Searching for Answers to Honey Bee Poisoning Small Hive Beetle
Transcription
Searching for Answers to Honey Bee Poisoning Small Hive Beetle
20123 August 2012 Vol 25 # 3 www.honeycouncil.ca Canadian Honey Council Searching for Answers to Honey Bee Poisoning Small Hive Beetle Update Integrated Management of Nosema & Detection of Antibiotic Residues Apimondia Symposium Program 2012 Call Mike at 1-866-948-6084 today or email [email protected] Proud sponsor of the Canadian Honey Council WE CONSIDER YOU OUR PARTNER WE BUY HONEY, BEESWAX, AND POLLEN Elise or Normand CALL toll free 1 800-567-3789 483 Grande-Cote Road, Rosemere, QC, J7A 1M1 Tél: (450) 965-1412 Fax: (450) 965-1425 www.odem.ca [email protected] [email protected] HiveLights Canadian Honey Council August 2012 Vol 25 #3 The Canadian Honey Council (CHC) is the national organization of the Canadian beekeeping industry and Hivelights is the industry’s magazine. Our association is an “organization of organizations”. One of the benefits of belonging to our member organizations is that all members receive a copy of Hivelights magazine. In order to receive Hivelights you must be a current member of your provincial association. International subscribers can receive our high quality magazine for a fee of $50 Canadian per year. This was my first swarm. It happened in Vancouver, in the Little Mountain area. The bees left their hive and went across the lane to the bird house in my neighbour's yard. We successfully rehived them. Photo: Jean Schwartz, Vancouver, BC Schools, libraries, non beekeepers, university or government personnel can receive Hivelights magazine through special membership as “Friends of Canadian Apiculture”. Please contact the CHC office for more information. Canadian Honey Council #36 High Vale Crescent Sherwood Park, AB T8A 5J7 Hivelights is published quarterly (Feb, May, Aug, Nov). Deadline for submissions are 6 weeks prior to publication (i.e. Dec 15th for Feb issue). For guidelines on article submission and advertising rates please visit our website at www.hivelights.ca The opinions expressed in the articles printed in Hivelights are those of the authors and do not imply endorsement of the Canadian Honey Council for the promotion of any product, goods or services mentioned unless specifically stated. Editor....................................................... Geoff Todd Design and Production................ Cristian Campean Advertising enquiries.............................. Geoff Todd Publisher........................... Canadian Honey Council Printed in Canada Table of Contents 3Canadian Honey Council Report. ..................................... Rod Scarlett 42012 CHC Directors 4 Searching for Answers to Honey Bee Poisoning.... Rod Scarlett 5 Regional Reports . ........................................................................CHC Directors 9 Small Hive Beetle Update .............................................. Dr. Medhat Nasr 11 Integrated Management of Nosema & Detection of . Antibiotic Residues. ............................................................................................ ........................................... Abdullah Ibrahim, Andony P. Melathopoulos, Stephen F. Pernal 19 21 23 23 24 27 World News Honey Prices - A Good News for Change...... Dr. Medhat Nasr Roger A. Morse Award for 2012........................................ Jim Bobb In a Honey Bee Hive, an Interesting Find. ..... David Ostermann Apimondia Symposium Program Classifieds Publication Mail Agreement number 40031644 ISSN 1489-730X Return undeliverable Canadian addresses to Canadian Honey Council #36 High Vale Crescent Sherwood Park, AB T8A 5J7 [email protected] www.honeycouncil.ca (877) 356 8935 Hivelights - The Magazine of the Canadian Honey Council is printed with all natural vegetable based inks. Please recycle this magazine. HiveLights August 2012 1 Proud sponsor of the Canadian Honey Council Canadian Honey Council Report Rod Scarlett, Executive Director, CHC At the time of writing this the honey pull is just starting. The spring brought some good news and some troubling events. While not yet having access to the final statistics it looks as though most of Canada had very good over-wintering statistics. Many beekeepers reported losses of less than 10% and many reported strong healthy colonies. This was tempered with a bee kill in southern Ontario that resulted in many beekeepers losing substantial portions of their operations. At the request of the Ontario Beekeepers Association the CHC has struck a committee to investigate what can be done to prevent the same situation from occurring. Coupled with the PMRA announcement that it is re-investigating neonicitoids, there should be significant information available shortly. There is no easy answer to this nor is the question very simple. What this event has shown is that safety net programs are ineffective, information sharing needs to improve, and that beekeepers must continue to work with farmers, industry, government and through their associations. Considerable time and effort has been spent by those involved in this case and their work is certainly appreciated. The OBA, PMRA, PA’s Beekeepers and Bayer all need to be recognized in trying to address the situation. In late June I attended an information tour in Guelph, sponsored by Bayer Canada, where the neonecitoid seed treatment was being further tested as per Pest Management Review Agency requests. The Tour had representatives from the beekeeping sector, PRMA, USDA, and industry in attendance. While not addressing the bee kill incident, it did indicate Bayer’s commitment to beekeeping and ensuring science is at the forefront of decision making. In late May, CFIA contacted me and asked that the CHC gather information from the industry concerning the elimination of regulations on standardized container sizing. I included the information in the edition of b-talk but also arranged for a conference call with 12 of the largest packers in Canada. I think it fair to say that a majority of packers were not aware of any prospective changes to container standards and Pictures are used to ensure accuracy. Photo: Rod Scarlett both a bee biosecurity manual and the CBSQT producer manual to be available. While the manuals themselves may be available earlier than November, I think the CHC will be proud to display both of the documents at Apimondia in Quebec City. If you have not already registered, please consider doing so by Paul Kelly of the University of Guelph Townsend House give a bee 101 overview. Photo: Rod Scarlett were surprised when I contacted them with the slide deck and the proposals. Those packers that were cognisant of upcoming changes were not aware of any process to speed up the 2014/15 planned implementation date. It was apparent, that contrary to the impression that was left with me, there is little or no appetite to quickly introduce changes to current standardized container sizing. The matter is far more complicated than just an administrative change. Packers need to prepare for a number of expected events and subsequently need time to adjust to changes in molds, labels, cartons, designs, and marketing campaigns. Budgets and budget planning will be impacted. A response to CFIA was be forwarded on June 15, 2012. Bayer officials explaining crop trial at one of the experimental sites near Hamilton. Photo: Rod Scarlett going to the web-site at http://www. craaq.qc.ca/le-calendrier-agricole/ apimondia-symposium-2012/e/1205. Announcement Nominations are requested for the 2012 Fred Rathje Award. This award is given to an individual who has made a significant positive contribution of innovative, creative and effective effort for the betterment of the Canadian honey bee industry. Nominations may be submitted to any of the Directors of The Canadian Honey Council. Names with achievements must be submitted by September 30th. 2012. Finally, in the fall I would expect HiveLights August 2012 3 2012 Directors Canadian Honey Council Conseil Canadien de Miel Chair Director Gerry McKee Bryan Ash BC Honey Producers Association McKee’s Bees 5430 Portland Street Burnaby BC V5J 2R4 ph 604-436-1614 [email protected] Manitoba Beekeepers Association Ash Apiaries Box 297 Gilbert Plains, MB R0L 0X0 ph. 204-548-2036 fax 204-548-2122 [email protected] Vice Chair Director Bernie Rousseau Lee Townsend Alberta Beekeepers TPLR Honey Farms 443 St. Andrews Crescent Stony Plain AB T7Z 1W8 ph 780-968-4624 fax 780-963-8257 cell 780-913-5345 [email protected] BeeMaid Honey 13407 – 136 Ave. NW Edmonton, AB T5L 4B4 780-454-1391 Cel: 780-907-6777 [email protected] Director Treasurer Scott Plante Tim Greer Federation des Apiculteurs du Québec 2369 chemin Lambert St-Nicolas, PQ G7A 2N4 ph. 418-531-0786 [email protected] Ontario Beekeepers Association Lilley Bee Apiaries 16 Redwood Avenue St. Catharines, ON L2M 3B2 ph 905-934-5904 cell 905-932-3457 [email protected] Director Paul Vautour Secretary Maritime Beekeepers Association Acadien Apiaries Ltd. 488 Cape Breton Road Saint-Philippe, NB E1H 1W2 ph 506-388-5127 [email protected] Kevin Nixon Alberta Beekeepers Box 28, Site 8, RR4 Innisfail, AB T4G 1T9 403-227-0092 [email protected] Calvin Parsons Saskatchewan Beekeepers Association Box 44 Meskanan, SK S0K 2W0 306-864-2632 [email protected] With these numerous reports being received the Ontario Beekeeper’s Association (OBA) executive contacted various government agencies and chemical companies to ensure their awareness and involvement. Professional testing and research is being provided on the poisoning. The OBA-Technology Transfer Program is working with these agencies to ensure all pertinent data and samples are available. Beekeepers are searching for answers. Nitro-guanidine neonicotinoid is widely used in agriculture, including soil applications, seed treatment, as well as foliar and greenhouse uses. OBA recognizes that nitroguanidine neonicotinoids are widely used by our agricultural neighbours. As stated by OBA President, Mr. John Van Alten, “we want a workable solution for all partners in agriculture, but not at the expense of the pollinators. We need to ensure that non target insects are not negatively affected by the use of these chemicals. ” For more information or media interviews, contact: Nancy Comber, Promotions/Media Coordinator Ontario Beekeepers’ Association Telephone: 905-636-0661, E-mail: [email protected] www.ontariobee.com ph 403-475-3882 [email protected] National organizations with a vested interest in honey bees, in addition to the existing provincial beekeeper organizations, are eligible for membership in the Canadian Honey Council. Applications are subject to review by the CHC Membership Committee. Those associations that meet established criteria are then considered for approval by the Board of Directors. Application form available from CHC office. August 2012 Over the last six weeks, reports have been received throughout Southwestern Ontario of honey bee poisoning. Symptoms ranged from unusually high numbers of dead or dying honeybees in front of hives to complete beeyards being depopulated. #36 High Vale Crescent Sherwood Park, AB T8A 5J7 ph 877-356-8935 cell 780-489-0231 [email protected] www.honeycouncil.ca Membership in CHC 4 Given the high number of reports of acute poisoning, and with lab results indicating the presence of Clothiandin, Ontario Beekeepers are pleased with Health Canada’s initiative to re-evaluate nitro-guanidine neonicotinoid insecticides and associated