Plan de cours

PLAN DE COURS
EQUALITY AND DIVERSITY IN THE
UNITED STATES
Professeur(s) : Daniel SABBAGH
Année universitaire 2016/2017 : Semestre d’automne
COURSE SESSION
Session 1 : Introduction ; organization of the work schedule ; liberal theories of
justice and equality (I)
Session 2 : Liberal theories of justice and equality (II)
Presentation : An introduction to John Rawls’ Theory of Justice
Reading: RAWLS, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1971, pp. 3-53.
References
•
ACKERMAN, Bruce, Social Justice in the Liberal State, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1980.
•
ANDERSON, Elisabeth, « What is the Point of Equality? », Ethics, January 1999, pp. 287-337.
•
BARRY, Brian, Theories of Justice, vol. 1, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1989.
•
DUPUY, Jean-Pierre, Libéralisme et justice sociale : Le sacrifice et l’envie, Paris, Calmann-Lévy,
1992.
•
DWORKIN, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press, 1977.
•
DWORKIN, Ronald, Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality, Cambridge (Mass.),
2000.
•
ELSTER, Jon, Local Justice: How Institutions Allocate Goods and Necessary Burdens, New York,
Cambridge University Press, 1992.
•
HOLMES, Stephen, The Anatomy of Antiliberalism, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press,
1993.
•
HONNETH, Axel and FRASER, Nancy, Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical
Exchange, New York, Verso, 2003.
•
LARMORE, Charles, Patterns of Moral Complexity, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987.
•
MASON, Andrew, Levelling the Playing Field: The Idea of Equal Opportunity and
•
its Place in Egalitarian Thought, Oxford University Press, 2006.
•
NOZICK, Robert, Anarchy, State, and Utopia, New York, Basic Books, 1974.
•
RAE, Douglas et al., Equalities, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press,1981.
•
RAWLS, John, Political Liberalism, New York, Columbia University Press, 1993.
11.07.2016
1
PLAN DE COURS
•
RAWLS, John, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Cambridge (Harvard University Press), 2002.
•
RAWLS, John, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press, 1971.
•
RAYNAUD, Philippe, “Égalité”, in Stéphane Rials and Philippe Raynaud (eds.), Dictionnaire de
•
RAZ, Joseph, The Morality of Freedom, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1986.
•
SANDEL, Michael, Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University
philosophie politique, Paris, PUF, 1996.
Press, 1982.
•
SAVIDAN, Patrick. Repenser l’égalité des chances, Paris, Grasset, 2007.
•
SEN, Amartya, Inequality Reexamined, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press ; New York,
Russell Sage Foundation, 1992.
•
SEN, Amartya, The Idea of Justice. Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press, 2009.
•
WALZER, Michael, Spheres of Justice, New York, Basic Books, 1983.
•
WALZER, Michael, MILLER, David (eds.), Pluralism, Justice, and Equality, Oxford, Oxford University
Press, 1995.
1
Supreme Court Case : San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1 (1973)
Session 3 : Nationalism and multiculturalism
Presentation : Are nationalism and multiculturalism in conflict ?
Reading:
•
LEVY, Jacob, “Classifying Cultural Rights”, in Shapiro and Kymlicka (1997): 22-66.
References
•
BAILYN, Bernard, The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard
•
BARRY, Brian, Culture and Equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism, Polity Press, 2001.
•
CARENS, Joseph, Culture, Citizenship, and Community: A Contextual Exploration of Justice as
University Press, 1967.
Evenhandedness, Oxford University Press, 2000.
•
ETZIONI, Amitai, The Monochrome Society, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2001.
•
KUKATHAS, Chandras, The Liberal Archipelago: A Theory of Diversity and Freedom, Oxford
University Press, 2007.
•
KYMLICKA, Will. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights, Oxford University
Press, 1995.
1
Some of the cases that we will consider are reprinted in part (in English and in French) in Elisabeth Zoller (ed.), Grands arrêts de la
Cour suprême des États-Unis, Paris, PUF, 2002 (which also contains the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution). Most
of these cases can be found on the web by simply googling their titles.
11.07.2016
2
PLAN DE COURS
•
KYMLICKA, Will, Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Citizenship, Oxford,
Oxford University Press, 2001.
