greetings workshop download

Transcription

Canadian Political Science Association
Association canadienne de science politique
May 27th to 29th
St Catharines, Ontario
Brock University
2014
27 au 29 mai
St Catharines, Ontario
Brock University
P R O G R A M M E
(13/5/2014)
TABLE OF CONTENTS/TABLE DES MATIÉRES
Table of Contents/Table des Matières
1
General Information/Renseignements généraux
2-3
Acknowledgements/Remerciements
4
2014 Programme Committee/Comité du programme 2014
5
CPSA Business and Committee Meetings/Réunions d’affaires et comités de l’ACSP
6
Special Events/Événements speciaux
7-8
Section Index/Index des sections
9-16
Notices to Participants/Note à l’intention des congressistes
17-22
Prizes/Prix
24-33
Workshops/Ateliers
34-40
Development Fund/Fonds de développement
41
Sessions/Séances
42-120
Participants
121-133
AGM Agenda and Annual Reports/Ordre du jour pour l’AGA et les rapports annuels
135-187
Map/Carte
188
1
General Information / Renseignements généraux
Registration
Inscription
The Congress of the Humanities and Social
Sciences registration desk will be located in the
Walker Complex (Building 22 on the campus
map). The hours of operation will be:
Le Bureau d'inscriptions du Congrès des
sciences humaines sera situé dans le Walker
Complex (Bâtiment 22 sur la carte du campus.
Les heures d’ouverture sont les suivantes :
May 23 – 10 am - 5 pm
May 24 to 29 – 7:30 am - 5 pm
May 30 – 7:30 am - 2 pm
23 mai – 10 h à 17 h
mai au 29 mai – 7 h 30 à 17 h 30
mai – 7 h 30 à 14 h
The CPSA will maintain a registration table in
the Walker Complex. After having registered
with the Congress of the Humanities and Social
Sciences, delegates are asked to proceed to
the CPSA registration table for additional
information. The table will be open as follows:
L’ACSP aura un bureau d’inscription dans le
Walker Complex. Après votre inscription au
Congrès des sciences humaines, veuillez
vous y rendre pour obtenir d’autres
renseignements. La table sera ouverte les :
May 26 – 12 pm – 5 pm
May 27 – 8 am – 5 pm
May 28 – 8 am – 5 pm
May 29 – 8 am – 12 pm
To register on-line:
http://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/conferenceregistration.2014.shtml
26 mai – 12 h – 17 h
27 mai – 8h – 17 h
28 mai – 8 h – 17 h
29 mai – 8 h – 12 h
Pour vous inscrire en ligne :
http://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/conferenceregistration-f.2014.shtml
CPSA Coffee Breaks
Pause cafés ACSP
400 Level: Mackenzie Chown C - O'Malley
Exhibit
400 Level: Mackenzie Chown C - O'Malley
Exhibit
300 Level: Taro Hall - Hallway
300 Level: Taro Hall - Hallway
Twitter
Join the conversation at
#CPSA2014
Twitter
Joignez-vous à la conversation à
#CPSA2014
Audio-Visual Equipment
Équipement audio-visuel
All the session rooms will be equipped with a
computer, data projector, projection screen,
internet access and sound system.
Toutes les salles où se dérouleront les
séances seront équipées un ordinateur, un
projecteur d’image écran, un écran de
projection, l’accès à l’Internet et un système
audio.
Local arrangements
Organisation des lieux
Tim Heinmiller of Brock University has taken
care of the local arrangements. He and the
Tim Heinmiller, de la Brock University, est le
responsable de l'organisation des lieux. Il et
2
student assistants will be available to help in
case of need.
les étudiants assistants sauront vous aider en
cas de besoin.
After-conference information
Renseignements après-congrès
After-conference information may be obtained
from the CPSA Secretariat: [email protected]
Pour des renseignements concernant l’aprèscongrès, veuillez communiquer avec le
secrétariat de l'ACSP : [email protected]
CPSA Membership
Cotisation à l’ACSP
Your 2014 membership can be paid at
www.cpsa-acsp.ca.
Votre cotisation pour 2014 peut être acquittée
au www.cpsa-acsp.ca.
Future Conference
Prochains congrès
June 2-4 2015 - University of Ottawa
May 31 - June 2 2016 – University of Calgary
2 au 4 juin 2015 - University of Ottawa
31 mai au 2 juin 2016 – University of Calgary
See your Congress delegate’s package for
information on the following:
Veuillez voir votre guide du congressiste
du Congrès des sciences humaines pour
les informations suivantes :
Airport Ground Transportation
Book Exhibit
Campus Security
Daycare
Dining Facilities
Luggage Storage
Parking
Public Transit
Taxis
Wireless Connectivity
Transport depuis l’aéroport
Salon du livre
Service de sécurité
Service de garderie
Restaruation
Rangement des bagages
Stationnement
Transport en commun
Taxis
Accès au réseau sans fil
3
Acknowledgements
The 2014 Programme Committee recognizes the contributions of the following to our programme:

Brock University Department of Political Science for hosting the departmental reception;

Brock University Special Collections and Archives, and David Sharron, Head of Special
Collections and Archives, for the exhibit drawn from the O'Malley Collection;

The Congress' International Keynote Speaker Support Fund and the Aid to
Interdisciplinary Sessions Fund;

The Brock University Congress Team for their support in organizing the Benjamin Barber
panel;

The Canadian Social Democracy Study
We also would like to thank Michelle Hopkins, CPSA Administrator, Silvina Danesi, CPSA
Executive Director, and Sean Hart, IT/Web Consultant, for enabling and supporting our work.
Remerciements
Le comité du programme 2014 tient à remercier les personnes et organisations suivantes pour
leur contribution au programme de cette année :

le département de science politique de la Brock University, hôte de la réception du
département;

les Special Collections and Archives de la Brock University et David Sharron, directeur
des Special Collections and Archives, pour l'exposition organisée à partir de la O'Malley
Collection;

le Fonds de soutien des conférenciers internationaux de marque et le Fonds de soutien
pour les séances interdisciplinaires du Congrès des sciences humaines;

l'équipe de la Brock University responsable du Congrès des sciences humaines pour le
soutien accordé lors de l'organisation de la table ronde sur Benjamin Barber;

la Canadian Social Democracy Study;
Nous voulons aussi remercier Michelle Hopkins, administratrice de l'ACSP, Silvina Danesi,
directrice générale l'ACSP, et Sean Hart, conseiller TI/Web Consultant, qui ont non seulement
rendu possible notre travail, mais l'ont aussi facilité.
4
2014 Programme Committee / Comité du programme 2014
Programme Chair / Président du comité du programme:
Peter Graefe (McMaster University)
Vice Programme Chair / Vice Présidente du comité du programme: Cheryl Collier (University
Windsor)
Local Arrangements Coordinator / Coordonnateur local: Tim Heinmiller (Brock University)
Sections
A Canadian Politics / Politique canadienne
Rachel Laforest (Queen’s
University)
B Comparative Politics / Politique comparée
Julian Durazo Herrmann (UQAM)
CPSA/ISA-Canada section on International Relations /
C ACSP/AÉI-Canada, section sur les relations
internationales
Colleen Bell (University of
Saskatchewan, CPSA/ISA
Canada)
Hevina Dashwood (Brock
University, CPSA/ISA-Canada)
D Law and Public Policy / Droit et analyse de politiques
Stephanie Paterson (Concordia
University)
E Local and Urban Politics / Politique locale et urbaine
Livianna Tossutti (Brock
University)
F
Political Behaviour/Sociology
Comportement politique/sociologie
Thierry Giasson (Université
Laval)
G Political Economy / Économie politique
Stephanie Ross (York University)
H Political Theory / Théorie politique
Dalie Giroux (University of
Ottawa)
J
Provincial and Territorial Politics in Canada and Beyond
Politique provinciale et territoriale au Canada et au-delà
K Public Administration / Administration publique
Dennis Pilon (York University)
Charles Conteh (Brock
University)
L
Race, Ethnicity, Indigenous Peoples and Politics
Race, ethnicité, peuples autochtones et politique
Davina Bhandar (Trent
University)
M
Teaching and Learning / Enseigner et apprendre la
politique
Todd Alway (McMaster
University)
N
Women, Gender and Politics / Femmes, genre et
politique
Tammy Findlay (Mount Saint
Vincent University)
P Special Session / Séances spéciales
5
Business and Committee Meetings / Réunions d'affaires et
comités
ID
Event Name
Z1
CPSA Executive Committee / Bureau
de direction de l’ACSP
May 26
09:00am to 12:00pm Taro Hall 262
Z2
CPSA Board of Directors / Conseil
d’administration de l’ACSP
May 26
01:00pm to 05:00pm Taro Hall 262
Z3
CPSA Students Caucus Meeting /
Réunion du caucus des étudiants de
l’ACSP
May 27
Z4
Editorial and Editorial Advisory Board
CJPS / Comité de rédaction et
conseil consultatif de la RCSP
May 27
Z5
ISA-Canada Business Meeting /
Réunion d’affaires de l'AÉI-Canada
May 28
Z6
CPSA Annual General Meeting /
Assemblée générale annuelle de
l’ACSP
May 28
04:05pm to 05:30pm
Welch Hall, D
Howse
Theatre
Z7
CPSA Board of Directors / Conseil
d’administration de l’ACSP
May 29
08:30am to 12:00pm
Plaza
Building,
500A
Z8
2015 CPSA Programme Committee /
Comité du programme 2015 de
l’ACSP
May 29
08:30am to 10:30am
Plaza
Building 501C
Z9
CPSA Women’s Caucus Meeting /
Réunion du caucus des femmes de
l’ACSP
May 29
6
Date
Time
Room
Special Events - Dinner / Événements speciaux - dîner
Session: S5 - CPSA President’s Dinner / Dîner du Président de l’ACSP
Date: May 28, 2014 | Time / Heure: 06:30pm to 09:30pm
Hernder Estates Winery | 1607 Eighth Avenue Louth, St. Catharines, (905) 684-3300
6:30 pm – 9:30 pm
As CPSA President, I would like to invite conference delegates to join me for the dinner which will start at 7 pm at Hernder
Estates Winery.
Hernder Estates is located in the lush Niagara countryside, 7.5 km from Brock University. Shuttle buses will run between
the university and the winery, every 15 minutes, between 5 pm and 7 pm and 9 pm and 11 pm. Delegates can catch the
shuttle buses along the sidewalk at Parking Lot D. The shuttle buses are included in the price of your ticket.
Delegates are welcome to go to Hernder Estates prior to the dinner for a wine tasting. The wine tasting is NOT included in
the price of your ticket.
I encourage faculty supervisors to invite their students to attend the dinner as their guests. This is a great opportunity to
congratulate the prize winners and meet fellow political scientists! Spouses and guests are also welcome.
Ticket prices: $50 for students / $70 for all other delegates Purchased tickets will be available for pick up at the CPSA
registration table as of May 26th. Please ensure to purchase your tickets well in advance of the conference as there will
be no on-site ticket sales.
I look forward to greeting you all at Hernder Estates! Alain Noël, CPSA President
En ma qualité de président de l’ACSP, j’ai le plaisir d’inviter les congressistes à se joindre à moi pour le dîner, qui
débutera à 19 h, au Hernder Estates Winery.
Ce domaine vinicole est situé dans la verte campagne de Niagara, à 7,5 km de la Brock University. Des navettes
circuleront entre l’université et le domaine vinicole, toutes les 15 minutes, entre 17 h et 19 h, puis entre 21 h et 23 h. Les
congressistes pourront attendre ces navettes sur le trottoir au parc de stationnement D. Le transport par navette est inclus
dans le prix de votre billet.
Vous pourrez, si vous le désirez, vous rendre au domaine viticole avant le dîner pour une dégustation de vins. Veuillez
noter toutefois que cette dégustation n’est pas incluse dans le prix de votre billet.
J’incite les superviseurs à inviter leurs étudiants au dîner. Ce sera pour eux une excellente occasion de rencontrer
d’autres politologues sans compter que nous en profiterons pour féliciter les lauréats des prix! Les conjoints et invités sont
également les bienvenus.
Prix des billets : 50 $ pour les étudiants / 70 $ pour tous les autres congressistes. Les billets prépayés pourront être
ramassés, à compter du 26 mai, au comptoir d’inscription de l'ACSP. Veuillez acheter vos billets bien à l’avance, car
aucun billet ne sera vendu sur place.
Au plaisir de vous accueillir tous au Hernder Estates Winery! Alain Noël, président de l’ACSP
7
Other Special Events / Autres événements spéciaux
ID
Event Name
Date
Time
Room
S1
Terry O'Malley Political
Advertising Exhibit
May 27
09:00am to
05:00pm
4th Floor Hallway,
Mackenzie Chown C Block
S2
Reception / Réception :
Department of Political
Science, Brock University
May 27
05:00pm to
06:30pm
Beddis Gym, Court 3
S3
Reception / Réception:
Women’s Caucus / Caucus
des femmes
May 27
06:30pm to
11:00pm
Scotiabank Atrium, 200
level, Cairns Building
S4
Advertising Exhibit
May 28
09:00am to
05:00pm
4th Floor Hallway,
S6
Student Caucus Social Event /
Soirée amicale du Caucus
des étudiants
May 28
09:00pm to
01:00am
Alphie's Trough (Campus
Bar)
S7
Advertising Exhibit
May 29
09:00am to
05:00pm
4th Floor Hallway,
8
Section Index / Index des Sections
A
Canadian Politics / Politique canadienne
A1(a):
The Politics of Rhetoric
A1(b):
A2(a):
What do Political Scientists Know About the NDP? A Roundtable on the Current State of
Research on Canada-s NDP - Double session / Séance double (see/voir A2c)
Principles of Canadian Democracy
A2(b):
Comparing Parliamentary Democracy in Canada and in the UK
A2(c):
A3:
What do Political Scientists know about the NDP? A Roundtable on the Current State of
Research on Canada-s NDP - Double session / Séance double (see/voir A1b)
Lunch / Déjeuner
A4(a):
Citizenship and Immigration
A4(b):
Journalists Meet Academics: A Critical Encounter with The Big Shift
A5(a):
Multilevel Citizenship: Canada in Comparative Perspective
A5(b):
Parliamentary Democracy in Action
A5(c):
Rethinking Canada's Founding: A Roundtable in Honour of Janet Ajzenstat
A6(a):
Citizenship and Diversity
A6(b):
Canadian Democracy
A6(c):
The Politics of Social Policy
A6(d):
A6(e):
Roundtable: Constitutional Conventions, Minority Parliaments and Government Formation: Is
There an Academic Consensus? What is the Media and Public Understanding? Is Greater
Clarity Needed?
Politics and Parliamentary Democracy
A7(a):
Voting Determinants (see/voir F7a)
A7(b):
Roundtable: Historical Political Science in Canada - Challenges and Prospects
A8:
Lunch / Déjeuner
A11(a):
Federalism and Regional Development
A11(b):
Workshop: Organizing Interests in Canada / Atelier : Les groupes d’intérêt au Canada
A12:
Indigenous-State Relations in a Multilevel Context
A13:
Lunch / Déjeuner
A14(a):
A14(b):
Roundtable: The Politics of Inclusion/Exclusion: Best Practices in Immigration Policy Since
1492
Mobilizing for Change
A15:
Digital Politics. Users and Institutions at Play (See/voir F15a)
B
Comparative Politics / Politique comparée
B1:
Political Parties
B2:
Multiculturalism
B3:
Lunch / Déjeuner
B4(a):
Methods and Approaches for Studying the Migration State
B4(b):
Human Rights Independent Assessments
B5(a):
Representation and Deliberation
B5(b):
Foreign Policy and International Relations
B6:
Federal Politics
9
B7:
Subnational Politics
B8:
Lunch / Déjeuner
B11(a):
Social Policy I
B11(b):
Political Change I
B12(a):
Social Policy II
B12(b):
Political Change II
B13:
Lunch / Déjeuner
B14(a):
The Politics of Animal Rights
B14(b):
Regime Change
B15:
Secession
C
C1(b):
CPSA/ISA-Canada section on International Relations / ACSP/AÉI-Canada, section sur
les relations internationales
Global Financial Governance After the Meltdown: What Legacies of the 2008 Financial
Meltdown?
Canada and Strategic Culture
C1(c):
Security, Development, and Order
C2(a):
Remote and Preemptive Warfare
C2(b):
Policing Borders
C3:
C4(a):
Lunch / Déjeuner - Professional Development Workshops – ISA Canada: Teaching my First
Class
Hero(in)es and Heroism in World Politics I
C4(b):
The Global Ethics of Diversity and Representation
C5:
Hero(in)es and Heroism in World Politics II
C6(a):
Reputation and Legitimacy in International Relations
C6(b):
Policy Relevance and Policy Failures in Critical Perspective
C6(c):
C7(a):
Workshop: Varieties of Global Governance Arrangements and their Impact on ResourceRich Developing Countries / Atelier : L’éventail des mécanismes de gouvernance mondiaux
et leur impact sur les pays en développement riches en ressources naturelles
Identity and (Foreign) Policy: Constructions of Canada in the Conservative Era II
C7(b):
Questions of Strategy: Perspectives on Canadian Security and Foreign Policy
C7(c):
C8:
Roundtable: Converging Practices in Security and Development: Using Fieldwork to Bridge
the Theory/Reality Gap in Security Studies
Lunch / Déjeuner - Professional Development Workshops – ISA Canada: How to Write a Lot
C11(a):
Foreign Policy in Focus
C11(b):
The Commercialization of Security
C11(c):
Issues in Global Governance: Varieties of (In)Security
C12(a):
Critical Perspectives on Peace and Security
C12(b):
Global Social Forces in International Politics
C12(c):
C1(a):
C7(d):
10
C14(a):
Lunch / Déjeuner - Professional Development Workshops – ISA Canada: Questions around
the Watercooler
Media and the Power of Representation
C14(b):
Critical Pedagogies in the IR Classroom
C15:
Acts of Non-citizenship
D
Law and Public Policy / Droit et analyse de politiques
D1:
Healthcare in Canada: Governance, Governing and Accountability
D2(a):
The Court and Intergovernmental Relations
D2(b):
D3:
Deepening Democratic Engagement: Policy Communities, Social Movements and Charity
Law
Lunch / Déjeuner
D4(a):
When the ''Who'' Matters: Personalities and Representation in the Court
D4(b):
Explaining Policy Outcomes I - Double session / Séance double (see/voir D5b)
D5(a):
Canadian Digital Copyright's Second Decade: What's at Stake
D5(b):
Explaining Policy Outcomes II - Double session / Séance double (see/voir D4b)
D6:
D8:
The Politics of Morality Policy: Studying Conception, Formulation and Implementation in
Canada - Double session / Séance double (see/voir D7)
The Politics of Morality Policy: Studying Conception, Formulation and Implementation in
Canada - Double session / Séance double (see/voir D6)
Lunch / Déjeuner
D11:
The Politics of Citizenship: Immigration and Multiculturalism
D12:
Policy and Sustainable Energy Transition: The Case of Smart Grids in Canada
D13:
Lunch / Déjeuner
D14(a):
Judicial Politics and Democracy
D14(b):
New Directions for Theories of Public Policy
D15(a):
Roundtable: Supreme Court Reference re Senate Reform
D15(b):
Policy Making for a New Era: Evidence-Based Policy and the Politics of Expertise
D15(c):
Labour Law and Labour Relations
D15(d):
Methods for Studying Politics Across Space and Time
E
Local and Urban Politics / Politique locale et urbaine
E1:
Beyond Borders: Local Climate Change Policy and Inter-Local Cooperation
E2:
Cities and Cultural Diversity
E3:
Lunch / Déjeuner
E4:
Citizen Involvement and Collective Action in Municipal Politics
E5:
Municipal Election Turnout
E6:
Workshop: The Just and Diverse City / Atelier : La cité juste et diversifiée
E7:
Workshop: The Just and Diverse City / Atelier : La cité juste et diversifiée
E8:
Lunch / Déjeuner
E11:
Roundtable: If Mayors Ruled the World: Dysfunctional States, Rising Cities (Double session
see E12 / Séance double voir E12)
Roundtable: If Mayors Ruled the World: Dysfunctional States, Rising Cities (Double session
see E11 / Séance double voir E11)
Lunch / Déjeuner
C13:
D7:
E12:
E13:
11
E14:
Comparative Urban Development Policy
E15:
No session / Aucune séance
F
Political Behaviour/Sociology | Comportement politique/sociologie
F1:
Racialized Politics, Immigration and Political Attitudes
F2(a):
I (un)like Democracy: Social Capital, Political Trust and Satisfaction with Liberal Democracy
F2(b):
Political Behaviour Keynote: Party Systems and Political Institutions
F3:
Lunch / Déjeuner - Author Meets Critics. Brad Lavigne's Building the Orange Wave
F4:
Social Issues, Political Debates and Public Opinion
F5(a):
Feminism and Political Behaviour: Pushing the Boundaries (See/voir N5)
F5(b):
Can't We Just Get Along? Affinity and Conflict Within and Between Groups
F6:
F7(a):
It's Decision Time: Determinants of Political Participation, Engagement or Decision-Making
Processes
Voting Determinants (see/voir A7a)
F7(b):
Not Your Good Old Brokerage Party Anymore: Partisan Organizations in Transition
F8:
F11:
Lunch / Déjeuner - Author Meets Critics: Susan Delacourt's Shopping for Votes: How
Politicians Choose Us and We Choose Them
Canadian Youth and Political Participation. The (Not So) Apathetic Generation?
F12:
Natural Experiments and the Vote
F13:
Lunch / Déjeuner
F14:
F15(a):
Digital Politics. Users and Institutions at Play (See/voir A15)
F15(b):
Do Campaigns Matter?
G
Political Economy / Économie politique
G1:
Indigenous Peoples and Natural Resource Extraction: Perspectives Across Provinces
G2(a):
Indigenous Peoples and Natural Resource Extraction: Consultation and Conflict in
Comparative Context
Understanding the Employment Standards Enforcement Gap in Ontario: A Multi-Method
Inquiry
Lunch / Déjeuner
G2(b):
G3:
G4:
G5:
Indigenous Peoples and Natural Resource Extraction: The Political Economy of Extraction,
Enterprises and Resistance (see/voir L4)
Indigenous Peoples and Natural Resource Extraction: International Indigenous Struggles
G6:
The Dynamics of US Hegemony
G7:
Roundtable: The Politics of Knowledge Production
G8:
Lunch / Déjeuner
G11:
Understanding Transformations in Corporate Power
G12:
Globalization and Social Movements for Global Justice
G13:
Lunch / Déjeuner
G14:
Austerity and Public Policy after the Global Financial Crisis
G15:
H
The Political Economy of Climate Change Policy
Political Theory / Théorie politique
H1:
Epistemology
12
H2(a):
Ancients and Justice
H2(b):
Canadian Thought
H3:
Lunch / Déjeuner
H4(a):
Ancients and Emotions
H4(b):
Diverse Societies
H5(a):
Tyranny
H5(b):
Roundtable: Technology and Modernity
H6(a):
Bodies
H6(b):
Ancients and Moderns
H7(a):
Critical Theory
H7(b):
Virtue
H8:
Lunch / Déjeuner
H11(a):
Machines
H11(b):
Animals of the Demos: Voice, Representation, and Silence
H12(a):
Resistances
H12(b):
Religion and Politics
H13:
Lunch / Déjeuner
H14(a):
Keynote/lecture: Radical Enlightenment as a (or the?) Prime Cause of the French Revolution
(1770-1815) - Double session / Séance double (see/voir H15)
Aristotle and the Problems of Human Freedom: Agency, Judgment, and Will
H14(b):
H15:
Roundtable with Jonathan Israel: Intellectual History and the Enlightenment - Double session
/ Séance double (see/voir H14a)
J
J1:
Provincial and Territorial Politics in Canada and Beyond / Politique provinciale et
territoriale au Canada et au-delà
The Legislature and the Political Education of Ontario Citizens
J2:
The Role of Legislators in the Ontario Legislative: Interaction with the Public
J3:
Lunch / Déjeuner
J4:
Energy and Environment
J5:
Roundtable: The Politics of Ontario
J6:
The Policy Impact of Legislators
J7:
J8:
Lunch / Déjeuner
J11:
Parties and Governing
J12:
J13:
Lunch / Déjeuner
J14:
Political Culture and Influence
J15:
K
Public Administration / Administration publique
K1:
K2:
Workshop Roundtable: Canadian Public Administration in the Twenty First Century: Future
Trends, Challenges and Prospects / Atelier : L’administration publique canadienne au XXIe
13
siècle : tendances futures, défis et perspectives
K3:
K4:
K5:
K6(a):
K6(b):
Lunch / Déjeuner - Workshop Roundtable: Canadian Public Administration in the Twenty
First Century: Future Trends, Challenges and Prospects / Atelier : L’administration publique
canadienne au XXIe siècle : tendances futures, défis et perspectives
Workshop Roundtable/Paper: Canadian Public Administration in the Twenty First Century:
Future Trends, Challenges and Prospects / Atelier : L’administration publique canadienne au
XXIe siècle : tendances futures, défis et perspectives
Workshop Roundtable/Papers: Canadian Public Administration in the Twenty First Century:
Future Trends, Challenges and Prospects / Atelier : L’administration publique canadienne au
XXIe siècle : tendances futures, défis et perspectives
Evaluating Public Organizations and their Policy Interventions
K7:
Rundtable: Constitutional Conventions, Minority Parliaments and Government Formation: Is
There an Academic Consensus? What is the Media and Public Understanding? Is Greater
Clarity Needed?
Networks and Horizontality in Public Administration
K8:
Lunch / Déjeuner
K11:
K12:
Balancing Between Political Accountability and Administrative Discretion
K13:
Lunch / Déjeuner
K14:
K15:
L
Race, Ethnicity, Indigenous Peoples and Politics / Race, ethnicité, peuples
autochtones et politique
Comparative Minority Politics, Voting, Leadership and Parties
L1(a):
L1(b):
L2(a):
L2(b):
L3:
L4:
Workshop: Intersectionality in Austere Times: Boundary-Crossing Conversations - Theorizing
Intersectinality I: Feminist Methods and Praxis / Atelier : L’intersectionalité en période
d’austérité : des conversations qui franchissent les frontières (see/voir N1)
Rethinking Canada's Humanitarian Tradition
Intersectinality II: Challenges, Limits and Embodiment / Atelier : L’intersectionalité en période
Lunch / Déjeuner
L5:
Indigenous Peoples and Natural Resource Extraction: The Political Economy of Extraction,
Enterprises and Resistance (see/voir G4)
L6(a):
Territories of Violence and National Identities
L6(b):
Workshop: Intersectionality in Austere Times: Boundary-Crossing Conversations Intersectionality and the Politics of Scale / L’intersectionalité en période d’austérité : des
conversations qui franchissent les frontières (see/voir N6)
Indigenous Nationhood From Redress to Reconciliation
L7(a):
L7(b):
L8:
Workshop: Intersectionality in Austere Times: Boundary-Crossing Conversations Intersectionality and the Social: Analyzing the Austere State / Atelier : L’intersectionalité en
période d’austérité : des conversations qui franchissent les frontières (see/voir N7)
Lunch / Déjeuner
L11(a):
Citizenship, Race National Identity
14
L11(b):
L12(a):
L12(b):
Workshop: Intersectionality in Austere Times: Boundary-Crossing Conversations - Discursive
Politics of Violence: Intersectional Perspectives / Atelier : L’intersectionalité en période
d’austérité : des conversations qui franchissent les frontières (see/voir N11b)
The Politics of Race, Design and Representation
L12(c):
Workshop: Intersectionality in Austere Times: Boundary-Crossing Conversations - Securing
Citizenship in Austere Times / Atelier : L’intersectionalité en période d’austérité : des
conversations qui franchissent les frontières (see/voir N12b)
Indigenous-State Relations in a Multilevel Context
L13:
Lunch / Déjeuner
L14:
L15:
Workshop: Intersectionality in Austere Times: Boundary-Crossing Conversations - Anti-racist
Feminism and Socialist Feminism: Revisiting Borders, Overcoming Boundaries / Atelier :
L’intersectionalité en période d’austérité : des conversations qui franchissent les frontières
(see/voir N14(b))
M
Teaching and Learning / Enseigner et apprendre la politique
M1:
M2:
Innovations in Teaching: Teaching Political Science to the 'Millennial Generation'
M3:
Lunch / Déjeuner
M4:
M5:
Mentoring Café: Engaging Students Inside the Classroom: Strategies to Promote Active
Learning
Mentoring Café: Political Science Outside the Classroom: Community-engaged Learning
M6:
Mentoring Café: The Politics of Teaching Online
M7:
Roundtable: Practices, Objectives, and Innovations in Teaching Canadian Politics
M8:
Lunch / Déjeuner
M11:
M12:
M13:
Lunch / Déjeuner
M14:
M15:
Mentoring Café: Demontrating Teaching Excellence
N
Women, Gender and Politics / Femmes, genre et politique
N1:
N3:
Intersectinality I: Feminist Methods and Praxis / Atelier : L’intersectionalité en période
d’austérité : des conversations qui franchissent les frontières (see/voir L1b)
Intersectinality II: Challenges, Limits and Embodiment / Atelier : L’intersectionalité en période
Lunch / Déjeuner
N4:
Gender and War
N5:
Feminism and Political Behaviour: Pushing the Boundaries (See/voir F5a)
N6:
Workshop: Intersectionality in Austere Times: Boundary-Crossing Conversations Intersectionality and the Politics of Scale / Atelier : L’intersectionalité en période d’austérité :
des conversations qui franchissent les frontières (see/voir L6b)
N7:
Workshop: Intersectionality in Austere Times: Boundary-Crossing Conversations -
N2:
15
N8:
Intersectionality and the Social: Analyzing the Austere State / Atelier : L’intersectionalité en
période d’austérité : des conversations qui franchissent les frontières (see/voir L7b)
Lunch / Déjeuner
N11(a):
Feminist Policy Analysist: Assessing the Tool Kit
N11(b):
Workshop: Intersectionality in Austere Times: Boundary-Crossing Conversations - Discursive
Politics of Violence: Intersectional Perspectives / Atelier : L’intersectionalité en période
Regulating Citizenship: States, Families and Civil Society
N12(a):
N12(b):
N13:
Workshop: Intersectionality in Austere Times: Boundary-Crossing Conversations - Securing
Citizenship in Austere Times / Atelier : L’intersectionalité en période d’austérité : des
conversations qui franchissent les frontières (see/voir L12b)
Lunch / Déjeuner
N14(a):
Women's Activism, Agency and Alternatives in Comparative Perspective
N14(b):
N15:
Workshop: Intersectionality in Austere Times: Boundary-Crossing Conversations - Anti-racist
Feminism and Socialist Feminism: Revisiting Borders, Overcoming Boundaries / Atelier :
L’intersectionalité en période d’austérité : des conversations qui franchissent les frontières
(see/voir L14)
Social Movement Politics: Challenges from Within
P
Special Session / Séances spéciales
P3:
Lunch on the Format of the CPSA Conference
P9:
Diversity and the Political Science Profession: Roundtable on the Findings of the Diversity
Task Force
Presidential Address/Discours présidentiel
P10:
16
Responsibilities / Responsabilités
Chairs
The chair is responsible for monitoring the entire session. The success of a session often
depends upon the chair's ability to restrict the time of speakers' presentations and temper the
discussions from the floor in order to allow sufficient time for inter-action within the presentation.
