SECTION 5 - ANNEXE 6: DESCRIPTITION DE CHAQUE UNITÉ
Transcription
SECTION 5 - ANNEXE 6: DESCRIPTITION DE CHAQUE UNITÉ
SECTION 5 - ANNEXE 6: DESCRIPTITION DE CHAQUE UNITÉ LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIQUE DÉFINIE AU NIVEAU NATIONAL INTRODUCTION Comme mentionné dans l'appel TDR, les concepts géodynamiques ayant fondamentalement changé depuis l’époque de la première définition formelle de la stratigraphie au premier niveau pour l’entièreté du Pays par Lepersonne en 1974, et de nouveaux travaux ayant été publié depuis ayant un impact sur cette stratigraphie, cette dernière était donc devenue obsolète et sujette à révision. Tenant compte des nouveaux travaux qui ont été publié depuis sur divers (sous)régions / provinces géologiques, nous avons essayé d’appliquer les directives récentes de l’UISG pour la définition des unités lithostratigraphiques de premier niveau du pays. • • Des roches, associations de roches, qui ont connu une histoire géologique commune, considérées d’origine sédimentaire, même si actuellement de faciès haut-métamorphique, sont à regrouper dans des Supergroupes, etc ... Des roches, ou groupes de roches dont l’origine est soit difficile à établir, soit des associations de composition diverses mais qui ont connu une évolution – histoire géologique commune, similaire, se regroupent dans des Complexes (magmatique, métasédimentaire, métamorphique, tectonique) DÉFINITION DES UNITÉS LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIQUES Pour chaque unité stratigraphique (re)définie au premier niveau , nous donnons En gras, le nom du Supergroupe / Complexe , accompagné de son code, redéfini En italique, le nom équivalent et code défini par Lepersonne en 1974. Les sous-divisions connues – publiées - de cette unité Accompagné d’une brève description des connaissances actuelles, citant les sources principales les plus récentes. L’information est extraite de Deblond (2004, annexe 3) ou de la littérature plus récente renseignées en annexe 4 . Les extraits sont produits dans la langue originale des publications, les copies de figures, tableaux sont également extraits de ces références. ARCHÉEN Complexe tonalitique de la Haute Luanyi ( Cp-HL) gneiss de la haute Luanyi - GnF Delhal (1963), Delhal ( 1991); Walraven and Rumvegeri ( 1993), Rumvegeri (1990) sous-divisions : aucune connue This rock unit includes partly migmatitized fine-grained biotite gneisses and pegmatites . Complexe amphibilotique et gneissique de la Bomu (Cp-Bo) complexe amphibolitique et gneissique du Bomu - Bo Thibaut (1983), Lavreau (1982a) Histoire longue d’environ 1Ga ; Roches de haut métamorphisme + granitoïdes. Appartient aux greenstones Kibaliens (Lavreau, 1982a). Cartographie de Lepersonne (1974) mise en défaut par Lavreau (1982a). Age Paléoprotérozoïque d’après BRGM (1980-1982)=> plus que probablement erroné, cfr datation géochronologiques de Lavreau qui confirme l’age Archéen. Sous-divisions : • • • • Gneiss de Nzangi: gneiss mafique avec qq micaschiste, quartzite et granitoïde Gneiss de Monga (RDC)/ de Ouango (RCA): micaschiste, quartzite et gneiss granitique Gneiss de Bereme: quartzite micacé, gneiss à hornblendes et biotites ; couffe les gneiss de Bomu Gneiss mafique de Bomu : gneiss à amphiboles et clinopyroxènes (cpx) (souventà grenats) = base Magmatisme , événements thermiques: • • • • Granitoïdes précurseurs des gneiss de Nzangi datés à 3.42 Ga (Pb-Pb) Evènement thermo-tectonique ~3.01 Ga dans les gneiss de Nzangi (Rb-Sr) et ~2.96 Ga dans les gneiss de Bomu Batholites granitiques(granite de Bondo) ont intrudé les gneiss de Nzangi vers 2.45 Ga Déformations mylonitiques ~900 Ma Supergroupe de la Gangu –( SG-Gn) Ganguien - G quartzite et phyllade + talcschiste, contient des BIF Lavreau 1982a, Lepersonne 1974 ; BRGM, 1980-1982 Série supracrustale Ganguen considérée comme inclue dans complexe amphibolitique et gneissique du Bomu (Lavreau 1982a) : recouvre gneiss de Bomu. Sous-divisions (Lepersonne1 1974) ; BRGM (1980-1982) • • Unite supérieur: sericitochists, talcschists1 talcschists with feldspar-rich layers/ chloritoschists/ quartzitic sericitoschists Unité inférieur: quartzitic sericitoschists/ sericite-bearing quartzites, magnetite-bearing banded iron-rich quartzites . Sous-divisions mises en question par Lavreau (1982a) : préconise des unités distinctes géographiques • • • Bili : fuchsite-bearing quartzites, sericite-bearing schists, talcsch ists, graphitic schists, Matundu : mainly composed of talcschists Mupi : not mapped by Lepersonne (1974): talcschists and serpentine-bearing rocks associated with quartzites and cherts. Magmatisme : intrudé par veines de qtz (à galène, 3.2 Ga) et d’aplite et par de petits massifs doléritiques. Le Supergroupe du Kasai-Lomami Delhal & Fieremans (1964), Delhal (1977, 1991), Lepersonne (1974), Delhal et al. (1967, 1976, 1986), Walraven & Rumvegeri (1993), Kabengele et al. (1991), Rumvegeri (1990), Rumvegeri et al. (1991), Delhal & Ledent (1971, 1973), Delhal & Liégeois (1982), Cahen et al. (1984) • • • • Le Complexe granitique et migmatitique de Dibaya Charno-enderbitic and Granulitic Complex; also known as the Kasai-Lomami Gabbronorite and Charnockite Complex Granito-gneissic Complex of Western Katanga; also known as Sandoa-Kapanga-Complex Kanda-Kanda Tonalitic Complex Contacts entre unités non apparents Nous n’utiliserons plus ce Supergroupe, composé de complexes ; Dibaya étant redéfini comme Supergroupe à part entière Magmatisme • • • • • Tonalities, granodiorites, charno-enderbites: 2,8 – 3,1Ma Alaskites:, granites, granodoirites : 2.8 Ma Migmatites : 2.7 Malafundi Granite : 2.6Ma Intrudé au Kasai et en Angola par des kimberlites du Crétacé Complexe tonalitique de Kanda-Kanda _ Cp-KK non cartographié par Lepersonne, 1974 Rumvegeri et al. (1991), sous-divisions : aucune connue The Dibaya Granite and Migmatite