The System of Medical Treatment for Addiction in France
Transcription
The System of Medical Treatment for Addiction in France
This article was downloaded by: [Citd], [Professor Olivier Cottencin] On: 20 March 2015, At: 10:50 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK International Journal of Mental Health Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/mimh20 The System of Medical Treatment for Addiction in France Olivier Cottencin, Jean Harbonnier, Dewi Guardia, Benjamin Rolland & Thierry Danel Published online: 18 Mar 2014. Click for updates To cite this article: Olivier Cottencin, Jean Harbonnier, Dewi Guardia, Benjamin Rolland & Thierry Danel (2014) The System of Medical Treatment for Addiction in France, International Journal of Mental Health, 43:3, 19-26, DOI: 10.1080/00207411.2014.1003734 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207411.2014.1003734 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. Downloaded by [Citd], [Professor Olivier Cottencin] at 10:50 20 March 2015 This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions Downloaded by [Citd], [Professor Olivier Cottencin] at 10:50 20 March 2015 International Journal of Mental Health, 43: 19–26, 2014 Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN 0020-7411 print/1557-9328 online DOI: 10.1080/00207411.2014.1003734 OLIVIER COTTENCIN, JEAN HARBONNIER, DEWI GUARDIA, BENJAMIN ROLLAND, AND THIERRY DANEL The System of Medical Treatment for Addiction in France ABSTRACT: The French Addictions Treatment system was recently reformed. The ministerial memo was clearly inspired by professionals and from the clinical reality of patients. The main purpose of this reform was to reorganize the treatments (fighting against the historical split of the different structures) but also to fight against the substances approach in favor of a global approach. Thus, this new plan allows addiction treatment professionals to be concerned with the prevention and the detection of addictive behaviors (abuse and risk use), which was relatively new in the French medical profession. We present a brief history of the evolution of the system of treatment for addiction, and we describe the new system of treatment for addiction as it is now defined in France. English translation © 2014 Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, from the French text, “Le système des soins adictologiques en France.” Olivier Cottencin, M.D., Ph.D. is Professor of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine at the University Hospital of Lille in the Department of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine. Jean Harbonnier, M.D. is Psychiatrist specialized in Addiction Medicine at the Psychiatric Hospital of Saint Andre in the Department of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine. Dewi Guardia, M.D., Ph.D. is Psychiatrist specialized in Addiction Medicine at the University Hospital of Lille in the Department of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine. Benjamin Rolland, M.D., Ph.D. is Psychiatrist specialized in Addiction Medicine at the University Hospital of Lille in the Department of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine. Thierry Danel, M.D., Ph.D. is Psychiatrist specialized in Addiction Medicine at the University Hospital of Lille in the Care Support and Prevention Center for Addiction. Address correspondence to: Olivier Cottencin, Department of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine, University Hospital of Lille, 1 rue Verhaeghe, 59000 Lille, France; e-mail: [email protected] Color versions of one or more of the figures in the article can be found online at http://www.tandfonline.com/mimh. 19 Downloaded by [Citd], [Professor Olivier Cottencin] at 10:50 20 March 2015 20 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH The French system of treatment for individuals suffering from addictions was recently reformed by a ministerial memo clearly inspired by addiction treatment professionals [1]. The objective of this reform was not only to reorganize the treatments (which were, until this time, limited to the substance approach) but also to suggest concern for the prevention and the detection of addictive behaviors (abuse and risk use), which is relatively new in the French concept of medical treatment. In France, addiction treatment devices are numerous and concern both the health system and the medical-social system, whether public or private (including General Practitioner). The French organization of treatment for individuals with addictions has today become a consistent tool with the objective of providing a gradation of territorially distributed treatments Its goal is the coverage of the needs of the whole population of individuals with addictive behaviors both in preventive material, evaluation of needs, and accompaniment, as well as the orientation toward the best system of care in terms of skills and techniques. A Brief History of the Availability of Addiction Treatment in France The twentieth century has placed addiction at the crossroads of repression and treatment. There have been three instances of important evolution the first was marked by the priority was repression consumption of psychoactive substances; the second was the introduction, in 1954, of health intervention, contained in the law on dangerous alcoholics (which would be followed in 1970 by the legislation on users of illicit substances); and the third was the opening of treatment to people suffering