautisme... -> connaissonce des impacts reglementation a Techniques transposition en mer des eoliennes terrestres ; depuis 1990 au Danemark sur pieux, gravftaires, jacket {treillis metallique), mixtes... installation par barges offshore et navispiciafises maintenance difficile: exigencede fiabilite Amelioration de ta fiabilite (corrosi . fouling. effet de sillag ) • f• Charles Francis Brush, le grand-pere des eoliennes Les batteries d'accumulateur de son laboratoire ont ete alimentees pendant 20 ans au moyen de Ia premiere eoli enne fonctlonnement automatique de l'histoire,gigantesque pour l'epoque- 17 metres de haut, lourdes pales en cedre produisalent une puissance de 12 kilowatts. a Potentiel eolien offshore puissance et rentabilite Special case: Scotland,Denmark (100% and 80% of Elec:.Con.In 2030 from HRE Evolution des installations Eol. Offshore (EO) --L....- EnW<gn de rAirt>us A380 80m Pare de Thorntonbank, au large d'Ostende (Belgique), utilise depuis 2008 des turbines de 5 wrN Crown Estate (Royaume-Uni) a acquis un prototype de 7,5 wrN developpe par Clipper Windpower On evoque deja des projets d'eoliennes d'une puissance unitaire de 10 wrN Un « pare eolien » ou « ferme eolienne » comporte generalement entre 20 et 50 eoliennes de 2 a 5 MW. D'ici a 2015, les pares pourraient rassembler de 50 a 100 eoliennes pour une puissance unitaire de 5 a 10 MW et une puissance installee totale de 500 MW. Certaines installations« farshore » c'est-a-dire au large (plus de 30 kilometres des cotes}, dotees de bases flottantes sont aujourd'hui en phase de conception Hlstolre: Pare de Middelgrunden (Danemark) est le plus grand pare eolien offshore en 2001. Une nouvelle generation d'eoliennes: 20 eoliennes de 2 MW, distantes de 180m et disposees en un arc de cercle de 3,4 km de long. Ces eoliennes sont specialement con ues pour resister a Ia corrosion.La nacelle et Ia tour sont equipees de systemes de controle et de regulation de l'humidite et de Ia temperature pour eviter tout risque de corrosion interne. La nacelle est equipee de deux grues hydrauliques permettant Ia manutention d'outils et de pieces de rechange en tout point de l'eolienne +/-de Ia technologie eolienne offshore Un nouveau potentiel eleve • La technologie de « EO » beneficie des avancees technologiques de « ET » • La mer etant plane, les vents plus soutenus, plus reguliers et moins turbulents. • A puissance egale, une EO peut produire 2 fois plus d'electricite qu'une ET. • La mer offre de grands espaces libres d'obstacles pour !'implantation, sous reserve de concertation avec les autres usagers de Ia mer • La duree de fonctionnement comprise entre 3000 et 3500 h selon les sites en Europe alors qu'elle est de moins de 2000 heures a terre Limites pour !'exploitation • • • • • • • • Une EO coote environ ou 30 a 50% plus cher qu'une ET. Energie eolienne offshore est egalement intermittente. EO est soumise aux efforts du vent sur les pales/structure, mais aussi aux courants. L'installation est plus compliquee. Des bateaux adaptes sont employes {500kE/j). La maintenance est egalement plus compliquee et plus coOteuse qu'a terre {200kE/j). En cas d'une panne, plusieurs jours sans reparation, done une perte de production. Le raccordement electrique: des cables sous-marins jusqu'a Ia cote {nx1Okm). Un acheminement en courant continu avec des convertisseurs electroniques de puissance afin d'attenuer les pertes d'electricite. Les constructeurs Les pays leaders Ht'!gi'.JU(' (•i"T ) Carvu:tf9 finJit:-'fV\9 ollc;hom 1t1Siallf..e d..'loie m>!){1e <Jftrl2012 cn;or. (9,2"Ao) 5538 MW Royauutt:·lini (52. 1 [)Jll)Cffl<ll1o. {!QG•O) En 2012, Siemens a construit 940 des 1 662 eoliennes offshore actuellement installees en Europe. Offshore wind farms: design, limitations, installation technique I. Forces, resistance, .... sQiutions 11 =>tfrr II !;!! v I I Particular requirements for quality of all materials II. Foundation inspection & protection {high risk of erosion: hole depth- diame filling with rocks & stones Ill. Under strong external forces, risk of oscillations System dimensions, de-coupling in frequency band, assessment of osc period "tt .g - -e r- .!! CXI ' u s Cl) 1-2 3 4 I Wave's period Rotor rotation I Period (s) 7 Floating systems 15 IV. Foundation & structure requirements, height, depth ... IGRAVITAIRE I ! MONOPIEU I . i .!! :::: til 5 MW, 25m w.depth, .5! ->6m dlam, 40m long, .1! Ill 6 em wall thickness, 450 tweigh c: :::: .s s For bigger depth, diam >Bm, length difficult to manage I') 8 1'1 ".. "" -2 ... .!!a .2! .Q g .e ... 2-.C: u-21 C'l l: ; I') " 1'1 le -8-2 Ill ill :; oo.. o:::: c: 0 '5E ,g Prototype 5MW onshore 1e V. Installation: 3 techniques l r;;;r L BMGE_.,., ........ NJTOE&DAnucf. Wind turbine 5MW. nacelle at 100m VI. Cable, grid connection VII. Maintenance conditions Calm sea (waves< 1.5m},implies a boat or helicopter, higly qualified VIII. Removing is highly expensive IX. Options for floating turbines {ali 1-11 IDU'vE'NTiL........y' l-J ! Energie eolienne: R&D --site de test a terre d'Aistom Wind : Le Carnet (Loire Atlantique) test de l'eollenne « Haliade 150 » de 6 MW (rotor de 150 m. nacelle a 100 m) bane test de nacelle de - unn•u'"" Realisation awe USA • Allemagne. France ? Bane test dynamique de 1!5 MW --- > - sites de demonstration et d'e sais en er : Plateforme Fino (Aile agne) : Mat instrumente permet Ia 111es1re : - du wrrt, des conditions ociano-mcteo, des irnpaGts Site d ais -\!p a Ve (AIIemagne) 2 types d'eollennes test&s (RcPower et Arevo Multlbrid 5MW) Projet de site d'essais ZEPHIR en Espagne Projet de site d'essais WIN en France • nouvelles technologies : eoliennes flottantes (plus de 25 projets...) Eoliennes flottantes · nombreux projets ... Diwet {Blue H) Principle power {Windfloat) NL!Uk/IT 3.!1 o !IMW ? l50 200 m ect..ll<o rCdult. 2008 Etuts-llnis !i o 10 MW "" tut .., PCII'fugal fill 2011 (pub Oregan ... Alai.,.) 2 MW on 2012? Poseidon 3 x 3.6 MW (2012?) Norvige 2.!1 o !i MW (2011) t>ancmork couplage avec: houlc Floating Wind Turbines Wind farms Hywlnd Statoil Technip Stavanger Norway, 2009 SPAR2,3MW anchoredfllnked Eoliennes posees r----------------------- Haliade 150 Alstom Le Carnet 6 MWturbine Paysage de Ia France apres 2 appels d'offres ... for more information, please read in Tony Barton. David Sharfpe, Nick Jenkins,Evrim Bossanyi 2001: Wind Energy Handbook 'Wind Energy o The Facts',European Wind Energy Association, 2004. 'Wind Energy Explained- Theory,Design and Application' J.F. Manwell, J.G.McGowan, A.L.Rogers, J.Willey and Sons, 2002. 'Wind Power Plants o Fundamentals,Design,Construction and Operation',R. Gasch,J. Twele,James and James, 2002. 'Wind Power in View',edited by M. J. Pasqualetti,P. Gipe,R.W. Righter, Academic Press, 2002. 'Wind Energy in the 21st Century',R.Y. Redlingen,P.D. Andersen,P.E. Morthorst, UNEP, 2002. 'Wind Energy Handbook',T. Burton, D. Sharpe,N. Jenkins,E. Bossanyi,John Wiley and Sons, 2001. 'Wind Energy Comes of Age',P. Gipe,John Wiley and Sons,1995. TidalEnergy: barrage and free stream Characteristics of TidalEnergy • Sustainable (as long as there is relative motion of the earth,moon and sun) • Perfectly predictable • Theoretical potential 7,800 TWh/year (39% of world consumption) Tidaltheory Tidal Energy: barrage and free stream i Pressure turbines i Free Stream turbines • High efficiency • Lower efficiency • High costs • Lower costs Why is tidal energy not used widely? lrdal tJower tJiants worldWide Tidal Energy compared to other Renewable Energy +--------------------1 Current E consumption {"'23000 TWh/year) 100,000"!.> TraditionaiHydro ----------- 10,000% 0,010% -1------------------- -l +------- -=,.-=----- +TPP Lake Sihwa --------------- Tidal:la Rance+ Annapolis + Kislay Guba o,oo1% +-------.----'-----,r----,.