and the Charno-enderbitic and Granulitic complexes are separated in the west by the Palaeoproterozoic Lulua-Luiza Supergroup while recent investigations, conducted by Rumvegeri et al. (1991), show that their contact zone in the east, in the Kanda-Kanda region, is occupied by a large, single Archaean plutonic complex, referred to as the Kanda-Kanda Tonalitic Complex. The complex shows an outwards magmatic evolution from tonalite in the core to granodiorite and finally monzogranite or granite s.s .. Complexe granito-gneissique de Sandoa – Cp-SA formations anté-Kibariennes indifférenciées - Ab complexe de la Lukoshi - Ls Walraven & Rumvegeri, 1993 Sous-divisions : aucune The Granito-gneissic Complex of Western Katanga, .also called the Sandoa-Kapanga Complex is characterized by a rather monotonous lithology and its constituents, granulites, tonalitic to granitic gneisses, granites and (minor) amphibolites, are metamorphosed to the amphibolite-granulite facies. Complexe granulitique de la Musefu – Cp-Mu complexe gabbro-noritique et charnockitique du Kasai-Lomami ; partie charnochite Walraven & Rumvegeri, 1993 Sous-Divisions : acune It is composed of hypersthene gneisses (charnockites s.s. and enderbites) and of garnet-bearing quartzo-feldspathic rocks regularly showing well-developed sillimanite crystals (granulites or leptinites). The composition of these rocks, which displays a clear silicic character, shows that they derive in part from sedimentary rocks and are the products of high grade metamorphism of an old gneissic basement of which the Haute Luanyi gneisses would be a remnant (Delhal, 1963). Supergroupe de Dibaya – SG-DI complexe granitique et migmatitique de Dibaya – D Delhal, 1967, 1991, Kabengele, 1991 Sous-division: aucune The northern half of the complex is mainly occupied by migmatitic gneisses amongst which amphibolite zones locally occur. These zones were considered to be residues of crystalline rocks older than the migmatitisation (Delhal et al., 1967) but are now being questioned (Delhal, 1991). The migmatites present three types of structures: agmatic, stromatic and schlieren, and all of them contain pegmatites. Geochemically the migmatites display calc-alkaline features (Kabengele et al., 1991) Calc-alcaline granitic rocks (MAlafundi granite) occur in the southern aprt. Upper Congo Granite-Greenstone (GG) association Lavreau (1973), Cahen et al. (1976), Poidevin et al. (1981). Lavreau and Ledent (1975), Lavreau et al. (1980), Lavreau (1982a), Lepersonne (1974); Lavreau and Deblond (2000) The greenstone belts of the GG domain are restricted to a number of small units set in a granitoid “matrix”: Tele, Panga, Ituri, Ngayu, Mambasa, Kilo, Zani, Moto, Tina & Isiro. They represent 15-20 % of the whole and are more abundant in the eastern part of the domain, suggesting that erosion cuts down to deeper levels in the west. In NE Congo, the greenstone belts are referred to as the Kibalian of Archaean age (from Kibali river; not to be mistaken with the Mesoproterozoic "Kibaran") or to the "Ganguan". Supergroupe de la Kibali – SG-KI Kibalien - Ki Sous-divisions Lavreau : • Upper Kibalian: sediments, with some andesitic volcanics • Lower Kibalian: volcanic-granitoid association. The volcanic members contain distinct andesitic members together with less typical tholeiites. The metavolcanics of the Lower Kibalian, akin to oceanic tholeiites including high-Mg basalts, have been subdivided on geochemical grounds (Lavreau and Navez, 1983), into ultramafic, mafic, intermediate and andesitic terms. The sediments are represented by various pelites and characteristic BIF BRGM: Upper Kibalian (Ki2): metavolcanic and metasedimentary Lower Kibalian (Ki1): paragneissic Complexe granitoide TTG de l’Uele – Cp-TTG Non défini par Lepersonne, repris dans ‘roches granitiques affectant le KiIbalien’ Lavreau and Deblond (2000) Typical TTG suite associated to the greenstones ( type A GG association; c. 95% of the gold output). The tonalites of this GG association intruded 2.8-2.9 Ga ago (see below). Contexte géodynamique: Lavreau and Deblond (2000). The granite-greenstone (GG) associations have been classified according to their nature and to that of their basement: • The type A GG association (c. 95% of the gold output) consists of greenstones with abundant mafic-ultramafic volcanics and scarce sediments (Lower Kibalian). No basement has been recognised. Associated granitoids correspond to a typical TTG suite. The tonalites of this GG association intruded 2.8-2.9 Ga ago. • The type B GG association comprises mafic-intermediate volcanics besides sediments, mainly BIFs (Upper Kibalian). Their basement consists either of type A GG association or of medium to high-grade metamorphic rocks. Associated granodiorites and granites (2.4-2.5 Ga) representing most of the volume of the entire greenstone belts, intruded this type B association and its basement Magmatime: Wanga tonalite: 2.84-2.89 Ma (dans KI) ; Kilo tonalite : 2.75 Ma Moto granitoides : 2.51 – 2.63Ma (dans KS) ; Kilo granites : 2.41Ma Énormes aires de granites indifférenciés. The West Nile Gneissic Complex This complex formed the subject of a small number of generally superficial studies. These include McDonald (1963), Hepworth (1967) and Hepworth & McDonald (1966) for Uganda and Sudan, whereas specific areas of the DRC were covered from the twenties to the fifties (re-ferences in Cahen, 1954) and in the eighties (Lavreau 1980, 1982a, 1982b). Correlating the different results turns out to be a futile exercise. In the DRC, the West Nile gneissic Complex comprises (Lavreau, 1982b): • • • the Garamba gneissic Complex with some mica- and amphibole-rich horizons; the Dungu Formation, composed of micaschists, quartzites and gneisses (some of them reworked Garamba gneisses); the Aru-Zani gneisses, composed of granitic gneisses overlain