Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) and swordfish
Transcription
Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) and swordfish
Vol. 3: 1-5, 2010 Journal of Oceanography, Research and Data Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) and swordfish (Xiphias gladius) catch distributions observed during driftnet fishery in the Northwestern Mediterranean Sea (2000-2003 database) BĂNARU Daniela.1,2*, DEKEYSER Ivan.1,2, IMBERT Guy. 1,2, LAUBIER Lucien. 1,2† 1)- Université de la Méditerranée, Aix-Marseille 2 2)- CNRS, Moyens communs du Centre d’Océanologie de Marseille, UMS 2196 Station Marine d’Endoume, rue de la batterie des Lions, 13007 Marseille, France *) Corresponding author: (D. Bănaru) Tel.: +33 491041628; Fax: +33 491041635 E-mail address: [email protected] ____________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT: Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus (Linnaeus, 1758)) and swordfish (Xiphias gladius Linnaeus, 1758) are pelagic, migratory species, with high economic value. They are currently heavily exploited. Many recent works have shown the importance of knowing the spatial distribution of these species. This study presents an important and unique database of these species’ catch distributions observed during driftnet fishing in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea in 2000-2003. Created by a concerted effort between the fishermen and the scientific team from the “Centre d’Océanologie de Marseille”, the database, composed of 2393 fishery reports concerning 51 fishing boats and validated by 74 scientific observers, was realised for an expertise funded by the Council of the “Région ProvenceAlpes-Côte d’Azur”. Only 20% of the fishery records, those from the “scientific” database, were previously published and analysed. This article presents the entire database. _____________________________________________________________________________________ KEY WORDS: Atlantic bluefin tuna, swordfish, driftnet, CPUE. ACRONYMS CPUE: Catch Per Unit Effort ICCAT: International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tuna FAO: Food and Agriculture Organization _____________________________________________________________________________________ Introduction Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus (Linnaeus, 1758)) (ABFT) and swordfish (Xiphias gladius Linnaeus, 1758) have been continually exploited in the Mediterranean Sea for thousands of years (Mather et al., 1995; Imbert et al., 2007). Atlantic bluefin tuna has been heavily exploited over its entire spatial distribution (Atlantic and Mediterranean) for a decade and its associated fishery has become a highly profitable commodity following the increase in demand from the Japanese market (Fromentin and Powers, 2005; ICCAT, 2007). Atlantic bluefin tuna and swordfish are both pelagic, migratory species with high economic value. Large uncertainties in the basic fisheries statistics for the East Atlantic and Mediterranean Atlantic bluefin 1 Atlantic blue fin tuna and swordfish catches –Mediterranean Sea tuna together with the lack of knowledge about key processes in its population dynamics (reproduction, migration and population structure) have strongly influenced, and possibly biased, the perception of Atlantic bluefin tuna stocks (Fromentin and Powers, 2005). These authors indicate that the spatial dynamics of ABFT is central to understanding the population dynamics of this species, which is in agreement with some recent studies which suggested juvenile and adult tuna aggregate along ocean fronts (Royer et al., 2004; Zainuddin et al., 2008). These associations are likely to be related to foraging (Atlantic bluefin tuna and swordfish feed on the abundant vertebrate and invertebrate prey concentrations in these areas), but their respective distributions may also be environmentally driven (Ravier and Fromentin, 2004; Imbert et al., 2007; Corbineau et al., 2008). For Royer et al. (2008) the patterns of variation in fisheries’ time series result from a complex combination of both species and fisheries dynamics coupled with environmental forcing (including climate and trophic interactions). The Northwestern Mediterranean Sea represents an important part of the migration routes of Atlantic bluefin tuna (Fromentin, 