Machine A Sous Classique Gratuite Slot Machine Queen Of Hearts
Transcription
Machine A Sous Classique Gratuite Slot Machine Queen Of Hearts
How can student video production affect teaching and learning in my Chemistry class? Submitted in part fulfilment for the Award of MSc in Education and Training Management (eLearning) School of Education Dublin City University Mary O’Toole Supervisor: Ms. Yvonne Crotty MSc 30th June 2012 Table of Contents Validation Meeting Video 1 Introduction 1 1.1 My Work Context 1 1.2 Chemistry in the Leaving Certificate Curriculum 2 1.3 The Chemistry Classroom 2 1.4 Experiments and record keeping 3 1.5 What is my concern? 4 1.5.1 Research Question 6 1.6 Why am I concerned? 7 1.7 My Initial Response 8 2 Methodology 9 2.1 Logical Positivism 9 2.2 The Interpretive Model of Enquiry 9 2.3 Critical Theory 10 2.4 Action Research 10 2.4.1 Living Educational Theory 11 2.5 My Ontological and Epistemological Perspectives 12 2.6 Rationale for selecting this methodological approach 13 2.7 The participants 14 2.8 Data Collection 14 2.9 The generation of evidence 15 2.10 Validity 15 2.11 Rigour 16 2.12 Ethical Considerations 17 2.13 Going forward 18 3 Implementation 19 3.1 Planning 19 3.2 Video in education 20 3.3 Video in Science education 21 3.4 Students as video producers 22 3.5 Video Production and Literacy 24 3.6 Planning for Action 24 3.7 Implementation Phase One 25 3.8 Implementation Phase Two 26 3.9 Implementation Phase Three 27 3.10 Observations and Reflections 27 3.11 Evaluation 28 3.12 Validity and Rigour 31 4 Overall Reflections 33 4.1 My learning and my living educational theory 33 4.2 Further Action Research Cycles 34 References Glossary 36 Acknowledgements I wish to thank my sister, Elizabeth, for your care and support over the last two years as I undertook this Masters programme. Thank you so much for your patience, sense of humour and practical assistance at all times. I would like to thank Sr. Martina for always believing in me and in my ability to achieve my goals. I very much appreciate your friendship, encouragement and help in so many practical ways. Thank you to Jacinta Canty – your friendship, support and practical help during my research are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your help in moving and setting up the cameras around the school, for carrying out interviews with the students, for reviewing my videos and always being available with good advice and encouragement. Thank you to Frances Leahy for encouraging me to undertake further study and for your continued support. A sincere thank you to Claire Flatley for willingly agreeing to participate in the research and allowing your interview to be included in the completed video. I wish to thank Sr. Elizabeth, for your constant interest in my work and the many contributions you have made to my scientific knowledge. I wish to express my thanks to David Wall for your practical advice and for sourcing and lending me a better tripod to complete filming. Many thanks to Alice O’Brien for challenging and encouraging me as I completed this research. I would like to express my gratitude to Sr. Mary, the chairperson of the Board of Management, and to Majella Deasy, my principal, for permission to undertake this research in St. Paul’s and for your constant support and encouragement along the way. I wish to thank my seven wonderful Chemistry students without whom this research could not have been completed. Thank you to Tamirah, Sinead, Shannon, Niamh O., Niamh G. Jennifer and Aisling for your willing and cheerful participation. It was a privilege to teach you and I can definitely say that Laboratory 26 will never be the same. You certainly broadened my knowledge of Chemistry with burnt hydrogen, Mr. Avocado’s constant and cups in the washing machine! Thank you for all the fun along with the hard work and I sincerely wish you all the very best as you move onto the next phase of your studies in September. Sincere thanks to Dr. Margaret Farren for all your help and support over the last two years in DCU. Very special thanks to my supervisor, Yvonne Crotty, for your endless patience, encouragement and inspiration. Thank you for challenging me to enter the realms of participatory multimedia, which has completely reinvigorated my mode of teaching. Finally, I wish to dedicate this thesis to my sister Elizabeth and to my late parents, Padraic and Elizabeth who encouraged me from an early age to live a life imbued with values and to develop a thirst for knowledge and learning. This research originates from your example. Technical Appendices Appendix A Action Research Cycle. Appendix B Extract from a student laboratory notebook. Appendix C Extract from the students’ storyboard. Appendix D Extract from the video storyboard. Appendix E Student Interview Questions. Appendix F Teacher Interview Questions. Appendix G Sample Permission Form for the School Principal and Board of Management. Appendix H Sample Permission Form for the Parents. Appendix I Sample Project Information Sheet for Parents and Students. Media Video Validation Presentation May 19th 2012. Video Experimenting with video: The role of video in my Leaving Certificate Chemistry Class. Video 1.1 Discovery Learning and Science. Video 1.2 The Periodic Table of the Elements – Vodcast. Video 3.1 Kinetic Theory of Gases – Animation. Video 3.2 Student Collaboration. Video 3.3 Students Storyboard and Prepare for Filming. Video 3.4 Students Learn about the Cameras. Video 3.5 Student Involvement. Video 3.6 Enjoyable Experience. Video 3.7 Reaction to Filming. Video 3.8 Learning Styles. Tables Table 1.1 Numbers Studying Leaving Certificate Chemistry. Abbreviations DCU Dublin City University. ICT Information and Communication Technology. NCCA National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. SNA Special Needs Assistant. UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation. Abstract The process of reflecting on my teaching of Leaving Certificate Chemistry resulted in a growing awareness that my practice did not always fully embody my core educational values of care, honesty and inclusion. This prompted the initiation of this study, using the Living Educational Theory approach to Action Research, in an attempt to resolve the conflict between my values and my practice and to generate my own living educational theory. The research shows the potential of participatory multimedia to enhance the teaching and learning experiences in my Chemistry class. Video is a powerful medium that enables the capture of the precise details of procedures and techniques. The storyboard prepared by the students for an experiment resulted in them knowing the procedure in detail before commencing the practical work. Students then recorded the experiment on video. This task encouraged high levels of collaboration and social interaction between students, which contributed to the enhancement of their learning experience. Students engaged with the creation of the storyboard and video and exhibited critical thinking, communication, collaboration and problem solving skills. Roles, which students had adopted previously in class, were changed as new leaders emerged to guide the production of the video. I witnessed that my Leaving Certificate Chemistry class had a more meaningful and enjoyable learning experience through their involvement in the production of videos of experiments. The video constitutes a resource for revision and for absent students to study the experiment. My teaching methodology has become more inclusive, catering for different learning styles. Student production of videos has resulted in my adoption of a less didactic and more collaborative approach to teaching, which allows for improved student engagement and interaction with the learning. Keywords: Living Educational Theory; Collaboration; Video; Values; Chemistry experiments. Validation Meeting Video 1 Introduction This research emanates from my attempts as a Chemistry teacher to address issues concerning the approach to practical work in my Leaving Certificate class. These concerns have led me to undertake an Action Research project seeking to address the question How can student video production affect teaching and learning in my Chemistry class? I initiated the project seeking to develop my own living educational theory, with the aim of enhancing both the teaching and the learning in my Chemistry classroom, through the engagement of my students in the video recording of experiments. After explaining the background from which the project originated, I describe my reasons for choosing the Living Educational Theory Approach to Action Research and detail the steps taken to change my practice. Data was generated over the course of this project and the checks carried out to show that this data is both valid and rigorous are described. As a result of my research, I propose that video has a valuable role to play in my Chemistry classes to enhance learning, to make learning more enjoyable, to provide a resource for students who missed experiments and for revision. 1.1 My Work Context I work in St. Paul’s Secondary School as a teacher of Chemistry, Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and Mathematics. St. Paul’s is a voluntary secondary school for girls, located near the foothills of the Dublin Mountains. Since 2010, the school is under the trusteeship of the Le Chéile Trust. There are currently six hundred and eighty students enrolled in the school and the staff includes forty-six teachers and six special needs assistants (SNAs). The student body includes a small minority with special educational needs. This includes students with physical disabilities and students with learning difficulties. The ethos of our school reflects that of the Sisters of Charity of St. Paul the Apostle who founded the school. This culture promotes the care and inclusion of all children. This caring philosophy permeates the daily routine and our work as teachers in the school. 1 1.2 Chemistry in the Leaving Certificate Curriculum The Irish Leaving Certificate Chemistry syllabus consists of both theoretical and practical work. The two-year course culminates in a three hour written examination, which tests the students’ knowledge of the theory and the experiments. Two thirds of the course is pure Chemistry. Pure Chemistry consists of the principles and theory of Chemistry. The remainder of the course consists of applied and social Chemistry, linking the subject to the students’ daily lives. The Chemistry curriculum is highly structured, covering a wide range of material from various different branches of Chemistry. These include Organic, Inorganic, Physical and Environmental Chemistry. The syllabus recommends a specific number of class periods for each section of the course. To prepare students effectively for the final summative assessment, the Chemistry classroom has to be assessment-focused dedicating time to feedback, revision and examination preparation (National Research Council 2000). 1.3 The Chemistry Classroom Time spent in the classroom or laboratory does not guarantee that learning is taking place. It is important that student learning is the main focus of classroom activity. I can present information to students but understanding and meaning must grow and develop in the students’ minds for learning to occur. The information that I supply must be integrated with existing knowledge to build new understanding (Eilks and Byers 2010). Instead of the more traditional teacher-centred approach to education, an active student centred approach encourages more student engagement with course material in Chemistry. Leaving Certificate Chemistry experiments transform the laboratory into a site of active learning. The syllabus highlights health and safety as a major concern since this is a subject that involves working with toxic, flammable or explosive chemicals (National Council for Curriculum and Assessment 1999). Students require sufficient background knowledge and should be competent in the specific procedure before attempting any experiment. The experience level of Leaving Certificate students is not sufficient to allow discovery learning where students would develop their own strategies for the experiment. 