ACUTE DIARRHEA CHICKENPOX - réseau Sentinelles

ACUTE DIARRHEA CHICKENPOX - réseau Sentinelles

Sentinelles network report from 09/14/2016, n° 2016w36 (data from 09/05/2016 to 09/11/2016)
ACUTE DIARRHEA
CHICKENPOX
ACUTE DIARRHEA
Low activity
In metropolitan France, last week, the incidence rate of Acute
diarrhea seen in general practice was estimated at 98 cases per
100,000 inhabitants (95% CI [78 ; 118]), below the epidemic
threshold (129 cases per 100,000 inhabitants) [1].
At the regional level, the highest incidence rates were noted in:
Lorraine (223 cases per 100,000 inhabitants, 95% CI [50 ; 396]),
Provence-Alpes-Côte-d’Azur (154, 95% CI [37 ; 271]) and
Languedoc-Roussillon (149, 95% CI [40 ; 258]). *
More information about this surveillance
CHICKENPOX
Low activity
In metropolitan France, last week, the incidence rate of
Chickenpox seen in general practice was estimated at 3 cases per
100,000 inhabitants (95% CI [0 ; 6]).
No significant regional cluster was reported. *
More information about this surveillance
INFLUENZA-LIKE ILLNESS
Low activity
In metropolitan France, last week, the incidence rate of Influenzalike illness seen in general practice was estimated at 1 case per
100,000 inhabitants (95% CI [0 ; 2]), below the epidemic threshold
(94 cases per 100,000 inhabitants) [1].
At the regional level, the highest incidence rates were noted in:
Limousin (6 cases per 100,000 inhabitants, 95% CI [0 ; 37]),
Corse (6, 95% CI [0 ; 23]) and Rhône-Alpes (3, 95% CI [0 ; 10]). *
Map of spatial data interpolation based on incidence rates at the
« departement » (NUTS 3) level, (per 100 000 inhabitants), Acute diarrhea,
Sentinelles general practitioners, 2016w36
Maps available at http://www.sentiweb.fr
Map of spatial data interpolation based on incidence rates at the
« departement » (NUTS 3) level, (per 100 000 inhabitants), Chickenpox,
Sentinelles general practitioners, 2016w36
Maps available at http://www.sentiweb.fr
More information about this surveillance
Information about the statistical methods
* The regional data are presented at the end of this report.
[1] Costagliola D, et al. A routine tool for detection and assessment of epidemics of influenza-like syndromes in France. Am J Public Health.
1991;81(1):97-9.
Incidence rate in blue,
epidemic threshold in red calculated by a periodic regression model [1]
(per 100 000 inhabitants), Acute diarrhea , Sentinelles general practitioners
Incidence rate in blue,
(per 100 000 inhabitants), Chickenpox, Sentinelles general practitioners
National incidence rates
(per 100 000 inhabitants)
over the past 3 weeks
INFLUENZA-LIKE ILLNESS
ACUTE DIARRHEA
CHICKENPOX
2016w36 (non consolidated)
2016w35
Incidence rate estimation
[95% confidence interval]
Incidence rate estimation
[95% confidence interval]
2016w34
Incidence rate estimation
[95% confidence interval]
1 [0 ; 2]
5 [2 ; 8]
3 [0 ; 7]
98 [78 ; 118]
98 [83 ; 115]
84 [68 ; 100]
3 [0 ; 6]
2 [0 ; 4]
5 [1 ; 9]
Table 1 : Incidence rates* estimation with 95% confidence interval, for each indicator, in France, over the past 3 weeks .
Regional incidence rates
for week 2016w36
(per 100 000 inhabitants)
INFLUENZA-LIKE ILLNESS
ACUTE DIARRHEA
CHICKENPOX
Incidence rate estimation
[95% confidence interval]
Incidence rate estimation
[95% confidence interval]
Incidence rate estimation
[95% confidence interval]
Réseau Sentinelles
Inserm-UPMC UMR-S 1136
Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP)
Faculté de Médecine Pierre et Marie Curie, site Saint-Antoine
27, rue Chaligny / 75571 Paris cedex 12
Phone. : 01 44 73 84 35 / Fax : 01 44 73 84 54
Email : [email protected]
The " Réseau Sentinelles" or Sentinelles Network
(a.k.a. French Communicable Diseases Computer Network)
is a network of 1,397 physicians working throughout the metropolitan regions
of France including 550 involved in the clinical surveillance activity
(437 general practitioners and 113 pediatricians)
enabling the achievement of weekly newsletters.
