La souveraineté dans les pays d`Océanie : Le cas des territoires
Transcription
La souveraineté dans les pays d`Océanie : Le cas des territoires
Séminaire international « La souveraineté dans les pays d’Océanie : Le cas des territoires francophones » Le lundi 14 Décembre 2015 au Centre des Nouvelles Etudes sur le Pacifique, Université de la Nouvelle-Calédonie (Département LLSH, salle L40) Ce séminaire, organisé par le Centre des Nouvelles Etudes sur le Pacifique, s’inscrit dans le cadre du projet de recherche « Aide et Souveraineté dans les pays du Pacifique » mené par le professeur John Overton (Université de Victoria, NZ) avec Warwick Murray (Université de Victoria, NZ), Gerard Prinsen (Université de Massey, NZ) ainsi qu’un certain nombre d’autres chercheurs de la région et en particulier en Nouvelle-Calédonie : Séverine Blaise (UNC-CNEP), Pierre-Yves le Meur (IRD), Hamid Mokaddem (IFMNC, CNEP) et Allisson Lotti (CNEP). Il s’agit de réunir plusieurs chercheurs de la région spécialistes des questions liées à la souveraineté afin d’échanger sur le cas spécifique des territoires du Pacifique francophone. Ce séminaire, ouvert au public, entend laisser une large place aux échanges (40 minutes), sur la base d’une courte présentation (20 minutes) du travail de chaque chercheur sur ces problématiques. Ces échanges feront l’objet d’un enregistrement audio que chaque communicant pourra conserver. Les autres participants acceptent implicitement que leur propos soit enregistré, et ceci strictement à des fins de recherche. Participants : Séverine Blaise (UNC-CNEP, Nouméa, Nouvelle-Calédonie) Pierre-Yves Le Meur (IRD, Nouméa, Nouvelle-Calédonie) Claire Levacher (IRD, Nouméa, Nouvelle-Calédonie) Allison Lotti (CNEP, Lifou, Nouvelle-Calédonie) Alexander Mawyer (Center for Pacific Islands Studies, University of Hawai‘I at Manoa, U.S) Hamid Mokaddem (IFMNC, CNEP, Nouméa, Nouvelle-Calédonie) Warwick Murray (Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand) John Overton (Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand) Gerard Prinsen (Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand) Elisabeth Worliczek (University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, en visioconf.) Programme 08h00 Accueil des participants en salle L40 (département LLSH) 08h15 : Pierre-Yves le Meur et Claire Levacher (IRD) Mining and competing sovereignties in New Caledonia New Caledonia, a French settler colony and now overseas territory, has been engaged in a process of negotiated decolonization that started with the political agreements of Matignon-Oudinot (1988) and Noumea (1998). The Noumea accord tackles the sovereignty issue in its preamble and equates it oddly enough with the identity issue (preamble, paragraph 4). It also develops the objective of shared sovereignty based on the restitution of a confiscated Kanak identity and on the recognition of its inherent sovereignty. Within this process, the mining issue came to the foreground in the mid-1990s as an economic means for political emancipation. Kanak proindependence parties developed a form of resource nationalism currently known as the ‘doctrine nickel’ and enacted through an active involvement in the mining sector through policy, law and equity. However the historical and political diversity of mining sites and projects has been generating local configurations and arenas that greatly differ in terms of actors, discourses and relationships. Discourses of sovereignty are themselves plural, mobilizing different local and exogenous discursive and normative repertoires. The comparative exploration of different mining sites (mainly Yaté/Vale, Thio/SLN and VKP/KNS, via 2 research programs on “mining governance” and “mining and the value of place” funded by CNRT “Nickel and its environment” and Claire Levacher’s doctoral program on “indigenous right and mining governance in South New Caledonia”) will mobilize and enrich Richard Joyce’s proposals about “competing sovereignties” and his triangular model linking sovereignty, community and law. 09h15 : Alexander Mawyer (Univ. of Hawai‘i) Lagoons, Languages, and Legal Regimes: Micro-Sovereignties in French Polynesia With reference to the Gambier and Society Islands in French Polynesia, this presentation examines the lived experience of sovereignty across several dimensions of daily life in one part of the French Pacific. I explore how the question, issue, or presence of sovereignty emerges and sometimes erupts into the present across in the politics of language, marine resource use and management, and regional courtrooms. Drawing concrete ethnographic attention to these three material contexts suggests that even within a profoundly shared political context of the French Polynesian state, Mangarevans, the people of French Polynesia’s Gambier Islands, and Tahitians encounter, confront, and negotiate their relationships with issues and experiences of sovereignty in ways that are sometimes parallel and sometimes divergent. Examples are used to explore intersections with literature elsewhere (eg Okinawa) on “residual sovereignty” and to initiate a conversation on the relevance of a concept of micro-sovereignty to some Pacific Islands state contexts. 