Dust Suppression Update English - Nunavut Municipal Training
Transcription
Dust Suppression Update English - Nunavut Municipal Training
Dust Suppression Alternatives 2016 Update June, 2016 Contents Overview................................................................................................................... 3 Mandate .................................................................................................................................................... 3 Background ............................................................................................................................................... 3 2016 Update ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Product Descriptions ................................................................................................... 5 Product Application ..................................................................................................... 8 Product Shipping and Cost ......................................................................................... 10 Contacts ................................................................................................................. 14 References .............................................................................................................................................. 16 Overview Mandate One outcome of the February 2009 Regional Mayors Forum in Nunavut was a petition to the territory’s Ministry of Community and Government Services to investigate alternatives to the use of calcium chloride for dust control on municipal roads. The Ministry contacted ICURR to conduct a preliminary survey of alternative products, paying particular attention to: Costs including weights for shipping Application process Required equipment for application Pros/con for environmental side effects The Ministry also informed ICURR that Tembind, a lignin-based product, had already been investigated locally and need not be considered in this survey. Background To place the options for consideration in context, it is important to consider the key benefits for dust control or suppression: Road maintenance costs can be lowered by reducing loss of aggregates Road safety can be increased by improving visibility and road surface conditions Dust-related health issues for humans can be minimized Negative impacts of dust on wildlife and vegetation can be reduced Damage to vehicles and equipment can be reduced The decision on which dust control process is to be used must consider several important questions: Is the product environmentally responsible? Does it meet regulatory standards? Is special equipment required to apply the product? Are there safety issues for employees and/or contractors in handling the product? Will there be any need for special storage and warehousing? How effective is the product in achieving the desired outcome? What is the required frequency of application? How durable is the product? Cost? Before even embarking upon a dust suppression strategy, the road authority should determine if other elements of road performance have been incorporated into the assessment. Road design and construction, including crowns, shoulders and drainage should be examined. Are appropriate surface materials being used? Have reduced speed limits been considered? Is paving an option? 2016 Update The purpose of the update was to identify whether the companies identified in 2009 were still operational and whether they carried the products that were identified in 2009 or if they had new products that were developed since 2009 for dust suppression. In addition to conducting an update on the previously identified companies and their products a search was conducted into other companies and their dust suppression products which were not considered or may have not existed in 2009. Although there have been a few distribution company name changes, eights of the nine products examined in 2009, are still available for distribution in 2016. These companies were contacted to obtain an update on their current costs and to determine if there have been any changes in the products that were identified in 2009. In addition three new companies and four products were added to the companies identified in 2009 and updated in 2016. One company which was contacted for an update refused to provide price updates due to their policy of not providing quotes for non-account holders therefore the 2009 cost estimate was not able to be updated. Provincial-Territorial Officials Committee (PTOC) on Local Government Comité des fonctionnaires des provinces et territoires (CFPT) pour les administrations locales 4 Product Descriptions The categories of products for dust suppression include: Hygroscopics (magnesium chloride, calcium chloride, etc) Lignin derivatives (e.g. Tembec’s Tembind or TDS) Bitumens, tars and resins Vegetable oils (canola, soybean, linseed etc) Synthetic polymer emulsions