2 Video 1.1: Discovery Learning and Science Inquiry-based learning involves posing a problem or challenge to which students respond and in the process the required knowledge is learnt (Prince and Felder 2007). A scaffolding approach (Criswell 2012) can enable inquiry-based learning in a Leaving Certificate Chemistry classroom. This strategy involves equipping the students with necessary laboratory knowledge and competencies, supplying background information and detailed sets of instructions but not giving the outcomes of the experiments (Bruck and Towns 2009). Students, therefore, work through the experiment safely and draw their own conclusions from the data or results produced. In order to create an effective learning environment and meet the needs of my students I constantly need to remember that the class should be learner-centred, knowledgecentred and assessment-centred. 1.4 Experiments and record keeping Twenty-eight mandatory experiments and seventeen specified teacher demonstrations form the core of the Leaving Certificate Chemistry syllabus. When students carry out an experiment, their understanding of the course theory improves. The practical tasks allow them to develop scientific competencies in laboratory and analytical techniques. According to the NCCA (National Council for Curriculum and Assessment), the performance of experiments equips students with the skills necessary to competently use scientific apparatus. Experiments also help students to become proficient in making 3 accurate observations and measurements (NCCA 2002). The completion of experiments is central to science curricula (Logar and Savec 2011). Students are required to record their practical work and these records are retained for the duration of the course. The format of these records is not specified in the syllabus. Traditionally, students have used a laboratory notebook to keep a written account of each experiment as they completed it. Photographs, pictures, audio and video provide us with alternative contemporary writing genres (Richardson 2010). Digital recording methods enable the keeping of more detailed and visual records of experiments. Students can encapsulate the activity of experiments visually, using digital video tools (Hilton 2011). 1.5 What is my concern? In Ireland, Leaving Certificate Chemistry is a pre-requisite for third-level courses such as Veterinary Science, Pharmacy, Nutrition and Dietetics along with some Medicine and Dentistry courses (www.qualifax.ie). In line with trends nationally and across Europe, the number of students in our school opting to study Leaving Certificate Chemistry has decreased from the levels in the 1980’s (Regan and Childs 2003; Gavaghan 2000). Number of Leaving Certificate Students Number of Leaving Certificate Chemistry Students Percentage of Leaving Certificate Students who studied Chemistry Table 1. 1987 2011 Approximately 49,000 57, 532 10, 287 7, 677 21% 13.34% Numbers studying Leaving Certificate Chemistry Source: www.examinations.ie; Regan and Childs 2003. The breadth and depth of subject material covered in the Leaving Certificate Chemistry syllabus can appear daunting. Some students find the subject material text-heavy with a 4 considerable amount of study required. Accuracy, precision and logical thinking are vital for a student to understand Chemistry principles and to achieve a high grade in the Leaving Certificate Chemistry examination. An Irish Government subcommittee has admitted that Chemistry, Mathematics and Physics are perceived as subjects in which high grades are not easily achieved and that these subjects need a new approach (Interdepartmental Committee on Science, Technology and Innovation 2006). Students’ subject choices are heavily influenced by the need to maximise the points they achieve in the Leaving Certificate to gain entry to their chosen third level course. An increased integration of technology into teaching and learning in my classroom might reduce students’ perception of Chemistry as a text-laden subject and potentially encourage more students in my school to study Chemistry. Textbooks and notes are the main learning aids available for Leaving Certificate Chemistry students. Textbooks cater for students with a literary learning style but similar to any class group, my students have a variety of learning styles. When data projectors and computers were installed in our classrooms last year, some of my Chemistry students noted that they find digital and audio-visual resources more engaging than textbooks. The students are ‘digital natives’ (Prensky 2001, p.1) using technology widely outside of school. Printed books play only a small role in many of their lives. Instead they engage with technology to communicate, to find information and to complete many other tasks. ‘Young people expect to be constantly connected by technology’ (King and Gura 2007, p.36). Prensky (2010, p.149) suggests that students today are ‘eager to create’. On reflection, I found it disconcerting that students in my class had access only to printed study resources when this was not their favoured medium of presentation and also that they had little input into the creation of those resources. Due to the time constraints of the Chemistry syllabus, each mandatory experiment is scheduled only once. Students who are frequently absent or absent for a prolonged period may miss out on the completion of some experiments. Yet, students need to fully grasp all the minute details of these experiments for the Leaving Certificate written examination. Experiments demand student participation and are not intended for passive learning. Van Horn (2001b) speaks of the difficulty of capturing a practical procedure in text. Despite this, absent students only have recourse to text-based descriptions to catch up on missed experiments. 5 The lack of sufficient realistic, visual resources for students to utilise in an attempt to compensate for missing an experiment or to revise an experiment sparked my concern initially. This concern deepened as I pondered the need to encourage more of our students to study Leaving Certificate Chemistry. The availability of study resources, created using a variety of media and classified as engaging by students, might have the potential to encourage students to view the choice of Chemistry for Leaving Certificate more favourably. I realised that I needed to encourage and facilitate the development of experiment resources if I was to address my concerns. I decided that video might be a more apt medium than a textbook for the presentation of experiments. Koumi (2006) and Van Horn (2001b) conclude that video is a suitable medium for the study of techniques and procedures. Video, therefore, has the potential to give students a clear insight into an experiment and improve their understanding whether or not they participated in the actual experiment. Wetzel, Radtke and Stern (1994) confirm this possibility when they refer to the effectiveness of video in the demonstration of new skills to students. Video would also appeal to the learning styles of most or all of my students. 1.5.1 Research Question As I attempted to address my concerns, I initially created vodcasts covering some of the theory on the syllabus. Podcasts are audio files on the internet which are subscribed to via a dedicated feed. A vodcast is a podcast that has been enhanced with video or a visual presentation. Video 1.2: The Periodic Table of the Elements 6 However, the issue of experiment resources was still outstanding. There was also a need for students’ voices to be heard and their creativity to be unleashed and garnered in the production of resources. ‘An essential part of the educational process is the activation of one’s practical and creative capacities’ (Stein 1996, p.137). My initial idea to film experiments altered after discussions with my research supervisor, Yvonne Crotty when she suggested an approach that might be more engaging for students. This change involved enabling my students to create storyboards and video record some of the Chemistry experiments in the hope of addressing my concerns about practical work in my Leaving Certificate class. This has led me to seek to address the question ‘How can student video production affect teaching and learning in my Chemistry class?’ 1.6 Why am I concerned? My concerns emanate from my educational values of care, inclusivity and honesty. I care that each one of my students is given the very best chance to achieve her full potential. I want the students to enjoy the process of reaching this goal and to have the best possible learning resources available to them, resources that are inclusive of their different learning styles. My students find the use of technology enjoyable and readily engage with different media and technologies. I want to harness this enthusiasm for technology and use it to enhance the students’ engagement with the Chemistry syllabus, especially the experiments, in the hope that it will assist them in the process of learning. The summative written examination suits some of the students more than others. Some students work extremely well in the laboratory carrying out experiments but the final examination result may not reflect this scientific excellence. My value of inclusivity directs me to produce resources that will help these students to catch up if they miss an experiment and enable them to achieve high marks on the experiment questions in the examination. My students are diligent and conscientious. Honesty is one of my core values, both in education and outside. It propels me to do everything in my power to help each of the students in my class to develop some level of passion for Chemistry and to achieve the highest grade that she can attain in the Leaving Certificate Chemistry examination. This 7 result will then improve her chance of pursuing the third level course or career of her choice after school. These values prompted my concerns about teaching and learning in my Chemistry class. I was experiencing tension between my values and my professional practice. A change in my approach to the teaching and carrying out of experiments was needed if I was to adhere to my values and live them out in my practice. 1.7 My Initial Response In response to my concerns, I commenced this project hoping that the incorporation of video technology into my Chemistry class would lead to the creation of a more enjoyable, engaging, effective and inclusive learning experience for the students, even for those who are absent. This change to my practice might perhaps make my chemistry class more appealing to students with different learning styles and in future years, encourage more students to select Chemistry as a Leaving Certificate subject. In addition, hopefully my values will be more fully embodied in my practice. 8 2 Methodology ‘How can student video production affect teaching and learning in my Chemistry class?’ My research question was now the guide for my enquiry. I aspired to understanding how I could improve my professional practice and to working alongside my students to enhance teaching and learning in my Chemistry class. My values were providing the impetus for the research and I wanted to acquire knowledge specific to my context. I examined the three research paradigms - positivism, interpretive and critical theory, before deciding to adopt Action Research as the philosophical framework for my study. 2.1 Logical Positivism Logical Positivism has been the predominant research paradigm in education for several centuries. Rooted in empiricism, it centres on a belief that an objective reality exists. Empiricism is a theory claiming that all knowledge is derived from sensory experiences. Practice is considered to be value-free. Knowledge is objective and quantifiable and is gained through scientific or inductive testing. The researcher is not a participant in the research since reality is independent of any individual. Research involves discovering truths and is carried out using quantitative data collection methods. The results of positivist research can be generalised. Positivism is widely used for research in the physical sciences as it serves to explain and predict. However, positivist research is not applicable to education in many cases since it cannot guide a teacher to know what will work best with a specific student or class at a particular teaching moment (Hinchey 2008). A positivist approach would not suit my enquiry since I could not be both the researcher and a participant or examine only my own practice. 