Full PDF - Check List: Journal of Species Lists and Distribution

Full PDF - Check List: Journal of Species Lists and Distribution

Check List 5(2): 202–209, 2009.
ISSN: 1809-127X
NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION
Amphibia, Anura, Limnomedusa macroglossa, Dendropsophus anceps, D. berthalutzae,
D. seniculus, Scinax littoralis: new state records, distribution extension and filling gaps
Carlos Eduardo Conte 1
Michel Varajão Garey 1
Rodrigo Lingnau 2, 3
Marina Xavier da Silva 4
Camilla Armstrong 5
Marilia Teresinha Hartmann 6
1
Universidade Estadual Paulista. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal, Departamento de Zoologia.
Rua Cristóvão Colombo 2265. CEP 15054-000. São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected]
2
3
Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, Área de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde.
Avenida Getúlio Vargas 2125. CEP 89600-000. Flor da Serra, Joaçaba, SC, Brazil.
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zoologia.
Avenida Ipiranga 6681. CEP 90619-900. Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
4
Parque Nacional do Iguaçu, Setor de Pesquisa.
BR 469, km 22,5. CEP 85851-970. Foz do Iguaçu, PR, Brazil.
5
Guilherme Chiarotti, 94. CEP 80640-340. Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
6
Universidade Federal do Pampa/UNIPAMPA.
Avenida Antonio Trilha, 1847. CEP 97300-000. São Gabriel, RS, Brazil.
Brazil is the world leader in amphibian diversity,
with 841 species (SBH 2008). However our
knowledge about amphibians in Brazil is still
incipient, and constantly new records of
geographic distribution and description of new
species are very common, even in the state of São
Paulo where the amphibian fauna is historically
better known (Araújo et al. 2007a; b; Brasileiro et
al. 2007a; b; Thomé et al. 2007; Prado et al.
2008).
The anuran richness of state of Paraná comprises
approximately 120 species of amphibians, 25
listed in some degree of threat, of which three are
critically endangered, one endangered, and 21
data deficient (Mikich and Bérnils 2004). The
majority of our knowledge of anurans from
Paraná is from some geographic distribution
notes, description of new species and a few
regional surveys, remaining gaps in the
geographic distribution for many species (Silva et
al. 2006).
It is not surprising that there are estimates
that around 10% of the anuran fauna of state of
Paraná is still not described (Segalla and Langone
2004).
Ecological studies and surveys of anurans in state
of Paraná are concentrated in the north, at
municipality of Londrina and surroundings
(Bernarde and Anjos 1999; Machado et al. 1999;
Bernarde and Machado 2000), along the basin of
Tibagi (Machado and Bernarde 2003), and at the
southeastern portion (Lingnau et al. 2004; Conte
and Machado 2005; Conte and Rossa-Feres 2006;
2007; Lingnau and Bastos 2007).
Our objective herein is to increase the knowledge
about anurans of Paraná and Santa Catarina states,
providing records of three species previously
unknown in the State of Paraná, and increasing
the geographic distribution of other two species
with records from new localities in Paraná and
Santa Catarina.
202
Check List 5(2): 202–209, 2009.
ISSN: 1809-127X
NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION
Limnomedusa macroglossa (Duméril and Bibron,
1841): occurs in Argentina and Uruguay, and in
all states of south Brazil. Its distribution in the
state of Paraná, Brazil, appears to be associated
with the median and final portions of Iguaçu River
(Segalla and Langone 2004). This species is
critically endangered in Paraná, because the only
known populations in Paraná, at Guarani and
Jordão River disappeared due to the construction
of dams of the hydroelectric from Salto Caxias
and Segredo (Segalla and Langone 2004).
Furthermore, this species is also under “some
threat” in Uruguay (“preocupación menor”
according to Maneyro and Langone 2001).
Currently, the main threat to this species in Paraná
is the construction of more dams in the Jordão
River, leading to extinction possible unknown
populations.
