Transcription
Transcription
Transcription
Conditions de fiabilité des mesures d’expression génique par RT-qPCR en cancérologie clinique J.D. Combes1,2, G. Grelier3, M. Laversanne2, N. Voirin1, S. Chabaud1, R. Ecochard2, C. Moyret-Lalle3 & C. Lasset1 1 Département de santé publique, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon 2 Service de biostatistiques des Hospices Civils de Lyon, CNRS UMR 5580 3 INSERM U590, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon PCR, qPCR, RT-qPCR... Polymerase Chain Reaction Real-Time quantitative PCR Reverse-Transcription Real-Time quantitative PCR Transcription reverse (ADNc) qPCR ? 2/10 RT-qPCR en cancérologie RT-qPCR Extraction Transcription ARN ADNc qPCR Cancer T47D Culture cellulaire Expression APC11 APC11+?? Non MB45 Cancer 9 Culture cellulaire RT-qPCR Extraction Transcription ARN ADNc qPCR Expression APC11 APC11-?? 3/10 Plan expérimental T47D Culture cellulaire Extraction Transcription ARN ADNc qPCR MB45 9 4/10 Plan expérimental BT-20 MCF-7 MDA-MB459 BT-474 MDA-MB157 MDA-MB549 Cal51 MDA-MB231 SK-Br3 Cama1 MDA-MB361 T47D HCC-1937 MDA-MB436 UACC-612 HS-57BT MDA-MB453 ZR-75.1 5/10 Estimation de l’erreur de mesure Lignées cellulaires (18) 18 3 2 1 Source de variabilité Culture cellulaire Extraction ARN Transcription ADNc Inter lignée ET ? Culture ? Extraction ARN ? RT ? qPCR ? qPCR 6/10 Estimation de l’erreur de mesure Lignées cellulaires (18) 18 3 2 1 Culture cellulaire Extraction ARN Transcription ADNc Source de variabilité ET Inter lignée 1.7 Culture 1.3 Extraction ARN 1.2 RT 2.0 qPCR 0.26 qPCR 7/10 Conditions de fiabilité ? ? ? ? 8/10 Conclusion Fiabilité des mesures d’expression génique? Murphy J, Bustin SA. Reliability reverse-transcription PCR in clinical diagnostics: clinical diagnostics: Tichopadof A,real-time Kitchen R, Riedmaier I, Becker C, Ståhlberg A, Kubista M. PfafflorMW. gold standard substandard? Design and optimization of reverse-transcription quantitative PCR experiments. PCR Étapes pré-The ongoing evolutionReview. of qPCR. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2009 Mar;9(2):187-97. PubMed PMID: 19298142. Clin Chem. 2009 Oct;55(10):1816-23. PubMed PMID: 19643838. 2009 Oct;55(10):1816-23. Methods. 2010 Apr;50(4):215-6. PubMed PMID: 20215019. recommend the use of issample replicates ““We However, this technology still troubled by preferentially to any other replicates significant technical deficiencies. Publication of Quantitative Real PCR) and RT pre-PCR steps like sampling, nucleic acid-Time stabilisation when working with solid tissue, cell and single Hence its often-improper use culture, as a clinical tool cells, are still highly variable and and wehas recommend the use of RT replicates public health implications, introduce lots of error in the quantification procedure.” when working with blood.” most recently demonstrated through its association with the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine/autism controversy.” recommend the use of issample replicates ““We However, this technology still troubled by MIQE Guidelines (Minimum Information “Most advances were implemented in PCR method for itself but 9/10 Remerciements INSERM U590 - CLB Dépt de Santé Publique - CLB Biostatistiques HCL Gaël Grelier Caroline Moyret-Lalle Alain Puisieux Sylvie Chabaud Christine Lasset David Perol Nicolas Voirin René Ecochard Jean Iwaz Matthieu Laversanne Pascal Roy Fabien Subtil Références 1: Combes JD, Grelier G, Laversanne M, Voirin N, Chabaud S, Ecochard R, Lasset C, Moyret-Lalle C. Contribution of cell culture, RNA extraction, and reverse transcription to the measurement error in quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction-based gene expression quantification. Anal Biochem. 2009 Oct 1;393(1):29-35. Epub 2009 Jun 13. PubMed PMID: 19527676. 2: Murphy J, Bustin SA. Reliability of real-time reverse-transcription PCR in clinical diagnostics: gold standard or substandard? Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2009 Mar;9(2):187-97. Review. PubMed PMID: 19298142. 3: Pfaffl MW. The ongoing evolution of qPCR. Methods. 2010 Apr;50(4):215-6.PubMed PMID: 20215019. 4: Tichopad A, Kitchen R, Riedmaier I, Becker C, Ståhlberg A, Kubista M. Design and optimization of reversetranscription quantitative PCR experiments. Clin Chem. 2009 Oct;55(10):1816-23. Epub 2009 Jul 30. PubMed PMID: 19643838. 10/10 8 + BT _4 74 + T4 7D _1 93 7 5 BT _2 0 C + C am a_ 1 + C 75 .1 + ZR M B1 57 F_ 7 + M D A_ + M C 4 H 81 2 M B2 31 C + M D A_ AC + U + al _5 1 3 C M B3 61 Br 3 + M D A_ + SK + M B4 53 M B4 59 + M D A_ 2 M D A_ S_ 57 8T + H M B4 36 M B5 49 1 M D A_ M D A_ Gene expression value Données 16 16 15 15 14 14 13 13 12 12 11 11 10 10 9 9 + 7 6 + + 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Estimation de l’erreur de mesure Erreur de mesure due Erreur de mesure due Variabilité ààla Reverse Transcription l’extraction de l’ARN la culture cellulaire interlignées cellulaires Conditions de fiabilité