2.2 The Interpretive Model of Enquiry The Interpretive paradigm emerged as an alternative to positivism during the last century. This model of enquiry encapsulates a belief in a subjectively based, socially constructed reality, influenced by external factors such as history, beliefs and culture (O’Brien 2001). It allows for the existence of multiple realities. Reality is constructed 9 and can differ depending on the perspective from which it is viewed (Burton, Brundrett and Jones 2008). ‘Interpretivists define knowledge as the meaning people assign to what they observe’ (Hinchey 2008, p.23). Researchers aim to develop understanding and insights rather than objective truths. The researcher constructs knowledge in collaboration with the research participants. Interpretive research includes approaches such as ethnography and phenomenology and employs the use of qualitative methods to gather data. This paradigm appreciates the complex nature of a classroom and allows a teacher to become a participant in the research. The lack of focus on the embodiment of values or improvement in practice led me to reject the interpretive approach as a philosophical framework for this research. 2.3 Critical Theory A third research model is the Critical Theory approach that emanated from the Frankfurt School. This paradigm has some perspectives that are similar to interpretivism. Reality is viewed as being subjective and socially constructed. Critical Theory aims to critique, emancipate, empower and transform (Guba and Lincoln 1994). It seeks to promote democratic freedom. Knowledge is subjective, contextualised and imbued with values. It will be transformed over time as understanding grows. The researcher is one of the participants in the research group. Action Research evolves from this approach, aiming to empower and emancipate through the improvement of practice. It includes both theory and praxis and involves the researcher in self-research in company with research participants and critical peers. I chose Action Research as the methodology for my study when it became apparent to me that it was more compatible with my research question than positivism or interpretivism. 2.4 Action Research According to Cohen and Manion (1994), Action Research involves implementing a small change in the real world and putting the effects of this action or intervention under scrutiny. It entails informed intervention in practice, which leads to the development of knowledge (McNiff, Lomax and Whitehead 1996). An Action Research approach to my enquiry enabled me to evaluate my practice and to attempt to improve it while at the same time creating my own theory of practice (McNiff and Whitehead 2005a). 10 Action Research is cyclical in nature and is undertaken when a practitioner identifies a need for change in his or her own practice (Bell 2010). It involves planning, acting, observing and reflecting. Theory and action work together to address a concern about practice while generating new learning and knowledge. The action gives rise to evidence, which must be validated to justify any claim to knowledge. Action Research involves reflection and is situated in a definite context. Action Researchers do not commence their study with a definite result that they will attempt to prove. Instead, they begin with an idea that develops (McNiff 2002) and leads to the creation of a plan for action. After implementation, its effects are evaluated and perhaps more ideas for action emerge, leading to another action research cycle. In Action Research, knowledge informs practice and knowledge is derived from practice. Action research involves the improvement of one’s own practice (Burton, Brundrett and Jones 2008). Cohen and Manion (1994) suggest that it is an appropriate framework for altering or introducing new teaching methods. This identifies it as a suitable philosophical framework for my research question. 2.4.1 Living Educational Theory Action Research emerged as a research methodology during the 1940’s and has its origins in the work of the German social scientist Kurt Lewin. Many people have contributed to the understanding and development of Action Research since that time. Stephen Corey introduced Action Research into the educational sphere with the publication of his book Action Research to improve school practices in 1953. He suggested that teachers practice might be improved more by reflection on their own practice rather than by reading about the work of other people (Corey 1953 cited in Ferrance 2000, p.7). Several approaches to Action Research have emerged. One such approach is the Living Educational Theory of Jack Whitehead. A living theory is a person’s account of how they have affected their own learning, the learning of others and the learning in their home and workplaces (Whitehead 2011). Whitehead developed the Living Educational Theory from his view that theory can come from real life practice (Whitehead and McNiff 2006). Practice is purposeful and permeated with values, which are personal to each individual practitioner. We may hold certain educational values but our practice may not mirror them. Responsibility for the 11 denial of our values in our professional practice may lie with ourselves or with others but it causes us to be a ‘living contradiction’ (Whitehead and McNiff 2006, p.32). This approach to Action Research involves practitioners in an attempt to improve their practice and to resolve conflicts between their practice and their espoused values. Reflection on our own practice assists us in identifying when our values are not fully embodied in our practice. In doing Action Research, we strive to improve the situation while at the same time we generate knowledge. This knowledge is our theory of practice – our Living Educational Theory, which we can use to inform our future practice. 2.5 My Ontological and Epistemological Perspectives As part of the eLearning strand of the MSc in Education and Training Management programme, I was encouraged to consider my ontology or theory of being. Our ontological perspectives encompass how we see ourselves as part of the world and its people (Whitehead and McNiff 2006). I believe that each of us views the world from our own unique perspective. This changes under the influence of external stimuli and our own growth in understanding. Each person has an intrinsic value. We are all linked through our shared environment and experiences. Our association and links with others are central in the shaping of our life view. Working together we can create new levels of understanding and learn from each other. My practice as a teacher cannot be separated from my concept of the world and my attitude to my students (Stein 1996). My values emanate from my ontological perspective and to make any sense my practice must mirror my ontological values of honesty, care and inclusion. My epistemological values include respect for what we learn simply by living and by learning from the people and environment around us. We are continuously learning and building on what we knew before, creating theory from our experiences. Every human interaction can prove to be educational (Stein 1996). The tacit knowledge in our daily practices has significance just as theoretical knowledge has. Dewey (2007 p.248) contends that the ‘function of knowledge is to make one experience freely available in other experiences’. Knowledge can be generated from our practice as well as applied to it (Schön 1995). In my role as a Mathematics teacher I encourage students to think about problems before attempting to solve them. When a student has experienced difficulty with a 12 question we go through it together discussing what action the student took at each stage until we reach a valid solution. Therefore in my maths teaching I have been advocating reflection on action to improve mathematical skills. This Masters programme has encouraged me to widen this view to now encompass the belief that practice can always be improved by reflection followed by appropriate action. 2.6 Rationale for selecting this methodological approach Values that we claim to hold must be expressed without words. They should shape our practice and the way that we live our lives should reflect them (McNiff and Whitehead 2009). When we observe that something is unfinished or unfulfilled we begin to reflect (Dewey 2007). I realised that, as a result of being absent, students were missing out on some Chemistry experiments. Those present saw the experiment only once, which Drahl (2010) considers insufficient for grasping practical techniques. In addition, the only resources available for students to revise or catch up were textbooks whereas film is more realistic, alive and engaging than printed words (Cuban 1986). My values of honesty, care and inclusivity were being negated in my practice. I wanted to give my students the most effective and enjoyable learning experience that I could, engendering in them a lifelong interest in and love for Chemistry. It was my aim to provide a learning environment that appealed to their different approaches to learning and to help them to achieve their personal best in this subject. However, adequate provisions were not being made for students who were absent or students who prefer more visual learning aids. In my practice, I was experiencing myself as a ‘living contradiction’ (Whitehead and McNiff 2006, p.32). Action was needed to improve my practice in order to resolve this tension and to align my practice with my ontological values. McNiff (2002) comments that action research is about being satisfied that I am living in a good way. This encapsulates my values of care and honesty - wanting to do my best so that my students can achieve their potential. My concern involved my practice and was situated in the ‘swampy lowlands’ (Schön 1995, p.28) of my Chemistry classroom. I wanted to improve my practice and to reflect on both my learning and my action in the process. The self-reflective nature of Action Research, coupled with its commitment to action offered a suitable methodological framework for my enquiry. The possibility of transforming my practice so that my values were manifested in it was appealing to me 13 and led to my choice of Whitehead’s Living Educational Theory approach to Action Research for my study. 2.7 The participants My Leaving Certificate Chemistry students and I were the participants in this research. The class consists of seven girls who are aged seventeen to eighteen years. They became my co-researchers in the project as they introduced new ideas, posed questions and made invaluable suggestions. A colleague in the Science department in St. Paul’s observed my work and agreed to be interviewed about practical work in secondary school Science. A colleague in the Mathematics department participated by carrying out some of the student interviews and by assisting with the movement and setting up of cameras around the school. My supervisor, Yvonne Crotty, my DCU (Dublin City University) validation group and my critical friend all contributed to my study. 