01 WELCOME.qxd - American Evaluation Association

Transcription

2005 Joint CES/AEA Conference
Congrès conjoint SCÉ/AEA 2005
2QWDULRLVFRPPLWWHGWRJUHDWHUHIIHFWLYHQHVVHIILFLHQF\DQGDFFRXQWDELOLW\RI
JRYHUQPHQWSROLFLHVSURJUDPVDQGVHUYLFHV
&RQWDFW,QIRUPDWLRQ
.HYLQ3HUU\0DQDJHU
3HUIRUPDQFH0HDVXUHPHQWDQG(YDOXDWLRQ7HDP
7UHDVXU\%RDUG2IILFH0LQLVWU\RI)LQDQFH
NHYLQSHUU\#ILQJRYRQFD
RU
.DUHQ+XJKHV
'LUHFWRU%XVLQHVV3ODQQLQJDQG([SHQGLWXUH0DQDJHPHQW%UDQFK
7UHDVXU\%RDUG2IILFH0LQLVWU\RI)LQDQFH
NDUHQKXJKHV#ILQJRYRQFD
Crossing Borders, Crossing Boundaries
Franchir les frontières, repousser les limites
7KH7UHDVXU\%RDUG2IILFHRIWKH0LQLVWU\RI)LQDQFHLVSOHDVHGWRVXSSRUW
WKH&DQDGLDQ(YDOXDWLRQ6RFLHW\$PHULFDQ(YDOXDWLRQ$VVRFLDWLRQ
&RQIHUHQFH7KH+RQRXUDEOH*UHJ6RUEDUD0LQLVWHURI)LQDQFHZRXOGOLNHWR
ZHOFRPHDOOFRQIHUHQFHSDUWLFLSDQWVWR2QWDULR
PROGRAM
PROGRAMME
October 24 to 30, 2005
Du Octobre 24 au 30 2005
SHERATON CENTRE
CENTRE SHERATON
Toronto • Ontario • Canada
Canadian Evaluation Society
La Société canadienne d’évaluation
1485 Laperriere Avenue
Ottawa ON K1Z 7S8 Canada
Tel.: 1-613-725-2526
Fax: 1-613-729-6206
www.evaluationcanada.ca
American Evaluation Association
Association américaine d'évaluation
16 Sconticut Neck Rd #290
Fairhaven MA 02719 USA
Tel.: 1-888-232-2275 (toll free in US and parts of Canada)
Tel.: 1-508-748-3326 (for our international callers)
Fax: 1-508-748-3158
www.eval.org
OCTOBER 24-30, 2005 • DU 24 AU 30 OCTOBRE 2005
S H E R AT O N C E N T R E • C E N T R E S H E R AT O N | T O R O N T O | O N TA R I O | C A N A D A
PROGRAM • PROGRAMME
2005 JOINT CES/AEA CONFERENCE • CONGRÈS 2005 DE LA SCÉ ET L’AEA
Crossing Borders, Crossing Boundaries • Franchir les frontières, repousser les limites
Message / Messages ............................................................................................................................0003
CES and AEA Officials /
Représentants officiels de la SCÉ et de l’AEA ..............................................................................0005
Conference Team / Équipe du congrès
........................................................................................0006
Frequently asked Questions about CES /
Questions fréquemment posées au sujet de la SCÉ ................................................................0009
Frequently asked Questions about AEA /
Questions fréquemment posées au sujet de l’AEA....................................................................0011
Conference Schedule / Horaire du congrès .................................................................................0013
Sheraton Centre / Centre Sheraton ...................................................................................................0015
Conference Highlights / Faits saillants du congrès
.................................................................0017
– Opening Plenary And Smudge Ceremony /
Séance plénière et cérémonie de purification ...................................................................0017
– Keynote Addresses /
Discours d’ouverture ...................................................................................................................0019
– Networking Socials /
Activités sociales de réseautage ............................................................................................0022
Things to Know / Choses à savoir ..................................................................................................0025
Professional Development Workshops /
Ateliers de perfectionnement professionnel ..................................................................................0035
Sincere Thanks to our Conference Sponsors /
Un grand merci à tous ceux qui appuient le Congrès ............................................................0055
CES/AEA Conference Exhibitors /
Exposants du congrès SCÉ/AEA .......................................................................................................0056
Monday, October 24 / Le lundi 24 octobre .................................................................................0061
Tuesday, October 25 / Le mardi 25 octobre ...............................................................................0063
Wednesday, October 26 / Le mercredi 26 octobre ..................................................................0065
Thursday, October 27 / Le jeudi 27 octobre ...............................................................................0081
Friday, October 28 / Le vendredi 28 octobre ..............................................................................0123
Saturday, October 29 / Le samedi 29 octobre...........................................................................0165
Sunday, October 30 / Le dimanche 30 octobre ........................................................................0209
Appendix A: Presenter Index / Annexe A : Index des conférenciers ...................................0211
Appendix B : Directory of Sessions by Sponsor /
Annexe B : Répertoire des sessions, par parrain ......................................................................0247
MESSAGES
MESSAGES
Welcome from the
CES and AEA Presidents
Mot de bienvenue de la part
des présidents de la SCÉ et de l’AEA
Carl Doucette (CES) and Sharon Rallis (AEA)
Carl Doucette (SCÉ) et Sharon Rallis (AEA)
On behalf of the National Council of the Canadian Evaluation
Society (CES) and the AEA Board of Directors, we are privileged
to welcome you to “Crossing Borders, Crossing Boundaries”. The
theme of this joint evaluation conference not only recognizes geographic borders between countries but raises multiple conceptualizations of the terms border and boundary. This conference raises
the awareness and demonstrates the value and future of evaluation
in the global context. Sessions will make evident the substantial
role that evaluation plays in the betterment of society overall. This
is an exciting time for those involved in the practice of evaluation
and we are thrilled that you have chosen to participate in this noteworthy event. We trust that you will expand your knowledge base
and share your experiences with your colleagues – and have some
fun as well! Let the border and boundary crossing begin!
Au nom du Conseil national de la Société canadienne d’évaluation
(SCÉ) et du conseil d’administration de l’AEA, nous sommes
heureux de vous souhaiter la bienvenue à « Franchir les frontières,
repousser les limites ». Le thème de ce congrès conjoint reflète non
seulement les frontières géographiques entre les pays, mais il permet aussi des conceptualisations multiples des termes frontière et
limite. Ce congrès veut promouvoir l’évaluation et démontrer la
valeur et l’avenir de cette dernière dans un contexte international.
Les sessions mettront en évidence le rôle substantiel que joue l’évaluation dans l’amélioration de la société en général. En tant que
praticiens de l’évaluation, nous vivons à une époque très stimulante
et nous sommes heureux que vous ayez choisi de participer à cet
événement sans précédent. Nous espérons que vous aurez l’occasion d’élargir vos connaissances et de partager vos expériences avec
vos collègues – tout en vous divertissant! Commençons donc à
franchir les frontières et à repousser les limites!
Welcome from the
Conference Co-Chairs
Mot de bienvenue des
coprésidents du congrès
Arnold Love (CES) and Jean King (AEA)
Arnold Love (SCÉ) et Jean King (AEA)
Ten short years ago we were fortunate to participate in the group
that collaborated on the first and – if we may say so – highly successful joint meeting of the Canadian Evaluation Society and
the American Evaluation Association. This event energized our
two organizations: delegates were enthusiastic, presentations represented diverse content and positions, and Vancouver proved a
welcoming host. Now, a decade later, we are again poised for
an exceptional conference, thanks to the hard work of many people, and especially of the CES Ontario Local Arrangements Committee, which has worked tirelessly to make this conference the
best yet. Toronto provides a fitting backdrop for our boundaryspanning discussions, and it is our pleasure to welcome you both
to the city and to what we believe will be a memorable event.
Thank you for coming.
Il y a à peine dix ans, nous avons eu la chance de faire partie d’un
groupe qui a collaboré au tout premier – et, j’ose dire, le très réussi – congrès conjoint de la Société canadienne d’évaluation et de
l’American Evaluation Association. Cet événement a redonné de la
vigueur à nos deux organismes : les délégués étaient enthousiastes,
les présentations offraient un contenu et des points de vue diversifiés et Vancouver s’est avéré une ville-hôte très accueillante.
Maintenant, une décennie plus tard, nous voilà sur le point d’entamer un autre congrès exceptionnel, grâce au travail inlassable de
nombreuses personnes, notamment le Comité des arrangements
locaux de la SCÉ-Ontario, qui a déployé des efforts considérables
pour faire de ce congrès le meilleur que nous ayons eu jusqu’ici.
Toronto offre un cadre très propice à des discussions sur le dépassement des frontières et il nous fait plaisir de vous souhaiter la
bienvenue dans notre ville et à cet événement qui selon nous
promet d’être mémorable. Merci d’être venus.
3
Welcome from the
Conference Program Co-Chairs
Mot de bienvenue des
coprésidents du programme du congrès
J. Bradley Cousins (CES) and Michael Quinn Patton (AEA)
J. Bradley Cousins (SCÉ) et Michael Quinn Patton (AEA)
As veterans of the two previous mid-decade joint conferences of
CES and AEA, we eagerly anticipate the opportunity to dialogue
once again with evaluation colleagues from around the world.
A great deal has happened in the world generally and in evaluation
specifically since our last international gathering together in Vancouver in 1995. The conference theme is an invitation to reflect on
our emergent global community of practice. The plenary keynotes
feature three important, insightful, and prestigious leaders selected to expand our thinking and stimulate dialogue about our larger
societal responsibilities as evaluators. The two featured strands of
the conference, the Theme Strand and the Canadian Strand, will
take us deeply into the diverse and complex challenges of twentyfirst century evaluation practices, methods, models, theories, and
contexts. And, given our own longstanding professional focus on
evaluation use, we hope that you will find these sessions not only
stimulating, provocative, and generative, but also useful on many
levels.
En tant que « vétérans » des deux premiers congrès conjoints de la
SCÉ et de l’AEA, nous attendons impatiemment l’occasion de dialoguer à nouveau avec des collègues de partout dans le monde.
Depuis la tenue de notre dernier congrès international à Vancouver en 1995, il s’est passé beaucoup de choses dans le monde en
général et, plus spécifiquement, dans le domaine de l’évaluation.
Le thème de ce congrès est une invitation à réfléchir sur notre
communauté internationale naissante. Les sessions plénières vous
feront découvrir trois éminents conférenciers prestigieux, qui
sauront élargir nos horizons et stimuler le dialogue sur les responsabilités sociétales plus vastes qui nous incombent en tant qu’évaluateurs. Les deux volets du congrès – le Volet thématique et le
Volet canadien – nous permettront d’examiner plus à fond les défis
complexes et diversifiés que comportent les pratiques, les méthodes, les modèles, les théories et les contextes d’évaluation du
XXIe siècle. Étant donné l’accent qu’a toujours mis notre profession sur l’utilisation de l’évaluation, nous espérons que vous trouverez ces sessions non seulement stimulantes et donnant matière à
réflexion, mais également utiles à plusieurs niveaux.
Welcome from the
CES Ontario Chapter
Local Arrangements Committee
Mot de bienvenue du
Comité des arrangements locaux
de la Section de l’Ontario
Norma Akinbiyi and Keiko Kuji-Shikatani (LAC co-chairs)
Norma Akinbiyi et Keiko Kuji-Shikatani (coprésidentes du CAL
We, the CES Ontario Chapter and the Local Arrangements
Committee, are happy to have our Elders welcome you to Toronto
with a Smudge Ceremony. Toronto was named for the Huron
word for ‘meeting place’– the area was well used in this manner for
centuries by people of the First Nations and later by traders,
thanks to its naturally protected harbour.
Les membres du Comité des arrangements locaux de la Section de
l’Ontario sont heureux que des aînés puissent vous accueillir à
Toronto par une cérémonie de purification. Le mot « Toronto »
signifie « lieu de rencontre » en langue huronne, et la région a été
utilisée à cette fin pendant des siècles par les peuples des Premières
nations et plus tard par des commerçants, en raison de son port
naturellement protégé.
Toronto is arguably the most diverse city in the world – so when
you step into our city you will realize that it is truly the best place
to explore the theme for the 2005 Joint CES/AEA Evaluation
Conference, “Crossing Borders, Crossing Boundaries.” Please join
us in the Smudge Ceremony, Thursday Night Entertainment,
Thematic Dinners, Canadian Books Discovery, Morning Walks/
Runs, to name a few of the exciting events the Local Arrangements
Committee have been planning for months.
With the help of many CES and AEA colleagues and especially the
assistance of the two secretariats, the CES Ontario Chapter’s
Local Arrangements Committee is excited to welcome you to our
‘meeting place’!
4
Toronto est sans aucun doute la ville la plus diversifiée au monde; à
votre arrivée, vous vous rendrez compte qu’il s’agit en effet du
meilleur endroit pour explorer le thème du congrès conjoint de
2005 de la SCÉ et de l’AEA, soit « Franchir les frontières, repousser les limites. » Joignez-vous à nous pour la cérémonie de purification, le spectacle de jeudi soir, les soupers thématiques, la découverte
de livres canadiens, les courses et les marches du matin, pour ne
nommer que quelques-unes des activités captivantes que le Comité
des arrangements locaux prépare depuis des mois.
Grâce à l’aide de plusieurs collègues de l’AEA et, en particulier, de
celle des deux secrétariats, le Comité des arrangements locaux de
la Section de l’Ontario est en mesure de vous souhaiter une
chaleureuse bienvenue à notre « lieu de rencontre ».
SHERATON CENTRE • CENTRE SHERATON • TORONTO • ONTARIO • CANADA
CES AND AEA
OFFICIALS
REPRÉSENTANTS OFFICIELS
D E L A S C É E T D E L’ A E A
Société canadienne d’évaluation
CES President
Carl Doucette, Independent Consultant
Président de la SCÉ
Carl Doucette, expert-conseil indépendant
CES Past President
Gwen Keith, Regina Catholic Education Centre
Présidente sortant de la SCÉ
CES Vice-President
Francis Remedios, Alberta Justice Department
Vice-président de la SCÉ
Francis Remedios, Ministère de la Justice de l’Alberta
CES Treasurer
Sandra Bozzo, Ontario Management Board Secretariat
Trésorière de la SCÉ
Sandra Bozzo, Secrétariat du Conseil de gestion de l’Ontario
CES Administration Committee Chair
Barry Warrack, Workers Compensation Board of Manitoba
Président du Comité d’administration de la SCÉ
Barry Warrack, Commission des accidents du travail du Manitoba
CES Professional Development Committee Chair
Gerald Halpern, Fair Findings Incorporated
Président du Comité de perfectionnement professionnel de la SCÉ
Gerald Halpern, Fair Findings Incorporated
CES Member Services Committee Chair
Jim Cullen, Quebec Ministry of Education
Président du Comité des services aux membres de la SCÉ
Jim Cullen, Ministère de l’Éducation du Québec
CES Chapter Representatives
Jennifer Carey (Northwest Territories), J. Carey Consulting
Afton Wright (British Columbia), BC Ministry of Education
Lori Ebbesen (Saskatchewan), Saskatchewan Health Research
Foundation
Martha McGuire (Ontario), Cathexis Consulting Inc.
Brigitte Maicher (New Brunswick), Consultant
Christina Haché (Nova Scotia), Human Resources and Skills
Development Canada
Stephanie Mowry (Prince Edward Island)
Bea Courtney (Newfoundland and Labrador), Goss Gilroy Inc.
Représentants des sections de la SCÉ
Jennifer Carey (Territoires du Nord-Ouest), J. Carey Consulting
Afton Wright (Colombie-Britannique), Ministère de l’Éducation de la C.-B.
Lori Ebbesen (Saskatchewan), Saskatchewan Health Research
Foundation
Martha McGuire (Ontario), Cathexis Consulting Inc.
Brigitte Maicher (Nouveau-Brunswick), Consultante
Christina Haché (Nouvelle-Écosse), Ressources humaines et
Développement des compétences Canada
Stephanie Mowry (Île-du-Prince-Édouard)
Bea Courtney (Terre-Neuve et Labrador), Goss Gilroy Inc.
Conference Liaison
Frankie Jordan, Saskatchewan Justice
Personne-ressource pour le congrès
Editor, Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation
J. Bradley Cousins, University of Ottawa
Rédacteur, Revue canadienne d’évaluation de programme
J. Bradley Cousins, Université d’Ottawa
CES Executive Secretary
Kathy Jones, The Willow Group
Secrétaire de direction de la SCÉ
Kathy Jones, The Willow Group
AEA President
Sharon Rallis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Présidente de l’AEA
Sharon Rallis, Université du Massachusetts, Amherst
AEA Past-President/Secretary
Nick L Smith, Syracuse University
Président sortant et secrétaire de l’AEA
Nick L Smith, Université de Syracuse
AEA President-Elect
Melvin M Mark, The Pennsylvania State University
Président désigné de l’AEA
Melvin M Mark, The Pennsylvania State University
AEA Treasurer
Kathleen Bolland, University of Alabama
Trésorière de l’AEA
Kathleen Bolland, Université de l’Alabama
AEA Board Members-at-Large
Sarita Davis, Clark Atlanta University
Rodney Hopson, Duquesne University
Melanie Hwalek, SPEC Associates
Zenda Ofir, The World Conservation Union
Katye Perry, Oklahoma State University
Ellen Taylor-Powell, University of Wisconsin-Extension
Craig Russon, Programme Planning & Evaluation Inc.
Thomas Schwandt, University of Illinois
Hazel Symonette, University of Wisconsin Madison
Autres membres du conseil d’administration de l’AEA
Sarita Davis, Clark Atlanta University
Rodney Hopson, Duquesne University
Melanie Hwalek, SPEC Associates
Zenda Ofir, Union mondiale pour la nature
Katye Perry, Oklahoma State University
Ellen Taylor-Powell , Université du Wisconsin-Extension
Craig Russon, Programme Planning & Evaluation Inc.
Thomas Schwandt, Université de l’Illinois
Hazel Symonette, Université du Wisconsin Madison
AEA Conference Chair
Jean King, University of Minnesota
Présidente du congrès de l’AEA
Jean King, Université du Minnesota
Editor, American Journal of Evaluation
Robin Miller, Michigan State University
Rédactrice, American Journal of Evaluation
Robin Miller, Michigan State University
Editor, New Directions for Evaluation
Rédactrice, New Directions for Evaluation
AEA Executive Director
Susan Kistler
Directrice générale de l’AEA
Susan Kistler
5
CONFERENCE TEAM
ÉQUIPE DU CONGRÈS
On behalf of CES and AEA, hearty thanks are given to the following people for their dedication to the planning and delivery of the
2005 Conference.
Au nom de la SCÉ et de l’AEA, j’aimerais exprimer des remerciements sincères aux personnes suivantes pour le dévouement dont
ils ont fait preuve dans la préparation et la réalisation du Congrès
de 2005.
CES Conference Co-Chair
Arnold Love, Independent Consultant
Coprésident du congrès de la SCÉ
Arnold Love, expert-conseil indépendant
CES Conference Program Co-Chairs
J. Bradley Cousins, University of Ottawa
Jim Cullen (Francophone Stream), Quebec Ministry of Education
Coprésidents du programme du congrès de la SCÉ
J. Bradley Cousins, Université d’Ottawa
Jim Cullen (Volet francophone), Ministère de l’Éducation du Québec
CES Conference Co-Treasurer
Richard Rose, Ontario Financing Authority
Cotrésorier du congrès de la SCÉ
Richard Rose, Office ontarien de financement
CES Conference Web Master
Benoît Gauthier, Réseau Circum
Webmestre du congrès de la SCÉ
Benoît Gauthier, Réseau Circum
CES Council Liaison
Personnes-ressources pour le Conseil
CES Career Center Coordinator
Jennifer Carey, J. Carey Consulting
Coordonnatrice du Centre des carrières de la SCÉ
Jennifer Carey, J. Carey Consulting
CES Silent Auction Coordinators
Joe Kopachevsky, University of Prince Edward Island
Karyn Hicks, Northwest Territories Financial Management Board
Secretariat
Coordonnatrice du Centre des carrières de la SCÉ
Joe Kopachevsky, Université de l’Île-du-Prince-Édouard
Karyn Hicks, Northwest Territories Financial Management Board
Secretariat
CES Secretariat
The Willow Group – Sharon James, Kathy Jones, Robin MacLellan,
Sue Ryan, Candice Thompson
Secrétariat de la SCÉ
The Willow Group – Sharon James, Kathy Jones, Robin MacLellan,
Sue Ryan, Candice Thompson
CES Ontario Chapter
Local Arrangements Committee
de la Section de l’Ontario
Local Arrangements Committee Co-chairs
Norma Akinbiyi, Workplace Safety & Insurance Board
Keiko Kuji-Shikatani, Program Evaluation and Learning Consultant
Coprésidentes du Comité des arrangements locaux
Norma Akinbiyi, Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de
l’assurance contre les accidents du travail
Keiko Kuji-Shikatani, Consultante en évaluation de programme et en
apprentissage
Reception and Fun Sub-committee
Erica Procter, University of Guelph PhD Candidate
Jennifer Yessis, The NRC+Picker Group Canada
Nichole Fraser, Harry Cummings & Associates
Thursday Night Entertainment Sub-committee
Martha McGuire, Cathexis Consulting
Student Sub-committee
Elaine Van Melles, Queens University PhD Candidate
Cheryl Poth, Queens University PhD Candidate
Ambassador Sub-committee
Rochelle Zorzi, Cathexis Consulting
Andrea Johnston, Johnston Research
Phil Groff, SMARTRISK
6
Sous-comité de la réception et des divertissements
Erica Procter, Université de Guelph, étudiante en doctorat
Jennifer Yessis, The NRC+Picker Group Canada
Sous-comité du spectacle du jeudi soir
Martha McGuire, Cathexis Consulting
Sous-comité étudiant
Elaine Van Melles, Université Queen’s, étudiante en doctorat
Cheryl Poth, Université Queen’s, étudiante en doctorat
Sous-comité des ambassadeurs
Rochelle Zorzi, Cathexis Consulting
Andrea Johnston, Johnston Research
Phil Groff, SMARTRISK
Conference Supporters Sub-committee
George Klima, Young and Klima
Jacqueline Whittingham, WoodGreen Community Services
Norma Akinbiyi, Workplace Safety & Insurance Board
Orlena Broomes, Simcoe County District School Board
Siu Mee Cheng, Cancer Care Ontario
Christine Frank, Georgian College
Shanon Kalra-Ramjoo, Ministry of Education
Farhad Khushid, Ministry of Health
Keiko Kuji-Shikatani, Program Evaluation and Learning Consultant
Hubert Paulmer, University of Guelph Graduate Student
Susan Scott, Cathexis Consulting
Cristina Toporas, Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada
Dale Vaillancourt, DALE Inc.
Sous-comité des partisans du congrès
George Klima, Young and Klima
Jacqueline Whittingham, WoodGreen Community Services
Norma Akinbiyi, Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de
l’assurance contre les accidents du travail
Orlena Broomes, Conseil scolaire régional du comté de Simcoe
Siu Mee Cheng, Action Cancer Ontario
Christine Frank, Georgian College
Shanon Kalra-Ramjoo, Ministère de l’Éducation
Farhad Khushid, Ministère de la Santé
Keiko Kuji-Shikatani, Consultante en évaluation de programme et en
apprentissage
Hubert Paulmer, étudiant diplômé de l’Université de Guelph
Susan Scott, Cathexis Consulting
Cristina Toporas, Société canadienne de la sclérose en plaques
Dale Vaillancourt, DALE Inc.
AEA Conference Co-chair
Coprésidente du congrès de l’AEA
AEA Conference Program Co-chair
Michael Quinn Patton, Utilization-Focused Evaluation
Coprésident du programme du congrès de l’AEA
Michael Quinn Patton, Utilization-Focused Evaluation
AEA Conference Co-treasurer
Kathleen Bolland, University of Alabama
Cotrésorière du congrès de l’AEA
Kathleen Bolland, Université de l’Alabama
AEA Career Center Coordinator
Stephen Axelrad, MetaMetrics
Coordonnateur du Centre des carrières de l’AEA
Stephen Axelrad, MetaMetrics
AEA Poster Exhibition Coordinator
Tasha Hargrove, Tuskegee University
Coordonnateur de l’exposition d’affiches de l’AEA
Tasha Hargrove, Université de Tuskegee
AEA Ambassador Coordinator
Hallie Preskill, Claremont Graduate University
Coordonnatrice des ambassadeurs de l’AEA
Hallie Preskill, Claremont Graduate University
AEA Silent Auction Coordinator
Craig Russon, Programme Planning & Evaluation
Coordonnateur de la vente aux enchères par écrit de l’AEA
Craig Russon, Planification de programmes et évaluation
AEA Secretariat
Susan Kistler, Aleise Mathison, Heidi McNeil, Heidi Nye
Secrétariat de l’AEA
Susan Kistler, Aleise Mathison, Heidi McNeil, Heidi Nye
Evaluation 2005
Program Advisory Committee
Comité consultatif du
programme d’Évaluation 2005
Jack Batho
Fred Carden
Ross Conner
Brad Cousins
Jim Cullen
Harry Cummings
Penny Hawkins
Rodney Hopson
Terry Hunt
Alexey Kuzmin
Linda Lee
Charles Lusthaus
Donna Mertens
Zenda Ofir
Michael Patton
Nancy Porteous
Sharon Rallis
Ray Rist
Andy Rowe
Craig Russon
Kim Scott
Marco Segone
Carol Townsend
Elizabeth Whitmore
Evaluation 2005
Program Reviewers
Examinateurs du
programme d’Évaluation 2005
All program review committees included members representing
both CES and AEA.
Tous les comités d’examen du programme comprenaient des membres représentant à la fois la SCÉ et l’AEA.
Mark Abrahams
Marie-Hélène Adrien
Dennis Affholter
Karen Alderete
Laurel Alexander
Asma Ali
James Altschuld
Eusebio Alvaro
Michelle AndersonDraper
Dianne Apter
Mary Arnold
Anne Atkinson
Donna Atkinson
Tarek Azzam
Elizabeth Bachrach
Eliza von Baeyer
Sharon Baggett
Caroline Bailey
Janelle Bailey
Eric Barela
Kriss Barker
Gwyn Barley
Zoe Barley
Beverley Anne Barry
Ray Bovet Basson
Katie Bates
Jack Batho
Al Bavon
Lester W Baxter
Scott Bayley
Kristy Benton
Rusti Berent
Dale Berger
Gale Berkowitz
Melanie Besculides
Monifa Green Beverly
Paula Bilinsky
Katrina Bledsoe
Ilsa Blidner
Chris Blow
Marcie Bober
Arlana Bobo Peterson
Debbie J Bond
Sally Bond
Patti Bourexis
Isabelle Bourgeois
Heather Boyd
Sharon Brisolara
Pauline Brooks
Astrid Brousselle
Courtney Brown
Soon Cheon Byeon
Xiaofan Cai
Judith Campbell
Stanley Capela
Fred Carden
Martha Ann Carey
Deborah Carran
Nancy Carter
Dolores Casillas
Denice Cassaro
Liying Cheng
Mimi Chernow
Christina Christie
Mary Church
Edith CisnerosCohernour
M H Clark
Carolyn Cohen
Ross Conner
Eric Cook
Leslie Cooksy
Jocelyn Cooledge
H Liesel Copeland
Chris Coryn
Bea Courtney
Brad Cousins
Susan Cozzens
Thomas Crochunis
Kara Crohn
Jim Cullen
Harry Cummings
Christian Dagenais
Mehmet Dali Ozturk
Ranjana Damle
Randy Davies
Melinda Davis
Samantha de Rivera
Kathleen Del Monte
Debbie DeLancey
Jonathan Delman
John Dorland
Kirk Dorland
Wendy Doughty
Ann Dozier
Kevin Driesen
Maryann Durland
Tosha Ellis
Christine Emmons
Molly Engle
Tola Ewers
Didi Fahey
David Fetterman
Tracy Fiander Trask
Charles Fiki
Robert Fischer
Andrew Fourney
Christine Frank
Elvis Fraser
Kimberly Fredericks
Bruce Frey
Victor Friedman
Henry Frierson
7
Evaluation 2005 Program Reviewers – continued
Susan Gaffney
John Gargani
Wendy Garrard
John Gartrell
Kathy Garvin-Doxas
Amy Germuth
Marie Gervais
Aisha Gilliam
Marlene Glassman
Sheryl Goldberg
Goeff Golder
Leslie Goodyear
Nancy Gordon
June Gothberg
Sheryl Gowan
Zandra Gratz
Sonja Greckol
Kari Green
Jennifer Greene
George Grob
Joe Grubbs
Nancy Grudens-Schuck
Ingrid Guerra
P Cristian Gugiu
Lisa Guion
Edith Gummer
Melvin Hall
M Sue Hamann
Kelly Hannum
Robert Hanson
Francis Hare
Michael Harnar
Maura Harrington
Penny Hawkins
Debra Heath
Linda Heath
Sarah Heinemeier
Carol HendersonDahms
Bart Hewitt
Sue Hewitt
Mindy Hightower King
George Hill
Allen Hite
Beth Hoen
Stafford Hood
Emily Hoole
Rodney Hopson
Thomas Horwood
Dale Howard
Jeanne Hubelbank
Terry Hunt
Nicholas Huntington
Marthe Hurteau
Kent Hutchinson
Bryant Hutson
Henry Ilian
Vicky I-Pei Tung
Barry Isaacs
Mukaria Itang’ata
Bebe Ivanochko
Tania Jarosewich
Michelle Jay
Susan Jenkins
Mark Jenness
Jennifer Jewiss
Darryl Jinkerson
Hamida Jinnah
Hélène Johnson
Paul Johnson
Jenny Jones
Gretchen Jordan
George Julnes
Summers Kalishman
Susan Kasprzak
Conrad Katzenmeyer
Nicki King
Rita Kirshstein
Natalie Kishchuk
Margaret Kitterman
Douglas Klayman
Kira Krenichyn
Keiko Kuji-Shikatani
Saville Kushner
Alexey Kuzmin
Deborah Kwon
Candace Lacey
Robert LaChausse
Joan LaFrance
Michel Lahti
Bhavya Lal
Tony Lam
Glenn Landers
Birgitta Larsson
Frank Lassus
Chak Lau
Rene Lavinghouze
Nicole Leduc
Linda Lee
Dan Leitch
Foong-Peng Leong
Christine Leow
Cheri Levenson
Ronnie Levin
Karla Lewis
Linda Liebenberg
Deborah Loesch-Griffin
Larry Lonero
Michael Long
Paul Longo
Paul Lorton Jr
Chris Lovato
Xuejin Lu
Annie Luk
Mia Luluquisen
Charles Lusthaus
Rosemary Lysaght
Brigitte Maicher
Nyambura Maina
Courtney Malloy
Colleen Manning
Lorraine Marais
Michael Maranda
Richard Marceau
Jules Marquart
Laura Massell
Sandra Mathison
John Mattox
Sharon Marie May
Charles McClintock
Andrew McConney
Treseen McCormick
Katherine McDonald
Kathy McDowell
Virginia McGowan
Martha McGuire
Patrick McKnight
Susan McMahon
Shannan McNair
Curt Mearns
Lori Megdal
Erin Elizabeth Mehalic
Davis Mende
Gale Mentzer
Donna Mertens
Jan Middendorf
Jane Minnema
Susana Mirassou
Gary Miron
Shahzad Mithani
Shahpar Modaressi
Ruth Mohr
Patty Molloy
Bianca Montrosse
Jonathan Morell
Shawn Morford
Jennifer Morrow
Botsalano Mosimakoko
Vanessa Moss-Summers
Karen Motylewski
Prachee Mukherjee
Miriam Mulsow
Penina Mungania
Elizabeth MurphyWalsh
Ottis Murray
Barry Nagle
Neva Nahan
Professional Development
Workshop Reviewers
Gail Barrington
8
Sandra Mathison
Examinateurs du programme d’Évaluation 2005 – suite
John Nash
Lisa Ncube
Michael Newman
Fred Newman
Frank Nicholson
Jan Noga
Emma Norland
Candace Nykiforuk
Joanna Ochocka
Zenda Ofir
Comfort Okpala
Muhsin Orsini
Elizabethann O’Sullivan
Rita O’Sullivan
Mehmet Dali Öztürk
Puneetha Sagar
Palakurthi
David Pankratz
Michael Papa
Maria Aparecida
Patroclo
David Patton
Michael Quinn Patton
Gil Peach
Genevieve Pepin
Lisa Petersen
Donna Peterson
Rebecca Pettit
Cynthia Phillips
Richard Phillips
Donald Pierson
Mary Elizabeth Piontek
Donna Podems
Margaret Polinsky
Scott Pollack
Elena Polush
Nancy Porteous
Jenny Post
Beth Powers Costello
Hallie Preskill
MaryLynn Quartaroli
Linnea Rademaker
Sharon Rallis
Sandhya Rao
Stephanie Reich
James Reidel
Roger Rennekamp
William Rickards
Manuel Riemer
Ray Rist
Elaine Rivers
Cindy Roberts-Gray
Daniel Robertson
JaMuir Michelle
Robinson
Patricia Rogers
Magdalena Rood
Sharyn Rosenberg
David Rosenbluth
John Ross
Andy Rowe
Simon Roy
Maureen Rubin
Monica Ruiz Casares
Craig Russon
James Salt
Pamela Sandoval
Yoshie Sano
Ron Saranchuk
James Sass
William Scarbrough
Marilyn Scheffler
Daniela Schroeter
Kirsten Scobie
Kim Scott
Sarah Scott
Lucy Seabrook
Marco Segone
Saumitra SenGupta
Patrick Serumola
Susan Shannon
Rumaisa Shaukat Janjua
Jeffrey Sheldon
John Sherman
Stephanie Shipp
Robert Shumer
Souraya Sidani
Jason Siegel
Amy Silverman
Kathy Simpson
Cathy Sleezer
Iris Smith
Juna Snow
Margarida Southard
Sanjeev Sridharan
Lawrence St Leger
Pam St Leger
Pamela Stazesky
Paule Steichen
Sharon Stevens
Emily Stewart
Maria Suchowski
Brenda Sullivan
Namratha Swamy
Heidi Sweetman
Oswaldo Yoshimi
Tanaka
Jennifer Taub
Sandy Taut
Andrew Taylor
George Teather
Megh Thapa
David Thomas
Bill Thornton
Paula Threadgill
Quint Thurman
Linda Thurston
Katherine Tibbetts
Minakshi Tikoo
Allison Titcomb
Carlos Todedo
Kate Toms
Carol Townsend
Lisa Townson
Lysette Trahan
James Tramill
Nicole Trentacoste
Mike Trevisan
William Trochim
James Trudeau
Susan Tucker
Felicia Tuggle
Zita Unger
Janet Unsinger
Anthonia Nnenna Utoh
William Valdez
Jim Van Haneghan
G Todd Vanek
Stanley Varnhagen
Elaine Vaurio
Roemer Visser
Rob Vito
Louis Volante
Hema Vyas
Madeleine Wallace
Anne Wallis
LihShing Wang
Denice Ward Hood
Deborah Wasserman
Nan Wehipeihana
Elizabeth Whitmore
Bob Williams
Lori Wingate
E Lea Witta
Mariette Xenopoulos
Karen Yanowitz
Yunsong Yao
Brian Yates
D Christian Young
Kai Young
Sandra Ziolkowski
George G Zhou
Ann Zukoski
Keith Zvoch
Examinateurs des ateliers de
perfectionnement professionnel
Patrick McKnight
Howard Mzumara
Nicole Vicinanza
Jennifer Williams
F R E Q U E N T LY A S K E D
QUESTIONS ABOUT CES
QUESTIONS FRÉQUEMMENT
POSÉES AU SUJET DE LA SCÉ
Find out everything you need and want to know about CES by
bookmarking www.evaluationcanada.ca.
Découvrez tout ce que vous avez besoin de savoir au sujet de la
SCÉ en consultant le site www.evaluationcanada.ca.
When was CES formed?
Quand la SCÉ a-t-elle été créée?
The Society was incorporated in May 1981 and will be celebrating its 25th Anniversary with a splash at the June 2006
CES Annual Conference in Charlottetown, PEI. The founders
of the Society were inducted as the Founding Fellows of CES and
the official launch of the CES Fellowship will take place at the
2006 conference.
La Société a été constituée en mai 1981 et célébrera son 25e anniversaire en grande pompe au congrès annuel de 2006 à
Charlottetown (ÎPÉ). Les fondateurs de la Société ont été intronisés comme « associés » (fellows) de la SCÉ et l’Association de la
SCÉ sera officiellement inaugurée dans le cadre du congrès de
2006.
What are the goals of CES?
Quels sont les buts de la SCÉ?
In the field of evaluation, the Society promotes:
Dans le domaine de l’évaluation, la Société promeut :
• Leadership – to provide leadership to individuals and organizations in support of evaluation theory and practice in Canada and
in the global community.
• Le leadership – fournir un leadership à des particuliers et à des
organismes afin de soutenir la théorie et la pratique de l’évaluation au Canada et dans la communauté internationale.
• Knowledge – to improve the state of evaluation theory and
practice.
• Les connaissances – améliorer l’état de la théorie et de la pratique de l’évaluation.
• Advocacy – to promote the importance of an evaluation culture.
• La promotion des intérêts – promouvoir l’importance d’une culture d’évaluation.
• Professional Development – to promote and facilitate the enhancement of evaluation capacity for members and non-members.
• Le perfectionnement professionnel – promouvoir et faciliter le
renforcement des capacités d’évaluation pour les membres et les
non-membres.
Why join CES?
The main benefits of becoming a member of CES are:
• Access to an international community of evaluators
• Three issues per year of the internationally recognized Canadian
Journal of Program Evaluation as well as online access to the full
text of several of its articles
• Reduced rate to the CES Annual Conference
• Reduced rates to professional development events, including the
CES’ Essential Skills Series (ESS) in Evaluation and the Tier II
Logic Models and Survey Research courses
• Access to reserved resources on the CES Web site (automatic
news broadcast, automatic opportunity broadcast, electronic
versions of documents, etc.)
• CES Web News
• CES Annual Report
• Reduced rate for membership in the American Evaluation Association ($60 US)
• Reduced rate for membership in the Australasian Evaluation
Society ($60 AUS)
• Reduction of 20% on purchases made from SAGE Publications
& Corwin Press, Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Imprint, and Guilford
Publications
Pourquoi devenir membre de la SCÉ?
Voici les principaux avantages qu’offre l’adhésion à la SCÉ :
• Accès à une communauté internationale d’évaluateurs
• Trois numéros par an de la Revue canadienne d’évaluation de programme, de renommée internationale, ainsi que l’accès en ligne
au texte complet de plusieurs de ses articles
• Tarifs réduits sur l’inscription au congrès annuel
• Prix réduit pour les événements de développement professionnel, y compris la Série sur les compétences essentielles en évaluation de la SCÉ et les cours de Niveau II sur les Modèles
logiques et la Recherche par sondages.
• Accès aux ressources réservées du site Web de la SCÉ (distribution automatique des nouvelles, distribution automatique des
opportunités, versions électroniques de documents, etc.)
• Bulletin électronique de la SCÉ
• Rapport annuel de la SCÉ
• Tarifs réduits sur l’adhésion à l’American Evaluation Association
(60 $US)
• Tarifs réduits sur l’adhésion à l’Australasian Evaluation Society
(60 $AUS)
9
• Deep discount on the purchase of The Student Evaluation
Standards and the Facilitator’s Guide to the Student Evaluation
Standards
• Réduction de 20 % sur les achats effectués auprès de SAGE
Publications & Corwin Press, Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Imprint et
Guilford Publications.
• Notification of employment and contract opportunities
• Rabais important à l’achat de The Student Evaluation Standards et
du guide de l’animateur
• Special initiatives for students
If you want to know what is going on in the evaluation field in
Canada and what the topical issues are from around the world, the
Canadian Evaluation Society is the professional association for
you!
How is the Society organized?
The CES has over 1400 members from every Province and
Territory in Canada. Twelve Regional Chapters offer services such
as resource networks, professional development activities and
forums for CES members to explore, discuss and get involved with
evaluation interests. The National Council is composed of an
executive and representatives from each Chapter. They strive to
bring the national interests to all of the membership. Volunteers
are the heart of this organization and participation in Chapter
activities is always welcome.
When and where are future CES Conferences?
• 2006 – Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island
• 2007 – Winnipeg, Manitoba
• 2008 – Quebec City, Quebec
• 2009 – Ottawa, Ontario
• 2010 – Victoria, British Columbia
What if I have additional questions?
Contact the CES National office at secretariat@evaluation
canada.ca. Kathy Jones and her team would be pleased to answer
any questions you may have or point you in the right direction.
Kathy has been the Executive Secretary for CES since 1989.
• Initiatives spéciales pour les étudiants et étudiantes
Si vous voulez savoir ce qui se passe dans le domaine de l’évaluation au Canada et vous renseigner sur les questions de l’heure à
travers le monde, la Société canadienne d’évaluation est l’association professionnelle toute indiquée pour vous!
Comment la Société est-elle organisée?
La SCÉ compte plus de 1 400 membres répartis dans chaque
province et territoire du Canada. Douze sections régionales
offrent des services comme des réseaux de ressources, des activités
de perfectionnement professionnel et des forums permettant aux
membres de la SCÉ d’explorer, de discuter et de participer à des
activités qui les intéressent. Le Conseil national est composé d’un
comité exécutif et de représentants de chaque Section. Ils s’efforcent de porter les intérêts nationaux à tout le sociétariat. Les
bénévoles sont au cœur de cette organisation et la participation aux
activités des Sections est toujours la bienvenue.
Où et quand se tiendront les futurs congrès de la SCÉ?
• 2006 – Charlottetown, Île-du-Prince-Édouard
• 2007 – Winnipeg, Manitoba
• 2008 – Ville de Québec, Québec
• 2009 – Ottawa, Ontario
• 2010 – Victoria, Colombie-Britannique
Et si j’ai d’autres questions?
Contactez le bureau national de la SCÉ à secretariat@evaluation
canada.ca. Kathy Jones et son équi pe se feront un plaisir de répondre à avos questions ou de vous orienter. Kathy est la secrétaire de
direction de la SCÉ depuis 1989.
Call for Submissions
Appel de soumissions
The CES Grey Literature Database offers access to a host
of unpublished papers, instruments, reports, and presentation components that may be of interest to evaluators.
CES and AEA encourages you to submit your
CES/AEA Conference 2005 presentation material to
[email protected] for uploading to this
valuable resource tool. Share your knowledge and
benefit from the wealth of research material!
La base de données de littérature grise de la SCÉ donne
accès à une foule d’articles, d’instruments, de rapports et
d’éléments de présentations non publiés susceptibles d’intéresser les évaluateurs. La SCÉ et l’AEA vous encouragent
à soumettre les présentations que vous faites dans le cadre
du congrès de 2005 à [email protected] pour
qu’on puisse les verser dans cette importante base de données. Partagez vos connaissances et profitez d’une riche
source de matériel de recherche!!
Questions? Check out www.evaluationcanada.ca or e-mail
[email protected].
10
• Notification d’occasions d’emplois et de contrats
Des questions? Consultez le site www.evaluationcanada.ca
ou envoyez un courriel à [email protected].
F R E Q U E N T LY A S K E D
QUESTIONS ABOUT AEA
QUESTIONS FRÉQUEMMENT
P O S É E S A U S U J E T D E L’ A E A
Find out everything you need and want to know about AEA by
bookmarking www.eval.org.
Découvrez tout ce que vous avez besoin de savoir au sujet de l’AEA
en consultant le site www.eval.org.
How long has AEA been around?
Depuis combien de temps l’AEA existe-t-elle?
The American Evaluation Association (AEA) came into being in
1986 out of the merger of two existing evaluation groups: The
Evaluation Network and the Evaluation Research Society.
L’American Evaluation Association (AEA) a vu le jour en 1986 et est
issue de la fusion de deux groupes d’évaluation : Le Evaluation
Network et la Evaluation Research Society.
What is the mission of AEA?
Quelle est la mission de l’AEA?
AEA’s mission is to:
L’AEA a pour mission :
• Improve evaluation practice and methods
• D’améliorer la pratique et les méthodes d’évaluation
• Increase evaluation use
• D’augmenter l’utilisation de l’évaluation
• Promote evaluation as a profession, and
• De promouvoir l’évaluation en tant que profession
• Support the contribution of evaluation to the generation of
theory and knowledge about effective human action.
• D’appuyer la contribution de l’évaluation à la production de
théories et de connaissances au sujet de l’action humaine efficace
Why should I become a member?
Pourquoi devrais-je devenir membre?
Membership in AEA signifies to yourself and to others that you
consider yourself an evaluation professional. The Association’s two
journals, subscriptions to both of which come with full membership, provide you with up-to-date information on current theory
and practice. The American Journal of Evaluation, published quarterly, includes peer-reviewed articles on topics of current interest,
information about upcoming conferences, book reviews, and
more. Also published quarterly, New Directions for Evaluation
focuses on various aspects of a single salient topic with each issue.
AEA members receive a free listing online on AEA’s “Find an
Evaluator” page, online access to back content from both journals,
significant discounts on evaluation publications, membership in up
to five of AEA’s Topical Interest Groups, discounts on the annual
conference and other professional development activities, and the
right to influence the future of the association by serving in leadership positions and voting in AEA’s elections.
L’adhésion à l’AEA démontre, tant aux autres qu’à vous-même, que
vous vous considérez comme un professionnel de l’évaluation. Les
deux revues publiées par l’Association (l’abonnement aux deux publications est un des avantages de l’adhésion complète) fournissent
des renseignements à jour sur la théorie et la pratique actuelles. Le
American Journal of Evaluation, publié trimestriellement, comprend
des articles revus par des pairs sur des sujets d’actualité, des renseignements sur des conférences à venir, des critiques de livres, etc.
L’Association publie également New Directions for Evaluation, qui
met l’accent sur divers aspects d’un seul sujet principal dans chaque
numéro. Les membres de l’AEA ont droit à une annonce gratuite
en ligne sur la page « Find an Evaluator » (trouvez un évaluateur) de
l’AEA, l’accès en ligne à d’anciens numéros des deux revues, d’importants rabais sur les publications en évaluation, l’adhésion à
jusqu’à cinq groupes thématiques de l’AEA, des rabais sur l’inscription au congrès annuel et à d’autres activités de perfectionnement
professionnel, ainsi que le droit d’influencer l’avenir de l’association
en occupant des postes de leadership et en votant aux élections de
l’AEA.
What is a TIG?
AEA’s 36 Topical Interest Groups (TIGs) span the methodological,
disciplinary, and ideological gamut. These subgroups allow members to connect with others who share their interests as well as provide a forum for sharing knowledge and skills during the annual
conference. Some TIGs are very active and produce a newsletter,
manage their own website, and solicit and develop special conference sessions. Other TIGs focus primarily on providing reviewers
for topical presentations for the annual conference. AEA members
may participate in up to five TIGs.
Qu’est-ce qu’un GT?
Les 36 Groupes thématiques (GT) de l’AEA couvrent un large
éventail méthodologique, disciplinaire et idéologique. Ces sousgroupes permettent aux membres de forger des liens avec d’autres
personnes qui partagent les mêmes intérêts, et fournissent un
forum pour le partage de connaissances et de compétences pendant le congrès annuel. Certains GT sont très actifs et produisent
un bulletin de nouvelles, gèrent leur propre site Web et élaborent
des sessions spéciales pour le congrès. D’autres GT s’occupent
principalement de fournir des examinateurs pour les présentations
thématiques du congrès annuel. Les membres de l’AEA peuvent
appartenir à un maximum de cinq GT.
11
What is a Local Affiliate?
Qu’est-ce qu’une filiale locale?
AEA’s Local Affiliates (LAs) are independent associations that
provide a regional home to evaluators. You do not need to be a
member of AEA to join an Affiliate and you do not need to participate in an Affiliate to be a member of AEA. Affiliates provide their
own programming and outreach activities, yet share with AEA a
focus on serving evaluators and the evaluation community. A list of
local affiliates may be found online at www.eval.org/affiliates.htm.
Les filiales locales (FL) sont des associations indépendantes qui
fournissent un foyer régional aux évaluateurs. Il n’est pas nécessaire d’être membre de l’AEA pour adhérer à une filiale et il n’est
pas nécessaire de faire partie d’une filiale locale pour être membre
de l’AEA. Les filiales locales ont leurs propres programmes et
activités, mais elles s’allient à l’AEA pour servir les évaluateurs et
la communauté d’évaluation. On peut trouver une liste des filiales
locales en ligne à l’adresse www.eval.org/affiliates.htm.
When and where are future AEA Conferences?
• 2006 – Portland, Oregon, October 30 – November 4
• 2007 – Baltimore, Maryland, November 5 – November 10
• 2008 – Denver, Colorado, November 3 – November 8
• 2009 – Orlando, Florida, November 9 – November 14
Quand et où auront lieu les futurs congrès de l’AEA?
• 2006 – Portland, Oregon, du 30 octobre au 4 novembre
• 2007 – Baltimore, Maryland, du 5 au 10 novembre
• 2008 – Denver, Colorado, du 3 au 8 novembre
• 2009 – Orlando, Florida, du 9 au 14 novembre
Where should I turn with questions?
A good place to start is with Heidi or Susan in our AEA office.
They can answer most conference-related, administrative, member services, or policy questions and will point you in the right
direction for other resources. They have guidelines available for
starting a TIG or Affiliate if that should be of interest to you, can
help you get your listing on the AEA web site if you are a consultant, and can get you included in the AEA bibliography if you are
an author.
12
À qui dois-je m’adresser si j’ai des questions?
Un bon point de départ est de contacter Heidi ou Susan au bureau
de l’AEA. Elles peuvent répondre à la plupart des questions d’ordre administratif, ou ayant trait aux services aux membres ou aux
politiques et vous aiguiller vers les ressources appropriées. Elles
disposent de lignes directrices pour créer un GT ou une filiale si
cela vous intéresse, et elles peuvent vous aider à placer votre
annonce sur le site Web de l’AEA si vous êtes un(e) consultant(e);
elles peuvent également ajouter votre nom à la bibliographie de
l’AEA si vous êtes un auteur.
CONFERENCE SCHEDULE
HORAIRE DU CONGRÈS
Conference-at-a-Glance
Aperçu du congrès
Monday, October 24, 2005
Lundi 24 octobre 2005
8:00 am – 5:30 pm
Registration Desk Open
De 8 h à 17 h 30
Ouverture du bureau d’inscription
9:00 am – 4:00 pm
Professional Development Workshops
De 9 h à 16 h
Ateliers de perfectionnement professionnel
Tuesday, October 25, 2005
Mardi 25 octobre 2005
8:00 am – 7:00 pm
De 8 h à 19 h
9:00 am – 4:00 pm
De 9 h à 16 h
Wednesday, October 26, 2005
Mercredi 26 octobre 2005
7:00 am – 7:00 pm
De 7 h à 19 h
8:00 am – 5:00 pm
Exhibits Open
De 8 h à 17 h
Ouverture des expositions
8:00 am – 3:00 pm
Full-Day Workshops
De 8 h à 15 h
Perfectionnement professionnel –
Ateliers d’un jour
8:00 am – 11:00 am
Half-Day Morning Workshops
De 8 h à 11 h
Ateliers d’une demi-journée (matin)
12:00 pm – 3:00 pm
Half-Day Afternoon Workshops
De 12 h à 15 h
Ateliers d’une demi-journée
3:15 pm – 4:15 pm
Opening Plenary
De 15 h 15 à 16 h 15 Plénière d’ouverture
4:30 pm – 6:00 pm
Concurrent Sessions
De 16 h 30 à 18 h
6:10 pm – 6:40 pm
First Time Attendee Orientation Session
De 18 h 10 à 18 h 40 Séance d’orientation des participants novices
6:30 pm – 8:00 pm
Reception, Posters, Information Tables and
Meet the Authors
De 18 h 30 à 20 h
Réception, présentations par affiches, tables
d’information et rencontre avec les auteurs
8:00 pm – 9:00 pm
Student Reception
De 20 h à 21 h
Réception des étudiants
Thursday, October 27, 2005
Séances concurrentes
Jeudi 27 octobre 2005
7:00 am – 6:30 pm
De 7 h à 18 h 30
7:00 am – 6:30 pm
Career Center Open
De 7 h à 18 h 30
Ouverture du centre des carrières
8:00 am – 5:00 pm
Exhibits Open
De 8 h à 17 h
8:00 am – 9:10 am
Keynote Address:
Sheila Fraser, Auditor General
of Canada
De 8 h à 9 h 10
Discours d’ouverture :
Sheila Fraser, vérificatrice générale
du Canada
9:10 am – 9:25 am
Refreshment Break
De 9 h 10 à 9 h 25
Pause-rafraîchissements
9:25 am – 10:55 am
Concurrent Sessions
De 9 h 25 à 10 h 55
11:05 am – 12:35 pm Concurrent Sessions
De 11 h 05 à 12 h 35 Séances concurrentes
12:45 pm – 1:30 pm
CES Annual General Meeting /
AEA Business Meeting
De 12 h 45 à 13 h 30 Assemblée générale annuelle de la SCÉ –
Réunion d’affaires de l’AEA
1:40 pm – 3:10 pm
Concurrent Sessions
3:10 pm – 3:20 pm
Refreshment Break
De 15 h 10 à 15 h 20 Pause-rafraîchissements
3:20 pm – 4:50 pm
Concurrent Sessions
5:00 pm – 6:00 pm
Concurrent TIG Business Meetings
De 17 h à 18 h
Réunions d’affaires concurrentes des GT
6:30 pm – 10:00 pm
Steam Whistle Brewery
Social Evening
De 18 h 30 à 22 h
Activité sociale –
Soirée à la brasserie Steam Whistle
13
CONFERENCE SCHEDULE
HORAIRE DU CONGRÈS
Conference-at-a-Glance
Aperçu du congrès
Friday, October 28, 2005
Vendredi 28 octobre 2005
7:00 am – 6:30 pm
De 7 h à 18 h 30
7:00 am – 6:30 pm
Career Center Open
De 7 h à 18 h 30
7:00 am – 7:50 am
Session 399 – TIG Business Meeting
De 7 h à 7 h 50
Séance 399 – Réunion d’affaires du GT
8:00 am – 5:00 pm
Exhibits Open
De 8 h à 17 h
8:00 am – 9:10 am
Keynote Address:
Roberta Jamieson,
CEO National Aboriginal
Achievement Foundation
De 8 h à 9 h 10
Roberta Jamieson,
directrice générale de la Fondation nationale
des réalisations autochtones
9:00 am – 1:00 pm
Recruitment Fair
De 9 h à 13 h 00
Foire de recrutement
9:10 am – 9:25 am
Refreshment Break
De 9 h 10 à 9 h 25
9:25 am – 10:10 am Concurrent Sessions
11:15 am – 12:00 pmConcurrent Sessions
De 11 h 15 à 12 h
12:10 pm – 1:45 pm Joint CES/AEA
Luncheon
De 12 h 10 à 13 h 45 Déjeuner-causerie conjoint
de la SCÉ et l’AEA
1:55 pm – 3:25 pm
Concurrent Sessions
3:25 pm – 3:35 pm
Refreshment Break
3:35 pm – 4:20 pm
Concurrent Sessions
4:30 pm – 6:00 pm
Concurrent Sessions
De 16 h 30 à 18 h
6:30 pm – 8:00 pm
Reception and Silent Auction
De 18 h 30 à 20 h
Réception et vente aux enchères par écrit
Saturday, October 29, 2005
Samedi 29 octobre 2005
7:00 am – 5:00 pm
De 7 h à 17 h
7:00 am – 12:00 pm Career Center Open
De 7 h à 12 h
8:00 am – 5:00 pm
Exhibits Open
De 8 h à 17 h
8:00 am – 9:20 am
Keynote Address:
Lieutenant-General (Retired) Roméo Dallaire
De 8 h à 9 h 20
Lieutenant-général Roméo Dallaire (retraité)
9:20 am – 9:35 am
Refreshment Break
De 9 h 20 à 9 h 35
10:30 am – 12:00 pmConcurrent Sessions
De 10 h 30 à 12 h
12:10 pm – 1:40 pm Concurrent Sessions
1:50 pm – 3:20 pm
Concurrent Sessions
3:20 pm – 3:30 pm
Refreshment Break
3:30 pm – 5:00 pm
Concurrent Sessions
De 15 h 30 à 17 h
6:00 pm – 7:30 pm
Reception hosted by IOCE, CES and AEA
De 18 h 00 à 19 h 30 Réception organisée par l’OICE, la SCÉ et l’AEA
Sunday, October 30, 2005
Dimanche 30 octobre 2005
8:00 am – 12:00 pm Registration Desk Open
De 8 h à 12 h
9:00 am – 12:00 pm Professional Development Workshops
De 9 h à 12 h
14
SHERATON CENTRE • CENTRE SHERATON
15
16
CONFERENCE HIGHLIGHTS
FA I T S S A I L L A N T S D U C O N G R È S
W e d n e s d a y, O c t o b e r 2 6
Le mercredi 26 octobre
Opening Plenary and Smudge Ceremony
Séance plénière et cérémonie de purification
The welcome plenary intends to get people thinking about the
conference theme “Crossing Borders, Crossing Boundaries” in a
substantive and visible way. Conference program co-chairs will
explain their selection of plenary keynote speakers, and the nature
and organization of the two conference strand sessions. From a
more symbolic perspective, selected delegates from around the
globe will make a visible show of the various national members of
the International Organisation for Cooperation in Evaluation, followed by selected illustrations of substantive aspects of the crossing borders, crossing boundaries theme.
La séance plénière d’ouverture vise à amener les délégués à réfléchir
au thème du congrès – « Franchir les frontières, repousser les limites » – d’une manière approfondie et visible. Les coprésidents du
programme du congrès expliqueront comment ils ont sélectionné
les conférenciers des sessions plénières, ainsi que la nature et l’organisation des deux volets du congrès. D’un point de vue plus symbolique, des délégués sélectionnés de partout au monde viendront
démontrer de manière visible les divers membres nationaux de l’Organisation internationale pour la coopération en évaluation, suivis
d’illustrations sélectionnées d’importants aspects du thème de franchissement des frontières et du repoussement des limites.
Opening Prayer Ceremony
Opening Prayer Ceremony
Why We Invited An Elder: We live in a world of boundaries and
borders and these sometimes divide us. We would like to open this
conference by acknowledging the unity of all people through a tradition that moves the spirit to remember honour and respect, not
only to other people but all of creation.
Pourquoi nous avons invité un aîné : nous vivons dans un monde de
frontières et de limites qui nous divisent parfois. Nous aimerions
ouvrir ce congrès en reconnaissant l’unité de tous les peuples
par l’entremise d’une tradition qui incite l’esprit à se rappeler
d’honorer et de respecter, non seulement les autres peuples, mais
toute la création.
About The Ceremony
À propos de la cérémonie
Everyone is equal in a ceremony. The ceremony is a blessing,
referred to by the Anishnawbe or Ojibway people as “smudging”.
The conductor of the ceremony is an Elder, a person who is recognized as a spiritual teacher in their community and who also
lives by the Sacred teachings of his/her nation.
Tout le monde est égal dans une cérémonie. Cette dernière est une
bénédiction que les peuples Anishnawbe ou Ojibway appellent « purification ». La cérémonie est dirigée par un aîné, une personne qui
est reconnue comme un enseignant spirituel dans leur communauté
et qui vit également selon les enseignements sacrés de sa nation.
Etiquette: We suggest that you behave in the way most comfortable
for you. You might wish to bow your head and close your eyes. You
may look upwards towards the sky and hold your palms out and up.
We feel strongly that you know the best way to connect to yourself and other spirits. And, of course, turn off cell phones and no
talking, please.
Règles d’étiquette : Nous vous suggérons de vous comporter de la
manière qui est la plus confortable pour vous. Vous voudrez peutêtre baisser la tête et fermer les yeux, ou encore lever la tête vers le
ciel et étendre vos mains avec les paumes tournées vers le haut. Vous
savez certainement quelle est la meilleure façon d’entrer en contact
avec vous-même et avec d’autres esprits. Et, bien sûr, on vous
demande d’éteindre vos téléphones cellulaires et de ne pas parler.
Today’s Ceremony – Step-by-Step
Étapes de la cérémonie d’aujourd’hui
➀
➀
The Elder will place a special Altar Cloth or blanket on a little table, clean floor or the earth. Most Altar Cloths will have
all Four Sacred Colours.
Yellow for Eastern Direction
(new life or birth)
Red for Southern Direction
(youth, freeness, kindness, nurturing)
Black for Western Direction
(home of the Sacred teachings,
wisdom)
White for Northern Direction
(home of Sacred Medicines, caring,
completion)
L’aîné placera une nappe d’autel ou une couverture sur une
petite table, sur un plancher propre ou sur le sol. La plupart des
nappes d’autel ont quatre couleurs sacrées.
Jaune pour la direction Est
(nouvelle vie ou naissance)
N O RT H • N O R D
W
E
S
T
•
O
U
E
S
T
E
A
S
T
•
E
S
T
Rouge pour la direction Sud
(jeunesse, liberté, bonté et soutien)
Noir pour la direction Ouest
(origine des enseignements sacrés, sagesse)
Blanc pour la direction Nord
(origine des remèdes sacrés, amour,
accomplissement)
SOUTH • SUD
17
➁
An Eagle Feather will be placed on the cloth and later used
to fan the smoke of the medicines.
➁
Une plume d’aigle sera placée sur la nappe et sera plus tard
utilisée pour éventer la fumée des remèdes.
➂
Sage (Prairie) will be used. This medicine is used because it is
a medicine that is used as a purifier when there are a lot of
people.
➂
On utilisera de la sauge (Prairie). Cette plante est utilisée
comme remède purificateur lorsqu’il y a beaucoup de
personnes.
➃
➄
A Smudge Bowl and matches are placed on the cloth.
➃
Tobacco is used as an offering by Anishnawbe every day to the
Creator for thanksgiving and prayers, being grateful for
another day to live.
Un bol de purification et des allumettes sont placés sur la
nappe.
➄
Les Anishnawbe utilisent le tabac comme offrande au
Créateur, en guise d’action de grâces et de prières, pour manifester leur reconnaissance de pouvoir vivre un jour de plus.
Our ceremonies are a Way of Life, not a religion; it is about “sharing our knowledge”.
The prayer that is being said in the language of the Conductor will
call in the Special Spirits from all the Four Directions to be with
the participants for the duration of the Conference. They will help
to protect and inspire everyone until they return home to their
loved ones.
Nos cérémonies sont un mode de vie et non une religion; c’est une
façon pour nous de « partager notre savoir ».
La prière que récite le célébrant dans sa propre langue a pour but
d’inviter les esprits spéciaux des quatre directions à venir accompagner les participants pendant le congrès. Ces esprits aideront à
protéger et à inspirer les délégués jusqu’à ce que ces derniers
retournent chez eux.
What Else You Can Do For The Rest Of The Conference
To honour the spirits that were invited here during today’s ceremony, you may want to take a minute during a busy day and think
of the helpers invited in Spirit and think about how they are helping you to think clearly and inspire you to learn or present in a
good way. If you smoke or have tobacco, you can break off a piece
and put it in the water or ground and give thanks to the Spirits
here with us, and you can ask for help and guidance (maybe you
want help to make the networking connections you had hoped, to
give you confidence to speak to anyone and start a conversation).
You can put a bit of food on your plate to the side before you eat
and give thanks for any help or good fortune you feel you have
been afforded.
Ce que vous pouvez faire d’autre pendant le congrès
Pour rendre hommage aux esprits qui ont été invités à prendre part
à la cérémonie d’aujourd’hui, vous voudrez peut-être faire une pause
pendant votre journée chargée et réfléchir à eux et à la façon dont ils
vous aident à clarifier vos pensées, à apprendre ou à faire une présentation réussie. Si vous fumez ou si vous avez du tabac, vous pouvez
en prendre un petit morceau et le mettre dans de l’eau ou dans la
terre et remercier les esprits qui sont présents ici avec nous, et leur
demander de l’aide et des conseils (vous voudrez peut-être obtenir
leur aide pour établir les contacts voulus, pour vous exprimer avec
confiance ou pour aborder les autres). Vous pouvez mettre de côté
un peu de nourriture sur votre plat avant de manger et rendre grâces
pour toute aide ou toute bonne fortune que vous ayez reçue.
About Our Elder
Rose Pauline Shirt,
Third Degree 3-Fires Society, Plains Cree
Rose Pauline Shirt was born in the Saddle Lake community, north of
Edmonton, Alberta. She is of the Red-Tailed Hawk Clan of the Cree
Nation. She is in the process of receiving her Masters in Education
through York University. A member of the Toronto Native community
since the sixties, Ms. Shirt has played an active role in the advancement
and regeneration of the urban Aboriginals’ involvement in their culture
and traditions. Ms. Shirt is one of the Founders of the First Nations
School of Toronto (formally known as Wandering Spirit Survival School).
She has been actively involved within the Toronto community as a
Traditional Teacher, Holistic Counselor Educator and Elder.
Ms. Shirt has five children and nine grandchildren. She has worked for
Corrections Canada as a Grandmother Teacher for the Prison for Women
and the Okimaw Oh Chi Healing Lodge for Women. Ms. Shirt has been
politically involved with Women’s issues for many years. Recently she has
come full Circle, going back to her reserve to work with children as a
Traditional Therapist. Ms. Shirt sits on the Native Canadian Centre’s
Council of Elders.
Recently, Pauline Shirt was the culture advisor for the Ka:nen: Our
Children, Our Future 2003 Evaluation and the Aboriginal Head Start
Urban and Northern Communities 2003-2005 Impact Evaluation.
À propos de notre aînée
Rose Pauline Shirt,
Troisième Degré, Société des Trois Feux, Cri-des-Plaines
Rose Pauline Shirt est née dans la communauté de Saddle Lake, au nord
d’Edmonton, en Alberta. Elle appartient au clan Red-Tailed Hawk de la
Nation crie. Elle termine actuellement une maîtrise en pédagogie à l’Université York. Membre de la communauté autochtone de Toronto depuis
les années 60, Mme Shirt a joué un rôle actif dans l’avancement et la
promotion de la participation des Autochtones en milieu urbain à leur
culture et leurs traditions. Madame Shirt est un des fondateurs de la First
Nations School of Toronto (anciennement connue sous le nom de
Wandering Spirit Survival School). C’est un membre actif de la communauté torontoise, où elle agit comme enseignante traditionnelle, éducatrice et conseillère holistique et aînée.
Madame Shirt a cinq enfants et neuf petits-enfants. Elle a travaillé pour
Corrections Canada comme grand-mère enseignante dans la Prison pour
femmes et au Pavillon de ressourcement pour femmes Okimaw Oh Chi.
Madame Shirt milite politiquement relativement aux questions touchant
les femmes depuis de nombreuses années. Récemment, elle a bouclé la
boucle en quelque sorte et est retournée sur la réserve pour travailler avec
des enfants comme thérapeute traditionnelle. Madame Shirt siège au
sein du Conseil des sages du Native Canadian Centre.
Récemment, Pauline Shirt était conseillère culturelle pour l’évaluation du
programme Ka:nen: Our Children, Our Future de 2003, et pour l’évaluation de l’impact du Programme d’aide préscolaire aux Autochtones des
communautés urbaines et du Nord 2003-2005.
18
Keynote Address –
T h u r s d a y, O c t o b e r 2 7
Sheila Fraser:
Independence in the
Context of Audit
In audit, as in evaluation, the need to remain
impartial and independent in judgement-making
is of increasing importance as the political sensitivities of the programs in question amplify. Ms.
Fraser will reflect on built-in safeguards to ensure independence in
her role as Auditor General of Canada. She will describe how rigorous professional standards and fact validation processes insulate
the Office of the Auditor General from political pressure.
Since being appointed Auditor General of Canada in May 2001,
Ms. Fraser has focused the Office’s efforts on serving the needs of
parliamentarians and ensuring they have objective and reliable
information with which to scrutinize government activities and
hold the government to account for its stewardship of public
funds. Before joining the Office, Ms. Fraser enjoyed a fruitful and
challenging career with the firm of Ernst & Young, where she
became a partner in 1981.
Ms. Fraser has always been active in her profession, at both the
provincial and national levels. For her noteworthy service to the
auditing and accounting professions, she was awarded the Prix
Émérite 1993 and the designation "Fellow" by the Ordre des
comptables agréés du Québec in 1994 and by the Institute of
Chartered Accountants of Ontario in 2000. She received the
Governor General’s medal commemorating Canada’s 125th
anniversary in 1992. Ms. Fraser has also been awarded honorary
Doctor of Laws degrees from Simon Fraser University and
Queen’s University that recognize her contribution to the fields of
accounting and legislative auditing.
Ms. Fraser served as the Chair of the Public Sector Accounting
Board of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants in
2004-05. She currently chairs the Working Group on
Environmental Auditing and the Sub-Committee on
Independence of Supreme Audit Institutions, two committees of
the International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions
(INTOSAI).
Ms. Sheila Fraser’s keynote address is supported in part by a
grant from the Ministry of Finance, Government of Ontario.
Discours d’ouverture –
Le jeudi 27 octobre
Sheila Fraser :
l’indépendance dans le contexte
de la vérification
En matière de vérification comme d’évaluation,
l’impartialité et l’indépendance, dans le cadre du
processus de jugement, revêtent une importance
grandissante, étant donné l’amplification de la
sensibilité politique face aux programmes en question. Mme
Fraser nous entretiendra des mesures de sauvegarde intégrées pour
assurer son indépendance à titre de vérificatrice générale du
Canada. Elle décrira la façon dont certaines normes professionnelles rigoureuses et autres procédés de validation des faits protègent le Bureau du vérificateur général des pressions politiques.
Depuis sa nomination au titre de vérificatrice générale du Canada,
en mai 2001, Mme Fraser a orienté les efforts déployés par le
Bureau vers la satisfaction des besoins présentés par les parlementaires, en assurant l’accès à une information objective et fiable qui
a permis d’examiner minutieusement les activités du gouvernement et de le responsabiliser face à sa gérance des fonds publics.
Avant d’entrer au Bureau, Mme Fraser a poursuivi une carrière
fructueuse et stimulante au sein du cabinet Ernst & Young, dont
elle était devenue l’associée en 1981.
Madame Fraser a toujours joué un rôle actif au sein de sa profession, tant aux niveaux provincial que national. Pour son apport
exceptionnel aux professions de vérificateur et de comptable, elle a
obtenu le Prix émérite 1993. En outre, elle est devenue boursière
de l’Ordre des comptables agréés du Québec en 1994 et de
l’Institut des comptables agréés de l’Ontario en 2000. En 1992,
elle a reçu la médaille du gouverneur général, qui commémorait le
125e anniversaire du Canada. Par ailleurs, Mme Fraser a obtenu
respectivement un doctorat honorifique en droit de l’Université
Simon Fraser et de l’Université Queen’s, qui ont souligné son
apport aux domaines de la comptabilité et de la vérification législative.
Durant la période de 2004-2005, Sheila Fraser a assumé la présidence du conseil de comptabilité du secteur public de l’Institut
canadien des comptables agréés. À l’heure actuelle, elle préside le
groupe de travail sur la vérification environnementale et le souscomité sur l’indépendance des institutions supérieures de contrôle
des finances publiques, deux comités rattachés à l’Organisation
internationale des institutions supérieures de contrôle des finances
publiques (INTOSAI).
L’allocution plénière de Mme Sheila Fraser est parrainée en
partie par le ministère des Finances de l’Ontario.
19
Keynote Address –
F r i d a y, O c t o b e r 2 8
Roberta Jamieson:
Diplomacy, Democracy and
Indigenous Peoples
Evaluation is considered by many as a powerful
force that can aid people and organizations in
making progress toward achieving their own valued goals. Diversity, deliberation and democracy
are increasingly familiar principles on the evaluation landscape.
Ms. Jamieson will share her work in the interests of First Nations,
Métis and Inuit peoples and indigenous peoples around the globe
in promoting human rights, non-adversarial conflict resolution
and democratic principles through leadership and institutional
change.
Roberta Jamieson is CEO of the National Aboriginal Achievement
Foundation and former Chief of the Six Nations of the Grand
River Territory, the most populace First Nation in Canada. A ten
year Ontario Ombudsman, Ms. Jamieson has won international
acclaim for her passion, willingness to take risks, and high involvement in the field of dispute resolution.
The first Canadian Aboriginal woman to earn a law degree, Ms
Jamieson was also the first woman appointed Ontario’s
Ombudsman. Raised on the Six Nations of the Grand River, she
learned to be an effective conciliator and negotiator within her
large family — a skill that would define her career. Lauded for
developing and promoting non-adversarial methods of conflict
resolution, Ms. Jamieson has collaborated with legal and political
experts in Asia, Africa, Europe and North America to advance
democracy through institutional change.
Ms. Roberta Jamieson's keynote address is supported by
contributions from the Canadian Evaluation Society and the
American Evaluation Association.
Le vendredi 28 octobre
Roberta Jamieson :
diplomatie, démocratie et
peuples autochtones
Nombreuses sont les personnes qui considèrent
l’évaluation comme une force puissante qui peut
aider les gens et les organisations à réaliser des
progrès en vue d’atteindre les objectifs leur tenant
à cœur. Les principes de la diversité, du débat et de la démocratie
sont de plus en plus présents dans le paysage de l’évaluation.
Madame Jamieson nous entretiendra sur son œuvre accomplie
dans l’intérêt des Premières nations, des Métis, des Inuit et des
peuples autochtones du monde entier. Cette oeuvre s’est traduite
par la promotion des droits humains, la résolution non contradictoire des conflits et l’établissement de principes démocratiques
grâce au leadership et au changement institutionnel.
Roberta Jamieson assume la direction générale de la Fondation
nationale des réalisations autochtones. Elle a également agi
comme chef des Six Nations du territoire de Grand River, plus
grande Première nation du Canada. Ayant consacré dix ans de sa
carrière au mandat d’ombudsman de l’Ontario, Mme Jamieson a
gagné l’approbation internationale pour sa passion, sa volonté de
prendre des risques et son engagement profond dans le domaine
de la résolution des conflits.
Première Canadienne autochtone à avoir obtenu sa licence en
droit, Mme Jamieson est également devenue la première femme
ombudsman de l’Ontario. Élevée parmi les Six Nations de Grand
River, elle a appris à jouer un rôle de conciliatrice et de négociatrice efficace au sein d’une grande famille, compétence qui a
d’ailleurs défini son orientation professionnelle.
Louangée pour l’élaboration et la promotion de méthodes de résolution non contradictoire des conflits, Mme Jamieson a collaboré
à l’avancement de la démocratie grâce au changement institutionnel, avec des jurisconsultes et des politicologues d’Asie, d’Afrique,
d’Europe et d’Amérique du Nord.
L’allocution plénière de Mme Roberta Jamieson est parrainée
en partie par des contributions de la Société canadienne
d’évaluation et de l’American Evaluation Association.
20
Keynote Address –
S a t u r d a y, O c t o b e r 2 9
Lieutenant-General (Retired),
Roméo Dallaire:
Speaking Truth to Power
Speaking truth to power is a major professional
responsibility of evaluators. General Dallaire will
share his experiences in trying to get the attention
of the world, and then the resources and authority to act to prevent the genocide in Rwanda, over a decade ago. The General will
use this tragic example of speaking truth to power to identify
lessons learned, lessons that are likely to be of great value to those
confronted by overwhelming resistance to facing the facts.
A decorated Lieutenant-General, Roméo Dallaire served for 35
years with the Canadian Armed Forces. A best-selling author, his
recently released book, Shake Hands with the Devil, is a stirring
account of his experience as the Force Commander of the United
Nations Mission to Rwanda and exposes the failures by humanity
to stop one of the worst genocides in the 20th century.
Lieutenant-General Dallaire received the Order of Canada in
2002. His book was awarded the Governor General’s Literary
Award for Non-Fiction in 2004. It has garnered numerous international literary awards, and will be the basis of a full-length feature film due for release in 2006. He was recently presented with
the United Nations Association in Canada’s Pearson Peace Medal
by Canada’s Governor-General, Adrienne Clarkson.
On March 24, 2005, Prime Minister Paul Martin announced that
Her Excellency the Governor General has summoned LieutenantGeneral Roméo Dallaire to the Senate. Lieutenant-General
Dallaire will be sitting in the Senate as a member of the Liberal
Party of Canada.
Lieutenant-General (Retired) Roméo Dallaire’s keynote
address is supported in part by a grant from the
W.K. Kellogg Foundation.
Le samedi 29 octobre
Lieutenant-général
Roméo Dallaire (retraité) :
énoncer la vérité face au pouvoir
Énoncer la vérité face au pouvoir constitue l’une
des principales responsabilités professionnelles de
l’évaluateur. À ce titre, le général Dallaire relatera
son expérience, puisqu’il a tenté d’attirer l’attention du monde
entier, puis d’obtenir les ressources et d’acquérir l’autorité nécessaires à la prévention du génocide au Rwanda, il y a plus de dix ans.
Le général se servira de ce tragique exemple pour définir les leçons
qu’il en a tirées, et qui pourraient s’avérer d’une aide précieuse aux
personnes qui doivent affronter une résistance implacable face à
l’acceptation de la réalité.
Roméo Dallaire, lieutenant-général décoré, a servi durant 35 ans
au sein des Forces armées canadiennes. Dans son livre paru récemment, intitulé J’ai serré la main du diable, l’auteur à succès livre un
compte rendu bouleversant de son expérience de commandant des
forces de la Mission des Nations Unies au Rwanda. Il démontre à
quel point l’humanité s’est révélée incapable d’empêcher le pire
génocide du XXe siècle.
Le lieutenant-général Dallaire a reçu l’Ordre du Canada en 2002.
Son livre lui a valu le prix du gouverneur général pour œuvre non
romanesque, en 2004. Il lui a également permis de remporter de
nombreux prix littéraires internationaux, et inspirera un long
métrage dont le lancement est prévu en 2006. Adrienne Clarkson,
gouverneure générale du Canada, lui a récemment décerné la
médaille Pearson de la paix, créée par l’Association canadienne
pour les Nations Unies.
D’après l’annonce faite par le premier ministre Paul Martin, le
24 mars dernier, son excellence la gouverneure générale a mandé
le lieutenant-général Roméo Dallaire au Sénat. Il y siégera comme
membre du Parti libéral du Canada.
L’allocution plénière du Lieutenant-général Roméo Dallaire
(retraité) est parrainée en partie par une subvention de la
Fondation W.K. Kellogg.
21
Networking
Socials
Activités sociales
de réseautage
Opening Reception, Posters, Information
Tables and Meet the Authors
Réception d’ouverture, Affiches, Tables
d’information et rencontre avec les auteurs
6:30 pm – 8:00 pm, Wednesday, October 26, 2005
De 18 h 30 à 20 h, le mercredi 26 octobre 2005
Take this opportunity to speak with some of the CES Council and
Chapter representatives, AEA Board, TIG, and Affiliate leaders,
and representatives from affiliated groups such as the International
Organisation for Cooperation in Evaluation and the CES
Educational Fund. Walk through the Poster displays and speak
one-on-one with the presenters about their work. Browse the area
featuring publications in evaluation and chat with the authors. And
as a special treat, enjoy the evening’s entertainment by Michael
Quinn Patton and Terry Smutylo performing evaluation ditties!
Profitez de cette occasion pour rencontrer des représentants du
Conseil national et des sections de la SCÉ, du conseil d’administration de l’AEA, des GT, des filiales locales et des représentants
d’organismes affiliés tels que l’Organisation internationale pour la
coopération en évaluation et le Fonds de bourses d’études de la
SCÉ. Parcourez l’exposition d’affiches et entretenez-vous en personne avec les présentateurs au sujet de leurs travaux. Promenezvous dans l’aire des publications en évaluation et bavardez avec les
auteurs. Le soir, Michael Quinn Patton et Terry Smutylo vous
divertiront avec leurs numéro de comédie sur l’évaluation!
Educational Fund
(CESEF)
Fonds éducatif de la
(FÉSCÉ)
The Canadian Evaluation Society Educational Fund (CESEF)
has been developed to:
Le Fonds éducatif de la Société canadienne d’évaluation
(FÉSCÉ) a été créé pour :
• Promote the integration of program evaluation into practice
in Canada.
• Promouvoir l’intégration de l’évaluation de programme à
la pratique au Canada.
• Provide tangible assistance to students pursuing studies or
internships/mentorships of program evaluation.
• Fournir une aide tangible aux étudiants qui sont aux études
ou qui veulent faire des stages ou du mentorat en évaluation
de programme.
• Obtain resources and in-kind contributions from all sources.
CESEF was originally proposed by the Canadian Evaluation
Society but operates as an independent charitable organization
in Canada. As such, it can secure funds, issue tax receipts to
donors, and assist students of program evaluation by funding
scholarships, research, award programs, cooperative terms, and
other programs based on merit and need. CESEF will partner
with CES and other appropriate agencies to plan programs
and forums.
CESEF is just developing its promotional materials, website,
and programs. If you wish to find out more about this organization, please contact Kathy Jones, CESEF Executive Secretary,
at [email protected] or 613-722-8796.
Or Joan Kruger, A/Chair, CESEF at [email protected]
or 306-584-1599.
Please watch for further information on the CES website and
subsequently, the CESEF website.
• Obtenir des ressources ou des contributions en nature
de diverses sources.
Le FÉSCÉ a initialement été proposé par la Société canadienne
d’évaluation, mais il s’agit d’un organisme de bienfaisance canadien indépendant. Il peut donc obtenir des fonds, émettre des
reçus pour fins d’impôt aux donateurs et aider les étudiants en
évaluation de programme en finançant des bourses d’études, des
travaux de recherche, des programmes de prix, des programmes
de formation coopératifs, et d’autres programmes fondés sur le
mérite et le besoin. Le FÉSCÉ agira en partenariat avec la SCÉ
et d’autres organismes pertinents pour organiser des programmes et des forums.
On est actuellement en train d’élaborer le matériel promotionnel, le site Web et les programmes du FÉSCÉ. Si vous voulez
en apprendre plus long sur cet organisme, veuillez communiquer avec Kathy Jones, secrétaire de direction du FÉSCÉ, à
[email protected] ou au 613-722-8796; ou
encore avec Joan Kruger, présidente intérimaire du FÉSCÉ à
[email protected] ou au 306-584-1599.
Vous trouverez de plus amples renseignements sur le site Web
de la SCÉ et, plus tard, sur celui du FÉSCÉ.
22
An Evening at Steam Whistle Brewery
Une soirée à la brasserie Steam Whistle
6:30 pm – 10:00 pm, Thursday, October 27, 2005
De 18 h 30 à 22 h, le jeudi 27 octobre 2005
The Steam Whistle Brewery is located in the Canadian Pacific
Rail steam locomotive repair facility (the Roundhouse) built in
1929, providing a taste of Canadian history. It is located near other
key attractions such as the CN Tower and the Rogers Centre. The
evening will take place in two unique event spaces – the Tank
Room and the Beer Hall – that can accommodate up to 750 people. The Roundhouse is an architectural gem with large multipaned windows, 30-foot ceilings, hand-hewn support pillars,
exposed red brick, and Steam Whistle’s renovation has kept much
of its originality in place. The atmosphere is relaxed and very
social.
La brasserie Steam Whistle est située dans l’usine de réparation de
locomotives à vapeur du Canadien Pacifique (la Rotonde) construite en 1929; elle constitue donc une véritable page d’histoire du
Canada. Elle se trouve à proximité d’autres attractions clés comme
la Tour du CN et le Rogers Centre. La soirée se déroulera dans
deux locaux uniques – le Tank Room et le Beer Hall – qui peuvent
accueillir jusqu’à 750 personnes. La Rotonde est un bijou architectural avec des fenêtres à vitres multiples, des plafonds de 30 pieds,
des piliers de support coupés à la main et des murs de brique rouge
exposée. Les travaux de rénovation du Steam Whistle ont permis
de préserver une bonne partie du caractère original du bâtiment.
L’ambiance y est détendue et très chaleureuse.
The evening will include a tour of the Brewery, available to small
groups throughout the evening, dancing with DJ service provided
by Maximum music and a gourmet dinner. A cash bar will be available. The cost is Cdn$80.25 per person and tickets can be purchased at the Registration Desk.
La soirée comprendra des visites de la brasserie en petits groupes
pendant toute la soirée, de la danse au rythme de la musique du
disc-jockey fourni par Maximum Music et un délicieux souper. Un
bar payant sera disponible. Le coût est 80,25 $CAN par personne
et on peut acheter des billets au bureau d’inscription.
23
Joint CES/AEA Luncheon
Déjeuner-buffet conjoint SCÉ/AEA
12:10 pm – 1:45 pm, Friday, October 28, 2005
De 12 h 10 à 13 h 45, le vendredi 28 octobre 2005
Carl Doucette, CES President, and Sharon Rallis, AEA President,
will host this ticketed luncheon where you will have an opportunity to network with conference delegates while enjoying sumptuous
food. Awards recognizing the outstanding accomplishments of
dedicated people from the evaluation community will be presented. If you have not already purchased your luncheon ticket, you
may do so at the Registration Desk until 5:00 pm on Thursday.
Carl Doucette, président de la SCÉ, et Sharon Rallis, présidente de
l’AEA, seront les hôtes de ce déjeuner-buffet (billets nécessaires)
qui vous donnera l’occasion de rencontrer d’autres délégués, tout
en dégustant des plats délicieux. Des prix soulignant les réalisations
exceptionnelles de membres dévoués de la communauté d’évaluation seront présentés. Si vous n’avez pas encore acheté vos billets
pour cet événement, vous pouvez vous les procurer au bureau
d’inscription jusqu’à 17 h jeudi.
Reception and Silent Auction
6:30 pm - 8:00 pm, Friday, October 28, 2005
Get a great start on your holiday shopping while you’re in
Toronto! There will be no better place than the Silent Auction.
This is your opportunity to buy unique things from around the
world donated by AEA/CES individuals and groups. What more
can you ask for on a Friday night – a fantastic networking opportunity at the reception, complimentary hors d’oeuvres, cash bar,
excitement and great deals at the Silent Auction. Most important,
your dollars will be used to support students working in the field
of evaluation and to fund travel awards to evaluators from developing countries and countries in transition who otherwise would
be unable to attend the conference. Many lucky attendees at Silent
Auctions at past AEA conferences can attest to the great items
they’ve purchased. If you want to meet people, contribute to worthy CES and AEA initiatives, get some great bargains and have a
lot of fun, then the Silent Auction is just the event for you!
Reception hosted by
IOCE, CES and AEA
6:00 pm - 7:30 pm, Saturday, October 29, 2005
Reception hosted by International Organisation for Cooperation
in Evaluation (IOCE), Canadian Evaluation Society (CES) and
American Evaluation Association (AEA) for representatives of
regional/national evaluation associations and organisational partners of IOCE, and colleagues from around the globe who are
fostering worldwide cooperation and partnerships in evaluation.
Join the IOCE, CES and AEA leaders at this networking reception! Enjoy complimentary hors d’oeuvres and cash bar.
Réception et vente aux enchères par écrit
De 18 h 30 à 20 h, le vendredi 28 octobre 2005
Prenez un peu d’avance sur vos courses de Noël pendant votre
séjour à Toronto! Il n’y a pas de meilleur endroit pour le faire qu’à
la vente aux enchères par écrit. C’est l’occasion pour vous de vous
procurer des objets uniques de partout à travers le monde, qui ont
été donnés par des membres et des groupes de la SCÉ et de l’AEA.
Que peut-on demander de mieux pour un vendredi soir : une merveilleuse occasion de réseautage à la réception, des hors-d’œuvre
gratuits, un bar payant, une ambiance animée et de merveilleuses
aubaines à la vente aux enchères par écrit. Et, surtout, les dollars
que vous dépensez serviront à fournir des bourses de voyage à des
étudiants en évaluation et à des évaluateurs de pays en voie de
développement et en transition qui autrement ne seraient pas en
mesure d’assister au congrès. Beaucoup de participants qui ont eu
la chance de participer à d’autres ventes aux enchères par écrit dans
le cadre de congrès antérieurs de l’AEA pourront vous parler des
achats fantastiques qu’ils ont effectués. Si vous voulez rencontrer
des gens, contribuer à des initiatives méritoires de la SCÉ ou de
l’AEA, profiter d’aubaines épatantes et vous divertir en même
temps, alors la vente aux enchères par écrit est l’événement tout
indiqué pour vous!
Réception organisée par
l’OICE, la SCÉ et l’AEA
De 18 h 00 à 19 h 30, le samedi 29 octobre 2005
Réception organisée par l’Organisation internationale pour la
coopération en évaluation (OICE), la Société canadienne d’évaluation (SCÉ) et l’American Evaluation Association (AEA) à l’intention des représentants des associations régionales et nationales d’évaluation, des partenaires organisationnels de l’OICE et des collègues de partout dans le monde qui promeuvent la coopération
internationale et les partenariats en évaluation.
Joignez-vous aux dirigeants de l’OICE, de la SCÉ et de l’AEA
à l’occasion de cette réception de réseautage! Il y aura des
hors-d’œuvre gratuits et un bar payant.
24
THINGS TO KNOW
CHOSES À SAVOIR
Registration Information
and Floor Plans
Renseignements sur l’inscription
et plans des lieux
The Registration Desk for Evaluation 2005 is located on the
Concourse Level of the Sheraton Centre. The Registration Desk
should be your first stop during the conference. It is where you
will receive your name badge and conference materials, where you
can return with questions or concerns at any time during the conference, and where any last minute changes to the program are
posted. There are conference programs available at the desk with
abstracts for each session for your perusal. It is also where you can
drop off donations for the Silent Auction, or check the message
board.
Le bureau d’inscription d’Évaluation 2005 est situé au niveau
Concourse du Centre Sheraton. Le bureau d’inscription devrait
être votre premier arrêt à votre arrivée au congrès. C’est là où vous
recevrez votre insigne et les documents afférents au congrès, où
vous pouvez poser des questions ou soulever des préoccupations à
n’importe quel moment pendant le congrès, et où seront affichés
les changements de dernière minute apportés au programme. Des
programmes du congrès sont également disponibles au bureau
d’inscription pour chaque session. Vous pouvez aussi y laisser des
dons pour la vente aux enchères par écrit ou consulter le babillard.
Day
Registration Desk
Hours
Monday, October 24
Tuesday, October 25
Career Center
Hours
Date
Heures
d’inscription
8:00 am – 5:30 pm
Lundi 24 octobre
8 h 00 – 17 h 30
8:00 am – 7:00 pm
Mardi 25 octobre
8 h 00 – 19 h 00
Wednesday, October 26 7:00 am – 7:00 pm
Heures d’ouverture
du Centre des carrières
Mercredi 26 octobre
7 h 00 – 19 h 00
Thursday, October 27
7:00 am – 6:30 pm
7:00 am – 6:30 pm
Jeudi 27 octobre
7 h 00 – 18 h 30
7 h 00 – 18 h 30
Friday, October 28
7:00 am – 6:30 pm
7:00 am – 6:30 pm
Vendredi 28 octobre
7 h 00 – 18 h 30
7 h 00 – 18 h 30
Saturday, October 29
7:00 am – 5:00 pm
7:00 am – 12:00 pm
Samedi 29 octobre
7 h 00 – 17 h 00
7 h 00 – midi
Sunday, October 30
8:00 am – 12:00 pm
Dimanche 30 octobre
8 h 00 – midi
The Career Center
and Recruitment Fair
Le Centre des carrières
et la Foire de recrutement
Find a position, consultant, or employee and review resumes, bios,
job announcements and requests for proposals at the Evaluation
2005 Career Center. Career Center services are offered at no
charge to conference attendees. Those who wish to have a resume
or job posted, and who did not submit it in advance electronically,
should drop it off as early as possible on Thursday once the Career
Center opens. The Career Center is located adjacent to the Vide
Office on the Lower Concourse level at the Sheraton Centre.
Rendez-vous au Centre des carrières d’Évaluation 2005 pour trouver un poste, un consultant, un employé ou pour examiner des curriculum vitae, des biographies, des annonces de postes vacants et
des demandes de propositions. Les services du Centre des carrières
sont offerts gratuitement aux délégués du congrès. Les délégués qui
aimeraient afficher une annonce de poste vacant ou un curriculum
vitae et qui ne l’ont pas envoyée par courrier électronique auparavant devrait apporter l’annonce en question au Centre des carrières
dès son ouverture jeudi. Le Centre des carrières est situé à côté du
bureau Vide au niveau Lower Concourse du Centre Sheraton.
Are you looking for a new job in the evaluation field and want to
interview with prospective employers? Are you a consultant trying
to seek out new business prospects? Are you an advanced graduate
student or new evaluation professional wanting to learn more
information about internship and fellowship opportunities? If you
answered yes to any or all of the above questions, you might be
interested in participating in the Recruitment Fair taking place
at the Evaluation 2005 Conference Career Center from 9:00 am to
1:00 pm on Friday, the 28th. You may sign up for a 30-minute
informational interview during the Recruitment Fair with any one
of our participating employers when the Career Center opens
on Thursday, the 27th, at 7:00 am. To sign up and learn more
about the Recruitment Fair, please talk with a Career Center staff
member.
Vous êtes à la recherche d’un nouvel emploi dans le domaine de
l’évaluation et vous aimeriez rencontrer des employeurs potentiels? Vous êtes un(e) consultant(e) qui cherche à obtenir de nouveaux clients? Vous êtes un(e) étudiant(e) diplômé(e) ou un(e) nouveau(velle) professionnel(le) en évaluation et vous voulez en apprendre plus long sur des occasions d’internat ou des bourses de
recherche? Si vous avez répondu oui à une ou à toutes ces questions, vous voudrez peut-être participer à la foire de recrutement
qui se tiendra au Centre des carrières d’Évaluation 2005 le vendredi 28 octobre de 9 h à 13 h. Vous pouvez vous inscrire à un
entretien d’information d’une demi-heure avec n’importe lequel
de nos employeurs participants lorsque le Centre des carrières
ouvrira ses portes le jeudi 27 octobre à 7 h. Pour vous inscrire et
en apprendre plus long sur la foire de recrutement, adressez-vous
à un membre du personnel du Centre des carrières.
25
Simultaneous Interpretation
Interprétation simultanée
Receivers for English and French simultaneous interpretation are
available in the Grand Ballroom Foyer. You will be asked to leave
your driver’s licence or credit card as a deposit that will be given
back to you when your headset is returned. All of the plenary sessions and the CES Annual General Meeting will have simultaneous interpretation services. In addition, most French-language sessions will have simultaneous translation available into English.
Des casques d’écoute pour l’interprétation simultanée en français et
en anglais sont disponibles dans le foyer de la grande salle de bal. On
vous demandera de laisser votre permis de conduire ou une carte
de crédit en dépôt, jusqu’à ce que vous retourniez votre casque
d’écoute. Toutes les sessions plénières et l’Assemblée générale
annuelle de la SCÉ seront dotées de services d’interprétation simultanée. L’interprétation simultanée vers l’anglais sera également
offerte pour la plupart des sessions se déroulant en français.
Look for this special icon in the program.
It will identify sessions with simultaneous
interpretation.
Special thanks to the Ministry of Finance, Government of
Ontario for their strong support to the practice of evaluation
and, in particular, the provision of simultaneous interpretation
at various sessions of the CES/AEA Conference 2005.
Recherchez cette icône spéciale dans le programme. Elle indique les sessions qui feront
l’objet d’une interprétation simultanée.
Un merci spécial au ministère des Finances de l’Ontario
pour son appui solide envers la pratique de l’évaluation et, en
particulier, pour avoir fourni l’interprétation simultanée pour
diverses sessions du congrès SCÉ/AEA 2005.
Special Activities Organized by
the Local Arrangements Committee
Activités spéciales organisées par le
• Thematic Dinners
On Saturday evening, members of the evaluation community will
host thematic dinners at local restaurants. Take this opportunity to
meet and converse with enthusiastic members of the evaluation
community, while enjoying some of the wonderful cuisine Toronto
has to offer. If you are interested in signing up for one of the dinners, go to the CES Ontario Chapter table located in the registration area. A list of thematic dinners will be available, along with
menu information and directions to the restaurants.
• Soupers thématiques
Samedi soir, les membres de la communauté d’évaluation tiendront des soupers thématiques dans des restaurants locaux.
Profitez de cette occasion pour rencontrer et bavarder avec des
membres enthousiastes de la communauté d’évaluation, tout en
dégustant des plats succulents. Pour vous inscrire à un de ces
soupers, présentez-vous à la table de la Section SCÉ-Ontario
située dans l’aire d’exposition; vous y trouverez une liste des
soupers thématiques, ainsi que des renseignements sur les menus
et sur la façon de se rendre aux divers restaurants.
• Canadian Books Discovery
During the conference, delegates will have the opportunity to
peruse and purchase books written by Canadian authors, all recommended by members of CES. This is your chance to discover
or explore the rich literary world in Canada. These books will be
on display and available for purchase at the CES Ontario Chapter
table located in the registration area.
• Morning Walk / Run
To add some balance to a busy conference schedule, start your day
with a walk or run, guided by a member of CES. Put on your exercise gear and meet in the Sheraton Centre hotel lobby. Look for a
CES Ontario Chapter guide holding a sign that reads “CES/AEA
Conference Joggers”, choose the type of activity, and then be on
your way. The morning walk or run will take place on Monday,
Tuesday and Wednesday mornings at 7:30 am and on Thursday,
Friday and Saturday mornings at 6:30 am.
26
• Découverte de livres canadiens
Pendant le congrès, les délégués pourront feuilleter et acheter des
ouvrages recommandés par des membres de la SCÉ et écrits par
des auteurs canadiens. C’est l’occasion pour vous de découvrir et
d’explorer le riche monde littéraire du Canada. Ces livres seront
en exposition et pourront être achetés à la table de la SCÉ-Ontario
située dans l’aire d’inscription.
• Marche/course du matin
Pour équilibrer un peu l’horaire chargé du congrès, commencez
votre journée par une marche ou une course, guidée par un membre de la SCÉ. Enfilez vos vêtements de sport et rendez-vous au
lobby de l’hôtel du Centre Sheraton. Cherchez un guide de la
Section de l’Ontario tenant une pancarte disant « Joggeurs du
congrès SCÉ/AEA », choisissez le type d’activité et lancez-vous.
Ces marches/courses démarreront à 7 h 30 les lundi, mardi et
mercredi et à 6 h 30 les jeudi, vendredi et samedi.
CES/AEA Conference 2005 Blog
Blogue du congrès SCÉ/AEA 2005
Make Your Views Known, Evaluate the Evaluators,
Build the Online Evaluation Community!
Faites connaître vos opinions, Évaluez les évaluateurs,
Bâtissez la communauté d’évaluation en ligne!
A Conference Blog is a unique feature of CES/AEA Conference
2005 and an important part of the conference evaluation process.
A blog is an interactive tool that allows you to share your thoughts
about a keynote presentation, conference session or event and
make them publicly available for others to read and discuss. The
Conference Blog also lets the conference organizers and presenters read your direct opinions about the various conference
sessions and events.
Ce blogue est une caractéristique unique du congrès SCÉ/AEA
2005 et constitue un aspect important du processus d’évaluation du
congrès. Un blogue est un outil interactif qui vous permet de
partager vos opinions sur une allocution plénière, une session ou un
événement du congrès et de mettre ces opinions à la disposition des
autres, qui peuvent à leur tour les lire et en discuter. Le blogue permet également aux organisateurs et aux conférenciers de lire vos
opinions directes sur les divers événements et sessions du congrès.
Using the CES/AEA Conference 2005 Blog is simple. Go to the
online version of the CES/AEA Conference 2005 program offered
by CES at http://c2005.evaluationcanada.ca and click on “Blog”
under “Program” in the Menu. Then you will be given a list of
time slots. Click on the time slot of interest and a list of all activites
for that time slot will appear. Pick the activity you want, and then
follow the “Add a comment” and “Read comments” links to join a
blog. Please note that the “Read comments” link will not become
active until someone has posted a comment.
Le blogue du congrès SCÉ/AEA 2005 est facile à utiliser. Il suffit
de consulter la version en ligne du programme du congrès
SCÉ/AEA 2005 qui se trouve à l’adresse http://c2005.evaluation
canada.ca et de cliquer sur « Blogue » sous la rubrique « Programme » dans le menu. Vous verrez une liste de créneaux; cliquez
sur celui qui vous intéresse et une liste d’activités pour cette période apparaîtra. Choisissez l’activité que vous voulez, puis suivez les
liens « Ajouter un commentaire » et « Lire les commentaires »
pour joindre un blogue. À noter que le lien « Lire les commentaires » ne s’activera que lorsque quelqu’un aura placé un
commentaire.
So now it is up to you to start a debate, propose avenues of
research to presenters, identify additional references on an issue –
give it a try and make the CES/AEA Conference 2005 Blog work
for you!
Exhibits
A host of displays will be located on the Concourse, Lower
Concourse, and Mezzanine levels of the Sheraton. Visit exhibitors
who make evaluation their business! Talk with them to learn how
they support the professionalism of evaluation.
Conference T-Shirt Memento
Want a special memento of Evaluation 2005? Custom designed
100% cotton jersey conference T-shirts are available. If you purchased a T-shirt when you pre-registered, or you would like to
place an order, proceed to the Registration Desk.
Pre/Post Conference
and Partner Activities
We hope that many of you will use this opportunity to take some
vacation time and allow yourself the opportunity to explore some
of the attractions around the city of Toronto. Toronto is home to
more than 100 cultures, with numerous vibrant communities and
countless opportunities for excitement, adventure, cultural exploration, and relaxation. Visiting Toronto allows you to explore
many different cultures and communities – consider it a world tour
within a city. All you need to fully experience all that Toronto has
to offer is a hearty appetite, an adventurous spirit, a love of culture,
a sense of humour, and an inquisitive nature.
Donc, c’est maintenant à vous de proposer des pistes de recherche
aux présentateurs et de repérer d’autres sources de référence sur
un sujet particulier – essayez le Blogue du congrès SCÉ/AEA 2005
et profitez-en pleinement!
Expositions
Une série d’expositions auront lieu aux niveaux Concourse, Lower
Concourse et Mezzanine de l’hôtel Sheraton. Visitez les exposants
qui oeuvrent dans le domaine de l’évaluation! Parlez avec eux
et découvrez comment ils aident à promouvoir le caractère
professionnel de l’évaluation.
T-shirt souvenir du congrès
Vous voulez garder un souvenir d’Évaluation 2005? Procurez-vous
un T-shirt personnalisé en pur jersey de coton. Si vous avez acheté
un T-shirt au moment de vous pré-inscrire ou si vous aimeriez
placer une commande, allez au bureau d’inscription.
Activités pré-congrès et post-congrès organisées avec les partenaires de l’événement
Nous espérons que plusieurs d’entre vous profiteront de cette occasion pour prendre quelques jours de vacances et pour explorer certains des sites touristiques de Toronto. Cette ville abrite plus d’une
centaine de cultures différentes, des communautés vibrantes et
d’innombrables occasions de découvertes, d’aventure, d’exploration
culturelle et de détente. Visiter Toronto vous permet d’explorer de
nombreuses cultures et communautés différentes – un peu comme
un monde à l’intérieur d’une ville. Tout ce qu’il vous faut pour voir
tout ce que Toronto a à offrir est un appétit sain, l’esprit d’aventure,
un amour de la culture, un sens de l’humour et de la curiosité.
27
Toronto is a mosaic of neighbourhoods – each with it’s own
personality. To discover these communities, you may want to
consider visiting Greektown, Little Italy, Chinatown, Little
Poland, Portugal Village, Little India, Koreatown, or the Gay
Village. Other areas of the city offer interesting boutiques, galleries, and restaurants, such as Harbourfront, Old Town (with
the Distillery District and St. Lawrence’s Market), upscale BloorYorkville, and funky Queen Street West. For a variety of multicultural shops and great bargains, visit Kensington Market. If you
crave artistic or historical outings, check out the Art Gallery of
Ontario or the Royal Ontario Museum. The Hockey Hall of Fame
and the tour at the Rogers Centre (previously known as the
SkyDome) are ideal for the sports enthusiasts in the crowd. For a
thought-provoking experience, visit Gunther von Hagens’
BodyWorlds2: The Anatomical Exhibition of Real Human Bodies
at the Ontario Science Centre. If the weather is not ideal, spend
some time in Toronto’s underground city (the PATH), 27 kilometers of shops and restaurants, right underneath the Financial
