Hoogewys-Wibaut
Transcription
Hoogewys-Wibaut
André JACQMAIN FINAL REPORT Megan DE PRINS, Julie HOOGEWYS, Romain WIBAUT ANDRÉ JACQMAIN FROM “IMAGINAIRE” TO “MATERIALITY” 1 André JACQMAIN FINAL REPORT Megan DE PRINS, Julie HOOGEWYS, Romain WIBAUT Table of contents PREFACE ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 3 Brussels Architectural Context ...................................................................................................... 3 PART I – THE POETICAL VISION OF JACQMAIN ................................................................................ 5 PART II – MATERIALITY ..................................................................................................................... 8 Urvater Museum-House (1960) .................................................................................................... 8 Foncolin (1957) vs. the Sart-Tilman (1967-1968) ......................................................................... 9 Glaverbel Building (1967)............................................................................................................ 10 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................................. 12 BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................................ 13 2 André JACQMAIN FINAL REPORT Megan DE PRINS, Julie HOOGEWYS, Romain WIBAUT PREFACE Introduction André Jacqmain is considered as one of the most influent architects of post-war Belgium architecture. After a 40 years career, his production includes a wide range of styles and has definitely evolved throughout the various collaborations he has been involved with. His fame is also the result of a very diverse work spanning from the private houses to city planning projects through experimental exhibition pavilions. This text will focus on what appears to be constancy in his oeuvre: the translation of what he referred to as the “imaginaire” of a project to its specific, as-built materialization. The first part of this work consists in a review of Jacqmain’s biography and the investigation of the monographic texts that has allowed to formulate this specific research question. Consequently, the argumentation is based on a thematic study. The second part of the text provides a possible answer to this question through the analysis of 4 built works under the scope of the use of materials; namely the Urvater, the Foncolin, the Sart-Tilman and finally the Glaverbel building. Brussels Architectural Context Jacqmain’s work comes obviously into the scope of the two main architectural movements of the post-war period. First, the functionalist movement dominates Belgian architecture from the 50s to the end of 70s. Secondly, postmodern architecture emerges in the early 80s and is still influent1. At the end of the ‘50, Jacqmain participates to the large-scale urban planning operations in Brussels resulting in the rise of new urban typologies of "low-rise buildings" in the capital city. Simultaneously, the European Institutions are installing in the Quartier Leopold. André Jacqmain is already a precursor of this trimness “low-rise building” architecture. He pursues this early work with the circular building of Glaverbel seat (realized in collaboration with Braem, Guillissen and Mulpas). Most of his architectural projects typically become the fruits of the collaborative labor between architecture and engineering agencies. Post-modernism will brutally react trying to bring « beauty back in the city »2. When creating the Atelier de Genval, Jacqmain directly denies his first ideals. The master plan project of the Stephanie area is built in a trendy ornamented style that guides the design of the new major buildings of capital and that turns completely the back on the functionalist movement. 1 Van Loo A., 2003, Dictionnaire de l'architecture en Belgique de 1830 à nos jours, Brussels, Fonds Mercator, p.24 2 Dictionnaire de l'architecture en Belgique de 1830 à nos jours, p.112 3 André JACQMAIN FINAL REPORT Megan DE PRINS, Julie HOOGEWYS, Romain WIBAUT In last years, architectural trends are concentrated on the refitting of the high-rise buildings3 while most of the low-rise buildings are preserved. Besides, the participation to a series of exhibitions through the world (Toronto 1957, Brussels Expo ‘58, New York 1970, Osaka ‘70, Tsukuba ’85) provides to Jacqmain the opportunity to experiment forms and test structures. 