----' 1995 2000 2005 2010 Year[-) Attention: Y axis in log scale Indication of kWhr-cost 20 18 ----------------------------------------------- -f-------------------,., 20years • 5 % discount rate -- "----=--£--- - -+-• 2% O&M 20-40 year amortization • 0 1 2 3 4 5 3300 hours full load eq. 6 7 capitalcosts [MEuro/MW] 1. Tidal Energy is more expensive than fossil fuel 2. RanQe on-shore/offshore wind enerQY - similan Tidal Energy in some more detail • Fundamentals of tidal dynamics (more information on the subject can be found on http://www.co ops.nos.noaa.gov) Tidal theory Forces gCnt:rahices de mar.TbCorie de Ia marie d' uilibre. Gravitationalforce Foree d'attraction newtonienne F Gm,m, d' oti G = 6.67 JO1. I N kg 'm·'; m..m2: ma.c;ses des deux corps; d:distances entre leurs centres. Un corps de masse unitaire a Ia surface de Ia Terre est attiree par Ia Terre avec Ia force /·i-=G'"·l=g (N). R Pour le systeme Terre-Lune, avec les masses respectives mT, m1 Ia force d'attrnction du mCme corps par 1a Lune est: F -gmLR2 L- mrx2 (.r - distance entre lc corps et Ia Lune) . De Ia meme fat;on, pour une masse unitaire placee au centre de Ia TerrIa force d'attractio est· R2 '-=mmrr (r - distance entre les deux centres) . Compte tenu de !'eifel de Ia force centrifuge et du fait que les deux forces (attraction pa Ia Lune et centrifuge) se compcnsent au centre de Ia Terre.on constate que Ia difference entr les deux forces (foKe multante) varie selon l'endroit. Ceue force rt!sul!ante, provoque le dcplacement des particules p.a.p.aux autres particules et p.a.p.au centre de Ia Terre. La force gent!ratrice de maree eo point X est dfflnie com me Ia force resultante en X tl.i.p.au centre de Ia Terre, oii cUe est nulle. Cest une force difi'Crentielle. Gravitationalforce with centrifugalforce (rotating system) et z Centrifugalforce: rotating system and rotating Earth c<ntreof=of Earth·Moon system Fig. 5.1: Rotation of t.be Earlb and Moon about a common ceotre of mu:s lust vector sum of two forces .......... to the Moen <·· + wunfq4lfM• ...- 11dtldt l"lforn g avitanonQ/for«dw t drll>frx11l Fig. 5.2: Poinu .A, D and C l'ftOYO iA cireula.t pnths o£ the a.mo radii; CM is the n•ntce of ma....s o£ the Earth-Moon sysLem, and F 4 denotes t.bc ce:nt.rifu(;OI force ;,:. G.3 Rebotive Jtft!IIIM .00 dirtcli!ollll of SJ""ilational. 1;011ttifupl am! lido. raduda,f<lrces(.dapled&OIIl ,J9t1) Detailed but static view Vectors on the earth's surface in the diagram below indicate the difference between the gravitational force the moon exerts at a given point on earth's surface and the force it would exert at the earth's center,These resultant force vectors move water toward the earth-moon orbital plane, creating two bulges on opposite sides of the earth.See http://www.lhup.edu/-dsimaneklscenario/tides.htm for a full explanation. T11 distant atimet ing ma'IS The Moon turns,two bulbs also turn Semidiumal Tide Mixed Tide OiumaiTide IIWlet low tide 0 6 12 18 24 3836 4218 0 6 12 18 24 30 38 4218 0 6 121824:.1384248 Time (hf) Tlme(h1) Tlm&(hf) It results in a variety of tides Moon and Sun motion creates another dynamics (a wave?) That's why we talk about tidalwaves PERIOD SYMJIOL M, s, n (SOU.A Ha) AUPUTUDE (t'IJ:- 100) IZ.4l 100.0 12.00 "" ]I 12.66 19.1 1{, 1.1!17 12.7 K, 23.9 -"-• 0 p 2s.l2 lf.07 41.!1 19.3 Mt IDM 17.2 lumr- I>£SC1W'110N ------<>d>iUI M ala CODSiituom Lattatdue lO moalhty wartatloam IDOOQ"t d1s:CI.Dot cialudccnmt<m !Dm e ton aDct c:banps tacdot.m clm Sol&.r-l=u<COD$d:UJUI& MaiD lomar diurnal COOS1i!Uml MaiasobtdNn>alMooo'sf comtfu>e!>t Semi-diurnalspectralband (many waves,only few are important) Co-tidalchart (amp and phase contour lines) Zoom on the North sea Tide in La Manche TidalEnergy in some more detail • Fundamentals of tidal dynamics (more information on the subject can be found on http://www.co ops.nos.noaa.gov) Content Part I Useful power basic equation and Power Conversion Technology (TPC) - Tidal Range - Tidal Stream -Other Tidal barrage energy: some history,present state and evolution Basic understanding in Fluid Mechanics (Frictionless Flow,Geophys. FL Dynamics) Evaluation of Energy Potential Economic motivations,cost,evaluation factors ... Study cases Part II Evaluation of Energy Potential and Advances on free stream turbine hydrodynamics. Ultra Low Head Technology. lnnovtions ... Tidal Range System Overview P1 --. z1 II I I I I I-::.. P2 IIZ2 This was an innovation ... 12th century Woodbridge Tide Mill, UK tlpe U Tid.!.!miD onlhe ben&tuary. (Courtesy WoodbridgeTideMiiJTJ'USI) Elemtnu of TidiJI-Elrrtric Engin!!tnng. By Robert H. Oark Copyright Cl 2007 the Institute of E trlcal and EIKtronics Engineen, Inc. I France, Cotes d'Armor, Brehat island, Birlot tide mill, built in 1632, Advances in technology 1876 1934 fJt{ituk!t d.ert Toute ·sa vie, Kaplan se passionna pour les turbines et l'hydroelectricite. Son invention revolutionnaire, les turbines a pas variable, adaptee aux rivieres fort debit et faibles chutes, remonte 1912. Kaplan travaillait depuis 1910 sur ce projet lorsque l'industriel Heinrich Storek, directeur de la fonderie et des Ateliers Mecaniques lgnaz Storek,lui fit amenager un laboratoire dans les caves de l'Institut Technique de Brunn. a a L'invention de Ka lan « s12 h12urta d'abord au sc12pticisme d12s (abricants ritab/is . » Entre 1912 et 1913, Kaplan deposa quatre brevets import ants : • une forme d'aube pour les roues primaires de turbine (28 decembre 1912: brevet n°74388) • dispositif de variation de l'espacement entre deux aubes consecutives (J aout 1913: brevet n° 74244) • Le carenage du corps de turbine entre le rotor et le stator • Procede de formage des aubes du rotor garantissant l'uni de surface Turbine del'usine hydroe!ectrique de Niederllausen-sur-!aNahe,inauguree en 1928 ;Ia visitepeut se f'aire par l'ecluse de Mettlach. A c ela vint s'ajouter en suite le divergent Kaplan. TI presenta ces inventions aux fabricants intemationaux et au public lors du Congres des Ingenieurs et architectes autrichiens de 1917. Les conclusions pratiques de son intense travail de recherche se heurterent Ia concurrence penible et au scepticisme des firmes suisses et allemandes, dont l'essentiel de Ia production consistait en turbines Francis. Cette opposition feroce empecha de nouveaux developpements par d'innombrable s proce s de propriete industrielle, qui epuiserent les forces de l'inventeur. Outre les sou cis bureaucratiques, son travail se trouva interrompu a partir de 1914 par Ia Premiere Guerre mondiale. a Robert Pierre Louis GIBRAT (1904-1980) Les turbines de tres basse chute (1954) Low head turbine technology (1954) This was the second innovation ... Post WWII Revival of Tidal Power in France Oust before FR switched to Nuclear Power) Operational Tidal Power Stations T.P. Station Capacity (MW) Country Come into service Sihwa Lake 254 S.Korea 2011 Uldolmok 1.5 S. Korea 2009 Annapolis 20 Canada 1984 Jiangxia 3.2 China 1980 Kislaya Guba 1.7 Russia 1968 Rance 240 France 1966 Strangford Lough SeaGen 1.2 UK 2008 ·=-- '> " ':. Tidal Power Stations under construction and proposed T.P. Station Garorim Bay; lncheon Capacity (MW) 520; 1 300 Country ConstYr South Korea Severn Barrage 8 640 UK Tugurskaya, Mezenskaya, Penzhinskaya 3 640; 2 000; 87 000 Russia Skerries; Swansea Bay 10; 300 UK Dalupiri Blue Energy Project 2 200 Philippines Gulf of Kutch 50 2015? 20132014 ::!..