District. Finally, don’t forget to visit the CN Tower, the World’s
highest building.
Following are two recommended activities. You can find additional information on these and other tours outside of Toronto at
www.torontotours.com.
• Niagara Falls/Niagara-on-the-Lake is an 8-hour tour that
includes viewing Niagara Falls, taking a ride on the Maid of the
Mist up under the fall, buffet lunch overlooking the falls and a
tour of Niagara-on-the-Lake. Cost: Cdn$87 plus GST. With
an extra hour and additional Cdn$9 the tour can include a
winery tour.
• Canadiana and Pioneer Days is an 8-hour tour including the
McMichael Gallery in Kleinburg, lunch at the Doctor’s House
and a tour of Black Creek Pioneer Village. The cost is
Cdn$119 plus GST.
These are only a few of your options during your stay in Toronto.
For information on additional attractions, visit the information
desk during the conference. Toronto Tourism also provides a
wealth of information and an on-line events calendar (please visit
www.torontotourism.com/visitor). Check it out and sign up for
activities or go to the “Toronto Tours” desk at the Sheraton Hotel.
28
Toronto est une mosaïque de quartiers ayant chacun sa propre personnalité. Pour découvrir ces communautés, vous voudrez peut-être
visiter le quartier grec, la petite Italie, le quartier chinois, la petite
Pologne, le village portugais, la petite Inde, le quartier coréen ou le
village gai. D’autres endroits de la ville recèlent une variété de boutiques, de galeries d’art et de restaurants, comme le Harbourfront, la
vieille ville (avec le quartier des distilleries et le marché St.
Lawrence), le quartier huppé Bloor-Yorkville et le quartier artistique
de la rue Queen Ouest. Pour une variété de magasins multiculturels
et des aubaines épatantes, visitez le marché Kensington. Si les sorties artistiques ou historiques vous intéressent davantage, allez au
Musée des beaux-arts de l’Ontario ou au Musée royal de l’Ontario.
Le Temple de la renommée du hockey et le Rogers Centre (anciennement le SkyDome) sont des sites idéals pour les mordus du sport.
Pour une expérience visuelle hors du commun, visitez le Gunther
von Hagens’ BodyWorlds2 : l’exposition anatomique de véritables
corps humains au Centre des sciences de l’Ontario. Si le temps est
maussade, promenez-vous dans la ville souterraine de Toronto (le
CHEMIN), 27 kilomètres de magasins et restaurants, situés
directement sous le quartier des affaires. Enfin, n’oubliez pas de
vous rendre à la Tour du CN, la plus haute structure du monde.
On vous recommande aussi les deux activités suivantes. Vous pouvez trouver d’autres renseignements sur elles et sur d’autres visites
guidées à l’extérieur de Toronto à l’adresse www.torontotours.com.
• Chutes du Niagara/Niagara-on-the-Lake – D’une durée de huit
heures, le circuit de Niagara Falls et de Niagara-on-the-Lake
comprend l’observation des chutes Niagara, une croisière sur le
Maid of the Mist, accompagnée d’une incursion sous les chutes,
un dîner-buffet avec vue imprenable sur les chutes, ainsi qu’une
visite guidée de Niagara-on-the-Lake. Coût : 87 $ CAN, TPS en
sus. Pour 9 $ de plus et une heure de plus, on vous fera visiter des
vineries.
• Canadiana et Pioneer Days – D’une durée de huit heures, la
journée des pionniers canadiana comprend une visite à la galerie
McMichael de Kleinburg, le dîner à la maison du docteur et
une visite guidée du village des pionniers de Black Creek. Coût :
119 $ CAN, TPS en sus.
Ce ne sont là que quelques-uns des choix qui s’offrent à vous
pendant votre séjour à Toronto. Pour des renseignements sur
d’autres attractions, visitez le comptoir de renseignements pendant
le congrès. Tourisme Toronto fournit également une mine de
renseignements et un calendrier d’événements en ligne (visitez
www.torontotourism.com/visitor). Consultez le site et inscrivezvous à des activités ou allez au comptoir de « Toronto Tours » à
l’hôtel Sheraton.
Frequently Asked Questions
About the Conference
Questions fréquemment posées
au sujet du congrès
What should I do when I arrive at the Conference?
Que devrais-je faire en arrivant au congrès?
Begin by checking in at the Registration Desk located on the
Concourse level near the escalators.
Commencez par vous présenter au comptoir d’inscription de l’hôtel,
situé au niveau Concourse, près des ascenseurs.
May I register or make purchases on site?
Puis-je m’inscrire ou faire des achats sur place?
You may register for the conference, or add to your existing conference registration, on site at the conference Registration Desk.
You may enroll in any open professional development session, but
many will have filled before the conference. Tickets for the
Thursday evening at the Steam Whistle Brewery will be available
until 3:00 pm on Thursday. Tickets for Friday’s Joint CES/AEA
Luncheon will be available until 5:00 pm on Thursday. T-shirts will
be sold in the Registration Desk for the duration of the conference.
Vous pouvez, sur place, vous inscrire au congrès ou ajouter des éléments à votre forfait actuel, en vous présentant au bureau d’inscription du congrès. Vous pouvez vous inscrire à toute session ouverte
de perfectionnement professionnel, mais plusieurs d’entre elles
seront déjà complètes avant même le début du congrès. Les billets
pour la soirée de jeudi à la brasserie Steam Whistle seront en vente
jusqu’à jeudi 15 h. Les billets pour le déjeuner conjoint SCÉ/AEA
de vendredi seront en vente jusqu’à jeudi 17 h. Les T-shirts seront
vendus du bureau d’inscription, et ce, pendant toute la durée du
congrès.
What is included in my registration?
Standard conference registration includes admission to all of the
sessions held after 3:15 pm on Wednesday, October 26 through
to 5:00 pm on Saturday, October 29, with the exception of the
Thursday evening Steam Whistle Brewery social and the Friday
joint CES/AEA Luncheon that require separate tickets. The conference includes over 580 sessions consisting of plenaries with
nationally and internationally known speakers, panels, demonstrations, poster sessions, paper sessions, and round tables. Registration also includes receptions on Wednesday, Friday and Saturday
evenings with beverages available through a cash bar. To keep registration fees low, meals are not included as part of registration.
Beverages are available each morning before and after the plenary
and each afternoon before the penultimate session.
Do I need to sign up for sessions in advance?
The professional development workshops that precede and follow
the conference require a separate registration and are filled on a
first-come, first-served basis. All other sessions held during the
conference are open to all attendees. You may attend any session
by arriving at the appropriate room before the session begins. We
make every effort to ensure that the room size is adequate for the
attendance; however, occasionally, a session’s seating will fill. If
there is a session that you especially wish to see, it is a good idea
to arrive at the beginning of the break rather than at the end.
What is the Thematic Strand?
The Thematic Strand is a set of sessions highlighting the conference theme of Crossing Borders, Crossing Boundaries. In addition
to the plenary sessions – one opening the conference on
Wednesday at 3:15 pm, and one each on Thursday, Friday and
Saturday mornings at 8:00 am – the conference theme will also be
incorporated into the content of many sessions spread throughout
the conference.
Que comprennent les frais d’inscription?
L’inscription au congrès comprend l’admission à toutes les sessions
qui se dérouleront du mercredi 26 octobre après 15 h 15, jusqu’au
samedi 29 octobre à 17 h. Seuls la soirée du jeudi à la brasserie
Steam Whistle, ainsi que le déjeuner-causerie conjoint de la SCÉ
et l’AEA exigent l’achat de billets séparés. Le congrès prévoit plus
de 580 sessions, qui consisteront en des plénières animées par des
conférenciers de réputation mondiale, ainsi que des panels, des
démonstrations, des présentations par affiches, des résumés d’articles et des tables rondes. De plus, l’inscription comprend les
réceptions du mercredi, vendredi et du samedi soir, avec service
de bar payant. La SCÉ a exclu les repas pour maintenir les frais
d’inscription au plus bas. Des rafraîchissements seront servis
chaque matin avant et après chaque session plénière, et après
l’avant-dernière session de chaque après-midi.
Dois-je m’inscrire aux sessions à l’avance?
Les ateliers de perfectionnement professionnel qui précèderont le
congrès et qui y feront suite exigent une inscription séparée; les
places seront octroyées d’après le principe premier arrivé, premier
servi. Toutes les autres sessions ayant lieu pendant le congrès sont
ouvertes à tous les délégués. Vous pouvez assister à n’importe
quelle session en vous présentant à la pièce appropriée avant le
début de la séance. Nous faisons tout notre possible pour veiller à
ce que la taille de la pièce soit adéquate pour le nombre de participants; cependant, à l’occasion, il arrivera que la salle se remplisse
à pleine capacité. S’il y a une session à laquelle vous souhaitez particulièrement assister, nous vous suggérons d’arriver au début de la
pause plutôt qu’à la fin.
Qu’est-ce que le Volet thématique?
Le Volet thématique est un ensemble de sessions soulignant le
thème du congrès, notamment Franchir les frontières, repousser les
limites. En plus des sessions plénières – celle qui marquera l’ouverture du congrès mercredi à 15 h 15 et les autres prévues pour jeudi,
vendredi et samedi matin à 8 h – le thème du congrès sera également intégré au contenu de plusieurs autres sessions du congrès.
29
What is the Canadian Strand?
Qu’est-ce que le Volet canadien?
The conference theme provides an excellent backdrop for discussion, dialogue and deliberation about issues and questions of particular interest to evaluation in the Canadian context. To that end,
one Canadian Strand session will be scheduled in each of the conference concurrent session time slots. These high-profile sessions
are reserved for theme-based exchanges of relevance to evaluation
in the Canadian context.
Le thème du congrès fournit une excellente toile de fond pour des
discussions, des dialogues et des débats sur des sujets et des questions intéressant particulièrement l’évaluation dans le contexte
canadien. À cette fin, il y aura une session du Volet canadien dans
chaque bloc de sessions simultanées prévues au congrès. Ces sessions de haut profil sont réservées à des échanges thématiques pertinents pour l’évaluation dans le contexte canadien.
What is the French-Language Strand?
Qu’est-ce que le Volet francophone?
Evaluation 2005 is a dual-language English and French conference. The French-language sessions selected for the program have
been combined to form a French-language strand woven throughout the conference or have been incorporated into the Canadian
Strand. Most French-language sessions will have simultaneous
translation available into English.
Le congrès d’évaluation 2005 est un événement bilingue. Dans le
cadre du programme, les organisateurs ont regroupé les sessions
en français en vue de constituer un volet francophone, qui agrémentera l’ensemble du congrès ou s’intégrera au volet canadien.
La plupart des sessions en français feront l’objet d’une traduction
simultanée en anglais.
Comment puis-je rencontrer des gens?
Il peut être difficile d’établir des liens avec des gens la première fois
qu’on assiste à un congrès. Une des meilleures façons de rencontrer
des collègues est d’assister à la réception de mercredi, où il y aura
une séance d’orientation, des affiches et une rencontre avec des
auteurs. Achetez un billet pour la visite de la brasserie Steam
Whistle jeudi soir et pour le déjeuner conjoint SCÉ/AEA de vendredi matin. La soirée du vendredi se terminera par une réception et
une vente aux enchères par écrit. Venez rencontrer des collègues de
partout à travers le monde et faites des offres sur un large éventail
d’articles, allant de livres à des talismans. Les bénéfices permettront
aux étudiants et délégués internationaux méritoires de se rendre à
des congrès futurs. Si vous êtes étudiant(e), ne manquez pas la réception prévue exclusivement pour vous permettre de rencontrer les
membres des conseils d’administration de la SCÉ et de l’AEA; cette
réception se tiendra mercredi soir à 20 h. Rencontrez les équipes
gagnantes du concours « Simulation d’évaluation ». Si c’est le premier congrès de la SCÉ ou de l’AEA auquel vous assistez, ne manquez pas non plus la séance d’orientation qui aura lieu mercredi soir,
de 18 h 10 à 18 40 – pour en apprendre plus long sur la SCÉ, l’AEA
et le congrès conjoint. Enfin, en assistant à la réunion d’affaires d’un
groupe thématique, vous aurez l’occasion de vous réseauter avec des
gens qui partagent vos intérêts disciplinaires.
Que dois-je faire si j’ai des questions pendant le congrès?
N’hésitez pas à vous présenter au bureau d’inscription à tout
moment. Nous nous ferons un plaisir de répondre à vos questions,
de vous donner quelques conseils ou de vous orienter. La Section
SCÉ-Ontario aura une table dans l’aire d’inscription et son personnel pourra vous renseigner sur les attractions et lieux touristiques locaux, et sur les activités qu’offre Toronto. Quand vous
parcourez les lieux du congrès, recherchez les délégués portant un
ruban avec le mot « Toronto » ou « Ambassadeur » attaché à leur
insigne. Ces personnes sont là pour vous servir et se feront un
plaisir de vous aider.
30
How can I meet people?
Qu’est-ce qu’un GT et que font-ils?
It can be difficult to connect with others your first time at a conference. One great way to meet colleagues is to attend Wednesday’s
reception featuring an Information Fair, Posters and Meet the
Authors. Purchase a ticket to Thursday evening’s Steam Whistle
Brewery and Friday’s Joint CES/AEA Awards Luncheon. Friday
evening is topped off by a Reception and Silent Auction. Meet colleagues from around the world and bid on a range of items from
texts to talismans. Proceeds are used to assist deserving students
and international delegates travel to future conferences. If you are
a student, don’t miss the exclusive Student Reception with the
CES Council and AEA Board held Wednesday evening at 8:00 pm.
Meet the winning teams from the CES Student Evaluation Case
Competition. Is this your first CES or AEA conference? If so, be
sure to attend the first time attendee’s orientation session held
from 6:10 to 6:40 pm on Wednesday evening to learn more about
CES, AEA and the Joint Conference. And finally, attending a TIG
business meeting will help you to connect with people who share
your disciplinary interests.
L’AEA a 36 Groupes thématiques (GT). Une des principales activités de chaque GT est d’examiner les propositions soumises pour le
congrès et de parrainer des sessions au congrès. Dans le programme,
à côté de chaque session figure le nom du GT qui la parraine et le
programme est présenté par GT (voir annexe B). Vérifiez le GT
parrain et cela vous donnera une idée du thème qui sous-tend
chaque session. Chaque GT tient également une réunion d’affaires
pendant le congrès; assister à ces réunions est une merveilleuse façon
de rencontrer des collègues qui partagent vos intérêts et d’en
apprendre plus long sur les projets que prépare le Groupe pour l’année qui vient. Il n’est pas nécessaire d’être membre d’un GT pour
participer à ses sessions ou à ses réunions d’affaires.
What if I have questions during the conference?
Please feel free to come to the Registration Desk at any time.
We’re happy to answer your questions, give a little advice, or point
you in the right direction. The CES Ontario Chapter will have a
table in the registration area and will be pleased to provide information on local sights of interest, entertainment and activities in
the Toronto area. When out and about at the conference, look for
attendees with “Toronto” or “Ambassador” ribbons attached to
their nametags. These Association leaders serve you and will be
happy to help.
What is a TIG and what do they do?
AEA has 36 Topical Interest Groups, or TIGs. One of the major
activities of each TIG is to review conference proposals and sponsor conference sessions. Under each session in the program you
will see the sponsoring group and the program is indexed by TIG
in Appendix B. Checking the TIG sponsor will give you an idea as
to the topical bent of the overall session. Each TIG also holds a
business meeting during the conference and attending one is a
great way to connect with others who share your interests and to
learn of the TIG’s plans for the coming year. You need not be a
member of a TIG to participate in its sessions or attend its business meeting.
Universalia...25 years of experience and
contributions in the field of evaluation
We are an international team of experienced, innovative
leaders with a passion for improving the performance of
development organizations around the world.
Some of our Services
Organizational Assessment
Performance Measurement & Management
Monitoring & Evaluation
Evaluation Capacity Development
Some of our Clients
UNICEF
World Bank
African Development Bank
Inter-American Development Bank
CIDA - Canadian International Development Agency
For more information:
email: [email protected]
website: www.universalia.com
or call us:
Montreal: (514) 485-3565
Ottawa: (613) 232-8401
Washington: (202) 342-1905
Serving client organizations in over 90 countries
Improving performance to make a difference
Améliorer la performance pour faire la différence
Mejorando el desempeño para hacer la diferencia
31
What are those ribbons everyone is wearing?
Que sont ces rubans que tout le monde porte?
The Topical Interest Groups (TIGs) sponsor ribbons that may be
attached to your nametag to indicate your Topical Interests. You
need not belong to a particular TIG to select its ribbon to show
your interest in its topical area – conversely, you need not wear ribbons from each of the TIGs to which you belong. It is up to you.
The ribbons are a great networking tool. They offer a way to
‘break the ice’ and locate others with a common affinity. A few
people also have other ribbons to indicate that they are Board
members, staff, or volunteer leaders.
Les rubans des Groupes thématiques (GT) peuvent être attachés à
votre insigne pour indiquer vos domaines d’intérêt. Il n’est pas
nécessaire d’appartenir à un GT donné pour sélectionner son ruban
et démontrer que vous vous intéressez à un domaine particulier; de
même, il n’est pas nécessaire de porter le ruban de chaque GT
auquel vous appartenez. Vous avez le choix. Les rubans constituent
un merveilleux outil de réseautage. C’est une façon de « briser la
glace » et de repérer d’autres délégués avec qui vous avez des affinités. Certaines personnes portent aussi d’autres rubans indiquant
qu’ils sont membres du conseil d’administration, du personnel ou
des dirigeants bénévoles.
Topical Interest Group Directory
Répertoire des Groupes thématiques
32
Topical Interest Group
Business
Meeting Time
Business
Meeting Room
Groupe thématique
Heure
de la réunion
Salle
de réunion
Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and
Mental Health
Thursday,
5:00 PM to 6:00 PM
V.I.P.
L’alcoolisme, la toxicomanie
et la santé mentale
Jeudi,
de 17 h à 18 h
V.I.P.
Assessment in
Higher Education
Thursday
5:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Conference
Room F
L’évaluation dans les
études supérieures
Jeudi,
de 17 h à 18 h
Salle de
conférence F
Business and Industry
Thursday,
5:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Huron
Affaires et industrie
Jeudi,
de 17 h à 18 h
Huron
Cluster, Multi-Site and
Multi-Level Evaluation
Friday,
7:00 AM to 7:50 AM
Conference
Room E
Évaluation en grappes,
multisites et multiniveaux
Vendredi,
de 7 h à 7 h 50
Salle de
conférence E
Collaborative, Participatory
& Empowerment
Friday,
4:30 PM to 6:00 PM
Civic Ballroom
North
Évaluations participatives
et habilitantes
Vendredi,
de 16 30 à 18 h
Salle de bal
Civic Nord
Costs, Effectiveness, Benefits, Thursday,
and Economics
5:00 PM to 6:00 PM
York
Coûts, efficacité, avantages
et aspects économiques
Jeudi,
de 17 h à 18 h
York
Crime and Justice
Thursday,
5:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Conference
Room D
Criminalité et justice
Jeudi,
de 17 h à 18 h
Salle de
conférence D
Distance Education and
Other Educational Tech
Thursday,
5:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Conference
Room G
Éducation à distance et
Jeudi,
autres technologies éducatives de 17 h à 18 h
Salle de
conférence G
Environmental Program
Evaluation
Thursday,
5:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Windsor Room
East
Évaluation des programmes
environnementaux
Jeudi,
de 17 h à 18 h
Salon Windsor
Est
Evaluating the Arts and
Culture
Thursday,
5:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Simcoe
Évaluation des arts et de
la culture
Jeudi,
de 17 h à 18 h
Simcoe
Evaluation Managers and
Supervisors
Thursday,
3:20 PM to 4:50 PM
Conference
Room G
Gestionnaires et superviseurs
d’évaluation
Jeudi,
de 15 h 20 à 16 h 50
Salle de
conférence G
Evaluation Use
Thursday,
5:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Grand Ballroom
West
Utilisation des évaluations
Jeudi,
de 17 h à 18 h
Grande salle
de bal Ouest
Extension Education
Evaluation
Thursday,
5:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Kent
Évaluation de l’enseignement
périscolaire
Jeudi,
de 17 h à 18 h
Kent
Feminist Issues in Evaluation
Saturday,
9:35 AM to 10:20 AM
Windsor Room
East
Questions féministes en
évaluation
Samedi,
de 9 h 35 à 10 h 20
Salon Windsor
Est
Government Evaluation
Thursday,
3:20 PM to 4:50 PM
Wentworth
Évaluation du gouvernement
Jeudi,
de 15 h 20 à 16 h 50
Wentworth
Graduate Student and
New Evaluators
Saturday,
9:35 AM to 10:20 AM
Grand Ballroom
West
Étudiants diplômés et
nouveaux évaluateurs
Samedi,
de 9 h 35 à 10 h 20
Grande salle
de bal Ouest
Health Evaluation
Thursday,
5:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Conference
Room C
Évaluation de la santé
Jeudi,
de 17 h à 18 h
Salle de
conférence C
Topical Interest Group Directory – continued
Topical Interest Group
Business
Meeting Time
Business
Meeting Room
Répertoire des Groupes thématiques – suite
Groupe thématique
Heure
de la réunion
Salle
de réunion
Human Services Evaluation
Friday,
Windsor Room
11:15 AM to 12:00 PM West
Évaluation des services
sociaux
Vendredi,
de 11 h 15 à midi
Salon Windsor
Ouest
Independent Consulting
Friday,
1:55 PM to 3:25 PM
Windsor Room
East
Consultation indépendante
Vendredi,
de 13 h 55 à 15 h 25
Salon Windsor
Est
Indigenous Peoples in
Evaluation
Friday,
9:25 AM to 10:10 AM
Executive
Les peuples autochtones
en évaluation
Vendredi,
de 9 h 25 à 10 h 10
Salon exécutif
Integrating Technology
into Evaluation
Thursday,
5:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Ice Palace
Intégration de la technologie
à l’évaluation
Jeudi,
de 17 h à 18 h
Ice Palace
International and
Cross-Cultural Evaluation
Thursday,
5:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Dominion
Ballroom South
Évaluations internationales
et interculturelles
Jeudi,
de 17 h à 18 h
Salle de bal
Dominion Sud
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual &
Transgender Issues
Thursday,
5:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Peel
Jeudi,
de 17 h à 18 h
Peel
Multiethnic Issues in
Evaluation
Thursday,
5:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Civic Ballroom
North
Questions liées à l’homosexualité, à la bisexualité
et à la transexualité
Needs Assessment
Thursday,
5:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Executive
Questions liées à la multiethnicité en évaluation
Jeudi,
de 17 h à 18 h
Salle de bal
Civic Nord
Évaluation des besoins
Salon exécutif
Non-Profits and Foundations
Evaluation
Thursday,
5:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Essex Ballroom
Jeudi,
de 17 h à 18 h
Thursday,
5:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Grand Ballroom
Centre
Jeudi,
de 17 h à 18 h
Salle de bal Essex
Prek-12 Educational
Evaluation
Évaluation des organismes
sans but lucratif et des
fondations
Program Theory and
Theory Driven Evaluation
Friday,
4:30 PM to 6:00 PM
Essex Ballroom
Qualitative Methods
Thursday,
5:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Civic Ballroom
South
Quantitative Methods:
Theory and Design
Thursday,
5:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Dominion
Ballroom North
Research, Technology, and
Development Evaluation
Thursday,
5:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Conference
Room B
Social Work
Thursday,
5:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Windsor Room
West
Special Needs Populations
Thursday,
5:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Conference
Room E
Systems in Evaluation
Thursday,
3:20 PM to 4:50 PM
Norfolk
Teaching of Evaluation
Thursday,
5:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Wentworth
Theories of Evaluation
Friday,
1:55 PM to 3:25 PM
Dominion
Ballroom North
Évaluation de l’enseignement l Jeudi,
de la prématernelle jusqu’à
de 17 h à 18 h
la 12e année
Grande Salle
de bal Centre
Théorie des programmes et
Vendredi,
l’évaluation axée sur la théorie de 16 h 30 à 18 h
Salle de bal Essex
Méthodes qualitatives
Jeudi,
de 17 h à 18 h
Salle de bal
Civic Sud
Méthodes quantitatives :
théorie et conception
Jeudi,
de 17 h à 18 h
Salle de bal
Dominion Nord
Évaluation de la recherche,
de la technologie et du
développement
Jeudi,
de 17 h à 18 h
Salle de
conférence B
Travail social
Jeudi,
de 17 h à 18 h
Salon Windsor
Ouest
Populations à besoins
spéciaux
Jeudi,
de 17 h à 18 h
Salle de
conférence E
Les systèmes en évaluation
Jeudi,
de 15 h 20 à 16 h 50
Norfolk
Enseignement de l’évaluation
Jeudi,
de 17 h à 18 h
Wentworth
Théories de l’évaluation
Vendredi,
de 13 h 55 à 15 h 25
Salle de bal
Dominion Nord
33
Just one of the reasons
Seulement une des raisons
why you should be
pourquoi vous devriez être
a member of
membre de l’AEA et/ou de la
AEA and/or CES …
SCÉ…
As a special benefit to members only,
Comme privilège spécial offert aux
we are pleased to announce that
membres seulement, il nous fait plaisir d’annoncer
deep discounts of 20% have been obtained
que nous avons pu obtenir une réduction de 20 %
from three highly reputable publishers:
chez trois éditeurs de renom :
Guilford Publications
www.guilford.com
34
Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Imprint
www.josseybass.com
SAGE Publications & Corwin Press
www.sagepub.com
Interested in saving money
Vous voulez économiser de l’argent
and expanding your library
tout en enrichissant votre bibliothèque
with the latest books on evaluation?
des plus récents ouvrages sur l’évaluation?
Stay tuned for more information
Restez à l’écoute pour plus de renseignements
from AEA and CES
de la part de l’AEA et de la SCÉ
on our Publishing Partners
sur nos partenaires en édition et
and how to order.
sur les modalités de commande.
And make sure you visit their displays
Et ne manquez pas de visiter leurs stands
at the CES/AEA Evaluation Conference 2005!
au congrès SCÉ/AEA Évaluation 2005!
T W O D AY W O R K S H O P S
AT E L I E R S D E D E U X J O U R S
MONDAY-TUESDAY, OCT 24-25
LUNDI ET MARDI, 24 ET 25 OCTOBRE
9 am to 4 pm • de 9 h à 16 h
Qualitative Methods
Qualitative data can humanize evaluations by portraying people
and stories behind the numbers. Qualitative inquiry involves using
in-depth interviews, focus groups, observational methods, and case
studies to provide rich descriptions of processes, people, and programs. When combined with participatory and collaborative
approaches, qualitative methods are especially appropriate for
capacity-building-oriented evaluations.
Through lecture, discussion, and small-group practice, this
workshop will help you to choose among qualitative methods and
implement those methods in ways that are credible, useful, and
rigorous. It will culminate with a discussion of new directions in
qualitative evaluation.
You will learn:
• Types of evaluation questions for which qualitative inquiry is
appropriate,
• Purposeful sampling strategies,
• Interviewing, case study, and observation methods,
• Analytical approaches that support useful evaluation.
Michael Quinn Patton is an independent consultant and professor at
the Union Institute. An internationally known expert on utilizationfocused evaluation and qualitative methods, he published the third
edition of Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (SAGE) in
2001.
SESSION 1: QUALITATIVE METHODS
SÉANCE 1 : QUALITATIVE METHODS
Level: Beginner, no prerequisites
Niveau : débutant, aucun prérequis
Quantitative Methods
Quantitative data offers opportunities for numerical descriptions
of populations and samples. The challenge is in knowing which
analyses are best for a given situation.
Designed for the practitioner needing a refresher course and/or
guidance in applying quantitative methods to evaluation contexts,
the workshop covers the basics of parametric statistics, and nonparametric statistics, as well as how to report your findings in ways
useful to stakeholder groups.
Hands-on exercises interspersed with mini-lectures will introduce
methods and concepts. The instructor will review examples of
research and evaluation questions and the statistical methods
appropriate to developing a quantitative data-based response.
You will learn:
• The conceptual basis for a variety of statistical procedures,
• How more sophisticated procedures are based on the statistical
basics,
• Which analysis technique is best for a given data set or evaluation question,
• How to interpret and report findings from these analyses.
Katherine McKnight applies quantitative analysis in her practice as a
research consultant and program evaluator for Public Interest Research
Services. Additionally, she teaches Research Methods, Statistics, and
Measurement in the Department of Psychology at the University of
Arizona in Tucson, Arizona.
SESSION 2: QUANTITATIVE METHODS
SÉANCE 2 : QUANTITATIVE METHODS
Consulting Skills for Evaluators: Getting Started
Do you have what it takes to be a successful independent consultant? Designed for evaluators considering becoming independent
consultants or who have recently begun a consulting practice, the
workshop will help you to assess your own skills and characteristics to determine if you have what it takes to be successful and
strategize about areas in need of improvement.
The workshop will focus on the full scope of operating an independent consulting practice from marketing and proposal writing,
to developing client relationships, to project management, ethics,
and business operations. Case examples, hands-on activities, and
take-home materials will prepare you to enter the world of
consulting.
You will learn:
• If consulting is an appropriate career choice for you,
• How to break into the evaluation consulting market – and stay
there,
• Time and money management strategies,
• Professional practices including customer service, ethical operations, and client relations.
Gail Barrington started Barrington Research Group 20 years ago as a
sole practitioner. Today, she has a staff of 7 and a diverse client base.
A top rated facilitator, she has taught workshops throughout the US
and Canada.
SESSION 3: CONSULTING SKILLS
SÉANCE 3 : CONSULTING SKILLS
35
TWO DAY WORKSHOPS • ATELIERS DE DEUX JOURS
MONDAY-TUESDAY, OCT 24-25 – 9 am to 4 pm
LUNDI ET MARDI, 24 ET 25 OCTOBRE – de 9 h à 16 h
Evaluation 101: Intro to Evaluation Practice
Begin at the beginning and learn the basics of evaluation from an
expert trainer. The session will focus on the logic of evaluation to
answer the key question: “What resources are transformed into
what program evaluation strategies to produce what outputs for
which evaluation audiences, to serve what purposes.” Enhance
your skills in planning, conducting, monitoring, and modifying the
evaluation so that it generates the information needed to improve
program results and communicate program performance to key
stakeholder groups.
A case-driven instructional process, using discussion, exercises,
and lecture will introduce the steps in conducting useful evaluations: Getting started, Describing the program, Identifying evaluation questions, Collecting data, Analyzing and reporting, and
Using results.
You will learn:
• The basic steps to an evaluation and important drivers of program assessment,
• Evaluation terminology,
• Contextual influences on evaluation and ways to respond,
• Logic modeling as a tool to describe a program and develop
evaluation questions and foci,
• Methods for analyzing, and using evaluation information.
John McLaughlin has been part of the evaluation community for
over 30 years working in the public, private, and non-profit sectors. He
has presented this workshop in multiple venues and will tailor this
two-day format for Evaluation 2005.
SESSION 4: EVALUATION 101
SÉANCE 4 : EVALUATION 101
Niveau: débutant, aucun prérequis
Performance Planning, Measurement and
Reporting for Continuous Improvement
Explore the latest in practical tools and techniques that have
evolved to build capacity across diverse stakeholders to describe,
analyze, plan, measure, report and manage performance. This
workshop will focus on ideas and concepts from traditional evaluation practice, as well as new approaches from the fields of systems
thinking, policy analysis, risk management and action research.
This workshop will showcase the most promising emerging cases,
and will invite you to engage in hands-on small group work to further reinforce key concepts, practical applications to real situations, and group learning.
• ‘Umbrella’ or high-level Results-based Management and
Accountability Frameworks (RMAFs),
• Risk-results analyses,
• Approaches to Implementing evaluation strategies across
diverse populations,
• Practical approaches to performance planning, measurement
and reporting.
Steve Montague, Partner at Performance Management Network Inc.
and author of The Three Rs of Performance, will lead this workshop.
He has two decades of international experience in performance
measurement, program evaluation, review and audit projects as a
management consultant and as an evaluation manager.
SESSION 5: PERFORMANCE PLANNING
SÉANCE 5 : PERFORMANCE PLANNING
Logic Models for Program Evaluation and
Planning
Many programs fail to start with a clear description of the program
and its intended outcomes, undermining both program planning
and evaluation efforts. The logic model, as a map of what a program is and intends to do, is a useful tool for clarifying objectives,
improving the relationship between activities and those objectives,
and developing and integrating evaluation plans and strategic
plans.
First, we will recapture the utility of program logic modeling as a
simple discipline, using cases in public health and human services
to explore the steps for constructing, refining and validating models. Then, we’ll examine how to use logic models in evaluation to
gain stakeholder consensus and determine evaluation focus, in
program monitoring to determine a set of balanced performance
measures, and in strategic planning to affirm mission and identify
key strategic issues. Both days use modules with presentations,
small group case studies, and debriefs to reinforce group work.
You will learn:
• To construct logic models,
• To develop an evaluation focus based on a logic model,
• To use logic models to answer strategic planning questions and
select and develop performance measures.
Thomas Chapel is the central evaluation resource person and logic
model trainer at the Centers for Disease Control. This is an expanded
version of a workshop he has taught for the past 3 years to much
acclaim.
SESSION 6: LOGIC MODELS
SÉANCE 6 : LOGIC MODELS
You will learn:
• How to establish multi-level results chains/performance frameworks,
• Uses of a Needs-Results hierarchy to set strategy,
36
TWO DAY WORKSHOPS • ATELIERS DE DEUX JOURS
MONDAY-TUESDAY, OCT 24-25 – 9 am to 4 pm
LUNDI ET MARDI, 24 ET 25 OCTOBRE – de 9 h à 16 h
Participatory Evaluation
Participatory evaluation practice requires evaluators to be skilled
facilitators of interpersonal interactions. This workshop will provide you with theoretical grounding (social interdependence theory, conflict theory, and evaluation use theory) and practical frameworks for analyzing and extending your own practice.
Through presentations, discussion, reflection, and case study, you
will experience strategies to enhance participatory evaluation and
foster interaction. You are encouraged to bring examples of challenges faced in your practice for discussion.
You will learn:
• Strategies to foster effective interaction, including belief sheets;
values voting; three-step interview; cooperative rank order;
graffiti; jigsaw; and data dialogue,
• Responses to challenges in participatory evaluation practices,
• Four frameworks for reflective evaluation practice.
Jean King has over 30 years of experience as an award-winning
teacher at the University of Minnesota. As an evaluation practitioner,
she has received AEA’s Myrdal award for outstanding evaluation
practice. Laurie Stevahn is a professor at Seattle University with
extensive facilitation experience as well as applied experience in
participatory evaluation.
SESSION 7: PARTICIPATORY EVAL
SÉANCE 7 : PARTICIPATORY EVAL
Prerequisites: Basic evaluation skills
Prérequis : compétences de base en évaluation
Level: Intermediate
Niveau : intermédiaire
FULL DAY WORKSHOPS
ATELIERS D’UN JOUR
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 25
MARDI 25 OCTOBRE
9 am to 4 pm • de 9 h à 16 h
Performance Measurement
Get up to speed on performance measurement and its contribution
to program evaluation. A sound performance measurement system
strengthens accountability, demonstrates value for money to taxpayers and funders, reinforces and supports planning and quality
assurance processes, and, most importantly, improves performance
at the strategic, client, and operational levels.
This intensive, interactive workshop uses many examples and case
studies from a variety of government and non-profit agencies.
Participants will engage a simple step-by-step process for developing meaningful performance measures. Focus will be on the use of
performance measurement in reporting, management decision
making and achieving program results.
You will learn:
• How to build a Simple Program Logic Model to identify a program’s key results,
• How to develop performance measures for planning, monitoring and evaluating results,
• How to use performance measurement in a variety of practical
management processes.
John Robert Allen a management consultant with more than 28
years of experience in performance measurement and program
evaluation in the public sector. He is an experienced facilitator who has
presented this workshop frequently in both the United States and
Canada.
SESSION 8: PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
SÉANCE 8 : PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
37
FULL DAY WORKSHOPS • ATELIERS D’UN JOUR
TUESDAY, OCT 25 – 9 am to 4 pm
MARDI, 25 OCTOBRE – de 9 h à 16 h
Dealing with Reality:
Systems Approaches to Evaluation
Systems theory is a large and highly evaluative filed of inquiry.
Evaluators can use many of the tools and techniques from the systems field, often with little modification. These tools can reveal
otherwise hidden insights, help address ongoing evaluation challenges, and provide valuable short-cuts.
This workshop explores design, data collection, and analysis methods drawn from two systems theory based approaches – Soft
Systems Methodology and Complex Adaptive Systems. Participants will learn and experiment with innovative techniques on a
real case study and then determine the usefulness of these techniques to their own projects.
You will learn:
• Criteria for selecting systems based methods,
• Ways to integrate evaluation and systems-based methods to
respond to the demands of a particular program,
• Multiple innovative and systems-based methods of evaluation
design, data collection and analysis.
Bob Williams is an independent consultant and a pioneer in applying
systems theory to the field of evaluation. Glenda Eoyang is founding
Executive Director of the Human Systems Dynamics Institute and has
presented systems approach workshops with Bob at previous AEA
conferences.
SESSION 9: SYSTEMS APPROACHES
SÉANCE 9 : SYSTEMS APPROACHES
Prerequisites: Basics of needs assessment, eval methods and
qualitative data collection and analysis
Prérequis : connaissance de base de l’évaluation des besoins,
des méthodes d’évaluation, ainsi que de la collecte et de
l’analyse des données qualitatives
Level: Intermediate
RealWorld Evaluation: Overcoming Constraints
What do you do when asked to perform an evaluation on a program that is well underway? When time and resources are few, yet
expectations high? When questions about baseline data and control groups are met with blank stares? This workshop presents a
seven-step approach that seeks to ensure the best quality evaluation under real-life constraints.
Through presentations and discussion, with real-world examples
drawn from international development evaluation, you will study
the RealWorld Evaluation approach. The workshop focuses on
developing country evaluation, but the techniques are applicable
to evaluators working in any context with budget, time, and data
constraints.
• How to identify, and overcome threats to the validity or adequacy of evaluation methods.
Jim Rugh will coordinate a team of four facilitators with extensive
real-world experience in conducting evaluations in a range of contexts
worldwide. He is a leader in the area of conducting evaluations with
budget, time, and data constraints.
SESSION 10: REALWORLD EVALUATION
SÉANCE 10 : REALWORLD EVALUATION
Prerequisites: Academic or practical knowledge of the basics
of evaluation
Prérequis : connaissance théorique ou pratique des fondements de l’évaluation
Level: Intermediate
Focus Group Interviewing
The focus group moderator plays a critical role in the quality of
the focus group interview. This workshop will examine the function of the moderator and suggest methods that maximize his or
her role. Specific topics will include when to use focus groups,
developing powerful questions, solving problems regularly
encountered by moderators, using effective and efficient analysis,
and alternative moderating styles.
Through lecture, demonstration, discussion and practice, this
hands-on session will introduce best practices in moderating,
developing questions and analyzing results for focus groups. You
will have the opportunity to participate in and/or observe a mock
focus-group.
You will learn:
• Critical ingredients of focus group research,
• Focus group moderating skills,
• Development of focus group questions,
• Analysis strategies for group data.
Richard Krueger is co-author of one of the most widely read texts on
focus groups: Focus Groups: A Practical Guide of Applied Research
(SAGE), as well as numerous articles on the topic. He has conducted
over 300 focus groups in the public, private, and non-profit sectors
and is a highly experienced workshop facilitator who has offered
sessions at AEA since 1988.
SESSION 11: FOCUS GROUPS
SÉANCE 11 : FOCUS GROUPS
Prerequisites: Experience with individual or group
interviewing
Prérequis : expérience des entrevues individuelles ou de
groupe
Level: Intermediate
You will learn:
• The seven steps of the RealWorld Evaluation approach,
• Ways to reconstruct baseline data,
38
Coding? Qualitative Software? Why and How
Coding and qualitative software are viewed as resources that assist
in the search for meaning in qualitative data. This session is
designed to use practical experience with real data in the form of
group exercise to direct discussion of important principles that
shape qualitative analysis.
Individual and small group work are framed by seminars that explore pre-code work, code evolution, and memo writing. Qualitative software, including ATLAS.ti and MAXqda, is presented as a
useful tool to integrate into analysis, but not as a solution to analysis challenges.
You will learn:
• The value of “context” in analytic decision-making,
• Processes that support the evolution of coding qualitative data,
• Strategies for moving through coding to later phases of finding
meaning from narrative data,
• How and when to integrate software into the qualitative analysis process.
Ray Maietta is President and founder of ResearchTalk Inc, a qualitative inquiry consulting firm. He is an active qualitative researcher
who also brings extensive experience as a trainer to the session. Jacob
Blasczyk is an active, experienced evaluator with in-depth experience
in using qualitative software.
SESSION 12: CODING
SÉANCE 12 : CODING
Prerequisites: Experience in qualitative data analysis
Prérequis : expérience en analyse des données qualitatives
Level: Intermediate
Creative, Interactive Strategies for
Communicating and Reporting
This unique session is designed to take practicing evaluators a level
beyond their current communicating and reporting practices.
You will self-assess your practices to determine what formats and
strategies you use most often, what challenges and successes you
have experienced, and why. Then, select among learning opportunities in the newest areas of communicating and reporting: video
and web conferencing, chat rooms and teleconferencing, working
sessions, photography and cartoons, poetry and drama, video and
computer-generated presentations, and website communications.
You will learn:
• To self-assess your communications needs,
• Cutting edge strategies in areas that you select as most applicable to your evaluation practice,
• In-depth about the one strategy that can benefit you right now.
Rosalie Torres, of Torres Consulting Group, and Mary Piontek, from
the University of Michigan, represent two-thirds of the authoring team
for the 2nd edition of Evaluation Strategies for Communicating and
Reporting (SAGE). They have applied their recommendations in a
range of evaluation contexts, bringing practical experience to the
workshop.
SESSION 13: REPORTING
SÉANCE 13 : REPORTING
Prerequisites: Experience with evaluation communicating and
reporting
Prérequis : expérience en communication et en présentation
de données sur l’évaluation
Level: Intermediate
Structural Equation Modeling for Evaluators
Explore the conceptual, technical, and applied issues related to
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). SEM merges confirmatory
factor analysis with path analysis and provides means for constructing, testing, and comparing comprehensive structural path
models as well as comparing the goodness of fit of models and
their adequacy across multiple samples.
Drawing heavily on structured lecture with opportunity for questions, this session will examine models varying from simple to
more complex that cover a wide range of situations including longitudinal and mediational analyses, comparisons between groups,
and analyses that include data from different sources such as from
supervisors and co-workers.
You will learn:
• Features and advantages of SEM,
• When and how to apply 6 basic SEM models,
• To test specific hypotheses and compare models,
• To report SEM analysis.
Amiram Vinokur is a charter member of AEA currently at the
University of Michigan’s Institute for Social Research. He has written
on SEM, uses it in his practice, and teaches it at the Survey Research
Summer Institute.
SESSION 14: SEM FOR EVALUATORS
SÉANCE 14 : SEM FOR EVALUATORS
Prerequisites: Intermediate Statistics
Prérequis : statistiques intermédiaires
Level: Intermediate
39
Evaluation Methodology Basics
Evaluation logic and methodology is a set of principles (logic) and
procedures (methodology) that guide evaluators in combining
descriptive data with relevant values to draw conclusions that
address how good, valuable, or important something is, rather
than just describing what it is like or what happened.
This workshop combines mini-lectures, demonstrations, small
group exercises and interactive discussions to offer a “nuts and
bolts” introduction to concrete, easy-to-follow, practical methods
for conducting an evaluation.
You will learn:
• The difference between research methodology and evaluationspecific methodology,
• The fundamentals of theory-based needs assessment,
• Where the “values” come from in an evaluation,
• How to respond to questions about subjectivity,
• Which evaluative criteria are more important than others,
• The fundamentals of using rubrics to convert descriptive data to
evaluative findings.
Jane Davidson has nearly 20 years of experience teaching and
conducting workshops on a wide variety of topics including evaluation
and research methods. The methodologies presented in this workshop
are drawn from her book Evaluation Methodology Basics: The nuts
and bolts of sound evaluation (SAGE).
SESSION 15: EVAL METHODOLOGY
SÉANCE 15 : EVAL METHODOLOGY
Applying the Results Based Approach
in Funding Applications and
Ongoing Programs
Evaluation has become increasingly important as funding opportunities become more competitive. This workshop is geared, in
particular, to those working with non-profit organizations that
want to build evaluation into funding applications and programs.
Through hands-on exercises, presentations, and discussion, you
will explore the Results Based Management approach to Program
Logic Models and Evaluation Matrices. A Program Logic Model
is a tool to help design and evaluate programs, demonstrating the
relationship between program inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes
and impacts. An Evaluation Matrix is a tool for systematically
identifying evaluation questions, indicators of success, appropriate
data sources and data collection methods.
You will learn:
• How to create Program Logic Models,
• How to develop an Evaluation Matrix,
• How to build evaluation into your funding applications and programs.
Harry Cummings, the award-winning director of Harry Cummings
and Associates, has designed and led numerous training workshops in
economic impact assessment. His associate, Nichole Fraser, brings to
the workshop a range of experience in applying the Results Based
Approach in real-world situations.
SESSION 16: RESULTS BASED APPROACH
SÉANCE 16 : RESULTS BASED APPROACH
40
FULL DAY WORKSHOPS
ATELIERS D’UN JOUR
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 26
MERCREDI 26 OCTOBRE
8 am to 3 pm • de 8 h à 15 h
Using the Tools of Quality
In the early stages of development, Quality Assurance/Quality
Control was defined as “…a type of evaluative monitoring.” Today,
quality is more than just an action taken on an assembly line. It is
a set of qualitative and quantitative tools applicable to all types of
organizations including non-profits, government and education.
In the course of its growth Quality has developed and adapted a
number of tools and techniques that are relevant to all evaluators
and should become a part of your tool kit.
This workshop uses mini-lectures, discussion and small group
exercises to explore the Seven Tools of Quality Control and the
Seven New Tools for Quality Management.
You will learn:
• The Seven Tools of Quality Control, including Pareto Charts,
Scatter Diagrams, and Flowcharts,
• The Seven New Tools for Quality Management, including
Affinity Diagrams and Prioritization Matrices,
• Applications of the tools to evaluation in a variety of contexts.
Thomas Berstene is the founder and president of WorkForce
Planning Associates, Inc. He has more than twenty years of experience
working in the area of quality and organizational assessments and
facilitating professional development seminars.
SESSION 17: TOOLS OF QUALITY
SÉANCE 17 : TOOLS OF QUALITY
Evaluation and Policy Implementation
Policy implementation can be thought of as a multi-level, multisite intervention in an organizational system. This workshop
explores evaluation as it relates to two important implementation
strategies. The fidelity approach focuses on development of a large
scale program that is delivered at all sites and the adaptation
approach focuses on development of programs that respond to the
needs of groups within the larger system.
John Owen founded the graduate teaching program at the Centre
for Program Evaluation at Melbourne University. He is a Fellow of the
Australasian Evaluation Society and has offered workshops for the AES
and AEA. Pam St Leger brings to the workshop a wealth of
facilitation skills and is a Senior Lecturer at the Centre for Program
Evaluation.
SESSION 18: POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
SÉANCE 18 : POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
Prerequisites: Experience with policy development and
evaluation
Prérequis : expérience en élaboration et en évaluation des
politiques
Level: Intermediate
Success Case Method Evaluation
The Success Case Method (SCM) is a proven and effective method
to quickly evaluate the impact of training programs and other
organizational or performance improvement initiatives. It is
research-based, practical, efficient and produces highly credible
and trustworthy impact. The SCM intentionally seeks the very
best results a program is producing so that best practices can be
leveraged and extended.
Workshop participants will practice with and learn about the SCM
through presentations, simulation exercises, and review of case
examples. Extensive take home resources, examples, and job aids
facilitate on-the-job application of workshop content.
You will learn:
• Fundamental principles and concepts of Success Case
Evaluation Method (SCM),
• How to plan and conduct a complete SCM evaluation,
• Strategic applications of the SCM.
Robert Brinkerhoff developed the SCM throughout the past 20
years in which he evaluated the impact and effectiveness of training
interventions in organizations worldwide and is the author of
12 books on the topic including, The Success Case Method: Find Out
Quickly What’s Working and What’s Not (Berrett Koehler). He will lead
a team of three during this workshop.
SESSION 19: SUCCESS CASE METHOD EVALUATION
SÉANCE 19 : SUCCESS CASE METHOD EVALUATION
Using mini-lectures, small group exercises and discussion, this
session enables participants to learn about evaluative methods
appropriate to both of these approaches. We will also address the
information needs of policy makers, program managers, the legislature and other stakeholders.
You will learn:
• How to structure evaluations to influence the quality of policy
implementation,
• How to identify and respond to the diverse needs of policy
stakeholders,
• How to determine policy impact.
41
WEDNESDAY, OCT 26 – 8 am to 3 pm
MERCREDI, 26 OCTOBRE – de 8 h à 15 h
Using Rasch to Measure Services and Outcomes
Program evaluation has great need for the development of valid
measures, e.g. of the quantity and quality of services and of the
outcomes of those services. Many evaluators are frustrated when
existing instruments are not well tailored to the task and do not
produce the needed sensitive, accurate, valid findings.
Through an extensive presentation, followed by discussion and
hands-on work with data sets and computer-generated output, this
workshop will explore Rasch Measurement as a means to effectively measure program services. Attendees should bring their own
charged PC laptop and will receive a copy of the Winsteps software at the workshop.
You will learn:
• Differences between Classical Test Theory and Rasch
Measurement,
• Why, when, and how to apply Rasch measurement,
• Hands-on application of Rasch analysis using Winsteps software,
• Interpretation of Rasch/Winsteps output.
Kendon Conrad is from the University of Illinois at Chicago and
Nikolaus Bezrucko is an independent consultant. They bring
extensive experience in both teaching about, and applying, Rasch
measurement to evaluation.
SESSION 20: RASCH MEASUREMENT
SÉANCE 20 : RASCH MEASUREMENT
Using Appreciative Inquiry In Evaluation
Experience the power of appreciative reframing! An appreciative
approach to evaluation maximizes chances for sustainable impact
by helping programs identify what is working and drawing on
existing strengths to build capacity and improve program effectiveness. Appreciatively oriented evaluation does not veil problems, but rather refocuses energy in a constructive and empowering way.
• How to develop interview guides, conduct interviews and analyze interview data,
• How to reframe deficits into assets.
Tessie Catsambas, President of EnCompass LLC, and Hallie Preskill,
University of New Mexico professor and evaluation consultant,
together bring to the workshop years of training experience and
hands-on practice using AI in a variety of program contexts.
SESSION 21: APPRECIATIVE INQUIRY
SÉANCE 21 : APPRECIATIVE INQUIRY
Needs Assessment
Assessing needs is a task often assigned to evaluators with the
assumption that they have been trained in or have experience with
the activity. However, surveys of evaluation training indicated that
by the year 2002 only one formal course on the topic was being
taught in university based evaluation programs.
This workshop uses hands-on activities interspersed with minipresentations and discussions to provide an overview of needs
assessment. The focus will be on basic terms and concepts, models
of needs assessment, steps necessary to conduct a needs assessment
and an overview of methods.
You will learn:
• The definition of need and need assessment and levels, types
and examples of needs,
• Models of needs assessment with emphasis on a comprehensive
3-phase model,
• How to manage a comprehensive needs,
• Methods commonly used in needs assessment.
James Altschuld is a professor at Ohio State University and the
instructor of the only needs assessment course in the most recent
study of evaluation training. He has co-written two books on needs
assessment and is a well-known presenter of workshops on the topic
in numerous respected venues.
SESSION 22: NEEDS ASSESSMENT
SÉANCE 22 : NEEDS ASSESSMENT
You will experience the various phases of Appreciative Inquiry (AI)
using appreciative interviews to focus on evaluation, developing
indicators and data collection tools, conducting appreciative interviews, analyzing interview data, and sharing results. The workshop
uses real-world case examples, exercises, discussion and short
lectures to show participants how to incorporate AI into their evaluation contexts.
You will learn:
• The principles and applications of appreciative inquiry,
• How to formulate evaluation goals and questions using the
appreciative inquiry approach,
42
Utilization-focused Evaluation
Evaluations should be useful, practical, accurate and ethical.
Utilization-focused Evaluation is a process that meets these expectations and promotes use of evaluation from beginning to end. By
carefully implementing evaluations for increased utility, this
approach encourages situational responsiveness, adaptability and
creativity.
With an overall goal of teaching you the process of Utilizationfocused Evaluation, the session will combine lectures with concrete examples and interactive case analyses, including cases provided by the participants.
You will learn:
• The fundamental premises of Utilization-focused Evaluation,
• The implications of focusing an evaluation on intended use by
intended users,
• Options for evaluation design and methods based on situational
responsiveness, adaptability and creativity,
• How to use the Utilization-focused Evaluation checklist & flowchart.
Michael Quinn Patton is an independent consultant and professor at
the Union Institute. An internationally known expert on Utilizationfocused Evaluation, in 1997 he published the third edition of the book
on which this session is based, Utilization Focused Evaluation: The
New Century Text (SAGE).
SESSION 23: UTILIZATION-FOCUSED
SÉANCE 23 : UTILIZATION-FOCUSED
Theory-Driven Evaluation
Learn the theory-driven approach for assessing and improving
program planning, implementation and effectiveness. Participants
will explore the conceptual framework of program theory and its
structure, which facilitates precise communication between evaluators and stakeholders regarding evaluation needs and approaches
to address those needs.
Mini-lectures, group exercises and case studies will illustrate the
use of program theory and theory-driven evaluation for program
planning, initial implementation, mature implementation and
outcomes. In the outcome stages, you will explore the differences
among outcome monitoring, efficacy evaluation and effectiveness
evaluation.
You will learn:
• How to apply the conceptual framework of program theory,
• How to apply the theory-driven approach to select an evaluation
that is best suited to particular needs,
• How to apply the theory-driven approach for evaluating a program’s particular stage or the full cycle.
Huey Chen, professor at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, is
the author of Theory-Driven Evaluations (SAGE), the classic text for
understanding program theory and theory-driven evaluation. He is an
internationally know workshop facilitator on the subject.
SESSION 24: THEORY DRIVEN EVALUATION
SÉANCE 24 : THEORY DRIVEN EVALUATION
Prerequisites: Knowledge of logic models or program theory
Prérequis : connaissance des modèles logiques ou de la
théorie des programmes
Level: Intermediate
Presenting Evaluation Findings: Effective
Messaging for Evaluators
Explore the difference between “presenting” findings and “communicating” findings. This is an interactive session for any evaluator who is asked to present evaluation findings in front of an
audience. Participants are introduced to three primary channels of
communication: how you look, how you sound and how you organize what you say.
The instructor will model a behavior, explain an idea and demonstrate concept after which attendees will have the opportunity to
practice in front of the group and receive coaching and feedback.
Come prepared with a specific topic that you’ll be asked to present
in the near future.
You will learn:
• The importance of the three main channels of communication,
• How to eliminate distracting physical behaviors from your presentations,
• How to organize and effectively stage an evaluation presentation for maximum impact.
Carl Hanssen hails from The Evaluation Center at Western Michigan
University and is a certified interpersonal skills instructor. An
experienced facilitator and presentations coach, he excels at
developing, practicing and teaching presentation skills.
SESSION 25: PRESENTING EVALUATION FINDINGS
SÉANCE 25 : PRESENTING EVALUATION FINDINGS
43
360-Degree Feedback:
Online Methods and Techniques
360-degree feedback is a powerful multi-dimensional leadership
development tool. Feedback is obtained from a range of perspectives across an organization. The ease of deploying surveys on the
web does not mean that organizations are better equipped to
implement 360-degree, but it does produce new opportunities and
challenges.
Through mini-lecture, demonstration, discussion, small group
practice and role-play this workshop will introduce you to conducting effective 360-degree feedback online.
You will learn:
• The steps in the 360-degree feedback process,
• The evaluation framework to understand outcomes for different
stakeholders,
• How to implement 360-degree instruments,
• How to interpret reports and selection of strategies for effective
feedback.
Zita Unger hails from Evaluation Solutions, a consulting company
with extensive experience in the design and delivery of online
evaluation instruments and has received the Australasian Evaluation
Society’s Evaluation Training and Service award for outstanding
contributions to the profession of evaluation.
SESSION 26: 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK
SÉANCE 26 : 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK
Using Effect Size and Association Measures
Answer the call to report effect size and association measures as
part of your evaluation results. Improve your capacity to understand and apply a range of measures including: standardized measures of effect sizes from Cohen, Glass, and Hedges; Eta-squared;
Omega-squared; the Intraclass correlation coefficient; and
Cramer’s V.
Through mini-lecture, hands-on exercises, and demonstration,
you will improve your understanding of the theoretical foundation
and computational procedures for each measure as well as ways to
identify and correct for bias.
You will learn:
• How to select and compute the appropriate measure of effect
size or association,
• Considerations in the use of confidence intervals,
• Ways to identify and correct for measurement bias.
Jack Barnette from The University of Alabama at Birmingham and
James McLean from The University of Alabama-Tuscaloosa have been
conducting research and writing on this topic for over five years.
Together, they bring over 60 years of teaching and workshop
facilitation experience and both have received awards for outstanding
teaching.
SESSION 27: EFFECT SIZE, MEASURES
SÉANCE 27 : EFFECT SIZE, MEASURES
Prerequisites: Univariate statistics through ANOVA & power
Prérequis : méthode à variables simples, par l’analyse de
variance et la puissance
Level: Intermediate
Minding Your Mind: Using Your Brain More
Effectively
Evaluators seldom pay attention to how their brains work day to
day; how they are affected by food; how memories are created,
organized, and accessed; under what physical circumstances inspiration arises; how ideas are generated and connected to one another; how sleep, exercise, unstructured time, and life problems affect
what they think about; and how easily or stressfully they handle
day to day thinking chores.
Through lecture and discussion, this workshop addresses how
thinking can be made easier, less stressful, and more productive.
This is not about “gimmicks” or clever philosophical insights, but
is based on the working habits of successful people involved in
intellectual work.
You will learn:
• How to work effectively on many evaluation topics at one time,
• How to increase the odds of finding solutions to hard problems,
• What to eat to increase your mental energy,
• How to connect with thoughtful people for mutual benefit.
George Grob works with the Office of Inspector General Corps and
has managed over 1000 evaluations and 100 evaluators in the past 15
years. Increasingly, his teaching focuses on effective performance,
problem solving, and thinking for evaluators.
SESSION 28: MINDING YOUR MIND
SÉANCE 28 : MINDING YOUR MIND
44
Improved Instrument Development Through
Group Facilitation
Sound instrument design is the hallmark of quality evaluation
practice. A solid understanding of item writing techniques and the
ability to effectively implement them are critical. Most item writing, however, takes place in isolation or with uneven contributions
from all participants. The item writing process can be greatly
enhanced through the use of group techniques.
This workshop outlines the process of item writing, showcasing
the role of nominal group technique as a process for item writers
to voice their opinions, prioritize their thoughts, and create coherent plans.
You will learn:
• A research-based system for generating survey items,
• When and how to use nominal group technique and its benefits,
• Technical aspects of item writing,
• A strategy for pilot testing newly developed items,
• Pitfalls to avoid in item writing.
Jennifer Dewey is an expert facilitator with varied experience in the
areas of quality assurance and evaluation, most currently working for
ORC Marco as an internal trainer. Stacie Hudgens hails from Learning
Point Associates where she designs and implements evaluation
projects for external contracts.
SESSION 29: INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT
SÉANCE 29 : INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT
Multilevel Models in Program Evaluation
Multilevel models (also called hierarchical linear models) open the
door to understanding the inter-relationships among nested structures (students in classrooms in schools in districts for instance), or
the ways evaluands change across time (perhaps longitudinal
examinations of health interventions). This workshop will demystify multilevel models and present them at an accessible level,
stressing their practical applications in evaluation.
Through discussion and hands-on demonstrations, the workshop
will address four key questions: When are multilevel models necessary? How can they be implemented using standard software?
How does one interpret multilevel results? What are recent developments in this arena?
You will learn:
• The basics of multilevel modeling,
• When to use multilevel models in your evaluation practice,
• How to implement models using widely available software.
Sanjeev Sridharan is head of evaluation programs and a senior
research fellow at the University of Edinburgh as well as a trainer for
SPSS and an Associate Editor for the American Journal of Evaluation.
SESSION 30: MULTILEVEL MODELS
SÉANCE 30 : MULTILEVEL MODELS
Prerequisites: Basic understanding of Regression
Methodology
Prérequis : compréhension de base de la méthodologie de
régression
Level: Intermediate
Getting the Values Into Evaluation
Evaluative conclusions are about the merit or worth or the evaluand, and therefore require a combination of empirical data about
its performance and some standards of merit or value. The usual
training of evaluators prepares them to find out what a program is
and does, but they are not familiar with ways to identify and validate the program’s value.
This workshop will use a set of handouts and posters plus a series
of case studies to make the process clear and accessible. Basic concepts include dimensions of merit, plus weights, bars, stars, steps,
and standards as indicators of value strength.
You will learn:
• How to identify all relevant values,
• How to validate (or invalidate) these values,
• How to combine the values with empirical results to get an evaluative conclusion.
Michael Scriven is among the most well-known professionals in the
field today with 25 years of work on the philosophy of science. He has
over 90 publications in the field of evaluation, many tangentially or
directly relevant to this theme.
SESSION 31: VALUES IN EVALUATION
SÉANCE 31 : VALUES IN EVALUATION
Prerequisites: Skills in determining empirical facts
Prérequis : compétences en détermination des faits
empiriques
Level: Intermediate
45
Evaluation Practice: A Collaborative Approach
Collaborative evaluation is an approach that actively engages program stakeholders in the evaluation process. When stakeholders
collaborate with evaluators, stakeholder and evaluator understanding increases and the utility of the evaluation is often enhanced.
Employing discussion, hands-on activities, and roleplaying, this
workshop focuses on strategies and techniques for conducting successful collaborative evaluations, including ways to avoid common
collaborative evaluation pitfalls.
You will learn:
• A collaborative approach to evaluation,
• Levels of collaborative evaluation and when and how to employ
them,
• Techniques used in collaborative evaluation,
• Collaborative evaluation design and data-collection strategies.
Rita O’Sullivan of the University of North Carolina and John
O’Sullivan of North Carolina A&T State University have offered this
well-received session for the past seven years at AEA. The presenters
have used collaborative evaluation techniques in a variety of program
settings, including education, extension, family support, health, and
non-profit organizations.
SESSION 32: COLLABORATIVE EVAL
SÉANCE 32 : COLLABORATIVE EVAL
Prerequisites: Basic Eval Skills
Prérequis : compétences de base en évaluation
Level: Intermediate
Evaluation in Immigrant Communities
Attend to the unique issues of working in communities and cultures with which you may be unfamiliar and within which your
craft is unknown. This workshop will examine such issues as
access, entry, relationship-building, sampling, culturally specific
outcomes, instrument development, translation, culturally appropriate behavior and stakeholder participation.
Drawing on case examples from practice in immigrant communities, we will illustrate what has and hasn’t worked, principles of
good practice, and the learning opportunities for all involved.
Through simulations and exercises you will experience the challenges and rewards of cross-cultural evaluation.
You will learn:
• Approaches to evaluation practice in unfamiliar cultures and settings,
• How to draw upon the traditions of communities in mutually
beneficial ways,
• Useful, respectful and credible ways to collect and report information for stakeholders.
Barry Cohen and Mia Robillos are on the staff of Rainbow Research,
Inc. They bring experience working with Hmong, Latino, Somali,
Nigerian, Native American, and Filipino cultures in their evaluation
practice.
SESSION 33: IMMIGRANT COMMUNITIES
SÉANCE 33 : IMMIGRANT COMMUNITIES
Prerequisites: Work with immigrant communities
Prérequis : travail auprès des communautés immigrantes
Level: Intermediate
Cost-Benefit and Cost-Effectiveness Methods
Get an overview of the main theoretical and applied issues in using
cost-effectiveness (CEA) and cost-benefit (CBA) techniques. An
important element of this workshop is to show that CEA is a retrospective technique well suited to program evaluation, while CBA
is a prospective technique best suited for program planning.
Participants will study cost-effectiveness measures applied to
health (vaccination) and labor market training and cost-benefit
analysis applied to transportation and infrastructure planning
through a combination of lectures and group discussion.
You will learn:
• The theoretical foundations of cost benefit analysis and cost
effectiveness analysis,
• The difference between CBA and CEA, and why CEA is preferred in most settings,
• The data requirements for successful application of CBA and
CEA,
• How to allocate costs to program activities,
• How to apply CEA in a range of contexts.
Greg Mason hails from the University of Manitoba where he has been
a member of the Department of Economics since 1974. He has more
than 20 years experience in making professional presentations in the
area of cost-effectiveness analysis.
SESSION 34: COST-EFFECTIVENESS
SÉANCE 34 : COST-EFFECTIVENESS
Prerequisites: Evaluation theory or experience
Prérequis : connaissance théorique ou pratique de
l’évaluation
Level: Intermediate
46
Experimental Designs in Evaluation
Experimental designs are central to much of the work done in
evaluation and yet also a source of controversy. To understand the
controversy and make the best use of these designs when appropriate, evaluators need to be versed in the logic, concepts, and
practical lessons involved in crafting and implementing experimental designs in evaluation.
With an emphasis on hands-on exercises and checklists to guide
your later work, this workshop introduces you to effective use of
experimental designs in supporting strong causal conclusions
about program and policy impacts.
You will learn:
• The conceptual advantages and drawbacks of experimental
designs,
• When and in what contexts to use experimental designs,
• How to modify experimental designs to address the constraints
and information needs of specific contexts, including the use of
recently developed designs,
• How to anticipate and plan for problems in implementing
experimental design evaluations.
Fred Newman is a Professor at Florida International University with
over thirty years of experience in performing front line program
evaluation studies. George Julnes, Associate Professor of Psychology
at Utah State University, has been contributing to evaluation theory for
over 15 years and has been working with the Social Security
Administration and the U.S. Dept. of Education on the design and
implementation of randomized field trials.
SESSION 35: EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
SÉANCE 35 : EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
HALF DAY WORKSHOPS
ATELIERS D’UNE DEMI-JOURNÉE
MERCREDI 26 OCTOBRE
8 am to 11 am • de 8 h à 11 h
Community and Systems Change Efforts:
Evaluation Dilemmas and Methods
Critical issues have emerged as programs address community and
systems change that are not addressed by methods used to evaluate individual outcomes. This workshop reviews and actively
engages participants in exploring evaluation dilemmas. Methods
and approaches will be reviewed including participatory development of program theory, semi-structured interviewing, tools to
measure collaboration and relational mapping.
Participants will engage in a relational mapping exercise using a
case study to explore relationships among program characteristics
that influence program development and contribute to community-based change efforts.
You will learn:
• How to identify and adapt approaches to evaluating community
and systems changes,
• How to develop approaches to engage multiple and diverse
stakeholders,
• How to apply relational mapping to establish relationships
among multiple factors.
Susanna Ginsburg has more than 30 years of experience in
designing evaluations at the community and funder levels and
conducting hands-on workshops on the topic. She will lead a team of
three facilitators experienced in community and systems development
evaluation.
SESSION 36: COMMUNITY CHANGE
SÉANCE 36 : COMMUNITY CHANGE
Prerequisites: Experience evaluating community-based
programs, application of logic models and theory of change
to evaluation design
Prérequis : Expérience en évaluation des programmes
communautaires, application des modèles logiques et de la
théorie du changement face au concept d’évaluation
Level: Intermediate
47
HALF DAY WORKSHOPS • ATELIERS D’UNE DEMI-JOURNÉE
WEDNESDAY, OCT 26 – 8 am to 11 am
Empowerment Evaluation
Empowerment Evaluation builds program capacity and fosters
program improvement. It teaches people to help themselves by
learning how to evaluate their own programs. The basic steps of
empowerment evaluation include: 1) establishing a mission or unifying purpose for a group or program; 2) taking stock – creating a
baseline to measure future growth and improvement; and 3) planning for the future – establishing goals and strategies to achieve
goals, as well as credible evidence to monitor change. The role of
the evaluator is that of coach or facilitator in an empowerment
evaluation, since the group is in charge of the evaluation itself.
Employing lecture, activities, demonstration and discussion, the
workshop will introduce you to the steps of empowerment evaluation and tools to facilitate the approach.
You will learn:
• Steps to empowerment evaluation,
• How to facilitate the prioritization of program activities,
• Ways to guide a program’s self-assessment.
David Fetterman hails from Stanford University and is the editor of
(and a contributor to) the recently published Empowerment Evaluation
Principles in Practice (Guilford). He Chairs the Collaborative,
Participatory and Empowerment Evaluation AEA Topical Interest
Group and is a highly experienced and sought after facilitator.
SESSION 37: EMPOWERMENT EVALUATION
SÉANCE 37 : EMPOWERMENT EVALUATION
Building a Performance Management System for
Program Improvement
Performance management is a process for getting and focusing
attention on the most important aspects of your program and
using that focus to improve services. Two critical steps to the
development of such a system are measuring only the few, most
important, aspects and using the data.
Through lecture, discussion, exercise, and the use of a range of
examples, this session provides an overview of performance management for beginners. Participants will review the basic steps to
implementing a new performance management system and have
the opportunity to draft and receive feedback on basic performance management plans.
48
You will learn:
• The definition and purpose of performance management and
it’s relationship to program evaluation,
• Basic implementation issues and common pitfalls,
• How do apply this knowledge by drafting steps to developing
your own system.
Natalia Pane of the American Institute for Research, has given
workshops and sessions with thousands of professionals and grantees
on performance management, strategic planning and data quality.
She has published and presented over 40 pieces on performance
management and related data quality and strategic planning issues.
SESSION 38: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
SÉANCE 38 : PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
Using Stories in Evaluation
Stories are an effective means of communicating the ways in which
individuals are influenced by educational, health, and human service agencies and programs. Unfortunately, the story has been
undervalued and largely ignored as a research and reporting procedure. Stories are sometimes regarded with suspicion because of
the haphazard manner in which they are captured or the cavalier
promise of what the story depicts.
Through short lecture, discussion, demonstration, and hands-on
activities, this workshop explores effective strategies for discovering, collecting, analyzing and reporting stories that illustrate program processes, benefits, strengths or weaknesses.
You will learn:
• How stories can reflect disciplined inquiry,
• How to capture, save, and analyze stories in evaluation contexts,
• How stories for evaluation purposes are often different from
other types of stories.
Richard Krueger is on the faculty at the University of Minnesota and
has over 20 years experience in capturing stories in evaluation. He has
offered well-received professional development workshops at AEA
and for non-profit and government audiences for over 15 years.
SESSION 39: USING STORIES
SÉANCE 39 : USING STORIES
WEDNESDAY, OCT 26 – 8 am to 11 am
HALF DAY WORKSHOPS
Putting Fun and Evaluation in the Same
Sentence
MERCREDI 26 OCTOBRE
12 pm to 3 pm • de 12 h à 15 h
Engaging stakeholders’ interest and increasing their ownership of
the evaluation process usually elicits groans rather than jumps of
joy. One reason for this is a general lack of enjoyment and imagination.
Through interactive discussions and demonstrations, an evaluation board game (complete with chocolate!) improv comedy, and
facials, learn how to creatively gather data, elicit education stories
and have stakeholders actually ask to do more evaluation while satisfying funder requirements. Participants will also receive a followup resource package to use after the workshop.
You will learn:
• How to increase stakeholder ownership through creative evaluation techniques,
• How to link creative evaluation techniques with evaluation
methodology,
• How to include diverse stakeholders in the evaluation process.
Lee-Anne Ragan has received much acclaim for her work as a
specialist in evaluation, cross-cultural training and conflict resolution
and has been providing lively, engaging workshops for more than 16
years. She is the co-owner of Rock.Paper.Scissors, a corporate training
and entertainment company.
SESSION 40: FUN AND EVALUATION
SÉANCE 40 : FUN AND EVALUATION
Prerequisites: Knowledge of the program logic model
Prérequis : connaissance du modèle logique de programme
Level: Intermediate
Evaluating Programs for Children
Evaluation programs for children calls for skills and knowledge
that go beyond traditional evaluation. Increasing emphasis on student outcomes, teacher outcomes, and site visits creates a need for
evaluators to further develop their specialized knowledge and skills
appropriate to contexts with children.
You will gain an increased awareness of principals and concepts
through mini-lectures on observation, instruments and strategies,
and engage in brief application exercises and group discussion.
You will learn:
• The “why” and “how” of conducting effective evaluation of
programs for children,
• Practical strategies and tools for evaluating children’s programs,
• Why some strategies work and why some do not work,
• A range of currently available instruments and their use.
Shannan McNair is an associate professor of Early Childhood
Education, who has been involved in developing and presenting
workshops for over 20 years. She conducts evaluations on a regular
basis for programs serving children from preschool through high
school. She will lead a team of three presenters from Oakland
University.
SESSION 41: PROGRAMS FOR CHILDREN
SÉANCE 41 : PROGRAMS FOR CHILDREN
Prerequisites: Basics of Evaluation, Applied experience
Prérequis : fondements d’évaluation, expérience appliquée
Level: Intermediate
49
WEDNESDAY, OCT 26 – 12 pm to 3 pm
TRIAGE : Du nouveau dans le monde des
techniques de groupe en évaluation
TRIAGE: A new group technique gaining
recognition in evaluation
Note: This session will be delivered in French with bilingual Q&A
N.B. : Cette session se déroulera en français et sera suivie d’une période de questions en français et en anglais.
Aux techniques de groupe traditionnellement utilisées en évaluation, s’est récemment ajoutée la TRIAGE (Technique de Recherche d’Information par Animation d’un Groupe Expert). Mais
qu’est-ce au juste que TRIAGE? D’où vient cette technique?
Comment procède-t-elle? Quand l’utiliser? Quelles sont ses
forces et faiblesses? Quelles habiletés exige-t-elle de la part de
l’évaluateur?
Nous vous convions donc à une exploration intensive de TRIAGE.
Exposé théorique, démonstration, discussions à partir d’histoires
de cas et expérimentation seront utilisés dans cet atelier. Vous
pourrez ainsi rapidement vous approprier cette technique de façon
à pouvoir l’appliquer avec efficacité dans votre milieu de pratique.
Vous apprendrez:
• à reconnaître les composantes de TRIAGE et son contexte
d’utilisation en évaluation
• à distinguer les différentes techniques de groupe (technique
Delphi, technique du groupe nominal, focus group) et à reconnaître l’apport complémentaire de TRIAGE,
• à dégager la contribution distinctive de TRIAGE dans divers
projets d’évaluation,
• à utiliser TRIAGE à partir d’un cas d’évaluation.
Marie Gervais oeuvre dans le domaine de l’évaluation depuis près de
15 ans. Elle enseigne et dirige des projets d’envergure en santé et dans
divers réseaux de services au Québec. Geneviève Pépin est également active en évaluation dans le domaine de la santé.
TRIAGE (Technique for Research of Information by Animation
of a Group of Experts) has recently been added to the group techniques traditionally used in evaluation. What exactly is TRIAGE?
Where does this technique come from? How does it work? When
is it used? What are its strengths and shortcomings? What skills
are evaluators required to have?
This workshop is an in-depth exploration of TRIAGE, including
a theory presentation, demonstration, discussions based on case
histories and experiments. Participants will be able to quickly learn
this technique and apply it effectively in their work situations.
Participants will learn to:
• Recognize the components of TRIAGE and its application in
different evaluation contexts
• Distinguish between the various group techniques (Delphi technique, Nominal Group Technique and Focus Group) recognize
how TRIAGE complements these main group techniques
• Recognize the distinct contribution of TRIAGE in various evaluation projects
• Use TRIAGE in a case simulation
Marie Gervais has been working in the field of evaluation for nearly
15 years. She teaches and manages large-scale projects in healthcare
and in various service networks in Quebec. Geneviève Pépin is also
active in evaluation in the healthcare field.
SESSION 42: TRIAGE
SÉANCE 42 : TRIAGE
50
WEDNESDAY, OCT 26 – 12 pm to 3 pm
Survey Design and Administration
This professional development workshop is designed for beginners in the field of evaluation. You will be introduced to the fundamentals of survey design and administration.
This interactive workshop will use a combination of direct instruction with hands-on opportunities for participants to apply what is
learned to their own evaluation projects. Learn about different
types of surveys, how to choose the right one, how to administer
the survey and how to increase response rates and quality of data.
Attendees will receive handouts with sample surveys, item writing
tips, checklists, and resource lists for further information.
You will learn:
• The various types and formats of surveys,
• Procedures for high quality survey design,
• How to write high quality items,
• Strategies for increasing reliability and validity.
Courtney Malloy and Harold Urman are consultants at Vital
Research, a research and evaluation firm that specializes in survey
design. They both have extensive experience facilitating workshops
and training sessions on research and evaluation for diverse audiences.
SESSION 43: SURVEY DESIGN
SÉANCE 43 : SURVEY DESIGN
The Swinging Dance of Evaluation: Lessons in
Collaboration and Partnership
Care to dance? This lively and highly interactive workshop
explores concepts related to swing dance to build our collaborative
and partnering skills as professional evaluators. Rhythmic and
dance-related activities will highlight fundamental issues in our
work as evaluators from enhancing our perspective to examining
our process to informing our practice.
Participants will listen and move to music to illustrate the evaluation process and reflect on how experiences in the workshop can
shape the way you approach your evaluation practice.
You will learn:
• Ways of collaborating and partnering with clients using the
metaphor of dance,
• Skills of leading and following in an evaluation setting,
• How concepts and experiences in the workshop can shape your
approach to evaluation.
Phyllis Clay is the co-founder and owner of Youth Policy Research
Group, Inc. Jamie Callahan teaches in the Human Resources Development Program at Texas A&M University. They are both competitive
dancers who apply the creative metaphor of dance in their evaluation
professions. A shortened version of this workshop at the 2004 AEA
Conference was extremely well received.
SESSION 44: SWINGING DANCE
SÉANCE 44 : SWINGING DANCE
Level: Beginner, no prerequisites – two left feet welcomed!
Niveau : débutant, aucun prérequis. Bienvenue aux deux
pieds gauches !
Cultivating Self as Responsive Instrument
Evaluative judgments are inextricably bound up with culture and
context. The AEA Guiding Principles encourage greater realization that excellence and ethical practice in evaluation are intertwined with orientations toward, responsiveness to, and capacities
for engaging diversity. Breathing life into this expectation calls for
critical ongoing personal homework for evaluators regarding their
lenses and filters vis- a-vis their judgment-making.
We will explore individual and group reflective exercises that spotlight culture and context issues and help us develop and refine the
self as a diversity-grounded responsive instrument. This workshop
addresses the reality that, from our privileged standpoints, we
often look but still do not see, listen but do not hear, touch but do
not feel. Such limitations handicap our capacities to accurately discern, describe, engage, interpret, and evaluate truths from multiple vantage points.
You will learn:
• To attend to your self as instrument and, thus, enhance “interpersonal validity” (The soundness and trustworthiness of self as
knower, inquirer and engager of others),
• To identify the lenses and filters influencing your meaning-making and evaluation practice,
• To examine how stakeholders’ perceptions of the evaluator
impact evaluation accuracy and effectiveness.
Hazel Symonette brings over 30 years of work in diversity-related
arenas to the workshop. She is founder and Director of the University
of Wisconsin-Madison Excellence Through Diversity Institute: A yearlong train-the-trainers/facilitators initiative organized around responsive assessment and evaluation.
SESSION 45: CULTIVATING SELF
SÉANCE 45 : CULTIVATING SELF
51
HALF DAY WORKSHOPS
SUNDAY, OCTOBER 30
DIMANCHE 30 OCTOBRE
9 am to 12 pm • de 9 h à 12 h
Advanced Applications of Program Theory
While simple logic models are an adequate way to gain clarity and
initial understanding about a program, sound program theory can
enhance understanding of the underlying logic of the program by
providing a disciplined way to state and test assumptions about
how program activities are expected to lead to program outcomes.
Lecture, exercises, discussion, and peer-critique will help you to
develop and use program theory as a basis for decisions about measurement and evaluation methods, to disentangle the success or
failure of a program from the validity of its conceptual model, and
to facilitate the participation and engagement of diverse stakeholder groups.
You will learn:
• To employ program theory to understand the logic of a program,
• How program theory can improve evaluation accuracy and use,
• To use program theory as part of participatory evaluation practice.
Stewart Donaldson is Dean of the School of Behavioral and
Organizational Sciences at Claremont Graduate University. He has
published widely on the topic of applying program theory, developed
one of the largest university-based evaluation training programs, and
has conducted theory-driven evaluations for more than 100
organizations during the past decade.
Focus Group Moderator Training
The literature is rich in textbooks and case studies on many aspects
of focus groups including design, implementation and analyses.
Missing however are guidelines and discussions on how to moderate a focus group.
In this experiential learning environment, you will find out how to
maximize time, build rapport, create energy and apply communication tools in a focus group to maintain the flow of discussion
among the participants and elicit more than one-person answers.
You will learn at least 15 strategies to create and maintain a focus
group discussion. These strategies can also be applied in other
evaluation settings such as community forums and committee
meetings to stimulate discussion.
You will learn:
• How to moderate a focus group,
• At least 15 strategies to create and maintain focus group
discussion,
• How to stimulate discussion in community forums, committee
meetings, and social settings.
Nancy-Ellen Kiernan has facilitated over 150 workshops on
evaluation methodology and moderated focus groups in 50+ studies
with groups ranging from Amish dairy farmers in barns to at-risk teens
in youth centers, to university faculty in classrooms.
SESSION 48: MODERATOR TRAINING
SÉANCE 48 : MODERATOR TRAINING
Prerequisites: Having moderated a focus group
Prérequis : animation d’un groupe de discussion
Level: Intermediate
SESSION 46: PROGRAM THEORY
SÉANCE 46 : PROGRAM THEORY
Prerequisites: Experience or Training in Logic Models
Prérequis : expérience ou formation dans le domaine des
modèles logiques
Level: Intermediate
52
SUNDAY, OCT 30 – 9 am to 12 pm
DIMANCHE, 30 OCTOBRE – de 9 h à 12 h
Analyzing Text and Audio Data
Are you drowning in a sea of words? Take this opportunity to focus
on the practical use of qualitative data analysis (QDA) for dealing
with text and audio data such as that derived from focus groups
and interviews.
Though hands-on work with sample data, you will select and mark
quotations, generate meaningful and useful codes, create memos
and construct networks in the style of grounded theory. In addition, the instructor will demonstrate the use of Atlas-ti, one of the
most popular QDA analysis programs, to suggest the next step in
moving participants towards computer-assisted QDA.
You will learn:
• To select and mark text quotations,
• To code and memo using grounded theory,
• To make a simple network diagram,
• The capabilities of Atlast-ti to do the above.
S Reed Early is with the British Columbia Office of the Auditor
General. He has taught qualitative data analysis in the college
classroom and workshop settings as well as using Atlast-ti extensively
in his own work in a range of evaluation contexts.
SESSION 49: ANALYZING TEXT
SÉANCE 49 : ANALYZING TEXT
Making the Leap to Evaluation Consulting
Have you thought about moving from employee to consultant? Do
you need more information about the benefits and challenges of
doing so? Do your skills, work style, risk tolerance, and temperament provide a good fit for independent consulting? Do you want
ideas about how to get started, attract and keep customers, and
transition on a part- or full-time basis?
We will focus on helping you decide whether and how to transition to consulting either instead of, or in conjunction with, current
employment. The workshop will be interactive with a good balance of content, practical exercises, and discussion, supplemented
by take-home materials and a list of resources you can explore.
You will learn:
• Whether consulting is for you,
• How to transition from employee to consultant,
• How to start and build a practice,
• How to acquire the skills you need to succeed.
Mary Grcich Williams, owner of Mary Williams & Associates,
maintains a solo practice but frequently partners with other consultants and specialists. She recently completed her 15th year as an
independent evaluation consultant, after 18 years as a consultant and
administrator with a large state agency.
SESSION 50: LEAP TO CONSULTING
SÉANCE 50 : LEAP TO CONSULTING
53
54
Sincere Thanks to our Conference Supporters /
Un grand merci à tous ceux qui appuient le Congrès
Ministry Ministry
of Finance,
Government
of Ontario
of Finance,
Government
of Ontario
www.fin.gov.on.ca
www.fin.gov.on.ca
W.K. Kellogg
Foundation
W.K. Kellogg
Foundation
www.wkkf.org
www.wkkf.org
Foundation
NationalNational
Science Science
Foundation
www.nsf.gov
www.nsf.gov
The
World Bank
The World
Bank
www.worldbank.org
www.worldbank.org
Goss
Gilroy Inc.
Goss Gilroy
Inc.
www.ggi.cawww.ggi.ca
Universalia
Management
Universalia
Management
Group Group
www.universalia.com
www.universalia.com
55
CES/AEA Conference Exhibitors /
Exposants du congrès SCÉ/AEA
Visit exhibitors who make evaluation their business!
Talk with them to learn how they support the professionalism
of evaluation.
Visitez les exposants qui oeuvrent dans le domaine de
l’évaluation! Parlez avec eux et découvrez comment ils aident
à promouvoir le caractère professionnel de l’évaluation.
When you are checking out the products and services our
exhibitors have to offer, don’t forget to stop by the CES and
AEA tables. Receive information about AEA, CES, CES
Ontario Chapter, CES Prince Edward Island Chapter, and
TIG tables, located near the Registration Desk on the
Concourse level.
En explorant les produits et services que nos exposants ont à
offrir, n’oubliez pas de vous arrêter aux tables de la SCÉ et de
l’AEA. Renseignez-vous sur l’AEA, la SCÉ, les sections de
l’Ontario et de l’Île-du-Prince-Édouard de la SCÉ, ainsi que
les tables des GT, situées près du comptoir d’inscription au
niveau Concourse.
Applied Psychology Program, Psychology
Department
The Applied Psychology Program at Southern Illinois University
Carbondale offers graduate students the opportunity to get training in psychological theory, methods, statistics, and measurement,
combined with hands-on training in applied psychology and program evaluation. The cornerstone of the program is Applied
Research Consultants, a consulting organization, which provides
an applied research practicum for graduate students. Promoting
the professional development of students while serving the SIUC
community and regional businesses, ARC is open to a variety of
projects, including survey design and research, statistical consulting, program evaluation, focus groups, needs assessment, job
analysis, performance appraisals, and personal training.
Athena Software
Athena software is one of the world’s most powerful and fully integrated case management and client information solutions designed
for counseling, mental health centres and EAP providers. Athena
helps its customers reduce operating costs, increase efficiency and
improve customer service by integrating human resources, notes,
outcome evaluation and billing into one system. Athena solutions
combine decades of combined experience with the power of
server based open source database technology. Athena gives the
power to innovate and customize the system back to the customer
without the cost. We make systems integration easy and affordable
for people helping others.
56
Centre canadien de leadership
en évaluation (CLÉ)
Le Centre canadien de leadership en évaluation (Le CLÉ) est un
centre d’excellence et de leadership en évaluation. Le CLÉ, organisme sans but lucratif, maintient son engagement à contribuer
son expertise, ses compétences et son appui pour aider les organismes et institutions francophones du Canada dans l’atteinte de
leurs résultats. Son approche en est une de rigueur et de qualité
certes, mais aussi d’accompagnement et de service pour accroître
les capacités des communautés francophones en matière de
mesure, d’évaluation et de gestion axée sur les résultats et la
responsabilisation. Pour favoriser une gestion stratégique et une
amélioration durable de la performance de votre organisation,
notre équipe offre des services en matière : d’analyse des acquis,
des besoins, de la performance organisationnelle; de planification
stratégique; d’élaboration de modèles logiques et de cadres
de responsabilisation; d’évaluation de l’efficience et de l’efficacité
de programmes, de projets ou d’initiatives et monitorage des
processus de gestion; de gestion du changement et gestion du
risque; d’évaluation du climat organisationnel et de la dynamique
de groupe.
Centre for Research and Education in
Human Services (CREHS)
The Centre for Research and Education in Human Services
(CREHS) is an independent, non-profit organization with over
20 years experience in community research, program evaluation,
needs assessment and planning. In all Centre work, we use a participatory, action-oriented approach. Our research themes include
cultural diversity, mental health, family support, and disability
issues. CREHS regularly develops evaluation frameworks and
conducts program evaluations across Ontario and Canada (approximately 120 projects in the past 8 years) and has a strong record of
effectively guiding organizations and government in utilizationfocused and evidence-based decision-making. We also offer a
wide variety of training, publications and resources, including the
handbooks on evaluation and sustainability.
Centre for Research and Education in Human
Services (CREHS)
Le Centre for Research and Education in Human Services
(CREHS), organisme indépendant sans but lucratif, cumule une
vingtaine d’années d’expérience dans les domaines de la recherche
communautaire, de l’évaluation des programmes, de l’analyse des
besoins et de la planification. Dans tous ses projets, il adopte une
démarche participative et orientée sur l’action. Ses thèmes de
recherche englobent la diversité culturelle, la santé mentale, le
soutien familial et les problématiques reliées aux incapacités. Le
CREHS élabore régulièrement des cadres d’évaluation et dirige
des programmes à cet effet, en Ontario et dans le reste du Canada.
(Il a réalisé environ 120 projets durant les 8 dernières années.) En