•
KYMLICKA, Will (ed.), The Rights of Minority Cultures, Oxford University Press, 1995.
•
LIEVEN, Anatol, America Right or Wrong: An Anatomy of American Nationalism, Oxford University
Press, 2012
•
MARGALIT, Avishai and RAZ, Joseph, “National Self-Determination”, Journal of Philosophy 87,
1990: 439-461.
•
MASON, Andrew, “Political Community, Liberal-Nationalism, and the Ethics of Assimilation”, Ethics
109, 1999: 261-286.
•
MILLER, David, On Nationality, Oxford University Press, 1995.
•
PANGLE, Thomas, The Spirit of Modern Republicanism, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press,
•
PHILLIPS, Anne, Multiculturalism without Culture, Princeton University Press, 2007
•
SHAPIRO, Ian et KYMLICKA, Will (eds), Ethnicity and Group Rights, New York University Press,
1988.
1997.
•
TAYLOR, Charles, et. al., Multiculturalism and « The Politics of Recognition » (Amy Gutmann ed.),
Princeton University Press, 1994.
•
WALDRON, Jeremy, « Minority Cultures and the Cosmopolitan Alternative », in Will Kymlicka, ed.,
The Rights of Minority Cultures, Oxford University Press, 1995, p. 93-119.
•
WALZER, Michael, On Toleration, Yale University Press, 1997.
•
WALZER, Michael, What It Means to Be an American, Marsilio, 1992.
•
WOOD, Gordon, The Creation of the American Republic, 1776-1787, Chapel Hill, University of North
Carolina Press, 1969.
Supreme Court Cases: Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972); Employment Division, Department of
Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990).
Session 4 : Immigration and citizenship
Presentation: Are the United States the country of the ‘melting-pot’?
Readings
•
Walzer, Michael. “What does it mean to be an American?”, Social Research, fall 2004
•
Hansen, Randall (2009). “Immigration and Immigration Reform in the United
•
States: An Outsider’s View”, The Forum, 7 (3), 2009.
References
•
ALBA, Richard, Blurring the Color Line: The New Chance for a More Integrated America, Harvard
University Press, 2009.
11.07.2016
3
PLAN DE COURS
•
ALBA, Richard and NEE, Victor. Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and
Contemporary Immigration, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press, 2003.
•
BERLIN, Ira, Generations of Captivity: A History of African-American Slaves, Cambridge (Mass.),
•
BORJAS, George, Heaven’s Door: Immigration Policy and the American Economy, Princeton
Harvard University Press, 2003.
University Press, 1999.
•
BRUBAKER, Rogers. “The Return of Assimilation? Changing Perspectives on Immigration and Its
Sequels in France, Germany, and the United States”, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24 (4), 2001, pp.
531-48.
•
GLEASON, Philip, Speaking of Diversity: Language and Ethnicity in Twentieth-Century America,
Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992.
•
GORDON, Milton, Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion and National Origins,
Oxford University Press, 1964.
•
HAWKINS, Mike, Social Darwinism in European and American Thought, 1860-1945, Cambridge
University Press, 1998.
•
HIGHAM, John, Strangers in the Land: Patterns of American Nativism, 1860-1925, Rutgers
University Press, 1988.
•
KALLEN, Horace, Culture and Democracy in the United States: Studies in the Group Psychology of
the American People, New York, Boni and Liveright, 1924.
•
KASINITZ, Philip, MOLLENKOPF, John, WATERS, Mary and Holdaway,
•
Jennifer, Inheriting the City: The Children of Immigrants Come of Age, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard
University Press, 2008.
•
KING, Desmond, Making Americans: Immigration, Race and the Origins of the Diverse Democracy,
•
LACORNE, Denis, La Crise de l’identité américaine, Paris, Fayard, 1997.
•
LIND, Michael. The Next American Nation: The New Nationalism and the Fourth American
Harvard University Press, 2000.
Revolution, Free Press, 1995.
•
MANN, Arthur, The One and the Many: Reflections on the American Identity, The University of
Chicago Press, 1979.
•
NEUMAN, Gerald, Strangers to the Constitution: Immigrants, Borders, and Fundamental Law,
Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1996.
•
NOVICK, Peter, The Holocaust and Collective Memory, London, Bloomsbury, 2000.