-- - The production of power from tide in 6 steps Step 1: A location has to be found where there is sufficient tidal changes to create enough energy to power the turbines. Step 2: A dam or barrage is created. Step 3: Sluice gates on the dam allow the tidal basin to fill on the incoming high tides. Step 4: The water then exits through the turbine system of the outgoing tide. Step 5: Turbines are turned by the outgoing water producing energy. Step 6: Two types of generators are used at TPS to transfer the energy into electricity and to distribute it. Step 1: A location has to be found where there is sufficient tidal changes to create enough energy to power the turbines. The map above shows the patterns of tidal energy across the surface of the Earth as the lines of force. The red color displays areas with larger and stronger tidal ranges. Blue colored areas have lower and weaker tidal ranges. Step 2: A dam or barrage is created. Sihwa US$ 355 million Rance 94.5 million Euros at today's prices The cost of setting up a tidal power station can be very high, although once in place the operating costs are low. As an example of the cost of setting up, a proposed 8000 MW tidal power plant and barrage system on the Severn Estuary in the UK has been estimated to cost US$15 billion, while another in the San Bernadino strait which would produce 2,200 MW as a tidal fence in the Philippines will cost an estimated US$3 billion. Tidal barrages have a lot in common with dams for traditional hydro power, the resource availability and patterns are the same as for tidal streams. P(t ) = pA (t) = p gQ h Transmission Unes Q denotes the water flow volume per second and h is the drop height, called the head. Twice the head, doubles the power, the same goes for water flow. Natural ranges for these parameters are wide: E.g. Niagara Falls: Q=1,420m3/s, h=52m Val Strem (Switzerland): Q=0.71m3/s, h=216m Step 3: Sluice gates on the dam allow the tidal basin to fill on the incoming high tides. Step 4:The water then exits through the turbine system of the outgoing tide. Step 5: Turbines are turned by the outgoing water producing energy. Reservoi( Flooding l EbbGeneration The power that can be captured from water flowing from high to low level (half a wave period) is proportional to the squared height (or head): P{t ) = pgh 1 (t) Power: way of estim. (Dyan & Dalrymple'91) k 1 (bl Ftg. 43. nv.-8aoin TA' (Ci<p:>t-Oo!,.,. C)dt} (a) TPP --IUITO<rood bv diK\'\ for oorY1lU11Cat<>n -ald t.- raca l • TA' --2 - dam fer (&wlld>ng ., .) a! -wlh - of the Vonbo! t.,pe: 3 lTnhdepo..w-a otd-<oad!inogr<dJnJIllW.'.....,...ncicato flow dr..:.ono "' CXlfTll)lolf1co .. lh - •• ..,_ 01<1: SSH evolution (blue) and electricity production (red) """' don> 4 <1- - ,_.oog -tho ,...,.,• .- o cnmect.ont botWWl -• tho .,. . ll1d,th. o. ....-. " doogr"" (d <looglm "' the Cl<p:>t-Ooll:u cycie Th o1 pcwrts C D. E.. F.G. H. L C acc«dng to (a) Basin separation allows to modify useful power curve (c.f. Bernstein'96) l BARRAGE I BASIN ·········-··-·-·········- ···· zl ···· ······---········ ·····-- Mean Level 2 z =:::t:==--- DATUM The power available from the turbine at any particular instant is given by where, Cd = Discharge coefficient A = Cross sectional area (m2) g = gravity = 9.81 p =density (kg/m3) The discharge coefficient accounts for the restrictive effect of the flow passage Importance the difference between the water levels of the sea and the basin (Z1-Z2). Stator btJ1Jt Into ecncrete bamge Turbines used at TPP Bulb Turbine Rim Turbine (90oang) Pumping Tubular Turbine (Copyright Boyle, 1996) The turbines in the barrage can be used to pump extra water into the basin at periods of low demand. This usually coincides with cheap electricity prices, generally at night when demand is low. The company therefore buys the electricity to pump the extra water in, and then generates power at times of high demand when prices are high so as to make a profit. This has been used in Hydro Power, and in that context is known as pumped storage. Advantages Disadvantages Reduced greenhouse gas emissions by tidal power. It is also sustainable because its energy comes from the lunar and solar cycle. Effect on plants and animals which live near tidal stations affects a tidal basin ecosystem in negative ways, causing habitat changes for aquatic life as well as for birds that may rely on low tides to unearth mud flats that are used as feeding areas. Easy to predict There are a limited number of locations worldwide that have tidal ranges large enough to make tidal power cost-effective. Tidal power systems are currently expensive to develop and they cannot be built in any location. Improved transportation because of the development of traffic or rail bridges across estuaries Very little is known about the full effect of tidal power plants on the local environment because so few have been built Not many places have dramatic enough tide change to support a tidal power plant Tidal energy systems that use dams may restrict fish migration. Tidal dams, barrages, and fences may affect commercial and recreational shipping patterns requiring the need to find alternative routes or costly systems to navigate through a barrage or dam systems Some concluding remarks: To date, 520 MW are installed worldwide in only a few sites: Shiva, S.Korea (254MW), La Rance estuary, France (240MW), Bay of Fundy, Canada (20MW), others (6MW) Economics High cost High capital costs > €/kWh 2,000, but long lifetime. La Rance is in operation since 1966. The capital required to start construction of a barrage has been the main stumbling block to its deployment. Long payback time It is not an attractive proposition to an investor due to long payback periods. This problem could be solved by government funding or large organisations getting involved with tidal power. In terms of long term costs, once the construction of the barrage is complete, there are very small maintenance and running costs and the turbines only need replacing once around every 30 years. The life of the plant is indefinite and for its entire life it will receive free fuel from the tide. Possible optimization The economics of a tidal barrage are very complicated. The optimum design would be the one that produced the most power but also had the smallest barrage possible. Environmental issues Perhaps the largest disadvantages of tidal barrages are the environmental and ecological affects on the local area. Effects on local environment are very difficult to predict, each site is different and there are not many projects that are available for comparison. Potentially more flooding in the vicinity. The change in water level and possible flooding would affect the vegetation around the coast, having an impact on the aquatic and shoreline ecosystems. Silting: Similar to hydro power dams. Loss of intertidal habitat, as it alters the flow of salt water in and out of estuaries. The quality of the water in the basin or estuary would also be affected, the sediment levels would change, affecting the turbidity of the water and therefore affecting the animals that live in it and depend upon it such as fish and birds. Ecosystem perturbations. Fish would undoubtedly be affected unless provision was made for them to pass through the barrage without being killed by turbines. All these changes would affect the types of birds that are in the area, as they will migrate to other areas with more favorable conditions for them. Positive effects. Flooding may allow different species of plant and creature to flourish in an area where they are not normally found. But these issues are very delicate, and need to be independently assessed for the area in question. Outlook Only feasible in few sites, though with huge potential. Construction of tidal barrages are underway in South Korea and China. There are advanced plans for a plant in Kamtchatka (87GW). Plans for the Severn Barrage (near Bristol, UK) for 8.6GW have been scrapped in October 2010 due to cost pressure, as the expected capital outlay would have been £30bn (-£/kWh3,500). Case study comes here: La Rance and Sihwa Lake TPP Optional ...... Hr= f 11H Q = A2 g 11H (1- f) Pmax r::; '7 P AJgi1Hr 2 f (1- f) u" ul:'l 1 Head [m] 1:.! ,4 -Tidal Current Energy Resources -Power Potential & Production by InStream Energy Conv (TISEC) Devices -TISEC Device Innovations -Real Case Study: SeaGen Acknowledgement: DR. JACOB VAN BERKEL (Tech. Director of ProTide Un. Eindhoven, NL) DR. CUAN BOAKE (Tech. Director of ARR, N. Ireland) vVny use marine currents? Marine currents = High en A tidal current turbine gains over 4x as much energy per m2 of rotor as a wind turbine Energy Captured per Annum MWh/yr per unit size of system 10 8 Min 6 . l: - +---+-- 4 ! 