matière de processus décisionnel fondé sur les preuves et axé sur
l’utilisation, il se révèle un guide particulièrement efficace auprès
des organismes et des gouvernements. Le CREHS offre également
un vaste éventail de formations, de publications et de ressources,
dont les manuels sur l’évaluation et sur la durabilité.
Harry Cummings and Associates Inc.
HCA specializes in program evaluation, monitoring, performance
review and measurement. HCA also offers a variety of professional development workshops including Results Based Management
and Evaluation, Performance Indicators, and Survey Design. We
also have expertise in conducting economic & social impact
assessments. Our clients include government, private sector, and
non-governmental organizations. Collectively, our core team of
consultants has over 50 years of professional experience in program planning and evaluation in Canada and overseas. HCA is
committed to participatory evaluation processes, acknowledging
that program stakeholders have a critical role to play in evaluation
planning, design and implementation. We strive to incorporate the
perspectives, needs and values of all stakeholders in evaluations.
In doing so, we believe that the utility of evaluation processes and
results increases.
International Development Research Centre
Claremont Graduate University
Claremont Graduate University in Southern California is one of
the leading providers of education and training in Evaluation and
Applied Research Methods. CGU offers MA, PhD, and
Certificate Programs that stress rigorous training and a high level
of competence. CGU also houses research institutes that perform
evaluations for private and public clientele, utilizing worldrenowned faculty and an extensive network of evaluation alumni.
Guilford Publications
Guilford Publications, is expanding into the fields of research
methods (both quantitative & qualitative) and evaluation. This
program is headed by a long-time AEA attendee and member,
C. Deborah Laughton. Come by our booth to get a first look at
Stake’s Multiple Case Study Analysis; Fetterman and Wandersman’s
Empowerment Evaluation Principles in Practice and our other new
offerings in statistics, psychology and education. We’re building
this evaluation and methods program for you, so drop by the
booth and tell us what topics and types of publications you need.
The International Development Research Centre (IDRC) is a
Canadian public corporation that works in close collaboration
with researchers from the developing world in their search for the
means to build healthier, more equitable, and more prosperous
societies. IDRC has had an Evaluation Unit since 1991 to monitor
performance and measure program achievements. The Evaluation
Unit will display its many resources relating to monitoring and
evaluation, including books and a CD-ROM on Outcome
Mapping. Corporate materials on IDRC will also be available.
International Program for
Development Evaluation Training
The International Program for Development Evaluation Training
(IPDET) is a four-week residential executive education program
designed to meet the professional development needs of evaluation
and audit professionals working in developed and developing
country governments, as well as the needs of professional evaluators working in bilateral and multilateral development agencies
and banks. The program is a joint collaboration between the
World Bank and Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, and will
operate for the sixth time in the summer of 2006. The program
consists of two full weeks of lectures delivered in plenary by two
World Bank principals and a Carleton University faculty member
followed by two weeks of workshops of varying lengths of time
from one to three days. Participants can attend all four weeks,
the first two weeks only, or either one or both of the last two
weeks. The program assembles a world-class faculty from four
continents, which blend extensive field experience with high-level
methodological skills and knowledge.
57
Jossey-Bass, An Imprint of Wiley
Come see Jossey-Bass/Wiley’s new titles and journals in evaluation, education, health, statistics, nonprofit, sociology, social services, community psychology, and other fields. New titles include
the The ABCs of Evaluation 2e., Creating More Effective Graphs,
and Statistical Methods for Forecasting. Special discounts for
CES and AEA members.
Luther Consulting, LLC
Luther Consulting, LLC provides comprehensive evaluation
support services for multi-site projects through EvaluationWeb,
our web-based data collection and analysis service. We are currently supporting seven separate EvaluationWeb systems and over
2000 users with live end-user technical assistance, which is the
key to successful web-based evaluation. Available capabilities
include online surveys, photo upload, document upload, online
customized reports, and geographical report mapping. This customizable and user friendly system allows clients to meet changing
evaluation requirements for an annual subscription fee, that is
typically far less expensive than the cost of custom computer
programming. In addition, our unique experience with both evaluation and programming allows us to rapidly create and support
these systems in far less time than most large tech companies.
Ministry of Finance, Government of Ontario,
Treasury Board Office
The principal functions of the Ministry of Finance are to recommend taxation, fiscal and economic policies, manage provincial
finances, develop and allocate the provincial budget, and administer Ontario’s major tax statutes and tax assistance programs.
The mission of the Ministry of Finance is to establish an environment, which will ensure a dynamic, innovative and growing economy and to manage the fiscal, financial and related regulatory
affairs of the Province of Ontario. To carry out this mission, the
ministry will create a climate for economic growth and job creation in the province; promote the effective and efficient delivery of
government services to taxpayers and control spending; ensure
prudent management of the province’s debt; balance the budget;
and ensure that public organizations remain accountable to taxpayers for the use of their funds.
Ministère des Finances, Gouvernement de
l’Ontario, Bureau du Conseil du Trésor
Les principales fonctions du ministère consistent à recommander
des politiques fiscales, budgétaires et économiques, gérer les
finances de la province, élaborer et répartir le budget provincial,
et administrer les principales lois fiscales de la province ainsi que
ses programmes d’aide fiscale.
Le mandat du ministère des Finances consiste à établir un milieu
favorable à une économie dynamique, innovatrice et florissante
ainsi qu’à gérer les affaires budgétaires et financières et la réglementation connexe de la province de l’Ontario. Pour s’acquitter de
ce mandat, le ministère favorisera un climat propice à la croissance
économique et à la création d’emplois dans la province; il encouragera la prestation efficace et efficiente des services gouvernementaux aux contribuables et la réduction des dépenses; il veillera
à une gestion prudente de la dette de la province, il équilibrera le
budget et il fera en sorte que les organismes publics demeurent
responsables envers les contribuables pour l’emploi de leurs fonds.
Le gouvernement de l’Ontario entretient des relations de longue
date avec la Société canadienne d’évaluation et est heureuse d’appuyer le travail qu’elle accomplit, et notamment cette conférence
internationale. Certes, nous continuons de soutenir les principes
fondamentaux de l’évaluation – pertinence, efficacité, rentabilité,
abordabilité, et viabilité – et anticipons avec enthousiasme de
participer à une conférence des plus productives.
Mosaic Network, Inc.
Mosaic Network’s flagship product is a Grant Evaluation and
Measurement Solution called GEMS. This software enables social
programs to track clients, services, and outcomes for self-evaluation and to share this data with funding staff and evaluators.
Funders use GEMS to manage administrative and fiscal information about their programs to meet contractual obligations, do
evaluation, and determine impacts. If short, GEMS enables programs to answer, “Is this working?” and “What should we
change?” For more information, please visit www.mosaic-network.com or call (805)692-0992.
The Ontario Government has enjoyed a long-standing relationship with and is pleased to support the work of the Canadian
Evaluation Society, particularly this international conference.
We continue to be committed to the principles of evaluation –
relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, affordability and sustainability
and look forward to participating in a productive conference.
58
National Science Foundation
QSR International
National Science Foundation (NSF), a CES/AEA Conference
supporter, is a United States federal agency that supports science
and engineering (S&E) research and education and S&E evaluation. Annually over 9,000 individuals, academic institutions, and
for-profits and non-profits receive NSF grants or contracts. The
Office of International Science and Engineering (OISE) is a focal
point for international science and engineering activities both
within and outside NSF. MYNSF, formerly the Custom News
Service (CNS) sends electronic notifications to subscribers about
NSF publications and grant and employment opportunities. For
more information, subscribe to MYNSF, visit www.nsf.gov or call
the NSF information center: 703-292-5111.
QSR International is the leading expert in qualitative research
software. Its innovative products are used by academic, commercial and Government researchers worldwide. NVivo 7, QSR’s
latest product brings together the best of NVivo and N6, QSR’s
flagship programs, and adds a whole new dimension and depth to
qualitative research. It combines NVivo, a tool for rich, complex
data with N6, a robust program ideal for large projects that automates clerical tasks. Better yet, NVivo 7 has innovative new features that will allow you to work in new way. Visit our exhibit and
experience NVivo 7 first-hand or visit our web site.
R.A. Malatest & Associates Ltd.
Pearson Allyn & Bacon Publishers
Allyn & Bacon Publishers is the premier publisher in Educational
textbooks, resources, and technology for students and instructors,
alike. At the CES/AEA Conference 2005, we will be promoting
our most recent titles in Educational Research; Qualitative
Research; Assessment; Intro to Educational Psychology; and
Motivation.
Principia Products
Do you need to collect data from surveys, evaluations, tests
or other paper and online forms? The Remark product family,
from Principia Products, a division of Gravic, Inc., is the unique,
affordable software solution for collecting data from paper-based
or web-based forms. Remark Office OMR® works with image
scanners to collect data from user-created forms. Remark Classic
OMR® works with traditional OMR readers to collect data from
pre-printed scannable forms. Remark Web Survey® makes it very
easy for users to create web surveys, tests and other online forms,
post them to the Internet or an intranet and collect the data.
R.A. Malatest & Associates Ltd. is a national research firm specializing in performance measurement and program evaluation. The
firm operates three offices – in Ottawa, Edmonton and Victoria.
Each office has its own call centre, focus group and research facilities. In business since 1985, the firm has grown to be one of the
largest independent research firms in Canada. R.A. Malatest &
Associates Ltd. has completed in excess of 300 consulting assignments for a variety of federal, provincial and local government
agencies. The firm has particular experience in the evaluation of
human resource programs, including job training and income support. The firm has also completed numerous assignments in the
areas of education, health care, environment and justice. With a
staff of more than 80, the firm is well positioned to complete small
to large-scale research assignments. More information about the
Company can be obtained by calling 1-800-665-5848 or visiting
our Web site.
ResearchTalk Inc.
ResearchTalk Inc. is a qualitative research consulting company.
Our scholars program and summer intensive program provide
opportunities for you to work directly with leading authors in the
field. We are specialists in the use of qualitative software.
ProGrid
Designed for new or transitioning organizations implementing
peer review or multiple reviewer processes, ProGrid is an evaluation support system that enables you to rapidly deploy a disciplined
selection or performance process that is objective, transparent and
built on your organization’s values, priorities and expectations.
59
Sage Publications
Treasury Board Secretariat of Canada
Celebrating 40 years of global publishing, Sage Publications provides journals, books, and electronic media of the highest caliber.
Please stop by our booth or visit us at http://www.sagepub.com to
review our publications and/or discuss your publishing ideas.
Treasury Board Secretariat of Canada’s Centre of Excellence for
Evaluation provides leadership, guidance and support to the practice of evaluation in the government of Canada. The CEE undertakes activities that foster community and capacity development,
working to ensure a sufficient number of appropriately trained
evaluation professionals support policy implementation across
government. The CEE develops and distributes tools and guidance materials to support evaluation professionals and program
managers as they work to embed evaluation into management
practices in government departments and agencies subject to the
Policy. These tools and materials are available for review at the
kiosk located on the ground floor.
The Evaluation Center,
WMU Interdisciplinary PHD in Evaluation
The Evaluation Center at Western Michigan University has a
40-year history of providing national and international leadership
for advancing the theory, practice, and utilization of evaluation.
Unlike most evaluation units in academic settings, the Center is
not affiliated with a single academic department or college. This
reflects the transdisciplinary nature of evaluation and enables
Center personnel to work effectively in an array of subject areas.
The Evaluation Center houses WMU’s Interdisciplinary Ph.D.
in Evaluation, which features practice-linked learning; more than
30 faculty members from 13 academic departments and The
Evaluation Center; and a fully tailored, challenging curriculum.
The MayaTech Corporation
The MayaTech Corporation is an applied social science research
firm providing research and evaluation, program management
and support services, information systems technology services,
conference and logistic services, and business services to public
and commercial sector clients. MayaTech has 20 years of substantive experience that enables us to asses the challenges at hand
and then to conceptualize, develop, and implement innovative,
“common sense solutions” that are consistent with our client’s
programmatic goals.
Secrétariat du Conseil du Trésor du Canada
Le Centre d’excellence en évaluation (CEE) du Secrétariat du
Conseil du Trésor du Canada fournit leadership, orientation
et appui en matière d’évaluation au gouvernement du Canada.
Le CEE entreprend diverses activités en vue de favoriser le développement de la collectivité et de la capacité, en veillant à ce qu’un
nombre suffisant de professionnels de l’évaluation dûment formés
soient en mesure d’appuyer la mise en oeuvre des politiques dans
l’ensemble de l’administration fédérale. Le CEE met au point
et distribue des outils et des documents d’orientation afin d’aider
les professionnels de l’évaluation et les gestionnaires de programme à intégrer l’évaluation dans les pratiques de gestion des
ministères et organismes assujettis à la politique connexe. Ces
outils et ces documents peuvent être consultés au kiosque installé
au rez-de-chaussée.
WestEd
WestEd is a nonprofit research, development, and service agency
that works with education and other communities to promote
excellence, achieve equity, and improve learning for children,
youth, and adults. Success for every learner is our goal at WestEd.
60
M o n d a y, O c t o b e r 2 4 / L e l u n d i 2 4 o c t o b r e
8:00 am – 5:30 pm / 8h00 – 17h30
Registration Desk Open /
LOCATION: CONCOURSE LEVEL
Workshop/Atelier 3
Consulting Skills for Evaluators: Getting Started
LOCATION:
Workshop/Atelier 4
Evaluation 101: Intro to Evaluation Practice
LOCATION:
9:00 am – 4:00 pm / 9h00 – 16h00
CONFERENCE ROOM E
KENT
Workshop/Atelier 5
Performance Planning, Measurement and Reporting for
Continuous Improvement
LOCATION:
(Refer to the Workshop Section in the program for presenters and
full descriptions. / Consulter la section « Ateliers » du programme
pour une liste des conférenciers et des descriptions détaillées des
sessions.)
Workshop/Atelier 6
TWO DAY WORKSHOPS – MONDAY & TUESDAY /
ATELIERS DE DEUX JOURS – LUNDI ET MARDI :
Workshop/Atelier 7
CONFERENCE ROOM D
Logic Models for Program Evaluation and Planning
LOCATION:
WENTWORTH
Workshop/Atelier 1
LOCATION:
Qualitative Methods
LOCATION:
KENORA
YORK
Workshop/Atelier 2
Quantitative Methods
LOCATION:
CITY HALL
61
62
Tu e s d a y, O c t o b e r 2 5 / L e m a r d i 2 5 o c t o b r e
8:00 am – 7:00 pm / 8h00 – 19h00
Workshop/Atelier 13
Creative, Interactive Strategies for
Communicating and Reporting
LOCATION:
ELGIN
Workshop/Atelier 14
Structural Equation Modeling for Evaluators
LOCATION:
9:00 am – 4:00 pm / 9h00 – 16h00
sessions.)
SIMCOE
Workshop/Atelier 15
Evaluation Methodology Basics
LOCATION:
NORFOLK
Workshop/Atelier 16
Applying the Results Based Approach in
Funding Applications and Ongoing Programs
LOCATION:
ICE PALACE
FULL DAY WORKSHOPS / ATELIERS D’UN JOUR :
Workshop/Atelier 8
Performance Measurement
LOCATION:
SPRING SONG/SPINDRIFT
Workshop/Atelier 9
Dealing with Reality:
Systems Approaches to Evaluation
LOCATION:
HURON
RealWorld Evaluation:
Overcoming Constraints
DUFFERIN
Workshop/Atelier 11
Focus Group Interviewing
LOCATION:
International Organisation for
Cooperation in Evaluation
Annual Meeting
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM G
The IOCE Annual Meeting is open to all representatives of
professional evaluation associations, societies or networks and institutional organizations, as well as supporters, observers and nonvoting IOCE members..
Workshop/Atelier 10
LOCATION:
4:00 pm – 6:00 pm / 16h00 – 18h00
The mission of the IOCE is: to help legitimate evaluation and support evaluation societies, associations and networks so that they
can better contribute to good governance, effective decision making and strengthen the role of civil society.
CONFERENCE ROOM C
Workshop/Atelier 12
Coding? Qualitative Software? Why and How
LOCATION:
PEEL
63
Monday / Professional Development Workshops
Le lundi / Ateliers de perfectionnement professionnel
64
W e d n e s d a y, O c t o b e r 2 6 / L e m e r c r e d i 2 6 o c t o b r e
7:00 am – 7:00 pm / 7h00 – 19h00
Workshop/Atelier 21
Using Appreciative Inquiry In Evaluation
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM G
Workshop/Atelier 22
Needs Assessment
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM D
8:00 am – 5:00 pm / 8h00 – 17h00
Workshop/Atelier 23
Exhibits Open / Ouverture des expositions
LOCATION:
CONCOURSE AND MEZZANINE LEVELS
Visit exhibitors who make evaluation their business! Talk
with them to learn how they support the professionalism of
evaluation.
Visitez les exposants qui oeuvrent dans le domaine de l’évaluation! Parlez avec eux et découvrez comment ils aident à
promouvoir le caractère professionnel de l’évaluation.
Utilization-focused Evaluation
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM B
Workshop/Atelier 24
Theory-Driven Evaluation
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM WEST
Workshop/Atelier 25
Presenting Evaluation Findings:
Effective Messaging for Evaluators
LOCATION:
NORFOLK
8:00 am – 3:00 pm / 8h00 – 15h00
Workshop/Atelier 26
sessions.)
FULL DAY WORKSHOPS / ATELIERS D’UN JOUR :
Workshop/Atelier 17
Workshop/Atelier 18
CONFERENCE ROOM E
Workshop/Atelier 27
Using Effect Size and Association Measures
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM C
Workshop/Atelier 28
LOCATION:
ICE PALACE
Workshop/Atelier 29
Evaluation and Policy Implementation
LOCATION:
LOCATION:
Minding Your Mind:
Using Your Brain More Effectively
Using the Tools of Quality
LOCATION:
360-Degree Feedback: Online Methods and Techniques
KENT
Improved Instrument Development Through Group Facilitation
LOCATION:
COSMOPOLITAN
Workshop/Atelier 19
Workshop/Atelier 30
Success Case Method Evaluation
Multilevel Models in Program Evaluation
LOCATION:
DUFFERIN
Workshop/Atelier 20
CIVIC BALLROOM NORTH
Workshop/Atelier 31
Using Rasch to Measure Services and Outcomes
LOCATION:
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM F
Getting the Values Into Evaluation
LOCATION:
DOMINION BALLROOM NORTH
65
Wednesday / Professional Development Workshops
Le mercredi / Ateliers de perfectionnement professionnel
8:00 am – 3:00 pm / Full Day Workshops – continued
8h00 – 15h00 / Ateliers d’un jour – suite
8:00 am – 11:00 am / Half Day Workshops – continued
8h00 – 11h00 / Ateliers d’une demi-journée – suite
Workshop/Atelier 32
Workshop/Atelier 39
Evaluation Practice: A Collaborative Approach
Using Stories in Evaluation
LOCATION:
WENTWORTH
LOCATION:
KENORA
Workshop/Atelier 33
Workshop/Atelier 40
Evaluation in Immigrant Communities
Putting Fun and Evaluation in the Same Sentence
LOCATION:
EXECUTIVE
Workshop/Atelier 34
Cost-Benefit and Cost-Effectiveness Methods
LOCATION:
DOMINION BALLROOM SOUTH
LOCATION:
OXFORD
12:00 pm – 3:00 pm / 12h00 – 15h00
HALF DAY WORKSHOPS /
ATELIERS D’UNE DEMI-JOURNÉE :
Workshop/Atelier 35
Experimental Designs in Evaluation
LOCATION:
ELGIN
Workshop/Atelier 41
Evaluating Programs for Children
LOCATION:
8:00 am – 11:00 am / 8h00 – 11h00
Workshop/Atelier 36
Community and Systems Change Efforts: Evaluation
Dilemmas and Methods
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM EAST
Workshop/Atelier 37
Workshop/Atelier 42
TRIAGE : Du nouveau dans le monde des techniques de
groupe en évaluation /
TRIAGE: A new group technique gaining recognition in
evaluation
LOCATION:
OXFORD
Note: This session will be delivered in French
with bilingual Q&A
N.B. : Cette session se déroulera en français
et sera suivie d’une période de questions
en français et en anglais.
Workshop/Atelier 43
Empowerment Evaluation
LOCATION:
KENORA
Survey Design and Administration
SIMCOE
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM EAST
Workshop/Atelier 38
Workshop/Atelier 44
Building a Performance Management System
for Program Improvement
The Swinging Dance of Evaluation:
Lessons in Collaboration and Partnership
LOCATION:
CIVIC BALLROOM SOUTH
LOCATION:
ESSEX BALLROOM
Workshop/Atelier 45
Cultivating Self as Responsive Instrument
LOCATION:
66
SIMCOE
Wednesday / Opening Plenary and Smudge Ceremony and Concurrent Sessions
Le mercredi / Séance plénière et cérémonie de purification et les séances concurrentes
3:15 pm – 4:15 pm / 15h15 – 16h15
Opening Plenary and Smudge Ceremony /
Séance plénière et cérémonie de purification
LOCATION:
GRAND BALLROOM, LOWER CONCOURSE
4:30 pm – 6:00 pm / 16h30 – 18h00
CONCURRENT SESSIONS 101 TO 133 /
SÉANCES CONCURRENTES 101 À 133
SESSION/SÉANCE 101
Methods for Monitoring and Evaluating
Research Outcomes
SESSION/SÉANCE 102
Evaluation: Constructing a Bridge to Health Care
Access for Children
MultiPaper / Présentations diverses
LOCATION:
PEEL
Non-profit and Foundations Evaluation TIG / Évaluation des
organismes sans but lucratif et des fondations
• Chair(s) – Ann L McCracken (Health Foundation of Greater
Cincinnati)
When Two Worlds Collide: The Foundation and External
Evaluations
• Ann L McCracken (Health Foundation of Greater Cincinnati)
The Foundation Program Officer as Evaluation Boundary
Spanner
• Kate N Keller (The Health Foundation of Greater Cincinnati)
Health Utilization and Cost Assessment for the
School-Based Health Center
LOCATION: YORK
• Jeff Guo (University of Cincinnati)
Research, Technology, and Development Evaluation TIG /
Évaluation de la recherche, de la technologie et du
développement
Assisting Foundations in Evaluating the Efficacy of Their
Strategic Initiatives: A Case Example of School-Based
Health Centers
• Chair(s) – Isabelle Collins (Technopolis Ltd)
• Terrance J Wade (Brock University)
Using Multivariate Techniques for the Analysis of Performance
Data: A Case Example
• Isabelle Bourgeois (University of Ottawa)
The Institutionalization of Impact Assessment in Argentina:
The National Institute for Agricultural Technology
as a Study Case
• Susana Beatriz Mirassou (Instituto Nacional de Tecnología
Agropecuaria), Daniel Lema (Instituto Nacional de Tecnología
Agropecuaria), María Cristina Saucede (Instituto Nacional de
Tecnología Agropecuaria), Hector Figoni (Instituto Nacional de
Tecnología Agropecuaria), Diego Schain (Instituto Nacional de
Tecnología Agropecuaria), Gabriela Gil (Instituto Nacional de
Tecnología Agropecuaria), Susana Morales (Instituto Nacional de
Tecnología Agropecuaria)
Applying the Balanced Scorecard in Public Research and
Development Program
• Byeongwon Park (Korea Institute of Science and Technology
Evaluation and Planning), Donghoon Oh (Korea Institute of S&T
Evaluation and Planning), Sehong Oh (Korea Institute of S&T
Evaluation and Planning), Seokho Son (Korea Institute of S&T
Evaluation and Planning)
The Use of Surveys in Determining Outcomes of Research,
Technology and Development Programs
SESSION/SÉANCE 103
Crossing the Divide Between Theory and
Practice: Managing the Complexity of Systems
and Programs
LOCATION:
NORFOLK
Systems in Evaluation TIG and Program Theory and
Theory-driven Evaluation TIG / Les systèmes en évaluation et
la théorie des programmes et l’évaluation axée sur la théorie
• Chair(s) – Laurene L Christensen (University of Minnesota)
• Discussant(s) – Kathryn Hill (University of Minnesota)
The Need for Theory-Based Component Evaluation:
A Case Study of a Small Program
• Laurene L Christensen (University of Minnesota)
New Theory From Existing Theory: Building Evaluation
Capacity Through Systems Change
• Kathryn Hill (University of Minnesota)
Program Theory and Program Quality: Evaluation in Smaller
Learning Communities
• Jeffrey Schultz (University of Minnesota)
• Suzanne Lafortune (Performance Management Network)
67
Wednesday, 4:30 pm – 6:00 pm / Concurrent Sessions
Le mercredi, 16h30 – 18h00 / Séances concurrentes
SESSION/SÉANCE 104
Negotiating Borders: Linking Across Sites and
Levels in Prevention Evaluation
LOCATION:
OXFORD
Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health TIG / L’alcoolisme,
la toxicomanie et la santé mentale
• Chair(s) – John F Stevenson (University of Rhode Island)
• Discussant(s) – Wayne M Harding (Social Science Research &
Evaluation)
Linking Local and State Data Collection for
Prevention Program Outcome Evaluation
• John F Stevenson (University of Rhode Island), Nathan Stein
(University of Rhode Island), Jessica Nargiso (University of Rhode
Island), Marco Andrade (University of Rhode Island), Paul R Florin
(University of Rhode Island)
Science-Based Substance Abuse Prevention:
Moderator Effects on Outcomes
• Thomas Sawyer (University of Rhode Island), John F Stevenson
(University of Rhode Island), Nathan Stein (University of Rhode
Island)
The Evolution and Adaptation of a Prevention Program
Fidelity Assessment Tool Across States
Developing Evaluating Skills of Future Teachers at the
Universidad de Granada
• Jose Luis Aroztegui-Plaza (Universidad de Granada)
Developing Evaluation Skills at the Fluminense Universidade
Rio de Janeiro
• Iduina Mon’t Alverne-Chaves (Universidad Fluminense – Rio de
Janeiro)
SESSION/SÉANCE 106
Straddling the Line between the Business of
Evaluation and the Goal of the American
Evaluation Association’s Guiding Principles
Think Tank / Cellule de réflexion
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM EAST
Independent Consulting TIG / Consultation indépendante
• Chair(s) – Maura J Harrington (Independent Consulting)
• Discussant(s) – Kathleen A Dowell (Partners in Evaluation &
Planning), Amy A Germuth (Compass Consulting Group), Melanie A
Hwalek (SPEC Associates), Harold Urman (Vital Research)
SESSION/SÉANCE 107
Successfully Embedding Participatory Evaluation
Into Enhancing Evaluation Capacity
• Wayne M Harding (Social Science Research & Evaluation), Scott W
Formica (Social Science Research & Evaluation), Michele Cummins
(Social Science Research & Evaluation), Peter Kreiner (Schneider
Institute for Social Policy at Brandeis University), Carol Prost
(Brandeis University), Chelsey Goddard (Education Development
Center)
Collaborative, Participatory & Empowerment Evaluation
TIG / Évaluations participatives et habilitantes
Modularization Versus Tailored Interaction in the Provision of
Program Technical Assistance: What is the Right Balance?
Evaluation Capacity Building: Case Study of the
Newfoundland and Labrador Primary Health Care Renewal
Initiative
• Peter Kreiner (Brandeis University), Carol Prost (Brandeis University),
MeeLee Kim (Brandeis University), Wayne M Harding (Social Science
Research & Evaluation), Scott W Formica (Social Science Research &
Evaluation), Michele Cummins (Social Science Research & Evaluation)
• Donald R Murray (Harry Cummings and Associates), Harry
Cummings (Harry Cummings and Associates Inc), Rob Alder (MedEmerg Inc), Juanita Barrett (Office of Primary Health Care)
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM WEST
• Chair(s) – Craig Love (Westat)
Building a Shared Evaluation Agenda: Role of the Evaluation
Advisory Team
SESSION/SÉANCE 105
Developing Evaluation and Research Skills in
Undergraduate Students in Mexico
• Maureen Rubin (University of South Carolina)
LOCATION:
CARLETON
Teaching of Evaluation TIG / L’enseignement en évaluation
• Chair(s) – Robert E Stake (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
• Discussant(s) – Robert E Stake (University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign)
Preparing Young Evaluators Through a Summer Apprentice
Program in Southern Mexico
• Maria Barrer-Bustillos (Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán), Edith J
Cisneros-Cohernour (Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán), Andrés
Aluja (Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán)
68
SESSION/SÉANCE 108
SESSION/SÉANCE 110
Evaluating Leadership Development Initiatives
in Organizations
LOCATION:
ESSEX BALLROOM
Business and Industry TIG / Affaires et industrie
• Chair(s) – Kelly M Hannum (Center for Creative Leadership)
• Discussant(s) – E Jane Davidson (Davidson Consulting Ltd)
Strategic Uses of Leadership Development Evaluation
• Jennifer W Martineau (Center for Creative Leadership), E Jane
Davidson (Davidson Consulting Ltd)
Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Evaluations of
Leadership Development
• Kelly M Hannum (Center for Creative Leadership), S Bartholomew
Craig (North Carolina State University)
Designing Evaluations of Leadership Development Programs
Using the Baldrige Education Criteria for Performance
Excellence
• Karl E Umble (North Carolina Institute for Public Health)
Evaluation of Leadership Development Programs: The Role of
Communication in Evaluation Use
• Darlene Russ-Eft (Oregon State University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 109
Online Self-Instructional Tool for Managers of
Research Programs
Demonstration / Démonstration
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM B
Challenges and Innovation in the Evaluation
of Comprehensive Community Initiatives:
The National Evaluation of Free to Grow
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM C
Health Evaluation TIG / Évaluation de la santé
• Chair(s) – Douglas V Easterling (Wake Forest University School of
Medicine)
• Discussant(s) – Ross F Conner (University of California, Irvine)
Design of the National Evaluation of “Free to Grow: Head
Start Partnerships to Promote Substance-Free Communities”
• Mark Wolfson (Wake Forest University School of Medicine), Ralph
D’Agostino (Wake Forest University School of Medicine), Todd
Rogers (Public Health Institute), Robert DuRant (Wake Forest
University School of Medicine), Douglas V Easterling (Wake Forest
University School of Medicine), Heather Champion (Wake Forest
University), David G Altman (Center for Creative Leadership), Dianne
Barker (Public Health Institute)
Retaining High-Risk, Mobile, and Multi-lingual Head Start
Survey Participants in the National Evaluation of Free to Grow:
Head Start Partnerships to Promote Substance-Free
Communities
• Heather Champion (Wake Forest University), Maria Parries (Wake
Forest University School of Medicine), Anshu Shrestha (University of
California, Los Angeles), Kristin Kidd (Wake Forest University),
William Martin (Wake Forest University School of Medicine)
It Comes Down to Relationships: A Formalized
Communication Approach for Participation and Retention in a
Multi-Site Evaluation
développement
• Victoria K Brown (Wake Forest University School of Medicine), Kristin
Kidd (Wake Forest University), Andrea Williams (Center for Creative
Leadership), Tracy Patterson (Center for Creative Leadership), Tara
Pitts (Wake Forest University School of Medicine)
•
•
•
•
It’s in the Cards: An Interactive Approach to Understanding
Strategy Implementation and Integration in a Multisite
Evaluation
Chair(s) – William J Valdez (US Department of Energy)
Rosalie Ruegg (TIA Consulting)
Padma Karunaratne (World Bank)
William A Eckert (World Bank)
• Kristin Kidd (Wake Forest University), Victoria K Brown (Wake Forest
University School of Medicine), Todd Rogers (Public Health Institute),
Douglas V Easterling (Wake Forest University School of Medicine),
Dianne Barker (Public Health Institute)
Balancing Validity and Efficiency in the Assessment of
Site-Level Dose
• Douglas V Easterling (Wake Forest University School of Medicine),
Todd Rogers (Public Health Institute), Rebecca Hensberry (Wake
Forest University School of Medicine), Leslie Tuttle (Wake Forest
University School of Medicine)
69
Bridging Evaluation and Assessment
SESSION/SÉANCE 111
Costs and Benefits of Criminal Justice Programs:
Recent Applications to Program Evaluations
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM D
• Jeanne H Hubelbank (Independent Consultant), Linda Pursley (Lesley
University)
Embedding Evaluation Practice in Institutional Research and
Staff Development Activities at the Community College
Crime and Justice TIG / Criminalité et justice
• Chris Efthimiou (City University of New York), Nancy Ritze (City
University of New York)
• Chair(s) – Edwin W Zedlewski (US Department of Justice)
The Complexity of Innovation Diffusion in Higher Education
Retrofitting Cost Benefit Analyses to Criminal Justice
Evaluations
• Elaine P Van Melle (Queen’s University at Kingston)
• Edwin W Zedlewski (US Department of Justice)
Results From the Cost-Benefit Analyses of Prisoner Reentry
Programs
• John Roman (The Urban Institute)
Is It Worth Collecting DNA Evidence From High Volume
Crimes?
• Katharine Browning (National Institute of Justice)
Evaluating the Effects of “Active Learning” and Faculty
Development Programming on Student Outcomes: It Can Be
Done
• Constance C Schmitz (Professional Evaluation Services), Michael G
Luxenberg (Professional Data Analysts, Inc.)
SESSION/SÉANCE 114
Challenges in Defining Program Outcomes
Panel / Panel
SESSION/SÉANCE 112
LOCATION:
Considerations in Special Education Evaluation
CONFERENCE ROOM G
Program Theory and Theory-driven Evaluation TIG / La
théorie des programmes et l’évaluation axée sur la théorie
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Patti Bourexis (The Study Group)
CONFERENCE ROOM E
Special Needs Populations TIG / Populations à besoins
spéciaux
Negotiating Program Outcomes Between Program Staff
and Sponsors
• Chair(s) – Ottis L Murray (University of North Carolina at Pembroke)
• Patti Bourexis (The Study Group)
Stringent Proof or Rich Description in Evaluating Broad-Scale
State-Level Education: Are Randomized Trials Most Effective?
Examing the Quality of Program Outcomes
• Marilyn L Scheffler (University of Nebraska at Lincoln), Jeannie
Kleinhammer-Tramill (University of Kansas)
Developing Indicators to Assess Program Outcomes
Evaluation of a Distance Education Training Certificate
Program for Assistive Technology in Low Incidence/Severe
Disabilities
• Larry Gallagher (Northern Arizona University), Carol L HendersonDahms (Northern Arizona University)
Crossing Borders and Boundaries in Special Education
Evaluation: Understanding Schools’ Responses to a Court
Order
• Casey D Cobb (University of Connecticut), Sharon F Rallis (University
of Massachusetts at Amherst)
SESSION/SÉANCE 113
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education:
Developing Conceptual Frameworks
LOCATION:
• Belle Brett (Brett Consulting Group)
• Kathryn E H Race (Race & Associates)
SESSION/SÉANCE 115
Feminist Issues in Evaluation:
Traversing Borders and Boundaries to Create
Cross-Topical Interest Group Networks
Through Dialogue
LOCATION:
Feminist Issues in Evaluation TIG / Questions féministes en
évaluation
• Chair(s) – Elizabeth Whitmore (Carleton University)
• Discussant(s) – Karen Kirkhart (Syracuse University), Tristi C Nichols
(Manitou), James Riedel (Girl Scouts Research Institute), Lois Thiessen
Love (Uhlich Children’s Advantage Network), William M Trochim
(Cornell University)
CONFERENCE ROOM F
Assessment in Higher Education TIG / L’évaluation dans les
• Chair(s) – Beverly Parsons (InSites)
• Discussant(s) – Pamela A Sandoval (Indiana University Northwest)
70
SESSION/SÉANCE 116
SESSION/SÉANCE 119
International Evaluation Wave:
Global Context and Local Practice
LOCATION:
Thematic Strand and International and Cross-cultural
Evaluation TIG / Volet thématique et l’évaluation
interculturelle et intersectorielle
• Chair(s) – Zenda Ofir (The World Conservation Union)
The Growth of Programme Evaluation in South Africa:
An Industry, Profession, or Professional Industry?
• Mark A Abrahams (Independent Consultant)
How the Global Context Shapes Evaluation Practice
Rounding the Bases: Not “Tagging Out” at
Each Step in Applied Evaluation – Centers for
Disease Control/ Examples From Tuberculosis
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
WENTWORTH
Government Evaluation TIG and Health Evaluation TIG /
Évaluation gouvernementale et l’évaluation de la santé
• Chair(s) – Thomas J Chapel (Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention)
Using a Participatory Approach to Ensure Binational
Relevance: The Evaluation of the Binational Referral System
for Binational Tuberculosis Patients Pilot Project
• Elliot Stern (Independent Consultant)
• Maureen A Wilce (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention),
Odile D Ferroussier (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
The Scale of the Growing International Evaluation Wave –
A Question of Methodology?
Integrating Standardized Nursing Case Management
Interventions Into an Evaluation Model
• Peter Dahler-Larsen (University of Southern Denmark)
• Judy D Gibson (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
Setting Up the Brazilian Evaluation Network:
A Challenging Work With no Boundaries
Can Program Managers Learn Anything From Tuberculosis
Surveillance Data?
• Angela Cristina Dannemann (Instituto Multiplicar), Thereza PennaFirme (Fundação Cesgranrio), Ana Carolina Letichevsky (Fundação
Cesgranrio)
• Linda S Leary (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Lori
Armstrong (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
SESSION/SÉANCE 117
Canadian Evaluators and Their Work:
Results of a Survey / Les évaluateurs canadiens
et leur travail : résultats d’un sondage
Expert Lecture / Exposé d’expert
LOCATION:
CITY HALL
Canadian Strand / Volet canadien
• Chair(s) – Benoît Gauthier (Circum Network)
• Discussant(s) – Terry Hunt (Treasury Board of Canada), Greg Mason
(Prairie Research Associates), Paula Speevak-Sladowski (Centre for
Voluntary Sector Research and Development)
• Shelley Borys (Environment Canada), Benoît Gauthier (Circum
Network), Natalie Kishchuk (Natalie Kishchuk Research and
Evaluation), Simon Roy (Goss Gilroy)
A Goal-Driven Web-Based Tool for Evaluation Capacity
Building
• Kai Young (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
SESSION/SÉANCE 120
Multi-Country, Multi-Site Monitoring and
Evaluation Mapping: Critical Choices, Decision
Points, and Implementation Protocols
LOCATION:
KENORA
International and Cross-cultural Evaluation TIG / Évaluation
• Lisa Ruth Shulman (International Child Resource Institute)
• Sarah E Stachowiak (Organizational Research Services)
SESSION/SÉANCE 118
Q-Methodology Within the Framework
of Evaluation
LOCATION:
ELGIN
Quantitative Methods: Theory and Design TIG / Méthodes
quantitatives : théorie et conception
• M Virginia Gravina (Universidad de la República)
71
SESSION/SÉANCE 121
SESSION/SÉANCE 124
Developing Functional Competency in
Evaluation: The Japan Evaluation Society
Accreditation Scheme for Evaluation
Training Programs
Becoming (Culturally Responsive) Evaluators:
The American Evaluation Association/Duquesne
University Graduate Education Diversity
Internship Experience
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
HURON
LOCATION:
DUFFERIN
Multiethnic Issues in Evaluation TIG / Questions liées à la
multiethnicité en évaluation
• Chair(s) – Arnold Love (Independent Consultant)
• Chair(s) – Rodney K Hopson (Duquesne University), Prisca Collins
(Duquesne University)
• Discussant(s) – Donna M Mertens (Gallaudet University), Stafford
Hood (Arizona State University)
Japan Evaluation Society: Accreditation Scheme for
Evaluation Training
• Masafumi Nagao (Hiroshima University)
Model of International Cooperation in Evaluation: The Japan
Evaluation Society and the Canadian Evaluation Society
• Keiko Kuji-Shikatani (Cathexis Consulting)
Development of the Hiroshima School Evaluation Training
Program
• Yasuyoshi Terachi (Hiroshima Prefectural Education Center)
SESSION/SÉANCE 122
Using Outcome Thinking to Target Outcomes:
Visions Becoming Real Programs
Skill-building Workshop / Atelier de formation
LOCATION:
KENT
Extension Education Evaluation TIG / Évaluation de
l’enseignement périscolaire
• Chair(s) – Nancy Grudens-Schuck (Iowa State University)
• S Kay Rockwell (University of Nebraska)
• Robert M Penna (The Rensselaerville Institute)
Cultivating Agency Through Conversation: Evaluation of the
Conversations for Common Wealth Project
• Tanya Brown (Duquesne University)
Aprendiendo en Communidad: Evaluation of The Transitional
Bilingual Learning Community Project
• Trini M Villegas (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
What Happens Here? My Experiences on My Journey
to Becoming a Culturally Responsive Evaluator:
The Urbana Adult Education Program
• Maurice Samuels (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
Recreating Lives: Evaluating Refugee Resettlement in
North Texas
• Liya Aklilu (University of North Texas)
SESSION/SÉANCE 125
Town Meeting: An AEA Public Statement on
Educational Accountability
SESSION/SÉANCE 123
LOCATION:
What to Do When I Face Ethical Dilemmas in
Evaluation
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
SIMCOE
Graduate Student and New Evaluator TIG / Les étudiants
diplômés et les nouveaux évaluateurs
• Chair(s) – Xiaofan Cai (Western Michigan University)
• Discussant(s) – Leslie Goodyear (Education Development Center)
American Evaluation Association / American Evaluation
Association
•
•
•
•
•
•
Chair(s) – Linda Mabry (Washington State University, Vancouver)
Linda Mabry (Washington State University, Vancouver)
Katherine E Ryan (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
David Bernstein (Westat)
Howard R Mzumara (Purdue University Indianapolis)
Maria Whitsett (Austin Independent School District)
To Please or Displease: That is the Question
• Bianca E Montrosse (Claremont Graduate University)
Rethinking Expectations of Evaluation
• Kim Glassman (William Penn Foundation)
Practical Ethics for Program Evaluation: Client Impropriety
• Chris LS Coryn (Western Michigan University), Daniela C Schroeter
(Western Michigan University)
72
SESSION/SÉANCE 126
SESSION/SÉANCE 129
Building and Nurturing Diversity:
A Think Tank to Discuss Ways the American
Evaluation Association Can Support Diversity
Within the Profession
LOCATION:
Association
• Chair(s) – Joan L LaFrance (Mekinak Consulting)
• Discussant(s) – Elmima C Johnson (National Science Foundation),
Melvin E Hall (Northern Arizona University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 127
Organizational Responses to Evaluation Results
LOCATION:
COSMOPOLITAN
Pre-K – 12 Educational Evaluation TIG / Évaluation de
l’enseignement de la prématernelle jusqu’à la 12e année
• Chair(s) – Sonja Ben Jaafar (University of Toronto)
Using Evaluation as Credible Evidence for School Decision
Makers
• Patty Molloy (Evergreen Training & Evaluation), Maureen Massey
(Seattle Public Schools), Jane Aronson (Evergreen Training &
Evaluation)
Let’s Talk Collaborative Evaluation
LOCATION:
GINGERSNAP
• Dawn Hanson Smart (Clegg & Associates)
SESSION/SÉANCE 131
Don’t Start the Journey to School Success
Without a Map: Develop Your Skills
in Measuring High Performing Learning
Communities in Schools
LOCATION:
ICE PALACE
• Chair(s) – Phyllis C Ault (Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory)
• Ann E Davis (Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory)
SESSION/SÉANCE 132
Essentials of Online Survey Development
and Use
LOCATION:
Coping With Evaluations: Influences of Evaluative Systems on
School-Organizations in Four Swedish Municipalities
Integrating Technology Into Evaluation / Intégration de la
technologie à l’évaluation
• Christina Segerholm (University of Umea)
• Robert Kadel (Kadel Research Consulting)
• Carolyn L Cohen (Cohen Research and Evaluation)
• Vicky Ragen (Puget Sound Center for Teaching, Learning and
Technology)
• Karen Peterson (Puget Sound Center for Teaching, Learning and
Technology)
Performance-Based Accountability Policy and the School
Practice of Consequences
• Sonja Ben Jaafar (University of Toronto)
SESSION/SÉANCE 128
A Picture Paints a 1000 Words:
Visually Representing Quantitative Data
LOCATION:
EXECUTIVE
• David L Streiner (University of Toronto)
• Stephanie M Reich (Vanderbilt University)
73
SESSION/SÉANCE 133
6:30 pm – 8:00 pm / 18h30 – 20h00
Techniques for Innovative Focus Group
Evaluation
LOCATION:
POSTERS / AFFICHES
SESSION/SÉANCE 135
PINNACLE
Qualitative Methods TIG / Méthodes qualitatives
• Chair(s) – Susan Ogletree (Georgia State University)
The Use of Telephone Focus Groups for Evaluation
Opening Reception, Posters, Information Tables
and Meet the Authors / Réception d’ouverture,
Affiches, Tables d’information et rencontre avec
les auteurs
• Rosalind E Hurworth (University of Melbourne)
Posters / Affiches
Segmenting Focus Group Participants by Specific Behaviors
and Experiences
LOCATION:
GRAND BALLROOM EAST
SPONSORED BY / COMMANDITAIRE PAR :
THE WORLD BANK
• Joscelyn Silsby (American Red Cross)
Transcribing Focus Group Interviews: Is There a Viable
Alternative for Analysis?
Conference Committee / Comité du congrès
• Rita O’Sullivan (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Michelle
Jay (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Elizabeth Powers
(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Chris Blow (University
of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
Promoting Assessment Literacy in Teachers: Lessons From
the External Evaluation of the Hawaii School Assessment
Liaison Program
Poster/Affiche 1
• Louis M Volante (Brock University), Christopher Melahn (University of
Hawai’i)
Poster/Affiche 2
6:10 pm – 6:40 pm / 18h10 – 18h40
Naresuan Evaluation Theory
• Rattana Buosonte (Naresuan University)
First Time Attendee Orientation Session /
Séance d’orientation des participants
novices
LOCATION:
Is this your first CES or AEA conference? If so, be sure to
attend the first time attendee’s orientation session to learn
more about CES, AEA and the Joint Conference.
C’est votre premier congrès de la SCÉ ou de l’AEA? Si c’est
le cas, ne manquez pas la session d’orientation conçue spécialement pour vous afin d’en apprendre plus long sur la
SCÉ, l’AEA et le congrès conjoint.
Poster/Affiche 3
Documenting Proximal and Distal Outcomes of AgrAbility for
Pennsylvanians Program: Challenges and Opportunities
• Rama B Radhakrishna (Penn State University), Connie D Baggett
(Penn State), Linda Fetzer (Penn State)
Poster/Affiche 4
An Early Reading First Quality Assurance Plan and Feedback
Loop: Linking Evaluation With Practice
• Jackie Counts (University of Kansas), Marleen Elliott (University of
Kansas), Marcetta Reilly (University of Kansas)
Poster/Affiche 5
Findings From a Short-Term Drug and Alcohol Residential
Treatment Program for Criminal Offenders
• Ann E Garrett (Arapahoe House), Danielle Toussaint (Arapahoe
House)
Poster/Affiche 6
Development and Analysis of a Student Survey for Use in
Program Model and Outcome Assessment
• Kathryn E H Race (Race & Associates), Belle Brett (Brett Consulting
Group)
Poster/Affiche 7
The Dynamic Evaluation Approach
• Vasilios Grammatikopoulos (University of Thessaly)
74
Wednesday, 6:30 pm – 8:00 pm / Posters
Le mercredi, 18h30 – 20h00 / Affiches
Poster/Affiche 8
Poster/Affiche 18
Evaluating the Provision of Policy Advice
The Effectiveness of Concurrent-Documentation in Promoting
Program Outcomes: A Pilot Study at Metropolitan Family
Services in Chicago, Illinois
• J Scott Bayley (Office of the Auditor-General of Melbourne Australia)
Poster/Affiche 9
An Authentic Project and Rubric for Use in a Graduate Level
Program Evaluation Course
• Zandra S Gratz (Kean University)
Poster/Affiche 10
Benchmarking the Graduate-Level Comprehensive Exam
• Marcie J Bober (San Diego State University), Donn Ritchie (San Diego
State University), Robin Martin (San Diego State University)
Poster/Affiche 11
• John Ridings (Metropolitan Family Services)
Poster/Affiche 19
The Methodology and Practice of Evaluability Assessment:
1985-2004
• Michael S Trevisan (Washington State University)
Poster/Affiche 20
A Survey of Physicians’ Views on the Saskatchewan Cancer
Agency’s Community Follow-up Program
Collaborative Evaluation Communities in Urban Schools
• Raegan A Osicki (University of Saskatchewan), Kathryn Green
(University of Saskatchewan)
• Douglas Huffman (University of Kansas), Frances P Lawrenz
(University of Minnesota), Kelli Thomas (University of Kansas), Lesa
Covington-Clarkson (University of Minnesota)
Poster/Affiche 21
Poster/Affiche 12
Access Denied: Tips for Data Collection With Inaccessible
Groups
• Hayley L Dawson-Owens (Southern Illinois University Carbondale),
Jeremiah K Edwards (Southern Illinois University Carbondale), Alecia
Eubanks (Southern Illinois University Carbondale), Lynda M
Sagrestano (Southern Illinois University)
Poster/Affiche 13
A Methodology for Self-Assessing the Integration of Equity
Into Professional Development
• Kimberly D Good (Appalachia Educational Laboratory)
Poster/Affiche 14
Building Evaluation Capacity: The Results of a Study to
Measure the Effectiveness of an Evaluation Training Model
Do Unemployment Experience and Social Assistance
Programs Affect Body Weight Changes? A Look at a Sample
of Reemployed Americans
• Eunice Rodriguez (Cornell University), Kelly L Bolton (University of
California at Los Angeles)
Poster/Affiche 22
The Use of Video to Convey Program Impact to Stakeholders:
An Illustration
• Rusti Berent (Children’s Institute), Debra Hoffman (Children’s
Institute), Dawn DiGiovanni (Children’s Institute)
Poster/Affiche 23
An Evaluation of the Achievement Impact of an Academic
Support Program for Underrepresented Minority Science
Majors: Participation Matters
• Heidi M Sweetman (University of Delaware), Ximena Uribe-Zarain
(University of Delaware), Audrey J Noble (University of Delaware)
• Mary E Arnold (Oregon State University)
Poster/Affiche 24
Poster/Affiche 15
Evaluation of a Teaching American History Web-Based
Distance-Learning Program
The Relationship of Risk and Protective Factors for 7th-12th
Grade Nonusers and Users of Alcohol Within the Past 30
Days
• Melissa R Williams (University of North Carolina at Greensboro),
Pamela B Finney (University of North Carolina at Greensboro), Arthur
Smith (WGBH Educational Foundation)
• Christie L Rood (The Answer Community Coalition), Richard G
Landry (University of North Dakota)
Poster/Affiche 16
Poster/Affiche 25
Graphic Presentation of Evaluation Findings: A Student
Restorative Justice Programme
Two Case Studies of Integrated Health Services Delivery
Models: Evaluation of Planning, Implementation and
Outcomes
• Kataraina Pipi (Paewhenua Hou, New Horizons), Jay Takoko
(Paewhenua Hou Partnership)
• Esther Suter (Calgary Health Region), Nelly D Oelke (Southern
Alberta Child and Youth Health Network)
Poster/Affiche 17
Poster/Affiche 26
How Does Evaluation Capacity Building Work in a School
District?
• Shu-Huei Cheng (University of Minnesota)
Evaluating in Native American Communities: A Reflexive
Questioning Presentation Based on Information Gathered
From a Review of Native American Tobacco Use Studies
• Rodney C Haring (State University of New York at Buffalo)
75
Poster/Affiche 27
Poster/Affiche 36
Children in the Shadow of Violence: Evaluation of a Social
Marketing Campaign
The Return on Investment of an Open Enrollment Leadership
Development Program
• Michael Epstein (Children’s Institute), Andrew Doniger (Monroe
County Health Department), Karen A Reixach (Children’s Institute),
Guillermo Montes (Ave Maria University), Deborah B Johnson
(Children’s Institute), A Dirk Hightower (Children’s Institute)
• Jennifer W Martineau (Center for Creative Leadership)
Poster/Affiche 28
Poster/Affiche 37
A Key Ingredients Based Site Selection Process for a
Multi-Site Study of Housing Programs
A Client Profile of Offenders Enrolled in a Community
Re-entry Program
• Nicholas Huntington (National Center on Family Homelessness), Beth
Provencher (National Center on Family Homelessness), Meghan
Finley (National Center on Family Homelessness)
• Kasey R Weber (Colorado Department of Corrections), Maureen L
O’Keefe (Colorado Department of Corrections), Kelli J Klebe
(University of Colorado at Colorado Springs)
Poster/Affiche 38
Poster/Affiche 29
The International Summer Internship Experience:
Learning How to Get Where You Want to Go
• Jeffrey A Sheldon (Claremont Graduate university)
Poster/Affiche 30
Effectiveness of Psychological Sex Offender Treatment:
Contributions of Metaanalysis to Evaluation Practice
Use of a Web Site as a Tool to Monitor Evaluations and
Continuous Improvement in a Complex Service Network
• Marie Gervais (Société de l’assurance automobile du Québec),
Marie-Eve Lamontagne (Société de l’assurance automobile du
Québec)
Poster/Affiche 39
Wealth in People: Strengthening the Social Networks of
Child-Headed Households in Namibia
• Monica Ruiz-Casares (Cornell University)
• Duyen Luong (University of Saskatchewan), J Stephen Wormith
Poster/Affiche 40
Poster/Affiche 31
Parental Satisfaction and Involvement With an Early
Childhood Program
The Intersection of the Stages of Program Development
and Evaluation
• Hamida A Jinnah (University of Georgia), Lynda Walters (University of
Georgia)
• Katherine A Tibbetts (Kamehameha Schools), Shawn M
Kanaìaupuni (Kamehameha Schools)
Poster/Affiche 41
Poster/Affiche 32
Estimating the Effectiveness of a Program: Weighting the
Quality of Components
Culturally Crossing the ‘T’ in Evaluation Training
• Yonglyun Kim (University of Minnesota)
• Sandy Kerr (Massey University), SL Milne (Massey University)
Poster/Affiche 42
Poster/Affiche 33
• JaMuir Michelle Robinson (National Cancer Institute)
Innovative Ways to Address Mental Health Needs of
African Americans: Examining the Need for Collaboration
Between African American Clergy and the Mental Health
Delivery Systems
Poster/Affiche 34
• Kimberly D Farris (University of Texas at Austin)
Working to Improve Health Ministries: Evaluation Capacity
Building Within African American Churches
An Evaluation of the New Portals to Appreciating the Global
Environment Graduate Teaching Assistant Training Program
Poster/Affiche 43
• Erin Elizabeth Mehalic (Old Dominion University), Margot Elise
Ackermann (Old Dominion University), Jennifer A Morrow (Old
Dominion University)
• Paula M Plonski (Praxis Research)
Poster/Affiche 35
Balancing Summative Policy Needs, Formative Program
Needs, and Methodological Rigor in Evaluating a
State-Funded Demonstration Project of Services
For Homeless Persons
Lessons Learned Doing a Longitudinal Study: The Region a
Smart Start Longitudinal Study Results
Poster/Affiche 44
Un Programme Simple Et Efficace Pour Réduire L’Illettrisme
Et La Dyslexie: Étude Pilote / A Simple, Effective Program for
Reducing Illiteracy and Dyslexia: Pilot Project
• Paule A Steichen Asch (IBIS International)
• Wendy Vaulton (National Center on Family Homelessness), Nicholas
Huntington (National Center on Family Homelessness), Eric I
Grumdahl (Hearth Connection)
76
Poster/Affiche 45
Poster/Affiche 54
Brownfield Redevelopment and Blight: Identifying
Opportunities for Redevelopment
Evaluating Counterproliferation Efforts in the Former Soviet
Union
• Kristi Walker (University of Missouri at St Louis)
• Elmer Yglesias (US Civilian Research & Development Foundation),
Richard Halkett (University of California, Berkeley)
Poster/Affiche 46
Right From Birth: Evaluating a Training Program for
Child Care Providers
Poster/Affiche 55
• Leanna T Cathey (Louisiana State University AgCenter), Rebecca E
White (Louisiana State University), Cheri M Gioe (Louisiana State
University AgCenter), Diane D Sasser (Louisiana State University
AgCenter), Emily LeJeune (Louisiana State University AgCenter)
• Karen L Yanowitz (Arkansas State University), Sharron Oleson
(Arkansas State University), Suzanne Mitchell (Arkansas Department
of Higher Education), Cynthia A Miller (Arkansas State University)
Poster/Affiche 47
Building Bridges to the Future: Assessing the Strengths and
Needs of Older Adults
How Early Contact With Key Local Stakeholders Participating
in a Regional Community Development Program Evaluation
Affects Evaluation Capacity of Local Program Initiatives
• Kerry Lupher (National Research Center)
• Diane K Wanner (Northwest Area Foundation)
Poster/Affiche 48
Poster/Affiche 57
Outcome’s Genealogy: Leading Outcome Models
Focusing Your Focus Group in the High School Setting
• Nathan D Haman (University of Nebraska), S Kay Rockwell
(University of Nebraska), Robert M Penna (Rensselaerville Institute)
• Joel D Philp (The Evaluation Group), Katie A Sesso (The Evaluation
Group), Jennifer R Sandusky (The Evaluation Group), Blake Dubose
(The Evaluation Group)
Poster/Affiche 49
Collaborative Evaluation of a Mathematics Instructional Grant
Poster/Affiche 56
Evaluation of Torture Treatment Programs: Challenges and
Opportunities
Poster/Affiche 58
• Carolyn J Swenson (Rocky Mountain Survivors Center), Kay
Stevenson (Rocky Mountain Survivors Center)
• Maria Leyde Oliveira (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro), Sonia
Natal (The National School of Public Health Sergio Arouca), Zulmira
Hartz (Universidade de Montreal), Elizabeth M dos Santos (Fundação
Oswaldo Cruz)
Poster/Affiche 50
Evaluation of the Difficulties Workers With Occupational
Injuries and Illnesses Have in Gaining Access to
Compensation
• Sylvie Gravel (Direction de la santé publique de Montréal), Patry
Louis (Direction de la santé publique de Montréal), Boucheron
Laurence (Direction de la santé publique de Montréal), Michel
Fournier (Sante Publiquede Montreal)
Testing of Evaluation Model for Hansen’s Disease Programs
Poster/Affiche 59
Examining Management Information System Service and
Cost Data as a Component of an Evaluation of a Children’s
Mental Health System Change Initiative: Findings,
Challenges, and Opportunities
• James D Salt (University of Delaware)
Poster/Affiche 51
Poster/Affiche 60
Needs of Parents and Providers of School Age Care for
Children With Disabilities: A Qualitative Approach
A Model for an Evaluation Data Integration Center
• Hamida A Jinnah (University of Georgia), Zolinda Stoneman
(University of Georgia), Christine Todd (University of Georgia), Anika
Francis (University of Georgia)
Poster/Affiche 52
Validity of the Risk and Protective Factor Model
• Randi K Nelson (University of Minnesota)
Poster/Affiche 61
Determining Fidelity Essential to Successful Program
Evaluation
• Warren C Stuart (University of Nevada, Las Vegas)
• Vicki L Schmitt (University of Kansas), Michelle Dunham (University
of Kansas), Carol Carmen (University of Kansas), Bruce B Frey
(University of Kansas)
Poster/Affiche 62
Poster/Affiche 53
• Jami M Bodonyi (University of Washington), Laura Orlando
(University of Washington), Briana Yancey (University of Washington)
A Judgment-Based Approach to Evaluating School Readiness
Sound Families: Preliminary Findings from a Multi-site
Evaluation of Transitional Housing for Homeless Families
• Steven W Lee (University of Kansas), Jill H Lohmeier (University of
Kansas), Vicki L Schmitt (University of Kansas)
77
Poster/Affiche 63
Poster/Affiche 70
Methodological and Validity Issues of an Adolescent
Outpatient Sex Offender Treatment Program Outcome
Evaluation
Curriculum and Instruction Student-Teaching:
A Formative Evaluation
• Karen K Parhar (University of Saskatchewan), J Stephen Wormith
(University of Saskatchewan), James F Hemphill (Youth Forensic
Psychiatric Services)
Poster/Affiche 64
Données préliminaires sur l’évaluation de mesures innovantes
de soutien à la réussite scolaire au primaire en milieu
défavorisé / Preliminary Data on Evaluation of Innovative
Support Measures for Academic Success in Elementary
Schools in Disadvantaged Areas
• Jean L Bélanger (Université du Québec à Montréal), Angèle Bilodeau
(Direction de la santé publique de Montréal), Francis Gagnon
(Direction de la santé publique de Montréal), Nathalie Lussier
(Direction de la santé publique de Montréal), France Gauthier (Sante
Publiquede Montreal), Chantal Schwanen (Université du Québec à
Montréal)
Poster/Affiche 65
• Nichole D Norman (University of North Carolina at Greensboro)
Poster/Affiche 71
Ex-ante Evaluation of an Online Environmental Training
Program: A Proposed Methodology
• Vicente Agustín Cloquell-Ballester (Technical University of Valencia),
Rafael Monterde-Diaz (Technical University of Valencia), Ana del
Carmen Torres Sibille (Technical University of Valencia)
Poster/Affiche 72
Assessing the Usefulness of Affirmative Action Hiring Policies
• Eric Cook (University of Illinois)
Poster/Affiche 73
Treatment Programming for Violent Offending:
A Meta-Analysis
• Dena M Derkzen (University of Saskatchewan), J Stephen Wormith
The Influence of the Contextual Factors on Applying Stake’s
and Rossi’s Evaluation Theories in Taiwan’s Teacher
Education Program
Poster/Affiche 74
• Chun-ping Wu (Syracuse University)
• Flavia Tavares Elias (Ministério da Saúde), Maria Aparecida Patroclo
(Municipal de saúde do Rio de Janeiro)
Poster/Affiche 66
Research Use: How to build a Theoretical Model of
Evaluation?
Issues Related to Program Improvement of an
Intellectually/Behaviorally Challenged Sex Offender
Treatment Program
Poster/Affiche 75
• Karen K Parhar (University of Saskatchewan), J Stephen Wormith
(University of Saskatchewan), Stephen Wong (Regional Psychiatric
Centre (Prairies))
• Michelle A Bakerson (Western Michigan University), June Elizabeth
Gothberg (Western Michigan University)
Evaluating the Language Usage Within Individual Education
Plans in Relationship to District and State Statistics
Poster/Affiche 76
Poster/Affiche 67
Evaluation and Validation of Mortality by Tuberculosis
• Sonia Natal (The National School of Public Health Sergio Arouca),
Elizabeth M dos Santos (Fundação Oswaldo Cruz), Zulmira Hartz
(Universidade de Montreal), Maria Lúcia Penna (Escola Nacional de
Saúde Pública)
Poster/Affiche 68
Protecting Intellectual Knowledge: A Review of Survey Method
Procedures With Native American Participants
• Rodney C Haring (State University of New York at Buffalo)
Poster/Affiche 69
Multiple Perspectives in Early Childhood Evaluations
• Karen M Ruprecht (Purdue University)
Poster/Affiche 77
A Brave New World: Bringing Utilization-Focused Evaluation
Into Early Childhood Classrooms
• Jennifer C Zimmerman (Children Inc)
Poster/Affiche 78
The Effectiveness of Classroom Observation Checklists in
Magnet School Evaluations: Lessons Learned in Instrument
Development
Evaluation of the Tuberculosis Control Program, in the
Amazonian Region, During the Year 2002-2003
• Marybeth Gilbert (Praxis Research)
• Sonia Natal (The National School of Public Health Sergio Arouca),
Zulmira Hartz (Universidade de Montreal), Elizabeth M dos Santos
(Fundação Oswaldo Cruz), Maria Aparecida Patroclo (Escola Nacional
de Saúde Pública), Marly Cruz (Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública),
Maria Lucia Penna (Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública)
Outcome Engineering: Mapping the Way for Evaluators and
Organizations
78
Poster/Affiche 79
• Lindsay Gotshall (Independent Consultant)
Poster/Affiche 80
Poster/Affiche 89
Evaluation of Spiritual Care Service in Hospital
Marketing Evaluation to Small Developing Countries
• Hong Zhong (Western Michigan University)
• P Cristian Gugiu (Western Michigan University), Nadini Persaud
Poster/Affiche 81
Essential Competencies for Evaluators: A Self-Assessment
Instrument
Poster/Affiche 90
• Gail Ghere (Independent Consultant), Jane E Minnema (University of
Minnesota), Jean A King (University of Minnesota), Laurie Stevahn
(Seattle University)
• P Cristian Gugiu (Western Michigan University)
Evaluation Certification Exam: A Call to Arms
Poster/Affiche 91
Poster/Affiche 82
Revisiting Regression Artifacts Through Relative Position
Matching
Lessons Learned From the Evaluation of the Big Back Yard,
a Unique Exhibit Integrating Miniature Golf With the
Traditional Museum Experience
• James Griffith (Claremont Graduate University), Michael A Harnar
(Claremont Graduate University), William D Crano (Claremont
Graduate University)
• Mary A McEathron (University of Minnesota), Amy L Grack
(University of Minnesota), Stacey J Grimes (University of Minnesota)
Poster/Affiche 92
Poster/Affiche 83
Retrospective Methods Of Measuring Practice Change
of Pharmacists in Continuing Education
Stepping Back to Move Forward: Development of a Program
Logic Model Within an Empowerment Evaluation Framework
• Certina Ho (Ontario Pharmacists’ Association), Sandra Winkelbauer
(Ontario Pharmacists’ Association)
• Michelle Everest (Wilfrid Laurier University)
Poster/Affiche 84
Western Developmental Programs in Cambodia: Contextual
Issues to Consider When Conducting Evaluations
• Miriam H Mulsow (Texas Tech University), Sothy Eng (Texas Tech
University), Sybil Hart (Texas Tech University)
Poster/Affiche 93
Family Dental Stories: An Assessment of the
Social Inclusiveness of Dental Policy in Ontario
• Jonathan Lomotey (Centre for Research and Education in Human
Services), Maria Hatzipantelis (Centre for Research and Education in
Human Services), Rich Janzen (Centre for Research and Education in
Human Services), Caroline Currie (Wilfrid Laurier University)
Poster/Affiche 85
Culture, Family and Schizophrenia: Lessons from a
Southeastern State in the United States
• Maureen Rubin (University of South Carolina)
Poster/Affiche 86
The Use of Sequential Retrospective Pretests and Posttests
Measurements to Evaluate Performance Among Those
Who Don’t Know What They Don’t Know
• John L Alexander (Claremont Graduate University)
Poster/Affiche 87
Examining the Effects of Religious Factors and Accompanying
Mediating and Modifying Factors on Health From the National
Longitudinal Survey of Youth
Poster/Affiche 94
Using Results-Based Monitoring for Development of
Monitoring and Evaluation System
• Anna Grzybinska (Universalia), Anne Garnder (Canadian Crossroad
International)
Poster/Affiche 95
The Use of the Achievement Via Individual Determination
Program at a High Socioeconomic Status Middle School in
North Carolina
• Monifa Green Beverly (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill),
Rita L Joyner (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Tawannah
Allen (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
Poster/Affiche 96
• Jennifer A Nolan (Cornell University), Eunice Rodriguez (Cornell
University)
Evaluating the Benefits of a UNI: A Community Partnership
Program in the Southeast of Mexico
Poster/Affiche 88
• Reyna Euán-Ramírez (Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán), Edith J
Cisneros-Cohernour (Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán)
Supporting a Culture of Collaboration Through Performance
Evaluation
• Kim Roberts (Maritz), Vicki Staebler Tardino (Maritz), Jan Cerny
(Maritz)
Poster/Affiche 97
Evaluating Children’s Mental Health Services in Homeless and
Domestic Violence Shelters: Challenges and Solutions
• Deborah L Sherwood (San Francisco Department of Public Health),
Thomas Bleecker (San Francisco Department of Public Health), T
Anne Richards (Independent Consultant)
79
Poster/Affiche 98
Using Student Voices in the Evaluation of Virtual Lab
Software: Documenting Reactions From High School Students
for Developers
• Jeonghee Huh (University of Central Florida), Laura Blasi (University
of Central Florida), Tao Yedong (University of Central Florida)
Poster/Affiche 99
Teachers Doing the Homework as Evaluators: A Flexible
Approach
• Sara Alicia Ancira Arechiga (Centro de Evaluaciones Universidad
Autonoma de Nuevo Leon), Laura Esthela Garcia Alvarez (Centro de
Evaluaciones Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon), Jose Angel
Salazar Guajardo (Technological of Monterrey Center of
Environmental Quality)
7:30 pm – 8:00 pm / 19h30 – 20h00
LOCATION:
GRAND BALLROOM EAST
Join Terry Smutylo and Michael Patton at 7:30 pm as they
kick off a half hour of song and laughter followed by an open
microphone. Come prepared to share your favourite evaluation joke, poem, song or skit.
Joignez-vous à Terry Smutylo et à Michael Patton à 19 h 30
pour une demi-heure de chansons et de rires, après quoi les
participants seront invités à partager leur(s) blague(s),
poème(s), chanson(s) ou sketch(es) favoris sur l’évaluation.
Poster/Affiche 100
Using Visual Display of Root Causes to Operationalize Goals:
A Lingua Franca for Participation Across Borders
• John B Nash (OpenEye Innovation Management), Tomas Erlandsson
(OpenEye Innovation Management), Gunnar Backman (OpenEye
Innovation Management)
Poster/Affiche 101
Formative and Summative Evaluation of South Carolina
Postbaccalaureate Research Education Program
• Rebecca C Horwitz (University of South Carolina), Sarah K Morsbach
(University of South Carolina), Christopher Allen (University of South
Carolina), Rachel Smolowitz (University of South Carolina), Abraham
Wandersman (University of South Carolina)
Poster/Affiche 102
Evaluation of a Multi-site Prevention Program to Reduce HIV
and Substance Abuse Among High-Risk Hispanic Youth
• Richard Cervantes (Behavioral Assessment), Avelardo Valdez
(University of Houston), Maria Zarza (Behavioral Assessment)
80
8:00 pm – 9:00 pm / 20h00 – 21h00
Student Reception /
Réception des étudiants
LOCATION:
If you are a student, don’t miss the exclusive Student
Reception with the CES Council and AEA Board. Meet the
winning teams from the CES Student Evaluation Case
Competition.
Si vous êtes étudiant(e), ne manquez pas la réception prévue
spécialement à votre intention et où vous pourrez rencontrer les membres du Conseil national de la SCÉ et
du conseil d’administration de l’AEA. Vous y rencontrerez
également les équipes gagnantes du concours « Simulation
d’évaluation » de la SCÉ.
T h u r s d a y, O c t o b e r 2 7 / L e j e u d i 2 7 o c t o b r e
7:00 am – 6:30 pm / 7h00 – 18h30
7:00 am – 6:30 pm / 7h00 – 18h30
Career Center Open /
LOCATION:
VIDE OFFICE, LOWER CONCOURSE LEVEL
Find a position, consultant, or employee and review resumes,
bios, job announcements and requests for proposals. Career
Center services are offered at no charge to conference attendees. Those who wish to have a resume or job posted, and
who did not submit it in advance electronically, should drop
it off as early as possible on Thursday once the Career
Center opens.
Are you looking for a new job in the evaluation field and
want to interview with prospective employers? Are you a
consultant trying to seek out new business prospects? Are
you an advanced graduate student or new evaluation professional wanting to learn more information about internship
and fellowship opportunities? If you answered yes to any or
all of the above questions, you might be interested in participating in the Recruitment Fair taking place in the Career
Center from 9:00 am to 1:00 pm on Friday, the 28th. You
may sign up for a 30-minute informational interview during
the Recruitment Fair with any one of our participating
employers when the Career Center opens on Thursday, the
27th, at 7:00 am. To sign up and learn more about the
Recruitment Fair, please talk with a Career Center staff
member.
Trouvez un emploi, un consultant ou un employé et examinez des curriculum vitae, des biographies, des annonces de
postes vacants et des demandes de propositions. Les services
du Centre des carrières sont offerts gratuitement aux délégués du congrès. Les délégués qui aimeraient afficher une
annonce de poste vacant ou un curriculum vitae et qui ne
l’ont pas envoyée par courrier électronique auparavant devrait
apporter l’annonce en question au Centre des carrières dès
son ouverture jeudi.
Vous êtes à la recherche d’un nouvel emploi dans le domaine
de l’évaluation et vous aimeriez rencontrer des employeurs
potentiels? Vous êtes un(e) consultant(e) qui cherche à obtenir de nouveaux clients? Vous êtes un(e) étudiant(e) diplômé(e) ou un(e) nouveau(velle) professionnel(le) en évaluation et vous voulez en apprendre plus long sur des occasions
de stage ou des bourses de recherche? Si vous avez répondu
oui à une ou à plusieurs de ces questions, vous voudrez peutêtre participer à la foire de recrutement qui se tiendra au
Centre des carrières le vendredi 28 octobre de 9 h à 13 h.
Vous pouvez vous inscrire à une entrevue d’information
d’une demi-heure avec n’importe lequel de nos employeurs
participants lorsque le Centre des carrières ouvrira ses
portes le jeudi 27 octobre à 7 h. Pour vous inscrire et en
apprendre plus long sur la foire de recrutement, adressezvous à un membre du personnel du Centre des carrières.
8:00 am – 5:00 pm / 8h00 – 17h00
LOCATION: CONCOURSE, LOWER CONCOURSE
AND MEZZANINE LEVELS
evaluation.
8:00 am – 9:10 am / 8h00 – 9h10
Keynote Address / Discours d’ouverture :
Independence in the Context of Audit /
L’indépendance dans le contexte
de la vérification
Sheila Fraser,
Auditor General of Canada / Vérificatrice générale du Canada
LOCATION:
GRAND BALLROOM WEST
Thematic Strand / Volet thématique
Ms. Sheila Fraser's keynote address is supported in part
by the Ministry of Finance, Government of Ontario, represented by Mr. Wayne Arthurs, MPP Pickering-AjaxUxbridge, Parliamentary Assistant to the Minister of
Finance. / L’allocution plénière de Mme Sheila Fraser est parrainée en partie par le ministère des Finances de l’Ontario,
représenté par M. Wayne Arthurs, député de Pickering-AjaxUxbridge, adjoint parlementaire du ministre des Finances.
81
Thursday - continuedessions
Le jeudi – suite
9:25 am – 10:55 am / Concurrent Sessions
9h25 – 10h55 / Séances concurrentes
SESSION/SÉANCE 202
9:10 am – 9:25 am / 9h10 – 9h25
Refreshment Break /
Evaluator Certification Debate: Canadian and
American Views
Debate / Débat
LOCATION:
GRAND BALLROOM CENTRE
Thematic Strand and Teaching of Evaluation TIG / Volet
thématique et l’enseignement en évaluation
9:25 am – 10:55 am / 9h25 – 10h55
•
•
•
•
•
Chair(s) – Arnold Love (Independent Consultant)
Gerald Halpern (Fair Findings)
Shelley Borys (Environment Canada)
MF Smith (The Evaluators’ Institute)
James W Altschuld (Ohio State University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 201
SESSION/SÉANCE 203
Evaluation, the “New Politics” and the
“New Public Management” : Dilemmas of
Engagement
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
GRAND BALLROOM WEST
Government Evaluation TIG / Évaluation gouvernementale
• Chair(s) – Saville Kushner (University of the West of England)
• Discussant(s) – Ernest R House (University of Colorado, Boulder)
Constitutive Effects of Performance Indicators
• Peter Dahler-Larsen (University of Southern Denmark)
Value-Engaged Evaluation
• Jennifer C Greene (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
New Public Management and Evaluation Under
Decentralising Regimes
• Christina Segerholm (University of Umea)
Poetry and Pathos in Evaluation Reporting
• Leslie Goodyear (Education Development Center)
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational
Evaluation: National Hearing on Standards for
Personnel Evaluation
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
GRAND BALLROOM EAST
Canadian Evaluation Society and American Evaluation
Association / Société canadienne d’évaluation et l’American
Evaluation Association
• Chair(s) – Elmima C Johnson (National Science Foundation), James
Cullen (Ministère de l’Education)
American Evaluation Association’s Role in the Revision of the
Personnel Evaluation Standards of the Joint Committee on
Standards for Educational Evaluation
• Elmima C Johnson (National Science Foundation)
The Canadian Evaluation Society’s Perspective on the Joint
Committee and the Personnel Evaluation Standards
• James Cullen (Ministère de l’Education)
Evaluation Ethics Within Cultures of Accountability
The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation:
Revision of the Personnel Evaluation Standards
• Thomas Schwandt (University of Illinois at Urbana)
• Arlen R Gullickson (Western Michigan University)
Tensions Between Reporting to National Targets and Staying
Faithful to Local Learning and Experience
Update on Task Force Revisions of the Personnel Standards
• Paul Mason (University of Birmingham)
• Barbara Howard (SERVE University of North Carolina, Greensboro)
82
Thursday, 9:25 am – 10:55 am / Concurrent Sessions
Le jeudi, 9h25 – 10h55 / Séances concurrentes
SESSION/SÉANCE 204
SESSION/SÉANCE 206
The Interplay Between Evaluation and
Evidence-Based Practices
LOCATION:
V.I.P
• Chair(s) – Bill Luckey (Westat)
• Discussant(s) – Sanjeev Sridharan (University of Edinburgh)
Recent Efforts to Moving Adolescent Substance Abuse
Treatment Towards Evidenced Based Practice
• Michael L Dennis (Chestnut Health Systems)
Outcome Monitoring and Integrated Clinical and Evaluative
Measure: A Difficult Step in Bridging the Gap Between
Research and Practice
Methods for Evaluating Foundation Portoflios
LOCATION:
PEEL
• Chair(s) – Lester W Baxter (The Pew Charitable Trusts)
• Discussant(s) – Lester W Baxter (The Pew Charitable Trusts)
Practical Strategies for Evaluating Research Investment
Outcomes
• Andrea Williams (Center for Creative Leadership), Tracy Patterson
(Center for Creative Leadership), David G Altman (Center for
Creative Leadership)
Reflections on Evaluation Practice
• Lester W Baxter (The Pew Charitable Trusts)
• Brian Rush (Centre for Addiction and Mental Health), Garth Martin
(Addiction Services Consulting)
Using Evidenced-Based Criteria for Evaluation of a Program
Portfolio in Foundations
Identifying and Promoting Promising Practices With an
Outcomes Monitoring System
• Bonnie L Shepard (Harvard School of Public Health)
• Bill Luckey (Westat), Donna D Atkinson (Westat)
Complexity Applied: Explorations in Evaluation
SESSION/SÉANCE 205
Pricing Human Health and Welfare
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
SESSION/SÉANCE 207
LOCATION:
NORFOLK
Systems in Evaluation TIG / Les systèmes en évaluation
YORK
Costs, Effectiveness, Benefits, and Economics TIG / Coûts,
efficacité, avantages et aspects économiques
• Chair(s) – Glenda H Eoyang (Human Systems Dynamics Institute)
• Discussant(s) – Patricia J Rogers (Royal Melbourne Institute of
Technology)
• Chair(s) – Ronnie Levin (US Environmental Protection Agency)
Evaluation Tools on a Complexity Landscape
Pricing Human Health and Welfare in Environmental Policies
• Glenda H Eoyang (Human Systems Dynamics Institute)
• Ronnie Levin (US Environmental Protection Agency)
Linked Indicators Hit City Hall
The Cost of Crime
• Kenneth A Meter (Crossroads Resource Center)
• Nigel Miller (Economics and Resource Analysis Unit Home Office)
Evaluation as Play
Cost-Benefits in After-School Programming: How do We
Count the Ways?
• Thomas H Berkas (Bethel University)
• Jerome Hipps (WestEd)
Incorporating Emergent Elements in Outcomes-Based
Program Evaluation
Cost-Benefit Findings and Methodology: Consumer-Run and
Traditional Mental Health Services
• Francis J Schweigert (Northwest Area Foundation)
• Danyelle Mannix (American University), Brian T Yates (American
University), Kristin Jones (Nathan Kline Institute)
• Lois Yellowthunder (Hennepin County)
Evaluating and Evolution: Complexity in Action
83
SESSION/SÉANCE 208
Alternatives for Measurement in Evaluation
LOCATION:
OXFORD
Crossing the Boundaries of “a Secret”, of Time and of a
Culture Using Projective Tools
• Miri Levin-Rozalis (Ben-Gurion University)
Cultural Relevance and the Use of Qualitative Methods in
International Energy Program Evaluation
• Mary E Worzala (Academy for Educational Development), Gourgen
Melikian (Pro-Energia Consultants)
• Chair(s) – Wendy M Garrard (Vanderbilt University)
Using the “Developmental Stages in the Use of Information
and Communication Technology in Teaching and Learning
Rubric” to Facilitate School Planning for Technology
SESSION/SÉANCE 210
Peer Review for Independent Consultants: Year
One Update and Peer Reviewer Orientation
• Luigia Cimellaro (Queen’s University)
Using Checklists to Document and Monitor Data Review, Data
Entry, and Data Validation
LOCATION:
• Tamara M Walser (Windwalker Corporation), Elizabeth Willis
(Windwalker Corporation)
• Sally L Bond (The Program Evaluation Group)
• Marilyn L Ray (Finger Lakes Law & Social Policy Center)
A New Approach for Meta-Evaluation Using Fuzzy Logic
• Ana Carolina Letichevsky (Fundação Cesgranrio), Marley Maria
Vellasco (Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro), Ricardo Tanscheit
(Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro), Reinaldo Castro Souza
(Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro)
Strengths and Weaknesses of Conducting Client Surveys via
the Web, Telephone, Mail and Fax
• Suzanne Lafortune (Performance Management Network), Brian
Steeves (Canada-Ontario Business Service Centre)
SESSION/SÉANCE 209
Crossing Cultural Boundaries Using Qualitative
Methods
LOCATION:
CARLETON
Qualitative Methods TIG and Multiethnic Issues in Evaluation
TIG / Méthodes qualitatives et les questions liées à la
• Chair(s) – Janet Usinger (University of Nevada, Reno)
• Discussant(s) – Janet Usinger (University of Nevada, Reno)
Qualitative Methods and a Transnational Evaluation Design
• Diane E Oliver (Texas Tech University)
Identifying Best Program Practices To Deliver Effective
Lifestyle Interventions: Lessons From Selected WISEWOMAN
Projects
WINDSOR ROOM EAST
SESSION/SÉANCE 211
Focus on Family Support Programs:
Developing Evaluation Capacity
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM WEST
Human Services Evaluation TIG / Évaluation des services
sociaux
• Chair(s) – Lorraine C Marais (Radford University)
• Discussant(s) – Henry R Ilian (James Satterwhite Academy for Child
Welfare Training)
Developing Evaluation Capacity in the Family Resource
Program Sector in Canada
• Peter A Gabor (University of Calgary)
Developing Indicators for Measuring the Quality of Child Care:
Parent and Provider Perceptions
• Michel Lahti (University of Southern Maine), Alexander Hildebrand
(Maine Commission for Community Service)
Expanding Vision: Looking Beyond Program-Specific
Evaluation to an Integrated Programs Delivery View of
Evaluation
• Wendy M Doughty (Emerging Directions Consulting Ltd), Jim P
Klingle (Emerging Directions Consulting Ltd)
• Melanie Besculides (Mathematica Policy Research), Heather Hesketh
(Mathematica Policy Research), Ronette Briefel (Mathematica Policy
Research), Pam Winston (Urban Institute), Julie Will (Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention), Karen Gregory-Mercado (Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention), Rosanne Farris (Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention)
84
SESSION/SÉANCE 212
Leadership as Boundary-Crossing: Multi-Level,
Cross-Cultural Evaluation Approaches
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
ESSEX BALLROOM
• Chair(s) – Claire Reinelt (Leadership Learning Community)
• Discussant(s) – Hazel Symonette (University of Wisconsin, Madison)
Learning-Oriented Evaluation in an Era of Performance
Measurement and Impact Assessment
• Douglas E Horton (Consultative Group on International Agricultural
Research), Jamie Watts (International Plant Genetic Resources
Institute)
SESSION/SÉANCE 214
Strategies for Evaluating Health Promotion
Services and Programs
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM C
Evaluation of Leadership Development Programs: What Role
Does Evaluation Play in Creating a Reflexive, Developmental
and Useful Leadership Development Tool?
• Maenette KP Benham (Michigan State University), Teresa R Behrens
(WK Kellogg Foundation)
Evaluation of the Planning Process for Healthcare Facilities
in the United States Indian Health Service
Evaluating Leadership Development for Social Change
• Lucie L Vogel (US Department of Health and Human Services)
• Claire Reinelt (Leadership Learning Community), Kim Ammann
Howard (BTW Consultants)
The Institutional Substitution Program: Evaluation of a
Multisite Program to Fund Non-physician Primary Care
Providers
Designing Evaluations of Youth Leadership Development
Within a Civic Activism Context
• Hanh Cao Yu (Social Policy Research Associates), Heather K LewisCharp (Social Policy Research Associates)
Designing Evaluations of Pipeline Leadership Development
Efforts: Evaluation Towards Social Change and Social Justice
• Prisca Collins (Duquesne University), Rodney K Hopson (Duquesne
University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 213
New Directions for Performance Monitoring and
Evaluation: Experiences From International
Agricultural Research Centers
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM B
développement
• Chair(s) – Leslie J Cooksy (University of California, Davis)
• Discussant(s) – Patrick Grasso (The World Bank)
Overview of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation in the
International Agricultural Research Centers
• Chair(s) – Al Bavon (University of North Texas)
• Christel A Woodward (McMaster University), Brian Hutchison
(McMaster University), Cristina Gage (McMaster University)
Understanding Intergenerational Boundaries to Reduce
Adolescents’ Risk Behaviors in Rural Areas
• Josephine A Allen (Cornell University), Eunice Rodriguez (Cornell
University), Jennifer S Tiffany (Cornell University), Deladem N KusiAppouh (Cornell University)
The 1997 Texas Motorcycle Helmet Law and Its Effect on
Motorcycle Crash Fatalities and Injuries
• Al Bavon (University of North Texas)
SESSION/SÉANCE 215
Improved Planning, Evaluation, and Reporting:
A Collaborative Approach
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM D
• Chair(s) – Lisa L Townson (University of New Hampshire Cooperative
Extension)
Geographical Boundaries
• Leslie J Cooksy (University of California, Davis), Sirkka Immonen
(Science Council Secretariat)
• Nancy K Franz (University of New Hampshire Cooperative Extension)
International Agricultural Research Center Impact
Assessments: Demonstrated Benefits and Donor Demands
• Dennis Harrington (University of Maine Extension)
• David A Raitzer (Science Council Secretariat), Hans Gregersen
(CGIAR Science Council), Timothy Kelley (Science Council
Secretariat)
Legal Boundaries
Technological Boundaries
• Robin Lockerby (University of Vermont Extension)
Organizational Boundaries
• William Miller (University of Massachusetts Extension)
85
SESSION/SÉANCE 216
SESSION/SÉANCE 218
Multisite Evaluations & Social Services
Lessons Learned from Using Program Logic
LOCATION:
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM E
CONFERENCE ROOM G
Cluster, Multi-site and Multi-level Evaluation TIG /
Évaluations en grappes, multisites et multiniveaux
• Chair(s) – Roger A Boothroyd (University of South Florida)
• Chair(s) – Andrew R Taylor (Centre for Research and Education in
Human Services)
Taste Tests as a Strategy for Changing Fruit and Vegetable
Preferences: Results From a Multi-Site Evaluation
• Andrew M Fourney (California Department of Health Services),
Sharon B Sugerman (Public Health Institute), Carole Pirruccello
(California Department of Health Services), Patrick Mitchell (Public
Health Institute)
Community Wellness Program For Low-Income Senior
Citizens: A Sound Methodology At A Low CostProgram Evaluation
• Paule A Steichen Asch (IBIS International), Annette Bell (Mercy
Connections), Sally Sherman (Mercy Connections)
Bridging Perspectives: Final Lessons Learned from a
5 Year Evaluation of an After-School Initiative
• Soo-Jin Yoon (The Colorado Trust), Sabrina Arrendondo Mattson
(National Research Center)
Re-Thinking Higher Education Applications:
Other Countries, Other Contexts
Process of Constructing a Program Theory as Perceived
and Understood by Stakeholders: The Case of the Higher
Education Challenge Grants Competitive Program, United
States Department of Agriculture, Cooperative State
Research, Education, and Extension Service
• Lynn Jones (Iowa State University), Elena Polush (Iowa State
University), Henry Bahn (US Department of Agriculture)
The Use of BDI Logic Models in Evaluating Programs
• Robert G LaChausse (California State University, San Bernardino)
• Margarida Southard (Leon County Schools), Ella Hall (Leon County
Schools), Beverly Owens (Leon County Schools)
SESSION/SÉANCE 219
CONFERENCE ROOM F
• Chair(s) – Dorene M MacKinnon-Tucker (University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill)
• Discussant(s) – Dorene M MacKinnon-Tucker (University of North
Carolina at Chapel Hill)
An Evaluation of the Extended Project for Educational
Reforming Collaboration: Guest Lecturer Networking Center
for Basic Educational Quality Assurance, Thailand
• Arunee Onsawad (Naresuan University), Bunga Wachirasakmongkol
(International College Naresuan University), Anan Malarat (Naresuan
University), Kitipong Luenam (Naresuan University), Arun
Suikradueng (Naresuan University), Nuanphan Wannasutee
(Naresuan University)
Developing a Democratic Institutional Evaluation for the
Empowerment of Academic Community
• Sonia Duarte Grego (Sao Paulo State University), Sheila Zambello
Pinho (Sao Paulo State University), Eunice Oba (Sao Paulo State
University), Helia Sonia Raphael (Sao Paulo State University)
86
• Andrew R Taylor (Centre for Research and Education in Human
Services), Jason Newberry (Centre for Research and Education in
Human Services)
Building Evaluation Capacity: Lessons From the Field Using
Logic Models for Planning, Evaluation and Grant Writing
SESSION/SÉANCE 217
LOCATION:
Boxing Ourselves In: When Do Program Logic Models Become
a Hinderance to Crossing Boundaries?
Evaluation Studies Versus Evaluation Systems?
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
Theories of Evaluation TIG / Théories de l’évaluation
• Chair(s) – Nick L Smith (Syracuse University)
• Discussant(s) – Michael Bamberger (Independent Consultant)
Evaluation Design Alternatives: Studies, Systems, and Other
Variations
• Nick L Smith (Syracuse University)
Evaluating Service Systems: Starting in the Middle
• Laurie J Hestness (Ramsey County Human Services)
Getting Results Through a Strategic Approach to Policy
Relevant Evaluation
• George F Grob (US Department of Health and Human Services)
Ignoring Evaluation as Adaptive Behavior
• Jonathan Morell (Altarum Institute)
Tools for Analysis: From T-Tests to Latent Variable Models
SESSION/SÉANCE 221
Fondements de la discipline de l’évaluation :
défis et pratiques en santé et des interventions
communautaires / The Basics of the Discipline of
Evaluation: Challenges and Practices in
Healthcare and Community Interventions
LOCATION:
CITY HALL
Comité d’examen francophone / French-Language Strand
• Chair(s) – Christian Dagenais (Université de Montréal)
L’étude des pratiques évaluatives : Un retour aux fondements
de la discipline / Studying Evaluation Practices: Back to
the Basics
• Marthe Hurteau (Université du Québec à Montréal), Sylvain Houle
(Université du Québec à Montréal), Julie Duval (Université du
Québec à Montréal)
Les défis de la mise en œuvre participative des interventions
communautaires : l’évaluation de l’implantation d’un projet
communautaire de soutien à l’engagement paternel /
The Challenges of Participatory Implementation in
Community Interventions: Evaluating the Implementation of
a Community Project to Support and Promote Fathering
• Melinda F Davis (University of Arizona)
Exploratory and Bayesian Analyses for Small-Scale Clinical
Research
• Michael Menke (University of Arizona)
SESSION/SÉANCE 223
Building Outcomes Evaluation Into
Government/Contractor Relationships:
A Stakeholder Approach
LOCATION:
WENTWORTH
• Kasey Langley (Organizational Research Services)
SESSION/SÉANCE 224
Organizational Strategies for Addressing
Effectiveness and Impact Measurement:
Case Examples of Five International
Non-governmental Organizations
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
KENORA
• Martine Cinq-Mars (CÉGEP Marie-Victorin), Kenneth H Cabatoff
(Université du Québec à Montréal)
Modélisation socio-historique de la professionnalisation
de l’évaluation en santé en Amérique du Nord /
Socio-historic Modelling of the Professionalization of
Evaluation in Healthcare in North America
• Chair(s) – Megan Steinke (Save the Children USA)
• Discussant(s) – Megan Steinke (Save the Children USA)
• Véronique A Lapaige (University of Montreal)
• Myriam Khoury (Mercy Corps)
The CARE International Evaluation Standards
SESSION/SÉANCE 222
Health Outcomes Research:
Design and Analysis Issues
LOCATION:
Mercy Corps’s Design, Monitoring and Evaluation Initiative
ELGIN
• Chair(s) – Melinda F Davis (University of Arizona)
• Jim Rugh (CARE International)
Getting SMART About Monitoring and Evaluation: The Catholic
Relief Services Experience
• Constance McCorkle (Catholic Relief Services)
Collaboration Between Organizations as an Innovative
Strategy for Monitoring and Evaluation Capacity-Building:
Catholic Relief Services and American Red Cross
• Alice Willard (American Red Cross)
Improving Outcome Studies With Better Treatments
• Julie Cohen (University of Arizona)
Packages of Care and Whole Systems of Medicine:
Do We Need New Methods or Clearer Thinking?
• Patricia M Herman (University of Arizona)
87
SESSION/SÉANCE 225
Evaluating Capacity Development and
Developing Evaluation Capacity
Transitioning From Doctoral Student to Evaluation Consultant
Business Owner
• Kathleen C Haynie (Kathleen Haynie Consulting)
International Evaluation Consulting: One Woman’s Perspective
LOCATION:
• Tristi C Nichols (Manitou)
HURON
• Chair(s) – Paula Bilinsky (Academy for Educational Development)
Organizational Assessment as a Tool for Project Planning and
Developing a Baseline for Monitoring and Evaluation: A Case
Study From the Former Yugoslavia
• Brian Moo Sang (Universalia Management Group), Anette
Wenderoth (Universalia Management Group)
Strengthening the Learning Function of Evaluation in Large
International Organizations: Empirical Findings on Capacity
Building in Self-Evaluation
• Sandy M Taut (University of California, Los Angeles)
Challenges and Issues With Assessing Capacity Development
Results in International Development Initiatives
• Geraldine Cooney (Universalia Management Group)
SESSION/SÉANCE 226
Collaborative Rubric Development for
Using Evaluation Results
LOCATION:
KENT
Evaluation Use TIG / Utilisation des évaluations
• Chair(s) – Maureen W Murphy (Caliber Associates Inc)
• Rhonda L Munford (Caliber Associates Inc)
• Erica Sorohan (National School Boards Association)
SESSION/SÉANCE 228
Engaging Youth in Empowerment Evaluation
LOCATION:
DUFFERIN
• Chair(s) – Kira Krenichyn (ActKnowledge)
Youth Participation in Evaluation: Young People Should
Be Seen and Heard!
• Pam K St Leger (University of Melbourne), Catherine S Bell
(University of Melbourne)
A Medication Compliance Education Curriculum for
Adolescents Diagnosed With Bi-polar Disorder: Using
Empowerment Evaluation Values to Develop Social Validity
Measures to Ask Participants About Appropriateness of
Procedures and the Importance of Outcomes
• Jan A Talley (Crittenton)
Youth Crossing Borders: Evaluating Services for Separated
Refugee Youth in Transition From the Child Welfare System
• Francis G Hare (Ryerson University), Irwin Elman (Pape Adolescent
Resource Centre)
Rethinking Concept Mapping for Youth Participatory Evaluation
in the Context of Youth Development Programs
• Jennifer S Brown (Cornell University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 227
Starting and Succeeding as an
Independent Evaluation Consultant
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
SIMCOE
• Chair(s) – Jennifer E Williams (Association for the Study and
Development of Community)
• Discussant(s) – Michael Hendricks (Independent Consultant)
Evaluation of Pre-K-12 Education Programs:
A Partnership Perspective
• Amy A Germuth (Compass Consulting Group)
88
SESSION/SÉANCE 229
Issues of Participant Protection and Data
Security Under Post-9/11 Legislation
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
American Evaluation Association and Canadian Strand /
American Evaluation Association et le volet canadien
• Chair(s) – Melvin E Hall (Northern Arizona University)
• Discussant(s) – Pauline E Brooks (Brooks Cross-Cultural and
International Evaluations)
Government Information Gathering and Privacy
• Chris Calabrese (American Civil Liberties Union)
Implications of Canada’s Anti-terrorism Legislation
• Paul Copeland (Association for the Defense of the Wrongly
Convicted)
Evaluating the Impact of Professional Development on
Teachers’ Standards-Based Instructional Planning and
Practices and Student Achievement
• Sharon Herpin (WestEd), Roger Chesswas (WestEd)
Experimental Results and Issues in the Year Five Evaluation
of Public Broadcasting Service TeacherLine
• Craig Nicholls (Hezel Associates)
SESSION/SÉANCE 232
Maps, Models and Frameworks in Evaluation of
ADAMH Programs
LOCATION:
EXECUTIVE
• Chair(s) – Edie Lassegard Cook (Cornell University)
The Challenge to Evaluators of Current Systems of
Government Surveillance
The Use of Provider and Consumer Concept Maps for the
Classification and Prioritization of Mental Health Services
• Sandra Mathison (University of British Columbia)
• Edie Lassegard Cook (Cornell University)
Ethical Evaluation Practice with Vulnerable Populations:
A United States Perspective
Evaluating Addiction Programs in Canada: Building
Sustainable Evaluations
• Robin Lin Miller (Michigan State University)
• Brigitte Maicher (Independent Consultant)
SESSION/SÉANCE 230
Building Evaluation Capacity Through
Interactive Learning Activities
Conceptualizing Evaluation With Psychology’s Therapeutic
Domains and ‘Narrative Therapy and Community Work’
• Robbie S Busch (Massey University), Tom Strong (University of
Calgary), Andy J Lock (Massey University)
LOCATION:
• Hallie Preskill (Claremont Graduate University)
• Darlene Russ-Eft (Oregon State University)
Internationalizing the Techniques and Culture
of Participatory Evaluation
LOCATION:
SESSION/SÉANCE 231
Applying Experimental and Quasi-experimental
Designs to the Evaluation of Teacher Professional
Development Programs
LOCATION:
SESSION/SÉANCE 233
COSMOPOLITAN
• Chair(s) – Shahpar Modarresi (Montgomery County Public Schools)
Summative Evaluation of the Effects of Studying Skillful
Teaching Professional Development on Students’ Academic
Achievement
GINGERSNAP
• Chair(s) – Iris E Smith (Emory University)
Internationalizing Empowerment Evaluation:
A South African Case Example
• Ray Bovet Basson (University of the Witwatersrand)
Participatory Evaluation and Research: A Model to
Enhance a Research and Evaluation Culture in Universities
• Wilma N Wright (University of Belize), Geoffrey A Lee (Western
Middle School)
• Shahpar Modarresi (Montgomery County Public Schools), Suzanne R
Merchlinsky (Montgomery County Public Schools)
89
SESSION/SÉANCE 234
SESSION/SÉANCE 236
Performance Measurement, Evaluation,
and Program Improvement: Some Centers for
Disease Control/Agency for Toxic Substances
and Disease Registry Examples
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
GOLD RUSH
Prevention)
HIV Partner Counseling and Referral Services in the
United States: A National Summary of Program and
Coverage Outcomes
• Choi K Wan (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Linda
Wright-Deaguero (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
Roundtable Set One
Roundtables / Tables rondes
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Earline C Lowry (South Carolina State University)
First Rotation – Roundtable A
An Evaluation of Individual-Level Activities and Impacts
of Mental Health Consumer/Survivor Initiatives
• Geoffrey B Nelson (Wilfrid Laurier University), Joanna Ochocka
(Centre for Research and Education in Human Services), Rich Janzen
(Centre for Research and Education in Human Services)
First Rotation – Roundtable B
Analysis of National State Examination’s Data
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Intervention
Evaluation Map: A Tool for Integrating Evaluation
Stakeholders, Approaches, and Outputs
• Marina Borisovna Chelyshkova (State University of Management),
Viktor Ivanovich Zvonnikov (State University of Management)
• Sue Lin Yee (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Barri
Burrus (RTI International), J Eric Peele (RTI International)
The Cumulative Advantage of Additional Independent
Coders on Recounting All Available Content in
State Mathematics Standards
Evaluation of the Southeast Michigan Partners Project
• Carla A Winston (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention),
Megan C Lindley (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention),
Pascale M Wortley (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
SESSION/SÉANCE 235
Supporting Student Success in Ontario:
Building Capacity for Evidence-Informed
Decision-Making at the Provincial and
School Board Levels
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
ICE PALACE
• Chair(s) – Grant Clarke (Ministry of Education)
Using Data to Support Student Success and Learning to 18:
The Ministry of Education Perspective
First Rotation – Roundtable C
• Guido G Gatti (Gatti Evaluation)
First Rotation – Roundtable D
Small Steps Towards Saving the World: Advocacy
and Evaluation