Figure 2. Map showing records for Limnomedusa
macroglossa: 1-Foz do Iguaçu, 2-Três Barras do
Paraná, 3-Reserva do Iguaçu, 4-Concórdia, 5-Itá, 6Chapecó, 7-Iraí, 8-Tenente Portela, 9-Vacaria, 10Bom Jesus, 11-Veranópolis 12-Caxias do Sul, 13São Francisco de Paula, 14-Torres, 15-Luiz
Gonzaga, 16-Santo Antônio das Missões, 17Boçoroca, 18-Quaraí, 19-Santana do Livramento,
20-Bagé, 21-São Gabriel, 22-Santa Maria, 23-Arroio
do Tigre, 24-Pelotas. 1,4 and 5-present study, 2Bernarde and Machado (2000), 3-Segalla and
Langone (2004), 6-Lucas and Fortes (2008), 7-22Braun and Braun (1980), 24-Winck et al. (2006).
——————————
On 24 February 2006 between 20:00 h and 21:00
h, a male L. macroglossa (Figure 1) was observed
vocalizing under a stone in front of a temporary
puddle on right margin of Iguaçu river
(25°37'38.7" S, 54°28'51.9" W). This is the third
record of L. macroglossa in state of Paraná, and
increases the geographic distribution in
approximately 189 km towards western Paraná
(Figure 2). Since this was the first record of L.
macroglossa in the Parque Nacional do Iguaçu,
the specimen was captured only for a photograph
and on the next day released on the same place
where it was collected. Certainly this species is
present in more localities in the park, and more
surveys will reveal more populations along the
park.
Figure 1. Male of Limnomedusa macroglossa from
Parque Nacional do Iguaçu. Photos: M. X. da
Silva).
On 17 January 2006 males of L. macroglossa
were observed on rocks at a rivulet in forest
remnants in Itá, Santa Catarina (27o10’40.4" S,
52o18’53.4" W). The area is mainly occupied by
203
Check List 5(2): 202–209, 2009.
ISSN: 1809-127X
NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION
open areas and some factories, with this rivulet in
the forest remnants. The voucher specimens are
housed at the Museu de Ciências e Tecnologia da
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande
do Sul (MCP 8661-8665). Additionally, we found
at the same collection another individual of L.
macroglossa from Concórdia, Vale do Estreito,
Santa Catarina (MCP 555). According to Kunz et
al. (2007) there are 11 specimens of this species
deposited in the herpetological collection of the
Ecology and Zoology Department (ECZ) at the
Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), all
collected in Santa Catarina, without more details
like the municipalities where specimens were
collected.
swamp where the species was found is dominated
by taboa vegetation (Typhaceae, Typha sp.),
situated in the permanent preservation area (APP)
in surroundings of the lake formed due to the dam
of Ourinhos (23°06'28" S, 49°47'36" W). This is
the second record of a population of this species
in state of Paraná, 128 km away from the nearest
population from Telêmaco Borba, in northwestern
Paraná (Figure 4), as reported by Machado and
Haddad (2001). The collected specimens are
housed at the collection of Amphibia of
Departamento de Zoologia e Botânica,
Universidade Estadual Paulista, campus São José
do Rio Preto (DZSJRP 10804 and 10805).
The conservation status of populations of L.
macroglossa in Santa Catarina is unknown (IUCN
et al. 2008), and so every record of new localities
in Santa Catarina are very important. To our best
knowledge, there is only one published record of
L. macroglossa in Santa Catarina, from
municipality of Chapecó (Lucas and Fortes 2008).
In the adjacent State of Rio Grande do Sul, the
species appears to be more common, with various
known populations (Braun and Braun 1980).
Dendropsophus anceps (Lutz, 1929) (Figure 3):
According to Frost (2007) this species occurs at
lowlands of Paraná through São Paulo, Rio de
Janeiro, adjacent eastern Minas Gerais, and
southeastern Bahia, Brazil. Recently Gomes and
Martins (2006) and Rolim et al. (2008) found this
species in new localities in the State of São Paulo.
This species is critically endangered in Paraná
State, and the major threat to the species is the
isolation of the only known population, restricted
to a 100 m2 pool surrounded by plantations of
Pinus sp. and Eucalyptus sp. (Segalla and
Langone 2004).