1:S - t - - --&.z0 wave current Max n Typical solar General Principles 8t Power estimation Principe de fonctionnement Une HYL est une turbine saus-marine (pasee, ancree au demi immergee, ...) Elle transfarme I'E de l'ecoulement (Ec) en E mecanique qui est transformee en E electrique par un altemateur Une source d'energie prapre, previsible et inepuisable a Criteres de choix d'une HYL et contraintes Se maintenir en place et resister aux forces du courant; Turbiner durant le flat et le jusant pour praduire de I'E mecanique (rarement possible) Transformer E mecanique en E electrique; Minimum de maintenance; Minimum de gene pour Ia navigation, peche et ecosysteme; Produire une E un coOt acceptable; a Puissance de Ia ressource IF= cpP Ar v: I P puissance disponible en W Ar aire balayee par les helices p = 1025 kgfmA3 v vitesse de l'eau en m/s Cp = 0.3- 0.5 (coef de puiss. loi de Betz) Avantages multiples pour HYL: - coOt de production - transport de pieces - installation,maintenance Potential Tidal Current Energy Sites = requirements: mean spring peak 2 to 3m/s (4 to 6kt) water depth 20 to 40m at low tide however slower continuous currents can be used Tidal stream potential ••• real France: 2eme potential in Europe : 3-4 GW (UK: 5-6 GW) - The map should be completed - Plan of development in progress (speculation must be avoided) - Price of El. Produced (if buy by EDF) is unchanged 173 C/MWh opportunity Panorama in Europe Potential of Electricity production (RenEn) par country RenEn Resources in Europe in 2020 (cf GreenNet Europe) 300 --------------------------------- ..250+----- •Additionalpotential2020 •Achievedpotential2004 300 250 200 ;::.s: :§ 200 +----- 150 !:: 100 w•!;!:l 150 +-- - - 50 0 - wo ., u) ,g .. !!! E "' ?;- 100 t----- 0 "' "' "' .. f! iii c 0 iii 50 "' l; 'i"5' ·E "' (l) en :f <> <> .2 (l) .. :¥! . .. s:"." .., .., * ., u l!: 0 :g . .. Q) > 0 0 ,s::; ..r:: ) "' .!!1 .E, i .!! iii ... 0 "0' 0 :0 ftj ..r:: "' "' .5 0 E e a; . , .e., 0. ;:: s: ., 0 !; >- :t: "' :t: E = " iii 0 (!) rJ) European standard imyiEC I S.boorlbe I SilOmop J FIIQt Contact ua J ""• f"dbaok International Standards and Conformity Assessment for all electrical, electronic and rotated technologies You& tha iEC About the IEC I News & views I Standards Gavelopment \ TC 114 Scope aunb1ts Developing '"',.. > TC 114 I 'W -----------------M•a-•rh-- Webst ore Search dA v.:meed Donhboard Marine energyW · ave, tidal and other water current converters flll' Mdl@§ffi'@J t.l.!iiHJ,i@ ---@!d§MM TC 114 scope To prepare internationalstandards for marine energy conversion systems The pnmary focus will be on conversiOn of wave, tidal and other water current energy IntO electncalenergy,allllough other conversionmethods.systems and products are included.Tidal b ar ra g e a n d d a m in sta llat ion s. as co ve re d by T C 4, are excluded The standards producedbyTC 114 V.lll address TC114 -r-' Further mformat 100 Secretari at . Umte d Kingd om strategic Business Plan "system definitiOn • performance measurement of we'Ve.tidalandwater current energy corwerters "resource assessment reqwrements. design and survivability' ·safety requirements • power quality "manufactunng and factory testing • evaluatioo and m1nganon of enVJronmental•mpaciS w Contact TC '\14 Jffl<er; Kinetic Energy Conversion Methods Axial-flow (propeller) Cross-flow (Darrieus) ;-- - - B- ----..... Lift-based kinetic energy converters or "underwater windmills" IIIli p = 11."h.pAV3 Support structures Limited to 20- 40m Piled Jacket Basic Tecnologies Horizontal axis devise (mostly developed) Hydrofoil devise Incident flow pushes up and down a foil (aile). A hydraulic system converts the Emec in electricity Vertical axis devise Ducked turbine uses Venturi effect Conventional approach Actuator disc theory Example comes here (Hou/sby eta/., 2008) Free Flow Turbine Theory Actuator disc model -P _1 ... ..........·····... -- .............. _ ..... -- -- .,._.,. PRO-TIDE _,.-- v=2/3 v1 pressure · ·········--··-e.. -·-··· ,.········· v2=1/3 v1 1D Actuator Disc Model, Houlsby, 2008, Roc, 2013 Xt- a Poo =-:pAr v; (1 +a Axial velocity through a turbine, Mikkelsen, 2003 a = V/Vt 2) '7 =_!._(1+aXI-a 2 ) max=(16 / 27)=0.592 Betz 2 1 P= Cp p Ar v13 2 Wind Turbine Theory {modified) PRO-TIOE Violating Betz-Limit Efficiency > 59 % ! Boundary layer effects, Adamski, 2013 (ANSYS Fluent simulation) I I I I I I AR I I I I :: I I I I I _!) -- : -- f----------- --1 I I T I __ ij t----- I I I I I I I I I I : :: I I I I I 4 A .J., I I I Mixing Us= u _ I · I 1D Actuator Disc Model. Houlsbv. 2008 (Whelan. 2009) HAMCT (2) : Lift, Ducted Typical Ducted Turbine Sueamtube Boundary .L PRO-TIDE Typical Unducted Tu:bine Sueamtube Boundary -j?.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . -- : : :.:: {·; . ·.. -- ..,.... ..,.. .... 4 ............................................ . Diffuser ...._ _ Figure 2.4:Sh·eamtubes In an unducted turbh1 Alidadi, 2009 Well known technology Power density Power Density (kW/m W/m2 35 30 25 20 2 v v P!Ao (kg/m3) (knots) (m/s) 0N/m2) 1,025 1,025 1,025 1,025 1,025 1,025 1,025 1,025 1,025 1,025 1,025 1,025 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 p 15 ) 10 5 o+--o 0.5 1 ---- -- -- 1.5 2 2.5 3 Current Speed (m/s) 3.5 4 Incident Power Density as a Function of Current Speed 0.1 0.1 0.0 Frequency of Occurrence O.O 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.9 l.3 1.7 2.1 2.5 2.9 3.3 3.7 0.26 0.51 0.77 1.03 1.29 1.54 1.80 2.06 2.57 3.09 3.60 4.12 Current Speed (mls) Observations: Representative Tidal Current Speed Distribution 9 70 235 558 1,090 1,884 2,992 4,466 8,722 15,071 23,933 35,725 &00 o +------+------+- L- Well known technology ---- 400 t------+------tT ---+ -3oo -----l--------r-T-- .. -----t--- 7-"'t--"....-- -\t----'\--- · 200 100 t------k:fi !j::«:::=ir-..--\----\-----.l 2500 0-------- ---10 0 20 15 Vjte$se de rotatkm (tlmn) 2000 Puissance e/ectrique en fonction de Ia vitesse de rotation du rotor et de Ia vitesse du courant Region I: Velocity below cut-in speed Electric power = 0 (rotor cannot turn power train) • I -- Flow power I I I ----- Bectric power I • I 1500 Region II: Velocity ,' above cut-in speed ,: Power (kW) Electric power = ,' fluid power x ! powertrain / 1000 Observations: II existe une relation entre Ia P mecanique delivree et Ia vitesse de rotation II existe une vitesse de rotation optimale pour chaque v Au-de/a, Ia P s'annule (vitesse de roue fibre) I I I I f Region Ill: Velocity abo'e rated speed Electric power = rated power efficiency ,• 500 -•/ l 0.0 0.5 ,• .4 1.0 III IT 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 Flow Speed (m/s) Typical plot of turbine output power vs flow speed In Region I, at velocities below the cut-in speed, the turbine will not rotate and so generates no power. In Region III, when current velocity exceeds the rated speed of the turbine, power output will be constant, typically at the turbine's rated power, regardless of velocity. Between the cut-in speed and rated speed, in Region II, the turbine's output depends on a chain of "water to wire" conversion efficiencies, as shown in Figure 1-11. There is no cut-out speed for tidal stream turbines, since even the most extreme currents produced by storm surges superimposed on the highest spring tides are not that much greater than monthly maximum spring tidal currents. This is in contrast to wind turbines, which must be designed to handle the I 00-year peak wind speed, which is several times greater than typical monthly maximum wind speeds. 100"/o water to wire power chain 90% >. SO% l:! · 70% .. 50% !S 60"/o pDelivered Electric = ATurbine X - == ... e" u" (!) A X 17TFC Water Rotor Generator -Gearbox 40% 30% 20Yo 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 11TFC = 11Turbine X 11DriveTrain X 11oenerator X 1JPowerConditioning Device Load (% rated power) 10% 0% Figure 1 11 Component Efficiency Curves 0% Typical values for component efficiencies when the htrbine is operating at its full rating are: • 11 Turbine = 45% (maximum theoretically possible is 59%) • 11 DriveTrain = 96% • 11 Generator= 95% • 11 Power Conditioning = 98%. eagen ower .,-. ·\ SeaGen delivers .... full power 14 octoa generator speed 1300hr 1 0001) 1400hr 1500hr 1600hr t6 00.00 Advantages et weak points in-stream technology cf: document « Analyse de differentes filieres energetiques » Cost of production & policy of buying of the energy 0.6 Wind offshore o.ss Wind onshore o.s ele<:triclte 0,45 $ 0,35 1:! E Solar thermal electricity 'E Photovoltaics 0,3 0,25 ;; .. Tide & Wave 0,4 .J: <I) "a . ' : l " u •cost range (LRMC) PV:430 to 1640 E!MWh . Hydro small-scale 0,2 0,15 Hydro large-scale 0,1 Geothermalelectricity o.os 0 .. 