2.8 Data Collection Data was gathered for this enquiry using qualitative research methods. These methods are suitable for enquiries in natural settings and aim to gather new insights into people’s perceptions and to develop understanding (Denzin and Lincoln 2000). Qualitative data is descriptive in nature and its format is linguistic or visual (Burton, Brundrett and Jones 2008). It is gathered by observing a particular situation or setting (Creswell 2009). The experiment video and the interviews recorded with participating students and another teacher form part of this data. Video recordings of the students as they storyboarded and filmed the experiment also represent data. I recorded field notes in my school diary and documented observations in the reflective learning journal, which I had been encouraged to keep throughout the Masters programme. A learning journal is ‘a vehicle for reflection’ (Moon 2006, p.1). It is intended that a journal should contribute to learning when the writer reflects on experiences (ibid.). Other sources of data included recordings of meetings with my supervisor, my validation group and critical friend in addition to emails and recorded Skype sessions with my supervisor. The data gathered was pertinent and meaningful to my research question (McNiff and Whitehead 2005a). The students were asked in recorded interviews to discuss their experience of Chemistry experiments both before the project and after they had begun 14 to video record them. My colleague from the Mathematics department interviewed the students and recorded the interviews on video to ensure that the students felt comfortable to share their honest views and perceptions. My field-notes and learning journal provided my observations on and perceptions of the impact of video recording experiments in the Chemistry class. The interview with the Science teacher provided data about the role of practical work in Science subjects. The benefits in terms of student collaboration and learning were discussed. Data concerning procedures and resources available when students are absent is contained in both the teacher and student interviews. 2.9 The generation of evidence The Living Educational Theory approach to Action Research involves setting my values as the standard of judgement for my research. The data was examined for evidence that my values of honesty, care and inclusion were being manifested in my practice. Data indicating that I exhibited a commitment to genuinely living my values in my practice constitutes evidence. Multimedia presentations are an effective means of displaying embodied evidence (McNiff and Whitehead 2009). Clips from the recorded video footage, entries from my learning journal and feedback from the meeting with my validation group help to show evidence of my values in my changed practice. They also demonstrate some of the effects of student video production on my class. The creation of a video is itself an indication of a change in teaching and learning in my Chemistry class. 2.10 Validity Validation involves showing the trustworthiness and credibility of my research. It is crucial that I provide evidence to support any claims that I make about my learning or about teaching and learning in my class. Validation involves both personal validation and social validation. Habermas’ Theory of Social Validity provides a useful framework for the validation process. Habermas contends that if claims to knowledge are valid and legitimate they must be: truthful comprehensible authentic and sincere 15 appropriate for the context (Habermas 1987 cited in McNiff and Whitehead 2005b). I must reflect on my work and examine my claims that teaching and learning has been affected. My values of honesty, care and inclusion are the criteria against which my work is compared to establish its validity. Evidence must exist to show that I am trying to live out my values in my practice. I invite other people to question and verify my claims so that my work is validated socially. Discussions and meetings with my supervisor, my critical friend and my validation group all contribute to the process of social validation. 2.11 Rigour Winter’s Criteria of Rigour provides a set of principles that I use to assess the rigour of my Action Research report. These criteria are: Reflexive Critique Dialectics Collaboration Risk Plural Structure Theory, practice and transformation Reflexive critique involves showing that I have reflected on my work and have examined my values with an awareness of assumptions or bias that I may hold when making judgements. Dialectic critique involves the assessment of different interpretations of the same event. The research report should include other voices authentically and assess the tension between my espoused and lived educational values. Collaboration with the other participants, my validation group, my critical friend and colleagues in school are pivotal to the study. Their contributions and opinions strengthen the dependability of any claims to knowledge that I make in this enquiry. Undertaking a project to improve personal practice has inherent risks of failure or criticism. I must be prepared to accept these risks. A plural structure is achieved by the use of a variety of data collection methods such as a reflective journal and interviews. It also indicates that the research includes views and criticisms from several sources such as my supervisor, my critical friend and my validation group. The completed video 16 along with other evidence of changed teaching and learning patterns from recorded interviews and my reflective journal are evidence of transformation. Theory is informing practice and practice is generating theory (Heikkinen et al. 2012; Winter 1989 cited in O’Brien 2001). 2.12 Ethical Considerations Action Research should be an ethical process (O’Brien 2001). It is important that ethical guidelines and codes of professional practice are adhered to when undertaking research. Consent is a central tenet of research ethics according to the Research Ethics Guidebook (www.ethicsguidebook.ac.uk). Permission to carry out the research in my school was secured in writing from the principal and the chairperson of the Board of Management. Five of the seven participants are aged eighteen; with the remaining two being seventeen years old. The participants and in the case of the two seventeen year olds, the participants and their parents, have provided written statements of consent regarding their participation in the research. The research was explained to the participants who were provided with a short document detailing the proposed enquiry. It was emphasised that the participation of a student was entirely voluntary and that no penalty would be applied if students opted not to take part or to later withdraw from the research. Students and their parents were provided with the opportunity to seek further information and to ask questions. Students and if necessary their parents were given time to consider all aspects of involvement before signing informed consent forms. All seven students agreed to participate in the research. The students and myself are the intended beneficiaries of the research. The research should not be a source of harm to the students or conflict in any way with my duty of care to them. The participants unanimously agreed that their first names should be used in the filming process. Participants were assured of confidentiality and made aware from the beginning that participation would involve being filmed while working on Chemistry experiments and being interviewed on video. All recorded material is stored securely and footage that is not included in the final video will be destroyed after one year. 17 2.13 Going forward Action Research enables professionals to examine, to improve and to simultaneously generate knowledge about their own professional practice. I have adopted the Living Educational Theory approach to Action Research in an attempt to improve my practice, to make it more consistent with my avowed values of honesty, care and inclusion. I hoped that the enquiry would produce evidence and generate knowledge, which would guide my future practice as a Chemistry teacher. 18 3 Implementation Reflecting on the teaching methodologies that I use in my Chemistry class indicated to me that some changes were needed if my practice was to be an embodiment of my values. I had acquired skills in making multimedia resources on the MSc course and I could use these in the creation of student learning materials. Furthermore, I needed to share those skills with my students where feasible and allow the girls to be involved in the planning and creation of multimedia resources. A participatory multimedia learning model involves allowing students to produce or enhance class learning materials (Kiili 2006). The introduction of this approach to learning would lead to greater student inclusion. It would also permit students to show their creativity, and enable talents, not previously seen in my Chemistry class, to emerge. This would help them to better engage with the syllabus and allow them to have fun while learning. True care for my students means that they learn and that they enjoy the learning experience. I could honestly say that I was doing the best that I could for my students if they were enjoying learning. My reflections led to the creation of a plan to intervene in my practice in the hope of enhancing teaching and learning. 3.1 Planning My research study was carried out between October 2011 and May 2012 and consisted of one Action Research cycle. I adopted the framework described by McNiff, Lomax and Whitehead (2003 cited in McNiff and Whitehead 2005a, p.29) to give structure to my work. I had reviewed my practice and identified an area that needed improvement. A study resource was needed for the mandatory Chemistry experiments to enable absent students to view and learn the procedure and as a revision tool for the whole class. I imagined possible ways forward. These included using video podcasts or short animated films. I created some vodcasts and animations but realised that these were more suited to the presentation of theory and not experiments. 19 Video 3.1: The Kinetic Theory of Gases This led me to examine the possible use of video as a means of improving my practice. Farmer’s (1987, p.31) assessment of the use of television in education led to the statement ‘if we can use this dazzle-dust to accomplish our goals in education, we’d be foolish not to take full advantage of it’. A decade later, Harwood and McMahon (1997) found that the appropriate integration of videos into Chemistry classes enabled students to significantly improve their grades. I realised that video might be an appropriate medium to portray Chemistry experiments accurately and to give a clear demonstration of practical techniques. I discussed the idea of video recording in the laboratory with my students, to include them in the decision making process and to adhere to my value of inclusivity. They responded enthusiastically to my suggestion. The path forward would now involve recording a video and observing the effects of this action on teaching and learning in my class. A reflection and evaluation phase would examine if this action helped me to live out my values more fully in my practice. This might then lead me to amend this course of action and perhaps result in further action research cycles. 3.2 Video in education Video is a valuable educational tool, which like many forms of technology can assist learning but cannot inherently cause learning to occur (Schwartz and Hartman 2007; John and Sutherland 2005; Prain and Hand 2003; National Research Council 2000; Tyner 1994). It is claimed that technology facilitates student engagement (Lin, Swan 20 and Kratcoski 2008; Kearsley and Shneiderman 1999) and video excels in this role while also encouraging learning (Schwartz and Hartman 2007). Video can be used in education to help instil in students, a passion for a particular subject (Koumi 2006). However, educators must decide when the use of video is suitable (ibid.) and it is only the appropriate use of relevant video in the classroom that increases the motivation to learn and student engagement (Alessi and Trollip 2001). Technologies such as video can be used in the classroom to engage and motivate students as well as to encourage the growth of students’ creativity (Hobbs 2004). Creativity has traditionally been linked in schools to subjects such as Art, Music or Drama. The Chemistry syllabus refers only once to creativity, quoting it as a general aim for education (NCCA 1999). While studying on the Masters programme in DCU, I became aware that I gave little thought to the fostering of students’ creativity when I was planning my classes. I have always expected assignments to be written or drawn by hand on paper but I have discovered that I should encourage the use of various different media for the presentation of work. This would result in a more genuine embodiment of my value of inclusion in my practice. I now realise that video has the potential to be an extremely useful teaching and learning tool in my Chemistry classes. (Campbell 2012; Shuldman and Tajik 2010; Kearney and Schuck 2006; National Research Council 2000). 