2009) and is probably a key feeding ground (Mather et al., 1995). Imbert et al. (2007) tried to relate Atlantic bluefin tuna and swordfish distribution with the environmental parameters, fronts, and forage areas using remote sensing satellite data. The aim of this paper is to release to the scientific community an important and unique database of Atlantic bluefin tuna and swordfish catch distributions observed for the driftnet fishery in the Northwestern Mediterranean Sea during 2000-2003 and realised as a coordinated effort between the fishermen and a scientific team from the “Centre d’Océanologie de Marseille”. Methods: Description of the fishery Driftnet fishing, also called “Thonaille” (French term) is a pelagic, traditional fishing technique conducted in the Northwestern Mediterranean Sea, along the French coast (Figure 1). This fishery targets mainly 2-3 year old Atlantic bluefin tuna with a body mass ranging between 10 and 20 kg (89% of the Atlantic bluefin tuna catches) and secondary swordfish. Past studies found that Atlantic bluefin tuna mature at approximately 4 years old in the East Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea (length at maturity is about 110-120 cm and weight 30-35 kg) (Mather et al., 1995). We may thus consider that this fishery targets mainly juvenile Atlantic bluefin tuna. Both species represent about 82% in biomass and 94% in number of the total annual catch by the driftnet fishery. Nice Sète Toulon Figure 1: Spatial distribution of the driftnet fishery reports from the Professional database (P, indicated by empty dots) and the Scientific database (S, indicated by filled dots) in the Northwestern Mediterranean Sea in 2000-2003. 2 Bănaru et al. (2010) JORD 3:1-5 This technique is practiced in surface waters, during calm weather, in full darkness conditions, and offshore where depths reach 2000-2500 m, along the border of the abyssal plain several tens of kilometres off the coast. In the Gulf of Lions, driftnet fisheries are also located over shallower depths (50-100 m). Boats operate on a daily rythm and carry no refrigerating equipment. Fishermen set and haul their net once per night, and disembark their catch each day in the nearest fishing harbour. About 70 boats of 8.6 to 17.6 m long (mean length 12 m) are fishing in this area. Most of the boats weigh below 10-tons (gross tonnage) and have less than 175-kW in motor power. The nets used by fishermen are driftnets, composed of a single sheet of large mesh (90-120 mm), woven with multihead nylon, set at the subsurface and let loose within the first meters of the surface water layer. Imbert et al. (2007) indicated that a “Thonaille”-style gillnet is not a driftnet in the usual sense and is characterized by inertial oscillations and little, if any, drift. However, driftnet is the term used to designate such fishing gear by the FAO (UN Food and Agriculture Organization) or by Regional Fisheries Management Organisations, such as ICCAT (International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas). The average height of a driftnet used by this fishery is 9 m (between 8 and 10 m) and the length from 3000 to 11,300 m. The driftnet length depends on the crew size: it is generally constant for a boat, but may vary according to sea conditions and to catch likelihood. A full description of this fishery is in Imbert et al. (2001, 2002, 2007). Database The database presented in this paper was funded by the Council of the “Région Provence-AlpesCôte d’Azur” and created by the “Centre d’Océanologie de Marseille”. Dr. Guy Imbert was the coordinator of this project and organised the scientific survey. Data were collected seasonally between March and October in 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003. The database is composed of 2393 fishery reports (Table 1). Table 1 Number of fishing reports registered in the driftnet fishery database. Database Source Scientific Professional Total 2000 2001 2002 2003 2000-2003 % on-board survey (Sb) 68 94 102 65 329 13.8 in-harbor survey (Sh) 70 9 52 37 168 7.0 Fishermen logbooks (P) 729 391 448 328 1896 79.2 867 494 602 430 2393 Scientific data (on-board or in-harbour surveys) were collected from 51 fishing boats. To preserve confidentiality, a code number designates each boat. Fishermen agreed to collaborate