'f::}t:. b'o " ""' , -6 ...,< '$' .y .,.o Biowaste (Solid) Biomass Solid) Biomass co-firing Biogas 200 0 50 100 150 Costs of electricity (LRMC- Payback time: 15 years) [€JMWh) ' Filiiue Arretes Duree des contrats 1mars 20ans 2007 Hydraulique Biogaz et methanisatioo 10 juillet 15 ans Energie eolienne 1Q ll!ill t 15 ans 2.rul§ (terrestre) 20 ans {en mer) Example de tarifs pour les nouvelles installations 6,07 c{lkWh + prime comprise entre 0,5 et 2,-5 pour les petites installations + prime comprise entre 0 et 1,68 c£/kWh en 11iver selon Ia regularite de fa production entre 7,5 et 9 c,:€lkWh selon Ia pt,tissance, + prime. a l'eflicacite energetique comprise entre 0 et 3 c€1kWh ,+ prime a Ia methanisatinn de 2c€1kWh . - eolien terrestre :8,2 c€1kWh pendant 10 ans, puis entre 2,8 et 8,2 c€1kWh pendant 5 ans selon les sites. - eolien en mer :13 cflkWh pendant 10 ans,puis entre 3 et 13 c€1kWh pendant 10 ans selon les sites. Energie photovoltalque 1g juille1 20 ans - Metropole :30 c€/kWh • + prime d"integration au bati de 25 c€/kWh - Corse, OOM, Mayotte : 40 c€/kWh , + prime d'inhigration au bati de 15 c€/kWh . Geothermie 10 iMill ! 15 ans - Metropole : 12 c€/kWh • + prime a fefficacite energetique comprise entre 0 et 3 c€/kWh - DOM : 10 c€/kWh + prime a l'efficacite energetique comprise entre 0 et 3 c{lkWh . :Pour Ia filiere solaire photovoltaique, un gud i e technique precise les criters d'elgibilite des equipements de production d'electricite photovolta que pour te benefice de Ia prime < 'integration au bati definie rannexe de rarrete du 10 juillet 2006. a Conclusions Alors Ia France, a Ia tra!ne ? « On a de bonnes idees, de bons concepts, de bons industriels », constate Alain Clement, directeur du laboratoire de mecanique des fluides de !'ecole centrale Nantes, qui teste depuis plusieurs annees un systeme houlomoteur tres novateur. «On sent que. dans les discours au moins, les energies marines decollent. Maison reste tres timide au niveau de !'action.» Ces demieres annees, les acteurs ont ainsi reclame quatre axes de soutien : une strategie nationale coherente, une rude financtbre A Ia R&D, Ia creation d'un s1te d'essru en mer, et la nuse en pace d'un tarif d'achat attractif. Or, a ]'exception de ce dernier (0,15€/kWh en France contre 0,22 a 0,25 au Portugal et en Grande-Bretagne), les vreux de Ia filiere son1 en train de se realiser. Un developpement massif de cette technologie hydrolienne semble possible, mais doit etre soutenue par une reelle volonte politique, notamment travers des 1arifs de rachat. d'electricite plus attrayant. Selon Herve Majastre, l'un des dew-: fondateurs d'Hydrohelix, les courants littorau.x bretons et normands sont capables de fournir entre 6 et 12% de l'electricite n&essrure a Ia France. 11 faudrait installer 4 SOO hydroliennes au fond des mers pour parvenir a un tel mveau de prOduction. Ceia represente un r1deau d heliCes de quelque 21 km, dissemn'le a moms de 6 kill des cotes, entre les fles de Sein et Ouessant et face au cao de.la Hague, dans le Cotentin. 6000 emplois pourraient etre crees. Toujours d'apres Herve Majastre, le coi'tt de l'electricite des hydroliennes serait equivalent a celui des eoliennes (entre 1 et 1,3€ le watt). La productivite de Ia technologie hydrolienne est superieure a celle des eoliennes. La qualite de 1a production permet une exploitation plus aisee. L'impact visuel est sans commune mesure avec l'eolien. et !'acceptation sociale devrait en etre largement facilitee. a Deux exemples de prototypes en fonctionnement • Le pro jet SeaGen [41 [SJ Le premier prototype mis au point par Ia societe anglaise « Marine Current Turbine » est le prototype Seaflow, une hydrolienne a simple rotor de 300 kW installee dans le detroit de Bristol. Le produit commercial est base sur le prototype SeaGen (2005), qui est installe a 400 metres du rivage, et pese plus de 1000 tonnes. Pour Ia maintenance, les pales remontent et s'immobilisent horizontalement au dessus de Ia surface de l'eau. Mesurant 16 metres de diametre, les rotors balayent un secteur de 402 metres carres. Les deux rotors developpent une puissance 1200 kW (2x 600) et fonctionnent environ 20h par jour. Le principal interet de ce prototype est !'orientation des pales qui varie : cela permet de limiter Ia vitesse de rotation en cas de courant trop important, done de limiter Ia fatigue de Ia structure, exactement comme sur une eolienne. II est meme possible de mettre Ia pale en drapeau (le bord d'attaque face au courant) de maniere a l'arreter tout doucement, meme par fort courant. Entin en faisant varier le pas de 180 degres, les rotors fonctionnent quand les courants vont dans les deux sens. L'inconvenient majeur est le cout d'installation tres eleve de cette machine: 4500 €/KW, dont 50% pour Ia fabrication, 30% pour !'installation et 20% pour le raccordement au n!seau. En 2011-2012, Marine Current Turbines compte installer Ia premiere "ferme" d'hydroliennes a but commercial. Elle sera probablement constituee de 3 ou 4 unites a double helices, ce qui permettrait d'obtenir une puissance de 4 a 5 MW. Le projet Semi Submersible Turbine[6J La compagnie londonienne TidalStream, a mis au point en 2006-2007, un nouveau type d'hydrolienne facile d'entretien qui fonctionne en eaux profondes. Le prototype, appele Semi-Submersible Turbine ou SST, devra operer a Pentland Firth C'est un appareil compose de 6 turbines de 20 m de diametre pour une puissance maximale totale de 10 MW. Elle sera installee a 60 metres de profondeurs et pesera 1100 tonnes. Le cout de Figure S : Prototype SST l'energie pourrait atteindre 0,045 euro/kWh. Le systeme a ete valide par des essais qui ont eu lieu dans Ia Tamise. Le Dr John Armstrong, responsable du design du SST, pense que le systeme sera operationnel en 2010. Cet appareil a les avantages suivants: une installation facile, une grande utilisation des courants qui le traverse car il est equipe des plusieurs helices et qu'il s'oriente facilement grace a son bras pivotant. Cependant, ce type d'hydrolienne utilise de nombreux systemes qui risquent de tomber en panne (comme les ballastes utilisees pour remonter les helices, les pas reglables des pales,...), et il provoque une gene pour les bateaux puisqu'il n'est pas totalement immerge. [4] http://www.ifremer.fr/dtmsi/colloques/seatech04 [5] ww.marineturbines.com [6] www.tidalstream.co.uk Examples: MCT Seaflow & SeaGen Just to remind that it exists a non-zero potential in Vietnamese waters Fig.18. Zone de fort potentlel hydro/len a l'et:heiiB mondlaiB (Soue : http:/lwww.atlanti!lresources<:orporatlon.t:om/marlnB-powBr/global-re.oun:B!I html) Examples of turbines (FSC) ••• much more inf in ProTide document Goals: in ProTide 1. Reduce costs, especially for low head,low flow turbines 2. Reduce environmental impact - Fauna friendliness: Fish,Mammals - Morphology - Basin ecology 3. Stimulate Public Private Partnership Improve technology Governance Advances in Ultra Low Head Technology 1. Fish friendly Turbines 2. Aerated Siphon 3. HydroVenturi 4. Civil Engineering PRO -TIDE PRO-TIDE_ Fish Friendliness ucttM 1 Tile Ald•ll Turblno A!JIIN 5.1magts from blgMpeecl Video of rainbow ttout blade strikes forUl mUos ol25 (top pbotos) and 1(bottomphotos), ALDEN Solving low problems since 1694 e I-I ElECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE Fish Friendly (Tidal) Turbines - Nijhuis Pentair {NL) Patented Technology PRO-TIDE VLH: Very Low Head Turbine Embryonic Technique: II Tidal Fence PRO-TIDE • Ultra Low Head • "Open Navigation" IT-Power, and many others.... Siphon air-turbine Aerated Siphon PRO-TIDE- F" urr 1: Idea is not new ... (cf. Bernshtein'95) -- of TPP. f ew . enerator o n 1'f coupled Wit h a g ) 't could be great ... • (h'-s generation 1 peed rot ,I Hn Some efforts have been already accomplished in Russia (cf. Bernshtein'95) F.g. 1:216 l!'illlS!lO"tatOO of the