The Challenges In Monitoring And Control Of Indoor Air Pollution
Transcription
The Challenges In Monitoring And Control Of Indoor Air Pollution
The Challenges In Monitoring And Control Of Indoor Air Pollution Due To Combustion In Kitchens In Urban And Rural Areas Rural Urban Rashmi S. Patil Professor Centre for Environmental Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Powai, Mumbai- 400 076 India Email: [email protected] Background: The most dominant source of indoor air pollution (IAP) is fuel combustion in kitchens. These sources, though small, have exposure effectiveness about tens or hundreds of times greater than large scale outdoor sources, so they have high health risk potential. Objectives: Monitoring and assessment of exposure due to fuel combustion in kitchens of different socio-economic groups. Identification of mitigation measures for exposure reduction and evaluation of the resultant health and economic benefits 2 Various Types of Kitchens Combustion in Kitchens Rural Regions (Biomass Fuel) Domestic Urban Slums (Biomass/ Kerosene) Urban Regions Commercial ( Kerosene/ LPG) Others (Schools/ Hospitals) Middle/ Upper Income Group (Kerosene/ LPG) 3 (I) Biofuel Combustion In Rural Kitchens Biofuels (wood, crop residues and animal dung) account for 60% of world air pollution exposure especially in developing countries. Biomass combustion in kitchens has three major issues: ¾ Health : High conc. of air pollutants ¾ Climate : Emissions of GHGs and black carbon which contribute to global warming ¾ Energy : Low energy efficiency exerts stress on fuel demand, natural resource base and human labor and time. 4 In India about 90% of rural population depends on biofuels. Several Interventions: ¾ Improvement in stoves, fuels, ventilation and child care practices. Under a National Program of Improved Smokeless Stoves (SI) by Government of India ¾ ¾ ¾ Subsidized several million stoves installed in rural areas. But, program not very successful and stoves not readily adopted Very little data on performance of SI in actual field conditions. 5 Comparative study on exposure assessment of traditional and improved biostoves in tribal villages on a longitudinal basis Sampling Protocol: ¾ Cooking Session: Kitchen Living Room Personal ¾ Indoor Background: Between Meals Outdoor: Outside House Far Away ¾ 6 Mean RPM and CO Concentration During Cooking Sessions for Traditional (ST) and Improved Stoves (SI) RPM (μg m-3) ¾ CO (ppm) 1173 ± 1059 AREA SAMPLING (LIVING ROOM) 628 ± 672 9.8 ± 6.8 570 ± 692 540 ± 654 409 ± 473 4.5 ± 4.4 % REDUCTION 37% (p=0.021) 54% (p=0.0026) 35% (p=0.0034) 54% (p= 0.0087) DELHI, INDIA (1999) (ST) 1200 1370 - 12 STOVE TYPE PERSONAL SAMPLING (COOK) AREA SAMPLING (KITCHEN) TRADITIONAL 906 ± 1167 IMPROVED During cooking RPM conc. at the centre is more compared to near the stove due to plume shadow effect. 7 EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT STOVE TYPE RPM EXPOSURE (mg h m-3) COOKING INDOOR DAILY BACKGROUND INTEGRATED TRADITIONAL 2.97 1.46 4.79 IMPROVED 1.37 1.11 2.85 Average 40 % reduction in daily-integrated exposure (p<0.0001) Average 54 % reduction in exposure due to cooking (p<0.0001) The average daily-integrated exposure in concentration units is 200 μg m-3 for ST and 118 μg m-3 for SI 8 Economic Evaluation of Health Benefits Physical impacts of the improved stoves like reduced emissions, fuel saving , less cooking time etc are easy to perceive A bigger incentive for stove adoption was the communication of monetary gains due to health benefits Methodology: Change in RPM Exposure Dose Response Parameter : Additional annual mortality risk per person per 1 µg/m3 change in PM Change in annual mortality risk for improved stove Value of Statistical Life (VSL= WTP/change in risk) Annual benefit of mortality risk reduction per person Cost of improved stove (Life Span of 5 years) = 82 µg/m3 = 8.26 x 10-6 = 6.77 x10-4 = 6.4 x 106 INR = 4330.00 (~80 USD) = 210.00 INR 9 ¾ The improved smokeless stoves have several benefits of health, climate and energy but other challenges for the promotion of intervention are: Dissemination : * * Placement : * Proper installation Training needed for maintenance Proper ventilation and dispersion Awareness and Education : * Communication of health benefits 10 (II) Exposure Assessment for Low Income Population Groups in Urban Areas: Study Region: ¾ Urban slums near industries. ¾ Worst Outdoor Air Pollution : Vehicles + Fugitive ¾ Worst Indoor Air Pollution : Low Grade Fuel Dense Houses/ Poor Ventilation Poor Nutrition/ Health Outcomes of the Study : ¾ Personal Exposure (PE) levels and its variation ¾ Risk factors effecting PE and Health ¾ Health linkages with PE ¾ Models for exposure prediction and health benefit assessment. 