•
PERLMANN, Joel, Italians Then, Mexicans Now: Immigrant Origins and Second-Generation
Progress, 1890 to 2000, Russell Sage Foundation, 2006.
•
RUMBAUT, Ruben, PORTES, Alejandro (ed.), Ethnicities: Children of Immigrants in America,
•
SCHUCK, Peter, Citizens, Strangers, and In-Betweens:: Essays on Immigration and Citizenship,
Berkeley, University of California Press, 2001.
Westview, 1998.
•
SAFI, Mirna, “Penser l’intégration des immigrés: les enseignements de la sociologie américaine”,
Sociologie, 2011/2, vol. 2, pp. 149-164.
11.07.2016
4
PLAN DE COURS
•
SCOTT FITZGERALD David et COOK MARTIN David, Culling the Masses: The Democratic Origins
of Racist Immigration Policy in the Americas, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press, 2014.
•
SKERRY, Peter, Mexican Americans: The Ambivalent Minority, Free Press, 1993.
•
SLEZKINE, Yuri, The Jewish Century, Princeton University Press, 2004.
•
SMITH, Rogers, Civic Ideals: Conflicting Visions of Citizenship in American Law, Yale University
Press, 1997.
•
TICHENOR, Daniel, Dividing Lines: The Politics of Immigration Control in America, Princeton,
•
TODD, Emmanuel, Le Destin des immigrés : Assimilation et ségrégation dans les démocraties
Princeton University Press, 2002.
occidentales, Le Seuil, 1994.
•
UEDA, Reed, Postwar Immigrant America: A Social History, Saint-Martin’s Press, 1994.
•
WALDINGER, Roger, Still the Promised City? African Americans and New Immigrants in
Postindustrial New York, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press, 1996.
•
WATERS, Mary, Black Identities: West Indian Immigrant Dreams and American Realities, Harvard
University Press; New York, Russell Sage Foundation, 1999.
•
Weil, Patrick, The Sovereign Citizen: Denaturalization and the Origins of the American Republic,
University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012.
Supreme Court cases: Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857) ; Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356
(1886) ; U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898); Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944) ;
Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202 (1982).
Session 5:The American system of ethno-racial classification : past and present (I)
Presentation : The historical definition(s) of blackness
Readings
•
WAGLEY, Charles. « On the Concept of Social Race in the Americas ». In D. B. Heath and R.N.
Adams (eds), Contemporary Cultures and Societies of Latin America, New York, Random House,
1965, pp. 531-545.
•
TEHRANIAN, John, « Performing Whiteness: Naturalization Litigation and the Construction of Racial
Identity », Yale Law Journal, 109 (4), 2000, pp. 817-848.
References
•
DAVIES, James F., Who is Black? One Nation’s Definition, Pennsylvania State University Press,
1991.
•
DEGLER, Carl, Neither Black Nor White: Slavery and Race Relations in Brazil and the United States,
Macmillan, 1971.
•
FREDRICKSON, George, Racism: A Short History, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2002.
11.07.2016
5
PLAN DE COURS
•
GROSS, Ariela, What Blood Won’t Tell: A History of Race on Trial in America, Harvard University
Press, 2008.
•
HANEY LOPEZ Ian, White By Law: The Legal Construction of Race, New York, New York University
•
HARRIS Marvin, Patterns of Race in the Americas, New York, Norton, 1964.
•
JACOBSON, Matthew F., Whiteness of a Different Color: European Immigrants and the Alchemy of
Press, 1996.
Race, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press, 1998.
•
JORDAN, Winthrop, White over Black: American Attitudes Toward the Negro, 1550-1812, Chapel
Hill, University of North Carolina Press, 1968.
•
MARX, Anthony, Making Race and Nation: A Comparison of the United States, South Africa and
Brazil, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
•
SAPERSTEIN, Aliya and PENNER, Andrew. « Racial Fluidity and Inequality in the United States »,
American Journal of Sociology, 118 (3), 2012, p. 676-727.
•
SHELBY, Tommie. We Who Are Dark: The Philosophical Foundations of Black Solidarity. Cambridge
(Mass.): Harvard University Press, 2005.