• Daniel Leitch (Appalachian State University)
First Rotation – Roundtable E
Educational Evaluation in Hawaii: Obstacles and Opportunities
• S Reed Early (British Columbia Office of the Auditor General)
Second Rotation – Roundtable A
An Evaluation of System-Level Activities and Impacts of
Mental Health Consumer/Survivor Initiatives
• Rich Janzen (Centre for Research and Education in Human Services),
Geoffrey B Nelson (Wilfrid Laurier University), Joanna Ochocka
Second Rotation – Roundtable B
• Grant Clarke (Ministry of Education), Don Young (Ministry of
Education)
Creative Evaluator and Evaluand Systems for Organizational
Learning
The Collection and Use of Data to Support Student Success:
The Toronto District School Board
• Joyce Montgomery (Oklahoma State University), Kathleen D Kelsey
(Oklahoma State University)
• Melanie Parrick (Toronto District School Board), Susan Manning
(Toronto District School Board)
Collection and Use of Data to Support Student Success in
Eastern Ontario
• Sheila Farris (Catholic District School Board of Eastern Ontario)
90
Second Rotation – Roundtable C
Easier Said Than Done: Evaluating Capacity For
Resident/Organizational Partnerships
• Branda L Nowell (Michigan State University), Nicole Greenway
(Michigan State University), Michael Mahaffey (Michigan State
University), Pennie G Foster-Fishman (Michigan State University)
Second Rotation – Roundtable D
An Alternative Framework for (Self)Evaluation: Crossing the
Boundaries of the Existing Evaluation Models for Quality and
Performance Management
• Jan Leysen (Royal Military Academy), Lieve Van Nuffel (Royal Military
Academy)
Second Rotation – Roundtable E
Portfolio Evaluation in Northern and Aboriginal Community
Literacy Programs: Pros and Cons on Using Various Media
• Bebe Ivanochko (Northlands College)
SESSION/SÉANCE 237
SESSION/SÉANCE 238
Accountability for Evaluation: A Help or a
Hindrance for Meaningful Governance,
Increased Programme Effectiveness, and for
Democracy?
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
GRAND BALLROOM WEST
• Chair(s) – Burt Perrin (Independent Consultant)
Evaluation for Accountability: Providing Transparency Where
Governance Styles Obscure Authority?
• Marie-Louise Bemelmans-Videc (Parliament of the Netherlands)
New Lenses on Qualitative Methods
LOCATION:
11:05 am – 12:35 pm / 11h05 – 12h35
PINNACLE
• Chair(s) – Susan Ogletree (Georgia State University)
• Discussant(s) – Sharon A Baggett (Quantec)
Positionality and Qualitative Program Evaluation:
The Impact of Individual Researcher Lenses
• Isabel Nunez (University of Illinois at Chicago), Carol R Fendt
(University of Illinois at Chicago), Mariam Mazboudi (University of
Illinois at Chicago)
Qualitative Evaluation and the Quantum Domain:
A Case Study of the Sophia Wisdom School
• Jane L Maland Cady (Criando Research and Evaluation Services)
Celebrating the Benefits of Graduate Student Status: -The
Epitome of Qualitative Researcher as Learner
• Jennifer L Jewiss (University of Vermont)
Towards a New View of Accountability
• Burt Perrin (Independent Consultant)
Evaluation for Accountability: Myth or Reality?
• John Mayne (Public Sector Performance)
Public Sector Auditing for Accountability: New Directions,
New Tricks?
• Jeremy Lonsdale (UK National Audit Office)
SESSION/SÉANCE 239
Empowerment Evaluation and Traditional
Evaluation: 10 Years Later
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
Thematic Strand and Collaborative, Participatory &
Empowerment Evaluation TIG / Volet thématique et les
évaluations participatives et habilitantes
• Chair(s) – Abraham Wandersman (University of South Carolina)
• Discussant(s) – David Fetterman (Stanford University), Abraham
Wandersman (University of South Carolina)
Social Justice in Evaluation: Where Does Empowerment
Evaluation Fit?
• Christina A Christie (Claremont Graduate University)
A Comparative Analysis of Evaluation Design Alternatives
• Nick L Smith (Syracuse University)
Taking Stock of Empowerment Evaluation: Reflections on
Circumstances Governing its Application
• Robin Lin Miller (Michigan State University), Rebecca M Campbell
(Michigan State University)
A Review of Empowerment Evaluation
• Michael Scriven (Western Michigan University)
91
SESSION/SÉANCE 240
SESSION/SÉANCE 242
The Review/Revision of the Joint Committee
Program Evaluation Standards: A Status Report
to the Membership of the American Evaluation
Association and Canadian Evaluation Society
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
So You’re Doing a Cost Study: Options for
Evaluating Costs, Benefits, Cost-Effectiveness,
and Cost-Benefit
LOCATION:
GRAND BALLROOM EAST
Canadian Evaluation Society and American Evaluation
Association / Société canadienne d’évaluation et l’American
Evaluation Association
• Chair(s) – Jim Cullen (Ministère de l’Education)
American Evaluation Association’s Role in the Revision of the
Program Evaluation Standards
• Elmima C Johnson (National Science Foundation)
YORK
• Brian T Yates (American University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 243
Effective Funder-Grantee Relationships
LOCATION:
PEEL
The Canadian Evaluation Society and the Revision of the
Joint Committee Program Evalaution Standards
• Jim Cullen (Ministère de l’Éducation)
• Chair(s) – Huilan Yang (WK Kellogg Foundation)
• Discussant(s) – Huilan Yang (WK Kellogg Foundation)
Revision of the Program Evaluation Standards
• Arlen R Gullickson (Western Michigan University)
Update on Task Force Revisions of the Program Evaluation
Standards
• Donald Yarbrough (University of Iowa)
SESSION/SÉANCE 241
Challenges in Evaluation of Substance Use
Programs in School Settings
LOCATION:
V.I.P
• Chair(s) – Robert Hanson (Health Canada)
Evidence-Based Substance Abuse Prevention Through SchoolCooperative Extension Collaborations: Challenges of Adoption
and Maintenance
Efforts to Increase Grantees’ Evaluation Capacity: A Small
Foundation’s Experience
• Laurel A Alexander (Hogg Foundation for Mental Health), Arthur L
Whaley (Hogg Foundation for Mental Health), Kimberly A Francis
(Hogg Foundation for Mental Health)
Devolving Evaluation: Some Implications of Devolving
Program and Service Delivery to Nonprofit and
Voluntary Organizations
• Jerry B Hinbest (Malaspina University-College)
The Use of Evaluation by Grantors and Grantees:
What is Learned by Whom and Under What Conditions
• Elizabethann O’Sullivan (North Carolina State University), Fred D
Mayhew (North Carolina State University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 244
An Introduction to Cultural-Historical Activity
Theory and Its Value to Evaluators
LOCATION:
NORFOLK
• Tena L St Pierre (Penn State)
Science Based Curriculums: Challenges of Evaluation
• Bob Williams (Independent consultant)
• Annapurna Ghosh (Institute for Community Health), Elisa Friedman
(Institute for Community Health)
The Methodological Quality of Evaluation Research on SchoolBased Prevention Programs: We’re Moving in the Right
Direction but We Have a Long Way to Go
• Scott Crosse (Westat), Carol Hagen (Westat), Michele Harmon
(Westat), Margaret Tseng (Westat), Barbara Williams (Westat)
92
SESSION/SÉANCE 245
SESSION/SÉANCE 247
Learning From Multilevel Analysis
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
OXFORD
• Chair(s) – Sanjeev Sridharan (University of Edinburgh)
Describing Multi-Level Changes Over Time in Group Therapy:
Individual, Group and Cluster Group’s Trajectories
• Frederick L Newman (Florida International University), Mark
MacGowan (Florida International University), Eric Wagner (Florida
International University)
Learning in Longitudinal Designs: A Proposal for Embedding
Multilevel Models in Sequential Experiments
• Sanjeev Sridharan (University of Edinburgh), Bernadette Campbell
(Westat)
Evaluation Capacity Building:
Lessons and Strategies
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM EAST
• Chair(s) – Carolyn L Cohen (Cohen Research and Evaluation)
• Discussant(s) – Patricia J Rogers (Royal Melbourne Institute of
Technology)
Evaluator and Client Perspectives on Evaluation Capacity
Building
• Carolyn L Cohen (Cohen Research and Evaluation), Karen Peterson
(Puget Sound Center for Teaching, Learning and Technology)
Building Evaluation Capacity Within a Multi-Site Coalition of
Adult Education Agencies
• Jo Ann Doino-Ingersoll (Strategic Research)
Multilevel Approach to Relating System Integration, Service
Delivery, and Outcomes
Building Evaluation Capacity: Integration of Evaluation and
Technical Assistance
• Robert G Orwin (Westat), L Joseph Sonnefeld (Westat)
• Tania Jarosewich (Censeo Group)
SESSION/SÉANCE 246
SESSION/SÉANCE 248
Using Qualitative Methods to Evaluate Teacher
Professional Development Activities
LOCATION:
CARLETON
Crossing Organizational Boundaries:
Partnership and the Evaluation of Out-of-School
Time Programs
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM WEST
• Chair(s) – Eric Barela (Los Angeles Unified School District)
• Discussant(s) – Eric Barela (Los Angeles Unified School District)
sociaux
Creating Instruments And Processes To Measure Teacher
Dispositions In A Teacher Education Program
• Chair(s) – James S Sass (LA’s BEST After School Enrichment Program)
• Discussant(s) – Shao-Chee Sim (The Wallace Foundation)
• Pamela A Sandoval (Indiana University Northwest), Janice Grskovic
(Indiana University Northwest), Carrie Cate-clements (Indiana
University Northwest), Karen Venditti (Indiana University Northwest),
Jennifer Nolan (Indiana University Northwest)
Building Partnerships in Diverse After-School Settings:
Best Practices Based on the Challenges and Successes of
Junior Achievement Worldwide
Multi-Site Evaluation of Teacher Professional Development:
A NUD*IST Framework
• Kelly E Godfrey (University of North Carolina at Greensboro),
Wenmin Zhang (University of North Carolina at Greensboro)
Using a Modified “Pragmatic Parallel” Mixed-Method
Evaluation to Realize the Requests of Multiple Stakeholders
in the Evaluation of a Grant-Funded Program
• Linnea L Rademaker (Indiana State University), Deborah Flurkey
(Indiana State University)
• Paul Frankel (Junior Achievement Worldwide)
The Practice of Evaluating After School Program Services
Provided by Multiple Community Partners of the Los Angeles
Unified School District
• Maria del Pilar O’Cadiz (California State Polytechnic University)
Partnership Between the Out-of-School Time Agency and the
External Evaluator: A Bi-focal Perspective
• James S Sass (LA’s BEST After School Enrichment Program), Denise
Huang (University of California at Los Angeles)
Year Two of a Teacher Education Study: Focus Group
Interview Results
• Cindy M Casebeer (University of Alabama), Judith A Burry-Stock
(University of Alabama)
93
SESSION/SÉANCE 249
SESSION/SÉANCE 251
Toward a Topical Interest Group (TIG) Sponsored
Request for Proposals: Conducting Research to
Understanding Funder and Grantee Evaluation
and Reporting Needs, Practices, and
Innovations
LOCATION:
ESSEX BALLROOM
• Deborah Wasserman (Columbus Children’s Research Institute)
SESSION/SÉANCE 250
Evaluating Societal Impacts of Research and
Technology Programs
Evaluating HIV/AIDS Programs
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM C
• Chair(s) – Molly Engle (Oregon State University)
Do Donor HIV/AIDS Performance Monitoring Systems Fit Into
National Performance Monitoring Frameworks: The Case of
Uganda
• Augustine Wandera (Management Systems International)
Monitoring and Evaluation as a Tool in the Fight Against
HIV/AIDS Within Southern Africa
• Juliann Moodley (Manto Management)
Civil Society Organizations and the Fight Against AIDS in
Africa: Lessons for the Evaluation Community
LOCATION:
• Scott Chaplowe (Independent Consultant)
CONFERENCE ROOM B
développement
• Chair(s) – Susan E Cozzens (Georgia Institute of Technology)
Feasibility of Using Project Outcomes Data to Evaluate
Partnership for Innovation Program of National Science
Foundation
• David Roessner (SRI International), Jongwon Park (SRI International),
James McCullough (SRI International)
How to Assess the Societal Impacts of Public Research
Organisations? Methods, Practices and Utilization
• Pirjo Kutinlahti (VTT Technology Studies), Kirsi Hyytinen (VTT
Technology Studies), Kaisa Lähteenmäki-Smith (Nordregio)
Closing the Gap: Science and Technology, Evaluation, and
Inequalities
• Susan E Cozzens (Georgia Institute of Technology)
Cross-Culturally Sensitive HIV Prevention for Latino Men:
Evaluation Plans and Outcomes from the SOLAAR Program
• Ross F Conner (University of California, Irvine), Eloy Ortiz (University
of California Irvine), Lois M Takahashi (University of California, Los
Angeles)
SESSION/SÉANCE 253
Training, Communication, Quality, and Buy-In:
Critical Issues in Two Models of Site
Management
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM E
• Chair(s) – Jennifer D Dewey (ORC Macro International)
How (or How Not) to Train Site Visitors, Site Contacts, and
Field Evaluators
• Mary Nistler (Learning Point Associates), Freda L Brashears (ORC
Macro International)
Why Do I See a “7” on This Five-Point Scale?:
Quality Assurance in Site Management
• Jennifer D Dewey (ORC Macro International), Mary Nistler (Learning
Point Associates)
Fifty E-mails on the Same Topic Later: Improving
Communication With Every Last Party
• Freda L Brashears (ORC Macro International), Jennifer D Dewey (ORC
Everyone Together: Buy-In and Investment From Multiple
Stakeholders
• Jennifer D Dewey (ORC Macro International), Freda L Brashears (ORC
94
A Post-Positivist Perspective on Ethics in Evaluation
SESSION/SÉANCE 254
Higher Education Assessment at the
Program Level: General Frameworks
• Melvin M Mark (Penn State University)
Cultivating Self as Responsive Instrument: Working the
Boundaries and Borderlands for Ethical Border Crossings
LOCATION:
• Hazel Symonette (University of Wisconsin, Madison)
CONFERENCE ROOM F
• Chair(s) – Linda P Thurston (Kansas State University)
• Discussant(s) – Constance C Schmitz (Professional Evaluation
Services)
When the Review Process is Reviewed: Issues for Theory and
Practice in Higher Education Program Review
• Trevor Gambell (University of Saskatchewan), Tonya Wirchenko
Crossing the Boundaries of Multiple Accreditation Boards:
Enhancing Program Understanding and Management
• Cathy C Kaufman (Indiana University of Pennsylvania)
Academic Freedom and Program Review: Tensions and
Potential Conflicts
• Trevor Gambell (University of Saskatchewan)
SESSION/SÉANCE 255
The Dilemma of Anonymous Services:
Using Program Theory and Other Strategies
to Evaluate Programs Serving “Hard to Reach”
People
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM G
• Jason Newberry (Centre for Research and Education in Human
Services)
• Andrew R Taylor (Centre for Research and Education in Human
Services)
Ethics at the Border of Regulation and Social Justice
• Linda Mabry (Washington State University, Vancouver)
SESSION/SÉANCE 257
International Perspectives on Evaluating
Capacity Development: An Exploration of
Theoretical and Practical Issues
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Charles S Lusthaus (Universalia Management Group)
• Discussant(s) – Fred Carden (International Development Research
Centre)
Evaluating Capacity Development: Review of Experience
in Research and Development Organizations
• Douglas E Horton (Consultative Group on International Agricultural
Research), Jamie Watts (International Plant Genetic Resources
Institute)
The Monitoring and Evaluating of Capacity: Results From a
Study
• Peter Morgan (European Centre for Development Policy
Management)
Theoretical and Practical Concerns in Evaluating Capacity
Development: A Case Study of a Donor Organization
• Charles S Lusthaus (Universalia Management Group), Stephanie
Neilson (Universalia Management Group), Marie Helene Adrien
(Universalia Management Group)
SESSION/SÉANCE 256
Ethical Issues in Program Evaluation at the
Borders and the Cross-Lands
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Donna M Mertens (Gallaudet University)
• Discussant(s) – Thomas Schwandt (University of Illinois at Urbana)
Ethics at the Paradigmatic Borders
• Donna M Mertens (Gallaudet University)
Unpacking the Boundaries of Propriety in Evaluation
• Rodney K Hopson (Duquesne University)
95
SESSION/SÉANCE 258
La Stratégie d’intervention agir autrement
pour la réussite scolaire des adolescents
québécois de milieux défavorisés :
Description et résultats préliminaires du
programme d’évaluation longitudinal /
The New Approaches, New Solutions
Intervention Strategy Fostering Academic
Success for Québec Adolescents in
Disadvantaged Areas: Description and
Preliminary Results of the Longitudinal
Evaluation Program
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
CITY HALL
• Chair(s) – Phil Abrami (Concordia University)
• Discussant(s) – Lyne Martin (Ministère de l’Éducation du Québec)
La Stratégie d’intervention agir autrement : vue d’ensemble
du programme et de son devis d’évaluation / The New
Approaches New Solutions Intervention Strategy: Overview
of the Program and Its Evaluation Guide
Analyse des planifications des écoles participant à la
Stratégie d’Intervention Agir Autrement (SIAA) / Analysis
of Planning by Schools Participating in the New Approaches,
New Solutions Strategy (NANS)
• François Bowen (Université de Montréal), Jean L Bélanger (Université
du Québec à Montréal), Jonathan Lévesque (Université de Montréal),
Gilles Roy (Université de Montréal), Michel Janosz (Université de
Montréal)
Les conditions de succès d’une approche touchant 196
écoles, 5 000 professeurs, 30 000 élèves: bigger is better
ou small is beautiful? / The Conditions for the Successful
Approach in 196 Schools, 5,000 Teachers, 30,000 Students:
“Bigger Is Better” or “Small Is Beautiful”
• Christian Dagenais (Université de Montréal), Michel Janosz
(Université de Montréal), Jean L Bélanger (Université du Québec à
Montréal), François Bowen (Université de Montréal), Gilles Roy
(Université de Montréal)
SESSION/SÉANCE 259
Applications of Item Response Theory/Rasch
Measurement in Evaluation
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
ELGIN
• Michel Janosz (Université de Montréal), Phil Abrami (Concordia
University), Jean L Bélanger (Université du Québec à Montréal),
François Bowen (Université de Montréal), Sylvie Cartier (Université de
Montréal), Roch Chouinard (Université de Montréal), Christian
Dagenais (Université de Montréal), Nadia Desbiens (Université de
Montréal), Jean-Sebastien Fallu (Université de Montréal)
La stratégie Agir autrement : Modèle théorique de sa mise
en oeuvre et données préliminaires de validation de ses deux
premières années / The New Approaches, New Solutions
Strategy: Theoretical Model of Its Implementation and
Preliminary Data Validating the First Two Years
• Kendon J Conrad (University of Illinois at Chicago), Michael L Dennis
(Chestnut Health Systems), Nikolaus Bezruczko (Independent
Consultant)
• Jean L Bélanger (Université du Québec à Montréal), François Bowen
(Université de Montréal), Gilles Roy (Université de Montréal), Michel
Janosz (Université de Montréal), Anne Pétrin (Université du Québec à
Montréal), Christian Dagenais (Université de Montréal)
• Chair(s) – Wendy M Garrard (Vanderbilt University)
Measuring Pre/Post Change in the Substance Problems Scale
With the Rasch Model
Assessing Outcomes: Questioning Measurement Precision
• Ann Doucette (The George Washington University)
Application of Rasch Model to Develop a Mental Health
Screening Checklist at Urban Child Care Settings
• Yueh-Wen Chang (California State University, Stanislaus), Thomas
Bleecker (San Francisco Department of Public Health), Deborah L
Sherwood (San Francisco Department of Public Health)
Accessibility of Trails and Walking Paths for Persons With
Disabilities: A Many Facet Rasch Analysis
• Barth Riley (University of Illinois at Chicago)
96
SESSION/SÉANCE 260
SESSION/SÉANCE 262
Government Sponsored Evaluations in the Field
of Public Health
Intercultural Dimensions of Learning and
Performance Evaluation
LOCATION:
LOCATION:
WENTWORTH
• Chair(s) – Kathleen E Del Monte (Florida Legislature)
HURON
Regional Incubators: Innovative Approaches to Strengthening
Capacity in North Carolina Local Public Health Agencies
• Chair(s) – Storm J Russell (Centre for Intercultural Learning)
• Mary V Davis (University of North Carolina), John Graham (University
of North Carolina), Rachel Stevens (University of North Carolina),
Edward Baker (University of North Carolina)
• Douglas H MacDonald (Centre for Intercultural Learning)
The Evaluation Challenges of Performance Measurement in
Network Environments: An Example From Public Health
• Amy S DeGroff (Georgia State University), Judith M Ottoson
(Georgia State University)
Effectiveness of Community Interventions Project: Framework
for Assessing Government Funded Community Health
Interventions
• Alison M Jetté (Public Health Agency of Canada), Sylvie Desjardins
(Public Health Agency of Canada)
SESSION/SÉANCE 261
Evaluation Methodologies for Identifying
Innovations for Scale-Up
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
KENORA
Intercultural Evaluation: Historical Context and Challenge
Theoretical Framework and Methodological Approach for an
Intercultural Evaluation
• Storm J Russell (Centre for Intercultural Learning)
Intercultural Evaluation: A Research Example and Applications
• Storm J Russell (Centre for Intercultural Learning)
The Importance of “Culture” in Intercultural Evaluation
• Brigitte Lapierre (Centre for Intercultural Learning)
SESSION/SÉANCE 263
Make Your Evaluation Report Come Alive:
Engaging Stakeholders in Interpreting Data
LOCATION:
KENT
• Chair(s) – Chantal C Follett (University of Michigan)
• Leena Mangrulkar (Formative Evaluation Research Associates)
• John A Seeley (Formative Evaluation Research Associates)
• Chair(s) – Richard Kohl (Management Systems International)
The Role of Evaluations in the Management Systems
International Scaling-Up Framework
• Richard Kohl (Management Systems International), Larry Cooley
(Management Systems International)
Rapid Evaluation Methodology for Identifying Potential ScaleUp Models
• Manish Subharwal (Management Systems International), Molly
Hageboeck (Management Systems International)
Evaluating an Organizational Innovation for Possible
Scaling-Up
• Savi Mull (Management Systems International), Molly Hageboeck
(Management Systems International)
97
Bridging Two Worlds: An Example of a Cross-Site Evaluation
SESSION/SÉANCE 264
Principles and Practice for Evaluating
Educational and Professional Development
Initiatives
LOCATION:
• Margaret A McKenna (University of Washington)
Crossing the Great Divide? Evaluation Knowledge and
Multi-Culturalism
• Joanne Farley (Farley & Associates)
SIMCOE
• Chair(s) – Xiaofan Cai (Western Michigan University)
Effects of Human Subjects Research and Institutional Review
Boards on Evaluation
• D D Fahey (Ohio State University), James W Altschuld (Ohio State
University)
Mixed Methods Approach With Diverse Stakeholder Groups:
An Evaluation of the College English Curriculum
Implementation in China
• Hong Wang (Queen’s University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 267
Essential Competencies for Program Evaluators:
Does Context Matter?
LOCATION:
•
•
•
•
Chair(s) – Jane E Minnema (University of Minnesota)
Gail Ghere (Program Evaluation Consultant)
Jean A King (University of Minnesota)
Laurie Stevahn (Seattle University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 269
Evaluating Health Interventions: The Analyse et Evaluation
des Interventions en Santé Transdisciplinary Training Program
• Nicole Leduc (University of Montreal), Jean-Marc Brodeur (University
of Montreal), Paul Lamarche (University of Montreal)
Comparing Teacher Preception of Content Professional
Development Using Online Survey
• Joshua T Goodman (University of North Carolina at Greensboro),
Deborah J Bartz (University of North Carolina at Greensboro), Terry A
Ackerman (University of North Carolina at Greensboro)
Transforming Principles Into Practice:
A Funder-Evaluator Panel on
Foundation-Commissioned Multicultural
Evaluations
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
EXECUTIVE
• Chair(s) – Astrid Hendricks-Smith (The California Endowment)
SESSION/SÉANCE 265
• Discussant(s) – Ricardo Millett (The Woods Fund)
Tools of the Trade: From Logic Models to
Evaluation Reports
LOCATION:
DUFFERIN
• Gary Miron (Western Michigan University)
• Barbara Wygant (Western Michigan University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 266
Shared Knowledge Across Borders:
Multiculturalism in Evaluation
Evaluation of The Colorado Trust’s Immigrant Integration
Strategy: Opportunities and Challenges
• Kien Lee (Association for the Study and Development of
Community), Soo-Jin Yoon (The Colorado Trust)
Applying the Principles of Multicultural Evaluation to
The California Endowment’s Hmong Refugee Resettlement
Health Project
• Traci Endo Inouye (Social Policy Research Associates), Rhonda Ortiz
(The California Endowment)
Applying Principles of Multicultural Evaluation of The Ford
Foundation’s Youth Leadership for Development Initiative
• Hanh Cao Yu (Social Policy Research Associates)
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Mehmet Dali Öztürk (Arizona State University)
Crossing the Divide Between Policy Implementation and
Program Evaluation: Managing Contextual Factors With
Intercultural Sensitivity
• Christopher M Rogers (University of Minnesota)
98
SESSION/SÉANCE 270
Collaborating Meaningfully Across Cultures
LOCATION:
GINGERSNAP
• Chair(s) – Bebe Ivanochko (Northlands College)
The Formation of Binational Popular Power: Doing
Multicultural Evaluation for Social Change Without Borders
• Nuria Ciofalo (The California Endowment), Xochitl Castaneda
(University of California), Mario Gutierrez (The California
Endowment)
Use of the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale
(ECERS-R): Revised in a Preschool Community Assessment
Partnership – A Continuous Improvement Process
• Lauri Brugger (Children’s Institute)
Building a Community of Learners Through Program
Evaluation
• Rusti Berent (Children’s Institute), Esther Karp (Children’s Institute),
Amy Baker (Children’s Institute)
SESSION/SÉANCE 273
Roundtable Set Two
LOCATION:
The Use of Visual Methods in Cross-Cultural Settings
• Linda Liebenberg (University of Stellenbosch)
• Chair(s) – Zandra S Gratz (Kean University)
Collaborating Across Cultures for Responsive Evaluation
• Lynda Atack (Centennial College), Karen L Ray (Saint Elizabeth
Health Care), Nancy Lefebre (Saint Elizabeth Health Care)
Necessary Currency for Crossing Boundaries in Evaluation
• Christine L Emmons (Yale University Child Study Center)
SESSION/SÉANCE 271
Service Review and Improvement:
Applying Evaluation in the Municipal Sector
Using a Mixed-Methods Approach to Evaluate Websites
• Amy A Germuth (Compass Consulting Group)
Addressing Stakeholders’ Concerns About Methods Through
Participation: The 2004 Delphi Study of On-Farm Research
Needs
• Elena Polush (Iowa State University), Nancy Grudens-Schuck (Iowa
State University)
LOCATION:
GOLD RUSH
• Natasha Bartlett (Government of Ontario)
SESSION/SÉANCE 272
What Makes a Successful Community
Evaluation? A Study of the Rochester Early
Childhood Assessment Partnership (RECAP)
LOCATION:
ICE PALACE
Developmental Trajectories in Acquisition of Evaluation
Expertise: Negotiating Stages
• Ellen Lavelle (Southern Illinois University Edwardsville), E Duff
Wrobbel (Southern Illinois University Edwardsville)
Lessons Learned in Year One of a Multiyear, Multisite
Evaluation
• Pamela B Finney (University of North Carolina at Greensboro),
Melissa R Williams (University of North Carolina at Greensboro)
• Chair(s) – Rusti Berent (Children’s Institute)
• Karen M Reid (University of Nevada, Las Vegas)
What Makes A Successful Community Evaluation? A Study of
the Rochester Early Childhood Assessment Partnership
• A Dirk Hightower (Children’s Institute), Andrew MacGowan
(Rochester City School District)
Understanding Outcomes by Crossing Boundaries:
Triangulation, Partnerships, and Longitudinal Analyses
• Walt Gramiak (Children’s Institute), A Dirk Hightower (Children’s
Institute)
A Theory-Driven Evaluation for an Evolving Virtual High School
Building an Evidence-Based Youth Development Program:
Differing Roles for Research and Evaluation
• Roger Rennekamp (Oregon State University), Mary Marczak
(University of Minnesota)
Evaluating the Impact of Continuous Improvement in Schools
• Anjum Halai (Aga Khan University), Stephen E Anderson (Ontario
Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto)
99
SESSION/SÉANCE 274
1:40 pm – 3:10 pm / 13h40 – 15h10
Using Qualitative Methods in Real Time
Evaluations
LOCATION:
PINNACLE
• Pennie G Foster-Fishman (Michigan State University)
• Miles McNall (Michigan State University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 277
State Versus the Public: The Case Against
Performance Measurement Systems
Debate / Débat
LOCATION:
GRAND BALLROOM WEST
12:45 pm – 1:30 pm / 12h45 – 13h30
SESSION/SÉANCE 275
American Evaluation Association Business
Meeting
Business Meeting / Séance administrative
LOCATION:
GRAND BALLROOM WEST
American Evaluation Association / Association américaine
d'évaluation
•
•
•
•
•
Sharon F Rallis (University of Massachusetts at Amherst)
Nick L Smith (Syracuse University)
Kathleen Bolland (University of Alabama)
Jean A King (University of Minnesota)
Melvin M Mark (Penn State University)
• Chair(s) – Stanley T Capela (HeartShare Human Services of New
York)
• Discussant(s) – Rakesh Mohan (Idaho State Legislature), Steve
Montague (Performance Management Network), Gene Lyle (Ramsey
County Community Human Services)
• Minakshi Tikoo (University of Connecticut)
• Gerd-Michael Hellstern (University of Kassel)
• David Bernstein (Westat)
SESSION/SÉANCE 278
Evidence, Practice, and Policy: Reconsiderations
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
Thematic Strand and Quantitative Methods: Theory and
Design TIG / Volet thématique et Les méthodes quantitatives :
théorie et conception
• Chair(s) – George Julnes (Utah State University)
• Discussant(s) – Stephanie L Shipman (US Government Accountability
Office), Frederick L Newman (Florida International University)
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: My Experiences on the
What Works Clearinghouse Technical Advisory Group
SESSION/SÉANCE 276
Canadian Evaluation Society Annual General
Meeting / Assemblée générale annuelle de
la Société canadienne d’Évaluation
• William R Shadish (University of California at Merced)
Meta-analysis, Evidence, and the Underpinnings of Causal
Inference
• William M Trochim (Cornell University)
LOCATION:
Evidence is Only Part of the Story
GRAND BALLROOM EAST
CES Executive Council / Conseil exécutif de la SCÉ
• Lee Sechrest (University of Arizona)
•
•
•
•
•
Carl Doucette, President/Président
Gwen Keith, Past President/Présidente sortant
Frankie Jordan, Vice-President/Vice-présidente
Sandra Bozzo, Treasurer/Trésorière
Barry Warrack, Administration Committee Chair/
Président du Comité d’administration
• Jim Cullen, Member Services Committee Chair/
Président du Comité des services aux membres
• Gerald Halpern, Professional Development Committee Chair/
Président du Comité de perfectionnement professionnel
100
Thursday, 1:40 pm – 3:10 pm / Concurrent Sessions
SESSION/SÉANCE 279
SESSION/SÉANCE 281
Evaluating Innovative Initiatives for Treating
Substance Use and Mental Health Problems
LOCATION:
V.I.P
Trauma Treatment for Persons in Substance Abuse Care:
Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
• Linda K Frisman (University of Connecticut), Julian D Ford (University
of Connecticut), Hsiu-Ju Lin (University of Connecticut)
The Effectiveness of Reducing Illegal Blood Alcohol
Concentration Limits for Driving: Evidence for Lowering the
Limit to .05 BAC in Canada
• James C Fell (Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation), Robert B
Voas (Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation)
Evaluating Interactive Health Communication in Peer-to-Peer
Substance Abuse Prevention and Health Promotion
• Les R Becker (Pacific Institute for Research & Evaluation), Ted R Miller
(Pacific Institute for Research & Evaluation), Dexter Taylor (Pacific
Institute for Research & Evaluation), Deborah M Galvin (Substance
Abuse and Mental Health Prevention), Julie A Sabol (ORC Macro
International)
Design and Findings from the Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration’s Evaluation of the
Buprenorphine Waiver Program
• Caroline C McLeod (Westat), Wendy B Kissin (Westat), L Joseph
Sonnefeld (Westat), Arlene Stanton (US Department of Health and
Human Services), James W Luckey (Westat)
SESSION/SÉANCE 280
LOCATION:
PEEL
• Chair(s) – Annette Gardner (University of California, San Francisco)
• Discussant(s) – Annette Gardner (University of California, San
Francisco)
Strategies for Evaluating Systems Change
• Pennie G Foster-Fishman (Michigan State University), Laurie A Van
Egeren (Michigan State University), Huilan Yang (WK Kellogg
Foundation)
Measuring the Effectiveness of Community Interventions for
Social Change: A Review of Evaluation Methods and
Directions
• Francis J Schweigert (Northwest Area Foundation)
Expanding Policy Advocacy Capacity:
Results From Years 1 and 2 of the Clinic Consortia
Policy and Advocacy Program Evaluation
• Annette Gardner (University of California, San Francisco), Astrid
Hendricks-Smith (The California Endowment)
Multi-site Initiative and Community-Based Project Logic
Models: Assessing Their Union and Use
• Jean Demmler (University of Denver), Soo-Jin Yoon (The Colorado
Trust)
SESSION/SÉANCE 282
Introduction to Network Analysis and Its Use
in Evaluation
Doing Cost –> Procedure –> Process –>
Outcome Analysis: Cost Analysis to Improve
Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Benefit
LOCATION:
Community Change Evaluation
YORK
• Brian T Yates (American University)
LOCATION:
NORFOLK
• Kimberly A Fredericks (Indiana State University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 283
Conducting a Randomized Experiment Without
Gathering Qualitative Data Is Like Betting on a
Two-Headed Horse: You Might Not Be Able to
Explain Which One “Won by a Nose”
LOCATION:
OXFORD
• Catherine A Callow-Heusser (EndVision Research and Evaluation)
• Daniel J Robertson (EndVision Research and Evaluation)
101
SESSION/SÉANCE 284
Learning in the Field: Models of Applied Projects
for Students
LOCATION:
CARLETON
• Chair(s) – Mary B Church (Pacific Resources for Education and
Learning)
Innovation in Teaching Evaluation: Building Reflexivity and
New Roles for “Teachers” and “Learners” Through the
Development of a Logic Model Learning Framework
• Joan M Nandlal (Centre for Addiction and Mental Health), Gregory
Kim (Centre for Addiction and Mental Health), Nuria Ribas (Centre
for Addiction and Mental Health), Cathy Callaghan (Centre for
Addiction and Mental Health)
An Outranking-Based Technique for Environmental Impact
Significance Assessment
• Rafael Monterde-Diaz (Technical University of Valencia), Vicente
Agustín Cloquell-Ballester (Technical University of Valencia), Víctor
Andrés Cloquell-Ballester (Technical University of Valencia),
Santamarina Siurana (Technical University of Valencia)
SESSION/SÉANCE 287
It’s Greek to Me: Using an Evaluation Tool to
Speak the Funders’ Language
LOCATION:
ESSEX BALLROOM
• Edie D Steele (Evaluation Enterprise)
• Paul Mastrodonato (Nonprofit Works)
Learning by Doing: Lessons on Teaching Program Evaluation
• Laura R Peck (Arizona State University)
Integrating Continuous Data Collection Into Graduate-Level
Student Experiences in Evaluation
• Laura Blasi (University of Central Florida), Lillian Thompson
(University of Central Florida)
Results and Discussion of the 2004 Survey of the
American Evaluation Association Independent
Consulting Topical Interest Group
WINDSOR ROOM EAST
• Chair(s) – Tania Jarosewich (Censeo Group)
• Discussant(s) – Christy Olenik Lynch (Partners in Evaluation and
Planning), Jo Ann Doino-Ingersoll (Strategic Research), Victoria L
Essenmacher (SPEC Associates), Jennifer E Williams (Association for
the Study and Development of Community)
SESSION/SÉANCE 286
International Innovations in Environmental
Program Evaluation
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM WEST
Environmental Program Evaluation TIG / Évaluation des
programmes environnementaux
• Chair(s) – Katherine Dawes (US Environmental Protection Agency)
The Effect-Evaluation of the Flemish Soil Sanitation Policy
• Joos Johanna Theo Gysen (University of Leuven), Hans Bruyninckx
(University of Wageningen), Kris Bachus (University of Leuven)
102
Performance Indicators and Assessment for
Different Levels of Research and Technology
Management
LOCATION:
SESSION/SÉANCE 285
LOCATION:
SESSION/SÉANCE 288
CONFERENCE ROOM B
développement
• Chair(s) – Jeanne W Powell (National Institute of Standards and
Technology)
Assessing Efficacy of Assistive Technology Transfers:
Validation of a Technology Transfer Model
• Vathsala I Stone (State University of New York at Buffalo), Douglas J
Usiak (Western New York Independent Living Center), Sajay
Arthanat (State University of New York at Buffalo), Katie Beaver
(State University of New York at Buffalo)
Crossing Methodological Borders to Develop and Implement
an Approach for Determining the Value of Energy Efficiency
Research and Development Programs
• Scott M Albert (GDS Associates), Helen Kim (New York State
Research & Development Authority), Rick S Ridge (Ridge &
Associates), Gretchen B Jordan (Sandia National Laboratories)
Different Levels of Performance Measures for Different Uses
in Science and Technology
• William G Kennedy (US Naval Research Laboratory)
Developing Alternative Measures of Technical Innovation for
Research Organizations
• Jonathon Mote (University of Maryland)
SESSION/SÉANCE 289
SESSION/SÉANCE 291
Evaluating Programs Serving Minority
Populations
Practical Tips: Many Sites, Many Cultures,
Many Methods
LOCATION:
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM C
• Chair(s) – M Sue Hamann (Coastal Area Health Education Center)
Needs Assessment of Health Care Access Issues in a Rural
Community; Using Data to Improve Access for Ethnic Minority
Populations
• Carla S King (Carla King & Associates)
Measuring the Influence of Cultural and Social Factors on
Cancer Treatment Decisions
• M Sue Hamann (Coastal Area Health Education Center), James D
Johnson (University of North Carolina at Wilmington), Nora E Noel
(University of North Carolina at Wilmington), Perri J Bomar
(University of North Carolina at Wilmington), Sandra J Diehl (Coastal
Area Health Education Center)
CONFERENCE ROOM E
• Sarah E Stachowiak (Organizational Research Services)
SESSION/SÉANCE 292
Understanding University Internal Review Boards:
Multiple Perspectives on Strategies for Surviving
and Learning From the Review Process
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM F
• Chair(s) – Neva Nahan (Wayne State University)
Evaluation of the Ethnic Health Institute’s Prostate Cancer
Initiative: Results and Key Lessons Learned
Why We Have Internal Review Boards and What It Is Like to
Sit Inside of One
• Mia Luluquisen (Alameda County Public Health Department), Sandra
Witt (Alameda County Public Health Department), Phillip Gardiner
(Gardiner and Associates), Gayle Cummings (CAMI Consulting),
Robyn Battle (CAMI Consulting), Ann Brekke-Yungert (Ethnic Health
Institute), Joyce Gray (Ethnic Health Institute), Frank Staggers (Ethnic
Health Institute)
• Neva Nahan (Wayne State University)
Experiences With Internal Review Boards From a Variety of
Disciplines’ Perspective
• Marie Colombo (Wayne State University)
Investigating Visual Researchers’ Experiences With
Institutional Review Boards
SESSION/SÉANCE 290
Client-Centered Criminal Justice and Public
Safety: Meeting Needs and Improving Services
• Bart Miles (Wayne State University), Stephen J Sills (Wayne State
University)
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM D
• Chair(s) – Quint Thurman (Texas State University)
Evaluation of Legal Aid Ontario’s Pilot Staff Family Law Offices
• Colin Meredith (Office of the Auditor General of Canada)
Evaluating Dating Violence Prevention Programs: Can We do
Better?
• Francine A Lavoie (Université Laval)
Deliberative Democracy in Practice: The Case of Police
Training
• Saville Kushner (University of the West of England)
103
SESSION/SÉANCE 293
SESSION/SÉANCE 295
Applications of Theory-based/Theory-driven
Evaluation
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM G
International Evaluation Standards
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Craig Russon (Programme Planning & Evaluation)
• Chair(s) – Katrina L Bledsoe (The College of New Jersey)
Evaluation Standards in an International Context
Applying the Theory-Driven Approach to Planning and
Developing a Non-Governmental Organization-Based
Voluntary Counseling and Testing Program in China
• Arnold Love (Independent Consultant)
• Huey T Chen (University of Alabama), Tom Creger (University of
Alabama at Birmingham)
Theory Within and Across Programs: A Normative Program
Theory Case Study and the Possibilities of Broader Theory
Use for Multi-Site Evaluations
• Tanner LeBaron Wallace (University of California, Los Angeles), Janet
S Lee (University of California, Los Angeles)
Background and History of the Joint Committee’s Program
Evaluation Standards
• Donald Yarbrough (University of Iowa)
The African Evaluation Guidelines
• Zenda Ofir (The World Conservation Union)
Standards for Australia and New Zealand: Questions, but Few
Answers Yet
• Douglas R Fraser (University of Tasmania)
Evaluating a Causal Explanation for a Vocational Program
for Substance Abusers: Method and Outcomes
The CARE International Evaluation Standards
• Laura E Blankertz (National Development and Research Institutes),
Stephen Magura (National Development and Research Institutes)
Evaluation Standards in Western Europe
Opening the Black Box of Driving Under the Influence/Drug
Court in Rural Idaho: A Program Theory Approach to
Program Evaluation
• Gregory S Wintz (Eastern Washington University), Anthony Cellucci
(Idaho State University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 294
Visions for an Inter-University Consortium of
University-Based Evaluation Programs
LOCATION:
• Jim Rugh (CARE International)
• Thomas Widmer (University of Zurich)
SESSION/SÉANCE 296
Program Evaluation and Performance
Measurement: Why Is the Boundary So Hard
to Cross? / L’évaluation de programme et la
mesure du rendement : pourquoi la frontière
est-elle si difficile à franchir?
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
CITY HALL
• Chair(s) – John Mayne (International Evaluation Research Group)
• Chair(s) – Stewart I Donaldson (Claremont Graduate University)
• Discussant(s) – Stewart I Donaldson (Claremont Graduate University),
Jean A King (University of Minnesota), Thomas Schwandt (University
of Illinois at Urbana), Michael Scriven (Western Michigan University)
• Christina A Christie (Claremont Graduate University)
Program Evaluation and Performance Measurement: Why the
Two Should Meet
• Jim McDavid (University of Victoria)
Evaluation can Cross the Boundaries: The Case of Transport
Canada
• Gail Young (Transport Canada)
Program Evaluation and Performance Measurement: A Need
to Strengthen the Link
• Terry Hunt (Treasury Board of Canada)
The Auditors Are Coming! The Auditors Are Coming!
• Barry Leighton (Office of the Auditor General of Canada)
104
SESSION/SÉANCE 297
SESSION/SÉANCE 300
Introduction to Logistic Regression: Dealing With
Dichotomous Dependent Variables
LOCATION:
ELGIN
• Dale E Berger (Claremont Graduate University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 298
Applying the American Evaluation Association
Guiding Principles to Ethical Issues in
Government Evaluation
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
Taking AIM: Demonstration of a Statewide WebBased Planning, Reporting and Evaluation
System
WENTWORTH
• Chair(s) – Ellen L Konrad (Independent Consultant)
• Discussant(s) – Leslie J Cooksy (University of California, Davis)
Ethics for Evaluators Who Are Federal Employees
• George F Grob (US Department of Health and Human Services)
Ethical Issues in State-Level Evaluation Settings
• Jules M Marquart (Foundation for Human Service Studies)
Local Government, Evaluating Your Friends
• Laurie J Hestness (Ramsey County Human Services)
SESSION/SÉANCE 299
LOCATION:
HURON
•
•
•
•
Chair(s) – Karen Ballard (University of Arkansas)
Nina Boston (University of Arkansas-Extension)
Mary Poling (University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture)
Steve Hall (University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service)
SESSION/SÉANCE 301
Motivation and Change Dynamics: Core
Organization Development Skills for Evaluators
LOCATION:
KENT
• Mary Nash Shawver (Fielding Graduate University)
• Charles McClintock (Fielding Graduate University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 302
The Culture of Evaluation and Evaluators:
Ethnographic, Competency, and Accessibility
Perspectives
Cross-cultural Evaluations: Explorations, Trends,
Models
LOCATION:
SIMCOE
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Nicole Leduc (University of Montreal)
KENORA
More Than “The Least Liked Person at a Cocktail Party”:
Ethnography of Program Evaluators
• Chair(s) – Tessie T Catsambas (EnCompass)
• Elena V Volkova (University of Minnesota), Boris B Volkov (University
of Minnesota)
Stranger in a Strange Land: The Evaluator as Other: An
Exploration of Cross-Cultural Evaluation
• Hayley M Cavino (Office of Professional Research & Development),
Laura Payne-Bourcy (The R/E/D Group)
Foregrounding Culture in Program Evaluation
• E M Ann Curry (University of Regina)
Balancing Cost With Coverage: Innovations That May Aid in
Providing Evaluation to Those Who Cannot Afford it
• Andrew M Wheeler (Southern Illinois University Carbondale), Hayley
L Dawson-Owens (Southern Illinois University Carbondale), Margaret
DiCocco (Southern Illinois University Carbondale), Terri Hitzke
(Southern Illinois University Carbondale)
Types of Racism and Cross-Cultural/Racial Evaluations
• Pauline E Brooks (Brooks Cross-Cultural and International
Evaluations)
Trends and Best Practices in International and Cross-Cultural
Evaluation
• Michael J Midling (Independent Consultant)
105
SESSION/SÉANCE 303
SESSION/SÉANCE 305
Building Evaluation Capacity in a Rural or
Frontier Setting
LOCATION:
DUFFERIN
• Discussant(s) – Mariah J Storey (University of Wyoming), Marc J
Homer (University of Wyoming), Lisa Parker (Fred Finch Youth
Center)
• Rodney A Wambeam (University of Wyoming)
• Laurel Parker West (University of Wyoming)
SESSION/SÉANCE 304
Community Based, Culturally Responsive
Evaluation: Building Bridges, Brokering Skills
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
The Revised American Evaluation Association
Guiding Principles for Evaluators and Culturally
Competent Evaluation Strategies: Implications
for Practice
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
Association
• Chair(s) – Elmima C Johnson (National Science Foundation)
• Discussant(s) – Melvin E Hall (Northern Arizona University)
The Revision of the Guiding Principles: The Process and
Outcomes
• Gail V Barrington (Barrington Research Group)
Culturally Responsive/Relevant Evaluation Practice
• Stafford Hood (Arizona State University)
• Chair(s) – Michelle Chino (University of Nevada, Las Vegas)
Cultural Perspectives in the Guiding Principles for Evaluators:
Examples and Implications for Training
• Veronica G Thomas (Howard University)
Community Based, Culturally Responsive Evaluation:
Building Relationships
Rubber Meets the Road: Applying American Evaluation
Association’s Guiding Principles and Culturally Competent
Evaluation in the Field
• Carolee Dodge Francis (Keweenaw Bay Ojibwa Community College)
• Phyllis L Clay (Youth Policy Research Group)
Community-Based, Culturally Responsive Evaluation:
Building Skills
• Lemyra DeBruyn (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
Working Together
• Lynn Short (Analytic Systems Associates)
SESSION/SÉANCE 306
Using Experimental Designs to Assess the
Impact of Educational Interventions of Student
Achievement
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
COSMOPOLITAN
Promoting Commitment
• Michelle Chino (University of Nevada, Las Vegas)
• Chair(s) – Karen Peterman (Goodman Research Group)
• Discussant(s) – Norma S Fleischman (US Department of Agriculture)
Using Findings From an Experimental Evaluation to Modify
Program and Evaluation Efforts
• Robert Keller (Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning)
Using an Experimental Design to Assess Literacy
Development in Early Childhood
• Irene Goodman (Goodman Research Group), Dreolin Fleischer
(Goodman Research Group)
Experimental Evaluation of a Science and Literacy Curriculum
• Karen Peterman (Goodman Research Group), Jennie Murack
(Goodman Research Group)
Evaluation Research for Educational Innovations:
Recommendations for the Field
• William R Penuel (SRI International)
106
SESSION/SÉANCE 307
Needs Assessment:
Applications Across Varied Settings
LOCATION:
EXECUTIVE
Needs Assessment TIG / Évaluation des besoins
• Chair(s) – Deborah H Kwon (The Ohio State University)
Using Needs Assessment Results as a Tool for Local Food
System Programming
• Rama B Radhakrishna (Penn State University), Joan S Thomson (Penn
State), Audrey N Maretzki (Penn State University)
Assessing the Need for a New Masters Program in College
Student Personnel: Working With Colleagues Across Campus
• Ellen Lavelle (Southern Illinois University Edwardsville), E Duff
Wrobbel (Southern Illinois University Edwardsville), Boyd Bradshaw
(Southern Illinois University Edwardsville), Mike Schultz (Southern
Illinois University Edwardsville)
Developing a Framework for Diversion: A Needs Assessment
Concerning Youth With Mental Health Issues in Contact With
the Law
• Linda N Yuval (University of Guelph), Kristi Kemp (Canadian Mental
Health Association), Janos Botschner (Canadian Mental Health
Association)
Use of Multi Methods to Cross Professional Borders in Needs
Assessment: A Lesson From Financial Educators’ Program
Evaluation Needs Assessment
• Koralalage SU Jayaratne (University of Georgia, Athens), Angela C
Lyons (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), Lance Palmer
(University of Georgia, Athens)
• Sheryl Goldberg (University of California, San Francisco), Steve
Lohrer (University of California, San Francisco), Carroll L Estes
(University of California, San Francisco), Milena Nelson (University of
California, San Francisco), Brooke Hollister (University of California
San Francisco)
Evaluating the Impact of Targeted Interventions in Complex
Systems: The American Cancer Society’s National Urban
School Health Leadership Institute as a Case Example
• Iris E Smith (Emory University), So Kuen Yue (Emory University),
Norma Aros (Catch Program), Nancy Blair (Cardinal Stritch
University), Chet Bradley (Cardinal Stritch University), Wayne Harris
(Independent Consultant), David Lohrmann (Indiana University), C J
Nickerson (Independent Consultant), Mary Waters (American Cancer
Society)
Blending Collaborative Evaluation and the Randomized
Controlled Trial: Serving the Diverse Needs of Client and
Evaluator
• Muhsin Michael Orsini (Tanglewood Research), David Wyrick
(Tanglewood Research), Rita O’Sullivan (University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill), Bill Hansen (Tanglewood Research)
SESSION/SÉANCE 309
The Challenge of Outcome Evaluation:
Measuring Training Outcomes in Workforce
Preparedness
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
GOLD RUSH
Prevention)
SESSION/SÉANCE 308
Experiences and Challenges in Mixed-Method
LOCATION:
Enhancing the Performance of Local Long Term Care
Ombudsman Programs: Experiences and Challenges of a
Collaborative Participatory Project
GINGERSNAP
• Chair(s) – Takayoshi Kusago (Osaka University)
Sisters Across Borders: A Case Study of 20 Years of
Outcomes for a Women’s Empowerment Program in the
United States and Canada
• Linda P Thurston (Kansas State University)
Challenges in Measuring System Impact of Training
• Joan P Cioffi (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Laura
Biesiadecki (Association of Schools of Public Health)
Evaluating Training for Public Health Workforce Preparedness:
Lessons Learned From the Centers for Public Health
Preparedness
• Andrea C Young (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention),
Marcia A Testa (Harvard School of Public Health), Louise Barden
(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
Improving Preparedness Through Training Supports and
Infrastructure
• Mary V Davis (University of North Carolina School of Public Health),
Lisa Macon Harrison (Harvard School of Public Health), Erin E
Rothney (Harvard School of Public Health), Pia DM MacDonald
(Harvard School of Public Health)
107
SESSION/SÉANCE 310
Evaluating Program Implementation:
Theory, Design, and Fidelity
Developing a Culture of Evaluation Within a Foundation: A
Case Study
• Meg V Blinkiewicz (The Skillman Foundation)
LOCATION:
ICE PALACE
• Chair(s) – Catherine E Johnson (School District of Philadelphia)
A Mixed-Method, Multi-Level Evaluation of Project Magnet
Education Resources for Information Technology
• Andrew McConney (Florida Gulf Coast University)
Examining Transferability of a Newly Developed Science
Education Program
• Elaine P Van Melle (Queen’s University at Kingston), Lyn M Shulha
(Queen’s University at Kingston)
Evaluating Program Implementation Under School Reform
• Catherine E Johnson (School District of Philadelphia)
Evaluation Consultants Tackle the Tough Questions: Sharing
Experiences and Answers About How to Start and Build Your
Practice
• Judah Viola (DePaul University), Susan D McMahon (DePaul
University)
Evaluation for School Improvement: The New Zealand
Education Review Office
• Karen M Sewell (Education Review Office), Michael J Hollings
(Government Department)
Evaluation of a 5 Year, Sustained Professional Development
Project Across a 4 State Region
Strategies for Assessing Fidelity to Program Implementation
in Educational Evaluation
• Karen L Bradley (Appalachia Educational Laboratory)
• Andrew K Rudd (Florida Gulf Coast University)
US Department of Education and American Evaluation
Association Positions on Randomized Control Group Trials:
Views of New and Used Evaluators
SESSION/SÉANCE 311
Roundtable Set Three
LOCATION:
• Phyllis A Kuehn (California State University, Fresno), Sharon BrownWelty (California State University, Fresno), David E Tanner (California
State University, Fresno), Conrad G Katzenmeyer (University of
Central Florida)
• Chair(s) – Zhicheng Zhang (Fairfax County Public Schools)
Purposeful Connectivity: Crossing the Boundaries Between
Alternative and Feeder Schools
The Role of Feedback and Evaluation in Setting Public Policy:
From Advocacy to New Policies
• Brenda A Sullivan (Independent Consultant), Pat Wigfall (North
Carolina Central University)
The Role of Data in Evaluation in Africa: The Case of
Botswana
• Imelda R Castañeda-Emenaker (University of Cincinnati)
Second Rotation – Roundtable E
Valuing Discussion by Expert Committees in a Research
Award Selection Process
• Michael Obrecht (Canadian Institutes of Health Research)
• G Nnunu Tsheko (University Of Botswana)
Collaboration or Confrontation: That Is the Question?
• Tara D Knott (Evaluation Resources)
108
SESSION/SÉANCE 312
3:20 pm – 4:50 pm / 15h20 – 16h50
Bringing Innovative Methods to Qualitative
Evaluation
LOCATION:
PINNACLE
• Chair(s) – Melissa Freeman (University of Georgia)
• Discussant(s) – Melissa Freeman (University of Georgia)
SESSION/SÉANCE 313
If You Build It, Will It Last? Insourcing:
An Alternative Approach to Capacity Building
Qualitative Photo Inquiry
LOCATION:
GRAND BALLROOM WEST
• Bianca E Montrosse (Claremont Graduate University)
Portfolio-Based Program Evaluation: Approaches and Models
•
•
•
•
•
• Tony C M Lam (University of Toronto), Marcella E Campbell
(University of Toronto)
Program Monitoring and Improvement Through Storytelling:
Adapting the Most Significant Change Technique
• Arlana Bobo Peterson (Albuquerque Public Schools), Curtis J Mearns
(Albuquerque Public Schools)
Chair(s) – Tom Miller (National Research Center)
Kerry Lupher (National Research Center)
Gregory Diggs (National Research Center)
Sabrina Arrendondo Mattson (National Research Center)
Deanna Hall LaFlamme (National Research Center)
SESSION/SÉANCE 314
Current Issues in Evaluation Theory, Methods and
Practice: Perspectives From Outside North
America
3:10 pm – 3:20 pm / 15h10 – 15h20
LOCATION:
Refreshment Break /
• Ross F Conner (University of California, Irvine)
• Nancy Porteous (Public Health Agency of Canada)
SESSION/SÉANCE 315
Reflecting Upon and Advances in Evaluation
Theory Categorization Systems
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
GRAND BALLROOM EAST
• Chair(s) – Christina A Christie (Claremont Graduate University)
• Discussant(s) – Yvonna Lincoln (Texas A&M University)
The Evaluation Theory Tree: Refined Growth
• Marvin Alkin (University of California at Los Angeles), Christina A
Christie (Claremont Graduate University)
Categorizing Evaluation Theories and Models
• Jody Fitzpatrick (University of Colorado, Denver)
Foundations of Program Evaluation: The Classification
Framework
• William R Shadish (University of California at Merced)
109
SESSION/SÉANCE 316
Measuring Environmental Strategies for
Substance Abuse Prevention
LOCATION:
V.I.P
• Chair(s) – Paul R Florin (University of Rhode Island)
Assessing Organizational Capacity to Employ Environmental
Strategies
• Carolyn Celebucki (University of Rhode Island)
Measuring the Effectiveness of Coalition-Delivered Strategies
for Preventing Alcohol-Related Problems
• Kristin J Quinlan (University of Rhode Island), Francione Witt
(University of Rhode Island)
Monitoring Environmental Strategy Efforts and Community
Effects
• Jessica Nargiso (University of Rhode Island)
Opioid Treatment and the Pursuit of Accreditation: Findings
from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration’s and the Center for Substance Abuse
Treatment’s (SAMHSA/CSAT) Opioid Treatment Program
Accreditation Evaluation
• Namratha Swamy (Northrop Grumman Health Solutions), Carolyn
Lichtenstein (Northrop Grumman Health Solutions), Arlene Stanton
(US Department of Health and Human Services), Kristin Zempolich
(Northrop Grumman Health Solutions), Danyelle Mannix (Northrop
Grumman Health Solutions), Brian T Yates (American University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 318
Evaluation Principles for Promoting Readiness for
Organisational Development Among Diverse
Nonprofits: Lessons Learned from a Small
Community
LOCATION:
PEEL
• C Julie Dunstan (Research & Evaluation Solutions)
SESSION/SÉANCE 317
Tricks of the Trade for Conducting Cost-Inclusive
Analyses and for Deciding Not to
LOCATION:
YORK
• Chair(s) – Brian T Yates (American University)
Transaction Cost-Based Approach to Program Evaluation:
Partnership Performance Assessment
• Denis Jobin (Health Canada)
Collaborative Cost-Benefit Analyses: Best Practices and
Lessons Learned
SESSION/SÉANCE 319
Systems in Evaluation TIG Business Meeting and
Presentation: Systems Thinking and Evaluation
LOCATION:
NORFOLK
• TIG Leader(s) – Patricia J Rogers (Royal Melbourne Institute of
Technology), Janice Noga (University of Cincinnati), Bob Williams
(Independent consultant)
• Chair(s) – Bob Williams (Independent consultant)
• Discussant(s) – Tessie T Catsambas (EnCompass), Thomas J Chapel
(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Iraj Imam (Center for
Applied Local Research)
• Michael Long (ORC Macro International)
Cost Effectiveness in Program Evaluation: When It Works and
When It Doesn’t
• Sarah E Heinemeier (Compass Consulting Group)
110
SESSION/SÉANCE 320
SESSION/SÉANCE 321
Constructing the Basis for the Brazilian AIDS
Program Evaluation: Integrating Efforts for
Building Local Capacity and Monitoring
Information
LOCATION:
OXFORD
• Chair(s) – Aristides Barbosa Jr (Nacional AIDS and DST Program)
Learning About the Process of Doing Evaluation:
From Standards to Competencies
LOCATION:
CARLETON
• Chair(s) – Neva Nahan (Wayne State University)
Identifying a Core Body of Knowledge for Evaluators:
A Study of Program Evaluation Field Practices
Building Programs Through Effective Alliances: The
Cooperation Experience Between Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention’s Global AIDS Program and the Brazilian
National Program on Sexually Transmitted Diseases and AIDS
• Marthe Hurteau (Université du Québec à Montréal), Sylvain Houle
(Université du Québec à Montréal), Julie Duval (Université du
Québec à Montréal)
• William Brady (National AIDS and DST Program), Suzanne Westman
(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Aristides Barbosa Jr
(National AIDS and DST Program), Ana Roberta Pascom (National
AIDS and DST Program), Leandro Montiero (National AIDS and DST
Program), Elizabeth M dos Santos (Fundação Oswaldo Cruz), Celia L
Szwarcwald (Centro de Informacao Científica e Tecnológica)
• Linda Heath (Loyola University, Chicago), Adam DeHoek (Loyola
University Chicago), Sara House (Loyola University Chicago)
MONITORAIDS: A Useful Tool for Monitoring and Evaluating
the Brazilian AIDS Program
• Celia L Szwarcwald (Centro de Informacao Científica e Tecnológica)
Development of an Integrated Curriculum in Program
Evaluation: A Promising Brazilian Experience at the
Professional and Master Degree Level
• Elizabeth M dos Santos (Fundação Oswaldo Cruz), Ana Roberta
Pascom (National AIDS and DST Program), Sonia Natal (The National
School of Public Health Sergio Arouca), Marly Cruz (National School
of Public Health-FIOCRUZ), Maria Elizabeth Correa (Faculdade de
Medicina de Marília), Maria Teresa Seabra Alves (Universidade
Federal do Maranhão), Maria Christina Baggio (Programa Nacional
de DST/AIDS-UDHI), Aristides Barbosa Jr (National AIDS and DST
Program), William Brady (National AIDS and DST Program), Suzanne
Westman (National AIDS and DST Program)
Balancing “Honesty/Integrity” With “Respect for People
Understanding Practice Through Exemplary Evaluation Cases
• Sheila A Arens (Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning)
Evaluation Competency Validation and Process Use for
Evaluation Capacity Building
• Catherine Bingle (Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit), Peggy
Govers (Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit)
SESSION/SÉANCE 322
Community and Social Psychology Applications
in Environmental Program Evaluation
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM EAST
• Chair(s) – MaryLynn Quartaroli (Northern Arizona University)
Addressing Health Disparities in California through a Multi-site
Evaluation of Environmental Asthma Risk Factors: Moving
Toward Community Indicators
• Mary Kreger (University of California, San Francisco), Diane M
Manuel (The California Endowment), Claire Brindis (University of
California, San Francisco), Lauren Sassoubre (University of California,
San Francisco), Heriberto Escamilla (Research Associates of San
Diego)
What Happens After the Workshop? Using an Integrated
Model to Predict, Explain, and Influence Educator Behavior
• Elizabeth H Danter (Independent Consultant)
Changing Environmental Behaviors With Community Based
Social Marketing
• Linda F Dethman (Dethman & Associates)
111
SESSION/SÉANCE 323
Innovative Evaluation Methods in Social Welfare
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM WEST
Social Work TIG / Travail social
• Chair(s) – Margaret L Polinsky (Parents Anonymous)
Identifying Indicators of Successful Reentry for Offenders
With Mental Illness in a Metropolitan Jail:
A Concept Mapping Process
• Schnavia J Smith (University of Kansas)
A Realist Evaluation Approach to Demonstrating the
Implementation and Institutionalization of Parent
Leadership in Family Service Agencies
• Margaret L Polinsky (Parents Anonymous), Mansoor AF Kazi
(University of Huddersfield)
Meeting the Challenges of Child Welfare Services Evaluation
Through Developmental and Realist Approaches
• Anne J Atkinson (PolicyWorks Ltd), Jackie M Burgeson (United
Methodist Family Services of Virginia)
Crossing the Rubicon: Critical Legal Studies, Evaluation
Theory, and Welfare Reform
• Elizabeth K Hayden (Northeastern University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 324
Success Case Method Evaluations in the
Context of Nonprofit Organizations
LOCATION:
ESSEX BALLROOM
• Chair(s) – Teresa R Behrens (WK Kellogg Foundation)
• Discussant(s) – Robert O Brinkerhoff (Western Michigan University),
Michael Scriven (Western Michigan University)
The Success Case Method in Human and Social Service
Contexts: A Different Meaning of the Terms Success and
Return On Investment
• Daniela C Schroeter (Western Michigan University), Chris LS Coryn
Applying the Success Case Method as Part of the Institutional
Evaluation of a Nonprofit Organization
• Thomaz K Chianca (Western Michigan University), John Risley
SESSION/SÉANCE 325
Evaluating Research Dynamics and Programs
Using Social Network Analysis
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM B
développement
• Chair(s) – Caroline S Wagner (George Washington University)
Science Parks as Knowledge Organizations:
The ‘ba’ in Action?
• Finn Hansson (Copenhagen Business School)
The Critical Link: Evaluating Research Dynamics Using
Network Analysis
• Caroline S Wagner (George Washington University), Frank
Cunningham (European Commission)
Social Network-Based Design of Collaborative Research
Program Evaluation
• Brian L Zuckerman (Center for Science and Technology Policy
Studies), Linda E Kupfer (National Institutes of Health)
Using Social Networks Methodology to Evaluate Research and
Development Programs
• Nicholas S Vonortas (George Washington University), Franco Malerba
(L Bocconi University)
Using Success Case Method to Assess Hard to Measures
Outcomes Within a Foundation-Wide Organizational
Development Initiative
• Tony Berkley (WK Kellogg Foundation), Gwen Day (WK Kellogg
Foundation), Sarah Smith (WK Kellogg Foundation), Thomaz K
Chianca (Western Michigan University)
112
SESSION/SÉANCE 326
Evaluating Community-Based Health Initiatives:
Caveats and Considerations
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM C
Building Cross-Cultural Intersections for Participatory
Evaluation of the Aboriginal Offender Substance Abuse
Program
• Virginia M McGowan (Correctional Service Canada), Peggy Mullins
(Correctional Service Canada)
Meeting the Needs of All or None? Development of an
Evaluation Framework for Federal Correctional Programs
• Chair(s) – Suzanne M Randolph (University of Maryland)
• Franca A Cortoni (Correctional Service Canada)
Development of Data Collection Instruments for Monitoring
the Project Activities of Community-Based Organizations
Involved in Health Initiatives
• Kevin K Hylton (MayaTech Corporation), Denise Stockton (MayaTech
Corporation), James Gajarsa (MayaTech Corporation), Ayana Perkins
(MayaTech Corporation), Erika Taylor (MayaTech Corporation)
Data Collection and Technical Assistance Techniques for a
Multi-Organization Evaluation
SESSION/SÉANCE 328
Findings From the Safe Schools/Healthy Students
Cross-Site Evaluation: Partnerships, Prevention
Interventions, School Violence and Safety,
and School Climate
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM E
• Wakina Scott (MayaTech Corporation), Ayana Perkins (MayaTech
Corporation), Patryce Curtis (MayaTech Corporation), Victor Ramirez
(MayaTech Corporation), Denise Stockton (MayaTech Corporation)
Examining the Use of Optical Character Recognition Software
as a Data Processing Tool: Considerations for Data
Management
The Influence of Partnership-Related Indicators on
Implementation, Policy Development, and Service Integration
• Erika Taylor (MayaTech Corporation), Nakia Brown (MayaTech
Corporation), Denise Stockton (MayaTech Corporation), Karen Golatt
(MayaTech Corporation)
Utilization of an Electronic Database in the Evaluation of
Multi-site, Community-Based Health Initiatives
• Lilliana Morales (MayaTech Corporation), Patryce Curtis (MayaTech
Corporation), Michael Burnett (MayaTech Corporation), Ravena
Chase (MayaTech Corporation), Lisa Bagley (MayaTech Corporation),
Kevin K Hylton (MayaTech Corporation)
SESSION/SÉANCE 327
Meeting Contemporary Challenges in
Evaluation Of Interventions in Canadian Federal
Correctional Programs
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – James V Trudeau (RTI International)
• Phillip W Graham (RTI International), Jason Williams (RTI
International)
School Violence and Safety in the Safe Schools/Healthy
Students Initiative
• James V Trudeau (RTI International), Antonio Morgan Lopez (RTI
International)
School Climate as Outcomes of the Safe Schools/Healthy
Students Initiative
• Steve Murray (RMC Research Corporation), Allen Schenck (RMC
Research Corporation), Margaret Beam (RMC Research Corporation)
SESSION/SÉANCE 329
Assessment and Evaluation in Medical Education
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM D
CONFERENCE ROOM F
• Chair(s) – Brian A Grant (Correctional Service Canada)
• Discussant(s) – Brian Rush (Centre for Addiction and Mental Health)
• Chair(s) – George Armstrong (Tougaloo College)
Challenges to Generalizability: A Case Study From the
Evaluation of Intensive Support Units for Federal Offenders
• Brian A Grant (Correctional Service Canada)
Data Integrity for Evaluation of the Methadone Maintenance
Treatment Program for Federal Offenders: Working Across
Operational Demands and Research Needs
• Dan A Kunic (Correctional Service Canada)
Assessing Medical Resident Competence: When State of the
Practice Collides With State of the Art
• M Sue Hamann (Coastal Area Health Education Center)
Evaluation of a Geriatrics Training Program for Medical
Students
• Summers Kalishman (University of New Mexico), Jan Mines
(University of New Mexico), Lisa Serna (University of New Mexico
School of Medicine), Carla Herman (University of New Mexico), Chris
Hayward (University of New Mexico School of Medicine)
113
SESSION/SÉANCE 330
SESSION/SÉANCE 332
Evaluation Managers and Supervisors
TIG Business Meeting and Presentation:
Crossing Boundaries Without Getting Cross:
How to Enrich Evaluation Work With Diverse
Graduate Students and Nontraditional Staff
While Developing Their Abilities and
Maintaining High Quality Work Product
Business Meeting(p) / Séance administrative
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM G
Evaluation Managers and Supervisors TIG / Gestionnaires et
superviseurs d’évaluation
• TIG Leader(s) – George F Grob (US Department of Health and
Human Services), Robert Vito (US Department of Health and Human
Services), Ann Maxwell (US Department of Health and Human
Services), Sue Hewitt (Health District of Northern Larimer County)
• Carol R Fendt (University of Illinois at Chicago)
• Sara R Stoelinga (University of Illinois at Chicago)
• Stacy A Wenzel (University of Illinois at Chicago)
SESSION/SÉANCE 331
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Scott Chaplowe (Independent Consultant)
Evaluation for Multiple Stakeholders in International Economic
Development: Lessons Learned from CARE
• Monica L Oliver (Georgia State University)
Puttng the ‘M’ Back in ‘MandE’: Issues and Strategies from
Program and Project Monitoring for International Development
• Anne E Gillies (Universalia Management Group)
How Hungry is Too Hungry: Measuring Household Food
Insecurity Across Cultures
• Paula Bilinsky (Academy for Educational Development), Jennifer C
Coates (Tufts University School of Nutrition Science and Policy)
SESSION/SÉANCE 333
Aggregating and Disaggregating Data
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
Developing Measurement Tools for
Cross-cultural and International Evaluations
Celebrating 20 Years of Dissemination:
Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation /
Célébrant 20 années de dissémination :
La Revue canadienne d’évaluation de
programme
• Chair(s) – Lee Sechrest (University of Arizona)
Understanding Data Aggregation and Disaggregation
LOCATION:
CITY HALL
• Lee Sechrest (University of Arizona)
Disaggregation and the Ecological Fallacy
• Chair(s) – J Bradley Cousins (University of Ottawa)
• Souraya Sidani (University of Toronto)
Two Decades of the Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation:
A Content Analysis
Aggregating Data: The Whole May be Less Than the
Sum of the Parts
• Katherine M McKnight (University of Arizona)
• Emily L Addison (University of Ottawa), Courtney F Amo (Social
Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada)
Analyses of Aggregated or Disaggregated Data
Trends, Issues, and Challenges in Evaluation Practice in Child
Welfare in Canada
• Mei-kuang Chen (University of Arizona)
• Robert Flynn (University of Ottawa)
Quid Tum: The Context for Evaluation in Human Services
• Jackie Sieppert (University of Calgary)
Methodological Challenges in Evaluating School Improvement
in Canada
• Lorna Earl (University of Toronto)
The Evolution of Evaluation in the Canadian Federal
Government Sector
• Bob Segsworth (Laurentian University)
114
Quality of Evaluative Information at the World Bank
SESSION/SÉANCE 334
Crossing Methodological Boundaries: ContextAppropriate Method-Choice
• Patrick Grasso (World Bank)
“Neat and Tidy ... and 100% Correct”: Assuring the Quality of
Supreme Audit Institution Performance Audit Work
LOCATION:
• Jeremy Lonsdale (UK National Audit Office)
ELGIN
• Chair(s) – Frederick L Newman (Florida International University)
Crossing Methodological Borders: The Unique Character of
Reasoning in Mixed Methods
SESSION/SÉANCE 337
Online Focus Groups: No Borders
LOCATION:
HURON
• Eunice Eunhee Jang (University of Toronto)
When “Crossing Boundaries” Rates a Yellow Light: Should The
Gold Standard of Randomized Clinical Trials Cross Over to
Social Policy Evaluation?
• Christine E Frank (Georgian College)
• Lisa Low (Itracks)
• Judith A Droitcour (US Government Accountability Office), Mary
Grace Kovar (University of Chicago)
Why Bother Crossing Methodological Boundaries? Elaborating
Mediated and Moderated Relationships
• George Julnes (Utah State University)
When “Crossing Boundaries” Rates a Green Light Using
Qualitative Methods to Assess Potential Bias in
Experimental/Quantitative Studies
• Valerie J Caracelli (US Government Accountability Office)
SESSION/SÉANCE 335
Government Evaluation TIG Business Meeting
LOCATION:
WENTWORTH
• TIG Leader(s) – Kent Hutchinson (Florida Legislature Office of
Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability), Minakshi
Tikoo (University of Connecticut), Katie Bates (Georgia Department
of Audits and Accounts)
SESSION/SÉANCE 336
SESSION/SÉANCE 338
Building Capacity to Conduct Evaluations
Across Partners, Regions, and Cultures
LOCATION:
KENT
• Chair(s) – Heather H Boyd (University of Wisconsin)
Framework for Crossing Cultural Boundaries in Extension
Evaluation
• Koralalage SU Jayaratne (University of Georgia, Athens), John J
House Jr (Center for Learning Connections)
Building Evaluation Capacity: Lessons From a 2 Year
Technical Assistance Project
• Gary Miron (Western Michigan University), Shawn M Kana’iaupuni
(Kamehameha Schools)
Crossing Boundaries: Development of a National Community
Nutrition Education Logic Model Online Program Management
and Reporting System
• Helen Chipman (US Department of Agriculture)
Assuring the Quality of Evaluative Information:
An International Perspective
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
KENORA
• Chair(s) – John Mayne (International Evaluation Research Group)
• Discussant(s) – Marie-Louise Bemelmans-Videc (Parliament of the
Netherlands), Natalia E Pane (American Institutes for Research)
Instruments and Procedures for Assuring Evaluation Quality:
A Swiss Perspective
• Thomas Widmer (University of Zurich)
115
SESSION/SÉANCE 339
SESSION/SÉANCE 341
Evaluation and Research in Foundations: Models
and Issues for the Arts, Culture, and Beyond
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
Review of Proposed American Evaluation
Association Public Statement on the Importance
of Cultural Competence in Evaluation
SIMCOE
Evaluating the Arts and Culture TIG and Non-profit and
Foundations Evaluation TIG / Évaluation des arts et de la
culture et l’évaluation des organismes sans but lucratif et des
fondations
• Chair(s) – Nicole Trentacoste (Pew Charitable Trusts)
Evaluation and Foundations:
Perspectives From an Arts Consulting Firm
• David B Pankratz (Emc.Arts)
Evaluation, Research, and Foundations:
Perspectives From The Wallace Foundation
LOCATION:
Multiethnic Issues in Evaluation TIG, Feminist Issues in
Evaluation TIG, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender Issues
TIG, and Special Needs Populations TIG / Les questions liées
à la multiethnicité en évaluation, les questions féministes en
évaluation, les questions liées à l’homosexualité, à la bisexualité
et à la transexualité, et les populations à besoins spéciaux
• Chair(s) – Melvin E Hall (Northern Arizona University)
• Discussant(s) – Karen Kirkhart (Syracuse University), Elizabeth
Whitmore (Carleton University), Cindy A Crusto (Yale University
School of Medicine)
• Ann Stone (The Wallace Foundation)
Evaluation, Research, and Foundations:
Perspectives From Beyond the Arts and Culture
• Jana Kay Slater (Public Health Institute)
SESSION/SÉANCE 342
Evaluation Bookends:
What it Used to be Like and What Happened
Panel / Panel
SESSION/SÉANCE 340
LOCATION:
Using Empowerment and Participatory
Strategies to Evaluate Learning and Promote
Classroom Dialogue
LOCATION:
DUFFERIN
• Chair(s) – Sheryl Gowen (Georgia State University)
• Discussant(s) – Katherine E Ryan (University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign)
Still Stretching After All These Years: Reinventing Qualitative
Methods for Evaluation Projects
• Valerie J Janesick (University of South Florida, Tampa)
• Chair(s) – John B Nash (OpenEye Innovation Management)
Discovering the Personal Voice in Evaluation
The Design, Use and Influence of Photofolios in Evaluating
Program Implementation
• Cheryl-Anne N Poth (Queen’s University), Lyn M Shulha (Queen’s
University)
Experiential Knowledge: Building From Direct Exposure to the
People, Places and Passages of Time
• Robert E Stake (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
Improving Interdisciplinary Geoenvironmental Engineering
Education Through Empowerment Evaluation
• E Marie Steichen (Kansas State University), Alok Bhandari (Kansas
State University), Stacy L Hutchinson (Kansas State University),
Lakshmi N Reddi (Kansas State University), David R Steward (Kansas
State University), Larry E Erickson (Kansas State University)
Development of Empowerment Evaluation Checklist for
Developing Teachers’ and Students’ Evaluation Skills
• Sompong Panhoon (Chulalongkorn University), Suwimon
Wongwanich (Chulalongkorn University)
116
SESSION/SÉANCE 343
Process for Developing Assessments to Measure
Teacher Content Knowledge
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
COSMOPOLITAN
•
•
•
•
•
Chair(s) – Tracy Roberts (Caliber Associates)
Discussant(s) – Lucy Seabrook (Ohio Department of Education)
Thomas J Horwood (Caliber Associates Inc)
Viv Wayne (Montgomery County Public Schools)
Bonnie Hansen-Grafton (Montgomery County Public Schools)
SESSION/SÉANCE 344
SESSION/SÉANCE 346
Needs Assessment: Aspects of Methodology
LOCATION:
A Participatory Self-Assessment Approach
to Evaluating After-School Programs
EXECUTIVE
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Ellen Lavelle (Southern Illinois University Edwardsville)
An Exploratory Study of Group Effects in Perceived Needs
Identification
• Yi-Fang Lee (The Ohio State University), James W Altschuld (Ohio
State University), Jeffry L White (The Ohio State University)
Participatory Needs Assessment
• John A Ross (University of Toronto), Sonja Ben Jaafar (University of
Toronto)
From the Laundromat to the Kitchen Table:
Creative Strategies in Needs Assessment with
Hard-to-Reach and Vulnerable Populations
• Kristen A Roderick (Centre for Research and Education in Human
Services), Andrew R Taylor (Centre for Research and Education in
Human Services)
Needs Assessment Methodologies: Crossing Boundaries
Between Education and Planning Methods
• Asma M Ali (Learning Point Associates), Shaunti Knauth (Learning
Point Associates)
SESSION/SÉANCE 345
Engaging Diverse Stakeholders in
Large-Scale Participatory Evaluation
LOCATION:
GINGERSNAP
• Chair(s) – Francis G Hare (Ryerson University)
Evaluating the Impact of Multisectoral Partnerships
• Leslie R Boydell (Institute of Public Health in Ireland), Jorun Rugkasa
(Institute of Public Health, Ireland)
Innovative Communication Techniques for a Participatory
Evaluation of a National Multi-Site Program
GOLD RUSH
•
•
•
•
Chair(s) – Daniel V Folkman (University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee)
Daniel V Folkman (University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee)
Devarati S Syam (University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee)
Danielle M Stingley (University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee)
SESSION/SÉANCE 347
Evaluating ITEST (Information Technology
Experience for Students and Teachers): Three
Projects’ Experiences
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
ICE PALACE
• Chair(s) – Leslie Goodyear (Education Development Center)
Measurement of Technology Skills, Attitudes and Science
Content in the Delta Agriculture Middle School Applied Life
Science -2 Teacher Professional Development Project
• Gerald Knezek (University of North Texas), Rhonda Christensen
(University of North Texas)
Technology Learning in the Detroit Area Pre-college
Engineering Program ITEST (Information Technology
Experience for Students and Teachers): Evaluation Strategies
for Determining Outcomes
• Shannan McNair (Oakland University)
Participant Observation as a Tool for Understanding the
Cultures of Teaching and Research Science in Inquiry-Based
Marine Biotechnology and Bioinformatics for Teachers
• Helen Cagampang (Independent Consultant), Simona Bartl (Moss
Landing Marine Laboratories), Henrik Kibak (California State
University, Monterey Bay)
• Gayle H Payne (ORC Macro International), Stephanie Kamin (ORC
Macro International), Nicola U Dawkins (ORC Macro International),
Geri Dino (West Virginal University), Demia L Sundra (Centers for
Crossing Boundaries to Evaluate a Large Scale Program to
Promote Quality Early Childhood Care and Literacy
Development in High Need and Underserved Families
• Magdalena Rood (Evaluation and Applied Research Associates),
Cindy R Roberts-Gray (Resource Network), Nance Bell (Independent
Consultant)
117
SESSION/SÉANCE 348
SESSION/SÉANCE 349
Roundtable Set Four
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Winifred L Reed (National Institute of Justice)
Engaging Stakeholders of Large Multifacet Preventive
Intervention Projects
• Dolores Casillas (Casillas Consulting Services), Samantha Heinrich
(Kyrene School District Prevention Services), Anthony J Alberta
(Sonoran Research Group), Cathryn Lore (Casillas Consulting
Services), Jenn-Yun Tein (Arizona State University)
The Nexus Between the Systems Thinking, Organizational
Learning, and Program Evaluation
• Bill Thornton (University of Nevada, Reno), Janet Usinger (University
of Nevada, Reno), George C Hill (University of Nevada, Reno), Tara
Shepperson (University of Nevada, Reno)
Crossing Stakeholder Boundaries: A Utilization Strategy for
Diverse Audiences
• Audrey J Noble (University of Delaware), Linda Grusenmeyer
(University of Delaware)
Brackish Waters: Going With the Flow in the
Space Between Indigenous Cultural Identities
and Western Professional Evaluation Roles
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
PINNACLE
Qualitative Methods TIG and Multiethnic Issues in Evaluation
TIG / Méthodes qualitatives et les questions liées à la
• Chair(s) – Morris K Lai (University of Hawai’i)
Acknowledging the Clash Between Indigenous and
Western Cultures
• Morris K Lai (University of Hawai’i)
Where’s the Aloha? Maintaining Commitment
Past the Funding Cycle
• Alice J Kawakami (University of Hawai’i)
Evaluating Relations and Maintaining Relationships
• Fiona Cram (Katoa)
Cultural Issues: Culling Out Cultural Factors That Contribute
to Readiness
• Kanani Aton (INPEACE)
Indigenous Culture and Its Relationship to Evaluation Practice
• Laurie Porima (LLE Research Ltd)
Parental Involvement: Interpretations by Parents and School
Personnel
• Janet Usinger (University of Nevada, Reno), George C Hill (University
of Nevada, Reno), Bill Thronton (University of Nevada, Reno), Tara
Shepperson (University of Nevada, Reno)
An Analysis of Evaluation Research on Large-Scale
Assessment Impact on Teaching and Learning
• Tony C M Lam (University of Toronto), Marcella E Campbell
(University of Toronto), Yihua Hong (University of Toronto)
Dilemmas (and Solutions?) in Evaluating School Mental
Health Programs
• Lawrence H St Leger (Deakin University)
Cultural Competency: Learnings From Two Aboriginal
Restorative Justice Program Evaluations
• Birgitta I M Larsson (BIM Larsson & Associates), Barbara Allen (Allen
Consulting & Training)
118
Thursday, 5:00 pm – 6:00 pm / Concurrent TIG Business Meetings
Le jeudi, 17h00 – 18h00 / Réunions des affaires concurrentes des GT
5:00 pm – 6:00 pm / 17h00 – 18h00
CONCURRENT TIG BUSINESS MEETINGS /
RÉUNIONS DES AFFAIRES CONCURRENTES
DES GT
SESSION/SÉANCE 350
Evaluation Use TIG business Meeting and
Think Tank: How Important Is the Issue of Use
in Evaluation Today?
LOCATION:
GRAND BALLROOM WEST
• TIG Leader(s) – Karen Kirkhart (Syracuse University), Susan A Tucker
(Evaluation and Development Associates), Emma Norland (US
Environmental Protection Agency)
• Chair(s) – Susan A Tucker (Evaluation and Development Associates)
• Discussant(s) – Nick L Smith (Syracuse University), Lyn M Shulha
(Queen’s University at Kingston)
SESSION/SÉANCE 351
PreK-12 Educational Evaluation TIG
Business Meeting
LOCATION:
• TIG Leader(s) – Karen Alderete (Austin Independent School District),
Stephanie Schneider (Orange County Office of Education), Sally L
Bond (The Program Evaluation Group), Karla Lewis (SERVE Regional
Education Laboratory)
SESSION/SÉANCE 352
Alcohol, Drug Abuse and Mental Health TIG
Business Meeting and Presentation:
Moving Adolescent Substance Abuse Treatment
Toward Evidence-Based Practice
LOCATION:
V.I.P
• TIG Leader(s) – Sanjeev Sridharan (University of Edinburgh), Michael
Maranda (University of Maryland)
• MIchael L Dennis (Chestnut Health Systems)
SESSION/SÉANCE 353
Costs, Effectiveness, Benefits, and Economics TIG
Tell Us About Your Cost Study! Creating
a Resource Database for Evaluators
Measuring Costs as Well as Outcomes
LOCATION:
YORK
• TIG Leader(s) – Brian T Yates (American University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 354
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender TIG
Business Meeting
LOCATION:
PEEL
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender Issues TIG / Questions
liées à l’homosexualité, à la bisexualité et à la transexualité
• TIG Leader(s) – Denice A Cassaro (Cornell University), Lyn Paleo
(Evaluation Research and Training), Saumitra SenGupta (New Mexico
Department of Health), Kari Greene (Oregon Department of Human
Services)
SESSION/SÉANCE 355
Environmental Program Evaluation TIG
Business Meeting
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM EAST
• TIG Leader(s) – Katherine Dawes (US Environmental Protection
Agency), Allison L Titcomb (LeCroy & Milligan Associates), Kara SD
Crohn (University of California Los Angeles)
SESSION/SÉANCE 356
Social Work TIG Business Meeting
and Presentation:
Enhancing Student Awareness of the Importance
of Full and Accurate Documentation in
Social Work Practice
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM WEST
• TIG Leader(s) – Mansoor AF Kazi (University of Huddersfield), Sue
Tungate (Colorado State University), Robert L Fischer (Case Western
Reserve University), Jenny L Jones (University of Tennessee)
• Rivka Savaya (Tel Aviv University)
119
SESSION/SÉANCE 357
SESSION/SÉANCE 361
Non-profit and Foundations Evaluation TIG
Business Meeting
LOCATION:
ESSEX BALLROOM
• TIG Leader(s) – Huilan Yang (WK Kellogg Foundation), Victor Kuo
(Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation), Deborah Wasserman
(Columbus Children’s Research Institute), Gale Berkowitz (The David
and Lucile Packard Foundation)
SESSION/SÉANCE 358
Research, Technology, and Development TIG
Business Meeting
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM B
développement
• TIG Leader(s) – Gretchen B Jordan (Sandia National Laboratories),
George Teather (Independent Consultant)
SESSION/SÉANCE 359
Health Evaluation TIG Business Meeting
and Presentation:
Using a Utilization-Focused Participatory
Approach to Evaluate Volunteer-Led Multicultural
Diabetes Support Groups: The Experiences of the
Volunteer Health Advisor Program
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM C
• TIG Leader(s) – Summers Kalishman (University of New Mexico),
Molly Engle (Oregon State University), Ann P Zukoski (Oregon State
University), Robert G LaChausse (California State University, San
Bernardino)
• Emily Chiasson (Cambridge Health Alliance), Elisa Friedman
(Cambridge Health Alliance), Maude Guerrier (Cambridge Health
Alliance), Nadine Marsan (Cambridge Health Alliance), Lisa Montuori
(Cambridge Health Alliance)
Special Needs Populations TIG Business Meeting
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM E
spéciaux
• TIG Leader(s) – Carol L Henderson-Dahms (Northern Arizona
University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 362
Assessment in Higher Education TIG
Business Meeting and Presentations:
Reconstructing Assessment and Evaluation
Models in Higher Education – Lessons from
Medical Education
Business Meeting(m) / Séance administrative
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM F
• Chair(s) – William H Rickards (Alverno College)
Bridging the Data Divides: Predicting Medical Student
Performance on a National Licensure Exam
• Gwyn E Barley (University of Colorado), Haggai Kupermintz
(University of Haifa), Maureen Garrity (University of Colorado)
Intensive Triennial Evaluation of Third Year Medical
Clerkships: Process, Challenges, Rewards
• F Michael Seefeldt (University of Illinois at Chicago), Amelia M
Bartholomew (UIC College of Medicine), Steven Crossman
(University of Illinois College of Medicine), Leslie J Sandlow (UIC college of Medicine)
SESSION/SÉANCE 363
Distance Education and Other Educational
Technologies TIG Business Meeting
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM G
Distance Ed. & Other Educational Technologies TIG /
Éducation à distance et autres technologies éducatives
• TIG Leader(s) – Kathy Garvin-Doxas (University of Colorado)
SESSION/SÉANCE 360
Crime and Justice TIG Business Meeting
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM D
• TIG Leader(s) – Roger K Przybylski (RKC Group), Quint Thurman
(Texas State University)
120
SESSION/SÉANCE 364
SESSION/SÉANCE 368
Quantitative Methods TIG Business Meeting
and Presentation: Challenges and Opportunities
in Multisite Evaluations
LOCATION:
• TIG Leader(s) – Mike Bradley (Research for Better Schools), Patrick E
McKnight (George Mason University), George Julnes (Utah State
University), Frederick L Newman (Florida International University)
• Debra J Rog (Vanderbilt University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 365
International and Cross-cultural TIG
Business Meeting
LOCATION:
• TIG Leader(s) – Zenda Ofir (The World Conservation Union), Thomaz
K Chianca (Western Michigan University), Alexey Kuzmin (Process
Consulting Company)
SESSION/SÉANCE 366
Teaching of Evaluation TIG Business Meeting
and Presentation: Bridging the Gap Between
Evaluation Ideals and the Limits of Practice:
Knowledge Transfer in Social Service
Organizations
LOCATION:
WENTWORTH
• TIG Leader(s) – Dean Spaulding (College of Saint Rose), Neva Nahan
(Wayne State University)
• Shannon R Fenton (Ontario Ministry of Education), Melissa S Kittmer
(Family Service Association of Toronto)
LOCATION:
KENT
• TIG Leader(s) – Roger Rennekamp (Oregon State University), Nancy
Grudens-Schuck (Iowa State University)
• Roger Rennekamp (Oregon State University), Heather H Boyd
(University of Wisconsin), Lisa A Guion (University of Florida)
SESSION/SÉANCE 369
Evaluating the Arts and Culture TIG
Business Meeting
LOCATION:
SIMCOE
Evaluating the Arts and Culture TIG / Évaluation des arts et
de la culture
• TIG Leader(s) – David B Pankratz (Emc.Arts), Treseen McCormick
(WestEd)
SESSION/SÉANCE 370
Multiethnic Issues TIG Business Meeting
LOCATION:
• TIG Leader(s) – Elmima C Johnson (National Science Foundation),
Jennifer E Williams (Association for the Study and Development of
Community), Denice Ward Hood (Northern Arizona University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 371
Qualitative Methods TIG Business Meeting
SESSION/SÉANCE 367
LOCATION:
Business and Industry TIG Business Meeting
LOCATION:
Extension Education Evaluation TIG
A Descriptive Profile of Cooperative Extension
Evaluators: Implications for Strengthening
Evaluation Capacity
HURON
• TIG Leader(s) – Ferdinand Tesoro (Wellpoint), Kelly M Hannum
(Center for Creative Leadership), Cecilia Hegamin-Younger
(Information Decision Analysis), Tracy Patterson (Center for Creative
Leadership)
• TIG Leader(s) – Leslie Goodyear (Education Development Center),
James S Sass (LA’s BEST After School Enrichment Program), John R
Mattox (PricewaterhouseCoopers), Sheryl Gowen (Georgia State
University)
121
SESSION/SÉANCE 372
6:30 pm – 10:00 pm / 18h30 – 22h00
Needs Assessment TIG Business Meeting
LOCATION:
EXECUTIVE
• Discussant(s) – , James W Altschuld (Ohio State University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 373
Integrating Technology Into Evaluation TIG
The IDEA Center
LOCATION:
ICE PALACE
Steam Whistle Brewery Social Evening /
Soirée sociale à la brasserie Steam Whistle
The Steam Whistle Brewery provides a taste of Canadian
history. The evening will include a tour of the Brewery,
dancing and a gourmet dinner. A cash bar will be available.
Tickets can be purchased at the Registration Desk.
La brasserie Steam Whistle constitue une véritable page
d’histoire du Canada. La soirée comprendre une visite de la
brasserie, de la danse et un repas gastronomique. Un bar
payant sera disponible. On peut acheter des billets au bureau
d’inscription.
• TIG Leader(s) – Margaret Lubke (Utah State University), Marcie J
Bober (San Diego State University)
• Amy Gross (IDEA Center)
SESSION/SÉANCE 375
Multiethnic Issues TIG Business Meeting Part II
LOCATION:
• TIG Leader(s) – Elmima C Johnson (National Science Foundation),
Jennifer E Williams (Association for the Study and Development of
Community), Denice Ward Hood (Northern Arizona University)
122
F r i d a y, O c t o b e r 2 8 / L e v e n d r e d i 2 8 o c t o b r e
7:00 am – 6:30 pm / 7h00 – 18h30
7:00 am – 6:30 pm / 7h00 – 18h30
8:00 am – 5:00 pm / 8h00 – 17h00
evaluation.
LOCATION:
8:00 am – 9:10 am / 8h00 – 9h10
7:00 am – 7:50 am / 7h00 – 7h50
TIG BUSINESS MEETING /
RÉUNION D’AFFAIRES DU GT
SESSION/SÉANCE 399
Cluster, Multisite and Multilevel Evaluation TIG
Business Meeting
LOCATION:
Diplomacy, Democracy and Indigenous
Peoples / Diplomatie, démocratie et
peuples autochtones
Roberta Jamieson,
CEO National Aboriginal Achievement Foundation /
PDG de la Fondation nationale des réalisations autochtones
LOCATION:
GRAND BALLROOM EAST
CONFERENCE ROOM E
• TIG Leader(s) – S René Lavinghouze (Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention), Cynthia C Phillips (Phillips Wyatt Knowlton), Martha
Ann Carey (US Department of Health and Human Services), Mark
Jenness (Western Michigan University)
Ms. Roberta Jamieson's keynote address is supported by
contributions from the Canadian Evaluation Society and the
American Evaluation Association. / L’allocution plénière
de Mme Roberta Jamieson est parrainée en partie par des
contributions de la Société canadienne d’évaluation et de
l’American Evaluation Association.
123
Friday – continued
Le vendredi – suite
9:25 am – 10:10 am / Concurrent Sessions
9h25 – 10h10 / Séances concurrentes
9:00 am – 1:00 pm / 9h00 – 13h00
Recruitment Fair / Foire de recrutement
LOCATION:
30-minute informational interviews with participating
employers – for those who signed-up on Thursday with
representatives at the Career Center.
Entrevues d’information d’une demi-heure avec les employeurs participants – pour les délégués qui s’y sont inscrits
jeudi au Centre des carrières.
SESSION/SÉANCE 402
What Do I Hear You Say? Crossing Borders
and Boundaries Through Capturing and
Honoring Participants’ Voices
LOCATION:
• Sharon F Rallis (University of Massachusetts at Amherst)
SESSION/SÉANCE 403
Partnerships, Leadership and Accountability
LOCATION:
V.I.P
9:10 am – 9:25 am / 9h10 – 9h25
Refreshment Break /
UNIVERSALIA MANAGEMENT GROUP
• Chair(s) – Colleen Ryan (Health Canada)
Leadership and Accountability in State Substance Use
Disorders Treatment Systems
• Minakshi Tikoo (University of Connecticut)
University-State Partnerships: Issues in Mental Health
Program Evaluation
• Jennifer Taub (University of Massachusetts)
SESSION/SÉANCE 404
9:25 am – 10:10 am / 9h25 – 10h10
SESSION/SÉANCE 401
Relationship Between Involvement and
Use/Influence in Large Multi-Site Evaluations
A Comparison of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses
Across Three Industries
LOCATION:
YORK
LOCATION:
GRAND BALLROOM WEST
• Chair(s) – Frances P Lawrenz (University of Minnesota)
• Discussant(s) – Jean A King (University of Minnesota), Linda M
Bosma (University of Minnesota), Lija O Greenseid (University of
Minnesota), Laura Gorny (University of Minnesota)
124
Friday, 9:25 am – 10:10 am / Concurrent Sessions
Le vendredi, 9h25 – 10h10 / Séances concurrentes
SESSION/SÉANCE 405
The Role of Evaluation Capacity-Building in a
Foundation’s Community-Based Initiative
PEEL
• Chair(s) – Anne E Farber (University of Pittsburgh)
• Discussant(s) – Anne E Farber (University of Pittsburgh)
A Case of a Foundation’s Quest to be a Good Corporate
Neighbor Through Building Community Capacity
• Prisca Collins (Duquesne University)
The Foundation’s Perspective on the Role of Evaluation in
Grant Making
• Scott K Hudson (Alcoa Foundation)
SESSION/SÉANCE 406
Quantitative Approaches
LOCATION:
• Rosemary M Lysaght (Queen’s University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 409
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
What do Rehabilitation Professionals Need to Know About
Program Evaluation?
Participatory Approaches in International
Development Contexts: The Challenges of
Assessing Impact, Measuring Gender Equality in
Urban Settings, and Capacity Building Among
Rural Women
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM EAST
évaluation
• Chair(s) – Donna Podems (OtherWISE Research and Evaluation)
Monitoring and Evaluating Environmental Management
Programs With Gender Equality as a Cross-Cutting Theme
• Chuthatip Maneepong (Shinawatra University Bangkok), J Mark
Stiles (Stiles Associates)
SESSION/SÉANCE 410
NORFOLK
• Chair(s) – Martha Ann Carey (US Department of Health and Human
Services)
Evaluating and Redesigning Large Scale
Systems Using Quality Function Deployment
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM WEST
Application of New Methods to Improve Cross-Site
Evaluations: Multi-Level Modeling and Meta-Ethnography
sociaux
• J Jackson Barnette (University of Alabama at Birmingham), Anne B
Wallis (University of Iowa)
• Robert M Gerst (Converge Consulting Group)
Estimates of Intraclass Correlation for Measures Related to
HIV/STD Prevention in a Predominantly African-American
and Latino/Hispanic Sample of Young Women
• Sherri L Pals (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Brenda L
Beaty (University of Colorado Health Sciences Center), Samuel F
Posner (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Sheana S Bull
(University of Colorado Health Sciences Center)
SESSION/SÉANCE 408
SESSION/SÉANCE 411
Putting the Byte in Data Collection: Strategies for
Using Technology to Collect Data
LOCATION:
ESSEX BALLROOM
• Chair(s) – Ann E Davis (Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory)
Strategies for Teaching Non-evaluators
About Evaluation
• Phyllis C Ault (Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory)
LOCATION:
CARLETON
• Chair(s) – Laura Blasi (University of Central Florida)
Monitoring and Evaluation: A Tool for School Development:
A Case of School Leadership Program in Pakistan
• Shahzad S Mithani (Aga Khan University), Kulsoom G H Jaffer (Aga
Khan University), Muhammad Memon (Aga Khan University)
125
SESSION/SÉANCE 412
SESSION/SÉANCE 416
Introduction of Government-Funded Research
and Development Project Evaluations and
Utilization of the Evaluations in Japan
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM B
développement
Introduction of New Energy and Industrial Technology
Development Organization’s Research and Development
Project Evaluation System
• Mutsumi Fujita (New Energy and Industrial Technology Development
Organization)
Essential Factors for Effective Project Management:
From Analysis of New Energy and Industrial Technology
Development’s Research and Development Project Evaluation
Results
• Momoko Okada (New Energy and Industrial Technology
Development Organization)
SESSION/SÉANCE 413
Evaluating Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention
Programs: Lessons From the Field
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM C
• Chair(s) – Charles L Thomas (George Mason University)
The Impact of Higher Education Evaluation in
Evolving Educational Practices: Part I
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM F
• Chair(s) – Linda Heath (Loyola University, Chicago)
• Discussant(s) – William H Rickards (Alverno College)
Using Participatory Evaluation for Reform and Accreditation in
Teacher Education
• Pamela A Sandoval (Indiana University Northwest), Gypsy Abbott
(University of Alabama at Birmingham)
Evaluating Teacher Competency in Classroom Assessment
• Celeste H Frazier (University of Alabama), Judith A Burry-Stock
(University of Alabama)
SESSION/SÉANCE 417
With an Eye on the Ball, Not the Game:
Introduction of a Systems-Based Logic Model
That Helps Evaluators Avoid Crossing the
“Do No Harm” Border
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM G
SESSION/SÉANCE 418
Promoting Science-Based Approaches in Teen Pregnancy
Prevention: Lessons Learned From the Partners in Prevention
Project
Strengthening Implementation Fidelity
• Victoria A Harris (Institute for Community Health), Elisa Friedman
(Institute for Community Health), Karen Pomerantz (Massachusetts
Alliance on Teen Pregnancy), Abi Karlin-Resnick (Massachusetts
Alliance on Teen Pregnancy), Karen Hacker (Institute for Community
Health)
Teen Pregnancy Prevention: Findings From Two Different
Program Approaches to the Problem
Defining Priorities for Strengthened Implementation: A
Practical Method for Assessing Fidelity to an Operating Model
• Charles L Thomas (George Mason University), Dimiter Dimitrov