by micaschists and amphibolites A complex association of two or three units of gneisses and migmatites crops out along Lake Albert, in continuation with the units defined in the West Nile District of Uganda. The Mount Speke gneissic Complex, which is exposed in the Ruwenzori horst (western branch of East Afri-can Rift), may be linked to the Garamba gneissic Complex (Lepersonne, 1974) Supergroupe de la Garamba – SG-GA complexe gneissique de la Garamba – Ga ; gneiss du Mont Speke - Sp formation Dungu (non défini par Lepersonne) gneiss Aru-Zani (non défini par Lepersonne) sous-divisions : tentative de définition d’unités tectono-stratigraphiques Lavreau (1980, 1982a). This study has emphasized its complexity, whatever the scale of the investigation could be. Aerial photographs interpretation allowed to define six main tectonic domains and prevailing ENE-trending mylonitic corridors. An attempt has been performed by this author (op. cit) in order to establish a link between the lithostratigraphic and tectonic units. This led to the following subdivision (essentially in DRC) : • • • • • • the gneisses and micaschists of the Aka domain; the Garamba, Faradje and Pays Logo gneisses; the granitoid gneisses of the area between the Dungu and Nzora rivers; the augite-diopside-bearing gneisses of the Aba area; the high-grade gneisses (granulite facies); the eastern part of the Eastern Grey Gneisses (Uganda) and the Mahagi-Port gneisses (DRC). Complexe de Niangara – Cp-NIA formations attribuées au Lindien (Ubangien) – L, Lc Lavreau (1982a) includes the Niangara-Zemio supracrustal series into the West Nile Complex. This elongated NW to NNW-trending narrow zone (20-50 km) runs across DRC (over c. 300 km) and CAR (over c. 150 km; Poidevin, 1985) along the edge between the West Nile Complex and the Upper Congo Granite-Greenstone association. Sous-division: Two units separated by an angular unconformity have been identified in this zone (Lavreau, 1982a ; ) they were undifferentiated and previously mapped as Neoproterozoic (Lepersonne, 1974): • • a Neoproterozoic upper unit extending northwards across the Centrafrican border: Rumu series (DRC) and Morkia series (CAR) (Poidevin, 1985); a lower unit (Bolume Formation); of inferred Archaean, (Poidevin, 1985) or Palaeoproterozoic age (BRGM, 1980-1982), composed of strongly folded quartzites, sericitebearing quartzites and white seritoschists. Supergroupe des Muhila – SG-MU complexe métasédimentaire et cristallin des Muhila – Mu Lepersonne, 1971, 1974; Jamotte, 1949). Sous-divisions : inconnues Reported rocks (Lepersonne, 1974) include whitish to pinkish jasper with hematite banding, itabirites (BIF), quartz-injected micaschists and sericitic quartzites. The main trend of the rocks is orthogonal to the general trend of the Palaeproterozoic Rusizian belt, which the Muhila complex underlies. The described lithologies are reminiscent of Archaean greenstone belts and Jamotte (1949) already compared them to the greenstone belts of NE Congo (Upper Congo Granite-Greenstone association) and of Zimbabwe. Régions (d’extension limitée) à protolithe granitique archéen Non cartographié par Lepersonne, 1974 These four presumed Archaean nuclei have been identified in Equator Province (Aderca, 1950; Thibaut, 1983). They consist of banded coarse-grained biotite-garnet-bearing gneisses in Turkwa, augen-gneisses in Banda and garnet-bearing two micas banded augen-gneisses associated to magnetite-bearing metacalc-schists in Dula. The Litima nucleus exposes albite-bearing leptynites. No radiometric age is available for these rocks, but according to Thibaut (1983) they display similarities with Centrafican Archaean units in continuity of which they crop out, on the other bank of Ubangi river. In CAR, this basement is intruded by Archaean granites, a situation arguing in favour of a minimum Archaean age for this basement (Thibaut, 1983). These inferred Archaean nuclei, by analogy with the more widespread similar formations identified in CAR, may thus constitute small-sized inliers occurring within the inferred Palaeoproterozoic Ubangi Complex, in the core of anticlines (Turkwa, Banda and Dula) or after faulting (Litima). PALÉOPROTÉROZOIQUE Complexe gabbro-noritique de Lueta – Cp-GN-LU complexe gabbro-noritique et charnockitique du Kasai-Lomami ; partie gabbronorite Delhal et al., 1976; Delhal, 1991, Lepersonne, 1974 A large mafic plutonic complex, composed of gabbronorite (representing about 50 % of the mafic rocks), garnet–bearing gabbros and amphibolites. The age of the Gabbronorite Complex, previously considered as Archaean (Lepersonne, 1974), has been requestioned and considered as Palaeoproterozoic (Delhal, 1991). Sous-divisions: aucune Supergroupe de la Lulua-Luiza – SG-LL complexe sédimentaire et volcanique de la Lulua – Lu ; Luizien – Lz Delhal, 1963, Delhal et al., 1966, Delhal (1991) and Fieremans (1991) Sous-divisions: On the basis of recent age dating and former field observations Delhal (1991) and Fieremans (1991) have advanced and/or confirmed the existence of a single Palaeoproterozoic Lulua-Luiza Supergroup (2.2–1.9 Ga) enclosing: • an upper volcano–sedimentary unit (the Lulua Volcano–sedimentary Group); o The Lulua volcano–sedimentary Group is composed of schists, quartzites and interstratified mafic volcanic rocks and has an estimated total thickness ranging between 4,000 and 7,000 m (Delhal et al., 1966). These authors have recognized at least two sedimentary graded sequences: - • an upper sequence starting with sandstones, overlying the lower sequence’s lavas, and overlain by shales and carbonaceous rocks; a lower sequence which comprises (from bottom to top) conglomerates, quartzites, sandstones, shales or phyllites and lavas. a lower and older metasedimentary unit (the Luiza metasedimentary Group and its equivalent in Katanga, the