•
TERRY, Don, « Getting Under My Skin », in Correspondents of the New York Times, How Race is
Lived in America, New York, Times Books, 2001, pp. 269-284.
•
WACQUANT, Loic. « For an Analytic of Racial Domination », Political Power and Social Theory, vol.
11, 1997, pp. 221-234.
•
Williamson, Joel. New People: Mulattoes and Miscegenation in the United States. Chapel Hill:
Louisiana State University Press, 1995
Supreme Court cases: United States v. Ozawa, 260 U.S. 178 (1922) ; United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind,
261 U.S. 204 (1923) ; Anderson v. Martin, 375 U.S. 399 (1964).
Session 6 : The American system of ethno-racial classification : past and present (II)
Presentation : Race in the American census
Reading:
•
SKERRY, Peter. Counting on the Census? Race, Group Identity, and the Evasion of Politics,
Brookings Institution, 2000, pp. 43-80.
References
•
ANDERSON, Margo and FIENBERG, S. E. Who Counts? The Politics of Census-Taking in
Contemporary America, Russell Sage Foundation, 1999.
•
KETZER, D.I. and AREL, Dominique (eds), Census and Identity: The Politics of Race, Ethnicity and
Language in National Censuses, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002.
•
FORD, Christopher A., « Administering Identity: The Determination of ‘Race’ in Race-Conscious
Law », California Law Review, October 1994, 82 (5), pp. 1231-1285.
11.07.2016
6
PLAN DE COURS
•
HATTAM, Victoria, In the Shadow of Race: Jews, Latinos, and Immigrant Politics in the United
States, The University of Chicago Press, 2007.
•
MORNING, Ann. The Nature of Race: How Scientists Think and Teach about Human Difference,
•
MORNING, Ann, “Ethnic Classification in Global Perspective: A Cross-National Survey of the 2000
Berkeley, University of California Press, 2011.
Census Round”, Population Research Policy Review, 27, 2008, pp. 239-72.
•
NOBLES, Melissa, Shades of Citizenship: Race and the Census in Modern Politics, Stanford,
•
PERLMANN, Joel and WATERS, Mary (eds), The New Race Question: How the Census Counts
Stanford University Press, 2000.
Multiracial Individuals, New York, Russell Sag Foundation, 2002.
•
PREWITT, Kenneth. What is Your Race? The Census and Our Flawed Efforts to Classify Americans,
•
RODRIGUEZ, Clara, Changing Race: Latinos, the Census and the History of Ethnicity in the United
Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2013.
States, New York, New York University Press, 2000.
•
SCHOR, Paul, Compter et classer : histoire des recensements américains, Presses de l’EHESS,
•
SCHOR, Paul. Les « immigrés », objets et sujets des statistiques. La négociation des catégories de
2009.
l’origine dans le recensement américain, 1860-1940 », Raisons politiques, 1992, n° 2, pp. 27-46.
•
SIMON, Patrick. « La statistique des origines : l’ethnicité et la « race » dans les recensements aux
•
THERNSTROM, Stephan, « American Ethnic Statistics », in Donald Horowitz et Gérard Noiriel (eds),
États-Unis, Canada et Grande-Bretagne », Sociétés contemporaines, avril 1997, n° 26, pp. 11-43.
Immigrants in Two Democracies: French and American Experience, New York, New York University
Press, 1992.
•
WATERS, Mary, Ethnic Options: Choosing Identities in America, Berkeley, University of California
Press, 1990.
Session 7 : From racial segregation to universal non-discrimination ? (I)
Presentation : Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954)
Readings:
•
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896)
•
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka
(http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=347&invol=483
References
•
BALKIN, Jack, and ACKERMAN, Bruce (eds), What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said,
New York, New York University Press, 2001.
11.07.2016
7
PLAN DE COURS
•
BERGER, Raoul, Government by Judiciary: The Transformation of the XIVth Amendment,
Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press, 1977.
•
FONER, Eric, Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877, New York, Harper &
•
FREDRICKSON, George, The Black Image in the White Mind: The Debate on Afro-American
Row, 1988.
Character and Destiny, 1817-1914, New York, Harper & Row, 1971.
•
GERSTLE, Gary, American Crucible: Race and Nation in the Twentieth Century, Princeton
•
KENNEDY, Randall, Race, Crime, and the Law, New York, Pantheon, 1997.