products. Executive Director Rod Scarlett Hivelights Magazine Editorial and Advertising Geoff Todd After devastating hive loss due to acute poisoning symptoms, Ontario Beekeepers were relieved to hear of Health Canada’s decision to re-evaluate neonicotinoid insecticides. The Ontario Beekeepers’ Association, established in 1881, is one of the oldest established farm organizations in Ontario. It is incorporated under the Agricultural and Horticultural Organizations Act (1987). The OBA’s mission is to ensure a thriving and sustainable beekeeping industry in Ontario. CHC OFFICE Director Searching for answers to Honey Bee Poisoning! HiveLights Canadian Honey Council and Ontario beekeepers meet with Parliament to discuss recent pesticide incidents Listen to Bill Fergusson, Davis Bryans, Dave and Erika Schuit and Rod Scarlet meeting with parliament. Go to: http://parlvu.parl.gc.ca/Parlvu/TimeBandit/PowerBrowser. aspx?ContentEntityId=9163&EssenceFormatID=873 RegionalReports Maritimes "Beekeepers in the Maritime Provinces are enjoying a "banner" year with super strong colonies. Many are Paul Vautour splitting colonies to increase their numbers. Rainy weather in mid-June has improved and strong honey flows are reported on PEI and in N.B. going into July. Border issues for the three provinces continue to be a hot topic. PEI blueberry growers are heavily dependent on the importation of bee colonies for pollination, and beekeepers and growers are currently working on a pollination plan for 2013. Black bear populations in N.B. are extremely high and causing much damage to bee hives and bumble bee quads in the wild blueberry fields and other apiaries. Speculation for the increase is that the number of Americn hunters – that normally come to hunt bears - is significantly lower in recent years - perhaps due to the sluggish economy there". Québec As this is being written the bees are being pulled off the cranberries. The Lac St-Jean blueberry pollination was very cool this year and some producers who usually make nucs at that time of year were disappointed by the lack of brood in the hives since the queens had stopped laying. Blueberry honey is also difficult to find. The new bee regulations have been signed into law in the month of June. No new cases of SHB have been reported. Some early reports on the summer honey crop indicate that things are looking good. Honey demand remains strong at both the wholesale and retail levels. The only Scott Plante down side to all this is that a lot of beekeepers have been telling me that their mite levels are a lot higher than usual and many are thinking of treating early this year. Have a good honey season. Nous en sommes présentement à l’étape de retirer nos ruches suite à la pollinisation des cannebergières. Cette année la pollinisation des bleuets au Lac St-Jean a fait face à des températures plus froides. Ainsi, les producteurs qui ont l’habitude de faire des nucléis à cette période se sont retrouvés à court de couvain puisque plusieurs reines avaient interrompue leur ponte. Le miel de bleuet, par la même occasion, s’est fait plus rare à trouver. Au mois de juin, les nouvelles règlementations de l’abeille ont été signées et sont devenues lois. De plus, aucun nouveau cas d’infestations aux petits coléoptères de la ruche n’a été signalé. Déjà, les premières récoltes de miel nous indiquent que nous devrions avoir une bonne saison de miel cette année. La demande pour le miel demeure toujours forte autant pour la vente au détail que pour la vente en gros. La seule ombre au tableau c’est que, malheureusement, plusieurs apiculteurs m’ont confié avoir des taux d’infestations parasitaires plus élevés qu’à la normale, ces derniers envisagent même traiter leurs ruches plus tôt cette année. Bonne saison à tous. Ontario Spring 2012 seemed to start as a good one for most Ontario beekeepers. Early warm weather had the bees in good shape and building up fast. Much of the province was reporting a winter loss rate of 10 to 15 percent. With a spring like that swarming was a problem for many to manage but after the past several years it was a welcomed change. Then a new challenge appeared. As the corn-planting season began in the southwest portion of the province and progressed northeastward with the warming HiveLights temperatures, beekeepers were seeing catastrophic affects on their bees. What appeared to be acute pesticide poisoning was affecting a large number of hives and bee yards. It was observed by many beekeepers within 24 hours of a neighboring field being planted with corn that bees were rolling out of the hives to form a twitching dying carpet in front of the entrance. It was observed that the affects seemed to be seen only next to fields that were being seeded with pneumatic seed drills and “theories” of the air pressure combined with the pesticide treated talc on the seed may be a factor. Since that time meetings have been held with the PMRA, Bayer, and OMAFRA to try and determine the cause and come up with options to prevent further occurrences. Some of the affected beekeepers were invited to a meeting with the Federal Standing Committee on Agriculture to share first hand how their operations have been affected. It should be noted the farmers planting the corn Tim Greer were doing so according to the label instructions and that all parties are seeking a solution to this problem. On July 25th the OBA along with beekeepers affected by the die offs are P pg 7 August 2012 5 Alberta Honey Producers 70 Alberta Avenue, Box 3909, Spruce Grove, Alberta T7X 3B1 Phone: (780) 962-5573 Fax: (780) 962-1653 Manitoba Co-operative Honey Producers 625 Roseberry Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3H 0T4 Phone: (204) 783-2240 Fax: (204) 783-8468 BeeMaid Honey Ltd. 1210 – 100 Street, Tisdale, Saskatchewan S0E 1T0 Phone: (306) 873-2521 Fax: (306) 873-3455 Carrying a full line of beekeeping equipment from several manufacturers: • • • • Dadant & Sons Ltd. • Mann Lake Supplies Maxant • Dakota Gunness • Walter T. Kelly Medivet • Perma-Dent Foundation Pierco Canada • Cook & Beals • Plus Many More. Whatever your requirements we would be glad to help. Quality products for the beekeeping industry, including: • • • • • Woodenware • Queen Rearing Supplies Package Bees & Queens • Bee Apparel Honey Containers • Extracting Equipment Beekeeper Tools • Novelties • Foundation Medication & Chemicals. Buyers of Light & Dark Beeswax at Competitive Prices. We can arrange your sugar requirements - dry or liquid sugar in small lots or trailer load lots delivered. Hive Contamination Management Iotron provides a solution for today’s bee colony problems. Iotron’s treatment program provides Apiculturist’s a cost effective and environmentally friendly solution for managing common beehive contaminants. Iotron’s Electron Beam irradiation treatment is proven effective for eliminating AFB and Nosema from comb, pollen, and wax. Iotron’s treatment method penetrates through materials like an X-Ray, yeilding superior results and does not leave any residues. The Iotron treatment allows beekeepers to reduce the need of antibiotics and other intervensions. Iotron’s Electron Beam irradiation treatment program is an advanced IPM tool for working on today’s complex issues. Please contact Iotron for more information Iotron Technologies Corp. 1425 Kebet Way, Port Coquitlam, BC V3C 6L3, Tel: 604 945-8838 Fax: 604 945-8827 Email [email protected] Website www.Iotron.com 6 August 2012 HiveLights scheduled to meet with Bayer and the PMRA. be a benefit for any paid up member. Summer has started out incredibly dry for most of Ontario. What appeared to be a year with the potential of a great honey crop is not shaping up that way. Rain could change everything still but the long range forecast doesn’t show much hope. It is a good thing we still have a couple months to work with and hopefully the optimism that characterizes Ontario beekeepers will prevail. Honey producers in Manitoba are still looking for more options for package bees. Producers feel the comb we winter our bees on needs a break. Producers can sort through combs discarding diseased and troubled combs. Honey producers feel the cold winters in Manitoba will kill some of the viruses and diseases on the empty brood combs. With an aging population, Manitoba Manitoba recognizes the importance of Producers in attracting younger Manitoba are in full farmers into swing of extraction. the agricultural The first round of sector. To this end, honey appears to be MBA established looking quite good. a $500.00 Thankfully most scholarship for a of the temporary Manitoba student Bryan Ash foreign workers attending the 2013 are now in place. Commercial Beekeeping Some producers faced course at Grand Prairie considerable stress as they Regional College, Fairview had to wait until early June Campus, in Alberta. The to get their full compliment award will be announced of requested workers. in the upcoming months, and students will be invited Manitoba Beekeepers’ to submit an application Association representatives form along with a brief met with the board of essay about their interest in Manitoba Agricultural beekeeping. Services Corporation and discussed some modifications The hot, dry weather in to the Over-Winter Bee Manitoba could be creating Mortality Insurance difficulties with bee colonies. program. The response First of all, the canola crop was favourable, given the blooms are disappearing good uptake and results at a rapid rate due to the of the first year of the continuous temperatures program. The application in the 30 degree Celcius form will be linked to the range. In some areas the MBA provincially approved blooms are finished already. Regulation covering Yellow Sweet Clover is also mandatory registration, and nearing completion, and therefore will have space one wonders what nectar for the four digit MBA sources will be available for Registration Number. The the next round of honey. insurance program will thus Meanwhile, producers noted varying difficulties with Honey Bee Queens from Hawaii. It seems producers using the KONA line had wide ranging results for Queen Acceptance and Supersedure issues. Given the good bee survivability this spring, there appeared to be problems when using a large nuc population. MBA is working with the province to survey users to determine what is happening, since Queens from both Chile and California don’t appear to be creating the same level of difficulty. Our June Field Day had a good turn out on a beautiful warm sunny day. Guests were shown how one operation has been managing with Queen Rearing techniques to ensure sustainability of their business. Producers were quite surprised about the event, as it rained for the next three days afterwards. How do you plan for such a nice day? Saskatchewan While much of the winter of 2011-2012 was quite mild here in Saskatchewan the same couldn’t be said for April and May. The bees as a rule came out of winter in fine condition. The Calvin Parsons unusually cold April took a heavy toll on smaller nucleus colonies moved out of wintering facilities early. Much of the beekeeping area was also blessed with 18-24 inches of snow in mid-april. This snow not only was hard on HiveLights the colonies but it made it very difficult for beekeepers to get to their colonies to do their usual beekeeping work. Heavy feeding of pollen supplements helped most colonies and a generous dandelion flow left most colonies in good condition. Mating weather for queens