3.3 Video in Science education Technology is part of our everyday lives and students expect that the classroom should reflect this (Bisoux 2003). The use of text to explain a technique, a complicated apparatus setup or a chemical reaction is not always sufficient (Drahl 2010; Van Horn 2001b). Instead, video provides students with an opportunity to experience processes and the correct use of equipment by observing experiments being conducted (Koumi 2006). Carrying out an experiment may involve making mistakes or having to repeat it several times which all form part of the learning experience. Video has the potential to enable the student to observe the correctly run experiment but some learning from the real-life experience is lost. Video can however, ‘capture the active, experimental and visual nature of science’ (Hilton 2011, p.311) and videos of laboratory sessions are valuable tools for absent students to maintain progress in class work (Drahl 2010). 21 My Leaving Certificate students are part of the ‘net generation’ (Tapscott 1998, p.3) and have grown up surrounded by multimodal representations of data. They expect more from educators than traditional teaching methods. Technology must be extensively integrated into my Chemistry classes for my value of care to be fully apparent in my work. Learning with technology supports achievement, motivation, engagement, cognitive development and problem solving (Lin, Swan and Kratcoski 2008). The incorporation of ICT into lessons means that in addition to the traditional subject content knowledge and pedagogy knowledge, teachers must also possess technology knowledge (Mishra & Koehler, 2006). Educators who now are integrating IT into the classroom should also be thinking about audio-visual technology such as video (Bisoux 2003). With the acquisition of more ICT equipment in my school in 2011, I had the opportunity to increase my use of technology in the classroom. The value of including relevant video clips in my teaching became evident to me. 3.4 Students as video producers During a discussion with my research supervisor Yvonne Crotty (Skype December 7th 2011), my initial concept of videoing the students carrying out experiments broadened. Yvonne suggested that I consider allowing the students to produce the videos because it would be more engaging. Initially, I struggled with this idea as my students were busy preparing for their Leaving Certificate examinations in June 2012 and were contending with a considerable workload. I was worried that I would be creating an additional burden for them to bear and that perhaps they would be unwilling to participate in the project. However, I realised that a refusal to consider this option would result in my being a ‘living contradiction’ (Whitehead and McNiff 2006, p.32) espousing values, which are not evident in my practice. I could not claim to be upholding my values of care, honesty and inclusion if I chose to ignore this option. I wanted to improve my practice to give my students the best teaching and learning experience that I possibly could. This would not happen if I decided to rule out a possible option without seeking more knowledge about it. When I enquired further about student video-production, I became convinced that this was the only way to proceed despite the challenging nature of filming in the classroom (Van Horn 2001a). Knowledge is constructed and meaningful learning occurs when students learn with technology rather than from technology (Howland, Jonassen and Marra 2012). 22 Providing students with the opportunity to create videos increases their engagement with lesson content and makes learning more enjoyable (Campbell 2012; Levin 2010; Kearney and Schuck 2006; Kimber and Wyatt-Smith 2006; Connelly and Connelly 2004; Meeks and Ilyasova 2003). Student video production is a constructivist, learnercentred approach to education where students actively build their knowledge, adding to their previous learning. The social interaction of students working in groups on video projects also contributes to their learning. Video 3.2: Student Collaboration As a result, student video creation may be classified as a social constructivist process (Masats, Dooly and Costa 2009; Kimber and Wyatt-Smith 2006) with the potential to facilitate rich learning experiences for students (Hernandez-Ramos 2007). It can encourage the development of higher-order and critical thinking skills (Shuldman and Tajik 2010; Brown 2007). Hilton (2011) found that when a mixed ability class created a video of their Science experiments, their delayed post-test results were considerably higher than the results of a similar class who created posters of the experiments and who had previously always achieved slightly higher test results. Kiili (2006) contends that student involvement in the creation of learning materials has the potential to improve learning. This improvement may result from increased student motivation and engagement. Students who are creating videos tend to rehearse first and to revise the finished video many times, which serves to reinforce the learning of the topic (Hilton 2011; Strassman and O’Connell 2007). Educators who have given video assignments to students have noticed that students revise their videos to perfect them and come to appreciate the value of time 23 spent in revision (Shuldman and Tajik 2010; Strassman and O’Connell 2007). The participation of students in the creation of videos promotes meaningful learning (Howland, Jonassen and Marra 2012). 3.5 Video Production and Literacy Literacy was defined traditionally as the ability to read and write. It implied carved, written or printed words on paper, wood, stone or other natural materials. Outside of school, young people are more familiar with new media and technologies than with printed notes and books. The developments in means of communication since the 1980s have led to calls for a broader definition of literacy, to include multiple literacies or multimodal forms of literacy. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation have proposed that literacy is ‘the ability to identify, understand, interpret, create, communicate and compute, using printed and written materials associated with varying contexts’ (UNESCO 2004, p.13). The new communication media affect and shape how we use language. Multiliteracies focus on a variety of modes of representation that include more than language alone (New London Group 1996). Perhaps, our definition of literacy needs broadening to encapsulate video recording (Masats, Dooly and Costa 2009; Siegle 2009). Van Horn (2001b) indicates that education makes less use of video than many other sectors of society. To live out my value of inclusivity, my teaching approach must reflect the literacy skills and learning styles of the twenty first century. The youth of today live in a visual world and assignments involving video creation allow for the development and use of more than text literacy skills (Kearney and Schuck 2006; Meeks and Ilyasova 2003). These assignments enable students to become active learners involved in the construction of their own knowledge (Hoffman Laroche, Wulfsberg and Young 2003) and make the classroom more relevant to students’ wider life experiences (Hobbs 2004; Ivers and Barron 1998). 3.6 Planning for Action The video production process would result in the creation of a digital artefact and also have the potential to affect the learning experience in my classroom. The recording of a video about Chemistry experiments involves three phases (Siegle 2009). Pre-production includes writing a storyboard and a script. The production phase consists of the 24 recording of the film. Post-production involves editing to produce the finished product. Some of the Leaving Certificate Chemistry students had previously made casual unscripted videos using personal mobile devices. They had no previous training in video-making or editing. For this first Action Research cycle students were made responsible for carrying out the first two phases, while the editing would be my task but with input from the students. This removed the need for students to learn how to use the editing software at this time when they were busy, committing many hours each day to study in preparation for the Leaving Certificate. The timeframe for the video creation was controlled by the school timetable, which was affected by pre-Leaving Certificate examinations in addition to Leaving Certificate oral and practical examinations. As the Leaving Certificate students were close to completing the syllabus, one of the few remaining topics, which involved some experiments was selected for the project. The chosen topic was ‘Water’, which includes four mandatory experiments. The experiment titled ‘To measure the total hardness of a water sample’ was the subject of the first video. 3.7 Implementation Phase One The students were assigned the task of drawing up a storyboard and including a script for the experiment. A detailed and complete storyboard was required (Siegle 2009; Kearney and Schuck 2006). Students had envisaged that this would be a very simple task, which would not take up much time. However, they had to ensure that each crucial step of the experiment was filmed and included in the video. The storyboard was sketched and prepared by hand as the students decided that this was their best approach. Video 3.3: Students storyboard and prepare for filming 25 The storyboard provided a visual representation of the script (Owens and Millerson 2012). Once the storyboard had been completed, students were trained in the use of the cameras and the audio equipment in preparation for recording the experiment. Students were filmed throughout this process. Video 3.4: Students learn about the cameras This footage guarantees the authenticity of the students’ work in keeping with Habermas’s criteria of social validity (Habermas 1987 cited in McNiff and Whitehead 2005b). It also highlights students’ enthusiasm and active participation in the process. 3.8 Implementation Phase Two Over a double class period the experiment was completed and filmed by the students. Each student had a role in making the film. Video 3.5: Student Involvement 26 The video was recorded without sound, as students opted to record a voiceover for the experiment instead, using the Garageband software – from Apple’s iLife ’11 suite. Two cameras were used. Students used one of the cameras to film the actual experiment and the second was used to video the students while they made the film. 3.9 Implementation Phase Three The Apple video editing software iMovie ’11 was used to create the final video. Footage from the digital camcorders was downloaded on to the computer. Clips were arranged and the matching audio clips from Garageband were added. Title and text slides were prepared using Apple’s Keynote software and these were inserted among the video clips at appropriate locations. This video, along with student interviews and an interview with another Science teacher in the school were integrated into a single video, which I presented to my class group in DCU for social validation. Feedback from the group led to some slight amendments to the video and it was later presented to a larger group in DCU. 3.10 Observations and Reflections Video evidence shows that all of the students engaged with the process of creating the video storyboard and a lively discussion arose. Each student contributed to the discussion and was actively involved in the storyboard’s construction. The video footage shows a high level of collaboration and the enthusiastic participation of every student in the class. Linguistic (verbal and read-write) learning has traditionally predominated in my classroom as in many other classes and schools. During the storyboarding process, evidence of visual learning appeared. Student attributes such as imagination and creativity emerged (Journal entry 5th March 2012) as the students worked, confirming that video production can release creativity (The New Media Consortium and The Educause Learning Initiative 2008). Students who had previously contributed little to discussions in class found their voice. The students exhibited the twenty first century skills of critical thinking, communication, collaboration and problem solving as they worked (Partnership for 21st century skills 2009). Once the storyboard had been completed, students were trained in the use of the cameras and the audio equipment. 