Lukoshian), o the Luizian metasediments are composed of mica–bearing quartzites, itabirites (BIFs), micaschists and local metamorphic conglomerates. This succession rests unconformably (but in normal contact) on the Gabbronorite Complex. o The Lukoshian supracrustals, of greenstone affinities exist as abundant isolated outcropping areas of sedimentary rock (phyllites, graphitic phyllites, quartzites,...) as well as amphibolitic schists, possibly of igneous origin The exposed contact between the Lulua and Luiza groups has been interpreted as a structural rather than stratigraphic contact (Delhal, 1963). Magmatisme: The mainly basaltic volcanic activity in the Lulua Group occurred from the time of deposition of the shales of the lower sequence to that of the shales and carbonaceous rocks of the upper sequence. The maximum apparent intensity is attained at the end of the lower sequence. Three 2.0 Ga, basaltic units have been identified (Delhal et al., 1966), : - the Malafudi basalts, in the east, with an apparent thickness of more than 900 m; the Yangwegi basalts, in the centre, some 700–850 m thick; the Kasadi–Sadi basalts, in the west, of unknown thickness. IN the Luiza group, “post tectonic” granites and pegmatites are dated at 2.0 Ga. Supergroupe de Kimeza – SG-KM complexe de gneiss et migmatites de Mpozo-Tombagadio - PT Cahen et al., 1984 In the Pan-African West Congo orogenic belt, in Bas Congo, a major angular unconformity separates the Neoproterozoic Zadinian Supergroup from the underlying c. 2.1 Ga Eburnian gneissic basement . Different names have been given to this basement giving rise to a confusing terminology. In the more recent literature of the Bas Congo region, the basement is generally referred to as the Kimezian Supergroup, affected by the Tadilian orogeny. Sous-division: aucune Complexe de l’Ubangui – Cp-UB complexe métasédimentaire et migmatitique de l’Ubangi - U Lepersonne, 1974 Unité très mal connu, cartographiè par Lepersonne en continuité de roches similaires en Centrafrique et Congo Brazaville. Sous-division : aucune Supergroupe de la Ruzizi – SG-RU Rusizien –R Originally defined in the eastern DRC (Kivu province), its existence in Rwanda and Burundi as basement to the Mesoproterozoic Burundian belt was postulated on the basis of gneisses and micaschists in areas such as the Butare complex and a few Palaeoproterozoic U/Pb ages in the latter (2063 Ma and 1920 Ma – Cahen et al., 1984; Ledent, 1979; Gérards, 1969). The metamorphic rocks actually turned out to be (dominantly?) higher-grade equivalents of Mesoproterozoic sediments, but the radiometric age and aeromagnetic data suggest that a Palaeoproterozoic basement is subcropping. As there is no real Rusizian type-area and its original definition was based on rocks that later turned out to be Mesoproterozoic in age, the existence of the Rusizian has been questioned by some authors (Lavreau, 1985; Theunissen, 1989). The difficulty of identifying the Rusizian in the Kivu region is illustrated by the geological map of the DRC (Lepersonne, 1974), where large zones of undifferentiated Kibaran/Rusizian units are reported between Masisi (square degree S28/2) and Lubero (square degree S29/1). Whatever the case, logic demands that the Mesoproterozoic Kibara and Burundian belts evolved on an older basement. In view of the observed structures, which call for extensive reactivation of this basement, it is highly unlikely that rigid, cratonised, Archaean units are responsible. Consequently, one has to postulate the existence of a Palaeoproterozoic basement, which likely corresponds to a collisional belt between the Archaean domain of NE DRC and the Tanzania craton and would link up to the south with the peripheral accretionary Ubendian orogen. The Rusizian belt is thus considered as the NW extension of the Ubendian (or Ubende) shear belt occurring in western Tanzania, (Cahen, 1954; Cahen and Lepersonne, 1967) and is characterized by a poor level of knowledge. . The variable lithologic compositions include metasedimentary rocks (micaschists, phyllites, quartzites...), amphibolites, granites, gneisses and migmatites. Although greenstones are locally reported, greenstone belts as such are not documented. Sous-divisions: Speculative correlations between various regions of the DRC (N Katanga, Kivu and Maniema) give the following general distribution of rock types (Cahen & Lepersonne, 1967; Lepersonne, 1974): southern Kivu (DRC) and (NE?) Burundi: migmatitic gneisses, micaschists, amphibolites, coarse-grained quartzites, metamorphosed limestones and dolomites; northern Katanga and southern Maniema (DRC): • - • - Upper beds Various phyllitic schists, quartzites (locally with lateral transitions to micaschists), amphibole-schists, amphibolites and metamorphic quartzites. Phyllitic conglomerates (occasionally including carbonate pebbles, locally with lateral transitions to biotite-schists containing elongate marble lenses), amphibole-schists and amphibolites. Lower beds Mica-rich, often graphite-bearing, phyllitic schists, containing lenses and beds of finegrained marbles Quartzites, arkoses and dark-coloured phyllitic schists Schists, often graphitic, quartzitic schists and quartzites Higher-grade and retrograde (?) equivalents of the Lower Beds comprise sericiteschists, chlorite-schists, amphibole-schists, micaschists, amphibolites and migmatitic gneisses Complexe volcano-plutonique acide des Marungu – Cp - MA Rhyolites des Marungu et « lower plateau series » - ρ , Lps The cratonic Bangweulu Block (Andersen and Unrug, 1984), a segment of the Ubende belt exposed in northeastern Katanga, northeastern Zambia and western Tanzania, includes possible Archaean segments assembled in a Palaeoproterozoic (2.5-1.6 Ga) structural setting. This assemblage is composed by schists, gneisses and by late Palaeoproterozoic (c. 1.8 