has been decent and nucleus colonies made up for winter are showing decent buildup at this time. June brought more rains and poor weather and more syrup pails were pushed into use. Syrup tanks were approaching Scotchman whistle amounts when the colonies finally started to pick up some early ditch flower nectar. The flowering period in Saskatchewan should be extended with the poor conditions experience in seeding. At the time of writing this we have canola in full bloom and canola that has not yet spiked. Sometimes this occurs in the same field! Virtually no honey remains in the hands of beekeepers except for those who have started extracting very early as conditions in their areas may have allowed. Most beekeepers are still experiencing extreme difficulty in accessing workers due to changes with Service Canada. A large majority are short decent workers or they have people who don’t really want to work. CFIA issues too have arisen P pg 8 August 2012 7 again. Hopefully this will be rectified before you read this article. Why is it that the people we have the most trouble with are the ones whose wages we pay! Alberta It is now the first of July that we are writing these updates and I must say I am glad the month of Kevin Nixon June is over and I hope July brings some sunshine. June was a very wet and cool month in southern and central Alberta. It was very challenging as it seemed like we could only get 2 or 3 days of good work in the bees done every week due to weather. Overall, it seems that the bees have built up ok. We had very good pollen flows here and we had a pretty decent dandelion flow as well. As I am writing this, we are in the process of moving bees in for pollination. It has been going ok. Southern Alberta has been very wet as well. Some fields are not accessible as they had up to 3 inches of rain last week in some thunder shower areas. Things are coming along and we have more bees in now, before July 1 than we have in the past. Hopefully things move along and we can get them out and home ASAP. So, I am going to keep this short as it is 4 pm and I actually just got up a short while ago because I went to bed at 8:30 this morning and I have to leave here shortly to do it all over again. Ahhh!! The life of a pollinator. 7 8 August 2012 nights down and 10 more to go. As we all have our challenges in different ways, another couple months from now it will all be a distant memory once again and will be making plans for next year. Good luck everybody!! Yesterday was the official first main honey flow day, and it is only fitting that today (Canada Day) brought rain. I am midway through my first pull, and so far everything looks excellent. Our area is a little advanced compared to others in Alberta, Lee Townsend but by all reports it is shaping up to be a bumper crop across the province. It’s amazing how strong and healthy bees make life a little easier. It also sounds like the pollination industry in Alberta is doing very well, as most beekeepers are in full bee moving mode right now. I just hope no one gets complacent in their hive health monitoring, as it would be unfortunate if industry had a setback and experienced high winter losses again in 2013. As a side note, early reports indicate that Alberta’s overwintering losses in 20112012 were between 11-15%. While most beekeepers across the country are very happy with how their hives look this year, there are still many issues we need to continue working on to ensure our industry remains strong and vibrant. Issues such as replacement stock, labour, hive treatment options, and HiveLights food safety remain priorities of the CHC and its directors. Despite what a small minority thinks, industry has remained proactive in recent years and as such we are experiencing healthy colonies and substantial colony number increases across the country. Millions of bees stolen from Alberta honey producer A honey producer near Grande Prairie, Alta., suspects another beekeeper may be responsible for the theft of millions of his bees. "You would have to have pretty good knowledge of beekeeping," Bill Termeer said. "You'd have to have the right kind of equipment to go in there and open up these hives." More than 150 of his 3,000 hives were taken over the past several weeks, a loss of about three million bees. Termeer estimates the theft will cost him $60,000. The loss is not covered by insurance. "It just sickens my stomach," he said. The province's chief beekeeper Medhat Nasr says bee thefts are rare, with only five in Alberta over the past decade. However, that number is expected to rise as new diseases and parasites kill bees. "If somebody did not take care of their bees . their winter kill will go sky high," Nasr said. "So, either you buy new bees or look for some other sources." RCMP are now investigating the theft of Termeer's hives. He says the incident is personally disappointing to him if it turns out someone in his industry is to blame. "We sort of have a code of ethics that, you know, we put our equipment out in fields and we tend to trust each other, often we will talk to each other if we're having problems," he said. "And so, this is really hard to understand." British Columbia Cool, wet weather was again a challenge for blueberry pollinators as a rigorous routine of feeding was needed to meet the pollination standard of “8 – 4 – 1” (eight frames covered with bees, four frames with brood and one queen) by mid April. Most New Gerry McKee Zealand packages arriving in February, managed to reach this standard of colony strength by the time blueberry blossoms emerged. Raspberry pollination was also hampered by the cool, damp weather and many beekeepers were frustrated with the grower's need for frequent spraying of fungicides. Our Pesticide Management Regulatory Agency's (PMRA) recent announcement of reviewing the environmental impact of the two neonicotinoid based pesticides, clothianidin and thiamethoxam has been received by many beekeepers with cautious optimism as there is hope our Agency will be able to improve their screening capabilities of the impact on bees and non targeted animals. There is, of course, the puzzling question of why beekeepers continue to pay for bee kills while PMRA struggles to determine the impact of conditionally registered pesticides upon bees? This is an issue which could draw beekeepers together in demanding compensation from those who benefit from the use of these poisons which our modern food industry seems to have become dependent. On our summer solstice, we received our invitation to the B.C. Honey Producers Conference & Trade Show on November 8 – 10, 2012, at Kamloops. With the theme, “Innovations in Apiculture,” this brightly coloured brochure outlines the Agenda, presenters and other attractive activites. Dr. Carlos Castillo, Director of the new National Bee Diagnostic Centre at Beaverlodge will be one of the featured speakers. There is a great variety of activities for your Significant Other in addition to networking with other beekeepers in moving several important issues forward for national discussion. Register before September 30th to take advantage of a $40.00 saving as well as a chance to win a Warre Hive. CO-OP Honey Packer Bee Maid Honey’s 50th Anniversary Scholarship Awards reading their winning essays can visit www. beemaid.com clicking About Bee Maid and selecting Press News Archive Marketing Li’l Honeys The Bee Samples Facebook Maid annual Promotion Scholarship is designed In April, Bee Bernie Rousseau to stimulate Maid ran a sample the pursuit of promotion driven excellence by rewarding entirely through their outstanding achievement Facebook page. This by the children and proved to be a very grandchildren of our inexpensive way to reach a members and staff as wide variety of consumers they enter post-secondary to create awareness about study. Bee Maid and Li’l Honeys. The Scholarship Committee is pleased to announce the 2012 recipients of Bee Maid Honey’s 50th Anniversary Scholarships: • From Manitoba Cooperative Honey Producers Limited Héloise Garez – Héloise is in her 4th year of Food Science at the University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon, going on to a Masters Degree in Food Science. • From Alberta Honey Producers Co-operative Teodor Kostelnik – Teodor is registered at the University of Alberta in the faculty of Physical Education and Recreation Combined Education. He hopes to become a high school Phys Ed teacher. Teodor is currently rated in the top three in Canada in his age group for High Jump. Anyone interested in On April 2nd a Facebook posting announced the free Li’l Honeys tab to our fans. Just hours after the start of the promotion, all 2,200 sample packets were allocated. Since there were so many fans requesting a sample, we offered an additional 300 sample packages through Facebook on April 25th. All the Li’l Honeys were claimed in less than three minutes! Recipients of the samples were very enthusiastic, posting Facebook comments Small Hive Bettle Update Submitted by Dr. Medhat Nasr So far all inspection of imported queens showed no positive findings of any live/ dead small hive beetles. This year so far exporters are doing good job in observing the protocol. As per our discussion and plans from last conference call, we can recommend using inspection at Prevalence limit 0.5% if you wish to continue using 0.2%, it is your own HiveLights touting the convenience, quality and flavor of the Li’l Honeys. This promotion alone increased our fan base from 1,096 to 6,621. In addition, 62% of our new fans signed up for our Sweet Talk Newsletter, swelling our member base to over 15,000 subscribers. Hive to Home – Chapter 3 We continue the fascinating story of honey with our third chapter of the “Hive to Home” initiative. How honey is produced is a captivating food production story and it helps consumers better understand the roles the honeybee and the honey producer play in bringing our quality 100% Canadian honey to their homes. A special thank you to Barrie Termeer, member and Chairman of the Alberta Honey Producers Co-operative, for the great job he did in representing all members in the producer phase of the Hive to Home campaign. When you see Barrie, please thank him for his support & dedication. Go to http://hivetohome. beemaid.com/ to view Chapter 3. decision. Some of us might continue to check all queens but this is up to the province. Box of 100 queens 1 2-3 4-9 10-18 19-30 31-50 51-100 August 2012 Prevalence limit (p%) .2% .5% all all all all all 3 8 5 12 6 13 6 14 6 9 10 August 2012 HiveLights Integrated Management of Nosema & Detection of Antibiotic Residues CBRF 2011, Abdullah Ibrahim, Andony P. Melathopoulos and Stephen F. Pernal A Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Box 29, Beaverlodge, Alberta, Canada T0H 0C0 As we near the completion of our research project, we are pleased to report updates on those objectives already met and the status of those objectives nearing completion. One of our initial objectives was to compare methods of disinfecting N. ceranaecontaminated comb, evaluated over a 16-month period during 2009 and 2010. An updated dataset on the efficacy of these methods at suppressing N. ceranae spore production and their impact on colony productivity and survival is presented. Also shown are initial results from a study comparing the effect of different sample sizes and sampling locations on Nosema infection levels within colonies. During the summer of 2011, we continued our work testing promising alternative compounds to fumagillin, based on those previously identified from our bioassays in 2010, as well as testing novel compounds synthesized specifically for this work. We also undertook an additional experiment examining the effect of fall fumigillin treatments on overwintered colonies in commercial apiaries. Objectives in 2011: 1. To complete our evaluation of acetic acid fumigation, heat treatment and irradiation as methods of disinfecting N. ceranae-contaminated comb, and their subsequent impact on colony productivity, and colony survival. 