27 The students enjoyed filming the experiment. The video creation process was exciting and fun (Levin 2010; Connelly and Connelly 2004). Video 3.6: Enjoying the process The students worked as a team (Kearney and Schuck 2006) with each member having a particular role. The students displayed confidence in the execution of the experiment and collaboration and discussion were evident throughout. Roles in the class were different to other days. Students who struggle with Chemistry are often reluctant to join in discussions about theory in class. These students excelled at operating the cameras, setting up the apparatus, knowing what was to come next and organising everybody. They became the leaders in the filming process (Journal entry 3rd April 2012). Their practical, organisational skills and common sense ensured that the film production phase ran smoothly. 3.11 Evaluation When all three phases of the video creation had been completed, students were interviewed. Their reaction to the project was overwhelmingly positive as the recorded interviews show. 28 Video 3.7: Reaction to filming Students acknowledge that the process of videoing experiments is engaging, worthwhile and fun. In their interviews, the students claim that the storyboarding and videoing processes have enabled them to learn the experiments better than traditional teaching and learning methods have done with previous experiments. The level of student collaboration that was evident during storyboarding and filming far exceeded any previous level of collaboration in the class. It was apparent that spending time producing a video in their Chemistry lesson resulted in greater communication and collaboration among my students. This finding mirrored the conclusions of several other research studies pertaining to student communication and collaboration. (Hakkarainen 2011; Shuldman and Tajik 2010; Masats, Dooly and Costa 2009; Kearney and Schuck 2006). The students engaged fully with the video project and took ownership of the work. I realised that giving the students more autonomy had a positive impact on the work of my class. The students became more involved in the class work and coped with the experiment without asking for my intervention at any stage. Students take ownership for their own learning in assignments that involve the production of a video, (Levin 2010; Masats, Dooly and Costa 2009). The most striking feature for me was the effect that the storyboarding phase had on the learning outcomes of the lesson. All of the students learned the experiment in detail through this process. Usually we discuss an experiment in class the day before it is carried out. This initial scaffolding is necessary to warn of important precautions, since several of the chemicals used on the Leaving Certificate Chemistry course are dangerous. There are specified mechanisms for mixing certain chemicals and students 29 learn these when they encounter the particular substances in the planning of an experiment. Students read over the experiment and learn the precise details that evening before conducting the experiment the following day. My students have asked questions about the procedure as they set up the apparatus for many of the experiments on the syllabus. I have intervened on several occasions during experiments to ensure that students adopted the correct procedure and that accurate results were recorded. On this occasion, after constructing the storyboard, the students were able to carry out the procedure flawlessly. My role in the class changed, as I was no longer needed for advice during the experiment. My teaching approach became more dialectic and less didactic. In their interviews, several of the students stated that they possessed a more indepth knowledge of the experiment as a result of the filming process. The inclusion of video as a learning and teaching tool in my experiment class led to improved student knowledge of the experiment. In subsequent weeks, the class storyboarded and filmed other experiments and this improvement in learning was again obvious. On one later occasion, we conducted a Chemistry experiment without creating a storyboard. The students themselves observed that they had much less knowledge of this experiment than the other experiments for which they had created storyboards. I realised that my students had acquired a detailed knowledge of the experiment through the process of storyboarding and making a video. With traditional teaching methods, I had never witnessed such levels of student collaboration and participation during an experiment. Using multimedia construction as a learning strategy resulted in some students being more involved in class than usual as it allowed for the expression of multiple literacies. Students’ creativity was no longer stifled but was expressed openly. The experience deepened my belief that a challenging practical examination should form part of the Leaving Certificate Chemistry examination. I noticed that students who have excellent laboratory skills, excelled also in the video creation process. Yet these skills will not be considered in their final examination. Students whose dominant literacy is alphabetic will achieve the highest results even if their laboratory skills are poor. This dichotomy valuing theoretical knowledge more highly than practical skills conflicts with my ontological and epistemological values. My Chemistry class continued to video record each experiment until the syllabus had been completed. These videos are a useful revision tool for the students as they prepare 30 for their Leaving Certificate. One student was absent for one of the more intricate experiments ‘to measure the biochemical oxygen demand of a water sample’. The video of the experiment gave the student an accurate visual representation of the procedure. All of the students acknowledged that the storyboarding and video recording phases were beneficial. It has resulted in greater student engagement with learning and with the content. Student collaboration and critical thinking were also increased. Students with visual rather than linguistic learning styles will probably profit most from the completed videos. Video 3.8: Learning Styles 3.12 Validity and Rigour My standards of judgement for this research are my values – my ontological values of honesty, care and inclusivity and my epistemological stance that we construct knowledge from our experiences. I initially discerned that my values were not being fully lived out in my practice. Throughout the months of the enquiry, I have reflected on my actions in relation to these values. The video interviews confirm that the students engaged with the subject matter while making the video. This indicates for me the truth and authenticity of my claims that my values are better reflected in my practice now than when I initiated this enquiry. I submitted my research to my supervisor, my DCU validation group and critical friend for social validation. My assumption that the teacher creates learning resources for the class came under scrutiny and changed as my knowledge grew. This reflexivity is one of Winter’s six criteria for rigour in Action Research. My values led me to amend my original idea that 31 I would film while the students conducted the experiments. This change followed discussions with my supervisor and provides evidence of dialectic critique in my enquiry. The involvement of my students in the planning stage and in making decision is further evidence of this and of the students being co-researchers in this enquiry. The students and a colleague in the Science department collaborated with me. This study examined my practice. However, the views of others were essential to indicate the plurality of the research. My supervisor, DCU validation group, critical friend and colleagues all observed, advised and contributed to the enquiry. There was risk involved in initiating this project – risk of failure and ridicule from colleagues or students (Journal entry 24th March 2012). My search of relevant literature produced knowledge that inspired my action. Reflection on my action led me to new knowledge about the value of video in my classroom. I realised the importance of integrating multimedia into lessons and of participatory multimedia learning. The completed video confirms the transformation in my Chemistry classroom. 32 4 Overall Reflections This enquiry was initiated in an attempt to respond to my research question ‘How can student video production affect teaching and learning in my Chemistry class?’ I reflected on my practice – reflecting on action and reflecting in action. The Action Research cycle that ensued aligned my practice better with my espoused values of care, honesty and inclusion. It also convinced me of the potential that participatory multimedia learning holds for the enhancement of my Chemistry classes. 4.1 My Learning and My Living Educational Theory The awareness that my teaching was not fully embodying my values inspired me to want to improve my practice. I discovered that my initial idea of videoing my students conducting experiments would have widened the gulf between my avowed and espoused values, as the students were not being included in my decision or in the creation of the resources. The importance of a dialectic approach, discussing and critiquing ideas was highlighted for me when my supervisor suggested that I should allow the students to make the videos. My initial reluctance to adopt this course of action was quickly overcome through discussion with Yvonne who highlighted that it would be much more engaging for students. This was also affirmed as being the right course of action by my engagement with relevant literature and by the realisation that ignoring this option would involve denying my values in my practice. My decision to enable student video production was based on my desire to live out my values in my practice. As a result of this decision, I witnessed that my Leaving Certificate Chemistry class had a more meaningful and enjoyable learning experience through their involvement in the making of videos of experiments. The students’ learning experience changed with the introduction of video recording into the laboratory. They fully engaged with the process and had fun while learning. I learned to overcome my initial hesitancy and to allow the students have greater autonomy (Journal 33 entry 28th February 2012). We became a team with the same goal as I moved away from a more traditional teacher student didactic teaching approach to a more collaborative model. The goal was that the students would learn effectively in an enjoyable way. The students created the storyboard and made all the decisions about the shots and audio that were needed for the finished video. I realised the value of the storyboarding process when the students began to record the video. They now knew the experiment in great detail and needed no help in conducting it accurately and successfully. It confirmed for me what I had now learnt from the reports of other researchers (referenced in this report) about the benefits of learning with technology. My values of honesty, care and inclusion became more evident in my practice through this study. I adopted a new teaching style in an effort to do my job to the best of my ability. I introduced a learning model that is more inclusive of all of the students in my Chemistry class. Hopefully this change in their learning experience will help them to prepare for and achieve their potential in the upcoming Leaving Certificate examination. 