Références sur les principes du GAR Blöndal, J.R. (2001), « La

1
Références sur les principes du GAR
Blöndal, J.R. (2001), « La procédure budgétaire en Suède », Revue de l’OCDE sur la
gestion budgétaire, 1:1.
Boston, J. (1994), « Purchasing Policy Advice : the Limits to Contracting Out »,
Governance, 7:1, janvier.
Bouckaert, G. et Halachmi, A. (1996), « The Range of Performance Indicators in the
Public Sector : Theory vs. Practice », dans A. Halachmi et G. Bouckaert (dir. publ.) Reengineering and Performance Measurement in Criminal Justice and Social
Programmes, Perth, Australie- Occidentale, International Institute of Administrative
Sciences.
Bouckaert, G. et Ulens, W. (1998), Mesure de la performance dans le service public :
exemples étrangers pour les pouvoirs publics belges, Bruxelles, Services Fédéraux des
Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et Culturelles.
Campos, E. et Pradhan, S. (1996), Budgetary Institutions and Expenditure Outcomes
: Binding Governments to Fiscal Performance, Policy Research Working Paper 1646,
Banque mondiale, Washington, D.C.
Carter, N., Klein R. et Day, P. (1992), How Organisations Measure Success : the Use
of Performance Indicators in Government, Londres, Routledge.
Gianakis, G. (1996), « Integrating Performance Measurement and Budgeting », dans
A. Halachmi et G. Bouckaert (dir. publ.) Organisational Performance and
Measurement in the Public Sector, Westport, CT., Quorum.
Gillibrand, A. et Hilton, B. (1998), « Resource Accounting and Budgeting :
Principles, Concepts and Practice – the MoD Case », Public Money and Management,
18:2, avril/juin.
Hencke, D. (1998), « Job Centres Fiddled the Figures », Guardian, 8 janvier.
Jones, L. et McCaffrey, J. (1997), « Implementing the Chief Financial Officers Act
and the Government Performance and Results Act in the Federal Government »,
Public Budgeting and Finance, 17:1, printemps.
Jones, R. (1998), « The Conceptual Framework of Resource Accounting », Public
Money and Management, 18:2, avril/juin.
2
Leloup, L., Long, C. et Giordano, J. (1998), « President Clinton’s Fiscal 1998 Budget
and Constitutional Paths to Balance », Public Budgeting and Finance, 18:1,
printemps.
Likierman, A. (1998), « Resource Accounting and Budgeting – Where Are We Now?
», Public Money and Management, 18:2, avril/juin.
Mayne, J. (1996), Mise en oeuvre de la gestion axée sur les résultats et de la
budgétisation axée sur le rendement. Leçons du document publié, document de travail
n° 73, Ottawa, Bureau du Vérificateur général du Canada.
Miller, G. (1994),
« What is Financial Management ? Are We Inventing a New Field Here ? », Public
Administration Review, 54:2, mars/avril.
Monnier, E. (1992), Évaluations de l’action des pouvoirs publics (2e édition), Paris,
Economica.
National Audit Office (1995), The Meteorological Office : Evaluation of Performance,
HC693, 29 août, Londres, HMSO, Royaume-Uni.
Neuby, B. (1997), « On the Lack of a Budget Theory », Public Administration
Quarterly, 21:2.
OCDE (1995), La gestion publique en mutation. Les réformes dans les pays de l’OCDE,
Paris, PUMA/OCDE.
OCDE (1997), En quête de résultats. Pratiques de gestion des performances, Paris,
PUMA/OCDE.
Pollitt, C. (1986), « Beyond the Managerial Model : the Case for Broadening
Performance Assessment in Government and the Public Services », Financial
Accountability and Management.
Pollitt, C. (1997), Looking Outcomes in the Face : the Limits of Government Action,
allocution à la Public Service Senior Management Conference, Wellington, NouvelleZélande,
9 octobre.
Pollitt, C. et Bouckaert, G. (dir. publ.), (1995), Quality Improvement in European
Public Services : Concepts, Cases and Commentary, Londres, Sage.
Pollitt, C., Girre, X., Lonsdale, J., Mul, R., Summa, H. et Waerness, M. (1999),
Performance or Compliance ? Performance Audit and Public Management Reform in
Five Countries, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
3
Président du Conseil du Trésor (1997), Rendre compte des résultats 1997, Ottawa,
Secrétariat du Conseil du Trésor du Canada.
