References - Propagation of ornamental plants

Propagation of Ornamental Plants
Vol. 15, № 3, 2015: 113-122
PROPAGATION OF CORK OAK (QUERCUS SUBER L.) BY AXILLARY SHOOT
AND SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS
Fatiha Lebtahi1,2*, Mohamed Brahim Errahmani3, and Nadia Bouguedoura1
University of Sciences and Technology Houari Boumediene, Faculty of Biological Sciences,
BP 32, Bab Ezzouar, 16111 Algiers, Algeria,
*Fax: + 213-21-63-91-41, *E-mail: [email protected]
2
National Institute of Forestry Research, Laboratory in vitro culture, BP 37, 16048 Chéraga, Algeria
3
Blida 1 University, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Chemistry, BP 270, route de Soumâa,
09000 Blida, Algeria
1
REFERENCES
Abousalim A., Hafdi A. (1995) Somatic embryogenesis in Pistachio (P. vera): effects of subculture growth regulators and explants
type. Acta Horticulturae, 419: 195-199.
Benderradji L., Bouzerzour N., Ykhlef N., Djekoun A., Kellou K. (2007). Réponse à la culture in vitro de trois variétés de l’olivier
(Olea europaea L.). Sciences et Technologie, 26: 27-32.
Borgel A., Cardoso C., Sané D., Chevallier M. H. (2003). La génétique d’Acacia raddiana. In: Grouzis M., Le Flo’ch E. (Eds).
Un arbre au désert. Paris: 59-75.
Boulay M. (1984). Aspect pratiques de la multiplication in vitro des essences forestières. Annales de Recherches Sylvicoles (Paris),
1984: 7-43.
Brown M. B., Forsythe A. B. (1974). Robust tests for the equality of variances. Journal of the American Statistical Association,
69: 364-367.
Bueno M. A., Astorga R., Manzanera J. A. (1992). Plant regeneration through somatic embryogenesis in Quercus suber. Physiologia Plantarum, 85: 30-34.
Celestino C., Picazo M. L., Toribio M., Alvarez-U de J., Bardasano J. L. (1998). Influence of 50 Hz electromagnetic fields on
recurrent embryogenesis and germination of Cork oak somatic embyos. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 54: 65-69.
Chalupa V. (1990). Plant regeneration by somatic embryogenesis from cultured immature embryos of oak (Quercus robur L) and
linden (Tilia cordata Mill.). Plant Cell Reports, 9: 398-401.
Cheepala S. B., Sharma N. C., Sahi S. V. (2004). Rapid in vitro regeneration of Sesbania drummondii. Biologia Plantarum, 48: 13-18.
Chouial M., Benamirouche S. (2010). Bilan de quelques essais de régénération artificielle du chêne liège (Quercus suber L.) dans des
parcelles expérimentales de la région littorale de Jijel (Est de l’Algérie). In: Villemant C., Ruiu P. A. (Eds). Integrated Protection
in Oak Forests. IOBC WPRS Bulletin, 57: 169-173.
Coutts M. P., Nilson C. C. N., Nicoll B. C. (1999). The development of symmetry rigidity and anchorage in the structural root
system of conifers. Plant and Soil, 218: 1-15.
Cuenca V., San-José M., Martinez M., Ballester A., Vieitez A. (1999). Somatic embryogenesis from stem explants of Quercus
robur L. Plant Cell Reports, 18: 538-543.
Danjan F., Bert D., Godin C., Tricbet P. (1999). Structural root architecture of six-year-old Pinus pinaster measured by 3D digesting and analyses with AMAP mod. Plant and Soil, 217: 49-63.
Deidda P., Azzena M., Coinu G. (1988). In vitro plantlet regeneration from (Quercus suber L.) seedlings. Acta Horticulturae, 227:
393-395.
El Kbiach M. L., Lamarti A., Badoc A. (2001). Culture in vitro du chêne liège (Quercus suber L). Bulletin de la Société de Pharmacie de Bordeaux, 140: 89-110.
El Kbiach M. L., Lamarti A., Abdali A., Badoc A. (2004). Micropropagation du chêne liège (Quercus suber L.) par bourgeonnement axillaire. Acta Botanica Gallica, 151: 415-427.
El Maâtaoui M., Espagnac H. (1987). Néoformation de structures de type embryons somatiques sur des cultures de tissus de chêne
liège (Quercus suber L.). Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences. Paris, 304: 83-88.
Etienne H., Montoro P., Michaux-Ferrière N., Carron M. P. (1993). Effects of desiccation, medium osmolarity and abscisic acid
on the maturation of Hevea brasiliensis somatic embryos. Journal of Experimental Botany, 44: 1613-1619.
Fernandez-Guijarro B., Celestino C., Toribio M. (1995). Influence of external factors on secondary embryogenesis and germination
of somatic embryos from leaves of Quercus suber. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 4: 99-106.
Gabe M. (1968). Techniques histologiques. Masson et Cie, Paris, 1113 pp.
Gresshof P. M., Doy C. H. (1972). Development and differentiation of haploid Lycopersicon esculentum (Tomato). Planta, 170: 161-170.
Grönroos R., von Arnold S. (1987). Initiation of roots on hypocotyl cuttings of Pinus contorta in vitro. Physiologia Plantarum, 69:
227-236.
Harfouche A., Bekkar H., Belhou O., Graine M. (2003). Quelques résultats à l’état juvénile sur la variabilité géographique du
chêne liège (Quercus suber L.) et stratégie d’amélioration génétique. Annales de la Recherche Forestière en Algérie, 1: 37-50.
Hernández I., Celestino C., Toribio M. (2003). Vegetative propagation of Quercus suber L. by somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell
Reports, 21: 759-764.