from addiction, from specialists other than psychiatrists (or doctors in general), and also entrusting the burden to professionals of the medical-social field (educators and social workers). The problem of addiction in France was the victim of a double split: firstly, a split between psychiatry and addiction medicine and secondly a split within its organization. Split between psychiatry and addiction medicine The sectional organization of French psychiatry that was very effective for the treatment of mental illnesses (screening, rehabilitation, and destigmatization) has failed (or not wanted) to adapt, outside of some specific services and intersections, to the intricacies between addictions and psychiatric problems, referring comorbid subjects to one or another field (while we estimate the addictive comorbidity in patients suffering from psychiatric problems at 50 percent). Additions, often considered a symptom of some psychiatric problem or an attempt to self-medicate, were those that were not believed FALL 2014 21 to improve with the help of psychiatric pathology. The future will show that the two pathologies worsen the other and necessitate an integrated approach. Downloaded by [Citd], [Professor Olivier Cottencin] at 10:50 20 March 2015 Split within treatment of addiction system The French treatment of addiction system has also suffered a split within its organization. Indeed, because of the quasi-exclusive substance approach, two large subspecialties distinguished themselves: one focused on the care of alcohol-dependent individuals, essentially, those who were hospitalized and, thus, principally in health management; and the second on addicts (of cannabis, heroin, cocaine, and other illicit substances), in large part taken care of by the ambulatory or residential medical-social system. Changing in physicians’ attitudes followed the clinical evolution of patients recognized today often as polyaddicts, abandoning the substance approach in favor of a global and generalized approach (in an all-addictions and bio-psycho-social sense) of the subject of addiction. The Addiction Plan (2007–2011) The addiction plan was conceived with the goal of structuring and harmonizing addiction management in a transversal manner into a biological, psychological, and social vision. This approach connected health and medical-social concerns along three levels of management, according to the gravity of the situation, making services available to the largest number of users. If some occasional resistance persisted, today the receptions, orientations, and treatments are clearly organized around a global concept of addiction. The hospital (public or private) procedure for addiction treatment is organized into three levels [1]: • • • The structure of level 1: proximity structures whose goal it is to fulfill simple residential withdrawal treatment and to assure meetings, consultations, and consultation-liaison; The structure of level 2: structures of recourse for a given area. In addition to the missions of level 1, level 2 must fulfill the complex residential treatments (complete hospitalization or day hospitalization). Health establishments that have developed a specific addictology structure can assure these activities. This level also includes the treatments of rest and readaptation (addictological and cognitive), which allow the seeking of residential treatment beyond the critical treatments; The structure of level 3: structures of regional and academic recourse. They assure, in addition to the missions of levels 1 and 2, teaching, formation, research, and regional coordination. Downloaded by [Citd], [Professor Olivier Cottencin] at 10:50 20 March 2015 22 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH The method of access to treatment was also reorganized. The Center for Cure, Accompaniment and Prevention in Addictions (CSAPA, Centres de Soins, d’Accompagnement et de Prévention en Addictologie), which resulted from the unification, in 2007, of the administrative setting that distinguished Centers Specialized in the Treatment of Drug Addicts (CSST) and Centers for the Ambulatory Course of Treatment for Alcoholism (CCAA), now assures welcome, information, medical evaluation, and psychological and social orientation of individuals who have a risky level of consumption, a harmful level of usage, or who have a dependence on psychoactive substances as well as the help for their families (parents, spouses, other family members, and friends). Therefore, CSAPA is a result of the unification of the medical sector and medical-social sector. However, access to the treatment of addiction system is also possible through private practice (GPs, psychiatrists, and private clinics). Patients can benefit from ambulatory treatment with their own GP, or enter a private addiction treatment program. In fact, a lot of patients (because of their social level and precarious living conditions) prefer the public health system (medical or medicalsocial). The medical-social system is anonymous and free; the cost under the public medical system is easily reimbursed by French social security. Entrusted to the medical-social setting, both public and associations, is a framework of treatments of proximity, suitable for patients for whom neither the clinical state nor an intense level of treatment is necessary. For them, the global approach is optimal, offering a variety of medicalmentoring, psychotherapeutic approaches for reducing the harm involved with social reinsertion