2. To compare the accuracy and variability of different sampling methods in determining N. ceranae infection levels in colonies. 3. To further investigate the efficacy of alternative compounds identified during the summer 2010 for Nosema control, and to test additional new synthetic compounds in incubator-based cage trials. 4. To compare the efficacy of fall-applied label dose treatments of fumagillin, in large and small volumes of sugar syrup, for suppressing N. ceranae infections. 1. Evaluation of methods of disinfecting Nosema ceranaecontaminated comb. Though first discovered as a parasite of Apis cerana, N. ceranae is now closely associated with Apis mellifera throughout most beekeeping areas of the world. As a newly-identified parasite of A. mellifera, the mode of transmission and epidemiology N. ceranae is not fully understood. Based on our knowledge of N. apis, however, it is known that the re-use of contaminated comb is a likely avenue for transmitting spores within and among colonies. Therefore we hypothesized that methods previously used to disinfect N. apis1, 2 on comb might also be effective at disinfecting N. ceranae¬-contaminated comb and equipment. The experiment involved artificially infecting frames of comb with N. ceranae spores, disinfecting them using acetic acid fumigation, heat or irradiation then placing these frames into brood chambers, and comparing the subsequent infection after establishing bees on the comb. Methods: One hundred and ninety-two full-depth Langstroth frames containing fullydrawn honey comb were sprayed with an aqueous suspension of N. ceranae spores, prepared the previous day from adult bees sampled from infected colonies. Confirmation of N. ceranae was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)3. Each inoculated brood chamber prepared for the experiment had four of these frames placed in its centre, surrounded by five additional noninoculated frames. Each inoculated brood chamber contained an overall dose 4.51 × 108 N. ceranae spores. After the addition of inoculated comb, each brood nest was assigned to one of the following treatment groups, with each treatment group consisting of 12 replicate colonies: (1) Acetic acid fumigation, (2) heat-treatment, (3) irradiation, (4) inoculated-untreated (inoculated combs that were not disinfected), and (5) uninoculateduntreated (combs neither receiving inoculation, nor disinfection). Sixty 1-kg New Zealand packages were hived on the experimental equipment. (For a detailed description of treatments and colony establishment please refer to our previous report). JMP version 74 was used for subsequent statistical analyses in all experiments. Data are expressed as means ± standard error. Results and Discussion: Multivariate analysis of our 16-month data set confirmed significant differences in Nosema spore levels in colonies among treatments (F = 27.34; df = 4, 33; P = <.0001) and across sampling dates (F = 10.7548; df = 6, 28; P = 0.0035), however, there was no significant interaction between the date of sampling and treatment applied (Wilkes’ Lambda: F = 1.0282; df = 112, 26.418; P = 0.4893) (Fig.1). Thirteen days after colony establishment, spore levels within inoculated-untreated colonies rapidly proliferated to 10.9 million spores/bee, whereas the spore levels in the other treatments remained below one million spores per bee. By 21 May 2009, 19 days after establishing the package colonies, inoculated-untreated colonies had ten-fold more spores per bee than the other treatment groups. The increase, however, began to reverse by 4 June 2009 and continued to decline until 30 July 2009, when infections among the inoculated-untreated colonies appeared to rebound to 1.6 million spores. HiveLights P pg13 August 2012 11 12 August 2012 HiveLights Figure 1. Mean number of N. ceranae spores per bee following the establishment of colonies on Nosemainoculated comb treated with one of three different disinfection techniques (acetic acid, fumigation, heat, irradiation) versus comb inoculated and left untreated and comb nether inoculated nor treated. Bees were hived onto comb on 2 May 09 (n = 12 colonies / treatment). Spore densities (millions of spores/bee) underscored by arrows indicate individual colonies on 13 November and 17 December 09 that fell well outside the range of the other colonies in the group. The name of the treatment group of these outlying colonies appears in parentheses below the number. Different letters above each date denote significant differences among treatment means (Tukey-Kramer HSD, α=0.05). Significantly, throughout the remainder of the experiment, infections among colonies established on irradiated comb and acetic acid-fumigated comb remained very low (Fig. 1). Although colonies on heattreated comb also exhibited low infections through the remainder of the experiment, they were prone to punctuated and transitory infections. increases were observed not among the inoculated-untreated colonies, as was the case the previous spring, but among the colonies on heat-treated comb where infection levels exceeded 1 million spores per bee by 15 May 2010. As was the case in the spring of 2009, however, all infection levels declined for the remainder of the summer by late May. A more uniform, but smaller, increase in infection was observed across all the treatments towards the end of April 2010, however the highest Determining Nosema infection severity by microscopically counting spores cannot discriminate between N. apis and N. ceranae. Consequently, to determine the Figure 2. The proportion of colonies that were infected with either N. apis, N. ceranae or a combination of both species at the time of colony establishment (2 May 2009, before contact with comb) or at different dates during the experiment (n = 12 colonies / treatment). species composition during the course of the experiment we analyzed the bee macerates, generated initially to count spores, by PCR techniques. Results indicate that while none of the package bees were infected with N. ceranae at the time of colony establishment, approximately one third had low levels of N. apis (Fig. 2). This finding confirms that N. ceranae was transmitted to the bees via the inoculated comb as it was not present among the package bees. This pattern, however, reversed after the bees were established on comb, such that both Nosema spp. were detected in virtually all colonies. N. ceranae appeared to follow a temporal pattern in which the incidence of colonies exhibiting an infection declined to about one third by fall after peaking in the spring. Infections were seen to rebound again in April 2010, however colonies on heat-treated comb had the highest proportion of mixed infections compared with other treatments (Fig. 2). When infections declined to very low levels toward mid-summer 2010, all irradiated colonies maintained pure N. apis while the other disinfection treatments harboured some proportions of mixed species infections. The inoculated, untreated colonies during this time period had single-species infections only. Collectively, our results also tend to suggest that N. ceranae has a seasonal phenology similar to N. apis in northern latitudes, whereby spore reductions tend to occur by the mid-summer periods after peaking in the spring. Our results further suggest that under northern temperate climates, N. apis is not readily outcompeted and replaced N. ceranae in colonies. As reported in previously, the positive effect of disinfecting comb also appeared to influence the productivity of colonies, presumably through reducing N. ceranae infection. There were significantly more adult bees in colonies two months after being established on irradiated comb compared with heat-treated comb; colonies hived on fumigated or untreated comb remained intermediate. Colonies established on irradiated and acetic HiveLights P pg14 August 2012 13 acid-fumigated comb, the two treatments which most greatly reduced spore levels, had the highest level of total honey production over the two production seasons, though this difference was not statistically significant. By the end of the 16-month experiment, 42% of the colonies in the heat and inoculated-untreated groups were dead, compared with 33% in the fumigated treatment, 17% in the non-inoculated treatment and none in the irradiated group (Fig. 3). function of age and task, there is a need to determine the precision and accuracy of different sampling methods to track Nosema levels. Methods: To address these questions, we selected 11 colonies naturallyIn conclusion, the beekeeping industry infected with is advised to employ irradiation as a N. ceranae from disinfection procedure for N. ceranae. a commercial beekeeping Heat treatment for N. ceranae spores operation in is not recommended; this finding is Northern Alberta. reinforced by the newly-discovered Samples of 250 high temperature tolerance associated bees were taken with these spores5. Though acetic acid from each of three disinfection does appear to reduce different locations spore levels in colonies, it does not offer in each colony: complete suppression. the brood nest, the outer honey 2. Sampling Methods for Detecting N. frames and the ceranae infection level in Colonies. Figure 4. Mean number of N. ceranae spores per bee of samples collected from the three different locations of each hive and processed compositely as samples underside of the of 30, 60 or 90 bees. Samples were collected on 30 April and 12 May 2010 (n= inner cover, on Managing N. ceranae requires an 11). Different letters above each location denote significant differences among locations within date of sampling (Tukey-Kramer HSD, α=0.05). 30 April and 12 accurate method to determine the May 2010. These infection level within colonies and to locations correspond to common Results and Discussion: make informed management decisions. sampling locations for adult bees Because the infection level within a within colonies. The samples from Based on samples analyzed from colony varies among adult bees as each location individual colonies on 30 April 2010, within each colony it was discovered that there were were processed differences in the level of infection as independently, in related to location of collection within composite groups of the hive as well as sample size. On 30 30, 60 and 90 bees; April, composite samples of 30 and 90 an additional 30 bees indicated that the brood nest had bees were processed the lowest level of Nosema infection individually. and that the honey frames had the Counting of highest, with inner cover samples being intermediate (F = 4.56 df = 2,31; P = Nosema spores was 0.019) and (F = 6.99; df = 2,31; P = performed using 0.006) (Fig. 4). Composite samples of phase-contrast light 60 bees on this date showed that the microscopy at 400x brood nest and the inner cover were magnification using similar in infection level with bees on the standard methods6. outer honey frames still remaining the Some samples of 30 most highly infected (F = 6.07; df = 2; individual bees per 31; P = 0.006). colony remain to Figure 3. Cumulative colony mortality 16 months after hiving package bees on Nosema ceranae-inoculated comb treated with acetic acid fumigation, heat, be analyzed and as irradiation, versus inoculated, untreated comb and uninoculated, untreated On 12 May, composite samples of 30 bees such these results comb. Bees were hived onto treated comb on 2 May 09 (n = 12 colonies / showed that the brood nest and inner are not reported. treatment). 