Hernández I., Cuenca B., Carneros E., Alonso-Blazkez N., Ruis M., Celestino C., Ocana L., Alegre J., Toribio M. (2011). Application of plant regeneration of selected Cork oak trees by somatic embryogenesis to implement multivarietal forestry for Cork
oak. Tree and Forestry Science and Biotechnology, 5: 19-26.
Kulchetscki L., Harry I. S., Yeung E. C., Thorpe T. A. (1995). In vitro regeneration of Pacific silver fir Abies amabilis plantlets and
histological analysis of shoot formation. Tree Physiology, 15: 727-739.
Lloyd G., McCown B. (1980). Commercially feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel (Kalima latifolia) by use of shoot-tip
culture. Combined proceedings of the International Plant Propagators’ Society, 30: 421-427.
Mann H. B., Whitney D. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals
of Mathematical Statistics, 18: 50-60.
Manzanera J. A., Pardos J. A. (1990). Micropropagation of juvenile and adult (Quercus suber L.). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ
Culture, 21: 1-8.
Martoja R., Martoja M. (1967). Initiation aux techniques de l’histologie animale. Masson et Cie, Paris, 345 pp.
Merouani H., Acherar M., Istanbouli A. (1998). Recherche de quelques contraintes biotiques et abiotiques à la régénération naturelle
du chêne liège (Quercus suber L.). Annales de l’INRGREF, Numéro spécial: 225-243.
Messaoudène M., Metna B., Djouaber N. (2006). Etude de quelques facteurs influençant la régénération naturelle du chêne liège
(Quercus suber L.) dans la forêt domaniale des Aït Ghobri: Algérie. Annales de la Recherche Forestière en Algérie, 12: 43-53.
Murashige T., Skoog F. (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue culture. Physiologia Plantarum,
15: 473-497.
Pardos J. A. (1981). In vitro plant formation from stem pieces of (Quercus suber L.). In: Boulay M. (Ed). Colloque International sur
la Culture In vitro des Essences Forestières. Fontainebleau, 31 August-15 September, 1981, AFOCEL: 186-190.
Pelegrini L. L., Ribas L. L. F., Zanette F., Koehler H. S. (2011). Micropropagation of Ocotea porosa (Nees et Martius) Barroso.
African Journal of Biotechnology, 10: 1527-1533.
Pérez M., Viejo M., LaCuesta M., Toorop P., Canal M. J. (2015). Epigenetic and hormonal profil during maturation of Quercus
suber L. somatic embryos. Journal of Plant Physiology, 173: 51-61.
Pinto G., Valentim H., Costa A., Castro S., Santos C. (2002). Somatic embryogenesis in leaf callus from a mature Quercus suber
L. tree. In vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant, 38: 569-572.
Puigderrajols P., Celestino C., Suils M., Toribio M., Molinas M. (2000). Histology of organogenic and embryogenic response in
cotyledons of somatic embryos of Quercus suber L. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 161: 353-362.
Rancillac M., Faye M., David A. (1982). In vitro rooting of cloned shoots in Pinus pinaster. Physiologia Plantarum, 56: 97-101.
Rodriguez-Sanz H., Manzanera J. A., Soli M. T., Gomez-Garay A., Pentos B., Risueno M. C., Testtilano P. S. (2014). Early markers are present in both embryogenesis pathways from microspores and immature zygotic embryos in Cork oak, Quercus suber
L. BMC. Plant Biology, 14: 224.
Romano A., Martin Louçao M. A. (1992). Micropropagation of Cork oak (Quercus suber L.): establishment problems. Scienta
Gerundensis, 18: 17-27.
Romano A., Noronha C., Martins-Louçao M. A. (1995). Role of carbohydrates in micropropagation of Cork oak. Plant Cell, Tissue
and Organ Culture, 40: 159-167.
Sanchez M. C., Teresa Martinez M., Valladares S., Ferro E., Vièitez A. M. (2003). Maturation and germination of oak somatic
embryos originated from leaf and stem explants: RAPD markers for genetic analysis of regenerants. Journal of Plant Physiology,
160: 699-707.
Shapiro S. S., Wilk M. B. (1968). Approximations for the null distribution of the W statistic. Technometrics, 10: 861-866.
Siegel S., Castellan N. J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, 2nd Edition.). McGraw-Hill Humanities/
Social Sciences/Languages, 399 pp.
Tamta S., Palni L. M. S., Purohit V. K., Nandi S. K. (2008). In vitro propagation of brown oak (Quercus semecarpifolia Sm.) from
seedling explants. In vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant, 44: 136-141.
Tamta S., Palni L. M. S., Vyas P., Bisht M. S. (2009). Conservation through in vitro method: A case of plant regeneration through
somatic embryogenesis in Quercus semecarpifolia Sm. The Journal of American Science, 5: 70-76.
Toribio M., Celestino C., Molinas M. (2005). Cork Oak, Quercus suber L. In: Jain S. M., Gupta P. K. (Eds). Protocol of Somatic
Embryogenesis in Woody Plants. The Netherlands, Springer, 77: 445-457.
Tsvetkov I. (1998). Somatic embryogenesis and regeneration of plantlets in common oak (Quercus robur L.). Biotechnology and
Biotechnological Equipment, 12: 51-55.
Wells S., Kester S. T., Geneve R. L. (2005). Somatic embryo development in Willow oak. Combined Proceedings of the International
Plant Propagators’ Society, 55: 451-453.
Wilhelm E. (2000). Somatic embryogenesis in oak (Quercus sp.). In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant, 36: 349-357.
Winer B. J., Brown D. R., Michels K. M. (1991). Statistical principles in experimental design (3rd Edition). McGraw-Hill, Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages, 928 pp.