We recorded D. anceps at municipality of
Jacarezinho, state of Paraná, during the anuran
monitoring program of the dam from
hydroelectric station of Ourinhos (UHEOurinhos), which is surrounded by the
municipalities of Jacarezinho and Ribeirão Claro,
north of Paraná and Ourinhos, Canitar and Irapé,
in São Paulo. Males of D. anceps were calling in
January 2006 (approximately 15 males) and
February 2007 (approximately 25 males). The
Figure 3. Lateral view of Dendropsophus anceps,
municipality of Jacarezinho. Photo: C. E. Conte.
——————————
Figure 4. Map showing records for Dendropsophus
anceps: 1-Permanent preservation area of UHE
Ourinhos (Jacarezinho) 2-Telêmaco Borba, 3Borebi, 4-Caçapava, 5-Seropédica, 6-Belford Roxo,
204
Check List 5(2): 202–209, 2009.
ISSN: 1809-127X
NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION
7-Duque de Caxias, 8-Rio Novo, 9-Marliéria, 10Parque Estadual Rio Doce, 11-Ipatinga, 12-Aimorés,
13-Barra do Sahy, 14-Teixeira de Freitas, 15-Porto
Seguro, 16-Itapebi, 17-Pau Brasil. 18-Jussari, 19Una. 1-present study, 2-Machado and Haddad
(2001), 3-Rolim et al. (2008), 4-Gomes and Martins
(2006), 5-Lutz (1973), 6-Cochran (1955), 7-type
locality, Lutz (1929), 8-Feio and Ferreira (2005) 9,
11 and 12-Nascimento and Feio (1999), 10-Feio et
al. (1998), 13-Haddad et al. (1995), 14, 15, 16, 18,
19 Silvano and Pimenta (2003), 17-Argôlo (2000).
——————————
December 2006. Vocalizing males were perched
on herbaceous vegetation (0,1 to 1,5 m), always
close to the margin or above aquatic vegetation in
temporary ponds, in open formations and inside
the forest.
This new records extend the distribution in
approximately 300 km from Santos, the nearest
known locality (Figure 6), as reported by
Bokermann 1963. The voucher specimens are at
Célio F. B. Haddad collection (CFBH 8112) and
collection of Museu de Zoologia da Universidade
de São Paulo (MZUSP 137958).
Dendropsophus berthalutzae (Bokermann, 1962)
(Figure 5): According to Frost (2007) this species
is restricted to coastal lowlands from Espírito
Santo to São Paulo, and Serra do Mar, São Paulo,
Brazil. In a brief account on the species,
Izecksohn and Carvalho-e-Silva (2001) mentioned
that it occurs on coast of south and southeastern
Brazil. But these authors did not cite more details
about the distribution, and we do not know where
in south Brazil the species occurs.
Figure 6. Map showing records for Dendropsophus
berthalutzae: 1- Morretes, 2- Guaraqueçaba; 3Santo André 4- Paranapiacaba, 5- Santos, 6Ubatuba, 7- Itaguaí, 8- Magé. 1 and 2- present study,
3 - 5, 7 and 8 - Bokermann (1963), 6- M.T.
Hartmann, personal communication.
——————————
Figure 5. Dorsal view of male Dendropsophus
berthalutzae from municipality of Guaraqueçaba.
Photo: M. V. Garey.
——————————
Our first record is from municipality of Morretes,
Estação II IAPAR (25°26' S, 48°52' W). One male
of Dendropsophus berthalutzae was observed
calling on herbaceous vegetation on 21 October
2004. The second record is from Reserva Natural
Salto Morato (25°09'50" S, 48°17'40" W),
Guaraqueçaba municipality. Twelve males of D.
berthalutzae were observed calling on 12
Dendropsophus seniculus (Cope, 1868) (Figure
7): occurs from Porto Seguro, state of Bahia
(Pimenta and Silvano 2001), until Parque
Estadual
de
Intervales,
Capão
Bonito
municipality, São Paulo State (Bertoluci 1998).
The westernmost record is from Parque Estadual
do Rio Doce, in Minas Gerais State (Feio et al.
1998). Our first record from Paraná State was
found at Reserva Natural Salto Morato (25°09'50"
S, 48°17'40" W), Guaraqueçaba municipality.
