Leave to Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada Denied to Philip

Leave to Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada Denied to Philip Morris
in Trademark Dispute
mars 21, 2013
The Supreme Court of Canada denied leave to appeal to Philip Morris from the Federal Court of Appeal's decision in Marlboro
Canada Limited, Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited v. Phillips Morris Products S.A., Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc., 2012 FCA 201.
The decision held that Philip Morris' otherwise non-branded cigarettes that used the "ROOFTOP" design on its packaging, infringed
Marlboro Canada's trademark rights in the “MARLBORO” trademark by causing confusion for consumers. (For further information on
the FCA decision please read Marlboro Man Dis-Guise Foiled by Federal Court of Appeal.)
In the 1930's, Philip Morris had sold its "MARLBORO" trademark rights in Canada to Imperial Tobacco. Subsequently, Philip Morris
began selling cigarettes using a package bearing a design similar to its distinctive international Marlboro "ROOFTOP" design for
which it held trademark registrations in Canada.
The FCA held that while Philip Morris' trademark registrations for the ROOFTOP design were valid, they caused confusion with the
MARLBORO brand and thus infringed Imperial Tobacco's trademark rights. Philip Morris sought leave to appeal to the Supreme
Court, which has been dismissed with costs.
L'information qui est présentée dans ce site web est fournie à titre informatif uniquement. Elle ne constitue pas un avis juridique et ne devrait pas être interprétée comme
tel. Vous ne devez pas agir ou négliger d’agir en vous fiant à ces renseignements. Un conseil juridique devrait être obtenu sans délai. Les professionnels de Bereskin &
Parr S.E.N.C.R.L., s.r.l. seront heureux de vous conseiller.
Bereskin & Parr S.E.N.C.R.L., s.r.l.