and accommodation. The old centers situated in town had, as a mission (in the spirit of the psychiatric sector), access to treatment closer to the population, to assure ambulatory treatments, the connection with hospital addiction medicine departments, and harm-reduction actions. Today, the addiction plan (because of the common substratum of addictions) hopes not only to aggregate its thematic consultations, but also to aggregate all of the types of addictions, whether with or without substance. The CSAPA is not simply a place of ambulatory treatment. Actually, the CSAPA is as well a place for prevention, risk reduction and information, which now clearly belong to specialists of the treatment of addiction. This point is clearly a change in culture, above all, for the medical profession that, until now, was in the habit of working only with known dependent patients. Today, the French system of treatment for addiction may also meet abusers or excessive consumers. It can also enroll in general hospital (maternity, medicine, surgery). It can provide also information to general population, in the scholarly and educational environment, in the workplace, and is able to focus on populations with specific needs: precarious, detained, young, parenthood, etc. Thus, the main objective of such a system of treatment is, indeed, for the most operative improvement of the management of patients. This goal is FALL 2014 23 accomplished using a more fluid course within the different structures, while considering the degree of gravity of addiction. Downloaded by [Citd], [Professor Olivier Cottencin] at 10:50 20 March 2015 A Coherent and Supervised Organization With the desire to reduce divisions, to avoid redundancies, and to develop a global approach to addiction treatment (substance or other), the addiction plan has also defined the missions of each field in order to assure that they better complement each other. A national and several regionals jurisdictions were created (National Addictions Commissions and Regional Addictions Commissions). These authorities are charged with putting together a notebook of the regional responsibility to watch over the global amelioration of responses, identifying needs in terms of resources, distributing those resources, and facilitating access to treatments. The distribution of tasks between the different centers of addiction treatment depends on international recommendations, such as those of the American Psychiatric Association [2], that suggest that the choice of treatment center to be founded on the capacity of the patient to receive treatment and to cooperate in the center that is the least restrictive possible, assuring, at the same time, security and efficiency. Thus, hospitalization is recommended for severe intoxications, complex withdrawal symptoms (e.g., the risk of physical decompensating such as delirium tremens, major alcoholic dependencies, polydependence), physical and psychiatric comorbidities, past treatment failures (residential or ambulatory), polydrug use or associated behavior, the intermediaries before the admission to follow-up care and readjustment to the community, and induced cognitive disorders (when applicable). Regional commissions, newly created in Regional Health Agencies, must oversee the complementarity of the structures at all levels of the organization. Thus, like all the other structures of responsibility, rest and rehabilitation care units, classically oriented toward the care of alcohol-dependent individuals, are now eligible to receive patients with other types of addictive behaviors or who are polydrugs consumers. These units must orient the individual toward reinsertion structures that offer longer stays. Residential treatment center is indicated for patients who do not require hospitalization, but who present a high risk of relapse, cognitive disorders, lack of socio-professional competence, and lack of environmental support. A stay of at least 3 months is associated with better outcomes. Finally, outpatient centers (CSAPA) are a part of an appropriate treatment for patients whose clinical condition or social environment does not require an intensive level of care. The global approach is optimal, providing a variety of pharmacological and psychotherapeutic treatments, harm reduction, and support for rehabilitation. Downloaded by [Citd], [Professor Olivier Cottencin] at 10:50 20 March 2015 24 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH France is also a country of medical networks, and the addiction plan provides that this peculiarity to be maintained. A medical network aims to increase access to care, coordination, continuity, or interdisciplinary treatment of certain populations. Thus, it is proposed that all collaborations between the care establishments and the medical-social correspondents be recorded and spelled by conventional preference in order to clarify the terms of work and possible partnerships: common formations, common documents, possibilities of shared activities, and others. General practitioners, the pivot of medical care in our country, are considered to belong to the organization of addiction treatment system. Thus, general practitioners are clearly identified for assessment, evaluation, and treatment of addiction. When their own abilities to treat are overwhelmed (e.g., complex comorbid cases) they can refer patients toward specialized centers of care. The connection between specialist and generalist must be reinforced by means of network