•
KENNEDY, Randall, Interracial Intimacies: Sex, Marriage, Identity and Adoption, New York,
University Press, 2001.
Pantheon, 2003.
•
KING, Desmond, Separate and Unequal: Black Americans and the U.S. Federal Government,
Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1995.
•
KLARMAN, Michael, From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial
Equality, Oxford University Press, 2004.
•
KLUGER, Richard, Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America’s
Struggle for Equality, New York, Vintage Books, 1977.
•
KOPPELMAN, Andrew, Antidiscrimination Law and Social Equality, New Haven, Yale University
Press, 1996.
•
KULL, Andrew, The Color-Blind Constitution, Harvard University Press, 1992.
•
PATTERSON, James, Brown v. Board of Education: A Civil Rights Milestone and Its Troubled
Legacy, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001.
•
ROSENBERG, Gerald, The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change?, University of
•
TUSHNET, Mark, The NAACP’s Legal Strategy Against Segregated Education, 1925-1950, Chapel
Chicago Press, 1991
Hill, University of North Carolina Press, 1987.
•
WILSON, William Julius, When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor, Knopf, 1996.
Supreme Court cases : Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883) ; Pace v. Alabama, 106 U.S. 583 (1883) ;
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896) ; Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948) ; Brown v. Board of
Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) ; Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States, 379 U.S. 241 (1964) ;
McLaughlin v. Florida, 379 U.S. 184 (1964) ; Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967) ; Palmer v. Thompson,
403 U.S. 217 (1971) ; Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1(1971) ; Palmore v.
Sidoti, 466 U.S. 329 (1982).
Session 8 :From racial segregation to universal non-discrimination ? (II)
Presentation : The legal history of gender equality in the U.S.
11.07.2016
8
PLAN DE COURS
Reading:
•
SONG, Sarah, Justice, Gender, and the Politics of Multiculturalism, Cambridge University Press,
2007, pp. 85-113
References
•
CANADAY, Margot, The Straight State: Sexuality and Citizenship in Twentieth-Century America,
Princeton University Press, 2009.
•
DEVAUX, Monique, Gender and Justice in Multicultural States, Oxford University Press, 2007.
•
EPSTEIN, Richard, Forbidden Grounds: The Case Against Employment Discrimination Laws,
Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press, 1992.
•
ESKRIDGE, William and SPEDALE, Darren, Gay Marriage: for Better or for Worse?, Oxford
University Press, 2006.
•
GERSTMANN, Evan, Same-Sex Marriage and the Constitution, Cambridge University Press, 2003.
•
INGLEHART, Ronald, Norris, Pippa, Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the
World, Cambridge University Press, 2003.
•
KOPPELMAN, Andrew, The Gay Rights Question in American Law, Chicago, The University of
•
MacKINNON, Catharine, Sexual Harassment of Working Women, New Haven, Yale University
Chicago Press, 2002.
Press, 1979.
•
NUSSBAUM, Martha, Sex and Social Justice, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999.
•
OKIN, Susan Moller, Is Multiculturalism Bad For Women?, Princeton University Press, 1999.
•
POLE, J. R., The Pursuit of Equality in American History, Berkeley, University of California Press,
1993 [1978].
•
RITTER, Gretchen, The Constitution as Social Design: Gender and Civic Membership in the
American Constitutional Order, Stanford University Press, 2006
Supreme Court Cases : Bradwell v. Illinois, 83 U.S. 130 (1872) ; Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908) ;
Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976) ; Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan, 458 U.S. 718 (1982) ;
Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (1996) ; United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996).
Session 9 : Affirmative action: A historical perspective
Presentation : How did affirmative action come about ?
Reading:
•
ANDERSON, Terry. The Pursuit of Fairness: A History of Affirmative Action. Oxford: University
Press, 2004, p. 69-109.
11.07.2016
9
PLAN DE COURS
References
•
CHEN, Anthony, The Fifth Freedom: Jobs, Politics, and Civil Rights in the United States, Princeton
University Press, 2009.
•
DOBBIN, Frank (2009). Inventing Equal Opportunity, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
•
GLAZER, Nathan. Affirmative Discrimination: Ethnic Inequality and Public Policy, Basic Books, 1987
[1ère éd. 1975], p. 43-53.