Some of the most important responsibilities of the chair are to:
 Inquire, on behalf of discussants and other paper-givers, about the status and expected
completion date of late (post-May 20) papers.
 Acquaint yourself with the content of the papers.
 Arrive early at the session and arrange with all participants the order of speaking and the
time limits; normally 15 minutes for paper presentations and 10 minutes for discussants is
ample.
 Start the session at the scheduled time with a brief presentation of the theme of the
paper/session and (if possible) of the links among the papers.
 Introduce the participants (names and institutional affiliations).
 Maintain strict time limits for each speaker and discussant.
 Moderate panel or floor discussions.
 Adjourn the session in time to allow the room to clear before the next session begins.
Chairs are requested to report name(s)) of any no shows and the session number to the section
head.
In sessions where discussants are expected to prepare comments in advance, the chair has the
option to drop from the programme any author not submitting a copy of his/her presentation to the
appropriate discussant by May 20.
Please also note the following ground rules:
1. The 2014 CPSA conference will be held during the Congress of the Social Sciences and
Humanities (Congress). Each CPSA conference participant must register for both the
Congress and the CPSA conference. Anyone who does not causes a loss of revenue for
the CPSA and is responsible for any increase in Congress registration fees. By not
paying, participants only serve to withhold much needed support for the CPSA and
penalize their paying colleagues with higher fees.
2. Each conference participant is responsible for his/her travel arrangements.
3. Session chairs are not required to be members of CPSA but are more than welcomed to
join. Membership information is available at http://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/membership.shtml.
Présidents
Le président est responsable du bon déroulement de chaque séance. Le succès d'une séance
dépend souvent de l'aptitude du président à limiter la durée des exposés et des interventions des
personnes dans la pièce de façon à donner à chacun l'occasion de s'exprimer. Les principales
responsabilités du président sont les suivantes :
 Au nom des commentateurs et des autres conférenciers, renseignez-vous sur l'état et la
date d'envoi des communications en retard (après le 20 mai).
 Prenez connaissance des textes de votre séance.
 Arrivez en avance et s'entendre avec les participants sur l'ordre de présentation et le
temps imparti à chacun. La norme prévoit 15 minutes pour les communications et pas
plus de 10 minutes pour les commentaires.
 Commencez la séance à l'heure prévue par une brève présentation des différents textes
et si possible des liens qui les unissent.
 Présentez chaque participant(e) en donnant son nom et son appartenance
institutionnelle.
17



Respectez le temps imparti à chaque conférencier et commentateur.
Animation des discussions.
Levez la séance à l'heure fixée afin de libérer la pièce pour la séance suivante.
Les présidents sont tenus de signaler toute absence d'un conférencier à une séance, en
précisant le numéro de la séance, au coordonnateur de la section concernée.
Pour les séances où des commentateurs sont censés préparer à l'avance leur analyse, le
président peut à son gré annuler la participation de tout auteur qui n'aurait pas soumis un
exemplaire de sa communication aux commentateurs, par le 20 mai.
Veuillez bien noter les règles à suivre :
1. Le congrès de l'ACSP de 2014 aura lieu durant le Congrès des sciences humaines.
Toutes les personnes qui participent au congrès de l'ACSP doivent s'inscrire au Congrès
des sciences humaines et au congrès de l'ACSP. Les participants qui ne le font pas
entraînent une perte de revenus pour l’ACSP et une augmentation éventuelle des frais
d'inscription au Congrès des sciences humaines. En ne payant pas, les participants
privent l’ACSP d'un soutien financier indispensable et pénalisent leurs collègues qui
s'inscrivent en leur faisant payer des frais plus élevés.
2. Chaque participant doit effectuer ses réservations d’avion, de train, d’hôtel ou autres.
3. On encourage les présidents de séance de devenir membres de l'ACSP. De plus amples
renseignements sont disponibles au http://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/membership-f.shtml.
Discussants
Discussants are to prepare, in advance, appropriate analytical or critical commentaries of the
significance and contribution of the papers presented in a session. Some of the most important
responsibilities of the chair are to:
 Inquire, on behalf of discussants and other paper-givers, about the status and expected
completion date of late (post-May 25) papers.
 Arrive early at the session to take part in informal discussions about the order of speaking
and time-limits.
 Ordinarily 10 minutes is set aside for discussants.
 Please attempt to place your remarks in a context broad enough to spark questions and
stir the interest of an audience that typically has not read the paper.
The following are suggested guidelines for discussants' remarks. (1) Given that the audience may
not have read the paper it is helpful to begin by stating the major thrust of the paper, identifying its
stronger or more interesting features; (2) focus the discussion on the paper's major argument; (3)
indicate whether you find the argument a compelling one; (4) state the basic merits and limits of
the paper and (5) conclude by stating linkages between papers.
In consultation with the section head, you may decline to discuss any paper which is received in
insufficient time for you to prepare an acceptable critique of it.
The 2014 CPSA conference will be held during the Congress of the Social Sciences and
Humanities (Congress). Each CPSA conference participant must register for both the Congress
and the CPSA conference. Anyone who does not causes a loss of revenue for the CPSA and is
responsible for any increase in registration fees. By not paying, participants only serve to withhold
much needed support for the CPSA and penalize their paying colleagues with higher fees.
Each conference participant is responsible for his/her travel arrangements.
Discussants are not required to be members of the CPSA but are more than welcomed to join.
Membership information is available at http://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/membership.shtml.
18
Commentateurs
Les commentateurs doivent préparer à l'avance des commentaires analytiques ou critiques
pertinents sur les communications présentées lors des séances. Les principales responsabilités
du commentateur sont les suivantes :
Renseignez-vous sur l'état et la date d'envoi des communications en retard (après le 25 mai).
Arrivez en avance au local de la séance pour prendre connaissance de l'ordre de présentation et
du temps alloué aux participants.
On accorde normalement une période de 10 minutes la personne pour les commentaires.
Dans la mesure du possible, placez vos remarques dans un contexte suffisamment général afin
de susciter les questions de l'assistance qui habituellement n'a pas lu les communications au
préalable.
Il est recommandé d'éviter de faire trop d'étalage de ses propres connaissances et de chercher
plutôt à faciliter la discussion autour des textes soumis. Il n'est jamais inutile (1) de rappeler quel
est l'objet principal de la communication que vous commentez, ainsi que ses aspects les plus
remarquables, (2) de souligner l'argumentation offerte par l'auteur, (3) de mentionner si ces
arguments vous apparaissent convaincants, (4) parler des mérites et des lacunes de la
communication et (5) de terminer en parlant des liens entre les communications.
En consultation avec le responsable de section, vous pouvez décliner de commenter toute
communication qui vous serait parvenue trop tardivement pour permettre d'élaborer un
commentaire dans des conditions acceptables.
Le congrès de l'ACSP de 2014 aura lieu durant le Congrès des sciences humaines. Toutes les
personnes qui participent au congrès de l'ACSP doivent s'inscrire au Congrès des sciences
humaines et au congrès de l'ACSP. Les participants qui ne le font pas entraînent une perte de
revenus pour l’ACSP et une augmentation éventuelle des frais d'inscription au Congrès des
sciences humaines. En ne payant pas, les participants privent l’ACSP d'un soutien financier
indispensable et pénalisent leurs collègues qui s'inscrivent en leur faisant payer des frais plus
élevés.
Chaque participant doit effectuer ses réservations d’avion, de train, d’hôtel ou autres.
On encourage les commentateurs de séance de devenir membres de l'ACSP. De plus amples
renseignements sont disponibles au http://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/membership-f.shtml.
Paper Presenters
If your proposal is accepted, the details of the conference session in which you will be
participating will be available in the on-line Programme. Once the programme is available, please
take a moment to go to that section of this site to check for spelling and other errors, and where
these occur, notify your section head and the CPSA secretariat as soon as possible.
The 15 May 2014 will be the final opportunity to make changes or to withdraw from the panel.
Please consider seriously any conditions that might make it impossible for you to meet the
deadlines or take part in this session and let your section head know immediately.
Responsibilities of presenters
Presenters are required to provide copies of their text to all of the other participants in their
session by May 20 at the latest. E-mail addresses will be available in the programme. Failure to
do this will likely result in the chair excluding the presentation from the session. Further, the
discussant has no obligation to comment on the paper if it has not been previously seen. Such an
action would be a loss to all attending the session. A copy must be sent to the following:
section head;
session chair;
discussant(s);
any other session participants;
one copy (pdf format) to the CPSA secretariat for posting to the CPSA web site.
19
The text must be SINGLE SPACED, not exceeding the CJPS manuscript submission word count
of 8,000, including notes and appendices and typed on standard 8 1/2" by 11" (or its metric
equivalent) paper.
Presenters should prepare comments outlining the major points of their papers. A good
presentation is a must for a successful session.
Oral Presentation (15 minutes) - Below are guidelines for preparing an oral summary of a paper:
No paper should ever be read verbatim from the text. Such presentations are often not only dull
but also incomplete due to time constraints imposed by the chair; an author reading from text may
be cut off by the chair before reaching the most significant aspects of the presentation. Highlights
may be given covering such points as purpose of the study, description of the sample,
methodology, problems, major findings, conclusions, or recommendations. The amount of time
devoted to each highlight may vary depending upon the author's evaluation of the importance of
each area related to the paper. Inexperienced extemporaneous speakers are advised to prepare
a "reading text" of approximately 5 typed pages.
For accepted presentations by single authors or multiple authors, each author must be a member
in good standing of the Canadian Political Science Association (CPSA) by April 15th. Membership
exemptions will be provided by the CPSA secretariat to invited guests of the programme
committee, and on request, to foreigners who can provide confirmation of a membership in their
national association or individuals from other scholarly disciplines. The CPSA secretariat will
contact all non-members regarding their membership status prior to the above deadline. Should
you need to become a member of the Association, please see http://www.cpsaacsp.ca/membership.shtml for more information.
much needed support for the CPSA and penalize their paying colleagues with higher fees .
Each conference participant is responsible for his/her travel arrangements.
Conférenciers-Communications
Si votre projet est accepté, les informations concernant la séance à laquelle vous accepterez de
participer seront disponibles dans le programme en ligne. Lorsque le programme sera disponible,
veuillez prendre quelques instants pour consulter le site web pour vérifier l’exactitude de ces
informations. Veuillez communiquer toute erreur (d'orthographe ou autre) aussitôt que possible à
votre responsable de section et au secrétariat de l'ACSP.
Le 15 mai 2014 sera la dernière occasion de faire des changements ou de vous retirer du
programme. Si vous vous trouvez dans l'incapacité de respecter les échéances ou de vous
présenter à la séance, veuillez communiquer avec votre responsable de section dans les
meilleurs délais.
Le programme sera imprimé le 15 mai 2014. Il sera alors impossible d'y apporter des
changements.
Responsabilités des conférenciers :
Les conférenciers doivent faire parvenir un exemplaire de leurs textes le 20 mai au plus tard à
chacune des personnes ci-dessous. Les courriels seront disponibles dans le programme.Tout
CONFÉRENCIER qui ne se conforme pas à cette exigence risque de voir sa communication
exclue du programme. En outre, un commentateur qui n'aurait pas reçu dans les délais un
exemplaire de la communication n'est pas tenu de préparer un commentaire; les personnes
assistant à la séance en seraient ainsi privées.
responsable de section ;
président de séance ;
20
commentateur(s) ;
les autres conférenciers ;
Une copie au secrétariat de l'Acsp (format pdf) pour le téléchargement au site web l’Acsp.
Le text doit être dactylographié À SIMPLE INTERLIGNE, sur des feuilles 8 1/2 par 11 (ou selon
les dimensions métriques équivalentes) et ne pas dépasser – comme pour la RCSP – 8 000 mots
(incluant notes et annexes).
Les conférenciers doivent préparer un document qui regroupe les points saillants de leurs
communications. Une bonne présentation constitue la base d'une séance réussie.
Présentations orales (15 minutes) - Vous trouverez ci-dessous quelques directives qui vous
aideront à préparer le résumé oral d'une communication : Ne jamais lire une communication mot
à mot. De telles présentations sont souvent monotones. De plus, le temps imparti étant limité,
l'auteur qui lit son texte sera souvent interrompu par le président avant d'avoir atteint le point
crucial de son exposé. Il est préférable de donner les grandes lignes : but de la recherche,
description de l'échantillon, méthodologie, problématique, principales observations, conclusions
ou recommandations. Le temps alloué à chacun de ces points peut varier selon l'importance que
l'auteur leur attribue. Il est conseillé à tout conférencier inexpérimenté de se préparer un texte de
5 pages dactylographiées. Distribution des communications destinées aux commentateurs.
Pour les exposés acceptés et ayant un seul auteur ou plusieurs auteurs, chaque auteur doit avoir
acquitté sa cotisation à l’ACSP d’ici le 15 avril. Des exemptions de cotisation seront accordées
par le secrétariat de l'ACSP aux invités du comité du programme et sur demande à l’ACSP aux
étrangers qui peuvent fournir la confirmation qu’ils sont membres en règle de leur association
nationale ou aux personnes provenant d’autres disciplines. Le secrétariat de l'ACSP
communiquera avec tous les non-membres à ce sujet avant la date limite indiquée plus haut. Si
vous n’êtes pas membre, de plus amples renseigments sont disponibles au http://www.cpsaacsp.ca/membership-f.shtml.
élevés.
Round Table Participants
Roundtable Participants are requested to bring copies of their presentation summaries to the
sessions. Doing so will enable participants to discuss the topic more effectively.
Each conference participant is responsible for his/her travel arrangements
Roundtable participants are not required to be members of CPSA but are more than welcomed to
join. Membership information is available at http://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/membership.shtml.
Conférenciers-Participant à une table ronde
Tout conférencier participant à une table ronde doit apporter avec lui des résumés de sa
présentation afin de favoriser une discussion plus fructueuse.
21
élevés.
On encourage les conférencier participant à une table ronde de devenir membres de l'ACSP. De
plus amples renseignements sont disponibles au http://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/membership-f.shtml.
Delegates
Delegates are asked to follow the rules set by the host university, to refrain from conversing in the
hallways outside of the presentations, and to refrain from leaving sessions early, that is, before all
presenters have presented.
Congressistes
On demande à tout congressistes d'obéir aux règlements établiés par l'université hôte, à refréner
de discuter dans les couloirs près des pièces de présentations et à refréner de sortir des séances
tôt, avant que tous les conférenciers aient présenté leur communication.
élevés.
22
23
Prizes / Prix
2014 CPSA PRIZE IN COMPARATIVE POLITICS / PRIX DE L’ACSP EN POLITIQUE
COMPARÉE 2014
Short-list of nominees / Livres retenus en sélection finale
Roberta Rice's monograph, The New Politics of Protest: Indigenous Mobilization in Latin
America's Neoliberal Era addresses a set of empirical puzzles that will be of great interest to
scholars of comparative politics: when, where, and why do we see indigenous groups protesting
against free-market reforms in Latin America. Relying on an elegant research design and a
nuanced analysis of data from field research and interviews with indigenous leaders Rice
compares cases in Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, and Chile to unpack long-term trends in indigenous
political mobilization. Rice develops a novel and persuasive theoretical framework bridging social
movement theory and insights from historical institutionalism to account for the role of indigenous
groups in contentious politics. Among the book's important arguments is the finding that recent
patterns of indigenous mobilization depend heavily on patterns of popular incorporation into
politics earlier in the 20th century. Rice's book sheds new light on the interaction between social
mobilization and formal political institutions across Latin America and makes an important
theoretical contribution by highlighting the role of history in shaping the context within which
collective action occurs.
La monographie de Roberta Rice, intitulée The New Politics of Protest: Indigenous Mobilization
in Latin America's Neoliberal Era, porte sur diverses énigmes empiriques qui intéresseront au
plus haut point les chercheurs en politique comparée : quand, où et pourquoi voit-on des groupes
autochtones protester contre des réformes du marché libre en Amérique latine? Tirant parti d’un
plan de recherche élégant et d’une analyse nuancée des données recueillies grâce à des études
sur le terrain et à des entrevues avec des leaders autochtones, Rice compare des cas en
Équateur, au Pérou, en Bolivie et au Chili et dévoile les tendances à long terme en ce qui
concerne la mobilisation politique chez les autochtones. Rice développe un cadre théorique
nouveau et convaincant qui fait appel à la fois à la théorie des mouvements sociaux et aux
trouvailles de l’institutionnalisme historique pour expliquer le rôle des groupes autochtones dans
les litiges politiques. Dans cet ouvrage, l’auteure avance, entre autres arguments clés, que les
modèles récents de la mobilisation des autochtones sont fortement tributaires des formes
d’intégration populaire dans la politique remontant au XXe siècle. Le livre de Rice jette un nouvel
éclairage sur les liens entre la mobilisation sociale et des institutions politiques officielles un peu
partout en Amérique latine et apporte une importante contribution théorique en mettant en
lumière le rôle de l’histoire dans l’évolution du contexte dans lequel s’insèrent des actions
collectives.
Dietlind Stolle and Michele Micheletti’s Political Consumerism breaks new ground in the
empirical exploration and analysis of “political consumerism”, a form of political participation by
which consumers use ethically and value-driven market choices to change institutional or market
practices. Through compelling mixed methods, Stolle and Micheletti demonstrate its increasing
importance and significance as an emerging form of individualized responsibility-taking and social
action. Consumers use a variety of new forms, particularly suited to the digital age, to exercise
pressure on corporations and governments. Collectivized individual actions are expressed
through such measures as “buycotts”, labeling schemes, or anti-sweatshop campaigns. The book
shows, among others, the effects of an email exchange campaign against Nike, as well as the
impact of fair trade labeling and organic food activism. Stolle and Micheletti have gathered an
impressive amount and different types of data, and have developed ingenious analytical
strategies. They are careful and balanced in their assertions on the significance and
consequences of political consumerism, and they engage seriously with potential critics. This
original book advances intriguing and fascinating claims that are well demonstrated and
supported.
24
Political Consumerism de Dietlind Stolle et Michele Micheletti fait œuvre de pionnier dans
l’exploration et l’analyse empiriques du « consumérisme politique », une forme de participation
politique de la part de consommateurs faisant des choix axés sur l’éthique et leurs valeurs
personnelles en vue de changer des pratiques institutionnelles et commerciales. À l’aide de
méthodes mixtes probantes, Stolle et Micheletti démontrent l’importance grandissante de cette
nouvelle façon d’agir socialement et de prendre ses responsabilités. Les consommateurs ont
recours à divers nouveaux moyens, particulièrement bien adaptés à l’ère numérique, pour
exercer des pressions sur les entreprises et les gouvernements. Ces actions collectives peuvent
prendre diverses formes : boycottage de tel ou tel produit, revendication de certains modes
d’étiquetage ou campagne contre les ateliers clandestins, par exemple. Le livre montre, entre
autres, les effets d’une campagne par courriel contre Nike ainsi que l’impact de l’étiquetage de
commerce équitable et de l’activisme en faveur des aliments bio. Stolle et Micheletti ont colligé
une quantité impressionnante de données de divers types et développé des stratégies d’analyse
ingénieuses. Elles font preuve de prudence et de pondération dans leurs propos sur l’importance
et les conséquences du consumérisme politique et elles tiennent tout à fait compte des critiques
potentielles. Cet ouvrage original met de l’avant des assertions fascinantes qui sont bien
démontrées et étayées.
In Becoming Multicultural, Triadafilos Triadafilopoulos examines how Germany and Canada
have managed the politics of membership in an era of mass international migration. The book's
contribution lies, first, in its framing of an overlooked puzzle. As Triadafilopoulos shows, two
countries typically thought of as operating starkly differing membership regimes have in fact
followed parallel policy trajectories, starting the 20th century with highly racialized immigration
policies and ending the century as de facto multicultural societies. The book then undertakes a
comparative-historical analysis to explain these transformations as well as cross-national
differences in the political dynamics generating them. Drawing extensively archival and other
primary sources, Triadafilopoulos illustrates persuasively how changing global norms can
permeate domestic politics, placing longstanding policy regimes under strain. And by elucidating
destabilizing patterns of feedback -- in which efforts to adapt existing policies to new challenges
can ultimately hasten their unraveling -- the book makes a significant contribution to debates
about the sources and mechanisms of institutional change.
Dans Becoming Multicultural, Triadafilos Triadafilopoulos examine comment l'Allemagne et le
Canada ont géré la politique d'appartenance dans une ère de migration de masse à l'échelle
internationale. L'apport du livre réside d'abord dans le cadre qu'il propose pour étudier cette
énigme négligée. Comme le démontre Triadafilopoulos, les deux pays, généralement considérés
aux antipodes de par leurs régimes d'appartenance, ont suivi des trajectoires parallèles en
matière de politiques, commençant le XXe siècle avec des politiques d'immigration fortement
axées sur l'appartenance à tel ou tel groupe ethnique et terminant de facto ce même siècle
comme des sociétés multiculturelles. L'auteur entreprend ensuite une analyse comparative de
nature historique en vue d'expliquer ces transformations ainsi que les différences entre les deux
pays dans la dynamique politique qui est à leur origine. Puisant abondamment dans des archives
et d'autres sources primaires, Triadafilopoulos illustre de manière convaincante comment
l'évolution des normes internationales peut influencer la politique intérieure d'un pays et causer
des tensions dans les régimes de politique de longue date. En élucidant les modèles de
rétroaction - dans lesquels les efforts déployés pour adapter les politiques existantes aux
nouveaux défis peuvent au bout du compte précipiter leur disparition -, le livre apporte une
contribution importante aux débats sur les sources et les mécanismes des changements
institutionnels.
25
2014 C.B. MACPHERSON PRIZE / PRIX C.B.-MACPHERSON 2014
Short-list of nominees / Communications retenues en sélection finale
Joseph H. Carens, The Ethics of Immigration, Oxford University Press, 2013
Joseph Carens’ The Ethics of Immigration is arguably the most substantial and enlightening
discussion of the normative issues raised by international immigration available. Using the
contextual normative analysis that he pioneered in his earlier work, Carens here offers a nuanced
discussion of the rights and duties of various categories of migrants and of the receiving
communities. Also contributing to an ideal theory of immigration, Carens rearticulates his
controversial yet path-breaking argument in favor of open borders: that is, the free movement of
people across the world. Carens’ treatise exemplifies how political theory can guide us through
both our difficult political problems and our more fundamental meditation on the demands of
social justice.
Joseph H. Carens, The Ethics of Immigration, Oxford University Press, 2013
The Ethics of Immigration de Joseph Carens offre sans doute l’étude la plus étoffée et la plus
éclairante au sujet des questions normatives soulevées par l’immigration internationale. Faisant
appel à l’analyse normative contextuelle élaborée dans ses travaux précédents, Carens propose
ici une présentation nuancée des droits et devoirs de diverses catégories de migrants et des
collectivités d’accueil. Apportant aussi sa contribution à une théorie idéale de l’immigration, il
reformule son argument controversé et d’avant-garde en faveur de l’ouverture des frontières,
c’est-à-dire de la libre circulation des personnes de par le monde. Le traité de Carens montre
comment la théorie politique peut nous guider à la fois dans les problèmes politiques difficiles qui
sont les nôtres et dans notre réflexion de fond sur les exigences de la justice sociale.
Bonnie Honig, Antigone, Interrupted, Cambridge University Press, 2013
For centuries and in our time western political theorists have oriented themselves to
contemporary politics through contending interpretations of Sophocles’ Antigone. In Antigone,
Interrupted Bonnie Honig enters into this contentious field and presents a fascinating new
interpretation that focuses on the varieties of ‘interruptions’ in the play. It is grounded in the text,
its historical context, and the rich field of conflicting contemporary readings. She argues that the
interruptions are full of abundant political promise beyond the standard interpretations. On her
account, Antigone provides inspiration for a politics of meaning-making action in concert on
behalf of collective life; an approach she calls agonistic humanism.
Bonnie Honig, Antigone, Interrupted, Cambridge University Press, 2013
Depuis des siècles, y compris durant le nôtre, les spécialistes de la théorie politique en Occident
réfléchissent à la politique de leur temps à travers des interprétations conflictuelles de la pièce
Antigone de Sophocle. Dans cet ouvrage, Bonnie Honig entre dans ce champ miné et présente
une interprétation tout aussi nouvelle que fascinante au sujet des diverses « interruptions » dans
la pièce. Son analyse se fonde sur le texte, le contexte historique et la riche panoplie des lectures
contemporaines antagoniques. Pour elle, Antigone est une source d’inspiration pour une politique
axée sur une action porteuse de sens au nom de la vie collective, une approche qu’elle appelle
l’humanisme agonistique.
Geneviève Nootens, Popular Sovereignty in the West, Routledge, 2013
Nootens’ systematic study of the notion of popular sovereignty throws new light on a key political
concept. Tracing the history of this idea in the West from medieval times to the present day,
Nootens shows how sovereignty comes to shape our understandings of such key political
concepts as nation (and nationhood), the state, and democracy. Stretching far beyond a history of
ideas approach, Nootens draws skillfully on historical events and analysis from comparative
politics to illuminate the complex evolution of sovereignty in theory and practice. Her account of
the contentious politics and state-building that frequently greet sovereignty claims is an insightful
and original account of the fractious evolution of both the theory and practice of popular
participation in political decision-making.
26
Geneviève Nootens, Popular Sovereignty in the West, Routledge, 2013
L’étude systématique de la notion de souveraineté populaire que propose Nootens jette un
nouvel éclairage sur un concept politique clé. Retraçant l’histoire de cette idée dans l’hémisphère
occidental depuis le moyen âge jusqu’à nos jours, Nootens montre comment la souveraineté en
vient à façonner notre compréhension de concepts politiques importants comme la nation (et le
statut de nation), l’État et la démocratie. Dépassant de loin une simple histoire des idées,
Nootens puise de manière adroite dans les événements historiques et les analyses tirées de la
politique comparée afin de mettre en lumière l’évolution complexe de la souveraineté dans la
théorie comme dans la pratique. Son compte rendu des litiges politiques souvent engendrés par
les revendications de souveraineté témoigne d’une analyse à la fois perspicace et originale de
l’évolution turbulente de la théorie et de la pratique quant à la participation populaire aux
décisions politiques.
2014 JOHN MCMENEMY PRIZE / PRIX JOHN-MCMENEMY 2014
Short-list of nominees / Articles retenus en sélection finale
Olena Hankivsky and Rita Kaur Dhamoon, “Which Genocide Matters the Most? An
Intersectionality Analysis of the Canadian Museum of Human Rights”, CJPS, 46.4: 899-920.
This timely article exams the controversy faced by the Canadian Museum of Human Rights
(CMHR) over the demands of groups and nations experiencing genocide for inclusion. Using a
feminist intersectionality lens, Olena Hanivsky and Rita Kaur Dhamoon explore the “Oppression
Olympics” providing a prescriptive response for policy direction amongst competing claims. The
paper adroitly outlines the context under which the CMHR is operating, as it nears its opening
date in September 2014 and provides a number of responses both the state and the community
could employ to meet these challenges head on. It moves beyond academic discussion and
provides real, practical applications that should be considered as the CMHR begins its
operation. This is a must read for anyone interested in discussions about race, oppression, and
public policy.
Olena Hankivsky et Rita Kaur Dhamoon, « Which Genocide Matters the Most? An
Intersectionality Analysis of the Canadian Museum of Human Rights », RCSP, 46.4: 899920.
Cet article arrive à point nommé puisqu’il examine la controverse dans laquelle est plongé le
Musée canadien pour les droits de la personne (MCDP) face aux groupes et nations qui, victimes
de génocide, demandent d’être inclus dans ce musée. À l’aide d’une analyse à la fois
intersectionnelle et féministe, Olena Hanivsky et Rita Kaur Dhamoon explorent les « Olympiques
de l’oppression » et proposent des pistes pour orienter les politiques face à des revendications
concurrentes. L’article décrit adroitement le contexte dans lequel fonctionne le MCDP à
l’approche de sa date d’inauguration en septembre 2014 et fournit plusieurs avenues possibles
que l’État et la communauté pourraient emprunter pour affronter ces défis. Ne se limitant pas à
une discussion théorique, les auteures fournissent des solutions pratiques et tangibles que le
MCDP devrait envisager avant d’ouvrir ses portes. Un article à lire à tout prix pour quiconque
s’intéresse aux questions de race et d’oppression et aux politiques publiques.
Lori Hausegger, Troy Riddell and Matthew Hennigar, “Does Patronage Matter? Connecting
Influences on Judicial Appointments with Judicial Decision Making”, CJPS 46.3: 665-690.
In Canada, the federal power to appoint superior court and appellate court judges in the
provinces has come under sustained scrutiny in recent decades, which led to changes to the
appointment process. Research has revealed that party affiliation, gender and professional
background have an effect on the appointment of appellate judges. With this important article
Lori Hausegger, Troy Riddell and Matthew Hennigar bring the inquiry further and ask whether
these factors matter in the end. Through an in-depth empirical investigation of decisions made by
the Ontario Court of Appeal between 1990 and 2003, they consider the extent to which the
characteristics which play a role in the appointment process actually influence the decisions
made by judges. The three authors bring the study of the Canadian judiciary to new levels of
27
sophistication and shed light on little know aspects of its dynamics. Their article makes an
important theoretical and empirical contribution to institutional analysis.
Lori Hausegger, Troy Riddell et Matthew Hennigar, « Does Patronage Matter? Connecting
Influences on Judicial Appointments with Judicial Decision Making », RCSP, 46.3: 665-690.
Au Canada, le pouvoir fédéral de nommer les juges de la cour supérieure et les juges des cours
d’appel dans les provinces a fait l’objet d’un examen soutenu au cours des dernières décennies,
à la suite de quoi des changements ont été apportés au processus de nomination. Des
recherches ont révélé que l’appartenance politique, le sexe et les antécédents professionnels ont
un effet sur la nomination des juges des cours d’appel. Dans cet article percutant, Lori
Hausegger, Troy Riddell et Matthew Hennigar poussent l’enquête plus loin et se demandent si
ces facteurs ont au final une importance. Fouillant minutieusement dans les décisions prises par
la Cour d’appel de l’Ontario entre 1990 and 2003, les auteurs analysent dans quelle mesure les
caractéristiques qui jouent un rôle dans le processus de nomination exercent effectivement une
influence sur les décisions des juges. Jamais jusqu’ici l’étude de la magistrature canadienne
n’avait atteint un tel degré de raffinement. Leur article, qui jette un éclairage sur des aspects peu
connus de sa dynamique, apporte une importante contribution théorique et empirique à l’analyse
des institutions.
Paul Saurette and Kelly Gordon, “Arguing Abortion: The New Anti-Abortion Discourse in
Canada”, CJPS, 46.1: 157-186.
The nature of contemporary anti-abortion discourse in Canada is the topic of this original and
fascinating analysis by Paul Saurette and Kelly Gordon. Using both quantitative and qualitative
analysis, Saurette and Gordon demonstrate that there is a new anti-abortion rhetoric changing
our Canadian cultural landscape. The research moves far beyond traditional accounts providing
evidence that the new discourse frames abortion as anti-woman thus supplanting traditional fetal
personhood perspectives. This paper would find a home on a number of syllabi, in courses on
media and politics, women and law, gender studies and public policy and it substantively changes
our understanding of how anti-abortion lobbyists are operating in this contentious policy field.