14 August 2012 HiveLights cover had the lowest level of infection compared with the honey frames (F = 8.30; df = 2; 26; P = 0.002). In examining composite samples of 60 bees, these trends were again evident (13.62; df = 2, 25; P = 0.0001). Composite samples of 90 bees showed that the brood nest had the lowest infection level and the honey frames the highest with the inner cover being intermediate (F = 4.86; df = 2, 25; P = 0.017). It is clear that bees collected from honey frames consistently had higher spore levels than those collected from the inner cover and the brood nest. For beekeepers wanting to increase their sensitivity of detection for N. ceranae within a colony, sampling from these peripheral frames is desirable. In general, brood nest bees appear to have lowest levels of infection or may, at times, be similar to sampling from the inner cover. These findings support historical work performed with N. apis in which older bees on peripheral frames had higher infection levels compared with the youngest bees in the brood nest area, with bees on the inner cover being of mixed age cohorts making infection levels from this location intermediate between the other two sampling locations. Sampling from the inner cover, as we have predominantly done in our work, is likely to yield better information on the average level of infection across all age cohorts of the colony. We are processing remaining samples, particularly those of the 30 individual bees per colony, in order to make more robust conclusions about the appropriate size and precision with which Nosema infection levels can be determined within colonies and apiaries. 3. Screening Alternative Compounds Against N. ceranae. During the summer 2011, we further evaluated the two promising compounds identified from our laboratory bioassays on caged bees conducted during the summer 2010. These included carbendazim, a fungicide, and JP-P145a, an aspiring analogue of fumagillin synthesized by Ph.D. student Johan van den Heever. Mr. van den Heever provided us with four additional functional analogues of fumagillin which were coded as: JP-P1-59a, JP-P1-50a, JP-P1-56a and JP-P1-58a. One of the objectives behind testing fumagillin analogues was to understand the mode of action of fumagillin against Nosema. This is important because fumagillin’s mode of action against microsporidia is not well understood and as such using a fumagillin analogue will allow us to determine what functional regions of the molecule contribute to its biological activity. The second objective was to determine if specific analogues have the same efficacy as fumagillin but with more desirable properties in terms of ease of manufacture, stability in sugar syrup or reduction in residue production in honey. Methods: ad libitum that contained 0, 0.04, 0.4 or 4 mmol of each test compound, except fumagillin which was administered at 0.04 mmol. Each concentration was replicated across 6 different cages. Treatment efficacy was assessed by comparing the density of spores among live and dead bees from each cage after 16 days of feeding on treated syrup. Compounds were considered promising if: a) spore levels declined in a concentration-response manner, similar to that for a positive control (fumagillin), b) were significantly reduced compared to those fed untreated syrup or c) toxicity to the bees was low. Results and Discussion: Of the two promising compounds selected during 2010 for further evaluation, and those additional compounds tested during the summer 2011, only JP-P1-45a (coded in 2010 as JP-P1-7a) showed a dose-response relationship against N. ceranae infections, The effectiveness of compounds was tested against cages of workers infected with a standard dose of N. ceranae. To accomplish this, cages were stocked with bees that were emerged overnight in an incubator from frames of sealed brood collected from Nosema-free colonies. Bees were pooled and mixed from all frames and 100 workers were added to wooden cages (9 x 11 x 14.5 cm). Bees were fed ad libitum 3:2 (v:v) sucrose syrup via gravity Figure 5. Mean number of N. ceranae spores per bee following 17d of incubation feeders for 24h, among the carbendazim, JP-P1-45A and fumagillin treatments. JP-P1-45A demonstrated a significant concentration response (n = 6 replicate cages of 100 after which time workers/treatment × concentration). Mean comparisons were made between they were fed carbendazim and JP-P1-45a for each concentration (ns=non-significant and asterisk = significant, t-Test, α=0.05). Fumagillin was omitted from the mean comparison to 5 mL of syrup meet the assumption of homoscedacity for the analysis and it was also not tested at containing 10 the 0.4 or 4 mmol concentration. million spores of N. ceranae prepared from freshlyand kept spore loads at low levels (Fig. killed bees for an additional 48h. After 5). Although fumagillin reduced N. inoculation, cages of bees were fed syrup P pg16 HiveLights August 2012 15 ceranae infections to almost undetectable levels at 0.04 mmol, similar reductions were only observed for JP-P1-45a at higher concentrations (0.4 and 4 mmol). Based on the results of all cage bioassay trials to date, fumagillin is by far the most effective compound identified against N. ceranae infections in honey bees. In 2011, carbendazim did not prove to have suppressive effects over the concentrations tested. The efficacy observed for JP-P1-45a, the aspirin analogue of fumagillin, continues to suggest that the side chain of the parent molecule may not be very important for enzymatic recognition and biological activity. This structureactivity relationship warrants further investigation as a means of producing an alternative to fumagillin. Beekeepers are advised not to purchase commercial products which purport to reduce Nosema infections in honey bees, other than fumagillin, as our tests over the last several years have not been able to substantiate any such claims. 4. Fall Fumagillin Treatment and Monitoring through Winter 2011 and Spring 2012 Fumagillin is the only registered treatment for Nosema spp. in honey bees. While its use in managing N. apis is well understood, it remains unclear how best to apply fumagillin to provide optimal control of N. ceranae. For example, label recommendations for applying fumagillin to control N. apis in overwintered colonies may not be optimal for N. ceranae, as the latter has been suggested to be more prevalent during summer months in certain regions7. Furthermore, recommendations for syrup-feeding fumagillin to individual colonies are becoming increasingly inapplicable with the widespread adoption of barrel feeding in some regions. In order to test the importance of the timing of treatments as well as the effectiveness of alternative formulations, we established several experiments examining either spring of fall-applied treatments of the drug. Reported here are the results of our latest experiment, which 16 August 2012 commenced in the fall of 2011. Methods: Thirty-six naturally N. ceranae-infected colonies were identified on 7 September 2011 in a commercial beekeeping operation in Northern Alberta. These colonies were randomly divided among three treatment groups, each group with 12 replicate colonies. The first two treatment groups received fumagillin applied to the colonies at a rate of 97.5 mg a.i. per application as either a ‘Drench’ or ‘Syrup’. The drench treatment was applied in 250 ml sucrose syrup (1:1 v/v) poured directly onto bees in the frame spaces. The syrup treatment was applied in 2 L sucrose syrup in a frame feeder. Control treatment colonies received 2 L unmedicated sugar syrup. All treatments were applied in two successive applications, one week apart, on 12 and 19 September 2011. As a result, each colony received a cumulative dose 195 mg a.i. fumagillin, the recommended fall dose for treating N. apis. Samples of 50 bees were collected weekly, from 7 September 2011 to 22 October 2011 from the inner cover of the colony. From October 2011- April 2012 these indoor-wintered colonies were sampled monthly from the winter cluster. From April 2012 until early June 2012, samples will be collected biweekly, from the inner cover. Data collected at the time of writing this report is presented. Results and Discussion: At the time of establishment of the experimental apiary (7 Sept 2011), the average Nosema load was 3.22 ± 0.51 x 106 spores per bee and the infection level did not differ among treatment groups (F=0.05 df=2, 35; P=0.94, (Fig. 6). Multivariate analyses of spores levels over time showed significant differences among treatments (F=8.92, df=2, 23; P=0.0014), over sampling dates (F=16.30; df=10, 14; P= <0.0001), and a significant interaction between time and treatment (Wilks’ Lambda: F= 1.87; df= 20, 28; P=0.062). Five days post-establishment, on 12 Sept 2011, there was a natural decline in the spore level observed in all treatments (overall mean: 1.8 ± 0.40 x 106), with the colonies in the syrup treatment having the lowest spore level and colonies in the drench treatment having the highest spore loads; untreated colonies had intermediate infection levels. However, one week after the second application, irrespective of treatment, spore loads started to increase with continued increases observed throughout the winter. No treatment separation was evident until 27 February 2012. At this Figure 6. Mean number of N. ceranae spores per bee among colonies after treatment in the fall with fumagillin (two applications of 97.5 mg a.i. per colony, on 12 and 19 September 2011) using two different techniques (Drench = low volume sucrose syrup applied onto bees or Syrup = bulk sucrose syrup feed) (n = 12 colonies / treatment). Different letters above each date denote significant differences among treatment means (Tukey-Kramer HSD, α=0.05). HiveLights sampling date, the untreated colonies had the highest infection level (20 x 106 spores per bee), the drench treatment had intermediate spore loads (8 x 106) and the syrup treatment had the lowest levels of Nosema spp. (4.8 x 106). In general, based on the results of all spring and fall application experiments performed to date, fumagillin has been shown to suppress infections of N. ceranae in commercial beekeeping operations. Label dose applications of the product in the spring confer significant suppression of Nosema spp. until the end of summer, irrespective of formulation. Applications of 195 - 200 mg a.i., of fumagillin in the fall, whether in full volume syrup or drench applications, appear to suppress spore levels lower than untreated colonies immediately after application. Few treatment differences have been observed over winter months and suppression of infection levels has been observed during the majority of weeks of the following spring. Under both treatment paradigms, however, monitoring of colonies during the subsequent fall or spring season is essential to make appropriate treatment decisions as levels of spores, though suppressed compared with untreated colonies, still may exceed the nominal economic threshold value of 1 x 106 spores per bee and can be variable among colonies. Our experience also speaks to the need to improve and standardize bee sampling techniques to reduce the potentially large variances among samples. General Project Conclusions: 1. Irradiation is the most effective method of disinfecting comb contaminated with N. ceranae spores and promoting long-term colony survival. 