3 Tour du Midi, Tour des Finances transformed by Michel Jaspers, Tour Madou renovated by the architect office ASSAR, the blue glasses buildings « North Gate I, II et II » and the Botanic building of the capital 4 André JACQMAIN FINAL REPORT Megan DE PRINS, Julie HOOGEWYS, Romain WIBAUT PART I – THE POETICAL VISION OF JACQMAIN This first part is the necessary background to study and to understand Jacqmain’s work. André Jacqmain (Figure 1) is born in 1921 in Anderlecht. As a child, because of his frail, he was placed in several health centers where he learnt to construct his own world with some wood blocks as unique toys4. This imaginary universe was pursued in his youth for a major interest in painting. This passion became determinant in his life when he entered at the Academy of Brussels in 1939. There he met Henry Lacoste5, the master who transmitted him his so-called “poetical vision of architecture”6. This vision remained influencing Jacqmain along his whole career. After his academy years, he got involved into a series of artistic communities. He joined the Atelier de Groenhove in Torhout (1948) and the Ateliers du Marais in Brussels (1948-1951) where he met famous personalities such as Alechinski and Dotremont. Finally, he encountered Jules Wabbes7 at the Ateliers “Rue de la Pépinière” (1950). The collaborative work between the furniture designer and the architect would continue for ten years. The most famous achievement would be the Foncolin (1957), an office building combining innovative techniques of prefabricated concrete elements with a refined Italian aesthetic. In 1950, he built his first house (Figure 2) for his friends Carlo and Denise de Brouckère procuring an “unforgettable happiness”8. Interior spaces were suggested by a play of multiple arches and vaults he had experimented in his drawings. It was succeeded by a series of individual houses, a field where Jacqmain reached his highest level of self-fulfillment. It was also the beginning of a striking brutalism period in Belgium. A gesture he translated through the majestic Urvater House (1960) and the Sart-Tilman (1967-1968). Heavy and straight black lines characterized the sketches of both projects. The next years, he built the emblematic Glaverbel building (1969), which made him famous for the first time at national level. Since he was directly in publics’ eyes, an increasing number of journalistic interviews9 where he confessed about his interpretation of his architecture10 have been published. The creation of the Atelier of Genval in 1967 concretized the dream of his academic life.11 The aim of the Atelier was 4 Couvreur D., 2004, André Jacqmain dessine son royaume imaginaire, Le Soir Mag, December 1, 2004, p.2-3 5 Hennaut E., 2008, Henri Lacoste : architecte 1885-1968, Archives d’Architecture Moderne, Brussels 6 Jacqmain A., 2005, L’imaginaire émergeant, Brussels, Archives d'Architecture Moderne AAM, p. 8 7 Ferran-Wabbes M., 2012, Jules Wabbes : furniture designer, BOZAR Books, Brussels 8 « Construire ma première maison, celle de Carlo et Denise de Brouckère à Torhout, fut un bonheur » « La première: TORHOUT 1950, inoubliable émotion.» L’imaginaire émergeant, p. 60 9 Press archives. Bibliography [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17] 10 The interesting fact is that these interviews are given by own words and from his point - often between quotes- so that his words are not altered. 11 « Capital d’imaginaire, l’Atelier de Genval a pris la vie et le talent de beaucoup. Passage de l’individualité à la pluralité, cet atelier, plus que n’importe quel autre bâtiment, est mon œuvre. J’ai essayé d’y implanter la personnalité plutôt que le savoir-faire.» L’imaginaire émergeant, p. 101 « Le travail solitaire m’inquiète […] ; dès l’académie, lorsque l’entourage se penche sur mon dessin, le regarde, réagit et discute je ressens l’amplification de l’imagination.» L’imaginaire émergeant, p. 101 5 André JACQMAIN FINAL REPORT Megan DE PRINS, Julie HOOGEWYS, Romain WIBAUT to bring an architects’ collective together to share contrasting visions in order to generate a stratified, imaginative and productive architecture. He believed that interacting criticism liberated from introversion. The production of the Atelier was oriented to the embellishment of Brussels city, as a kaleidoscope of styles12. The early straight lines of his drawings