Paul Saurette et Kelly Gordon, « Arguing Abortion: The New Anti-Abortion Discourse in
Canada », RCSP, 46.1: 157-186.
La nature du discours contemporain contre l’avortement au Canada, tel est le sujet de cet article
original et fascinant de Paul Saurette et de Kelly Gordon. Faisant appel à la fois à une analyse
quantitative et qualitative, les auteurs démontrent qu’une nouvelle rhétorique anti-avortement est
en train de changer le paysage culturel de notre pays. Allant bien au-delà des comptes rendus
coutumiers, cette recherche apporte la preuve que le nouveau discours présente l’avortement
comme anti-féminin, supplantant ainsi les points de vue traditionnels accordant le statut de
personne au fœtus. Cet article aurait sa place dans plusieurs plans de cours, notamment des
cours sur les médias et la politique, les femmes et le droit, la condition féminine et les politiques
publiques. Les auteurs viennent nettement changer notre façon de percevoir le comportement
des lobbyistes anti-avortement dans ce domaine politique litigieux.
Christa Scholtz, “Federalism and Policy Change: An Analytic Narrative of Indigenous Land
Rights Policy in Australia (1966-1978)”, CJPS, 46.2: 397-418.
Under what conditions do governments choose to protect Indigenous land rights? This question is
the point of departure of Christa Scholtz’s rigorous analysis of Indigenous land rights policy in
Australia in the 1960s and 1970s. Noticing that existing research has left underexplored the
institutional factors that either constrain or liberate government strategic decision making to
protect such rights, professor Scholtz directs her attention to the role federalism plays in
influencing policy deliberation and choice. Developing a game theoretic model, which uses
Australian cabinet archives at the state and Commonwealth levels related to Indigenous land
rights, she sets out to understand how the costs and uncertainties related to intergovernmental
retaliation and jurisdictional autonomy affect policy change. This is an intellectually robust article,
which makes a significant contribution in at least three areas of the discipline: game theory,
federalism theory and Aboriginal politics.
28
Christa Scholtz, « Federalism and Policy Change: An Analytic Narrative of Indigenous
Land Rights Policy in Australia (1966-1978) », RCSP, 46.2: 397-418.
Dans quelles conditions les gouvernements choisissent-ils de protéger les droits fonciers des
Autochtones? Cette question est le point de départ de la rigoureuse analyse que fait Christa
Scholtz de la politique australienne en matière de droits fonciers des Autochtones dans les
années 1960 et 1970. Voyant que les recherches effectuées jusqu’ici n’avaient pas abordé les
facteurs institutionnels qui limitent ou non les décisions stratégiques des gouvernements eu
égard à de tels droits, la Pre Scholtz se penche sur l’influence du fédéralisme sur les
délibérations stratégiques et les choix des politiques. Élaborant un modèle de la théorie des jeux
et puisant dans les archives des cabinets australiens, au niveau de l’État comme du
Commonwealth, au sujet des droits fonciers des Autochtones, Scholtz cherche à comprendre
comment les coûts et les incertitudes reliés aux représailles intergouvernementales et à
l’autonomie juridictionnelle ont une incidence sur l’évolution des politiques. Cet article étoffé
apporte une contribution théorique et empirique importante dans au moins trois secteurs de la
science politique : la théorie des jeux, les principes du fédéralisme et les politiques concernant
les autochtones.
2014 DONALD SMILEY PRIZE / PRIX DONALD SMILEY 2014
Short-list of nominees / Livres retenus en sélection finale
Chrisopher Alcantara, Negotiating the Deal: Comprehensive Land Claims Agreements in
Canada, University of Toronto Press.
Alcantara’s book makes an important contribution to the study of Aboriginal politics in
Canada. The book explores factors driving both successful and unsuccessful negotiations
surrounding “comprehensive land claims agreements” over the past forty years. Alcantara relies
on broad body of evidence, including interviews with officials; it represents, in short a major effort
in terms of fieldwork. This fieldwork also pays off. Alcantara examines negotiations related to
four groups: the Kwanlin Dün First Nation, the Kaska Nations, the Inuit, and Innu. Each case
study is informative, and unique; but there are of course some important over-arching findings as
well. “…this book argues that variation in negotiation outcomes can be best explained by taking
into account the preferences, incentives, and strategies of the negotiating parties, all of which are
influenced by the institutional framework governing the comprehensive land claims process.” In
the end, Alcantara offers a valuable, theory-driven and empirically rich account of land claims
negotiations in Canada.
Christopher Alcantara, Negotiating the Deal: Comprehensive Land Claims Agreements in
Canada, University of Toronto Press
Le livre d’Alcantara contribue nettement à l’avancement de l’étude des politiques relatives aux
Autochtones au Canada. L’ouvrage explore les facteurs contribuant aux succès et aux échecs
des négociations entourant les « revendications territoriales globales des Autochtones » au cours
des 40 dernières années. Alcantara s’appuie sur un vaste ensemble de données probantes, dont
certaines issues d’entrevues avec des fonctionnaires – un immense travail sur le terrain, qui a
d’ailleurs porté fruit. Alcantara examine les négociations menées avec quatre groupes : la
Première Nation des Kwanlin Dun, les Nations Kaska, les Inuits et les Innus. Chaque étude de
cas est bien documentée et intéressante par les particularités dont elle fait état; il y a aussi, bien
sûr, des conclusions importantes qui s’appliquent à l’ensemble. Comme le souligne l’auteur luimême, « ce livre fait valoir que c’est en tenant compte des préférences, des mesures incitatives
et des stratégies des parties aux négociations, lesquelles sont toutes influencées par le cadre
institutionnel régissant le processus de revendication territoriale, que l’on peut le mieux expliquer
les variantes dans les résultats des négociations ». En fin de compte, Alcantara propose un
précieux compte rendu, fondé à la fois sur une théorie et des données empiriques, des
négociations sur les revendications territoriales au Canada.
29
G. Bruce Doern, Allan M. Maslove and Michal J. Prince, Canadian Public Budgeting in the
Age of Crises, McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Doern, Maslove and Prince’s book deals with a topic of broad and current interest. Doern and
colleagues begin their book with an argument that scholars of Canadian public policy need (a) a
deeper understanding of budgetary domains, (b) a better way of defining and thinking about fiscal
crisis, and (c) an increasing focus on the temporal dimension of budgetary decision-making. The
book provides all this, by first reviewing thirty years of fiscal climate, macroeconomic policy and
budgetary institutions; and then in detailed reviews of different policy domains. What is most
striking about this book is the magnitude of the endeavor – the book manages to combine a rich
theoretical background with a very thorough account of recent budgetary trends. It also places
budget crises in comparative context, and examines the Canadian-specific elements that have
made them better or worse. This is a meticulous but also far-reaching analysis of Canadian
budgetary policy.
G. Bruce Doern, Allan M. Maslove et Micheal J. Prince, Canadian Public Budgeting in the
Age of Crises, McGill-Queen’s University Press
Le livre de Doern, Maslove et Prince traite d’un sujet qui suscite actuellement un vif intérêt.
D’entrée de jeu, Doern et ses collègues soutiennent que les chercheurs en politiques publiques
canadiennes ont besoin (a) d’une meilleure compréhension des domaines budgétaires, (b) d’une
meilleure définition des crises financières, et c) d’une focalisation accrue sur la dimension
temporelle du processus décisionnel en matière de budget. Le livre vient combler tous ces
besoins d’abord en analysant le climat financier, les politiques macro-économiques et les
institutions budgétaires sur trente ans, puis en fournissant des analyses détaillées de différents
domaines stratégiques. Ce qui est le plus frappant dans ce livre, c’est son envergure : il réussit à
combiner un riche bagage théorique avec un compte rendu très exhaustif des tendances
récentes en matière de budget. Tout en comparant diverses crises budgétaires, les auteurs
cernent les éléments propres au Canada qui les ont atténuées ou aggravées. Voilà donc une
analyse à la fois méticuleuse et ambitieuse des politiques budgétaires canadiennes.
Elizabeth Goodyear-Grant, Gendered News: Media Coverage and Electoral Politics in
Canada, UBC Press.
Goodyear-Grant’s book offers a rare but important look at the relationship between media
coverage and women’s representation in Canada. In particular it “…asks whether the new media
contribute to the supply- and demand-size barriers to women’s political representation.” The
answer is: yes, it does. Drawing on a considerable body of content-analytic data, alongside
opinion data from the Canadian Election Studies, Goodyear-Grant offers an impressively detailed
analysis of the nature and magnitude of gendered media coverage in Canada. Goodyear-Grant
makes a strong case for the importance of mass media in citizens’ ideas about politics and
politicians. She then outlines important differences in the visibility and treatment of female
politicians. The book exposes the heavily biased climate in which female politicians much
operate; and offers one possible explanation for ongoing gender gaps in political interest and
participation.
Elizabeth Goodyear-Grant, Gendered News: Media Coverage and Electoral Politics in
Canada, UBC Press.
L’ouvrage de Goodyear-Grant traite d’un sujet à la fois important et pourtant rarement abordé : le
lien entre la couverture médiatique et la représentation des femmes au Canada. Comme le note
l’auteure elle-même, elle se demande « si les nouveaux médias contribuent à nuire, en termes
d’offre et de demande, à la représentation politique des femmes ». Et elle répond que c’est bien
le cas. Puisant dans un ensemble considérable de données relatives à l’analyse de contenu
parallèlement à des données de sondages d’opinion tirées de diverses Études sur l’élection
canadienne, Goodyear-Grant offre une analyse détaillée et fort impressionnante de la nature et
de l’étendue de la couverture médiatique selon le genre au Canada. Elle démontre de façon
convaincante l’influence des médias sur les opinions des citoyens au sujet de la politique et de la
classe politique. Elle décrit ensuite les différences importantes quant à la visibilité des femmes
politiques et à la façon dont on en parle. Le livre met en lumière le climat fortement imprégné de
préjugés dans lequel les femmes politiques doivent évoluer et offre une possible explication pour
30
les écarts constants entre les hommes et les femmes quant à l’intérêt et à l’engagement
politiques.
2014 JILL VICKERS PRIZE / PRIX JILL-VICKERS 2014
Short-list of nominees / Communications retenues en sélection finale
Amanda Bittner and Elizabeth Goodyear-Grant, “Understanding the Impact of “Gender” in
Election Studies”
The authors offer an excellent and important addition to election studies. In this paper, Bittner and
Goodyear-Grant provide a thorough overview of the literature, and advance a qualitative and
comprehensive empirical plea to election studies which often collapse gender and sex as
variables in the determination of political behaviour. They skilfully apply comparative data from
four provincial elections questioning the traditional practice of substituting sex for gender. The
breadth of the quantitative data persuasively supported and framed their arguments regarding
attitudinal analyses adding important insights into explaining male-female gaps in public opinion,
and how their gender variables offer an improvement over the conventional practice of using sex
proxies alone.
Amanda Bittner et Elizabeth Goodyear-Grant, « Understanding the Impact of ‘Gender’ in
Election Studies »
Les auteures offrent un ajout à la fois excellent et important aux études sur les élections. Après
avoir présenté une revue complète de la littérature, Bittner et Goodyear-Grant critiquent la
confusion, courante en études électorales, entre le genre et le sexe comme variables dans
l’étude du comportement politique. Elles utilisent de manière adroite des données comparatives
provenant de quatre élections provinciales pour remettre en question la pratique traditionnelle
consistant à substituer le sexe au genre. L’ampleur des données quantitatives colligées vient
étayer de manière convaincante leurs arguments au sujet des études sur le comportement et
mieux expliquer les écarts entre les hommes et les femmes, ainsi que l’importance de tenir
compte du genre, sans le réduire au sexe..
Brenda O’Neill, “The Political and Civic Participation of Canadian Women”
Brenda O’Neill’s analysis of political participation, vast in its generation, application and
interpretation of quantitative data, goes beyond gender gap studies to analyse how personality
shapes women’s participatory decision-making. It is a very well written paper, and is a work which
analyses an array of diverse communities of women in Canada which are not generally included
in the aggregate (i.e., ethnic minority, aboriginal and immigrant status).
Brenda O’Neill, « The Political and Civic Participation of Canadian Women »
Nous considérons qu’il était important d’accorder une mention honorable à cette communication.
L’analyse que fait O’Neill de la participation politique brille par son envergure quant à la
production, à l’application et à l’interprétation des données quantitatives sans compter qu’elle va
au-delà des études sur le fossé entre les sexes. O’Neill montre comment c’est la personnalité des
femmes qui oriente leurs décisions quant à la participation. Bien rédigée, cette étude a aussi le
mérite de prendre en compte une série de communautés de femmes au Canada qui ne sont pas
généralement comprises dans les données agrégées (minorité ethnique, statut d’autochtone et
statut d’immigrant).
Stephanie Paterson, Patrik Marier and Felix Chu, “The ‘State’ of Gender Analysis in
Canada: An Interprovincial Comparison”
The authors present a comprehensive comparative analysis of how gender is mediated by
women’s policy agencies and how well these agencies act as “consultative mechanisms”. In part
focussing on discursive analysis, Paterson, Marier and Chu apply two frameworks, state feminism
and critical frame analysis, to investigate the relationship between the autonomy and influence of
women’s policy agencies and how gender equality is represented. The authors’ work adds
31
important emerging insights into the role of women’s policy agencies across multiple jurisdictions,
offering readers an impressive qualitative analysis. In their study, they generated a typology of
women’s policy agencies to investigate institutional and discursive similarities and differences
across jurisdictions – analyses which is absent in the current literature. Indeed, previous work in
this area of study has tended to analyse women’s policy agencies at the federal level or through a
small number of provincial cases.
Stephanie Paterson, Patrik Marier et Felix Chu, « The ‘State’ of Gender Analysis in Canada:
An Interprovincial Comparison »
L’analyse comparative exhaustive de ces auteurs porte sur la façon dont la notion de genre est
véhiculée par les organismes étatiques traitant de la condition féminine et sur le degré d’efficacité
avec lequel ces organismes agissent à titre de « mécanismes de consultation ». Faisant entre
autres appel à l’analyse discursive, Paterson, Marier et Chu mettent en application deux cadres,
le féminisme d’État et l’analyse critique de cadres, en vue d’élucider, d’une part, le lien entre
l’autonomie et l’influence de ces organismes, et d’autre part, le mode de représentation de
l’égalité entre les sexes. Le travail des auteurs vient enrichir la réflexion sur le rôle des
organismes étatiques traitant de la condition féminine dans de nombreux champs de compétence
tout en livrant aux lecteurs une analyse quantitative impressionnante. Les auteurs proposent en
outre une typologie de ces organismes afin de mieux cerner leurs similitudes et leurs différences
institutionnelles et discursives dans les divers champs de compétences – une analyse qui était
jusque-là absente dans la littérature sur le sujet. Les recherches antérieures dans le domaine
avaient en effet tendance à analyser les organismes étatiques traitant de la condition féminine au
niveau fédéral ou par le biais d’un nombre restreint de cas au niveau provincial.
Melanee Thomas and Lisa Lambert, “Private Mom vs Political Dad? Communications of
Parental Status in the 41st Canadian Parliament”
In this well-written and expertly presented research which offers fresh insights to the literature,
the author’s analyse empirical data which counters much of the previous academic work in
women and media which has typically argued that women downplay their parental status and
men politicians celebrate their family lives. Indeed, as Thomas and Lambert persuasively argue in
this treatment of political marketing, politicians displays of parental status are deliberate and
strategic decisions designed to highlight both the candidate’s party’s brand and to shape their
own image and political fortunes. They conclude that gender and political party “condition how
parental status is communicated to constituents”.
Melanee Thomas et Lisa Lambert, « Private Mom vs Political Dad? Communications of
Parental Status in the 41st Canadian Parliament »
Dans cette recherche bien structurée et présentée dans un langage clair, les auteures analysent
des données empiriques venant contredire une bonne partie des recherches antérieures sur les
femmes et les médias dans lesquelles on soutient généralement que les femmes minimisent leur
statut de parent alors que les hommes célèbrent leur vie familiale. Comme Thomas et Lambert le
démontrent de manière convaincante, c’est une question de marketing politique : l’affichage du
statut de parent que font les hommes et les femmes politiques relève de choix conscients et
stratégiques visant à mettre en lumière la marque du parti du candidat ou de la candidate et à
façonner leur propre image et leur propre destinée politique. Les auteures concluent que le genre
et le parti politique « conditionnent le mode de communication du statut parental aux électeurs ».
PRIX FRANCOPHONE DE L’ACSP 2014
Livres retenus en sélection finale / Short-list of nominees
Dans Tout le monde en regarde!, Frédérick Bastien examine, à partir des théories de la
communication politique, les émissions qui combinent divertissement et information. Brisant avec
les idées reçues sur la nocivité du phénomène, l’auteur montre à quel point ces dernières se sont
intégrées au processus démocratique et électoral. Rappelant que l’infodivertissement
accompagne depuis longtemps l’offre télévisuelle offerte aux citoyens, il examine de plus près la
relation qui s’est instaurée entre le monde télévisuel et le monde politique. Ce faisant, Bastien
32
offre un regard novateur sur ce phénomène qui influence la pratique du journalisme politique et la
façon dont le public s’informe en démocratie.
In Tout le monde en regarde!, Frédérick Bastien uses political communication theories to
examine programs that combine entertainment and news. Breaking with the traditional view that
this phenomenon is harmful, the author shows how much they have become part of the
democratic and electoral processes. Noting that "infotainment" has long been part of what voters
can watch on television, he takes a closer look at the relationship that has been created between
the worlds of TV and politics. In doing so, Bastien presents an innovative look at this
phenomenon, which has had an impact on both the practice of political journalism and the way
the public learns about democracy.
Dans Trois espaces de protestation, Pascale Dufour cherche à comprendre comment les débats
entourant la mondialisation transforment l’action collective et la politique des partis, des syndicats
et du milieu associatif en France, au Canada et au Québec. Théoriquement ambitieux, son
ouvrage fournit une analyse systématique et détaillée de ces luttes en les situant historiquement
et géographiquement. L’auteure fait une contribution importante à la recherche sur les
mouvements sociaux en liant l’analyse des discours et des actions des acteurs collectifs afin de
faire ressortir la diversité des pratiques. Dufour illustre de manière convaincante l’utilité de
concevoir la mondialisation comme une variable endogène aux sociétés pour explorer les
dynamiques et les échelles changeantes de la contestation politique au 21ème siècle.
In Trois espaces de protestation, Pascale Dufour seeks to understand how the globalization
debate transforms collective action and policies of parties, unions and the cooperative movement
in France, Canada and Québec. Her theoretically ambitious work provides a systematic and
detailed analysis of these struggles, situating them historically and geographically. The author
makes a major contribution to research on social movements, linking discourse analysis and
actions by collective players in order to reveal the diversity of practices. Dufour convincingly
illustrates the usefulness of looking at globalization as an endogenous social variable, in order to
explore the dynamics and changing scale of political disputes in the 21st century.
Aude-Claire Fourot compare, dans L’intégration des immigrants, plus de cinquante ans d’action
publique locale pour expliquer les différences de trajectoire entre Montréal et Laval en matière
d’intégration des immigrants. Malgré des compétences formelles limitées par le fédéralisme, le
livre montre que les villes jouent un rôle majeur dans le cadrage et la construction politique de
l’intégration des immigrants au Québec et au Canada. L’auteure fait une contribution significative
à l’avancement des connaissances sur les relations intergouvernementales, et dresse un portrait
exhaustif des politiques adoptées par les deux métropoles québécoises à l’endroit des
immigrants et des communautés culturelles.
Aude-Claire Fourot, in L’intégration des immigrants, compares more than fifty years of local
public action to explain the different trajectories with respect to the integration of immigrants
between Montréal and Laval. Despite jurisdictions that are formally defined by federalism, the
book shows that cities play a major role in the framing and political construction of the integration
of immigrants in Québec and Canada. The author makes a significant contribution to the
advancement of knowledge of intergovernmental relations and paints an exhaustive portrait of the
policies adopted by the two Québec cities with respect to immigrants and cultural communities.
33
Workshops / Ateliers
Workshops are sessions that are meant to provide an opportunity for participants to engage in
fuller examination of a particular theme. All conference registrants are invited to attend workshops
in their entirety or to drop in for any part.
Les ateliers visent à permettre aux participants d'approfondir un thème particulier. Toutes les
personnes qui s'inscrivent au congrès sont invitées à prendre part à ces ateliers, soit du début à
la fin, soit pour une partie seulement.
Workshop 1 – Canadian Politics: Organizing Interests in Canada
Organizer: Rachel Laforest (Queen’s University)
See sessions A11b,A12b
Organized interests are central to the study of Canadian politics. Many Canadian scholars have
recently observed changes in the strength of civil society actors in the state's surrounding.
Whether it is through funding cuts, more stringent regulations that restrict the ability of groups to
advocate, or the closure of consultative spaces; it is clear that the voice of some civil society
groups in policy making has been weakened. However, we can also observe new patterns of
mobilization of interests emerge with the rise of a new wave of contentious politics and new forms
of citizen engagement thanks to social media - both of which are reshaping the way citizens
engage with the public sphere. These trends deserve further investigation, and need to be
investigated simultaneously, for together they affect the contexts of policy making in Canada.
The workshop aims to answer the following questions:
- How are power and influence changing?
- How have the relationships between the state and civil society actors changed?
- How have the relationships between the state and citizens changed?
- How have the relationships between civil society actors changed?
- Do existing theoretical models of state-society relations still offer useful analytical tools for
understanding current trends?
- What are the implications of the changing patterns of political representation for democracy in
Canada?
Answering these questions is fundamental to enhancing our understanding of Canadian politics.
By bringing together scholars studying organized interests in Canada from a variety of
perspectives, we hope to get a more comprehensive theoretical and empirical understanding of
the role that organized interests currently play in the Canadian polity.
Confirmed Workshop Participants include: Pascale Dufour (Université de Montréal), Jonathan
Greene (Trent University), Joël Harden (Carleton University), Rachel Laforest (Queen's
University), Michael Orsini (University of Ottawa), Miriam Smith (York University), Steven
Rathgeb Smith (Syracuse University)
Atelier 1 – Politique canadienne : Les groupes d’intérêt au Canada
Organisatrice : Rachel Laforest (Queen’s University)
Voir les séances A11b,A12b
Les groupes d’intérêt constituent un élément essentiel à l'étude de la politique canadienne. Un
grand nombre de chercheurs canadiens ont récemment observé des changements dans le poids
des acteurs de la société civile à l’œuvre dans l’entourage des administrations publiques. Que ce
soit à travers des coupures budgétaires, des règlements plus sévères qui limitent la capacité des
groupes de faire pression ou la fermeture des espaces consultatifs, il est clair que la voix de
certains groupes de la société civile par rapport à l’élaboration de politiques a moins de poids.
34
Par ailleurs, on peut aussi noter l’émergence de nouveaux modèles de mobilisation avec la
montée d’une nouvelle vague de contestations politiques et de nouvelles formes de participation
citoyenne grâce aux médias sociaux , qui toutes deux sont en train de refaçonner la manière dont
les citoyens s’engagent dans la sphère publique. Ces tendances méritent des recherches plus
approfondies et menées simultanément, car elles ont une incidence sur les contextes dans
lesquels les politiques s’élaborent au Canada.
L’atelier vise à répondre aux questions suivantes :
- Comment les notions de pouvoir et d’influence sont-elles en train de changer?
- Comment les relations entre l’État et les acteurs de la société civile ont-elles changé?
- Comment les relations entre l’État et les citoyens ont-elles changé?
- Comment les relations entre les divers acteurs de la société civile eux-mêmes ont-elles
changé?
- Les modèles théoriques des relations État-société offrent-ils encore des outils analytiques utiles
pour comprendre les tendances actuelles?
- Quelles sont les implications de l’évolution des modèles de représentation politique pour la
démocratie au Canada?
Des réponses à ces questions sont indispensables si nous voulons mieux comprendre la
politique canadienne. En réunissant des chercheurs qui étudient, à partir de divers points de vue,
les groupes d’intérêt au Canada, nous espérons mieux saisir, sur le plan théorique et empirique,
le rôle de ces groupes au sein du régime politique canadien.
Les conférenciers suivants ont confirmé leur présence à cet atelier : Pascale Dufour (Université
de Montréal), Jonathan Greene (Trent University), Joël Harden (Carleton University), Rachel
Laforest (Queen's University), Michael Orsini (Université d’Ottawa), Miriam Smith (York
University), Steven Rathgeb Smith (Syracuse University)
Workshop 2 – CPSA/ISA-Canada section on International Relations: Varieties of Global
Governance Arrangements and their Impact on Resource-Rich Developing Countries
Organizer: Hevina S. Dashwood (Brock University)
See sessions C6b,C7d,C12d
In an effort to address global “governance gaps”, a wide variety of global initiatives have sought
to respond to the inability/ unwillingness of states to govern in policy realms that transcend
national borders. Variously referred to as ‘hybrid’ global governance initiatives, ‘multi-stakeholder
partnerships’ or ‘tripartite’ governance, these governance arrangements typically include some
combination of state, non-governmental (NGO) and private sector actors. A quickly proliferating
number of global governance arrangements have been developed to address the environmental,
social, human rights and economic development challenges faced by resource-rich developing
countries. Although much attention has been paid in the private global governance literature to
the impetus behind and the institutional form these initiatives take, there is relatively little research
on their impact in developing countries. The objective of this workshop is to bring together
research that critically examines the extent to which various global governance initiatives realize
their goals in resource-rich developing countries. Specifically, the workshop organizers invite
paper proposals that critically analyze the ‘on the ground’ impact of global governance initiatives
in the extractive, forestry, and agricultural sectors in Africa, Asia and Latin America.
Confirmed Keynote: Timothy Shaw (University of Massachusetts)
35
Atelier 2 – ACSP/AÉI-Canada, section sur les relations internationales : L’éventail des
mécanismes de gouvernance mondiaux et leur impact sur les pays en développement
riches en ressources naturelles
Organizer: Hevina S. Dashwood (Brock University)
Voir les séances C6b,C7d,C12d
Dans un effort en vue de combler les lacunes de la gouvernance à l’échelle mondiale, tout un
éventail d’initiatives ont été mises sur pied afin de répondre à l’inhabileté ou au manque de
volonté des États de gouverner dans des sphères de la politique qui transcendent les frontières
nationales. Désignées comme des initiatives de gouvernance mondiale « hybrides », des «
partenariats multilatéraux » ou de la « gouvernance tripartite », ces accords de gouvernance
comprennent d’ordinaire une certaine combinaison d’intervenants gouvernementaux, nongouvernementaux (ONG) et du secteur privé. Un nombre rapidement grandissant d’accords de
gouvernance mondiaux ont été mis au point pour s’attaquer aux enjeux environnementaux et
sociaux et aux questions de droits de la personne et de développement économique auxquels
font face des pays en développement riches en ressources naturelles. Bien que, dans la
littérature sur la gouvernance mondiale privée, une grande attention ait été portée aux facteurs à
l’origine de ces initiatives et à la forme institutionnelle qu’elles prennent, il y a relativement peu de
recherche sur leur impact dans les pays en développement. Cet atelier a pour objectif de
regrouper des recherches qui examinent de manière critique dans quelle mesure les diverses
initiatives de gouvernance mondiale atteignent leurs buts dans les pays en développement riches
en ressources naturelles. Plus précisément, nous vous invitons à soumettre des communications
qui font une analyse critique de l’impact des initiatives en matière de gouvernance mondiale ‘sur
le terrain’ dans les secteurs minier, forestier et agricole en Afrique, en Asie et en Amérique latine.
Conférencier invité dont la présence est confirmée : Timothy Shaw (University of Massachusetts)
Workshop 3 – Local and Urban Politics: The Just and Diverse City
Organizer: Livianna Tossutti (Brock University)
See sessions E6,E7
The fortunes of cities across Canada and around the world are being shaped by a host of wellknown transformative factors, including demographic transition, global migration, economic
restructuring and trade liberalization, income inequality, fiscal pressures, infrastructure gaps, and
changing environmental conditions, technologies and lifestyle preferences. This workshop aims to
bring together academics and practitioners to explore the principles and qualities of a just and
diverse city that will enhance the quality of life in cities of all sizes.
We welcome both theoretical and empirical papers that explore the following topics from
Canadian, international or comparative perspectives:
1. What are the principles and qualities of the just and diverse city?
2. To what extent have the qualities of the just and diverse city been realized? Single and multiple
case studies are particularly welcome.
3. What are the politics, policies and governance models, and the demographic, economic, social
and cultural forces, that contribute to the just and diverse city?
4. What strategies can subnational governments and non-governmental organizations and
networks implement to realize the qualities of the just and diverse city?
Keynote Speaker: Dr. Susan Fainstein, Harvard University
Address: What Is the Relationship between Diversity and Justice?
36
Atelier 3 – Politique locale et urbaine : La cité juste et diversifiée
Organisatrice : Livianna Tossutti (Brock University)
Voir les séances E6,E7
La situation des villes dans l’ensemble du Canada et ailleurs dans le monde est façonnée par
une multitude de facteurs de transformation bien connus, comme la transition démographique,
les flux migratoires à l’échelle mondiale, la restructuration économique, la libéralisation des
échanges commerciaux, l’inégalité des revenus, les pressions fiscales, les lacunes en matière
d’infrastructures et l’évolution des conditions environnementales, des technologies et des
préférences quant au mode de vie. Cet atelier vise à réunir des universitaires et des praticiens en
vue d’explorer les principes et les attributs d’une cité juste et diversifiée qui amélioreront la qualité
de vie dans des villes de toutes dimensions.
Nous aimerions recevoir des communications théoriques et empiriques portant sur les sujets
suivants d’un point de vue canadien, international ou comparatif :
1. Quels sont les principes et les attributs d’une cité juste et diversifiée?
2. Dans quelle mesure les attributs d’une cité juste et diversifiée peuvent-ils être concrétisés?
Des études de cas portant sur une ville ou plusieurs villes seront particulièrement bienvenues.
3. Quels systèmes politiques, politiques et modèles de gouvernance et quelles forces
démographiques, économiques, sociales et culturelles contribuent à l’édification d’une cité juste
et diversifiée?
4. Quelles stratégies les gouvernements sous-nationaux ainsi que les organismes et réseaux non
gouvernementaux peuvent-ils mettre en œuvre pour concrétiser les attributs d’une cité juste et
diversifiée?
Conférencière‐ invitée : Susan Fainstein, Harvard University
Discours : What Is the Relationship between Diversity and Justice?
Workshop 4 – Public Administration: Canadian Public Administration in the Twenty First
Century: Future Trends, Challenges and Prospects
Organizers: Charles Conteh (Brock University), Frank Ohemeng (University of Ottawa) and Ian
Roberge (Glendon College)
See sessions K2,K4,K5
This workshop proposes to bring together younger and seasoned scholars of Canadian public
administration to discuss current and future trends in the field while seeking to bridge the
Anglophone and Francophone analytical traditions. Building on current trends, the workshop
participants are to consider new and innovative issues in Canadian public administration. The
landscape of Canadian public administration is changing due to phenomena like globalization,
fiscal austerity, natural disasters, and increased citizen activism. New theories have emerged,
such as new public governance, to try and explain more recent developments that are re-shaping
the institutions and processes of public administration. The workshop will provide an opportunity
to identify and analyze present and future trends in Canadian public administration. The goal is to
use current approaches as point of departure to develop a new and innovative research agenda
for the discipline. We would particularly welcome proposals that consider new theoretical
approaches or new methodological tools that address the increasingly porous boundaries of the
public sector.
