Marking grid for oral presentations M2

Service des Langues de l’Université Joseph Fourier (Grenoble I)
Octobre 2015
Student number ________________________Last name ________________________________ First name_____________________________
UFR _____________________________________Subject _________________________________
Marking grid for Master’s degree oral presentations (See CEF on verso for oral presentation skills)
A1
Structure n.a.
One mark
on each
row.
Includes
half points,
ex. 3.
“seuil” B1
Presents the main
points in a reasonably
clear and precise
manner.
“indépendent” B2
Establishes rapport
Clear, systematically
developed presentation,
highlighting significant
points.
0.5
1
2
n.a.
No reading. Numerous
grammar and
pronunciation mistakes.
Noticeable mother
tongue influence – but
usually understandable.
English
0.5
n.a.
Fluency
0.5
Questions
and
answers
“survie”A2
Can give a short
rehearsed presentation.
(Introduction / basic
transitions / signing
off).
n.a.
.
0.5
1
Can manage to answer
– may ask for repetition
if speech was rapid.
1
2
Communication Clear and aesthetic
Points per criteria
are added.
visuals
0 - ½
- 1
Tick one:
Pas de validation (less than 11.49)
11.5-12.99/ Passage en commission
13+/ Validation or Validation by the
Commission
Creative Commons : Attribution – Pas d’utilisation commerciale.
Citez : UGA SdL - ALP Sciences et Technologies.
Remarks:
-
1
Native user fluency.
Chunking.
Can handle difficult and
even hostile questions.
3.5
-
English
/4
Fluency
/4
Questions and
answers
/4
Good speed and
volume.
0 - ½
Very articulate. Uses
idiomatic expressions.
Varies intonation to
express finer shades of
meaning.
4
Responds spontaneously
almost effortlessly.
2.5
Visuals are
integrated into talk.
0 - ½
3.5
Ease of expression.
Fluency and spontaneity
poses no strain (on either
self or audience).
/4
4
Almost effortless fluency.
Smooth flow of language.
Chunking.
2.5
Total Points
Structure
4
3.5
Good fluency and
intonation, despite
occasional hesitations.
Some chunking.
2
Frequently asks for
repetition.
Needs help with
formulation of reply.
3.5
Rare errors difficult to spot.
Varies intonation to express
finer shades of meaning.
Easily uses occasional
circumlocutions.
2.5
Keeps going
comprehensively,
despite pauses for
planning and repair.
1
“maîtrise” C2
Confident and articulate,
Adapts to audience
needs, Explains with
elaborate and often
memorable descriptions.
2.5
Does not make
;5 mistakes,
which lead to breakdown
in understanding. Selfcorrects. Pronunciation
clear.
2
Pauses, false starts,
reformulation very
evident.
“autonome” C1
Explains complex subjects
clearly and in detail. Wellstructured. Use of cohesive
devices. “Rounds off” the
conclusion.
4
Interactive body
Communication
language, eye contact. skills
/4
1
0 -
½
-
1
Total
/20
Service des Langues de l’Université Joseph Fourier (Grenoble I)
Octobre 2015
Student number ________________________Last name ________________________________ First name_____________________________
UFR _____________________________________
Marking grid for Master’s degree note-taking (See CEF on verso for note-taking skills)
“survie” A1/A2
Comprehension
Basic information.
Relies heavily on
visual aids. Very
simple summary
from an outline or
direct questions.
Errors may hinder
comprehension.
In-class notetaking
from oral
document(s).
Class notes,
follow up
& from
student
presentations.
“seuil” B1
→
→
Selection
“independent” B2
→
→
Records key or important points
when more or less dictated. Can
write a basic summary of main
ideas. Some errors in the
association or importance of the
ideas. Structural and lexical
errors do not hinder
comprehension.
1 - 2
Organisation
→
→
“autonome” C1
Reaction
→
→
“maîtrise” C2
Misses some facts. Rare
structural and lexical
errors. Relates work to
personal objectives. Rich
vocabulary. Gives basic
opinion. Notices points
of personal interest.
Detailed notes useful for
other people. Notes and
summarizes clearly and
in detail. Gives opinions.
Main ideas clearly given
priority. Can reformulate
with own structural and
vocabulary elements.
Complex summaries
relating different sources
and objectives. Nuances,
allusions and implicit
facts included. Elegant
use of vocabulary, idioms
and complex structures.
No errors.
5
7
8
4
Total Points
In depth understanding
In-class notetaking.
/8
1 - 2
Introduction/Conclusion
0 - ½ - 1
4
7
8
Class notes,
follow up, and
from student
presentations.
/8
Glossary
1 - 2 - 3
Validation of B2-level note-taking skills : Can understand a
clearly structured lecture on a familiar subject, and can take
notes on points which strike him/her as important, even
though he/she tends to concentrate on the words themselves
and therefore to miss some information. (CEFRL)
Tick one:
Pas de validation
Passage en commission (9.5-9.99)
Validation (10+) or Validation by commission
Creative Commons : Attribution – Pas d’utilisation commerciale.
Citez : UGA SdL - ALP Sciences et Technologies.
5
Organisation and Objectives
/4
Remarks:
Total
/20