became refined and curved. The « Stephany Area », followed by important orders in the same idea of postmodern style: the building complex for the Flemish Community (1988), the seat of Euroclear (1992) and the European Parliament (1997) were given to birth. During this last period, the conceptual inventiveness was attenuated for a more ornamented and international style. Later in life, the new generation of architects at the office was taking over Jacqmain’s work while he still kept concerned eyes on the Atelier. Besides, he was still in relation with many of youthful friendships. They were those that remembered Jacqmain’s first steps in the world of architecture. They would persuade the old man to bring together the traces of its life in order to immortalize his sinuous route in the literature. It was the reason why the writing exercise was extented in autobiographical books. Pierre Loze13 would first help Jacqmain to relate the life of the Atelier, the tensions, the emotions and the never-ending questioning of a common work14. Still with the support and the critical eye of Loze, and two other friends, Fabien de Cugnac and Nicole Beeckmans, Jacqmain was convinced to undertake the writing of the book of his own life: “L’imaginaire émergeant” (Figure 3). It is a composition of sentimental images thoughtfully selected by André Jacqmain to give birth to the album that depicts the way of his life. In this autobiographic book, he accords a fundamental and central place to demonstrate how the poetical concept and the instinct of its imaginary were at the base of a creative gesture. The amalgam of thematic photographs, drawings and written extracts are the images that build up the close environment and the choices he made along his lifetime. They are the samples of an intimate world where “habits are perfumed by strangeness”15. At the heart of a personal reflection, the aim was to elucidate his vocation of architect via the attitude he has adopted since his early childhood 16 . It depicts the creation process and its ambiguities, which came out to impressive architectural works. In this sense, each built work has a unique vocation and has to be given an independent and adequate expression. Through the eyes and the comments of André Jacqmain, the gamble was paid off for reinventing a language 12 Dictionnaire de l’architecture en Belgique, p.112 Amongst the writers and the journalists who have been retracing Jacqmain’s life, Pierre Loze is certainly the most present. Art historian and archeologist, Pierre Loze was caring about transmitting art from the personal vision of the personalities he met in the artistic world. 14 The case studies were also analysed on the main base of Jacqmain’s point of view as an involved author of these books. 15 « Un zeste d’étrangeté qui parfume l’habitude.» L’imaginaire émergeant, p.12 16 « J'ai décidé de dessiner ma vie pour montrer comment je me suis fabriqué, tout en expliquant ce que signifie un bâtiment, comment on y arrive.» André Jacqmain dessine son royaume imaginaire, Le Soir Mag, p. 2-3 13 6 André JACQMAIN FINAL REPORT Megan DE PRINS, Julie HOOGEWYS, Romain WIBAUT to express the poetical emotion of his work touching the spirits17. At the moment that the first lines are drawn, the building appears and receives a powerful sense when the materiality occurs. 17 The architect chose to speak to souls, rather than aesthetes or developers. At 83 years old, André Jacqmain passes the crazy challenge of reinventing a language to express the poetic emotion of his work. 7 André JACQMAIN FINAL REPORT Megan DE PRINS, Julie HOOGEWYS, Romain WIBAUT PART II – MATERIALITY This part focuses on Jacqmain’s work under the scope of the use of materials, on what happens when the “imaginaire” gets built. Indeed three different periods can be clearly distinguished in this work: the “brick period”, the “concrete period” and the “stone period”. Such atypical periodization demonstrates obviously the care that Jacqmain accords to a personal and formal expression through a sensitive use of materials. It is his way to translate and to appropriate its architecture. Four built works are described in the following paragraph in order to see what the relationship that Jacqmain entertained with those materials is. Furthermore, materials are the means to translate his imagination into materiality through a poetical vision that has been the key of