Comm Bibl 2013 - Ancient Commentators on Aristotle

Ancient Commentators on Aristotle Bibliography 2004-­‐2013 This bibliography lists work on the ancient commentators on Aristotle published from 2004 to (the first half of) 2013. It is conceived as a supplement to two existing bibliographies covering up to 1990 (R. Sorabji, Aristotle Transformed, London: Duckworth 1990, 485-­‐524) and 1991-­‐2003 (J. Sellars ‘The Aristotelian Commentators: A Bibliographical Guide’, in P. Adamson, H. Baltussen, M. Stone, eds, Philosophy, Science, and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic, and Latin Commentaries, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, Suppl. 83/1 (2004), 239-­‐68). The three bibliographies taken together hopefully offer fairly full coverage of the scholarly literature to date, although they do not claim to be complete. Revised versions of this list will be issued in due course. This is v. 1 (July 2013). 2004 Ademollo, F. “Sophroniscus’ son is approaching: Porphyry, Isagoge 7.20-­‐1.” The Classical Quarterly 54/1 (2004): 322-­‐325. Berg, R. M. van den. “Smoothing Over the Differences: Proclus and Ammonius on Plato’s Cratylus and Aristotle’s De Interpretatione.” In Philosophy, Science and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentaries. Edited by P. Adamson, H. Baltussen, M. W. F. Stone, vol. 1, 191-­‐201. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2004. Berryman, S. “Necessitation and Explanation in Philoponus’ Aristotelian Physics.” In Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics: Themes from the Work of Richard Sorabji. Edited by R. Salles, 65-­‐80. Oxford: Clarendon, 2004. Chaniotis, A. “Epigraphic evidence for the philosopher Alexander of Aphrodisias.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 47 (2004): 79–81. Charrue, J.-­‐M. “Ammonius et Plotin.” Revue Philosophique De Louvain 102/1 (2004): 72-­‐103. Chase, M. “‘Omne corpus fugiendum?’ Augustine and Porphyry on the body and the post-­‐mortem destiny of the soul. “ Chôra 2 (2004): 37-­‐58. Côté, A. “Note on Syrianus’ use of the divided line in his commentary on Aristotle’s ‘Metaphysics’.” The Modern Schoolman 81 (2004): 57–66. Dufour, R. “Comment se produit l’écho selon Alexandre d’Aphrodise (De l’âme 47.25-­‐
48.21).” Dionysius 22 (2004): 19-­‐28. Fazzo, S. “Aristotelianism as a Commentary Tradition.” In Philosophy, Science and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentaries. Edited by P. Adamson, H. Baltussen, M. W. F. Stone, vol. 1, 1-­‐19. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2004. Gutas, D. “Avicenna’s Marginal Glosses on De Anima and the Greek Commentatorial Tradition.” In Philosophy, Science and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentaries. Edited by P. Adamson, H. Baltussen, M. W. F. Stone, vol. 2, 77-­‐88. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2004. Hadot, I. and P. Hadot. Apprendre à philosopher dans l’Antiquité: L’enseignement du ‘Manuel d’Épictète’ et son commentaire néoplatonicien. Paris: Le Livre de Poche, 2004. Harvey S. “The Impact of Philoponus’ Commentary on the Physics on Averroes: Three Commentaries on the Physics.” In Philosophy, Science and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentaries. Edited by P. Adamson, H. Baltussen, M. W. F. Stone, vol. 2, 89-­‐105. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2004. Haswani, A. “Taxinomie topique. La classification thémistéenne des lieux chez Boèce, Averroès et Abû l-­‐Barakât al-­‐Baghdâdî,” In Words, Texts and Concepts. Edited by R. Arnzen and J. Thelmann, 245-­‐258. Peeters: Leuven, 2004. Hugonnard-­‐Roche, H. “Remarques sur les Commentaires d’Averroès à la Physique et au De Caelo d’Aristotle.” In Averroes and the Aristotelian Heritage. Edited by C. Baffioni, 103-­‐120. Naples: Guida, 2004. Karamanolis, G. “Porphyry: The First Platonist Commentator on Aristotle.” In Philosophy, Science and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentaries. Edited by P. Adamson, H. Baltussen, M. W. F. Stone, vol. 1, 97-­‐120. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2004. Kupreeva, I. “Alexander of Aphrodisias on Mixture and Growth.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 27 (2004): 297-­‐334. Kupreeva, I. “Aristotelian Dynamics in the 2nd century School Debates: Galen and Alexander of Aphrodisias on Organic Powers and Movements.” In Philosophy, Science and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentaries. Edited by P. Adamson, H. Baltussen, M. W. F. Stone, vol. 1, 71-­‐95. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2004. LaChance, P. J. “Boethius on Human Freedom.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78/2 (2004): 309-­‐327. Lautner, P. “The KOINH AIΣΘHΣIΣ in Proclus and Ps.-­‐Simplicius.” In Philosophy, Science and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentaries. Edited by P. Adamson, H. Baltussen, M. W. F. Stone, vol. 1, 163-­‐174. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2004. Manolea, C. P. The Homeric tradition in Syrianus. Thessaloniki: Stamoulis, 2004. Rashed, M. “Priorité de l’ΕΙΔΟΣ ou du ΓΕΝΟΣ entre Andronicos et Alexandre: vestiges arabes et grecs inédits.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 14 (2004): 9-­‐63. Rashed, M. “The Problem of the Composition of the Heavens (529-­‐1610): A New Fragment of Philoponus and its Readers.” In Philosophy, Science and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentaries. Edited by P. Adamson, H. Baltussen, M. W. F. Stone, vol. 1, 35-­‐58. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2004. Rescigno, A., ed. Alessandro di Afrodisia: Commentario al (De caelo di Aristotele, Frammenti del primo libro). Amsterdam: Hakkert, 2004. Rosset, M.-­‐C. and M.-­‐H. Congourdeau, eds. Jean Philopon, La création du monde. Paris: Migne, 2004. Salis, R. I movimenti dei corpi celesti nel commento dello pseudo-­‐Alessandro alla Metafisica di Aristotele. Padova: Tipografia La Garangola, 2004. Sharples, R. W. “Alexander of Aprhodisias on the nature and location of vision.” In Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics: Themes from the Work of Richard Sorabji. Edited by R. Salles, 345-­‐362. Oxford: Clarendon, 2004. Sharples, R. W. “Alexander of Aphrodisias: what is a mantissa?” In Philosophy, Science and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentaries. Edited by P. Adamson, H. Baltussen, and M. W. F. Stone, 51-­‐69. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2004. Sorabji, R. The Philosophy of the Commentators 200-­‐600 AD, A Sourcebook, vol. 1 Psychology, vol. 2 Physics, vol. 3 Logic and Metaphysics. London: Duckworth, 2004. Thiel, R. Aristoteles Kategorienschrift in Ihrer Antiken Kommentierung. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004. Wood, R. and M. Weisberg. “Interpreting Aristotle on mixture: problems about elemental composition from Philoponus to Cooper.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 35 (2004): 681-­‐706. 2005 Accattino, P., ed. Alessandro di Afrodisia: De anima II (Mantissa), Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso, 2005. Barnes, J. “Les Catégories et les Catégories.” In Les Catégories Et Leur Histoire. Edited by O. Bruun and L. Corti, 11-­‐80. Paris: Vrin, 2005. Brisson, L., ed. Porphyre. Sentences. 2 vols. Histoire des doctrines de l’antiquité classiques. Paris: Vrin, 2005. Chiesa, C. “Porphyre et le problème de la substance des Catégories.” In Les Catégories Et Leur Histoire. Edited by O. Bruun and L. Corti, 81-­‐101. Paris: Vrin, 2005. Frede, M. “Les Catégories d’Aristote et les Pères de l’Église grecs.” In Les Catégories Et Leur Histoire. Edited by O. Bruun and L. Corti, 135-­‐174. Paris: Vrin, 2005. Gerson, L. P. Aristotle and Other Platonists. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2005. Guldentops, G. “Plato’s Timaeus in Simplicius’ In De caelo.” In Plato’s Timaeus and the Foundations of Cosmology in Late Antiquity, the Middle Ages and Renaissance. Edited by T. Leinkauf, and C. Steel, 195-­‐211. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2005. Hahmann, A. Was ist Willensfreiheit? Alexander von Aphrodisias Über das Schicksal, Marburg: Tectum, 2005. Henry, D. “Embryological Models in Ancient Philosophy.” Phronesis 50/1 (2005): 1-­‐42. Ierodiakonou, K. “La réception byzantine des Categories d’Aristote.” In Les Catégories Et Leur Histoire. Edited by O. Bruun and L. Corti, 307-­‐340. Paris: Vrin, 2005. Ierodiakonou, K. “Metaphysics in the Byzantine Tradition: Eustratios of Nicaea on universals”, Quaestio 5 (2005): 67-­‐82. Kenny, A. “Les Catégories chez les Pères de l’Église latins.” In Les Catégories Et Leur Histoire. Edited by O. Bruun and L. Corti, 121-­‐135. Paris: Vrin, 2005. Libera, A. de. “L’onto-­‐théo-­‐logique de Boèce: doctrine des catégories et théorie de la predication dans le De Trinitate.” In Les Catégories Et Leur Histoire. Edited by O. Bruun and L. Corti, 175-­‐222. Paris: Vrin, 2005. Longo, A. Siriano e I principi della scienza. Naples: Bibliopolis, 2005. Majercik, R. “Porphyry and Gnosticism.” The Classical Quarterly 55/1 (2005): 277-­‐292. Marenbon, J. “Les Catégories au début du Moyen Âge.” In Les Catégories Et Leur Histoire. Edited by O. Bruun and L. Corti, 223-­‐244. Paris: Vrin, 2005. Morison, B. “Les Catégories d’Aristote comme introduction à la logique.” In Les Catégories Et Leur Histoire. Edited by O. Bruun and L. Corti, 103-­‐119. Paris: Vrin, 2005. Panayides, C. “Ammonius and the Seabattle.” Ancient Philosophy 25/2 (2005): 474-­‐
478. Rashed, M. “Les marginalia d’Aréthas, Ibn al-­‐Tayyib et les dernières gloses alexandrines à l’Organon.” In Scientia in margine. Etudes sur les marginalia dans les manuscrits scientifiques du Moyen Âge à la Renaissance, Edited by D. Jacquart and C. Burnett, 57-­‐73. Geneva: Librarie Droz, 2005. Reeth, J. F. M. van. “Éléments de théodicée syrienne de Jean Philopon au Causa causarum.” In Les Syriaques. Edited by R.J. Mouwad, 151-­‐164. Paris: Harmattan, 2005. Salis, R. Il commento di pseudo-­‐Alessandro al libro Λ della Metafisica di Aristotele, Padua: Rubbettino, 2005. Sharples, R. W. “Alexander of Aphrodisias on Universals: Two Problematic Texts.” Phronesis 50 (2005): 43-­‐55. Sharples, R. W. “An Aristotelian Commentator on the Naturalness of Justice.” In Virtues, Norms, and Objectivity. Edited by C. Gill, 279-­‐293. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. Sharples, R. W. “Implications of the New Alexander of Aphrodisias Inscription.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 48 (2005): 47–56. Sorabji, R. “Sordid Deals and Divine Names in Ammonius’ Alexandria.” In The Philosopher and Society in Late Antiquity. Edited by A. Smith, 203-­‐213. Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 2005. Wilberding, J. “Aristotle, Plotinus, and Simplicius on the Relation of the Changer to the Changed.” The Classical Quarterly 55/2 (2005): 447-­‐454. 2006 Adamson, P. “Vision, Light and Color in Al-­‐Kindi, Ptolemy and the Ancient Commentators.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 16/2 (2006): 207-­‐236. Arampatzēs, G. Paideia kai epistēmē ston Michaēl Ephesio : eis peri zōōn moriōn I 1,3 -­‐ 2,10. Athens: Akadēmia Athēnōn, Kentron Ereunēs tēs Hellēnikēs Philosophias, 2006. Castelletti, C. (ed.). Porfirio, Sullo Stige. Testo greco a fronte, 99. Milan: Bompiani, 2006. Daneš, J (trans.). O věčnosti světa: Jan Filoponos proti Aristotelovi. Prague: Filosofia, 2006. Hoffmann, P. “What was Commentary in Late Antiquity? The Example of the Neoplatonic Commentators.” In A Companion to Ancient Philosophy. Edited by M. L. Gill and P. Pellegrin, 597-­‐622. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006. Ierodiakonou, K. “The Greek concept of sympatheia and its Byzantine appropriation in Michael Psellos.” In The Occult Sciences in Byzantium. Edited by. P. Magdalino and M. Mavroudi, 97-­‐117. Geneva: Pomme d’Or, 2006. Kapetanaki, S. and R. W. Sharples, eds. Pseudo Aristoteles (Pseudo Alexander), Supplementa Problematorum. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2006. Karamanolis G. Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Lamascus, L. “Aquinas and Themistius on Intellect.” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80 (2006): 255-­‐273. Lautner, P. “Ammonius Hermeae.” Ancient Philosophy 26/1 (2006): 237-­‐240. Lines, D. (ed.), Eustratius, Aspasius, Michael Ephesius et al.: Aristotelis Stagiritae Moralia Nicomachi.a Stuttgart-­‐Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-­‐Holzboog, 2006. McGinnis, J. “Positioning Heaven: The Infidelity of a Faithful Aristotelian.” Phronesis 51/2 (2006): 140-­‐161. Sharples, R. W. “Ps.-­‐Alexander or Ps.-­‐Aristotle. Medical Puzzles and Physical Problems.” In Aristotle’s Problemata in different times and tongues. Edited by P. De Leemans and M. Goyens, 21-­‐32. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2006. Warren. J. “Psychic Disharmony: Philoponus and Epicurus on Plato’s Phaedo.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 30 (2006): 235-­‐260. Watts, E. J. City and School in Late Antique Athens and Alexandria. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006. 2007 Adamson, P. “Porphyrius Arabus on nature and art: 463F Smith in context.” In Studies on Porphyry. Edited by G. Karamanolis and A. Sheppard, 141-­‐164. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2007. Baltussen, H. “From Polemic to Exegesis: The Ancient Philosophical Commentary.” Poetics Today 28 (2007): 247-­‐281. Chase, M. “Did Porphyry Write a Commentary on Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics? Albertus Magnus, al-­‐Fārābī and Porphyry on per se Predication.” In Classical Arabic Philosophy: Sources and Reception. Edited by P. Adamson, 21-­‐38. London: Warburg Institute, 2007. Chiaradonna, R. “Porphyry and Iamblichus on Universals and Synonymous Predication.” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 18 (2007): 123-­‐