(George Mason University)
• J Fred Springer (EMT Associates)
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Katherine M McKnight (University of Arizona)
Predicting Implementation Fidelity: An Explorative Analysis
• Manuel Riemer (Vanderbilt University), L James Schut (Vanderbilt
University)
126
SESSION/SÉANCE 419
SESSION/SÉANCE 422
Fireside chat with Roberta Jamieson
Fireside Chat / Causerie du coin du feu
LOCATION:
• Roberta Jamieson (National Aboriginal Achievement Foundation)
SESSION/SÉANCE 420
La culture de l’évaluation : méthodes diverses
et partenariats / The Culture of Evaluation:
Diverse Methods and Partnerships
LOCATION:
CITY HALL
• Chair(s) – Marie-Hélène Adrien (Universalia Management Group)
Évaluation des interventions de Développement économique
Canada en innovation et économie du savoir : une approche
pragmatique / Evaluation of Intervention by Canada Economic
Development in Innovation and the Knowledge-Based
Economy: A Pragmatic Approach
• Daniel Otis (Développement économique Canada)
Implementing PART Within an
Environmental Agency
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
WENTWORTH
• Chair(s) – John A McLaughlin (John McLaughlin Associates)
• Discussant(s) – John A McLaughlin (John McLaughlin Associates)
Challenges to Measuring the Environmental Protection
Agencey’s Performance Through the Office of Management
and Budget’s Program Assessment Rating Tool
• Michael Mason (US Environmental Protection Agency)
Getting Ready for the Program Assessment Rating Tool With
Internal Results Focused Evaluation
• Will Hall (US Environmental Protection Agency), Andy Rowe (GHK
International)
SESSION/SÉANCE 423
The Changing Role of Evaluation in the
United Nations: Progress and Roadblocks
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
KENORA
Le développement de la culture d’évaluation et le
renforcement de la capacité d’évaluation dans les
programmes de réadaptation en traumatologie; une
expérience de partenariat fructueuse / Developing a Culture
of Evaluation and Reinforcing the Capacity for Evaluation in
Rehabilitation Programs in Traumatology: A Fruitful
Partnership
• Johanne Delisle (Association des établissements de réadaptation en
déficience physique du Québec), Jacques Drolet (Association des
centres de Réadaptation en Déficience Physique du Québec), Lucie
Mongrain (Association Québécoise d’établissements de santé et de
services sociaux)
• Chandi Kadirgamar (United Nations)
Strengthening Evaluation in the United Nations
• Demetra Arapakos (United Nations)
Using Evaluation in Results-Based Management
SESSION/SÉANCE 424
Evaluation and Human Resources
SESSION/SÉANCE 421
LOCATION:
Comparing Alternative Design Analyses:
What Do They Tell Us?
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Demetra Arapakos (United Nations)
ELGIN
• Chair(s) – Richard H Smiley (Northwest Regional Educational
Laboratory)
• Elizabeth Autio (Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory)
HURON
• Chair(s) – Tracy Patterson (Center for Creative Leadership)
Sickness Absences and Employee Morale
• Blair Stephenson (Los Alamos National Laboratory)
Understanding the Impact of Organizational Power on
Evaluation Outcomes for Human Resource Development
• Hanbyul Kim (University of Georgia)
127
SESSION/SÉANCE 425
SESSION/SÉANCE 430
Theory-Based Needs Assessment:
A Nuts and Bolts Introduction
Evaluation Design and Measurement in
Early Childhood Initiatives
LOCATION:
LOCATION:
KENT
• E Jane Davidson (Davidson Consulting Ltd)
Arts Evaluation for Art’s Sake: Bridging the Gap
Between Arts Organizations and Evaluators
SIMCOE
de la culture
• Discussant(s) – Naida Tushnet (WestEd), Juan Carlos Bojorquez
(WestEd)
• Treseen McCormick (WestEd)
SESSION/SÉANCE 427
Cultivating Partnerships in Evaluation
DUFFERIN
• Chair(s) – Michelle Jay (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
Teaching Evaluation to Stakeholders: Utilizing the StudentTeacher Relationship as an Outside Evaluator
• Jill H Lohmeier (University of Kansas)
A Model for Consumer-Led Mental Health Evaluation
• Jonathan Delman (Consumer Quality Initiatives), Sara Plachta-Elliott
(Consumer Quality Initiatives)
• Pamela J Zeller (Western Michigan University), Brooks Applegate
(Western Michigan University), Cheryl Kurz (Western Michigan
University)
Conducting Scientifically Based Evaluations in Education:
An Example of an Experimental Evaluation for an
Early Literacy Tutoring Program
• Rahel C Kahlert (University of Texas at Austin), Darlene Yañez
(University of Texas at Austin)
Indigenous Peoples in Evaluation TIG
Business Meeting
LOCATION:
EXECUTIVE
Indigenous Peoples in Evaluation / Autochtones en évaluation
• TIG Leader(s) – Katherine A Tibbetts (Kamehameha Schools),
Jeannette Johnson (Friends Research Institute), Richard Nichols
(Richard Nichols and Associates)
SESSION/SÉANCE 432
Evaluation Programs Serving Disadvantaged
Clientele
LOCATION:
GINGERSNAP
SESSION/SÉANCE 429
Program Evaluation in K-12 Education:
Challenges and Opportunities
LOCATION:
Students May Be Ready For Kindergarten,
Is Your School Ready For Them?
SESSION/SÉANCE 431
• Sharon Herpin (WestEd)
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Rahel C Kahlert (University of Texas at Austin)
SESSION/SÉANCE 426
LOCATION:
COSMOPOLITAN
• Chair(s) – Pam K St Leger (University of Melbourne)
Understanding Identity Building Among Disadvantages
Clienteles: A Missing Link in Evaluation Methodology?
• Kenneth H Cabatoff (Université du Québec à Montréal)
Evaluation of a Comprehensive Prevention Program for
High-Risk Adolescent Girls
• Gwen Keith (Canadian Evaluation Society)
• James G Emshoff (Georgia State University), Gabe Kuperminc
(Georgia State University), Phyllis Niolon (Georgia State University),
Kim Broomfield (Georgia State University), Tracey Dickens (Georgia
State University)
128
Roundtable C
SESSION/SÉANCE 433
Government to Government Evaluation:
Issues and Strategies to Support State, Federal,
and Tribal Government Evaluation Studies
LOCATION:
GOLD RUSH
Bridging the Organizational Divide:
Schools Reaching out to Preschool Children
• Larry K Bremner (Proactive Information Services), Denise Belanger
(Proactive Information Services)
Roundtable D
Moving Beyond Evaluation Utilization Theory to
Embrace a Comprehensive Theory of Influence
• Chair(s) – Nicole R Bowman (University of Wisconsin, Madison)
• Candace Peterson (Pacific Institute for Research & Evaluation)
• Rumaisa Shaukat (University of Ottawa)
Roundtable E
SESSION/SÉANCE 434
Mixed-Method Evaluations of Teacher
Professional Development Programs
LOCATION:
ICE PALACE
• Chair(s) – Josephine Imbimbo (ActKnowledge)
Challenges and Promise in the Evaluation of Teacher
Transformation: The Evaluation of the Enhancing Education
Through Technology Program
Serving an Underserved Population:
Substance Use Among Minority Populations
• Deepa Avula (US Department of Health and Human Services), Donna
D Atkinson (Westat), Kevin P Mulvey (US Department of Health and
Human Services), Bill Luckey (Westat)
SESSION/SÉANCE 436
Seeing the Forest From the Trees:
An Example of Using Evaluation to Help Refine
a Program Construct
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
PINNACLE
• Josephine Imbimbo (ActKnowledge), Steven D’Agustino (Fordham
University Regional Educational Technology Center)
Verifying and Expanding Success Case Method Findings With
Participant Surveys: Helping Stakeholders Understand, Value
and Use Results From a Process and Outcome Evaluation
of Instructional Coaching
Learning From Experiences: Crafting a Construct
• Debra Olive Heath (Albuquerque Public Schools), River Dunavin
(Albuquerque Public Schools)
• Chair(s) – Annelise Carleton-Hug (Montana State University)
• Discussant(s) – Joan L LaFrance (Mekinak Consulting)
• Lisa Flowers (University of Montana)
Working From a Distance: Teamwork Across Five Institutions
• Janet Gordon (Montana State University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 435
Roundtable Set Five
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Cynthia S Robins (Westat)
Roundtable A
A Learning History of the Mali Community Learning and
Information Centers Project With a Focus on the Role of
Information Technology in Monitoring and Evaluation
• Barbara Fillip (Academy for Educational Development)
Roundtable B
From Research to Practice:
Training Nonprofits to Use Outcome Logic Models
• Rebecca W Pettit (Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania), Balinger
Brown (ConnectSynergy)
129
10:20 am – 11:05 am / 10h20 – 11h05
Multi-Site Evaluation of the Center for Substance
Abuse Prevention’s Mentoring-Family
Strengthening Initiative
SESSION/SÉANCE 437
Strategies for Customizing Evaluation Reports to
Increase Use
LOCATION:
SESSION/SÉANCE 439
GRAND BALLROOM WEST
LOCATION:
V.I.P
• Chair(s) – J Fred Springer (EMT Associates)
• Chair(s) – Cindy R Roberts-Gray (Resource Network)
Large-Scale, Multisite Evaluation of Mentoring Programs:
Lessons From the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention’s
Mentoring Youth Initiative
Using Evaluation Data for Decision-making: Community
Perinatal Support Services
• Elizabeth Sale (Missouri Institute of Mental Health), Nikki Bellamy
(US Department of Health and Human Services)
• Ann M Dozier (University of Rochester), Marta Bermudez (Perinatal
Network of Monroe County), Jim Peters (Perinatal Network of
Monroe County), Andrew Doniger (Monroe County Health
Department), Timothy D Dye (University of Rochester)
Measuring Design and Implementation Characteristics of
Prevention Interventions
Using the Internet to Expand the Boundaries of Evaluation
Utilization: Lessons Learned From an Evaluation of Smoking
Restrictions in Municipal Ordinances in Texas
• Cindy R Roberts-Gray (Resource Network), Phyllis M Gingiss
(University of Houston), Phil Huang (Texas Department of State
Health Services), Melynda Boerm (University of Houston)
SESSION/SÉANCE 438
SESSION/SÉANCE 440
Follow-Up Monitoring and Evaluation of National
Research and Development in New Energy
and Industrial Technology Development
Organization: Results of the Full Scale Operation
in First Year
The Transdisciplinary Model of Evaluation:
Radical Implications
LOCATION:
• J Fred Springer (EMT Associates)
• Chair(s) – Michael Quinn Patton (Utilization-Focused Evaluation)
• Michael Scriven (Western Michigan University)
LOCATION:
YORK
développement
• Chair(s) – Hiroshi Sano (New Energy and Industrial Technology
Results Obtained From Follow-up Monitoring
• Shuji Yumitori (New Energy and Industrial Technology Development
Organization), Hiroshi Sano (New Energy and Industrial Technology
Results of Evaluation in the First Year
• Hiroshi Sano (New Energy and Industrial Technology Development
Organization), Shuji Yumitori (New Energy and Industrial Technology
130
SESSION/SÉANCE 442
SESSION/SÉANCE 445
Nodes, Links, Lines and Paths:
A Social Network Analysis Primer
Fractal Logic Modeling: A Modular Participatory
Technique for Modeling Complex Programs
LOCATION:
LOCATION:
NORFOLK
• Maryann M Durland (Durland Consulting)
SESSION/SÉANCE 443
Not Lost in Translation:
Listening Begets Impact Across Borders
SESSION/SÉANCE 446
Human Services Evaluation in Schools
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM EAST
OXFORD
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM WEST
sociaux
• Chair(s) – Zoe C Clayson (Abundantia Consulting)
• Discussant(s) – Gale Berkowitz (The David and Lucile Packard
Foundation)
• Chair(s) – James D Salt (University of Delaware)
The Intersection of Culture, Language, and Technology:
Case Studies of Evaluations With Key Stakeholders in the
United States and Mexico
• Lawrence S Bernstein (Abt Associates Inc)
• Zoe C Clayson (Abundantia Consulting)
Selecting Program and Control Group Members for a
Study of the Impact of Universal Free School Breakfast
Crossing the Boundaries of Program Evaluation and
Sustainability: System Organized Between Education,
Intervention, and Treatment
Leveraging Evaluation to Create Learning Processes Across
Cultures: Allowing for Multiple Entry Points Into the
Evaluation Conversation
• Candace H Lacey (Nova Southeastern University)
• John B Nash (OpenEye Innovation Management)
Emerging Models
SESSION/SÉANCE 444
A Demonstration of Capacity Building in
Evaluation via Distance Learning for the
United States Affiliated Pacific
LOCATION:
SESSION/SÉANCE 447
CARLETON
• Mary B Church (Pacific Resources for Education and Learning)
LOCATION:
ESSEX BALLROOM
• Chair(s) – Paule A Steichen Asch (IBIS International)
Evaluating the Impact of Training Programs:
Simple Surveys Are Not Enough!
• Chanson D Noether (Policy Research Associates), Wendy M Vogel
(Policy Research Associates)
Web-Based Surveys in Multisite Program Evaluation:
Strengths and Limitations of Two National Science Foundation
Cases
• Carl E Hanssen (Western Michigan University), Frances P Lawrenz
131
SESSION/SÉANCE 448
Innovation Systems: Theories and Practice
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM B
développement
• Chair(s) – Steve Montague (Performance Management Network)
Examination of National Innovation Systems
• George Teather (Independent Consultant)
Cross-Border Research and Design Evaluation:
The Øresund Contracts
• Nyambura Maina (Montgomery County Public Schools), Carrie L
Conley (Montgomery County Public Schools), Daniel E CurryCorcoran (Montgomery County Public Schools), Khalid Rosenbaum
(Montgomery County Public Schools)
SESSION/SÉANCE 451
Multi-Site Evaluation of a School-Based Internet
Safety Curriculum
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM E
• Isabelle Collins (Technopolis Ltd)
SESSION/SÉANCE 449
Health Communication: Evaluating
Communication Technologies
LOCATION:
Keeping the Curriculum, Instruction, and Student Achievement
Closely Linked: New Tools for Monitoring and Evaluating the
Effectiveness of English for Speakers of other Languages
Instructional Practices
CONFERENCE ROOM C
• Chair(s) – Madeleine F Wallace (Caliber Associates Inc)
Results of a Multi-site Evaluation of the
i-SAFE Internet Safety Curriculum
• Madeleine F Wallace (Caliber Associates Inc), Susan H Chibnall
(Caliber Associates Inc)
Lessons Learned From Doing Research in Schools
• Chair(s) – Marlene Glassman (Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention)
• Susan H Chibnall (Caliber Associates Inc), Madeleine F Wallace
(Caliber Associates Inc)
Evidenced-Based Model for a Federal Communications
Campaign
• Lenora Johnson (National Cancer Institute), Herbert M Baum (Macro
International), Joanne L Milne (ORC Macro International)
Evaluating Information and Communication Technologies
in a Publicly Administered and Publicly Financed Healthcare
System: The Canada Health Infostructure Partnership Program
Evaluation Framework
• Sandra C Chatterton (Health Canada), Robert Hanson (Health
Canada)
SESSION/SÉANCE 450
Expanding Assessment and Evaluation Capacity
in Higher Education: The Instructional
Technology Assessment Repository
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM F
• E Joel Heikes (University of Texas at Austin)
SESSION/SÉANCE 454
How Web-based Technologies Contribute
to School Accountability
LOCATION:
SESSION/SÉANCE 452
CONFERENCE ROOM D
• Chair(s) – Penina Mungania (University of Arkansas)
Evolution of a Computer Driven Evaluation Acquisition Process
• Paul Lorton Jr (University of San Francisco), Davida Desmond (San
Francisco Unified School District), Lisa Kline (San Francisco Unified
School District)
Comparing and Combining Theoretical Models
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Michael A Harnar (Claremont Graduate University)
The Model of the Dimensions of a Program and the Model
of Human Occupation: An Innovative Way to Look at
Evaluation Knowledge and Practice
• Genevieve Pepin (Laval University)
A Comparative Analysis of Scriven’s Key Evaluation Checklist
and Stufflebeam’s Program Evaluation Standards Checklist:
Implications for Evaluation Practice and Metaevaluation
• Lori A Wingate (Western Michigan University), Lori A Wingate
132
SESSION/SÉANCE 455
Building Performance Management Systems
for Reporting Real Results: The Ontario
Public Service Experience
LOCATION:
Canadian Strand and Government Evaluation TIG / Volet
canadien et l’évaluation gouvernementale
• Kevin D Perry (Government of Ontario)
Combining Comparison Group Designs With Binary Logistic
Regression to Evaluate What Interventions Work and in
What Circumstances: An Example of a School Setting
• Mansoor AF Kazi (University of Huddersfield), John Bowden
(Hyndburn Park Primary School), Jenny Eades (University of
Huddersfield)
SESSION/SÉANCE 458
Reducing Barriers Through the Creation of
an Evaluation Culture
SESSION/SÉANCE 456
LOCATION:
Les impacts des évaluations externes et
des évaluations internes des programmes de
gouvernement / The Impact of External and
Internal Evaluations of Government Programs
LOCATION:
CITY HALL
• Chair(s) – Marie Gervais (Société de l’assurance automobile du
Québec)
Les lacunes dues à l’absence du facteur de l’identité sociale
dans l’évaluation d’Emploi-Québec concernant la rupture de
la participation des assistés sociaux aux mesures d’insertion
professionnelle / Weaknesses Due to the Absence of
the Social Identity Factor in the Evaluation of Emploi-Québec
Concerning the Lack of Participation of Social Assistance
Recipients in Professional Integration Measures
• Mohamed Bounegta (Consultant en réinsertion socio-professionnelle), Francis Côté (Réseau des Carrefours jeunesse-emploi du
Québec), Kenneth H Cabatoff (Université du Québec à Montréal)
Les impacts de l’évaluation externe d’un programme de
gouvernement / The Impact of External Evaluation of a
Government Program
• Jean L Dethier (Perspective Consulting), Luc Vandendorpe (Cabinet
du Ministre wallon de l’Economie et de l’Emploi)
SESSION/SÉANCE 457
WENTWORTH
• Chair(s) – Tracy E Fiander Trask (Office of Economic Development)
• Tracy E Fiander Trask (Office of Economic Development)
• Heather Perkins (Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia)
SESSION/SÉANCE 459
Logic Modeling in International Settings
LOCATION:
KENORA
• Chair(s) – Alexey Kuzmin (Process Consulting Company)
Working With the Logical Framework With Grassroots
Organizations and Non-Governmental Organizations
in the Andean Rural Context: Reflections and Proposals
Based on Experience
• Luis Soberon (Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru)
The Modeler’s Approach: Towards More Representative
Models of International Development Projects
• Molly den Heyer (Dalhousie University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 460
Incorporating Traditional Knowledge into
Evaluation Methodology
Advancing Use of Comparison Group Designs
LOCATION:
ELGIN
• Chair(s) – Patrick E McKnight (George Mason University)
Finding a Comparison Group: Strengths/Shortcomings of
Using Databases in Creating Matched Control Groups
• Tarek Azzam (University of California at Los Angeles), Christina A
Christie (Claremont Graduate University)
LOCATION:
HURON
• Chair(s) – Catherine Bingle (Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit)
Southern Exposure to Northern Storms
• Rita Gunn (Prairie Research Associates)
Doing Evaluation With Indigenous/Aboriginal Peoples:
Some Lessons Learnt, But No Bible Promised
• N Nan Wehipeihana (Research Evaluation Consultancy Ltd)
133
SESSION/SÉANCE 461
SESSION/SÉANCE 465
From Poor to Not Poor:
A Qualitative Interpretation
Using Focus Groups With Children in Community
Based Studies
LOCATION:
LOCATION:
KENT
• Christine E Frank (Georgian College)
Services)
• Eleanor Wint (UNBC)
Focus Groups With Children and Parents to Develop
Program Theory and Modify Treatment
SESSION/SÉANCE 462
Empowerment and Participatory Evaluation
of Teaching Artists and Arts Curricula
LOCATION:
SIMCOE
de la culture
• Chair(s) – Don Glass (Independent Consultant)
An Empowerment Evaluation of South African Arts and Culture
Curriculum
• Don Glass (Independent Consultant)
Participatory Evaluation and the Teaching Artists Mentoring
Project: Crossing Boundaries in Evaluation Roles
• Josephine Imbimbo (ActKnowledge), Eden Graber (Association of
Institutes for Aesthetic Education)
Using Focus Groups With At-Risk Youth:
Insights and Cautionary Tales
• Jo-Ellen Asbury (Bethany College), Martha Ann Carey (US
Department of Health and Human Services)
SESSION/SÉANCE 466
Multi-Agency Collaborations on
Program Evaluation
LOCATION:
COSMOPOLITAN
• Chair(s) – Kelci M Price (Chicago Public Schools)
The Growth of Grass Roots Evaluation Efforts:
Collaboration is Contagious
SESSION/SÉANCE 464
Grounding Evaluation Practices in
Indigenous Knowledge
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
• Aja Lesh (Azusa Pacific University)
• Chair(s) – Andrea LK Johnston (Johnston Research)
• Discussant(s) – Andrea LK Johnston (Johnston Research)
• Deborah T Carran (Johns Hopkins University), Millicent H Kellner
(Association of Schools and Agencies for the Handicapped), Sue
Murray (Maryland Association of Non-Profit Special Education
Facilities)
Building an Evaluation Through Collaboration:
An Evaluation of a Transition to High School Summer Program
• Kelci M Price (Chicago Public Schools), Bret Feranchak (Chicago
Public Schools), Megan E Deiger (Chicago Public Schools)
Minimizing Ethnic Gloss Using a Sociocultural Assessment
Format for American Indians
• Jeannette Johnson (Friends Research Institute), Rodney C Haring
(State University of New York at Buffalo), Barbara General (State
University of New York at Buffalo)
Grounding Evaluation in Canadian First Nations Teachings
• Andrea LK Johnston (Johnston Research)
134
SESSION/SÉANCE 468
SESSION/SÉANCE 471
From Cultural Competence to Cultural Comfort:
It’s Not Just About Ethnicity!
Roundtable Set Six
LOCATION:
GINGERSNAP
• Chair(s) – Doreen G Branch (Pacific Institute for Research and
Evaluation)
• Margo Hall (MBH Limited)
• Tarik Chapman (Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation)
SESSION/SÉANCE 470
Measurement and Design Issues in the Evaluation
of 21st Century Community Learning Centers
LOCATION:
ICE PALACE
• Chair(s) – Lisa B Ncube (Purdue University)
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – James V Trudeau (RTI International)
Roundtable A
Evaluation of the Comprehensive Cancer Control Leadership
Institutes: A Utilization-Focused Evaluation
• Michelle L Revels (ORC Macro International), Emily C Stewart (ORC
Macro International), Lori Belle-Isle (American Cancer Society),
Madeline La Porta (National Cancer Institute), Robyn Housemann
(American Cancer Society), Cynthia Vinson (National Cancer
Institute)
Roundtable B
Culture and Context in Program Evaluation
• Margaret M Hale (American Institutes for Research), Rita Kirshstein
(American Institutes for Research), Carlos Rodriguez (American
Institutes for Research)
Roundtable C
Assessing the Impact of an Elementary After-School Program
on Academic Achievement and Developmental Assets
New Directions for Collaborative Evaluations:
A Case Study in the Private Sector
• Lisa B Ncube (Purdue University), Sharon Paulson (Ball State
University)
• Liliana Rodriguez Campos (Western Michigan University), Rigoberto
Rincones-Gomez (Lake Michigan College)
Defining Afterschool Participation: A Synthesis of Work From
Three 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program
Evaluations
• Karin L Chang-Rios (University of Kansas), Yngve Monsson
(University of Kansas)
Roundtable D
If Sampling Is Good Enough, How Can Resources
Be Allocated To Maximize Survey Response Rates?
• Susan M Saka (University of Hawai’i)
SESSION/SÉANCE 472
McGill University’s Web-Based Field Assessment
Tool for Internship Students: Improving the
Formative Evaluation Process
LOCATION:
PINNACLE
• Mariette A Xenopoulos (McGill University)
135
Friday, 11:15 am – 12:00 pm / Concurrent Sessions
11:15 am – 12:00 pm / 11h15 – 12h00
Demonstration of the Feedback Panel as a
Quick Turn-Around Formative Evaluation Tool
GRAND BALLROOM WEST
Evaluation for Practice Improvement and
Organizational Learning
• Chair(s) – Patricia J Rogers (Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology)
• Bob Williams (Independent consultant)
• Patricia J Rogers (Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology)
• Chair(s) – Robin Kane (Innovation Network)
Design and Methods in a Campaign Environment
• Robin Kane (Innovation Network)
SESSION/SÉANCE 478
So You’re a Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, or
Transgender Evaluator: Implications for the
Profession and Practice
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
NORFOLK
Finding a Purpose in the Land of Topical Interest Groups
Culturally Competent Mental Health Evaluation
Issues
V.I.P
• Chair(s) – Tony Rey (Behavioral Assessment)
• Richard Cervantes (Behavioral Assessment)
• Thomas J Horwood (Caliber Associates Inc)
Reflective Practice for the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual,
Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ) Evaluator
• Kari Greene (Oregon Department of Human Services)
SESSION/SÉANCE 479
Tracking the Arts:
The Pennsylvania Cultural Data Project
SESSION/SÉANCE 476
A Model of Evaluation and Capacity Building for
The Colorado Trust Bullying Prevention Initiative
YORK
•
•
•
•
• Chair(s) – Thomas J Horwood (Caliber Associates Inc)
SESSION/SÉANCE 475
LOCATION:
PEEL
• Jackie Williams Kaye (Atlantic Philanthropies)
SESSION/SÉANCE 474
LOCATION:
Panel / Panel
A Foundation’s View on Advocacy Evaluation
• Patti Bourexis (The Study Group)
LOCATION:
The Advocacy Framework: An Evaluation Model
for Public Policy Campaigns
LOCATION:
SESSION/SÉANCE 473
LOCATION:
SESSION/SÉANCE 477
LOCATION:
OXFORD
• Bobbie Lippman (Pew Charitable Trusts)
• Nicole Trentacoste (Pew Charitable Trusts)
• Neville Vakharia (Pew Charitable Trusts)
Robin L Leake (JVA Consulting)
Soo-Jin Yoon (The Colorado Trust)
Ed Guajardo-Lucero (The Colorado Trust)
Richard Rainaldi (Civicore)
136
SESSION/SÉANCE 480
SESSION/SÉANCE 483
Teaching Evaluation Via the Web
LOCATION:
CARLETON
• Chair(s) – F Michael Seefeldt (University of Illinois at Chicago)
Innovative Strategies for Online Teaching of Evaluation in the
University of Illinois at Chicago Masters in Health Professions
Education Leadership Program
• F Michael Seefeldt (University of Illinois at Chicago), Ilene Harris (UIC
Dept of Medical Education), Gerald Stapleton (UIC Dept of Medical
Education)
Design of Evaluation Instruments for a Web-Based Evaluation
Course: Listening to Our Primary Stakeholders
The Boundaries and Bridges of Cluster, Initiative,
and Multi-Site Evaluation: Part I
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
ESSEX BALLROOM
• Chair(s) – Cynthia C Phillips (Phillips Wyatt Knowlton)
Building Better Bridges: Lessons Learned in Federal Projects
• Martha Ann Carey (US Department of Health and Human Services),
Debra J Rog (Vanderbilt University)
The Bridges Between Initiative, Cluster, and Multi-Site
Evaluation
• Teresa R Behrens (WK Kellogg Foundation)
• Chanda D Elbert (Texas A&M University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 485
SESSION/SÉANCE 481
Past to the Present: Utilizing a Unique Lens
to Drive Our Evaluation Work
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
Health Communication:
Evaluating Use of Mass Media
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM EAST
CONFERENCE ROOM C
• Chair(s) – Eusebio M Alvaro (Claremont Graduate University)
• Chair(s) – Dianne Apter (Apter & O’Connor Associates)
• Discussant(s) – Marilyn L Ray (Finger Lakes Law & Social Policy
Center)
Increasing Organ Donation: Evaluating Potential Mass Media
Appeals Before Spending Mass Dollars
What Jackson Pollock Can Teach Us About
Program Evaluation
• Jason T Siegel (Claremont Graduate University), Eusebio M Alvaro
(Claremont Graduate University), Sara Pace Jones (Donor Network of
Arizona)
• Anne Chamberlain (Success for All Foundation)
Applying Family Systems Theory to the Craft of
Program Evaluation
• Dianne Apter (Apter & O’Connor Associates)
SESSION/SÉANCE 482
Human Services Evaluation TIG Business Meeting
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM WEST
sociaux
• TIG Leader(s) – Lois Thiessen Love (Uhlich Children’s Advantage
Network), Margaret L Polinsky (Parents Anonymous), Paul J Longo
(Independent Consultant)
Evaluating Mass Media/Community Outreach Campaigns:
Challenges and Outcomes Associated With a Campaign
Targeting Hispanic Organ Donation
• Eusebio M Alvaro (Claremont Graduate University), Jason T Siegel
(Claremont Graduate University), William D Crano (Claremont
Graduate University), Alexander Dominick (Arizona Kidney
Foundation)
SESSION/SÉANCE 486
Monitoring and Evaluation Information Systems:
A Demo of a System Developed in Epi-Info for
School Improvement
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM D
• William Saisi Mengich (Kenya Schools Improvement Project)
137
SESSION/SÉANCE 487
SESSION/SÉANCE 489
State of the States in Evaluation
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM E
• Chair(s) – Roger A Boothroyd (University of South Florida)
Multi-Site Evaluations From a State and National Perspective:
An Example From StateNets
• Mary Crave (University of Wisconsin Extension), Cynthia Shuman
(Kansas State University), B Jan Middendorf (Kansas State University)
Strategies for Increasing Local Evaluation Capacity Within
a State Evaluation of the 21st Century Community Learning
Centers
• Laurie A Van Egeren (Michigan State University), Celeste Sturdevant
Reed (Michigan State University), Laura V Bates (Michigan State
University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 488
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM G
• Chair(s) – Mukaria J Itang’ata (Western Michigan University)
Using Programmatic Evaluation to Stimulate New Thinking
About Peace Initiatives
• Michael J Papa (Central Michigan University), Jeffrey Mapendere
(The Carter Center)
Using the Outcome-Based Approach to Compare, Contrast,
and Evaluate the Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning
and Traditional Curricula Models on Medical Student Learning
Perception and Satisfaction
• Mukaria J Itang’ata (Western Michigan University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 490
The Challenge of Evaluating a Multidisciplinary,
Mandatory Course for First-Year College
Students
LOCATION:
Peace Initiatives, Programs, and Policies in
Theory-based Evaluation
CONFERENCE ROOM F
• Chair(s) – Jennifer A Morrow (Old Dominion University)
• Discussant(s) – Erin Elizabeth Mehalic (Old Dominion University)
Monitoring the Implementation of a Large-Enrollment, Multidisciplinary Course: Providing Feedback to Stakeholders in
Real-Time
• Shana Pribesh (Old Dominion University), Jennifer Kidd (Old
Dominion University)
Assessing the Effectiveness of an Innovative, Multidisciplinary
Course for First-Year College Students: What Worked and
What did not Work
• Jennifer A Morrow (Old Dominion University), Nicole Benn (Old
Dominion University), Erin Elizabeth Mehalic (Old Dominion
University)
Deliberative Democratic Evaluation in Action,
Examples of Practice
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Genevieve Pepin (Laval University)
Challenges to Implementing a More Democratic Educational
Accountability
• Katherine E Ryan (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
Evaluating Democratic Governance
• Anders Hanberger (Umeå University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 491
Expérience tunisienne en matière du
suivi/évaluation des opérateurs de formation /
Tunisian Experience in Follow-up/Evaluation of
Training Organizations
LOCATION:
Comité d’examen francophone / Comité d’examen
francophone
• Fayçal Ben Brahim (Independent Consultant)
138
SESSION/SÉANCE 492
SESSION/SÉANCE 494
L’évaluation en milieu communautaire :
approches novatrices à l’évaluation
participative / Evaluation in a community
setting: innovative approaches to
participatory evaluation
LOCATION:
CITY HALL
• Chair(s) – Natalie Kishchuk (Natalie Kishchuk Research and
Evaluation)
• Discussant(s) – Natalie Kishchuk (Natalie Kishchuk Research and
Evaluation)
L’évaluation participative axée sur le développement d’un
programme communautaire / Participatory Evaluation Focused
on Developing a Community Program
• Hélène Johnson (Johnson et Roy inc. et Université Laval), Valéry
Ridde (Université Laval)
Les dispositifs de la participation aux étapes stratégiques de
l’évaluation / The Participation Mechanisms for the Strategic
Steps in Evaluation
• Angèle Bilodeau (Direction de la santé publique de Montréal-Centre
et Université de Montréal), Denis Allard (Direction de la santé
publique de Montréal-Centre), Sylvie Gendron (University of
Montreal)
SESSION/SÉANCE 493
Understanding and Improving
Program Processes
LOCATION:
ELGIN
Challenges and Opportunities in Measuring the Policy
“Black Box” for Use in Public Health Evaluation Studies
Applying Theory to Program Practice
LOCATION:
WENTWORTH
Government Evaluation TIG and Theories of Evaluation /
Évaluation gouvernementale et les théories de l’évaluation
• Chair(s) – Elaine L Vaurio (US Government Accountability Office)
Of Course I Have a Theory:
Posthoc Application of Theory to Programs
• Scott E Pollack (University of Georgia)
Crossing Theory-Practice Cultures Within Evaluation
• Kaireen M Chaytor (Chaytor Consulting Services), Nancy L Carter
SESSION/SÉANCE 495
Evaluating Multiinstitutional, Multisector,
Multicountry Interventions
LOCATION:
KENORA
• Chair(s) – Tracy E Fiander Trask (Office of Economic Development)
The Key Role of Communication Theory in Reporting
Evaluation Findings in Multi-Institutional International
Evaluations
• Gunter Rochow (Capra International)
Navigating Complex Relationships: Evaluating a Multi-Sector,
Multi-Country HIV/AIDS Workplace Intervention
• Susan J Rogers (Academy for Educational Development), Caryn A
Sweeney (Academy for Educational Development)
• Jamie F Chriqui (MayaTech Corporation), Jean O’Connor (The
MayaTech Corporation), Shelby S Eidson (The MayaTech
Corporation)
Statistical Process Control as Program Evaluation
Methodology
• Kevin E Driesen (University of Arizona), Lee Sechrest (University of
Arizona)
139
SESSION/SÉANCE 496
SESSION/SÉANCE 500
Using Visual Images for a Tracer Study With
Emergent Design in a Cross-Cultural Project
in Israel
LOCATION:
HURON
Evaluation Systems for Collaborative Programs
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Ross F Conner (University of California, Irvine)
• Discussant(s) – Ross F Conner (University of California, Irvine)
• Barbara Rosenstein (The Center for Creativity in Education and
Cultural Heritage)
• Rivanna Miller (The Center for Creativity in Education and Cultural
Heritage)
Design and Utilization Lessons From Working Collaboratively
With Collaboratives
Implementing and Enhancing a Collaboratively Developed
Evaluation System
SESSION/SÉANCE 497
Omnibus Polling for Program Evaluation
and Needs Assessment: Lessons From the
2002-2005 Summit Polls
LOCATION:
KENT
• Eric J Mundy (University of Akron)
Research and Evaluation in Arts Organizations
SIMCOE
de la culture
• Chair(s) – Treseen McCormick (WestEd)
Measuring Success in Opera: A Marketing Audit in the
Performing Arts
• Paul Lorton Jr (University of San Francisco)
Value Conflicts in a Museum-Based Formative Evaluation of
Educational Technology
• Colleen F Manning (Goodman Research Group)
SESSION/SÉANCE 499
Evaluation and Capacity Building Issues
for Native American Communities
LOCATION:
• Will Hall (US Environmental Protection Agency)
SESSION/SÉANCE 501
The Why and How of Using Case Studies
to Evaluate Educational Programs
LOCATION:
SESSION/SÉANCE 498
LOCATION:
• Andy Rowe (GHK International)
DUFFERIN
• Eric Barela (Los Angeles Unified School District)
• Sheryl Gowen (Georgia State University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 502
Uses of a Social Capital Approach in Evaluation:
Mapping School Capacity and Identifying
Community-Level Outcomes
LOCATION:
COSMOPOLITAN
• Chair(s) – William R Penuel (SRI International)
Mapping the Distribution of Expertise and Resources in a
School: A Social Capital Approach to Evaluating School
Capacity
• William R Penuel (SRI International), Christine Korbak (SRI
International), Judith Fusco (SRI International)
Beyond Academic Success: Evaluating Community Impact of
21st Century Community Learning Centers
• Gwen M Willems (University of Minnesota), Mary Marczak
• Nicole R Bowman (University of Wisconsin, Madison)
140
SESSION/SÉANCE 504
SESSION/SÉANCE 507
Building Science-Based Evaluation
Competencies: Perspectives on and
Experiences With Multi-Level Evaluation
LOCATION:
GINGERSNAP
• Chair(s) – Deborah A Loesch-Griffin (Turning Point)
• Discussant(s) – Deborah A Loesch-Griffin (Turning Point)
Linking Structured Reflection Opportunities With an Evaluation
Conference Format
• Deborah A Loesch-Griffin (Turning Point), Alyssa K Rye (University of
Nevada, Reno), Jaime LK Anstee (University of Nevada, Reno)
Multilevel Collaborative Evaluation: The Case of the Urban
Mind on the Rural Frontier
• Jaime LK Anstee (University of Nevada, Reno), Alyssa K Rye
(University of Nevada, Reno), Deborah A Loesch-Griffin (Turning
Point)
Roundtable Set Seven
LOCATION:
Roundtable A
The Application of Job Analysis to Enhance Process
Evaluation Practice
• Susan M Jenkins (Caliber Associates Inc)
Roundtable B
Utilization of the Center for Disease Control
Evaluation Capacity Building Model as a Management
and Development Tool
• Jeanette H Nu’Man (ORC Macro International), John A Encandela
(ORC Macro International), Winifred G King (Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention)
Roundtable C
Mentoring Young Evaluators
SESSION/SÉANCE 505
• Shannan McNair (Oakland University), Alexis Garland (Oakland
University), Akecia Thompson (Oakland University), Colin Garland
(Oakland University)
LOCATION:
Roundtable D
Evaluating the Evaluator
GOLD RUSH
• Lisa R Kieffer (Georgia Department of Audits and Accounts)
• Annie Xuemei Feng (College of William and Mary)
SESSION/SÉANCE 506
A Template for Effective School Improvement
Planning
LOCATION:
Using Multi-site and Multi-stakeholder Focus Group Data
to Interpret K-12 Gifted Program Development
ICE PALACE
• James F McTavish (Assessment Assistance Plus)
Roundtable E
Developing Surveys for Multiple Stakeholders to
Enhance Your Evaluations
• Courtney L Malloy (Vital Research)
• Pat Yee (Vital Research)
SESSION/SÉANCE 508
Audio Data Analysis Using Atlas-ti Software
LOCATION:
PINNACLE
• S Reed Early (British Columbia Office of the Auditor General)
141
12:10 pm – 1:45 pm / 12h10 – 13h45
Joint CES/AEA Luncheon /
Déjeuner-causerie conjoint
de la SCÉ et l’AEA
LOCATION: GRAND BALLROOM EAST
Carl Doucette, CES President, and Sharon Rallis, AEA
President, will host this ticketed luncheon where you will
have an opportunity to network with conference delegates
while enjoying sumptuous food. Awards recognizing the
outstanding accomplishments of dedicated people from the
evaluation community will be presented.
Carl Doucette, président de la SCÉ, et Sharon Rallis, présidente de l’AEA, seront les hôtes de ce déjeuner (billets
nécessaires) où vous aurez l’occasion de rencontrer d’autres
délégués tout en dégustant des mets somptueux. Des prix
soulignant les réalisations exceptionnelles de membres
dévoués de la communauté d’évaluation seront décernés.
Crossing Four State Boundaries in Teacher Education
Reform Projects: A Comparative Analysis of the Utility of
Various Evaluation Methods to Facilitate Data-Driven
Decision Making in US Department of Education
Teacher Quality Enhancement Grants
• Susan A Tucker (Evaluation and Development Associates), Diane
Hirschberg (University of Alaska Anchorage), Alexandra Hill
(University of Alaska Anchorage), Tomas D Morales (Cal Poly
Pomona), Jackie Stillisano (Ball State University), Nancy Shapiro
(University System of Maryland)
SESSION/SÉANCE 511
Building and Sharing Capacity: The American
Evaluation Association and Its Affiliates
LOCATION:
Association
• Deborah A Loesch-Griffin (Turning Point)
• Rachel Hickson (Montgomery County Public Schools)
SESSION/SÉANCE 512
Asking Dicey Questions: Assessing
Sexual Risk Behaviors Among People of Color
Panel / Panel
1:55 pm – 3:25 pm / 13h55 – 15h25
SESSION/SÉANCE 510
Methods for Using Evaluation to Build
Organizational Learning, Networking and
Capacity
LOCATION:
GRAND BALLROOM WEST
• Chair(s) – Emma Norland (US Environmental Protection Agency)
• Discussant(s) – Emma Norland (US Environmental Protection Agency)
LOCATION:
V.I.P
• Chair(s) – Elizabeth J Harris (EMT Associates)
• Discussant(s) – Rena A Agee (ORC Macro International)
The Development of Instrumentation Assessing
Sexual Risk Among Adults
• Elizabeth J Harris (EMT Associates), Rena A Agee (ORC Macro
International)
Asking Graphic Sexual Questions of Adults of Color
in Street Settings: Lessons Learned From the National Minority
HIV and Substance Abuse Prevention Initiative
• Rashi Rohatgi (Harlem United Community AIDS Center)
An Evaluation of a Measurement Tool for
Assessing Organizational Learning Capacity
Asking Graphic Sexual Questions of Adults of Color in
Faith-Based Settings: Lessons Learned From the National
Minority HIV and Substance Abuse Prevention Initiative
• Swee C Goh (University of Ottawa), J Bradley Cousins (University of
Ottawa), Tony Quon (University of Ottawa)
• Kimberly Brown (EMT Associates)
Facilitating Organizational Learning:
Understanding Social Networks in an Evaluation Context
• Stephanie D Sutherland (University of Pittsburgh)
142
Friday, 1:55 pm – 3:25 pm / Concurrent Sessions
SESSION/SÉANCE 513
SESSION/SÉANCE 516
Cooperative Efforts in International Science
and Technology Evaluation
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
An Empirical Test of Critical Multiplism
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
YORK
développement
• Chair(s) – William J Valdez (US Department of Energy)
• Discussant(s) – William J Valdez (US Department of Energy)
An Emerging Framework for International Research and
Development Evaluation Cooperation
• Peter Johnston (European Commission)
World Research Evaluation Network’s Critical Science and
Technology Assessement of Japan Evaluation and
Planning Programs
• Koh Harada (Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry)
2005 South Korean/World Research Evaluation Network
Workshop Results
• Jae Young Lee (Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning)
Unified Science and Technology Evaluation Framework
• George Teather (Independent Consultant)
Creating Uniform Standards for Research and
Development Evaluation
• Cheryl J Oros (US Department of Agriculture)
OXFORD
• Chair(s) – Patrick E McKnight (George Mason University)
Critical Multiplism in Social Science Measurement
• Patrick E McKnight (George Mason University)
Testing Critical Multiplism Through Simulation Studies
• Julius Najab (University of Arizona), Patrick E McKnight (George
Mason University)
A Comprehensive Evaluation of Cricial Multiplism In
Measurement
• Mei-Kuang Chen (University of Arizona), Patrick E McKnight (George
Mason University), Julius Najab (University of Arizona), Michael
Menke (University of Arizona)
SESSION/SÉANCE 517
Crossing the Boundaries Between
Theory and Practice
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
CARLETON
• Chair(s) – Sanford I Friedman (Friedman Consulting Group)
The Evaluator’s Multiple Roles
SESSION/SÉANCE 514
• Marycruz Diaz (WestEd)
Collaborative Efforts in Capacity Building:
Evaluation Cohort 2004/05
LOCATION:
PEEL
• Maria Z Townsend (University of Pittsburgh)
• Michele Puzzanchera (University of Pittsburgh)
• Jessica DeGel (University of Pittsburgh)
• Naida Tushnet (WestEd)
Reconciling Theory and Practice at the Point of Planning
• Jordan E Horowitz (WestEd)
Evaluation as a Business
• Sanford I Friedman (Friedman Consulting Group)
SESSION/SÉANCE 518
Independent Consulting TIG Business Meeting
SESSION/SÉANCE 515
Evaluating the System:
Helping Clients Shift From Simply Sustaining
Programs to Sustaining Outcomes
LOCATION:
Conducting Site Visits With the Funder
NORFOLK
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM EAST
• TIG Leader(s) – Maura J Harrington (Independent Consulting), Amy
A Germuth (Compass Consulting Group), Kathleen A Dowell
(Partners in Evaluation & Planning)
•
•
•
•
•
Chair(s) – Eric L Canen (University of Wyoming)
Laurel Parker West (University of Wyoming)
Laura L Feldman (University of Wyoming)
Mariah J Storey (University of Wyoming)
Marc J Homer (University of Wyoming)
143
SESSION/SÉANCE 519
SESSION/SÉANCE 521
Changing the Boundaries:
Evaluation and the Faith-Based Organization
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
Panel / Panel
WINDSOR ROOM WEST
sociaux
• Chair(s) – Eileen A Robertson-Rehberg (Frost Research Center)
The Evaluation of a Faith-Based Youth Mentoring Program:
One Evaluator’s Experience and the Lessons Learned
• Debra L Stark (University of Pittsburgh)
Quality of Life Indicators and Faith-Based Mentoring Program
Outcomes
• Eileen A Robertson-Rehberg (Frost Research Center)
Balancing the Evaluation of Program Consumer and Program
Volunteer Impacts in a Faith-Based Context
• John Risley (Western Michigan University), Thomaz K Chianca
Creating an Evidence Base for Faith-Based Social Services
• Robert L Fischer (Case Western Reserve University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 520
The Boundaries and Bridges of Cluster,
Initiative, and Multi-Site Evaluation: Part II
LOCATION:
ESSEX BALLROOM
CONFERENCE ROOM B
développement
• Chair(s) – Gretchen B Jordan (Sandia National Laboratories)
Lessons From Seven Years of Study of the Research
Environment
• Gretchen B Jordan (Sandia National Laboratories)
Crossing Boundaries to Assess the Academic Research
Environment at New Mexico State University
• Laura Haas (New Mexico State University)
Assessing Research Management at Canada’s National
Research Council
• Flavia Leung (National Research Council Canada)
SESSION/SÉANCE 522
The Journey of HIV/AIDS Prevention Evaluation:
An Experience Crossing Multiple Borders and
Multiple Boundaries
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
Let’s Assess the Work Environment for Research,
Not Just Outcomes
CONFERENCE ROOM C
• Chair(s) – Marlene Glassman (Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention)
Services)
HIV/AIDS Program Monitoring and Evaluation: Assessment in
an International Context
An Exploration of the History and Future of Cluster Evaluation
• Marlene Glassman (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
• Cynthia C Phillips (Phillips Wyatt Knowlton)
Integrating Evaluation into Guidance for Adapting and
Tailoring Evidence-Based Behavioral Interventions for New
Populations
The Participatory Approach to Cluster Evaluation:
Examples From the Field
• S René Lavinghouze (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
Making Meaning From Cluster Evaluation Data
• Beverly Parsons (InSites)
• Jennifer Galbraith (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
Monitoring and Evaluating HIV/AIDS Prevention Interventions
Among Racial and Ethnic Minority Populations: Issues of
Cultural Responsiveness
• Aisha Gilliam (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
144
SESSION/SÉANCE 523
SESSION/SÉANCE 525
Evaluating a Short-Term Residential Program
for Girls
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
The Impact of Higher Education Evaluation
in Evolving Educational Practices: Part II
CONFERENCE ROOM D
• Chair(s) – Cornelia S Sigworth (National Institute of Justice)
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM F
Reviewing the Research on Short-Term Detention and
the Treatment of Female Juvenile Offenders
• Chair(s) – Linda Heath (Loyola University, Chicago)
• Stephen Gies (Development Services Group)
Impact of a Week-Long Institute on Embedding
Math Concepts Into Agricultural Curriculum
Girls and Boys Town Short-Term Residential Service Program
• Discussant(s) – William H Rickards (Alverno College)
• Mona Way (Girls and Boys Town)
• Dennis C Scanlon (Penn State), Rama B Radhakrishna (Penn State
University)
Evaluation of Father Flanagan’s Boys’ Home
(Girls and Boys Town)
Disseminating a Methodology to Create Virtual Machines
• Marcia Cohen (Development Services Group)
• Marcie J Bober (San Diego State University), Thomas Impelluso (San
Diego State University)
Managing a Multi-site Evaluation: The Federal Perspective
• Cornelia S Sigworth (National Institute of Justice)
SESSION/SÉANCE 524
Multi-Site Evaluation of Federal Programs:
A Panel Discussion on the Selection of Research
Methods and the Roles of Evaluators in
Community-Participatory Research
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
Indirect Measures of Student Learning:
On Not Knowing What We Don’t Know
• Linda Heath (Loyola University Chicago), Adam DeHoek (Loyola
University Chicago)
SESSION/SÉANCE 526
Building Theories of Change Online
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM E
• Chair(s) – Doryn D Chervin (ORC Macro International)
Evaluation of the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Coalition
Initiative of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
• Doryn D Chervin (ORC Macro International)
National Evaluation of the Prevention Research Centers of the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
• Nicola U Dawkins (ORC Macro International)
The National Evaluation of the Comprehensive Community
Mental Health Services for Children and Their Families
Program
• Robert L Stephens (ORC Macro International)
Evaluation of the National Child Traumatic Stress Network
Initiative
• Christine M Walrath (ORC Macro International)
CONFERENCE ROOM G
• Helene Clark (ActKnowledge)
SESSION/SÉANCE 527
Theories of Evaluation TIG Business Meeting
and Presentation: Bunche-Da Vinci Revisited
(New Directions for Evaluation Volume 106) –
Reflections on Theory to Practice
LOCATION:
• TIG Leader(s) – Bernadette Campbell (Westat), Tarek Azzam
(University of California at Los Angeles)
• Chair(s) – Marvin Alkin (University of California at Los Angeles)
• Discussant(s) – Stewart I Donaldson (Claremont Graduate University),
Gary Henry (Georgia State University), Jennifer C Greene (University
of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), Jean A King (University of
Minnesota)
145
SESSION/SÉANCE 528
Cultural Borderlands: Being Present as a
Group Facilitator in Cross-Cultural Contexts
LOCATION:
• Gregory Diggs (National Research Center)
• Kerry Lupher (National Research Center)
• Sabrina Arrendondo Mattson (National Research Center)
Incorporating Indigenous Knowledge
into Practice / Intégrer les connaissances
autochtones à la pratique
Panel / Panel
CITY HALL
• Chair(s) – Andrea LK Johnston (Johnston Research)
Drawing on Indigenous Knowledge: Crossing Boundaries
to Listen and Learn
• Sheryl Scott (Scott Consulting), Jennifer Irving (University of
Minnesota), Sharon Day (Indigenous Peoples’ Task Force)
Identifying Culturally-Based Best Practices for Indigenous
Substance Abuse Treatment and Prevention Programs
• Jane Grover (RMC Research Corporation), Roy Gabriel (RMC
Corporation)
Using Methods That Work With Aboriginal Communities
• Andrea LK Johnston (Johnston Research)
Inter-Organizational Learning
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
WENTWORTH
Inter-Organizational Learning in Networks and Partnerships
Inter-Organizational Learning: Partners’ Different Perspectives
on Project Effectiveness and Sustainability
• Delwyn Goodrick (Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology,
Australia)
Inter-Organizational Learning: Whole-of-Government
Monitoring and Evaluation of Government Departments
• Indran A Naidoo (Public Service Commission), Mashwahle J Diphofa
(Public Service Commission of South Africa)
SESSION/SÉANCE 532
The Challenge of Measuring Results in
Developing Countries: Recent International
Experiences
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
KENORA
• Chair(s) – Robert E Lahey (REL Solutions)
SESSION/SÉANCE 530
Indices and Scales in Educational Evaluation
ELGIN
• Chair(s) – Stephanie M Reich (Vanderbilt University)
Psychological and Pedagogical Interpretation of
Latent Characteristics of Graduates’ Achievements
• Marina Borisovna Chelyshkova (State University of Management),
Viktor Ivanovich Zvonnikov (State University of Management)
Building a Valid and Reliable Index of School Safety
• Bruce B Frey (University of Kansas), Vicki L Schmitt (University of
Kansas), Jill H Lohmeier (University of Kansas)
146
SESSION/SÉANCE 531
SESSION/SÉANCE 529
LOCATION:
• Daniel J Robertson (EndVision Research and Evaluation), Catherine A
Callow-Heusser (EndVision Research and Evaluation)
Thematic Strand and Special Needs Populations TIG / Volet
thématique et les populations à besoins spéciaux
LOCATION:
Analyzing Likert-Type Responses to a Middle School
Science Attitude Questionnaire Using a Polytomous
Item Response Model
Building and Sustaining a Results-Based Monitoring and
Evaluation System: Lessons for Developing Countries
• Ray C Rist (World Bank)
Challenges to Effective Results Measurement of Local
Programs and Services in Developing Countries
• Lauren Nancoo (Upside)
Building a Results-Based Social Policy: The Experience of the
State of Ceara-Brazil
• Marcos C Holanda (Economic Research Institute of Ceara)
Harmonization and Alignment of Results Measurement in
Developing Countries: Moving to Country Ownership of
Results Measurement
• Robert E Lahey (REL Solutions)
SESSION/SÉANCE 533
SESSION/SÉANCE 536
Evaluation in Peacebuilding
LOCATION:
HURON
• Chair(s) – Diana Lawyer Brook (Leaders Net)
Evaluating a Post-conflict Pilot Project in Croatia:
Crossing Political, Ethnic and Sectoral Boundaries
• Patricia J Vondal (The QED Group), Jill Tirnauer (The QED Group)
Evaluation in Educational Contexts:
K-12 and Higher Education
LOCATION:
DUFFERIN
Factors That Influence the Teaching of Inquiry Science to
Under-Represented Groups
Civil Society Organizations and the Prevention of Armed
Conflict in Africa: Lessons for the Evaluation Community
• Megan Zander-Cotugno (RAND Corporation), Louise G Yarnall (SRI
International)
• Scott Chaplowe (Independent Consultant)
An Evaluation of an Undergraduate Minority Research
Program Involving a 5 Year Cohort
Peacebuilding Evaluation:
An Overview of the Current State of the Art
• Sharon K Stout (Community Well Research and Evaluation)
SESSION/SÉANCE 534
Shortening the Psychopathology Measures
of the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs:
An Application of Rasch and Computer
Adaptive Testing
LOCATION:
KENT
• Chair(s) – Kendon J Conrad (University of Illinois at Chicago)
• Michael L Dennis (Chestnut Health Systems)
• Barth Riley (University of Illinois at Chicago)
SESSION/SÉANCE 535
What Makes Evaluating the Arts and Culture
Unique?
LOCATION:
SIMCOE
• Dorene M MacKinnon-Tucker (University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill), Henry Frierson (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
What to Observe and Analyze in a Multicultural Context?
Evaluate Teacher-Student Relationship From a Multicultural
Perspective
• Xiaofan Cai (Western Michigan University), Gunilla Holm (Western
Michigan University), William Cobern (Western Michigan University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 538
The Step by Step Case Study Project: Capturing
Early Education Reforms in Central Eastern
Europe, the Caucuses, Central Asia and Haiti
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Linda E Lee (Proactive Information Services)
• Discussant(s) – Linda E Lee (Proactive Information Services)
The Step-by-Step Program and Case Study Project
• Sarah Klaus (International Step by Step Assn), Hugh McLean (Open
Society Institute)
de la culture
Inclusive Education: Influencing Children, Teachers, Parents,
and State Policies in Ukraine
• Rodney A Wambeam (University of Wyoming)
• Natalia Sofiy (Ukrainian Step by Step Foundation), Svitlana Efimova
(Lviv Regional Institute of Postgraduate Pedagogical Education)
• Kathlyn M Steedly (VSA Arts)
The Multicase Study Experience
147
SESSION/SÉANCE 539
SESSION/SÉANCE 541
New Academic Approaches to
Evaluation Capacity Building
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
COSMOPOLITAN
Developing an Evaluation Toolkit:
Assessing K-12 Classroom Presentations
in Collaboration With Title VI Funded K-12
International Education Outreach Programs
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
GINGERSNAP
• Chair(s) – Conrad G Katzenmeyer (University of Central Florida)
• Discussant(s) – Arlen R Gullickson (Western Michigan University)
The National Science Foundation-Sponsored Certificate
in Program Evaluation: Building Capacity in
Rural Central California
• Chair(s) – Rita O’Sullivan (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
• Phyllis A Kuehn (California State University, Fresno), Sharon BrownWelty (California State University, Fresno)
Developing an Evaluation Toolkit: Assessing K-12 Classroom
Presentations in Collaboration with Title VI Funded
K-12 International Education Outreach Programs
Building Capacity in a New Evaluation Office
• Rita O’Sullivan (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Chris
Blow (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
• Judy A Kelley (West Texas A&M University)
Building a Toolkit: Activity Processes, Quality, and Outcomes
A Comprehensive Evaluation and Training Program
• Mary Penta (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
• Nancy S Lewis (University of Central Florida), Carine S Strebel
Halpern (University of Central Florida), Jo Ann Smith (University of
Central Florida), Conrad G Katzenmeyer (University of Central
Florida), E Lea Witta (University of Central Florida)
Collaborating With National Partners
Evaluating Programs to Strengthen Research Capacity
• Beth Powers Costello (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
• Michelle Jay (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
Working Collaboratively With Partner Sites
SESSION/SÉANCE 543
• Judith K Inazu (University of Hawai’i at Manoa)
SESSION/SÉANCE 540
Using Performance Measures for Managing
Results: Ontario’s Experience
Practicing Responsive Evaluation in the
Context of No Child Left Behind
LOCATION:
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
EXECUTIVE
• Chair(s) – Barbara J Adams (Ministry of Finance, Government of
Ontario)
Developing Performance Measurement Systems
to Support Government Results
ICE PALACE
•
•
•
•
•
Chair(s) – Lizanne DeStefano (University of Illinois)
Discussant(s) – Lizanne DeStefano (University of Illinois)
Victoria Hammer (University of Illinois)
Leanne Kallemeyn (University of Illinois)
Matthew R Hanson (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
• Kevin D Perry (Government of Ontario)
Importance and Use of Performance Information
to Support Government Results
• Karen L Hughes (Government of Ontario)
148
SESSION/SÉANCE 544
Examining a Technology-Based School Program and
its Impact on Student Achievement
Roundtable Set Eight
LOCATION:
• Sharon Herpin (WestEd), Roger Chesswas (WestEd)
• Chair(s) – Susan M Jenkins (Caliber Associates Inc)
Evaluation of Evaluations: Building a Conceptual Model
and Developing a Tool to Assess Return on Investment
for Evaluations in Human Development Organisations
• Seetharam Mukkavilli (Plan International)
Evaluating Nongovermental Organization Entrepreneurship:
Lessons From the Field
• Gayle Peterson (Headwaters Group Philanthropic Services), John E
Sherman (Headwaters Group Philanthropic Services)
Program Evaluation in a Community Agency:
From Capacity Building to Results
• Barry J Isaacs (Surrey Place Centre), Matthew Jacques (Surrey Place
Centre)
Evaluation: The Engine in a Dynamic Learning Loop
• John E Sherman (Headwaters Group Philanthropic Services), Gayle
Peterson (Headwaters Group Philanthropic Services)
Going the Distance: Making Evaluations Work
Across Geographic Borders
• Shaunti Knauth (Learning Point Associates)
Culturally Competent Evaluation in Guatemala
• David D Williams (Brigham Young University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 545
Supporting Ethnographic Approaches in
Government Research: The Perspectives of
a Federal Project Officer and Evaluation Team
on an Ethnographic Study of Medicare
Managed Care
Esteeming Stakeholders as Evaluating Agents:
Implications Across Cultures
LOCATION:
• David D Williams (Brigham Young University), Trav D Johnson
(Brigham Young University), Eileen Sorenson (Brigham Young
University)
PINNACLE
Qualitative Methods TIG and Government Evaluation TIG /
Méthodes qualitatives et l’évaluation gouvernementale
• Chair(s) – Cynthia S Robins (Westat)
• Amy J Heller (US Department of Health and Human Services)
• Karla Eisen (Westat)
Measuring Student Motivation and Sense of Efficacy
in a Middle College Evaluation Project
• Bruce Yelton (Praxis Research Inc/Winthrop University), Paula M
Plonski (Praxis Research), Stephen K Miller (University of Louisville)
3:25 pm – 3:35 pm / 15h25 – 15h35
Refreshment Break /
149
SESSION/SÉANCE 549
3:35 pm – 4:20 pm / 15h35 – 16h20
Small Neighborhood Grants Programs:
An Overview of Four Evaluation Tools for
Foundations and Communities and
How to Use Them
SESSION/SÉANCE 546
Effective Evaluator-Client Negotiation
in Contracted Evaluation
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
GRAND BALLROOM WEST
• Chair(s) – John M Owen (University of Melbourne)
• Discussant(s) – Ernest R House (University of Colorado, Boulder),
Hallie Preskill (Claremont Graduate University)
Evaluator Roles in Contracted Evaluation Studies
• Rosalind E Hurworth (University of Melbourne), John M Owen
(University of Melbourne), Pam K St Leger (University of Melbourne)
Exceeding Client Expectations in Evaluation Grants
and Contracts: Victories, Wounds, and War Stories
• Eusebio M Alvaro (Claremont Graduate University), Stewart I
Donaldson (Claremont Graduate University), Christina A Christie
(Claremont Graduate University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 547
Using a Scorecard Evaluation Process
to Evaluate Abstinence Education Programs
LOCATION:
V.I.P
• Danielle Ruedt (Children and Youth Coordinating Council)
• Georgina O Iyamu (Children and Youth Coordinating Council)
SESSION/SÉANCE 548
Operating in the Pasteur’s Quadrant: Evaluating
Use-Inspired Basic Research Programs
LOCATION:
PEEL
•
•
•
•
•
Melissa S Quon Huber (Michigan State University)
Pennie G Foster-Fishman (Michigan State University)
Gretchen Archer (Michigan State University)
Laurie A Van Egeren (Michigan State University)
Steven J Pierce (Michigan State University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 550
Challenges in the Evaluation of the
Smaller Learning Communities in
Clark County High Schools
LOCATION:
NORFOLK
• Amber Jacobo (University of Nevada, Las Vegas)
• Jennifer Personius Zipoy (University of Las Vegas)
• Michelle Chino (University of Nevada, Las Vegas)
SESSION/SÉANCE 551
Results-Based Accountability: A Case Study
From the Annie E Casey Foundation
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
OXFORD
• Chair(s) – Robin Kane (Innovation Network)
Learning and Support Strategies for Results-Based
Accountability
LOCATION:
• Robin Kane (Innovation Network)
YORK
développement
A Foundation’s Perspective on Implementing Results-Based
Accountability
• Donna Stark (Annie E Casey Foundation)
• Bhavya Lal (C-STPS LLC)
150
SESSION/SÉANCE 552
SESSION/SÉANCE 555
Applying Jung’s Archetypes and the
Symbolism of Tarot for the Evaluator Profession
The Evaluative Mind: How Top-Notch
Organizations Leverage It to Excel
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
LOCATION:
CARLETON
ESSEX BALLROOM
• Débora Cristina Aranha (Brazilian Evaluation Network)
• Chair(s) – Jennifer W Martineau (Center for Creative Leadership)
• Discussant(s) – Michael Scriven (Western Michigan University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 553
Independent Consulting Considerations
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM EAST
Executive Intelligence: The Evaluative Mind
• Justin M Menkes (Spencer Stuart)
Evaluative Thinking and High-Performance Organizational
Cultures
• E Jane Davidson (Davidson Consulting Ltd)
• Chair(s) – Amy A Germuth (Compass Consulting Group)
CIRCA Group Europe:
A Possible Model for Independent Consultants
• Jim Ryan (CIRCA Group Europe)
When Things Go Wrong; Protesting a Bid Decision
• Hugh G Peach (H Gil Peach & Associates), Michael Maranda
(University of Maryland)
SESSION/SÉANCE 554
Large-Scale Evaluation Approaches: The
Canadian National Outcomes Matrix and the
CDC Response to the Tsunami
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM WEST
sociaux
• Chair(s) – David Rosenbluth (Saskatchewan Community Resources
and Employment)
Merging Organizational Cultures to Evaluate the Center for
Disease Control’s Response to the Tsunami: Using a Lessons
Learned Process to Further Program and Policy Development
SESSION/SÉANCE 556
Logic Models to Describe Diffusion of
Innovations
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM B
Research, Technology, and Development Evaluation TIG and
Systems in Evaluation TIG / Évaluation de la recherche, de la
technologie et du développement et les systèmes en évaluation
• Chair(s) – Gretchen B Jordan (Sandia National Laboratories)
• Discussant(s) – Janice Noga (University of Cincinnati)
Innovation Systems, Program Theory, and Sustainability
Research
• Diana Bauer (US Environmental Protection Agency), Julie Zimmerman
(US Environmental Protection Agency), Dale Alan Pahl (US
Environmental Protection Agency), Emma Norland (US Environmental
Protection Agency)
Generic Logic Models for Federal Program Delivery and
Diffusion of Innovation
• John H Reed (Innovologie), John C Mortensen (Energetics), Gretchen
B Mortensen (Sandia National Laboratories)
• D Michele Hoover (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention),
Janet Smith (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Marie
Socha (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Catherine
Partain (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Richard W
Klomp (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Steve Bridges
(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Kathleen M KowalskiTrakofler (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Dori
Reissman (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
The National Outcomes Matrix: Utilizing Archival Data to
Examine the Appropriateness of National Outcomes Matrix
Indicators for Child and Family Service Programs
• Kelly Ernst (Canadian Outcomes Research Institute), Casey P Boodt
(Canadian Outcomes Research Institute)
151
SESSION/SÉANCE 557
Building Capacity for, and Conducting
Evaluation in, Rural Community-Academic
Partnerships
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM C
The Citizen Participation Partnership Project: Key Learnings
from a Cross-Jurisdictional, Multi-Site Evaluation
• John Church (University of Alberta), Olive Triska (University of
Alberta), Kent Rondeau (University of Alberta), Susan Wagner
(University of Saskatchewan), Doug Wilson (University of Alberta),
Robert McKim (Capital Health), Ray LaFleur (ComDev Consulting),
Karyn Gibbons (University of Alberta), Josh Marko (Capital Health)
SESSION/SÉANCE 560
• Chair(s) – Demia L Sundra (Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention)
Minority Achievement and Evaluation
Challenges in Higher Education: Part I
Which Hat Am I Wearing? Adventures in Evaluation in
Smallville, United States of America
• Terry Uyeki (Rocky Mountain Prevention Research Center)
Kicking Ash: The Evolving Role of Evaluation in
West Virginia’s Tobacco Prevention Plan
• Kimberly Horn (West Virginal University), Valerie Frey-McClung (West
Virginia University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 558
Technology’s Influence on Evaluation Theory
and Capacity: Real-world Examples
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM D
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM F
• Chair(s) – Monifa Green Beverly (University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill)
• Discussant(s) – Laura Blasi (University of Central Florida)
Evaluating Alaska Native-Serving and Native Hawaiian-Serving
Institutions of Higher Education
• Henry M Doan (US Department of Agriculture), Saleia Afele-Faamuli
(US Department of Agriculture)
On the ACT as a Tool for Predicting Success of Black
American Students in Freshman Chemistry at Tougaloo
College
• George Armstrong (Tougaloo College)
• Chair(s) – Mariette A Xenopoulos (McGill University)
Picturing and Customizing the Vision: An Automated,
Database-Driven, Logic-Model-Assisted Approach to Blending
Strategic Planning and Performance Measurement
• Paul J Longo (independent consultant)
How to Integrate Web-Based Tools Into Needs Analysis and
Evaluation of e-Learning Programs
• Penina Mungania (University of Arkansas)
SESSION/SÉANCE 559
Advantages of Participatory Models
LOCATION:
SESSION/SÉANCE 561
Raising the Benchmarks for Evaluation
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM G
• Discussant(s) – James W Altschuld (Ohio State University), Burt Perrin
(Independent Consultant), Arnold Love (Independent Consultant),
Keiko Kuji-Shikatani (Cathexis Consulting), Laurie Stevahn (Seattle
University), Jean A King (University of Minnesota), Gail Ghere
(University of Minnesota), Jane E Minnema (University of Minnesota),
Rochelle Zorzi (Cathexis Consulting)
• Martha McGuire (Cathexis Consulting)
CONFERENCE ROOM E
• Chair(s) – S René Lavinghouze (Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention)
Adaptation and Implementation of a Multi-Site Participatory
Evaluation Model
• Leslie Goodyear (Education Development Center), Frances P Lawrenz
152
Au-delà des barrières linguistiques et frontalières en
évaluation: conditions d’efficacité et stratégies de
communication innovantes / Beyond Language and State
Barriers in Evaluation: Conditions for Effectiveness and
Innovative communication Strategies
LOCATION:
• Thierry Barreto Fernandes (Fondation Rurale de l’Afrique de l’Ouest)
SESSION/SÉANCE 562
Evaluating the Merit and Worth of Multi-Pronged
Programs
•
•
•
•
Ralph Renger (University of Arizona)
Adriana Cimetta (University of Arizona)
Melissa Page (University of Arizona)
Erin Peacock (University of Arizona)
SESSION/SÉANCE 565
Quantitative Analyses for Impact Evaluation
in Education
LOCATION:
SESSION/SÉANCE 563
Multicase Methods and Generalization
LOCATION:
Thematic Strand and Cluster, Multi-site and Multi-level
Evaluation TIG / Volet thématique et l’évaluations en grappes,
multisites et multiniveaux
• Chair(s) – Saville Kushner (University of the West of England)
SESSION/SÉANCE 564
Using Scientific-Based Evidence to Evaluate the
Teaching American History Grant Program: Towards a
Quantitative Methodology
• Julianne Hanavan (Education Alliance at Brown University), Susan M
Gracia (Brown University), Terese Zimmer (Brown University)
Assessing Afterschool Program Effects:
A Multidimensional Approach for Evaluating the
Relationship Between Attendance and Outcomes
• Karin L Chang-Rios (University of Kansas)
L’impact des frontières culturelles et linguistiques
sur l’évaluation : diagnostics et stratégies pour
accroître les échanges interlinguistiques et
interculturels sur le plan des connaissances, des
compétences et des pratiques en évaluation /
The Impact of Cultural and Linguistic Boundaries
on Evaluation: Diagnoses and Strategies for
Increasing Interlinguistic and Intercultural
Exchanges of Evaluation Knowledge,
Competencies and Practices
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
ELGIN
CITY HALL
• Chair(s) – Jack Batho (Agence intergouvernementale de la
francophonie)
• Discussant(s) – Richard Marceau (École nationale d’administration
publique)
SESSION/SÉANCE 566
Evaluation, Knowledge Management, and
Organizational Learning: Weaving Disciplines
to Enhance Evaluation Capacity Development
LOCATION:
WENTWORTH
Applied Linkages: Evaluation, Knowledge Management and
Organisational Learning in a Public Sector Context
• Melissa Weenink (Ministry of Education, New Zealand), Kate
McKegg (Independent Consultant)
Public Management: Learning From Evaluation and
Knowledge Management
• Kate McKegg (Independent Consultant)
Les Journées francophones de l’évaluation : une première
manifestation de la stratégie d’échanges interculturels en
évaluation de l’Agence Intergouvernementale de la
Francophonie / Les Journées francophones de l ‘evaluation:
A First Step Toward Intercultural Exchanges in Evaluation by
the Agence Intergouvernementale de la Francophonie
• Isabelle Sannié (Agence intergouvernementale de la francophonie)
153
SESSION/SÉANCE 567
SESSION/SÉANCE 571
Introducing Evaluation to the Developing
Countries
LOCATION:
KENORA
Evaluating Community Development Initiatives
LOCATION:
DUFFERIN
Measuring Social Capital: Its Role in Community Development
• Chair(s) – Ana Coghlan (ACTion Consulting)
• Dale CP Howard (Howard Research & Management Consulting)
Multiple Dimensions to Evaluating Across Borders
Evaluating Partnership and Collaboration: A CommunityBased Example
• Myrna R Sears (University of Alberta), Bradley R Arkison (Advanis
Inc), Stanley J Varnhagen (University of Alberta)
Learning From Micro-projects Managed by Community-Based
Organizations: The Need of an International and CrossCultural Evaluation Approach
• Rafael Monterde-Diaz (Technical University of Valencia)
SESSION/SÉANCE 568
Evaluation of Science and Technology Programs
in China
LOCATION:
HURON
• Chair(s) – Conrad G Katzenmeyer (University of Central Florida)
• Caryn A Sweeney (Academy for Educational Development), Elvis E
Fraser (Academy for Educational Development), Diane Williams
(Independent Consultant), Alejandra Lopez-Fernandini (Academy for
Educational Development)
SESSION/SÉANCE 572
Examining and Applying Professional Standards
in Social Work Evaluation
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Mansoor AF Kazi (University of Huddersfield)
Developing Methods to Evaluate What Interventions Work and
in What Circumstances
China’s Science and Technology System: Challenge and
Change
• Mansoor AF Kazi (University of Huddersfield)
• Deh-I Hsiung (National Science Foundation)
• Jenny L Jones (University of Tennessee), Sarita Davis (Clark Atlanta
University), Sue Tungate (Colorado State University)
Meta-evaluation of an Evaluation of Science and Technology
Programs in China Using the Joint Committee on Standards
for Educational Evaluation National Program Evaluation
Standards
• Jo Ann Smith (University of Central Florida)
SESSION/SÉANCE 570
Tips From the Trenches
SESSION/SÉANCE 573
Leave No Indian Child Behind:
Culturally Relevant Program Evaluation
Strategies for Pre-K-12 Programs Serving
Native American Students
LOCATION:
Issues in Ethics and Evaluations
SIMCOE
LOCATION:
• Nicole R Bowman (University of Wisconsin, Madison)
York)
Darwin was Right: The Evolution of Evaluation in the
Real World
• Gene Lyle (Ramsey County Community Human Services)
The Real World and the Non-Profit Internal Evaluator
• Stanley T Capela (HeartShare Human Services of New York)
154
SESSION/SÉANCE 574
New Directions in the Charter School Movement
and the Need for Alternative Evaluation
Approaches
LOCATION:
COSMOPOLITAN
Positive School Culture and Alternative Placements:
Collaboratively Keeping Kids in Class
• Jennifer E Williams (Association for the Study and Development of
Community)
SESSION/SÉANCE 579
Roundtable Set Nine
• Jonathan A Plucker (Indiana University)
• Kelly E Rapp (Indiana University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 576
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Thomas J Horwood (Caliber Associates Inc)
Roundtable A
Crossing Educational Boundaries:
Including Evaluation as an Essential Educational
Strategy to Change Human Behavior
LOCATION:
GINGERSNAP
Sharing Ideas About Evaluating the Quality of Group Therapy
Sessions
• Kasey R Weber (Colorado Department of Corrections), Kelli J Klebe
(University of Colorado at Colorado Springs), Maureen L O’Keefe
(Colorado Department of Corrections)
Roundtable B
• Robert D Shumer (University of Minnesota)
• Craig Love (Westat), Gayle A Wisdom (Westat)
Roundtable C
SESSION/SÉANCE 577
What Color is Your Book? How the Standards
We Follow Influence the Utilization of
Government Evaluation Efforts
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
Crossing Boundaries: Making Evaluation Work
GOLD RUSH
Evaluating the Impact of Service Learning in a Pre-service
Teacher Education Program
• Linda B Schrader (Florida State University), Tamara C Bertrand
(Florida State University)
Roundtable D
Using a Collaborative Approach to Evaluate a
Smaller Learning Communities Program
• Chair(s) – Rakesh Mohan (Idaho State Legislature)
• Discussant(s) – Rakesh Mohan (Idaho State Legislature)
• Alberto Heredia (WestEd)
A Voice Crying in the Wilderness
• Gary VanLandingham (Florida Office of Program Policy Analysis and
Government Accountability)
Remaining Independent Without Becoming Irrelevant:
A Case Study
• John Abbey (Georgia Department of Audits)
SESSION/SÉANCE 578
Measuring Positive School Culture and
Social Climate
SESSION/SÉANCE 580
Images as Catalysts of Expression:
A Demonstration of Photolanguage
LOCATION:
PINNACLE
• Chair(s) – Rebecca E White (Louisiana State University)
• Diane D Sasser (Louisiana State University AgCenter)
• Leanna T Cathey (Louisiana State University AgCenter)
LOCATION:
ICE PALACE
• Chair(s) – David R Thomas (University of Auckland, New Zealand)
Measuring School Social Climate to Assess
School Improvement Interventions
• David R Thomas (University of Auckland, New Zealand)
155
4:30 pm – 6:00 pm / 16h30 – 18h00
National Research Council of Canada’s
Integrated Approach to Planning and
Performance Management
Panel / Panel
SESSION/SÉANCE 581
Stakeholder Involvement in Evaluations of
Mental Health Services
LOCATION:
SESSION/SÉANCE 582
V.I.P
• Chair(s) – Sanjeev Sridharan (University of Edinburgh)
A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for Mental Health:
Consumer/Survivor Organizations: Participation,
Conceptualization, Design, and Action
• Joanna Ochocka (Centre for Research and Education in Human
Services), Geoffrey B Nelson (Wilfrid Laurier University), Rich Janzen
Evidence-Based Practices in Adult Mental Health Services:
The Voices of Service Recipients
• Anna M Scheyett (University of North Carolina), Paul Childers
(Independent Consultant), Erin McCarthy (University of North
Carolina)
Women’s Views of the Behavioral Health Treatment System:
A Mixed Methods Approach
• Julienne A Giard (University of South Florida), Colleen Clark
(University of South Florida), Alex Rich (University of South Florida),
Janet Suleski (University of South Florida), Marion Becker (University
of South Florida)
LOCATION:
YORK
développement
• Chair(s) – Jeninfer A Birta (National Research Council Canada)
National Research Council of Canada’s Planning and
Performance Management Solution
• N Bruce Baskerville (National Research Council of Canada)
A Piece of the Puzzle: Results From a Recent Evaluation
• Alexandra Dagger (National Research Council Canada), Jeninfer A
Birta (National Research Council Canada)
A Piece of the Puzzle: Management Self-Assessments
• Flavia Leung (National Research Council Canada)
A Piece of the Puzzle: The Risk Management Picture
• Frances E Isaacs (National Research Council Canada)
SESSION/SÉANCE 583
Evaluation Becomes an Integral Part
of an Organization: Learning From Multiple
Case Studies
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
PEEL
• Chair(s) – Gale Berkowitz (The David and Lucile Packard Foundation)
Foundation)
Organizational Environments and the Introduction of
Evaluation Into Foundations
• Victor Kuo (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation)
Participatory Approaches to Internal Evaluation and
• Tony Berkley (WK Kellogg Foundation)
Evaluation Becomes Part of the Organizational Culture:
A Case Study of the Philanthropy and Volunteerism
Programming Area at the Kellogg Foundation
• Huilan Yang (WK Kellogg Foundation), Jianping Shen (Western
Michigan University), Honggao Cao (University of Michigan), Charles
Warfield (Western Michigan University)
156
SESSION/SÉANCE 584
SESSION/SÉANCE 586
Activities Analysis:
An Ethnographic Tool for Applying a Systems
Approach to Process Evaluation
Applied Research Consultants:
Crossing Boundaries Through a Graduate-Level
Vertical Practicum in Evaluation
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
LOCATION:
NORFOLK
CARLETON
• Eve C Pinsker (Stroger Hospital)
• Michael D Lieber (University of Illinois at Chicago)
• Chair(s) – Lynda M Sagrestano (Southern Illinois University)
Applied Research Consultants: Theory and Practice
• Silvia Montoya-Gomez (Southern Illinois University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 585
Multilevel and Multivariate Analyses
in Evaluation
Applied Research Consultants: Relationships and Roles
• Virginia Dicken (Southern Illinois University)
Applied Research Consultants: Campus and Community
LOCATION:
• Phil Seneca (Southern Illinois University Carbondale)
OXFORD
• Chair(s) – Robert G Orwin (Westat)
Using Principal Components Analysis in Program Evaluation:
Some Practical Considerations
• Thomas Kellow (University of South Florida, St Petersburg)
An Outcomes-by-Implementation Evaluation of a Literacy
Program for Struggling 9th Grade Readers
• Larry Letourneau (University of Nevada, Las Vegas), Keith Zvoch
(University of Nevada, Las Vegas), Leslie Nix (Clark County School
District)
Evaluating the Quality of Organizational Training Using
Heirarchical Linear Models
• Cristina Ling Chard (World Bank Group), Shreyasi Jha (University of
Texas at Austin), Diana Arango (London School of Economics)
SESSION/SÉANCE 587
Standards and Guidelines for Internal
Quality Assurance of Evaluation Practice
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM EAST
• Victoria L Essenmacher (SPEC Associates)
• Priscilla Spencer (Formative Evaluation Research Associates)
• Michel Lahti (University of Southern Maine)
SESSION/SÉANCE 588
Evaluation in Child Welfare Services
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM WEST
Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling and Growth Curve Analysis
in Outcome Based Evaluation
• Mukaria J Itang’ata (Western Michigan University)
Joining Forces to Promote Better Outcomes:
An Outcome Evaluation of the Fulton County Court Appointed
Special Advocates Program
• Chair(s) – Jenny L Jones (University of Tennessee)
• Felicia J Tuggle (Court Appointed Special Advocates)
The Kansas Peer Review Model for Evaluating Child Abuse
Neglect and Prevention Programs
• Jackie Counts (University of Kansas), James Redmon (Kansas
Children’s Cabinet), John Green (University of Kansas), Stephanie
Wallio (University of Kansas)
Promoting Social Change: An Evaluation of a Primary
Prevention Program to Prevent Child Sexual Abuse
• Kamilah A Jones (Clark Atlanta University)
157
SESSION/SÉANCE 589
SESSION/SÉANCE 591
Program Theory and Theory Driven Evaluation
TIG Business Meeting and Debate:
Does Program Theory Really Improve
Evaluation Practice? Criticisms and Questions
for the Advocates
LOCATION:
ESSEX BALLROOM
• TIG Leader(s) – Katrina L Bledsoe (The College of New Jersey), E Lea
Witta (University of Central Florida)
• Carol H Weiss (Harvard University)
• Huey T Chen (University of Alabama)
• Stewart I Donaldson (Claremont Graduate University)
• John Gargani (University of California, Berkeley)
SESSION/SÉANCE 590
Experiences From the Use of an Innovative
Quantifiable Portfolio Review Process
That Blends and Employs Traditional Tools
(in Example, Logic Models, and Expert Reviews)
to Quantify the Benefits of Research Programs
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM B
développement
• Chair(s) – Cheryl J Oros (US Department of Agriculture)
• Discussant(s) – Cheryl J Oros (US Department of Agriculture)
Quantifying Expected Outcomes for Research Via the Use of
Logic Models
Building Community Capacity to Improve
Health Outcomes: Evaluation Efforts
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM C
• Chair(s) – Rusti Berent (Children’s Institute)
Evaluating the Alberta Regional Health Authorities’ Capacity
to Build Sustainable Health Initiatives: Providing Enhanced
Prevention and Early Detection of Cervical Cancer for
Un/underserved Alberta Women
• Pamela A Magee (Alberta Cancer Board), Nancy B Snowball (Alberta
Cancer Board)
Evaluation for Program Improvement: Lessons Learned From
the Evaluation of HIV Prevention Capacity in the United
States
• Aisha Gilliam (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Green
Donata (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Sam Taveras
(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
Parent Appraisal of Child’s Experiences: A Comprehensive
Needs Assessment of Children That Inform Public Health and
Education for Service Providers and Policy-Makers
• Susan R Greenberg (Children’s Institute), Christine A Lehman
(Children’s Institute)
Community Capacity: Can it be Measured?
A Case Study in Instrument Development and Application
to Population Health Programs
• Mary Frances MacLellan-Wright (Public Health Agency of Canada),
Donna Anderson (Université Laval), Sarah Barber (Public Health
Agency of Canada), Brenda Cantin (Public Health Agency of
Canada), Kim Raine (University of Alberta), Neale Smith (University
of Alberta)
• Henry M Doan (US Department of Agriculture)
Developing an Integrated Approach to Data Collection,
Analysis, and Reporting for Research Evaluation
• Djimé D Adoum (US Department of Agriculture)
• Bart Hewitt (US Department of Agriculture)
158
SESSION/SÉANCE 592
Is It possible to Successfully Evaluate the
Effectiveness of Comprehensive Community
Initiatives (CCIs)?
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM D
• Chair(s) – Antoine Bourdages (Government)
• Robert Flynn (University of Ottawa)
SESSION/SÉANCE 593
Lessons From the Field: Use of Logic Models
at Three Multi-Site Evaluations
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM E
• Chair(s) – Astrid Hendricks-Smith (The California Endowment)
The Clinic Consortia Policy and Advocacy Program Evaluation
• Annette Gardner (University of California, San Francisco)
The Mental Health Initiative
• Karen Linkens (The Lewin Group)
Diabetes Strategic Grants Evaluation
• Zoe C Clayson (Abundantia Consulting)
SESSION/SÉANCE 594
Minority Achievement and Evaluation
Challenges in Higher Education: Part II
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM F
Evaluating Strategies And Programs That Increase
African American, Latino, And Native American
Representation Among High Achieving Undergraduates
At Selective Colleges And Universities In The US
• L Scott Miller (Arizona State University), Mehmet Dali Öztürk
(Arizona State University)
The Use of Scientific Conferences as a Method to Increase
Minority Students Advancement in the Sciences:
A Follow-up Study
• Rebecca M Eddy (Claremont Graduate University), Jack Mills (Choice
Point Applied Research), Tiffany D Berry (Claremont Graduate
University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 595
Methodologies Developed for the Evaluation of
Distance and Other Educational Technologies
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM G
• Chair(s) – Kathy Garvin-Doxas (University of Colorado)
Scientific Evidence for Technology Supported Curriculum:
You Can Get It!
• Dianna L Newman (State University of New York at Albany), Leigh A
Mountain (State University of New York at Albany), Mohua Bose
(State University of New York at Albany), Katerina Passa (State
University of New York at Albany)
What Factors Influence Students’ Learning and Satisfaction
in Online Courses?
• Penina Mungania (University of Arkansas), Maria Vasquez (University
of Louisville)
Analysis of Student Course Evaluation Data in Online
Courses: Factors Affecting Student Satisfaction and Learning
• Husein Abdul-Hamid (University of Maryland), Yun Yun Dai
(University of Maryland College Park)
• Chair(s) – Comfort O Okpala (Shaw University)
• Discussant(s) – N Nan Wehipeihana (Research Evaluation
Consultancy Ltd)
Evaluating Educational Technologies in a Distributed Medical
Education Program: Methods and Reflections
Interest and Interaction: An Evaluation Model for
Minority Student Retention Programs
• Caroline C Murphy (University of British Columbia), Angela Towle
(University of British Columbia), Chris Y Lovato (University of British
Columbia)
• Jeffry L White (The Ohio State University), James W Altschuld (Ohio
State University), Yi-Fang Lee (The Ohio State University)
Evaluation of the US National Institutes of Health Program
to Increase the Participation of Minority and Women’s
Higher Educational Institutions in Biomedical and
Behavioral Research
• Paul L Johnson (National Institutes of Health), Herbert M Baum
(Macro International)
159
SESSION/SÉANCE 596
SESSION/SÉANCE 598
Understanding the Role of Philosophy and
Theory in Evaluation Methods and Practice
LOCATION:
Issues and Challenges in Evaluation Capacity
Building in Canada and Beyond / Questions et
défis liés au renforcement des capacités
d’évaluation au Canada et ailleurs
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Bernadette Campbell (Westat)
Using Philosophy to Optimize Mixed Method Evaluation
• Lija O Greenseid (University of Minnesota), Frances P Lawrenz
Theory Construction and Professional Identity in Evaluation
Based on Alkin and Christie’s Tree
• Véronique A Lapaige (University of Montreal)
How School District Evaluators Make Sense of Their Practice:
A Folk Theory
• Eric Barela (Los Angeles Unified School District)
CITY HALL
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Chair(s) – Robert E Lahey (REL Solutions)
Discussant(s) – John M Owen (University of Melbourne)
Shelley Borys (Environment Canada)
Kaireen M Chaytor (Chaytor Consulting Services)
J Bradley Cousins (University of Ottawa)
Steve Montague (Performance Management Network)
Robert E Lahey (REL Solutions)
SESSION/SÉANCE 599
Expanding Our Conceptualisation of Program Implementation:
Lessons From the Genealogy of a School-Based Nutrition
Program
Regression Models for Counts and Rates
• Sherri Bisset (Université de Montréal), Louise Potvin (Université de
Montréal)
LOCATION:
ELGIN
• Blair Stephenson (Los Alamos National Laboratory)
SESSION/SÉANCE 597
Making the Case for Culture and Diversity
in Evaluation: Critical Conversations,
Perspectives, and Cases
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Rodney K Hopson (Duquesne University)
• Discussant(s) – Sousan Arafeh (Research Images), Ross F Conner
(University of California, Irvine), Joan L LaFrance (Mekinak
Consulting), Stafford Hood (Arizona State University), Rodney K
Hopson (Duquesne University), Karen Kirkhart (Syracuse University),
Saumitra SenGupta (New Mexico Department of Health), Hazel
Symonette (University of Wisconsin, Madison), Elizabeth Whitmore
(Carleton University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 601
International Perspectives on Assessment:
Challenges and Ethical Dilemmas
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
KENORA
• Chair(s) – Linda Mabry (Washington State University, Vancouver)
The Validity of Model V for Assessing School Quality and
Student Outcomes: Strengths and Limitations
• Edith J Cisneros-Cohernour (Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán)
Standardized Assessment and the Quality of Educational
Outcomes: The Experience of Two Brazilian Universities
• Iduina Mon’t Alverne-Chaves (Universidade Federal Fulminense),
Sueli Barboza Thomaz (University of Rio de Janeiro)
Equity Issues and the EXANI-I: National Examination to
Access to High School Education in Mexico
• Agustín Tristán-López (Instituto de Evaluación e Ingeniería
Avanzada), Rafael Vidal-Uribe (National institute for the Evaluation
of Education)
Assessing the Quality of Music Teaching Under
Accountability Pressures
• Jose Luis Aroztegui-Plaza (Universidad de Granada)
160
SESSION/SÉANCE 602
SESSION/SÉANCE 604
The Influence of Cultural Context on
Evaluation Theory and Practice
LOCATION:
HURON
• Chair(s) – Molly den Heyer (Dalhousie University)
A Bi-National Collaborative Study of the Quality of Life
in a Mexican Community
• Terry Carrilio (San Diego State University)
Crossing the Boundaries of Culture and Time: A Tracer Study
(10 Years Later) of an Early Childhood Intervention Among
Ethiopian Immigrant Children
• Miri Levin-Rozalis (Ben-Gurion University)
Participant Influence in an Action Research Evaluation of
Two Distinct Ecuadorian Cultures
• Peter Redvers-Lee (Vanderbilt University), Melinda A Coston
(Vanderbilt University), Sarah E Van Hooser (Vanderbilt University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 603
Using and Disseminating Evaluation Results
for Program, Organizational, and
Policy Enhancement
Exploring Evaluation Practice, Theory, and
Disciplinary Trends: Perspectives From
Graduate Students and New Evaluators
LOCATION:
SIMCOE
• Chair(s) – Lori A Wingate (Western Michigan University)
An Investigation of the Cross-disciplinary or Interdisciplinary
of Evaluation Approaches and Tools Used Across Sectors in
Mid-Term Review: The Case of Botswana Mid-Term Review
Document
• Botsalano T Mosimakoko (University of Ottawa)
Exploring the Dynamics Between Theory and Practice in
Program Evaluation Using Concept Mapping
• Jie Zhang (Syracuse University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 605
Culturally Competent Professional Practice:
Four Perspectives
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
DUFFERIN
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Dawn Hanson Smart (Clegg & Associates)
KENT
• Chair(s) – Susan A Tucker (Evaluation and Development Associates)
The Office of African American Children Services: Culturally
Competent Service Delivery in Child Protective Services
• Discussant(s) – Susan A Tucker (Evaluation and Development
Associates)
• Mareon V Henderson (Washington State Department of Social and
Health Services)
Communicating Evaluation Results
Designing and Managing a Project Focused on Cultural
Competence
• Harry C Hubley (National Defence Headquarters)
Crossing Methodological Boundaries in the Evaluation of the
Working Life Development
• Katri Vataja (National Research and Development Centre for Welfare
and Health), Riitta Seppänen-Järvelä (National Research and
Development Centre for Welfare and Health), Juha Koivisto (National
Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health)
What is the Half-life of an Evaluation? A 10 Year
Retrospective on a Landmark Australian Study
• Wanda L Hackett (Wanda Hackett Enterprises)
Culturally Competent Professional Practice: A View From a
Project Coach
• Gregory M Townsend (UJIMA Community Services)
Culturally Competent Professional Practice:
The Evaluator’s Perspective
• Dawn Hanson Smart (Clegg & Associates)
161
SESSION/SÉANCE 606
SESSION/SÉANCE 610
Collaborative, Participatory and Empowerment
TIG Business Meeting
An Indigenous Self Assessment Tool: The
Waitangi Wheel
LOCATION:
LOCATION:
GINGERSNAP
• TIG Leader(s) – David Fetterman (Stanford University), Rita O’Sullivan
(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
• Chair(s) – Kataraina Pipi (Paewhenua Hou, New Horizons)
• Jay Takoko (Paewhenua Hou Partnership)
SESSION/SÉANCE 607
SESSION/SÉANCE 611
Application of Evaluation Principles
LOCATION:
Using Evaluation Strategies to Sustain
Accurate and Consistent Implementation
of Science-Based Interventions
• Chair(s) – Mary V Davis (University of North Carolina)
LOCATION:
GOLD RUSH
Evaluating Competing Methods of Exit Polling
• Matt A Barreto (Independent Consultant), Nathan D Woods (Welch
Consulting)
• Jeanette H Nu’Man (ORC Macro International)
• Winifred G King (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
Developing, Implementing and Evaluating a Leadership
Framework and Competencies for Public Sector Managers
• Wendy E Rowe (Royal Roads University), AR Elangovan (University of
Victoria), Jim McDavid (University of Victoria)
SESSION/SÉANCE 612
Reading First: Lessons Learned from Four
Large-Scale Literacy Evaluations
SESSION/SÉANCE 608
LOCATION:
What Works for What Works?
Creating Study Reports That Meet the
What Works Clearinghouse Review Standards
LOCATION:
COSMOPOLITAN
ICE PALACE
• Chair(s) – Lizanne DeStefano (University of Illinois)
The Illinois Reading First External Evaluation
• Lizanne DeStefano (University of Illinois), Victoria Hammer (University
of Illinois), Holly Downs (University of Illinois), Wonsuk Lee
(University of Illinois)
• Mariam Manley (PRES Associates)
• Miriam Resendez (PRES Associates)
Reading First External Evaluations in Alaska, Arizona,
Montana, Washington, and Wyoming
• Theresa Deussen (Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory)
The Connecticut Reading First External Evaluation
• Glen Martin (Glen Martin Associates)
The Georgia Reading First External Evaluation
• Dorothy J Harnish (University of Georgia)
162
SESSION/SÉANCE 613
Roundtable Set Ten
LOCATION:
Strategic Collaboration for Ethical Decision Making
in Business: Using Empowerment Evaluation to
Assess Outcomes
• Lisa B Ncube (Purdue University), Mara H Wasburn (Purdue
University), Linda Naimi (Purdue University)
• Chair(s) – Lisa L Townson (University of New Hampshire Cooperative
Extension)
• John E Sherman (Headwaters Group Philanthropic Services), Gayle
Peterson (Headwaters Group Philanthropic Services)
Using Program Logic Modeling With Social Science/Business
Analysis to Guide Evaluations and Program Refinement
• Lori M Megdal (Megdal & Associates), Victoria Engle (New York
State Energy), Larry Pakenas (New York State Energy), Scott M Albert
(GDS Associates), Jane S Peters (Research Into Action), Gretchen B
Jordan (Sandia National Laboratories)
Using a Standardized Instrument to Evaluate
Capacity Building Activities and Process Measures of
Substance Abuse Prevention Projects
Evaluating Public Policy Grantmaking: What is Success?
Performance Reports Versus Evaluation Reports:
Two Case Examples From the Social Sciences and
Humanities Research Council of Canada
• Courtney F Amo (Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council
of Canada), Natalie Kishchuk (Natalie Kishchuk Research and
Evaluation), Robert Lalande (Social Sciences and Humanities
Research Council of Canada)
• Kristianna Pettibone (MayaTech Corporation), Shelly M Kowalczyk
(MayaTech Corporation)
Making the Most of Limited Resources:
Lessons Learned From a Quality Improvement Project
• M Margaretta Fox (Harlem United Community AIDS Center), Rashi
Rohatgi (Harlem United Community AIDS Center)
Evaluation Starvation: How to Keep a Malnourished
Evaluation Alive
• Laura Reynolds Keefer (University of South Carolina), Margaret
Gredler (University of South Carolina)
Generating Social Capital in Small Island States:
An Evaluation Challenge
• Dawn I Marshall (Independent Consultant), Monica B Thomas
Woodley (Independent Consultant)
SESSION/SÉANCE 614
Photolanguage:
The Hands on Experience of Inspiring
a Thousand Words
LOCATION:
PINNACLE
• Ann G Bessell (University of Miami)
• Marisa Collett Burke (University of Miami)
163
Friday, 6:30 pm – 8:00 pm
Le vendredi, 18h30 – 20h00
6:30 pm – 8:00 pm / 18h30 – 20h00
Reception and Silent Auction / Réception et vente aux enchères par écrit
LOCATION: GRAND BALLROOM, LOWER CONCOURSE
This is your opportunity to buy unique things from around the
world donated by AEA/CES individuals and groups.
A fantastic networking opportunity at the reception, complimentary hors d’oeuvres, cash bar, excitement and great deals at
the Silent Auction. Most important, your dollars will be used to
support students working in the field of evaluation and to fund
travel awards to evaluators from developing countries and
countries in transition who otherwise would be unable to attend
the conference.
164
C’est l’occasion pour vous de vous procurer des objets uniques
de partout à travers le monde, qui ont été donnés par des membres et des groupes de la SCÉ et de l’AEA. Une merveilleuse
occasion de réseautage à la réception, des hors-d’œuvre gratuits, un bar payant, une ambiance animée et de merveilleuses
aubaines à la vente aux enchères par écrit. Et, surtout, les
dollars que vous dépensez serviront à fournir des bourses de
voyage à des étudiants en évaluation et à des évaluateurs de pays
en voie de développement et en transition qui autrement ne
seraient pas en mesure d’assister au congrès.
S a t u r d a y, O c t o b e r 2 9 / L e s a m e d i 2 9 o c t o b r e
7:00 am – 5:00 pm / 7h00 – 17h00
8:00 am – 9:20 am / 8h00 – 9h20
Speaking Truth to Power /
Énoncer la vérité face au pouvoir
Lieutenant-General (Retired) Roméo Dallaire /
Lieutenant-général Roméo Dallaire (retraité)
LOCATION:
7:00 am – 12:00 pm / 7h00 – 12h00
LOCATION:
GRAND BALLROOM EAST
Lieutenant-General (Retired) Romeo Dallaire’s keynote
address is supported in part by a grant from the
W.K. Kellogg Foundation, represented by Teresa R.
Behrens, Director of Evaluation. / L’allocution plénière du
Lieutenant-général Roméo Dallaire (retraité) est parrainée
en partie par une subvention de la Fondation W.K. Kellogg,
représentée par Teresa R. Behrens, directrice de l’évaluation.
8:00 am – 5:00 pm / 8h00 – 17h00
Your last opportunity to visit exhibitors who make evaluation their business! Talk with them to learn how they
support the professionalism of evaluation.
9:20 am – 9:35 am / 9h20 – 9h35
Refreshment Break /
GOSS GILROY INC.
C’est votre dernière occasion de visiter les exposants qui
oeuvrent dans le domaine de l’évaluation! Parlez avec eux
et découvrez comment ils aident à promouvoir le caractère
professionnel de l’évaluation.
165
Saturday, 9:35 am – 10:20 am / Concurrent Sessions
Le samedi, 9h35 – 10h20 / Séances concurrentes
9:35 am – 10:20 am / 9h35 – 10h20
SESSION/SÉANCE 701
• Joel Sherman (American Institutes for Research), Steven Honegger
(American Institutes for Research)
SESSION/SÉANCE 706
Graduate Student and New Evaluators TIG
Business Meeting
LOCATION:
Consensus-Building and Priority-Setting Tools for
Grantmakers: An Example From the John S and
James L Knight Foundation
GRAND BALLROOM WEST
• TIG Leader(s) – Xiaofan Cai (Western Michigan University), Bianca E
Montrosse (Claremont Graduate University), Chris LS Coryn (Western
Michigan University), Tola Ewers (Western Michigan University)
Supporting Systems Change: Working With
Grassroots Philanthropic Organizations
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
PEEL
• Chair(s) – Diane M Manuel (The California Endowment)
• Discussant(s) – Diane M Manuel (The California Endowment)
What Are the Key Ideas Around Systems Change Focused on
Community Initiatives?
SESSION/SÉANCE 702
Crawl, Walk, Run, Fly?
Building a Culture of Monitoring and Evaluation
in South Africa’s Public Service
• Elvis E Fraser (Academy for Educational Development)
To What Extent Were the Participating Community-Based
Organizations Ready for System Change?
• Rose Ann M Renteria (Academy for Educational Development)
LOCATION:
How Does the Focus Funders Program Model Represent
Elements of Community Systems Change?
• Richard M Levin (Department of Public Service and Administration)
SESSION/SÉANCE 703
GRAND BALLROOM EAST
• Chair(s) – Michael Scriven (Western Michigan University)
• Discussant(s) – Michael Scriven (Western Michigan University)