•
GRAHAM, Hugh Davis, The Civil Rights Era: Origins and Development of National Policy, 1960-
•
GRAHAM, Hugh Davis, Collision Course: The Strange Convergence of Affirmative Action and
1972, Oxford University Press, 1990, p. 244-254.
Immigration Policy in America, New York, Oxford University Press, 2002.
•
KATZNELSON, Ira. When Affirmative Action was White: An Untold History of Racial Inequality in
•
KOTLOWSKI, Dean. Nixon’s Civil Rights: Politics, Principle, and Policy. Cambridge (Mass): Harvard
Twentieth-Century America. New York: Norton, 2005.
University Press, 2001.
•
MACLEAN, Nancy, Freedom is not Enough: The Opening of the American Workplace, Harvard
•
SABBAGH, Daniel L’Égalité par le droit: les paradoxes de la discrimination positive aux États-Unis,
University Press, 2006.
Paris, Economica, 2003, chap. 1
•
SKRENTNY, John David, The Ironies of Affirmative Action: Politics, Culture, and Justice in America,
•
SKRENTNY, John David, The Minority Rights Revolution, Harvard University Press, 2002.
Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1996.
Supreme Court Cases : Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971) ; Washington v. Davis, 426 U.S.
229 (1976) ; United Steelworkers v. Weber, 443 U.S. 193 (1979) ; Johnson v. Santa Clara Transportation
Agency, 480 U.S. 616 (1987).
Session 10 : Affirmative action: A philosophical and legal perspective
Presentation : Can affirmative action be justified as an instrument for promoting ‘diversity’ ?
Readings
•
HOLLINGER, David, Postethnic America: Beyond Multiculturalism, Basic Books, 2006, p. 19-50
•
SCHUCK, Peter, Diversity in America: Keeping Government at a Safe Distance, Cambridge (Mass.),
Harvard University Press, 2003 (p. 151-169).
References
•
ANDERSON, Elisabeth, The Imperative of Integration, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2010.
•
APPIAH Anthony, GUTMANN Amy, Color-Conscious: The Political Morality of Race, Princeton,
Princeton University Press, 1996 (p. 109-138, 163-178).
11.07.2016
10
PLAN DE COURS
•
BOWEN William, BOK Derek, The Shape of the River: Long-Term Consequences of Considering
Race in College and University Admissions, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1998.
•
CALVES, Gwénaële, L’Affirmative action dans la jurisprudence de la Cour suprême : le problème de
•
COLE, Stephen, and BARBER, Elinor. Increasing Faculty Diversity: The Occupational Choices of
la discrimination « positive », Paris, LGDJ, 1998.
High-Achieving Minority Students. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 2003.
•
COHEN Marshall, NAGEL Thomas, and SCANLON Thomas (eds), Equality and Preferential
•
DWORKIN, Ronald, A Matter of Principle, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press, 1985 (the
Treatment. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1977.
two chapters on affirmative action).
•
FORD, Richard Thompson, Racial Culture: A Critique, Princeton University Press, 2005.
•
GREGOY, E. John, “Diversity is a Value in American Higher Education, but it is not a Legal
Justification for Affirmative Action”, Florida Law Review, 52, 2000, pp. 930-955.
•
KRONMAN, Anthony, « Is Diversity a Value in American Higher Education? », Florida Law Review,
52, 2000, pp. 861- 928.
•
LOURY, Glenn, 2002. The Anatomy of Racial Inequality. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University
Press.
•
MOSKOS Charles, and BUTLER John, All That We Can Be: Black Leadership and Racial Integration
the Army Way, New York, Basic Books, 1996.
•
NAGEL, Thomas, « Equal Treatment and Compensatory Discrimination », in Cohen, Nagel and
Scanlon (1977), pp. 3-18.
•
RAYNAUD, Philippe. « Multiculturalisme et démocratie », Le Débat, novembre-décembre 1997, n°
97, pp. 153-157.
•
RUBENFELD Jed, « Affirmative Action », Yale Law Journal, 107 (2), 1997, p. 427-472.
•
SABBAGH Daniel, Equality and Transparency: A Strategic Perspective on Affirmative Action in
American Law, Palgrave, 2007.