Ga) felsic metavolcanics intruded by cogenetic granitoids, exposed in Katanga in the northernmost part of the Bangweulu Block in the Marungu plateau (Kabengele et al., 1991) and also known across the border in western Tanzania as the Kate-Kipili volcano-plutonic complex (Lenoir et al., 1993). Sous-divisions: aucune MÉSOPROTÉROZOIQUE Supergroupe de la Liki-Bemba – SG-LB Liki-Bembien – LB Lepersonne, 1974 Unité cartographiè par Lepersonne 1974, de position stratigraphique discutable puisque inconnue en tant que Mésoprotérozoique dans les pays avoisinants (Centrafrique, Congo Brazzaville), ou des unités en continuité sont répertoriées comme appartenant au Néoprotérozoiques (Lindien, Ubangien). Pourrait être revu en tant que Néoprotérozoique. Sous-divisions : • • Série supérieur Série inférieur Supergroupe des Monts Kibara – SG-KB Kibarien – Kb Laghmouch et al, 2012, Fernandez-Alonso et al, 2012, Cahen, L., Lepersonne, J. 1967, Kokonyangui, 2004, 2005, 2007 The Kibara belt was defined in the type-region of the Kibara Mountains of southeastern DRC . It extends NE-SW over a distance of 750-800 km from Kalemie on Lake Tanganyika in the north to the Nzilo gorges in the Kolwezi area (Katanga province). It is bordered to the west by the Kasai domain of the Congo craton .Part of the western margin is covered by Neoproterozoic sediments of the MbujiMayi. The eastern margin of the Kibara belt corresponds to border faults of the Neoproterozoic Kundelungu aulacogen, to which it may form (part of) the basement; the actual eastward extent of the belt underneath the Kundelungu sediments remains unknown. In the north, Kibaran sediments are covered in places by sediments of the continental “Karoo cycle”, mapped as both CarboniferousPermian and Triassic-Jurassic Sous-divisions: The Mesoproterozoic stratigraphy of the KIB can be subdivided into 4 lithostratigraphic units. They are from oldest to youngest: the Kiaora Group, the Nzilo (or Lufira) Group, the Mount Hakansson Group and the Lubudi Group. The Kiaora Group is dominantly consisted of (quartzo-) phyllites and schists, with quartzitic horizons and with rhyolites at the top (K1a of Cahen & Lepersonne, 1967). The(Lufira) Nzilo group is dominantly quartzitic, with locally (quartzo-)phyllitic levels and lava’s on top. (K1b, K2 of Cahen & Lepersonne, 1967) The Mount Hakanssson Group consists of dark-coloured slates and quartzites, with conglomerates at the base. (K2b, K3, K4a of Cahen & Lepersonne, 1967) The Lubudi Group consists of dark-coloured arkoses and conglomerate lenses, black graphitic shale with some sandstone levels and an upper part consisting of limestones and dolomites, often silicified with stromatolites (K4b, K5 of Cahen & Lepersonne, 1967) The topmost carbonate - stromatholites level (K5) is probably part of the lowermost Neoproterozoic Mbudji-Mai units as stromatholites have not been described in the Mesoproterozoic in the DRC. Magmatisme: Granites : 1370 – 1380 Ma Granites – pegamtites à étain : +/- 1000 Ma Supergroupe de la Bilati-Luhule fromations de la Bilati – Bi formations de la Luhule – Mobisio – LM the Luhule-Mobisio and Bilati units, already identified by Lepersonne (1974) in northernmost Kivu, and considered as a possible Mesoproterozoic formation has to be pointed out. The age of these series outcropping in a restricted areas is poorly constrained. Lonchampt, a BRGM geologist (BRGM, 1972) considered the Luhule-Mobisio unit as situated at a lithostratigraphic level between a locally defined “Middle Burundian” and a “Middle Lindian” tillite, i.e. as “Upper Burundian”. Moreover, as above-mentioned, work of the French BRGM performed in the seventies has led to some reconsiderations of the lithostratigraphy. In the absence of any geochronological data, the age of the Luhule-Mobisio could as well be Palaeoproterozoic (Lavreau, pers. comm). Supergroupe du Kivu Burundien – B Badosa, 1996, Villeneuve, 1978, Villeneuve, 1987, Fernandez-ALonso et al, 2012, Tack, 2010, Lepersonne, 1974 Sous-divisions : Les travaux de Villeneuve (1977, 1978), dans la région de Bukavu (Kivu), lui ont permis de définir deux unités lithostratigraphiques, séparées par une discordance ou hiatus sédimentaire, dans le « Burundien » de cette région. De haut en bas : • • Groupe de Nya-Ngezie o Fromation de Mughera o Formation de la Mukubio o Formation du Bangwe Groupe de Bugarama o o o Formation de Mushenie Formation de Kamanyola Formation de Kashenie Cependant, des travaux plus récents de Villeneuve (2004, 2006) sur le Kivu et le Maniéma, lui font définir trois groupes « Burundiens », séparés par des discordances tectoniques et/ou hiatus stratigraphiques. De haut en bas : • • • Groupe de Nya-Ngezie (plus jeune que 1200Ma ; intrudé par des granites et pegmatises à étain ; 986Ma) o Fromation de Mughera o Formation de la Mukubio o Formation du Bangwe Groupe du Burundien supérieur (intrudé par les granites 1380Ma) o Sans non ni sous divisions formelles Groupe du Burundien inférieur (= Groupe de Bugarama de 1978 ? ; >1600Ma) o o o Formation de Mushenie Formation de Kamanyola Formation de Kashenie Le Groupe de Nya-Ngezie se corrèle avec la partie supérieure des formations « Burundiennes » au Rwanda, Burundi, redéfinies en tant que Supergroupe de l’Akanyaru - Groupe de Cyohoha, Groupe de Rugezi -(Baudet, 1987, Fernandez-Alonso, 2012). Le granite et pegmatites à étain (type G4) datés à 986Ma, (Tack, 2010) sont intrudés jusqu’à ces niveaux stratigraphiques. Le Groupe du Burundien supérieur se corrèle avec la partie inférieure des formations « Burundiennes » au Rwanda, Burundi, redéfinies en tant que Supergroupe de l’Akanyaru - groupe de Gikoro, groupe de Pindura – (Baudet, 1987, Fernandez-Alonso, 2012). Ces séquences sont intrudé par les venues des granites de type G1-G3, datés à 1375 Ma (Tack, 2010) La position stratigraphique du Groupe de Bugarama