2. In Northern Alberta, N. ceranae spore levels appear to naturally decline during mid-summer, exhibiting phenological patterns historically seen for N. apis. 3. Applications of 100 mg a.i. fumagillin during spring, irrespective of the formulations evaluated, are effective at suppressing active infections of N. ceranae until fall. 4. Applications 195 - 200 mg a.i. fumagillin in low or high volumes of syrup during the fall are effective at suppressing active infections of N. ceranae immediately after treatment and continue to depress spore levels below that of untreated colonies during the following spring. 5. For both spring and fall applications of fumagillin, monitoring of spore levels is still essential during the subsequent fall or spring periods to make appropriate treatment decisions. of their time to the analysis of remaining bee samples. In 2011-12, Mr. Johan van den Heever continued as a part-time Ph.D. student in chemistry at the University of Alberta. Mr. van den Heever has been devising the LC-MS/MS residue detection technique for fumagillin and its degradation products in honey and has synthesized novel compounds as alternatives to fumagillin. Future Activities 6. With collaborators at the Agri-Food Laboratories of the Province of Alberta, a new LC-MS/MS technique for the detection of fumagillin and its primary thermal and UV degradation products has been developed. 7. An aspirin analogue of fumagillin appears to be a promising synthetic compound at suppressing N. ceranae infections in caged bees. Continued research in this area will focus on the determination of incurred fumagillin residues in colonies and further bioassay work with novel compounds to treat Nosema spp. Acknowledgements In addition to the support provided by the Canadian Bee Research Fund, this research was generously supported by the Alberta Beekeepers’ Commission, Medivet Pharmaceuticals, the Alberta Crop Industry 8. Fumagillin remains the most effective antibiotic so far tested at suppressing Nosema spp. and is highly effective against N. ceranae. Development Fund, Bee Maid Honey, the NSERCCANPOLIN Strategic Network and the Matching Investment Initiative of Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada. In-kind support was also received from Iotron Industries Canada Ltd and Paradis Honey. 9. Honey frames in the periphery of the brood nest appear to be the most sensitive location to sample bees in order to detect the presence of N. ceranae levels in a colony. References Cited: 1. Bailey, L. 1957. Comb fumigation for nosema diseases. Amer. Bee J. 1: 24-26. 2. Cantwell G.E., Shimanuki, H. 1969. Heat treatment as a means of eliminating Nosema and Project Personnel increasing production. Amer. Bee J. 109: 52-54. 3. Klee, J., Besana, A.M., Genersch, E., Gisder, S., Funds from all partners were used to employ postdoctoral fellow, Dr. Abdullah Ibrahim, for the duration of this project. Nanetti, A., Tam, D.Q., Chinh, T.X., Puerta, F., Ruz, J.M., Kryger, P., Message, D., Hatjina, F., Korpela, S., Fries, I., Paxton, R.J. 2007. Widespread dispersal of the microsporidian Nosema ceranae, an emergent pathogen of the western honey bee, Apis mellifera. J. In the last project year, postsecondary students Asrar Ibrahim and Devon Sekora (Grande Prairie Regional College) and Meagan Maloney (University of Alberta) were hired from May-August 2011. In addition, Alex von Tiesenhausen was hired from in July-August 2011 to assist with managing colonies and honey extraction. Invertebr. Pathol. 96:1-10. 4. SAS Institute. 2001. A guide to statistics and data analysis using JMP and JMPIN software, 2nd ed. SAS Institute, Cary, NC. 5. Fenoy, S., Rueda, C., Higes, M., Martín-Hernandez, R., del Aguila, C. 2009. High-level resistance of Nosema ceranae, a parasite of the honeybee, to temperature and desiccation. 6. Cantwell, G.E. 1970. Standard methods for counting Nosema spores. Amer. Bee J. 110: 222-223. From January to March of 2012, co-operative education students Cheryl Penny and Marika Viens (Thompson Rivers University) have contributed part 7. Martín-Hernández, R., Meana, A., Prieto, L., Salvador, A.M., Garrido-Bailón, E., Higes, M. 2007. Outcome of colonization of Apis mellifera by Nosema ceranae. AEM 73: 6331-6338. HiveLights August 2012 17 18 August 2012 HiveLights WORLD NEWS Poland Beekeepers Dump Thousands of Dead Bees in Protest Submitted by The Editor On March 15, over 1,500 beekeepers and anti-GMO protesters marched through the streets of Warsaw, depositing thousands of dead bees on the steps of the Ministry of Agriculture in protest of genetically modified foods and their pesticides which are together largely responsible for the killing off of bees, butterflies, moths and other beneficial pollinators in great numbers. Later that day the Minister of Agriculture, Marek Sawicki, announced plans to ban MON810, which has already produced millions of hectares of pesticide resistant “superweeds” in the US. The Polish Beekeepers Association organized the protest, joining forces with International Coalition to Protect the Polish Countryside (ICPPC) and the Coalition for a GMO Free Poland. Targeting Monsanto’s MON810 GM corn in particular, they also called for a complete ban on all genetically engineered crops as well as the pesticides found to be most damaging to the environment (and particularly to bees). In 2008, the Polish Parliament banned GM feed, including both the planting and importing of GM crops. “Despite this progressive step,” reports Food Travels, “the European Commission has refused to accept regional bans on GMOs, keeping Polish farmers, producers, and activists on the offensive.” Regardless, says the ICPPC, “None of the nine European Union countries that have already prohibited MON 810 did so by asking the permission of the EU.” There was a great variety of attire as beekeepers dressed in their work bee suits and masks and ran their hive smoke guns as they marched, many wore yellow jackets with the famous Einstein quote, and many more original signs, props, and costumes. The ICPPC is asking Polish residents to write Minister of Agriculture Marek Sawicki, demanding that he implement an immediate moratorium on GM crops, without waiting for EU approval. HiveLights August 2012 19 20 August 2012 HiveLights Honey Prices A Good News for Change In the month of May the honey retail price of US $ 5.65 is 8.9 % higher than one year ago. These prices are the highest in years..... Submitted by Dr. Medhat Nasr HiveLights August 2012 21 Tony Lalonde Sales Prt. BuySell Honey Wax Propolis Beekeeping Supplies Extracting Equipment Used Equipment Bentley extractors Cowan extractors Swinger Forklift High Fructose Corn Syrup Sucrose Syrup Inland Plastic Winter Wraps TLS Bee Apparel Mahurangi Hiveware Bee Pro Pollen Supplement Mountain Bee Products - bee suits, veils Oxytet Permadent Frames Supers painted and unpainted Supers assembled and unassembled Lumber for supers Helmets Hive tools Hive lifters Smokers Honey containers Feeder pails Barrels Liners Barrel Grabber Barrel Carts Pallet puller Distributors for some or all of the supplies Alberta Alberta Honey Producers Coop...................... 780-960-8010 Manitoba Manitoba Honey Coop................................... 204-783-2240 Maritimes Claude Hachey............................................... 506-546-6687 Ontario Munro Honey ........................................... 519-847-5333 Quebec Réjean Lambert.............................................. 819-828-2549 Saskatchewan Tony Lalonde Sales.................................... 306-931-0155 [email protected] & Sons Enterprises Ltd. BOX 316, AUSTIN, MANITOBA Toll-free 1-866-800-2077 Phone: (204) 637-2277 Fax: (204) 637-2033 Murray or Adam Lewis QUALIT Y WOODENWARE B OXES, FRAMES, ET C., AND PINE LUMBER Unassembled, Assembled and/or Wax-dipped Food-Grade Finish Also available at all " Bee Maid " Bee Supply Outlets Call for Pricing Please order well in advance. BEEKEEPERS BUILDING FOR BEEKEEPERS. Tony Lalonde Sales Prt. Box 42, Clavet Sk, Canada S0K 0Y0 Ph: 306-931-0155 fax: 931-1646 Proud sponsor of the Canadian Honey Council Honey Wanted FOR CURRENT MARKET CONDITIONS CALL – GAIL WYANT 1-800-265-4988 Ext. 3322 e-mail: [email protected] Trusted By Beekeepers for Over 50 Years! McCormick Canada, 600 Clarke Road, London, On. N5V 3K5 Fax: 519-673-0089 22 August 2012 www.billybee.com HiveLights or check our website: www.fraserauction.com Roger A. Morse Outstanding Teaching/Extension Service/Regulatory Award for 2012 Winner Announced Submitted by Jim Bobb, EAS Chairman M My Fellow Beekeepers, www.cowenmfg.com I am pleased to announce that Doug McRory is the EAS award recipient for the Roger A. Morse Outstanding Teaching/Extension Service/Regulatory Award for 2012. Doug McRory had been the Ontario Provincial Apiarist for over one score and four years. Doug has been instrumental in promoting IPM techniques for beekeepers, including formic and oxalic acid treatment regimens; encouraging a selection criteria and a queen breeding program, which advanced the genetic stock for queen production and improved mite-resistance and overwintering ability; and played a major role in the establishment of the Ontario Beekeepers' Association Technology-Transfer Program. Please join me in congratulating Doug in joining a prestigious list of previous Roger A. Morse Award winners. We invite Mr. McRory; and all those who benefitted from his knowledge, tutelage, and programs; to the EAS Convention in Burlington, Vermont, the week of August 13, 2012. Visit www.easternapiculture.org for the convention schedule and more information. “BUY COWEN” 800-257-2894 Roger A. Morse Outstanding Teaching/Extension Service/ Regulatory Award Recipients 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 James E. Tew, The Ohio State University Dewey M. Caron, University of Delaware Michael Burgett, Oregon State University Malcolm Sanford, University of Florida, Retired Don Dixon, Provincial Apiarist, Manitoba, Canada Marion Ellis, Ext. Specialist, Univ. Nebraska Tony Jadczak, Apiary Inspector, Maine Clarence Collison, Extension, Mississippi State Robert Berthold, Delaware Valley College, Retired William Michael Hood, Clemson University Dennis vanEngelsdorp, Pa Dept of Agriculture Maryann Frazier, Ext. Specialist, Penn State University Doug McRory, Provincial Apiarist, Ontario, Canada In a honey bee hive, an interesting find F David Ostermann, Business Development Specialist - Pollination Apiarist Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives, Winnipeg, Manitoba For those interested, larvae of an as-of-yet unidentified insect were found on some honey bees in a hive in Manitoba. See picture attached At this point it’s suspected they are beetle larvae, perhaps of the family Meloidae, which includes blister beetles. Larvae are being sent out for id. A cluster of the larvae was between the thorax and abdomen (see picture) of some live bees in the brood area of the