37
Atelier 4 – Administration publique : L’administration publique canadienne au XXIe siècle :
tendances futures, défis et perspectives
Organisateurs : Charles Conteh (Brock University), Frank Ohemeng (University of Ottawa) et Ian
Roberge (Glendon College)
Voir les séances K2,K4,K5
Cet atelier vise à réunir de jeunes chercheurs et des chercheurs chevronnés pour discuter des
tendances actuelles et futures dans le domaine de l’administration publique canadienne et à jeter
un pont entre les traditions anglophones et francophones en matière d’analyse. S’appuyant sur
les tendances actuelles, les participants réfléchiront ensemble aux nouveaux enjeux dans
l’administration publique canadienne. Le paysage de l’administration publique canadienne évolue
en raison de phénomènes comme la mondialisation, les mesures d’austérité budgétaire, les
désastres naturels et l’accroissement du militantisme citoyen. De nouvelles théories émergent,
notamment sur la nouvelle gouvernance publique, en vue de tenter d’expliquer les événements
plus récents qui sont en train de refaçonner les institutions et les procédures au sein de
l’administration publique. Cet atelier permettra d’identifier et d’analyser les tendances actuelles et
futures dans l’administration publique canadienne. L’objectif est de partir des approches actuelles
en vue de développer un programme de recherche novateur pour notre discipline. Nous nous
intéressons tout particulièrement aux propositions portant sur les nouvelles approches théoriques
ou les nouveaux outils méthodologiques qui prennent en compte les frontières de plus en plus
poreuses du secteur public.
Workshop 5 – Women, Gender and Politics and Race, Ethnicity and Indigenous Peoples
and Politics: Intersectionality in Austere Times: Boundary-Crossing Conversations
Organizers: Davina Bhandar (Race, Ethnicity and Indigenous Peoples and Politics) and Tammy
Findlay (Women, Gender and Politics)
See sessions L1b/N1,L2b/N2,L4b/N4b,L6b/N6,L7b/N7,L11b/N11b/L12b/N12b
In the 2013 edition of Signs dedicated to the theme of intersectionality, Cho, Crenshaw and
McCall state that intersectionality has provided “a gathering place for open-ended investigations
of the overlapping and conflicting dynamics of race, gender, class, sexuality, nation, and other
inequalities” (788). While intersectionality is entering its third decade as a key tool of social
analysis, the full impact of this approach has arguably not been realized. Questions remain as to
whether it leads to forms of a hierarchy of oppressions, or if the ability to challenge dynamics of
power can be understood via an intersectional approach. At the 2014 CPSA, the Race, Ethnicity,
Indigenous Peoples and Politics and the Women and Politics sections are hosting such a
gathering place of conversations and collaboration.
In this current moment of austerity, interrogating the systems of power that produce and reinforce
multiple axes of oppression is particularly pressing. Austerity is not handed out evenly -- social
and economic policy making in austere times has had a greater impact on women, racialized
communities and indigenous populations. Globally, cuts to social spending on health care,
education, and social welfare and increased privatization, commodification, militarization and
securitization are having devastating effects on marginalized peoples.
How do we evaluate austerity measures in the context of colonial violence and continued legacies
of dispossession?
How can an intersectional lens help to make sense of these processes of radical social
dislocation?
Does an intersectional approach lead to solidarity politics, or does it limit these possibilities?
We welcome papers from a variety of influences including: critical race theory, feminism, political
economy, post-structuralism, institutionalism, queer theory, and critical disability.
Suggested Themes:
- austerity, indigeneity and dispossession
38
- effects of austerity measures on racialized/gendered/queer/immigrant communities
- intersectionality, colonialism and imperialism
- intersectionality, citizenship and governance
- intersectionality, state restructuring and social policy
- intersectionality, security and militarization
- intersectionality and institutions (electoral politics, federalism, courts, etc.)
- intersectionality, space, place, and scale
- neoliberal intersectionality and the commodification of “insurgent knowledge” (Mohanty 2013)
- intersectionality, activism and social movements/ forms of resistance
- intersectionality and radical research methods
Atelier 5 – Femmes, genre et politique et Race, ethnicité, peuples autochtones et politique
: L’intersectionalité en période d’austérité : des conversations qui franchissent les
frontières
Organisatrices : Davina Bhandar (Race, ethnicité, peuples autochtones et politique) et Tammy
Findlay (Femmes, genre et politique)
Voir les séances L1b/N1,L2b/N2,L4b/N4b,L6b/N6,L7b/N7,L11b/N11b/L12b/N12b
Dans le numéro 2013 de Signs consacré au thème de l’intersectionalité, Cho, Crenshaw et
McCall affirment que l’intersectionalité fournit « un lieu de rencontre pour des recherches
ouvertes sur le recoupement et l’opposition dans la dynamique de la race, du genre, de la classe
sociale, de la sexualité, de la nation et d’autres domaines d’inégalité » (788). Bien que
l’intersectionalité entre dans sa troisième décennie en tant qu’outil d’analyse sociale, tout l’impact
de cette approche n’a sans doute pas été compris. On ne sait toujours pas si elle aboutit à des
formes d’oppressions hiérarchisées ou si la capacité de remettre en question la dynamique du
pouvoir peut être comprise par le biais d’une approche intersectionnelle. Au congrès 2014 de
l’ACSP, les sections Race, ethnicité, peuples autochtones et politique ainsi que Femmes, genre
et politique seront les hôtes d’un lieu de rencontre privilégiant échanges et collaboration.
En cette période d’austérité, il est particulièrement urgent de remettre en question les systèmes
de pouvoir qui produisent et renforcent de multiples axes d’oppression. L’austérité ne touche pas
tout le monde de la même manière – l’élaboration des politiques sociales et économiques en
période d’austérité a un impact plus grand sur les femmes, les communautés ethniques et les
peuples autochtones. À l’échelle mondiale, les coupures dans les dépenses pour les soins de
santé, l’éducation et l’assistance sociale ainsi que la progression de la privatisation, de la
marchandisation, de la militarisation et de la sécurisation ont des effets dévastateurs sur les
populations marginalisées.
Comment évaluer les mesures d’austérité dans le contexte de la violence coloniale et des
traditions continues d’expropriation?
Comment la lentille de l’intersectionalité peut-elle contribuer à faire mieux comprendre les
processus de dislocation sociale radicale?
Une approche intersectionnelle conduit-elle à une politique de la solidarité ou limite-t-elle ces
possibilités?
Les communications provenant de divers courants d’influence sont les bienvenues, qu’il s’agisse
par exemple de la théorie critique de la race, du féminisme, de l’économie politique, du
poststructuralisme, de l’institutionnalisme, de la théorie fondée sur la diversité sexuelle ou des
études critiques sur la situation des personnes handicapées.
Thème suggérés :
- Austérité, indigénéité et dépossession
- Les effets des mesures d’austérité sur les communautés
racialisées/gendrées/allosexuelles/immigrantes
- Intersectionalité, colonialisme et impérialisme
- Intersectionalité, citoyenneté et gouvernance
- Intersectionalité, restructuration de l’État et politiques sociales
-Intersectionalité, sécurité et militarisation
39
- Intersectionalité et institutions (politiques électorales, fédéralisme, tribunaux, etc.)
- Intersectionalité, espace, lieu et portée
- Intersectionalité néolibérale et marchandisation du « savoir des insurgés » (voir la notion d’«
insurgent knowledge », Mohanty 2013)
- Intersectionalité, activisme et mouvements sociaux/formes de résistance
- Intersectionalité et méthodes de recherches radicales
40
Development Fund / Fonds de développement
Give papers, discuss their work, meet future colleagues and network with experienced political
scientists… Yes, your $20 can make all this happen for our students and young
researchers!
STUDENT TRAVEL GRANT
2014 - Brock University and 2015 - University of Ottawa, CPSA Conferences
You certainly know that our graduate students and junior scholars are generally unable to afford
the cost of attending a conference. Since the termination of the SSHRC student travel grant, their
participation depends on the voluntary contributions from CPSA members.
Remember that they are at the beginning of their careers. With your small or big donation, we can
increase the number of grants offered annually.
Contact the CPSA Secretariat at [email protected]
Présenter une communication, discuter de ses recherches, rencontrer de futurs collègues et se
développer un réseau relationnel avec des politologues d’expérience… Oui, votre don de 20 $
peut donner un coup de pouce à nos étudiants et jeunes chercheurs!
BOURSES DE VOYAGE DESTINÉES AUX ÉTUDIANTS
2014 - Brock University and 2015 - University of Ottawa, CPSA Conferences
Vous savez sans doute que nos étudiants diplômés et jeunes chercheurs n’ont habituellement
pas les moyens d’assister à un congrès. Depuis la suppression des bourses de voyage qui leur
étaient accordées en vertu d’un programme du CRSH, leur participation dépend des dons des
membres de l’ACSP.
N’oubliez pas qu’ils sont au début de leur carrière. Vos dons, modestes ou plus importants, nous
permettront d’augmenter le nombre de bourses de voyage que nous mettrons à leur disposition
chaque année.
Contacter le Secrétariat de l'ACSP au [email protected]
41
SESSIONS/SÉANCES
TUESDAY MAY 27 / LE MARDI 27 MAI
8:45 am - 10:15 am / 8 h 45 - 10 h 15
Session: A1(a) - The Politics of Rhetoric
Location: Taro Hall 260 | Date: May 27, 2014 | Time: 08:45am to 10:15am
Discussant/Commentateur: Simon Kiss (Wilfrid Laurier University)
Participants & Authors/Auteurs:
James T Baker (Memorial University of Newfoundland) : Defending the Indefensible?
Legitimation Strategies in Political Talk and Text
Jeremy Martin Ladd (Queen's University) : Appraising Contemporary Developments in
Canadian Democracy Assistance
Shaun Haresh Narine (St. Thomas University) : Explaining Stephen Harper's Foreign Policy:
Energy-Realism in a Changing World
Laura Anne Way (University of Alberta) : Drive-by Versus Local Journalism: Newspaper
Coverage of the Alberta Oil Sands
Session: A1(b) - What do Political Scientists Know About the NDP? A Roundtable on the
Current State of Research on Canada-s NDP - Double session / Séance double (see/voir
A2c)
Frédérick Guillaume Dufour (Université du Québec à Montréal)
Bryan Evans (Ryerson University)
Matt Fodor (York University)
David Laycock (Simon Fraser University)
David McGrane (University of Saskatchewan)
Larry Savage (Brock University)
Byron Sheldrick (University of Guelph)
Charles Smith (University of Saskatchewan)
Alan Whitehorn (Royal Milltary College of Canada)
Nelson Wiseman (University of Toronto)
Abstract: Due to its status as a relatively weak third party in the House of Commons, there was
very little research done on the federal NDP during the 2000s. However, as academic attention
was focused elsewhere, the federal NDP quietly modernized its organization and moderated its
ideology under the leadership of Jack Layton. With the party's historic breakthrough in the 2011
federal election and its new found status as official opposition, Canadian political scientists must
now re-evaluate the state of our knowledge on the federal NDP. As part of the SSHRC-funded
Canadian Social Democracy Study, this roundtable will explore the question: “What are the
strengths and weaknesses of academic research on Canadian social democracy and, in
particular, the federal NDP?” We will follow a ‘speed dating' type of format where a group of three
on the roundtable would be given a five minutes each to address the question and then the chair
would take questions from the audience for fifteen minutes and then process would repeat itself
with next two groups of roundtable participants. It is hoped that the roundtable will be able to
identify a number of strengths and weaknesses within our knowledge of the federal NDP thereby
encouraging future research on the topic.
42
8:45 am - 10:15 am / 8 h 45 - 10 h 15
Session: B1 - Political Parties
William Cross (Carleton University), Scott Pruysers (Carleton University) : What is a Party
Primary? Creating a Common Definition and Typology
Jean-Francois Godbout (Université de Montréal), Anthony Sayers (University of Calgary),
Monika Smaz (Université de Montréal) : The Development of Parties in Parliament: Comparing
Canada and Australia
Csaba Nikolenyi (Concordia University) : Exit, Voice and Loyalty•: Party Unity in Israel Since
1992
Paul E.J. Thomas (University of Toronto) : Why Can They All Just Get Along? Exploring
Influences on Cross-party Cooperation Among Backbench Politicians in the Canadian and British
Parliaments
Session: C1(a) - Global Financial Governance After the Meltdown: What Legacies of the
2008 Financial Meltdown?
Malcolm Adair Campbell-Verduyn (McMaster University ) : Moral Economese of Scale?
Exploring the Persisting Authority of Economists in the Wake of the 2007-8 Financial Crisis
Randall Germain (Carleton University) : Locating Authority? Levels of Authority in the Practice of
Financial Governance: The Case of SIFI's
Eric Helleiner (University of Waterloo) : Was the Market-Friendly Nature of International
Financial Standards Overturned after the 2008 Crisis?
Kathryn C Lavelle (CWRU) : Creating American Regulatory Agencies at the National and
International Levels
Session: C1(b) - Canada and Strategic Culture
Location: Mackenzie Chown C Block 300 | Date: May 27, 2014 | Time: 08:45am to 10:15am
Calum McNeil (Master University) : Trust and Affectivity in Contemporary Canada-Cuba-US
Relations: Transcending the Past in Shaping the Future
Steven Seligman (The University of Western Ontario) : Canada and the 2001 United Nations
World Conference Against Racism
Session: C1(c) - Security, Development, and Order
Discussant/Commentatrice: Colleen Bell (University of Saskatchewan)
Marc Doucet (Saint Mary's University), Miguel de Larrinaga (University of Ottawa) :
(De)securitization, Security Practices and Democracy's Political Form
Gaëlle Rivard Piché (Carleton University) : When Security Sector Reform Misfires: the
Remaking of Public Order Regimes
Althea Maria Rivas (University of Sussex ) : Revisiting the Security-Development Nexus through
the Everyday of Humanitarian Intervention
43
8:45 am - 10:15 am / 8 h 45 - 10 h 15
Session: D1 - Healthcare in Canada: Governance, Governing and Accountability
Chair/Présidente: Ozge Uluskaradag (Concordia University)
Discussant/Commentatrice: Vandna Bhatia (Carleton University)
Poland Lai (York University) : New Governance, Disability and Health Care
Janet Phillips (University of Alberta) : From Confinement to Resilience: New Grounds for the
Marginalization of the Perceived Mentally Ill in Canada
Patrik Marier (Concordia University) : Population Aging in Canadian Provinces: Planning for
Health and Long Term Care Services
Robert Waterman (University of Western Ontario) : What we Communicate: Citizen Knowledge
and Accountability in Provincial Healthcare
Session: E1 - Beyond Borders: Local Climate Change Policy and Inter-Local Cooperation
Chair/Présidente: Melissa Sharpe-Harrigan (Trent University)
Discussant/Commentateur: Patrick Robson (Canadian Institute of Planners & Registered
Professional Planner)
Daniel Henstra (University of Waterloo) : Municipalities and Climate Change: A Framework for
Analyzing Local Adaptation Policy
Elizabeth Schwartz (University of British Columbia) : Testing the Limits of Local Climate Change
Action
Zachary Devon Spicer (University of Toronto) : Inter-Local Cooperation in Canada: Scale,
Scope and Intensity
Session: F1 - Racialized Politics, Immigration and Political Attitudes
Chair/Présidente: Shannon Sampert (University of Winnipeg)
Discussant/Commentateur: Luc Turgeon (Université d'Ottawa)
Randy Besco (Queen's University) : Conservative and Conservative? Racialized Canadians,
Political Values, and the Conservative Party of Canada
Charles Breton (University of British Columbia), Yannick Dufresne (University of Toronto),
Gregory Eady (University of Toronto), Jennifer Hove (University of Toronto), Clifton van der
Linden (University of Toronto) : Does the Public Lie about Supporting Some Minorities More than
Others? Evidence from a Large-scale List Experiment
Erin Tolley (University of Toronto) : Racially Mediated Reporting: Journalists' Role in the
Coverage of Diversity in Politics
44
8:45 am - 10:15 am / 8 h 45 - 10 h 15
Session: G1 - Indigenous Peoples and Natural Resource Extraction: Perspectives Across
Provinces
Discussant/Commentatrice: Annis May Timpson (University of Edinburgh)
Ryan Bowie (York University) : Mushkegowuk Land Use Planning: Shifting from State Directed to
Self-Driven Initiatives in the Far North of Ontario
James R McKay (Royal Military College of Canada) : Rational Choice, Aboriginal Communities
and Proposed Pipelines in British Columbia
Roberta Rice (University of Guelph) : Achieving First Nation Self-Government in Yukon, Canada
Makere Stewart-Harawira (University of Alberta) : Reflections in the Mirror. Expanding Mining
Development and Limiting Indigenous Rights in Aotearoa New Zealand and Canada
Session: H1 - Epistemology
Tyler W Chamberlain (Carleton University) : The Compatibility of Classical Natural Right and
Modern Science
Colin Cordner (Carleton University ) : Trust, Understanding, and Paradigms in the Works of
Michael Polanyi and of Plato
Marc Hanvelt (Carleton University) : Consensus or Convention?: A Humean Challenge to Public
Reason
Session: J1 - The Legislature and the Political Education of Ontario Citizens
Chair/Président: Henry Jacek (McMaster University)
Discussant/Commentateur: Jonathan Malloy (Carleton University)
Emily Barrette (Ontario Legislature Internship Programme) : In Her Own Words: Women and
Politics in the Ontario Legislature
Vanessa Dupuis (Ontario Legislature Internship Programme) : Ontario's New Financial
Accountability Office: Educating Citizens and Members of the Legislative Assembly about the
Real Costs of Government Programmes
Lauren Millar (Ontario Legislature Internship Programme) : Interest Association Advertising and
Ontario Politics
Session: K1 - No session / Aucune séance
Location: | Date: May 27, 2014 | Time: 08:45am to 10:15am
45
8:45 am - 10:15 am / 8 h 45 - 10 h 15
Session: L1(a) - Comparative Minority Politics, Voting, Leadership and Parties
Karen Bird (McMaster University), Nicole Goodman (McMaster University), Chelsea Gabel
(McMaster University) : Digital Technology and First Nations Participation and Governance
Dongyan Blachford (University of Regina), Yuchao Zhu (University of Regina) : The Ethnic
Issues and Minzu Policies for China's New Leadership
Jamie Levin (University of Toronto), Christopher Cochrane (University of Toronto) : Leaning to
the Right? Shifting Patterns in Jewish-Canadian Voting Behaviour
Nelson Wiseman (University of Toronto) : Ethnicity, Religion, and Socialism in Canada During
the Interwar Years
Session: L1(b) - Workshop: Intersectionality in Austere Times: Boundary-Crossing
Conversations - Theorizing Intersectinality I: Feminist Methods and Praxis / Atelier :
L’intersectionalité en période d’austérité : des conversations qui franchissent les
frontières (see/voir N1)
Joint Session / Séance conjointe: With the Women, Gender and Politics section / Avec la section
Femmes, genre et politique
Chair/Présidente: Tammy Findlay (Mount Saint Vincent University)
Kate M Daley (York University) : In Intersectionality's Shadow: Tracing Feminist Theories of
Privilege
Lee MacLean (Carleton University) : Describing the Dynamics of Domination: Two Types of
Intersectional Impact
Session: M1 - No session / Aucune séance
Session: N1 - Workshop: Intersectionality in Austere Times: Boundary-Crossing
Conversations - Theorizing Intersectinality I: Feminist Methods and Praxis / Atelier :
frontières (see/voir L1b)
Joint Session / Séance conjointe: With the Race, Ethnicity and Indigenous Peoples and Politics
section / Avec la section Race, ethnicité, peuples autochtones et politique
Kate M. Daley (York University) : In Intersectionality's Shadow: Tracing Feminist Theories of
Privilege
Lee MacLean (Carleton University) : Describing the Dynamics of Domination: Two Types of
Intersectional Impact
46
10:30 am - 12:00 pm / 10 h 30 - 12 h 00
Session: A2(a) - Principles of Canadian Democracy
Location: Taro Hall 203 | Date: May 27, 2014 | Time: 10:30am to 12:00pm
Discussant/Commentatrice: Julie Simmons (University of Guelph)
Jennifer E. Dalton (York University) : An Anomalous Apology?: Examining the Development of
Aboriginal Policy under the Current Conservative Government of Canada
Kyle D Hanniman (University of Toronto) : Is Canadian Federalism Market-Preserving? The
View from the Financial Markets
Session: A2(b) - Comparing Parliamentary Democracy in Canada and in the UK
Location: Mackenzie Chown C Block 301 | Date: May 27, 2014 | Time: 10:30am to 12:00pm
Discussant/Commentatrice: Barbara Cameron (York University)
Matthew Aaron Hennigar (Brock University) : The Protection of Parliamentary Democracy by the
Speaker of the House
Gary Levy (Carleton University) : Constitutional and Parliamentary Reform in the United
Kingdom: Lessons for Canada
Tanya Whyte (University of Toronto ) : Some Honourable Members: A Quantitative Analysis of
Decorum in the Canadian and British Parliaments
47
10:30 am - 12:00 pm / 10 h 30 - 12 h 00
Session: A2(c) - What do Political Scientists know about the NDP? A Roundtable on the
Current State of Research on Canada-s NDP - Double session / Séance double (see/voir
A1b)
Frédérick Guillaume Dufour (Université du Québec à Montréal)
Bryan Evans (Ryerson University)
Matt Fodor (York University)
David Laycock (Simon Fraser University)
David McGrane (University of Saskatchewan)
Charles Smith (University of Saskatchewan)
Alan Whitehorn (Royal Milltary College of Canada)
Abstract: Due to its status as a relatively weak third party in the House of Commons, there was
very little research done on the federal NDP during the 2000s. However, as academic attention
was focused elsewhere, the federal NDP quietly modernized its organization and moderated its
ideology under the leadership of Jack Layton. With the party's historic breakthrough in the 2011
federal election and its newfound status as official opposition, Canadian political scientists must
now re-evaluate the state of our knowledge on the federal NDP. As part of the SSHRC-funded
Canadian Social Democracy Study, this roundtable will explore the question: “What are the
strengths and weaknesses of academic research on Canadian social democracy and, in
particular, the federal NDP?” We will follow a ‘speed dating' type of format where a group of three
on the roundtable would be given a five minutes each to address the question and then the chair
would take questions from the audience for fifteen minutes and then process would repeat itself
with next two groups of roundtable participants. It is hoped that the roundtable will be able to
identify a number of strengths and weaknesses within our knowledge of the federal NDP thereby
encouraging future research on the topic.
Session: B2 - Multiculturalism
Shelly Ghai (University of Toronto) : Framing the Contest: the Bharatiya Janata Party Versus the
Indian National Congress
Anastasiya Salnykova (University of British Columbia) : International National Minority Regime
and its Impact on the Deliberative Capacity in Transitional Ukraine
Joanie Thibault-Couture (Université de Montréal) : La « destinée manifeste » sud-africaine : la
politique étrangère comme vecteur de la construction de l’identité nationale en Afrique du Sud
Arjun Tremblay (Concordia University) : Explaining The Persistence of Multiculturalism
48
10:30 am - 12:00 pm / 10 h 30 - 12 h 00
Session: C2(a) - Remote and Preemptive Warfare
Discussant/Commentateur: David Grondin (Université d'Ottawa)
Marc Doucet (Saint Mary's University) : Mapping Contemporary International Interventions: Global
Assemblages of Security Governance
Scott Matthew Fitzsimmons (University of Limerick) : Bureaucratic and Cultural Explanations for the
Remotely Piloted Aircraft Revolution in the United States Air Force
Melanie Richter-Montpetit (York University) : The Biopolitics of Preemption. Drones,
Performativity, and the Pacification of the Global Frontier.
Session: C2(b) - Policing Borders
Discussant/Commentateur: Adam Cote (University of Calgary)
Heather Lynn Johnson (Queen's University Belfast) : Interpreting Risk, Negotiating Threat:
Developing Border Technologies
Veronica Kitchen (University of Waterloo), Kim Rygiel (Wilfrid Laurier University) :
Reconstituting the Border Through Cross Border Law Enforcement: The Case of US-Canada
Integrated Border Enforcement Teams and Shiprider
Session: D2(a) - The Court and Intergovernmental Relations
Discussant/Commentatrice: Christine Rothmayr Allison (Université de Montréal)
Kathy Lenore Brock (Queen's University) : The Harper Government and the McLachlin Court:
Setting the Limits on Federal Policy
Jean-Philippe Gauvin (Université de Montréal) : Intergovernmental Relations and Environmental
Policy in Quebec: A Program's Point of View
Emmett Macfarlane (University of Waterloo) : Insurmountable Barrier? Constitutional Politics and
the Amending Formulae in Canada
Emmett Macfarlane (University of Waterloo), Minh Do (University of Waterloo) : Drug Policy,
Positive Rights, and Inter-Institutional Battles under the Charter
Session: D2(b) - Deepening Democratic Engagement: Policy Communities, Social
Movements and Charity Law
David Rayside (University of Toronto) : The Canadian Politics of Sexual Diversity After Marriage
Kevin Wipf (University of Alberta) : Closing the Circle: Grain Marketing Reform and the Shift
Toward An Integrated Model In the Prairie Agricultural Policy Community
49
10:30 am - 12:00 pm / 10 h 30 - 12 h 00
Session: E2 - Cities and Cultural Diversity
Chair/Présidente: Serena Kataoka (Nipissing University)
Discussant/Commentatrice: Mireille Paquet (Concordia University)
Joanne Heritz (Brock University) : Aboriginal Inclusion in Municipal Government in Canada
Melissa Sharpe-Harrigan (Trent University) : Cities for Sale: Targeted Marketing towards
Immigrants in Ontario
Session: F2(a) - I (un)like Democracy: Social Capital, Political Trust and Satisfaction with
Liberal Democracy
Chair/Présidente: Andrea Lawlor (University of California)
Discussant/Commentatrice: Heather Bastedo (Queen's University)
Michael Atkinson (University of Saskatchewan), Loleen Berdahl (University of Saskatchewan),
David McGrane (St. Thomas Moore College, University of Saskatchewan), Steven White
(Concordia University) : How Much Democracy is Tolerable? Attitudes towards democratic
decision-making in Saskatchewan
Kenny William Ie (University of Western Ontario) : Minding the (Trust) Gap: Explaining
Differential Institutional Trust in Comparative Context
Travis Reynolds (University of Saskatchewan) : Membership Required: The Relationship
Between Social Capital and Economic Growth
Session: F2(b) - Political Behaviour Keynote: Party Systems and Political Institutions
Chair/Présidente: Laura Stephenson (University of Western Ontario)
Discussant/Commentateur: William Cross (Carleton University)
John Aldrich (Duke University, 2014 APSA President) : Are Separated Powers and a Two-party
System Incompatible with Effective Governance? Or, That Is, Did Montesquieu and Duverger
Cause the U.S. Government's Shutdown
50
10:30 am - 12:00 pm / 10 h 30 - 12 h 00
Session: G2(a) - Indigenous Peoples and Natural Resource Extraction: Consultation and
Conflict in Comparative Context
Amelia Alva (Ghent University) : The Right of Indigenous Peoples to Prior Consultation in the
Andean Countries
Adrienne Davidson (University of Toronto) : Indigenous Governance and Resource
Development: Rhetoric or Reality?
Martin Papillon (Université d'Ottawa) : Yet Another Faustian Bargain? Indigenous Peoples'
Participation in Natural Resources Development in Canadian Provinces
Jacqueline Teresa Romanow (University of Winnipeg) : Consultation, Consent and Conflict: A
Survey of Indigenous Participation in Natural Resource Extraction Projects in Canada and the
Andes
Session: G2(b) - Understanding the Employment Standards Enforcement Gap in Ontario: A
Multi-Method Inquiry
Location: Welch Hall 202 | Date: May 27, 2014 | Time: 10:45am to 12:15pm
Joint Session / Séance conjointe: Canadian Association for Work and Labour Studies /
Association canadienne d'études du travail et du syndicalisme
Chair/Présidente: Leah F. Vosko (York University)
Eric Tucker (York University), Leah F. Vosko (York University), John Grundy (Wilfrid Laurier
University), Mark P. Thomas (York University), Mary Gellatly (Parkdale Community Legal
Services) : Carrying Little Sticks: Is there a Deterrence Gap in Employment Standards
Enforcement?
Alan Hall (Memorial University of Newfoundland), Eric Tucker (York University), Leah F. Vosko
(York University), Rebecca Hall (York University), Elliot Siemiatycki (York University) : Mapping
Enforcement Decisions in Employment Standards in Ontario
Rebecca Hall (York University), Kiran Mirchandani (Ontario Institute for Studies in Education),
Andrea Noack (Ryerson University), Adam Perry (Ontario Institute for Studies in Education),
Urvashi Soni-Sinha (University of Windsor), Leah F. Vosko (York University) : Methodological
K/Nots: Designing Research on the Enforcement of Labour Standards
Leah F. Vosko (York University), Andrea Noack (Ryerson University), John Grundy (Wilfrid
Laurier University), Azar Masoumi (York University), Jennifer Mussell (York University) : Who’s
Covered by the Ontario Employment Standards Act? Assessing the Relationships between
Workers' Characteristics and Levels of Protection
51
10:30 am - 12:00 pm / 10 h 30 - 12 h 00
Session: H2(a) - Ancients and Justice
Robert Ballingall (University of Toronto) : Why is the Good Regime of Plato's 'Laws' a Second
Best City?
Marlene K Sokolon (Concordia University) : Poetic Justice: Euripides and the Question of 'What
is Justice?'•
Session: H2(b) - Canadian Thought
Location: Mackenzie Chown D Block 301 | Date: May 27, 2014 | Time: 10:30am to 12:00pm
Timothy Douglas Anderson (University of Calgary) : The Pragmatism of Sir John A Macdonald
Nigel Cones (The University of Calgary) : Seeing like the Canadian State: Legibility and the
Long-Form Census
Raf Geenens (Institute of Philosophy - Centre for Ethics, Social and Political Philosophy), Helder
De Schutter (University of Leuven) : Allocation of Powers in a Federal Setting: How to
Democratize a Perennial Conflict
John Grant (King's University College, Western University) : A People Without Sovereignty:
Canada's Constituent Power Problem
Session: J2 - The Role of Legislators in the Ontario Legislative: Interaction with the Public
Discussant/Commentateur: Graham White (University of Toronto)
Jessica Marianne Behnke (Ontario Legislature Internship Programme) : Representation by
Legislators: How Responsive can they be in a Westminster Legislature?