his success. The “brick period” is first characterized by the Urvater house-museum (1960). Secondly, the “concrete period” is illustrated by the Foncolin office building (1957) where concrete is considerate as a “noble” material for the self- supported façade and the Sart-Tilman campus project where the rough concrete does not have the ambition to be part of the structure but serves to elevate the massive walls of a fortress. The aim was to create a magic and intimate atmosphere when light rays enter through the punctual openings. Finally, natural stone demonstrates a manifest role when declined into multiple tones in the Glaverbel building (1967). Urvater Museum-House (1960) (Figure 4) In the 50’s, Europe is under an optimistic post-war reconstruction period. American influence results in the outflow of the bourgeoisie to construct big houses outside the cities. The Urvater family, Antwerp’s rich collector family wants a new house outside Brussels, which has to be “a piece of art”. From the first lines to the final plans and the realization (1960) Jacqmain is responsible for the project. His sources of inspiration are his journey to Mexico - where pre-Columbian monuments impressed him - and his new friendship with the Urvater, with whom he discovers a new universe of excess and art. He permanently works with the catalogue of the family’s collection and with partner’s recommendation18 to end in a striking brutalist work. When entering the site the impressive brick gate is already announcing the Urvater house as a masterwork. In a second time the visitor is entailed towards the path of the house through successive open-air antechambers covered by dark brick floors (Figure 5). Inside the house, the architectural promenade continues similarly. The concept of Jacqmain acquires at this moment 18 The only recommendation he received was: “do not hesitate: stronger!” De Temmerman D., Jacqmain A., Langui E., Roberts-Jones Ph. and Alechinsky P., 2013, Urvater, Histoire d’une collection, Brussels, Stichting Kunstboek, p.42 8 André JACQMAIN FINAL REPORT Megan DE PRINS, Julie HOOGEWYS, Romain WIBAUT all its significance: the 140 walls are instinctively designed for 140 paintings (Figure 6). Moreover Jacqmain gives all the power to his imagination when drawing the lines of a radical geometry. The proportions are capital. A sensitive geometry is developed from a drawing guided by emotion19. Through this concept Jacqmain can deploy his architecture, in the isolated location20, without constraints, in a free composition made of a series of vertical and horizontal lines (Figure 7). Combined with the choice of materiality, the composition gives to the house a pre-Columbian ruin like style. The conception of the house-museum is especially laid out for the paintings collection and is organized following successive empty spaces as a maze defined by freestanding solid walls in brickwork masonry. Every detail is taken into account in the staging of this decor. For example, only small windows are designed in the gallery, because the external world should not interfere with the paintings. At the center of the composition, the staircase accesses to a long corridor serving all living spaces at the upper floors. The horizontal layout is extended in lounge terraces and the panoramic windows stand out from the façade to give views over the valley. By playing with colors and materials – dark bricks, white painted bricks, painted concrete, concrete with insertion of green marble or gold meshes, polished metal - Jacqmain creates an interacting harmony between the house façade, the northern lights and the vegetation. This building was considered as a real artwork only after the house was furnished21, was inhabited and was adorned by the Urvater’s collection. « Elle est terriblement architecturale » 22 comments Jacqmain on the final result. Foncolin (1957) vs. the Sart-Tilman (1967-1968) (Figures 8 & 9) The Foncolin is early mentioned in 1961 by the American traveler-historian Kidder-Smith 23 as an office model building worth seeing. In Europe, the specialized press also praises its innovative conception in architectonic concrete produced by the Schokbeton Company. The building hits the headlines of the magazines Architecture and La Technique des Travaux. It becomes an international prevailing advertisement icon that impacted in intensive research on architectonic concrete