140. Chiaradonna, R. “Porphyry’s views on the immanent incorporeals.” In Studies on Porphyry. Edited by G. Karamanolis and A. Sheppard, 35-­‐50. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2007. Clark, G. “Augustine’s Porphyry and the universal way of salvation.” In Studies on Porphyry. Edited by G. Karamanolis and A. Sheppard, 127-­‐140. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2007. Delli, E. “Entre compilation et originalité. Le corps pneumatique dans l’oeuvre de Michel Psellos.” In The Libraries of the Neoplatonists. Edited by C. D’Ancona, 211-­‐230. Leiden: Brill, 2007. Dillon, J. “What price the father of the noetic triad?: some thoughts on Porphyry’s doctrine of the first principle.” In Studies on Porphyry. Edited by G. Karamanolis and A. Sheppard, 51-­‐60. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2007. Edwards, M. “Porphyry and the Christians.” In Studies on Porphyry. Edited by G. Karamanolis and A. Sheppard, 11-­‐126. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2007. Gavray, M.-­‐A. Simplicius, lecteur du Sophiste. Paris: Klincksieck, 2007. Golitsis, P. “Nicéphore Blemmyde lecteur du commentaire de Simplicius à la Physique d’Aristote.” In The Libraries of the Neoplatonists. Edited by C. D’Ancona, 243-­‐258. Leiden: Brill, 2007. Goulet, R. “La conservation et la transmission des textes philosophiques.” In The Libraries of the Neoplatonists. Edited by C. D’Ancona, 29-­‐62. Leiden: Brill, 2007. Hadot, I. “Dans quel lieu le néoplatonicien Simplicius a-­‐t-­‐il fondé son école de mathématiques, et où a pu avoir lieu son entretien avec un manichéen?” International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 1/1 (2007): 42-­‐107. Hadot, I. “Remarque complémentaire à mon article “dans quel lieu le néoplatonicien Simplicius a-­‐t-­‐il fondé son école de mathémathiques, et où a pu avoir lieu son entretien avec un manichéen?” International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 1/2 (2007): 263-­‐269. Hasnawi, A. “Boèce, Averroès et Abū Al-­‐Barakāt Al Bagãdī, témoins des écrits de Thémistius sur les Topiques d’Aristote.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 17 (2007): 203-­‐
265. Hasse, D. N. “Spontaneous Generation and the Ontology of Forms in Greek, Arabic and Medieval Latin Sources.” In Classical Arabic Philosophy: Sources and Reception. Edited by P. Adamson, 150-­‐175. London: Warburg Institute, 2007. Karamanolis, G. “Porphyry’s notion of empsychia.” In Studies on Porphyry. Edited by G. Karamanolis and A. Sheppard, 91-­‐110. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2007. Lautner, P. “Perception and self-­‐knowledge: interpreting fr. 264 Smith” In Studies on Porphyry. Edited by G. Karamanolis and A. Sheppard, 77-­‐90. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2007. López-­‐Farjeat, L. X. “Determinism and Free Will in Alexander of Aphrodisias and the Arabic Tradition.” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81 (2007): 161-­‐177. Luna, C. “Mis en page et transmission textuelle du commentaire de Syrianus sur la Metaphysique.” In The Libraries of the Neoplatonists. Edited by C. D’Ancona, 121-­‐134. Leiden: Brill, 2007. Mansfield, J. “Out of Touch: Philoponus as a source for Democritus.” In Democritus: Science, The Arts, and the Care of the Soul: Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Democritus. Edited by A. Brancacci and P-­‐M. Morel, 277-­‐292. Leiden: Brill, 2007. Movia, G. (ed.), Alessandro di Afrodisia e Pseudo-­‐Alessandro, Commentario alla “Metafisica” di Aristotele. Milan: Bompiani, 2007. Natali, C. “Aspasius on Nicomachean Ethics 7: An Ancient Example of ‘Higher Criticism’?.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 33 (2007): 347-­‐367. Papamanolakis, A. “L’échelle neoplatonicienne des vertus chez Psellus et Eustrate de Nicée.” In The Libraries of the Neoplatonists. Edited by C. D’Ancona, 231-­‐242. Leiden: Brill, 2007. Pazouki, S. “From Aristotle’s Ousia to Ibn Sina’s Jawhar” In Substance and Attribute. Edited by C. Kanzian and M. Legenhausen, 163-­‐172. Frankfurt: Ontos, 2007. Rashed, M. Essentialisme. Alexandre d’Aphrodise entre logique, physique et cosmologie. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2007. Rashed, M. L’héritage aristotélicien. Textes inédits de l’antiquité. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2007. Reinhardt, T. “Andronicus of Rhodes and Boethus of Sidon on Aristotle’s Categories.” In Greek and Roman Philosophy 100 BC-­‐200 AD. Edited by R. Sorabji and R. W. Sharples, 513-­‐529. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2007. Sharples, R. W. “Aristotle’s Exoteric and Esoteric Works: Summaries and Commentaries.” In Greek and Roman Philosophy 100 BC-­‐200 AD. Edited by R. Sorabji and R. W. Sharples, 505-­‐512. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2007. Sheppard, A. “Porphyry’s views on phantasia.” In Studies on Porphyry. Edited by G. Karamanolis and A. Sheppard, 71-­‐76. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2007. Smith, A. “Porphyry: scope for a reassessment.” In Studies on Porphyry. Edited by G. Karamanolis and A. Sheppard, 7-­‐17. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2007. Sorabji, R. “Modifications to Aristotle’s Physics of the Heavens by Peripatetics and Others, 100 BC to 200 AD.” In Greek and Roman Philosophy 100 BC-­‐200 AD. Edited by R. Sorabji and R. W. Sharples, 575-­‐594. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2007. Sorabji, R. “Porphyry on self-­‐awareness, true self, and individual.” In Studies on Porphyry. Edited by G. Karamanolis and A. Sheppard, 61-­‐70. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2007. Strange, S. “Porphyry and Plotinus’ metaphysics.” In Studies on Porphyry. Edited by G. Karamanolis and A. Sheppard, 17-­‐34. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2007. Valente, L. “Names that can be said of everything: Porphyrian tradition and ‘transcendental’ terms in twelfth-­‐century logic.” Vivarium 45/2-­‐3 (2007): 298-­‐310. 