QUANTA VS. LGE
Transcription
QUANTA VS. LGE
QUANTA VS. LGE: A DECISION CONCERNING LICENSING FRANÇOIS PAINCAHUD AND CLAIRE CEBRON* LEGER ROBIC RICHARD, LLP LAWYERS, PATENT AND TRADE-MARK AGENTS Generally, when a patent owner sells a patented product to a first buyer, the purchaser is free to use or sell that patented product without having to worry about being sued for infringement by the patent holder. This is referred to as the doctrine of “patent exhaustion”. In a case opposing the Korean company, LG Electronics (“LGE”), and Taiwanese company Quanta Computers (“Quanta”), the Supreme Court of United States recently ruled on the sensitive subject of the applicability of doctrine of patent exhaustion on method patents (Quanta Computer, Inc. v. Electronics, Inc., no. 06-937, 2008 U.S. LEXIS 4702 (June 9th, 2008)). the the the LG The Supreme Court unanimously overruled the Federal Circuit’s decision and held that (i) the doctrine of patent exhaustion applies to method patents, and that (ii) once a product is unconditionally authorized for sale, and that this product comprises the essential elements of a patented invention, with no other intended use than to practice the patent, the doctrine of patent exhaustion applies and the patent owner can no longer invoke patent law in an attempt to receive additional royalties or limit the rights of the licensee’s subcontractors and the latter’s clients, since, by doing so, the patent owner would extend the patent’s scope and the rights which the patent confers without due cause. In reaching this decision, the Supreme Court reaffirmed its support of a doctrine which, according to its advocates, serves to maintian a competitive market. However, the Court did not rule upon the contractual aspect of the dispute between the parties as it did not discuss or limit the rights of the patent owners to impose restrictions/conditions to the sale of their products by way of a license agreement. Therefore, it follows that when patent law cannot be used to prohibit or limit the use of a product, contractual law may come into play to achieve the intended result. The impact of this decision goes well beyond the issue of the scope of applicability of the doctrine of patent exhaustion, since patent owners will have every interest, before marketing their product, to review the wording of their license agreements (at © CIPS, 2008. With LEGER ROBIC RICHARD, LLP. a multidisciplinary firm of Lawyers, and Patent and Trade-mark Agents. Published in the Winter 2008 Newsletter of the firm (Vol. 12, No. 4). Publication 068.101. * 2 least with respect to, directly or indirectly, the territory of the United States), for instance by: 1- drafting license agreements which clearly restrict the right of the licensee to re-sell patented articles only to purchasers authorized by the licensor, while preventing anti-competitive practices. As such, (i) the sale will be deemed conditional and the doctrine of patent exhaustion will not apply, (ii) every third party purchaser will also have to enter into a license agreement with the patent owner, allowing the latter to supervise and restrict the use of the patented article, (iii) the patent owner will thereby retain a certain degree of control over gains stemming from the use of the patent by imposing a royalty to be paid by every licensee; or 2- fully negotiating the amount of the royalty to retain the maximum value of the patented rights, when the license is granted to the first buyer. Although patent owners appear to be able to limit the impact of the Supreme Court’s decision by using contractual clauses to their advantage, potential licensees might be reluctant to enter into a license agreement which imposes substantial obligations upon them. It will be interesting to see how licensors and licensees will strike a balance between their respective interests. ROBIC, un groupe d'avocats et d'agents de brevets et de marques de commerce voué depuis 1892 à la protection et à la valorisation de la propriété intellectuelle dans tous les domaines: brevets, dessins industriels et modèles utilitaires; marques de commerce, marques de certification et appellations d'origine; droits d'auteur, propriété littéraire et artistique, droits voisins et de l'artiste interprète; informatique, logiciels et circuits intégrés; biotechnologies, pharmaceutiques et obtentions végétales; secrets de commerce, know-howet concurrence; licences, franchises et transferts de technologies; commerce électronique, distribution et droit des affaires; marquage, publicité et étiquetage; poursuite, litige et arbitrage; vérification diligente et audit. ROBIC, a group of lawyers and of patent and trademark agents dedicated since 1892 to the protection and the valorization of all fields of intellectual property: patents, industrial designs and utility patents; trademarks, certification marks and indications of origin; copyright and entertainment law, artists and performers, neighbouring rights; computer, software and integrated circuits; biotechnologies, pharmaceuticals and plant breeders; trade secrets, know-how, competition and anti-trust; licensing, franchising and technology transfers; e-commerce, distribution and business law; marketing, publicity and labelling; prosecution litigation and arbitration; due diligence. COPYRIGHTER IDEAS LIVE HERE IL A TOUT DE MÊME FALLU L'INVENTER! 3 LA MAÎTRISE DES INTANGIBLES LEGER ROBIC RICHARD NOS FENÊTRES GRANDES OUVERTES SUR LE MONDE DES AFFAIRES PATENTER R ROBIC ROBIC + DROIT +AFFAIRES +SCIENCES +ARTS ROBIC ++++ ROBIC +LAW +BUSINESS +SCIENCE +ART THE TRADEMARKER GROUP TRADEMARKER VOS IDÉES À LA PORTÉE DU MONDE , DES AFFAIRES À LA GRANDEUR DE LA PLANÈTE YOUR BUSINESS IS THE WORLD OF IDEAS; OUR BUSINESS BRINGS YOUR IDEAS TO THE WORLD Trade-marks of LEGER ROBIC RICHARD, LLP ("ROBIC")