est problématique : soit « substratum » d’âge non défini mais probablement Paleoprotérozoique en similitude avec le Rwanda, Burundi; soit la partie inférieure de la séquence du « Burundien Supérieur », partie non observée au Rwanda, Burundi. Au Maniéma, plusieurs géologues de l’UNILU ont travaillé sous la direction de A. H. Kampunzu et R.T. Lubala dans le cadre de leur thèse de Licence. Les travaux de Badosa et de ses collègues entre Kalima et Shabunda, dans la partie cartographiée comme « Ruzizien » par Lepersonne, 1974, font conclure ces auteurs qu’ils sont en fait dans des formations « Burundiennes ». Ils sont amenés à définir ces unités comme suite : • Groupe du Maniéma o Formation de Mukombe : Méta-arkoses en bancs très durs, à cassure conchoïdale, à texture massive et à grains moyens avec du ciment siliceux. Puissance 600 à 800m. o Formation de Ngongomeka : Métabasites noire à gris sombre ou noir verdâtre se débitant en bancs subhorizontaux. Puissance 1000 à 1500m. o Formation de Lubile : Grès quartzitiques gris sombre avec alternance des niveaux noir-bleuâtre et brun violacé (bariolé). Puissance 1000 à1800m. Magmatisme : Ces trois formations ci-haut citées sont intrudé par les massifs granitiques et leur cortège filonien d’âges Mésoprotérozoïques. La corrélation avec les travaux de Villeneuve au Kivu, et ceux de Baudet, Fernandez-Alonso, Tack au Rwanda, Burundi reste spéculative. • Si on se base sur la carte de Lepersonne (1974), il est certain que les unités cartographiées comme « Burundien » au Kivu, doivent se corréler avec le Supergroupe de l’Akanyaru, puisqu’ils sont en continuité cartographique de ce dernier. • La réinterprétation de la géologie régionale du Kivu – Maniéma par Villeneuve (2004), place les unités décrites par Badosa et collègues dans le Groupe du Burundien supérieur (sillons plissés du Burundien supérieur), ce qui les corrèlerait avec les groupes de Gikoro et Pindura ; les séquences inférieures du Supergroupe de l’Akanyaru. NÉOPROTÉROZOIQUE Supergroupe du Ouest-Congo – SG-WC Ouest-Congolien – I, mp, sc, sh, ti, S Mayombien- M Zadinien – Z Tack et al, 2001, Baudet et al, 2013 The type cross-section of the West Congo belt illustrates a general decrease in deformation and regional metamorphism from west to east. To the west, in the more internal Pan-African thrust and fold belt, the east-verging, oldest c. 2.1 Ga Kimezian Supergroup (polycyclic Palaeoproterozoic basement) is thrust onto the Zadinian Group, itself in places thrust onto the Mayumbian Group, which finally comes into contact with the youngest West Congolian Group Sous-divisions: The recently (Tack et al., 2001) revised lithostratigraphic column of the West Congo Supergroup includes, from oldest to youngest, the Zadinian, Mayumbian and West Congolian Groups. Baudet et al, 2013, on stratigraphic grounds, introduced a new terminology: resp. from oldest to youngest: • • • Groupe de Matadi Groupe de Tschéla (ouest) / Groupe de Seke-Banza (est) Groupe des Cataractes o Sous-groupe de la Mpioka o Sous-groupe de Lukala o Sous-groupe du Haut-Shiloango o Sous-groupe du Sansikwa The topmost unit of the former West Congo group, i.e. the Inkisi subgroup, is postulated by Baudet et al, (2013), to be post Precambrian, in line with equivalent postulates for the topmost units of the Lindi and Katanga Supergroups (Kadima et al, 2011, Tait et al, 2011). This unit is a typical ‘redbeds’ arkose, which is characterized by a relative important thickness, red beds, and a series of sedimentay features typical of a rapidly deposited shallow-water deltaic siliciclastic deposits. Inkisi (Super) Group Cataractes Group Seke-Banza Tshela Group Matadi Group Supergroupe de la Lindi – SG-LI Lindien – L, a, l, tillite, it Ubangien – a,l Verbeek, 1970, Kadima et al, 2011, Tait et al, 2011 The Neoproterozoic Lindian Supergroup (Verbeek, 1970) exposed in N DRC (essentially in Eastern Province of DRC), at the southern edge of the Pan-African Ubanguide fold belt consists of a sedimentary sequence with a thickness of more than 2,500 m, which was considered as alleged foreland deposits of this orogen. The Ubangian is the local name for the extension of this unit in Equator Province of DRC. The prolongation of these sedimentary series to the north, in CAR, via the N-S-trending Fouroumbala basin, includes a series of units with local names gathered by Poidevin (1985) under the names of Middle Chinko–Morkia-Rumu and Fouroumbala Formations. Sous-divisions: According to the detailed study of Verbeek (1970), the Lindian Supergroup has been subdivided into three main units, which are from top to bottom, the Aruwimi, Lokoma and Ituri Groups . Verbeek (1970) BRGM (1980-1982) Aruwimi Group Average thickness Yambuya Formation not mapped ± 1.200 m L8 ± 400 m L7 ± 150 m S Banalia Arkoses * (not anymore part of Aruwimi but separate (Super)Group L i d i Malili Formation Alolo Shales Galamboge Quartzites = Gemena Quartzite (Ubangian) Lokoma Group Bombua Formation Kole Shales L6 ± 100 m L5 from 250 to 500 m L4 50 - 300 m LT 50 m (lenticular) Asoso Shales L3 50 m Lenda Limestones L2 50 - 100 m Penge Quartzites and Arkoses L1 ± 20 m Opienge-Bomili-Bafwabato Conglomerate Mamungi Shales =Wanie-Rukula Limestones =Opienge Dolostones Panga Formation Bobwamboli Arkoses = Avakubi Sandstones and Conglomerates = Lundutuda Sandstones and Conglomerates Akwokwo Tillite Ituri Group The Banalia Arkoses, which is characterized by a relative important thickness (c. 1200 m), red beds, and a series of sedimentary features typical of a rapidly deposited shallow-water deltaic siliciclastic deposits, laid down under a regular subsidence of the basin, and resulting from a granitic source, are postulated to be of Post precambrian age (Kadima et al, 2011, Tait et al, 2011) .. Supergroupe de la Mbuji-Mayi – SG-MB Bushimay et Luamba – b0, b1, b2, Lu The