2008 Achard, M. “Themistius’ Paraphrase of Posterior Analytics 71a17-­‐b8: An Example of Rearrangement of an Aristotelian Text.” Laval théologique et philosophique 64/1 (2008): 19-­‐34. Baltussen, H. Philosophy and Exegesis in Simplicius: The Methodology of a Commentator. London: Duckworth, 2008. Benakis, L. Michael Psellos: Kommentar zur Physik des Aristoteles. Editio princeps. Einleitung, Text, Indices. Corpus Philosophorum Medii Aevi, Commentaria in Aristotelem Byzantina 5. Athens: Academy of Athens, 2008. Bergeron, M. and R. Dufour, eds. Alexandre D’Aphrodise. De l’Âme. Textes & Commentaires. Paris: Vrin, 2008. Bodéüs, R., ed. Porphyre, Commentaire aux Catégories d’ Aristote. Paris: Vrin, 2008. Brunschwig, J. “Le chapitre 1 du De Interpretatione: Aristote, Ammonius et nous.” Laval théologique et philosophique 64/1 (2008): 35-­‐87. Chase, M. “The Medieval Posterity of Simplicius’ Commentary on the Categories: Thomas Aquinas and al-­‐Farabi.” In Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle’s Categories. Edited by L.A. Newton, 9-­‐30. Leiden: Brill, 2008. Chiaradonna R. “Hylémorphisme et causalité des intelligibles. Plotin et Alexandre d’Aphrodise.” Les études philosophiques 86/3 (2008): 379-­‐398. Cook, J. G. “Porphyry’s attempted demolition of Christian allegory.” International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 2/1 (2008): 1-­‐27. Cordonier, V. “Corps, Matière et Contact: La cohérence du sensible selon Alexandre d’Aphrodise.” Les études philosophiques 86/3 (2008): 353-­‐378. Côté, A. “Simplicius on idoneities.” Proceedings of the XXII World Congress of Philosophy 14 (2008): 21-­‐27. Dillon, J. “Syrianus polémiste : Métaphysique M et N.” Laval Théologique et Philosophique 64/3 (2008): 641-­‐649. Ebbesen, S. Greek-­‐Latin philosophical interaction. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008. Falcon, A. “The Pre-­‐History of the Commentary Tradition: Aristotelianism in the First Century BCE: (Prolegomena to a Study of Xenarchus of Seleucia).” Laval théologique et philosophique, 64/1 (2008): 7-­‐18. Fazzo, S. “L’exégèse du livre Lambda de la Métaphysique d’Aristote dans le De principiis et dans la Quaestio I.1 d’Alexandre d’Aphrodise.” Laval Théologique et Philosophique 64/3 (2008): 607-­‐626. Golitsis, P. Les commentaires de Simplicius et de Jean Philopon à la Physique d’Aristote: Tradition et Innovation. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2008. Guyomarc’h, G. “Le visage du divin: la forme pure selon Alexandre d’Aphrodise Les études philosophiques 86/3 (2008): 323-­‐341. Helmig, C. “Plutarch of Chaeronea and Porphyry on transmigration – who is the author of Stobaeus I 445.14–448.3 (W.-­‐H.)?” The Classical Quarterly 58/1 (2008): 250-­‐255. Jaulin, A. “Remarques sur la conception de la nature dans les § 2-­‐6 du De Fato d’Alexandre d’Aphrodise.” Les études philosophiques 86/3 (2008): 343-­‐353. Lautner, P. “Methods in examining Sense-­‐perception: John Philoponus and Ps.-­‐
Simplicius.” Laval Théologique et Philosophique 64/3 (2008): 651-­‐661. Lavaud, L. “Matière et privation chez Alexandre d’Aphrodise et Plotin.” Les études philosophiques 86/3 (2008): 399-­‐415. LeFebvre, D. “Le commentaire d’Alexandre d’Aphrodise à métaphysique.” Les études philosophiques 86/3 (2008): 305-­‐323. Rashed, M. “Alexandre d’Aphrodise: de l’eidocentrisme comme actualisation d’un aristotélisme possible.” Les études philosophiques 86/3 (2008): 281-­‐284. Reisman, D. “An Obscure Neoplatonist of the Fourth/Tenth Century and the Putative Philoponus Source.” In In the Age of al Fārābī: Arabic Philosophy in the Fourth/Tenth Century. Edited by P. Adamson, 239-­‐264. London: Warburg Institute, 2008. Renaud, F. “Tradition et critique: lecture jumelée de Platon et Aristote chez Olympiodore.”Laval théologique et philosophique 64/1 (2008): 89-­‐104. Rescigno, A., ed. Commento al De caelo di Aristotele. Frammenti del secondo, terzo, e quarto libro. Amsterdam: Hakkert, 2008. Schroeder, F. M. and R. Todd. “The De Intellectu Revisited.” Laval théologique et philosophique 64/3 (2008): 663-­‐680. Sharples, R. W. “L’accident du déterminisme: Alexandre d’Aphrodise dans son contexte historique.” Les études philosophiques 86/3 (2008): 285-­‐303. Sharples, R. W. Alexander Aphrodisiensis, “De anima libri mantissa”: A new edition of the Greek text with introduction and commentary. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2008. Sharples, R. W. “Habent sua fata libelli: Aristotle’s Categories in the 1st Century BC.” Acta antiqua Hungarica 48 (2008): 273-­‐287. Sharples, R. W. “La Escuela de Alejandro de Afrodisia?” Diànoia 61 (2008): 3-­‐46. Wear, S. K. “Syrianus the Platonist on Eternity and Time.” The Classical Quarterly 58 (2008): 648-­‐660. Wilberding, J. “Porphyry and Plotinus on the Seed.” Phronesis 53/4 (2008): 406-­‐432. 2009 Arabatzis, G. “Michael Of Ephesus On The Empirical Man, The Scientist And The Educated Man (In Ethica Nicomachea X and In De Partibus Animalium I).” In Medieval Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics. Edited by C. Barber and D. Jenkins, 163-­‐184. Leiden: Brill: 2009. Balthussen, H. “Simplicius and the Subversion of Authority.” Antiquorum Philosophia 3 (2009): 121-­‐136. Barber, C. “Eustratios Of Nicaea On The Separation Of Art And Theology.” In Medieval Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics. Edited by C. Barber and D. Jenkins, 131-­‐144. Leiden: Brill, 2009. Barnes, J. “‘Drei sonnen sah’ ich …’: Syrianus et l’astronomie.” In Syrianus et la Métaphysique de l’Antiquité Tardive. Edited by A. Longo, 59-­‐92. Naples: Bibliopolis, 2009. Barney, R. “Simplicius: Commentary, Harmony, and Authority.” Antiquorum Philosophia 3 (2009): 101-­‐120. Bechtle, G. “Metaphysicizing the Aristotelian Categories. Two References to the Parmenides in Simplicius’ Commentary on the Categories (Simplicius, In Categorias 4 [CAG 8, 75,6 Kalbfleisch] and In Categorias 8 [291,2 K.]).” Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum 12/1 (2009): 150-­‐165. Benakis, L. “Aristotelian Ethics in Byzantium.” In Medieval Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics. Edited by C. Barber and D. Jenkins, 63-­‐70. Leiden: Brill 2009. Bonazzi, M. “Siriano, gli efettici e l’orthe doxa.” In Syrianus et la Métaphysique de l’Antiquité Tardive. Edited by A. Longo, 439-­‐462. Naples: Bibliopolis, 2009. Bonelli, M. “Dialectique et philosophie premiere: Syrianus et Alexandre d’Aphrodise.” In Syrianus et la Métaphysique de l’Antiquité Tardive. Edited by A. Longo, 423-­‐438. Naples: Bibliopolis, 2009. Bonazzi, M. “Syriano, gli efettici e l’orthe doxa.” In Syrianus et la métaphysique de l’antiquité tardive. Edited by A. Longo, 439-­‐462. Naples: Bibliopolis, 2009. Busine, A. “Porphyry and the Debate Over Traditional Religious Practices.” In Late Antique Epistemology: Other Ways to Truth. Edited by P. Vassilopolou and S. Clark, 21-­‐
29. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. Cameron, M. “Boethius on utterances, understanding and reality.” In The Cambridge Companion to Boethius. Edited by J. Marenbon, 85-­‐104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Cardullo, R.L. “Natura e moto del cielo in Siriano.” In Syrianus et la Métaphysique de l’Antiquité Tardive. Edited by A. Longo 93-­‐132. Naples: Bibliopolis, 2009. Chiaradonna, R. “Autour D’eudore. Les Débuts De L’exégèse Des Catégories Dans Le Moyen Platonisme.” In The Origins of the Platonic System. Platonisms of the Early Empire and Their Philosophical Contexts. Edited by M. Bonazzi and J. Opsomer, 89-­‐111. Louvain: Peeters, 2009. Correia, M. “The Syllogistic Theory of Boethius.” Ancient Philosophy 29 (2009): 391-­‐
405. Côté, A. “Simplicius and James of Viterbo on Propensities.” Vivarium 47/1 (2009): 24-­‐
53. De Haas, F. “Philoponus and the Mathematician of Logic.” Documenti e Studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 20 (2009): 193-­‐210. Dillon, J. “Philosophy and Exegesis in Simplicius: The Methodology of a Commentator.” International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 3/2 (2009): 158-­‐160. Ebbesen, S. “The Aristotelian Commentator.” In The Cambridge Companion to Boethius. Edited by J. Marenbon, 34-­‐55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Fisher, E. “The Anonymous Commentary on Nicomachean Ethics VII: Language, Style and Implications.” In Medieval Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics. Edited by C. Barber and D. Jenkins, 145-­‐162. Leiden: Brill, 2009. Frede, M. “Syrianus on Aristotle’s Metaphysics.” In Syrianus et la métaphysique de l’antiquité tardive. Edited by A. Longo, 23-­‐58. Naples: Bibliopolis, 2009. Freudenthal, G. “The Astrologization of the Aristotelian Cosmos: Celestial Influences on the Sublunary World in Aristotle, Alexander of Aphrodisias, and Averroes.” In New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo. Edited by A. Bowen, 239-­‐282. Leiden: Brill, 2009. Gleede, B. Platon und Aristoteles in der Kosmologie des Proklos. Ein Kommentar zu den 18 Argumenten für die Ewigkeit der Welt bei Johannes Philoponos. Tübingen: Mohr, 2009. Harari, O. “Simplicius on the Reality of Relations and Relational Change.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 37 (2009): 245-­‐274. Helmig, C. “‘The Truth can never be refuted’ -­‐ Syrianus’ View(s) on Aristotle Reconsidered.” In Syrianus et la métaphysique de l’antiquité tardive. Edited by A. Longo, 347-­‐382. Naples: Bibliopolis, 2009. Hugonnard-­‐Roche, H. “La Tradition Gréco-­‐Syriaque Des Commentaires D’Aristote.” In L’œuvre de David l’Invincible et la transmission de la pensée grecque dans la tradition arménienne et syriaque. Edited by V. Calzolari and J. Barnes, 67-­‐88. Leiden: Brill, 2009. Ierodiakonou, K. “Some Observations on Michael of Ephesus’ Comments on Nicomacheau Ethics X.” In Medieval Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics. Edited by C. Barber and D. Jenkins, 185-­‐202. Brill: 2009. Ierodiakonou, K. “Syrianus on Scientific Knowledge and Demonstration.” In Syrianus et la métaphysique de l’antiquité tardive. Edited by A. Longo, 401-­‐22. Naples: Bibliopolis, 2009. Jenkins, D. “Eustratios Of Nicaea’s ‘Definition Of Being’ Revisited” In Medieval Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics. Edited by C. Barber and D. Jenkins, 111-­‐
130. Brill: 2009. Kaldellis, A. ”Classical Scholarship in Twelfth-­‐Century Byzantium.” In Medieval Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics. Edited by C. Barber and D. Jenkins, 1-­‐44. Brill: 2009. Kukkonen, T. “Ibn Tufayl and the Wisdom of the East: In Apprehending the Divine.” In Late Antique Epistemology: Other Ways to Truth. Edited by P. Vassilopolou and S. Clark, 87-­‐102. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. Lacrosse, J. “Plotinus, Porphyry, and India: A Re-­‐Examination.” In Late Antique Epistemology: Other Ways to Truth. Edited by P. Vassilopolou and S. Clark, 103-­‐117. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. Lernould, A. “Les réponses du platonicien Syrianus aux critiques faites par Aristote en Métaphysique M et N contre la thèse de l’existence séparée des nombres.” In Syrianus et la Métaphysique de l’Antiquité Tardive. Edited by A. Longo, 133-­‐160. Naples: Bibliopolis, 2009. Longo, A. “The Principle of Contradiction. An Ancient Interpretation (Syrianus, AD Vth cent.) and a Modern Interpretation (J. Lukasiewicz, 1878-­‐1956): a Comparison.” In Syrianus et la Métaphysique de l’Antiquité Tardive. Edited by A. Longo, 383-­‐400. Naples: Bibliopolis, 2009. Manolea, C. “The Treatment of Ancient Greek Myth in Syrianus’ Philosophical Works.” In Syrianus et la Métaphysique de l’Antiquité Tardive. Edited by A. Longo, 499-­‐514. Naples: Bibliopolis, 2009. Manolea, C. “The Homeric Tradition in Ammonius and Asclepius.” In Late Antique Epistemology: Other Ways to Truth. Edited by P. Vassilopolou and S. Clark, 174-­‐188. Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. Martin, C. “The Logical Textbooks and their Influence.” In The Cambridge Companion to Boethius. Edited by J. Marenbon, 56-­‐84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Mitrović, B. “Defending Alexander of Aphrodisias in the Age of the Counter-­‐
Reformation: Iacopo Zabarella on the Mortality of the Soul according to Aristotle.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 91/3 (2009): 330-­‐354. Moorhead, J. “Boethius’s life and the world of late antique philosophy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Boethius. Edited by J. Marenbon, 13-­‐33. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Mueller-­‐Jourdan, P. “L’indéterminé ‘matière’ chez Syrianus. Brève exégèse d’in metaph., 133, 15-­‐29.” In Syrianus et la Métaphysique de l’Antiquité Tardive. Edited by A. Longo, 161-­‐176. Naples: Bibliopolis, 2009. Muradyan, G. “David The Invincible’s Commentary On Porphyry’s Isagoge. A Collation Of The Greek And Armenian Versions.” In L’œuvre de David l’Invincible et la transmission de la pensée grecque dans la tradition arménienne et syriaque. Edited by V. Calzolari and J. Barnes, 67-­‐88. Leiden: Brill, 2009. O’Meara, J. “Le fondement du principe de non-­‐contradiction chez Syrianus.” In Syrianus et la Métaphysique de l’Antiquité Tardive. Edited by A. Longo, 266-­‐310. Naples: Bibliopolis, 2009. Opsomer, J. “M. Annius Ammonius, a philosophical profile.” In The origins of the Platonic System: Platonisms of the Early Empire and their Philosophical Contexts. Edited by M. Bonazzi and J. Opsomer, 123-­‐186. Louvain: Peeters, 2009. Schneider, J. P. “Les apories soulevées par Syrianus sur la thèse de l’identité de l’un et de l’être.” In Syrianus et la Métaphysique de l’Antiquité Tardive. Edited by A. Longo 281-­‐298. Naples: Bibliopolis, 2009. Trizio, M. “Neoplatonic Source-­‐Material in Eustratios of Nicaea’s Commentary on Book VI of the Nicomachean Ethics.” In Medieval Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics. Edited by C. Barber and D. Jenkins, 71-­‐110. Leiden: Brill: 2009. Tuominen, M. The Ancient Commentators on Plato and Aristotle. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2009. Wear, S. K. “Syrianus’ teachings on the Soul” In Syrianus et la Métaphysique de l’Antiquité Tardive. Edited by A. Longo, 177-­‐200. Naples: Bibliopolis, 2009. 2010 Baltussen, H. “Simplicius.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Edited by L. Gerson, 711-­‐732. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Blank, D. L. “Ammonius Hermeiou and his School.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Edited by L. Gerson, 654-­‐666. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Bonelli, M. “Alexander of Aphrodisias on the Science of Ontology.” In Interpreting Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics in Late Antiquity and Beyond. Edited by F. A. J. de Haas, M. Leunissen, M. Martijn, 99-­‐122. Leiden: Brill, 2010. Brisson, L. “Between Matter and Body Mass in the Sentences of Porphyry.” International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 4/1 (2010): 36-­‐53. Charrue, J.-­‐M. De l’Être Et du Monde: Ammonius, Plotin, Proclus. Paris: Klincksieck, 2010. Chase, M. “Porphyry on the Cognitive Process.” Ancient Philosophy 30/2 (2010): 383-­‐
405. D’Ancona, C. “The Origins of Islamic Philosophy.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Edited by L. Gerson, 869-­‐893. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Dillon, J. “Intellect and the One in Porphyrys Sententiae.” International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 4/1 (2010): 27-­‐35. Dillon, J. “Iamblichus of Chalcis and his School.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Edited by L. Gerson, 358-­‐374. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Donini, P. Commentary and Tradition. Aristotelianism, Platonism, and Post-­‐Hellenistic Philosophy. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2010. El Fekkak, B. “Alexander’s ‘Inâya Transformed: Justice as Divine Providence in Al-­‐
Fârâbî.” Documenti e Studi, 21 (2010): 1-­‐17. Fiori, E. “L’épitomé syriaque du traité sur les causes du tout d”Alexandre d’Aphrodise attribué à Serge de Resh’ayna.” Le Muséon 123 (2010): 127-­‐158. Gabbe, M. “Themistius on Concept Acquisition and Knowledge of Essences.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 92/3 (2010): 215-­‐235. Goldin, O. “Two Traditions in the Ancient Posterior Analytics Commentaries.” In Interpreting Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics in Late Antiquity and Beyond. Edited by F. A. J. de Haas, M. Leunissen, M. Martijn, 155-­‐182. Leiden: Brill, 2010. Haas, F. de. “Priscian of Lydia and Ps-­‐Simplicius on the soul.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Edited by L. Gerson, 756-­‐764. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Hendrix, J. “Philosophy of Intellect and Vision in the De anima and De intellectu of Alexander of Aphrodisias.” In his Robert Grosseteste: Philosophy of Intellect and Vision. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 2010. Hendrix, J. “Philosophy of Intellect and Vision in the De anima of Themistius.” In his Robert Grosseteste: Philosophy of Intellect and Vision. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 2010. Ierodiakonou, K. “Eustratius’ Comments on Posterior Analytics II 19.” In Interpreting Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics in Late Antiquity and Beyond. Edited by F. A. J. de Haas, M. Leunissen, M. Martijn, 55-­‐72. Leiden: Brill, 2010. King, D. “Alexander of Aphrodisias’ On the Principles of the Universe in a Syriac Adaptation.” Le Muséon 123 (2010): 159-­‐191. Kupreeva, I. “Alexander of Aphrodisias on Form. A discussion of Marwan Rashed, Essentialisme.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 38 (2010): 211–249. Kupreeva, I. “Aristotle: Commentators on Aristotle.” In The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Greece and Rome. Edited by M. Gagarin, vol. 1, 252-­‐65. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Kupreeva, I. “Aristotle on Causation and Conditional Necessity: Analytica Posteriora II 12 in Context.” In Interpreting Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics in Late Antiquity and Beyond. Edited by F. A. J. de Haas, M. Leunissen, M. Martijn, 203-­‐234. Leiden: Brill, 2010. Kupreeva, I. “Themistius.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Edited by L. Gerson, 397-­‐416. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Leunissen, M. “Aristotle and Philoponus on Final Causes in Demonstrations in Posterior Analytics II 11.” In Interpreting Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics in Late Antiquity and Beyond. Edited by F. A. J. de Haas, M. Leunissen, M. Martijn, 183-­‐202. Leiden: Brill, 2010. Longo, A. “Les Seconds Analytique dans le commentaire de Syrianus sur la Métaphysique d’Aristote” In Interpreting Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics in Late Antiquity and Beyond. Edited by F. A. J. de Haas, M. Leunissen, M. Martijn, 123-­‐134. Leiden: Brill, 2010. Longo, A. “Syrianus.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Edited by L. Gerson, 616-­‐629. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Magee, J. “Boethius.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Edited by L. Gerson, 788-­‐812. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Magee, J. “On the Composition and Sources of Boethius Second Peri Hermeneias Commentary.” Vivarium 48/1-­‐2 (2010): 7-­‐54. Menn, S. “Simplicius on the Theaetetus (In Physica 17,38-­‐18,23 Diels).” Phronesis 55/3 (2010): 255-­‐270. Panayides, C. Y. “Ammonius and the Seabattle.” Ancient Philosophy 25/2 (2010): 474-­‐