Mitchell Davidson (Ontario Legislature Internship Programme) : The Evolution of Question
Period in the Ontario Legislative Assembly: Uniqueness and Utilities
Taylor Lew (Ontario Legislature Internship Programme) : Stakeholder Participation in the Annual
Budget Planning Cycle
Douglas Wong (Ontario Legislature Internship Programme) : Mitigating Hyper-Partisanship
52
10:30 am - 12:00 pm / 10 h 30 - 12 h 00
Session: K2 - Workshop Roundtable: Canadian Public Administration in the Twenty First
Century: Future Trends, Challenges and Prospects / Atelier : L’administration publique
canadienne au XXIe siècle : tendances futures, défis et perspectives
Jean-François Savard (École nationale d'administration pubique), Christian Rouillard
(Université d'Ottawa)
Isabelle Fortier (École nationale d'administration publique), Jonathan Paquette (University of
Ottawa)
Frank Ohemeng (University of Ottawa)
Ian Roberge (Glendon College, York University)
Session: L2(a) - Rethinking Canada's Humanitarian Tradition
Yasmeen Abu-Laban (University of Alberta) : Controlling 'Global Citizens': Canada and
Refugees in an Age of Security
Christopher G Anderson (Wilfrid Laurier University) : Rethinking Canada's Humanitarian
Tradition: Refugee Policy under the Harper Conservatives
Christopher G Anderson (Wilfrid Laurier University) : Designing for Justice: W. Gunther Plaut on
Access and Fairness in Canada's Response to Asylum Seekers
Christina Gabriel (Carleton University), Laura Macdonald (Carleton University) : At Cross
Purposes: Refugee and Immigration Policy vs Foreign Policy in the Canada-Mexico Relationship
Sandy Irvine (McMaster University) : Understanding the 'Humanitarian' Label of Canadian
Refugee Policy 1978-2012: Meaning, Evolution and Usage.
Conversations - Theorizing Intersectinality II: Challenges, Limits and Embodiment / Atelier
Rita Shelton Deverell (Independent Researcher) : Intersectionality and Institutions: Media and
Learning
Candace Johnson (University of Guelph) : Intersectionality and the Structure-Agency Dilemma:
Evidence from the US-Mexico Border
Reese Simpkins (York University) : Trans* Intersections
53
10:30 am - 12:00 pm / 10 h 30 - 12 h 00
Session: M2 - Innovations in Teaching: Teaching Political Science to the 'Millennial
Generation'
Discussant/Commentateur: Mark Busser (McMaster University)
JP Lewis (University of New Brunswick Saint John) : Should Electoral Agencies Encourage
Voting? The Canadian Case
Greg Flynn (McMaster University), Todd Alway (McMaster University) : Improving Instructor and
Student Outcomes - Problem Based Learning in Political Science
Scott Reid (Memorial University) : The Politics of Teaching Online
Conversations - Theorizing Intersectinality II: Challenges, Limits and Embodiment / Atelier
Rita Shelton Deverell (Independent Researcher) : Intersectionality and Institutions: Media and
Learning
Candace Johnson (University of Guelph) : Intersectionality and the Structure-Agency Dilemma:
Evidence from the US-Mexico Border
Reese Simpkins (York University) : Trans* Intersections
54
12:00 pm - 1:30 pm / 12 h 00 - 13 h 30
Session: A3 - Lunch / Déjeuner
Location: | Date: May 27, 2014 | Time: 12:00pm to 01:30pm
Session: B3 - Lunch / Déjeuner
Session: C3 - Lunch / Déjeuner - Professional Development Workshops – ISA Canada:
Teaching my First Class
Location: Taro Hall 307 | Date: May 27, 2014 | Time: 12:00pm to 01:30pm
This interactive workshop is designed to ease anxiety related to teaching your first class. Central
questions to be addressed include: what are my concerns about teaching and how do I create
strategies to address those concerns? Through interactive techniques such as gallery walks and
group work using the jigsaw method, the facilitators will encourage reflective practices in new
teachers while simultaneously helping them build their teaching toolkit.
This workshop will be co-facilitated by Dr. Marshall Beier (McMaster University) and Dr. Heather
Smith (University of Northern B.C). Drs Beier and Smith are both winners of the 3M National
Teaching Fellowship, an award that is only given to 10 professors across the country, across all
disciplines, annually. They are also both winners of the Canadian Political Science Association
Excellence in Teaching Award. In addition, Dr. Smith is the Director of the UNBC Centre for
Teaching, Learning and Technology and Dr. Beier, an experienced peer mentor, has extensive
experience in the design and delivery of workshops for teaching assistants. Both Dr. Smith and
Dr. Beier are also accomplished scholars.
Session: D3 - Lunch / Déjeuner
Session: E3 - Lunch / Déjeuner
55
12:00 pm - 1:30 pm / 12 h 00 - 13 h 30
Session: F3 - Lunch / Déjeuner - Author Meets Critics. Brad Lavigne's Building the Orange
Wave
Sponsor: Canadian Social Democracy Study
Chair/Président: Alex Marland (Memorial University of Newfoundland)
Discussant/Commentateur - 1: Simon Kiss (Wilfrid Laurier University)
Discussant/Commentateur - 2: David McGrane ([email protected])
Brad Lavigne (H+K Strategies)
Session: G3 - Lunch / Déjeuner
Session: H3 - Lunch / Déjeuner
Session: J3 - Lunch / Déjeuner
Session: K3 - Lunch / Déjeuner - Workshop Roundtable: Canadian Public Administration in
the Twenty First Century: Future Trends, Challenges and Prospects / Atelier :
L’administration publique canadienne au XXIe siècle : tendances futures, défis et
perspectives
Session: L3 - Lunch / Déjeuner
Session: M3 - Lunch / Déjeuner
Session: N3 - Lunch / Déjeuner
56
12:00 pm - 1:30 pm / 12 h 00 - 13 h 30
Session: P3 - Lunch on the Future of the Association and the CPSA Conference
Chair/Présidente: Debora VanNijnatten (Wilfrid Laurier University)
Session: Z3 - CPSA Students Caucus Meeting / Réunion du caucus des étudiants de
l’ACSP
Session: Z4 - Editorial and Editorial Advisory Board CJPS / Comité de rédaction et conseil
consultatif de la RCSP
57
1:30 pm - 3:00 pm / 13 h 30 - 15 h 00
Session: A4(a) - Citizenship and Immigration
Location: Mackenzie Chown C Block 300 | Date: May 27, 2014 | Time: 01:30pm to 03:00pm
Discussant/Commentateur: Patrik Marier (Concordia University)
John Carlaw (York University) : A Change of Heart or a Rhetorical Blue Sweater for 'Ethnic
Voters'•? The Long March From Reform to Pragmatic (Neo)Conservatism and its Relevance for
Citizenship, Immigration and Refugee Policy
Christopher James Miller (Carleton University) : 'Offloaded' - Migration Management: Canada's
Stream for Lower-skilled Occupations
Ian Reeve (Queen's University) : Putting the Genie Back in the Bottle: Recentralization in
Canadian Federalism
Robert Schertzer (University of Toronto) : Reasserting the Federal Role in Immigration:
Explaining the Paradox of Recent Intergovernmental Relations in Canada's immigration system
Session: A4(b) - Journalists Meet Academics: A Critical Encounter with The Big Shift
Sponsor: Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences Aid for Interdisciplinary Sessions
Fund / Fonds d'aide aux séances interdisciplinaires de la Fédération des sciences humaines
Joint Session / Séance conjointe: Canadian Association for Work and Labour Studies /
Association canadienne d'études du travail et du syndicalisme
Chair/Président: Dennis Pilon (York University)
Darrell Bricker (Author, Ipsos-Global)
John Ibbitson (Author, Globe and Mail)
William Cross (Carleton University)
Larry Leduc (University of Toronto)
Judith McKenzie (University of Guelph)
Abstract: This session brings nationally renowned, award winning Globe and Mail journalist John
Ibbitson and Ipsos-Global pollster Darrell Bricker into dialogue with three academic experts about
the substantive contribution of their recent bestselling book The Big Shift: The Seismic Change In
Canadian Politics, Business, And Culture And What It Means For Our Future.
58
1:30 pm - 3:00 pm / 13 h 30 - 15 h 00
Session: B4(a) - Methods and Approaches for Studying the Migration State
Discussant/Commentatrice: Laura Madokoro (McGill University)
Mireille Paquet (Concordia University) : Public Servants as Heroes: Process-tracing and Elite
Interviews in a Politically Sensitive
Marie Michèle Sauvageau (University of Ottawa), Elke Winter (University of Ottawa) :
Scrutinizing Naturalization : Which Data? Which Methodologies?
Vic Satzewich (McMaster University) : Gatekeepers, Sponsors and 'Studying Up': Accessing
Canada's Overseas Visa Offices
Sule Tomkinson (Université de Montréal) : Being Invisible at a Research Site That is Hidden
From Sight, Doing Politically Sensitive Research on Refugee Decision Makers
Session: B4(b) - Human Rights Impact Assessments and the Mining Industry: Guatemala
and the Philippines
Chair/Présidente: Kalowatie Deonandan (University of Saskatchewan)
Discussant/Commentatrice: Kalowatie Deonandan (University of Saskatchewan)
Kalowatie Deonandan (University of Saskatchewan) : HRIAs and the Mining Industry:
Guatemala
Jennifer Morgan (University of Saskatchewan), Kalowatie Deonandan (University of
Saskatchewan) : Evaluating the HRIA of Marlin Mine: Community and Shareholder Concerns
Penelope Corcino Sanz (University of Saskatchewan) : The Politics of Community-based HRIA:
The Philippines Case
Session: C4(a) - Hero(in)es and Heroism in World Politics I
Discussant/Commentatrice: Veronica Kitchen (University of Waterloo)
Krystel Chapman (Royal Military College of Canada) : The Gendered Warrior Heroism
Discourse of the War in Afghanistan and Canadian Foreign Policy
Barbara Falk (Canadian Forces College) : Havel and Mandela: Leadership and Legitimacy at
Home and Abroad
Alexandra Martins (CAPP, Lisbon University and CLEPUL, Universidade Aberta) : The Hero in
World Politics: Ideology and Culture
Matthew Morgan (York University) : The Contested Heroism of Edward Snowden: The Impact of
Anti-systemic Individuals Upon Contemporary Politics
59
1:30 pm - 3:00 pm / 13 h 30 - 15 h 00
Session: C4(b) - The Global Ethics of Diversity and Representation
Michael Di Gregorio (McMaster University ) : A Perpetual Piece? The Ethics of Aesthetics and
the Self in IR
Pietro Pirani (Western University) : From Economic Sanctions to Military Intervention: The Social
Construction of Economic Statecraft
Iain G Wilson (University of Edinburgh) : Diversity in IR Theory: Darwin all the Way Down
Session: D4(a) - When the ''Who'' Matters: Personalities and Representation in the Court
Discussant/Commentateur: Emmett Macfarlane (University of Waterloo)
Erin Crandall (Queen's University) : The Appointment of Women Judges to Canada's Courts:
Does the System of Selection Matter?
Peter McCormick (University of Lethbridge), Marc Zanoni (University of Lethbridge) : The
Development of the 'By the Court' Judgment: Who, When and Why?
Peter McCormick (University of Lethbridge), Brook Biesenthal (University of Lethbridge) : What
a Difference a Chair Makes: McLachlin Before and After
Session: D4(b) - Explaining Policy Outcomes I - Double session / Séance double (see/voir
D5b)
Discussant/Commentateur: Éric Montpetit (Université de Montréal)
Gerard Boychuk (University of Waterloo) : What Room for 'Policy'? Provincial Social Assistance,
1990-2013
Andrea Lawlor (University of California) : Conduit, Contributor or Mirror: What Media Tell Us
About Politics and Policy and Why It Matters
Adam Thorn (Ryerson University) : Agenda Setting and Risk: The Strategic Use of Risk in
Environmental Conflicts
Arjun Tremblay (Concordia University) : The Dynamics of Political Competition and the
Expansion of Multicultural Public Policy in Britain under New Labour (1997-2010)
60
1:30 pm - 3:00 pm / 13 h 30 - 15 h 00
Session: E4 - Citizen Involvement and Collective Action in Municipal Politics
Chair/Présidente: Karen Bird (McMaster University)
Discussant/Commentateur: Andrew Sancton (University of Western)
Jacquetta (Jacquie) Newman (King's University College, Western University), Patricia Mockler
(King's University College, Western University) : Citizens, Council and the Board: Neutralising
citizen input in London City Planning
Laura Grace Pin (York University) : Does Deliberative Democracy Work? An Investigation of
Participatory Budgeting in Guelph, ON. and Hamilton, ON.
Session: F4 - Social Issues, Political Debates and Public Opinion
Chair/Présidente: Valérie-Anne Mahéo (McGill University)
Discussant/Commentatrice - 1: Valérie-Anne Mahéo (McGill University)
Discussant/Commentateur - 2: Michael McGregor (Bishop's University)
Timothy B. Gravelle (University of Essex), Erick Lachapelle (Université de Montréal) : Party,
Economy and NIMBY: Explaining Public Opinion toward the Northern Gateway and Keystone XL
Pipelines
Anthony Sealey (University of Toronto) : Une explication des différences religieuses pour le
support pour les politiques redistributives dans l'opinion publique canadienne
Charles Tessier (Université Laval), Éric Montigny (Université Laval) : Charter of Quebec
Values: New Partisan Cleavage?
Session: G4 - Indigenous Peoples and Natural Resource Extraction: The Political Economy
of Extraction, Enterprises and Resistance (see/voir L4)
Matt Anthony Thomas Dow (York University) : Canada Metamorphosizing into an Energy
Superpower
Catherine Howlett (Griffith University), Gabrielle Ann Slowey (York University) : Fractured
Relations? Understanding Indigenous Responses to the Pursuit of Unconventional Oil and Gas
Extraction in Australia and Canada
Rauna Kuokkanen (University of Toronto) : Greenland: Toward Indigenous Governance or
Modern Nationhood?
Henry Veltmeyer (Saint Mary’s University) : The Answer is Still No: Resistance to the Enbridge
Oil Pipeline
61
1:30 pm - 3:00 pm / 13 h 30 - 15 h 00
Session: H4(a) - Ancients and Emotions
Location: Mackenzie Chown D Block 300 | Date: May 27, 2014 | Time: 01:30pm to 03:00pm
Janice Freamo (Carleton University ) : Intergenerational Conflict: Lessons from the Ancients
Eleni Panagiotarakou (Concordia University) : Dikaiopolis' Political Wisdom and Nussbaum's
Comic Soul
Ann Ward (Campion College, University of Regina) : Maternal Contemplation in Aristotle's
Ethical Philosophy
Session: H4(b) - Diverse Societies
Afsoun Afsahi (Department of Political Science - The University of British Columbia) : Barriers to
multicultural deliberation
Anna Drake (University of Waterloo) : The Limitations of Activist Participation in Deliberative
Mini-Publics
Tanja Mirjana Juric (York University) : Post-Race and Anti-Race Discourse in Diverse Societies:
Examining Post-race and Multiculturalism debates in the US and Europe
Tolga Karabulut (Ankara University (Turkey)) : Gezi Park Movement: Considerations on The
Public Sphere and Democracy in Turkey
Session: J4 - Energy and Environment
Chair/Présidente: Roberta Rice (University of Guelph)
Discussant/Commentateur: James Lawson (University of Victoria)
Brendan Dean Boyd (University of Victoria) : Provincial Climate Change Policy: Coordinated
Response or Patchwork of Policies?
Peter Clancy (St. Francis Xavier University) : The 'New Politics' of Northern Wildlife: The Case of
Arctic Whales
Mario Levesque (Mount Allison University) : Beyond NIMBYISM: How Expert Science, Policy
Frames and Venue Shifting Interact to Explain Rejections of Energy from Waste Proposals for
Tire Derived Fuels in Canada
Sanjoy Sen (The University of Aberdeen) : A Devolved Scottish Oil & Gas Sector: Regulatory
Lessons from the Relationship Between Newfoundland & Labrador and the Federal Government
of Canada.
62
1:30 pm - 3:00 pm / 13 h 30 - 15 h 00
Session: K4 - Workshop Roundtable/Paper: Canadian Public Administration in the Twenty
First Century: Future Trends, Challenges and Prospects / Atelier : L’administration
publique canadienne au XXIe siècle : tendances futures, défis et perspectives
Charles Conteh (Brock University)
Carolyn Johns (Ryerson University)
Evert Lindquist (University of Victoria)
Steven Rathgeb Smith (American Political Science Association)
Session: L4 - Indigenous Peoples and Natural Resource Extraction: The Political Economy
of Extraction, Enterprises and Resistance (see/voir G4)
Joint Session / Séance conjointe: With the Political Economy section / Avec la section Économie
politique
Matt Anthony Thomas Dow (York University) : Canada Metamorphosizing into an Energy
Superpower
Catherine Howlett (Griffith University), Gabrielle Ann Slowey (York University) : Fractured
Relations? Understanding Indigenous Responses to the Pursuit of Unconventional Oil and Gas
Extraction in Australia and Canada
Rauna Kuokkanen (University of Toronto) : Greenland: Toward Indigenous Governance or
Modern Nationhood?
Henry Veltmeyer (Saint Mary’s University) : The Answer is Still No: Resistance to the Enbridge
Oil Pipeline
Session: M4 - Mentoring Café: Engaging Students Inside the Classroom: Strategies to
Promote Active Learning
J.A. (Sandy) Irvine (McMaster University)
Todd Alway (McMaster University)
63
1:30 pm - 3:00 pm / 13 h 30 - 15 h 00
Session: N4 - Gender and War
Location: Mackenzie Chown D Block 350L | Date: May 27, 2014 | Time: 01:30pm to 03:00pm
Chair/Présidente: Sandra Whitworth (York University)
Discussant/Commentatrice: Nancy Taber (Brock University)
Vanessa Ashley Renee Brown (Carleton University) : Militarized Masculinity and Femininity:
Gender (In)Equity in the Canadian Armed Forces
Krystel Chapman (Royal Military College of Canada) : Canadian Women's Experience of War
Beyond the Wire in Afghanistan
Maya Eichler (University of Toronto), Krystel Chapman (Royal Military College of Canada) :
Rethinking Military Families in Canada: A Critical Feminist Perspective
Victoria ElizabethTait (Carleton University) : Female Combat Arms Soldiers; Before and After
Afghanistan
64
3:15 pm - 4:45 pm / 15 h 15 - 16 h 45
Session: A5(a) - Multilevel Citizenship: Canada in Comparative Perspective
Discussant/Commentatrice: Erin Tolley (University of Toronto, Mississauga)
Willem Maas (Glendon College, York University) : Multilevel Citizenship in Canada
Mireille Paquet (Concordia University) : Provincial Citizenship Regimes? Exploring the Case of
Newcomers
Jill Vickers (Carleton University) : 'How We Treat Our Women is Our Business'•: A Comparative
Study of Legal Pluralism's Impact on Women's Citizenship in Multi-National Federations
Session: A5(b) - Parliamentary Democracy in Action
Discussant/Commentateur: John McAndrews (University of British Columbia)
Stewart Hyson (University of New Brunswick - Saint John) : Political Integrity Paradigm of
Democratic Governance:
Royce Koop (University of Manitoba), Heather Bastedo (Queen's University), Kelly Blidook
(Memorial University) : Representation in Action: Observing MPs in their Constituencies
Andrew J McKelvy (American University) : Why So Many Orphans? Explaining The Fate of
Government Legislation in Parliament
Session: B5 - Representation and Deliberation
Heather MacRae (York University), Gabriele Abels (Eberhard Karls Universitet) : Gendering
European Integration and Integration Theory
Anastasiya Salnykova (University of British Columbia ) : Deliberative Capacity in Post-Soviet
Democratization: The Case of Inter-cultural Relations in Ukraine
Session: C5 - Hero(in)es and Heroism in World Politics II
Location: Mackenzie Chown C Block, Room 304 | Date: May 27, 2014 | Time: 03:15pm to
04:45pm
Discussant/Commentateur: Andrew Cooper (University of Waterloo)
Colleen Bell (University of Saskatchewan) : Friendly Fire: COINsters and the Popularity of War
Lori Ann Crowe (York University) : The Colonization of Social and Political Imagination:
Interrogating the Problematic Role of the Hero in the Circulation of the (In)security Illogic
Veronica Kitchen (University of Waterloo) : Romancing the Military Hero(ine)
65
3:15 pm - 4:45 pm / 15 h 15 - 16 h 45
Session: D5(a) - Canadian Digital Copyright's Second Decade: What's at Stake
Joint Session / Séance conjointe: Multidisciplinary panel presented in conjunction with Congress
2014's Copyright and the Modern Academic series
Discussant/Commentateur: Joseph Turcotte (York University)
Blayne Haggart (Brock University) : Canadian Copyright in an Era of Public Involvement: Less
Restriction, More Ppenness?
Tim Ribaric (Brock University) : Copyright in the Stacks: The Chilling Effects of Unclear
Copyright Interpretations in the Canadian Academic Library
Martin J. Zeilinger (University of Toronto at Mississauga) : Copyright and Moral Economies of
Digital Practice
Session: D5(b) - Explaining Policy Outcomes II - Double session / Séance double (see/voir
D4b)
Discussant/Commentatrice: Andrea Lawlor (McGill University)
John Grundy (Wilfrid Laurier University ) : More Than a Placement Service•: High Modernism in
Canadian Labour Market Policy, 1965-1975
Ryan Kassian (Ryerson University) : Interrogating the Political: Protest Politics and
Depoliticization
Chance Allen Minnett Watchel (University of Calgary) : Adoption for Gay and Lesbian Couples
in Alberta: A Reevaluation of the Alberta Surprise
Paola Profeta (Bocconi University), Simona Scabrosetti (University of Pavia), Stanley L. Winer
(Carleton University) : Wealth Transfer Taxation in the G7 Countries: An Empirical Model
Session: E5 - Municipal Election Turnout
Chair/Président: David McGrane (University of Saskatchewan)
Discussant/Commentateur: Neil Thomlinson (Ryerson University)
Jérôme Couture (Université Laval, INRS-UCS), Sandra Breux (INRS-UCS) : The More It
Shrinks, The More It Grows
Kalina Kamenova (University of Alberta), Nicole Goodman (McMaster University) : Prospects
for Internet Voting in Canada: Public Attitudes and Policy Change
66
3:15 pm - 4:45 pm / 15 h 15 - 16 h 45
Session: F5(a) - Feminism and Political Behaviour: Pushing the Boundaries (See/voir N5)
Joint Session / Séance conjointe: With the Women, Gender, and Politics section / Avec la section
Chair/Présidente: Joanna Everitt (University of New Brunswick - Saint John )
Discussant/Commentatrice: Elizabeth Goodyear-Grant (Queen's University )
Karen Bird (McMaster University) : Intersectionality and the Impact of Electoral Quotas for Ethnic
Minorities and Women
Brenda O'Neill (University of Calgary) : Religion, Spirituality and Women's Political Behaviour
Session: F5(b) - Can't We Just Get Along? Affinity and Conflict Within and Between
Groups
Chair/Présidente: Jonathan Rose (Queen's University)
Discussant/Commentateur: Cameron Anderson (University of Western Ontario)
Adrienne Davidson (University of Toronto), Matt Lesch (University of Toronto ), Zain Asaf
(University of Toronto), Tanya Whyte (University of Toronto), Maxime Héroux-Legault
(University of Toronto), Alesha Porisky (University of Toronto), Karo Czuba (University of
Toronto) : Affinity in the Canadian Federation
Mike Medeiros (Université de Montréal) : Feelings and Language: The Influence of Linguistic
Vitality on Intergroup and Political Attitudes among Francophones in Canada
Mike Medeiros (Université de Montréal), Patrick Fournier (Université de Montréal) : Linguistic
Perceptions: The Key to Better Intergroup Relations?
Session: G5 - Indigenous Peoples and Natural Resource Extraction: International
Indigenous Struggles
Sujit Kumar (Institute for Social and Economic Change) : The Politics of Dispossession:
Appropriating Social Dynamics of Indigenous People in West Singhbhum of Jharkhand, India
Angelica Quesada (University of Alberta), Makere Stewart-Harawira (University of Alberta) :
Reframing the World. Local Communities and Multinational Corporations. The Case of
Cajamarca, Colombia
67
3:15 pm - 4:45 pm / 15 h 15 - 16 h 45
Session: H5(a) - Tyranny
Patrick N. Cain (Lakehead University) : Politics, Reason, and Greatness of Soul in Thomas
Aquinas's De Regno
Christopher Holman (Nanyang Technological University) : Machiavelli and the Concept of
Political Sublimation
Catherine Mathie (Baylor University) : Tyrants and Lovers of Money in Aristotle's Nicomachean
Ethics IV
Ryan Alexander McKinnell (Carleton University) : Caesar or Cato: Is Severity better than
Magnanimity as a Political Virtue?
Session: H5(b) - Roundtable: Technology and Modernity
Shannon Bell (York University)
Leah Bradshaw (Brock University)
Jay Conte (Carleton University)
David Tabachnick (Nipissing University)
Abstract: This roundtable has been organized as a platform to discuss a new book by David
Tabachnick, Professor of Political Science at Nipissing University, titled ‘The Great Reversal: How
We Let Technology Take Control of the Planet’ (University of Toronto Press, 2013) This book is
an important and innovative contribution to Canadian political theory, identified by Darin Barney
(Canada Research Chair in Technology and Citizenship, McGill University) as a ‘magnificent tour
through the history of Western political thought’ that gives ‘sober, sobering and detailed attention
to the material challenges of contemporary technology’. Central to Tabachnick’s concern is a
consideration of whether technology is an autonomous force in the contemporary context, or
whether it is a consequence of reigning institutional structures. The roundtable has four
participants: David Tabachnick, Professor, Political Science, Nipissing University; Shannon Bell,
Professor, Political Science, York University; Leah Bradshaw, Professor, Political Science, Brock
University; and Jay Conte, PhD Candidate, Political Science, Carleton University. All of the
participants have written in the general area of technology and politics, but participants have been
chosen on the basis of the diversity of their perspectives. Bell is a political theorist and
performance artist currently engaged in research on tissue-engineered bioart and robotic art.
Bradshaw writes on the history of political thought, and draws much of her critical perspective
from Hannah Arendt’s thinking on technology and modernity. Jay Conte has been pursuing
research on the distinction between therapy and enhancement in bioethics.
68
3:15 pm - 4:45 pm / 15 h 15 - 16 h 45
Session: J5 - Roundtable: The Politics of Ontario
Cheryl Collier (University of Windsor)
Henry Jacek (McMaster University)
Jonathan Malloy (Carleton University)
Graham White (University of Toronto)
Abstract: This roundtable will discuss change and continuity in Ontario politics and its study. It
coincides with a book to be published in spring 2014, The Politics of Ontario, and this represents
an unparalleled opportunity to reflect on changes since the last comprehensive text on Ontario
politics, the 1997 5th edition of The Government of Politics of Ontario. The roundtable will link the
new and the (somewhat)old. Is it still the same old Ontario? Or has the province and its politics
fundamentally changed? And how has the academic study of Ontario politics evolved, with an
apparent dearth since the 1990s until recently? The roundtable will feature the book editors,
Cheryl Collier and Jonathan Malloy, along with two scholars from the earlier Government and
Politics era (tentatively Graham White and Henry Jacek…to be confirmed). Other contributors to
the Politics of Ontario will attend but not be part of the formal roundtable.
Session: K5 - Workshop Roundtable/Papers: Canadian Public Administration in the
Twenty First Century: Future Trends, Challenges and Prospects / Atelier : L’administration
publique canadienne au XXIe siècle : tendances futures, défis et perspectives
Carey Doberstein (University of Toronto) : Network Governance in Canada: Practice, Research
and Future
Al G Dizboni (Royal Military College of Canada), Robert Addinall (Royal Military College of
Canada) : Defence Capability Development, the Comprehensive Approach and Constraints of
Policy Environment in Canada
Sarah Giest (Simon Fraser University) : Resolving the Canadian Innovation Bottleneck: Cluster
Facilitation in High-technology Fields
Maria Gintova (Ryerson University) : Effective Use of Social Media by Government
Session: L5 - No session / Aucune séance
69
3:15 pm - 4:45 pm / 15 h 15 - 16 h 45
Session: M5 - Mentoring Café: Political Science Outside the Classroom: Communityengaged Learning
Jessica Merolli (McMaster University)
Session: N5 - Feminism and Political Behaviour: Pushing the Boundaries (See/voir F5a)
Joint Session / Séance conjointe: With the Political Behaviour/Sociology section / Avec la section
Chair/Présidente: Joanna Everitt (University of New Brunswick - Saint John)
Discussant/Commentatrice: Elizabeth Goodyear-Grant (Queen's University)
Karen Bird (McMaster University) : Intersectionality and the Impact of Electoral Quotas for Ethnic
Minorities and Women
Brenda O'Neill (University of Calgary) : Religion, Spirituality and Women's Political Behaviour
70
5:00 pm - 6:30 pm / 17 h 00 - 18 h 30
Session: A5(c) - Rethinking Canada's Founding: A Roundtable in Honour of Janet
Ajzenstat
Chair/Président: Rainer Knopff (University of Calgary)
Dennis Baker (University of Guelph)
Guy Laforest (Université Laval)
Travis Smith (Concordia University)
Abstract: No political scientist has contributed more to the study of Canada's founding period
than Janet Ajzenstat. Her penetrating 1988 study, The Political Thought of Lord Durham, shed
new light on responsible government and Canada's national question. In 1999, 132 years after
Confederation, she and her colleagues produced our first comprehensive collection of Canada's
Founding Debates. A close reading of those debates informed The Canadian Founding: John
Locke and Parliament (2007), which won the John T. Saywell Prize for Canadian Constitutional
Legal History (2009) and the APSA's Seymour Martin Lipset Award for the best book in political
science (2009). Her other works include Canada's Origins: Liberal, Tory, or Republican (1995,
edited with Peter J. Smith), and The Once and Future Canadian Democracy: An Essay in Political
Thought (2003). In her books and many articles she has mounted a serious challenge to orthodox
interpretations of the Canadian founding, a challenge subsequent scholarship cannot afford to
ignore. Janet Ajzenstat's latest book, Discovering Confederation, is scheduled to appear in the
spring of 2014 (McGill-Queen's University Press), making this year's CPSA conference a fitting
occasion for a roundtable honouring her work and addressing the challenges it poses. The
roundtable participants – Rainer Knopff - Chair ( [email protected] ), Peter J. Smith
([email protected] ), Dennis Baker ( [email protected] ), Travis Smith
([email protected] ), and Guy Laforest ([email protected]) – are all familiar
with Janet Ajzenstat's writings and have drawn on them in their own work.
Session: S2 - Reception / Réception : Department of Political Science, Brock University
Location: Beddis Gym, Court 3 | Date: May 27, 2014 | Time: 05:00pm to 06:30pm
Sponsor: Sponsored by the Brock University Department of Political Science and the Canadian
Political Science Association / Commandité par le département de science politique de la Brock
University et l’Association canadienne de science politique
71
WEDNESDAY MAY 28 / LE MERCREDI 28 MAI
8:45 am - 10:15 am / 8 h 45 - 10 h 15
Session: A6(a) - Citizenship and Diversity
Chair/Président: Michael Orsini (University of Ottawa)
Discussant/Commentateur: Alain Noël (Université de Montréal)
Willem Maas (Glendon College, York University) : Internal Citizenship: The Case of Quebec
Luc Turgeon (University of Ottawa), Antoine Bilodeau (Concordia University), Alain-G Gagnon
(Université du Québec à Montréal), Ailsa Henderson (University of Edinburgh) :
AttitudesTtoward Official Bilingualism in Multi-Linguistic States: Exploring the Impact of Interest,
Identity and Personality in the Canadian Case
Arjun Tremblay (Concordia University) : The Persistence of Multiculturalism in Quebec
Session: A6(b) - Canadian Democracy
Discussant/Commentateur: Nelson Wiseman (University of Toronto)
Dennis Pilon (York University) : From Dominion to Democracy: Canada's Democratization
Process
Session: A6(c) - The Politics of Social Policy
Discussant/Commentateur: Peter Graefe (McMaster University)
Gabriel Arsenault (University of Toronto) : The 'social economy turn' in the Quebec Welfare
State
Annie McEwen (Carleton University) : From 'Poverty' to 'Inequality': A Richer Discourse for
Advancing a Better Canada?