in following years. Besides, the concept of building is also an inspiration source for other Belgium offices’ buildings. Jacqmain plays a major role in the post-war development of prefabricated concrete. The Foncolin, built in 1957, directly symbolizes an “avant-garde” prototype as consequence of its functionalist style and innovative concept. This building is ordered in 1954 by the “Fonds Colonial des Invalidités”, an insurance company. Strongly inspired by the modern architecture from Milan, Andre Jacqmain imagines a largely opened façade animated by metallic balconies. In order to 19 Urvater, Histoire d’une collection, p.44 20 Rhodes-Saint-Genèse, the parcel was on top of a meadow in the forest. 21 Each piece of furniture was specifically conceived for the house. 22 L’imaginaire émergeant, p.32 23 Kidder-Smith G.E, 1961, The New Architecture in Europe, Vol 10/6, a Pelican Book, Cleveland, World Pub. Co 9 André JACQMAIN FINAL REPORT Megan DE PRINS, Julie HOOGEWYS, Romain WIBAUT realize the project, he works in close collaboration with the architect Mulpas, the furniture designer Wabbes (Figure 10), the Company Schokbeton and the engineer Degroodt. As an answer to the architect’s wishes, Degroodt conceives a self-supported façade in prefabricated elements (Figure 11) predisposing to the open plan of the building (internal supports are limited). The façade, as the essential key of the project, is composed of 2500 white reinforced concrete frames. Moreover, those latest are elongated and slender shaped (only 12 cm thick) providing the transparent exterior aesthetic. The Dutch company Schokbeton was in charge of patented fabrication process of the architectonic concrete elements24. However, the aesthetic is not left behind technical advances. The design is influenced by the Italian refinement of Gio Ponti. Ornaments are detailed with quality consideration and sophisticated materials: oak and bronze, the “mutéyé” carpentry, “wengé” parquet floor and bronze ironmongery. In 2001, the building is demolished and is replaced by the Sapphire building. Some structural elements could be conserved and are still exposed in the entrance hall. Permanently in the research of the primacy of aesthetic, concrete is given a distinct significance in the project of the new university campus of Liege than in the structural elements of the Foncolin. In 1962, Claude Strebelle invites Jacqmain to participate to this huge project. Jacqmain is impressed by the brutalist power of nature of the plateau of Sart-Tilman site (Figure 12). This impression influences his first drawings25. Jacqmain designs the student’s homes of three massive towers (Figure 13) organized around a social and community services center and the campus restaurant (respectively 1981 and 1967). Once again, the role of the materials is to translate and to express this power. Heavy concrete shells protect the intimate inside to create a magic atmosphere of a light razing the brick walls. Into the building the walk through successive mysterious semi-obscure spaces finally lead to the sacral belvedere offering a panoramic view on the surrounding landscape. The passage of the self-services restaurant works as an efficient “anticlimax”. Glaverbel Building (1967) (Figure 14) The Glaverbel building is the result of a collaborative work between four renowned architects, engineer and furniture designer (respectively Braem and Jacqmain, Guillissen and Mulpas). At the 24 The process consists in intense and choking vibrating in a first time, and the compacting proceed in a second time to confer high durability and rigidity properties. Besides, it proves economical advantageous since no additional surface treatments are necessary. 25 “Seuls les dessins collectifs réalisés pour des bâtiments citadins échappent à mon penchant pour une architecture de force, à un instinct facilement brutaliste. La force du restaurant a été portée à l’extrême, impression que j’étais par la rudesse hivernale du plateau du Sart-Tilman, par la forte, par les lointains en direction de la Fagne.”, L’imaginaire émergeant, p.45 10 André JACQMAIN FINAL REPORT Megan DE PRINS, Julie HOOGEWYS, Romain WIBAUT start of a competition, the sketch (Figure 15) of the closed ring is the most striking amongst the drawings proposed by Jacqmain. Moreover he imagines the use of the typical Hainaut blue stone. It is this latest material, wearing the brand