Approximately 30 males of D. seniculus were
found calling in two occasions in a temporary
swamp in September 2006 and January 2007.
205
Check List 5(2): 202–209, 2009.
ISSN: 1809-127X
NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION
Males called perched between 0.4 and 1.40 m
above the ground. These records extend the
known range of the species approximately 125 km
south from Capão Bonito municipality (Figure 8),
São Paulo, as reported by Bertoluci (1998).
Specimens are housed at the herpetological
collection of the Museu de Zoologia da
Universidade de São Paulo (MZUSP 137949-51).
Figure 7. Dorsal view of male Dendropsophus
seniculus from municipality of Guaraqueçaba.
Photo: D. B. Provete.
Scinax littoralis (Pombal and Gordo, 1991)
(Figures 9 and 10): assigned to the Scinax
catharinae group, it was described from a
population from Estação Ecológica Juréia-Itatins,
in state of São Paulo, the only known locality of
this species. (Pombal and Gordo 1991; Frost
2007).
Figure 9. Dorsal view of male Scinax littoralis from
Morretes. Photo: C.E. Conte.
——————————
Figure 10. Dorsal view of male Scinax littoralis
from Guaraqueçaba. Photo by M. A. Sacramento.
——————————
Figure 8. Map showing records for Dendropsophus
seniculus: 1-Guaraqueçaba, 2-Parque Estadual de
Intervales, 3-Estação Ecológica de Boracéia, 4-Rio
de Janeiro, 5-São Mateus, 6-Linhares, 7-Parque
Estadual do Rio Doce, 8-Porto Seguro. 1-present
study, 2-Bertoluci (1998), 3-Heyer et al. (1990), 4Izecksohn and Carvalho-e-Silva (2001), 5 and 6Bokermann (1966), 7-Feio et al. (1988), 8-Pimenta
and Silvano (2001).
Our first record of this species is from
municipality of Morretes, Condomínio Rio
Sagrado (25°29'55" S, 48°50'29" W). Males of S.
littoralis were observed vocalizing December
2002, February 2003 and from April 2003 to
October 2003, with number of calling males
ranging from 3 to 20 individuals. Males were
observed vocalizing perched on herbaceous
vegetation (0,05 to 0,40 m) always near to
206
Check List 5(2): 202–209, 2009.
ISSN: 1809-127X
NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION
margins of streamlets. The second report is from
Guaraqueçaba municipality, at Reserva Natural
Salto Morato (25°09'50" S, 48°17'40" W).
Eighteen calling males were found on 16 January
2007, on marginal vegetation of a temporary
puddle. This is a first record for the state of
Paraná and first record out of type-locality. These
records extend the known range of the species
approximately 154 km south from municipality of
Iguape (Figure 10), São Paulo, as reported Pombal
and Gordo (1991). The voucher specimens are
housed at the herpetological collection of Museu
de História Natural Capão da Imbuia (MHNCI
6513 to 6518) and the collection of Museu de
Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo (MZUSP
137947 and 137948).
Amphibian research in Paraná is very incipient,
there are few surveys, which in turn increase the
relevance of our records, although possible new
records would be found at other localities.
Although some authors say that state of Paraná
would have around 120 amphibian species
(Mikich et al. 2004), no complete species list is
presented, and since them new species were
described (Alves et al. 2006; Toledo et al. 2007;
Langone et al. 2008). Investments in surveys at
more localities with different survey methods
would possibly increase the number of new
records in the State of Paraná.
Figure 11. Map showing records for Scinax
littoralis: 1-Estação Ecológica Juréia-Itatins; 2Guaraqueçaba 3-Morretes. 1-type locality, Pombal
Jr and Gordo (1991), 2 and 3-present study.
————————————————
Acknowledgments
We thank Capes for fellowship to M. T. Hartmann. MVG and MTH thank Fundação O Boticário de Proteção à
Natureza for fellowship (accord FBPN – UFPR # 623) and permission to collect in the Reserva Natural Salto Morato.