478. Perelmuter, Z. “Nous and Two Kinds of Episteme in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics.” Phronesis 55/3 (2010): 228-­‐254. Rashed, M. “Alexander of Aphrosisias on Particulars and the Stoic Criterion of Identity.” In Particulars in Greek Philosophy, Edited by R. Sharples, 157–179. Leiden: Brill, 2010. Rashed, M. and R. Chiaradonna. “Before and after the commentators: an exercise in periodization.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 38 (2010): 251-­‐297. Smith, A. “Porphyry and his School.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Edited by L. Gerson, 325-­‐357. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Sorabji, R. Philoponus and the Rejection of Aristotelian Science. 2nd ed. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2010. Sorabji, R. “The Ancient Commentators on Concept Formation.” In Interpreting Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics in Late Antiquity and Beyond. Edited by F. A. J. de Haas, M. Leunissen, M. Martijn, 1-­‐26. Leiden: Brill, 2010. Taormina, D. “Plotino e Porfirio sul messaggero e il re. Nota sulla conoscenza di sé secondo Plotino, trattato 49, 3.44-­‐4.1.” In L’essere del pensiero. Saggi sulla filosofia di Plotino, Edited by D. Taormina, 245-­‐266. Naples: Bibliopolis, 2010. Tuominen, M. “Alexander and Philoponus on Prior Analytics I 27–30: Is There Tension between Aristotle’s Scientific Theory and Practice?” In Interpreting Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics in Late Antiquity and Beyond. Edited by F. A. J. de Haas, M. Leunissen, M. Martijn, 135-­‐154. Leiden: Brill, 2010. Tuominen, M. “Receptive Reason: Alexander of Aphrodisias on Material Intellect.” Phronesis 55/2 (2010): 170-­‐190. Verrycken, K. “John Philoponus.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Edited by L. Gerson, 733-­‐755 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Watt, J. Rhetoric and Philosophy from Greek into Syriac Farnham: Ashgate, 2010. 2011 Barnes, J. “An Introduction to Aspasius.” In Method and Metaphysics: Essays in Ancient Philosophy I. Edited by M. Bonelli, 212-­‐261. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. Barnes, J. “Syrianus and Astronomy.” In Method and Metaphysics: Essays in Ancient Philosophy I. Edited by M. Bonelli, 510-­‐539. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. Berg, R. van den. “Procheirisis: Porphyry Sent. 16 and Plotinus on the similes of the waxen block and the aviary.” International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 4/2 (2011): 163-­‐180. Cordonier, V. “Du moyen-­‐platonisme au néo-­‐platonisme: sources et postérité des arguments d’Alexandre d’Aphrodise contre la doctrine stoicienne des mélanges.” In Plato, Aristotle, or Both? Dialogues between Platonism and Aristotelianism in Antiquity. Edited by T. Bénatouïl, E. Maffi, F. Trabattoni, 95-­‐116. Hildesheim: Olms, 2011. Correia, M. “Philoponus on the Nature of Logic.” Apeiron, 37/3 (2011): 247-­‐258. DePalma-­‐Digeiser, E. “Methodius and Porphyry.” Studia Patristica 46 (2010): 21-­‐26. D’Hoine, P. “Aristotles Criticism of Non-­‐Substance Forms and its Interpretation by the Neoplatonic Commentators.” Phronesis 56/3 (2011): 262-­‐307. D’Hoine, P. “Forms of symbebèkota in the Neoplatonic Commentaries on Plato and Aristotle.”In Plato, Aristotle, or Both? Dialogues between Platonism and Aristotelianism in Antiquity. Edited by T. Bénatouïl, E. Maffi, F. Trabattoni, 161-­‐188. Hildesheim: Olms, 2011. Ebbesen, S. “Boethius as a translator and Aristotelian commentator.” In Interpreting the Bible and Aristotle in late antiquity: the Alexandrian commentary tradition between Rome and Baghdad. Edited by J. Lössl and J. W. Watt, 121-­‐133. Farnham: Ashgate, 2011. Gavray, M.-­‐A. “Archytas lu par Simplicius. Un art de la conciliation.” International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 5/1 (2011): 85-­‐158. Gili, L. “Boeto di Sidone e Alessandro di Afrodisia intorno alla sillogistica.” Rheinisches Museum 154/3-­‐4 (2011): 375–397. Gili, L. La Sillogistica di Alessandro di Afrodisia: Sillogistica Categorica E Sillogistica Modale Nel Commento Agli Analitici Primi di Aristotele. Hildesheim: Olms, 2011. Haas, F. de. “Principles, Conversion, and Circular Proof. The Reception of an Academic Debate in Proclus and Philoponus.” In Plato, Aristotle, or Both? Dialogues between Platonism and Aristotelianism in Antiquity. Edited by T. Bénatouïl, E. Maffi, F. Trabattoni, 173-­‐194. Hildesheim: Olms, 2011. Hugonnard-­‐Roche, H. “Du commentaire à la reconstruction : Paul le Perse interprète d’Aristote (sur und lecture du Peri Hermeneias, à propos des modes et des adverbes selon Paul, Ammonius et Boèce).” In Interpreting the Bible and Aristotle in late antiquity: The Alexandrian commentary tradition between Rome and Baghdad. Edited by J. Lössl and J. W. Watt, 165-­‐178. Farnham: Ashgate, 2011. Kessler, E. Alexander of Aphrodisias and his doctrine of the soul: 1400 years of lasting significance. Leiden: Brill, 2011. King, P. “Boethius’ Anti-­‐Realist Arguments.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 40 (2011): 381-­‐403. Lachance, G. “La querelle des universaux: analyse comparative de l’Isagôgè et du Commentaire aux Catégories d’Aristote de Porphyre.” Ithaque 9 (2011): 1-­‐22. Morel, P.-­‐M. “Cardiocentrisme et antiplatonisme chez Aristote et Alexandre d’Aphrodise.” In Plato, Aristotle, or Both? Dialogues between Platonism and Aristotelianism in Antiquity. Edited by T. Bénatouïl, E. Maffi, F. Trabattoni, 63-­‐84. Hildesheim: Olms, 2011. Mueller-­‐Jourdan, P. Gloses et commentaire du livre XI du Contra Proclum de Jean Philopon : autour de la matière première du monde. Leiden: Brill, 2011. Pavel, G. and C. Helmig. Ομοσε χωρειν: Simplicius, corollarium de loco 601.26–8 (Diels). The Classical Quarterly 61/2 (2011): 722-­‐730. Rashed, M. “Commentateurs antiques d’Aristote.” In Le savoir grec. Edited by J. Brunschwig, G. Lloyd, P. Pellegrin, 1011-­‐1030. Paris: Flammarion, 2011. Rashed, M. Alexandre D’Aphrodise, Commentaire Perdu a la “Physique” D’Aristote (Livres IV-­‐VIII): Les Scholies Byzantines. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2011. Rashed, M. “Un corpus de logique anti-­‐platonicienne d’Alexandre d’Aphrodise.” In Plato, Aristotle, or Both? Dialogues between Platonism and Aristotelianism in Antiquity. Edited by T. Bénatouïl, E. Maffi, F. Trabattoni, 85-­‐94. Hildesheim: Olms, 2011. Roskam, G. “Aristotle in Middle Platonism. The Case of Plutarch of Chaeronea.” In Plato, Aristotle, or Both? Dialogues between Platonism and Aristotelianism in Antiquity. Edited by T. Bénatouïl, E. Maffi, F. Trabattoni, 35-­‐61. Hildesheim: Olms, 2011. Sirkel, R. “Alexander of Aphrodisias’ Account of Universals and its Problems.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (2011): 297–314. Trabattoni, F. “Boeto di Sidone e l’immortalità dell’anima nel Fedone.” In Plato, Aristotle, or Both? Dialogues between Platonism and Aristotelianism in Antiquity. Edited by T. Bénatouïl, E. Maffi, F. Trabattoni, 1-­‐17. Hildesheim: Olms, 2011. Watts, E. “Translating the Personal Aspect of Late Platonism in the Commentary Tradition.” In Interpreting the Bible and Aristotle in late antiquity: the Alexandrian commentary tradition between Rome and Baghdad. Edited by J. Lössl and J. Watt, 137-­‐