Radin, B. (1998), « The Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) : Hydraheaded
Monster or Flexible Management Tool ? », Public Administration Review, 58:4,
juillet/août.
Reeth, W., van, (1998), Revolutions in Financial Management, proposition de thèse
de doctorat, Centre de la gestion publique, Université catholique de Louvain.
Rubin, I. (1992), « Budgeting : Theory, Concepts, Methods, and Issues », dans J.
Rabin (dir.
publ.) Handbook of Public Budgeting, New York, Marcel Dekker. Schick, A. (2001), «
L’évolution du rôle des services centraux du budget », La revue de l’OCDE sur la
gestion budgétaire, 1:1.
Schick, A. (1996), The Spirit of Reform : Managing the New Zealand State Sector in a
Time of Change, préparé pour la State Services Commission et le Trésor, NouvelleZélande.
Straw, J. (1998), « Resource Accounting and NHS Trusts », Public Money and
Management, 18:2,
avril/juin.
Thompson, F. (1997), « Toward a Regulatory Budget », Public Budgeting and
Finance, 17:1, printemps.
Vérificateur général du Canada (1997), La communication de l’information sur le
rendement dans le Système de gestion des dépenses, chapitre 5, avril, Ottawa, ministre
des Travaux publics et des Services gouvernementaux.
Vérificateur général du Canada (1997), Vers une gestion axée sur les résultats,
chapitre 11, octobre, Ottawa, ministre des Travaux publics et des Services
gouvernementaux.
Widlavsky, A. (1979), Speaking Truth to Power : the Art and Craft of Policy Analysis,
Boston, Little, Brown and Co.
Zifcak, S. (1994), New Managerialism : Administrative Reform in Whitehall and
Canberra, Buckingham,
Open University Press
4
Références sur les politiques de gestion axe sur le résultat.
ANGRIST J., BETTINGER E., BLOOM E., KING E., KREMER M. (2001). – Vouchers for
Private Schooling in Colombia : Evidence from a Randomized Natural
Experiment. NBER Working Paper n° 8343, Cambridge,
Mass.
BENNET R.J. (1990). – Decentralization, Local Governments and Markets.
Towards Post-Welfare Agenda. Oxford, UK : Clarendon Press.
BARDHAN P., MOOKHERJEE D. (1998). – Expenditure Decentralization and The
Delivery of Public Services in Developing countries. CIDER, Working Paper
C98/104. Boston University.
BRYK A.S., THUM Y.M., EASTON J.Q., LUPPESCU S. (1998). – Examining
Productivity : Ten-Years Trends in the Chicago Public Schools. Chicago :
Consortium on Chicago School Research.
CALDWELL B. (1990). – School-Based Decision Making and Management :
International Developments. In J. Chapman (eds.), School Based Decision Making
and Management, p. 3-26. London, UK : Falmer Press.
COX C., LEMAITRE M.J. (1999). – Market and State Principles of Reform in Chile
Education : Policies and Results. In D. Leiptziger and G. Perry (eds.), Chile : Recent
Policy Lessons and Emerging Challenges. WDI Development Studies Series.
Washington D.C. :World Bank.
DI GROPELLO E. (1999). – Educational Decentralization models in Latin America.
Cepal Review, n° 68, p. 155173.
DURU-BELLAT M., MEURET D. (2001). – Nouvelles formes de régulation dans les
systèmes éducatifs étrangers : autonomie et choix des établissements scolaires.
Revue Française de Pédagogie, n° 135, p. 173-221.
DURU-BELLAT M., MONS N., SUCHAUT B. (2004). – Caractéristiques des systèmes
éducatifs et compétences des jeunes de 15 ans : l’éclairage des comparaisons
entre pays. Rapport pour le Ministère de l’Éducation. Dijon : Iredu.
ESKELAND G.S., FILMER D. (2002). – Autonomy, Participation, and Learning in
Argentine Schools. Finding and their Implications for Decentralization. Policy
Research Working Paper, WPS n° 2766, Washington D.C. : World Bank.
GAURI V. (1998) – School Choice in Chile : Two Decades of Educational Reform.
Pittsburgh, PA. : University of Pittsburgh Press GORARD S., TAYLOR C. (2002). –
5
Market Forces and Standards in Education : a Preliminary Consideration. Bristish
Journal of Sociology of Education, 23, 1, p. 5-18.