Love HEPP lloatong ea.ssoos 8C10!1$ tile Allarllle Oa:3n oo a Civil Construction PRO-TIDE jl Turbines are not the only components that count Remove dam core; 10 Turbines; 135 Anticipated Direct Costs TPP Brouwersdam,MIRT 2010 --·--------·--- Civil construction SIHWA TPP, Korea, 2010 (VAtech-hydro, Andritz) Plastic membrane dams Severn, Hafran Power TU Delfts (NL) Van der Ziel PRO-TIDE HydroVenturi Bernoulli's principle (energy equation): a; + ------- v2 +: + gz = /(t), Frictionless flow: High velocity, Low pressure r:a:=r:::: . PRO-TIDE_ System Overview -·-------- Tidal Stream HAMCT (1) : Lift, open MCT-Seagen (now Siemens) Evopod Cygnet Morild HAMCT (2): Lift, open Tocardo HAMCT (2) : Lift, Ducted PRO-TIDE Lunar Energy Clean Current Under Water Electric Kite Tidal Energy Pty Open Hydro HAMCT (3): Drag, open PRO-TIDE'! Aquaphile Rutten VAMCT (3) PRO-TIDE Ponte di Archi Blue Energy ( f Ocean Mill (IHC) Sea Power International Edinburgh designs PRO-TIDE Orthogonal Turbine (RusHydro JCNies) ;RO -TIDE Orthoqonal Turbine (RusHydro JCNies) Multi story (shared axis) Top view flow pattern Tidal Stream Innovations (IHC) PRO-TIDE Part Ill Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) Ocean Wave Energy Conversion (OWEC) Osmotic Energy Conversion Part IV Research in LOG Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) 80' N 26 Constraints : Big/heavy installation at zones cyclonic activities (Pipe-lines,surf. Plate formes •••) - En. transport toward the consumer (future de hydrogen transport) 2«- v 24 40'N 23 22 21 0' 20 19 18 40'S .. ? Evaluation du productible .. Limitations: transport,impact 17 16 100'W 100'E Map of the temperature difference between surface and depth of 1000 meters, showing the region open to develop OTEC technology. Blue contour- area with possible production during the whole year. Energy experts believe that OTEC could produce GW of electrical power if it could become cost competitive with conventional power technologies. Tropical islands are the most likely areas for OTEC development because of their growing power requirements and their dependence on expensive imported oil. To bring the cold water to the surface, OTEC plants require an expensive, large diameter intake pipe, which is submerged 1OOOm or more into the ocean's depths. French DCNS projet of 20 MW For Martinique Is., Caribbean Sea Air-condition & thermal pump Desalfnallld wat&r OTEC ,,,_ 8Jdldlng <IOIHIIIlanlrtg l tfgat!On Cold·W11..., refrlgefallon lllr-cqodlttonfng Environmental impacts -low if the site is selected carefully. - appropriate spacing of plants throughout the tropical oceans can eliminate negative impacts on ocean temperatures and on marine life Economic Challenges - OTEC plants require a lot of capital investment. - Only a few hundred land-based sites in the tropics where deep-ocean water is close enough to shore to make OTEC plants feasible. "Thalasso-thermie" (.fr) = heat pump in the marine environment Ocean Wave Energy Conversion {OWEC) Map of the waves energy resources in the World Potential resources -290 GW in the area of the north-eastern Atlantic (including the North Sea) and -30 GW in the Mediterranean sea. Waves energy resources available mainly in the northern and southern parts of the ocean. Commercial energy plant location: Scotland (5MW), Denmark(?), Spain(?). Wave Energy Potential in Europe Wave resource distribution ' cl'tlluation du praductible 40 TWh/y Potential in France : JO GW - onshore I near shore I off shore French over-sea territories : - effective solution for population on islands - immediate access to the market - experimentation and fast exploitation Why Wave Energy ? •Energy is produced without fossil fuels •Devices are low structures and situated at sea they have no visual impact •W/En is more predictable and stable than wind energy •W/En devices produce more energy when placed far from shore at gr depths •Devices can provide coastal protection Reduction of the cost of energy farms due to: •Sharing the cost-intensive offshore installations (plateforms,foundations, transformers,power cables,connection,...) •Optimization and increasing the utilization of the available sea area •Positioning of W/En devices in front of offshore wind turbine farms will reduce the waves and ease servicing of the wind turbines •W/En inscr/decreaces slower than wind power and En. production is more stable •Combination will provide a more stable balance •W/En can be predicted 6-9h ahead with larger accuracy,thus it is cheaper to integrate in the electrical system. HOMERE database: Wave climatology in Manche - Gascogne WAVEWATCH Ill hindcast {1994-2012) Provides complete wave statistics .:·:"''··.: ..·::/:!.;. ::': .. ..... , • et •·!•• > • " .i '..'*' .- ... •:! ,,. ... l': ·...: - ·-··'-·--''•::_,... . I . ·,\ :·.:.::. ':' ...:::·: .. '\ L''-"'•i --•'•\.\. er>'il 4fl $ I'!) f e G •• e '1) e f) Q) e til (!) (D (0 • • $ (tl) G> fl) • ., fit > il tb 0 II i) ¢! (; (if ($ $ (j. $ e• (:) G (l e G $ Mean power per lm for wave power 1/6 Pelamis: offshore wave energy converter (180m long, 4m in diam) Fig.23. Principe de ftmctiannement de /11 chaine ffotante Pe/11mls http:llwww.pelaml•wave.com} @ • (Soun:e: Operating in water depths greater than 50m. The machine consists of a series of semi submerged cylindrical sections linked by hinged joints. As waves pass along the length of the machine, the sections move relative to one another. The wave-induced motion of the sections is resisted by hydraulic cylinders which pump high pressure oil through hydraulic motors via smoothing hydraulic accumulators. The hydraulic motors drive electrical generators to produce electricity. It was first connected to the UK grid in 2004. Commercial production since 2008 (Scott) 2/6 Oyster, Aquamarine Power, UK Fig. 24 l"rlnci'pe d6 hHttliotJIIflmiN'It d• Ill fMIOI Oy.ter 0 .. (Source: http?'Jwww.Mf......W=O I!W=WDdc&? Power Connector Frame (PCF) is bolted to the seabed, and a Power Capture Unit (PCU). The PCU is a hinged buoyant flap that moves back and forth with movement of the waves. The movement of the flap drives two hydraulic pistons that feed high pressured water to an onshore hydro-electric turbine, which drives a generator to make electricity. Oyster is stationed at the EMEC site in Orkney, Scotland, in August 2009. On 20 November 2009, Oyster was officially launched and connected to the National Grid (UK) Oyster 1 (300kW), Oyster 2 (2.4 MW) 3/6 Principtl de fonctitH'IIHiment de Ia t:t1fonne -cillante • (Source: http:lfwww.tdfrlctu«t/on.orglartlt:WI1Illldng-wilm.wtpry.w; yebobl Fig.25. Wavebob system, developed since 1999, tested since 2006 in lrlande. The Wavebob consisted of two oscillating structures. These structures must be able to absorb in a variety of conditions and be robust to survive in the harsh marine environment. The structures are controlled by a damping system that can respond to predicted wave height, wave power and frequency. The tank structure (a semi submerged body) uses captured sea water mass as the majority of its inertial mass. This significantly reduces the cost associated with structural materials. 4/& POWER TO THE USER 15-50 METAfS WATER DEPTH SEA\VATER RETURH Principe du capde pnunslon lmmtti'Bti -(Saui'Cfl: Fi'g.26. http:llwww.t!lnHiffltl-v•.t:IHIIIJ CETO units are fully submerged and permanently anchored to the sea floor meaning that there is no visual impact as the units are out of sight. This also assists in making them safe from the extreme forces that can be present during storms. Recent work has focused on the design and manufacture of the commercial scale CETO unit (CETO Ill) and its testing in the waters off Garden Island in Western Australia. CETO ' . "'""'·lf•.JOD.«((S.Iotlt7!.•nlfl! J '-'' "· t'WI'f Urill'ltw \ : - "!t.:.fl''l"'l. ·- V£--... .r.; ·-vr-·•· ! . y.· f11r+¥ "t "-- (>f ' r,..... • I ,..,... :; f . 'tS:; r -. c.n..t'o C9< <>•t< .