Neoproterozoic Mbuji-Mayi (Bushimay) Supergroup (Raucq, 1957) crops out in the type area of eastern Kasai and in northwestern Katanga. In Katanga, the Supergroup rests unconformably upon the Mesoproterozoic Kibaran belt, while in southern Kasai, it unconformably overlies the Archaean Kasai craton. In the north, the supergroup is overlain by Mesozoic sedimentary rocks belonging to the Congo Basin (“Cuvette Centrale”). The Roan Supergroup of Katanga, forming the lower part of the Katangan System, is considered as the stratigraphical equivalent of the Mbuji-Mayi Supergroup (Raucq, 1970; Cahen, 1982; Baudet, 1987). The poorly studied Luamba unit, in western Katanga, forms a narrow zone which is considered as correlative with the Mbuji-Mayi Supergroup (Lepersonne, 1974) Sous-divisions: According to Raucq (1957) and Lepersonne (1973), the Supergroup is subdivided into, from bottom to top B0, B1, B2. In Kasai, Baudet 1987; Raucq and Baudet, 1991 identified B1 and B2 as resp. B I and B II. • B0 Group (1000 – 2000 m): mainly constituted of arkoses, quartzites, red shales and conglomerates. This Group, absent in Kasai, occurs only in the southern part of the zone located in Katanga, along the Kibaran belt. It is characterized by its local distribution and is presumably older than the Roan group of Katanga. • B1 (B I) Group (c. 1000 m): subdivided into a series of subunits (B1a–B1e), which can be summarized as follow: B1a–b: displaying lateral variations of facies, from calcschists to conglomerates including pebbles from the basement. In Katanga, no distinction is made between this unit and the B0 Group; B1c–d: whitish quartzites and shales; B1e: shales and calcschists; • B2 (B II) Group (800 – 1000 m): limestones (locally silicified, cherty, oolitic, or with stromatolites), dolomites. Magmatisme: The Mbuji-Mayi Supergroup includes amygdaloidal basaltic pillow lavas. Their relationship with the Supergroup is still matter of discussion. The coincident ages obtained from samples of different lavas (950 Ma ± 20 Ma; K-Ar age determination; Cahen, 1982) suggest a single volcanic event. Many dolerite dykes cutting the Supergroup are considered as the feeder systems of the lavas. (Super)Groupe de la Lubudi – SG-LU non cartographié par Lepersonne, 1974 Le groupe de Lubudi est l’unité supérieure de la pile sédimentaire du Supergroupe des Monts Kibara, et consiste en sa partie inférieur d’arkoses et conglomérats sombres, des shales noirs graphitiques et quelques niveaux de grés ; ainsi qu’une partie supérieur composée de calcaires et dolomies, silicifiés et des stromatholites. Nulle part ailleurs en RDC, des stromatholites ont été décrit faisant part du Mésoprotérozoique . D’autre part, des unités géographiquement avoisinantes du Néoprotérozoique (Mbuji-Mai) contiennent typiquement ce genre de formations organiques. Il y a donc lieu à supposer que les géologues, travaillant dans la région, ont mal attribué ce niveau au Supergroupe Mésoprotérozoique des Monts Kibara. Supergroupe de l’Itombwe – SG-IT non cartographié par Lepersonne, 1974 ; considéré Burundien - B Villeneuve, 1977, 1987 and Walemba et al, 2005 The Itombwe and Irumu troughs The previously called “Itombwe Syncline” or “Itombwe Synclinorium”, first described in 1946, has been studied by several geologists, who have established different lithostratigraphic columns for this geological unit (Lohest, 1946, 1964; Peeters, 1955, 1956; Villeneuve, 1973, 1976, 1978, 1983, 1985; Waleffe, 1988). Sous-divisions: According to Walemba et al, 2005, the Itombwe Supergroup consists of an Upper Kadubu group and a Lower Kadubu group, separated by a tectonic contact. Villeneuve 1987 also describes these upper and lower Kadubu “sections” but postulates that both might be equivalent stratigraphic levels. He divides the Itombwe Supergroup into into a lower NyaKasiba Group (thickness ~ 1000 to 1500m) and an upper Tshibangu Group (thickness ~ 2000 m). Supergroupe du Katanga Katangien - K Cailteux et al, 2008, Kampunzu et al, 2009 Sous-divisions The Katangan sedimentary rock succession totals 5-10km in thickness and is divided into three major lithostratigraphical units (François,1974, 1995). From bottom to top, these units are the Roan (codeR), Nguba (code Ng, formerly Lower Kundelungu) and Kundelungu (code Ku, formerly Upper Kundelungu) Groups. PHANÉROZOIQUE (Super)Groupe de l’Inkisi Inkisi – I (Super)Groupe de Banalia non cartographié par Lepersonne, 1974 ; partie supérieure de Aruwimi - a (Super)Groupe des Biano non cartographié par Lepersonne, 1974 ; partie supérieure de Kundelungu supérieur – K3 post-précambrien, pré-Karoo Kanda-Nkula et al, 2011, Delpomdor et al, 2011, Tait et al, 2011 Neoproterozoic tabular sedimentary sequences were largely preserved and define respectively the West Congo and Katanga Supergroups. The uppermost unit of these Supergroups consists of a ca 1000m thick Redbed-facies sequence, respectively the “Inkisi” and “Plateaux (also known as KilunguLupili or Biano)” Subgroups. Other similar Neoproterozoic sequences are known in intracratonic aulacogenes in and/or around the Congo river basin, where they define distinct Supergroups (e.g. the Mbuji-Mayi Supergroup in the DRC Kasai region). The most prominent is the Lindi/Ubangi Supergroup exposed to the N and NE of the CRB. Its uppermost unit (the “Banalia Arkoses”) is also a ca. 1000m thick Redbed sequence. It was shown that these Redbeds overlie unconformably the folded Neoproterozoic sequences of the Pan-African West Congo and Katanga belts and are thus post ca. 550Ma (paroxysm of Pan African orogeny). Therefore, they can no longer be considered as Precambrian but are Phanerozoic in age. The Redbeds are themselves overlain by the ca. 320Ma Karoo tillite (base of the Karoo Supergroup). The Redbeds of the CRB are characteristic of lacustrine and fluvio-deltaic (semi)arid