• Paul C Clements (Western Michigan University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 705
Using Data to Set Foundation Priorities and
Evaluate Investment Choices:
Examples From Two Foundations
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
SESSION/SÉANCE 707
Qualitative Approaches
Upgrading International Development Evaluation
LOCATION:
• Diane M Manuel (The California Endowment)
LOCATION:
NORFOLK
Services)
Multi-Site/Multi-Stakeholder Evaluation in the Medical
Education Sector in Australia: The Challenges of
“No Boundaries”
• Susan J Shannon (Spencer Gulf Rural Health School)
How Case Study Evaluation can Build Theory:
The Transfer of Innovation Among Health Networks
• Karen J Minyard (Georgia State University), Chris Parker (Georgia
State University), S Lindsey Lonergan (Georgia State University)
YORK
• Chair(s) – Natalia E Pane (American Institutes for Research)
• Discussant(s) – Natalia E Pane (American Institutes for Research)
Using Data to Inform Decision-making in Grant-making:
An Example from Annie E Casey
• Amy Walter (New American Schools/AIR), Fonda Sutton (American
Institutes for Research), Steven Honegger (American Institutes for
Research)
166
SESSION/SÉANCE 708
SESSION/SÉANCE 715
Urban Planning Evaluation and Assessing
the Impact of Evaluators
LOCATION:
Using a Web-Based Data Collection Tool Within
a Comprehensive Evaluation Framework: The
Community Activity Tracking (CAT) System
OXFORD
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Edith Thomas (US Department of Agriculture)
Evaluating Sustainability Planning in American and
Canadian Cities
• Elizabeth M Markatos (RTI International)
• David Laverny Rafter (Minnesota State University)
Evaluating the Evaluators: Lessons Learned
From Transport Canada’s Report Card Project
SESSION/SÉANCE 716
Overarching Perspectives
• Denise Tom-Kun (Transport Canada), Susan Luedke (Transport
Canada), Nathalie LaRoche (Transport Canada)
Using SPSS and GB-Stat
CARLETON
• MaryJo O Smith (Ypsilon Associates)
SESSION/SÉANCE 710
Feminist Issues TIG Business Meeting
WINDSOR ROOM EAST
évaluation
• TIG Leader(s) – Donna Podems (OtherWISE Research and Evaluation),
Sharon Brisolara (Evaluation Solutions), Denise Seigart (Mansfield
University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 712
Extending the Definitions of Program Theory
in Theory-based Evaluation
How Do You Evaluate a Network? A Child and Youth Health
Network Experience
• Carly M Dolinski (Calgary Health Region), Laura N L’Heureux
(Southern Alberta Child and Youth Health Network), Janice K Popp
(Southern Alberta Child and Youth Health Network), Kathleen L
Douglas-England (Calgary Health Region), Ann L Casebeer
(University of Calgary), Carol E Adair (University of Calgary),
Catherine C Morrison (Calgary Health Region), Suzanne C Tough
(Calgary Health Region)
• Victor Kuo (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation)
Evaluating a Multi-country Health Partnership Program
• Eun-Joo Chang (American International Health Alliance), Gosia
Wolfe (American International Health Alliance), Susan Pobywajlo
(American International Health Alliance)
SESSION/SÉANCE 717
Creating Integrated Outcomes Assessment
in Higher Education
LOCATION:
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM E
• Chair(s) – Paule A Steichen Asch (IBIS International)
LOCATION:
LOCATION:
SESSION/SÉANCE 709
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM D
ESSEX BALLROOM
• Chair(s) – Manuel Riemer (Vanderbilt University)
Crossing Best Practices Boundaries: How Program Theory
Helped Reinterpreting Dual Diagnosis Guidelines
CONFERENCE ROOM F
•
•
•
•
Sharon Roy (Washington State University)
G Todd Vanek (Washington State University)
Tamara Smith (Washington State University)
DesRosier Theron (Washington State University)
• Astrid Brousselle (McGill University)
Theories of Change: From Rhetoric to Reality
• Paul Mason (University of Birmingham)
167
SESSION/SÉANCE 718
SESSION/SÉANCE 723
Evaluation Reporting in the Paperless Era:
Practical Advice for Designing, Implementing,
and Using Web-Based Reporting Systems
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM G
Performance Measurement and Evaluation
in Government Settings
LOCATION:
WENTWORTH
York)
• Jeffrey G Willett (Ohio Tobacco Use Prevention and Control
Foundation)
Evaluation of State Meat and Poultry Inspection Programs
SESSION/SÉANCE 720
Fireside chat with Lieutenant-General (Retired)
Roméo Dallaire
Fireside Chat / Causerie du coin du feu
LOCATION:
• Roméo Dallaire (Force Commander of the United Nations Mission to
Rwanda)
SESSION/SÉANCE 721
CITY HALL
• Alhousseynou Sy (INEADE/ Ministère de l’Education)
• Lynda S Robson (Institute for Work & Health)
SESSION/SÉANCE 724
The Same Only Different: How Evaluators
From Three Professional Organizations
Think About Ethics in Their Work
Panel / Panel
KENORA
• Chair(s) – Sandra Mathison (University of British Columbia)
• Discussant(s) – Sandra Mathison (University of British Columbia)
The View From Down Under: Looking at Ethics and Evaluation
in Australia and New Zealand
• David R Turner (New Zealand Ministry of Justice), Amanda M Wolf
(Victoria University of Wellington)
Ethics and Evaluation Practice in the United States and
Canada
SESSION/SÉANCE 722
Use of Geographic Information Systems
in Program Evaluation
LOCATION:
A Performance Measurement Framework for Ontario’s Public
Sector Involved in Occupational Health and Safety
LOCATION:
Dix ans d’expérience d’évaluation au Sénégal :
Cibles, Matières et Méthodologie /
Ten Years of Evaluation Experience in Senegal:
Goals, Subjects and Methodology
LOCATION:
• Cynthia B Williams (United Nations), Jane Roth (US Department of
Agriculture)
ELGIN
• Michele Walsh (University of Arizona)
• Sue Voelker (University of Arizona)
• Kathleen T Toms (Research Works), Amanda M Wolf (Victoria
University of Wellington)
SESSION/SÉANCE 725
Online 360-Degree Feedback: On Target?
LOCATION:
HURON
• Zita Unger (Evaluation Solutions)
168
SESSION/SÉANCE 726
SESSION/SÉANCE 729
Communicating Evaluation Results in
Health Organisations
Costs, Outcomes, Economics, and
Health Services
LOCATION:
LOCATION:
KENT
• Chair(s) – Dale Alan Pahl (US Environmental Protection Agency)
• Discussant(s) – Dale Alan Pahl (US Environmental Protection Agency)
After the Report is Written: Knowledge Utilization of
Evaluation Results
• Julie A Joza (University of Waterloo), Natalie Parry (Canadian Cancer
Society), Naghmeh Desroches (University of Waterloo), H Sharon
Campbell (University of Waterloo)
Facilitating the Interpretation of School Safety and Climate
Survey Data: Building Capacity for Evaluation Use
• Laura N Massell (University of Vermont), Rebecca Gajda (University
of Vermont)
SESSION/SÉANCE 727
Keys to Successful Client Partnerships in
Arts and Culture Evaluations
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
SIMCOE
de la culture
• Chair(s) – David B Pankratz (Emc.Arts)
Partnerships in Program-level and Project-level Evaluations
• David B Pankratz (Emc.Arts)
• Chair(s) – Ronnie Levin (US Environmental Protection Agency)
• Discussant(s) – Brian T Yates (American University)
Cost Savings Associated With Improving Appropriate and
Reducing Inappropriate Preventive Care:
Cost Consequences Analysis
• N Bruce Baskerville (National Research Council of Canada), William
Hogg (University of Ottawa), Jacques Lemelin (University of Ottawa)
Evaluation Across Data Sets and Patient Populations:
Implications for Utility, Feasibility, Propriety, and Accuracy
• Glenn M Landers (Georgia State University), Mei Zhou (Georgia
State University), Jay P Bae (Georgia State University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 730
Bridging Qualitative to Quantitative Data
by Building Scoring Guides
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Phyllis C Ault (Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory)
• Ann E Davis (Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory)
SESSION/SÉANCE 731
A Partnership in Designing Protocols for Collecting and
Analyzing Evaluation Data
• Lindsay Welber (Emc.Arts)
Blending Classroom and State Assessment Data
to Measure Student Achievement
SESSION/SÉANCE 728
LOCATION:
Partnerships and Capacity Building in
Cross-cultural Contexts
COSMOPOLITAN
• Chair(s) – John A Ross (University of Toronto)
LOCATION:
Cross-Validation of Classroom Testing and Mandated External
Assessments
DUFFERIN
• Chair(s) – Jenny L Jones (University of Tennessee)
• John A Ross (University of Toronto), Peter Gray (University of
Toronto)
Cultural and Contextual Evaluation of the
Hawaiì Minority Entity Capacity Building Project
StoneSoup: An Alternative Assessment System Connecting
Classroom Assessment With Public School Accountability
• Robin L Brandt (University of Hawai’i at Manoa)
• Juna Z Snow (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
Challenges in Conducting a Cross Border Evaluation:
The Case of the US-Mexico Border Philanthropy Partnership
• Sylvia Peregrino (University of Texas at El Paso)
169
SESSION/SÉANCE 732
SESSION/SÉANCE 735
Needs Assessment:
Unique Undergraduate Populations
Models for Formative Evaluation
LOCATION:
EXECUTIVE
LOCATION:
ICE PALACE
• Chair(s) – Christine E Frank (Georgian College)
• Chair(s) – Megan E Deiger (Chicago Public Schools)
Undergraduate Students Assess Parents’ Needs Regarding
Early Care and Education
Internal Program Evaluation of the Quality and
Growth of Teaching and Learning of Career and
Technical Education Classes
• Rebecca W Pettit (Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania), Deborah
F Jacobs (Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania)
Traversing the Boundaries of an Invisible Community: A Needs
Assessment of Asian American Students in the Midwest
• Deborah H Kwon (The Ohio State University)
Using Quantitative Data in the Formative Evaluation
of a Large Scale Eduction Policy: The Case of The Chicago
Public Schools Algebra Problem Solving Task Force
• Megan E Deiger (Chicago Public Schools), Kelci M Price (Chicago
Public Schools), Bret Feranchak (Chicago Public Schools)
SESSION/SÉANCE 733
Collaborative and Participatory Data Analysis
LOCATION:
• David L MacQuarrie (Western Michigan University)
GINGERSNAP
SESSION/SÉANCE 736
Roundtable Set Eleven
• Chair(s) – Jill H Lohmeier (University of Kansas)
LOCATION:
Democracy in Analysing and Theorising Evaluation Data
• Chair(s) – John F Stevenson (University of Rhode Island)
Roundtable A
Self-Evaluation as a Practice Strategy to Achieve the Goals
of a Community Change Initiative
• Daniel S Brisson (University of Denver)
SESSION/SÉANCE 734
Initiating a Systematic Review of the Literature:
Thoughtful Considerations
• Caroline J Bailey (ORC Macro International), John A Encandela (ORC
Macro International), Helen Coelho (ORC Macro International)
Roundtable B
Victory Avenue: Evaluating Transitional Housing in
South Suburban Cook County, Illinois
LOCATION:
• Susan Gaffney (Governors State University)
Evaluating Tobacco Control Initiatives
GOLD RUSH
Roundtable C
• Chair(s) – Michael Maranda (University of Maryland)
• Sue Hewitt (Health District of Northern Larimer County), Judith M
Ottoson (Georgia State University)
A New Model for Evaluating Comprehensive Tobacco Control
Programs
• David Mills (Health Canada Tobacco Control Program), Mark D Jarvis
(Health Canada)
Multiple Evaluation Methods to Assess the Effects of
Coordinated State-Community Campaigns to Reduce Adult
Cigarette Use
Tips on Starting and Sustaining an AEA Affiliate
Roundtable D
The Use of Acculturation Measures
• Blanca Flor Guillen (Lodestar Management Research), Nathan D
Woods (Welch Consulting)
• James C Hersey (RTI International), Surenda Andikar (Ohio Tobacco
Use Prevention and Control Foundation), Jeffrey G Willett (Ohio
Tobacco Use Prevention and Control Foundation), Sarah Ray (RTI
International), Ghada Homsi (RTI International), Nancy Sonnenfeld
(RTI International), Beth Schieber (Ohio Tobacco Use Prevention and
Control Foundation), Ken Slenkovich (Ohio Tobacco Use Prevention
and Control Foundation), Icilda Dickerson (Ohio Tobacco Use
Prevention and Control Foundation), Mike Renner (Ohio Tobacco
Use Prevention and Control Foundation)
170
Saturday, 10:30 am – 12:00 pm / Concurrent Sessions
10:30 am – 12:00 pm / 10h30 – 12h00
How Do I Get a Job in Your Organization?
Advice to Those Seeking Careers in
Various Evaluation Fields
Panel / Panel
GRAND BALLROOM WEST
• Chair(s) – Bianca E Montrosse (Claremont Graduate University)
• Discussant(s) – , Gail V Barrington (Barrington Research Group),
Robert Jones (Canadian International Development Agency),
Anthony J Alberta (Sonoran Research Group), John R Mattox
(PricewaterhouseCoopers), Sharon Marie Mya (Hewlett Packard),
Jennifer C Greene (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign),
Christina A Christie (Claremont Graduate University), Stanley T
Capela (HeartShare Human Services of New York), Jim Rugh (CARE
International), Nancy Kingsbury (US Government Accountability
Office)
SESSION/SÉANCE 739
Implications for Evaluation of Systems Thinking
and Complexity Theory
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
Putting Evaluation Results to Use: (International)
Attendees’ Feedback to Evaluation 2004 and
the American Evaluation Association’s Response
Panel / Panel
SESSION/SÉANCE 738
LOCATION:
SESSION/SÉANCE 740
LOCATION:
GRAND BALLROOM EAST
Association
• Chair(s) – Katherine McDonald (University of Illinois at Chicago),
Jennifer Watling Neal (University of Illinois at Chicago)
What did US and International Conference Attendees Have to
Say About Their Experience at Evaluation 2004?
• Katherine McDonald (University of Illinois at Chicago), Jennifer
Watling Neal (University of Illinois at Chicago), Gillian Mason
(University of Illinois at Chicago), Shanika Blanton (University of
Illinois at Chicago), Manolya Tanyu (University of Illinois at Chicago),
Tina Taylor Ritzler (University of Illinois at Chicago), Robin Lin Miller
(Michigan State University), Kendon J Conrad (University of Illinois at
Chicago), Sharon Telleen (University of Illinois at Chicago)
How Will the American Evaluation Association Respond to
United States and International Conference Attendees’
Feedback?
• Susan Kistler (American Evaluation Association), John A Seeley
(Formative Evaluation Research Associates), Sharon F Rallis
(University of Massachusetts at Amherst), Molly Engle (Oregon State
University), Melvin M Mark (Penn State University), Thomaz K
Chianca (Western Michigan University), Nick L Smith (Syracuse
University)
Thematic Strand and Systems in Evaluation TIG / Volet
thématique et les systèmes en évaluation
• Chair(s) – Michael Quinn Patton (Utilization-Focused Evaluation)
Matching Evaluation to the Nature and Conceptualization
of the Problem: Simple, Complicated, and Complex
Problem Framings and the Implications for Evaluation
• Brenda Zimmerman (School of Business York University Toronto)
Matching Evaluation to Cycles of Intervention and Program
Development: Panarchy as a Framework
• Frances Westley (University of Wisconsin, Madison)
Developmental Evaluation for Complex Nonlinear
Interventions and Innovations
• Michael Quinn Patton (Utilization-Focused Evaluation)
171
SESSION/SÉANCE 742
SESSION/SÉANCE 744
Models and Methods: Costs and Benefits
in Public and Private Sectors
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
YORK
• Chair(s) – Susan N Labin (Temple University)
• Discussant(s) – Brian T Yates (American University)
Broadening the Perspective on Stakeholder Motivation:
Program Outcomes and Business Implications
• Susan N Labin (Temple University)
Taking AIM (Arkansas Information Management
System): Development and Implementation of
a Statewide Web-Based Evaluation System
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
NORFOLK
• Chair(s) – Karen Ballard (University of Arkansas)
• Discussant(s) – Karen Ballard (University of Arkansas)
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: The Journey to the
Arkansas Information Management System
Using Expert Judgment and Party Perceptions to Determine
Environmental Effects
• Nina Boston (University of Arkansas-Extension), Steve Hall (University
of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service)
• Andy Rowe (GHK International)
Herding Carts: The Multidisciplinary Team Approach
to System Development
Developing Methods to Monetize Health Benefits: Examples
From Environmental Protection
• Ronnie Levin (US Environmental Protection Agency)
Patient-Level Quality Adjusted Life Years in Treatment
Outcome Research: A New Approach for Assessing CostEffectiveness
• Michael C Freed (American University), Kelly J Rohan (Uniformed
Services University of the Health Sciences), Brian T Yates (American
University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 743
Faculty Training and Support:
Bridging the Generational and Geographic Divide
• Mary Poling (University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture)
SESSION/SÉANCE 745
The Why’s and How’s of Foundation Performance
Assessment
Panel / Panel
What’s Age Got to Do With It? Common Issues
in Evaluating Programs in Aging
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
• Karen Ballard (University of Arkansas), Mary Poling (University of
Arkansas Division of Agriculture)
PEEL
• Chair(s) – Patricia A Yee (Vital Research)
• Discussant(s) – Lauren D Harris-Kojetin (American Association of
Homes and Services for the Aging)
Evaluations of Aging: Both Ends of the Continuum
• Melanie A Hwalek (SPEC Associates)
Seeing Senior Living Communities Through the Eyes
of Its Residents
• Gwen C Uman (Vital Research)
Meeting the Challenges of Measuring Quality of Life
• David L Streiner (Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care)
LOCATION:
OXFORD
• Chair(s) – Constance C Schmitz (Professional Evaluation Services)
• Discussant(s) – Ricardo Millett (The Woods Fund)
Report Carding: A Model of Foundation Performance
Assessment
• Constance C Schmitz (Professional Evaluation Services), Barbara A
Schillo (Minnesota Partnership for Action Against Tobacco)
The Why and How of Performance Assessment in a
Health Conversion Foundation
• Abraham Wandersman (University of South Carolina), Pamela Imm
(Lexington-Richland Alcohol and Drug Abuse Council), Jan Yost (The
Health Foundation of Central Massachusetts), Noreen P Johnson
(The Health Foundation of Central Massachusetts)
Assessing Performance at The Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation
• James R Knickman (The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation), Kelly A
Hunt (The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation)
172
SESSION/SÉANCE 746
Evaluating Health Promotion and
Surveillance Systems
LOCATION:
CARLETON
• Chair(s) – Kirsten Wallace (University of South Florida)
Determining Evaluation Questions and Standards in the
Evaluation of Health Promotion Programs
• Robert G LaChausse (California State University, San Bernardino)
Utilizing Logic Models to Create Community Ownership of
School Health Programs
Crossing Boundaries of Methods, Programs and Evaluators:
Evaluation of Publicly Funded Energy Programs in
New York State
• Sharon A Baggett (Quantec), Jane S Peters (Research Into Action),
Patricia Gonzales (New York State Energy Research and
Development Authority (NYSERDA))
Crossing Disciplinary Borders in Program Evaluation:
Environmental Protection Agency’s Partnership for
Environmental Program and Policy Evaluation and Review
• Michelle Mandolia (US Environmental Protection Agency)
SESSION/SÉANCE 748
Evaluation in Child and Youth Services
• James G Emshoff (Georgia State University), Mary Ann Phillips
(Georgia State University), Bernette McColley (Georgia State
University)
Evaluation of the Rapid Risk Factor Surveillance System
• Chair(s) – Lois Thiessen Love (Uhlich Children’s Advantage Network)
• Kathy Moran (Durham Region Health Department), Kathleen O
O’Connor (Kingston, Frontenac and Lennox & Addington Public
Health)
Analyzing the ABC’s of Mentoring: Evaluating the
Effectiveness of the Alabama Builds Champions Mentoring
Program
SESSION/SÉANCE 747
Partnerships in Environmental Program
Evaluation
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM EAST
• Chair(s) – Elizabeth Murphy-Walsh (National Defence and Canadian
Forces)
Utilization-Focused Evaluation of the American Indian Air
Quality Training Program: Benefits of an Internal Evaluator
as a Project Team Member
• MaryLynn Quartaroli (Northern Arizona University)
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM WEST
• Kenneth J Leistico (Tuscaloosa Family Resource Center), Sylvia
Dietrich (University of Alabama), Julia Newsom (University of
Alabama)
Serving Youth in an Urban Summer Employment Program:
Assessing Program Quality and Youth Outcomes
• Noel Kulik (Wayne State University), Marie Colombo (Wayne State
University), Wilma Scott (Wayne State University), Joanne Sobeck
(Wayne State University)
Methodological Lessons for Foster Care Follow-up Studies
• Susan Pope (University of Alaska Anchorage), Jason Williams
(University of Alaska Anchorage), Cynthia A Dana (University of
Alaska, Anchorage), Audrey N Reyes (University of Alaska
Anchorage)
SESSION/SÉANCE 749
Building Bridges and Creating Coalitions: Program
Evaluation and Performance Measurement Capacity Building
Efforts at the US Environmental Protection Agency
Outcome Logic Models: An Introduction
• Yvonne M Watson (US Environmental Protection Agency), John A
McLaughlin (John McLaughlin Associates)
LOCATION:
ESSEX BALLROOM
• Rebecca W Pettit (Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania)
• Balinger Brown (ConnectSynergy)
173
SESSION/SÉANCE 750
SESSION/SÉANCE 752
Leveraging Competing and Complementary
Roles for Success in Research and Development
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM B
développement
• Chair(s) – Sheila A Arens (Mid-continent Research for Education and
Learning)
Recognizing and Addressing the Realities for Partners in the
Research and Development Endeavor
Building Capacity of a National Initiative
for Children Exposed to Violence Through
Evaluation
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM D
• Chair(s) – Mary Morris Hyde (Association for the Study and
Development of Community)
Lessons Learned in Building the Evaluation Capacity
of a Local Safe Start Collaborative
• Zoe A Barley (Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning)
• Sandra Ortega (Ounce of Prevention Fund), Judith Simpson (Juvenile
Welfare Board)
Creating a Coherence With Language of a Research and
Development Continuum
Building the Evaluation Capacity of Community-Based
Organizations: The Bridgeport Safe Start Initiative
• LeAnn M Gamache (Mid-continent Research for Education and
Learning)
• Cindy A Crusto (Yale University School of Medicine), Michael A
Quan (The Center for Women and Families), Kim O’Reilly (The
Center for Women and Families), Jesse Reynolds (Yale University
School of Medicine), Stacey R Friedman (Yale University School of
Medicine), Joy S Kaufman (Yale University)
Validity Concerns Reconciled? Clients Versus Evaluator
Evidentiary Expectations
• Sheila A Arens (Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning)
Geniuses, Bottom Liners, and Chameleons: Complementary
and Varying Roles in Educational Research and Development
• Helen S Apthorp (Mid-continent Research for Education and
Learning)
SESSION/SÉANCE 751
Applications of Theory-Driven Evaluation
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM C
• Chair(s) – Souraya Sidani (University of Toronto)
The Identification of the Promising Practices of the
National Safe Start Demonstration Project
• Mary Morris Hyde (Association for the Study and Development of
Community), David Chavis (Association for the Study and
Development of Community), Iga James (Association for the Study
and Development of Community), Kien Lee (Association for the
Study and Development of Community)
SESSION/SÉANCE 754
Higher Education Assessment at the
Program Level: Department Applications
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM F
Evaluating Using Program Theory:
From Inception to Dissemination
• Anita Myers (University of Waterloo), Catrine Tudor-Locke (Arizona
State University)
• Chair(s) – Mehmet Dali Öztürk (Arizona State University)
• Discussant(s) – Debbie J Bond (Syracuse University)
Contribution of Theory-Driven Approach to Program Utilization
• Maria Huijbregts (Baycrest Center for Geriatric Care), Anita Myers
(University of Waterloo)
The Establishment of Assessment Processes as Integral to
the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business
Accreditation
Importance of Client Treatment Preference in
Evaluation Research
• Darryl L Jinkerson (Abilene Christian University), Jozell Brister
(Abilene Christian University)
• Souraya Sidani (University of Toronto)
Applying Methods and Objectives-Based Approaches to
the Evaluation of an Educational Administration Preparation
Program: Theoretical, Methodological, and Utilization
Considerations
A Systematic Process for Eliciting Clients’ Treatment
Preference
• Joyal Miranda (University of Toronto)
• Tim R Gawley (Wilfrid Laurier University)
From Theory to Practice: Evaluation of a High-Stakes Program
at the Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center
• John A Lett Jr (Defense Language Institute)
174
SESSION/SÉANCE 755
The Use of Portable Digital Assistants (PDAs), or
“Palm Pilots,” for Survey-Based Data Collection
in International Contexts
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM G
• Chair(s) – Christie Getman (Winrock International)
• Discussant(s) – Guy Sharrock (Catholic Relief Services)
Palm Pilots, GPS, and GIS for Impact Mapping the Increased
Participation in Democratic Governance by Malian Women
• Christie Getman (Winrock International)
Project Hope: Pocket Personcal Computers as Part of a
Child Survival Survey in Nicaragua
• Juan Carlos Alegre (Project Hope)
The Geek Factor in Development: Surveys and
Personal Digital Assistants in Cambodia and Albania
• Alice Willard (American Red Cross)
SESSION/SÉANCE 756
• Jason K Luellen (University of Memphis), William R Shadish
(University of California at Merced), MH Clark (Southern Illinois
University Carbondale)
Internal and External Validity in One Fell Swoop:
Integrating Propensity Scores With Sampling, Nonresponse,
and Poststratification Weights in a Nationally Representative
Impact Evaluation
• Robert G Orwin (Westat)
SESSION/SÉANCE 757
2005 Canadian Evaluation Society Student
Competitions: Case Competition Winning Team
and Student Paper Winner
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
Canadian Evaluation Society / Société canadienne d’évaluation
• Chair(s) – Michael Goodyer (Carleton University)
Canadian Evaluation Society Student Evaluation Case
Competition 1996-2005
• Michael Goodyer (Carleton University)
Advances in Propensity Score Research:
Improving Methods to Reduce Bias in
Quasi-Experiments
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
A Comparison of Two Methods of Computing Estimated
Propensity Scores
• Chair(s) – MH Clark (Southern Illinois University Carbondale)
Using Propensity Scores to Improve Matching in
Quasi-Experiments
• MH Clark (Southern Illinois University Carbondale)
Propensity Scores in Multi-Site Studies: Issues in
Computation and Interpretation
• C Scott Holupka (Vanderbilt University)
Presentation of Co-Winner of the 2005 Case Competition:
University of Waterloo
• Christina Atkinson (University of Waterloo), Mary-Jean Costello
(University of Waterloo), Ashley Johns (University of Waterloo), Sarah
Robinson (University of Waterloo), Kelly Skinner (University of
Waterloo)
Presentation of Co-Winner of the 2005 Case Competition:
Georgian College
• Michele Burrows (Georgian College), Jill Hickman (Georgian
College), Alyshia Landry (Georgian College), Katie Ryan (Georgian
College)
Paper Presentation by the Winner of the 2005 Student Paper
Contest: Understanding Cultural Competence by Evaluating
“Breaking the Silence: A Project to Generate Critical
Knowledge About Family Violence Within Immigrant
Communities
• Michelle H Anderson-Draper (University of Alberta)
175
SESSION/SÉANCE 758
SESSION/SÉANCE 759
Développer et maintenir la capacité
d’évaluation : Quelles leçons peut-on tirer
d’expériences internationales? /
Developing and Maintaining the Capacity
of Evaluation: What Lessons Can Be Learned
From International Experiences?
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
CITY HALL
• Chair(s) – Marie Gervais (Société de l’assurance automobile du
Québec)
• Discussant(s) – Céline Mercier (Université de Montréal)
Le monitorage et l’évaluation de la réforme de la santé
mentale dans trois pays des Amériques: un projet de
développement des capacités / Monitoring and Evaluation of
Mental Health Reforms in Three South American Countries: A
Project for Skill Development
• Christian Dagenais (Université de Montréal), Céline Mercier
(Université de Montréal)
Principaux défis reliés au développement et au maintien de la
capacité d’évaluation en Australie, Nouvelle-Zélande et
Malaisie / Main Challenges in Developing and Maintaining
Evaluation Capacity in Australia, New Zealand and Malaysia
Organisations humanitaires et renforcement des capacités en
évaluation de programme / Humanitarian Organizations and
Reinforcing Capacities in Program Evaluation
Reliable and Valid Measurement
LOCATION:
ELGIN
• Chair(s) – Melinda F Davis (University of Arizona)
Developing a Useful Likert Scale to Evaluate
Average Group Performance
• Randall S Davies (Indiana University South Bend), Lee Smith (Indiana
University), Colleen New (Indiana University), Jenny Dakins (Indiana
University South Bend)
Creating Virtual Populations for Cross-Validation
• Julius Najab (University of Arizona), Lee Sechrest (University of
Arizona), Patrick E McKnight (George Mason University)
Inter-rater Reliability Across Rater Groups:
Accuracy in Assessment
• Megh Thapa (Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory), Delane
Munson (NWREL)
SESSION/SÉANCE 760
How Do We Do It? Examples of How the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Is
Building the Evaluation Capacity of Its Grantees
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
WENTWORTH
• Valéry Ridde (Université Laval)
Prevention)
L’amélioration d’un réseau de services via l’évaluation : 12
ans d’expériences à partager / Improving a Service Network
Through Evaluation: Sharing 12 Years of Experiences
No-Nonsense Approach to Increase Evaluation Capacity
Among Sexually Transmitted Disease Programs
• Marie Gervais (Société de l’assurance automobile du Québec)
• Yamir Salabarría-Peña (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
Do We Really Have To? How One Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention Program Implemented Performance Measures
• Betty S Apt (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
Evaluation of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer
Early Detection Program
• Phyllis Rochester (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Debra
Holden (Research Triangle Institute), Anne Major (Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention)
176
SESSION/SÉANCE 761
SESSION/SÉANCE 763
Evaluation, Learning, and Capacity
Development: Experiences From Research and
Development Organizations Around the World
Building Evaluation Capacity: Strategies for
Gathering Resources, Establishing Context,
Organizing Inputs, and Involving Stakeholders
LOCATION:
LOCATION:
KENORA
• Chair(s) – Douglas E Horton (Consultative Group on International
Agricultural Research)
• Discussant(s) – Sarah Earl (International Development Research
Centre)
Local Capacity Building and Its Evaluation: Experiences
With the Mäori and Iwi in Aotearoa, New Zealand
KENT
• Chair(s) – Dennis Affholter (AffholterAssociates)
• Discussant(s) – Dennis Affholter (AffholterAssociates)
Path Planning and Evaluation Tool: A Tool for Work With
Indigenous Communities
• Kataraina Pipi (Paewhenua Hou, New Horizons), Jay Takoko
(Paewhenua Hou Partnership)
• Fiona Cram (Katoa)
A Real-Time Empirical Case Study of Process Use: A
Discussion of Methodological and Conceptual Challenges
Learning Lessons in Learning Communities: Experiences
From Non-Governmental Organizations in Latin America
• Sandy M Taut (University of California, Los Angeles)
• Brenda Bucheli (Pact Peru)
Gender and Diversity in International Organizations:
Lessons From a Self-Assessment of Organizational Culture
• Fabiola Amariles (Centro International de Agricultura Tropical),
Nancy Johnson (Centro International de Agricultura Tropical),
Gustavo Peralta (Centro International de Agricultura Tropical)
Fostering a Learning-Oriented Organizational Culture
and Mainstreaming Evaluation for Institutional Learning:
Experiences From an International Organization
• Jamie Watts (International Plant Genetic Resources Institute), Krista
Baldini (Independent Consultant)
SESSION/SÉANCE 762
Cross-Country, Cross-Sectoral Impact Evaluation
of International Training Programs
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
HURON
Program Evaluation Grounded in Community Understandings
and Values
• Debbie Zorn (University of Cincinnati), M Kathryn Brown (University
of Cincinnati), Maureen Sullivan (Urban Appalachian Council),
Walter Handy (Cincinnati Health Department)
SESSION/SÉANCE 764
Evaluation of a Standards Based Arts in
Education Program for Youth
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
SIMCOE
de la culture
• Chair(s) – Virginia J Smith (Branch Associates)
The Role of the Evaluation Technical Assistance Provider at
the Macro Level for an Arts in Education Initiative
• Virginia J Smith (Branch Associates)
Are There Unique Aspects About the Evaluation Process for
Arts Programs?
• Chair(s) – Jaime B Quizon (The World Bank)
• Carol Morgan (ArtsConnection)
Path Analytic Approach to Evaluation of World Bank Institute’s
Poverty and Growth Program
How Evaluation Informs Program Design in the Arts
• Chaoying Liu (The World Bank), Shreyasi Jha (University of Texas at
Austin)
• Elizabeth Pringle (Commonwealth Public Broadcasting
MHzNetworks)
Impact Analysis of the World Ban Institute’s Social Protection
Program
• Cristina Ling Chard (The World Bank), Shreyasi Jha (University of
Texas at Austin)
World Bank Institute’s Community Empowerment and Social
Inclusion Program: A Qualitative Approach
• Shreyasi Jha (University of Texas at Austin), Heidi S Zia (The World
Bank)
177
SESSION/SÉANCE 765
SESSION/SÉANCE 767
The Relevance of Culture in Evaluation Institute
(RCEI): Defining and Engaging Culture
LOCATION:
DUFFERIN
From Thought to Text: Generating and
Synthesizing Ideas for Concept Mapping and
Other Qualitative and Mixed Methods
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Stafford Hood (Arizona State University)
• Discussant(s) – Melvin E Hall (Northern Arizona University)
• Chair(s) – William M Trochim (Cornell University)
• Discussant(s) – William M Trochim (Cornell University)
The Relevance of Culture in Evaluation Institute:
Teacher-Led Evaluation Teams
Text Extraction From Public Comments to Facilitate a
Concept Map for Environmental Planning
• Sharon R Stevens (Arizona State University), Christine Chee (Arizona
State University)
• David M Filiberto (Cornell University)
A Mixed-Methods Approach to Integrating Culture
• Sharon R Stevens (Arizona State University), Christine Chee (Arizona
State University)
Meaningful Evaluation in Native American Culture
• Christine Chee (Arizona State University), Sharon R Stevens (Arizona
State University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 766
Evaluation and Anthropology:
An Idea Whose Time Has Come (Part I)
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Eve C Pinsker (Stroger Hospital)
• Discussant(s) – Rodney K Hopson (Duquesne University)
Theory-Building Evaluation Anthropology
From Literature to Conceptual Framework:
Analyzing and Synthesizing a Diverse Knowledge Base
• Kathleen M Quinlan (Concept Systems), Frank Ceo (Centers for
So Many Ideas, So Little Time: Statement Synthesis in
a Youth Development Context
• Jennifer S Brown (Cornell University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 768
Evaluating Title IIB Mathematics and Science
Partnerships: Issues From the Trenches
LOCATION:
COSMOPOLITAN
• Discussant(s) – John T Sutton (RMC Research Corporation), J Patrick
White (Idaho Department of Education), Jerine Pegg (Oregon State
University)
• Edith S Gummer (Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory)
• Ginger Redlinger (Oregon Department of Education)
• Jacqueline Copeland-Carson (University of Minnesota)
Beyond Ethnography: The Role of the Culture Concept in
Program Evaluation
• Mary Odell Butler (Battelle)
The Role of Ethnography in Evaluation: Concepts and
Methods That Cross Boundaries
• David Fetterman (Stanford University)
178
SESSION/SÉANCE 769
Needs Assessment: Applications With an
Emphasis on Contextual Features and
Complexities
LOCATION:
EXECUTIVE
• Chair(s) – Koralalage SU Jayaratne (University of Georgia, Athens)
Causal Model of Individual Needs on Becoming a
Learning Organization
• Chatchanok Saisuwan (Chulalongkorn University), Suwimon
Wongwanich (Chulalongkorn University), Wannee Kaemkate
All Stars Senior: Collaborative Evaluation of a Substance
Abuse Prevention Program for High School Students
• David Wyrick (Tanglewood Research), Muhsin Michael Orsini
(Tanglewood Research), Rita O’Sullivan (University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill)
SESSION/SÉANCE 771
The Integration of Evaluation Models Into
Policy and Program Development: Reality Bites
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
GOLD RUSH
• Chair(s) – Joseph Kopachevesky (University of Prince Edward Island)
Development of Program Design Guidelines
Assessing Safety Training Needs at AVN 300: A Case Study
• Sahara Pawluk (Government of the Northwest Territories)
• Catherine M Sleezer (Oklahoma State University), Kathleen D Kelsey
(Oklahoma State University), Thomas Wood (Federal Aviation
Administration)
The Reality of Program Implementation in Support of Policy
and Pressure
Improving Continuous Improvement:
A Multi-state, Multi-agency Approach
• Laura M Moore-Lamminen (Mid-South Regional Resource Center),
Tiffany A Martinez (Mid-South Regional Resource Center), Kenneth
R Olsen (Mid-South Regional Resource Center), Michael Du (MidSouth Regional Resource Center)
Islands of Information:
Needs Assessment in the Pacific Region
• Ormond W Hammond (Pacific Resources for Education and
Learning)
SESSION/SÉANCE 770
Collaborative Evaluation Strategies in Different
Program Settings: Promoting College Access,
Increasing School Readiness, and Preventing
Substance Abuse in High School
• Debbie DeLancey (Government of the Northwest Territories)
The Impact of Applying Evaluation Theory To Policy and
Planning
• Karyn L Hicks (Government of the Northwest Territories)
Conclusions and Recommendations for Evaluation Policy and
Practice in the Real World
• Brenda Eaton (British Columbia Housing Management Commission)
SESSION/SÉANCE 772
What Works Clearinghouse: Evaluating Evidence
to Improve Instructional Practice
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
ICE PALACE
• Chair(s) – Rebecca Herman (American Institutes for Research)
LOCATION:
What Works Clearinghouse Tools and Processes
GINGERSNAP
• Chair(s) – Rita O’Sullivan (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
• Rebecca Herman (American Institutes for Research)
Standards-Based Evidence on Middle School Mathematics
Curricula: Initial Results From the What Works Clearinghouse
Collaborative Evaluation of GEAR UP North Carolina:
Promoting College Access for Middle and
High School Students
• Stacey Merola (American Institutes for Research)
• Michelle Jay (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Muhsin
Michael Orsini (Tanglewood Research), Rita O’Sullivan (University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
• Teresa Garcia Duncan (American Institutes for Research)
Findings From the What Works Clearinghouse Review of
Beginning Reading Interventions
First 5 LA Child Care Initiative Evaluation: Working
Collaboratively to Capture Cross-Grantee Outcomes
• Rosenberg Sharyn (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Mimi
Chernow (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Rita O’Sullivan
(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
179
SESSION/SÉANCE 773
Roundtable Set Twelve
LOCATION:
Integrating Program Evaluation and Community Based
Research: Lessons Learned From Collaborative Evaluation
of a Commercial Sex Venue Initiative
• Leonardo Colemon (AIDS Project Los Angeles), Matt G Mutchler
(AIDS Project Los Angeles)
• Chair(s) – Robert D Shumer (University of Minnesota)
Online Student Ratings of Instruction:
Implications for Evaluation in Higher Education
Who Needs Evaluation Standards and Why?
• Petri Virtanen (Net Effect), Mikko K Wennberg (Net Effect)
Factors Contributing to and Impeding the Success
of Foreign-Trained Immigrant Teacher Candidates
• Liying Cheng (Queen’s University), Hong Wang (Queen’s University)
Framework for Evaluating Reproductive Health and
Rights Advocacy in the Global Arena
• Trav D Johnson (Brigham Young University)
What are the Internal Consulting Issues of Evaluators
in Public Health Organizations?
• Catherine Bingle (Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit)
SESSION/SÉANCE 774
Crossing Sites, Crossing Approaches,
and Crossing Our Fingers
• Rhonda Schlangen (Planned Parenthood Federation of America),
Wendy R Sheldon (Planned Parenthood Federation of America)
Evaluation of Cultural Competence From the Consumer’s
Perspective in the Mental Health HIV Services Collaborative
• Lisa J LeRoy (Abt Associates Inc), Marta Moret (Urban Policy
Strategies), Wilbur Campbell (Alliance for Community
Empowerment)
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
spéciaux
• Chair(s) – Patricia Mueller (Northeast Regional Resource Center)
• Discussant(s) – Patti Bourexis (The Study Group)
Crossing Sites
• Patricia A Muller (Indiana University)
The Evaluation of Health Colleges’ Quality Assurance
Programs and Focus Group Research Methods
Crossing Approaches
• Nora MacLeod-Glover (Ontario College of Pharmacists), Harry
Cummings (Harry Cummings and Associates)
Crossing Our Fingers
180
PINNACLE
• Arlene Russell-Bender (Western Regional Resource Center)
• Susan Williamson (Southeast Regional Resource Center)
Saturday, 12:10 pm – 1:40 pm / Concurrent Sessions
12:10 pm – 1:40 pm / 12h10 – 13h40
SESSION/SÉANCE 775
Would You Hire Me? What Organizations Look for
in Evaluators
LOCATION:
GRAND BALLROOM WEST
• Chair(s) – Jennifer D Dewey (ORC Macro International)
• Discussant(s) – John R Mattox (PricewaterhouseCoopers), Bianca E
Montrosse (Claremont Graduate University), Daniela C Schroeter
(Western Michigan University), Carolyn D Sullins (Western Michigan
University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 776
Building a Culture of Organizational Learning in
Development Organizations
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Kevin Kelpin (International Development Research Centre)
Creating a Culture of Evaluation: Nurturing People and
Processes
Substance Use Among the Elderly: A Hidden Problem
• Deepa Avula (US Department of Health and Human Services), Kevin
P Mulvey (US Department of Health and Human Services), Donna D
Atkinson (Westat), Bill Luckey (Westat)
Collecting Qualitative Data From Sensitive Populations:
Observing and Interviewing Clients of a Mental Health
Program
• Joshua T Goodman (University of North Carolina at Greensboro),
Tiese Roxbury (University of North Carolina at Greensboro), David
Scales (University of North Carolina at Greensboro), Anessa Burgman
(University of North Carolina at Greensboro), Keith Kremer
(University of North Carolina at Greensboro), Henry Nicholoson
(University of North Carolina at Greensboro), Melissa Nixon
(University of North Carolina at Greensboro), Sarah Roberts
(University of North Carolina at Greensboro)
Performance Monitoring and Evaluation of HIV Programs:
A Systematic Approach to Examining Program Outcomes
• Donna D Atkinson (Westat), Bill Luckey (Westat), Kevin P Mulvey (US
Department of Health and Human Services), Deepa Avula (US
Department of Health and Human Services)
SESSION/SÉANCE 779
The Cost Effectiveness of Using the Web
to Survey Various Populations in Education
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
YORK
• Terry Smutylo (Independent Consultant)
• Chair(s) – Jordan E Horowitz (WestEd)
• Discussant(s) – Jordan E Horowitz (WestEd)
Building an Evaluation System and Culture at Chaitanya,
a Non-Governmental Organization in Maharashtra, India
Response Patterns for a National Survey of Principals
• Kalpana Pant (Chaitanya)
• Michelle LaPointe (Stanford University)
Crossing Corporate Boundaries: A Framework for
Learning and Accountability
Online, Paper and Pencil, or Telephone Interview: Nationwide
Survey Responses From Parents and Teachers of Child Care
Centers
• Rohinton Medhora (International Development Research Centre)
• Lauren Davis Sosenko (WestEd), Jodie LS Hoffman (WestEd)
Tacit Tools: Home-Made Knowledge Management
Joy and Pain, Sunshine and Rain: Overcoming Obstacles to
the Development and Implementation of Online Surveys
Within a School District
• Richard Fuchs (International Development Research Centre)
SESSION/SÉANCE 778
• Erica Holmes (WestEd)
Approaches to Gathering Information
on Sensitive Issues
LOCATION:
Web-Based Surveys of Key Stakeholders in the Preparing
Future Faculty Evaluation
• Kimberly Dailey (WestEd)
V.I.P
• Chair(s) – Donna D Atkinson (Westat)
Canadian Addiction Survey 2004:
Postmortem and Implications for the Future
• Robert Hanson (Health Canada), Stephane Racine (Health Canada)
181
SESSION/SÉANCE 780
SESSION/SÉANCE 782
Methods for Attending to Context and Culture
LOCATION:
PEEL
• Chair(s) – Jennifer L Yessis (NRC Picker Group Canada)
• Discussant(s) – Jennifer L Yessis (NRC Picker Group Canada)
Linking Sexual Behavior, Identity and
Orientation Through an Evaluative Lens
LOCATION:
OXFORD
• Chair(s) – Kari Greene (Oregon Department of Human Services)
Overcoming Contextual Unpredictability : Evaluation of
Nonprofit Organization in Cross-Cultural Setting
Evaluation as a Way to Engage Difference
• Hélène Laperrière (University of Montreal)
Mysexycity: An Interactive Web-Based Resource for
Young Gay Men and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men
Stakeholder Participation in the Evaluation Process:
Evidence From Work With the Third Sector: Benefits,
Drawbacks, Challenges, Issues and Solutions
• Douglas W Booker (Social Development Canada), Jim Blain (Audit
and Evaluation Social Development Canada), Caroline DeWitt (Audit
and Evaluation Social Development Canada)
Collecting Data in the Not-for-Profit Sector in Canada:
An Innovative Approach
• Jennifer L Yessis (NRC Picker Group Canada), Teuta Dodbiba (NRC
Picker Group Canada), Barbara Van Maris (NRC Picker Group
Canada), Kristie Coulombe (Muscular Dystrophy Canada)
SESSION/SÉANCE 781
• Norman Candelario (Gay Men’s Health Crisis), Laura Templeton
Horwitz (Gay Men’s Health Crisis), Matt G Mutchler (AIDS Project
Los Angeles), Leonardo Colemon (AIDS Project Los Angeles)
Things Aren’t Always as They Seem:
Linking Sexual Behavior, Identity and Orientation
• Kari Greene (Oregon Department of Human Services)
SESSION/SÉANCE 783
Improving Health Care Quality in
In-Patient and Out-Patient Settings
We’re in This Together: Assessing the
Performance of Cooperative State Research,
Education, and Extension Service – Land Grant
University Programs for the Office of
Management and Budget
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
• Denice A Cassaro (Cornell University)
NORFOLK
• Chair(s) – Eric R Norland (US Department of Agriculture)
LOCATION:
CARLETON
• Chair(s) – Diane Berthelette (Université du Québec à Montréal)
Methodological Issues in Evaluating Community
Palliative Care Programs
• Susan F Kasprzak (University of Ottawa), Lynda Weaver (Elizabeth
Bruyere Research Institute), Frances Legault (University of Ottawa),
Kevin Brazil (McMaster University), Shelia Bauer (Ottawa Community
Care Access Centre), Pippa Hall (University of Ottawa), Liliane Locke
(SCO Health Service), Barbara Cameron (Ottawa Community Care
Access Centre)
Office of Management and Budget, Budget-Performance
Integration and Program Assessments: The Cooperative
State, Research, Education and Extension Service Portfolio
Review Process
Do Children With an Emergency Department Visit for Asthma
Have a Regular Physician? The Case of Montreal, Canada
• Djimé D Adoum (US Department of Agriculture)
Evaluating a Collaborative Process for Integrating
Pharmacists into Primary Care Practices:
An Application of the CRESPAR Framework
Constructing” the Forest, Range, Fish, and Wildlife Program
Portfolio From Existing Data and Program Reports From
University Partners
• Eric R Norland (US Department of Agriculture)
Perspectives on the Portfolio Review as a Process for
Determining Program Effectiveness and Implications for
Extension Program Evaluation Specialists
• Michael T Lambur (Virginia Cooperative Extension Service)
Perspectives on the Portfolio Review Process and What State
Extension Administrators Need to Know and Do
• Anna J Kone (University of Montreal), Michele Rivard (University of
Montreal), Claudine Laurier (University of Montreal)
• Rhonda Cockerill (University of Toronto), Linda MacKeigan
(University of Toronto), Joan Marshman (University of Toronto), Philip
Ellison (University Health Network), Kris Wichman (University of
Toronto), Joseph D’Cruz (University of Toronto)
Back Pain Primary Prevention Program: Evaluating the
Program Theory by an Interdisciplinary Grounded Approach
• Diane Berthelette (Université du Québec à Montréal), Nicole Leduc
(Université de Montréal), Henriette Bilodeau (Université du Québec à
Montréal)
• Nancy K Franz (University of New Hampshire Cooperative Extension)
182
SESSION/SÉANCE 784
SESSION/SÉANCE 787
Intermediate Consulting Skills: A Self-Help Fair
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM EAST
• Chair(s) – Gail V Barrington (Barrington Research Group)
• Discussant(s) – Jo Ann Doino-Ingersoll (Strategic Research), Martha
McGuire (Cathexis Consulting), Gail V Barrington (Barrington
Research Group), Kathryn A Bowen (Bowen’s Evaluation &
Consulting Services), Laura N L’Heureux (Panoptik Research and
Consulting), Catherine Bingle (Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit),
Maura J Harrington (Independent Consulting), Marylee Stephenson
(CS/RESORS Consulting)
SESSION/SÉANCE 785
Special Populations in Social Work Evaluation
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM WEST
• Chair(s) – Robert L Fischer (Case Western Reserve University)
An Evaluation of a Veterans Affairs Medical Center HIV
Program: Provision of Client Services to Stabilize Psychosocial
Functioning
• Tosha L Ellis (Clark Atlanta University)
Evaluating the Economic Impact of Research
and Technology Programs
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM B
développement
• Chair(s) – George Teather (Independent Consultant)
Toward a Standard Benefit-Cost Methodology for
Publicly-Funded Science and Technology Projects
• Jeanne W Powell (National Institute of Standards and Technology)
Approaches to Measuring the Economic Impacts of
Research and Development
• A Dennis Rank (BearingPoint), Frederick Kijek (BearingPoint)
The Economic Impact on Georgia of Georgia Tech’s
Microsystems Packaging Research Center
• Sushanta K Mohapatra (SRI International), Quindi Franco (SRI
International), David Roessner (SRI International)
SESSION/SÉANCE 788
Implementation of Health Evaluation Theory
in Program Management
The Use and Benefits of Collaborative Evaluation Techniques
in Developing a Harm Reduction Program for Street Drinkers
Panel / Panel
• Gregory Kim (Centre for Addiction and Mental Health), Joan M
Nandlal (Centre for Addiction and Mental Health), Nuria Ribas
(Centre for Addiction and Mental Health), Cathy Callaghan (Centre
for Addiction and Mental Health), Jayne Caldwell (St Stephen’s
House)
Utilizing a Logic Model Approach to Assess Implementation
Fidelity for Latinos in Non-traditional Behavioral Health
Settings
• Chantal C Follett (University of Michigan), Megan Gilster (University
of Michigan), Patricia Miller (Southwest Solutions), Mike Spencer
(University of Michigan)
CONFERENCE ROOM C
Prevention)
From Logic Models to Program Change: Piloting a
Tuberculosis Program Evaluation Toolkit
• Kristine Lykens (North Texas Health Science Center)
Linking Logic Models and a Conceptual Framework of
Tuberculosis Surveillance, Action, and Support to Monitor
Performance and Measure Cost: Implementation Results
and Lessons Learned From Pilot Counties in Florida
• Sevim Ahmedov (Florida Department of Health)
SESSION/SÉANCE 786
Advanced Logic Model Course
LOCATION:
LOCATION:
ESSEX BALLROOM
• Simon Roy (Goss Gilroy)
• Zelda Yule (Goss Gilroy Inc)
Evaluation as a Tool to Drive County-Level Health Policy
Decisions: Making Rational Decisions for Resource Allocation
• Thad Miller (North Texas Health Science Center)
Cost as a Yardstick to Aid County-Level Health Program
Design
• Peter Hilsenrath (North Texas Health Science Center), Victoria Phillips
(Emory University)
From Health Theory to an Applied Format for Monitoring and
Evaluation
• Bridget Young (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
183
SESSION/SÉANCE 789
SESSION/SÉANCE 791
Process and Outcome Issues Associated With
Adult and Juvenile Offender Populations
Higher Education Perspectives:
The Practice in Development
LOCATION:
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM D
CONFERENCE ROOM F
• Chair(s) – Candace H Lacey (Nova Southeastern University)
Building Bridges: The Impact of the Arts on Incarcerated
Women
• Chair(s) – Marcie J Bober (San Diego State University)
• Discussant(s) – Summers Kalishman (University of New Mexico)
• Candace H Lacey (Nova Southeastern University)
When Roles Blend: How External Becomes Internal Evaluation
in a Higher Education Setting
Evaluation of the Central Texas Drug Treatment Program
• Pablo E Martinez (Texas State University, San Marcos)
Development of a Measurement Tool for Anger Management
and Substance Abuse Programs for Juvenile Offenders
• Erica E Procter (University of Guelph), Karen Korabik (University of
Guelph), William O’Grady (University of Guelph)
SESSION/SÉANCE 790
Building Natural Laboratories for
Research Efficiency: A Process Evaluation
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM E
• Chair(s) – Patricia Bonifer-Tiedt (American Red Cross)
• Discussant(s) – Patricia Bonifer-Tiedt (American Red Cross)
Research Without Borders: Establishing Field-Based Chapter
Laboratories
• Jeff Grebinoski (American Red Cross)
Re-Visiting Evaluation on the Front Line: Helping Practitioners
to Challenge Misconceptions, Build Self-Efficacy, and
Embrace the Process
• Mary Elizabeth Piontek (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor)
Using Communities of Learning and Integrated Practice to
Build Evaluation Capacity in Community Colleges
• Beverly Parsons (InSites)
Growing an Evaluation Office: Five Years and a Million Dollars
• Linda P Thurston (Kansas State University), B Jan Middendorf (Office
of Educational Innovation and Evaluation), Cynthia Shuman (Office
of Educational Innovation and Evaluation)
SESSION/SÉANCE 792
Demonstration of an Electronic Relational
Database for Managing the Evaluation
of Multi-Site, Community-Based Programs
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM G
•
•
•
•
Kevin K Hylton (MayaTech Corporation)
Lisa Bagley (MayaTech Corporation)
Ravena Chase (MayaTech Corporation)
Hugues deMedeiros (MayaTech Corporation)
• Joscelyn Silsby (American Red Cross)
“Quickie” Evaluations: Using New and Existing Data in
Chapter Laboratories to Meet Customer Needs
• Barbara J Muth (American Red Cross)
184
SESSION/SÉANCE 793
SESSION/SÉANCE 795
More on Retrospective Pre-Test:
Developing a Taxonomy of Best Practice Uses
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
From Project to Program Evaluation:
From Single Agency to Joint Evaluations
Panel / Panel
• Chair(s) – Shannan McNair (Oakland University)
• Discussant(s) – Melanie A Hwalek (SPEC Associates), Frederick L
Newman (Florida International University)
Synthesis of Literature Relative to Retrospective Pretest
Design
LOCATION:
CITY HALL
• Chair(s) – Sheila Dohoo Faure (Goss Gilroy Inc)
• Discussant(s) – Niels Dabelstein (Danida Ministry of Foreign Affairs),
Ted Kliest (Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs)
Changes in Development Cooperation Programming
and Evaluation: A Brief Overview
• Goberdhan Singh (Canadian International Development Agency)
• Ellen Taylor-Powell (University of Wisconsin Extension), John Klatt
(University of Wisconsin Extension)
A Joint Evaluation of External Support to Education:
Reflections on Avoiding Cacophony and Encouraging Synergy
Experiences and Concerns About the Retrospective Pretest
Posttest Model of Measuring Change
• Joel Samoff (Stanford University)
• Karl E Umble (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
Comparison of Different Strategies of Measuring Change
on Assessment of Outcome Quality of Inpatient
Psychosomatic Rehabilitation
• Werner W Willmann (Universitat Mannheim), Frederick L Newman
(Florida International University)
Changing Roles of External Evaluators in Large Scale Joint
Evaluations: Two Recent Examples
• Sheila Dohoo Faure (Goss Gilroy Inc), Ted Freeman (Goss Gilroy)
Joint Evaluations: Recent Experiences, Lessons Learned, and
Options for the Future
• Horst Breier (Independent Consultant)
SESSION/SÉANCE 796
SESSION/SÉANCE 794
Applications of Systems Thinking to
Organizational Evaluation
Visual Presentations: The Rudiments of
Conveying Complex Ideas in Visual Formats
LOCATION:
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Bob Williams (Independent consultant)
Evaluating Social Capital in Interorganizational Alliances:
An Application of Social Network Analysis
ELGIN
• Patrick E McKnight (George Mason University)
• Michael Menke (University of Arizona)
• Branda L Nowell (Michigan State University)
Organizational Systems Evaluation:
Evaluation as Adaptivity and Learning in Organizations
• Derek A Cabrera (Cornell University), William M Trochim (Cornell
University)
Toward the Development of an Evaluation Approach
for Systems Change Programs
• Elvis E Fraser (Academy for Educational Development), Caryn A
Sweeney (Academy for Educational Development)
185
SESSION/SÉANCE 797
SESSION/SÉANCE 799
The New Spotlight on Federal Program
Evaluation
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
Panel / Panel
WENTWORTH
• Chair(s) – Stephanie L Shipman (US Government Accountability
Office)
Federal Agencies’ Progress in Conducting Effectiveness
Evaluations Recommended by the Office of Management
and Budget
• Stephanie L Shipman (US Government Accountability Office), Valerie
J Caracelli (US Government Accountability Office)
The Dialogue Between Federal Evaluation Leaders and
the Office of Management and Budget Regarding
the Acceptability of Evaluation Approaches for
the Program Assessment Rating Tool
• Cheryl J Oros (US Department of Agriculture)
The Office of Management and Budget’s Program Evaluation
Guidance: The Federal Dialogue and the Realities of
Implementation at the Environmental Protection Agency
• Katherine Dawes (US Environmental Protection Agency)
Scientifically-Based Evaluation in Education:
Experimental Design Versus a Multimethod Approach
• Alan L Ginsburg (US Department of Education), Natalia E Pane
(American Institutes for Research)
LOCATION:
HURON
• Chair(s) – Linda Morra-Imas (World Bank Group)
• Discussant(s) – Andy Rowe (GHR International)
World Bank Institute Standardized Assessment of
Training Impact
• William A Eckert (World Bank)
Standardization of Performance Indicators for the International
Finance Corporation’s Technical Assistance Programs
• Mark D Bardini (International Finance Corporation), Getta Batra
(International Finance Corporation)
Self-Evaluation Approach for Evaluating Knowledge Transfer
Programs
• Rosalía Rodriguez García (World Bank), Elizabeth M White (World
Bank)
SESSION/SÉANCE 800
Developing a New Class of Evaluation Artifacts
to Promote Use
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
KENT
SESSION/SÉANCE 798
Methodological Challenges in Conducting a
Mixed-Method Multi-Site International Study
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
Methods and Approaches for Evaluating
Technical Assistance
KENORA
• Chair(s) – Michael Ungar (Dalhousie University)
An International Study of Resilience in Adolescents:
Challenges in Conceptualization and Design
• Michael Ungar (Dalhousie University), Roger A Boothroyd (University
of South Florida)
Quantitative Measurement Challenges
• Linda Liebenberg (Dalhousie University), Roger A Boothroyd
(University of South Florida)
Qualitative Methodological and Analytic Challenges
• Chair(s) – Matthew R Hanson (University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign)
An Overview of the Advanced Reading Development
Demonstration Project, Its Evaluation, and the Need to Do
Something Different
• Matthew R Hanson (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
Development and Use of “The Indicators of High Performance
in School Literacy Improvement” and Their Impact on the
Evaluators’ Role
• Lizanne DeStefano (University of Illinois)
Use of “The Indicators” From the Perspective of a Teacher
Professional Development Provider
• Taffy E Raphael (University of Illinois at Chicago)
Use of “The Indicators” From the Perspective of the
Program’s Funder
• Peggy Mueller (The Chicago Community Trust)
• Mary Armstrong (University of South Florida), Marion Brown
(Dalhousie University), Eli Teram (Laurier University), Michael Ungar
(Dalhousie University)
186
SESSION/SÉANCE 801
SESSION/SÉANCE 803
Program Creation/Administration and Evaluation:
Moving Toward the Goal of Evaluation as
Welcomed Participant Observer – Creating a
Conceptual Model for Cohabitation
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
SIMCOE
de la culture
• Chair(s) – Michael Cohen (The Michael Cohen Group)
Total Literacy: An Arts-Based Early Childhood Literacy
Curriculum
• Susan Snyder (Inventive Designs for Education and the Arts), Bruce
Wilson (Independent Researcher/Evaluator)
Longitudinal Evaluation: Evolving Relationships in an Iterative
Process
Evaluation and Anthropology:
An Idea Whose Time Has Come (Part II)
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Jacqueline Copeland-Carson (University of Minnesota),
Mary Odell Butler (Battelle)
• Discussant(s) – Jacqueline Copeland-Carson (University of
Minnesota)
Anthropological Approaches to the Evaluation of CommunityUniversity Partnerships
• Eve C Pinsker (Stroger Hospital), Michael D Lieber (University of
Illinois at Chicago)
Evaluation of Environmental Issues
• Susan Cushing (The Alliance for a Media Literate America), Nellie
Gregorian (The Michael Cohen Group)
• Lenora Bohren (Colorado State University)
The Creation and Evaluation of a Parent-Child Engagement
Center Within a Community Oriented Urban-Based Children’s
Museum
• Cathleen Crain (LTG Associates), Nathaniel Tashima (LTG Associates)
• Andrew Ackerman (Children’s Museum of Manhattan)
Bridging the Gap Between Evaluation Practice
and Training: Implications of Field Experience
From Multiple Settings
SESSION/SÉANCE 802
Framing Evaluation Within an
Indigenous World View
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
DUFFERIN
• Chair(s) – Joan L LaFrance (Mekinak Consulting)
Indigenous Education Knowledge Network and Indigenous
Evaluation
• Sharon Nelson-Barber (WestEd)
Theoretical Underpinnings for Indigenous Evaluation
• Joan L LaFrance (Mekinak Consulting)
Concepts Guiding the Practice of Indigenous Evaluation
• Richard Nichols (Richard Nichols and Associates)
Anthropology and Evaluation: Lessons From the Field
SESSION/SÉANCE 804
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Zhicheng Zhang (Fairfax County Public Schools)
• Discussant(s) – Stewart I Donaldson (Claremont Graduate University)
Myriad Influences on Evaluation Training of Varying
Methodologies Used in Schools of Public Health
• J Jackson Barnette (University of Alabama at Birmingham)
Challenges and Opportunities for Evaluation in Education
• Zhicheng Zhang (Fairfax County Public Schools)
Challenges in the Evaluation of Workplace Practices
• Susan N Labin (Temple University)
Improving the Use of Evaluation in Human Service Agencies
• Mary Ann Scheirer (Scheirer Consulting)
187
SESSION/SÉANCE 805
SESSION/SÉANCE 807
A Potpourri of Mixed-Method Evaluations of
Educational Programs
LOCATION:
COSMOPOLITAN
• Chair(s) – June Elizabeth Gothberg (Western Michigan University)
A Multi-Method Approach to Evaluating the Implementation
of a Social and Character Education Program in
A Sample of Maryland Elementary Schools
Developing and Implementing Evaluation Plans
for Academic-Community Research Centers:
Building Partnerships, Capacity, Trust, and
Models for Center Assessment
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
GINGERSNAP
• Chair(s) – Demia L Sundra (Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention)
• Amy B Silverman (University of Maryland), Gary G Gottfredson
(University of Maryland)
New Light for the Dark Tunnel: Engaging Community to
Frame Program Vision and Shape Ongoing Evaluation
Using a Comprehensive Evaluation Model to Ensure
Optimal Implementation of a District-Wide Middle School
Literacy Initiative
• Geri L Peak (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health)
• Beverly J Winsch (Jefferson County Public Schools)
• Delores M Pluto (University of South Carolina), Michelle Granner
(University of South Carolina), Sarah F Griffin (University of South
Carolina)
Evaluating an Individualized Education Plan Process
and Measuring Excellence in Conjunction With State
Transition Requirements
• June Elizabeth Gothberg (Western Michigan University), Michelle A
Bakerson (Western Michigan University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 806
Needs Assessment as Community Mobilization:
The Immigrant Skills Initiative in Waterloo Region
LOCATION:
EXECUTIVE
• Rich Janzen (Centre for Research and Education in Human Services)
• Kathy Hogarth (Centre for Research and Education in Human
Services)
• Maria Hatzipantelis (Centre for Research and Education in Human
Services)
Evaluation of Prevention Research Center Infrastructure:
From Logic Model to Feasible Evaluation Plan
Engaging Stakeholders in the Development of a
Prevention Research Center’s Evaluation Plan
• Monique Barber (University of Texas School of Public Health), Belinda
Reininger (University of Texas School of Public Health), Susan
Tortolero (University of Texas School of Public Health), Nancy Murray
(University of Texas School of Public Health)
SESSION/SÉANCE 808
Evaluation in the Public Sector and
Use of Report Cards
LOCATION:
GOLD RUSH
Government Evaluation TIG and Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and
Mental Health TIG / Évaluation gouvernementale et
l’alcoolisme, la toxicomanie et la santé mentale
• Chair(s) – Minakshi Tikoo (University of Connecticut)
A Process of Getting to Feasible Recommendations
• Carlos J Torres (Peace Corps), Mike Jerald (Peace Corps)
Evaluation of a Voucher Management Substance Abuse
Program
• Robert T Atanda (Westat)
Program Assessment: What Kinds of Evaluation Information
Do Programs Need?
• Elaine L Vaurio (US Government Accountability Office)
188
SESSION/SÉANCE 809
The Voice of the Young: Engaging Young
Students in Evaluations
LOCATION:
ICE PALACE
• Linda E Lee (Proactive Information Services)
• Denise Belanger (Proactive Information Services)
• Carlos Rodriguez (American Institutes for Research), Mary Quinn
(American Institutes for Research), Leonardo Colemon (AIDS Project
Los Angeles), Mindee O’Cummings (American Institutes for
Research), Marlene Martarese (American Institutes for Research),
Mike Friedman (American Institutes for Research)
Teaching Program Evaluation Across Countries:
Communalities and Differences
• Maria Medina Diaz (University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras), Ada L
Verdejo Carrion (University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras)
SESSION/SÉANCE 810
Roundtable Set Thirteen
LOCATION:
Youth Suicide: Unspoken Realities
Evaluation of a Shift in Educational Paradigms:
No Adult Left Behind
• Chair(s) – Tamara M Walser (Windwalker Corporation)
• Susan E Nyce (Western Michigan University), Jeanine MattsonGearhart (Western Michigan University)
Breaking Down Classroom Borders and Boundaries:
A Graduate Student’s Perspective of Learning the Practice
of Stakeholder Focused Evaluation in the Field
Title: Designing and Testing a Peer Review System for
the New Earth Web-Fund
• Greg Norris (New Earth Web Fund)
• Julia Burnett (Oklahoma State University), Tammie Bland (Oklahoma
State University), Kathleen D Kelsey (Oklahoma State University)
Evaluating an Alternative Education Program:
A Democratic Approach
Academic Impacts of After School Programs:
What Can Teachers Tell Us?
• Maurice Samuels (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign),
Katherine E Ryan (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
• Mindy M Hightower King (Indiana University), Ada B Simmons
(Indiana University), Amy M Kemp (Indiana University)
All Together Now: Using Evaluation to Strengthen
the Grantee/Grantor Relationship
• Veena Pankaj (Innovation Network)
Virtual Organization: How Independent Evaluators
can Continue to Learn, do Good Work, Have Fun, and
Stay Employed
SESSION/SÉANCE 811
Using Ethnography to Evaluate Community
Change: Lessons Learned From an Ethnographic
Study of 36 United States Communities
LOCATION:
PINNACLE
• Heather K Lewis-Charp (Social Policy Research Associates)
• Sengsouvanh Soukamneuth (Social Policy Research Associates)
• Cindy R Roberts-Gray (Resource Network), Magdalena Rood
(Evaluation and Applied Research Associates), Nance Bell
(Independent Consultant), Mary Lou Bell (Bell Group)
189
1:50 pm – 3:20 pm / 13h50 – 15h20
Developing and Completing a Doctoral
Dissertation
GRAND BALLROOM WEST
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Chair(s) – Daniela C Schroeter (Western Michigan University)
Michelle H Anderson-Draper (University of Alberta)
Eric J Mundy (University of Akron)
Guillaume Ndongo Mebometa (Canadian Evaluation Society)
Sandra Ortega (Ounce of Prevention Fund of Florida)
Linnea L Rademaker (Indiana State University)
Annalisa Raymer (Cornell University)
Valéry Ridde (Université Laval)
John Risley (Western Michigan University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 813
Jumping, Hurdling, and Leaping Across Borders:
Ethical Considerations From Japan, Russia,
and South Africa
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
Applying the Guiding Principles for Evaluators
in Practice: Ethical Dilemmas Across Different
Content Areas of Evaluation Practice
Panel / Panel
SESSION/SÉANCE 812
LOCATION:
SESSION/SÉANCE 814
LOCATION:
GRAND BALLROOM EAST
Association
• Chair(s) – Leslie Goodyear (Education Development Center)
• Discussant(s) – Gail V Barrington (Barrington Research Group)
Applying the Guiding Principles for Evaluators in
the Evaluation of Health Promotion Programs
• Molly Engle (Oregon State University)
Dancing at Two Weddings at the Same Time
• Naida Tushnet (WestEd)
Ethics and Evaluation: Making Sure the Tail Does not
Wag the Dog
• Kelly M Hannum (Center for Creative Leadership)
Evaluation and Ethics in a Changing Political Landscape
• Quint Thurman (Texas State University)
Ethical Concerns Working With Vulnerable Populations
and Vulnerable Organizations
• Lois Thiessen Love (Uhlich Children’s Advantage Network)
Ethical Issues to Consider When Conducting Evaluation
Research Involving Special Needs Populations
• Edie Lassegard Cook (Cornell University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 815
• Chair(s) – Craig Russon (Programme Planning & Evaluation)
Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Indonesia and South Africa
• Donna Podems (OtherWISE Research and Evaluation)
Russia and the Newly Independent States
• Alexey Kuzmin (Process Consulting Company)
Japan
• Masafumi Nagao (Hiroshima University)
Evaluability Assessment: A Re-emergence?
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
V.I.P
• Chair(s) – Debra J Rog (Vanderbilt University)
• Discussant(s) – Joseph Wholey (University of Southern California)
Evaluability Assessment: Then and Now
• Debra J Rog (Vanderbilt University)
An Evaluability Assessment of Discharge Planning as a
Strategy to Prevent Homelessness
• Garrett Moran (Westat), Elizabeth Quinn (Westat), Rafael Semansky
(Westat), Teresa Koenig (Westat), Rebecca Noftsinger (Westat),
Susan Azrin (Westat)
Evaluability Assessment of the Mental Health Block Grant and
the Protection and Advocacy for Individuals With Mental
Illness Programs
• Virginia Mulkern (Human Services Research Institute)
190
SESSION/SÉANCE 816
SESSION/SÉANCE 818
Evaluating Research and Technology Programs
at the National and International Level
Contending With Unintended Consequences:
Theory and Practice for Evaluation
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
LOCATION:
YORK
Government Evaluation TIG / Évaluation de la recherche, de
la technologie et du développement et l’évaluation
gouvernementale
• Chair(s) – Patries Boekholt (Technopolis Ltd)
Evaluation of Science Foundation Ireland: A Case Study of a
Programme Designed to Enhance National Research Quality
• Jim Ryan (CIRCA Group Europe), Michael Fitzgibbon (Forfás)
The Role of Bibliometrics in the Performance Evaluation of
National Research and Development Programs in Korea
• Soon Cheon Byeon (Korea Institute of Science and Technology
Evaluation and Planning), Jung Jae Lee (Korea Institute of Science
and Technology Evaluation and Planning), Sun Woo Chang (Korea
Institute of Science and Technology Evaluation and Planning), Hyuck
Jae Lee (Korea Institute of Science and Technology Evaluation and
Planning)
Advantages and Limitations of Trans-national Benchmarking
as Element in Evaluation
• Patries Boekholt (Technopolis Ltd)
Scoreboarding and the Art of Biotechnology Measurement
• Éric JA Archambault (Science-Metrix), Etienne Vignola-Gagné
(Science-Metrix)
SESSION/SÉANCE 817
Extending Evaluation Towards
LOCATION:
PEEL
• Chair(s) – Gale Berkowitz (The David and Lucile Packard Foundation)
Foundation)
Working With Fellow Staff: An Internal Evaluator’s Bridge
to Cross
NORFOLK
• Chair(s) – Jonathan Morell (Altarum Institute)
Why are There Unintended Consequences, and What are the
Implications for Doing Evaluation?
• Jonathan Morell (Altarum Institute)
Unanticipated Consequences Within a High School Reform
Initiative
• Barbara Means (SRI International)
Delays in Federal Funding and Concomitant Agency Changes
• Carol T Mowbray (University of Michigan)
Evaluation of The Cleveland Foundation’s Successful
Aging Initiative: How Evaluating an Innovative Initiative
Discovered the Unexpected Need for “Border Crossing”
in Funder-Grantee Roles and Relationships
SESSION/SÉANCE 819
Practical Applications for
Using Propensity Scores
LOCATION:
OXFORD
• MH Clark (Southern Illinois University Carbondale)
SESSION/SÉANCE 820
Oral History Methods for the Evaluator
as Qualitative Researcher
LOCATION:
CARLETON
• Valerie J Janesick (University of South Florida, Tampa)
• David Campos (University of the Incarnate Word)
• Zoe A Barley (Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning)
The Nelson Mandela Foundation is Crossing Borders,
Crossing Boundaries to Learn and Innovate for Social Change
• Beverley Anne Barry (South African Evaluation Network)
Organizational Learning in the Face of Threatening
Evaluation Findings
• Douglas V Easterling (Wake Forest University School of Medicine)
191
SESSION/SÉANCE 821
SESSION/SÉANCE 823
Finding the Balance Between Meeting Client
Needs and Maintaining the Integrity and
Validity of the Evaluation
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM EAST
• Chair(s) – Patricia A Muller (Indiana University)
• Discussant(s) – Patricia A Muller (Indiana University)
Developing a Participatory or Collaborative Evaluation in Spite
of a Disinterested Program Director and/or Stakeholders
• Courtney L Brown (Indiana University)
Dealing With the Ethical and Practical Issues Associated With
Clients Who Exert “Pressure” to Find Certain Outcomes
• Marcey Moss (Indiana University)
LOCATION:
ESSEX BALLROOM
• Discussant(s) – John M Owen (University of Melbourne), Catherine A
Callow-Heusser (EndVision Research and Evaluation), Stewart I
Donaldson (Claremont Graduate University), Cynthia A Tananis
(University of Pittsburgh), James McCullough (SRI International), Joy
Frechtling (Westat)
• Rosalie T Torres (Torres Consulting Group)
• Gabriel M Della-Piana (National Science Foundation)
SESSION/SÉANCE 824
Maintaining Clarity and Direction Amidst Competing Needs of
Multiple, Diverse Stakeholders
• Mindy M Hightower King (Indiana University)
Meeting an Evaluation Challenge: Identifying
and Overcoming Methodological Problems
LOCATION:
SESSION/SÉANCE 822
Services for Children and Families in
Palm Beach County: A Longitudinal
Multi-Program Evaluation
LOCATION:
Subtleties and Nuances of Evaluation Practice
Using Logic Models (Part I of Extended Session
on Logic Model Practices and Tools)
WINDSOR ROOM WEST
sociaux
• Chair(s) – Julie A Spielberger (University of Chicago)
The Palm Beach County Longitudinal Multi-Program
Evaluation: A Systems Approach
• Julie A Spielberger (University of Chicago), Jeff Goodman (Children’s
Services Council)
Evaluation: Collection and Analysis of Administrative Data
From Multiple Systems
• Thomas Haywood (University of Chicago)
Evaluation: An 8 Year Study of Patterns of Service Utilization
of 500 Families
CONFERENCE ROOM B
développement
• Rosalie Ruegg (TIA Consulting)
• Connie Chang (National Institute of Standards and Technology)
SESSION/SÉANCE 825
Improving Health Care Quality in In-Patient and
Out-Patient Settings Evaluating Maternal-Child
Health Programs
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM C
• Chair(s) – Ann P Zukoski (Oregon State University)
Testing a New Interdisciplinary Evaluation Method: A Case of
the Maternal and Child Health Handbook Project in Central
Java, Indonesia
• Yasuhide Nakamura (Osaka University), Takayoshi Kusago (Osaka
University)
• Julie A Spielberger (University of Chicago), Crystal A MacAllum
(Westat)
Identification of Key Attributes for Improving Appropriate
Utilization of Medicaid and PeachCare for Kids Services in Six
Community-Based Organizations
The Palm Beach County Longitudinal Multiprogram Evaluation:
The Family and Community Partnership Evaluation
• Mary Ann Phillips (Georgia State University), Bernette McColley
(Georgia State University)
• Sandra Lyons (University of Chicago), Laura Fleischman (Children’s
Services Council)
Evaluating a Neonatal Resuscitation Program in Eurasia:
The 10,000 Births Study
• Sudhakar G Ezhuthchan (Henry Ford Health System), Christine O
Newman (Henry Ford Health System), Dmytro O Dobryanskyy
(Danylo Halytskiy L’viv National Medical University)
192
SESSION/SÉANCE 826
Developing Innovative Methodologies for
Evaluating Emergency Response and
Crisis Management Programs
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM D
• Chair(s) – William Modzeleski (US Department of Education)
Introduction to the Emergency Response and Crisis
Management Program
• William Modzeleski (US Department of Education), Tara Hill (US
Department of Education)
Evaluating HIV Prevention Programs: Providing Context,
Improving Delivery, and Assessing Outcomes
• Carlos Toledo (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Marla
Vaughan (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Gary Uhl
(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Merle Hamburger
(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Jane Mezoff (Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention)
SESSION/SÉANCE 828
Emerging Dimensions in Higher Education
Applications: E Portfolios, Technology
and Learning
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM F
Evaluating the Emergency Response and Crisis Management
Planning Process
• Kathy Zantal-Wiener (Caliber Associates Inc), Allan W Porowski
(Caliber Associates)
• Chair(s) – Duishon A Shamatov (University of Toronto)
• Discussant(s) – Daph J Crane (Bow Valley College)
Emergency Response and Crisis Management Plans Put to
the Test: A Local Perspective
• Edward Clarke (Montgomery County Public Schools)
• Howard R Mzumara (Purdue University Indianapolis)
SESSION/SÉANCE 827
Developing and Implementing a
National Framework for Monitoring and
Evaluating HIV Prevention Programs
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
Evaluating e-Portfolios as Tools for Assessing Student
Learning: Progress Report on the Indiana University –
Purdue University Indianapolis e-Portfolio Project
CONFERENCE ROOM E
Using Outcome Evaluation to Support an Online
Virtual Advising Program for 1st Year Students
• Bryant L Hutson (University of North Carolina at Greensboro), Micah
T Martin (University of North Carolina at Greensboro), Julie A
Atwood (University of North Carolina at Greensboro)
Portfolio Reflections in a Digital Environment:
Evaluating an Unfinished Tool
• William H Rickards (Alverno College), Linda Ehley (Alverno College)
• Chair(s) – Linda Wright-DeAgüero (Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention)
The Development and Implementation of the Program
Evaluation and Monitoring System
• Craig Thomas (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Linda
Wright-DeAgüero (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), John
Neatherlin (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Bryce Smith
(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), David Hurst (Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention)
Performance Indicators: A Tool for Monitoring Progress
Towards National Prevention Program Objectives
• Barbara Maciak (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Craig
Thomas (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Jay Smith
(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Linda WrightDeAgüero (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Laura
Selman (ORC Macro International), David Cotton (ORC Macro
International)
193
SESSION/SÉANCE 829
SESSION/SÉANCE 831
Course Management Systems and
Other Case Studies
Performance Measurement in
Canadian Municipalities
LOCATION:
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM G
• Chair(s) – MaryJo O Smith (Ypsilon Associates)
Measuring the Canadian Municipality
Evaluation of the Impact of Technology on Middle School
Writing
• Peter R Bracegirdle (Appian Consulting)
• Corey P Greenlaw (Central Unified School District), Shant H Avakian
(Central Unified School District)
Getting Beyond the Technology in Instructional Technology
Through Evaluation
• Stanley J Varnhagen (University of Alberta), Myrna R Sears
(University of Alberta), George G Zhou (University of Alberta)
Vital Signs for Evaluating the Integration of a
Course Management System
• Meghan Kennedy (Brigham Young University), Greg L Waddoups
(Brigham Young University)
Distance Education, Technology and Implementation:
Challenges for Evaluation
• Roy Kruger (Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory), Megh
Thapa (Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory)
The Ontario Municipal Performance Measurement Program
• Bohdan Wynnycky (Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and
Housing)
Measuring Municipalities Through the Federation of Canadian
Municipalities’ Quality of Life Reporting System
• John Burrett (Federation of Canadian Municipalities)
Finding Best Practices by Asking Best Practitioners
• Hans Muntz (Canshield Management Services)
SESSION/SÉANCE 832
Using Evaluator Competencies for Professional
Development and Quality Assurance
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
CITY HALL
SESSION/SÉANCE 830
An Educative, Value-Engaged Approach to
Evaluating National Science Foundation Science
and Mathematics Educational Programs
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Sebastien Hamel (Federation of Canadian Municipalities)
• Chair(s) – Jennifer C Greene (University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign)
• Discussant(s) – James S Dietz (National Science Foundation), Beverly
Parsons (InSites)
Navigating the Intersections of Science, Education,
and Diversity: Our Developmental Process
• Lizanne DeStefano (University of Illinois)
Key Commitments and Perspectives in an Educative,
Value-Engaged Approach to Evaluating Science Technology
Engineering and Math Educational Programs
• Chair(s) – Martha McGuire (Cathexis Consulting)
• Discussant(s) – Burt Perrin (Independent Consultant), James W
Altschuld (Ohio State University)
The Use of Evaluation Competencies in a Formal
Teaching Setting
• Laurel Stevahn (Seattle University), Jean A King (University of
Minnesota), Gail Ghere (University of Minnesota), Jane E Minnema
The Use of Core Body of Knowledge in Performance
Development
• Rochelle Zorzi (Cathexis Consulting), Martha McGuire (Cathexis
Consulting)
Use of Core Body of Knowledge in Developing Evaluation
Training in the Japanese Context
• Arnold Love (Independent Consultant), Keiko Kuji-Shikatani
(Cathexis Consulting)
• Jennifer C Greene (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
Illustrating an Educative, Value-Engaged Approach
to Evaluation of Science Technology Engineering and
Math Educational Programs
• Jori Hall (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), Holli Burgon
(University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
194
SESSION/SÉANCE 833
Missing Data – Oh My! Practical Alternatives
for Handling Missing Data
LOCATION:
ELGIN
• Chair(s) – Patrick E McKnight (George Mason University), Katherine
M McKnight (University of Arizona)
• Wendy M Garrard (Vanderbilt University)
• Henry R Ilian (James Satterwhite Academy for Child Welfare
Training), Robert Highsmith (James Satterwhite Academy for Child
Welfare Training), Sandra Davidson (James Satterwhite Academy for
Child Welfare Training)
“Proof of Concept”: How Evaluation Demonstrates the Value
of Training Outside the Ivory Tower
• Nancy C Gordon (PricewaterhouseCoopers), John R Mattox
(PricewaterhouseCoopers), Carol A Feula (PricewaterhouseCoopers)
SESSION/SÉANCE 837
SESSION/SÉANCE 835
Applying RealWorld Evaluation in the Field:
a Case Study From Bangladesh and a
Discussion of Applications of the Approach
in Developing and Developed Countries
Process and Product: Collaborative
Utilization-Focused Evaluation of a
Multicomponent Tobacco Cessation Program
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
Smiling About Smile Sheets While the Folks in the
Focus Group Get Testy: What a Comprehensive Integrated
Evaluation Immediately Following Training can Tell Us
KENORA
• Chair(s) – Michael Bamberger (Independent Consultant)
• Discussant(s) – Andy Rowe (GHR International), Jim Rugh (CARE
International)
KENT
• Chair(s) – Anne Betzner (Professional Data Analysts Inc)
• Discussant(s) – Rita O’Sullivan (University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill)
Introduction and Background: Describing the Evaluation Need
and Stakeholders
Evaluating the Impacts of a Program to Reduce the
Vulnerability of the Chars Island Dwellers in Bangladesh:
Applying RealWorld Evaluation in the Field
• Barbara A Schillo (Minnesota Partnership for Action Against
Tobacco)
• Michael Bamberger (Independent Consultant)
• Anne Betzner (Professional Data Analysts Inc)
Using RealWorld Evaluation in the US and Other Developed
Nations
Process for Sharing Information and Ideas
• Linda Mabry (Washington State University, Vancouver)
SESSION/SÉANCE 836
Design and Methodology for Implementing the Evaluation
• Julie Rainey (Professional Data Analysts)
Results and Their Uses
• Jessie E Saul (Minnesota Partnership for Action Against Tobacco)
Evaluating Training
LOCATION:
HURON
Quantifying the Influence of Corporate Training on Turnover
• Sandhya Rao (PricewaterhouseCoopers), John R Mattox
(PricewaterhouseCoopers)
Implementing an International Evaluation System
for a Corporate University
• John R Mattox (PricewaterhouseCoopers), Nancy C Gordon
(PricewaterhouseCoopers), Kevin P Jones (PricewaterhouseCoopers),
Gregory A Line (PricewaterhouseCoopers)
195
SESSION/SÉANCE 838
Lessons Learned in Evaluating Health-Related
Programs
LOCATION:
SIMCOE
spéciaux
The Healing Lodge: A Faith-Based Alternative to HIV/AIDS
Service Delivery in an American Indian Community
• Ottis L Murray (University of North Carolina at Pembroke)
Implementing a Medical and Dental Clinic for Inner City
Street Youth: Lessons Learned From a Process Evaluation
• Margo S Rowan (University of Ottawa), Lise Labrecque (Independent
Consultant)
Crossing Many Boundaries: Guidelines for Evaluating
MSM HIV/AIDS Programs in Asia
• Ana Coghlan (ACTion Consulting), Philippe Girault (Family Health
International), Dimitri Prybylski (Family Health International)
SESSION/SÉANCE 839
Model for Evaluating Key Organizational Factors
in the Provision of Culturally Competent Mental
Health Services to HIV-Positive Clients in
Traditionally Underserved Communities
LOCATION:
DUFFERIN
• Chair(s) – Michael Costa (Abt Associates)
• Douglas Fuller (Abt Associates Inc)
Using Appreciative Inquiry Methods to Improve
Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research Within the United States
Department of Health and Human Services
• David M Introcaso (US Department of Health and Human Services)
Mainstreaming Evaluation to Fuel Generative Visions of
Provocative Possibility
• Hazel Symonette (University of Wisconsin, Madison)
Evaluation of Women’s Empowerment Program IREX
(Education Review and Exchange Board)
• Tessie T Catsambas (EnCompass)
SESSION/SÉANCE 841
Improving Methods to Evaluate Program
Sustainability
LOCATION:
• Mary Ann Scheirer (Scheirer Consulting)
SESSION/SÉANCE 842
Experimental Design Methods in the
Evaluation of Three Federally Funded
Technology in Education Programs
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
COSMOPOLITAN
• Chair(s) – Helene P Jennings (ORC Macro International)
• Discussant(s) – Norma S Fleischman (US Department of Agriculture)
Experimental Design in Evaluating an Electronic Field Trip:
Decisions and Results
• Helene P Jennings (ORC Macro International)
SESSION/SÉANCE 840
Crossing Boundaries: Bridging Evaluation and
Appreciative Inquiry
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
Public Broadcasting Service Ready To Learn: Taking
Quasi-Experimental Evaluation Design to the Next Step
• Kristen Willard (Public Broadcasting Service), Kristin A Juffer
(WestEd)
The Rest of the Iceberg: Negotiating and Implementing
an Experiment in K-12 Schools
• Paula Szulc Dominguez (Hezel Associates)
Prevention)
• Discussant(s) – Hallie Preskill (Claremont Graduate University)
Using Appreciative Inquiry in Evaluation
• Francoise Coupal (Mosaic.net International)
Using Appreciative Inquiry to Evaluate the Quality of a School
Improvement Program in Mexico
• Edith J Cisneros-Cohernour (Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán)
196
SESSION/SÉANCE 843
SESSION/SÉANCE 845
Conducting International Evaluations:
The United States Agency for International
Development’s Evaluation System
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
Crossing Borders, Crossing Boundaries:
Navigating Between the Federal and
State/Provincial Levels of Government
Panel / Panel
EXECUTIVE
• Chair(s) – Krishna Kumar (US Agency for International Development)
Multitiered Evaluation System in the United States Agency
for International Development
• Janet E Kerley (US Agency for International Development)
LOCATION:
GOLD RUSH
• Discussant(s) – Kent Hutchinson (Florida Legislature Office of
Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability)
Balancing Access to Sensitive Information While
Protecting Confidentiality
Conducting Multicountry Evaluations: Some Lessons
• Martha Carter (Nebraska Legislature, Performance Audit Section)
• Krishna Kumar (US Agency for International Development)
Mutual Accountability Between the Federal and
State Governments With No Child Left Behind
Opportunities for Consulting for the United States Agency
for International Development
• Cressida Slote (US Agency for International Development)
Sifting Mandates From Myths
• Rakesh Mohan (Idaho State Legislature)
SESSION/SÉANCE 844
Evaluation as a Community Building and
Learning Tool for Arab-American Communities
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
• Katherine E Ryan (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
GINGERSNAP
SESSION/SÉANCE 846
Conducting a Large-Scale, Multi-Site Program
Evaluation in a Major Urban School District:
Implications for Evaluation Theory and Practice
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
ICE PALACE
• Chair(s) – Leena Mangrulkar (Formative Evaluation Research
Associates)
• Discussant(s) – Karen Eugenie Rignall (Arab Community Center for
Economic and Social Services)
Documenting our History to Chart our Future:
Case Studies in Arab-American Community Building
The Role of Inside and Outside Collaboration in
Designing and Implementing a Successful High Stakes,
Multi-Site Program Evaluation
• Barry Checkoway (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor), Karen
Eugenie Rignall (Arab Community Center for Economic and Social
Services), Aparna Ramakrishnan (University of Michigan)
Identifying the Progress and Challenges of an
Emerging Ethnic-Specific Network: Evaluating the
Arab American Community Service Initiative
• Leena Mangrulkar (Formative Evaluation Research Associates)
Needs Assessments as Tools for Arab-American Inclusion
• Louise Cainkar (Senior Research Scholar, Great Cities Institute)
• Chair(s) – Keith Zvoch (University of Nevada, Las Vegas)
• Discussant(s) – Peter Jailall (Mississauga Board of Education)
• Robert P Parker (Clark County School District)
Measuring and Documenting Fidelity of Program
Implementation Through Classroom Observations and
Mixed-Methods Data Analysis
• Alison M Williams (University of Nevada, Las Vegas), Keith Zvoch
(University of Nevada, Las Vegas)
Implementation Effects on Students’ Literacy Growth:
A Multilevel Analysis of Program Process and Program Impact
• Keith Zvoch (University of Nevada, Las Vegas), Alison M Williams
(University of Nevada, Las Vegas)
Reflections on Collaborative Evaluation Practice:
Learning From a Precedent-Setting Experience
• Marilyn E Jordan (Clark County School District), Arlene Lewis (Clark
County School District)
197
SESSION/SÉANCE 847
SESSION/SÉANCE 848
Roundtable Set Fourteen
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – Imelda R Castañeda-Emenaker (University of Cincinnati)
Technical Assistance as Participatory Evaluation
• Dora W Kyabu (Georgia State University), Patricia J Kota (Georgia
State University)
Practical Challenges Associated With Experimental Studies
of Educational Initiatives
The How and Why of Using Qualitative and
Mixed Methods Designs to Evaluate
Educational Programs
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
PINNACLE
• Chair(s) – Sheryl Gowen (Georgia State University)
Using Qualitative Methods to Study Schools as Organizations:
Techniques from Evaluations of Charter Schools and
School-Based Professional Development
• James S Sass (LA’s BEST After School Enrichment Program), Noelle V
Rivera (Action Learning Systems)
• Gary Silverstein (Westat), Amber Winkler (Westat), Lance Rougeaux
(Pennsylvania Department of Education)
Using Mixed Methods to Improve Program Implementation
and Outcomes: Techniques From an Evaluation of Teacher
and Leader Professional Development in Public Schools
• Darlene Yañez (University of Texas at Austin)
Complex Change Initiatives: Evaluating Frameworks
Rather Than Programs
• Michelle R Bloodworth (University of Illinois at Chicago), Samuel P
Whalen (University of Illinois at Chicago), Jennifer Watling Neal
(University of Illinois at Chicago)
Using Mixed Methods to Improve Program Implementation
and Outcomes: Techniques From an Evaluation of
Academic Service Learning
• Sheryl Gowen (Georgia State University)
Fusing Perspectives and Seeing More: A Philosopher
and an Evaluator Think Together About Social Justice and
Public Education
• John P Rudisill (The College of Wooster), Stephanie K Siddens
Evaluation War Stories: A Reflection on the Joint Practice
of Evaluation and Program Consultation
3:20 pm – 3:30 pm / 15h20 – 15h30
Refreshment Break /
• Barbara J Muth (American Red Cross)
Testing Two Different Focus Group Discussion Methods
for Material Evaluation
• H Liesel Copeland (University of Medicine and Dentistry of New
Jersey), Susan L Santos (University of Medicine and Dentistry of New
Jersey)
Crossing the Border: When Technology Enters
the Underserved Home
• John M Enger (Florida Atlantic University), Candace H Lacey (Nova
Southeastern University)
198
3:30 pm – 5:00 pm / 15h30 – 17h00
After the Concept Map: Applications of the
Emergent Conceptual Framework for Planning,
Action, and Evaluation
Panel / Panel
GRAND BALLROOM WEST
• Chair(s) – Mary Kane (Concept Systems)
• Discussant(s) – William M Trochim (Cornell University)
Mapping the Partnership: Using Concept Mapping for
the Development of a Complementary Action Partnership
Model for Public Health
• Mary Kane (Concept Systems), Kathleen M Quinlan (Concept
Systems)
Using Concept Mapping Assessments to Guide Action
and Implementation
• Jeanine R Draut (Concept Systems)
Using Concept Mapping in Evaluation
• William M Trochim (Cornell University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 850
Panel / Panel
GRAND BALLROOM EAST
• Chair(s) – Sarah Earl (International Development Research Centre)
Experiences With Outcome Mapping in a Natural Resource
Management Project in Ecuador
• Kaia Ambrose (Ecopar)
Experiences With Outcome Mapping in a Multinational Project
• Rajeev Khedkar (Academy of Development Science)
Experiences With Outcome Mapping in Honduras
• Raul Zelaya (International Development Research Centre)
Using Outcome Mapping to Evaluate the Policy Influence
of Research
• Ben Ramalingam (Overseas Development Institute), Enrique
Mendizabal (Overseas Development Institute)
SESSION/SÉANCE 852
Evaluating State/Provinces and Community
Programs for Substance Use and Impaired
Driving
Social Psychology of/and/for/from Evaluation:
Crossing Disciplinary Boundaries to Improve
Evaluation Practice and Theory, and Contribute
to the Broader Knowledge Base
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
Are You My Boundary Partner? Crossing Borders,
Crossing Boundaries With Outcome Mapping
LOCATION:
SESSION/SÉANCE 849
LOCATION:
SESSION/SÉANCE 851
LOCATION:
V.I.P
• Chair(s) – Linda M Bosma (University of Minnesota)
Prevention of Substance Abuse Among Hawaii Teens:
Evaluation of the State Initiative Grant (2001-2004)
Thematic Strand and Theories of Evaluation TIG / Volet
thématique et les théories de l’évaluation
• John Gartrell (University of Hawai’i at Manoa), Judith K Inazu
(University of Hawai’i at Manoa)
• Chair(s) – Melvin M Mark (Penn State University)
• Discussant(s) – Laurie Stevahn (Seattle University)
Evaluation of Four States’ Alcohol Demonstration Programs
to Reduce Impaired Driving: Georgia, Louisiana,
Pennsylvania, and Tennessee
Social Psychology and Evaluation: The Past, the Present, and
Alternative Possible Futures
• Melvin M Mark (Penn State University), Jennifer Mills (Penn State
University), Christopher Gamble (Penn State)
Meaning in the Middle: How Social Psychology Can Help Us
to Build Middle-Ground Evaluation Theories
• Bernadette Campbell (Westat)
Mining the Fertile Intersection of Evaluation and Social
Psychology: Caught in the Act of Trespassing
• Stewart I Donaldson (Claremont Graduate University)
• James C Fell (Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation), Elizabeth
Langston (Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation), Scott
Tippetts (Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation)
Meta-Analysis of Adolescent Community-Based
Drug Prevention Program Evaluations
• Andrei V Streke (American Institutes for Research)
Evaluation of Community Organizing in Model Programs:
Lessons Learned From the Three Groups Implementing
Communities Mobilizing for Change on Alcohol
• Linda M Bosma (University of Minnesota)
199
SESSION/SÉANCE 853
SESSION/SÉANCE 855
Extending Organization Capability to Evaluate
Federal Environmental Research Programs
LOCATION:
YORK
Environmental Program Evaluation TIG / Évaluation de la
recherche, de la technologie et du développement et
l’évaluation des programmes environnementaux
• Chair(s) – Howard Cantor (US Environmental Protection Agency)
Extending Organization Capability to Evaluate Federal
Environmental Research Programs: Conceptual Framework
• Dale Alan Pahl (US Environmental Protection Agency), Lorei Kowalski
(US Environmental Protection Agency), Howard Cantor (US
Environmental Protection Agency), Jennifer Robbins (US
Protection Agency)
Environmental Research Programs: Initial Evaluation
Experience
• Lorei Kowalski (US Environmental Protection Agency), Dale Alan Pahl
(US Environmental Protection Agency)
Environmental Research Programs: Strengthening the
Evaluation Culture Within and Among Participating
Organizations
• Emma Norland (US Environmental Protection Agency), Dale Alan
Pahl (US Environmental Protection Agency)
Research Contributions to Environmental Outcomes and
Accountability
• Rona Birnbaum (US Environmental Protection Agency), David
Schmeltz (US Environmental Protection Agency), Rochelle Araujo (US
Protection Agency), Dale Alan Pahl (US Environmental Protection
Agency)
Borders, Boundaries, Bridges, and Paths:
Using Social Network Analysis to Measure our
Workspaces, Communities, and Structures
LOCATION:
NORFOLK
• Maryann M Durland (Durland Consulting)
• Kimberly A Fredericks (Indiana State University)
• Melanie A Hwalek (SPEC Associates)
SESSION/SÉANCE 856
Translating Different Evaluation Statistical
and Methodology Languages
LOCATION:
OXFORD
• Chair(s) – Lee Sechrest (University of Arizona), Souraya Sidani
SESSION/SÉANCE 857
A Sampler of Prominent Approaches to
Qualitative Evaluation: Examples of
Participatory Action Research, Appreciative
Inquiry, and the Case Study Method
LOCATION:
CARLETON
• Chair(s) – James S Sass (LA’s BEST After School Enrichment Program)
• Discussant(s) – James S Sass (LA’s BEST After School Enrichment
Program)
Integrating Evaluation Methods Through Instrument
Development: Using Appreciative Inquiry Questions in
Interview Protocols
• Tamara M Walser (Windwalker Corporation)
Evaluating Parent Involvement Programs in Public Schools:
A Case for Qualitative Case Study Method
• Ranjana V Damle (Albuquerque Public Schools)
200
SESSION/SÉANCE 858
SESSION/SÉANCE 860
Walking the Talk: Holding Evaluators
Accountable for Standards of Quality Work and
Adherence to Ethical Guidelines
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM EAST
• Chair(s) – Kathleen A Dowell (Partners in Evaluation & Planning)
A Client-Based Method for Assessing Evaluator Performance