•
SANDALOW, Terrance, « Minority Preferences Reconsidered », Michigan Law Review, 97, 1999, p.
•
SCHAUER, Frederick. Profiles, Probabilities, and Stereotypes. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard
1874-1908.
University Press, 2003.
•
SKRENTNY, John David (2013). After Civil Rights: Racial Realism in the New American Workplace.
•
SNIDERMAN, Paul, and Carmines Edward, Reaching Beyond Race, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard
Princeton: Princeton University Press.
University Press, 1997.
•
SNIDERMAN, Paul, and PIAZZA, Thomas, The Scar of Race, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard
University Press, 1993.
Supreme Court cases : Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) ; Wygant v.
Jackson Board of Education, 476 U.S. 267 (1986) ; City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469
(1989) ; Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission et. al., 497 U.S. 547 (1990) ;
Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 515 U.S. 200 (1995); Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003); Gratz v.
Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003)
11.07.2016
11
PLAN DE COURS
Session 11 : November 16: The political representation of women and minorities
Presentation : Do the race and sex of U.S. representatives matter ?
Readings
•
MANIN, Bernard, Principes du gouvernement représentatif, Paris, Calmann-Lévy, 1995, chapter 3
(NB : optional : for those of you who read French).
•
MANSBRIDGE, Jane, « Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women ? A
Contingent « Yes» », Journal of Politics, 61 (3), 1999, p. 628-657.
References
•
BEITZ, Charles, Political Equality, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1989.
•
BYBEE, Keith, Mistaken Identity: The Supreme Court and the Politics of Minority Representation,
Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1998.
•
CANON, David, Race, Redistricting, and Representation: The Unintended Consequences of Black
Majority Districts, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1999.
•
GAUCHET, Marcel. La Religion dans la démocratie, Gallimard, 1998 (last two chapters).
•
GROFMAN, Bernard, and DAVIDSON, Chandler (eds), Quiet Revolution in the South: The Impact of
the Voting Rights Act, 1965-1990, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1994.
•
GUINIER, Lani The Tyranny of the Majority: Fundamental Fairness in Representative Democracy,
•
KEYSSAR, Alexander. The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States,
New York, Free Press, 1994.
New York, Basic Books, 2009 [2001].
•
KOUSSER, Morgan, Color-Blind Injustice: Minority Voting Rights and the Undoing of the Second
Reconstruction, Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press, 1999. LUBLIN, David, The Paradox
of Representation: Racial Gerrymandering and Minority Interests in Congress, Princeton, Princeton
University Press, 1997.
•
PHILLIPS, Anne, The Politics of Presence, Oxford, New York, Clarendon Press, 1995.
•
PITKIN, Hannah, The Concept of Representation, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1967.
•
REEVES, Keith, Voting Hopes or Fears? White Voters, Black Candidates and Racial Politics in
America, New York, Oxford University Press, 1997.
•
ROSANVALLON, Pierre, « Le Nouveau travail de la représentation », Esprit, 240, février 1998, p.
•
SUGRUE, Thomas, Not Even Past: Barack Obama and the Burden of Race, Princeton, Princeton
41-59.
University Press, 2010
•
TATE, Katherine, Black Faces in the Mirror: African-Americans and Their Representatives in the
•
THERNSTROM, Abigail, Whose Votes Count? Affirmative Action and Minority Voting Rights,
U.S. Congress, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2003.
Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press, 1987.
11.07.2016
12
PLAN DE COURS
•
URBINATI, Nadia, Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy, University of Chicago
Press, 2006.
Supreme Court cases: Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962) ; United Jewish Organizations of Williamsburgh
v. Carey, 430 U.S. 144 (1977) ; Thornburg v. Gingles, 478 U.S. 30 (1985) ; Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630
(1993) ; Miller v. Johnson, 515 U.S. 900 (1995).
Session 12 : Comparing affirmative action in the United States and France
Presentation : Does it make sense to talk about « affirmative action » in France ?
Readings:
•
FREDRICKSON, George. « Diverse Republics: French and American Responses to Racial
•
BLEICH, Erik, “The French Model: Color-Blind Integration”, in John David Skrentny (ed.), Color
Pluralism », Daedalus, winter 2005, p. 88-101.