of Jacqmain, which allows the original project to be distinguished and to win the competition26. The original plans27, which are delivered in 1964, stress on flexible spaces and are based on a functionalist organization. They are especially suited to the needs of the first owner, the Glaverbel society. This layout provides meeting spaces and thus an effective collaboration work in the huge building. The mobility scheme is driven by a circular circulation connecting six sectors. Working life takes places with a peculiar dynamism turned to exterior spaces. Following Jacqmain «what makes the true sustainability of a building is to be well built» 28. These sustainable aspects are pursued in the architectural expression of the building. The originality of the concept lies in the circular form that surrounds the green central garden. The 115m external diameter is directly integrated harmoniously in the outline of the landscape as an ecological proposal. Indeed, the hundred-year-old trees existing in the site could be preserved. The relationship between the gardens, as well from the inside to the outside, is intense (Figure 16), and especially due to glass curtain wall façade29. This latest reflects nature is multiple facets. On the exterior side, Jacqmain plays with the contrast with another material, the stone. A “stone crust” (Figure 17) catches the light rays and underlines the structure that emerges from superimposing rings. More than the architectural expression of a crust made of stone blocks, it was the first reusing material approach in the world of Belgium construction. The stone blocks are indeed the unused blocks directly extracted from stone carriers. Jacqmain chose to treat blue stone in different manners in the interior spaces. While raw blocks of stone characterize the exterior façade, the ground floor is made of the same polished material and streaked stone blocks underline the corridors. In the case of a precise and refined work on the stone, luxury is provided by itself. By imposing the style, Jacqmain could go beyond the functional aspects. In the Glaverbel building, Jacqmain is still demonstrating a brutalist expression such as in his previous works, the Foncolin and the Sart-Tilman restaurant. But the way to consider the stone in the Glaverbel building is already announcing the architectural wave of post-modernism he was going to follow when creating the Atelier de Genval. 26 Un trajet riche en surprises, Le Soir Mag, p.4 « A première vue, on pourrait croire que la forme circulaire du bâtiment Glaverbel était juste une idée fantaisiste, une volonté de créer quelque chose d’original à tout prix. Mais il n’en est rien. En effet, à l’époque, ce choix résultait d’une analyse minutieuse des besoins de la société.» Pok M., 2013, André Jacqmain, un trajet riche en surprises, Essentielle Immo Novembre 2013, p.7 28 «ce qui fait la vraie durabilité d’un bâtiment, c’est d’être bien construit», André Jacqmain, un trajet riche en surprises, Essentielle Immo Novembre 2013, p.8 29 « Le lyrisme ici c’était l’idée de partir de quelque chose de naturel — les arbres – pour tendre vers l’artificiel.» André Jacqmain, un trajet riche en surprises, Essentielle Immo Novembre 2013, p.8 27 11 André JACQMAIN FINAL REPORT Megan DE PRINS, Julie HOOGEWYS, Romain WIBAUT The Glaverbel is one of the most mythical buildings of Brussels and has acquired its unique value through the pertinent form combined with the use of the stone material. CONCLUSION In this paper, some recurrent aspects in Jacqmain’s work can be identified. First, the architect had to invent a concept for which he had to appeal to his imagination. Next to the specific requirement of the order, his personal feelings often emerged from the visit of the site of the project. The landscape is seen as its first inspiration source. Another key point is that following Jacqmain, imagination has necessarily to be emulated by a collaborative work. Under those circumstances, he was able to draw force lines of the project on paper: black and white lines instinctively drawn based on feelings, emotions and lyricism. In a second time, he aimed to translate these two-dimensional drafts into three-dimensional constructed and material buildings with the same intensity. At that moment, Jacqmain could consciously choose for the more appropriate material to regive such forces and power. Once more, collaborations