11 PERSONAL EXPOSURE TO RPM RPM Exposure in μg/m 3 Personal Exposure (PE) to RPM 408 450 400 293 330 350 300 250 200 150 153 100 70 100 50 0 WHO NAAQS AAQ TP COW AOW WHO, NAAQS: Standards AAQ: Ambient Air Quality TP: Traffic Police COW: Casual Outdoor Workers *PE > NAAQS, f = 3.3 > WHO, f = 4.7 > AAQ, f = 2.2 AOW: All Outdoor Workers 12 An Int Study : NOX measurements ( ppb) in 11 countries ( Harvard Univ ,US) [HARVARD UNIV., US] City and Country Indoor (I) Outdoor (O) Personal I/O ratio Taejon, Korea Bombay, India Sapporo, Japan Manila, Philippines 38.7±18.2 40.8±17.1 23.1±14.1 23.4±11.3 41.7±16.2 38.7±13.7 22.0±13.8 25.0±11.5 50.0±28.5 43.7±16.0 28.3±14.2 25.8±6.5 1.0±0.5 1.1±0.6 1.5±1.6 1.0±0.2 London, UK 21.7±12.4 42.3±5.1 29.3±6.4 0.6±0.3 Boston, US 19.2±15.8 33.7±20.1 28.0±10.7 0.6±0.4 Geneva, Switzerland 8.3±6.3 11.9±5.5 11.0±5.0 0.8±0.6 I/O > 1 for all Asian Countries 13 Components of Total Daily Exposure To RPM (mg h/m3) RPM Exposure in mg h/m3 10 8 6 4 2 0 Others Residential Marol ( Low Ambient Level) Sakinaka (High Ambient Level) Combined (Average) Occupational Site Residential Exposure ~ Outdoor Exposure Rural v/s Urban area (i) PM5 levels almost same during cooking (ii) But exposure levels due to cooking as a fraction of daily exposure was about 75% in rural and 20% in urban areas respectively. 14 Modeling for Exposure and Health Benefit Assessment Air pollution management strategies were evaluated based on exposure reduction and health benefits Model Used: Ben MAP (Benefits Mapping and Analysis) of USEPA BenMAP modified to use personal exposure as basis rather than ambient concentrations. Inputs into the integrated health assessment model: ¾ ¾ ¾ Exposure Model: ambient air quality, I/O model, time activity The concentration response functions for various health endpoints like bronchitis, URI and hospital admission. Economic model for valuation of various health endpoints. 15 Observed Baseline Ambient Concentrations Predicted Control Scenario Ambient concentrations Reduction in Population level exposure Regulatory Strategies Predicted Concentration in Micro-environments Population Distribution and Time Activity Patterns Predicted Control Personal Exposure Reduction in Health effect Incidence (mortality and morbidity) Monetary Benefits Reduction in Personal exposure Predicted Baseline Personal Exposure Framework for health benefit assessment of various control strategies e.g.: Change in cooking fuel from kerosene to LPG gave economic benefits for reduction in mortality and morbidity as INR 515.29 (11.4USD) per capita per year. 16 (III) Domestic Combustion in Urban Kitchens Study done in typical middle income households, where LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas) fuel is used. PM5 conc. during cooking ranged as high as 348- 2882 μg/m3. PM during cooking is generated from: I. II. Fuel combustion Cooking process : like frying produces very large fraction of PM and condensable vapors. Cooking contributed about 30% to 48% of total daily exposure. Considerable variation in exposure between homes mainly due to air exchange rate. Three control techniques for exposure reduction were tested: ¾ ¾ ¾ Natural ventilation An exhaust fan An electric chimney 17 Concentration of Air Pollutants in μg/m3 with Different Control Techniques During Cooking Session Concentration in μg/m3 Type of Pollutant Percent Reduction in Concentration Natural Ventilation Exhaust Fan Electric Chimney With Exhaust With Electric Fan Chimney PM5 1828.25 681.11 1188.45 63 35 NO2 23.32 16.49 21.32 30 8.6 SO2 21.29 15.92 16.22 25.3 24 CO 0.021 0.006 0 71.4 - Exhaust fan seems to be more effective than the costly electric chimney. The study indicated that the most cost-effective way to reduce indoor exposure is to ensure proper ventilation through appropriate building design codes. 