Alison Smith (Université de Montréal) : Filling the Gap: The Framing of Homelessness in
Vancouver and Montréal
Ozge Uluskaradag (Concordia University) : Policy-Making in Canada: Social Capital as a Public
Policy Tool
72
8:45 am - 10:15 am / 8 h 45 - 10 h 15
Session: A6(d) - Roundtable: Constitutional Conventions, Minority Parliaments and
Government Formation: Is There an Academic Consensus? What is the Media and Public
Understanding? Is Greater Clarity Needed?
Joint Session / Séance conjointe: With the Public Administration section / Avec la section
Administration publique (see/voir K6b)
Chair/Présidente: Barbara Cameron (York University)
Hugo Cyr (Université du Québec à Montréal)
Bob Rae (Former Premier of Ontario and former interim leader of the Liberal Party of Canada)
Peter Russell (University of Toronto)
Johannes Wheeldon (Norwich University)
Abstract: Elections that produce legislatures in which no party holds the majority of seats are a
feature of Canadian political life yet considerable public confusion exists around the “groundrules”
for the selection of a Prime Minister and the composition of a government (one party,
coalition,other) in these situations. This roundtable explores whether or not a consensus exists
among academics on the constitutional conventions surrounding the process of government
formation, what the understanding is of the public and media, and how greater clarity might be
achieved.
Session: A6(e) - Politics and Parliamentary Democracy
Discussant/Commentateur: Graham White (University of Toronto)
Christopher Cochrane (University of Toronto) : Political Polarization and Animosity in Canada
and the United States
Anna Lennox Esselment (University of Waterloo) : From the Shadows and Into the Light? An
Accountability Framework for Political Advisors
John McAndrews (University of British Columbia) : The Purpose of Legislative Debate in Partydominated Parliamentary Systems: The Canadian Case
John Lloyd Nater (Western University) : It Being Thursday: The Weekly Business Statement in
Minority and Majority Parliaments
73
8:45 am - 10:15 am / 8 h 45 - 10 h 15
Session: B6 - Federal Politics
Chair/Président: Julián Durazo Herrmann (Université du Québec à Montréal)
Discussant/Commentateur: Julián Durazo Herrmann (Université du Québec à Montréal)
James Bickerton (St. Francis Xavier University ) : Citizenship, Identity and Regime Stability:
Managing Legitimacy Deficits and Workable Balances in Democratic Multinational Federations
Jorg Broschek (Wilfrid Laurier University) : Pathways of Federal Reform: Australia, Canada,
Germany and Switzerland in Comparative Perspective
Sanjay Jeram (Brock University), Arno van der Zwet (European Policies Research Centre),
Verena Wisthaler (University of Leicester and European Academy of Bozen/Bolzano) : Friends
or Foes? Stateless Nationalist and Regionalist Parties and Immigrant-Generated Diversity
Session: C6(a) - Reputation and Legitimacy in International Relations
Edward Ansah Akuffo (University of the Fraser Valley) : AU-ICC Relations: In Search of Justice
and Security or Contest for Legitimacy?
Patty Zakaria (Wayne State University) : Reputation and Nuclear Weapons
Session: C6(b) - Policy Relevance and Policy Failures in Critical Perspective
Andrea M. Collins (Queen's University) : Grassroots or 'Grass Tops'•?: A Gendered Analysis of
Local Land Governance
Elizabeth Ann Smythe (Concordia University College of Alberta) : Can I Have Some Hormone
Free Beef Too? The Curious Case of CETA, Free Trade and the Politics of Food Standards
Debora L. VanNijnatten (Wilfrid Laurier University) : Capacity for Failure?: Exploring the
'Material Determinants' of Policy Failure in a Transboundary Context
Session: C6(c) - Workshop: Varieties of Global Governance Arrangements and their
Impact on Resource-Rich Developing Countries / Atelier : L’éventail des mécanismes de
gouvernance mondiaux et leur impact sur les pays en développement riches en
ressources naturelles
Timothy Shaw (University of Massachusetts Boston) : Keynote: Varieties of Global Governance
Arrangements and their Impact on Resource-Rich Developing Countries
74
8:45 am - 10:15 am / 8 h 45 - 10 h 15
Session: D6 - The Politics of Morality Policy: Studying Conception, Formulation and
Implementation in Canada - Double session / Séance double (see/voir D7b)
Discussant/Commentatrice - 1: Candace Johnson (University of Guelph)
Discussant/Commentatrice - 2: Lois Harder (University of Alberta)
Alana Rose Cattapan (Dalhousie University) : An Ill Wind?: Commercial Egg Donation as Harm
Reduction
Carol Laura Dauda (University of Guelph) : Between 'Us' and the Child Pornographers: Age of
Consent and the Politics of Internet Child Pornography In Liberal Democracies
Genevieve Fuji Johnson (Simon Fraser University) : The Regulation of Prostitution in Canada: A
Complicated Relationship Among Laws, Policies, and Practices
Audrey L'Espérance (University of Toronto) : Fulfilling the Wishes of the Magistarium, the
Colleges and the Parents: How Moral, Medical and Administrative Frames Influence the
Implementation of HPV Vaccination Strategies in the Canadian Provinces
Dave Snow (University of Calgary) : Does Federalism Matter for Morality Policy? The Case of
Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Embryo Research in Canada
Session: E6 - Workshop: The Just and Diverse City / Atelier : La cité juste et diversifiée
Chair/Présidente: Livianna Tossutti (Brock University)
Discussant/Commentateur - 1: Robert Young (University of Western Ontario)
Discussant/Commentateur - 2: Warren Magnusson (University of Victoria)
Susan Fainstein (Harvard University Graduate School of Design) : Keynote Address: What Is the
Relationship Between Diversity and Justice?
Benoît Morissette (Université de Montréal) : Local Self-government and the Just City in the
Canadian Federation
Julie Tomiak (Carleton University) : Settler Colonialism, Neoliberal Urban Politics, and the Right
to the City
75
8:45 am - 10:15 am / 8 h 45 - 10 h 15
Session: F6 - It's Decision Time: Determinants of Political Participation, Engagement or
Decision-Making Processes
Chair/Président: Timothy B. Gravelle (University of Essex)
Discussant/Commentatrice: Elizabeth Goodyear-Grant (Queen's University)
Cameron Anderson (The University of Western Ontario), Laura Stephenson (The University of
Western Ontario) : Social Network Conflict, Personality and Political Engagement in Canada
Valérie-Anne Mahéo (McGill University) : With or Without Education: Political Participation
among the (Dis)Advantaged
David McGrane (University of Saskatchewan) : Amateur Campaign Managers or Judges of
Character? Results from Surveys of Voters in the 2013 Saskatchewan NDP and 2013 Federal
Liberal Leadership Races
Session: G6 - The Dynamics of US Hegemony
Paul Kellogg (Athabasca University) : The Changing Contours of Corporate Capitalism, 19802013
Brandon J Tozzo (Queen's University) : Is America Too Big To Fail? Polarization, Conflict
Extension and the Role of US Debt in the International Economy
Session: H6(a) - Bodies
Willy Blomme (Johns Hopkins University) : Assault on the Senses: Climate Change and the
Challenge to World-making
Douglas William Hanes (McGill University) : Born This Way in a World of Choice
David S. Western (Valparaiso University) : Empathy, Politics, Difference
Session: H6(b) - Ancients and Moderns
Location: Mackenzie Chown D Block 300 | Date: May 28, 2014 | Time: 08:45am to 10:15am
Nancy Bertoldi (University of Toronto) : Locke on Property, Sovereignty, and International
Relations
Simon Kow (University of King's College) : China and Early Modern Political Theology
Lynda Lange (University of Toronto Scarborough) : A Feminist Defense of Philosophical
Individualism in the Work of Thomas Pogge
Paul Mazzocchi (York University) : Towards a Politics of Friendly Disorder: La Boétie and
Contemporary Democratic Theory
76
8:45 am - 10:15 am / 8 h 45 - 10 h 15
Session: J6 - The Policy Impact of Legislators
Location: Mackenzie Chown C 403 | Date: May 28, 2014 | Time: 08:45am to 10:15am
Discussant/Commentatrice: Nicola Hepburn (University of Toronto)
Aaron Denhartog (Ontario Legislature Internship Programme) : The Development of Ontario
Minerial Resources: The Involvement and Impact of Legislator Participation in the Ring of Fire
Proposal
Amanda Garofalo (Ontario Legislature Internship Programme) : Specialized Knowledge: A
Comparison of the Public Service, Ministerial Political Staff and Legislators
Melinda Munding (Ontario Legislature Internship Programme) : The Representation of Children's
Interests in the Ontario Parliament: Looking at the Mandate of the Provincial Advocate for
Children and Youth
Session: K6 - Rundtable: Constitutional Conventions, Minority Parliaments and
Government Formation: Is There an Academic Consensus? What is the Media and Public
Understanding? Is Greater Clarity Needed?
Joint Session / Séance conjointe: With the Canadian Politics section / Avec la section Politique
canadienne (see/voir A6d)
Hugo Cyr (Université du Québec à Montréal)
Bob Rae (Former Premier of Ontario and former interim leader of the Liberal Party of Canada)
Johannes Wheeldon (Norwich University)
Abstract: Elections that produce legislatures in which no party holds the majority of seats are a
feature of Canadian political life yet considerable public confusion exists around the “groundrules”
for the selection of a Prime Minister and the composition of a government (one party,
coalition,other) in these situations. This roundtable explores whether or not a consensus exists
among academics on the constitutional conventions surrounding the process of government
formation, what the understanding is of the public and media, and how greater clarity might be
achieved. Chair: Barbara Cameron (York University) Participants: Hugo Cyr (Université du
Québec à Montréal), Peter Russell (University of Toronto), Johannes Wheeldon (Norwich
University)
Session: L6(a) - Territories of Violence and National Identities
Tiago André Ferreira Lopes (Kirikkale University ) : On the Verge of Multiethnic Peace and
Ethno-complex Conflict: The Case of Dagestan
Amanda Vyce (The University of Western Ontario) : Haudenosaunee Collective Action:
Disrupting the Dominant Narrative of the Canadian State as Non-Violent
77
8:45 am - 10:15 am / 8 h 45 - 10 h 15
Conversations - Intersectionality and the Politics of Scale / L’intersectionalité en période
Femmes, genre et politique (see/voir N6)
Discussant/Commentatrice: Miriam Smith (York University)
Yasmeen Abu-Laban (The University of Alberta), Abigail B. Bakan (University of Toronto) :
Intersectionality Goes Global: Race, Gender and the UN World Conference Against Racism
Isabel Altamirano-Jiménez (The University of Alberta) : Noble Savages and Fire Setters: Neoliberalism, Land and Conservation
Rauna Kuokkanen (University of Toronto) : Gendered Violence and Politics in Indigenous
Communities
Melissa Sharpe-Harrigan (Trent University) : The Use of Scale in Ontario's Immigration Strategy
Session: M6 - Mentoring Café: The Politics of Teaching Online
Scott Reid (Memorial Univesity)
Abstract: Several scholars (Bijker, 1995; Callon, 1989;Hughes, 2005; Latour, 2005; Law, 2003;
Winner, 1985) have pointed out thattechnologies bring with them political values and structures.
Winner (1985) presented cases wherein the way atechnology evolved was based on a political
decision and cases where thetechnology supported particular political frameworks. He
emphasizes thatchoices made early on in the development of technologies often set a coursethat
can endure for generations. Also, to accept a certain technology bringswith it a certain power
structure in society.Thispaper explores the political dimensions of the adoption of online courses
byuniversity professors. Recognizing and understand these political aspects ofthe use and
development of online courses is import to guiding the future useof this technology. In this paper
politics is defined in a broad sense associal relations involving authority and power. The objective
is to draw onexisting theories of technological change and a case study of universityprofessors'
adoption of online courses to explore the political implicationsinherent in the use of any
technology. The study also emphasizes the importanceof the involvement of various groups in
decisions around the use and shaping ofonline courses as a technology. The paper explores the
concepts of relevantsocial groups, interpretative flexibility, technological frames and the use
ofpower in the context of university professors' adoption of asynchronous onlinecourses.
78
8:45 am - 10:15 am / 8 h 45 - 10 h 15
Conversations - Intersectionality and the Politics of Scale / Atelier : L’intersectionalité en
Chair/Présidente: Christina Gabriel (Carleton University)
Discussant/Commentatrice: Miriam Smith (York University)
Yasmeen Abu-Laban (The University of Alberta), Abigail B. Bakan (University of Toronto) :
Intersectionality Goes Global: Race, Gender and the UN World Conference Against Racism
Isabel Altamirano-Jiménez (The University of Alberta) : Noble Savages and Fire Setters: Neoliberalism, Land and Conservation
Rauna Kuokkanen (University of Toronto) : Gendered Violence and Politics in Indigenous
Communities
Melissa Sharpe-Harrigan (Trent University) : The Use of Scale in Ontario's Immigration Strategy
79
10:30 am - 12:00 am / 10 h 30 - 12 h 00
Session: A7(a) - Voting Determinants (see/voir F7a)
Joint Session / Séance conjointe: With the Political Behaviour/Sociology section / Avec la section
Discussant/Commentatrice: Rachel Laforest (Queen's University)
Jean-Francois Godbout (Université de Montréal), Eve Bourgeois (Université de Montréal) : La
genèse des partis politiques au Bas-Canada (1791-1840)
Maxime Héroux-Legault (University of Toronto), Carolina De Miguel (University of Toronto),
Peter Loewen (University of Toronto) : Individual and Contextual Determinants of the Vote for
Nationalist Parties
Simeon Mitropolitski (Université de Montréal) : Why People Vote in Canada? Hermeneutic
Analysis of Statistical Surveys
Session: A7(b) - Roundtable: Historical Political Science in Canada - Challenges and
Prospects
Chair/Président: Jack Lucas (University of Toronto)
Eric Helleiner (University of Waterloo)
Miriam Smith (York University)
Robert Vipond (University of Toronto)
Abstract: For much of its history, Canadian political science has had no need for a “historical
turn”. Many of Canada's best-known political scientists have been resolutely historical in their
interests and methods, and the richest traditions of research in the Canadian discipline – such as
federalism, political culture, party systems, and constitutional politics – encouraged, indeed
required, historical approaches. Yet this tradition of historical political science in Canada has
produced little reflection on the challenges, opportunities, theories, and methods of historically
oriented political science scholarship. This roundtable will begin to redress this absence. It brings
together four distinguished political scientists to discuss the theoretical and practical challenges of
historical political science in Canada. Is historical political science as strong today as it has been
in the past? Does historical work require distinctive theories or methods? How well have fellow
political scientists and historians received historical research? The panelists' reflections on these
questions will be of interest to a wide range of scholars, including empirical theorists, historicallyoriented social scientists, political historians, and younger scholars who are interested in
conducting historical social science research. Confirmed Roundtable Participants: Eric Helleiner,
Professor of Political Science, University of Waterloo ([email protected])Miriam Smith,
Professor of Social Science, York University ([email protected])Robert Vipond, Professor of
Political Science, University of Toronto ([email protected])Nelson Wiseman, Associate
Professor of Political Science, University of Toronto ([email protected])
80
10:30 am - 12:00 am / 10 h 30 - 12 h 00
Session: B7 - Subnational Politics
Jorg Broschek (Wilfrid Laurier University), Christopher Alcantara (Wilfrid Laurier University),
Jennifer Nelles (Hunter College, CUNY) : Multilevel Governance in Comparative Perspective:
The Instance Approach
Julián Durazo Herrmann (Université du Québec à Montréal) : Médias et démocratie en
Amérique latine
Beesan Sarrouh (Queen's University) : Accommodating Muslim Minorities in Secular Societies:
The Cases of Ontario and Quebec
Session: C7(a) - Identity and (Foreign) Policy: Constructions of Canada in the
Conservative Era II
Discussant/Commentateur: Pierre Lizée (Brock University)
Renaud Clément (University of Ottawa) : Conservative Sovereignty and Liberal Bioculture: The
Practice of Official Canadian Multiculturalism Now andThen
Stephane Roussel (École nationale d'administration publique), Justin Massie (Université du
Québec à Montréal) : Les quatre piliers du néoconservatisme en politique étrangère canadienne
Heather A Smith (University of Northern British Columbia) : Unpacking Constructions of a
Mythical Past and Harmonious Present: The Harper Government, Colonialism and First Nations
Rebecca Tiessen (University of Ottawa) : Harper's Conservative Party: A Champion for
Righteous Indignation and the Needs of the Girl Child but not for Gender Equality
Session: C7(b) - Questions of Strategy: Perspectives on Canadian Security and Foreign
Policy
Edward Ansah Akuffo (University of the Fraser Valley) : Africa's Geopolitical Space: The Case
of Continuities and Changes in Canada's Security Policy from Chrétien to Harper
Brandon J Tozzo (Queen's University), Dru Lauzon (Queen's University) : Canada in the PostAmerican World: The Policy Paradox of the Conservative Government
81
10:30 am - 12:00 am / 10 h 30 - 12 h 00
Session: C7(c) - Roundtable: Converging Practices in Security and Development: Using
Fieldwork to Bridge the Theory/Reality Gap in Security Studies
Mélanie Cambrezy (Université de Montréal )
Amélie Forget (Université de Montréal)
David Last (Royal Military College of Canada )
Gaëlle Rivard Piché (Carleton University)
Althea Maria Rivas (University of Sussex )
Patrick Michael Ulrich (University of Calgary )
Abstract: The evolution of the international security environment led to a convergence of the
realms of security, defense and development. This shift has blurred the distinctions between
social categories, making our understanding of the distribution of power, roles and responsibilities
of international security actors more complex than ever. This roundtable addresses the impacts of
these changes on three sets of security professionals – the military, humanitarians and
development agents. Sharing insights from their fieldwork observations and from their
professional experiences as practitioners of these different sectors, participants will discuss the
contexts that connect these actors together, the practices they implement and the social meaning
they give to this undefined security environment. Acknowledging the practical turn, the
interdisciplinarity and the intersectoriality of security studies, this roundtable also explores the
added value of in-depth qualitative research with security actors, which provides necessary data
to overcome the boundaries of theoretical frameworks, conceptual categories and disciplines.
Participants will question whether the contributions of sociologically oriented researches are
mainly empirical or if they also help to fill the theory/reality gap of IR theory and security studies.
This initiative brings together Mélanie Cambrezy, PhD candidate at the Université de Montréal
([email protected]), Amélie Forget, postdoctoral researcher at the Cornell
University ([email protected]), David Last, professor of political science at the Royal
Military College of Canada ([email protected]), Gaëlle Rivard-Piché, PhD candidate at
the Carleton University ([email protected]) and Patrick Michel Ulrich, PhD
candidate at the University of Calgary ([email protected]). The roundtable will be held in
both English and French.
Session: C7(d) - Workshop: Varieties of Global Governance Arrangements and their
Bjornar Egede-Nissen (University of Western Ontario ) : What Went Wrong with Norway's
REDD+ Scheme? Deforestation and Cash-on-delivery Aid
J. Andrew Grant (Queen's University), W.R. Nadège Compaoré (Queen's University) : Tripartite
Global Governance Arrangements and Corporate Social Responsibility in West Africa's Extractive
Sectors
Mark Stephen Williams (Vancouver Island University) : Negotiating Global Governance and
Nationalism in Indonesia during the Yudhoyono Years, 2004-2014
Xu Yi-chong (Griffith University) : New Dynamics of FDI in Extractive Industries
82
10:00 am - 12:00 am / 10 h 00 - 12 h 00
Session: D7(a) - Feeding the Future: Can Scientists, Regulators and Activists Agree?
Location: South Block - 204 | Date: May 28, 2014 | Time: 10:00am to 12:00pm
Sponsor: Congress of the Humanities and Social Sciences and Genome Canada / Congrès des
sciences humaines et Genome Canada
Increasing food production to provide food security to a growing population is one of the world’s
great challenges. Not only is food security essential for the health and prosperity of individuals
and populations, it is also linked to global security as food scarcity can cause conflict and
migration. Increases in food production have been achieved in the past, but now scarcity of water,
land and energy and the impacts of climate change increase the challenge.
Innovation in ag-biotech to address these challenges is at the heart of heated debates, which also
question the regulatory oversight of these technologies.
As part of Genome Canada’s series GPS: Where Genomics, Public Policy and Society Meet, this
multidisciplinary session will investigate the role of genomics in Feeding the Future, grounds for
contesting and challenging the purely ‘science-based model’ of regulatory evaluation, and policy
options to foster transparency and strengthen engagement or to consider uncertainty in a new
light.
10:30 am - 12:00 am / 10 h 30 - 12 h 00
Session: D7(b) - The Politics of Morality Policy: Studying Conception, Formulation and
Implementation in Canada - Double session / Séance double (see/voir D6)
Discussant/Commentatrice - 1: Candace Johnson (University of Guelph)
Discussant/Commentatrice - 2: Lois Harder (University of Alberta)
Alana Rose Cattapan (Dalhousie University) : An Ill Wind?: Commercial Egg Donation as Harm
Reduction
Carol Laura Dauda (University of Guelph) : Between 'Us' and the Child Pornographers: Age of
Consent and the Politics of Internet Child Pornography In Liberal Democracies
Genevieve Fuji Johnson (Simon Fraser University) : The Regulation of Prostitution in Canada: A
Complicated Relationship Among Laws, Policies, and Practices
Audrey L'Espérance (University of Toronto) : The Politics of Morality Policy: Studying
Conception, Formulation and Implementation in Canada
Audrey L'Espérance (University of Toronto) : Fulfilling the Wishes of the Magistarium, the
Colleges and the Parents: How Moral, Medical and Administrative Frames Influence the
Implementation of HPV Vaccination Strategies in the Canadian Provinces
Dave Snow (University of Calgary) : Does Federalism Matter for Morality Policy? The Case of
Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Embryo Research in Canada
83
10:30 am - 12:00 am / 10 h 30 - 12 h 00
Session: E7 - Workshop: The Just and Diverse City / Atelier : La cité juste et diversifiée
Chair/Présidente: Livianna Tossutti (Brock University)
Discussant/Commentateur: Christopher Leo (University of Winnipeg)
Kate M.Daley (York University) : The Good Fight and the Usual Suspects: A Case Study of
Community Transit Advocacy
Jeanne Fortilus (Brock University), Charles Conteh (Brock University) : Making the Connection
Between Cultural Diversity and the Economic Resilience of Cities
Joanne Heritz (Brock University) : Representation of Aytpical Groups: Urban Aboriginal Peoples
in Canada and Travellers in Ireland
Serena Kataoka (Nipissing University) : Mythologizing the Just and Diverse City
Session: F7(a) - Voting Determinants (see/voir A7a)
canadienne
Maxime Héroux-Legault (University of Toronto), Carolina De Miguel (University of Toronto),
Peter Loewen (University of Toronto) : Individual and Contextual Determinants of the Vote for
Nationalist Parties
Simeon Mitropolitski (Université de Montréal) : Why People Vote in Canada? Hermeneutic
Analysis of Statistical Surveys
Session: F7(b) - Not Your Good Old Brokerage Party Anymore: Partisan Organizations in
Transition
Chair/Président: Royce Koop (University of Manitoba)
Discussant/Commentatrice: Anna Esselment (University of Waterloo)
William Cross (Carleton University) : In Search of Stratarchy: A Comparative Assessment of the
Franchise Model
Thierry Giasson (Université Laval), Frédérick Bastien (Université de Montréal), Mireille
Lalancette (Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières) : Is Social Media Transforming Canadian
Electioneering? Partisan strategies for Online Campaigning in the 2012 Quebec Elections
Alex Marland (Memorial University of Newfoundland) : The Brokerage Party is Old School: Why
the Branded Party is the New Model of Canadian Politics
Vincent Raynauld (Carleton University), André Turcotte (Carleton University) : E-politicking 3.0
in Europe: A look at the 2013 Norwegian Parliamentary Elections
84
10:30 am - 12:00 am / 10 h 30 - 12 h 00
Session: G7 - Roundtable: The Politics of Knowledge Production
Joint Session / Séance conjointe: Society for Socialist Studies and Studies in Political Economy /
La société d'études socialistes et Studies in Political Economy
Chair/Présidente: Laurie Adkin (University of Alberta)
Thomas Collombat (Université du Québec en Outaouais)
Radhika Desai (University of Manitoba)
Brent Epperson (President of the Graduate Students' Association, University of Alberta)
Malinda Smith (University of Alberta )
Abstract: Universities in Canada and elsewhere have been undergoing a new wave of marketdriven restructuring in recent years. Governing parties in many countries believe that the priorities
of post-secondary research and education should be determined –to a historically unprecedented
extent-- by the immediate investment, workforce, and technological needs of private corporations.
The over-arching aims of the direction of public revenue into such prioritized domains are said to
be the promotion of economic growth, technological competitiveness in global markets, and
employment opportunities for youth. With regard to education, a revived utilitarianism is devaluing
social sciences, humanities, and natural sciences while demanding that post-secondary
education produce marketable workers. Efforts to build interdisciplinarity between, for example,
arts and sciences, are being undermined or reversed by neoliberal funding practices that aim to
re-entrench the division between “useful” technology-and-training-oriented PSE and “frivolous”
ethical-and-citizenship-oriented PSE. Moreover, diversity objectives are being relegated to the
institutional shadows, particularly in terms of curriculum. There is incessant pressure on
universities to enter into public-private partnerships in research and to commodify (or
“commercialize”) research products and services.
The participants in this roundtable bring
reports and analyses of these developments from a variety of specific contexts (within Canada
and from other countries), allowing us to compare experiences, identify patterns, and learn from
the forms of resistance to the neoliberalization of education and knowledge that have arisen to
date.
Session: H7(a) - Critical Theory
Caleb Basnett (York University) : Aesthetics Against Humanity: Adorno on Art and Politics
Paul Mazzocchi (York University) : Messianic Democracy: Benjamin's Politics Between Ontology
and Ethics
Inna Viriasova (Acadia University) : Homelessness and Homesickness: Nietzsche, Life and
Refugees
85
10:30 am - 12:00 am / 10 h 30 - 12 h 00
Session: H7(b) - Virtue
Robert Alan Sparling (Université de Montréal) : Incorruptibility: Kant, Robespierre and the Cult
of Virtue
Dorina Verli (University of Toronto) : Rousseau and the Genevan Constitutional Crisis of 176264
Lee Ward (Campion College, University of Regina) : Republican Political Theory in Irish
Nationalism
Session: J7 - No session / Aucune séance
Location: | Date: May 28, 2014 | Time: 10:30am to 12:00pm
Session: K7 - Networks and Horizontality in Public Administration
Chair/Président: Steven Rathgeb Smith (American Political Science Association)
Discussant/Commentateur: Steven Rathgeb Smith (American Political Science Association)
Paul Barker (Brescia University College) : An Assessment of Local Health Integration Networks
in Ontario
Carey Doberstein (University of Toronto) : Achieving the 'Collaborative Advantage': Bureaucratic
Steering of Governance Networks
Carolyn Johns (Ryerson University) : The Significance of Networks in Understanding
Governance and Public Administration: Using Social Network Analysis to Analyze Governance in
the Great Lakes Region
Session: L7(a) - Indigenous Nationhood From Redress to Reconciliation
Chadwick Richard John Cowie (University of Alberta) : Resurgence and Division: The Question
of Indigenous Belonging in the Canadian State
Matt James (University of Victoria) : From Redress to Reconciliation: The New Canadian Politics
of Historical Justice•
Robert Maciel (The University of Western Ontario), Zachary Spicer (University of Toronto) :
(Transitional) Justice Delayed: Will Canada's Truth and Reconcilliation Commission Ever Result
in Meaningful National Dialogue?
86
10:30 am - 12:00 am / 10 h 30 - 12 h 00
Conversations - Intersectionality and the Social: Analyzing the Austere State / Atelier :
Discussant/Commentatrice: Sedef ARat-Koç (Ryerson University)
Tammy Findlay (Mount Saint Vincent University) : Intersectionality and Child Care: Building
Social Policy Solidarity in Austere Times
Christina Gabriel (Carleton University) : Framing Families: Neo-Liberalism and the Regulation of
the Family Class Within Canadian Immigration Policy
Dan Leon Irving (Carleton University) : 'More than a feeling'•: What Transsexual and Two-Spirit
Women's Experiences of Underemployment and Unemployment Reveal About Gender
Normativity and Whiteness In Times of Austerity
Deborah Stienstra (Mount Saint Vincenct University) : More and Less: DisAbling Women and
Girls in 'Austere' Times
Session: M7 - Roundtable: Practices, Objectives, and Innovations in Teaching Canadian
Politics
Erin Crandall (Queen's University)
JP Lewis (University of New Brunswick, Saint John)
Iain Reeve (Queen's University)
Abstract: How is Canadian politics taught in university? The realities of budget limitations,
technological innovations, and continuing research mean that those who teach Canadian politics
today are faced with both new opportunities and challenges in how they design their courses.
However, we know little about whether and how current approaches to teaching vary across
teacher and institution. This panel is intended to provide a forum for teachers of Canadian politics
to discuss practices, objectives, and innovations in the of teaching Canadian politics. In particular,
it will focus on innovations in classroom design and technologies, and the development of an
online teaching resource that is intended to share the experiences and best practices of
Canadian politics teachers.
87
10:30 am - 12:00 am / 10 h 30 - 12 h 00
Conversations - Intersectionality and the Social: Analyzing the Austere State / Atelier :
Chair/Présidente: Wendy McKeen (York University)
Discussant/Commentatrice: Sedef ARat-Koç (Ryerson University)
Tammy Findlay (Mount Saint Vincent University) : Intersectionality and Child Care: Building
Social Policy Solidarity in Austere Times
Christina Gabriel (Carleton University) : Framing Families: Neo-Liberalism and the Regulation of
the Family Class Within Canadian Immigration Policy
Dan Leon Irving (Carleton University) : More Than a Feeling'•: What Transsexual and TwoSpirit Women's Experiences of Underemployment and Unemployment Reveal About Gender
Normativity and Whiteness In Times of Austerity
Deborah Stienstra (Mount Saint Vincent University) : More and Less: DisAbling Women and
Girls in 'Austere' Times
88
12:00 pm - 1:30 pm / 12 h 00 - 13 h 30
How to Write a Lot
This workshop is based on Paul Silvia's book of the same title. Typically, a copy of the book ($16)
is given to each participant. Each academic is a writer, but sometimes the writing of a book or an
article can be a challenge. This workshop will present strategies to overcome the barriers to
writing and will discuss tactics to improve your writing productivity.