hive. It‘s estimated less than 1% of the bees had these on them. The honey bee colony was in 3 standard boxes but appeared to be struggling from varroa which was seen on some bees. The larvae were only found on live bees on frames. On the way home from the site, a couple bees I collected with these larvae on them were twitching and seemed otherwise paralysed. Other bees with the larvae on them seemed ok. HiveLights August 2012 23 Symposium Apimondia 2012 Élevage de reines, sélection et pathologie de l'abeille mellifère Du 16 au 18 novembre 2012 Hôtel Château Laurier, ville de Québec Apimondia Symposium 2012 Queen Breeding, Selection and Honey Bee Health November 16 to 18, 2012, Hôtel Château Laurier, Quebec City Programme préliminaire / Preliminary Program Vendredi 16 novembre / Friday, November 16 CONFÉRENCES / CONFERENCES (En anglais avec traduction simultanée en français / In English with simultaneous translation into French) SESSION D'AFFICHES / POSTER SESSION : HORAIRE À VENIR - SCHEDULE TO COME 7h Accueil, pause café et inscription / Welcome, coffee break and registration 8 h 15 Mot de bienvenue / Welcome speech Rod Scarlett, directeur exécutif, Conseil canadien du miel / Executive Director, Canadian Honey Council Pierre Giovenazzo, président, comité organisateur local / President, Local Organizing Committee 8 h 25 Allocution du Commanditaire Officiel / Official Sponsor speech Emmanuel de France, Propolis-etc... 8 h 35 Discours d’ouverture / Opening speech « Les nouveaux défis pour les systèmes d’assurance qualité dans une mondialisation du marché / The new challenges for quality management systems in the globalization of makets » Gilles Ratia, président d’Apimondia / President of Apimondia Un programme d’élevage allemand pour augmenter la resistance aux maladies et la productivité des abeilles canioliennes / A German breeding program for increasing disease resistance and productivity of Carniolan bees Ralph Büchler, Ph.D., professionnel de recherche et chef de l'institut sur l'abeille / Ph.D., research professional and head of the bee institute, Landesbetrieb Landwirtschaft Hessen/Bieneninstitut Kirchhain, Al11 h 30 lemagne / Germany Seront présentés lors de cette conférence les résultats et la structure du programme d’élevage allemand qui vise l’amélioration de la résistance aux maladies, la productivité et la diminution de l’agressivité des abeilles canioliennes. Structure and results of a German breeding program to simultaneously improve disease resistance, productivity and gentleness of Carniolan bees will be presented. 12 h Animateur / Chair : Ingemar Fries Trente années d’expérience sur le contrôle de Varroa destructor / Thirty years experience with the control of Varroa destructor Wolfgang Ritter, president, Commission Scientifique Santé de l’Abeille, Allemagne / President, Scientific Commission Bee Health, Germany 13 h 30 En Europe, il y a trente ans, les colonies pouvaient survivre avec un traitement annuel contre la Varroa. Aujourd’hui, trois à quatre traitements par année sont nécessaires. De nouvelles technologies doivent être développées. In Europe 30 years ago, colonies could survive with one Varroa treatment. Today, three to four per year are necessary. New strategies should be developed. Nosema apis et Nosema ceranae – espèces similaires mais différentes / Nosema apis and Nosema ceranae – similar but different 14 h Plénière Élevage et sélection / Plenary Breeding and selection Animateur / Chair : Marla Spivak 9h Élevage de la ligne « hygienic » Minnesota : 1994-2008 / Breeding the Minnesota hygienic line : 1994-2008 Marla Spivak, Ph.D., professeur, Département d'entomologie Université du Minnesota, Minnesota, États-Unis / Ph.D., professor, University of Minnesota, Department of Entomology, Minnesota, USA Le comportement hygiénique est un mécanisme inné de l’abeille permettant d'augmenter la résistance aux maladies et aux acariens. Grâce à un nouveau programme de transfert technologique, les apiculteurs américains peuvent maintenant sélectionner spécifiquement pour cette caractéristique dans les croisements génétiques. Hygienic behaviour is an important mechanism of desease and mite resistance. US beekeepers are actively selecting for this trait through a new Technology Transfer program. 9 h 30 Grooming intensity and resistance of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) to Varroa destructor mites Ernesto Guzman-Novoa, Ph.D., professor, School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Canada 10 h Le programme d’élevage fermé de la lignée « New World Carniolan » dans sa 31e generation / The New World Carniolan Closed Population Breeding Program, in its 31st Generation Sue Cobey, apicultrice, Université de l'État de Washington et Université de Californie, Davis, Washington, États-Unis / bee breeder, Washington State University and University of California, Davis , Washington, USA Vue d'ensemble sur le programme d'élevage fermé de la lignée " New World Carniolan " : son histoire, sa maintenance et ses orientations futures. Overview of the New World Carniolan Closed Population Breeding Program: its history, stock maintenance and future directions. 10 h 30 Pause café / Coffee break 11 h Quebec honey bee breeding program Pierre Giovenazzo, chercheur en apiculture, Centre de recherche en sciences animales de Deschambault, Deschambault, Quebec 11 h 15 The Saskatraz project : Saskatchewan honey bee breeding and selection program Albert Robertson, Ph.D., CEO and research scientist, Meadow Ridge Enterprises LTD, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan ,Canada 24 August 2012 HiveLights Dîner / Lunch Plénière Pathologie de l’abeille / Bee Pathology plenary 14 h 30 Ingemar Fries, professeur, Université d’Agriculture et des Sciences de Suède, Suède / professor, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden Deux infections microsporidies chez les abeilles : similaires mais différentes. Two Microsporidia infections in honey bees : similar but yet very different. Comparative susceptibility of hybrid clades of the Western honeybee to the microsporidian Régis Fontbonne, Ph.D. étudiant, professionnel de recherche, Laboratoire Microorganismes : Génome et Environnement, Clermont Université, Université Blaise Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France Comparative analysis of honey bee survival and immune response to co-infections of IAPV and N. ceranae using quantitative mass 14 h 45 spectrometry based proteomics Amanda Van Haga, Ph.D., student, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British-Columbia, Canada 15 h Épidémologie en action dans le monde apicole / The bee informed partnership: epidemiology in action! Denis vanEnglesdorp, M.Sc., Ph.D., assistant de recherche, Université du Maryland, États-Unis / M.Sc., Ph.D., assistant research scientist, University of Maryland, USA Le BIP est un programme conçu pour réduire les pertes de colonies. Nous soulignerons les outils qui fonctionnent bien pour la gestion et ceux à ne pas utiliser. Dans plusieurs parties du monde, les populations d’abeilles ont diminué depuis des décennies. Nous explorerons et évaluerons le rôle que les facteurs biotiques et abiotiques jouent dans la gestion du nombre de colonies actives. Bee Informed Partnership (BIP) is a program dedicated to reducing colony losses. We highlight which management tools work and which do not. In many parts of the world Honey Bee Populations have been declining for decades. Here we explore and assess the role a host of biotic and abiotic factors play in managed colony numbers. 15 h 30 Pause café / Coffee break 16 h Your hive as an integrated tool box: predictive biomarkers for losses of managed honey bee colonies Benjamin Dainat, Ph.D., scientist, USDA-ARS Bee Research Laboratory, Beltsville, USA / Swiss Bee Research Centre, Bern, Switzerland 16 h 30 Contribution des outils génomiques à la santé de l’abeille mellifère / Genetic toolbox for bee health Jay Evans, Ph.D., chercheur en entomologie, Laboratoire de recherche apicole, Département d’agriculture des États-Unis, États-Unis / Ph.D., research scientist, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Bee research laboratory, USA Cette conférence abordera comme sujets les outils génétiques pour étudier la santé des abeilles de même que les résultats spécifiques d’études sur les pathogènes et produits chimiques qui affectent les abeilles. I will discuss genetic tools for studying honey bee health, and specific results from studies of pathogens and chemicals that affect honey bees. Mot de clôture – invitation au banquet pour les inscrits / Closing speech – invitation to the banquet for the participants 11 h Impact of viruses on honey bee comb on the phenology of virus dynamics and impact of viruses on honey bee colony performance Rob Currie, Ph.D., professor and Head, Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada CONFÉRENCES / CONFERENCES 11 h 30 (En anglais avec traduction simultanée en français / In English with simultaneous translation into French) SESSION D'AFFICHES / POSTER SESSION : HORAIRE À VENIR - SCHEDULE TO COME Infections, dynamiques virales et contrôle des acariens / Virus infection, mite control and virus dynamics Ingemar Fries, professeur, Université d’Agriculture et des Sciences de Suède, Suède / professeur, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden Le contrôle des acariens peut influencer la dynamique virale du virus. Mite control may influence virus infection dynamics. 12 h Dîner / Lunch 17 h 19 h Souper thématique / Thematic Dinner Samedi 17 novembre / Saturday, November 17 7h Accueil, pause café et inscription / Welcome, coffee break and registration 8 h 15 Mot de bienvenue / Welcome speech Rod Scarlett, directeur exécutif, Conseil canadien du miel / Executive Director, Canadian Honey Council Pierre Giovenazzo, président, comité organisateur local / President, Local Organizing Committee 8 h 25 Allocution du Commanditaire Officiel / Official Sponsor speech Emmanuel de France, Propolis-etc... 8 h 30 Discours d’ouverture / Opening speech Technologie et qualité, un défi pour l’avenir de l’apiculture / Technology and quality, the challenge for the future Étienne Bruneau, président, Commission Scientifique Technologie et Qualité – Apimondia, ingénieur agronome, diplôme en administration d'entreprises, administrateur délégué, CARI – Centre apicole de recherche et d’information, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgique / President, Technology and Quality Scientific Committee – Apimondia, agronomist engineer, degree in business administration, Managing Director, Beekeeping Centre for Research and Information, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgique Dans notre monde apicole en pleine évolution et confronté à d'énormes difficultés, quelles sont les priorités en matière de technologie et de qualité? Our beekeeping world is changing and facing enormous difficulties, what are the technology and quality priorities for the future? Plénière Élevage et sélection / Breeding and selection plenary Animateur / Chair : Ralph Buchler, Ph.D., Bieneninstitut Kirchhain, Allemagne / Germany L’adaptation et la diversité des abeilles européennes comme facteurs clés pour la survie et la productivité des colonies / Diversity and local adaptation of European honey bees as key factors for colony survival and productivity Ralph Buchler, Ph.D., professionnel de recherche et chef de l'institut sur l'abeille / Ph.D., research professional and head of the bee institute, Landesbetrieb Landwirtschaft Hessen/Bieneninstitut Kirchhain, Al13 h 30 lemagne / Germany Quelle est l’importance des différences génétiques et des adaptations environnementales spécifiques dans l’apparition de pertes de colonies? Les résultats et recommandations d’une étude européenne vous sont présentés. How important are genetic differences and specific environmental adaptations for the occurrence of colony losses? Results and recommendations of a Europe-wide study will be presented. 