were needed to achieve such goal with full intensity. The material was becoming as an entire part of the concept providing atmosphere and modeling spaces with light. Above all, he had the ambition to transform his profession into art. This way of creating and thinking architecture pushed him forward to be in contact with contrasted architecture and typologies. Notably, he could impose his style to the Belgium architectural context. To travel through times human constructions need poetry. Persuaded of this idea, André Jacqmain liberated his imagination inseparable from the architectural creation. Today his work procures the similar emotion to the visitor fifty years after the first bricks, concrete or stone wall was erected. Through a 60 years carrier, Jacqmain has been recognized as a major figure in Belgian architecture because he has often preferred his own recipes in a world full of prejudges about “beauty” architecture. 12 André JACQMAIN FINAL REPORT Megan DE PRINS, Julie HOOGEWYS, Romain WIBAUT BIBLIOGRAPHY Monographs [1] Cugnac F., 1988, Entretiens sur l’architecture, Brussels, Eiffel. [2] Loze P., Scullica F., 2002, Atelier d’Architecture de Genval: Designing the City. Torino, l’Arca Edizioni spa [3] L’Atelier d’Architecture de Genval, 2003, Sapphire Bruxelles, Brussels, Codic & Atelier d’Architecture de Genval [4] Jacqmain A., 2005, L’imaginaire émergeant, Brussels, Archives d'Architecture Moderne (AAM) [5] De Temmerman D., Jacqmain A., Langui E., Roberts-Jones Ph. and Alechinsky P., 2013, Urvater : histoire d’une collection, Brussels, Stichting Kunstboek General bibliography [6] Aron J., Burniat P., Puttemans P., 1990, Guide d'Architecture Moderne, Bruxelles et environs, 1890-1990, Brussels, Hatier [7] Crahai P., 1994, Bruxelles, Monuments et Sites classés, Région de Bruxelles-Capitale, Service des Monuments et Sites, Brussels, 1994, p. 158 [8] Dubois M., Hennaut E., Strauven F., Van Laethem, F., Englebert J., Génicot L., Langerman N., Bekaert G., 1996, Architecture contemporaine en Belgique, Brussels: Editions Racines [9] Van Loo A., 2003, Dictionnaire de l'architecture en Belgique de 1830 à nos jours, Brussels, Fonds Mercator [10] Denoël J.-F., Espion B., Hellebois A., Provost M., Van De Voorde S., 2013, Histoires de béton armé. Patrimoine, durabilité et innovations. Brussels, Publication FEBELCEM, collaboration FABI Comité Patrimoine et Histoire 13 André JACQMAIN FINAL REPORT Megan DE PRINS, Julie HOOGEWYS, Romain WIBAUT Articles [11] 1958, Le ‘Foncolin’, Immeuble pour bureaux à Bruxelles. Architecte: A. Jacqmain. La technique des Travaux, n° 3-4, mars-avril 1958, p. 103-110 [12] Lamensch M., 1988, André Jacqmain: l'architecture belge est comme son peuple, laide et vieille. Insaisissable Jacqmain. Le Soir Mag, Novembre 28, 1988, p. 2 [13] Simon Ch., 1989, Bureaux de rêve (VI), le Stéphanie Square, tourne vers le futur, Le Soir Mag, August 19, 1989, p.32 [14] Couvreur D., 2000, Quartier Léopold, le siège de l'ancien Fonds colonial des invalidités promis à la démolition. Raser pour enflammer la création. Une œuvre d'exception, Le Soir Mag, September 26, 2000, p.27 [15] Couvreur D., 2004, Entretien, André Jacqmain dessine son royaume imaginaire, Le Soir Mag, December 1, 2004, p. 2-3 [16] Duplat G., 2004, L'imaginaire d'André Jacqmain, La Libre « Arts visuels – RENCONTRE », November 25, 2004, p.6 [17] Pok M., 2013, André Jacqmain, un trajet riche en surprises, Essentielle Immo Novembre 2013, p. 4-10 Web Sites [18] Région de Bruxelles-Capitale, Inventaire du Patrimoine Architectural www.irismonument.be/fr. Bruxelles_Extension_Sud.Avenue_Louise.54.htlm Last consultation March 12, 2015 [19] Urvater, Histoire d’une Collection http://urvater.eu/new/andre-jacqmain/ Last consultation May 10, 2015 [20] Atelier d’Architecture de Genval http://www.genval-architecture.be Last consultation April, 2 2015 14 André JACQMAIN - Appendices Megan DE PRINS, Julie HOOGEWYS, Romain WIBAUT ANDRÉ JACQMAIN FROM “IMAGINAIRE” TO “MATERIALITY” APPENDICES: FIGURES 1 André JACQMAIN - Appendices Megan DE PRINS, Julie HOOGEWYS, Romain WIBAUT Table of contents PART I – THE POETICAL VISION OF JACQMAIN ................................................................................ 4 PART II – MATERIALITY ..................................................................................................................... 