This workshop has been developed by Françoise Moreau-Johnson. Ms. Moreau-Johnson is the
Activities Coordinator at the Centre for Academic Leadership at the University of Ottawa, Ottawa,
Canada. Through the activities and workshops she organizes for full-time faculty on the topics of
leadership and career development, she has met approximately half of the 1200 tenured or
tenure-track professors at the University of Ottawa. The mentoring program forms an important
part of the Centre's activities with over 110 professors who have asked to be paired with a mentor
since 2006. For her work on this program and other activities she organized at the Centre for
Academic Leadership, Françoise has received the 2010 Prize for Excellence in Service for
University of Ottawa's support staff. She holds a M.Sc. in Experimental Psychology and an M.A.
in Linguistics.
Session: F8 - Lunch / Déjeuner - Author Meets Critics: Susan Delacourt's Shopping for
Votes: How Politicians Choose Us and We Choose Them
Discussant/Commentatrice - 1: Anna Esselment (University of Waterloo)
Discussant/Commentateur - 2: Alex Marland (Memorial University of Newfoundland)
Susan Delacourt (The Toronto Star)
89
12:00 pm - 1:30 pm / 12 h 00 - 13 h 30
Session: K8 - Lunch / Déjeuner
Session: Z5 - ISA-Canada Business Meeting / Réunion d’affaires de l'AÉI-Canada
90
1:30 pm - 3:00 pm / 13 h 30 - 15 h 00
Session: P9 - Diversity and the Political Science Profession: Roundtable on the Findings
of the Diversity Task Force
Location: Thistle Hall 325 | Date: May 28, 2014 | Time: 01:30pm to 03:00pm
Chair/Président: Alain Noël (Université de Montréal)
Yasmeen Abu-Laban (University of Alberta)
Joanna Everitt (University of New Brunswick - Saint John)
Martin Papillon (Université d'Ottawa)
David Rayside (Univesity of Toronto)
3:15 pm - 4:00 pm / 15 h 15 - 16 h 00
Session: P10 - Presidential Address/Discours présidentiel
Location: Welch Hall, DS Howes Theatre | Date: May 28, 2014 | Time: 03:15pm to 04:00pm |
Alain Noël (Université de Montréal) : What is it a Case Of? Studying Your Own Country
Introduction: Guy Laforest (Université Laval)
Words of Thanks/Mots de remerciement: Peter Graefe (McMaster University)
4:05 pm - 5:30 pm / 16 h 05 - 17 h 30
Session: Z6 - CPSA Annual General Meeting / Assemblée générale annuelle de l’ACSP
Location: Welch Hall, D Howse Theatre | Date: May 28, 2014 | Time: 04:05pm to 05:30pm
91
THURSDAY MAY 29 / LE JEUDI 29 MAI
8:45 am - 10:15 am / 8 h 45 - 10 h 15
Session: A11(a) - Federalism and Regional Development
Discussant/Commentateur: James Bickerton (St. Francis Xavier University)
Christopher Alcantara (Wilfrid Laurier University), Jen Nelles (Hunter College, CUNY) : Interjurisdictional Cooperation in Canada: A Tale of One City and Two First Nations
Markus Sharaput (Ryerson University) : An Austere Environment: The Impact of Austerity,
Environmentalism, and Resources on Regional Development in Canada
Markus Sharaput (Ryerson University) : Blurred Lines: Federalism and Regional Development in
Canada
Session: A11(b) - Workshop: Organizing Interests in Canada / Atelier : Les groupes
d’intérêt au Canada
Pascal Dufour (Université de Montréal)
Jonathan Greene (Trent University)
Joel Harden (Carleton University)
Rachel Laforest (Queen's University)
Michael Orsini (University of Ottawa)
Steven Rathgeb Smith (American Political Science Association)
Session: B11(a) - Social Policy I
Mélanie Bourque (Université du Québec en Outaouais), Nathalie St-Amour (Université du
Québec en Outaouais) : Work and Family Balance : What is the Role of Family Policies?
Cem Utku Duyulmus (McGill University) : Politics and Distributional Dynamics of Conditional
Cash Transfer Program in Turkey
Anthony Sealey (University of Toronto) : Explaining Geopolitical Variation in Popular Support for
Economic Redistribution
Session: B11(b) - Political Change I
Kenny William Ie (University of Western Ontario) : Choosing Power: A Rational Actor Model of
Executive Institutional Change
Laura Rose Levick (Queen's University) : If an Electoral Reform Fails and No One Studies It,
Does it Matter?: Advancing a Process-Based Approach to the Study of Electoral Reform
Elliot Storm (University of Toronto) : Political Opportunity and Capacity in Venezuela's
'University Crisis'•
92
8:45 am - 10:15 am / 8 h 45 - 10 h 15
Session: C11(a) - Foreign Policy in Focus
Discussant/Commentateur: Edward Akuffo (University of the Fraser Valley)
Amir Mohammad Haji-Yousefi (Shahid Beheshti University) : Heroic Flexibility and the Future of
Iran`s Foreign Policy
Kang-uk Jung (University of Denver) : Hiding, Mediating, or Abetting: China’s Strategic Choices
toward Iran and North Korea, 1998-2005
Isaac Odoom (University of Alberta ) : The Role of South-South Cooperation in Africa's
Development Beyond 2015
Jeremy Paltiel (Carleton University), Shakir Chambers (Carleton University) : When the Sun
Rises in the West: Canada's Ambivalent Response to the Rise of China and the Asia-Pacific
Session: C11(b) - The Commercialization of Security
Discussant/Commentatrice: Veronica Kitchen (University of Waterloo)
Aaron Ettinger (Queen's University) : Historical Sequencing and the Long-Term Causes of
Military Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan
Scott Matthew Fitzsimmons (University of Limerick) : Road Warriors: Violence and Personnel
Protection by Private Security Companies in Iraq
Chris Hendershot (York University) : Commercial Security Contractors: The Subject-Objects of
Self-Defence
Session: C11(c) - Issues in Global Governance: Varieties of (In)Security
Discussant/Commentateur: Sanjay Jeram (Brock University)
Jeffrey Lee Rice (Queen's University) : European Security and the Value(s) of Intervention
Patty Zakaria (Wayne State University) : Proliferation of Small Arms in West Africa
93
8:45 am - 10:15 am / 8 h 45 - 10 h 15
Session: D11 - The Politics of Citizenship: Immigration and Multiculturalism
Discussant/Commentateur: Arjun Tremblay (Concordia University)
Halina Sapeha (McMaster University) : Comparative Analysis of Initial Settlement Patterns of
Immigrants After the Introduction of Subnational Immigration Programmes in Canada and
Australia
Stephanie Jessica Silverman (York University) : The Absconding Justification: Interrogating a
Key Basis for Immigration Detention in Canada and the United Kingdom
Anne Staver (University of Toronto) : Negotiating the Right to Family Life in Immigration Policy
Sule Tomkinson (Université de Montréal) : Prove To Me That You Are a Genuine Refugee Credibility Assessment during Refugee Hearings
Session: E11 - Roundtable: If Mayors Ruled the World: Dysfunctional States, Rising Cities
(Double session see E12 / Séance double voir E12)
Location: DS Howes Theatre, Welch Hall | Date: May 29, 2014 | Time: 10:00am to 11:30am
Sponsor: The CPSA gratefully acknowledges the support of the Brock University Congress team
in the organization of this event. / L'ACSP remercie vivement l'équipe responsable du congrès en
poste à la Brock University pour son soutien dans l'organisation de cet événement.
Joint Session / Séance conjointe: With Congress' Big Thinking Lecture Series / Avec la Série de
causeries Voir grand du Congrès
Chair/Président: David Siegel (Brock University)
Benjamin Barber (City University of New York)
Alan Broadbent (Maytree Foundation)
Naheed Nenshi (Mayor, City of Calgary)
Andrew Sancton (University of Western Ontario)
94
8:45 am - 10:15 am / 8 h 45 - 10 h 15
Session: F11 - Canadian Youth and Political Participation. The (Not So) Apathetic
Generation?
Chair/Président: Simon Kiss (Wilfrid Laurier University)
Discussant/Commentatrice: Tamara Small (University of Guelph)
Heather Bastedo (Queen's University) : When it Comes to Non-Engaged Youth, Politics is
Personal
Nicole J Goodman (McMaster University) : Internet Voting and Voter Turnout: An Experiment
with University Students in Canada
Vincent Raynauld (Carleton University), Mireille Lalancette (Université du Québec à TroisRivières), Sofia Tourigny-Koné (Université du Québec à Trois-Rivieres) : Tweet, Click, Protest:
The 2012 Quebec Student Strike
Session: G11 - Understanding Transformations in Corporate Power
Simarjit Singh Bal (University of Alberta) : Banking on Identity - American and Canadian
Banking Regulation and the Global Financial Crisis
Geoffrey E. Hale (University of Lethbridge) : Canada's Crown Corporations and The Changing
Face of State Capitalism
Session: H11(a) - Machines
Simon Choat (Kingston University) : Everything for Sale: A critique of Michael Sandel's What
Money Can't Buy
Devin Penner (University of Manitoba) : Between Image and Democracy: Notes Toward a
'Playful' Approach to Public Relations
Trevor Garrison Smith (University of Western Ontario) : The Possibility of Online Political Space
Session: H11(b) - Animals of the Demos: Voice, Representation, and Silence
Chair/Président: Will Kymlicka (Queen's University)
Discussant/Commentatrice - 1: Kendra Coulter (Brock University)
Discussant/Commentateur - 2: Will Kymlicka (Queen's University)
Lauren Corman (Brock University) : Silence Fiction: Voice, Resistance, and Animal Politics
Stefan Dolgert (Brock University) : Animal Republics: Plato, Representation, and the Politics of
Nature
Emma Planinc (University of Toronto) : Political Ménageries: Theriophilia and Theriophobia in
18th Century France
95
8:45 am - 10:15 am / 8 h 45 - 10 h 15
Session: J11 - Parties and Governing
Chair/Président: John Carlaw (York University)
Discussant/Commentateur - 1: Stewart Hyson (University of New Brunswick)
Discussant/Commentatrice - 2: Laura Stephenson (University of Western Ontario)
J.P. Lewis (University of New Brunswick Saint John), Andrea Lawlor (University of California at
Berkeley) : Governance in the Centre: An Examination of Representation and Tenure in Federal
Cabinet Committees, 1980-2013
Scott Pruysers (Carleton University) : Party Integration During the Inter-election Period
Scott Reid (Memorial Univesity) : Casting a Wider Net: A Case Study of the 2013 Liberal Party
Leadership Selection Process in Newfoundland and Labrador
Session: L11(a) - Citizenship, Race National Identity
Kyle Brandon Jackson (Queen's University) : Queer Jamaica?
Jessica Lisa Merolli (McMaster University ) : (Re)Defining the Ideal Citizen: Expertise and
Policy-Making in Canada, the UK and Netherlands
Althea Maria Rivas (University of Sussex) : Race, Racism and Development
Paul Williams (Brock University) : Becoming European: The Dynamics of Citizenship,
Statelessness and Race in the European Union
96
8:45 am - 10:15 am / 8 h 45 - 10 h 15
Conversations - Discursive Politics of Violence: Intersectional Perspectives / Atelier :
frontières (see/voir N11b)
Joint Session / Séance conjointe: Wih the Women, Gender and Politics section / Avec la section
Femmes, genre et politique (see/voir N11b)
Discussant/Commentatrice: Heather L. Johnson (Queen's University Belfast)
Bailey Gerrits (Queen's University) : Speak Up/Speak Out
Travis Andrew Hay (York University) : It is Bizarre to Have that Many Kids Gone'•: Syntaxes of
Deferral and Colonial Violence in Thunder Bay, Ontario
Alison James-Lomax (The University of British Columbia) : Framing Sexual Violence in South
Africa: Reflections
Session: N11(a) - Feminist Policy Analysist: Assessing the Tool Kit
Discussant/Commentatrice: Jacquie Newman (University of Western Ontario)
Jane Arscott (Athabasca University) : Gender-Equality Measurement: Simple, Transparent,
Robust
Barbara Cameron (York University) : Women's Human Rights and Gender Responsive
Budgeting: A Feminist Political Economy Critique
Leah Levac (University of Guelph) : An Intersectionality-Informed Systematic Scoping Review of
the Impacts of Changing Provincial Public Services on Young Women in Canada
Heather MacRae (York University) : Gender Mainstreaming and the Increasing Invisibility of
Gender in the European Union
97
8:45 am - 10:15 am / 8 h 45 - 10 h 15
Session: N11(b) - Workshop: Intersectionality in Austere Times: Boundary-Crossing
Conversations - Discursive Politics of Violence: Intersectional Perspectives / Atelier :
Discussant/Commentatrice: Heather L. Johnson (Queen's University Belfast)
Bailey Gerrits (Queen'University) : Speak Up/Speak Out
Travis Andrew Hay (York University) : It is Bizarre to Have that Many Kids Gone'•: Syntaxes of
Deferral and Colonial Violence in Thunder Bay, Ontario
Alison James-Lomax (University of British Columbia) : Framing Sexual Violence in South Africa:
Reflections
98
10:30 am - 12:00 pm / 10 h 30 - 12 h 00
Session: A12 - Indigenous-State Relations in a Multilevel Context
Joint Session / Séance conjointe: With the Race, Ethnicity, Indigenous Peoples and Politics
section / Séance conjointe avec la séction Race, ethnicité, peuples autochtones et politique
(see/voir L12c)
Jodi Bruhn (Stratéjuste Consulting) : Key Issues and Promising Approaches to the Governance
of Indigenous Data in Canada
Janique Dubois (Brock University) : Explaining the Resurgence of Métis Self-Government on
Canada's Policy Agenda
Kelly Lynne Saunders (Brandon University) : Essence of the Struggle: Constitution Building and
Métis Self-Government in Canada
Session: B12(a) - Social Policy II
Gerard Boychuk (University of Waterloo) : US Social Policy Expansionism in Response to
Financial Crisis, 2008-2013: A Comparative Perspective from Advanced Liberal Welfare States
Brent L Epperson (University of Alberta) : Media Representations of Health Care Reform in the
United States: Framing the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare)
Anthony Kevins (McGill University) : The Strivers and the Skivers: Public Opinion, Political
Discourse, and Changes to Benefit Access
Session: B12(b) - Political Change II
Marie Brossier (Université Laval) : Familial Transfer of Political Power in Africa: The Formation
of Republican Dynasties
Sen Lin (Grant MacEwan University) : Urbanization, Poverty, and Regime Legitimacy in China
Siavash Saffari (University of Alberta) : Rethinking the Religion-Democracy Nexus in Muslim
Contexts: Contesting Visions of Civil Public Religion in Contemporary Iran
Yasmine Shamsie (Wilfrid Laurier University) : Haiti's Fragile State Designation: Focusing on
State-society Relations After the Earthquake
Session: C12(a) - Critical Perspectives on Peace and Security
Adam Cote (University of Calgary) : Securitization Theory and Foreign Policy Decision-Making:
Areas for Collaboration?
Amélie Forget (Université de Montréal) : From Networks-as-structures to Networks-as-actors :
Military Networks as Intentional Actors of International Security
Michael Crawford Urban (University of Oxford) : Between Friends; Trust and the Flawed Internal
Logic of Democratic Peace Theory
99
10:30 am - 12:00 pm / 10 h 30 - 12 h 00
Session: C12(b) - Global Social Forces in International Politics
Discussant/Commentateur: Blayne Haggart (Brock University)
Isabelle Fortin (University of Ottawa ) : The Missing Social Dimension in the Social
Structurationist Approach to Energy Policy Formation: A Theoretical Approach Applied to the
Canadian Pipeline Policy
Ray Silvius (University of Winnipeg) : Eurasianism, Common-Sense, and Russian Regional
Hegemony: Exploring the Linkages Between Cultural Legitimation and the Architecture of
Eurasian Regional Economic Initiatives
Session: C12(c) - Workshop: Varieties of Global Governance Arrangements and their
Nathan Andrews (University of Alberta) : Don’t just tell me, but show me’: Interrogating the MultiLevel Factors of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Adoption & Practice
Brian Carriere (University of Ottawa ) : A Comparative Analysis of Ghana and South African
Approaches to Transnational Governance to Natural Resource Mechanisms
Hevina Dashwood (Brock University), Uwafiokun Idemudia (York University) : Global Natural
Resource Governance Initiatives and Local Adoption: The Case of the Extractive Industry
Transparency Initiative (EITI) in Ghana and Nigeria
Session: D12 - Policy and Sustainable Energy Transition: The Case of Smart Grids in
Canada
Discussant/Commentateur: Erick Lachapelle (Université de Montréal)
Maya Jegen (Université du Québec à Montréal) : Challenges for Quebec's Smart Grid
Development
Alex Mallett (Carleton University), Xavier Deschênes-Philion (Université du Québec à
Montréal), Ryan Reiber (Carleton University), Danny Rosenbloom (Carleton University) :
Visions of Smart Grids in Canada: Capturing the 'Pulse'of the Nation Through the Media
Mark Winfield (York University), Scott Weiler (York University) : The Policy and Politics of
Technological Transitions: The Case of Smart Grids in Ontario
100
10:30 am - 12:00 pm / 10 h 30 - 12 h 00
Session: E12 - Roundtable: If Mayors Ruled the World: Dysfunctional States, Rising Cities
(Double session see E11 / Séance double voir E11)
Location: DS Howes Theatre, Welch Hall | Date: May 29, 2014 | Time: 10:00am to 11:30am
Sponsor: The CPSA gratefully acknowledges the support of the Brock University Congress team
in the organization of this event. / L'ACSP remercie vivement l'équipe responsable du congrès en
poste à la Brock University pour son soutien dans l'organisation de cet événement.
Joint Session / Séance conjointe: With Congress' Big Thinking Lecture Series / Avec la Série de
causeries Voir grand du Congrès
Chair/Président: David Siegel (Brock University)
Benjamin Barber (City University of New York)
Alan Broadbent (Maytree Foundation)
Naheed Nenshi (Mayor, City of Calgary)
Andrew Sancton (University of Western Ontario)
Session: F12 - Natural Experiments and the Vote
Chair/Président: Thierry Giasson (Université Laval)
Discussant/Commentateur: Jason Roy (Wilfrid Laurier University)
Marc André Bodet (Université Laval), Charles Tessier (Université Laval), Melanee Thomas
(University of Calgary) : Come Hell or High Water: An Investigation on the Effects of Natural
Disaster on Incumbent Vote Choice
Matto Mildenberger (Yale University), Chad Hazlett (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) :
Testing the Conservatism-under-threat Hypothesis: A Natural Experimental Approach
Leah C Stokes (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) : The Electoral Consequences of Public
Policy: Evidence from a Renewable Energy Natural Experiment in Ontario
Erin Tolley (University of Toronto), Elizabeth Goodyear-Grant (Queen's University) :
Experimental Evidence on Race and Gender Affinity Effects in Candidate Choice
101
10:30 am - 12:00 pm / 10 h 30 - 12 h 00
Session: G12 - Globalization and Social Movements for Global Justice
Location: Lowenberger Dining Hall | Date: May 29, 2014 | Time: 11:15am to 01:00pm
Sponsor: Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences Aid for Interdisciplinary Sessions
Fund / Fonds d'aide aux séances interdisciplinaires de la Fédération des sciences humaines
Joint Session / Séance conjointe: With the Canadian Association for Studies in International
Development (CASID), the Canadian Sociological Association (CSA) and the Canadian
Association of Geographers (CAG) / Avec l'Association canadienne d'études du développement
international (ACÉDI), la Société canadienne de sociologie (SCS) et l'Association canadienne
des géographes (ACG)
Manisha Desai (Professor of Women’s, Gender and Sexuality Studies and Sociology, University
of Connecticut)
Philip McMichael (Professor of Development Sociology, Cornell University)
Janet Conway (Canada Research Chair in Social Justice, Brock University)
Katharine Rankin (Professor of Geography, University of Toronto)
This session addresses the phenomenon of growing interconnectivity across borders of nation
states, but also across the North-South divide in global politics, and across linguistic, ethnocultural, and class difference and inequality in social movements for global justice operating in
different places and at various scales. Contemporary globalization has ushered in extraordinary
possibilities for exchange and collaboration across historic divides while also creating new shared
risks and intensifying inequality and conflict. The panel will address this contradictory global
condition of borders without boundaries from the point of view of diverse social justice
movements, rooted in particular contexts and concerns but actively building intelligibility and
alliances across distance and difference.
Session: H12(a) - Resistances
Kiran Meisan Banerjee (University of Toronto) : Rethinking Membership: Statelessness,
Domination, and the Limits of Contemporary Citizenship
Pamela Clark (York University) : Civility as Virtue: On the Treatment of 'Uncivil' •Subjects
Session: H12(b) - Religion and Politics
Stephen Block (Baylor University) : Hobbes on Glory and Religion
James G. Mellon (Independent Scholar) : Romanticism, Skepticism and the Liberal: Reading
Isaiah Berlin
102
10:30 am - 12:00 pm / 10 h 30 - 12 h 00
Session: K12 - Balancing Between Political Accountability and Administrative Discretion
Chair/Président: Ian Roberge (Glendon College, York University)
Discussant/Commentateur: Paul Barker (Brescia College, University of Western Ontario)
Alex Marland (Memorial University of Newfoundland) : Message Event Proposals are Only the
Beginning: The Practice of Political Branding in Canada
Geneviève Nadeau (University of Ottawa) : Interpretive Powers, Democratic Accountability and
Emerging Issues : What Potential Contribution of the Concept of « Administrative Discretion » for
a Deepened Understanding of Environmental and Health-based Decision-making?
Jennifer Robson (Carleton University) : Spending on Political Staffers: Revealed Preferences of
Federal Cabinet
Session: L12(a) - The Politics of Race, Design and Representation
Dana Gold (Western University ) : Representations of the 'Other' in the Israeli-Palestinian
Conflict: Political and Cognitive Dimensions
Lena Saleh (Carleton University) : She's Fulla Something: The Fulla Doll, Identity and
Consumption in a Globalizing Arab World
Conversations - Securing Citizenship in Austere Times / Atelier : L’intersectionalité en
période d’austérité : des conversations qui franchissent les frontières (see/voir N12b)
Discussant/Commentatrice: Kim Rygiel (Wilfrid Laurier University)
Andrea Susan Chandler (Carleton University) : The Politics of Face Coverings and Masks in
Russia, France and Quebec
Lois Harder (University of Alberta) : Canadian Citizenship and the Magic of 1947: War Brides,
Soldier Daddies and Birthright Citizenship
Nisha K Nath (University of Alberta) : Far from Belonging: What Racialization, Securitization and
the Regulation of Dissent Tell us about Citizenship, Security Certificates and the Supreme Court
of Canada
Melanie Richter-Montpetit (York University) : Gay Patriot Acts. (National) Love, Violence and
Belonging in an Age of Austerity
103
10:30 am - 12:00 pm / 10 h 30 - 12 h 00
Session: L12(c) - Indigenous-State Relations in a Multilevel Context
canadienne (see/voir A12)
Jodi Bruhn (Stratéjuste Consulting) : Key Issues and Promising Approaches to the Governance
of Indigenous Data in Canada
JD Crookshanks (Government of Alberta) : Aboriginal Seniors and Urban Homelessness
Janique Dubois (Brock University) : Explaining the Resurgence of Métis Self-Government on
Canada's Policy Agenda
Kelly Lynne Saunders (Brandon University) : Essence of the Struggle: Constitution Building and
Métis Self-Government in Canada
Session: N12(a) - Regulating Citizenship: States, Families and Civil Society
Chair/Présidente: Ethel Tungohan (University of Alberta)
Discussant/Commentatrice - 1: Carol Dauda (University of Guelph)
Discussant/Commentatrice - 2: Alexandra Dobrowolsky (Saint Mary's University)
Bipasha Baruah (Western University), Rishita Apsani (Western University) : Women's Rights in
a Stalemate? Assessing the Impact of State-Building Efforts on Women's NGOs in Afghanistan
and Iraq
John Francis Cappucci (Carleton University) : An Affront to the Ayatollah: An Explanation of the
Islamic Republic of Iran's Treatment of Sexual Minorities in the Ahmadinejad Era
Megan Gaucher (Trent University) : Family Women Need Not Apply: Intersections Between
Family and Citizenship in the Case of Canada's Foreign Domestic Worker
Jessica Lisa Merolli (McMaster University) : Emancipation via Patriarchy: A Critical Feminist
Reading of Integration Exams
104
10:30 am - 12:00 pm / 10 h 30 - 12 h 00
Session: N12(b) - Workshop: Intersectionality in Austere Times: Boundary-Crossing
Conversations - Securing Citizenship in Austere Times / Atelier : L’intersectionalité en
Chair/Présidente: Veronica Kitchen (University of Waterloo)
Discussant/Commentatrice: Kim Rygiel (Wilfrid Laurier University)
Andrea Susan Chandler (Carleton University) : The Politics of Face Coverings and Masks in
Russia, France and Quebec
Lois Harder (University of Alberta) : Canadian Citizenship and the Magic of 1947: War Brides,
Soldier Daddies and Birthright Citizenship
Nisha K Nath (University of Alberta) : Far from Belonging: What Racialization, Securitization and
the Regulation of Dissent Tell us about Citizenship, Security Certificates and the Supreme Court
of Canada
Melanie Richter-Montpetit (York University) : Gay Patriot Acts. (National) Love, Violence and
Belonging in an Age of Austerity
105
12:00 pm - 1:30 pm / 12 h 00 - 13 h 30
Questions around the Watercooler
Watercooler sessions are designed to be fast paced rotating interactive sessions. We will be
recruiting ten faculty members at different ranks, with different administrative and research
backgrounds to 'host' a table. We then tell participants (including both current faculty and
graduate students) that they will rotate through three different tables over the course of an hour.
Participants will be required to move every 20 minutes.
This workshop will be facilitated by Ms. Moreau-Johnson. Topics for the 'watercoolers' may
include: balancing life and work, balancing teaching and research, how and when to say no, how
to write a cover letter, tips for interviews, how to talk to publishers about book proposals, writing a
teaching dossier, thinking strategically about tenure and promotion, 'I'm an Associate
Professor...now what?" and mentoring.
Session: F13 - Lunch / Déjeuner
106
12:00 pm - 1:30 pm / 12 h 00 - 13 h 30
Session: K13 - Lunch / Déjeuner
Session: Z9 - CPSA Women’s Caucus Meeting / Réunion du caucus des femmes de l’ACSP
107
1:30 pm - 3:00 pm / 13 h 30 - 15 h 00
Session: A14(a) - Roundtable: The Politics of Inclusion/Exclusion: Best Practices in
Immigration Policy Since 1492
Chair/Président: Neil Cruickshank (Algoma University)
Discussant/Commentateur: Zuba Wai (Lakehead University)
Amar Bhatia (University of Toronto)
Dawnis Kennedy (University of Toronto)
Nadia Verrelli (Lakehead University )
Abstract: This panel will examine the laws and policies pursued by Aboriginals and Europeans
towards one another before and since the Confederation. These laws and policies have been
pursued with good intentions and met questionable results on both sides. (1) Canadian
Aboriginal policy is characterized by exclusion through numerous layered distinctions of
status/non-status within race-based legislation, primarily the Indian Act. Moreover, inclusion
through Indian Act status is problematic as the Act seeks to enfranchise Indigenous people,
simultaneously disenfranchising Indigenous people. Nadia, draws lessons from Canadian
Aboriginal policy and examines their relevance within an immigration context. (2) All relations
within Canada exist by virtue of treaties held between Indigenous peoples and the nonIndigenous. However, much of Canadian law, including Aboriginal and immigration law, is
developed without regard for these foundational treaties. Furthermore, where such treaties are
considered, they are interpreted solely through the lens of European legal traditions. Dawnis,
juxtaposes Canadian immigration and Aboriginal law with an examination of the status that
settlers and migrants are accorded in Anishinabe law. (3) Canadian immigration policy is often
understood as an exercise in nation- building characterized by overtly race-based practices of
inclusion/exclusion. Amar questions whether such practices continue to shape Canada's identity
and problematizes this identity within an Indigenous context. Examining the status accorded to
diverse immigrants and migrants within Indigenous legal orders, Bhatia queries whether these
legal orders might allow us to achieve status for all.
Session: A14(b) - Mobilizing for Change
Chair/Présidente: Pascale Dufour (Université de Montréal)
Discussant/Commentateur: Jonathan Greene (Trent University)
Eleonore Pellé (Chercheure indépendente) : L'observation de l'encadrement des relations entre
les gouvernements canadiens, ontarien, quebécois et les groupes d'intérêts
Vuk Radmilovic (University of Western Ontario) : Governmental and Organized-Group Influence
on Supreme Court Decision Making
Andrew M Robinson (Wilfrid Laurier University) : Canadian NGOs That Advance Human Rights
as an Indication of Canadian Understandings of Human Rights
Ethel Tungohan (University of Alberta) : Organizing Migrant Care Workers' Interests in Canada
108
1:30 pm - 3:00 pm / 13 h 30 - 15 h 00
Session: B14(a) - The Politics of Animal Rights
Chair/Présidente: Eve Séguin (Université du Québec à Montréal)
Discussant/Commentateur: Stefan Dolgert (Brock University)
Tim Fowler (Carleton University), Doug Hagar (Carleton University), Keri Cronin (Brock
University) : When Neglect Isn't Working Anymore: The Unlikely Success of the Tuxedo Party
Terry Gibbs (Cape Breton University), Tracey Harris (Cape Breton University) : A
Compassionate Democracy? Citizenship and the Living World
Paul Hamilton (Brock University) : Green Parties and Animal Rights
Dietlind Stolle (McGill University) : Vegetarianism as Sustainable Citizenship
Session: B14(b) - Regime Change
Nibaldo H. Galleguillos (McMaster University) : Elusive Political Reconciliation in the 'New'
Chile.
André Lecours (University of Ottawa), Joaquin Bardallo Bandera (University of Ottawa) : A
Tale of Two Latin American Countries: The Rule of Law in Mexico and Uruguay.
Allison McCulloch (Brandon University) : Power-Sharing, Extremism and Political Stability: Can
Consociationalism Encourage Moderate Politics in Deeply Divided Societies?