150. Farnham: Ashgate, 2011. Wear, S. “The One in Syrianus Teachings on the Parmenides: Syrianus on Parm., 137d and 139a1.” International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 5/1 (2011): 58-­‐84. 2012 Arabatzis, G. “Michael of Ephesus and the philosophy of living things (In De partibus animalium 22.25-­‐23.9).” In The Many Faces of Byzantine Philosophy. Edited by B. Bydén and K. Ierodiakonou, 51-­‐78. Athens: The Norwegian Institute at Athens, 2012. Berryman, S. “‘It Makes No Difference’: Optics and Natural Philosophy in Late Antiquity” Apeiron, 45/3 (2012): 201-­‐220. Bowen, A. Simplicius on the Planets and Their Motions: In Defense of a Heresy. Leiden: Brill, 2012. Caston, V. “Higher-­‐order Awareness in Alexander of Aphrodisias.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 55 (2012): 31–49. Cross, R. “Form and Universal in Boethius.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20/3 (2012): 439-­‐458. DePalma-­‐Digeiser, E. A Threat to Public Piety: Christians, Platonists and the Great Persecution. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2012. Fazzo, S. “The Metaphysics from Aristotle to Alexander of Aphrodisias.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 55 (2012): 51–68. Fortier, S. “Ammonius on Universals and Abstraction: An interpretation and Translation of Ammonius’ In Porphyrii Isagogen 39,8-­‐42,16.” Laval théologique et philosophique 68/1 (2012): 21-­‐33. García-­‐Huidobro, Joaquín. “Michael of Ephesus and the Byzantine Reception of the Aristotelian Doctrine of Natural Justice.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 94/3 (2012): 274-­‐295. Giardini, G. Fisica del movimento e teoria dell’infinito: Analisi critica di Aristotele, Phys. III. Academia-­‐Verlag, 2012. Gili, L. “Alexander of Aphrodisias’ Solution to the Puzzle of the Two Modal Barbaras: A semantic Approach.” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale (2012): 35-­‐
64. Griffin, M. “What Has Aristotelian Dialectic to Offer a Neoplatonist? A Possible Sample of Iamblichus at Simplicius on the Categories 12,10-­‐13,12.” International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 6/2 (2012): 173-­‐185. Griffin, M. “What Does Aristotle Categorize? Semantics and the Early Peripatetic Reading of the Categories.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 55/1 (2012): 65-­‐
108. Harari, O. “Simplicius on Tekmeriodic Proofs.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43/2 (2012): 366-­‐375. Harari, O. “John Philoponus and the conformity of mathematical proofs to Aristotelian demonstrations.” In The History of Mathematical Proof in Ancient Traditions. Edited by K. Chemla, 206-­‐227. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Helmig, C. Forms and Concepts. Concept Formation in the Platonic Tradition. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012. Ierodiakonou, K. “The Byzantine Commentator’s Task: Transmitting, Transforming or Transcending Aristotle’s Text.” In Knotenpunkt Byzanz. Edited by A Speer and P. Steinkrüger, 199-­‐209. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012. Johnson, A. “Philosophy, Hellenicity, Law: Porphyry on Origen, Again.” Journal of Hellenic Studies 132 (2012): 55-­‐69. Kupreeva, I. “Alexander of Aphrodisias and Aristotle’s de Anima: What’s in a commentary?” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 55 (2012): 109-­‐129. Lafleur, C. and J. Carrier. “Triple signification des noms universels, intellection et abstraction dans la Logica Ingredientibus: Super Porphyrium d’Abélard.” Laval théologique et philosophique, 68/1 (2012): 91-­‐128. Lafleur, C. and J. Carrier. “Abélard et les universaux: édition et traduction du début de la Logica Ingredientibus: Super Porphyrium” Laval théologique et philosophique, 68/1 (2012): 129-­‐210. Marenbon, J. “Boèce, Porphyre et les variétés de l’abstractionnisme.” Laval théologique et philosophique, 68/1 (2012): 9-­‐20. Sharples, R. W. “Alexander On Physics 2.9.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 55 (2012): 19–30. Sorabji, R. “Waiting for Philoponus.” In Medieval Arabic Thought: Essays in Honour of Fritz Zimmermann. Edited by M. Afifi al-­‐Akiti and C. Burnett, 181-­‐196. London: Warburg Institute, 2012. Strobino, R. “Avicenna’s Use of the Arabic Translations of the Posterior Analytics and the Ancient Commentary Tradition.” Oriens 40/2 (2012): 355-­‐389. Suto, T. Boethius on Mind, Grammar, and Logic: A Study of Boethius’ Commentaries on Peri Hermeneias. Leiden: Brill, 2012. Trizio, M. “On the Byzantine fortune of Eustratios of Nicaea’s commentary on Books I and VI of the Nicomachean Ethics.” In The Many Faces of Byzantine Philosophy. Edited by B. Bydén and K. Ierodiakonou, 199-­‐224. Athens: The Norwegian Institute at Athens, 2012. Tuominen, M. “Philosophy of the Ancient Commentators on Aristotle.” Philosophy Compass 7/12 (2012): 852-­‐895. 2013 Bobzien, S. “Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle’s Theory of the Stoic Indemonstrables.” In From Refutation to Assent: Strategies of Argument in Greek and Roman Philosophy. Edited by M. Lee and M. Schiefsky. Oxford: Oxford University Press, (expected 2013). Chiaradonna, R. “Alexander, Boethus and the other Peripatetics” In Universals in Ancient Philosophy. Edited by R. Chiaradonna and G. Galluzzo. Pisa: Edizione della Scuola Normale (expected 2013) Gili, L. “Categorical μὴ κατὰ χρόνον propositions in Alexander of Aphrodisias’ modal syllogistic.” Apeiron (2013): 1-­‐17 Griffin, M. “Which “Athenodorus” Commented on Aristotle’s Categories?” The Classical Quarterly 63 (2013): 199-­‐208. Guyomarc’h, G. “Les sources post-­‐hellénistiques du questionnaire de Porphyre.” In Methodos. Savoirs Et Textes 13 (2013). Hatzimichali, M. “The texts of Plato and Aristotle in the First Century BC.” In Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century BC. Edited by Malcolm Schofield, 1-­‐27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. Rashed, M. “Boethus’ Aristotelian Ontology.” In Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century BC. Edited by M. Schofield, 53-­‐77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. Sluiter, I. “The Violent Scholiast: Power Issues in Ancient Commentaries.” In Writing Science. Edited by M. Asper, 191-­‐214. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013. Taylor, R. “Themistius and the development of Averroes' noetics.” In Medieval Perspectives on Aristotle's De Anima. Edited by R. L. Friedman and J.-­‐M. Counet, 1-­‐38. Louvain: Peeters, 2013.