10h15 : Pause-café 10h45 : John Overton (Victoria Univ.) & Warwick Murray (Victoria Univ.), Moving triangles: Aid, migration, education and retroliberalism in Oceania Changing donor aid regimes have significantly affected development trajectories across Oceania. Aid levels are highly unequal and have been used to steer development in different directions, as with the recent move from poverty-related efforts in education and health towards more infrastructural and market-led approaches. In addition different Pacific Island countries face quite different opportunities for migration. This paper examines this skewed geography of aid and development in the region. It questions the relevance and efficacy of new 'retroliberal' aid regimes and focuses on the way education and migration may or may not align with local development aspirations, strategies and agencies. 12h00-13h15 : Pause déjeuner 13h30 Accueil des participants en salle des conseils (administration) 13h45 : Gerard Prinsen (Massey Univ.), Severine Blaise (UNC-CNEP) An emerging ‘Islandian’ Sovereignty of Non-self-governing Islands Comparative analyses find non-self-governing islands have better development indicators than sovereign islands. Unsurprisingly, since 1983, no non-self-governing island has sought political independence. However, rather than merely maintaining the status quo, this paper argues nonself-governing islands are actively creating a new form of sovereignty. Conceptually, the creation of this ‘Islandian’ sovereignty takes place against the backdrop of debates around the relevance and validity of classic Westphalian sovereignty and emerging practices of Indigenous sovereignty. Reviewing global research and taking New Caledonia’s negotiations with France as an exemplary case study, this paper identifies five global patterns that may characterize an emerging ‘Islandian’ sovereignty. 14h45 : Hamid Mokaddem (IFMNC, CNEP) What does it mean a “Shared Sovereignty” to day in New Caledonia? This paper try to explain the actual political system which is actually organized in New Caledonia by France, more peculiar, by the power and political technology of French State. Today a « shared Sovereignty » between France and New Caledonian is in process. By the name of New Caledonia, France includes Kanak People and the others communities issued by French colonization since XIXth century. Nobody except a few people knows exactly what does it mean a kanak conception of Sovereignty. France argues that the Kanak People was recognized since 1998, date of the Noumea Agreement. But firstly, Kanaky, the name of Kanak Statis or Nationhood is considered like an outstanding notion by France. And secondly, there is no analysis concerning the relationship between Caledonians communities, Kanak People and French People. Where is the place today in New Caledonia for Kanaky ? For giving a clear answer to this question, we need to do an anthropological analysis to clarify the meaning of the relationship between these three names : Kanaky, New Caledonia and France. In other words, could indigenous people, caledonian communities and french people built together one and single People in one Nation ? What does it mean exactly a « shared Sovereignty » in New Caledonia ? 15h45 : Pause-café 16h15 : Allison Lotti (CNEP), Gerard Prinsen (Massey Univ.), John Overton (Victoria Univ.), Elisabeth Worliczek (Univ. of NRLS) Inter-island rivalry There is ample research suggesting islands are developing distinct ways to shape their relations with the world and their (neo-) colonial metropoles. Islands have “a different appetite for sovereignty” (Baldacchino & Hepburn, Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 50(4), 555). However, most research into the sovereignty of islands seems to treat groups of islands as a single entity, calling them twin islands, or sibling islands. Irrespective of their political status, we talk of Trinidad & Tobago as if they were one; we refer to the Wallis & Futuna as if they were one; we discuss the Dutch Antilles as if they were one. Perhaps this still reflects the perspective of outsiders. Most Tobagonians feel they have little in common with Trinidadians; Arubans obtained a ‘status aparte’ in the Dutch Antilles because they want to keep their distance from Curaçao, and in September 2015, Futuna’s Customary Council leaders demanded from the French administration, “a more equitable relation between the two islands or we leave the republic”. The rivalry within island groups and its impact on these islands’ sovereignty is perhaps a poorly understood dynamic. The authors of this presentation will outline the preliminary features of a research designed to investigate inter-island rivalry within island groups in Oceania and in the Caribbean. Gerard will sketch the background and methodology and Allison will share some of the first findings from interviews she did on Wallis and on Futuna in August.