-o...n.n&. W < l lnefl )' ...... ._ • (tl'Q A tro ,....... Fig.27. Les sites d'investigatiDn pDur htte:llwww.csmegiewave.CDIIIIJ implantatiDn de CETD - {Source: 5/& oceanlinx Fig.28. Print;:ipfl de Is colonne tPesu ocesnllnlr • (Source: http://www.ociNinlinx.com/J The concept involves the use of waves to produce high pressure air, which in turn is converted into electricity by a turbine. Oceanlinx reached a milestone with the launch of the first 1MW wave-energy-to-electricity unit in Port MacDonnell, South Australia. The unit's rated capacity of 1MW can supply approximately 1,000 homes with their required electricity consumption. This machine is the first commercial-scale unit to be launched. &I& Fig.29. Principe du piege a defertement (Siot.C..ne Generator) ·(Source.: http:t!Wm.-u.dk/flt.s/52276928/R D t:Dnttnerc lizMIIH! of S.JI Wawr Slot Con e GenenlttH' SSG Overl!!pplng Waw E-rgy Conwttrftlr.pdfJ r-nt• The Sea Wave Slot-Cone Generator (SSG) is based on the overtopping principle. It utilizes a total of three reservoirs stacked on top of one other (referred to as a 'multi-stage water turbine') in which the potential energy of the incoming wave will be stored. The water captured in the reservoirs will then run through the multi stage turbine for highly efficient electricity production. The main focus is on opportunities to build the SSG concept as breakwater structures. Concept implemented in breakwater structures capacity will depend on local wave energy and length of breakwater Example: 20kW m wave climate with 50m breakwater structure has 1MW capacity We do not forget Australia and its great potential ... Status of Wave Energy development in Denmark Wavestar is testing their prototype with two floaters at DanWEC, Hanstholm Floating Power Plant in testing phase prototype with power production from wind & waves WavePiane at DanWEC Resen Energy testing 2kW level operated pivoted float Leacon Wave En is preparing testing Wave En Fyn testing their CrestWing scale 1:5 Wave Dragon is developing a 1.5 MW demonstration devise WavePiston conducting small scale tank testing WECs WECs Status of Wave Energy development in other countries Pelamis 2 at Orkney, Scotland PowerBuoy 150kW USA Ceto, 200 kW Australia & Bolt 45 kW, Norway Seabased, Sweeden, 25 kW module in a 10,5 MW array 20 kW, OE Buoy, Ireland BOO kW Oyster, Aquamarin, Ireland T Tidal CtJr rd:.4.8 MW + 1 7 MW" Wave energy: 2 MW + 2.4 wrw• · ( . Tidal aJrrent:300 kW Salmi'¥.4 kW • W'«Ve et ergy- 150 kW + 1000 kW" Todal ..,.,.gy:240 WIN 1i ..... A \10 Wt:NeEnergy *{ installation} 4kW+ 20kW" MRE potential: short summary for the World Osmotic Power Conversion Osmosis is a process in which a fluid passes through a semipermiale membrane, moving from an area in which a solute such as salt is present in low concentrations to an area in which the solute is present in high concentrations. The end result of osmosis, will be equal amounts of fluid on either side of the barrier, creating a state which is known as "isotonic." The fluid most commonly used in demonstrations of osmosis is water, and osmosis with a wide variety of fluid solutions is key for every living organism on Earth, from humans to plants. A semipermeable membrane is a membrane that allows certain types of molecules to pass through but blocks others. Body cells are surrounded by this type of membrane, which helps to control what substances can and cannot pass into the cells. By serving as a barrier between the interior and the exterior of the cell, it protects the cell from foreign bodies that could be harmful. Outside of the body, these membranes, usually artificially created, are used for specific functions such as water desalination and purification. ... works in Norway. capable to produce power in regions were fresh and salty water are available: estuaries, fiords, ... Statkraft (Norway) is the world's leader in the development of osmotic power. -- - - J lif . -. ; Osmotic power is clean, renewable energy, with a global potential of 1 600 to 1 700 TWh - equal to China's total electricity consumption in 2002. Based on the natural phenomenon osmosis , defined as the transport of water through a semi-permeable membrane. When fresh water meets salt water, for instance where a river runs into the sea, enormous amounts of energy are released. This energy can be utilized for the generation of power through osmosis. At the osmotic power plant, fresh water and salt water are guided into separate chambers, divided by an artificial membrane. The salt molecules in the sea water pulls the freshwater through the membrane, increasing the pressure on the sea water side.The pressure equals a 120 metre water column, or a significant waterfall, and be utilized in a power generating turbine. The membrane is the most essential component in the osmotic power system. Statkraft has been involved in the development of suitable membranes through several years, and in 2011 a cooperation with Nitto Denko, a world leader in membranes, were established. Seagen (MCT) The world's first and only official tidal current power plant delivered as electrical energy into the grid in UK Seagen History SeaGen Prototype Some key features:- -+ 2x 600kW rotors:16m diameter -+ rotors and nacelles raised above sea levelfor maintenance and easy replacement -+ transformer and electrical connection to grid in accessible and visible housing at top of pile -+ 180 degree pitch controlallows efficient rotor operation with bi directionalflow -+ deployment in arrays or "farms . Qf hundreds of turbines Seagen Life Cycle - Site & Resource Assessment (2oo4) -Device Installation (April2ooa) - Environmental Monitoring (2oos-2o11) -Performance Assessment (2oo9-2o1o) - Electrical Power Quality (2010) -Blade Loading (2011) -Turbulence/Wake Investigations (2009 7) Seagen- Strangford Lough CIS!!.:ngf:lro,OI.9h C =··Awl li I "'IIP'f • _..,goog e..;, l.c>9-> Cl flWC ;p!xe'Sn 01n9bd• o , ifl!C ..A.....'lll ll CIIC (.,j. •JI , '; ,..; "'-'- E.Jsrl'W t:ee., G FB l'•:4· - a,..., FUa 4 G9'l • 1!4G .:1 .f')C;:: •yo<,1;o, '':r - -· ' j( ' U ff!M @ m.t ll ' .&e! '¥;· - 1M! •PO QQUII W Aatt.B " ,,_ [.')Spe.dltd I!S s·o • ,. m II =. • Seagen- Strangford Lough Strangford Narrows Tidal Test Site Contours to MSL Speed m/s - -, : Jtl - '.3 -l.O 1·,- h 1'1$ 10 (11'1 -" I 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 - w Seagen Design ._ t.:mponuy platfonn •-" conductor • tube 1 OOOt ballast Seagen Deployment SeaGen showing quadropod (4 fee ) jacket structure being collected crane oarDe.:f;?J "Ra.........rw.,-.- Harland Seagen Deployment SeaGen installation (MCT) SeaGen - Cross Arm and Rotors SeaGen - Cross Arm and Rotors SeaGen - Cross Arm and Rotors SeaGen - Technical Solutions The first commercial technology Rated at 1.2 MW for currents above 2.4 m/s; cut off speed 1.0 m/s Twin rotors - Cost-effective solution (2 times more energy at lower cost) - Twin-bladed rotor is more cost-effective than a three-bladed one - Power trains (rotor, gearbox, generator) are outboard of the pile, on wing-like cross arm: rotor is not disturbed by the pile wake -full-span pitch control (180°pitch angle), high efficiency to stop in Ss - Cross arm (complete) weigh 120 t -Normal loading (at rated power) -30 t per blade - Gearbox and gen are passively cooled Top-housing/work platform contains all electronics for power conditioning and lifting mechanism (60kW waste heat is dissipated). It produces fully grid compliant electricity. High capability multiple turbines can be easily interfaced to form an array Power Certification power : : . -. kW r------------------- ---- -n--o..... ' ' 1200 -•••••••••- ••••••••••••••••. :.•-••••-•• ••••-•.ebb..u-•••-·•- •" f&,l'.f.&J I --.........--... . . j: :·-······;.·······:...····-······ ........,.. . ; 1000 "i· ..... . . :•........_ftooJ 200 4 •I .. .. 600 ....... ; ' r •v ·.· 800 400 ... .•. ....