Snow Control
Transcription
Snow Control
2012-2016 Business Plan Summary Program Transportation Services Service grouping Roadways Service Snow Control Type Public Service Owner: John Parsons, Division Manager, Transportation & Roadside Operations, Planning, Environmental & Engineering Services Spacer row turn text white when ready Strategic Priority Financial & Staffing Progressive Transportation System In $000s 2010 A ctua l 2011 R evised Budget Operating budget Purpose Expenditure: To provide safe, clear mobility on roadways and sidewalks in periods of inclement climate conditions (winter) to the citizens, businesses and community at large while meeting the Minimum Maintenance Standards (MMS) contained within the regulations of the Ontario Municipal Act. Non-tax revenue: Net (tax supported): Capital budget 13,713 12,301 679 315 13,034 11,986 2010 R evised 2011 R evised Budget Budget 15 50 15 50 46.0 46.0 1.84 1.67 78.60 71.37 Expenditure: Non-tax revenue: Net (tax supported): Staffing FTEs: Percentage of expenditures budget (all rate sources): Annual per household cost of net budget ($): Key processes Sidewalk Snow Removal Within Road Right of Way This group is responsible for snow clearing services on sidewalks within the road right of way and connecting walkways. Bus stop clearing is provided on behalf of the LTC and funding is recovered within this business unit. Outsourced percentage 30% % Roadway Snow Removal Snow Control Operations is responsible for road plowing service levels based on provincially prescribed standards. Main roads are treated when the depth of snow reaches 2.5 cm and local streets are treated when the depth of snow reaches 10.0 cm. Outsourced percentage 50% % Priorities are set out in the regulations and are based on traffic volumes and road speed. Page 1 of 5 Snow Control Salting/Sanding and Anti Icing Roadways Salt is used to treat main routes which represent 40% of the entire road network. Local streets are sanded at intersections, curves and hills. Outsourced percentage 60% % Anti icing is a proactive step that is used on major routes to prevent snow and ice from bonding to the road. Spacer row turn text white when ready Regulatory/Policy landscape Service Delivery method Discretionary Legislative New council direction, new regulations, legislative changes Spacer row turn text white when ready Current state of this service Service delivery for Snow Control is dependant on conditions experienced each year. The 2010/2011 record setting number of snow incidents, although challenging, were managed and generally the delivery of this service within standards was successfully met. A challenge is to manage the public's understanding and expectation of the snow service standard. The public should expect, at a minimum, that the snow service standard be maintained, but in unusual snow incidents the service standard may be compromised. An existing constraint is the ability to meet the expectations of the Public to clear sidewalks. With winter conditions and the length of sidewalks that needs clearing it is not possible to clear sidewalks to bare condition. This is notwithstanding additional budget funding provided in 2010 intended to enhance sidewalk plowing. Council provided an additional $400,000 to enhance sidewalk clearing in 2010. This allowed for additional passes and more frequent sanding and 'windrow' removals at intersections. Service delivery risks include our dependence on and availability of outsourced resources and equipment. The tender process does not always provide the preferred equipment. Also, in situations such as frequency of snow incidents and the volume of snow, the ability to maintain the minimal standards is at risk. As demonstrated this past winter secondary outcomes of a harsh winter is the impact on public property. Sod damage becomes a public concern. Council in past years has recognized the need to increase the snow control budget to meet the yearly cost averages and to ensure that service standards can be attained. A Severe Weather Reserve has been established to address the fluctuating conditions. In years where conditions require less budget, surplus funding has been allocated to the reserve to provide for the unusual and above average years. The service draws strength from its use of the latest materials, equipment and methods in snow control. Spacer row turn text white when ready Recent enhancements to economy, efficiency and effectiveness The housing of exposed winter sand stockpiles at the Adelaide Operations Centre to contain sand/salt runoff. Page 2 of 5 Snow Control Spacer row turn text white when ready Future direction of this service In 2012 a strategy to achieve the corporate target approved by Council will be required through a rigorous evaluation of options for service changes. Budgets will need to be reviewed to identify cost containment, efficiencies and possible revenue opportunities. This may include the return to the previous sidewalk snow removal standard. Future evaluation is required to analyze historic statistics for storm frequencies, related costs, MMS compliance, growing road network, rising