Lines: Affirmative Action, Immigration, and Civil Rights Options for America, Chicago, The University
of Chicago Press, 2001, pp. 270-96.
References :
•
BEHAR, Daniel, « Entre intégration des populations d’origine étrangère et politique de la ville :
existe-t-il une discrimination positive à la française ? », Hommes et Migrations, mai-juin 1998,
n°1213, pp. 79-88.
•
BERENI, Laure. La Bataille de la parité : mobilisations pour la féminisation du pouvoir, Paris,
Économica, 2015
•
BERENI, Laure and LÉPINARD, Éléonore, « « Les femmes ne sont pas une catégorie » : les
stratégies de légitimation de la parité en France », Revue française de science politique, 54 (1),
2004, pp. 71-98.
•
BLEICH, Erik, “The French Model: Color-Blind Integration”, in John David Skrentny (ed.), Color
Lines: Affirmative Action, Immigration, and Civil Rights Options for America, Chicago, The University
of Chicago Press, 2001, pp. 270-96.
•
BLEICH, Erik, Race Politics in Britain and France, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002.
•
BLUM, Alain, « Resistance to Identity Categorization in France », in KETZER, D.I., and AREL,
Dominique (eds), Census and Identity: The Politics of Race, Ethnicity, and Language in National
Censuses, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
•
CALVES, Gwénaële, « Affirmative Action in French Law », Revue Tocqueville/ The Tocqueville
Review XIX, 2 (1998).
•
CALVES, Gwénaële, La discrimination positive, PUF, collection « Que Sais-Je », 2010 CALVES,
Gwénaële, « ’Il n’y a pas de race ici’ : le modèle français à l’épreuve de l’intégration européenne »,
Critique internationale, 17, 2002, pp. 173-186.
11.07.2016
13
PLAN DE COURS
•
CALVES, Gwénaële, « Pour une analyse (vraiment) critique de la discrimination positive », Le
Débat, 117, 2001.
•
CHAPMAN, Herrick and FRADER, Laura (ed.), Race in France: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the
•
Comité pour la mesure de la diversité et l’évaluation des discriminations (COMEDD, chaired by
Politics of Difference, New York, Berghahn Books, 2004.
François Héran). 2010. Inégalités et discriminations: pour un usage critique et responsable de l’outil
statistique. Report to M. Yazid Sabeg, Commissioner for Diversity and Equal Opportunity. Paris: La
Documentation Française: http://lesrapports.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/BRP/104000077/0000.pdf
•
CONSEIL D’ETAT, Rapport public 1996 : Sur le principe d’égalité, La Documentation Française,
Études et Documents, n°48, 1997.
•
DONZELOT, Jacques, Faire société: la politique de la ville aux États-Unis et en France, Paris, Seuil,
•
DOYTCHEVA, Milena. Une Discrimination positive à la française ? Ethnicité et territoire dans les
2003.
politiques de la ville. Paris : La Découverte, 2007.
•
KIRSZBAUM, Thomas, « La Discrimination positive territoriale : de l’égalité des chances à la mixité
•
LAGRANGE, Hughes, Le Déni des cultures, Paris, Seuil, 2011.
•
LE BRAS, Hervé, Le Démon des origines, Ed. de l’Aube, 1998.
•
LÉPINARD, Éléonore. L’Égalité introuvable : la parité, les féministes et la République, Paris, Presses
•
LIEBERMAN, Robert, Shaping Race Policy: The United States in Comparative Perspective,
urbaine », Pouvoirs, n° 111, 2004, pp. 101-118.
de Sciences Po, 2007.
Princeton University Press, 2005.
•
ROSANVALLON, Pierre, La Société des égaux, Paris, Seuil, 2011.
•
SIMON, Patrick. “The Choice of Ignorance: The Debate on Ethnic and Racial Statistics in France”,
French Politics, Culture, and Society, 26 (1), 2008, pp. 7-31.
•
TRIBALAT, Michèle, Faire France. Une enquête sur les immigrés et leurs enfants, La DécouverteEssais, 1995.
•
WACQUANT, Loïc, Urban Outcasts: A Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality, London,
Polity, 2007.
•
WEIL, Patrick, La République et sa diversité: intégration, immigration, discriminations, Paris, Seuil,
2005.
11.07.2016
14