• Jo Ann Doino-Ingersoll (Strategic Research), Jean Haley (Haley
Consulting Services), Kathleen A Dowell (Partners in Evaluation &
Planning)
Assessing Evaluator Performance Through Peer Review
• Sally L Bond (The Program Evaluation Group), Marilyn L Ray (Finger
Lakes Law & Social Policy Center)
Using Assessments of Evaluator Performance to Identify
Professional Needs
Assessing Evaluator Adherence to Ethical Standards and
the Guiding Principles
• Jean Haley (Haley Consulting Services)
SESSION/SÉANCE 859
Evaluation Challenges in Child-Serving Programs:
Child Welfare, Adoption, and Girls & Boys Town
LOCATION:
WINDSOR ROOM WEST
sociaux
• Chair(s) – Lois Thiessen Love (Uhlich Children’s Advantage Network)
Assessing the Fidelity of a Complex Ecological Family Based
Model: A Multi-Method Approach
• Tanya R Shaw (Girls and Boys Town), Stephanie D Ingram (Girls and
Boys Town)
Evaluation Lessons From a Public/Private Partnership:
The Piedmont Adoption Coalition Experience
• Lorraine C Marais (Radford University)
Aiming at a Moving Target: A Multidimensional Evaluation of
Supervisory Training: 2 Years Later, a Case History
An Online Logic Model Tool and the DesignImplementation-Outcomes Cycle of Evidence:
Improving Evaluation Efforts in the Math Science
Partnership Program (Part II of Extended Session
on Logic Model Practices and Tools)
LOCATION:
ESSEX BALLROOM
• Chair(s) – Catherine A Callow-Heusser (EndVision Research and
Evaluation)
• Discussant(s) – Gabriel M Della-Piana (National Science Foundation)
• Jim Dorward (Utah State University)
• Heather Chapman (Utah State University)
• Catherine A Callow-Heusser (EndVision Research and Evaluation)
SESSION/SÉANCE 861
Evaluation of Health Related Technologies
and Information Systems
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM B
Health Evaluation TIG / Évaluation de la recherche, de la
technologie et du développement et l’évaluation de la santé
• Chair(s) – Sandra C Chatterton (Health Canada)
The Development and Piloting of a Measurement Instrument
to Evaluate Staff Satisfaction With Implementation of a
Clinical Information System
• Brian Gugerty (University of Maryland), Michael Maranda (University
of Maryland), Dona Rook (Pepin Heart Hospital and Research
Institute)
The Impact of a Federally Developed Framework on the
Field of Evaluation
• Sandra C Chatterton (Health Canada), Robert Hanson (Health
Canada)
Potential Roles for Health Technology Assessment Agencies:
Opportunities and Challenges for an Effective Health
Technology Assessment Practice at the Meso Level
• Chantale Lessard (Université de Montréal), Anaîs Tanon (Université
de Montréal)
• Henry R Ilian (James Satterwhite Academy for Child Welfare
Training), Robert Highsmith (James Satterwhite Academy for Child
Welfare Training), Sandra Davidson (James Satterwhite Academy for
Child Welfare Training)
201
SESSION/SÉANCE 862
SESSION/SÉANCE 864
How Do We Know When We’re There? Thinking
Creatively About Methods of Measurement and
Links to Program Improvement
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM C
Prevention)
Linking Surveillance and Evaluation: Using National
Surveillance Data of Police-Reported Crashes to Evaluate the
Effectiveness of a Collision Warning System Used in Heavy
Trucks
• Guang Chen (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
Linking Surveillance, Prevention Outreach, and Mitigation of
Environmental Hazards: Evaluation Challenges for the
Hazardous Substances Emergency Events Surveillance
Program
• Wendy A Wattigney (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention),
Maureen Orr (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Shannon
Rossiter (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Charles H
Weir (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
Success Stories: Beyond the One Page Description
• S René Lavinghouze (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
SESSION/SÉANCE 863
Responding to Crime in Indian Country:
Evaluation Results
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM D
• Chair(s) – Winifred L Reed (National Institute of Justice)
• Discussant(s) – Norena A Henry (US Office of Justice Programs)
Outcome Findings from the Comprehensive Indian Resources
for Community and Law Enforcement Project Evaluation
• Stewart Wakeling (University of Arizona), Miriam Jorgensen
(University of Arizona)
Assessing Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Under
Public Law 280
• Duane Champagne (University of California, Los Angeles), Carole
Goldberg (University of California, Los Angeles), Heather Valdez
Singleton (Harvard University)
Identifying Evaluative Criteria in the Multi-Site
Context: Topical, Longitudinal, and Conceptual
Approaches From the Evaluation of the National
Science Foundation’s Advanced Technology
Education Program
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM E
• Chair(s) – Michael Scriven (Western Michigan University)
• Discussant(s) – Arlen R Gullickson (Western Michigan University)
The Impact and Effectiveness of the Advanced Technological
Education Program’s Professional Development Efforts: Using
a Targeted-Study to Identify Evaluative Criteria
• Darryl L Jinkerson (Abilene Christian University), Carl E Hanssen
Criteria for Evaluating Program Sustainability Within a MultiSite Context: A Longitudinal Approach
• Daniela C Schroeter (Western Michigan University), Jonathan Morell
(Altarum Institute)
Identifying Relevant Evaluative Criteria in the Multi-Site
Context: A Conceptual Approach for Diverse Needs, Values,
and Goals
• Chris LS Coryn (Western Michigan University), Carl E Hanssen
(Western Michigan University), Arlen R Gullickson (Western
Michigan University), Liesel Ritchie (Western Michigan University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 865
Methodological Dimensions
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM F
• Chair(s) – E Lea Witta (University of Central Florida)
• Discussant(s) – M Sue Hamann (Coastal Area Health Education
Center)
How the Use of Email as an Initial Contact to Survey
Participants Contributes to Response Rates
• Debbie J Bond (Syracuse University)
Assessment Literacy for Respondents: Improving the
Reliability of Group Data
• Randall S Davies (Indiana University South Bend), Naomi Petterson
(Indiana University South Bend), Bruce Spitzer (Indiana University
South Bend)
Using Mixed Methods for Systemic Continuous Program
Evaluation in Higher Education
• Kedar Kulkarni (University of Central Florida), Laura Blasi (University
of Central Florida), Suzanne Martin (University of Central Florida)
202
SESSION/SÉANCE 866
SESSION/SÉANCE 868
Technology Competence: Needs and Measures
LOCATION:
CONFERENCE ROOM G
• Chair(s) – Daph J Crane (Bow Valley College)
Technical Skills of Teachers and the Implications for
Technology Integration
Better Practices: Lessons Learned in Applying
an Emerging Model to Evidence-Based
Practice in Population Health
LOCATION:
• MaryJo O Smith (Ypsilon Associates)
• Chair(s) – Chris Y Lovato (University of British Columbia)
• Discussant(s) – Candace Nykiforuk (McMaster University)
Development and Administration of the Parent Technology
Knowledge Test
Better Solutions for Complex Problems: A Model to Support
Better Practices for Health
• John M Enger (Florida Atlantic University), Candace H Lacey (Nova
Southeastern University)
• Oonagh Maley (Canadian Tobacco Control Research Initiative),
Cheryl Moyer (Canadian Tobacco Control Research Initiative),
Catherine Maule (University of Toronto), Cameron Roy (University of
Waterloo), Manske Steve (University of Waterloo), John Garcia
(Ontario Ministry of Health)
Digital Portfolios in Classroom Based Evaluation: Lessons
Learned From an Elementary School Teacher
• I-Pei Tung (McGill University), Robert J Bracewell (McGill University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 867
The Principles of Empowerment Evaluation:
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
• Chair(s) – David Fetterman (Stanford University)
• Discussant(s) – Lawrence W Green (University of Maryland)
Empowerment Evaluation: An American Perspective
• David Fetterman (Stanford University)
Empowerment Evaluation: A Japanese Perspective
• Momo Waguri (Chuo University)
Identifying Better Practices in Youth Tobacco Use Cessation:
Lessons Learned
• Chris Y Lovato (University of British Columbia), Catherine Maule
(University of Toronto), Cheryl Moyer (Canadian Tobacco Control
Research Initiative)
Identifying Better Practices in Physical Activity and Smoking
Cessation: Lessons Learned
• Faulkner Guy (University of Toronto), Roberta Ferrence (Ontario
Tobacco Research Unit), William Montelpare (Lakehead University),
Peter Selby (Centre for Addiction and Mental Health), Adrian Taylor
(University of Exeter), Shelley Urban (Centre for Addiction and
Mental Health)
Identifying Best Practices in Type 2 Diabetes Prevention:
Lessons Learned
• Manske Steve (University of Waterloo), Rhona Hanning (University of
Waterloo), Kelly Skinner (University of Waterloo)
Empowerment Evaluation: A South African Perspective
• Ray Bovet Basson (University of the Witwatersrand)
Empowerment Evaluation: A Brazilian Perspective
• Thereza Penne Firme (Fundação Cesgranrio)
Empowerment Evaluation: An Israeli Perspective
• Barbara Rosenstein (Ben Gurion University of the Negev)
203
SESSION/SÉANCE 869
Building System-Wide Evaluation Capacity
Through Graduate Evaluation Training:
The Case of the Government of the Northwest
Territories in Canada
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
CITY HALL
• Chair(s) – John M Owen (University of Melbourne)
• Discussant(s) – Molly Engle (Oregon State University), James W
Altschuld (Ohio State University)
Building System-Wide Evaluation Capacity Across the
Government of the Northwest Territories in Canada:
A Perspective From the Client
• Debbie DeLancey (Government of the Northwest Territories)
A Perspective From the Organizer
• Karyn L Hicks (Government of the Northwest Territories)
A Perspective From a Participant
• Jennifer Carey (J. Carey Consulting)
A Perspective From the Provider
• John M Owen (University of Melbourne)
Review of the Quality of Canadian Federal Government
Evaluations
• Glenn Crone (Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat)
The Evolution of the Program Evaluation Function as an
Accountability Tool Within Federal Departments and
Agencies in Canada: A Review
• Jim Blain (Audit and Evaluation Social Development Canada)
Targeted Performance Audit Based on Program Evaluation:
Increasing Effectiveness of Monitoring Public Programs
• Ta Liu (Battelle Memorial Institute)
SESSION/SÉANCE 872
Hitting a Moving Target: Evaluating Success
in the Context of Civil Society Projects
LOCATION:
KENORA
• Chair(s) – Robert E Stake (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
Defining Success Across Diverse and Changing Contexts: –
The Experience of the Roma Education Initiative
• Linda E Lee (Proactive Information Services)
Civil Society Development in Ukraine: Strengthening
Capacities or Striving for a “Seat at the Table”
• Kseniya Temnenko (Institute for Sustainable Communities)
Russian Environmental Project Evolves Into A Civil Society
Program: Implications for Measurement and Evaluation
SESSION/SÉANCE 870
An Introduction to Bayesian Methods for
Program Evaluators
• Gretchen Elias (Institute for Sustainable Communities)
SESSION/SÉANCE 873
LOCATION:
ELGIN
• Katherine M McKnight (University of Arizona)
LOCATION:
HURON
• Chair(s) – Cecilia Hegamin-Younger (Information Decision Analysis)
SESSION/SÉANCE 871
PM3: Using Performance Measures for
Monitoring and Management
LOCATION:
Building Evaluation Capacity
WENTWORTH
• Chair(s) – Andy Rowe (GHK International)
Evaluation and Audit Findings: Performance Measurement
and Results-Based Management in the Public Sector;
Relationships to Modern Controllership; Challenges and
Issues; Implications for Evaluation Practice
A Grounded Checklist for Implementing Evaluation Capacity
Building in Organizations
• Boris B Volkov (University of Minnesota), Jean A King (University of
Minnesota)
Evaluating an International Effort to Improve Working
Conditions and Labor Relations in the Bangladesh Garment
Industry
• Michael Hendricks (Independent Consultant)
• Mary Ellen Skinner (Alberta Human Resources and Employment)
• Jim Blain (Audit and Evaluation Social Development Canada)
204
SESSION/SÉANCE 874
SESSION/SÉANCE 877
Adapting and Adjusting Methods to
Fit Evaluation of Extension Education
Drawing the Line: Participatory Evaluation
Research With Young People
LOCATION:
LOCATION:
KENT
• Chair(s) – Lisa A Guion (University of Florida)
• Kira Krenichyn (ActKnowledge)
• Helene Clark (ActKnowledge)
• Nicole Schaefer-McDaniel (ActKnowledge)
Increasing Educational Impact: A Multi-Method Model
for Evaluating Extension Workshops
• Kathleen D Kelsey (Oklahoma State University), Mile Schnelle
(Oklahoma State University), Pat Bolin (Oklahoma State University)
Evaluation Challenge: An Extension Youth Leadership Program
That is “Making It Up as They Go Along”
• Kathlene A Larson (Iowa State University Extension), Beverlyn Allen
(Iowa State University Extension)
Enhancing Evaluator Competency Through
Self Assessment and Self Awareness
LOCATION:
Respectable Research/Weak Needs
Assessment: Why?
SIMCOE
• C Julie Dunstan (Research & Evaluation Solutions)
• Wendy E Rowe (Royal Roads University)
• Martha Mattare (Frostburg State University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 879
Lessons Learned From Follow-Up Evaluations
in Education: Bridging the Gap in Time
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
SESSION/SÉANCE 876
Identity and Racism as Variables in Evaluation
in Data Collection and Use
LOCATION:
SESSION/SÉANCE 875
LOCATION:
SESSION/SÉANCE 878
DUFFERIN
• Chair(s) – Katherine A Tibbetts (Kamehameha Schools)
Bridging the Gap Between the “I” and the “We” i
n Focus Groups
• Monica L Oliver (Georgia State University), Shena R Ashley (Georgia
State University), Paul D Hirsch (Georgia Institute of Technology)
Uncovering and Measuring Hidden Sources of Racism:
The Brooks Racism/Domination Typology
• Pauline E Brooks (Brooks Cross-Cultural and International
Evaluations)
COSMOPOLITAN
• Chair(s) – Ormond W Hammond (Pacific Resources for Education
and Learning)
• Discussant(s) – Ormond W Hammond (Pacific Resources for
Education and Learning)
Lessons Learned From a Follow-up Evaluation of a Rural
Superintendent Network in the Southeast
• Kathleen Mooney (SERVE Regional Educational Laboratory)
Lessons Learned From a Follow-Up Evaluation of a CreditBearing Course for Teachers and Paraprofessionals
• Phyllis M Thomas (Mid-continent Research for Education and
Learning)
Lessons Learned From a Follow-up Evaluation of a
Professional Development Resource for Educators
• Ivana Zuliani (Brown University)
Unpacking the Identity Boxes: Working the Margins of
Utilizing Institutionalized Standard Demographic Survey
Instruments by Incorporating Efforts to Honor Meanings of
Ethnic/Racial Identities
• Denice A Cassaro (Cornell University), Marne K Einarson (Cornell
University)
205
SESSION/SÉANCE 880
SESSION/SÉANCE 882
Evaluating Culturally Diverse and Special Needs
Populations
LOCATION:
EXECUTIVE
spéciaux
• Chair(s) – Carol L Henderson-Dahms (Northern Arizona University)
Supporting People With Disabilities as Volunteers: Using
Participatory Action Evaluation to Shape a Community
Program
• Becky L Choma (Centre for Research and Education in Human
Services), Joanna Ochocka (Centre for Research and Education in
Human Services)
Needs Assessment With Youth With Special Health Care
Needs and/or Disabilities: Focus Group Experiences
• Heather H Boyd (University of Wisconsin)
Needs Assessments With Culturally Diverse and Hard-toReach Populations: Challenges, Barriers and Successes
• Bethany Page (Compass Consulting Group), Anne D’Agostino
(Compass Consulting Group)
LOCATION:
GOLD RUSH
Government Evaluation TIG and Cluster, Multi-site and
Multi-level Evaluation TIG / Évaluation gouvernementale et
l’évaluations en grappes, multisites et multiniveaux
• Chair(s) – Kent Hutchinson (Florida Legislature Office of Program
Policy Analysis and Government Accountability)
Evaluative Capacity Building in Governmental Environment
• Paulo Henrique Lustosa (Ministério de Minas e Energia ao Publico)
The Problem of Policy Evaluation in a European Multi-Level
Governance Context
• Bart De Peuter (University of Leuven), Joris De Smedt (University of
Leuven), Geert Bouckaert (University of Leuven)
(Not Quite) Everything’s Better the Second Time Around: Or,
Applying Lessons Learned in State-Level, Multi-Site
Evaluations
• Celeste Sturdevant Reed (Michigan State University), Laurie A Van
Egeren (Michigan State University), Laura V Bates (Michigan State
University)
SESSION/SÉANCE 883
SESSION/SÉANCE 881
A Collaborative Action Inquiry Approach to
Program Evaluation: Crossing Borders Between
Community Based Agencies, Universities, and
Funding Sources
Panel / Panel
LOCATION:
Inter- and Intra-Organization Evaluation
GINGERSNAP
• Chair(s) – Daniel V Folkman (University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee)
Welcome and Overview of the Action Inquiry Approach
to Program Evaluation
• Daniel V Folkman (University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee)
PEARLS for Teen Girls: An Organization Engaged in
Learning and Transformation
• Colleen Fitzgerarld (PEARLS for Teen Girls)
The Founders Perspective: What We’re Learning
Through an Action Inquiry Evaluation
• Steve Gilbertson (Ruddie Memorial Youth Foundation)
Evaluating the Implementation and Outcomes
of Inquiry-Based Science Education
LOCATION:
ICE PALACE
• Chair(s) – Paul R Brandon (University of Hawai’i)
Development and Validation of the Inquiry Science Teacher
Questionnaire, the Inquiry Science Principal Questionnaire,
and the Inquiry Science Teacher Log
• Paul R Brandon (University of Hawai’i), Alice KH Taum (University of
Hawai’i)
Development and Validation of the Inquiry Science
Observation Guide
• Alice KH Taum (University of Hawai’i), Paul R Brandon (University of
Hawai’i)
Development and Validation of the Inquiry Science Focus
Group Guide
• Brian Lawton (University of Hawai’i), Paul R Brandon (University of
Hawai’i), Alice KH Taum (University of Hawai’i)
Development and Validation of the Inquiry Science Student
Assessment Suite
• Carlos C Ayala (Sonoma State University), Paul R Brandon (University
of Hawai’i), Alice KH Taum (University of Hawai’i)
206
SESSION/SÉANCE 884
SESSION/SÉANCE 885
Roundtable Set Fifteen
LOCATION:
An Experience of Open Space Technology:
A Process for Evaluative Inquiry
LOCATION:
PINNACLE
• Chair(s) – Elena Polush (Iowa State University)
• Vicki Staebler Tardino (Maritz)
• Kim Roberts (Maritz)
Promoting Common Goals to Achieve Effective Evaluation
Practice
• Laura G Hill (Washington State University), Louise A Parker
(Washington State University)
Breaking Down Barriers: How to Overcome Resistance
to Evaluation
• Mary Jo Rattermann (University of Indianapolis), Ruth Green
(University of Indianapolis), Zora Ziazi (University of Indianapolis),
Gail Fox (University of Indianapolis)
Democratic Transformation in a Hierarchical Mechanism:
An Analytical Study of the Educational Evaluation Practice in
China’s Higher Education Institutions
• Xuejin Lu (Western Michigan University), Donghai Xie (Western
Michigan University), Jiangqiao Lan (Hua Zhong University of Science
& Technology)
When Gates Open But Doors Close: Evaluating a Prisoner
Residential Placement Program
• Michael S Nokes (Western Michigan University)
Cooperative Extension Programs in Ghana
• Jemima Yakah (Texas A&M University), Chanda D Elbert (Texas A&M
University)
By Indigenous, For Indigenous: Applying Culturally Based
Principles and Practices in Evaluation
• N Nan Wehipeihana (Research Evaluation Consultancy Ltd), Laurie D
Porima (LLE Limited)
6:00 pm – 7:30 pm / 18h00 – 19h30
Reception / Réception
Hosted by / Organisée par
International Organisation for Cooperation in
Evaluation (IOCE), Canadian Evaluation Society
(CES) and American Evaluation Association (AEA) /
l’Organisation internationale pour la coopération en
évaluation (OICE), la Société canadienne d’évaluation
(SCÉ) et l’American Evaluation Association (AEA)
for representatives of regional/national evaluation
associations and organisational partners of IOCE,
and colleagues from around the globe who are fostering
worldwide cooperation and partnerships in evaluation. /
à l’intention des représentants des associations régionales
et nationales d’évaluation, des partenaires organisationnels
de l’OICE et des collègues de partout dans le monde
qui promeuvent la coopération internationale et
les partenariats en évaluation.
LOCATION: CHURCHILL
Join the IOCE, CES and AEA leaders at this networking
reception! Enjoy complimentary hors d’oeuvres and
cash bar. / Joignez-vous aux dirigeants de l’OICE,
de la SCÉ et de l’AEA à l’occasion de cette réception
de réseautage! Il y aura des hors-d’œuvre gratuits
et un bar payant.
A Review of the Impact Assessment Evaluation Approach of
The SEEP Network, USA Applied to Ethiopia Household Food
Security, Conflict and Post Conflict Environment With
Microfinance Interventions
• Victoria Taiwo Obasaju-Ayo (United Nations)
207
208
S u n d a y, O c t o b e r 3 0 / L e d i m a n c h e 3 0 o c t o b r e
8:00 am – 12:00 pm / 8h00 – 12h00
Workshop/Atelier 46
Advanced Applications of Program Theory
LOCATION:
KENORA
Workshop/Atelier 48
Focus Group Moderator Training
9:00 am – 12:00 pm / 9h00 – 12h00
sessions.)
LOCATION:
Workshop/Atelier 49
Analyzing Text and Audio Data
LOCATION:
KENT
Workshop/Atelier 50
Making the Leap to Evaluation Consulting
LOCATION:
WENTWORTH
HURON
209
210
2005 JOINT CES/AEA CONFERENCE • CONGRÉS 2005 DE LA SCÉ ET L’AEA
Crossing Borders, Crossing Boundaries • Franchir les frontiéres, repousser les limites
Appendix A:
Annexe A :
Presenter Index
Index des conférenciers
The numbers that follow each presenter’s e-mail address correspond to the session numbers for each session in which he or she
is a participant or author. This listing is provided as a service for
one-to-one contact with colleagues and may not be used to produce mailing lists or for research purposes.
Les numéros qui suivent l’adresse électronique de chaque conférencier correspondent aux numéros de session pour chacune des
sessions auxquelles il/elle participe. Cette liste est fournie pour
faciliter le contact avec les collègues et ne doit pas être utilisée pour
produire des listes d’envoi ou à des fins de recherche.
A
Abbey, John, Georgia Department of Audits,
[email protected] (577)
Abbott, Gypsy, University of Alabama at
Birmingham, [email protected] (416)
Abdul-Hamid, Husein, University of Maryland,
Abrahams, Mark A, Independent Consultant,
Abrami, Phil, Concordia University,
Ackerman, Andrew, Children’s Museum of
Manhattan, [email protected] (801)
Ackerman, Terry A, University of North
Carolina at Greensboro,
Ackermann, Margot Elise, Old Dominion
University, [email protected]
(135)
Albert, Scott M, GDS Associates,
[email protected] (288,
613)
Amariles, Fabiola, Centro International de
Agricultura Tropical, [email protected]
(761)
Alberta, Anthony J, Sonoran Research Group,
[email protected]
(348, 738)
Ambrose, Kaia, Ecopar,
Alderete, Karen, Austin Independent School
District, [email protected]
(351)
Alder, Rob, Med-Emerg Inc, ralder@
med-emerg.com (107)
Alegre, Juan Carlos, Project Hope,
Alexander, John L, Claremont Graduate
University, [email protected] (135)
Alexander, Laurel A, Hogg Foundation for
Mental Health,
Amo, Courtney F, Social Sciences and
Humanities Research Council of Canada,
[email protected] (333, 613)
Ancira Arechiga, Sara Alicia, Centro de
Evaluaciones Universidad Autonoma de
Nuevo Leon, [email protected]
(135)
Anderson, Donna, Université Laval,
Anderson-Draper, Michelle H, University of
Alberta, [email protected] (757, 812)
Adair, Carol E, University of Calgary,
Alkin, Marvin, University of California at Los
Angeles, [email protected] (315, 527)
Anderson, Stephen E, Ontario Institute for
Studies in Education of the University of
Toronto, [email protected]
(273)
Adams, Barbara J, Ministry of Finance,
Government of Ontario,
Allard, Denis, Direction de la santé publique
de Montréal-Centre, [email protected] (492)
Andikar, Surenda, Ohio Tobacco Use
Prevention and Control Foundation,
Addison, Emily L, University of Ottawa,
Allen, Barbara, Allen Consulting & Training,
Andrade, Marco, University of Rhode Island,
Adoum, Djimé D, US Department of
Agriculture, [email protected]
(590, 781)
Allen, Beverlyn, Iowa State University
Extension, [email protected] (874)
Anstee, Jaime LK, University of Nevada, Reno,
Allen, Christopher, University of South
Carolina, [email protected] (135)
Aparecida Patroclo, Maria, Escola Nacional de
Saude Publica, [email protected]
(135)
Adrien, Marie-Hélène, Universalia
Management Group,
Afele-Faamuli, Saleia, US Department of
(560)
Affholter, Dennis, AffholterAssociates, [email protected] (763)
Agee, Rena A, ORC Macro International,
Ahmedov, Sevim, Florida Department of
Health, [email protected]
(788)
Aklilu, Liya, University of North Texas,
Ali, Asma M, Learning Point Associates,
Ammann Howard, Kim, BTW Consultants,
Allen, Josephine A, Cornell University,
Allen, Tawannah, University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill (135)
Altman, David G, Center for Creative
Leadership, [email protected]
(110, 206)
Altschuld, James W, Ohio State University,
[email protected] (202, 264, 344,
372, 561, 594, 832, 869)
Aluja, Andrés, Universidad Autónoma de
Yucatán, [email protected] (105)
Alvaro, Eusebio M, Claremont Graduate
University, [email protected] (485,
546)
Applegate, Brooks, Western Michigan
(430)
Apt, Betty S, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, [email protected] (760)
Apter, Dianne, Apter & O’Connor Associates,
Apthorp, Helen S, Mid-continent Research for
Education and Learning,
Arafeh, Sousan, Research Images,
Arango, Diana, London School of Economics,
211
Appendix A: Presenter Index / Annexe A : Index des conférenciers
Aranha, Débora Cristina, Brazilian Evaluation
Network, [email protected] (552)
Atwood, Julie A, University of North Carolina
at Greensboro, [email protected] (828)
Ballard, Karen, University of Arkansas,
Arapakos, Demetra, United Nations,
Ault, Phyllis C, Northwest Regional
Educational Laboratory, [email protected]
(131, 411, 730)
Bamberger, Michael, Independent Consultant,
Araujo, Rochelle, US Environmental Protection
Agency, [email protected] (853)
Archambault, Éric JA, Science-Metrix,
[email protected]
(816)
Autio, Elizabeth, Northwest Regional
(421)
Barber, Monique, University of Texas School
of Public Health,
Barber, Sarah, Public Health Agency of
Canada, [email protected]
(591)
Archer, Gretchen, Michigan State University,
Avakian, Shant H, Central Unified School
(829)
Arens, Sheila A, Mid-continent Research for
Education and Learning, [email protected]
(321, 750)
Avula, Deepa, US Department of Health and
Human Services,
Arkison, Bradley R, Advanis Inc,
Ayala, Carlos C, Sonoma State University,
Barden, Louise, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, [email protected] (309)
Armstrong, George, Tougaloo College,
560)
Azrin, Susan, Westat, [email protected]
(815)
Bardini, Mark D, International Finance
Corporation, [email protected] (799)
Azzam, Tarek, University of California at Los
Barela, Eric, Los Angeles Unified School
District, [email protected] (246, 501,
596)
Armstrong, Lori, Centers for Disease Control
Armstrong, Mary, University of South Florida,
Arnold, Mary E, Oregon State University,
B
Bachus, Kris, University of Leuven,
Backman, Gunnar, OpenEye Innovation
Management,
Aros, Norma, Catch Program,
Bae, Jay P, Georgia State University,
Aroztegui-Plaza, Jose Luis, Universidad de
Granada, [email protected] (105, 601)
Baggett, Connie D, Penn State, [email protected]
(135)
Arrendondo Mattson, Sabrina, National
Research Center, [email protected] (216,
313, 528)
Baggett, Sharon A, Quantec,
Arthanat, Sajay, State University of New York
at Buffalo, [email protected] (288)
Baggio, Maria Christina, Programa Nacional
de DST/AIDS-UDHI, [email protected]
(320)
Asbury, Jo-Ellen, Bethany College,
Bagley, Lisa, MayaTech Corporation,
Ashley, Shena R, Georgia State University,
Bahn, Henry, US Department of Agriculture,
Atack, Lynda, Centennial College,
Bailey, Caroline J, ORC Macro International,
Atanda, Robert T, Westat,
Baker, Amy, Children’s Institute,
Atkinson, Anne J, PolicyWorks Ltd,
Baker, Edward, University of North Carolina,
Atkinson, Christina, University of Waterloo,
Bakerson, Michelle A, Western Michigan
805)
Aton, Kanani, INPEACE, [email protected]
(349)
212
Barboza Thomaz, Sueli, University of Rio de
Janeiro (601)
Barker, Dianne, Public Health Institute,
Aronson, Jane, Evergreen Training &
Evaluation, [email protected] (127)
Atkinson, Donna D, Westat,
[email protected] (204, 435,
778)
Barbosa Jr, Aristides, Nacional AIDS and DST
Program, [email protected] (320)
Baldini, Krista, Independent Consultant,
Barley, Gwyn E, University of Colorado,
Barley, Zoe A, Mid-continent Research for
Barnette, J Jackson, University of Alabama at
Birmingham, [email protected] (406,
804)
Barrer-Bustillos, Maria, Universidad Autónoma
de Yucatán, [email protected] (105)
Barreto Fernandes, Thierry, Fondation Rurale
de l’Afrique de l’Ouest, [email protected]
(564)
Barreto, Matt A, Independent Consultant,
Barrett, Juanita, Office of Primary Health
Care, [email protected] (107)
Barrington, Gail V, Barrington Research
Group,
[email protected]
(305, 738, 784, 814)
Barry, Beverley Anne, South African
Evaluation Network, [email protected]
(817)
Bartholomew, Amelia M, UIC College of
Medicine, [email protected] (362)
Bartlett, Natasha, Government of Ontario,
Bartl, Simona, Moss Landing Marine
Laboratories (347)
Bartz, Deborah J, University of North Carolina
Baskerville, N Bruce, National Research
Council of Canada,
Basson, Ray Bovet, University of the
Witwatersrand, [email protected]
(233, 867)
Bates, Katie, Georgia Department of Audits
and Accounts, [email protected]
(335)
Bates, Laura V, Michigan State University,
Batho, Jack, Agence intergouvernementale
de la francophonie, jack.batho@
francophonie.org (564)
Batra, Getta, International Finance
Corporation, [email protected] (799)
Battle, Robyn, CAMI Consulting,
Bauer, Diana, US Environmental Protection
Bauer, Shelia, Ottawa Community Care
Access Centre, shelia.bauer@
ottawa.ccac-ont.ca (783)
Baum, Herbert M, Macro International,
594)
Bavon, Al, University of North Texas,
Baxter, Lester W, The Pew Charitable Trusts,
Bayley, J Scott, Office of the Auditor-General
of Melbourne Australia,
Beam, Margaret, RMC Research Corporation,
Beaty, Brenda L, University of Colorado Health
Sciences Center, [email protected]
(406)
Beaver, Katie, State University of New York at
Buffalo, [email protected] (288)
Bellamy, Nikki, US Department of Health and
Human Services, [email protected]
(439)
Bell, Annette, Mercy Connections (216)
Bell, Catherine S, University of Melbourne,
Bell, Mary Lou, Bell Group,
Bell, Nance, Independent Consultant,
Belle-Isle, Lori, American Cancer Society,
Bemelmans-Videc, Marie-Louise, Parliament
of the Netherlands, bemelmans-videc@
planet.nl (238, 336)
Ben Brahim, Fayçal, Independent Consultant,
Benham, Maenette KP, Michigan State
Ben Jaafar, Sonja, University of Toronto,
Bessell, Ann G, University of Miami,
Betzner, Anne, Professional Data Analysts Inc,
Beverly, Monifa Green, University of North
Carolina at Chapel Hill,
Bezruczko, Nikolaus, Independent Consultant,
Bhandari, Alok, Kansas State University,
Biesiadecki, Laura, Association of Schools of
Public Health, [email protected]
(309)
Bilinsky, Paula, Academy for Educational
Development, [email protected] (225,
332)
Bilodeau, Angèle, Direction de la santé
publique de Montréal-Centre et
Université de Montréal, abilodea@
santepub-mtl.qc.ca (135, 492)
Benn, Nicole, Old Dominion University,
Bilodeau, Henriette, Université du Québec à
Montréal, [email protected]
(783)
Berent, Rusti, Children’s Institute,
272, 591)
Bingle, Catherine, Simcoe Muskoka District
Health Unit, [email protected]
(321, 460, 773, 784)
Berger, Dale E, Claremont Graduate
Birnbaum, Rona, US Environmental Protection
Berkas, Thomas H, Bethel University,
Birta, Jeninfer A, National Research Council
(582)
Berkley, Tony, WK Kellogg Foundation,
Berkowitz, Gale, The David and Lucile
Packard Foundation,
583, 817)
Bermudez, Marta, Perinatal Network of
Monroe County, [email protected] (437)
Bernstein, David, Westat,
Bisset, Sherri, Université de Montréal,
Blain, Jim, Audit and Evaluation Social
Development Canada, jim.blain@
sdc-dsc.gc.ca (780, 871)
Blair, Nancy, Cardinal Stritch University,
Bland, Tammie, Oklahoma State University,
Bernstein, Lawrence S, Abt Associates Inc,
Blankertz, Laura E, National Development and
Research Institutes, [email protected]
(293)
Berry, Tiffany D, Claremont Graduate
Blanton, Shanika, University of Illinois at
Chicago, [email protected] (740)
Behrens, Teresa R, WK Kellogg Foundation,
[email protected] (212, 324, 483)
Berthelette, Diane, Université du Québec à
(783)
Blasi, Laura, University of Central Florida,
[email protected] (135, 284, 408, 560,
865)
Belanger, Denise, Proactive Information
Services, [email protected] (435,
809)
Bertrand, Tamara C, Florida State University,
Bledsoe, Katrina L, The College of New Jersey,
Bélanger, Jean L, Université du Québec à
Montréal, [email protected] (135, 258)
Besculides, Melanie, Mathematica Policy
Research, [email protected] (209)
Bleecker, Thomas, San Francisco Department
of Public Health, [email protected]
(135, 259)
Becker, Les R, Pacific Institute for Research &
Becker, Marion, University of South Florida,
becker@[email protected] (581)
213
Blinkiewicz, Meg V, The Skillman Foundation,
Bloodworth, Michelle R, University of Illinois
at Chicago, [email protected] (847)
Blow, Chris, University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill, [email protected] (133,
541)
Bober, Marcie J, San Diego State University,
791)
Bobo Peterson, Arlana, Albuquerque Public
Schools, [email protected] (312)
Bodonyi, Jami M, University of Washington,
Boekholt, Patries, Technopolis Ltd,
[email protected]
(816)
Botschner, Janos, Canadian Mental Health
Association, [email protected]
(307)
Bouckaert, Geert, University of Leuven,
[email protected]
(882)
Bounegta, Mohamed, Consultant en
réinsertion socio-professionnelle,
Bourdages, Antoine, Government,
Bourexis, Patti, The Study Group,
Bourgeois, Isabelle, University of Ottawa,
Boerm, Melynda, University of Houston (437)
Bowden, John, Hyndburn Park Primary
School, [email protected]
(457)
Bohren, Lenora, Colorado State University,
Bowen, François, Université de Montréal,
Bojorquez, Juan Carlos, WestEd,
Bowen, Kathryn A, Bowen’s Evaluation &
Consulting Services, [email protected]
(784)
Bolin, Pat, Oklahoma State University,
Bolland, Kathleen, University of Alabama,
Bowman, Nicole R, University of Wisconsin,
Madison, [email protected] (433,
499, 573)
Brandon, Paul R, University of Hawai’i,
Brandt, Robin L, University of Hawai’i at
Manoa, [email protected] (728)
Brashears, Freda L, ORC Macro International,
Brazil, Kevin, McMaster University,
Breier, Horst, Independent Consultant,
Brekke-Yungert, Ann, Ethnic Health Institute,
Bremner, Larry K, Proactive Information
Services, [email protected] (435)
Brett, Belle, Brett Consulting Group,
Bridges, Steve, Centers for Disease Control
Briefel, Ronette, Mathematica Policy
Research, [email protected]
(209)
Brindis, Claire, University of California, San
Francisco, [email protected] (322)
Brinkerhoff, Robert O, Western Michigan
(324)
Bolton, Kelly L, University of California at Los
Angeles, [email protected] (135)
Boydell, Leslie R, Institute of Public Health in
Ireland, [email protected]
(345)
Bomar, Perri J, University of North Carolina at
Wilmington, [email protected] (289)
Boyd, Heather H, University of Wisconsin,
Brisson, Daniel S, University of Denver,
Bond, Debbie J, Syracuse University,
Bozzo, Sandra, Ministry of Finance,
Government of Ontario, [email protected]
(276)
Brister, Jozell, Abilene Christian University,
Bond, Sally L, The Program Evaluation Group,
Bonifer-Tiedt, Patricia, American Red Cross,
Boodt, Casey P, Canadian Outcomes Research
Institute, [email protected] (554)
Booker, Douglas W, Social Development
(780)
Boothroyd, Roger A, University of South
Florida, [email protected]
(216, 487, 798)
Borys, Shelley, Environment Canada,
Bose, Mohua, State University of New York at
Albany, [email protected] (595)
Bosma, Linda M, University of Minnesota,
Boston, Nina, University of ArkansasExtension, [email protected] (300, 744)
214
Bracegirdle, Peter R, Appian Consulting,
Brisolara, Sharon, Evaluation Solutions,
Brodeur, Jean-Marc, University of Montreal,
Bracewell, Robert J, McGill University,
Brooks, Pauline E, Brooks Cross-Cultural
and International Evaluations,
Bradley, Chet, Cardinal Stritch University,
Broomfield, Kim, Georgia State University,
Bradley, Karen L, Appalachia Educational
Laboratory, [email protected] (311)
Brousselle, Astrid, McGill University,
Bradley, Mike, Research for Better Schools,
Brown, Balinger, ConnectSynergy,
Bradshaw, Boyd, Southern Illinois University
Edwardsville, [email protected] (307)
Brown, Courtney L, Indiana University,
Brady, William, National AIDS and DST
Brown, Jennifer S, Cornell University,
Branch, Doreen G, Pacific Institute for
Research and Evaluation,
Brown, Kimberly, EMT Associates,
Brown, Marion, Dalhousie University,
Brown, M Kathryn, University of Cincinnati,
C
Cao, Honggao, University of Michigan,
Brown, Nakia, MayaTech Corporation,
Cabatoff, Kenneth H, Université du Québec à
Montréal, [email protected] (221,
432, 456)
Capela, Stanley T, HeartShare Human Services
of New York, [email protected]
(277, 570, 723, 738)
Cabrera, Derek A, Cornell University,
Caracelli, Valerie J, US Government
Accountability Office, [email protected]
(334, 797)
Brown, Tanya, Duquesne University,
Brown, Victoria K, Wake Forest University
School of Medicine, [email protected]
(110)
Cagampang, Helen, Independent Consultant,
Carden, Fred, International Development
Research Centre, [email protected] (257)
Browning, Katharine, National Institute of
Justice, [email protected]
(111)
Cai, Xiaofan, Western Michigan University,
701)
Brown-Welty, Sharon, California State
University, Fresno, [email protected]
(311, 539)
Cainkar, Louise, Senior Research Scholar,
Great Cities Institute, [email protected]
(844)
Carey, Martha Ann, US Department of Health
and Human Services, [email protected]
(399, 406, 465, 483, 520, 707)
Brugger, Lauri, Children’s Institute,
Calabrese, Chris, American Civil Liberties
Union, [email protected] (229)
Carleton-Hug, Annelise, Montana State
Bruyninckx, Hans, University of Wageningen,
Caldwell, Jayne, St Stephen’s House,
Carmen, Carol, University of Kansas,
Bucheli, Brenda, Pact Peru,
Callaghan, Cathy, Centre for Addiction and
Mental Health, [email protected]
(284, 785)
Carran, Deborah T, Johns Hopkins University,
Bull, Sheana S, University of Colorado Health
Sciences Center, [email protected]
(406)
Buosonte, Rattana, Naresuan University,
Burgeson, Jackie M, United Methodist Family
Services of Virginia, [email protected]
(323)
Burgman, Anessa, University of North
Burgon, Holli, University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign, [email protected] (830)
Burke, Marisa Collett, University of Miami
(614)
Burnett, Julia, Oklahoma State University,
Burnett, Michael, MayaTech Corporation,
Burrett, John, Federation of Canadian
Municipalities, [email protected] (831)
Burrows, Michele, Georgian College,
Burrus, Barri, RTI International, [email protected]
(234)
Burry-Stock, Judith A, University of Alabama,
Busch, Robbie S, Massey University,
Byeon, Soon Cheon, Korea Institute of
Science and Technology Evaluation and
Planning, [email protected] (816)
Callow-Heusser, Catherine A, EndVision
823, 860)
Cameron, Barbara, Ottawa Community
Care Access Centre, barbara.cameron@
ottawa.ccac-ont.ca (783)
Campbell, Bernadette, Westat,
527, 596, 850)
Campbell, H Sharon, University of Waterloo,
Campbell, Marcella E, University of Toronto,
Campbell, Rebecca M, Michigan State
Campbell, Wilbur, Alliance for Community
Empowerment, [email protected]
(773)
Campos, David, University of the Incarnate
Word, [email protected] (820)
Candelario, Norman, Gay Men’s Health Crisis,
Canen, Eric L, University of Wyoming,
Cantin, Brenda, Public Health Agency of
(591)
Cantor, Howard, US Environmental Protection
Carey, Jennifer, (J. Carey Consulting),
Carrilio, Terry, San Diego State University,
Carter, Martha, Nebraska Legislature,
Performance Audit Section,
Carter, Nancy L, University of Toronto,
Cartier, Sylvie, Université de Montréal,
Casebeer, Ann L, University of Calgary,
Casebeer, Cindy M, University of Alabama,
Casillas, Dolores, Casillas Consulting Services,
Cassaro, Denice A, Cornell University,
Castañeda-Emenaker, Imelda R, University of
Cincinnati, [email protected] (311,
847)
Castaneda, Xochitl, University of California,
Castro Souza, Reinaldo, Catholic University of
Rio de Janeiro, [email protected]
(208)
Cate-clements, Carrie, Indiana University
Northwest, [email protected] (246)
Cathey, Leanna T, Louisiana State University
AgCenter, [email protected] (135, 580)
215
Catsambas, Tessie T, EnCompass,
319, 840)
Chavis, David, Association for the Study and
Development of Community,
Cavino, Hayley M, Office of Professional
Research & Development,
Chaytor, Kaireen M, Chaytor Consulting
598)
Celebucki, Carolyn, University of Rhode
Island, [email protected] (316)
Checkoway, Barry, University of Michigan,
Ann Arbor, [email protected] (844)
Cellucci, Anthony, Idaho State University,
Chee, Christine, Arizona State University,
Ceo, Frank, Centers for Disease Control and
Chelyshkova, Marina Borisovna, State
University of Management,
Cerny, Jan, Maritz, [email protected]
(135)
Cervantes, Richard, Behavioral Assessment,
Chamberlain, Anne, Success for All
Foundation, achamberlain@
successforall.net (481)
Chen, Guang, Centers for Disease Control
Chen, Huey T, University of Alabama,
Chen, Mei-Kuang, University of Arizona,
Champagne, Duane, University of California,
Los Angeles, [email protected] (863)
Cheng, Liying, Queen’s University,
Champion, Heather, Wake Forest University,
Cheng, Shu-Huei, University of Minnesota,
Chang, Connie, National Institute of
Standards and Technology,
Chernow, Mimi, University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill, [email protected]
(770)
Chang, Eun-Joo, American International
Health Alliance, [email protected] (716)
Chervin, Doryn D, ORC Macro International,
Chang-Rios, Karin L, University of Kansas,
Chesswas, Roger, WestEd,
Chang, Sun Woo, Korea Institute of Science
and Technology Evaluation and Planning,
Chianca, Thomaz K, Western Michigan
(324, 365, 519, 740)
Chang, Yueh-Wen, California State University,
Stanislaus, [email protected] (259)
Chiasson, Emily, Cambridge Health Alliance,
Chapel, Thomas J, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, [email protected]
(119, 234, 309, 319, 760, 788, 840, 862)
Chibnall, Susan H, Caliber Associates Inc,
Chaplowe, Scott, Independent Consultant,
Chino, Michelle, University of Nevada, Las
Vegas, [email protected]
(304, 550)
Chapman, Heather, Utah State University,
Chapman, Tarik, Pacific Institute for Research
and Evaluation, [email protected] (468)
Chard, Cristina Ling, The World Bank,
Chase, Ravena, MayaTech Corporation,
Chatterton, Sandra C, Health Canada,
216
Childers, Paul, Independent Consultant (581)
Chipman, Helen, US Department of
(338)
Choma, Becky L, Centre for Research and
Education in Human Services,
Chouinard, Roch, Université de Montréal,
Chriqui, Jamie F, MayaTech Corporation,
Christensen, Laurene L, University of
Minnesota, [email protected] (103)
Christensen, Rhonda, University of North
Texas, [email protected] (347)
Christie, Christina A, Claremont Graduate
294, 315, 457, 546, 738)
Church, John, University of Alberta,
Church, Mary B, Pacific Resources for
Cimellaro, Luigia, Queen’s University,
Cimetta, Adriana, University of Arizona,
Cinq-Mars, Martine, Cégep Marie-Victorin,
Ciofalo, Nuria, The California Endowment,
Cioffi, Joan P, Centers for Disease Control and
Cisneros-Cohernour, Edith J, Universidad
Autónoma de Yucatán, cchacon@
tunku.uady.mx (105, 135, 601, 840)
Clark, Colleen, University of South Florida,
Clark, Helene, ActKnowledge,
Clark, MH, Southern Illinois University
Carbondale, [email protected] (756, 819)
Clarke, Edward, Montgomery County Public
Schools, [email protected]
(826)
Clarke, Grant, Ministry of Education,
Clay, Phyllis L, Youth Policy Research Group,
Clayson, Zoe C, Abundantia Consulting,
Clements, Paul C, Western Michigan
(703)
Cloquell-Ballester, Vicente Agustín, Technical
University of Valencia, [email protected]
(135, 286)
Cloquell-Ballester, Víctor Andrés, Technical
University of Valencia,
Coates, Jennifer C, Tufts University School of
Nutrition Science and Policy,
Copeland, H Liesel, University of Medicine
and Dentistry of New Jersey,
Cobb, Casey D, University of Connecticut,
Copeland, Paul, Association for the
Defense of the Wrongly Convicted,
Cobern, William, Western Michigan
Cockerill, Rhonda, University of Toronto,
Correa, Maria Elizabeth, Faculdade de
Medicina de Marília,
Crane, Daph J, Bow Valley College,
Crano, William D, Claremont Graduate
485)
Crave, Mary, University of Wisconsin
Creger, Tom, University of Alabama at
Birmingham, [email protected] (293)
Cortoni, Franca A, Correctional Service
Canada, [email protected] (327)
Crohn, Kara SD, University of California Los
Coryn, Chris LS, Western Michigan University,
701, 864)
Crone, Glenn, Treasury Board of Canada
Secretariat, [email protected]
(871)
Costa, Michael, Abt Associates,
Crosse, Scott, Westat,
Cohen, Julie, University of Arizona,
Costello, Beth Powers, University of North
Crossman, Steven, University of Illinois
College of Medicine, [email protected]
(362)
Cohen, Marcia, Development Services Group,
Costello, Mary-Jean, University of Waterloo,
Cohen, Michael, The Michael Cohen Group,
Coston, Melinda A, Vanderbilt University,
Crusto, Cindy A, Yale University School of
Medicine, [email protected] (341,
752)
Colemon, Leonardo, AIDS Project Los
Angeles, [email protected] (773,
782, 810)
Côté, Francis, Réseau des Carrefours
jeunesse-emploi du Québec,
Collins, Isabelle, Technopolis Ltd,
[email protected]
(101, 448)
Cotton, David, ORC Macro International,
Coelho, Helen, ORC Macro International,
[email protected]
(736)
Coghlan, Ana, ACTion Consulting,
Cohen, Carolyn L, Cohen Research and
Evaluation, [email protected]
(132, 247)
Collins, Prisca, Duquesne University,
Coulombe, Kristie, Muscular Dystrophy
(780)
Colombo, Marie, Wayne State University,
Counts, Jackie, University of Kansas,
Conley, Carrie L, Montgomery County Public
(450)
Coupal, Francoise, Mosaic.net International,
Conner, Ross F, University of California,
Irvine, [email protected] (110, 251, 314,
500, 597)
Conrad, Kendon J, University of Illinois at
Chicago, [email protected] (259, 534,
740)
Cousins, J Bradley, University of Ottawa,
[email protected] (333, 419, 510, 598,
720)
Covington-Clarkson, Lesa, University of
Cook, Eric, University of Illinois,
Cozzens, Susan E, Georgia Institute of
Technology,
[email protected]
(250)
Cooksy, Leslie J, University of California,
Davis, [email protected] (213, 298)
Craig, S Bartholomew, North Carolina State
Cooley, Larry, Management Systems
International, [email protected] (261)
Crain, Cathleen, LTG Associates,
Cooney, Geraldine, Universalia Management
Group, [email protected] (225)
Cram, Fiona, Katoa, [email protected]
(349, 761)
Cruz, Marly, National School of Public HealthFIOCRUZ, [email protected] (135,
320)
Cullen, Jim, Ministère de l’Éducation,
276)
Cummings, Gayle, CAMI Consulting,
Cummings, Harry, Harry Cummings and
Associates, [email protected] (107, 773)
Cummins, Michele, Social Science Research &
Cunningham, Frank, European Commission,
Currie, Caroline, Wilfrid Laurier University,
Curry-Corcoran, Daniel E, Montgomery
County Public Schools, [email protected] (450)
Curry, E M Ann, University of Regina,
Curtis, Patryce, MayaTech Corporation,
Cushing, Susan, The Alliance for a Media
Literate America, [email protected]
(801)
Copeland-Carson, Jacqueline, University of
Minnesota, [email protected] (766, 803)
217
D
Davis, Mary V, University of North Carolina,
D’Agostino, Anne, Compass Consulting
Davis, Melinda F, University of Arizona,
D’Agostino, Ralph, Wake Forest University
School of Medicine,
Davis, Sarita, Clark Atlanta University,
D’Agustino, Steven, Fordham University
Regional Educational Technology Center,
D’Cruz, Joseph, University of Toronto,
Davis Sosenko, Lauren, WestEd,
Dawes, Katherine, US Environmental
Protection Agency, dawes.katherine@
epa.gov (286, 355, 797)
Dabelstein, Niels, Danida Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, [email protected] (795)
Dawkins, Nicola U, ORC Macro International,
524)
Dagenais, Christian, Université de Montréal,
258, 758)
Dawson-Owens, Hayley L, Southern Illinois
University Carbondale, [email protected]
(135, 302)
Dagger, Alexandra, National Research Council
(582)
Day, Gwen, WK Kellogg Foundation,
Dahler-Larsen, Peter, University of Southern
Denmark, [email protected] (116, 201)
Dai, Yun Yun, University of Maryland College
Park, [email protected] (595)
Dailey, Kimberly, WestEd, [email protected]
(779)
Dakins, Jenny, Indiana University South Bend,
Dallaire, Roméo, Force Commander of the
United Nations Mission to Rwanda (700,
720)
Damle, Ranjana V, Albuquerque Public
Dana, Cynthia A, University of Alaska,
Anchorage, [email protected]
(748)
Dannemann, Angela Cristina, Instituto
Multiplicar, adannemann@
institutomultiplicar.org.br (116)
Danter, Elizabeth H, Independent Consultant,
Davidson, E Jane, Davidson Consulting Ltd,
425, 555)
Davidson, Sandra, James Satterwhite
Academy for Child Welfare Training,
859)
Davies, Randall S, Indiana University South
Bend, [email protected] (759, 865)
Davis, Ann E, Northwest Regional Educational
Laboratory, [email protected] (131, 411,
730)
218
Day, Sharon, Indigenous Peoples’ Task Force,
DeBruyn, Lemyra, Centers for Disease Control
Dennis, MIchael L, Chestnut Health Systems,
534)
De Peuter, Bart, University of Leuven,
Derkzen, Dena M, University of
Saskatchewan, [email protected]
(135)
Desbiens, Nadia, Université de Montréal,
Desjardins, Sylvie, Public Health Agency
of Canada, sylvie_desjardins@
phac-aspc.gc.ca (260)
De Smedt, Joris, University of Leuven,
Desmond, Davida, San Francisco Unified
School District, [email protected]
(450)
Desroches, Naghmeh, University of Waterloo,
DeStefano, Lizanne, University of Illinois,
[email protected] (543, 612, 800, 830)
DeGel, Jessica, University of Pittsburgh,
Dethier, Jean L, Perspective
Consulting, jean-louis.dethier@
perspective-consulting.org (456)
DeGroff, Amy S, Georgia State University,
Dethman, Linda F, Dethman & Associates,
DeHoek, Adam, Loyola University Chicago,
Deussen, Theresa, Northwest Regional
Educational Laboratory,
Deiger, Megan E, Chicago Public Schools,
DeLancey, Debbie, Government of the
Northwest Territories, debbie_delancey@
gov.nt.ca (771, 869)
Delisle, Johanne, Association des
établissements de réadaptation en
déficience physique du Québec,
Dewey, Jennifer D, ORC Macro International,
775)
DeWitt, Caroline, Audit and Evaluation
Social Development Canada,
Diaz, Marycruz, WestEd, [email protected]
(517)
Della-Piana, Gabriel M, National Science
Foundation, [email protected] (823, 860)
Dicken, Virginia, Southern Illinois University,
Delman, Jonathan, Consumer Quality
Initiatives, [email protected] (427)
Dickens, Tracey, Georgia State University,
Del Monte, Kathleen E, Florida Legislature,
507, 845)
Dickerson, Icilda, Ohio Tobacco Use
deMedeiros, Hugues, MayaTech Corporation,
DiCocco, Margaret, Southern Illinois
(302)
Demmler, Jean, University of Denver,
den Heyer, Molly, Dalhousie University,
Diehl, Sandra J, Coastal Area Health
Education Center, [email protected]
(289)
dos Santos, Elizabeth M, Fundação Oswaldo
Cruz, [email protected] (135,
320)
Dietrich, Sylvia, University of Alabama,
Doucette, Ann, The George Washington
Dietz, James S, National Science Foundation,
Doucette, Carl, Independent Consultant,
Diggs, Gregory, National Research Center,
Doughty, Wendy M, Emerging Directions
Consulting Ltd,
DiGiovanni, Dawn, Children’s Institute,
Dimitrov, Dimiter, George Mason University,
Douglas-England, Kathleen L, Calgary Health
Region, kathleen.douglas-england@
calgaryhealthregion.ca (716)
Dino, Geri, West Virginal University,
Dowell, Kathleen A, Partners in Evaluation &
Planning, [email protected] (106, 518,
858)
Diphofa, Mashwahle J, Public Service
Commission of South Africa,
Downs, Holly, University of Illinois,
Doan, Henry M, US Department of
Agriculture, [email protected] (560,
590)
Dobryanskyy, Dmytro O, Danylo Halytskiy L’viv
National Medical University,
Dodbiba, Teuta, NRC Picker Group Canada,
Dodge Francis, Carolee, Keweenaw Bay
Ojibwa Community College,
Dohoo Faure, Sheila, Goss Gilroy Inc,
Doino-Ingersoll, Jo Ann, Strategic Research,
858)
Dolinski, Carly M, Calgary Health Region,
Dominguez, Paula Szulc, Hezel Associates,
Dominick, Alexander, Arizona Kidney
Foundation, [email protected] (485)
Donaldson, Stewart I, Claremont Graduate
(294, 527, 546, 589, 804, 823, 850)
Donata, Green, Centers for Disease Control
Doniger, Andrew, Monroe County Health
Department, [email protected]
(135, 437)
Dorward, Jim, Utah State University,
Dozier, Ann M, University of Rochester,
Draut, Jeanine R, Concept Systems,
Eades, Jenny, University of Huddersfield,
Earl, Lorna, University of Toronto,
Earl, Sarah, International Development
Research Centre, [email protected] (761, 851)
Early, S Reed, British Columbia Office of the
Auditor General, [email protected]
(236, 508)
Easterling, Douglas V, Wake Forest University
School of Medicine, dveaster@
wfubmc.edu (110, 817)
Eaton, Brenda, British Columbia Housing
Management Commission,
Eckert, William A, World Bank,
Eddy, Rebecca M, Claremont Graduate
Driesen, Kevin E, University of Arizona,
Edwards, Jeremiah K, Southern Illinois
(135)
Droitcour, Judith A, US Government
(334)
Efimova, Svitlana, Lviv Regional Institute of
Postgraduate Pedagogical Education,
Drolet, Jacques, Association Des centres de
Réadaptation en Déficience Physique du
Québec, [email protected]
(420)
Efthimiou, Chris, City University of New York,
Dubose, Blake, The Evaluation Group,
Eidson, Shelby S, The MayaTech Corporation,
Du, Michael, Mid-South Regional Resource
Center, [email protected] (769)
Einarson, Marne K, Cornell University,
Dunavin, River, Albuquerque Public Schools,
Eisen, Karla, Westat, [email protected]
(545)
Dunham, Michelle, University of Kansas,
Elangovan, AR, University of Victoria (607)
Dunstan, C Julie, Research & Evaluation
Solutions, [email protected] (318, 875)
DuRant, Robert, Wake Forest University
School of Medicine, [email protected]
(110)
Durland, Maryann M, Durland Consulting,
855)
Duval, Julie, Université du Québec à
321)
Dye, Timothy D, University of Rochester,
E
Ehley, Linda, Alverno College,
Elbert, Chanda D, Texas A&M University,
Elias, Flavia Tavares, Ministério da Sa˙de,
Elias, Gretchen, Institute for Sustainable
Communities, [email protected] (872)
Elliott, Marleen, University of Kansas,
Ellis, Tosha L, Clark Atlanta University,
Ellison, Philip, University Health Network,
219
Elman, Irwin, Pape Adolescent Resource
Centre, [email protected] (228)
F
Fillip, Barbara, Academy for Educational
Development, [email protected] (435)
Emmons, Christine L, Yale University Child
Study Center, [email protected]
(270)
Fahey, D D, Ohio State University,
Finley, Meghan, National Center on Family
Homelessness,
[email protected]
(135)
Emshoff, James G, Georgia State University,
Encandela, John A, ORC Macro International,
[email protected]
(507, 736)
Fallu, Jean-Sebastien, Université de Montréal,
Farber, Anne E, University of Pittsburgh,
Farley, Joanne, Farley & Associates,
Endo Inouye, Traci, Social Policy Research
Associates, [email protected] (269)
Farris, Kimberly D, University of Texas at
Austin, [email protected] (135)
Eng, Sothy, Texas Tech University,
Farris, Rosanne, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, rosanne.farris@
hhs.cdc.gov (209)
Enger, John M, Florida Atlantic University,
Engle, Molly, Oregon State University,
740, 814, 869)
Engle, Victoria, New York State Energy,
Eoyang, Glenda H, Human Systems Dynamics
Farris, Sheila, Catholic District School Board
of Eastern Ontario, sheila.farris@
cdsbeo.on.ca (235)
Feldman, Laura L, University of Wyoming,
Fell, James C, Pacific Institute for Research
and Evaluation, [email protected] (279, 852)
Finney, Pamela B, University of North Carolina
at Greensboro, [email protected] (135,
273)
Firme, Thereza Penne, Fundação Cesgranrio,
Fischer, Robert L, Case Western Reserve
University, [email protected] (356, 519,
785)
Fitzgerarld, Colleen, PEARLS for Teen Girls,
Fitzgibbon, Michael, Forfás,
Fitzpatrick, Jody, University of Colorado,
Denver, [email protected]
(315)
Fleischer, Dreolin, Goodman Research Group,
Epstein, Michael, Children’s Institute,
Fendt, Carol R, University of Illinois at
Chicago, [email protected] (237,
330)
Erickson, Larry E, Kansas State University,
Feng, Annie Xuemei, College of William and
Mary, [email protected] (507)
Erlandsson, Tomas, OpenEye Innovation
Management, [email protected]
(135)
Fenton, Shannon R, Ontario Ministry of
Education, [email protected]
(366)
Ernst, Kelly, Canadian Outcomes Research
Feranchak, Bret, Chicago Public Schools,
Escamilla, Heriberto, Research Associates of
San Diego, [email protected] (322)
Ferrence, Roberta, Ontario Tobacco Research
Unit, [email protected] (868)
Essenmacher, Victoria L, SPEC Associates,
587)
Ferroussier, Odile D, Centers for Disease
(119)
Estes, Carroll L, University of California, San
Fetterman, David, Stanford University,
867)
Folkman, Daniel V, University of Wisconsin,
Milwaukee, [email protected] (346,
881)
Fetzer, Linda, Penn State, [email protected]
(135)
Follett, Chantal C, University of Michigan,
Feula, Carol A, PricewaterhouseCoopers,
Ford, Julian D, University of Connecticut,
Fiander Trask, Tracy E, Office of Economic
495)
Formica, Scott W, Social Science Research &
Euán-Ramírez, Reyna, Universidad Autónoma
de Yucatán, [email protected] (135)
Eubanks, Alecia, Southern Illinois University
Carbondale, [email protected]
(135)
Everest, Michelle, Wilfrid Laurier University,
Ewers, Tola, Western Michigan University,
Ezhuthchan, Sudhakar G, Henry Ford Health
System, [email protected] (825)
Figoni, Hector, Instituto Nacional de
Tecnología Agropecuaria,
Filiberto, David M, Cornell University,
220
Fleischman, Laura, Children’s Services Council,
Fleischman, Norma S, US Department of
Agriculture,
842)
Florin, Paul R, University of Rhode Island,
Flowers, Lisa, University of Montana,
Flurkey, Deborah, Indiana State University,
Flynn, Robert, University of Ottawa,
Foster-Fishman, Pennie G, Michigan State
281, 549)
Fourney, Andrew M, California Department of
Health Services, [email protected]
(216)
Fournier, Michel, Sante Publiquede Montreal,
Fox, Gail, University of Indianapolis,
Fox, M Margaretta, Harlem United
Community AIDS Center,
Francis, Anika, University of Georgia,
Friedman, Elisa, Institute for Community
Health, [email protected] (241,
413)
Galvin, Deborah M, Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Prevention,
Friedman, Mike, American Institutes for
Gamache, LeAnn M, Mid-continent Research
for Education and Learning,
Friedman, Sanford I, Friedman Consulting
Group, [email protected]
(517)
Gambell, Trevor, University of Saskatchewan,
Francis, Kimberly A, Hogg Foundation for
(243)
Friedman, Stacey R, Yale University School of
Medicine,
[email protected]
(752)
Gamble, Christopher, Penn State,
Franco, Quindi, SRI International,
Frierson, Henry, University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill, [email protected] (536)
Frank, Christine E, Georgian College,
732)
Frisman, Linda K, University of Connecticut,
Garcia Alvarez, Laura Esthela, Centro de
Evaluaciones Universidad Autonoma de
Nuevo Leon, [email protected]
(135)
Fuchs, Richard, International Development
Garcia Duncan, Teresa, American Institutes for
Fujita, Mutsumi, New Energy and Industrial
Technology Development Organization,
Gardiner, Phillip, Gardiner and Associates,
Frankel, Paul, Junior Achievement Worldwide,
Franz, Nancy K, University of New Hampshire
Cooperative Extension,
Fraser, Douglas R, University of Tasmania,
603)
Garcia, John, Ontario Ministry of Health,
Fuller, Douglas, Abt Associates Inc,
Gardner, Annette, University of California,
San Francisco, [email protected] (281,
593)
Fusco, Judith, SRI International,
Gargani, John, University of California,
Berkeley, [email protected] (589)
Fraser, Elvis E, Academy for Educational
Development, [email protected] (571, 706,
794)
G
Fraser, Sheila, Auditor General of Canada
(200)
Gabor, Peter A, University of Calgary,
Frazier, Celeste H, University of Alabama,
Gabriel, Roy, RMC Corporation,
Frechtling, Joy, Westat,
Gaffney, Susan, Governors State University,
Fredericks, Kimberly A, Indiana State
(282, 855)
Gage, Cristina, McMaster University,
Garland, Alexis, Oakland University,
Garland, Colin, Oakland University (507)
Garnder, Anne, Canadian Crossroad
International (135)
Garrard, Wendy M, Vanderbilt University,
833)
Garrett, Ann E, Arapahoe House,
Garrity, Maureen, University of Colorado,
Freed, Michael C, American University,
Gagnon, Francis, Direction de la santé
publique de Montréal, fgagnon@
santepub-mtl.qc.ca (135)
Freeman, Melissa, University of Georgia,
Gajarsa, James, MayaTech Corporation,
Freeman, Ted, Goss Gilroy, [email protected]
(795)
Gajda, Rebecca, University of Vermont,
Frey, Bruce B, University of Kansas,
Galbraith, Jennifer, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention,
Gauthier, Benoît, Circum Network,
Gallagher, Larry, Northern Arizona University,
Gauthier, France, Sante Publiquede Montreal,
Frey-McClung, Valerie, West Virginia
(557)
Friedman, Elisa, Cambridge Health Alliance,
Gartrell, John, University of Hawai’i at
Manoa, [email protected] (852)
Garvin-Doxas, Kathy, University of Colorado,
Gatti, Guido G, Gatti Evaluation,
Gawley, Tim R, Wilfrid Laurier University,
Gendron, Sylvie, University of Montreal,
221
General, Barbara, State University of New
York at Buffalo, [email protected]
(464)
Glassman, Kim, William Penn Foundation,
[email protected]
(123)
Govers, Peggy, Simcoe Muskoka District
Health Unit, [email protected]
(321)
Germuth, Amy A, Compass Consulting
Group, [email protected] (106,
227, 273, 518, 553)
Glassman, Marlene, Centers for Disease
Gowen, Sheryl, Georgia State University,
[email protected] (342, 371, 501, 848)
Gerst, Robert M, Converge Consulting Group,
Goddard, Chelsey, Education Development
Graber, Eden, Association of Institutes for
Aesthetic Education,
Gervais, Marie, Société de l’assurance
automobile du Québec, mariegervais1@
videotron.ca (135, 456, 758)
Godfrey, Kelly E, University of North Carolina
Gracia, Susan M, Brown University,
Goh, Swee C, University of Ottawa,
Grack, Amy L, University of Minnesota,
Golatt, Karen, MayaTech Corporation,
Graham, John, University of North Carolina,
Goldberg, Carole, University of California, Los
Graham, Phillip W, RTI International,
Goldberg, Sheryl, University of California, San
Gramiak, Walt, Children’s Institute,
Giard, Julienne A, University of South Florida,
Gonzales, Patricia, New York State Energy
Research and Development Authority
(NYSERDA), [email protected] (747)
Grammatikopoulos, Vasilios, University of
Thessaly, [email protected] (135)
Gibbons, Karyn, University of Alberta,
Good, Kimberly D, Appalachia Educational
Gibson, Judy D, Centers for Disease Control
Goodman, Irene, Goodman Research Group,
Gies, Stephen, Development Services Group,
Goodman, Jeff, Children’s Services Council,
Gil, Gabriela, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología
Agropecuaria, [email protected]
(101)
Goodman, Joshua T, University of North
Gilbert, Marybeth, Praxis Research,
Goodrick, Delwyn, Royal Melbourne Institute
of Technology, Australia,
Getman, Christie, Winrock International,
Ghere, Gail, Program Evaluation Consultant,
Ghere, Gail, University of Minnesota,
Ghosh, Annapurna, Institute for Community
Health, [email protected] (241)
Gilbertson, Steve, Ruddie Memorial Youth
Foundation (881)
Gilliam, Aisha, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, [email protected];
Gillies, Anne E, Universalia Management
Gilster, Megan, University of Michigan,
Gingiss, Phyllis M, University of Houston,
Ginsburg, Alan L, US Department of
Education, [email protected] (797)
Goodyear, Leslie, Education Development
Center, [email protected] (123, 201,
347, 371, 559, 814)
Goodyer, Michael, Carleton University,
Gordon, Janet, Montana State University,
Gordon, Nancy C, PricewaterhouseCoopers,
Gorny, Laura, University of Minnesota,
Granner, Michelle, University of South
Grant, Brian A, Correctional Service Canada,
Grasso, Patrick, The World Bank,
Gratz, Zandra S, Kean University,
Gravel, Sylvie, Direction de la santé publique
de Montréal (135)
Gravina, M Virginia, Universidad de la
Rep˙blica, [email protected] (118)
Gray, Joyce, Ethnic Health Institute,
Gray, Peter, University of Toronto,
Grayson, Tom, University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign, [email protected] (362)
Grebinoski, Jeff, American Red Cross,
Gredler, Margaret, University of South
Green, John, University of Kansas,
Gioe, Cheri M, Louisiana State University
AgCenter, [email protected] (135)
Gothberg, June Elizabeth, Western Michigan
805)
Girault, Philippe, Family Health International,
Gotshall, Lindsay, Independent Consultant,
Green, Lawrence W, University of Maryland,
Glass, Don, Independent Consultant,
Gottfredson, Gary G, University of Maryland,
Green, Ruth, University of Indianapolis,
222
Green, Kathryn, University of Saskatchewan,
Greenberg, Susan R, Children’s Institute,
Gugerty, Brian, University of Maryland,
Hall, Margo, MBH Limited,
Greene, Jennifer C, University of Illinois at
Urbana-Champaign, [email protected]
(201, 527, 738, 830)
Gugiu, P Cristian, Western Michigan
Hall, Melvin E, Northern Arizona University,
341, 765)
Greene, Kari, Oregon Department of Human
478, 782)
Greenlaw, Corey P, Central Unified School
District, [email protected] (829)
Greenseid, Lija O, University of Minnesota,
Guillen, Blanca Flor, Lodestar Management
Guion, Lisa A, University of Florida,
Gullickson, Arlen R, Western Michigan
(203, 240, 539, 864)
Greenway, Nicole, Michigan State University,
Gummer, Edith S, Northwest Regional
Gregersen, Hans, CGIAR Science Council,
Gunn, Rita, Prairie Research Associates,
Gregorian, Nellie, The Michael Cohen Group,
Guo, Jeff, University of Cincinnati,
Gregory-Mercado, Karen, Centers for Disease
(209)
Gutierrez, Mario, The California Endowment,
Grego, Sonia Duarte, Sao Paulo State
Griffin, Sarah F, University of South Carolina,
Griffith, James, Claremont Graduate
Grimes, Stacey J, University of Minnesota,
Grob, George F, US Department of Health
(219, 298, 330)
Guy, Faulkner, University of Toronto,
Gysen, Joos Johanna Theo, University of
Leuven, [email protected]
(286)
Grusenmeyer, Linda, University of Delaware,
Grzybinska, Anna, Universalia,
Guajardo-Lucero, Ed, The Colorado Trust,
Guerrier, Maude, Cambridge Health Alliance,
Halpern, Gerald, Fair Findings,
Haman, Nathan D, University of Nebraska,
Hamann, M Sue, Coastal Area Health
Education Center,
865)
Hamburger, Merle, Centers for Disease
Hammer, Victoria, University of Illinois,
Hacker, Karen, Institute for Community
Hammond, Ormond W, Pacific Resources for
Hageboeck, Molly, Management Systems
International, [email protected]
(261)
Grumdahl, Eric I, Hearth Connection,
Hall LaFlamme, Deanna, National Research
Haas, Laura, New Mexico State University,
Grover, Jane, RMC Research Corporation,
Grudens-Schuck, Nancy, Iowa State University,
Hall, Will, US Environmental Protection
Agency, [email protected]
(422, 500)
Hamel, Sebastien, Federation of Canadian
Municipalities, [email protected] (831)
Hackett, Wanda L, Wanda Hackett
Enterprises, [email protected] (605)
Grubbs, Joseph W, Florida Gulf Coast
University, [email protected] ()
Hall, Steve, University of Arkansas
Cooperative Extension Service,
H
Gross, Amy, IDEA Center, [email protected]
(373)
Grskovic, Janice, Indiana University
Northwest, [email protected] (246)
Hall, Pippa, University of Ottawa,
Hagen, Carol, Westat,
Halai, Anjum, Aga Khan University,
Hale, Margaret M, American Institutes for
Haley, Jean, Haley Consulting Services,
Halkett, Richard, University of California,
Berkeley, [email protected] (135)
Hall, Ella, Leon County Schools,
Hall, Jori, University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign, [email protected] (830)
Hanavan, Julianne, Education Alliance at
Brown University,
Hanberger, Anders, UmeÂ University,
Handy, Walter, Cincinnati Health Department,
Hanning, Rhona, University of Waterloo,
Hannum, Kelly M, Center for Creative
(108, 367, 814)
Hansen, Bill, Tanglewood Research,
Hansen-Grafton, Bonnie, Montgomery
County Public Schools,
Hanson, Matthew R, University of Illinois at
(543, 800)
223
Hanson, Robert, Health Canada,
449, 778, 838, 861)
Hayward, Chris, University of New Mexico
School of Medicine, chaward@
salud.umn.edu (329)
Hanssen, Carl E, Western Michigan University,
Haywood, Thomas, University of Chicago,
Hansson, Finn, Copenhagen Business School,
Heath, Debra Olive, Albuquerque Public
Harada, Koh, Ministry of Economy, Trade and
Industry, [email protected] (513)
Heath, Linda, Loyola University, Chicago,
Hesketh, Heather, Mathematica Policy
Harding, Wayne M, Social Science Research &
Hegamin-Younger, Cecilia, Information
Decision Analysis, chyounger@
idanalysis.com (367, 873)
Hestness, Laurie J, Ramsey County Human
Services, [email protected]
(219, 298)
Heikes, E Joel, University of Texas at Austin,
Hewitt, Bart, US Department of Agriculture,
Heinemeier, Sarah E, Compass Consulting
Hewitt, Sue, Health District of Northern
Larimer County, [email protected]
(330, 736)
Hare, Francis G, Ryerson University,
Haring, Rodney C, State University of New
(135, 464)
Harmon, Michele, Westat, micheleharmon@
westat.com (241)
Harnar, Michael A, Claremont Graduate
454)
Harnish, Dorothy J, University of Georgia,
Harrington, Dennis, University of Maine
Extension, [email protected]
(215)
Heinrich, Samantha, Kyrene School District
Prevention Services, [email protected]
(348)
Herman, Rebecca, American Institutes for
Herpin, Sharon, WestEd, [email protected]
(231, 426, 544)
Hersey, James C, RTI International,
Hickman, Jill, Georgian College,
Heller, Amy J, US Department of Health and
(545)
Hicks, Karyn L, Government of the Northwest
Territories, [email protected] (771,
869)
Hellstern, Gerd-Michael, University of Kassel,
Hickson, Rachel, Montgomery County Public
(511)
Hemphill, James F, Youth Forensic Psychiatric
Harrington, Maura J, Independent Consulting,
784)
Henderson, Mareon V, Washington State
Department of Social and Health Services,
Highsmith, Robert, James Satterwhite
Academy for Child Welfare Training,
859)
Harris, Elizabeth J, EMT Associates,
Henderson-Dahms, Carol L, Northern Arizona
(112, 361, 880)
Hightower, A Dirk, Children’s Institute,
272)
Hendricks, Michael, Independent Consultant,
Hightower King, Mindy M, Indiana University,
Hendricks-Smith, Astrid, The California
Endowment, [email protected]
(269, 281, 593)
Hildebrand, Alexander, Maine Commission for
Community Service,
Henry, Gary, Georgia State University,
Hill, Alexandra, University of Alaska
Anchorage, [email protected] (510)
Henry, Norena A, US Office of Justice
Programs, [email protected] (863)
Hill, George C, University of Nevada, Reno,
Hensberry, Rebecca, Wake Forest University
School of Medicine,
Hill, Kathryn, University of Minnesota,
Harris, Ilene, UIC Dept of Medical Education,
Harris, Victoria A, Institute for Community
Harris, Wayne, Independent Consultant,
Harris-Kojetin, Lauren D, American
Association of Homes and Services for the
Aging, [email protected] (743)
Hart, Sybil, Texas Tech University,
Hartz, Zulmira, Université de Montréal,
Hatzipantelis, Maria, Centre for Research and
Hayden, Elizabeth K, Northeastern University,
Haynie, Kathleen C, Kathleen Haynie
Consulting, [email protected]
(227)
224
Heredia, Alberto, WestEd,
Herman, Carla, University of New Mexico,
Herman, Patricia M, University of Arizona,
404, 856)
Hill, Laura G, Washington State University,
Hill, Tara, US Department of Education,
Hilsenrath, Peter, North Texas Health Science
Hinbest, Jerry B, Malaspina University-College,
Hipps, Jerome, WestEd, [email protected]
(205)
Horn, Kimberly, West Virginal University,
Hirsch, Paul D, Georgia Institute of
Technology, [email protected]
(876)
Horowitz, Jordan E, WestEd,
Hirschberg, Diane, University of Alaska
Horton, Douglas E, Consultative Group on
International Agricultural Research,
Hitzke, Terri, Southern Illinois University
Carbondale, [email protected] (302)
Horwitz, Rebecca C, University of South
Ho, Certina, Ontario Pharmacists’ Association,
Horwood, Thomas J, Caliber Associates Inc,
Hoffman, Debra, Children’s Institute,
Houle, Sylvain, Université du Québec à
321)
Hoffman, Jodie LS, WestEd,
Hogarth, Kathy, Centre for Research and
Hogg, William, University of Ottawa,
Holanda, Marcos C, Economic Research
Institute of Ceara,
Holden, Debra, Research Triangle Institute,
Hollings, Michael J, Government Department,
House, Ernest R, University of Colorado,
Boulder, [email protected] (201,
546)
Huijbregts, Maria, Baycrest Center for
Geriatric Care, [email protected]
(751)
Hunt, Kelly A, The Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation (745)
Hunt, Terry, Treasury Board of Canada,
Huntington, Nicholas, National Center on
Family Homelessness,
[email protected]
(135)
Hurst, David, Centers for Disease Control and
Hurteau, Marthe, Université du Québec à
(221, 321)
House Jr, John J, Center for Learning
Connections, [email protected] (338)
Hurworth, Rosalind E, University of
Melbourne, [email protected]
(133, 546)
House, Sara, Loyola University Chicago,
Hutchison, Brian, McMaster University,
Housemann, Robyn, American Cancer Society,
Hutchinson, Kent, Florida Legislature Office of
Program Policy Analysis and Government
Accountability,
[email protected]
(335, 845, 882)
Howard, Barbara, SERVE University of North
Carolina, Greensboro, [email protected]
(203)
Hutchinson, Stacy L, Kansas State University,
Hollister, Brooke, University of California San
Howard, Dale CP, Howard Research &
Management Consulting,
Holm, Gunilla, Western Michigan University,
Hsiung, Deh-I, National Science Foundation,
Holmes, Erica, WestEd, [email protected]
(779)
Huang, Denise, University of California at Los
Holupka, C Scott, Vanderbilt University,
Huang, Phil, Texas Department of State
Health Services (437)
Hyde, Mary Morris, Association for the Study
and Development of Community,
Homer, Marc J, University of Wyoming,
Hubelbank, Jeanne H, Independent
Consultant, [email protected] (113)
Hylton, Kevin K, MayaTech Corporation,
Homsi, Ghada, RTI International,
Huber, Melissa S Quon, Michigan State
Hyytinen, Kirsi, VTT Technology Studies,
Honegger, Steven, American Institutes for
Hubley, Harry C, National Defence
Headquarters, [email protected]
(603)
I
Hong, Yihua, University of Toronto,
Hudson, Scott K, Alcoa Foundation,
Hood, Stafford, Arizona State University,
765)
Huffman, Douglas, University of Kansas,
Hoover, D Michele, Centers for Disease
Hughes, Karen L, Management Board of
Cabinet, Ontario,
Hopson, Rodney K, Duquesne University,
[email protected] (124, 212, 256, 597,
766)
Huh, Jeonghee, University of Central Florida,
Hutson, Bryant L, University of North Carolina
Hwalek, Melanie A, SPEC Associates,
793, 855)
Ilian, Henry R, James Satterwhite Academy for
Child Welfare Training,
859)
Imam, Iraj, Center for Applied Local Research,
Imbimbo, Josephine, ActKnowledge,
225
Imm, Pamela, Lexington-Richland Alcohol and
Drug Abuse Council, [email protected]
(745)
Janesick, Valerie J, University of South Florida,
Tampa, [email protected]
(342, 820)
Johnson, Elmima C, National Science
Foundation, [email protected] (126, 203,
240, 305, 370, 375)
Immonen, Sirkka, Science Council Secretariat,
Jang, Eunice Eunhee, University of Toronto,
Impelluso, Thomas, San Diego State
University, impelluso@
engineering.sdsu.edu (525)
Janosz, Michel, Université de Montréal,
Johnson, Hélène, Johnson et Roy inc. et
Université Laval,
Inazu, Judith K, University of Hawai’i at
Manoa, [email protected] (539, 852)
Janzen, Rich, Centre for Research and
[email protected] (135, 236, 581, 806)
Ingram, Stephanie D, Girls and Boys Town,
Jarosewich, Tania, Censeo Group,
Introcaso, David M, US Department of Health
(840)
Jarvis, Mark D, Health Canada,
Irving, Jennifer, University of Minnesota,
Isaacs, Barry J, Surrey Place Centre,
Isaacs, Frances E, National Research Council
(582)
Itang’ata, Mukaria J, Western Michigan
(489, 585)
Ivanochko, Bebe, Northlands College,
[email protected]
(236, 270)
Iyamu, Georgina O, Children and Youth
Coordinating Council,
J
Johnson, James D, University of North
Carolina at Wilmington,
Johnson, Jeannette, Friends Research
Institute,
464)
Johnson, Lenora, National Cancer Institute,
Jay, Michelle, University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill, [email protected];
770)
Johnson, Nancy, Centro International de
(761)
Jayaratne, Koralalage SU, University of
Georgia, Athens, [email protected] (307,
338, 769)
Johnson, Noreen P, The Health Foundation of
Central Massachusetts,
Jenkins, Susan M, Caliber Associates Inc,
Johnson, Paul L, National Institutes of Health,
Jenness, Mark, Western Michigan University,
Johnson, Trav D, Brigham Young University,
Jennings, Helene P, ORC Macro International,
Johnston, Andrea LK, Johnston Research,
802)
Jerald, Mike, Peace Corps,
Jetté, Alison M, Public Health Agency of
(260)
Jewiss, Jennifer L, University of Vermont,
Johnston, Peter, European Commission,
Jones, Jenny L, University of Tennessee, [email protected] (356, 572, 588,
728)
Jones, Kamilah A, Clark Atlanta University,
Jacobo, Amber, University of Nevada, Las
Vegas, [email protected]
(550)
Jha, Shreyasi, University of Texas at Austin,
Jacobs, Deborah F, Shippensburg University of
Pennsylvania, [email protected] (732)
Jinkerson, Darryl L, Abilene Christian
(754, 864)
Jones, Kristin, Nathan Kline Institute,
Jinnah, Hamida A, University of Georgia,
Jones, Lynn, Iowa State University,
Jae Lee, Hyuck, Korea Institute of Science and
Technology Evaluation and Planning,
Jobin, Denis, Health Canada,
Jones, Robert, Canadian International
Development Agency, [email protected] (738)
Jaffer, Kulsoom G H, Aga Khan University,
Johns, Ashley, University of Waterloo,
Jailall, Peter, Mississauga Board of Education,
Johnson, Catherine E, School District of
Philadelphia, [email protected]
(310)
Jordan, Frankie, Saskatchewan Justice,
James, Iga, Association for the Study and
Johnson, Deborah B, Children’s Institute,
Jordan, Gretchen B, Sandia National
Laboratories, [email protected] (288,
358, 521, 556, 613)
Jacques, Matthew, Surrey Place Centre,
Jamieson, Roberta, National Aboriginal
Achievement Foundation (400, 419)
226
Jones, Kevin P, PricewaterhouseCoopers,
Jones, Sara Pace, Donor Network of Arizona,
Jordan, Marilyn E, Clark County School
Jorgensen, Miriam, University of Arizona,
Kawakami, Alice J, University of Hawai’i,
Kidd, Kristin, Wake Forest University,
Joyner, Rita L, University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill, [email protected] (135)
Kaye, Jackie Williams, Atlantic Philanthropies,
[email protected]
(477)
Kieffer, Lisa R, Georgia Department of Audits
and Accounts, [email protected]
(505)
Juffer, Kristin A, WestEd, [email protected]
(842)
Kazi, Mansoor AF, University of Huddersfield,
572)
Kijek, Frederick, BearingPoint,
Julnes, George, Utah State University,
Keith, Gwen, Canadian Evaluation Society,
K
Keller, Kate N, The Health Foundation of
Greater Cincinnati,
Joza, Julie A, University of Waterloo,
Kadel, Robert, Kadel Research Consulting,
Kadirgamar, Chandi, United Nations,
Kaemkate, Wannee, Independent Consultant,
Kahlert, Rahel C, University of Texas at
Austin, [email protected] (430)
Kalishman, Summers, University of New
Mexico, [email protected] (329,
359, 791)
Keller, Robert, Mid-continent Research for
Kelley, Judy A, West Texas A&M University,
Kelley, Timothy, Science Council Secretariat,
Kellner, Millicent H, Association of Schools
and Agencies for the Handicapped,
Kellow, Thomas, University of South Florida,
St Petersburg, [email protected] (585)
Kim, Gregory, Centre for Addiction and
(284, 785)
Kim, Hanbyul, University of Georgia,
Kim, Helen, New York State Research &
Development Authority, [email protected]
(288)
Kim, MeeLee, Brandeis University,
Kim, Yonglyun, University of Minnesota,
King, Carla S, Carla King & Associates,
King, Jean A, University of Minnesota,
[email protected] (135, 267, 275, 294,
401, 527, 561, 832, 873)
Kelpin, Kevin, International Development
King, Winifred G, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, winifred.king@
cdc.hhs.gov (507, 611)
Kelsey, Kathleen D, Oklahoma State
(236, 769, 810, 874)
Kingsbury, Nancy, US Government
Accountability Office, kingsburyn@
gao.gov (738)
Kemp, Amy M, Indiana University,
Kirkhart, Karen, Syracuse University,
[email protected] (115, 341, 350, 597)
Kane, Robin, Innovation Network,
Kemp, Kristi, Canadian Mental Health
Association, [email protected]
(307)
Kirshstein, Rita, American Institutes for
Karlin-Resnick, Abi, Massachusetts Alliance on
Teen Pregnancy,
Kennedy, Meghan, Brigham Young University,
Karp, Esther, Children’s Institute,
Kennedy, William G, US Naval Research
Laboratory, [email protected]
(288)
Karunaratne, Padma, World Bank,
Kerley, Janet E, US Agency for International
Kasprzak, Susan F, University of Ottawa,
Kerr, Sandy, Massey University,
Kittmer, Melissa S, Family Service Association
of Toronto, [email protected]
(366)
Katzenmeyer, Conrad G, University of Central
Florida, [email protected] (311,
539, 568)
Khedkar, Rajeev, Academy of Development
Science, [email protected] (851)
Klatt, John, University of Wisconsin Extension,
Khoury, Myriam, Mercy Corps,
Klaus, Sarah, International Step by Step Assn,
Kibak, Henrik, California State University,
Monterey Bay (347)
Klebe, Kelli J, University of Colorado at
Colorado Springs, [email protected] (135,
579)
Kallemeyn, Leanne, University of Illinois,
Kamin, Stephanie, ORC Macro International,
Kanaìaupuni, Shawn M, Kamehameha
Schools, [email protected] (135, 338)
Kane, Mary, Concept Systems,
Kaufman, Cathy C, Indiana University of
Pennsylvania, [email protected] (254)
Kaufman, Joy S, Yale University,
Kidd, Jennifer, Old Dominion University,
Kishchuk, Natalie, Natalie Kishchuk Research
and Evaluation, [email protected]
(117, 492, 613)
Kissin, Wendy B, Westat,
Kistler, Susan, American Evaluation
Association, [email protected] (740)
227
Kleinhammer-Tramill, Jeannie, University of
Kansas, [email protected] (112)
Kreger, Mary, University of California, San
L
Kliest, Ted, Netherlands Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, [email protected] (795)
Kreiner, Peter, Schneider Institute for Social
Policy at Brandeis University,
L’Heureux, Laura N, Panoptik Research and
Consulting, [email protected] (784)
Kline, Lisa, San Francisco Unified School
Klingle, Jim P, Emerging Directions Consulting
Ltd, [email protected] (211)
Klomp, Richard W, Centers for Disease
(554)
Knauth, Shaunti, Learning Point Associates,
544)
Knezek, Gerald, University of North Texas,
Knickman, James R, The Robert Wood
Johnson Foundation, [email protected]
(745)
Kremer, Keith, University of North Carolina at
Greensboro, [email protected] (778)
Krenichyn, Kira, ActKnowledge,
Kruger, Roy, Northwest Regional Educational
Kuehn, Phyllis A, California State University,
Fresno, [email protected] (311, 539)
Kuji-Shikatani, Keiko, Cathexis Consulting,
Kulik, Noel, Wayne State University,
Kulkarni, Kedar, University of Central Florida,
Knott, Tara D, Evaluation Resources,
Kumar, Krishna, US Agency for International
Koenig, Teresa, Westat,
Kunic, Dan A, Correctional Service Canada,
Kohl, Richard, Management Systems
Kuo, Victor, Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation, [email protected]
(357, 583, 716)
Koivisto, Juha, National Research and
Development Centre for Welfare and
Kuperminc, Gabe, Georgia State University,
L’Heureux, Laura N, Southern Alberta Child
and Youth Health Network,
[email protected]
(716)
Labin, Susan N, Temple University,
Labrecque, Lise, Independent Consultant,
Lacey, Candace H, Nova Southeastern
847, 866)
LaChausse, Robert G, California State
University, San Bernardino,
LaFleur, Ray, ComDev Consulting,
Lafortune, Suzanne, Performance
Management Network,
LaFrance, Joan L, Mekinak Consulting,
802)
Lahey, Robert E, REL Solutions,
Kone, Anna J, University of Montreal,
Kupermintz, Haggai, University of Haifa,
Lahteenmaki-Smith, Kaisa, Nordregio,
[email protected]
(250)
Konrad, Ellen L, Independent Consultant,
Kupfer, Linda E, National Institutes of Health,
Lahti, Michel, University of Southern Maine,
Kopachevesky, Joseph, University of Prince
Edward Island, kopachevsky@upei. ca
(771)
Kurz, Cheryl, Western Michigan University
(430)
Lai, Morris K, University of Hawai’i,
Kusago, Takayoshi, Osaka University,
Lal, Bhavya, C-STPS LLC, [email protected] (548)
Korbak, Christine, SRI International,
Kushner, Saville, University of the West of
England, [email protected] (201,
290, 342, 563, 733)
Lalande, Robert, Social Sciences and
Humanities Research Council of Canada,
Kota, Patricia J, Georgia State University,
Kusi-Appouh, Deladem N, Cornell University,
Lam, Tony C M, University of Toronto,
Kovar, Mary Grace, University of Chicago,
Kutinlahti, Pirjo, VTT Technology Studies,
Lamarche, Paul, University of Montreal,
Kowalczyk, Shelly M, MayaTech Corporation,
Kuzmin, Alexey, Process Consulting Company,
Kowalski, Lorei, US Environmental Protection
Kwon, Deborah H, The Ohio State University,
Lambur, Michael T, Virginia Cooperative
Extension Service, [email protected]
(781)
Kowalski-Trakofler, Kathleen M, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention,
Kyabu, Dora W, Georgia State University,
Korabik, Karen, University of Guelph,
228
Lamontagne, Marie-Eve, Société de
l’assurance automobile du Québec,
[email protected]
(135)
Lan, Jiangqiao, Hua Zhong University of
Science & Technology,
Landers, Glenn M, Georgia State University,
Landry, Alyshia, Georgian College,
Landry, Richard G, University of North Dakota,
Langley, Kasey, Organizational Research
Services,
[email protected]
(223)
Langston, Elizabeth, Pacific Institute for
Lawton, Brian, University of Hawai’i,
Lemelin, Jacques, University of Ottawa,
Lawyer Brook, Diana, Leaders Net,
LeRoy, Lisa J, Abt Associates Inc,
Leake, Robin L, JVA Consulting,
Lesh, Aja, Azusa Pacific University,
Leary, Linda S, Centers for Disease Control
Lessard, Chantale, Université de Montréal,
LeBaron Wallace, Tanner, University of
California, Los Angeles, [email protected]
(293)
Letichevsky, Ana Carolina, Fundação
Cesgranrio, [email protected]
(116, 208)
Leduc, Nicole, Université de Montréal,
783)
Letourneau, Larry, University of Nevada, Las
Vegas, [email protected] (585)
Lee, Geoffrey A, Western Middle School
(233)
Lapaige, Véronique A, University of Montreal,
596)
Lee, Jae Young, Korea Institute of S&T
Evaluation and Planning,
Laperrière, Hélène, University of Montreal,
Lee, Janet S, University of California, Los
Lapierre, Brigitte, Centre for Intercultural
Learning, [email protected]
(262)
Lee, Jung Jae, Korea Institute of Science and
Technology Evaluation and Planning,
LaPointe, Michelle, Stanford University,
Lee, Kien, Association for the Study and
LaRoche, Nathalie, Transport Canada,
Larson, Kathlene A, Iowa State University
Larsson, Birgitta I M, BIM Larsson &
Lassegard Cook, Edie, Cornell University,
Laurence, Boucheron, Direction de la santé
publique de Montréal,
Lee, Linda E, Proactive Information Services,
Lee, Steven W, University of Kansas,
Lee, Wonsuk, University of Illinois,
Lee, Yi-Fang, The Ohio State University,
Lett Jr, John A, Defense Language Institute,
Leung, Flavia, National Research Council
Canada, [email protected] (521,
582)
Lévesque, Jonathan, Université de Montréal,
Levin, Richard M, Department of Public
Service and Administration,
Levin, Ronnie, US Environmental Protection
Agency, [email protected] (205, 729,
742)
Levin-Rozalis, Miri, Ben-Gurion University,
Lewis, Arlene, Clark County School District,
Lewis, Karla, SERVE Regional Education
Lewis, Nancy S, University of Central Florida,
Lefebre, Nancy, Saint Elizabeth Health Care,
Lewis-Charp, Heather K, Social Policy
Research Associates, [email protected]
(212, 811)
Laurier, Claudine, University of Montreal,
Legault, Frances, University of Ottawa,
Leysen, Jan, Royal Military Academy,
Lavelle, Ellen, Southern Illinois University
Edwardsville, [email protected] (273, 307,
344)
Lehman, Christine A, Children’s Institute,
Lichtenstein, Carolyn, Northrop Grumman
Health Solutions,
Laverny Rafter, David, Minnesota State
Lavinghouze, S René, Centers for Disease
(399, 520, 559, 862)
Lavoie, Francine A, Université Laval,
Lawrenz, Frances P, University of Minnesota,
[email protected] (135, 401, 447, 559,
596)
Leighton, Barry, Office of the Auditor General
of Canada, [email protected] (296)
Leistico, Kenneth J, Tuscaloosa Family
Resource Center, [email protected] (748)
Leitch, Daniel, Appalachian State University,
LeJeune, Emily, Louisiana State University
AgCenter, [email protected] (135)
Lema, Daniel, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología
Agropecuaria,
Liebenberg, Linda, Dalhousie University,
Liebenberg, Linda, University of Stellenbosch,
Lieber, Michael D, University of Illinois at
Chicago, [email protected] (584, 803)
Lin, Hsiu-Ju, University of Connecticut,
229
Lincoln, Yvonna, Texas A&M University,
Lindley, Megan C, Centers for Disease Control
Line, Gregory A, PricewaterhouseCoopers,
Love, Arnold, Independent Consultant,
561, 832)
Love, Craig, Westat, [email protected]
(107, 579)
Lyons, Sandra, University of Chicago,
Lysaght, Rosemary M, Queen’s University,
M
Linkens, Karen, The Lewin Group,
Love, Lois Thiessen, Uhlich Children’s
Advantage Network,
814, 859)
Lippman, Bobbie, Pew Charitable Trusts,
Low, Lisa, Itracks, [email protected] (337)
Mabry, Linda, Washington State University,
Vancouver, [email protected]
(125, 256, 601, 835)
Liu, Chaoying, The World Bank,
Lowry, Earline C, South Carolina State
MacAllum, Crystal A, Westat,
Liu, Ta, Battelle Memorial Institute,
Lu, Xuejin, Western Michigan University,
Lock, Andy J, Massey University,
Lubke, Margaret, Utah State University,
MacDonald, Douglas H, Centre for
Intercultural Learning, doug.macdonald@
international.gc.ca (262)
Locke, Liliane, SCO Health Service,
Luckey, Bill, Westat, [email protected]
(204, 435, 778)
Lockerby, Robin, University of Vermont
Luckey, James W, Westat,
Loesch-Griffin, Deborah A, Turning Point,
Luedke, Susan, Transport Canada,
Lohmeier, Jill H, University of Kansas,
[email protected] (135, 427, 530, 733)
Luellen, Jason K, University of Memphis,
Lohrer, Steve, University of California, San
Luenam, Kitipong, Naresuan University,
Lohrmann, David, Indiana University,
Luluquisen, Mia, Alameda County Public
Health Department,
Lomotey, Jonathan, Centre for Research and
Luong, Duyen, University of Saskatchewan,
Lonergan, S Lindsey, Georgia State University,
Lupher, Kerry, National Research Center,
Long, Michael, ORC Macro International,
Lussier, Nathalie, Direction de la santé
publique de Montréal,
Longo, Paul J, Independent Consultant,
Lonsdale, Jeremy, UK National Audit Office,
336)
Lopez-Fernandini, Alejandra, Academy for
Educational Development,
Lore, Cathryn, Casillas Consulting Services,
Lorton Jr, Paul, University of San Francisco,
Louis, Patry, Direction de la santé publique de
(135)
Lovato, Chris Y, University of British
Columbia, [email protected] (595, 868)
230
Lusthaus, Charles S, Universalia Management
Lustosa, Paulo Henrique, Ministério de Minas
e Energia ao Publico,
Luxenberg, Michael G, Professional Data
Analysts, Inc., [email protected]
(113)
Lykens, Kristine, North Texas Health Science
Lyle, Gene, Ramsey County Community
Human Services,
Lyons, Angela C, University of Illinois at
(307)
MacDonald, Pia DM, Harvard School of Public
MacGowan, Andrew, Rochester City School
(272)
MacGowan, Mark, Florida International
University (245)
Maciak, Barbara, Centers for Disease Control
MacKeigan, Linda, University of Toronto,
MacKinnon-Tucker, Dorene M, University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
MacLellan-Wright, Mary Frances, Public
Health Agency of Canada,
MacLeod-Glover, Nora, Ontario College of
Pharmacists, [email protected]
(773)
Macon Harrison, Lisa, Harvard School of
(309)
MacQuarrie, David L, Western Michigan
Magee, Pamela A, Alberta Cancer Board,
Magura, Stephen, National Development and
Research Institutes, [email protected]
(293)
Mahaffey, Michael, Michigan State University,
Maicher, Brigitte, Independent Consultant,
Maina, Nyambura, Montgomery County
Public Schools, [email protected]
(450)
Major, Anne, Centers for Disease Control and
Marko, Josh, Capital Health,
Mattare, Martha, Frostburg State University,
Maland Cady, Jane L, Criando Research and
Evaluation Services, [email protected]
(237)
Marquart, Jules M, Foundation for Human
Service Studies,
Mattox, John R, PricewaterhouseCoopers,
775, 836)
Malarat, Anan, Naresuan University,
Marsan, Nadine, Cambridge Health Alliance,
Malerba, Franco, L Bocconi University,
Marshall, Dawn I, Independent Consultant,
Mattson-Gearhart, Jeanine, Western
Michigan University, [email protected] (810)
Maley, Oonagh, Canadian Tobacco Control
Research Initiative, [email protected] (868)
Marshman, Joan, University of Toronto,
Malloy, Courtney L, Vital Research,
Martarese, Marlene, American Institutes for
Maxwell, Ann, US Department of Health and
Human Services,
Mandolia, Michelle, US Environmental
Protection Agency, Mandolia.Michelle@
epamail.epa.gov (747)
Martin, Garth, Addiction Services Consulting,
Mayhew, Fred D, North Carolina State
Martin, Glen, Glen Martin Associates,
glenmartinassociates.com (612)
Mayne, John, International Evaluation
Research Group, [email protected]
(296, 336)
Martin, Lyne, Ministère de l’Éducation du
Québec, [email protected]
(258)
Mayne, John, Public Sector Performance,
Martin, Micah T, University of North Carolina
Mazboudi, Mariam, University of Illinois at
Manley, Mariam, PRES Associates,
Martin, Robin, San Diego State University,
McCarthy, Erin, University of North Carolina,
Manning, Colleen F, Goodman Research
Martin, Suzanne, University of Central Florida,
McClintock, Charles, Fielding Graduate
Manning, Susan, Toronto District School
Board, [email protected] (235)
Martin, William, Wake Forest University
School of Medicine,
McColley, Bernette, Georgia State University,
Maneepong, Chuthatip, Shinawatra
University Bangkok, chuthatip@
shinawatra.ac.th (409)
Mangrulkar, Leena, Formative Evaluation
Research Associates, leenasm@
hotmail.com (263, 844)
Mannix, Danyelle, American University,
Mannix, Danyelle, Northrop Grumman Health
Solutions, [email protected]
(317)
Manuel, Diane M, The California Endowment,
Mapendere, Jeffrey, The Carter Center,
Marais, Lorraine C, Radford University,
Maranda, Michael, University of Maryland,
734, 861)
Marceau, Richard, École nationale
d’administration publique,
Marczak, Mary, University of Minnesota,
Maretzki, Audrey N, Penn State University,
Mark, Melvin M, Penn State University,
[email protected] (256, 275, 740, 850)
Markatos, Elizabeth M, RTI International,
Martineau, Jennifer W, Center for Creative
(108, 135, 555)
Maule, Catherine, University of Toronto,
McConney, Andrew, Florida Gulf Coast
McCorkle, Constance, Catholic Relief
Martinez, Pablo E, Texas State University, San
Marcos, [email protected] (789)
McCormick, Treseen, WestEd,
Martinez, Tiffany A, Mid-South Regional
McCracken, Ann L, Health Foundation of
Greater Cincinnati,
Mason, Gillian, University of Illinois at
Mason, Greg, Prairie Research Associates,
Mason, Michael, US Environmental Protection
Mason, Paul, University of Birmingham,
Massell, Laura N, University of Vermont,
Massey, Maureen, Seattle Public Schools,
McCullough, James, SRI International,
McDavid, Jim, University of Victoria,
McDonald, Katherine, University of Illinois at
McEathron, Mary A, University of Minnesota,
McGowan, Virginia M, Correctional Service
(327)
Mastrodonato, Paul, Nonprofit Works,
McGuire, Martha, Cathexis Consulting,
832)
Mathison, Sandra, University of British
Columbia, [email protected] (229,
724)
McKegg, Kate, Independent Consultant,
231
McKenna, Margaret A, University of
Washington, [email protected]
(266)
McKim, Robert, Capital Health,
McKnight, Katherine M, University of
Arizona, [email protected]
(331, 418, 833, 870)
McKnight, Patrick E, George Mason
457, 516, 759, 796, 833)
Menkes, Justin M, Spencer Stuart,
Millett, Ricardo, The Woods Fund,
Merchlinsky, Suzanne R, Montgomery County
Public Schools, suzanne_r_merchlinsky@
mcpsmd.org (231)
Mills, David, Health Canada Tobacco Control
Mercier, Céline, Université de Montréal,
Meredith, Colin, Office of the Auditor
General of Canada, colin.meredith@
oag-bvg.gc.ca (290)
Mills, Jack, Choice Point Applied Research,
Mills, Jennifer, Penn State University,
Milne, Joanne L, ORC Macro International,
Merola, Stacey, American Institutes for
Milne, SL, Massey University,
Mertens, Donna M, Gallaudet University,
McLean, Hugh, Open Society Institute,
Mines, Jan, University of New Mexico,
Meter, Kenneth A, Crossroads Resource
McLeod, Caroline C, Westat,
Mezoff, Jane, Centers for Disease Control and
Minnema, Jane E, University of Minnesota,
832)
McMahon, Susan D, DePaul University,
Middendorf, B Jan, Kansas State University,
McNair, Shannan, Oakland University,
Middendorf, B Jan, Office of Educational
Innovation and Evaluation,
McLaughlin, John A, John McLaughlin
Associates, [email protected] (422,
747)
McNall, Miles, Michigan State University,
McTavish, James F, Assessment Assistance
Plus, [email protected] (506)
Means, Barbara, SRI International,
Mearns, Curtis J, Albuquerque Public Schools,
Medhora, Rohinton, International
Development Research Centre,
Medina Diaz, Maria, University of Puerto Rico,
Rio Piedras, [email protected] (810)
Megdal, Lori M, Megdal & Associates,
Midling, Michael J, Independent Consultant,
Miles, Bart, Wayne State University,
Miller, Cynthia A, Arkansas State University,
Miller, L Scott, Arizona State University,
Miller, Nigel, Economics and Resource
Analysis Unit Home Office,
Miller, Patricia, Southwest Solutions,
Mehalic, Erin Elizabeth, Old Dominion
University, [email protected] (135, 488)
Miller, Rivanna, The Center for Creativity in
Education and Cultural Heritage,
Melahn, Christopher, University of Hawai’i,
Miller, Robin Lin, Michigan State University,
Melikian, Gourgen, Pro-Energia Consultants,
Miller, Stephen K, University of Louisville,
Memon, Muhammad, Aga Khan University,
Miller, Ted R, Pacific Institute for Research &
Mendizabal, Enrique, Overseas Development
Miller, Thad, North Texas Health Science
Mengich, William Saisi, Kenya Schools
Improvement Project, [email protected]
(486)
Miller, Tom, National Research Center,
Menke, Michael, University of Arizona,
796)
232
Miller, William, University of Massachusetts
Extension, [email protected]
(215)
Minyard, Karen J, Georgia State University,
Miranda, Joyal, University of Toronto,
Mirassou, Susana Beatriz, Instituto Nacional
de Tecnología Agropecuaria,
Miron, Gary, Western Michigan University,
Mitchell, Patrick, Public Health Institute,
Mitchell, Suzanne, Arkansas Department of
Higher Education,
Mithani, Shahzad S, Aga Khan University,
Modarresi, Shahpar, Montgomery County
Public Schools,
Modzeleski, William, US Department of
Mohan, Rakesh, Idaho State Legislature,
Mohapatra, Sushanta K, SRI International,
Molloy, Patty, Evergreen Training & Evaluation,
Mon’t Alverne-Chaves, Iduina, Universidad
Fluminense - Rio de Janeiro,
Mongrain, Lucie, Association Québécoise
d’établissements de santé et de services
sociaux, [email protected]
(420)
Monsson, Yngve, University of Kansas,
Montague, Steve, Performance Management
Network, [email protected] (277,
448, 598)
Morgan, Peter, European Centre for
Development Policy Management,
Montelpare, William, Lakehead University,
Morra-Imas, Linda, World Bank Group,
Monterde-Diaz, Rafael, Technical University of
Valencia, [email protected] (135, 286,
567)
Morrison, Catherine C, Calgary Health
Region, catherine.morrison@
Montes, Guillermo, Ave Maria University,
Morrow, Jennifer A, Old Dominion University,
Murphy, Caroline C, University of British
Columbia, [email protected] (595)
Montgomery, Joyce, Oklahoma State
(236)
Morsbach, Sarah K, University of South
Murphy, Maureen W, Caliber Associates Inc,
Mortensen, John C, Energetics,
Murphy-Walsh, Elizabeth, National Defence
and Canadian Forces, murphy-walsh.e@
forces.gc.ca (747)
Montiero, Leandro, National AIDS and DST
Montoya-Gomez, Silvia, Southern Illinois
Montrosse, Bianca E, Claremont Graduate
701, 738, 775)
Montuori, Lisa, Cambridge Health Alliance,
Moo Sang, Brian, Universalia Management
Moodley, Juliann, Manto Management,
Mooney, Kathleen, SERVE Regional
Mooney, Peggy A, Government of Ontario,
Moore-Lamminen, Laura M, Mid-South
Regional Resource Center,
Morales, Lilliana, MayaTech Corporation,
Morales, Susana, Instituto Nacional de
Mosimakoko, Botsalano T, University of
Ottawa, [email protected] (604)
Moss, Marcey, Indiana University,
Mote, Jonathon, University of Maryland,
Mountain, Leigh A, State University of New
York at Albany,
Mowbray, Carol T, University of Michigan,
Moyer, Cheryl, Canadian Tobacco Control
Research Initiative, [email protected]
(868)
Mueller, Patricia, Northeast Regional Resource
Mueller, Peggy, The Chicago Community
Trust, [email protected] (800)
Mukkavilli, Seetharam, Plan International,
seetharam.mukkavilli@
plan-international.org (544)
Muntz, Hans, Canshield Management
Murack, Jennie, Goodman Research Group,
Murray, Donald R, Harry Cummings and
Associates, [email protected]
(107)
Murray, Nancy, University of Texas School of
(807)
Murray, Ottis L, University of North Carolina
at Pembroke, [email protected]
(112, 838)
Murray, Steve, RMC Research Corporation,
Murray, Sue, Maryland Association of NonProfit Special Education Facilities,
Mutchler, Matt G, AIDS Project Los Angeles,
Muth, Barbara J, American Red Cross,
Mya, Sharon Marie, Hewlett Packard,
Myers, Anita, University of Waterloo,
Mull, Savi, Management Systems
Mzumara, Howard R, Purdue University
Indianapolis, [email protected] (125,
828)
Muller, Patricia A, Indiana University,
Moran, Garrett, Westat,
Mullins, Peggy, Correctional Service Canada,
Moran, Kathy, Durham Region Health
Department, kathy.moran@
region.durham.on.ca (746)
Mulsow, Miriam H, Texas Tech University,
Morell, Jonathan, Altarum Institute,
Mulvey, Kevin P, US Department of Health
and Human Services, kevin.mulvey@
samhsa.hhs.gov (435, 778)
Moret, Marta, Urban Policy Strategies,
Mundy, Eric J, University of Akron,
Morgan, Carol, ArtsConnection,
Munford, Rhonda L, Caliber Associates Inc,