MVG and MTH thank Instituto Agronômico do Paraná (IAPAR) for permission to collect in the IAPAR Estação 2. RL
thanks M. Solé and A. Kwet for help at field activities in Itá. CEC thanks Companhia Brasileira de Alumínio and Juris
Ambientis Consultores for logistic support at Ourinhos. Célio F. B. Haddad and Paulo C. A. Garcia confirmed
identification of some specimens. Arthur A. B. Oliveira helped with the maps. IBAMA provided collecting permits
(license # 183/05 and 107/06 – IBAMA/RAN).
————————————————
Literature cited
Alves, A. C. R., L. F. Ribeiro, C. F. B. Haddad, and S.
F. Reis. 2006. Two new species of Brachycephalus
(Anura: Brachycephalidae) from the Atlantic forest
in Paraná state, Southern Brazil. Herpetologica
62(2): 221-233.
Araujo, C. O., T. H. Condez, and C. F. B. Haddad.
2007a. Amphibia, Anura, Barycholos ternetzi,
Chaunus rubescens, and Scinax canastrensis:
Distribution extension, new State record. Check List
3(2): 153-155.
Araujo, C. O. T. H Condez, and C. F. B. Haddad.
2007b. Amphibia, Anura, Phyllomedusa ayeaye (B.
Lutz, 1966): Distribution extension, new State
record, and geographic distribution map. Check List
3(2): 156-158.
Argôlo, A. J. S. 2000. Geographic distribution: Hyla
anceps. Herpetological Review 31(2): 109.
Bernade, P. S. and L. Anjos. 1999. Distribuição
espacial e temporal da anurofauna no Parque
Estadual Mata dos Godoy, Londrina, Paraná, Brasil
(Amphibia: Anura). Comunicações do Museu de
Ciências e Tecnologia PUCRS, Série Zoologia 12:
127-140.
Bernade, P. S. and R. A. Machado. 2000. Riqueza de
espécies, ambientes de reprodução e temporada de
vocalização da anurofauna em Três Barras do
207
Check List 5(2): 202–209, 2009.
ISSN: 1809-127X
NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION
Paraná, Brasil (Amphibia: Anura). Cuadernos de
Herpetologia 14: 93-104.
Bertoluci, J. A. 1998. Annual patterns of breeding
activity in Atlantic Rainforest anurans. Journal of
Herpetology 32(4): 607-611.
Bokermann, W. C. A. 1963. Girinos de anfíbios
brasileiros -1 (Amphibia -Salientia). Anais da
Academia Brasileira de Ciências 35: 465-474.
Bokermann, W. C. A. 1966. Notas sobre Hylidae do
Espírito Santo (Amphibia, Salientia). Revista
Brasileira de Biologia 26: 29-37.
Brasileiro, C. A., H. M. Oyamaguchi, and C. F. B.
Haddad. 2007a. A new island species of Scinax
(Anura; Hylidae) from Southeastern Brazil. Journal
of Herpetology 41(2): 271–275.
Brasileiro, C. A., C. F. B. Haddad, R. J. Sawaya, and
M. Martins. 2007b. A new and threatened species of
Scinax (Anura: Hylidae) from Queimada Grande
Island, southeastern Brazil. Zootaxa 1391: 47–55.
Braun, P. C. and C. A. S. Braun. 1980. Lista prévia dos
anfíbios do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil.
Iheringia Série Zoologia 56: 121-146.
Conte, C. E. and R. A. Machado. 2005. Riqueza de
espécies e distribuição espacial e temporal em
comunidade de anuros (Amphibia, Anura) em uma
localidade de Tijucas do Sul, Paraná, Brasil. Revista
Brasileira de Zoologia 22(4): 940-948.
Conte, C. E. and D. C. Rossa-Feres. 2006. Diversidade
e ocorrência temporal da anurofauna (Amphibia,
Anura) em São José dos Pinhais, Paraná, Brasil.
Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 23(1): 162-175.
Conte, C. E. and D. C. Rossa-Feres. 2007. Riqueza e
distribuição espaço-temporal de anuros em um
remanescente de Floresta de Araucária no sudeste do
Paraná. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 24(4): 10251037.
Cochran, D. M. 1955. Frogs of Southeastern Brazil.