structures, with intervision and supervision meetings. These networks reinforce the idea of a global approach, which is seen as an object of political and medical goodwill in France. Nevertheless, the addiction plan has not created a blank slate of the existing plan and, instead, utilizes it to reinforce and facilitate access to care. One can see, despite an apparent lack of order, to what extent it is possible in France to gain access, in different degrees and in graduated ways, to the most specialized structures for the most complex treatments (see Figure 1). Figure 1 Illustration of Different Possibilities of Access to the System of Treatment for Addiction in France FALL 2014 25 The patient’s entrance into the system is allowed at all levels. This health collaboration (private and public) with the medical-social sector allows the cohesion of the group (even if a network is still fragile and must constantly be stimulated). Downloaded by [Citd], [Professor Olivier Cottencin] at 10:50 20 March 2015 Addictions and Psychiatry Sectional Organization of Psychiatry In France, addiction treatment is not left just to psychiatrists; addiction treatment structures are required to work with psychiatric structures (by means of consultation-liaison teams and the connection with the available psychiatric sector) so as to propose a guarantee of responsibility for the degree of difficulty of each case. In the 1960s, psychiatry was also in its mission the management of patients suffering from drug addiction, alcoholic behaviors, and eating disorders. Unfortunately, these responsibilities did not seem compatible with the organization of general psychiatric treatments because of the difficulties of mixing psychiatric populations, the lack of formation of teams, the principles of psychiatric sector, the psychopathological specifics, when compared to the methods of specific treatment. The psychiatric sector was and is still very efficient for the management of complex psychiatric disorders (from their appearance to their rehabilitation), but addictions were not taken care of specifically by psychiatric units, other than in rare exceptions. This lack of interest in the addiction comorbidities within psychiatric units is surprising as addictions and psychiatric comorbidities are common [3]. However, some specific treatment structures for drug addicts or alcoholics created in the psychiatric hospitals have naturally become the structures of the second level in the addiction plan (cf. above). Anorexia Nervosa and Eating Disorders Another title for this chapter could have been “the problem of the management of anorexia nervosa in France”. While many academic psychiatric departments treat anorexia nervosa, it is clear that many gaps remain in care of this psychiatric illness which is very serious (lack of departments, lack of specialists, lack of networks, etc.) Professional references actually recommend ambulatory treatment, considering that hospitalization is allowed only if ambulatory treatment fails. However, the reality clearly shows that anorexia nervosa is a disease of denial and concealment (which is very difficult to manage in ambulatory), and requires a strong institutional setting and, consequently, a familial approach. Recent findings confirmed by Papadopoulos et al. [4] have 26 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH Downloaded by [Citd], [Professor Olivier Cottencin] at 10:50 20 March 2015 suggested that, at the outset, a younger age and a longer hospital stay were associated with better outcomes. Finally, regarding other eating disorders (e.g., binge eating disorder), Endocrinologists or Nutritionists manage most of them (but rarely Psychiatrists) and they are rarely diagnosed as an addictive disorder. Conclusion After numerous years of using an approach only focused on the substances and many years of division between Addiction Medicine and Psychiatry, Addictions Treatment in France evolved toward a global beneficial vision. What is remarkable in this evolution is that it does not follow ministerial directives enacted on the simple advice of experts, but benefits from the constant observation of the evolution of both patients and their behaviors. Today, that includes polyconsumers associated with alcohol, tobacco, and cannabis (in the most simple of situations), or that reveals medical and psychiatric intricacies of complex personality disorders. The global concept of addictions is not purely a view of hope; it is the fruit of long-time clinical observations to which the addiction plan brings responses. However, we must be attentive to the barriers of which we ourselves can be the creators. Prevention is still not well written into our French medical culture, and the intrinsic fragility of our networks necessitates an accrued vigilance of the different partnerships with a good readability of the health care system. References 1. Memo from the Minister of Health, DGS/6B/DHOS/o2/2007/203, May 16, 2007. 2. Kleber, H.D.; Weiss, R.D.; Anton, Jr., R.F., (2007) Treatment of patients with substance abuse disorders. American Psychiatric Association, 164(Suppl 4), 5–123. 3. Drake, R.E.; Mueser, K.T.; & Brunette, M.F. (2007) Management of persons with co-occurring mental illness and substance use disorder: Program implications. World Psychiatry, 6(3), 131–136. 4. Papadopoulos, F.C.; Ekbom, A.; Brandt, L.; & Ekselius, L. (2009) Excess mortality, causes of death and prognostic factors in anorexia nervosa. Br J Psychiatry, 194(1), 10–17.