Since the chlorides currently in use in Nunavut have been determined to be undesirable, and a lignan product has already been tested, ICURR did not include any products based on these compounds in this survey. Bunker C oil was to be considered but has been omitted from this report due to its negative environmental impacts (Yukon) and the fact that changes to petroleum refining processes have rendered the product scarce and relatively expensive (interview with Frank Hall, OGRA). In most cases, any dust suppressant will be affected to a certain extent by the conditions in which it is being applied and under which it is expected to perform. The local soil (percentage of sand, glacial till, clay etc), the drainage conditions, the application process and the application rates all play into the product’s performance. Similarly, traffic type and density need to be taken into account. The number of vehicles per day and the type of vehicles (percentage which are automobiles, light-duty trucks, heavy equipment, ATVs etc) will both need to be assessed against product features in order to determine the best choice for the particular situation. Given that most product testing has been conducted in southern Canada and the United States, product selection for use in far northern locales should probably be preceded by testing under local conditions and on tundra soils. It is important to stress that the manufacturer’s recommended application rates need to be followed to guarantee results. There are many companies in North America selling dust suppressant products for roads and this report does not attempt to be comprehensive or recommend one product over another. The sampling attempts to provide an array of alternative products representing different product categories and including both Canadian and American suppliers capable of delivering in the volumes required. Provincial-Territorial Officials Committee (PTOC) on Local Government Comité des fonctionnaires des provinces et territoires (CFPT) pour les administrations locales 5 Table 1. Selected non-chloride, non-lignan dust suppressants Product Company Product Type Dust Stop Cypher Environmental Polymer Winnipeg, Manitoba Proprietary formula (modified polysaccharide) DSF65 RDS EnviroKleen EK 35 Syntech EDC PetroTac Organic, biodegradable, renewable resource, non-toxic Non-toxic, “readily biodegradable” Petro Canada Petroleum-based Calgary, Alberta iso-paraffinic fluid Milligan Biofules Vegetable Oil (Canola) Biodegradable, renewable resource Beamsville, Ontario Tall Pitch Oil (organic liquid pine rosin emulsions - not a lignosulphonate) Organic, non-toxic, biodegradable (100%) Hydrograss Technologies Petroleum Emulsion North Oxford, Mass Synthetic Isoalkane Biodegradable (60%), non-toxic Hydrograss Technologies Petroleum Emulsion North Oxford, Mass Synthetic Isoalkane Syntech Toledo, Ohio Hygroscopic, agriculturally engineered from renewable resources, contains some chloride) Biodegradable, nontoxic, non-leaching Syntech Modified Bitumen Biodegradable, nontoxic, non-leaching Foam Lake, Saskatchewan Entac Environmental Impact* ENS Solutions Ltd Toledo, Ohio Biodegradable (60%), non-toxic Dustkill Dustkill, Columbus Indiana Agriculturally derived oil Bio-degradable, nontoxic BioRain Dustkill, Columbus Indiana Agriculturally derived oil Bio-degradable, nontoxic Provincial-Territorial Officials Committee (PTOC) on Local Government Comité des fonctionnaires des provinces et territoires (CFPT) pour les administrations locales 6 Adherex Envirosafe Chemicals Canada, North Battleford Saskatchewan Vegetable (Canola Oil) Non-hazardous Dustless DirtGlue Enterprises, Amesbury MA Organic Blend Non-hazardous, noncorrosive Proprietary formula *MSDS sheets or equivalent data is available from most suppliers on their web sites Provincial-Territorial Officials Committee (PTOC) on Local Government Comité des fonctionnaires des provinces et territoires (CFPT) pour les administrations locales 7 Product Application Application of dust suppressant products can be either topical or worked into the surface via grading or scarification. Some products are applied as supplied and others require additional handling (e.g. mixing, pumping, heating, compacting etc). Products come in a variety of forms including liquids, emulsions, powders etc. Curing times are often dependent upon climate conditions at the time of application and can also vary significantly from product to product. The durability of dust suppressants depends upon the type of product used, its application, the amount of rainfall, the temperature and the amount of traffic. Some product durability is enhanced with each subsequent application. Table 2. Application Product Preparation Topical/ Mixed Application Rate Equipment Dust Stop Liquid Concentrate Mix with water Topical 1 gal/2m2 Tanker truck with spray bar and agitator or recirculating pump DSF65 No dilution Topical 0.5 to 2L/m2 Tanker truck with spray bar RDS