This network is developped in cooperation between Inserm, Université Pierre
et Marie Curie (UPMC) and the Agence Santé publique France.
Alsace
0 [0 ; 0]
22 [0 ; 62]
0 [0 ; 0]
Aquitaine
0 [0 ; 0]
38 [0 ; 87]
0 [0 ; 0]
Auvergne
0 [0 ; 0]
56 [0 ; 124]
2 [0 ; 7]
Basse-Normandie
0 [0 ; 0]
58 [1 ; 115]
0 [0 ; 0]
Bourgogne
0 [0 ; 0]
48 [0 ; 101]
5 [0 ; 20]
Regional branch
Head of network
Regional manager
Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes /
Bourgogne-France-Comté
Marianne Sarazin
Caroline Liotard
Centre-Val-de-Loire /
Nord-Pas-de-Calais-Picardie
Thierry Prazuck
Mathieu Rivière
Ile-de-France
Mathilde François
Cécile Pino
Méditerranée :
Corse, Languedoc-Roussillon
Midi-Pyrénées, ProvenceAlpes-Côte d’Azur
Jean-Pierre Amoros
Alessandra Falchi
Lisandru Capai
Shirley Masse
Head of RS : Thomas Hanslik
Deputy head of RS : Thierry Blanchon
Monitoring managers: Louise Rossignol, Caroline Guerrisi, Victoire Roussel
Information systems, biostatistics : Clément Turbelin, Cécile Souty
Editor : Yves Dorléans
Bretagne
0 [0 ; 0]
43 [0 ; 92]
6 [0 ; 19]
Centre
0 [0 ; 0]
102 [45 ; 159]
0 [0 ; 0]
Champagne-Ardenne
0 [0 ; 0]
148 [26 ; 270]
0 [0 ; 0]
Corse
6 [0 ; 23]
23 [0 ; 74]
0 [0 ; 0]
Franche-Comté
0 [0 ; 0]
72 [0 ; 156]
0 [0 ; 0]
Haute-Normandie
0 [0 ; 0]
100 [7 ; 193]
0 [0 ; 0]
Ile-de-France
0 [0 ; 0]
103 [55 ; 151]
9 [0 ; 27]
Languedoc-Roussillon
0 [0 ; 0]
149 [40 ; 258]
0 [0 ; 0]
Limousin
6 [0 ; 37]
0 [0 ; 0]
0 [0 ; 0]
Lorraine
0 [0 ; 0]
223 [50 ; 396]
0 [0 ; 0]
You can visit our website :
Midi-Pyrénées
0 [0 ; 0]
43 [0 ; 93]
0 [0 ; 0]
http://www.sentiweb.fr
Nord-Pas-de-Calais
0 [0 ; 0]
85 [8 ; 162]
0 [0 ; 0]
Pays-de-la-Loire
0 [0 ; 0]
43 [2 ; 84]
0 [0 ; 0]
Picardie
0 [0 ; 0]
13 [0 ; 46]
0 [0 ; 0]
Poitou-Charentes
0 [0 ; 0]
105 [0 ; 267]
0 [0 ; 0]
Provence-Alpes-Côte-d'Azur
0 [0 ; 0]
154 [37 ; 271]
0 [0 ; 0]
Rhône-Alpes
3 [0 ; 10]
103 [53 ; 153]
7 [0 ; 22]
Table 2 : Incidence rates* estimation with 95% confidence interval, for each indicator, for each French region, for week 2016w36.
Need information ?
These information are also available by using our RSS feed :
http://www.sentiweb.fr/rss/fr/en
You can also contact us using the above contact information.
* Incidence rates estimate are calculated on the activity of general practitioners.