HOXBY C. (2000). – Does competition among public schools benefit students and
taxpayers ? American Economic Review, 90, 5, p. 1209-38.
JIMENEZ E., SAWADA Y. (1998). – Do Community-managed schools work ? An
Evaluation of El Salvador’s EDUCO Program. World Bank Economic Review, 13, 3,
p. 415-441.
LEITHWOOD K., MENZIES T. (1998). – Forms and Effects of School-based
Management : A Review. Educational
Policy, 12, 3, p. 325-346.
LITVACK J, SEDDON J. (1999). – Decentralization briefing notes. World Bank
Institute Working Paper, Washington, D.C. : World Bank.
LOCKEED M., ZHAO Q. (1992). – The Empty Opportunity : Local Control of
Secondary Schools and Student Achievement in the Philippines. Working Paper
WPS 825, Washington DC : World Bank. LUCAS R. (1988). – On The Mechanics of
Economic Development.Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 1, p. 3-42.
McEWAN P., CARNOY M. (1998). – Public investments or private schools ? A
Reconstruction of Educational Improvements in Chile, processed, Washington,
D.C. World Bank
MEURET D., PROD’HOM J., STOCKER E. (1995). – Comparer les structures de
décision des systèmes éducatifs : un bilan de l’approche quantitative. In OCDE-CERI,
Mesurer la qualité des établissements scolaires (p. 33-58). Paris : OCDE-CERI.
MURPHY, J. (1991). – Restructuring Schools : Capturing and Assessing the
Phenomena. New York : Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
MUSGRAVE R.A. (1959). – The Theory of Public Finance. New York : Mc Graw Hill.
OATES W. (1972). – Fiscal Federalism. New York : Harcourt Brace.
PAES DE BARROS R., SILVA PINTO DE MENDONÇA S. (1998). – The Impact of Three
institutional Innovations in
Brazilian Education. In W. D. Savedoff (eds.), Organisation Matters : Agency
problems in Health and Education. Washington D.C.: Inter-American
Development Bank.
PANDEY R. (2000). – Getting to Scale: The Story of DPEP in India. A presentation
made as part of The Education Ministers Series, Education Reform and Management
Group. Washington D.C. : World Bank.
6
PRUD’HOMME R. (1995). – The Dangers of Decentralization The World Bank
Research Observer, 10, 2, p. 201-220.
RAYWID M.A. (1990). – Rethinking School Governance. In R.F. Elmore (Eds.),
Restructuring Schools : The Next Generation of School Reform, p. 152-206. San
Francisco CA : Jossey-Bass Inc.
RHOTEN D. (2000). – Education Decentralization in Argentina : a “Global-Local
Conditions of Possibility” Approach to State, Market and Society Change. Journal of
Education Policy, Vol. 15, 6, p. 593-619.
RONDINELLI D., NELLIS J., CHEEMA G. S. (1984). – Decentralization in Developing
Countries. World Bank Staff Working Paper No. 581, Washington, D.C. : World Bank.
SEDDON T., ANGUS L., POOLE M. (1990). – Pressures on the Move to School Based
Management. In J. Chapman (Eds.), School Based Decision Making and
Management, p. 29-54. London, UK : Falmer Press.
TIEBOUT C. (1956). – A pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Political
Economy, 64, p. 416-424
THRUPP M., HAROLD B., MANSELL H., HAWKSWORTH L. (2000). – Mapping the
Cumulative Impact of Education Reform: Final Report. New Zealand : University
of Waikato.
WINKLER D. (1989). – Decentralization in Education : An Economic Perspective,
Population and Human Resources Department, Working Paper WPS 143,
Washington, D.C. : World Bank.
WINKLER D., ROUNDS T. (1996). – Municipal and Private Sector Response to
Decentralization and School Choice. Economics of Education Review, 15, 4, p. 365376
WINKLER D., GERSHBERG I. (1999). – Education Decentralization in Latin
America : The Effects on the Quality of Schooling. LCSHD Paper Series n° 59.
Washington, D.C. : World Bank.
WEST L., WONG C. (1995). – Fiscal Decentralization and Growing Disparities in
Rural China : Some Evidence in the Provision of Social Services. Oxford Review of
Economic Policy, 11, 4, p. 70-84
WÖSSMANN L. (2000). – Schooling Resources, Educational Institutions, and
Student Performance : The International Evidence. Kiel Working Paper n° 983.
Germany : KIWE.