Bulletin of United States National Museum 201:1423.
Feio, R. N., U. M. L Braga, H. Wiederhecker, and P. S.
Santos. 1998. Anfíbios do Parque Estadual do Rio
Doce (Minas Gerais). Universidade Federal de
Viçosa, Instituto Estadual de Florestas. 32 p.
Feio, R. N. and P. L. Ferreira. 2005. Anfíbios de dois
fragmentos de Mata Atlântica no município de Rio
Novo, Minas Gerais. Revista Brasileira de
Zoociências 7(1): 121-128.
Frost, D. R. 2007. Amphibian Species of the World: an
Online Reference. Version 5.1 (10 October, 2007).
Electronic
Database
accessible
at
http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index
.php. American Museum of Natural History, New
York, USA. Captured on 3 February 2008.
IUCN, Conservation International, and NatureServe.
2008. Global Amphibian Assessment. Electronic
Database,
accessible
at
http://www.globalamphibians.org. Captured on 19
May 2008.
Gomes, F. B. R. and I. A. Martins. 2006. Amphibia,
Anura, Hylidae, Dendropsophus anceps (Lutz,
1929): filling gap, geographic distribution map and
vocalization.
Haddad, C. F. B. J. L. Gasparini and J. P. Pombal Jr.
1995. Geographic distribution: Hyla anceps.
Herpetological Review 26(4): 207.
Heyer, W. R., A. S. Rand; C. A. G. Cruz, O. L. Peixoto
and C. E. Nelson. 1990. Frogs of Boracéia. Arquivos
de Zoologia 31(4): 231-410.
Izecksohn, E. and S. P. Carvalho-e-Silva. 2001.
Anfíbios do Município do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de
Janeiro. Editora UFRJ. 147 p.
Kunz, T. S., I. R. Guizoni Jr., W. L. A. Santos, and P.
A. Hartmann. 2007. Nota sobre a coleção
herpetológica da Universidade Federal de Santa
Catarina (UFSC). Biotemas 20(3): 127-132.
Langone, J. A., M. V. Segalla, M. Bornschein, and R.
O. de Sá. 2008. New reproductive mode in the genus
Melanophryniscus
Gallardo,
1961
(Anura:
Bufonidae) with description of a new species from
the State of Paraná, Brazil. South American Journal
of Herpetology 3: 1-9.
Lingnau, R., L. D. Guimarães, and R. P. Bastos. 2004.
Vocalizações de Hyla werneri (Anura, Hylidae) no
sul do Brasil. Phyllomedusa 3: 115-120.
Lingnau, R. and R. P. Bastos. 2007. Vocalizations of
the Brazilian torrent frog Hylodes heyeri (Anura,
Hylodidae): repertoire and influence of air
temperature on advertisement call variation. Journal
of Natural History 41: 1227-1235.
Lucas, E. M. and Fortes, V. B. 2008. Frog diversity in
the Floresta Nacional de Chapecó, Atlantic Forest of
southern Brazil. Biota Neotropica 8(3): 51-61.
Lutz, A. 1929. Une nouvelle espèce de Hyla. Comptes
Rendus de la Société de Biologie de Paris 101(24):
943.
Lutz, B. 1973. Brazilian Species of Hyla. Austin,
University of Texas Press. 268p.
Machado, R. A. and P. S. Bernade. 2003. Anurofauna
da Bacia do Rio Tibagi; Pp. 297-306 In M. E. Medri,
E. Biachini, O. A. Shibatta, and J. A. Pimenta (Ed.).
A Bacia do rio Tibagi. Londrina. MC-Gráfica.
Machado, R. A., P. S. Bernade, S. A. A. Morato, and L.
Anjos. 1999. Análise comparada da riqueza de
anuros entre duas áreas com diferentes estados de
conservação no município de Londrina, Paraná,
Brasil (Amphibia, Anura). Revista Brasileira de
Zoologia 19: 997-1004.
Machado, R. A. and C. F. B. Haddad. 2001.
Geographic distribution: Hyla anceps. Herpetological
Review 32(2): 113.
208
Check List 5(2): 202–209, 2009.