4.2 Further Action Research Cycles Video will play a central role in my Chemistry class as I begin with a new group of fifth year students in September 2012. Each experiment will become a video project with the students constructing the storyboard and filming. A further cycle of Action Research is emerging from the cycle completed here. This new cycle will involve students in all three stages of the video creation. Students will initially be trained to edit video using iMovie in the school computer room. It is my hope that the completion of this additional phase of video production will reinforce the learning about the experiment that the students have already gained. A suggestion from a member of my class in DCU that I should involve my students in the creation of animated Chemistry equations is another area that I would particularly like to explore. Through this enquiry, I have witnessed the potential of media creation to engage students and enhance learning. This propels me to reflect on my Mathematics lessons to seek a role for video creation in these classes also 34 and thereby initiate further cycles of Action Research. My enquiry has not ended. In fact, this is very much the beginning of a new phase of my teaching career. 35 References Alessi, S.M. and Trollip, S.R. 2001. Multimedia for learning: Methods and development. 3rd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Bell, J. 2010. Doing your research project. 5th ed. Maidenhead, Berks: Open University Press. Bisoux, T. 2003. Lights . . . Camera . . . Learning! BizEd, 3(1), pp.42-49. Brown, C. 2007. Learning through multimedia construction - a complex strategy. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16(2), pp.93-124. Bruck, L.B. and Towns, M.H. 2009. Preparing students to benefit from inquiry-based activities in the chemistry laboratory: guidelines and suggestions. Journal of Chemical Education, 86(7), pp.820-822. Burton, N., Brundrett, M. and Jones, M. 2008. Doing your education research project. London: Sage. Campbell, L.O. 2012. If you give a kid a video camera. Learning and Leading with Technology, 39(5), pp.30-33. Cohen, L. and Manion, L. 1994. Research methods in education. 4th ed. London: Routledge. Connelly, J. and Connelly, M. 2004. Lights, Camera, Learning! TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 48(2), p.10. Creswell, J. 2009. Research Design. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Criswell, B. 2012. Framing inquiry in high school chemistry: helping students see the bigger picture. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(2), pp.199-205. Cuban, L. 1986. Teachers and machines. New York: Teachers College Press. Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (eds.) 2000. Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Dewey, J. 2007. Democracy and Education. Middlesex: The Echo Library. Drahl, C. 2010. Lights, Camera, Chemistry. Learning how to make lab demonstration videos can pay off for instructors and students. Chemical & Engineering News, 88(6), pp.56-58. Eilks, I. and Byers, B. 2010. The need for innovative methods of teaching and learning chemistry in higher education - reflections from a project of the European Chemistry Thematic Network. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(4), pp.233-240. Farmer, D.L. 1987. The VCR: Raiders as a teaching tool. English Journal, 76(1), p.31. 36 Ferrance, E. 2000. Action Research. Providence, RI: The Education Alliance. Gavaghan, H. 2000. Undergraduate interest in chemistry wanes in Europe. Nature: International Weekly Journal of Science, 406(6797), p.809. Guba, E. and Lincoln, Y. 1994. Competing paradigms in qualitative research IN: Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (eds.) Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.105-117. Hakkarainen, P. 2011. Promoting meaningful learning through video productionsupported PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 5(1), pp.34-53. Harwood, W.S. and McMahon, M.M. 1997. Effects of integrated video media on student achievement and attitudes in high school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), pp.617-631. Heikkinen, H.L.T., Huttunen, R., Syrjälä, L. and Pesonen, J. 2012. Action research and narrative inquiry: five principles for validation revisited. Educational Action Research, 20(1), pp.5-21. Hernandez-Ramos, P. 2007. Teachers learning to "do" video: aim, shoot, ready! British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(1), pp.33-41. Hilton, G. 2011. Rehearsing for an audience: students learning science through video production. International Journal of Innovation & Learning, 9(3), pp.311-324. Hinchey, P.H. 2008. Action Research Primer. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc. Hobbs, R. 2004. A Review of School-Based Initiatives in Media Literacy Education. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(1), pp.42-59. Hoffman Laroche, L., Wulfsberg, G. and Young, B. 2003. Discovery Videos: A safe, tested, time-efficient way to incorporate discovery-laboratory experiments into the classroom. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(8), pp.962-966. Howland, J.L., Jonassen, D. and Marra, R.M. 2012. Meaningful learning with technology. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education. Interdepartmental Committee on Science, Technology and Innovation 2006. Strategy for Science, Technology and Innovation [Online]. Available from: http://www.agriculture.gov.ie/media/migration/research/Strategy%20for%20Science%2 0Technology%20and%20Innovation%202006%202013.pdf [Accessed 19 April 2012]. Ivers, K.S. and Barron, A.E. 1998. Multimedia projects in education: designing, producing and assessing. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited. John, P. and Sutherland, R. 2005. Affordance, opportunity and the pedagogical implications of ICT. Educational Review, 57(4), pp.405-413. Kearney, M. and Schuck, S. 2006. Spotlight on authentic learning: Student developed digital video projects. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(2), pp.189208. 37 Kearsley, G. and Shneiderman, B. 1999. Engagement Theory: a framework for technology-based teaching and learning [Online]. Available from: http://home.sprynet.com/~gkearsley/engage.htm [Accessed 22 March 2012]. Kiili, K. 2006. Towards a Participatory Multimedia Learning Model. Education & Information Technologies, 11(1), pp.21-32. Kimber, K. and Wyatt-Smith, C. 2006. Using and creating knowledge with new technologies: a case for students-as-designers. Learning, Media and Technology, 31(1), pp.19-34. King, K.P. and Gura, M. 2007. Podcasting for teachers. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc. Koumi, J. 2006. Designing video and multimedia for open and flexible learning. Abingdon, OX: Routledge. Levin, S. 2010. Student Created Videos. Knowledge Quest, 38(4), pp.52-55. Lin, Y., Swan, K. and Kratcoski, A. 2008. Scaffolding learning through multimedia development. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17(3), pp.363-385. Logar, A. and Savec, V.F. 2011. Students' hands-on experimental work vs lecture demonstration in teaching elementary school chemistry. Acta Chimica Slovenica, 58(4), pp.866-875. Masats, D., Dooly, M. and Costa, X. 2009. Exploring the potential of language learning through video making. IN: Edulearn09 Conference [Online]. Available from: http://divisproject.eu/attachments/083_EDULEARN_09_DIVIS.pdf [Accessed 28 March 2012]. McNiff, J. 2002. Action research for professional development [Online]. Available from: http://www.jeanmcniff.com/ar-booklet.asp [Accessed 15 October 2011]. McNiff, J., Lomax, P. and Whitehead, J. 1996. You and your action research project. London: Routledge. McNiff, J. and Whitehead, J. 2009. Doing and writing action research. London: Sage. McNiff, J. and Whitehead, J. 2005a. Action Research for Teachers. Abingdon, Oxon: David Fulton Publishers. McNiff, J. and Whitehead, J. 2005b. Teachers as educational theorists: transforming epistemological hegemonies [Online]. Available from: http://www.jeanmcniff.com/items.asp?id=25 [Accessed 04 January 2012]. Meeks, M. and Ilyasova, A. 2003. A review of digital video production in postsecondary English classrooms at three universities. Kairos [Online], 8(2). Available from: http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/8.2/binder.html?reviews/meeksilyasova/index.htm [Accessed 03 April 2012] 38 Mishra, P. and Koehler, M.J. 2006. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), pp.1017-1054. Moon, J.A. 2006. Learning journals: a handbook for reflective practice and professional development. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge. National Council for Curriculum and Assessment 2002. Chemistry: Guidelines for teachers. Dublin: Government Publications. National Council for Curriculum and Assessment 1999. Chemistry Syllabus. Dublin: Stationery Office. National Research Council 2000. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Expanded ed. Washington: The National Academies Press. New London Group 1996. A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), pp.60-92. O'Brien, R. 2001. An Overview of the Methodological Approach of Action Research [Online]. Available from: http://www.web.ca/~robrien/papers/arfinal.html [Accessed 20 December 2011]. Owens, J. and Millerson, G. 2012. Video Production Handbook. 5th ed. Oxford: Focal Press. Partnership for 21st century skills 2009. Framework for 21st century learning [Online]. Available from: http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/P21_Framework.pdf [Accessed 03 March 2012]. Prain, V. and Hand, B. 2003. Using New Technologies for Learning: A Case Study of a Whole-School Approach. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(4), pp.441-458. Prensky, M. 2010. Teaching Digital Natives: Partnering for real learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Prensky, M. 2001. Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), pp.16. Prince, M. and Felder, R. 2007. The many faces of inductive teaching and learning. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(5), pp.14-20. Regan, E. and Childs, P. 2003. An investigation of Irish students' attitudes to chemistry: the promotion of chemistry in schools project. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 4(1), pp.45-53. Richardson, W. 2010. Blogs, Wikis, Podcasts and other powerful web tools for classrooms. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Schön, D. 1995. The new scholarship requires a new epistemology. Change, 27(6), pp.26-34. 39 Schwartz, D.L. and Hartman, K. 2007. It is not television anymore: Designing digital video for learning and assessment [Online]. Available from: http://aaalab.stanford.edu/papers/Designed_Video_for_Learning.pdf [Accessed 01 April 2012]. Shuldman, M. and Tajik, M. 2010. The role of media/video production in non-media disciplines: the case of health promotion. Learning, Media and Technology, 35(3), pp.357-362. Siegle, D. 2009. Literacy in the 21st century: the fourth r - video recording. Gifted Child Today, 32(2), pp.14-19. Stein, E. 1996. Essays on Woman, translated by Oben, F.M. 2nd ed. Washington: ICS Publications. Strassman, B.K. and O'Connell, T. 2007. Authoring with video. The Reading Teacher, 61(4), pp.330-333. Tapscott, D. 1998. Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill. The New Media Consortium and The Educause Learning Initiative 2008. The Horizon Report. Austin, TX: New Media Consortium and Educause Learning Initiative. Tyner, K. 1994. Video in the classroom: A tool for reform. Arts Education Policy Review, 96(1), pp.18-26. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation 2004. The plurality of literacy and its implications for policies and programmes. Paris: UNESCO. Van Horn, R. 2001a. Shooting Classroom Video. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(2), pp.107-108. Van Horn, R. 2001b. Digital Video: Get with It! Phi Delta Kappan, 82(10), pp.799-800. Wetzel, C.D., Radtke, P.H. and Stern, H.W. 1994. Instructional effectiveness of video media. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Whitehead, J. 2011. Using a living theory methodology in improving practice and generating educational knowledge in living theories IN: Farren, M., Whitehead, J. and Bognar, B. (eds.) Action Research in the Educational Workplace. Palo Alto, CA Academica Press, pp.1-32. Whitehead, J. and McNiff, J. 2006. Action Research Living Theory. London: Sage Publications. 