No dilution, liquid Topical 1L/m2 Tanker truck with spray bar Entac Mix with water Topical Varies and customizable based on surface type and number of applications Tanker truck with spray bar, aerial application available from company. EnviroKleen No dilution Topical and mixed 4L/6.5m2 Tanker truck with spray bar EK 35 No dilution Topical and mixed 4L/6.5m2 Tanker truck with spray bar Syntech EDC Straight or diluted with water Topical and mixed 0.10-0.50 gal/square yard Tanker truck with spray bar and pump Suppressant Provincial-Territorial Officials Committee (PTOC) on Local Government Comité des fonctionnaires des provinces et territoires (CFPT) pour les administrations locales 8 PetroTac Dilution, liquid Topical mixed and 0.05-0.5 gallons per square yard Tanker truck with spray bar and pump 1 gallon/50 ft2 Tanker truck with spray bar Dustkill Liquid, no dilution Topical BioRain Liquid mixed with water Topical Adherex Liquid mixed with water Topical 1L/m2 Water truck with circulating pump Dustless Liquid, no dilution Topical Minimum application 0.02Gal/sq. ft. Tanker Truck with spray bar Any type of spraying device Provincial-Territorial Officials Committee (PTOC) on Local Government Comité des fonctionnaires des provinces et territoires (CFPT) pour les administrations locales 9 Product Shipping and Cost Obviously, in shipping these products any great distance, the shipping costs can be the single largest expense. Product pricing in almost all cases will vary depending upon the quantities ordered, and shipping costs will vary based on the weights of the product and the distances to be shipped. The products are generally available in bags (50 to 55 pounds) or totes if they are in powdered formats and 450 pound drums or 2000 plus pound totes if they are liquid. Bulk shipments are available for most products will result in better pricing for both product and shipping costs. Most product manufacturers indicate that surface condition is a factor in product efficiency and surface preparation costs will only be known on a case by case basis. This can range from no surface preparation required to extensive grading, scarification and drainage work. Clearly, the more preparation required prior to application will have an impact on cost. Application rates vary from product to product. Even with the same product, suppliers often specify a range of application rates depending upon road and climate conditions. Application equipment costs in many cases will be no greater than current costs where typical water trucks with sprayer attachments are used. However, in some cases, products will necessitate the addition of agitators or pumps which will need to be factored in to cost estimates. The durability of the product is another factor to be considered when evaluating cost. Durability claims vary widely from product to product and those claims will need to be evaluated on a case by case basis. Some products would need multiple applications per season while others claim to need only one. Most products must be reapplied after reworking the surface for maintenance but at least one claims to continue to be effective after reworking. After the initial application, some products are applied at the same rate for all subsequent applications while others can be applied at significantly reduced rates on subsequent applications (as little as 30% of the 1 st application). All of these elements can have a dramatic effect on the cost. In comparing costs, the relative environmental impacts, while difficult to quantify, should be factored in. Also, when compared to chloride based products, all of the products surveyed for this report do not have the corrosive qualities on machines and equipment normally associated with chlorides. Finally, product handling and storage is different from product to product. Emulsions require careful handling and cleaning of equipment, some products work best when applied in warm weather and others claim to be easily applied in below freezing weather. This may result in incremental costs or savings for the road authority. The cost estimates in the table that follows are based on application rates that are either the recommended rate or the highest rate for maximum results and durability. Lower rates might Provincial-Territorial Officials Committee (PTOC) on Local Government Comité des fonctionnaires des provinces et territoires (CFPT) pour les administrations locales 10 be appropriate in certain cases. The costs are also based on pricing provided for non-bulk orders. Provincial-Territorial Officials Committee (PTOC) on Local Government Comité des fonctionnaires des provinces et territoires (CFPT) pour les administrations locales 11 Table 3. Product shipping options and cost Product/Source Shipping options Product Cost* Dust Stop Liquid 1000 Litre totes and bulk $4.33/Litre of concentrate (2016) (CND) Cypher International Winnipeg, MB DSF65 Pricing customizable based on surface type