· ......!::· 00 ------------------2 3 rnls velocity ,, SeaGen at Strangford Narrows: Power Curve 1200kW rated Power • Peak average (Flood & Ebb tides) turbine efficiency (based on net power before turbine transformer) is 0.43 (Cp = 0.43) • Average Rotor efficiency of 0.48 (using current magnitude) • Cp spreading (best I worst) 0.52/ 0.45. Means 88% - 75% of theor value (0.59) Verified by DNV (lnt Marine & Offshore Certification and Classification Agency) delivered a Statement of Conformity on 27-Aug-2010 The overall system efficiency (inc losses in gen, gearbox, elect) ranges 40 - 45% Project cost Seagen Power Production SeaGen delivers .... full power 620kW -+--- - 14 oct -- - generator speed 1 1300hr 1400hr 1500hr 1600hr oa power ADCP Deployment- Cp/Lamda PotertialPower (top) •nd hghll{filtered GeneratedPower (bottom) 600 Available power y 500 .;M,,..,. . 200 Generated power fh....fv"J, 1oo -"'' 20 19"00 11-..\ II\J\N; tJtl"'. . JN¥\. )V tt" i'"'J;vi 'If 20 2000 20 21"00 Time /T' f \·l!,.\Jr'\ \ 2022 00 202300 Seagen Power Production During 4000 hour period (2006- 2010) averaged PP was 2800MWh 20h per day Power generation; 1000 houses receive Elec Power Facteur de charge 65% (pare eolien - 24 % en 2012, pare photovolta'ique -13,3% en 2012) Project cost ??? 25-30% reduction in generating unit cost is possible MCT Future Plans Horizontal arrays of smaller or bigger rotors Ex. A: six 8m rotors would sit in 12m of water and produce 660kW Ex. B: six 24m rotors would deliver up to BMW. Marine Current Turbines Ltd BENDALLS Engineering lnstitut fur Solare Energieversorgungstachnik Jahnei-Kestarmann Getriebewerke Bochum GmbH Marine Current Turbines Ltd 'W·' ...... . . - ··- '· ."" ..!.. -5 I Ai L Operational mode 13 'I'. Marine Current Turbines Ltd . "•• -:;., 11 · "' ..... } Seaflow gearbox - assembly at Jahneii-Kestermann 14 Marine Current Turbines Ltd '- . . ·- I{. ... ... Seaflow rotor blade assembly- at Aviation Enterprises l_ Marine Current Turbines Ltd " ·. - · . .. , Seaflow Project Pile and collar 16 Marine Current Turbines Ltd "L .... . . . . J L Seaflow Project testing rotor blade pitch system Newport - Mar 2003 7 Marine Current Turbines ltd 'L:,_ .-· . Seaflow jack up 'Deep Diver' drilling foundation in up to 5 knot currents and u to 25m water de 18 Marine Current Turbines Ltd ·-- W' _ - J'&·.. .:. Seaflow - Foundation drillin 1 l I i J ! 1!1 ""' onii.O to • t 5 m o•p>h b•low '"''' lm I w 19 Marine Current Turbines Ltd .WIML -·.- W '· ) Seaflow - Pile Installation It.ij 0 Cood,do" ood 9'PP" oon 'Omo_,d open hoe. ;:. 11 oo. og ooo;ng ond ft d, Cl!l buoX,!;Int ft,_ and H!_esented through drilled h e. 20 Marine Current Turbines Ltd · :,. ·.- , Seaflow Assembly ·#1 21 -' Marine Current Turbines Ltd . "· ·- " . , . Seaflow - Assembly #2 22 .. . Marine Current Turbines Ltd · . ' Seaflow installed 30 May 2003 operational 11 .. ,.... ., raised for access rotor dia. 11m rated power 300kW pile dia. 2.1m 23 Marine Current Turbines Ltd .. . , _ 'L -' . . ..e Seaflow installed First run 30 May 2003 24 Marine Current Turbines Ltd 'L" .-,_ - - , Visual impact from Exmoor 25 :w-· _ . Marine Current Turbines Ltd ''.f'•- : tJI!!t · .. · • Energy capture - Actual v Predicted 500 400 - - I :c I I I - - Energy Actual I -Energy Predicted ISET I I 300 l >e' Gl /, c: w 27o/o better / / / / 200 1-- than predicted / L ,_ -t 100 / -+- / -·-- - - ....,. 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 / -2.0 +--!- 2.5 -f- 3.0 3.5 Timefrom HW rhrsl Marine Current Turbines Ltd -- ·· ...... What has 'worked' The Fundamental Concept • • • • Axial flow rotor Marinised drive train Surface breaking monopile Structure :;. - -.,. -.' , • Low cost intervention • Minimal environmental impact 27 :W'' Marine Current Turbines Ltd ·· - L.· , :t'. The future - twin rotors Some key features:· + 2 x 500kW rotors:16m diameter + installed on steel pile + rotors and nacelles raised above sea level for maintenance + transformer and electrical connection to grid in accessible and visible housing at top of pile + deployment in arrays or "farms". of hundreds of turbines 28 Marine Current Turbines Ltd "L" -..., -.- . MCT Phase 2 Technology 29 Marine Current Turbines Ltd . .J - ...... 'JIItt . .. Planned R&D Programme Route to commercial production 2002-3 Ph. 1 300kW trial unit 2003-5 Ph. 2 1MW commercial prototype (SeaGen project) 2005-6 Ph. 3 5 MW farm installed (SeaGen Array project) 2006-7 Commercial Demonstrator Projects 2007-8 installed capacity over 15 MW 2009-10 installed capacity over 350 MW by 2012- installed capacity over 500 MW ultimate potential -- 1OOOs of MW 30 "11·· _ -· . ·.. • · ... -·· , ..JIA# . -. Marine Current Turbines Ltd Key Project Costs - short-term cost trend §' 4000 fJ) 3000 () :5 2000 "C Q) 1000 fJ) c:: Seaflow 0.3MW SeaGen 1MW DGrid Connection DInstallation costs SeaGen Array SMW Manufacturing Costs 31 ."'f'L Marine Current Turbines Ltd 1p = 1.5 Euro-cent :2 22 s 20 -- -t • Q) w Ill! .;.. ·...,, t. Driving down costs - ------1.................r...-- - + 18 1- - --t-- 71'---- + -+a. '-" 16 1----+-------i-----+----++-' 14 1------+----+--(_) 121------+ - -tl 10 t------+-----+--- .r-- -----r---(.) ·c 8 ---------+-----+----- ---t) _r: 6 r.n t;rur- - ---- t- --t- --==-"'"""i 1-=--llUii.l.eiiH +-----+-----+----2--+-----+-----1- ==r- 4 0--------------------- ---- ---- ---2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2003 Year 32 Status of Offshore Wind and Offshore Wind Industry in Denmark -- Offshoreenergy.dk Colloque lnternational"les Energies Marines Renouvelables" novembre 2013 The worlds first offshore wind farm has now been operating for more than 20 years 0-'(,e, ?P -... "'"'0 o.;y-4. -" 7>e. J>-oo. .e 1>e,..,c \. ..,y e, ,.. ..,...o.'O. .....,... t$>"" - ,-?>-0 '01 e.'" tP ;d>""'b- 02 1 11 1 (\ 110 oo 0. _y..o I I I '91 oc, ,. ._II< ,'?-.. sP '13 I -- Offshoreenergy.dk Renewabl.es Status of Offshore Wind and Offshore Wind Industry in Denmark We are going to more than double our offshore wind capacity - until 2020 we will install 1.500 MW The Danish Energy Agency will call two tenders of large scale offshore - total 1GW. r· --- / 1. Horns Reef 3: 400 MW This tender will be finalized in the beginning of 2015 2. Kriegers Flak: 600 MW Both parks have to be in operation at latest the 1st of January 2020 - ............... Offshoreenergy.dk Ranewables Status of Offshore Wind and Offshore Wind Industry in Denmark We are going to more than double our offshore wind capacity - until 2020 we will install 1.500 MW The Danish Energy Agency will call for tender of 450 MW near shore offshore wind farms On the top of this 50 MW will be awarded to projects which aims to demonstrate Cost of Energy reducing solutions ' Source: Danish Energy Agency Status of Offshore Wind and Offshore Wind Industry in Denmark Offshoreene rgy.dk Ranewables Zooming in on Denmark's current world leading position in offshore wind • 30% wind energy in 2012 and 50% in 2020 • The worlds leading OWF operator is Danish • 9 out of 10 installed offshore wind turbines are manufactured and installed by Danish based companies • World's most globalised wind industry with a strong first mover advantage in the offshore market -- Offshoreenergy.dk Renewables Status of Offshore Wind and Offshore Wind Industry in Denmark 2015-2020 "Mega" off shore power plants New concepts,technolo gies and "Supergrid" 2009-2015 Industrialization Production set-up for installation Economies of scale,sourcing, knowhow,installation and O&M Offshoreenergy.dk Renewabtes Status of Offshore Wind and Offshore Wind Industry in Denmark - Offshoreenergy.dk Status of Offshore Wind and Offshore Wind Industry in Denmark The economic impact from Offshore Wind ..;-Offshoreenergy.dk Renewabtes Colloque lnternationai"Les Energies Marines Renouvelables" novembre 2013 The economic impact • 11,200 employees in the offshore wind and wave industry {2012) • FORECAST 2015-2020- 21.000 employees References • Farming- 69.728 employees • Food & Beverage- 55.107 employees • Metal Industry- 36.730 employees • Electrical- 16.086 employees • Medicinal Industry -17.711employees \ -- Offshoreenergy.dk Renewables The economic impact from Offshore Wind 14 The economic impact • Total turn-over 32 MDKK/4.3 BEUR • Export share 2 MDKK/2 BEUR References • Food & Beverage- 160 MDKK/21.5 BEUR • Metal Industry- 146 MDKK/19.6 BEUR • Electrical- 28 MDKK/3.8 BEUR • Medicinal Industry- 72 MDKK/5.6 BEUR Offshoreenergy.dk Renewable. The economic impact from Offshore Wind 15