40 Glossary Ethnography A qualitative research methodology used to study people and cultures. Le Chéile Schools Trust The Le Chéile Schools Trust comprises the schools of thirteen religious congregations. The aim of the Trust is to carry on the legal, financial and inspirational role of trusteeship that has, previously, been done by the individual congregations. Multiliteracies A definition of literacy that focuses on a broad range of modes of representation and not just language alone. Paradigm A set of basic beliefs. Participatory Multimedia Learning Learning that involves the learners in the creation of multimedia course learning materials. Phenomenology A branch of philosophy that deals with things of which we have conscious experience. Podcast Audio files on the internet which are subscribed to via a dedicated feed. Pure Chemistry The theory of Chemistry Vodcast A podcast enhanced with video or a slideshow. Voluntary Secondary School A second level school that is privately owned and managed. Most are non-fee-paying. Appendix A Action Research Cycle Reconsider the position in light of the evaluation Review my current practice Identify an aspect I want to improve Evaluate the modified action Imagine a way forward Modify plan and continue Try it out Take stock of what happens McNiff, Lomax and Whitehead (2003 cited in McNiff and Whitehead 2005a, p.29) A1 Appendix B Sample pages from a student’s laboratory notebook B1 B2 Appendix C Extracts from Students’ Storyboard C1 Appendix D Extract from the completed storyboard The Storyboard D1 Appendix E Student Interview Questions 1) How does practical work contribute to your study of Leaving Certificate Chemistry? 2) Do you think Chemistry has a role in the Leaving Certificate Chemistry classroom? 3) Discuss how your laboratory skills have changed over the last two years. 4) Does the recent ban on doing certain experiments have any impact on your studies? 5) What happens if you are absent for an experiment? 6) Discuss your experience of videoing Chemistry experiments. 7) What effect if any might making these videos have on your learning of Chemistry? E1 Appendix F Teacher Interview Questions 1) In your opinion, what importance or role do experiments hold in the school Science curricula? 2) What role does discovery learning have in relation to the mandatory experiments? 3) What happens if a student is absent for a mandatory experiment and what impact does it have on learning? 4) If a student is absent what resources are available for them to learn the experiment and are these sufficient? 5) Experiments involve student collaboration. Other than helping with carrying out the procedure in a short time span has this collaboration any other benefits? F1 Appendix G Sample Permission Form for School Principal and Board of Management G1 Request for permission to carry out a low-risk research project Project Title: How can student video production affect teaching and learning in my Chemistry class? Applicant Name and E-mail: Mary O’Toole email: [email protected] Level of Study: Taught MSc in Education and Training Management (eLearning strand). Supervisor Name and E-mail: Ms. Yvonne Crotty email: [email protected] Proposed Dates for the Research Project It is proposed that the research will take place between February and May 2012. It is proposed that the thesis will be completed by June 30th 2012. Description of the proposed research: The research proposes an examination of the use of video as a tool for teaching and learning chemistry experiments in a secondary school. Students will create a video of some of the Leaving Certificate experiments. They will begin by storyboarding the experiment, planning each step in full detail. They will film the experiment as they carry it out, from the setup stage to completion. Students reaction to the use of video both during the creation phase and afterwards, will be observed and recorded. Video and a reflective journal will be used for this purpose. The investigation will centre around whether the use of video will enhance teaching and learning, improve student engagement, appeal to a wider range of learning styles and provide a useful resource for revision and a means for absent students to gain a better understanding of an experiment than a textbook can provide. G2 The proposed methodology: It is proposed that the research will be carried out using an action research methodology. My values of inclusiveness (for my teaching to appeal to different learning styles), of caring (wanting my students to achieve their full potential in chemistry while enjoying the process) and honesty (wanting to do the best that I can for the students in my class) are fundamental to my research question. I want my practice to reflect my values and would propose using action research to reflect on and improve my current work in the classroom. As a result, the research would involve using Jack Whitehead’s Living Education Theory approach to action research. Data collection methods will include recorded video interviews, video footage of participants while they are involved in creating the videos, observations and field notes, my use of a reflective journal. The means by which potential participants will be recruited: A non-probability sampling technique is used for this research. Purposive sampling is used to select the potential participants. From the nature of the research, the participants will be Leaving Certificate Chemistry students whom I teach. Participation will be voluntary and based on informed consent. How will the anonymity of the participants be respected? Participants’ names will not be used unless they wish to be named. Video material will be securely stored and any that is not included in the final video will be destroyed within a year. What risks are researchers or participants being exposed to, if any? It is not envisaged that that the research will pose any risk to participants from their involvement in the research. G3 The practical experimental work is not increasing the danger to which students would be exposed since the students must carry out these experiments as part of the Leaving Certificate syllabus. Permission I give permission for the above research to be carried out in St. Paul’s Secondary School and for the results of the research and the video to be submitted by Mary O’Toole as part of the M.Sc. in Education and Training Management (eLearning) in Dublin City University. Signed: ________________________________ Position: ________________________________ Date: ________________________________ G4 Appendix H Sample Permission Form for Parents H1 Informed Consent Form I. Research Study Title How can student video production affect teaching and learning in my Chemistry class? This research will be submitted as part of the MSc in Education and Training Management. The principal investigator is Mary O’Toole, email: [email protected] II. Clarification of the purpose of the research The research will help to add to the body of knowledge about the use of video in the classroom, especially the role of video in teaching practical techniques. It will provide the participants with a resource to assist them when revising for the Leaving Certificate. Any student who is absent for the experiment may also benefit from the completed video. III. Confirmation of particular requirements as highlighted in the Plain Language Statement As stated in the plain Language Statement, participants will create a video and will be filmed while they storyboard and film. Participants will be requested to take part in video interviews. Participants will be observed while working on the chemistry experiment and these observations will be recorded in my journal. Parent/Guardian – please complete the following (Circle Yes or No for each question) Have you and your daughter read the Plain Language Statement? Yes/No Do you and your daughter understand the information provided? Yes/No Have you and/or your daughter been offered the opportunity to ask questions and discuss this study? Yes/No Have you and your daughter received satisfactory answers to any questions that you may have had? Yes/No Are you aware that your daughter will be videoed while carrying out the experiment and in interviews? Yes/No H2 IV. Confirmation that involvement in the Research Study is voluntary Participant involvement in the research is voluntary. Participants may withdraw from the research at any point and there is no penalty for withdrawing before all stages of the research have been completed. V. Advice as to arrangements to be made to protect confidentiality of data, including that confidentiality of information provided is subject to legal limitations Participants’ names will not be used unless they wish to be named. Video material will be securely stored and any that is not included in the final video will be destroyed within a year. VI. Any other relevant information Participation or non-participation in the research will have no effect on a student’s grades or class participation. VII. Signature: I have read and understood the information in this form. My questions and concerns have been answered, and I have a copy of this consent form. Therefore, I give consent for my daughter to take part in this research project Signature of Parent: Name in Block Capitals: Date: Participant’s Signature: Name in Block Capitals: H3 Appendix I Sample Project Information Sheet for Parents and Students I1 Plain Language Statement I. Introduction to the Research Study The title of the research study is How can student video production affect teaching and learning in my Chemistry class? This research will be submitted as part of the MSc in Education and Training Management (eLearning). The principal investigator is Mary O’Toole, email: [email protected] II. Details of what involvement in the Research Study will require Participants will prepare for a chemistry experiment by producing a detailed plan for the experiment. They will then film the running of the experiment. The participants will be filmed as they plan, storyboard and make the video. Their comments and observations will be recorded on video and in my journal. Participants will be required to take part in two recorded video interviews. The recorded interviews will each be no longer than five minutes. III. Potential risks to participants from involvement in the Research Study (if greater than that encountered in everyday life) It is not envisaged that the research will pose any risks to the participants. IV. Benefits (direct or indirect) to participants from involvement in the Research Study The research will help to add to the body of knowledge about the use of video in the classroom, in particular about its use for teaching practical techniques. It will provide the participants with a resource to assist them when revising for the Leaving Certificate. Any participant who is absent for the experiment will have the video as a learning tool to gain a more realistic view of the experiment than a textbook can provide. V. Advice as to arrangements to be made to protect confidentiality of data, including that confidentiality of information provided is subject to legal limitations. Participants’ names will not be used unless they wish to be named. Video material will be securely stored and any that is not included in the final video will be destroyed within a year. I2 VI. Advice as to whether or not data is to be destroyed after a minimum period Any data that is not included in the final video will be destroyed after one year. VII. Statement that involvement in the Research Study is voluntary Participant involvement in the research is voluntary. Participants may withdraw from the research at any point and there is no penalty for withdrawing before all stages of the research have been completed. VIII. Any other relevant information Participation or non-participation in the research will have no effect on a students’ grades or participation in my class. If participants have concerns about this study and wish to contact an independent person, please contact: The Principal, St. Paul’s Secondary School, Greenhills, Dublin 12. Tel 01 - 4505682 or The Secretary, Dublin City University Research Ethics Committee, c/o Office of the Vice-President for Research, Dublin City University, Dublin 9. Tel 01 - 7008000 I3