fuel/equipment costs and the association to the cost savings anticipated with lower standards or service elimination. Spacer row turn text white when ready Objectives next 4 years Winter Materials Storage To expand our winter materials storage capacity so that we are not faced with inventory shortages that have occurred intermittently over the past few years. The new dome at the Exeter Road Operations Centre and Oxford St work yard has helped achieve in part this objective. Future building at Adelaide work yard is proposed in the Facilities budget to complete the objective. Expected completion year Division responsible 2016 Transportation & Roadside Operations Actions Secure budget Outcomes and measures Winter service levels are met. Better pricing for salt by buying in the off-season and storing. Performance Objectives / Cost Analysis and Council Report Undertake an analysis of cost reduction strategies and related service level implications for Council's consideration. Expected completion year Division responsible 2012 Transportation & Roadside Operations Actions Using external auditors or other appropriate resources, analyse historical statistics for frequency of storm occurrences, related event costs, Minimum Maintenance Standard compliance, growing road network and equipment/fuel cost trends. Evaluate the cost savings associated with lower standards and service elimination. Evaluate possible changes in collisions, delays and other risks. Outcomes and measures Completion of the analysis and a report to Council which will provide information on potential cost saving strategies and service levels. Spacer row turn text white when ready Emerging issues and challenges Budget Constraints Financial constraints and unpredictable winter incidents impact the delivery of snow control service. Labour, equipment and materials cost and the size of road network continue to increase. Short term service reductions may be required to meet the economic challenge until a decision is made about long term service levels (see 2012 objective) and may include: Reduced service response that will impede meeting the service standard as well as increasing customer inquiries and public delay costs. Page 3 of 5 Snow Control Return to previous sidewalk plowing standard thereby releasing the $400,000 budget funding for enhanced sidewalk plowing. The preferred plan is to use the reserve fund to balance 2012 actual needs over a zero budget increase, if required, until service level changes are decided upon in 2012. Spacer row turn text white when ready 2012 - 2016 Service changes with financial impact (+/-) Return to previous sidewalk plowing standard thereby releasing the $400,000 budget funding for enhanced sidewalk plowing Objective To meet corporate target Implementation year Target year Funding type 2012 2012 Ongoing Budget Implications in $000s Operating budget Year 1: Year Gross Expenditure 2012 Non -Tax Supported Revenue Net Budget (Tax Supporte d) -400 -400 Year 2: 0 Year 3: 0 Ongoing annual: Beginning year 2013 -400 -400 Capital budget Year 1: 0 Year 2: 0 Year 3: 0 Future years: Beginning year 0 Comments Council, in the 2010 Budget, approved an additional $400,000 budget to enhance sidewalk plowing by targeting specific sidewalk winter clearing measures. Administration recommended the additional budget increment be declined , it being noted that substantially greater investment would be necessary for meaningful improvement. Spacer row turn text white when ready Statistics and performance measures A Activity measures Description of measurements Number of Event-Days for Winter Roadway Maintenance 2005 Actuals 2006 Actuals 2007 Actuals 89 2010 Expected 50 2013 Forecast 85 2010 Actuals 118 2014 Forecast 85 2011 Forecast 85 2015 Forecast 85 2008 Actuals 96 2009 Actuals 66 2012 Forecast 85 2016 Forecast 85 Comments Spacer row turn text white when ready Page 4 of 5 Snow Control B Efficiency measures Description of measurements Cost of Snow Control ($/Lane Km) (OMBI 903M) 2005 Actuals 2006 Actuals 2010 Expected 2010 Actuals 2,010 2,800 2013 Forecast 2,964.20 2014 Forecast 2,800 2,800 2007 Actuals 2008 Actuals 2,867 2011 Forecast 3,280 2,521 2012 Forecast 2,800 2015 Forecast 2009 Actuals 2,800 2016 Forecast 2,800 2,800 Comments Variation due mostly to weather patterns. Description of measurements 2005 Actuals 2006 Actuals Cost of Snow Control ($/Capita) 22 2010 Expected 2010 Actuals 30 2013 Forecast 36 2014 Forecast 32 32 2007 Actuals 2008 Actuals 31 38 2011 Forecast 2012 Forecast 33 32 2015 Forecast 2016 Forecast 31 31 2009 Actuals 30 Comments Stable budget (zero increase) in relation to population growth is assumed. Spacer row turn text white when ready C Effectiveness/Quality/Satisfaction measures Description of measurements Snow Response (% of standards met) 2005 Actuals 2006 Actuals 2010 Expected 2010 Actuals 97.2 100 2013 Forecast 100 95 2014 Forecast 100 2007 Actuals 2008 Actuals 98.3 97.8 2011 Forecast 2012 Forecast 100 100 2015 Forecast 2016 Forecast 100 100 2009 Actuals 100 Comments Assumed standard is met, until results of 2012 service level review is completed. Page 5 of 5 Snow Control