and allow on-board and in-harbour monitoring for the 74 observers from the “Centre d’Océanologie de Marseille” scientific team. The “professional” database was constructed with data registered in the fishermen’s personal logbooks. Cross-examination of all these records permitted the professional reports to be validated and also emphasized the high level of redundancy between data collected on-board, data collected in-harbours and data registered in the fishermen’s logbooks. When we had two or three reports (on-board, in-harbour and fishermen’s logbooks) for a single fishing operation we chose to include only the on-board report in the database. Imbert et al. (2001, 2002, 2007) published and analysed only 20% of these reports representing the “scientific” database. Our paper presents the entire database, which now consists of 80% reports from fishermen (professional data) and 20% from the scientific data (on-board, in-harbour surveys) (Table 2: Data in supplementary file). Each fishing report includes information about date (day/month/year), boat, driftnet length, position (initial coordinates), and catches (species, number and weight). 3 Atlantic blue fin tuna and swordfish catches –Mediterranean Sea Numbers and weights are pooled for the same fishing operation. There is no individual weight in the database except for some large individuals, and this information is available in paper format only. An Atlantic and Mediterranean size limit of 6.4 kg (age 2) has been in force since 1975; this is the reason why ABFT catches were indicated separately in Table 2 for individuals larger and smaller than 6.4 kg. This limit was recently raised to 10 kg for the Mediterranean Sea (Fromentin and Powers, 2005). A limit of 10 kg was also established for the swordfish. CPUE (catch per unit of effort) was indicated for each report and fish species and was calculated as a ratio between catch weight and net length. Table 2 Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) and swordfish (Xiphias gladius) catch distribution realised in 2000-2003 by the French driftnet fishery. No = number of fishing report, Db = database (P = professional database, Sb = scientific database, on-board survey, Sh = scientific database, in-harbour survey), Boat = code number of the boat, NL = net length (km), D = Day, M = month, Y = year, Long = Longitude (ºN), Lat = Latitude (ºE), n = number of individuals caught, W = total weight (kg), L = lost fish, CPUEt = Atlantic bluefin tuna catch by unit of effort, CPUEx = swordfish catch by unit of effort, - = no available data. No Db Boat NL D M Y Long Lat Thunnus thynnus >6,4kg 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 P P P P P P P P P P 16 1 16 23 29 31 33 34 1 23 7,4 9,2 7,4 4,5 6,0 4,3 7,4 5,0 9,2 4,5 22 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 24 24 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 5,37 7,08 4,98 7,77 7,10 7,08 6,85 7,50 7,42 7,75 Xiphias gladius <6,4kg L CPUEt >10kg <10kg CPUEx n W n 42,63 8 55 12 43,03 7 82 9 42,70 0 0 2 43,10 11 163 1 43,03 2 50 10 43,03 1 54 0 42,95 5 97 15 43,23 6 79 0 43,13 16 210 9 43,08 10 187 20 W 48 27 9 3 28 0 41 0 26 51 n - W/NL 13,9 11,8 1,2 36,9 13,0 12,6 18,6 15,8 25,7 52,9 n 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 2 3 1 W 0 76 0 0 0 100 201 158 93 93 n W 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 2 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 W/NL 0,0 8,8 0,0 0,0 2,3 23,3 27,2 31,6 10,8 20,7 2 30 2 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 15 0 0 5,1 10,2 2,3 0,0 Complete data are available in the supplementary file 2390 2391 2392 2393 P P P P 21 40 40 9 5,9 18 9 6,4 19 9 6,4 26 9 3,0 2 10 2003 2003 2003 2003 4,62 7,75 7,45 4,16 42,50 43,20 43,21 43,21 8 0 1 3 100 0 13 65 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16,9 0,0 2,0 21,7 Acknowledgments This project was funded by the Council of the “Région Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur” who also permitted the publication of this database. Many thanks to the captains and fishermen of the 51 boats who collaborated on this project: Adeline-Kévin, Alain II, Angelika, Anna-Félicienne, Annonciade, Charcot, Charly-Christ, Cigogne, Corail, Daurade, Dragon II, Eloi Bernard, Geneviève, Gilsand, Hardi, Idéfix, Jean-Christophe, Jean-Emmanuel, Jean-Marie-André, Jeanne d’Arc, Jessica, La Rafale, La Santa, Les Copains, Loup Bar, Lulu IV, Marco, Neptune III, Notre Dame du Grau, Notre Dame du Rouet, Norville, Océane, Orchidée, P’tit Bosco, Prince des Mers, Prosper, St Louis, Sainte Marie, San Antonio, Saphir, Sergéric, Shark 3, Shark 4, Sonia IV, Le Sanaryen, Tchi Tchao, Thido, Tiki II, Valé, Valmar and Yves Julien. 