and number of applications 250 Litre drum or bulk Petro Canada $3.08/Litre (2009 estimate) Contacted in 2016, company policy will not allow for price estimate without account and quote details. Calgary, AB RDS 205 Litre drum Milligan Bio-Tech 1000 litre totes or bulk $1.25/Litre (2016 estimate) (CND) Foam Lake, SK Entac ENS Solutions Ltd 275 Gal tote or bulk tankers $1.54/Litre of 55% concentrate (CND) (2016 estimate) Beamsville ON 55 gallon drums (new in 2016) EnviroKleen 55 Gal drum (475 lbs) $10.50/Gal (2009) (awaiting reply) Hydrograss Tech 275 Gal tote (2300 lbs) (3.78L) EK 35 55 Gal drum (475 lbs) $9.25/Gal (2009) (awaiting reply) Hydrograss Tech 275 Gal tote (2300 lbs) (3.78L) EDC 55 Gal drum (605 lbs) Syntech 275 Gal tote (3025 lbs) $2.25/Gal (USD) (bulk – prices based on 4500-5800 gallon loads) (2016 prices) Toledo, Ohio Bulk North Oxford, Mass North Oxford, Mass $893.75/Tote (USD) (275 gallons) $206.25/drum (USD) (55 gallons) Provincial-Territorial Officials Committee (PTOC) on Local Government Comité des fonctionnaires des provinces et territoires (CFPT) pour les administrations locales 12 PetroTac 55 Gal drum (500 lbs) Toledo, Ohio 275 Gal tote (2310 lbs) Dustkill 275 Gal totes, 55 gallon drums and 5 gallon containers $2.75/Gal (USD) (2016) BioRain 4900 Gal bulk tankers $1.75/Gal (USD) (2016) Columbus Indiana 18,500 Gal railcar Adherex 1000 Litre totes Columbus, Indiana $3.05/Gal (USD) (bulk) (2016) $1.80/ Litre (CDN) (2016) ~ 0.60/Litre (CDN) diluted Dustless 275 Gal totes Amesburry, MA Bulk Tankers $8.5/Gal (USD) (2016) *All costs are exclusive of shipping and application. Provincial-Territorial Officials Committee (PTOC) on Local Government Comité des fonctionnaires des provinces et territoires (CFPT) pour les administrations locales 13 Contacts Cypher Environmental Ltd 391 Campbell St Winnipeg, Manitoba R3N 1B6 Darryl Chuback Tel: 204-489-1214 x 108 Cell: 204-997-4175 http://www.cypherenvironmental.com/ Petro Canada P.O. Box 2844 150 – 6th Avenue S.W. Calgary, Alberta T2P 3E3 1-866-355-3369, 403-296-8000 http://www.petro-canada.ca/default.aspx Milligan BioFuels Inc Box 130, 907 Highway 16E Foam Lake, Saskatchewan S0A 1A0 306-272-6284, 1-866-388-6284 www.milliganbiotech.com/ ENSSolutions Ltd Paul Goulet, 416-960-4713 Cell: 416-617-0904 4306 Bartlett Rd. Beamsville. Ontario. L0R 1B1 http://www.entacemulsions.com/ Hydrograss Technologies 157 Southbridge Road, North Oxford, Massacheussetts, 01537 Paul Nigosian, 508-726-7695, 1-800-853-5393 http://www.hydrograsstech.com/ SynTech 520 East Woodruff, Toledo Ohio 43604 Ted Leslie, 1-800-537-0288 http://www.syntechproducts.com/ Provincial-Territorial Officials Committee (PTOC) on Local Government Comité des fonctionnaires des provinces et territoires (CFPT) pour les administrations locales 14 Dustkill LLC. 6921 East 600 North Columbus, IN 47203 David Streitelmeier [email protected] (317) 446-7672 1(877) 350-2645 http://www.arenadust.com/ Envirosafe Chemicals Canada James Davey 10011 Thatcher Avenue Po Box 1792 North Battleford, Saskatchewan, (306) 446-0505 http://www.envirosafechem.com/ DirtGlue Enterprises, LLC Chris Rider [email protected] 83 Middle Street Amesbury, MA 01913 978-388-3312 https://www.dirtglue.com Provincial-Territorial Officials Committee (PTOC) on Local Government Comité des fonctionnaires des provinces et territoires (CFPT) pour les administrations locales 15 References Dust control for Unpaved Roads, National Guide to Sustainable Municipal Infrastructure (InfraGuide), October 2005 Dust Palliative Application and Selection Guide, Bolander et al, U.S. Department of Agriculture,1999 http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/air/pdfs/Dust_Palliative.pdf Potential Environmental Impacts of Dust Suppressants: Avoiding Another Times Beach, An Expert Panel Summary Las Vegas, Nevada May 30-31, 2002, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2004, Piechota et al. http://www.epa.gov/esd/cmb/pdf/dust.pdf Testing of Dust Suppressants for Water Quality Impacts, Karen Irwin et al, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2008. http://www.epa.gov/region09/air/dust/DustSuppressants-sept2008.pdf Alaska Rural Dust Control Alternatives, (DRAFT), Sierra Research for the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, 2006 http://www.epa.gov/region09/air/dust/DustSuppressants-sept2008.pdf Dust Suppressants, Environment Yukon, Government of Yukon. Retrieved on March 3, 2009 from http://environmentyukon.gov.yk.ca/monitoringenvironment/EnvironmentActandRegu lations/dustsuppres.php Telephone interviews with each company contact, February 25 to March 6, 2009. Telephone Interviews with each company contact, June 8th to June 9th, 2016. Telephone interview with Frank Hall, Ontario Good Roads Association (OGRA), March 2, 2009. Provincial-Territorial Officials Committee (PTOC) on Local Government Comité des fonctionnaires des provinces et territoires (CFPT) pour les administrations locales 16