ISSN: 1809-127X
NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION
Maneyro, R. and J. A. Langone. 2001. Categorización
de los anfíbios del Uruguay. Cuadernos de
Herpetologia 15(2): 107-118.
Mikich, S. B. and R. S. Bérnils. 2004. Livro vermelho
da fauna ameaçada no Estado do Paraná. Curitiba.
Governo do Paraná. 764p.
Mikich, S. B., R. S. Bérnils, and P. A. Pizzi. 2004.
Fauna ameaçada no Paraná: uma introdução; Pp. 3-5
In S. B. Mikich and R. S. Bérnils (Ed.). Livro
Vermelho da Fauna Ameaçada no Estado do Paraná.
Curitiba. Instituto Ambiental do Paraná.
Nascimento, L. B. and R. N. Feio. 1999. Geographic
distribution: Hyla anceps. Herpetological Review
30(1): 49-50.
Pimenta, B. V. S. and D. L. Silvano. 2001. Geographic
distribution. Hyla senicula. Herpetological Review
32(4): 271.
Pombal Jr., J. P. and M. Gordo. 1991. Duas novas
espécies de Hyla da Floresta Atlântica do estado de
São Paulo (Amphibia, Anura). Memórias do Instituto
Butantan 53(11): 135-144.
Prado, V. H. M., R. E Borges, F. R. Silva, T. T
Tognolo, and D. C. Rossa-Feres, 2008. Amphibia,
Anura, Hylidae, Phyllomedusa azurea: distribution
extension. Check List 4(1): 55-56.
Rolim, D. C. F. Maffei, R. K. Sene, C. A. B.
Medolago, T. H. Vernini, F. K. Ubaid and J. Jim.
2008. Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae, Dendropsophus
anceps: Distribution extension in state of São Paulo,
Brazil. Check List 4(3): 358–361.
SBH. Sociedade Brasileira de Herpetologia. 2008.
Lista de espécies de anfíbios do Brasil. Sociedade
Brasileira de Herpetologia (SBH). Eletronic
Database
accessible
at:
http://www.sbherpetologia.org.br/checklist/anfibios.h
tm. Captured on 08 February 2009.
Segalla, M. V. and J. A. Langone. 2004. Anfíbios;
Pp.537-577 In S. B. Mikich and R. S. Bérnils (Ed.).
Livro Vermelho da Fauna Ameaçada no Estado do
Paraná. Curitiba. Instituto Ambiental do Paraná.
Silva, M. O., R. A. Machado, and V. Graf. 2006. O
conhecimento de Amphibia do Estado do Paraná; Pp.
305-314 In E. L. A. Monteiro-Filho and J. M. R.
Aranha. (Org.). Revisões em Zoologia I: Volume
comemorativo dos 30 anos do Curso de PósGraduação em Zoologia da Universidade Federal do
Paraná. 1 ed. Curitiba. M5 Gráfica e Editora.
Silvano, D. L. and B. V. S. Pimenta. 2003. Diversidade
e distribuição de anfíbios na Mata Atlântica do Sul
da Bahia; Pp. 1-28 In P. I. Prado, E. C. Landau, R. T.
Moura, L. P. S. Pinto, G. A. B. Fonseca, and K.
Alger (org.). Corredor de Biodiversidade na Mata
Atlântica
do
Sul
da
Bahia.
Ilhéus:
IESB/CI/CABS/UFMG/ Unicamp. CD-ROM.
Thomé, M. T. C., H. M. Oyamaguchi, and C. A
Brasileiro. 2007. Amphibia, Anura, Leiuperidae,
Physalaemus bokermanni: distribution extension.
Check List 3(1): 1-3.
Toledo, L. F., P. C. A. Garcia, R. Lingnau, and C. F. B.
Haddad. 2007. A new species of Sphaenorhynchus
(Anura; Hylidae) from Brazil. Zootaxa 1658: 57-68.
Winck, G. R., F. P. Maragno, and S. Z. Cechin. 2006.
Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae, Limnomedusa
macroglossa: distribution extension in Rio Grande
do Sul State, Brazil. Check List 2(2): 53-54.
Received June 2008
Accepted March 2009
Published online April 2009
209