14 h Marker-Assisted Selection in honey bees using proteins Stephen F. Pernal, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Beaverlodge Research Farm, Beaverlodge, Alberta, Canada 14 h 30 The effects of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) queen reproductive potential on colony growth Juliana Rangel, postdoctoral research associate, Department of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA 14 h 45 First evidence that Nasonov gland pheromone is involved in recruiting honeybee works for individual larvae to be reared as queens Saad N. AL-Kahtani, Saudi Arabia 15 h Insémination artificielle, son utilisation aujourd’hui / Instrumental insemination, its use today Sue Cobey, apicultrice, Université de l'État de Washington et Université de Californie, Davis, Washington, États-Unis / bee breeder, Washington State University and University of California, Davis , Washington, USA L'insémination artificielle : un outile essentiel pour contrôler l'accouplement chez l'abeille. C'est également un moyen qui permet de créer de nouveaux croisements avec les exigences, les complexités et les usages courants. Instrumental insemination : an essential tool to control honey bee mating. It also provides a means to create novel crosses, the requirements, intricacies and current uses. 15 h 30 Pause café / Coffee break 16 h Status of two commercialized breeding programs providing Varroaresistant bees in the USA Robert Danka, USDA-ARS, Honey Bee Breeding, Genetics and Physiology Laboratory, Baton Rouge, LA, USA 16 h 30 Transfert technologique des résultats de la recherche en sélection et élevage de l’abeille mellifère : 2008 et au-délà / Translating bee breeding research into beekeeping practice : 2008 and beyond Marla Spivak, Ph.D., professeur, Département d'entomologie Université du Minnesota, Minnesota, États-Unis / Ph.D., professor, University of Minnesota, Department of Entomology, Minnesota, USA Le comportement hygiénique est un mécanisme inné de l’abeille permettant d'augmenter la résistance aux maladies et aux acariens. Grâce à un nouveau programme de transfert technologique, les apiculteurs américains peuvent maintenant sélectionner spécifiquement pour cette caractéristiques dans les croisements génétiques. Hygienic behaviour is an important mechanism of desease and mite resistance. US beekeepers are actively selecting for this trait through a new Technology Transfer program. 17 h Mot de clôture – invitation aux ateliers du lendemain pour les inscrits / Closing speech – invitation at the Sunday workshops for the participants Plénière Pathologie de l’abeille / Bee Pathology plenary Animateur / Chair : Denis vanEnglesdorp 9h Un examen historique des populations d’abeilles en Europe et aux États-Unis et les facteurs pouvant les affecter / A historical review of managed honey bee populations in Europe and the United States and the factors that may affect them Denis vanEnglesdorp, M.Sc., Ph.D., assistant de recherche, Université du Maryland, États-Unis / M.Sc., Ph.D., assistant research scientist, University of Maryland, USA Le BIP est un programme conçu pour réduire les pertes de colonies. Nous soulignerons les outils qui fonctionnent bien pour la gestion et ceux à ne pas utiliser. Dans plusieurs parties du monde, les populations d’abeilles ont diminué depuis des décennies. Nous explorerons et évaluerons le rôle que les facteurs biotiques et abiotiques jouent dans la gestion du nombre de colonies actives. Bee Informed Partnership (BIP) is a program dedicated to reducing colony losses. We highlight which management tools work and which do not. In many parts of the world Honey Bee Populations have been declining for decades. Here we explore and assess the role a host of biotic and abiotic factors play in managed colony numbers. 9 h 30 Efficacy of new miticides for the management of Varroa destructor under Canadian prairie conditions Lynae Vandervalk, M.Sc. candidate, graduate student, Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science Agriculture-Forestry Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton 9 h 45 (À CONFIRMER / TO CONFIRM) 10 h Survie des abeilles mellifères confrontées aux maladies / Survival of honey bees in the face of disease Jay Evans, Ph.D., chercheur en entomologie, Laboratoire de recherche apicole, Département d’agriculture des États-Unis, États-Unis / Ph.D., research scientist, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Bee research laboratory, USA Cette conférence abordera comme sujets les outils génétiques pour étudier la santé des abeilles de même que les résultats spécifiques d’études sur les pathogènes et produits chimiques qui affectent les abeilles. I will discuss genetic tools for studying honey bee health, and specific results from studies of pathogens and chemicals that affect honey bees. 10 h 30 Pause café / Coffee break Dimanche 18 novembre / Sunday, November 18 HiveLights August 2012 25 CHOIX A / CHOICE A CIRCUIT TECHNIQUE ET ATELIER DE FORMATION / WORKSHOPS (billingue / bilingual) Coordonnateur / Coordinator : Paul Kosak, et / and Dr. Claude Boucher Choix de circuit / Choice of workshops : (Dîner inclus / Lunch included) 10 h to 15 h Lieu / Place : Centre de recherche en sciences animales de Deschambault (CRSAD) #1 Circuit technique / Workshop Hivernage efficace des colonies d’abeilles en regions tempérées / Effective wintering of honey bee colonies in temperate climate Paul Kosak, chef apicole provincial de l’Ontario / Ontario provincial apiarist Nicolas Tremblay, conseiller apicole provincial, CRSAD, Québec, Canada Ou / OR 9 h to 12 h Lieu / Place : Hôtel Château Laurier #2 Atelier de formation / Workshop Lutte intégrée pour l’apiculture à grande échelle / Integrated pest management for large scale beekeeping Medhat Nasr, chef apicole de la province de l’Alberta / Alberta provincial apiarist, Canada Dr Claude Boucher, vétérinaire, ministère de l’Agriculture et de l’Agroalimentaire du Québec, Québec, Canada / veterinary, Ministry of Agriculture and Agri-Food of Quebec, Quebec, Canada CHOIX B / CHOICE B VISITE GUIDÉE DE LA VILLE DE QUÉBEC EN AUTOCAR DE LUXE / SIGHTSEEING OF QUEBEC CITY IN BUS (billingue / bilingual) 9 h to 12 h Nous vous invitons à découvrir les charmes et les sites historiques de la ville de Québec : le quatier Latin, les plaines d'Abraham, les ramparts, le Château Frontenac, l'Assemblée nationale, la Basilique Notre-Dame, l'Hôtel de ville, la Place Royale, la Citadelle ainsi que plusieurs points d'intérêt des quartiers plus modernes de la ville. Trois arrêts prévus. We invite you to discover the charm and historic sites of Quebec city : the Quartier Latin, the Plains of Abraham, the ramparts, the Château Frontenac, National Assembly, the Notre Dame Basilica, City Hall, Place Royale, the Citadelle and many points of interest of most modern neighborhoods of the city. Three scheduled stops. 26 August 2012 HiveLights Classifieds: 403-599-3953. Summit Gardens Honey, Milo, Alberta. www.summitgardenshoney.com Bee Supplies for Sale Wanted – Bees Wax for candles: (ON) Bee Supplies - Silicon Moulds for Candles: Petawawa (ON) Over 18 years selling high quality silicon moulds for making beeswax candles. The moulds do not require lubrication. Easy to follow instructions included in $5.00 catalogue. Cost of the catalogue is refunded on your first order. Contact: E. & R. Schmitt, 3468A Petawawa Blvd. Petawawa, ON K8H 1X3. Phone: Business 613-687-4335 Light Yellow rendered beeswax cappings. Email: [email protected], Phone: 613-478-3784 Contact: Ian or JoAnn Fraser. Wanted – Barrels of white and buckwheat honey: (ON) Phone: 647-801-6690. Contact: Jonathan. For Sale: 80 hives and honey equipment for sale in Ontario. Call 780-728-7006. Honey Bees For Sale Retirement Sale: 50 frame, stainless Maxant extractor and Ford F250 4X4 Super Duty with hydraulic tailgate, flat deck, expanded metal walls, etc. Phone 306-374- 8130 or e-mail [email protected]. For sale: Queen cells ready for pick-up June and July. Mated queens shipped June through September. Highlands Honey, 6-Z2 Old Kingston Rd., Portland, ON, K0G 1V0. Phone: 613-272-2091 For sale: 1300 hives of bees available after blueberry pollination in New Brunswick. Double brood chamber hives, migratory lids and pallets. 3 semi loads, available approx. by June 23. Free delivery to New Brunswick, Quebec and Ontario. Call Chris 519-617-5503. For sale: 400 four frames nucs, available starting beginning of may, minimum of 3 frames of brood + 1 honey frame. All Hawaiian carniolian queens from last year, please contact Pierre : 1 204 248 2645 or cell number 1 204 208 0110. Nucs have to be picked up in Southwestern Manitoba. Minimum of 10 nucs at a time. Price : 150 dollars per nucs. We'll give you a Use round comb section equipment by reduction for any big quantity orders. Ross Rounds, Inc. and see how this low cost investment can increase your profits. Wanted to Buy • 8 oz. Sells For Same As 12 oz. Wanted - Raw Honey • Minimal Labor • Bees Fill Completely Will buy raw honey, small or large • No Breakage And No Propolis amounts. • Attractive Durable Package Preference from Southern BC region. 250-495-2234 “Will pay top dollar” To purchase, contact your dealer. For more information call toll-free: 877.901.4989 Wanted - Round Comb Honey Equipment: Milo (AB) Used Round Comb Honey Equipment. Supers, Frames, etc. Cobana/Ross Round Size. Best Price. We pick up. Comb Honey Has Come Full Circle. www.rossrounds.com PO Box 11583, Albany, NY 12211 HiveLights August 2012 27 Fully reconditioned and #1 Quality Export Drums - Offering custom trucking across western Canada and western states. Office/Cory 250-499-5773 - Lee 250-499-5753 Fax 250-499-5752 PLANET BEE HONEY FARM TOURS & GIFTS Retail / Wholesale & 5011 Bella Vista Road Vernon, B.C. V1H 1A1 Phone 250 542-8088 email: [email protected] website: www.planetbee.com Distributor Pricing, Re-sellers Wanted Specialty Honey, Pollen, Propolis, Royal Jelly, Filtered Beeswax WAX FOR SALE! For all your crafting and candle needs! Yellow and Ivory wax Phone us for more information! 1-403-687-2440 Poelman Apiaries Ltd., Box 1887, Fort Macleod, AB T0L 0Z0 “SAVE OUR BEES” donations can be made to: [email protected] MENTHOL BOARDS Please order early HAMILTON BEE RANCH LTD. Box 1169, Nipawin SK S0E 1E0 Phone 306-862-4194 Fax 306-862-4193 Producers of Northern Blossom Honey The proof is in the frame! Made from 100% Natural Vegetable Ingredients Contains: No Pollen - No Hive Products - No Animal Products - No Soy Products - No Chemicals Formulated to closely emulate the natural diet of Honeybees Available Dry and in Patties Available from: Ellingson’s Inc. – 1.888.273.2300 Cell - 1.320.760.6769 www.FeedBee.com NOW AVAILABLE Revised 2nd Edition IPM BOOKLETS Integrated Pest Management • Including a new chapter on Small Hive Beetle • Printed in Full Color • 3’’ x 5’’ (60 pages) • $7.00 each plus $2.00 S/H • Advertising space available To order contact: [email protected] Proud sponsor of the Canadian Honey Council