planning committee report 67 9 april 2014 60 comité de l

Transcription

planning committee report 67 9 april 2014 60 comité de l
PLANNING COMMITTEE
REPORT 67
9 APRIL 2014
EXTRACT OF DRAFT
PLANNING COMMITTEE
MINUTES 71
25 MARCH 2014
60
COMITÉ DE L’URBANISME
RAPPORT 67
LE 9 AVRIL 2014
EXTRAIT DE L’ÉBAUCHE DU
PROCÈS-VERBAL 71 DU
COMITÉ DE L’URBANISME
LE 25 MARS 2014
APPLICATION TO DEMOLISH AND TO CONSTRUCT A NEW STRUCTURE
AT 7 CLARENCE STREET, A PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE BYWARD
MARKET HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT AND DESIGNATED
UNDER PART V OF THE ONTARIO HERITAGE ACT
ACS2014-PAI-PGM-0055
RIDEAU-VANIER (12)
BUILT HERITAGE SUB-COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS:
That the Planning Committee recommend Council:
1.
Approve the application to demolish 7 Clarence Street, a rear
addition to 461-465 Sussex Drive, according to the application
received by the City of Ottawa on February 3, 2014, subject to the
receipt of a complete application for Site Plan Control approval
and minor variances (if required) for a new addition;
2.
Direct Planning and Growth Management staff to work with the
National Capital Commission with respect to the height, footprint
and material for the replacement building;
3.
Direct Planning and Growth Management staff to advise, prior to
the consideration of this report by Council, the new deadline to
which the National Capital Commission has agreed for the
consideration of the new construction at 7 Clarence Street by
Council;
PLANNING COMMITTEE
REPORT 67
9 APRIL 2014
EXTRACT OF DRAFT
PLANNING COMMITTEE
MINUTES 71
25 MARCH 2014
61
COMITÉ DE L’URBANISME
RAPPORT 67
LE 9 AVRIL 2014
EXTRAIT DE L’ÉBAUCHE DU
PROCÈS-VERBAL 71 DU
COMITÉ DE L’URBANISME
LE 25 MARS 2014
4.
Issue the heritage permit pursuant to Recommendation 1 with a
two year expiration date from the date of issuance, and;
5.
Direct that, whereas the NCC has agreed to seek comments from
the Federal Heritage Buildings Review Office (FHBRO), staff
review any comments that may be provided by FHBRO as part of
their additional review.
(Note: Approval to Alter this property under the Ontario Heritage Act
must not be construed to meet the requirements for the issuance of a
building permit.)
Correspondence had been received from the following individuals, as noted:

Ms. Leslie Maitland*, President, Heritage Ottawa, speaking to the
inappropriateness of the current National Capital Commission (NCC) design
in terms of building material and fenestration.

Mr. Claude B. Robert*, Acting VP, Real Estate Management, Design and
Construction, NCC, speaking to a reconsideration of the design for the
replacement building, in response to recommendations from the BHSC.
[ * Individuals / groups marked with an asterisk above either provided comments in
writing or by email; all submissions are held on file with the City Clerk. ]
Councillor Harder introduced the following Motion as a technical amendment to
the Built Heritage Sub-Committee recommendations:
PLANNING COMMITTEE
REPORT 67
9 APRIL 2014
62
COMITÉ DE L’URBANISME
RAPPORT 67
LE 9 AVRIL 2014
EXTRAIT DE L’ÉBAUCHE DU
PROCÈS-VERBAL 71 DU
COMITÉ DE L’URBANISME
LE 25 MARS 2014
EXTRACT OF DRAFT
PLANNING COMMITTEE
MINUTES 71
25 MARCH 2014
MOTION NO PLC 71/2
Moved by Councillor J. Harder:
That Recommendation 1 of the Built Heritage Sub-Committee
recommendation be amended to read as follows: Approve the application
to demolish 7 Clarence Street, a rear addition to 461-465 Sussex Drive,
according to the application received by the City of Ottawa on February 3,
2014, subject to the receipt of an application for Site Plan Control
CARRIED
There being no further discussion, the report recommendation was put before
Committee and was CARRIED, as amended by Motion NO PLC 71/2.
That the Planning Committee recommend Council:
1.
Approve the application to demolish 7 Clarence Street, a rear
addition to 461-465 Sussex Drive, according to the application
received by the City of Ottawa on February 3, 2014, subject to the
receipt of an application for Site Plan Control;
2.
Direct Planning and Growth Management staff to work with the
National Capital Commission with respect to the height, footprint
and material for the replacement building;
PLANNING COMMITTEE
REPORT 67
9 APRIL 2014
EXTRACT OF DRAFT
PLANNING COMMITTEE
MINUTES 71
25 MARCH 2014
63
COMITÉ DE L’URBANISME
RAPPORT 67
LE 9 AVRIL 2014
EXTRAIT DE L’ÉBAUCHE DU
PROCÈS-VERBAL 71 DU
COMITÉ DE L’URBANISME
LE 25 MARS 2014
3.
Direct Planning and Growth Management staff to advise, prior to the
consideration of this report by Council, the new deadline to which
the National Capital Commission has agreed for the consideration of
the new construction at 7 Clarence Street by Council;
4.
Issue the heritage permit pursuant to Recommendation 1 with a two
year expiration date from the date of issuance, and;
5.
Direct that, whereas the NCC has agreed to seek comments from the
Federal Heritage Buildings Review Office (FHBRO), staff review any
comments that may be provided by FHBRO as part of their additional
review.
(Note: Approval to Alter this property under the Ontario Heritage Act must
not be construed to meet the requirements for the issuance of a building
permit.)
CARRIED, as amended