Munson, Delane, NWREL,
Mulkern, Virginia, Human Services Research
Morales, Tomas D, Cal Poly Pomona,
Morgan Lopez, Antonio, RTI International,
Mungania, Penina, University of Arkansas,
N
Nagao, Masafumi, Hiroshima University,
Nahan, Neva, Wayne State University,
Naidoo, Indran A, Public Service Commission,
Naimi, Linda, Purdue University,
Najab, Julius, University of Arizona,
233
Nakamura, Yasuhide, Osaka University,
Nichols, Richard, Richard Nichols and
(431, 802)
O
Nichols, Tristi C, Manitou,
O’Cadiz, Maria del Pilar, California State
Polytechnic University, mpocadiz@
csupomona.edu (248)
Nickerson, C J, Independent Consultant,
O’Connor, Jean, The MayaTech Corporation,
jo’[email protected] (493)
Nargiso, Jessica, University of Rhode Island,
Niolon, Phyllis, Georgia State University,
Nash, John B, OpenEye Innovation
Management, [email protected]
(135, 340, 443)
Nistler, Mary, Learning Point Associates,
O’Connor, Kathleen O, Kingston, Frontenac
and Lennox & Addington Public Health,
Nancoo, Lauren, Upside, [email protected]
(532)
Nandlal, Joan M, Centre for Addiction and
(284, 785)
Natal, Sonia, The National School of Public
Health Sergio Arouca,
Nix, Leslie, Clark County School District,
Nixon, Melissa, University of North Carolina at
Ncube, Lisa B, Purdue University,
Noble, Audrey J, University of Delaware,
Ndongo Mebometa, Guillaume, Canadian
Evaluation Society, [email protected]
(812)
Noel, Nora E, University of North Carolina at
Wilmington, [email protected] (289)
Neatherlin, John, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, [email protected]
(827)
Neilson, Stephanie, Universalia Management
Nelson-Barber, Sharon, WestEd,
Nelson, Geoffrey B, Wilfrid Laurier University,
Nelson, Milena, University of California, San
Francisco, mnelson@@itsa.ucsf.edu (308)
Nelson, Randi K, University of Minnesota,
New, Colleen, Indiana University,
Newberry, Jason, Centre for Research and
Noether, Chanson D, Policy Research
Noftsinger, Rebecca, Westat,
Noga, Janice, University of Cincinnati,
Nokes, Michael S, Western Michigan
Nolan, Jennifer A, Cornell University,
Nolan, Jennifer, Indiana University Northwest,
Norland, Emma, US Environmental Protection
Agency, [email protected] (350,
510, 556, 853)
Norland, Eric R, US Department of
(781)
Newman, Christine O, Henry Ford Health
System, [email protected] (825)
Norman, Nichole D, University of North
Carolina at Greensboro, ndnorma2@
uncg.edu (135)
Newman, Dianna L, State University of
New York at Albany, dnewman@
uamial.albany.edu (595)
Norris, Greg, New Earth Web Fund,
Newman, Frederick L, Florida International
334, 364, 793)
Newsom, Julia, University of Alabama,
Nicholls, Craig, Hezel Associates,
Nicholoson, Henry, University of North
234
Nowell, Branda L, Michigan State University,
Nu’Man, Jeanette H, ORC Macro
(507, 611)
Nunez, Isabel, University of Illinois at Chicago,
Nyce, Susan E, Western Michigan University,
Nykiforuk, Candace, McMaster University,
O’Cummings, Mindee, American Institutes for
O’Grady, William, University of Guelph,
O’Keefe, Maureen L, Colorado Department of
Corrections, maureen.okeefe@
doc.state.co.us (135, 579)
O’Reilly, Kim, The Center for Women and
Families (752)
O’Sullivan, Elizabethann, North Carolina State
University, elizabethann_osullivan@
ncsu.edu (243)
O’Sullivan, Rita, University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill, [email protected] (133, 308,
541, 606, 770, 837)
Oba, Eunice, Sao Paulo State University,
Obasaju-Ayo, Victoria Taiwo, United Nations,
Obrecht, Michael, Canadian Institutes of
Health Research, [email protected] (311)
Ochocka, Joanna, Centre for Research and
Odell Butler, Mary, Battelle,
Oelke, Nelly D, Southern Alberta Child and
Youth Health Network, nelly.oelke@
Ofir, Zenda, The World Conservation Union,
Ogletree, Susan, Georgia State University,
Oh, Donghoon, Korea Institute of
S&T Evaluation and Planning,
Oh, Sehong, Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation
and Planning, [email protected] (101)
Okada, Momoko, New Energy and Industrial
Okpala, Comfort O, Shaw University,
Olenik Lynch, Christy, Partners in Evaluation
and Planning, [email protected] (285)
Oleson, Sharron, Arkansas State University,
Oliveira, Maria Leyde, Universidade Federal do
(135)
Pahl, Dale Alan, US Environmental Protection
Agency, [email protected] (556, 726,
853)
Pakenas, Larry, New York State Energy,
Paleo, Lyn, Evaluation Research and Training,
Pascom, Ana Roberta, National AIDS and DST
Passa, Katerina, State University of New York
at Albany, [email protected] (595)
Patroclo, Maria Aparecida, Municipal de sa˙de
do Rio de Janeiro,
Oliver, Diane E, Texas Tech University,
Palmer, Lance, University of Georgia, Athens,
Oliver, Monica L, Georgia State University,
Pals, Sherri L, Centers for Disease Control and
Olsen, Kenneth R, Mid-South Regional
Pane, Natalia E, American Institutes for
Research, [email protected] (336, 705, 797)
Patton, Michael Quinn, Utilization-Focused
Evaluation, [email protected] (438,
739)
Onsawad, Arunee, Naresuan University,
Panhoon, Sompong, Chulalongkorn
Paulson, Sharon, Ball State University,
Orlando, Laura, University of Washington,
Pankaj, Veena, Innovation Network,
Pawluk, Sahara, Government of the
Northwest Territories,
Oros, Cheryl J, US Department of Agriculture,
Pankratz, David B, Emc.Arts,
Orr, Maureen, Centers for Disease Control
Pant, Kalpana, Chaitanya,
Orsini, Muhsin Michael, Tanglewood
Research, [email protected] (308, 770)
Papa, Michael J, Central Michigan University,
Ortega, Sandra, Ounce of Prevention Fund of
Florida, [email protected] (752, 812)
Parhar, Karen K, University of Saskatchewan,
Ortiz, Eloy, University of California Irvine,
Park, Byeongwon, Korea Institute of Science
and Technology Evaluation and Planning,
Ortiz, Rhonda, The California Endowment,
Orwin, Robert G, Westat, robertorwin@
westat.com (245, 585, 756)
Osicki, Raegan A, University of Saskatchewan,
Otis, Daniel, Développement économique
Canada, [email protected] (420)
Ottoson, Judith M, Georgia State University,
Owen, John M, University of Melbourne,
869)
Parker, Chris, Georgia State University,
Park, Jongwon, SRI International,
Parker, Lisa, Fred Finch Youth Center,
Parker, Louise A, Washington State University,
Parker, Robert P, Clark County School District,
Parker West, Laurel, University of Wyoming,
Patterson, Tracy, Center for Creative
(110, 206, 367, 424)
Payne, Gayle H, ORC Macro International,
Payne-Bourcy, Laura, The R/E/D Group,
Peach, Hugh G, H Gil Peach & Associates,
Peacock, Erin, University of Arizona,
Peak, Geri L, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg
School of Public Health, geripeak@
charm.net (807)
Peck, Laura R, Arizona State University,
Peele, J Eric, RTI International, [email protected]
(234)
Pegg, Jerine, Oregon State University,
Penna, Maria Lucia, Escola Nacional de Saude
Publica, [email protected] (135)
Penna, Maria L˙cia, Escola Nacional de Saude
Publica, [email protected] (135)
Penna, Robert M, The Rensselaerville Institute,
Owens, Beverly, Leon County Schools,
Parrick, Melanie, Toronto District School
Board, [email protected] (235)
Öztürk, Mehmet Dali, Arizona State
754)
Parries, Maria, Wake Forest University School
of Medicine, [email protected]
(110)
Penta, Mary, University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill (541)
Parry, Natalie, Canadian Cancer Society,
Penuel, William R, SRI International,
Parsons, Beverly, InSites, beverlyaparsons@
aol.com (113, 520, 791, 830)
Pepin, Genevieve, Laval University,
Partain, Catherine, Centers for Disease
(554)
Peralta, Gustavo, Centro International de
(761)
P
Page, Bethany, Compass Consulting Group,
Page, Melissa, University of Arizona,
Penna-Firme, Thereza, Fundação Cesgranrio,
235
Peregrino, Sylvia, University of Texas at El
Paso, [email protected] (728)
Pinho, Sheila Zambello, Sao Paulo State
Porta, Madeline La, National Cancer Institute,
Perkins, Ayana, MayaTech Corporation,
Pinsker, Eve C, Stroger Hospital,
Perkins, Heather, Workers Compensation
Board of Nova Scotia,
Piontek, Mary Elizabeth, University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor,
Porteous, Nancy, Public Health Agency of
(314)
Perrin, Burt, Independent Consultant,
Pipi, Kataraina, Paewhenua Hou, New
Horizons, [email protected] (135, 610,
763)
Perry, Kevin D, Ministry of Finance,
Government of Ontario,
Persaud, Nadini, Western Michigan University,
Personius Zipoy, Jennifer, University of Las
Vegas, jennifer.personius@
ccmail.nevada.edu (550)
Peterman, Karen, Goodman Research Group,
Peters, Jane S, Research Into Action,
Peters, Jim, Perinatal Network of Monroe
County, [email protected] (437)
Peterson, Candace, Pacific Institute for
Research & Evaluation, [email protected]
(433)
Peterson, Gayle, Headwaters Group
Philanthropic Services, gpeterson@
headwatersgroup.com (544, 613)
Peterson, Karen, Puget Sound Center for
Teaching, Learning and Technology,
[email protected]
(132, 247)
Pétrin, Anne, Université du Québec à
Montréal, [email protected] (258)
Petterson, Naomi, Indiana University South
Bend, [email protected] (865)
Pirruccello, Carole, California Department of
Health Services, [email protected]
(216)
Pitts, Tara, Wake Forest University School of
Medicine (110)
Plachta-Elliott, Sara, Consumer Quality
Initiatives, [email protected]
(427)
Plonski, Paula M, Praxis Research,
Plucker, Jonathan A, Indiana University,
Pluto, Delores M, University of South
Pobywajlo, Susan, American International
Health Alliance, [email protected]
(716)
Podems, Donna, OtherWISE Research and
710, 813)
Poling, Mary, University of Arkansas Division
of Agriculture, [email protected] (300,
744)
Polinsky, Margaret L, Parents Anonymous,
482)
Posner, Samuel F, Centers for Disease Control
Poth, Cheryl-Anne N, Queen’s University,
Potvin, Louise, Université de Montréal,
Powell, Jeanne W, National Institute of
Standards and Technology,
Powers, Elizabeth, University of North
Carolina at Chapel Hill, epowers@
email.unc.edu (133)
Preskill, Hallie, Claremont Graduate University,
Pribesh, Shana, Old Dominion University,
Price, Kelci M, Chicago Public Schools,
Pringle, Elizabeth, Commonwealth Public
Broadcasting MHzNetworks,
Procter, Erica E, University of Guelph,
Prost, Carol, Brandeis University,
Provencher, Beth, National Center on Family
Homelessness,
[email protected]
(135)
Prybylski, Dimitri, Family Health International,
Pollack, Scott E, University of Georgia,
Przybylski, Roger K, RKC Group,
Polush, Elena, Iowa State University,
Pursley, Linda, Lesley University,
Pomerantz, Karen, Massachusetts Alliance on
Teen Pregnancy, karen_pomerantz@
yahoo.com (413)
Puzzanchera, Michele, University of
Pittsburgh, [email protected] (514)
Pope, Susan, University of Alaska Anchorage,
Q
Phillips, Victoria, Emory University,
Popp, Janice K, Southern Alberta Child and
Youth Health Network, janice.popp@
Quan, Michael A, The Center for Women and
Families, [email protected] (752)
Philp, Joel D, The Evaluation Group,
Porima, Laurie D, LLE Limited,
Quartaroli, MaryLynn, Northern Arizona
(322, 747)
Pierce, Steven J, Michigan State University,
Porowski, Allan W, Caliber Associates,
Quinlan, Kathleen M, Concept Systems,
Pettibone, Kristianna, MayaTech Corporation,
Pettit, Rebecca W, Shippensburg University of
Pennsylvania, [email protected] (435, 732,
749)
Phillips, Cynthia C, Phillips Wyatt Knowlton,
Phillips, Mary Ann, Georgia State University,
Quinlan, Kristin J, University of Rhode Island,
236
Quinn, Elizabeth, Westat,
Quinn, Mary, American Institutes for
Quizon, Jaime B, The World Bank,
Quon, Tony, University of Ottawa,
R
Race, Kathryn E H, Race & Associates,
Racine, Stephane, Health Canada,
Rademaker, Linnea L, Indiana State University,
812)
Radhakrishna, Rama B, Penn State University,
Ragen, Vicky, Puget Sound Center for
Teaching, Learning and Technology,
Rattermann, Mary Jo, University of
Indianapolis, [email protected]
(884)
Ray, Karen L, Saint Elizabeth Health Care,
Ray, Marilyn L, Finger Lakes Law & Social
Policy Center, [email protected] (210,
481, 858)
Ray, Sarah, RTI International, [email protected]
(734)
Resendez, Miriam, PRES Associates,
Revels, Michelle L, ORC Macro International,
Rey, Tony, Behavioral Assessment,
Reyes, Audrey N, University of Alaska
Anchorage, [email protected]
(748)
Raymer, Annalisa, Cornell University,
Reynolds, Jesse, Yale University School
of Medicine, jreynolds@
theconsultationcenter.org (752)
Reddi, Lakshmi N, Kansas State University,
Reynolds Keefer, Laura, University of South
Redlinger, Ginger, Oregon Department of
(768)
Ribas, Nuria, Centre for Addiction and Mental
Health, [email protected] (284, 785)
Redmon, James, Kansas Children’s Cabinet,
Redvers-Lee, Peter, Vanderbilt University,
Rich, Alex, University of South Florida,
Richards, T Anne, Independent Consultant,
Reed, John H, Innovologie,
Rickards, William H, Alverno College,
525, 828)
Rainaldi, Richard, Civicore, [email protected]
(476)
Reed, Winifred L, National Institute of Justice,
Ridde, Valéry, Université Laval,
Raine, Kim, University of Alberta,
Reich, Stephanie M, Vanderbilt University,
530)
Ridge, Rick S, Ridge & Associates,
Rainey, Julie, Professional Data Analysts,
Raitzer, David A, Science Council Secretariat,
Rallis, Sharon F, University of Massachusetts at
Amherst, [email protected] (112,
275, 402, 740)
Ramakrishnan, Aparna, University of
Michigan, [email protected] (844)
Reid, Karen M, University of Nevada, Las
Reilly, Marcetta, University of Kansas,
Reinelt, Claire, Leadership Learning
Community, [email protected]
(212)
Ridings, John, Metropolitan Family Services,
Riedel, James, Girl Scouts Research Institute
(115)
Riemer, Manuel, Vanderbilt University,
Rignall, Karen Eugenie, Arab Community
Center for Economic and Social Services,
Ramalingam, Ben, Overseas Development
Reininger, Belinda, University of Texas School
of Public Health,
Ramirez, Victor, MayaTech Corporation,
Reissman, Dori, Centers for Disease Control
Rincones-Gomez, Rigoberto, Lake Michigan
College, [email protected] (471)
Randolph, Suzanne M, University of
Maryland, [email protected]
(326)
Reixach, Karen A, Children’s Institute,
Risley, John, Western Michigan University,
Renger, Ralph, University of Arizona,
Rist, Ray C, World Bank, [email protected]
(532)
Rennekamp, Roger, Oregon State University,
368)
Ritchie, Donn, San Diego State University,
Rank, A Dennis, BearingPoint,
Rao, Sandhya, PricewaterhouseCoopers,
Raphael, Helia Sonia, Sao Paulo State
Raphael, Taffy E, University of Illinois at
Rapp, Kelly E, Indiana University,
Renner, Mike, Ohio Tobacco Use Prevention
and Control Foundation,
Renteria, Rose Ann M, Academy for
Educational Development,
Riley, Barth, University of Illinois at Chicago,
Ritchie, Liesel, Western Michigan University,
Ritze, Nancy, City University of New York,
Rivard, Michele, University of Montreal,
237
Rowe, Andy, GHK International,
799, 835, 871)
Rivera, Noelle V, Action Learning Systems,
Rogers, Christopher M, University of
Robbins, Jennifer, US Environmental
Protection Agency,
Rogers, Patricia J, Royal Melbourne Institute
of Technology, [email protected]
(207, 247, 319, 474, 531, 566, 702, 758)
Roberts, Kim, Maritz, [email protected]
(135, 885)
Rogers, Susan J, Academy for Educational
Roxbury, Tiese, University of North Carolina at
Roberts-Gray, Cindy R, Resource Network,
[email protected];
Rogers, Todd, Public Health Institute,
Roy, Cameron, University of Waterloo,
Rohan, Kelly J, Uniformed Services University
of the Health Sciences, [email protected]
(742)
Roy, Gilles, Université de Montréal,
Robertson, Daniel J, EndVision Research and
530)
Rowe, Wendy E, Royal Roads University,
Roy, Sharon, Washington State University,
Robertson-Rehberg, Eileen A, Frost Research
Rohatgi, Rashi, Harlem United Community
AIDS Center, [email protected]
(512, 613)
Roberts, Sarah, University of North Carolina
Roman, John, The Urban Institute,
Rubin, Maureen, University of South Carolina,
Roberts, Tracy, Caliber Associates,
Rondeau, Kent, University of Alberta,
Rudd, Andrew K, Florida Gulf Coast
Robins, Cynthia S, Westat,
Rood, Christie L, The Answer Community
Coalition, [email protected] (135)
Rudisill, John P, The College of Wooster,
Robinson, JaMuir Michelle, National Cancer
Rood, Magdalena, Evaluation and Applied
Research Associates, [email protected];
Ruedt, Danielle, Children and Youth
Coordinating Council, danielleruedt@
cycc.state.ga.us (547)
Robson, Lynda S, Institute for Work & Health,
Rook, Dona, Pepin Heart Hospital and
Research Institute, [email protected]
(861)
Ruegg, Rosalie, TIA Consulting,
Rochester, Phyllis, Centers for Disease Control
(760)
Rosenbaum, Khalid, Montgomery County
Public Schools,
Rochow, Gunter, Capra International,
Rosenbluth, David, Saskatchewan Community
Resources and Employment,
Robinson, Sarah, University of Waterloo,
Rockwell, S Kay, University of Nebraska,
Roderick, Kristen A, Centre for Research and
Rodriguez Campos, Liliana, Western Michigan
(471)
Rodriguez, Carlos, American Institutes for
Research, [email protected] (471, 810)
Rodriguez, Eunice, Cornell University,
Rodriguez García, Rosalía, World Bank,
Roessner, David, SRI International,
[email protected];
Rog, Debra J, Vanderbilt University,
815)
238
Rosenstein, Barbara, Ben Gurion University of
the Negev, [email protected]
(867)
Rosenstein, Barbara, The Center for Creativity
in Education and Cultural Heritage,
Ross, John A, University of Toronto,
Rossiter, Shannon, Centers for Disease
(862)
Roth, Jane, US Department of Agriculture,
Rothney, Erin E, Harvard School of Public
Rougeaux, Lance, Pennsylvania Department
of Education, [email protected]
(847)
Rowan, Margo S, University of Ottawa,
Roy, Simon, Goss Gilroy, [email protected] (117,
786)
Rugh, Jim, CARE International, [email protected]
(224, 295, 738, 835)
Rugkasa, Jorun, Institute of Public Health,
Ireland, [email protected]
(345)
Ruiz-Casares, Monica, Cornell University,
Ruprecht, Karen M, Purdue University,
Rush, Brian, Centre for Addiction and Mental
Health, [email protected] (204, 327)
Russ-Eft, Darlene, Oregon State University,
230)
Russell, Storm J, Centre for Intercultural
Learning, [email protected] (262)
Russell-Bender, Arlene, Western Regional
Resource Center, [email protected]
(774)
Russon, Craig, Programme Planning &
813)
Ryan, Colleen, Health Canada,
Ryan, Jim, CIRCA Group Europe,
Ryan, Katherine E, University of Illinois at
(125, 342, 490, 810, 845)
Sass, James S, LA’s BEST After School
Enrichment Program, [email protected]
(248, 371, 848, 857)
Ryan, Katie, Georgian College,
Sassoubre, Lauren, University of California,
San Francisco, [email protected] (322)
Rye, Alyssa K, University of Nevada, Reno,
Saucede, María Cristina, Instituto Nacional de
S
Saul, Jessie E, Minnesota Partnership for
Action Against Tobacco, [email protected]
(837)
Sabol, Julie A, ORC Macro International,
Sagrestano, Lynda M, Southern Illinois
Saisuwan, Chatchanok, Chulalongkorn
(769)
Savaya, Rivka, Tel Aviv University,
Sawyer, Thomas, University of Rhode Island,
Scales, David, University of North Carolina at
Schrader, Linda B, Florida State University,
Schroeter, Daniela C, Western Michigan
(123, 324, 775, 812, 864)
Schultz, Jeffrey, University of Minnesota,
Schultz, Mike, Southern Illinois University
Edwardsville, [email protected] (307)
Schut, L James, Vanderbilt University,
Schwandt, Thomas, University of Illinois at
Urbana, [email protected] (201, 256,
294)
Schwanen, Chantal, Université du Québec à
Montréal, [email protected] (135)
Saka, Susan M, University of Hawai’i,
Scanlon, Dennis C, Penn State,
Schweigert, Francis J, Northwest Area
Foundation, [email protected] (207,
281)
Salabarría-Peña, Yamir, Centers for Disease
(760)
Schaefer-McDaniel, Nicole, ActKnowledge,
Scott, Sheryl, Scott Consulting,
Schain, Diego, Instituto Nacional de
Scott, Wakina, MayaTech Corporation,
Salazar Guajardo, Jose Angel, Technological
of Monterrey Center of Environmental
Quality, [email protected] (135)
Sale, Elizabeth, Missouri Institute of Mental
Scheffler, Marilyn L, University of Nebraska at
Lincoln, [email protected] (112)
Salt, James D, University of Delaware,
Scheirer, Mary Ann, Scheirer Consulting,
841)
Samoff, Joel, Stanford University,
Schenck, Allen, RMC Research Corporation,
Samuels, Maurice, University of Illinois at
(124, 810)
Scheyett, Anna M, University of North
Scott, Wilma, Wayne State University,
Scriven, Michael, Western Michigan
(239, 294, 324, 438, 555, 703, 864)
Seabra Alves, Maria Teresa, Universidade
Federal do Maranhão, [email protected]
(320)
Seabrook, Lucy, Ohio Department of
(343)
Sandlow, Leslie J, UIC college of Medicine,
Schieber, Beth, Ohio Tobacco Use Prevention
Sandoval, Pamela A, Indiana University
Northwest, [email protected] (113, 246,
416)
Schillo, Barbara A, Minnesota Partnership for
Action Against Tobacco,
Sechrest, Lee, University of Arizona,
759, 856)
Sandusky, Jennifer R, The Evaluation Group,
Schlangen, Rhonda, Planned Parenthood
Federation of America,
Seefeldt, F Michael, University of Illinois at
Sannié, Isabelle, Agence
intergouvernementale de la francophonie,
Sano, Hiroshi, New Energy and Industrial
Santos, Susan L, University of Medicine and
Dentistry of New Jersey,
Sasser, Diane D, Louisiana State University
AgCenter, [email protected] (135,
580)
Schmeltz, David, US Environmental Protection
Schmitt, Vicki L, University of Kansas,
Schmitz, Constance C, Professional Evaluation
Services, [email protected] (113, 254,
745)
Sears, Myrna R, University of Alberta,
Seeley, John A, Formative Evaluation Research
511, 740, 858)
Segerholm, Christina, University of Umea,
201)
Segsworth, Bob, Laurentian University,
Schneider, Stephanie, Orange County Office
of Education, [email protected] (351)
Seigart, Denise, Mansfield University,
Schnelle, Mile, Oklahoma State University,
Selby, Peter, Centre for Addiction and Mental
239
Selman, Laura, ORC Macro International,
Sherman, Joel, American Institutes for
Semansky, Rafael, Westat,
Sherman, John E, Headwaters Group
Philanthropic Services, jsherman@
headwatersgroup.com (544, 613)
Seneca, Phil, Southern Illinois University
Carbondale, [email protected] (586)
Singh, Goberdhan, Canadian International
Development Agency,
Siurana, Santamarina, Technical University of
Valencia (286)
Sherman, Sally, Mercy Connections,
Skinner, Kelly, University of Waterloo,
Sherwood, Deborah L, San Francisco
Department of Public Health,
Skinner, Mary Ellen, Alberta Human Resources
and Employment,
Seppänen-Järvelä, Riitta, National Research
and Development Centre for Welfare and
Shipman, Stephanie L, US Government
(278, 797)
Slater, Jana Kay, Public Health Institute,
Serna, Lisa, University of New Mexico School
of Medicine, [email protected] (329)
Short, Lynn, Analytic Systems Associates,
Sleezer, Catherine M, Oklahoma State
(769)
Sesso, Katie A, The Evaluation Group,
Shrestha, Anshu, University of California, Los
Angeles, [email protected]
(110)
Slenkovich, Ken, Ohio Tobacco Use Prevention
Shulha, Lyn M, Queen’s University at
Kingston, [email protected] (310,
340, 350)
Slote, Cressida, US Agency for International
SenGupta, Saumitra, New Mexico
Department of Health,
597)
Sewell, Karen M, Education Review Office,
Shadish, William R, University of California at
Merced, [email protected] (278,
315, 756)
Shamatov, Duishon A, University of Toronto,
Shannon, Susan J, Spencer Gulf Rural Health
School, [email protected]
(707)
Shulman, Lisa Ruth, International Child
Resource Institute, [email protected]
(120)
Shuman, Cynthia, Kansas State University,
Smart, Dawn Hanson, Clegg & Associates,
Smiley, Richard H, Northwest Regional
(421)
Shumer, Robert D, University of Minnesota,
Smith, Arthur, WGBH Educational
Foundation, [email protected]
(135)
Sidani, Souraya, University of Toronto,
Smith, Bryce, Centers for Disease Control and
Siddens, Stephanie K, Independent
Consultant, [email protected] (847)
Smith, Iris E, Emory University,
Siegel, Jason T, Claremont Graduate
Smith, Janet, Centers for Disease Control and
Shaukat, Rumaisa, University of Ottawa,
Sieppert, Jackie, University of Calgary,
Smith, Jay, Centers for Disease Control and
Shaw, Tanya R, Girls and Boys Town,
Sigworth, Cornelia S, National Institute of
Justice, [email protected]
(523)
Smith, Jo Ann, University of Central Florida,
Shapiro, Nancy, University System of
Maryland, [email protected] (510)
Sharrock, Guy, Catholic Relief Services,
Sharyn, Rosenberg, University of North
Shawver, Mary Nash, Fielding Graduate
(301)
Sills, Stephen J, Wayne State University,
Smith, Lee, Indiana University,
Sheldon, Jeffrey A, Claremont Graduate
university, [email protected] (135)
Silsby, Joscelyn, American Red Cross,
Smith, MaryJo O, Ypsilon Associates,
866)
Sheldon, Wendy R, Planned Parenthood
Federation of America,
Silverman, Amy B, University of Maryland,
Smith, MF, The Evaluators’ Institute,
Silverstein, Gary, Westat,
Smith, Neale, University of Alberta,
Sim, Shao-Chee, The Wallace Foundation,
Smith, Nick L, Syracuse University,
[email protected] (219, 239, 275, 350,
740)
Shen, Jianping, Western Michigan University,
Shepard, Bonnie L, Harvard School of Public
Health, [email protected]
(206)
Shepperson, Tara, University of Nevada, Reno,
240
Simmons, Ada B, Indiana University,
Simpson, Judith, Juvenile Welfare Board,
Smith, Sarah, WK Kellogg Foundation,
Smith, Schnavia J, University of Kansas,
Spitzer, Bruce, Indiana University South Bend,
Steve, Manske, University of Waterloo,
Smith, Tamara, Washington State University,
Springer, J Fred, EMT Associates,
Stevens, Rachel, University of North Carolina,
Smith, Virginia J, Branch Associates,
Sridharan, Sanjeev, University of Edinburgh,
352, 581)
Stevens, Sharon R, Arizona State University,
Smolowitz, Rachel, University of South
Smutylo, Terry, Independent Consultant,
Snow, Juna Z, University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign, [email protected] (731)
Snowball, Nancy B, Alberta Cancer Board,
Snyder, Susan, Inventive Designs for
Education and the Arts,
Sobeck, Joanne, Wayne State University,
Soberon, Luis, Pontificia Universidad Catolica
del Peru, [email protected] (459)
Stachowiak, Sarah E, Organizational Research
Services,
[email protected]
(120, 291)
Staebler Tardino, Vicki, Maritz,
Staggers, Frank, Ethnic Health Institute,
Stake, Robert E, University of Illinois at
(105, 342, 538, 563, 601, 872)
Stanton, Arlene, US Department of Health
and Human Services, arlene.stanton@
samhsa.hhs.gov (279, 317)
Stevenson, John F, University of Rhode Island,
Stevenson, Kay, Rocky Mountain Survivors
Steward, David R, Kansas State University,
Stewart, Emily C, ORC Macro International,
Stiles, J Mark, Stiles Associates,
Stillisano, Jackie, Ball State University,
Stingley, Danielle M, University of Wisconsin,
Milwaukee, [email protected] (346)
Stapleton, Gerald, UIC Dept of Medical
St Leger, Lawrence H, Deakin University,
Stark, Debra L, University of Pittsburgh,
St Leger, Pam K, University of Melbourne,
Stark, Donna, Annie E Casey Foundation,
Stockton, Denise, MayaTech Corporation,
Steedly, Kathlyn M, VSA Arts,
Stoelinga, Sara R, University of Illinois at
Steele, Edie D, Evaluation Enterprise,
Stone, Ann, The Wallace Foundation,
Steeves, Brian, Canada-Ontario Business
Service Centre, [email protected]
(208)
Stone, Vathsala I, State University of New
(288)
Sorohan, Erica, National School Boards
Association, [email protected] (226)
Steichen Asch, Paule A, IBIS International,
716)
Stoneman, Zolinda, University of Georgia,
Soukamneuth, Sengsouvanh, Social Policy
Research Associates, [email protected]
(811)
Steichen, E Marie, Kansas State University,
Socha, Marie, Centers for Disease Control
Sofiy, Natalia, Ukrainian Step by Step
Sonnefeld, L Joseph, Westat,
Sonnenfeld, Nancy, RTI International,
Son, Seokho, Korea Institute of S&T
Evaluation and Planning,
Sorenson, Eileen, Brigham Young University,
Southard, Margarida, Leon County Schools,
Spaulding, Dean, College of Saint Rose,
Speevak-Sladowski, Paula, Centre for
Voluntary Sector Research and
Spencer, Mike, University of Michigan,
Stein, Nathan, University of Rhode Island,
Steinke, Megan, Save the Children USA,
Stephens, Robert L, ORC Macro International,
Stephenson, Blair, Los Alamos National
Laboratory, [email protected] (424, 599)
Stephenson, Marylee, CS/RESORS Consulting,
Spencer, Priscilla, Formative Evaluation
Research Associates,
Stern, Elliot, Independent Consultant,
Spielberger, Julie A, University of Chicago,
Stevahn, Laurie, Seattle University,
832, 850)
Storey, Mariah J, University of Wyoming,
Stout, Sharon K, Community Well Research
St Pierre, Tena L, Penn State, [email protected]
(241)
Strebel Halpern, Carine S, University of
Central Florida, [email protected]
(539)
Streiner, David L, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric
Care, [email protected]
(743)
Streiner, David L, University of Toronto,
Streke, Andrei V, American Institutes for
Strong, Tom, University of Calgary,
241
Stuart, Warren C, University of Nevada, Las
T
Templeton Horwitz, Laura, Gay Men’s Health
Crisis, [email protected] (782)
Sturdevant Reed, Celeste, Michigan State
Takahashi, Lois M, University of California, Los
Subharwal, Manish, Management Systems
(261)
Takoko, Jay, Paewhenua Hou Partnership,
Terachi, Yasuyoshi, Hiroshima Prefectural
Education Center, [email protected] (121)
Sugerman, Sharon B, Public Health Institute,
Suikradueng, Arun, Naresuan University,
Suleski, Janet, University of South Florida,
jsuleski@[email protected] (581)
Talley, Jan A, Crittenton, [email protected] (228)
Tananis, Cynthia A, University of Pittsburgh,
Tanner, David E, California State University,
Fresno, [email protected] (311)
Teram, Eli, Laurier University, [email protected]
(798)
Tesoro, Ferdinand, Wellpoint,
Testa, Marcia A, Harvard School of Public
Tanon, Anaîs, Université de Montréal,
Thapa, Megh, Northwest Regional
Tanscheit, Ricardo, Catholic University of Rio
de Janeiro, [email protected] (208)
Theron, DesRosier, Washington State
Sullivan, Brenda A, Independent Consultant,
Tanyu, Manolya, University of Illinois at
Thomas, Charles L, George Mason University,
Sullivan, Maureen, Urban Appalachian
Council, [email protected] (763)
Tashima, Nathaniel, LTG Associates,
Thomas, Craig, Centers for Disease Control
Sundra, Demia L, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, [email protected] (345,
557, 807)
Taub, Jennifer, University of Massachusetts,
Thomas, David R, University of Auckland,
New Zealand, [email protected]
(578)
Sullins, Carolyn D, Western Michigan
(775)
Suter, Esther, Calgary Health Region,
Sutherland, Stephanie D, University of
Pittsburgh, [email protected] (510)
Sutton, Fonda, American Institutes for
Sutton, John T, RMC Research Corporation,
Swamy, Namratha, Northrop Grumman
Health Solutions,
Sweeney, Caryn A, Academy for Educational
571, 794)
Sweetman, Heidi M, University of Delaware,
Swenson, Carolyn J, Rocky Mountain
Survivors Center, [email protected]
(135)
Sy, Alhousseynou, INEADE/ Ministère de
l’Education, [email protected]
(721)
Syam, Devarati S, University of Wisconsin,
Milwaukee, [email protected] (346)
Symonette, Hazel, University of Wisconsin,
Madison, [email protected]
(212, 256, 597, 840)
Szwarcwald, Celia L, Centro de Informacao
Científica e Tecnológica,
242
Taum, Alice KH, University of Hawai’i,
Taut, Sandy M, University of California, Los
Taveras, Sam, Centers for Disease Control and
Taylor, Adrian, University of Exeter,
Taylor, Andrew R, Centre for Research and
Taylor, Dexter, Pacific Institute for Research &
Taylor, Erika, MayaTech Corporation,
Taylor-Powell, Ellen, University of Wisconsin
Taylor Ritzler, Tina, University of Illinois at
Teather, George, Independent Consultant,
787)
Thomas, Edith, US Department of Agriculture,
Thomas, Kelli, University of Kansas,
Thomas, Phyllis M, Mid-continent Research
for Education and Learning,
Thomas, Veronica G, Howard University,
Thomas Woodley, Monica B, Independent
Consultant, [email protected]
(613)
Thompson, Akecia, Oakland University,
Thompson, Lillian, University of Central
Florida, [email protected] (284)
Thomson, Joan S, Penn State,
Thornton, Bill, University of Nevada, Reno,
Thurman, Quint, Texas State University,
Tein, Jenn-Yun, Arizona State University,
Thurston, Linda P, Kansas State University,
Telleen, Sharon, University of Illinois at
Tibbetts, Katherine A, Kamehameha Schools,
Temnenko, Kseniya, Institute for Sustainable
Communities, [email protected]
(872)
Tiffany, Jennifer S, Cornell University,
Trudeau, James V, RTI International,
V
Tseng, Margaret, Westat,
Vakharia, Neville, Pew Charitable Trusts,
Tsheko, G Nnunu, University Of Botswana,
Valdez, Avelardo, University of Houston,
Tucker, Susan A, Evaluation and Development
(350, 510, 603)
Valdez Singleton, Heather, Harvard
University, heather_valdez-singleton@
ksg06.harvard.edu (863)
Tudor-Locke, Catrine, Arizona State University,
Valdez, William J, US Department of Energy,
Toledo, Carlos, Centers for Disease Control
Tuggle, Felicia J, Court Appointed Special
Advocates, [email protected]
(588)
Vandendorpe, Luc, Cabinet du Ministre
wallon de l’Economie et de l’Emploi,
Tom-Kun, Denise, Transport Canada,
Tungate, Sue, Colorado State University,
Toms, Kathleen T, Research Works,
Tung, I-Pei, McGill University, i-pei.tung@
mail.mcgill.ca (866)
Van Egeren, Laurie A, Michigan State
549, 882)
Torres, Carlos J, Peace Corps,
Turner, David R, New Zealand Ministry of
Justice, [email protected] (724)
Torres, Rosalie T, Torres Consulting Group,
Tushnet, Naida, WestEd, [email protected]
(426, 517, 814)
Torres Sibille, Ana del Carmen, Technical
University of Valencia,
Tuttle, Leslie, Wake Forest University School of
Medicine, [email protected] (110)
Tortolero, Susan, University of Texas School of
(807)
U
Tikoo, Minakshi, University of Connecticut,
403, 808)
Tippetts, Scott, Pacific Institute for Research
Tirnauer, Jill, The QED Group,
Titcomb, Allison L, LeCroy & Milligan
(355)
Todd, Christine, University of Georgia,
Tough, Suzanne C, Calgary Health Region,
[email protected]
(716)
Toussaint, Danielle, Arapahoe House,
Towle, Angela, University of British Columbia,
Townsend, Gregory M, UJIMA Community
Townsend, Maria Z, University of Pittsburgh,
Townson, Lisa L, University of New Hampshire
Cooperative Extension,
Trentacoste, Nicole, Pew Charitable Trusts,
Trevisan, Michael S, Washington State
Triska, Olive, University of Alberta,
Tristán-López, Agustín, Instituto de Evaluación
e Ingeniería Avanzada,
Trochim, William M, Cornell University,
[email protected] (115, 278, 767, 794,
849)
Uhl, Gary, Centers for Disease Control and
Uman, Gwen C, Vital Research,
Umble, Karl E, University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill, [email protected] (108,
793)
Vanek, G Todd, Washington State University,
Van Hooser, Sarah E, Vanderbilt University,
VanLandingham, Gary, Florida Office of
Program Policy Analysis and Government
Accountability,
Van Maris, Barbara, NRC Picker Group
Canada,
Van Melle, Elaine P, Queen’s University at
Kingston, [email protected] (113, 310)
Van Nuffel, Lieve, Royal Military Academy,
Varnhagen, Stanley J, University of Alberta,
Ungar, Michael, Dalhousie University,
Vasquez, Maria, University of Louisville,
Unger, Zita, Evaluation Solutions,
Vataja, Katri, National Research and
Development Centre for Welfare and
Urban, Shelley, Centre for Addiction and
(868)
Uribe-Zarain, Ximena, University of Delaware,
Urman, Harold, Vital Research,
Usiak, Douglas J, Western New York
Independent Living Center,
Vaughan, Marla, Centers for Disease Control
(827)
Vaulton, Wendy, National Center on
Family Homelessness, wendy.vaulton@
familyhomelessness.org (135)
Vaurio, Elaine L, US Government
(494, 808)
Usinger, Janet, University of Nevada, Reno,
Vellasco, Marley Maria, Catholic University of
(208)
Uyeki, Terry, Rocky Mountain Prevention
Research Center, [email protected]
(557)
Venditti, Karen, Indiana University Northwest,
243
Verdejo Carrion, Ada L, University of Puerto
Rico, Rio Piedras, [email protected]
(810)
Vidal-Uribe, Rafael, National institute for the
Evaluation of Education, rafael.vidal@
ineemexico.org (601)
Vignola-Gagné, Etienne, Science-Metrix,
etienne.gignola-gagne@
science-metrix.com (816)
Villegas, Trini M, University of Illinois at
(124)
Vinson, Cynthia, National Cancer Institute,
Viola, Judah, DePaul University,
Virtanen, Petri, Net Effect,
Wagner, Susan, University of Saskatchewan,
Waguri, Momo, Chuo University,
Wakeling, Stewart, University of Arizona,
Walker, Kristi, University of Missouri at
St Louis, [email protected] (135)
Wallace, Madeleine F, Caliber Associates Inc,
Wallio, Stephanie, University of Kansas,
Wallis, Anne B, University of Iowa,
Walrath, Christine M, ORC Macro
International, christine.m.walrath@
orcmacro.com (524)
Wasserman, Deborah, Columbus Children’s
Research Institute, wasserman.12@
osu.edu (249, 357, 417, 818)
Waters, Mary, American Cancer Society,
Watling Neal, Jennifer, University of Illinois at
Watson, Yvonne M, US Environmental
Protection Agency, watson.yvonne@
epa.gov (747)
Wattigney, Wendy A, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, wwattigney@
cdc.gov (862)
Watts, Jamie, International Plant Genetic
Resources Institute, [email protected]
(213, 257, 761)
Way, Mona, Girls and Boys Town,
Vito, Robert, US Department of Health and
Human Services, [email protected] (330)
Walser, Tamara M, Windwalker Corporation,
810, 857)
Wayne, Viv, Montgomery County Public
Voas, Robert B, Pacific Institute for Research
Walsh, Michele, University of Arizona,
Weaver, Lynda, Elizabeth Bruyere Research
Voelker, Sue, University of Arizona,
Walter, Amy, New American Schools/AIR,
Vogel, Lucie L, US Department of Health and
(214)
Weber, Kasey R, Colorado Department of
Corrections, kasey.roebken@
doc.state.co.us (135, 579)
Walters, Lynda, University of Georgia,
Vogel, Wendy M, Policy Research Associates,
Volante, Louis M, Brock University,
Volkov, Boris B, University of Minnesota,
Volkova, Elena V, University of Minnesota,
Vondal, Patricia J, The QED Group,
Vonortas, Nicholas S, George Washington
W
Wachirasakmongkol, Bunga, International
College Naresuan University,
Waddoups, Greg L, Brigham Young University,
Wade, Terrance J, Brock University,
Wagner, Caroline S, George Washington
Wagner, Eric, Florida International University,
244
Wambeam, Rodney A, University of
Wyoming, [email protected] (303, 535)
Weenink, Melissa, Ministry of Education, New
Zealand, [email protected]
(566)
Wan, Choi K, Centers for Disease Control and
Wehipeihana, N Nan, Research Evaluation
Consultancy Ltd, [email protected]
(460, 594, 884)
Wandera, Augustine, Management Systems
(251)
Weir, Charles H, Centers for Disease Control
Wandersman, Abraham, University of South
Carolina, [email protected] (135, 239,
745)
Wang, Hong, Queen’s University,
Wannasutee, Nuanphan, Naresuan University,
Wanner, Diane K, Northwest Area
Ward Hood, Denice, Northern Arizona
375)
Warfield, Charles, Western Michigan
(583)
Warrack, Barry, Workers Compensation Board
of Manitoba, [email protected] (276)
Wasburn, Mara H, Purdue University,
Weiss, Carol H, Harvard University,
Welber, Lindsay, Emc.Arts,
Wenderoth, Anette, Universalia Management
Group, [email protected]
(225)
Wennberg, Mikko K, Net Effect,
Wenzel, Stacy A, University of Illinois at
Westley, Frances, University of Wisconsin,
Madison, [email protected] (739)
Westman, Suzanne, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention,
Whalen, Samuel P, University of Illinois at
Whaley, Arthur L, Hogg Foundation for
(243)
Wheeler, Andrew M, Southern Illinois
University Carbondale, bramwabull@
hotmail.com (302)
White, Elizabeth M, World Bank,
White, Jeffry L, The Ohio State University,
White, J Patrick, Idaho Department of
Williams, Jason, RTI International,
Witt, Sandra, Alameda County Public Health
Department, [email protected] (289)
Williams, Jason, University of Alaska
Wolf, Amanda M, Victoria University of
Wellington, [email protected]
(724)
Williams, Jennifer E, Association for the Study
and Development of Community,
285, 370, 375, 578)
White, Rebecca E, Louisiana State University,
Williams, Melissa R, University of North
Carolina at Greensboro, mwilliam@
serve.org (135, 273)
Whitmore, Elizabeth, Carleton University,
341, 597)
Williamson, Susan, Southeast Regional
Resource Center, [email protected]
(774)
Whitsett, Maria, Austin Independent School
(125)
Will, Julie, Centers for Disease Control and
Wholey, Joseph, University of Southern
California, [email protected] (815)
Wichman, Kris, University of Toronto,
Widmer, Thomas, University of Zurich,
Wigfall, Pat, North Carolina Central
Willis, Elizabeth, Windwalker Corporation,
Willmann, Werner W, Universitat Mannheim,
Wilson, Bruce, Independent Researcher/
Evaluator, [email protected]
(801)
Wilson, Doug, University of Alberta,
Wilce, Maureen A, Centers for Disease
(119)
Wingate, Lori A, Western Michigan University,
Willard, Alice, American Red Cross,
Winkelbauer, Sandra, Ontario Pharmacists’
Association, swinkelbauer@
ontpharmacists.on.ca (135)
Willard, Kristen, Public Broadcasting Service,
Willems, Gwen M, University of Minnesota,
Willett, Jeffrey G, Ohio Tobacco Use
Winkler, Amber, Westat,
Winsch, Beverly J, Jefferson County Public
(805)
Wolfe, Gosia, American International Health
Alliance, [email protected] (716)
Wolfson, Mark, Wake Forest University School
of Medicine, [email protected]
(110)
Wong, Stephen, Regional Psychiatric Centre
(Prairies), [email protected] (135)
Wongwanich, Suwimon, Chulalongkorn
(340, 769)
Wood, Thomas, Federal Aviation
Administration, [email protected]
(769)
Woods, Nathan D, Welch Consulting,
Woodward, Christel A, McMaster University,
Wormith, J Stephen, University of
(135)
Wortley, Pascale M, Centers for Disease
(234)
Worzala, Mary E, Academy for Educational
Wright-DeAgüero, Linda, Centers for Disease
(234, 827)
Wright, Wilma N, University of Belize,
Winston, Carla A, Centers for Disease Control
Wrobbel, E Duff, Southern Illinois University
Edwardsville, [email protected] (273,
307)
Winston, Pam, Urban Institute,
pwinstoni.urban.org (209)
Wu, Chun-ping, Syracuse University,
Wint, Eleanor, UNBC (461)
Wintz, Gregory S, Eastern Washington
Wygant, Barbara, Western Michigan
(265)
Williams, Bob, Independent consultant,
[email protected] (244, 319, 474, 794)
Wirchenko, Tonya, University of
(254)
Wynnycky, Bohdan, Ontario Ministry of
Municipal Affairs and Housing,
Williams, Cynthia B, United Nations,
Wisdom, Gayle A, Westat,
Wyrick, David, Tanglewood Research,
Williams, David D, Brigham Young University,
Witta, E Lea, University of Central Florida,
Williams, Diane, Independent Consultant,
Witt, Francione, University of Rhode Island
(316)
Williams, Alison M, University of Nevada, Las
Williams, Andrea, Center for Creative
(110, 206)
Williams, Barbara, Westat,
245
X
Yost, Jan, The Health Foundation of Central
Massachusetts, [email protected] (745)
Xenopoulos, Mariette A, McGill University,
Young, Andrea C, Centers for Disease Control
Xie, Donghai, Western Michigan University,
Young, Bridget, Centers for Disease Control
Y
Yakah, Jemima, Texas A&M University,
Yancey, Briana, University of Washington,
Young, Don, Ministry of Education,
Young, Gail, Transport Canada,
Young, Kai, Centers for Disease Control and
Zhang, Wenmin, University of North Carolina
at Greensboro,
Zhang, Zhicheng, Fairfax County Public
Schools, [email protected] (311, 804)
Zhong, Hong, Western Michigan University,
Zhou, George G, University of Alberta,
Zhou, Mei, Georgia State University,
Zia, Heidi S, The World Bank,
Yañez, Darlene, University of Texas at Austin,
Yu, Hanh Cao, Social Policy Research
269)
Yang, Huilan, WK Kellogg Foundation,
[email protected] (243, 281, 357, 583)
Yue, So Kuen, Emory University,
Zimmer, Terese, Brown University,
Yanowitz, Karen L, Arkansas State University,
Yule, Zelda, Goss Gilroy Inc, [email protected]
(786)
Yarbrough, Donald, University of Iowa,
Yumitori, Shuji, New Energy and Industrial
Zimmerman, Brenda, School of Business York
University Toronto, bzimmerman@
schulich.yorku.ca (739)
Yarnall, Louise G, SRI International,
Yates, Brian T, American University,
317, 353, 729, 742)
Yedong, Tao, University of Central Florida,
Yee, Patricia A (Pat), Vital Research,
Yee, Sue Lin, Centers for Disease Control and
Yellowthunder, Lois, Hennepin County,
[email protected]
(207)
Zimmerman, Jennifer C, Children Inc,
Yuval, Linda N, University of Guelph,
Zimmerman, Julie, US Environmental
Protection Agency,
Z
Zorn, Debbie, University of Cincinnati,
Zander-Cotugno, Megan, RAND Corporation,
Zorzi, Rochelle, Cathexis Consulting,
Zantal-Wiener, Kathy, Caliber Associates Inc,
Zuckerman, Brian L, Center for Science and
Technology Policy Studies,
Zarza, Maria, Behavioral Assessment,
Zedlewski, Edwin W, US Department of
Justice, [email protected] (111)
Yelton, Bruce, Praxis Research Inc/Winthrop
Zelaya, Raul, International Development
Yessis, Jennifer L, NRC Picker Group Canada,
Zeller, Pamela J, Western Michigan University,
Yglesias, Elmer, US Civilian Research &
Development Foundation,
Zempolich, Kristin, Northrop Grumman
Health Solutions,
Yoon, Soo-Jin, The Colorado Trust,
476)
Zhang, Jie, Syracuse University,
246
Ziazi, Zora, University of Indianapolis,
Zukoski, Ann P, Oregon State University,
Zuliani, Ivana, Brown University,
Zvoch, Keith, University of Nevada, Las Vegas,
Zvonnikov, Viktor Ivanovich, State University
of Management, [email protected]
(236, 530
Wednesday, 4:30 pm – 6:00 pm /
Le mercredi, 16h30 – 18h00
Thursday, 9:25 am – 10:55 am /
Le jeudi, 9h25 – 10h55
Thursday, 11:05 am – 12:35 pm /
Le jeudi, 11h05 – 12h35
Thursday, 1:40 pm – 3:10 pm /
Le jeudi, 13h40 – 15h10
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
Le jeudi, 17h00 – 18h00
Friday, 9:25 am – 10:10 am /
Friday, 10:20 am – 11:05 am /
Friday, 11:15 am – 12:00 pm /
Friday, 1:55 pm – 3:25 pm /
Friday, 3:35 pm – 4:20 pm /
Friday, 4:30 pm – 6:00 pm /
Friday, 4:30 pm – 6:00 pm /
Saturday, 9:35 am – 10:20 am /
Le samedi, 9h35 – 10h20
Saturday, 12:10 pm – 1:40 pm /
204
232
241
279
316
352
403
439
475
512
547
581
610
734
778
808
815
852
868
Time / Heure
104
Session /
Séance
MultiPaper /
Présentations diverses
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Demonstration /
Démonstration
MultiPaper /
Demonstration /
Démonstration
Panel / Panel
Demonstration /
Démonstration
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Business Meeting /
Séance administrative
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Type / Type de session
Better Practices: Lessons Learned in Applying an Emerging Model to
Evidence-Based Practice in Population Health
Evaluating State/Provinces and Community Programs for Substance Use
and Impaired Driving
Evaluability Assessment: A Re-emergence?
Evaluation in the Public Sector and Use of Report Cards
Approaches to Gathering Information on Sensitive Issues
Evaluating Tobacco Control Initiatives
An Indigenous Self Assessment Tool: The Waitangi Wheel
Stakeholder Involvement in Evaluations of Mental Health Services
Using a Scorecard Evaluation Process to Evaluate Abstinence Education
Programs
Asking Dicey Questions: Assessing Sexual Risk Behaviors Among
People of Color
Culturally Competent Mental Health Evaluation Issues
Multi-Site Evaluation of the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention’s
Mentoring-Family Strengthening Initiative
Partnerships, Leadership and Accountability
Alcohol, Drug Abuse and Mental Health TIG Business Meeting and
Presentation: Moving Adolescent Substance Abuse Treatment Toward
Evidence-Based Practice
Measuring Environmental Strategies for Substance Abuse Prevention
Evaluating Innovative Initiatives for Treating Substance Use and
Mental Health Problems
Challenges in Evaluation of Substance Use Programs in School Settings
Maps, Models and Frameworks in Evaluation of ADAMH Programs
The Interplay Between Evaluation and Evidence-Based Practices
Negotiating Borders: Linking Across Sites and Levels
in Prevention Evaluation
Title / Titre de la session
Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health TIG / L’alcoolisme, la toxicomanie et la santé mentale
Primary Session Sponsor / Parrain de la session primaire :
Dominion Ballroom South
V.I.P
V.I.P
Gold Rush
V.I.P
Gold Rush
Gingersnap
V.I.P
V.I.P
V.I.P
V.I.P
V.I.P
V.I.P
V.I.P
V.I.P
V.I.P
V.I.P
Executive
V.I.P
Oxford
Location / Endroit
2005 JOINT CES/AEA CONFERENCE • CONGRÉS 2005 DE LA SCÉ ET L’AEA
Crossing Borders, Crossing Boundaries • Franchir les frontiéres, repousser les limites
Appendix B: Directory of Sessions by Sponsor /
Annexe B : Répertoire des sessions, par parrain
247
248
Thursday, 11:05 am – 12:35 pm /
Le jeudi, 11h05 – 12h35
Le jeudi, 13h40 – 15h10
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
Le jeudi, 17h00 – 18h00
Friday, 9:25 am – 10:10 am /
Friday, 10:20 am – 11:05 am /
Friday, 11:15 am – 12:00 pm /
Friday, 1:55 pm – 3:25 pm /
Friday, 3:35 pm – 4:20 pm /
Friday, 4:30 pm – 6:00 pm /
Saturday, 10:30 am – 12:00 pm /
217
254
292
329
362
416
452
488
525
560
594
717
754
791
828
865
Time / Heure
113
Session /
Séance
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Demonstration /
Démonstration
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Demonstration /
Démonstration
MultiPaper /
Business Meeting(m) /
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Methodological Dimensions
Emerging Dimensions in Higher Education Applications:
E Portfolios, Technology and Learning
Higher Education Perspectives: The Practice in Development
Higher Education Assessment at the Program Level:
Department Applications
Creating Integrated Outcomes Assessment in Higher Education
Minority Achievement and Evaluation Challenges in Higher Education:
Part II
Minority Achievement and Evaluation Challenges in Higher Education:
Part I
The Impact of Higher Education Evaluation in Evolving Educational
Practices: Part II
The Challenge of Evaluating a Multidisciplinary, Mandatory Course for
First-Year College Students
Expanding Assessment and Evaluation Capacity in Higher Education:
The Instructional Technology Assessment Repository
The Impact of Higher Education Evaluation in Evolving Educational
Practices: Part I
Assessment in Higher Education TIG Business Meeting and Presentations:
Reconstructing Assessment and Evaluation Models in Higher Education
– Lessons from Medical Education
Assessment and Evaluation in Medical Education
Understanding University Internal Review Boards: Multiple Perspectives
on Strategies for Surviving and Learning From the Review Process
Higher Education Assessment at the Program Level:
General Frameworks
Re-Thinking Higher Education Applications:
Other Countries, Other Contexts
Developing Conceptual Frameworks
Assessment in Higher Education TIG / L’évaluation dans les études supérieures
Conference Room F
Conference Room F
Conference Room F
Conference Room F
Conference Room F
Conference Room F
Conference Room F
Conference Room F
Conference Room F
Conference Room F
Conference Room F
Conference Room F
Conference Room F
Conference Room F
Conference Room F
Conference Room F
Conference Room F
Location / Endroit
Le jeudi, 17h00 – 18h00
Friday, 9:25 am – 10:10 am /
Friday, 3:35 pm – 4:20 pm /
367
424
555
725
836
873
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Demonstration /
Démonstration
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
Business Meeting /
MultiPaper /
Thursday, 11:05 am – 12:35 pm /
Le jeudi, 11h05 – 12h35
Le jeudi, 13h40 – 15h10
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
Friday, 9:25 am – 10:10 am /
Friday, 10:20 am – 11:05 am /
Friday, 11:15 am – 12:00 pm /
229
257
296
333
419
455
492
Time / Heure
117
Session /
Séance
MultiPaper /
Expert Lecture /
Exposé d’expert
Fireside Chat /
Causerie du coin du feu
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Expert Lecture /
Exposé d’expert
Time / Heure
108
Session /
Séance
L’évaluation en milieu communautaire : approches novatrices à
l’évaluation participative / Evaluation in a community setting:
innovative approaches to participatory evaluation
Building Performance Management Systems for Reporting Real Results:
The Ontario Public Service Experience
Fireside chat with Roberta Jamieson
Celebrating 20 Years of Dissemination:
Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation
Célébrant 20 années de dissémination :
La Revue canadienne d’évaluation de programme
Program Evaluation and Performance Measurement:
Why Is the Boundary So Hard to Cross? /
L’évaluation de programme et la mesure du rendement :
pourquoi la frontière est-elle si difficile à franchir?
International Perspectives on Evaluating Capacity Development:
An Exploration of Theoretical and Practical Issues
Issues of Participant Protection and Data Security Under
Post-9/11 Legislation
Canadian Evaluators and Their Work: Results of a Survey /
Les évaluateurs canadiens et leur travail : résultats d’un sondage
Evaluating Training
Online 360-Degree Feedback: On Target?
The Evaluative Mind: How Top-Notch Organizations Leverage It to Excel
Evaluation and Human Resources
Business and Industry TIG Business Meeting
Evaluating Leadership Development Initiatives in Organizations
City Hall
City Hall
City Hall
Civic Ballroom North
City Hall
Location / Endroit
Huron
Huron
Huron
Essex Ballroom
Huron
Huron
Essex Ballroom
Location / Endroit
249
250
Friday, 3:35 pm – 4:20 pm /
Friday, 4:30 pm – 6:00 pm /
Saturday, 10:30 am – 12:00 pm /
564
598
720
758
795
832
869
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Fireside Chat /
Causerie du coin du feu
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Thursday, 11:05 am – 12:35 pm /
Le jeudi, 11h05 – 12h35
Le jeudi, 13h40 – 15h10
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
Friday, 7:00 am – 7:50 am /
253
291
328
399
Time / Heure
216
Session /
Séance
Business Meeting /
Panel / Panel
Skill-building Workshop /
Atelier de formation
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
City Hall
Location / Endroit
continued / suite
Building System-Wide Evaluation Capacity Through Graduate Evaluation
Evaluation Training: The Case of the Government of the
Northwest Territories in Canada
Using Evaluator Competencies for Professional Development and
Quality Assurance
From Project to Program Evaluation:
From Single Agency to Joint Evaluations
Développer et maintenir la capacité d’évaluation :
Quelles leçons peut-on tirer d’expériences internationales? /
Developing and Maintaining the Capacity of Evaluation:
What Lessons Can Be Learned From International Experiences?
Fireside chat with Lieutenant-General (Retired) Roméo Dallaire
Issues and Challenges in Evaluation Capacity Building in Canada
and Beyond / Questions et défis liés au renforcement des capacités
d’évaluation au Canada et ailleurs
Cluster, Multisite and Multilevel Evaluation TIG business Meeting
Findings From the Safe Schools/Healthy Students Cross-Site Evaluation:
Partnerships, Prevention Interventions, School Violence and Safety,
and School Climate
Practical Tips: Many Sites, Many Cultures, Many Methods
Practical Tips: Many Sites, Many Cultures, Many Methods
Training, Communication, Quality, and Buy-In:
Critical Issues in Two Models of Site Management
Multisite Evaluations & Social Services
Conference Room E
Conference Room E
Conference Room E
Conference Room E
Conference Room E
Location / Endroit
City Hall
City Hall
City Hall
City Hall
City Hall
L’impact des frontières culturelles et linguistiques sur l’évaluation :
City Hall
diagnostics et stratégies pour accroitre les échanges interlinguistiques et
interculturels sur le plan des connaissances, des compétences et des
pratiques en évaluation / The Impact of Cultural and Linguistic Boundaries
on Evaluation: Diagnoses and Strategies for Increasing Interlinguistic and
Intercultural Exchanges of Evaluation Knowledge, Competencies and Practices
Incorporating Indigenous Knowledge into Practice /
Intégrer les connaissances autochtones à la pratique
Cluster, Multi-site and Multi-level Evaluation TIG / Évaluations en grappes, multisites et multiniveaux
Friday, 1:55 pm – 3:25 pm /
Time / Heure
529
Session /
Séance
Friday, 9:25 am – 10:10 am /
Friday, 10:20 am – 11:05 am /
Friday, 10:20 am – 11:05 am /
Friday, 11:15 am – 12:00 pm /
Friday, 11:15 am – 12:00 pm /
Friday, 1:55 pm – 3:25 pm /
Friday, 1:55 pm – 3:25 pm /
Friday, 3:35 pm – 4:20 pm /
Friday, 3:35 pm – 4:20 pm /
Friday, 3:35 pm – 4:20 pm /
Friday, 4:30 pm – 6:00 pm /
447
451
483
487
520
524
550
559
563
593
707
716
790
827
864
882
Time / Heure
406
Session /
Séance
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
Expert Lecture /
Exposé d’expert
MultiPaper /
Think Tank /
Cellule de réflexion
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Identifying Evaluative Criteria in the Multi-Site Context: Topical,
Longitudinal, and Conceptual Approaches From the Evaluation of the
National Science Foundation’s Advanced Technology Education Program
Developing and Implementing a National Framework for Monitoring and
Evaluating HIV Prevention Programs
Building Natural Laboratories for Research Efficiency: A Process Evaluation
Overarching Perspectives
Qualitative Approaches
Lessons From the Field: Use of Logic Models at Three Multi-Site Evaluations
Multicase Methods and Generalization
Advantages of Participatory Models
Challenges in the Evaluation of the Smaller Learning Communities in
Clark County High Schools
Multi-Site Evaluation of Federal Programs: A Panel Discussion on the
Selection of Research Methods and the Roles of Evaluators in
Community-Participatory Research
The Boundaries and Bridges of Cluster, Initiative, and Multi-Site Evaluation:
Part II
State of the States in Evaluation
The Boundaries and Bridges of Cluster, Initiative, and Multi-Site Evaluation:
Part I
Multi-Site Evaluation of a School-Based Internet Safety Curriculum
Emerging Models
Quantitative Approaches
Cluster, Multi-site and Multi-level Evaluation TIG / Évaluations en grappes, multisites et multiniveaux
Gold Rush
Conference Room E
Conference Room E
Conference Room E
Conference Room E
Norfolk
Conference Room E
Conference Room E
Norfolk
Conference Room E
Essex Ballroom
Conference Room E
Essex Ballroom
Conference Room E
Essex Ballroom
Norfolk
Location / Endroit
continued / suite
251
252
Friday, 10:20 am – 11:05 am /
Friday, 11:15 am – 12:00 pm /
Friday, 11:15 am – 12:00 pm /
Friday, 1:55 pm – 3:25 pm /
Friday, 1:55 pm – 3:25 pm /
500
504
539
541
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
340
468
Le jeudi, 13h40 – 15h10
308
Friday, 9:25 am – 10:10 am /
Le jeudi, 13h40 – 15h10
303
432
Thursday, 11:05 am – 12:35 pm /
Le jeudi, 11h05 – 12h35
270
Friday, 9:25 am – 10:10 am /
Thursday, 11:05 am – 12:35 pm /
Le jeudi, 11h05 – 12h35
265
427
Thursday, 11:05 am – 12:35 pm /
Le jeudi, 11h05 – 12h35
239
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
233
346
228
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
129
345
Time / Heure
107
Session /
Séance
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
Expert Lecture /
Exposé d’expert
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Think Tank /
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Think Tank /
MultiPaper /
Developing an Evaluation Toolkit: Assessing K-12 Classroom
Presentations in Collaboration With Title VI Funded K-12 International
Education Outreach Programs
New Academic Approaches to Evaluation Capacity Building
Building Science-Based Evaluation Competencies:
Perspectives on and Experiences With Multi-Level Evaluation
Evaluation Systems for Collaborative Programs
From Cultural Competence to Cultural Comfort:
It’s Not Just About Ethnicity!
Evaluation Programs Serving Disadvantaged Clientele
Cultivating Partnerships in Evaluation
A Participatory Self-Assessment Approach to Evaluating After-School
Programs
Engaging Diverse Stakeholders in Large-Scale Participatory Evaluation
Using Empowerment and Participatory Strategies to Evaluate Learning
and Promote Classroom Dialogue
Experiences and Challenges in Mixed-Method Participatory Evaluation
Building Evaluation Capacity in a Rural or Frontier Setting
Collaborating Meaningfully Across Cultures
Tools of the Trade: From Logic Models to Evaluation Reports
Empowerment Evaluation and Traditional Evaluation: 10 Years Later
Internationalizing the Techniques and Culture of Participatory Evaluation
Engaging Youth in Empowerment Evaluation
Let’s Talk Collaborative Evaluation
Successfully Embedding Participatory Evaluation Into Enhancing Evaluation
Capacity
Collaborative, Participatory & Empowerment Evaluation TIG / Évaluations participatives et habilitantes
Gingersnap
Cosmopolitan
Gingersnap
Gingersnap
Gingersnap
Dufferin
Gold Rush
Gingersnap
Dufferin
Gingersnap
Dufferin
Gingersnap
Dufferin
Grand Ballroom Centre
Gingersnap
Dufferin
Gingersnap
Windsor Room West
Location / Endroit
Friday, 4:30 pm – 6:00 pm /
Saturday, 10:30 am – 12:00 pm /
Saturday, 10:30 am – 12:00 pm /
733
766
770
803
807
840
844
867
877
881
Panel / Panel
Think Tank /
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
Business Meeting /
Démonstration
606
Demonstration /
Friday, 3:35 pm – 4:20 pm /
576
MultiPaper /
Friday, 3:35 pm – 4:20 pm /
Time / Heure
571
Session /
Séance
A Collaborative Action Inquiry Approach to Program Evaluation:
Crossing Borders Between Community Based Agencies,
Universities, and Funding Sources
Drawing the Line: Participatory Evaluation Research With Young People
The Principles of Empowerment Evaluation: An International Perspective
Evaluation as a Community Building and Learning Tool for
Arab-American Communities
Crossing Boundaries: Bridging Evaluation and Appreciative Inquiry
Developing and Implementing Evaluation Plans for Academic-Community
Research Centers: Building Partnerships, Capacity, Trust, and Models
for Center Assessment
Evaluation and Anthropology: An Idea Whose Time Has Come (Part II)
Collaborative Evaluation Strategies in Different Program Settings:
Promoting College Access, Increasing School Readiness, and Preventing
Substance Abuse in High School
Evaluation and Anthropology: An Idea Whose Time Has Come (Part I)
Collaborative and Participatory Data Analysis
Collaborative, Participatory and Empowerment TIG Business Meeting
Educational Strategy to Change Human Behavior
Crossing Educational Boundaries: Including Evaluation as an Essential
Evaluating Community Development Initiatives
Collaborative, Participatory & Empowerment Evaluation TIG / Évaluations participatives et habilitantes
Gingersnap
Dominion Ballroom North
Gingersnap
Gingersnap
Gingersnap
Gingersnap
Gingersnap
Dufferin
Location / Endroit
continued / suite
253
254
Thursday, 11:05 am – 12:35 pm /
Le jeudi, 11h05 – 12h35
Friday, 9:25 am – 10:10 am /
Friday, 10:20 am – 11:05 am /
Friday, 11:15 am – 12:00 pm /
258
420
456
491
721
Time / Heure
221
Session /
Séance
Demonstration /
Démonstration
Demonstration /
Démonstration
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
Dix ans d’expérience d’évaluation au Sénégal:Cibles,Matières et
Méthodologie / Ten Years of Evaluation Experience in Senegal:
Goals, Subjects and Methodology
Expérience tunisienne en matière du suivi/évaluation des opérateurs de
formation / Tunisian Experience in Follow-up/Evaluation of
Training Organizations
Les impacts des évaluations externes et des évaluations internes des
programmes de gouvernement / The Impact of External and Internal
Evaluations of Government Programs
La culture de l’évaluation : méthodes diverses et partenariats /
The Culture of Evaluation: Diverse Methods and Partnerships
La Stratégie d’intervention agir autrement pour la réussite scolaire des
adolescents québécois de milieux défavorisés : Description et résultats
préliminaires du programme d’évaluation longitudinal /
The New Approaches, New Solutions Intervention Strategy Fostering
Academic Success for Québec Adolescents in Disadvantaged Areas:
Description and Preliminary Results of the Longitudinal Evaluation Program
Fondements de la discipline de l’évaluation :
défis et pratiques en santé et des interventions communautaires /
The Basics of the Discipline of Evaluation:
Challenges and Practices in Healthcare and Community Interventions
Comité d’examen francophone / Comité d’examen francophone
City Hall
City Hall
City Hall
City Hall
City Hall
Location / Endroit
Le mercredi, 18h30 à 20h00
Thursday, 11:05 am – 12:35 pm /
Le jeudi, 11h05 – 12h35
Le jeudi, 13h40 – 15h10
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
Friday, 9:25 am – 10:10 am /
Friday, 10:20 am – 11:05 am /
Friday, 11:15 am – 12:00 pm /
Friday, 1:55 pm – 3:25 pm /
Friday, 3:35 pm – 4:20 pm /
Friday, 3:35 pm – 4:20 pm /
Friday, 4:30 pm – 6:00 pm /
Saturday, 10:30 am – 12:00 pm /
236
273
311
348
435
471
507
544
561
579
613
709
736
773
810
841
847
884
Time / Heure
135
Session /
Séance
Roundtables /
Tables rondes
Roundtables /
Tables rondes
Roundtables /
Tables rondes
Roundtables /
Tables rondes
Roundtables /
Tables rondes
Demonstration /
Démonstration
Roundtables /
Tables rondes
Roundtables /
Tables rondes
Think Tank /
Roundtables /
Tables rondes
Roundtables /
Tables rondes
Roundtables /
Tables rondes
Roundtables /
Tables rondes
Roundtables /
Tables rondes
Roundtables /
Tables rondes
Roundtables /
Tables rondes
Roundtables /
Tables rondes
Poster / Affiches
Roundtable Set Fifteen
Improving Methods to Evaluate Program Sustainability
Roundtable Set Thirteen
Roundtable Set Twelve
Roundtable Set Eleven
Using SPSS and GB-Stat
Roundtable Set Ten
Roundtable Set Nine
Raising the Benchmarks for Evaluation
Roundtable Set Eight
Roundtable Set Seven
Roundtable Set Six
Roundtable Set Five
Roundtable Set Four
Roundtable Set Three
Roundtable Set Two
Roundtable Set One
Reception, Posters, Information Tables and Meet the Authors
Réception, présentations par affiches, tables d’information et rencontre
avec les auteurs
Spring Song/Spindrift
Civic Ballroom South
Carleton
Conference Room G
Grand Ballroom East
Location / Endroit
255
256
Thursday, 11:05 am – 12:35 pm /
Le jeudi, 11h05 – 12h35
Le jeudi, 13h40 – 15h10
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
Le jeudi, 17h00 – 18h00
Friday, 9:25 am – 10:10 am /
Saturday, 10:30 am – 12:00 pm /
242
280
317
353
404
729
742
779
Time / Heure
205
Session /
Séance
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
Demonstration /
Démonstration
Business Meeting /
MultiPaper /
Demonstration /
Démonstration
Panel / Panel
The Cost Effectiveness of Using the Web to Survey Various Populations
in Education
Models and Methods: Costs and Benefits in Public and Private Sectors
Costs, Outcomes, Economics, and Health Services
A Comparison of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses Across Three Industries
Costs, Effectiveness, Benefits, and Economics TIG Business Meeting
and Presentation: Tell Us About Your Cost Study! Creating a Resource
Database for Evaluators Measuring Costs as Well as Outcomes
Tricks of the Trade for Conducting Cost-Inclusive Analyses
and for Deciding Not to
Doing Cost –> Procedure –> Process –> Outcome Analysis:
Cost Analysis to Improve Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Benefit
So You’re Doing a Cost Study:
Options for Evaluating Costs, Benefits, Cost-Effectiveness, and Cost-Benefit
Pricing Human Health and Welfare
Costs, Effectiveness, Benefits, and Economics TIG / Coûts, efficacité, avantages et aspects économiques
York
York
York
York
York
York
York
York
Location / Endroit
Le jeudi, 13h40 – 15h10
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
Le jeudi, 17h00 – 18h00
Friday, 1:55 pm – 3:25 pm /
Friday, 4:30 pm – 6:00 pm /
Saturday, 10:30 am – 12:00 pm /
290
327
360
523
592
752
789
826
863
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
Think Tank /
Panel / Panel
Business Meeting /
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
Responding to Crime in Indian Country: Evaluation Results
Developing Innovative Methodologies for Evaluating
Emergency Response and Crisis Management Programs
Process and Outcome Issues Associated With Adult and
Juvenile Offender Populations
Building Capacity of a National Initiative for Children Exposed to
Violence Through Evaluation
Is It possible to Successfully Evaluate the Effectiveness of
Comprehensive Community Initiatives (CCIs)?
Evaluating a Short-Term Residential Program for Girls
Crime and Justice TIG Business Meeting
Meeting Contemporary Challenges in Evaluation Of Interventions
in Canadian Federal Correctional Programs
Client-Centered Criminal Justice and Public Safety:
Meeting Needs and Improving Services
Costs and Benefits of Criminal Justice Programs:
Recent Applications to Program Evaluations
Le jeudi, 17h00 – 18h00
Friday, 9:25 am – 10:10 am /
Friday, 4:30 pm – 6:00 pm /
411
595
829
866
Time / Heure
363
Session /
Séance
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Demonstration /
Démonstration
Business Meeting /
Technology Competence: Needs and Measures
Course Management Systems and Other Case Studies
Methodologies Developed for the Evaluation of Distance and
Other Educational Technologies
Putting the Byte in Data Collection: Strategies for Using Technology
to Collect Data
Distance Education and Other Educational Technologies TIG
Business Meeting
Distance Ed. & Other Educational Technologies TIG / Éducation à distance et autres technologies éducatives
Time / Heure
111
Session /
Séance
Conference Room G
Conference Room G
Conference Room G
Essex Ballroom
Conference Room G
Location / Endroit
Conference Room D
Conference Room D
Conference Room D
Conference Room D
Conference Room D
Conference Room D
Conference Room D
Conference Room D
Conference Room D
Conference Room D
Location / Endroit
257
258
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
Le jeudi, 17h00 – 18h00
Friday, 10:20 am – 11:05 am /
Saturday, 10:30 am – 12:00 pm /
322
355
445
747
853
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Demonstration /
Démonstration
Business Meeting /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Extending Organization Capability to Evaluate Federal Environmental
Research Programs
Partnerships in Environmental Program Evaluation
Fractal Logic Modeling: A Modular Participatory Technique for
Modeling Complex Programs
Environmental Program Evaluation TIG Business Meeting
Community and Social Psychology Applications in
Environmental Program Evaluation
International Innovations in Environmental Program Evaluation
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
Le jeudi, 17h00 – 18h00
Friday, 9:25 am – 10:10 am /
Friday, 10:20 am – 11:05 am /
Friday, 11:15 am – 12:00 pm /
Friday, 1:55 pm – 3:25 pm /
Saturday, 10:30 am – 12:00 pm /
369
426
462
498
535
727
764
801
Time / Heure
339
Session /
Séance
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Think Tank /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Think Tank /
Business Meeting /
Panel / Panel
Program Creation/Administration and Evaluation:
Moving Toward the Goal of Evaluation as Welcomed Participant Observer
– Creating a Conceptual Model for Cohabitation
Evaluation of a Standards Based Arts in Education Program for Youth
Keys to Successful Client Partnerships in Arts and Culture Evaluations
What Makes Evaluating the Arts and Culture Unique?
Research and Evaluation in Arts Organizations
Empowerment and Participatory Evaluation of Teaching Artists
and Arts Curricula
Arts Evaluation for Art’s Sake: Bridging the Gap Between
Arts Organizations and Evaluators
Evaluating the Arts and Culture TIG Business Meeting
Evaluation and Research in Foundations:
Models and Issues for the Arts, Culture, and Beyond
Evaluating the Arts and Culture TIG / Évaluation des arts et de la culture
Le jeudi, 13h40 – 15h10
Time / Heure
286
Session /
Séance
Environmental Program Evaluation TIG / Évaluation des programmes environnementaux
Simcoe
Simcoe
Simcoe
Simcoe
Simcoe
Simcoe
Simcoe
Simcoe
Simcoe
Location / Endroit
York
Windsor Room East
Windsor Room East
Windsor Room East
Windsor Room East
Windsor Room West
Location / Endroit
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
Time / Heure
Business Meeting(p) /
Thursday, 11:05 am – 12:35 pm /
Le jeudi, 11h05 – 12h35
Le jeudi, 13h40 – 15h10
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
Le jeudi, 17h00 – 18h00
Friday, 9:25 am – 10:10 am /
Friday, 10:20 am – 11:05 am /
Friday, 11:15 am – 12:00 pm /
Friday, 1:55 pm – 3:25 pm /
Friday, 3:35 pm – 4:20 pm /
Friday, 4:30 pm – 6:00 pm /
Saturday, 10:30 am – 12:00 pm /
263
301
313
350
401
437
473
510
546
603
726
763
800
837
849
Time / Heure
226
Session /
Séance
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
Demonstration /
Démonstration
MultiPaper /
Think Tank /
Business Meeting /
Think Tank /
Demonstration /
Démonstration
330
Session /
Séance
After the Concept Map: Applications of the Emergent Conceptual
Framework for Planning, Action, and Evaluation
Process and Product: Collaborative Utilization-Focused Evaluation
of a Multicomponent Tobacco Cessation Program
Developing a New Class of Evaluation Artifacts to Promote Use
Building Evaluation Capacity: Strategies for Gathering Resources,
Establishing Context, Organizing Inputs, and Involving Stakeholders
Communicating Evaluation Results in Health Organisations
Using and Disseminating Evaluation Results for Program, Organizational,
and Policy Enhancement
Effective Evaluator-Client Negotiation in Contracted Evaluation
Methods for Using Evaluation to Build Organizational Learning,
Networking and Capacity
Demonstration of the Feedback Panel as a Quick Turn-Around
Formative Evaluation Tool
Strategies for Customizing Evaluation Reports to Increase Use
Relationship Between Involvement and Use/Influence in
Large Multi-Site Evaluations
Evaluation Use TIG Business Meeting and Think Tank:
How Important Is the Issue of Use in Evaluation Today?
If You Build It, Will It Last? Insourcing:
An Alternative Approach to Capacity Building
Motivation and Change Dynamics:
Core Organization Development Skills for Evaluators
Make Your Evaluation Report Come Alive: Engaging Stakeholders
Engaging Stakeholders in Interpreting Data
Collaborative Rubric Development for Using Evaluation Results
Evaluation Managers and Supervisors TIG Business Meeting
and Presentation: Crossing Boundaries Without Getting Cross:
How to Enrich Evaluation Work With Diverse Graduate Students and
Nontraditional Staff While Developing Their Abilities and Maintaining
High Quality Work Product
Evaluation Managers and Supervisors TIG / Gestionnaires et superviseurs d’évaluation
Grand Ballroom West
Kent
Kent
Kent
Kent
Kent
Grand Ballroom West
Grand Ballroom West
Grand Ballroom West
Grand Ballroom West
Grand Ballroom West
Grand Ballroom West
Grand Ballroom West
Kent
Kent
Kent
Location / Endroit
Conference Room G
Location / Endroit
259
260
Thursday, 11:05 am – 12:35 pm /
Le jeudi, 11h05 – 12h35
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
Le jeudi, 17h00 – 18h00
Saturday, 10:30 am – 12:00 pm /
215
252
338
368
744
781
874
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Business Meeting /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
Friday, 9:25 am – 10:10 am /
341
409
710
Time / Heure
115
Session /
Séance
Business Meeting /
Expert Lecture /
Exposé d’expert
Think Tank /
Think Tank /
Kent
Kent
Conference Room D
Conference Room D
Kent
Location / Endroit
Adapting and Adjusting Methods to Fit Evaluation of Extension Education
We’re in This Together: Assessing the Performance of Cooperative
State Research, Education, and Extension Service – Land Grant
University Programs for the Office of Management and Budget
Feminist Issues TIG Business Meeting
Monitoring and Evaluating Environmental Management Programs With
Gender Equality as a Cross-Cutting Theme
Review of Proposed American Evaluation Association
Public Statement on the Importance of Cultural Competence in Evaluation
Feminist Issues in Evaluation: Traversing Borders and Boundaries to
Create Cross-Topical Interest Group Networks Through Dialogue
Windsor Room East
Windsor Room East
Dominion Ballroom North
Location / Endroit
Kent
Norfolk
Taking AIM (Arkansas Information Management System):
Norfolk
Development and Implementation of a Statewide Web-Based Evaluation System
Extension Education Evaluation TIG Business Meeting and Presentation:
A Descriptive Profile of Cooperative Extension Evaluators:
Implications for Strengthening Evaluation Capacity
Building Capacity to Conduct Evaluations Across Partners,
Regions, and Cultures
Crossing Program Boundaries in the Louisiana Cooperative
Extension Service
Improved Planning, Evaluation, and Reporting:
A Collaborative Approach
Using Outcome Thinking to Target Outcomes:
Visions Becoming Real Programs
Feminist Issues in Evaluation TIG / Questions féministes en évaluation
Time / Heure
122
Session /
Séance
Extension Education Evaluation TIG / Évaluation de l’enseignement périscolaire
Thursday, 11:05 am – 12:35 pm /
Le jeudi, 11h05 – 12h35
Thursday, 11:05 am – 12:35 pm /
Le jeudi, 11h05 – 12h35
Thursday, 11:05 am – 12:35 pm /
Le jeudi, 11h05 – 12h35
Le jeudi, 13h40 – 15h10
Le jeudi, 13h40 – 15h10
Le jeudi, 13h40 – 15h10
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
Friday, 9:25 am – 10:10 am /
Friday, 9:25 am – 10:10 am /
Friday, 10:20 am – 11:05 am /
Friday, 10:20 am – 11:05 am /
Friday, 11:15 am – 12:00 pm /
Friday, 11:15 am – 12:00 pm /
Friday, 1:55 pm – 3:25 pm /
Friday, 1:55 pm – 3:25 pm /
201
223
234
238
260
271
277
298
309
335
422
433
455
458
494
505
531
540
Time / Heure
119
Session /
Séance
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Demonstration /
Démonstration
MultiPaper /
Expert Lecture /
Exposé d’expert
Expert Lecture /
Exposé d’expert
Expert Lecture /
Exposé d’expert
Panel / Panel
Business Meeting /
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Debate / Débat
Demonstration /
Démonstration
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Demonstration /
Démonstration
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Location / Endroit
Wentworth
Grand Ballroom West
Wentworth
Using Performance Measures for Managing Results: Ontario’s Experience
Inter-Organizational Learning
Evaluating the Evaluator
Applying Theory to Program Practice
Reducing Barriers Through the Creation of an Evaluation Culture
Building Performance Management Systems for Reporting Real Results:
The Ontario Public Service Experience
Government to Government Evaluation: Issues and Strategies
to Support State, Federal, and Tribal Government Evaluation Studies
Implementing PART Within an Environmental Agency
Government Evaluation TIG Business Meeting
The Challenge of Outcome Evaluation: Measuring Training Outcomes
in Workforce Preparedness
Applying the American Evaluation Association Guiding Principles
to Ethical Issues in Government Evaluation
State Versus the Public:
The Case Against Performance Measurement Systems
Service Review and Improvement:
Applying Evaluation in the Municipal Sector
Government Sponsored Evaluations in the Field of Public Health
Accountability for Evaluation: A Help or a Hindrance for Meaningful
Governance, Increased Programme Effectiveness, and for Democracy?
Executive
Wentworth
Gold Rush
Wentworth
Wentworth
Gold Rush
Wentworth
Wentworth
Gold Rush
Wentworth
Grand Ballroom West
Gold Rush
Wentworth
Grand Ballroom West
Performance Measurement, Evaluation, and Program Improvement:
Gold Rush
Some Centers for Disease Control/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Examples
Building Outcomes Evaluation Into Government/Contractor Relationships:
BA Stakeholder Approach
Evaluation, the “New Politics” and the “New Public Management”:
Dilemmas of Engagement
Rounding the Bases: Not “Tagging Out”at Each Step in Applied Evaluation
– Centers for Disease Control/ Examples From Tuberculosis
261
262
Friday, 1:55 pm – 3:25 pm /
Friday, 3:35 pm – 4:20 pm /
Friday, 3:35 pm – 4:20 pm /
Friday, 4:30 pm – 6:00 pm /
Saturday, 10:30 am – 12:00 pm /
Saturday, 10:30 am – 12:00 pm /
566
577
607
708
723
760
771
797
808
816
831
845
871
882
Time / Heure
545
Session /
Séance
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
Demonstration /
Démonstration
PM3: Using Performance Measures for Monitoring and Management
Crossing Borders, Crossing Boundaries: Navigating Between the
Federal and State/Provincial Levels of Government
Performance Measurement in Canadian Municipalities
Evaluating Research and Technology Programs at the National and
International Level
Evaluation in the Public Sector and Use of Report Cards
The New Spotlight on Federal Program Evaluation
The Integration of Evaluation Models Into Policy and
Program Development: Reality Bites
How Do We Do It? Examples of How the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC) Is Building the Evaluation Capacity of Its Grantees
Performance Measurement and Evaluation in Government Settings
Urban Planning Evaluation and Assessing the Impact of Evaluators
Application of Evaluation Principles
What Color is Your Book? How the Standards We Follow Influence
the Utilization of Government Evaluation Efforts
Evaluation, Knowledge Management, and Organizational Learning:
Weaving Disciplines to Enhance Evaluation Capacity Development
Supporting Ethnographic Approaches in Government Research:
The Perspectives of a Federal Project Officer and Evaluation Team
on an Ethnographic Study of Medicare Managed Care
Gold Rush
Wentworth
Gold Rush
York
Gold Rush
Wentworth
Gold Rush
Wentworth
Wentworth
Oxford
Civic Ballroom South
Gold Rush
Wentworth
Pinnacle
Location / Endroit
continued / suite
Thursday, 11:05 am – 12:35 pm /
Le jeudi, 11h05 – 12h35
Le jeudi, 13h40 – 15h10
Friday, 3:35 pm – 4:20 pm /
Friday, 4:30 pm – 6:00 pm /
Saturday, 10:30 am – 12:00 pm /
227
264
302
570
604
701
738
775
812
Time / Heure
123
Session /
Séance
Think Tank /
Think Tank /
Panel / Panel
Business Meeting /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
Developing and Completing a Doctoral Dissertation
Would You Hire Me? What Organizations Look for in Evaluators
How Do I Get a Job in Your Organization?
Advice to Those Seeking Careers in Various Evaluation Fields
Graduate Student and New Evaluators TIG Business Meeting
Exploring Evaluation Practice, Theory, and Disciplinary Trends:
Perspectives From Graduate Students and New Evaluators
Tips From the Trenches
The Culture of Evaluation and Evaluators:
Ethnographic, Competency, and Accessibility Perspectives
Principles and Practice for Evaluating Educational and
Professional Development Initiatives
Starting and Succeeding as an Independent Evaluation Consultant
What to Do When I Face Ethical Dilemmas in Evaluation
Graduate Student and New Evaluator TIG / Les étudiants diplômés et les nouveaux évaluateurs
Grand Ballroom West
Grand Ballroom West
Grand Ballroom West
Grand Ballroom West
Simcoe
Simcoe
Simcoe
Simcoe
Simcoe
Simcoe
Location / Endroit
263
264
Friday, 4:30 pm – 6:00 pm /
Friday, 4:30 pm – 6:00 pm /
Saturday, 10:30 am – 12:00 pm /
Saturday, 10:30 am – 12:00 pm /
591
611
746
751
783
788
Friday, 9:25 am – 10:10 am /
413
Friday, 3:35 pm – 4:20 pm /
Le jeudi, 17h00 – 18h00
359
557
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
326
Friday, 1:55 pm – 3:25 pm /
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
320
522
Le jeudi, 13h40 – 15h10
289
Friday, 11:15 am – 12:00 pm /
Thursday, 11:05 am – 12:35 pm /
Le jeudi, 11h05 – 12h35
251
485
214
Friday, 10:20 am – 11:05 am /
119
449
Time / Heure
110
Session /
Séance
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
Demonstration /
Démonstration
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Business Meeting /
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
Implementation of Health Evaluation Theory in Program Management
Improving Health Care Quality in In-Patient and Out-Patient Settings
Applications of Theory-Driven Evaluation
Evaluating Health Promotion and Surveillance Systems
Using Evaluation Strategies to Sustain Accurate and Consistent
Implementation of Science-Based Interventions
Building Community Capacity to Improve Health Outcomes:
Evaluation Efforts
Building Capacity for, and Conducting Evaluation in,
Rural Community-Academic Partnerships
The Journey of HIV/AIDS Prevention Evaluation:
An Experience Crossing Multiple Borders and Multiple Boundaries
Health Communication: Evaluating Use of Mass Media
Health Communication: Evaluating Communication Technologies
Evaluating Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention Programs:
Lessons From the Field
Health Evaluation TIG Business Meeting and Presentation:
Using a Utilization-Focused Participatory Approach to Evaluate
Volunteer-Led Multicultural Diabetes Support Groups:
The Experiences of the Volunteer Health Advisor Program
Evaluating Community-Based Health Initiatives:
Caveats and Considerations
Constructing the Basis for the Brazilian AIDS Program Evaluation:
Integrating Efforts for Building Local Capacity and Monitoring Information
Evaluating Programs Serving Minority Populations
Evaluating HIV/AIDS Programs
Strategies for Evaluating Health Promotion Services and Programs
Rounding the Bases: Not “Tagging Out”at Each Step in Applied Evaluation
– Centers for Disease Control/ Examples From Tuberculosis
Challenges and Innovation in the Evaluation of Comprehensive
Community Initiatives: The National Evaluation of Free to Grow
Conference Room C
Carleton
Conference Room C
Carleton
Gold Rush
Conference Room C
Conference Room C
Conference Room C
Conference Room C
Conference Room C
Conference Room C
Conference Room C
Conference Room C
Oxford
Conference Room C
Conference Room C
Conference Room C
Wentworth
Conference Room C
Location / Endroit
861
862
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
How Do We Know When We’re There? Thinking Creatively About
Methods of Measurement and Links to Program Improvement
Evaluation of Health Related Technologies and Information Systems
Improving Health Care Quality in In-Patient and Out-Patient Settings,
Evaluating Maternal-Child Health Programs
Thursday, 11:05 am – 12:35 pm /
Le jeudi, 11h05 – 12h35
Friday, 9:25 am – 10:10 am /
Friday, 10:20 am – 11:05 am /
Friday, 11:15 am – 12:00 pm /
Friday, 1:55 pm – 3:25 pm /
Friday, 3:35 pm – 4:20 pm /
248
410
446
482
519
554
822
859
Time / Heure
211
Session /
Séance
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
Business Meeting /
MultiPaper /
Expert Lecture /
Exposé d’expert
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
Evaluation Challenges in Child-Serving Programs:
Child Welfare, Adoption, and Girls & Boys Town
Services for Children and Families in Palm Beach County:
A Longitudinal Multi-Program Evaluation
Large-Scale Evaluation Approaches: The Canadian National
Outcomes Matrix and the CDC Response to the Tsunami
Changing the Boundaries: Evaluation and the Faith-Based Organization
Human Services Evaluation TIG Business Meeting
Human Services Evaluation in Schools
Evaluating and Redesigning Large Scale Systems Using Quality
Function Deployment
Crossing Organizational Boundaries: Partnership and the Evaluation of
Out-of-School Time Programs
Focus on Family Support Programs: Developing Evaluation Capacity
Human Services Evaluation TIG / Évaluation des services sociaux
Time / Heure
825
Session /
Séance
Windsor Room West
Windsor Room West
Windsor Room West
Windsor Room West
Windsor Room West
Windsor Room West
Windsor Room West
Windsor Room West
Windsor Room West
Location / Endroit
Conference Room C
Conference Room B
Conference Room C
Location / Endroit
continued / suite
265
266
Thursday, 11:05 am – 12:35 pm /
Le jeudi, 11h05 – 12h35
Le jeudi, 13h40 – 15h10
Friday, 11:15 am – 12:00 pm /
Friday, 1:55 pm – 3:25 pm /
Friday, 3:35 pm – 4:20 pm /
Friday, 4:30 pm – 6:00 pm /
247
285
481
518
553
587
784
821
210
858
Time / Heure
106
Session /
Séance
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Think Tank /
Think Tank /
MultiPaper /
Business Meeting /
Panel / Panel
Think Tank /
Panel / Panel
Think Tank /
Walking the Talk: Holding Evaluators Accountable for Standards of
Quality Work and Adherence to Ethical Guidelines
Finding the Balance Between Meeting Client Needs and
Maintaining the Integrity and Validity of the Evaluation
Intermediate Consulting Skills: A Self-Help Fair
Standards and Guidelines for Internal Quality Assurance of
Evaluation Practice
Independent Consulting Considerations
Independent Consulting TIG Business Meeting
Past to the Present: Utilizing a Unique Lens to Drive Our Evaluation Work
Results and Discussion of the 2004 Survey of the American
Evaluation Association Independent Consulting Topical Interest Group
Evaluation Capacity Building: Lessons and Strategies
Peer Review for Independent Consultants:
Year One Update and Peer Reviewer Orientation
Straddling the Line between the Business of Evaluation and the
Goal of the American Evaluation Association’s Guiding Principles
Windsor Room East
Windsor Room East
Windsor Room East
Windsor Room East
Windsor Room East
Windsor Room East
Windsor Room East
Windsor Room East
Windsor Room East
Windsor Room East
Windsor Room East
Location / Endroit
Le jeudi, 13h40 – 15h10
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
Le jeudi, 17h00 – 18h00
Friday, 10:20 am – 11:05 am /
Friday, 10:20 am – 11:05 am /
Friday, 11:15 am – 12:00 pm /
Friday, 3:35 pm – 4:20 pm /
Saturday, 10:30 am – 12:00 pm /
300
337
373
450
472
486
558
715
718
755
792
Time / Heure
132
Session /
Séance
Demonstration /
Démonstration
Panel / Panel
Expert Lecture /
Exposé d’expert
Demonstration /
Démonstration
MultiPaper /
Demonstration /
Démonstration
MultiPaper /
Business Meeting /
Demonstration /
Démonstration
Demonstration /
Démonstration
Demonstration /
Démonstration
Demonstration of an Electronic Relational Database for
Managing the Evaluation of Multi-Site, Community-Based Programs
The Use of Portable Digital Assistants (PDAs), or “Palm Pilots,”
for Survey-Based Data Collection in International Contexts
Evaluation Reporting in the Paperless Era: Practical Advice for
Designing, Implementing, and Using Web-Based Reporting Systems
Using a Web-Based Data Collection Tool Within a Comprehensive
Evaluation Framework: The Community Activity Tracking (CAT) System
Technology’s Influence on Evaluation Theory and Capacity:
Real-world Examples
Monitoring and Evaluation Information Systems:
A Demo of a System Developed in Epi-Info for School Improvement
McGill University’s Web-Based Field Assessment Tool for
Internship Students: Improving the Formative Evaluation Process
How Web-based Technologies Contribute to School Accountability
Integrating Technology Into Evaluation TIG Business Meeting
and Presentation: The IDEA Center
Online Focus Groups: No Borders
Taking AIM: Demonstration of a Statewide Web-Based
Planning, Reporting and Evaluation System
Essentials of Online Survey Development and Use
Integrating Technology Into Evaluation / Intégration de la technologie à l’évaluation
Conference Room G
Conference Room G
Conference Room G
Conference Room D
Conference Room D
Conference Room D
Pinnacle
Conference Room D
Ice Palace
Huron
Huron
Location / Endroit
267
268
Friday, 10:20 am – 11:05 am /
Friday, 10:20 am – 11:05 am /
Friday, 11:15 am – 12:00 pm /
Friday, 11:15 am – 12:00 pm /
Friday, 1:55 pm – 3:25 pm /
Friday, 1:55 pm – 3:25 pm /
459
460
495
496
532
533
Le jeudi, 13h40 – 15h10
299
Friday, 9:25 am – 10:10 am /
Le jeudi, 13h40 – 15h10
295
423
Thursday, 11:05 am – 12:35 pm /
Le jeudi, 11h05 – 12h35
262
Le jeudi, 17h00 – 18h00
Thursday, 11:05 am – 12:35 pm /
Le jeudi, 11h05 – 12h35
261
365
225
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
224
336
121
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
120
332
Time / Heure
116
Session /
Séance
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
Demonstration /
Démonstration
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
Business Meeting /
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Demonstration /
Démonstration
MultiPaper /
Evaluation in Peacebuilding
The Challenge of Measuring Results in Developing Countries:
Recent International Experiences
Using Visual Images for a Tracer Study With Emergent Design in a
Cross-Cultural Project in Israel
Evaluating Multiinstitutional, Multisector, Multicountry Interventions
Incorporating Traditional Knowledge into Evaluation Methodology
Logic Modeling in International Settings
The Changing Role of Evaluation in the United Nations:
Progress and Roadblocks
International and Cross-cultural TIG Business Meeting
Assuring the Quality of Evaluative Information:
Developing Measurement Tools for Cross-cultural and
International Evaluations
Cross-cultural Evaluations: Explorations, Trends, Models
International Evaluation Standards
Intercultural Dimensions of Learning and Performance Evaluation
Evaluation Methodologies for Identifying Innovations for Scale-Up
Evaluating Capacity Development and Developing Evaluation Capacity
Organizational Strategies for Addressing Effectiveness and
Impact Measurement: Case Examples of Five International
Non-governmental Organizations
Developing Functional Competency in Evaluation:
The Japan Evaluation Society Accreditation Scheme for
Evaluation Training Programs
Multi-Country, Multi-Site Monitoring and Evaluation Mapping:
MCritical Choices, Decision Points, and Implementation Protocols
International Evaluation Wave: Global Context and Local Practice
International and Cross-cultural Evaluation TIG / Évaluation interculturelle et intersectorielle
Huron
Kenora
Huron
Kenora
Huron
Kenora
Kenora
Kenora
Kenora
Huron
Kenora
Huron
Kenora
Huron
Kenora
Location / Endroit
Friday, 3:35 pm – 4:20 pm /
Friday, 3:35 pm – 4:20 pm /
Friday, 4:30 pm – 6:00 pm /
Friday, 4:30 pm – 6:00 pm /
Saturday, 10:30 am – 12:00 pm /
Saturday, 10:30 am – 12:00 pm /
568
601
602
703
724
761
762
798
799
835
843
851
872
Time / Heure
567
Session /
Séance
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
Expert Lecture /
Exposé d’expert
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Hitting a Moving Target:
Evaluating Success in the Context of Civil Society Projects
Are You My Boundary Partner?
Crossing Borders, Crossing Boundaries With Outcome Mapping
Conducting International Evaluations: The United States Agency
for International Development’s Evaluation System
Applying RealWorld Evaluation in the Field: A Case Study From
A Case Study From Bangladesh and a Discussion of Applications
of the Approach in Developing and Developed Countries
Methods and Approaches for Evaluating Technical Assistance
Methodological Challenges in Conducting a Mixed-Method Multi-Site
International Study
Cross-Country, Cross-Sectoral Impact Evaluation of International
Training Programs
Evaluation, Learning, and Capacity Development: Experiences From
Research and Development Organizations Around the World
The Same Only Different: How Evaluators From Three
Professional Organizations Think About Ethics in Their Work
Upgrading International Development Evaluation
The Influence of Cultural Context on Evaluation Theory and Practice
International Perspectives on Assessment:
Challenges and Ethical Dilemmas
Evaluation of Science and Technology Programs in China
Introducing Evaluation to the Developing Countries
International and Cross-cultural Evaluation TIG / Évaluation interculturelle et intersectorielle
Kenora
Grand Ballroom East
Executive
Kenora
Huron
Kenora
Huron
Kenora
Kenora
Grand Ballroom East
Huron
Kenora
Huron
Kenora
Location / Endroit
continued / suite
269
270
Le jeudi, 17h00 – 18h00
Friday, 11:15 am – 12:00 pm /
354
478
782
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
Business Meeting /
Think Tank /
Linking Sexual Behavior, Identity and Orientation
Through an Evaluative Lens
So You’re a Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, or Transgender Evaluator:
Implications for the Profession and Practice
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender TIG Business Meeting
Thursday, 11:05 am – 12:35 pm /
Le jeudi, 11h05 – 12h35
Thursday, 11:05 am – 12:35 pm /
Le jeudi, 11h05 – 12h35
Le jeudi, 13h40 – 15h10
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
Le jeudi, 17h00 – 18h00
Le jeudi, 18h00 à 19h00
Friday, 10:20 am – 11:05 am /
Friday, 11:15 am – 12:00 pm /
Friday, 1:55 pm – 3:25 pm /
209
266
269
304
341
349
370
375
464
499
536
Time / Heure
124
Session /
Séance
MultiPaper /
Expert Lecture /
Exposé d’expert
Panel / Panel
Business Meeting /
Business Meeting /
Panel / Panel
Think Tank /
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Evaluation in Educational Contexts: K-12 and Higher Education
Evaluation and Capacity Building Issues for
Native American Communities
Grounding Evaluation Practices in Indigenous Knowledge
Multiethnic Issues TIG Business Meeting Part II
Multiethnic Issues TIG Business Meeting
Brackish Waters: Going With the Flow in the Space Between
Bndigenous Cultural Identities and Western Professional Evaluation Roles
Community Based, Culturally Responsive Evaluation:
Building Bridges, Brokering Skills
Transforming Principles Into Practice: A Funder-Evaluator Panel
on Foundation-Commissioned Multicultural Evaluations
Shared Knowledge Across Borders: Multiculturalism in Evaluation
Crossing Cultural Boundaries Using Qualitative Methods
Becoming (Culturally Responsive) Evaluators:
The American Evaluation Association/Duquesne University Graduate
Education Diversity Internship Experience
Multiethnic Issues in Evaluation TIG / Questions liées à la multiethnicité en évaluation
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
Time / Heure
341
Session /
Séance
Dufferin
Dufferin
Pinnacle
Executive
Carleton
Dufferin
Location / Endroit
Oxford
Norfolk
Peel
Location / Endroit
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender Issues TIG / Questions liées à l’homosexualité, à la bisexualité et à la transexualité
Saturday, 10:30 am – 12:00 pm /
728
765
802
839
876
MultiPaper /
Demonstration /
Démonstration
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
Le jeudi, 13h40 – 15h10
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
Le jeudi, 17h00 – 18h00
Friday, 9:25 am – 10:10 am /
Friday, 10:20 am – 11:05 am /
Friday, 11:15 am – 12:00 pm /
Saturday, 10:30 am – 12:00 pm /
344
372
425
461
497
732
769
806
875
Time / Heure
307
Session /
Séance
Demonstration /
Démonstration
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Demonstration /
Démonstration
Expert Lecture /
Exposé d’expert
Demonstration /
Démonstration
Business Meeting /
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Friday, 4:30 pm – 6:00 pm /
Time / Heure
605
Session /
Séance
Respectable Research/Weak Needs Assessment: Why?
Needs Assessment as Community Mobilization:
The Immigrant Skills Initiative in Waterloo Region
Needs Assessment: Applications With an Emphasis on
Contextual Features and Complexities
Needs Assessment: Unique Undergraduate Populations
Omnibus Polling for Program Evaluation and Needs Assessment:
Lessons From the 2002-2005 Summit Polls
From Poor to Not Poor: A Qualitative Interpretation
Theory-Based Needs Assessment: A Nuts and Bolts Introduction
Needs Assessment TIG Business Meeting
Needs Assessment: Aspects of Methodology
Needs Assessment: Applications Across Varied Settings
Identity and Racism as Variables in Evaluation in Data Collection and Use
Model for Evaluating Key Organizational Factors in the Provision of
Culturally Competent Mental Health Services to HIV-Positive Clients
in Traditionally Underserved Communities
Framing Evaluation Within an Indigenous World View
The Relevance of Culture in Evaluation Institute (RCEI):
Defining and Engaging Culture
Partnerships and Capacity Building in Cross-cultural Contexts
Culturally Competent Professional Practice: Four Perspective
Multiethnic Issues in Evaluation TIG / Questions liées à la multiethnicité en évaluation
Simcoe
Executive
Executive
Executive
Kent
Kent
Kent
Executive
Executive
Executive
Location / Endroit
Dufferin
Dufferin
Dufferin
Dufferin
Dufferin
Dufferin
Location / Endroit
continued / suite
271
272
Friday, 10:20 am – 11:05 am /
Friday, 11:15 am – 12:00 pm /
Friday, 11:15 am – 12:00 pm /
Friday, 11:15 am – 12:00 pm /
Friday, 1:55 pm – 3:25 pm /
443
476
477
479
514
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
324
Friday, 9:25 am – 10:10 am /
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
318
407
Le jeudi, 13h40 – 15h10
287
Friday, 9:25 am – 10:10 am /
Le jeudi, 13h40 – 15h10
281
405
Thursday, 11:05 am – 12:35 pm /
Le jeudi, 11h05 – 12h35
249
Le jeudi, 17h00 – 18h00
Thursday, 11:05 am – 12:35 pm /
Le jeudi, 11h05 – 12h35
243
357
212
Le jeudi, 15h20 – 16h50
206
339
Time / Heure
102
Session /
Séance
Demonstration /
Démonstration
Demonstration /
Démonstration
Panel / Panel
Demonstration /
Démonstration
Panel / Panel
Demonstration /
Démonstration
Panel / Panel
Business Meeting /
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
Demonstration /
Démonstration
Demonstration /
Démonstration
MultiPaper /
Think Tank /
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Collaborative Efforts in Capacity Building: Evaluation Cohort 2004/05
Tracking the Arts: The Pennsylvania Cultural Data Project
The Advocacy Framework:
An Evaluation Model for Public Policy Campaigns
A Model of Evaluation and Capacity Building for The Colorado Trust
Bullying Prevention Initiative
Not Lost in Translation: Listening Begets Impact Across Borders
Evaluate the Intangibles: Using Online Electronic Survey System to
Evaluate the Effectiveness of Volunteering Programs
The Role of Evaluation Capacity-Building in a Foundation’s
Community-Based Initiative
Non-profit and Foundations Evaluation TIG Business Meeting
Evaluation and Research in Foundations:
Models and Issues for the Arts, Culture, and Beyond
Success Case Method Evaluations in the Context of
Nonprofit Organizations
Evaluation Principles for Promoting Readiness for Organisational
Development Among Diverse Nonprofits: Lessons Learned from a
Small Community
It’s Greek to Me: Using an Evaluation Tool to Speak the
Funders’ Language
Community Change Evaluation
Toward a Topical Interest Group (TIG) Sponsored Request for Proposals:
Conducting Research to Understanding Funder and Grantee
Evaluation and Reporting Needs, Practices, and Innovations
Effective Funder-Grantee Relationships
Leadership as Boundary-Crossing:
Multi-Level, Cross-Cultural Evaluation Approaches
Methods for Evaluating Foundation Portoflios
Evaluation: Constructing a Bridge to Health Care Access for Children
Non-profit and Foundations Evaluation TIG / Évaluation des organismes sans but lucratif et des fondations
Peel
Oxford
Peel
York
Oxford
Oxford
Peel
Essex Ballroom
Simcoe
Essex Ballroom
Peel
Essex Ballroom
Peel
Essex Ballroom
Peel
Essex Ballroom
Peel
Peel
Location / Endroit
Friday, 3:35 pm – 4:20 pm /
Friday, 3:35 pm – 4:20 pm /
Friday, 4:30 pm – 6:00 pm /
Saturday, 10:30 am – 12:00 pm /
Saturday, 10:30 am – 12:00 pm /
551
583
705
706
743
745
780
817
Time / Heure
549
Session /
Séance
MultiPaper /
MultiPaper /
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Panel / Panel
Demonstration /
Démonstration
Extending Evaluation Towards Organizational Learning
Methods for Attending to Context and Culture
The Why’s and How’s of Foundation Performance Assessment
What’s Age Got to Do With It?
Common Issues in Evaluating Programs in Aging
Supporting Systems Change:
Working With Grassroots Philanthropic Organizations
Using Data to Set Foundation Priorities and Evaluate Investment Choices:
Examples F

01 WELCOME.qxd - American Evaluation Association

Transcription

Documents pareils

feb newsletter

TALKING ABOUT WORK CONDITIONS PART 1: http://www.bbc.co

Grades 8-10

First Step en Francais

Les Arts Florissants

FRENO1201 Intermed French I

winning the job

March 2013_paper

repertoire Pascal sur XL

class 7 au château de la baudonnière