4 Bănaru et al. (2010) JORD 3:1-5 Thanks also to the persons who realised the scientific survey of the catches and landings of the fishing boats: Allanic Y., Astruc G., Atay A., Autran S., Bachet F., Bichel M., Bonnaud E., Bouchard O., Bouillac G., Bourreau S., Bourret V., Brossard C., Brutinel C., Calcat C., Carteron S., Cerbone S., Cérutti F., Chazon M., Contino F., Couthon C., Dalègre K., Delaunay A., Delord K., Desmond G., Diéval E., Dollé N., Douroux C., Duhem C., Fauconnier G., Favreau-Bikoff V., Ferré B., Fornier M., Ghazania F., Gimenez P., Girard C., Glatz N., Grondin J., Guerri F., Hugon V., Jackovsky J., Laudet I., Lefèvre C., Maixandeau A., Marteau-Delphin A., Mas V., Masseboeuf O., Massie A-L., Matho M., Mérigot B., Morrin E., Mourand L., Mouriès M., Nassar K., Négrel S., Niesten P., NGuyen D., Nourrisson C., Olivès M., Perriez A., Politi F., Roche V., Sanguinède F., Sanchez S., Soussiguian C., Tailamé Y., Thuillier D., Tolla C., Touitou M., Uitz J., Vettoretti A., Villeneuve M. and K. Volpatti. We are grateful to Paul Nival, Mireille Harmelin-Vivien, Philip Trevelyan, Jennifer Guarini and the two anonymous reviewers for helping us to improve the manuscript. References CORBINEAU, A., ROUYER, T., CAZELLES, B., FROMENTIN, J.-M., FONTENEAU, A. and MENARD, F., 2008. Time series analysis of tuna and swordfish catches and climate variability in the Indian Ocean (1968-2003). Aquatic Living Ressources, 21, 277-285. FROMENTIN, J.M. and POWERS, J.E., 2005. Atlantic bluefin tuna: population dynamics, ecology, fisheries and management. Fish and Fisheries, 6(4), 281-306. FROMENTIN, J.M., 2009. Lessons from the past: investigating historical data from bluefin tuna fisheries. Fish and Fisheries, 10(2), 197-216. ICCAT, 2007. Report of the 2006 Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Stock Assessment Session. Collective Volume of Scientific Papers ICCAT, 60, 652-880. IMBERT, G., GAERTNER, J.-C. and LAUBIER, L., 2001. Thonaille Méditerranéenne suivi en mer de la campagne 2000. Rapport to the Council of the “Région Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur”. Université de la Méditerranée (Aix-Marseille II), 90 pp. IMBERT, G., GAERTNER, J.-C., CERBONNE, S. and LAUBIER, L., 2002. Effets des répulsifs sur la capture de dauphins dans les thonailles. Rapport to the Council of the “Région Provence-AlpesCôte d’Azur”. Université de la Méditerranée (Aix-Marseille II), 36 pp. IMBERT, G., LAUBIER, L., MALAN, A., GAERTNER, J.-C. and DEKEYSER, I., 2007. La thonaille ou courantille volante. Final rapport to the Council of the « Région Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur”. Centre d’Océanologie de Marseille, Ed. Méditerranée 2000, Cannes, 402 pp. MATHER, F.J., MASON, Jr J.M. and JONES, A., 1995. Historical document: life history and fisheries of Atlantic bluefin tuna. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-370, Miami, 165 pp. RAVIER, C. and FROMENTIN, J.-M., 2004. Are the long-term fluctuations in Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) population related to environmental changes? Fisheries Oceanography, 13, 145160. ROYER, F., FROMENTIN, J.-M. and GASPAR, P., 2004. The association between bluefin tuna schools and oceanic features in the Western Mediterranean Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 269, 249263. ROUYER, T., FROMENTIN, J.-M., MÉNARD, F., CAZELLES, B., BRIAND, K., PIANET, R., PLANQUE, B. and STENSETH, N.C., 2008. Complex interplays among populations dynamics, environmental forcing, and exploitation in fisheries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the Unites States of America, 105(14), 5420-5425. ZAINUDDIN, M., SAITOH, K. and SAITOH, S.-I., 2008. Albacore (Thunnus alalunga) fishing ground in relation to oceanographic conditions in the western North Pacific Ocean using remotely sensed satellite data. Fisheries Oceanography, 17(2), 61-73. Complete DATA in supplementary file. 5