18 The particulate respiratory dose for Indian women was estimated using lung deposition model. Input data: Particle mass size distribution (PSD) and Physiological data on women. Biomodal distribution was obtained for both cooking and non-cooking periods. Non-Cooking : Dominant Coarse mode 1-2 μm. Cooking : Dominant Accumulation mode 0.1-0.3 μm Non-Cooking Session Cooking Session 19 Average particulate doses per day (μg day-1) during cooking and noncooking sessions for Indian Women Lung Region Daily dose (μg day-1) Pulmonary Tracheabronchial Nasopharyngeal Total Cooking Mode 1 (Fine) 46.93 14.18 21.10 82.21 Mode 2 (Coarse) 88.75 28.54 23.51 140.80 Total 135.67 42.72 44.61 223.01 Non-cooking Mode 1 (Fine) 7.04 2.25 1.86 11.15 Mode 2 (Coarse) 43.92 14.25 22.85 81.02 Total 50.96 16.50 24.71 92.17 Highest deposition was observed in pulmonary region during cooking with severe health impacts About 18% and 40.8% of the inhaled particles of accumulation mode and coarse mode respectively are deposited in the respiratory tract during cooking session Physiological data of Indian subjects needed for accurate prediction. 20 (IV) Combustion In Commercial Kitchens Commercial Kitchens (CK) are defined as places where customer pays for food consumed. These are critical hot spots of IAP because: High fuel consumption (~ 100kg of LPG/ day) Long operating time More people exposed (workers and customers) 21 Moreover these are not considered as occupational work environments like industries. Hence, no regulations exist for air pollution or kitchen design. It’s observed that kitchen is the most neglected of hotel/ restaurant ventilation system. There are about 5200 in Mumbai city and they contribute about 23% of total ambient PM load (NEERI, 2004) 22 Apart from air pollution a major challenge in these kitchens is high waste heat load which causes severe thermal discomfort and sickness to workers. Hence, a study was conducted to assess IAQ of CK and a control device was designed based on heat recovery from exhaust gases which gave three major co- benefits as follows: 23 1. Energy Savings: Water was used as the cooling fluid in the heat exchanger and its temperature rose by almost 15-20oC. The heated water could be reused causing energy savings. Total heat recovered = 22.5 kWh/d Hence, earned carbon credits could be 0.014 per day. Thus, under some assumptions total carbon credits earned for Mumbai city can be 30,000/yr. This, can help in reducing global warming and has a good prospect of earning revenue and carbon trading. 24 2. Air Pollution Reduction 300 Concentration (µg/cu. m.) 250 200 Cooking with oil use [with control] Cooking with oil use [without control] Cooking without oil use [with control] Cooking without oil use [Without control] [without control] 150 100 50 0 Stove PM10 Stove PM 2.5 Work PM10 Work PM2.5 Sampling Site 20 to 48% reduction in particulate concentration Reduction in fine particles (PM2.5) more than larger size (PM10) especially for oil use 25 3. Improved Work Environment : • Indoor temperatures reduce - so better thermal comfort (climate) for workers Conclusions Develop codes/guidelines for ecodesign of kitchens to assist builders/architects to : reduce pollution + conserve energy + improve work environment 26 (V) Assessment of IAQ in Schools ¾ Objective To characterize IAQ in representative schools of different socio-economic status and identify suitable mitigation measures ¾ Measurements Comfort parameters: Temp., RH Ventilation Pollutants: PM10, PM2.5, CO2, CO Bioaerosols Average PE in PMS about 4 times higher than ASB due to greater occupant density and poor ventilation Schools of different economic status: ASB/ High; KV IIT/ Medium; PMS/Low 27 ¾CFD tool FLUENT 6.2 used for simulation of velocity and temperature profiles, to test the adequacy of air circulation in class rooms. • Poor ventilation indicated for Powai Municipal School • Simulation with additional ventilator (skylight) and exhaust fans gave considerable improvement. (a) (b) Temperature profile developed for classroom of Powai Municipal School (a) Initial (b) Skylights on internal wall 28 Conclusions: What are the challenges and needs? Monitoring and Exposure Assessment: Large Scale/ Long Term studies needed Measurements highly resource intensive so need studies on : I/O Relation Area v/s Personal Sampling Proxy Indicators Protocols and Instruments Epidemiological Studies: Linking exposure and health risk. Models for health benefit evaluation of control strategies. 29 Regulatory/ Policy Interventions: ¾ Policies should include Personal Exposure and IAQ • • ¾ Standards and Regulations • ¾ Health based air quality management Exposure effectiveness of sources should be accounted Indoor sources/ IAQ/ Personal Exposure Building/Ventilation Codes Technological Interventions: ¾ ¾ Cost effective solutions Co-benefits should be the target 30 Energy Air Pollution Climate ¾This nexus offers opportunity for win-win strategies ¾Investment in strategies which provide health benefit and energy conservation on local scale and mitigate climate change on global scale should be promoted 31 32