6 Brick: Urvater Museum-House (1960) .......................................................................................... 6 Concrete: Foncolin (1957) vs. Sart-Tilman (1967-1968) .............................................................. 8 Stone: Glaverbel Building (1967) ................................................................................................ 11 2 André JACQMAIN - Appendices Megan DE PRINS, Julie HOOGEWYS, Romain WIBAUT Table of figures Figure 1: André Jacqmain, http://www.genval-architecture.be/atelier/equipe/andrejacqmain/…………………………………………………………........................…………………………………………………4 Figure 2: Habitation de MR C. de B. à Turhout, André Jacqmain, L’imaginaire émergeant, p.60…4 Figure 3: L’imaginaire émergeant, L’imaginaire émergeant, p.60…………………………….…………………5 Figure 4: The Urvater Museum-House, Atelier d’architecture de Genval, Designing the city, p.93…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….6 Figure 5: Approach to the house with open-air anterchambers, Atelier d’architecture de Genval, Designing the city, p.103……………………………………………………………………………………………………….……6 Figure 6: Interior of the Art Gallery, Atelier d’architecture de Genval, Designing the city, p.94…..7 Figure 7: Configuration of vertical and horizontal lines, sketch by André Jacqmain, Atelier d’architecture de Genval…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….7 Figure 8: The Foncolin Building, Atelier d’architecture de Genval, Designing the city, p.86…………8 Figure 9: Sart-Tilman Building, L’imaginaire émergeant, p.79……………………………..……………………..8 Figure 10: Collaboration between the furniture designer Wabbes and Jacqmain, 1956, L’imaginaire émergeant, p.66…………………………………………………………………………………………………….9 Figure 11: Drawing of the construction principle by André Jacqmain, L’imaginaire émergeant, p.65…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….9 Figure 12: Concrete facade of the Sart-Tilman building, Atelier d’architecture de Genval, Designing the City, p.31…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….10 Figure 13: Plan and section of the Sart-Tilman building, Atelier d’architecture de Genval, Designing the City, p.30…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….10 Figure 14: Glaverbel, Atelier d'architecture de Genval, Designing the City, p.99……....................11 Figure 15: Sketch of the Glaverbel by André Jacqmain, Atelier d'architecture de Genval, Designing the City, p.100………………………………………………………………………………………………………….11 Figure 16: Relationship between the garden and the building, Atelier d'architecture de Genval, Designing the city, p.101………………………………………………………………………………………….……………….12 Figure 17: The “stone crust”, Atelier d'architecture de Genval, Designing the City, p. 99………….12 3 André JACQMAIN - Appendices Megan DE PRINS, Julie HOOGEWYS, Romain WIBAUT PART I – THE POETICAL VISION OF JACQMAIN Figure 1: André Jacqmain Figure 2: Habitation de Mr C. DE B. à Turhout, André Jacqmain 4 André JACQMAIN - Appendices Megan DE PRINS, Julie HOOGEWYS, Romain WIBAUT Figure 3: L'imaginaire émergeant 5 André JACQMAIN - Appendices Megan DE PRINS, Julie HOOGEWYS, Romain WIBAUT PART II – MATERIALITY Brick: Urvater Museum-House (1960) z Figure 4: The Urvater Museum-House Figure 5 : Approach to the house with open-air antechambers 6 André JACQMAIN - Appendices Megan DE PRINS, Julie HOOGEWYS, Romain WIBAUT Figure 6 : Interior of the Art Gallery Figure 7 : Configuration of vertical and horizontal lines, sketch by André Jacqmain 7 André JACQMAIN - Appendices Megan DE PRINS, Julie HOOGEWYS, Romain WIBAUT Concrete: Foncolin (1957) vs. Sart-Tilman (1967-1968) Figure 8 : The Foncolin Building Figure 9 : Sart-Tilman Building 8 André JACQMAIN - Appendices Megan DE PRINS, Julie HOOGEWYS, Romain WIBAUT Figure 10: Collaboration between the furniture designer Wabbes and Jacqmain, 1956 Figure 11: Drawing of the construction principle by André Jacqmain 9 André JACQMAIN - Appendices Megan DE PRINS, Julie HOOGEWYS, Romain WIBAUT Figure 12: Concrete facade of the Sart-Tilman building Figure 10 : Plan and section of the Sart-Tilman building 10 André JACQMAIN - Appendices Megan DE PRINS, Julie HOOGEWYS, Romain WIBAUT Stone: Glaverbel Building (1967) Figure 1411: Glaverbel Figure 12: Sketch of the Glaverbel by André Jacqmain 11 André JACQMAIN - Appendices Megan DE PRINS, Julie HOOGEWYS, Romain WIBAUT Figure 16: Relationship between the garden and the building Figure 17: The “stone crust” 12