3_plete text _VI LSD No. 227 (§102a) B0L No. 16 (§91c
Transcription
3_plete text _VI LSD No. 227 (§102a) B0L No. 16 (§91c
3_plete text _VI LSD No. 227 (§102a) B0L No. 16 (§91c) serotonln (§90a) _IEY, P.B., HANCE, _ingham) A.J. M 405 EEG (Dept.of Exp.Psychiatry, Med.School, _ effects of intraventricular injections of d-lysergic acid _ethylamide (LSD 25) and 5-hydroxyt .ryptamine (serotonin) on the _ctrical activity of the brain of the conscious cat. _i J.Physiol., !_ London 122 , 50 P (1956). The etTects of drugs iniected intraperitoneally or intraventricularly (Feldberg & Sherwood, 1953) on the electrical activity of the brain have been studied in _Ji:: eats with implanted electrodes (Bradley & Elkes, 1953a). The effects of intraperitoneal injections of LSD25 (20-25/_g/kg) _! have been described (Bradley & Elkes, 1953 b). The same drug injected intraventricularly in doses of 100-200/_g produced high-amplitude rhythmic activity at 4-7 c/s _f_l.: (Fig. 1), which was only transitorily blocked by sensory stimuli. The immediate _i effects of the drug included licldng movements, twitching of the ears and increased restlessness. The animals later became retarded. ........ _'_; .... ' l_sec Normal conscious ¢=¢.arousal Fig. 1. The arrow _qindicatu 7 rain.after 100pg L.S.D.25, Intr,ventrlcular the application of a sensory stimulus. The effects on behaviour of intraventricular injections of serotonin (200250pg) were similar to those described by Feldberg & Sherwood (1954), and the electrical activity showed an increase in slow rhythms which still responded to sensory stimuli. An intraperitoneal injection of LSD 25 failed to antagonize the effects of serotonin, but the combination of these two drugs, irrespective of the o_lez in which theywere given, produced an electrical pattern s_milar to that seen with LSD 25 alone when given intraventricularly, namely, highamplitude rhythmic activity at 4-7 c/s. Bzom-lysergic acid diethylamide, a powerful inhlbitor of serotouin (Konzett, 1956), but lacldng the psychological effects of LSD 25, produced mild sedation when given intraventrieularly or intraperitoneally in equivalent doses; the electrical activity showed an increase in slow activity. There was no sign of the _i fast electrical activity or alerting of behaviour seen with intraperitoneal injections of LSD25 (Bradley & Elkes, 1953b), even when doses of up to 100pg/kg of brom-LSD were used. The effects on electrical activity pechliar to LSD25 may therefore be related to its psychological effects. The results also suggest a possible synergism between the central et[ect8 of LSD25 and 5-hydroxytryptam_ne. REFERENCES Bradley,P. B. &Elku, J. (19_a). l_aroeaceph. Clin. Neuro_dol. 5, 451-456. Bradley,P. B. & Elkes,J. (1953b).J. Phys/o/.120, 13-14P. Feldberg,W. &Sherwood,S. L. (195S).J. P_. 120, S-4P. Feldberg0 W. & Sherwood, S_ L. (1954). J. Phydol. 128, 148-167. Koazett, H. (1956). Ar_t. _vp. Pa_ P/mrmak. (in the Prem). (Effet d'injections intraventriculaires de LSD et de s_rotc sur l'activit_ _lectrique du cerveau de chats non-narcotis_ Chez le chat non-narcotise, l'administration intraventricu_ de i00 _ 200_ de LSD provoque une activite rythmique d'ampl_ @levee et un rythme de 4 _ 7/sec. qui ntest bloqu_ qus pass_ ment par des stimuli sensoriels. L'inJection intraventriculai: de 200 k 500_ de s_rotonine augmente les rythmes lents qui_ sont pas bloqu6s par des stimuli sensoriels. Le ISD i.p. n'ini hibe pas l'effet de la s6rotonine; mais l'administration n_e des 2 substances provoque, ind_pendemment de l'ordre administration, une activit_ rythmique d'amplitude _lev_e a_ un rythme de 4 _ 7/sec., c._ d. un effet ressemblant _ celu_i_ LSD seul administr_ par voie intraventriculaire. Le BOL prowo_ une s_dation l_gbre lorsqu'il est administr6 par les voies _, ventriculaire ou .intrap@riton@ale, et il augmente I' activit_ lente. Administre _ des doses Jusqu'_ I00 _/kg, le BOL ne provoque pas de rythme EEG rapide et ne rend pas plus anime le camportement de l'animal, tel qu'on l'a observ6 apr_s LSD i.p, (BRADLEY & ELKES, LSD No 3Aa, Rapport 22/15). (D_e Wirkung intraventricul_rer LS.D- und Serotonin-lnJektionez auf die elektrische Aktivit_t des Gehirns bei wachen Katzen.) Bei wachen Katzen verursachten 100-200 _LSD intraventricul_r eine rhythmische Aktivit_t von hoher Amplitude und 4-7 Welle_ Sek., welche nur vorh'oergehend durch Sinnesreize blockiert w_tr de. 200-500 _Serotonin intraventricul_r verst_rkten die langss_en Rhythm en. Diese wurden dutch Sinnesreize nicht blockiert LSD i.p. hemmte die Serotonin-Wirkung nicht, aber die kambinie 7erabfolgung beider Mittel verursachte, ungeachtet ihrer Re_e folge, eine rhythmische Aktivit_t yon hoher Amplitude un_ _-7 Wellen/Sek., wirkte also _hnlich wie ISD intraventricul_r a!lein. BOL wirkte bei intraventricul_rer oder i.p. Verabfol_g leicht sedativ und verst_rkte die langsame Aktivit_t. Auch in Dosen bis zu lO0 _,/kg verursachte B0L keinen schnellen EEG_hythmus oder Lebhafterwerden des Tieres, wie dies nach LSD i. beobachtet wurde (BRADLEY & ELVES, LSD Nr. 3La, Raoport 22/15) _6 (EFD lO'&6V) NKT/Dr.Bs/Dr.Spi/ev 1256 _