palaeoenvironments, in contact with atmospheric oxygen as indicated by their colour due to iron oxides/hydroxides coating around detrital grains, but their palaeo-depositional history is still poorly constrained. Sous-divisions: non connues Supergroupe du Karoo – SG-K Carbonifère supérieur , Permien inférieur, : série de la lukuga - pc Triasique et ( ?) Liasique : série de la haute Lueki – t Delvaux, 1991 The Karoo deposits (encompassing Upper Carboniferous, Permo-Triassic and Lower Jurassic) occur either as part of the sedimentary pile of the “Cuvette Centrale”, or as infilling of rift basins (e.g. Lukuga and Luena basins). Sous-divisions: The Karoo deposits include the Permo-Carboniferous Lukuga series (siliciclastic rocks with minor coal seams; Cahen and Lepersonne, 1978) and the Triassic red facies rocks of the Haute Lueki series. Lower Karoo sediments are of fluvial/lacustrine origin, while Middle and Upper Karoo are essentially of fluvial origin (Super)Groupe de Kisangani - (S)G-KIS Jurassique supérieur post Oxfordien : série de Stanleyville - J Lepersonne, 1974, 1977 Sous-divisions : alternances d’unités lithologiques sans division formelle : Dans la région comprise entre de Kisangani au nord et Lubefu, au sud, de haut en bas Grès, argillites de la Lilo Argillites de la Riki Grès , argillites sableuses, intercalations chistes bitumineux Argillites Argillites et schistes bitumineux de l’Usengwwe Argilites calcaires Argillites et schistes bitumineux de la Loso Argillites, grès Schistes bitumineux de Minjaro Argillites Argillites, grès , grès conglomératiques, conglomérats avec passées bitumineuses. - Supergroupe de la Sankuru – SG-SAN Crétacique indifférencié, principalement inférieur - c Wealdien : série de la Loia – c1 Albien – Aptien : série de Bokungu – c2 Crétacique supra-Cénomanien et ( ?) Cénomanien : série du Kwango, couches de Boende – c3 Lepersonne, 1974, Lepersonne, 1977, Kadima, 2011 Lepersonne (1977) has proposed the following succession for the Mesozoic formations, from top to bottom: • • • Kwango Group Bokungu Group Loia Group (Cenomanian –C3) (Albian -? Lower Cenomanian – C2) (Albian-Aptian – C1) Supergroupe de la Luki – SG-LU Crétacique inférieur continental : « grès sublittoraux » - c1 Albien – Aptien continental : Mavuma supérieur – c2 Aptien marin : Mavuma inférieur – c2 Maestrichtien, Campanien, Santonien, Coniacien, Turonien – c3 Cahen 1954, Lepersonne, 1974, Kadima, 2011 • • • Formation de Bulu-Zambi – C3 Formation de Mavuma – C2 Formation de Lukunga – C1 Supergroupe du Kalahari-SG-KAL Paléogène : série des « grès polymorphes » (« Kalahari » inférieur) – tt Néogène : série des sables ocre (« Kalahari » supérieur) – tt Miocène inférieur, Eocène, Paléocène – e, mi The Cenozoic to Recent formations overlying the “Cuvette Centrale” are continental in origin and comprise (from top to bottom): 1. The fine Neogene yellow (ocre) sands, relating to the Upper Kalahari formations, form discontinuous lenses of 30 to 40m thickness which represent remnants of a formerly continuous blanket. They rest on a Mid-Tertiary peneplain; 2. The Paleogene “Grès polymorphs”: a series of sands and soft sandstones exposed along discontinuous lenses. The series is related to the Lower Kalahari and its thickness ranges, e.g. in Kasaï between 10 and 20m (Delhal et al., 1966, in Carte géologique à l 'échelle 1/200,000, feuille de Dibaya). Supergroupe de la Cuvette centrale – SG-CC Pléistocène , Pliocène : alluvions, éluvions et colluvions – pp Lepersonne, 1974 (Cahen, 1954); The Lower Pleistocene to Pliocene sediments: more or less argillaceous sands with conglomerates at the basis cover the late-Tertiary plains. The yellow sands are recognized to originate from the Neogene sand formations, the red sands relate to the Cretaceous formations. The thickness of the Lower Pleistocene to Pliocene cover is reported to range between 25 and 40m Lepersonne, 1974: couches de Yagambi, de Salonga, Lodja Formations du Rift Miocène : fossé tectonique centre africain – ml Pléistocène , Pliocène : alluvions, éluvions et colluvions – pp Kampunzu et al., 1998b, De Paepe and Fernandez-Alonso, 1981, Tack and De Paepe, 1983; Tack et al., 1987 The Cenozoic volcanic activity is contained in three volcanic provinces in Kivu: the Virunga, Bukavu and Mwenga-Kamituga Volcanic Provinces. The Virunga Province is characterized by two major volcanic episodes: 1. The Recent to Present (Pliocene-Pleistocene) episode, including peralkaline potassic volcanics (silica undersaturated lavas: nephelinites, melilites and leucitites, potassic basanites, mugearites,...); outpoured from eight major volcanoes; 2. The older initial Virunga episode (Miocene) including basalts with tholeiitic affinities at the base, overlain by Na-alkaline lavas (basanites, hawaiites, ...). The Bukavu and Mwenga-Kamituga Provinces, also extending in Rwanda and Burundi display: 1. Tholeiitic to transitional basalts during the pre-rift stage; 2. Na-alkaline lavas during the initial stage of downwarping (rift individualisation); 3. Transitional volcanics during the graben stage. It is suggested (Kampunzu et al., 1998b; Pasteels, 1989) that the volcanism associated with the Western Rift began c. 11 Ma ago in the Virunga region and c. 10 Ma ago in the Bukavu region. The age of the earliest extrusive rocks recorded in the Mwenga-Kamituga region, not well constrained, could be close to 6 Ma. (Super)Groupe de Quelo – (S)G-QU Pléistocène, Pliocène et ( ?) Miocène supérieur : « série des Cirques », Quelo – ppm Lepersonne, 1974 Sous-division : • Quelo supérieur - « Série des Cirques » pleistocène ? • Quelo inférieur : pliocène – miocène supérieur Alluvions et sédiments subaériens - Ho Holocène : alluvions modernes - Ho Lepersonne, 1974 Alluvions anciennes, modernes, terrasses fluviatiles, produits d’altération, plages anciennes, sables d’estuaire.