Julien Morency-Laflamme (Université de Montréal) : Military Defection and Democratic
Transitions: A Study of the Armed Forces Actions during Periods of Regime Crisis in Benin and
Togo
Session: C14(a) - Media and the Power of Representation
Ilan Danjoux (University of Calgary) : Reactions to Terror in Israeli Political Cartoons
Timothy B. Gravelle (University of Essex) : The Structure of Foreign Policy Attitudes in
Comparative Perspective
Tom P Najem (University of Windsor), Walter C Soderlund (University of Windsor), Sarah
Cipkar (University of Windsor) : Press Framing of International Intervention in Syria's Civil War:
The Globe and Mail and The National Post, March 2011 - September 2013
109
1:30 pm - 3:00 pm / 13 h 30 - 15 h 00
Session: C14(b) - Critical Pedagogies in the IR Classroom
Discussant/Commentatrice: Anne-Marie D’Aoust (Université du Québec à Montréal)
Marshall Beier (McMaster University) : Subject Matters: Critical Pedagogies and the Ontological
Significance of Voice
Felix Grenier (University of Ottawa) : Moving Beyond the Gap in the Theory-Practice Debate by
Using the Sociology of Knowledge in IR Classes
Mark B Salter (University of Ottawa) : Crowdsourcing Education: Constructing a Generative
Learning Syllabus
Heather A Smith (University of Northern British Columbia) : Teaching as Discipline and
Disciplining
Session: D14(a) - Judicial Politics and Democracy
Discussant/Commentateur: Christopher Manfredi (McGill University)
Greg Flynn (McMaster University) : Litigating Democracy: Judicial Resolutions of Electoral
Controversies in Canada
Kate Puddister (McGill University) : Filling the Empirical Gap on Canadian Reference Cases: A
Comprehensive Analysis from 1949 to Present
Christine Rothmayr Allison (Université de Montréal), Audrey L'Espérance (University of
Toronto) : Legal Mobilisation, Courts and the Medicalization of Life and Death Issues in Canada
Byron Sheldrick (University of Guelph) : Strategic Litigation and Public Participation: Balancing
Judicial Decision-making and Principles of Political Accountability
Session: D14(b) - New Directions for Theories of Public Policy
Chair/Présidente: Ozge Uluskaradag (Concordia University)
Discussant/Commentateur: Michael Orsini (University of Ottawa)
Francis Garon (Glendon College, York University) : Governing Parties and Degenerative Politics:
The Case of Immigration and Integration in Québec
Andrea Olive (University of Toronto) : Does the Existence of Policy Matter? Resident Attitudes
toward Species at Risk in Toronto and Vancouver
Andrew Stritch (Bishop's University) : Advocacy Coalitions and Union Transparency in Canada
110
1:30 pm - 3:00 pm / 13 h 30 - 15 h 00
Session: E14 - Comparative Urban Development Policy
Chair/Président: Daniel Henstra (University of Waterloo)
Discussant/Commentateur: Christopher Leo (University of Winipeg)
Gabriel Eidelman (University of Western Ontario) : Rethinking Public Land Ownership and
Urban Development in Canada
Aaron Alexander Moore (University of Winnipeg) : Same Tool, Different Use: Institutional
Difference and Density for Benefit Agreements in Toronto and Vancouver
Zack Taylor (University of Toronto) : Explaining Stability and Change in Long-term Metropolitan
Development: Introducing the Urban Development Policy Regime
Matthew John Wadsworth (University of Guelph) : The Post-Urban Regime and Economic
Development in Guelph: Signs of Theoretical Evolution or Contextual Peculiarity?
Session: F14 - No session / Aucune séance
Session: G14 - Austerity and Public Policy after the Global Financial Crisis
Oleg Kodolov (University of Waterloo) : Budgeting at a Time of Constraint
Heather Whiteside (University of British Columbia) : From Turbulence to Entrenchment: P3
Policy Evolution and Innovation After the Global Financial Crisis
Session: H14(a) - Keynote/lecture: Radical Enlightenment as a (or the?) Prime Cause of the
French Revolution (1770-1815) - Double session / Séance double (see/voir H15)
Jonathan Israel (Institute for Advanced Study)
111
1:30 pm - 3:00 pm / 13 h 30 - 15 h 00
Session: H14(b) - Aristotle and the Problems of Human Freedom: Agency, Judgment, and
Will
Chair/Président: Marc James (Brock University)
Discussant/Commentateur - 1: William Mathie (Brock University)
Discussant/Commentatrice - 2: Marlene Sokolon (Concordia University)
Patrick N. Cain (Lakehead University), Steve Block (Baylor University) : Aristotle on Moral
Agency: Incontinence, Spiritedness, and Love in Book VII of the Nicomachean Ethics
Matthew David Dinan (College of the Holy Cross) : 'If it bends, it's justice:' Rawls, Derrida, and
Aristotle on Justice and Principle
Mary E Mathie (Baylor University) : The Expense of Spirit and the Waste of Shame: Maintaining
Agency in the Nicomachean Ethics
Session: J14 - Political Culture and Influence
Chair/Présidente: Laura Way (University of Alberta)
Discussant/Commentateur - 1: Charles Smith (University of Saskatchewan)
Discussant/Commentatrice - 2: Radhika Desai (University of Manitoba)
Clark Banack (York University) : Politically Active Religious Organizations, Education Policy, and
Religious Freedom in Alberta
Kyle D Hanniman (University of Toronto) : Public Employment and the Price of Credit: Evidence
from Provincial Bond Yields
Paul Kellogg (Athabasca University) : Democracy in Alberta: Political Transformations in North
America's Energy Frontier
Julie Simmons (University of Guelph) : Regional Political Culture and Equalization Discourse in
Ontario
112
1:30 pm - 3:00 pm / 13 h 30 - 15 h 00
Session: L14 - Workshop: Intersectionality in Austere Times: Boundary-Crossing
Conversations - Anti-racist Feminism and Socialist Feminism: Revisiting Borders,
Overcoming Boundaries / Atelier : L’intersectionalité en période d’austérité : des
conversations qui franchissent les frontières (see/voir N14(b))
Location: Schmon Tower-107 | Date: May 29, 2014 | Time: 02:00pm to 03:45pm
Joint Session / Séance conjointe: Women, Gender and Politics section and Socialist Studies
Association / Avec la section Femmes, genre et politique et La société d'études socialistes
Sedef Arat-Koc (Ryerson University) : Crises of Citizenship, Crises of Social Reproduction, and
the Current Urgency of Joining Anti-Racist and Socialist Feminist Analyses and Politics
Abigail B. Bakan (University of Toronto) : Marxism, Feminism and Anti-racism: the Challenge of
Intersectionality
Debbie Dergousoff (Simon Fraser University) : Borders, Boundaries and the Challenge of
Collaborative Knowledge Production in Institutional Ethnography (IE)
Abstract: Anti-racist feminism has a long history, with various genealogies associated with
movements against slavery and colonialism, and movements for indigenous and migrant rights.
Socialist feminism also claims a long historical arc, associated with working women’s movements,
Communist and Socialist political projects, and labour organizing. These two traditions have
often, however, operated in parallel spaces, with minimal points of intersection.
Session: N14(a) - Women's Activism, Agency and Alternatives in Comparative Perspective
Chair/Présidente: Reese Simpkins (York University)
Discussant/Commentatrice: Candace Johnson (University of Guelph)
Nadine Changfoot (Trent University) : Feminist Aesthetic Community: Multiple Political
Possibilities
Timothy Luchies (Queen's University) : Anti-Oppression and its Discontents
Yongjie Wang (University of Alberta) : Female Labour Empowerment in China: Opportunities and
Constraints
113
1:30 pm - 3:00 pm / 13 h 30 - 15 h 00
Session: N14b - Workshop: Intersectionality in Austere Times: Boundary-Crossing
Conversations - Anti-racist Feminism and Socialist Feminism: Revisiting Borders,
Overcoming Boundaries / Atelier : L’intersectionalité en période d’austérité : des
conversations qui franchissent les frontières (see/voir L14)
Location: Schmon Tower-107 | Date: May 29, 2014 | Time: 02:00pm to 03:45pm
Joint Session / Séance conjointe: With the Race, Ethnicity, Indigenous Peoples and Politics
section and Socialist Studies Association / Avec la section Race, ethnicité, peuples autochtones
et politique et La société d'études socialistes
Sedef Arat-Koc (Ryerson University) : Crises of Citizenship, Crises of Social Reproduction, and
the Current Urgency of Joining Anti-Racist and Socialist Feminist Analyses and Politics
Abigail B. Bakan (University of Toronto) : Marxism, Feminism and Anti-racism: the Challenge of
Intersectionality
Debbie Dergousoff (Simon Fraser University) : Borders, Boundaries and the Challenge of
Collaborative Knowledge Production in Institutional Ethnography (IE)
Abstract: Anti-racist feminism has a long history, with various genealogies associated with
movements against slavery and colonialism, and movements for indigenous and migrant rights.
Socialist feminism also claims a long historical arc, associated with working women’s movements,
Communist and Socialist political projects, and labour organizing. These two traditions have
often, however, operated in parallel spaces, with minimal points of intersection.
114
3:15 pm - 4:45 pm / 15 h 15 - 16 h 45
Session: A15 - Digital Politics. Users and Institutions at Play (See/voir F15a)
Joint Session / Séance conjointe: With the Political Behaviours/Sociology section / Avec la
séction Comportement politique/sociologie
Chair/Président: JP Lewis (University of New Brunswick Saint John)
Discussant/Commentateur: Vincent Raynauld (Carleton University)
Jane Hilderman (Samara Canada), Laura Anthony (Samara Canada) : Is Politics Local ... and
Online? Federal Riding Association Websites in Canada
Peter Malachy Ryan (MacEwan University) : The Prime Minister's Speeches in the Internet Age,
2004-2013: A Measure of Communication Effectiveness
Tamara A. Small (University of Guelph) : Party Leaders & The Tone of Twitter
Session: B15 - Secession
Neil A Cruickshank (Algoma University), Nadia Verrelli (Lakehead University) : How Clear is
Clarity? Examing the Clarity Ethos in Scotland and Canada
Sabrina Elena Sotiriu (University of Ottawa) : In Reaction to an Ideological Other: Why
Nationalism in Scotland is Left Wing
Robert Young (University of Western Ontario) : Transition Costs in Secession
Session: C15 - Acts of Non-citizenship
Discussant/Commentateur: Sandy Irvine ([email protected])
Caitlin Craven (McMaster University) : Travelling Away from the Ethical Tour: Work, Awareness,
and Solidarity on a Simulated Undocumented Border-crossing
Heather Lynn Johnson (Queen's University Belfast) : Occupying Asylum? Understanding the
Space of Non-Citizenship in Autonomous Camps
115
3:15 pm - 4:45 pm / 15 h 15 - 16 h 45
Session: D15(a) - Roundtable: Supreme Court Reference re Senate Reform
Chair/Président: Matthew Hennigar (Brock University)
Emmett Macfarlane (University of Waterloo)
Christopher Manfredi (McGill University)
Peter McCormick (University of Lethbridge)
Abstract: Stephen Harper's Conservatives have made Senate reform a key goal, as exemplified
by Bill C-7, the Senate Reform Act. The Act would impose 9-year term limits on senators and
require consultation with electors on Senate appointments. Would these changes require
amendments to the constitution, and if so, under which of the several amending formulae in our
constitution? On February 1, 2013 the Harper government asked the Supreme Court of Canada
via the reference procedure to clarify whether the federal Parliament can unilaterally reform the
Senate via Bill C-7, but also what procedures would be necessary to abolish the Senate or
impose other types of term limits. Simultaneously, the Quebec government referred Bill C-7 to the
Quebec Court of Appeal, which ruled in October 2013 that the proposed changes required—
contrary to the Conservatives' position—a constitutional amendment with the support of at least
two-thirds of the provinces representing half of Canada's population. Argumentation before the
SCC decision is still pending, and its opinion is not expected before spring 2014. The roundtable
will explore the reference case from a variety of perspectives, including possible and desired
outcomes, and the politics of reference cases. The participants are leading commentators on the
court, and three of them have provided expert opinions for governments in these cases, an
experience which will also be discussed. Chair: Matthew Hennigar (Brock)
[email protected] Participants: Andrew Heard (SFU), [email protected] Emmett Macfarlane
(Waterloo) [email protected] Christopher Manfredi (McGill)
[email protected] Peter McCormick (Lethbridge) [email protected]
Session: D15(b) - Policy Making for a New Era: Evidence-Based Policy and the Politics of
Expertise
Discussant/Commentateur: Patrik Marier (Concordia University)
Ryan Kassian (Ryerson University) : Governance and the Problem with Evidence Based Policy
Matthieu Mondou (University of Toronto) : Making Sense of European Biofuel Policy: the
Mobilization of Causal and Normative Beliefs Through Expertise
Eric Montpetit (Université de Montréal), Erick Lachapelle (Université de Montréal) : Experts,
Biases and Learning
116
3:15 pm - 4:45 pm / 15 h 15 - 16 h 45
Session: D15(c) - Labour Law and Labour Relations
Joint Session / Séance conjointe: Joint session with Canadian Association for Work & Labour
Studies / Séance conjointe avec la Canadian Association for Work & Labour Studies
Benjamin Isitt (University of Victoria) : Obeying a Higher Law: Workers and the Courts in British
Columbia
Ellen MacEachen (University of Toronto) : Work and Health Risks Faced by Temporary Agency
Workers: How These are Fostered by Perverse Regulation Incentives
Charles Smith (St. Thomas More College, University of Saskatchewan) : The Pepsi Strike and
Workers' Collective Rights in Canada
Andrew Stevens (University of Regina) : Open for Business: Temporary Foreign Workers and
Labour Law Reform in Saskatchewan's 'Hot' Economy
Session: D15(d) - Methods for Studying Politics Across Space and Time
Julian Campisi (York University) : Situating the 'Political' in Risk Assessments
Jerald Sabin (University of Toronto) : Mining our History: Political Scientists and the Archive
Daniel Westlake (University of British Columbia) : Do Parties Matter to Multiculturalism? The
Role of Political Parties in the Development of Multiculturalism Policies
Iain G. Wilson (University of Edinburgh) : Chinese Students Abroad: Tracking Political Changes
Across Space and Time
Session: E15 - No session / Aucune séance
Session: F15(a) - Digital Politics. Users and Institutions at Play (See/voir A15)
Joint Session / Séance conjointe: With the Canadian Politics section / Avec la séction Politique
canadienne
Tim Fowler (Carleton University), Doug Hagar (Carleton University), Keri Cronin (Brock
University) : When Neglect Isn't Working Anymore: The Unlikely Success of The Tuxedo Party
Jane Hilderman (Samara Canada), Laura Anthony (Samara Canada) : Is Politics Local ... and
Online? Federal Riding Association Websites in Canada
Peter Malachy Ryan (MacEwan University) : The Prime Minister's Speeches in the Internet Age,
2004-2013: A Measure of Communication Effectiveness
Tamara A. Small ((University of Guelph) : Party Leaders & The Tone of Twitter
117
3:15 pm - 4:45 pm / 15 h 15 - 16 h 45
Session: F15(b) - Do Campaigns Matter?
Chair/Président: Alex Marland (Memorial University of Newfoundland)
Discussant/Commentateur: Jonathan Rose (Queen's University)
Chris Alcantara (Wilfrid Laurier University), Jason Roy (Wilfrid Laurier University) : Fighting Fire
with Fire: The Implications of (not) Going Negative in a Multiparty Election Campaign
Michael McGregor (Bishop's University) : Correct Voting and Campaign Effects
Denver James Walton McNeney (McGill University) : The Four Worlds of Political Campaigns:
How Political Sophistication and Strength of Partisanship Determine the Form of Campaign
Effects
Nick Ruderman (University of Toronto) : The Sponsorship Scandal and Vote Choice in Canada
Session: G15 - The Political Economy of Climate Change Policy
Laurie Adkin (University of Alberta) : Making Climate Change Policy in Alberta
Yi-tsui Tseng (University of Denver) : Energy Policy, Political Discourse, and Politics of
Sustainable Development of the People's Republic of China
118
3:15 pm - 4:45 pm / 15 h 15 - 16 h 45
Session: H15 - Roundtable with Jonathan Israel: Intellectual History and the Enlightenment
- Double session / Séance double (see/voir H14a)
Ed Andrew (University of Toronto)
Ronald Beiner (University of Toronto)
Jeffrey Collins (Queen's University)
Jonathan Israel (Institute for Advanced Study)
Simon Kow (University of King's College)
Emma Planinc (University of Toronto)
Rob Sparling (Université de Montréal)
Abstract: This roundtable is in honour of the completion of Jonathan Israel's Enlightenment
trilogy with the 2011 publication of Democratic Enlightenment - an erudite and captivating account
of 'the quest for human amelioration . . . driven principally by 'philosophy' . . . [which in its] radical
manifestation, [laid] the foundations for modern basic human rights and freedoms and
representative democracy' (2011, 7). Central to Israel's work is a focus on the intellectual history
of the period, and he deftly demonstrates the integral role of historiographical work for the full
appreciation and understanding of the philosophy and political theory of the Enlightenment. The
roundtable will be an interdisciplinary discussion of Israel's preceding lecture, his interpretation of
the Enlightenment, and the value of the historiographical method for the practice of and
engagement with intellectual and political thought for history (Collins, Israel), the humanities
(Kow) and the social sciences (Andrew, Beiner, Planinc, Sparling). It will employ a micro-lecture
format in which each participant will present or offer a response to Israel for 5-7 minutes, after
which there will be a discussion between Israel, the panelists and the audience.
119
3:15 pm - 4:45 pm / 15 h 15 - 16 h 45
Session: L15 - No session / Aucune séance
Session: M15 - Mentoring Café: Demontrating Teaching Excellence
Greg Flynn (McMaster University)
Session: N15 - Social Movement Politics: Challenges from Within
Discussant/Commentatrice: Lois Harder (University of Alberta)
Alexandra Zorianna Dobrowolsky (Saint Mary's University) : Deconstructing the
Multiculturalism vs Feminism Debate: Interculturalism, Feminisms and Contemporary Quebec
Values
Douglas William Hanes (McGill University) : Living on Solid Ground? Questioning the Metaphor
of Ownership in Feminist Approaches to Autonomy
Wendy McKeen (York University) : Women's Voice in the Debate on Welfare Mothers in Ontario
in the 1970s and Early 1980s: The Conflicting Politics of Feminists and Mobilized Welfare
Mothers
120
PARTICIPANTS
Abels, Gabriele
Abu-Laban, Yasmeen
Addinall, Robert
Adkin, Laurie
Afsahi, Afsoun
Akuffo, Edward Ansah
Alcantara, Chris
Alcantara, Christopher
Aldrich, John
Allison, Christine Rothmayr
Altamirano-Jiménez, Isabel
Alva, Amelia
Alway, Todd
Anderson, Cameron
Anderson, Christopher G
Anderson, Timothy Douglas
Andrew, Ed
Andrews, Nathan
Anthony, Laura
Apsani, Rishita
Arat-Koc, Sedef
Arscott, Jane
Arsenault, Gabriel
Asaf, Zain
Atkinson, Michael
Bakan, Abigail B.
Baker, Dennis
Baker, James T
Bal, Simarjit Singh
Ballingall, Robert
Banack, Clark
Bandera, Joaquin Bardallo
Banerjee, Kiran Meisan
Barber, Benjamin
Barker, Paul
Barrette, Emily
Baruah, Bipasha
Basnett, Caleb
Bastedo, Heather
Bastien, Frédérick
Behnke, Jessica Marianne
Beier, Marshall
Beiner, Ronald
Bell, Colleen
B5
L2(a),L6(b),N6,P9
K5
G7,G15
H4(b)
C6(a),C7(b),C11(a)
F15(b)
B7,A11(a)
F2(b)
D2(a),D14(a)
L6(b),N6
G2(a)
M2,M4
F5(b),F6
L2(a)
H2(b)
H15
C12(c)
A15,F15(a)
N12(a)
L7(b),N7,L14,N14(b)
N11(a)
A6(c)
F5(b)
F2(a)
L6(b),N6,L14,N14(b)
A5(c)
A1(a)
G11
H2(a)
J14
B14(b)
H12(a)
E11,E12
K7,K12
J1
N12(a)
H7(a)
F2(a),A5(b),F11
F7(b)
J2
C14(b)
H15
C1(c),C5
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
121
Bell, Shannon
Berdahl, Loleen
Bertoldi, Nancy
Besco, Randy
Bhatia, Amar
Bhatia, Vandna
Bickerton, James
Biesenthal, Brook
Bilodeau, Antoine
Bird, Karen
Blachford, Dongyan
Blidook, Kelly
Block, Stephen
Blomme, Willy
Bodet, Marc André
Bourgeois, Eve
Bourque, Mélanie
Bowie, Ryan
Boychuk, Gerard
Boyd, Brendan Dean
Bradshaw, Leah
Breton, Charles
Breux, Sandra
Bricker, Darrell
Broadbent, Alan
Brock, Kathy Lenore
Broschek, Jorg
Brossier, Marie
Brown, Renee Vanessa
Ashley
Bruhn, Jodi
Busser, Mark
Cain, Patrick N.
Cambrezy, Mélanie
Cameron, Barbara
Campbell-Verduyn, Malcolm
Adair
Campisi, Julian
Cappucci, John Francis
Carlaw, John
Carriere, Brian
Cattapan, Alana Rose
Chamberlain, Tyler W
Chambers, Shakir
Chandler, Andrea Susan
Changfoot, Nadine
122
H5(b)
F2(a)
H6(b)
F1
A14(a)
D1
B6,A11(a)
D4(a)
A6(a)
L1(a),E4,F5(a),N5
L1(a)
A5(b)
H12(b),H14(b)
H6(a)
F12
A7(a)
B11(a)
G1
D4(b),B12(a)
J4
H5(b)
F1
E5
A4(b)
E11,E12
D2(a)
B6,B7
B12(b)
N4
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
A12,L12(c)
M2
H5(a),H14(b)
C7(c)
A2(b),A6(d),K6,N11(a),N15
C1(a)
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
D15(d)
N12(a)
A4(a),J11
C12(c)
D6,D7(b)
H1
C11(a)
L12(b),N12(b)
N14(a)
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Chapman, Krystel
Choat, Simon
Cipkar, Sarah
Clancy, Peter
Clark, Pamela
Clément, Renaud
Cochrane, Christopher
Collier, Cheryl
Collins, Andrea M.
Collins, Jeffrey
Collombat, Thomas
Compaoré, W.R. Nadège
Cones, Nigel
Conte, Jay
Conteh, Charles
Conway, Janet
Cooper, Andrew
Corcino, Penelope
Cordner, Colin
Corman, Lauren
Cote, Adam
Coulter, Kendra
Couture, Jérôme
Cowie, John Chadwick
Richard
Crandall, Erin
Craven, Caitlin
Cronin, Keri
Crookshanks, JD
Cross, William
Crowe, Lori Ann
Cruickshank, Neil
Cyr, Hugo
Czuba, Karo
D’Aoust, Anne-Marie
Daley, Kate M
Dalton, Jennifer E.
Danjoux, Ilan
Dashwood, Hevina
Dauda, Carol Laura
Davidson, Adrienne
Davidson, Mitchell
Delacourt, Susan
Denhartog, Aaron
Deonandan, Kalowatie
Dergousoff, Debbie
C4(a),N4
H11(a)
C14(a)
J4
H12(a)
C6(a)
L1(a),A6(e)
J5
C6(b)
H15
G7
C7(d)
H2(b)
H5(b)
E7,K4
G12
C5
B4(b)
H1
H11(b)
C12(a),C2(b)
H11(b)
E5
L7(a)
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
D4(a),M7
C15
B14(a),F15(a)
L12(c)
B1,F2(b),A4(b),F7(b)
C5
A14(a),B15
A6(d),K6
F5(b)
C14(b)
L1(b),N1,E7
A2(a)
C14(a)
C12(c)
D6,D7(b),N12(a)
G2(a),F5(b)
J2
F8
J6
B4(b)
L14,N14(b)
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
123
Desai, Manisha
Desai, Radhika
Deschênes-Philion, Xavier
Deverell, Rita Shelton
Di Gregorio, Michael
Dinan, Matthew David
Dizboni, Al G
Do, Minh
Doberstein, Carey
Dobrowolsky, Alexandra
Dolgert, Stefan
Doucet, Marc
Dow, Thomas Matt Anthony
Drake, Anna
Dubois, Janique
Dufour, Frédérick Guillaume
Dufour, Pascale
Dufresne, Yannick
Dupuis, Vanessa
Durazo, Julián
Duyulmus, Cem Utku
Eady, Gregory
Egede-Nissen, Bjornar
Eichler, Maya
Eidelman, Gabriel
Epperson, Brent
Esselment, Anna Lennox
Ettinger, Aaron
Evans, Bryan
Everitt, Joanna
Fainstein, Susan
Falk, Barbara
Findlay, Tammy
Fitzsimmons, Scott Matthew
Flynn, Greg
Fodor, Matt
Forget, Amélie
Fortier, Isabelle
Fortilus, Jeanne
Fortin, Isabelle
Fournier, Patrick
Fowler, Tim
Freamo, Janice
Gabel, Chelsea
Gabriel, Christina
Gagnon, Alain-G
124
G12
G7,J14
D12
L2(b),N2
C4(b)
H14(b)
K5
D2(a)
K5,K7
N12(a),N15
H11(b),B14(a)
C1(c), C2(a),C6(a)
G4,L4
H4(b)
A12,L12(c)
A1(b),A2(c)
A11(b),A14(b)
F1
J1
B6,B6,B7
B11(a)
F1
C7(d)
N4
E14
G7,B12(a)
A6(e),F7(b),F8
C11(b)
A1(b),A2(c)
F5(a),N5,P9
E6
C4(a)
N1,L1(b),L7(b),N7,N11(a)
C2(a),C11(b)
M2,D14(a),M15
A1(b),A2(c)
C7(c),C12(a)
K2
E7
C12(b)
F5(b)
B14(a),F15(a)
H4(a)
L1(a)
L2(a),N6,L7(b),N7
A6(a)
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Galleguillos, Nibaldo H.
Garofalo, Amanda
Garon, Francis
Gaucher, Megan
Gauvin, Jean-Philippe
Geenens, Raf
Gellatly, Mary
Germain, Randall
Gerrits, Bailey
Ghai, Shelly
Giasson, Thierry
Gibbs, Terry
Giest, Sarah
Gintova, Maria
Godbout, Jean-Francois
Gold, Dana
Goodman, Nicole J
Goodyear-Grant, Elizabeth
Graefe, Peter
Grant, J. Andrew
Grant, John
Gravelle, Timothy B.
Greene, Jonathan
Grenier, Felix
Grondin, David
Grundy, John
Hagar, Doug
Haggart, Blayne
Haji-Yousefi, Amir
Mohammad
Hale, Geoffrey E.
Hall, Alan
Hall, Rebecca
Hamilton, Paul
Hanes, Douglas William
Hanniman, Kyle D
Hanvelt, Marc
Harden, Joel
Harder, Lois
Harris, Tracey
Hay, Travis Andrew
Hazlett, Chad
Helleiner, Eric
Hendershot, Chris
Henderson, Ailsa
Hennigar, Matthew Aaron
B14(b)
J6
D14(b)
N12(a)
D2(a)
H2(b)
G2(b)
C1(a)
L11(b),N11(b)
B2
F12,F7(b)
B14(a)
K5
K5
B1,A7(a)
L12(a)
L1(a),E5,F11,F14
F5(a),N5,F6,F12
A6(c)
C7(d)
H2(b)
F4,F6,C14(a)
A11(b),A14(b)
C14(b)
C2(a)
G2(b),D5(b)
B14(a),F15(a)
D5(a),C12(b)
C11(a)
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
G11
G2(b)
G2(b)
B14(a)
H6(a),N15
A2(a),J14
H1
A11(b)
D6,D7(b),L12(b),N12(b),N15
B14(a)
L11(b),N11(b)
F12
C1(a),A7(b)
C11(b)
A6(a)
A2(b),D15(a)
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
125
Henstra, Daniel
Hepburn, Nicola
Heritz, Joanne
Héroux-Legault, Maxime
Hilderman, Jane
Holman, Christopher
Hove, Jennifer
Howlett, Catherine
Hyson, Stewart
Ibbitson, John
Idemudia, Uwafiokun
Ie, Kenny William
Irvine, J.A. (Sandy)
Irving, Dan Leon
Isitt, Benjamin
Israel, Jonathan
Jacek, Henry
Jackson, Kyle Brandon
James-Lomax, Alison
James, Marc
James, Matt
Jegen, Maya
Jeram, Sanjay
John, Matthew
Johns, Carolyn
Johnson, Candace
Johnson, Genevieve Fuji
Johnson, Heather Lynn
Jung, Kang-uk
Juric, Tanja Mirjana
Kamenova, Kalina
Karabulut, Tolga
Kassian, Ryan
Kataoka, Serena
Kellogg, Paul
Kennedy, Dawnis
Kevins, Anthony
Kiss, Simon
Kitchen, Veronica
Knopff, Rainer
Kodolov, Oleg
Koop, Royce
Kow, Simon
Kumar, Sujit
Kuokkanen, Rauna
Kymlicka, Will
126
E1,E14
J6
E2,E7
F5(b),A7(a),F7(a)
A15,F15(a)
H5(a)
F1
G4,L4
A5(b), J11
A4(b)
C12(c)
F2(a),B11(b)
L2(a),M4,C15
L7(b),N7
D15(c)
H14(a),H15
J1,J2,J5,J6
L11(a)
L11(b),N11(b)
H14(b)
L7(a)
D12
B6,C11(c)
E14
K4,K7
N2,L2(b),D6,D7(b),N14(a)
D6,D7(b)
C2(b),L11(b),N11(b),C15
C11(a)
H4(b)
E5
H4(b)
D5(b),D15(b)
E2,E7
G6,J14
A14(a)
B12(a)
A1(a),F3,F11
C2(b),C4(a),C5,C11(b),N12(b)
A5(c)
G14
A5(b),F7(b)
H6(b),H15
G5
G4,L4,L6(b),N6
H11(b)
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
L'Espérance, Audrey
Lachapelle, Erick
Ladd, Jeremy Martin
Laforest, Guy
Laforest, Rachel
Lai, Poland
Lalancette, Mireille
Lange, Lynda
Larrinaga, Miguel de
Last, David
Lauzon, Dru
Lavelle, Kathryn C
Lavigne, Brad
Lawlor, Andrea
Lawson, James
Laycock, David
Lecours, André
Leduc, Larry
Leo, Christopher
Lesch, Matt
Levac, Leah
Levesque, Mario
Levick, Laura Rose
Levin, Jamie
Levy, Gary
Lew, Taylor
Lewis, J.P.
Lewis, JP
Lin, Sen
Linden, der Clifton van
Lindquist, Evert
Lizée, Pierre
Loewen, Peter
Lopes, Ferreira Tiago André
Lucas, Jack
Luchies, Timothy
Maas, Willem
Macdonald, Laura
MacEachen, Ellen
Macfarlane, Emmett
Maciel, Robert
MacLean, Lee
MacRae, Heather
Madokoro, Laura
Magnusson, Warren
Mahéo, Valérie-Anne
D6,D7(b),D14(a)
F4,D12,D15(b)
A1(a)
A5(c)
A7(a),A11(b)
D1
F7(b),F11
H6(b)
C1(c)
C7(c)
C7(b)
C1(a)
F3
F2(a),D4(b),D5(b),J11
J4
A1(b),A2(c)
B14(b)
A4(b)
E14,E7
F5(b)
N11(a)
J4
B11(b)
L1(a)
A2(b)
J2
J11
M2,M7,A15
B12(b)
F1
K4
C7(a)
A7(a),F7(a)
L6(a)
A7(b)
N14(a)
A5(a),A6(a)
L2(a)
D15(c)
D2(a),D4(a),D15(a)
L7(a)
L1(b),N1
B5,N11(a)
B4(a)
E6
F4,F4,F6
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
127
Mallett, Alex
Malloy, Jonathan
Manfredi, Christopher
Marier, Patrik
Marland, Alex
Martins, Alexandra
Masoumi, Azar
Massie, Justin
Mathie, Catherine
Mathie, Mary E
Mathie, William
Mazzocchi, Paul
McAndrews, John
McCormick, Peter
McCulloch, Allison
McEwen, Annie
McGrane, David
McGregor, Michael
McKay, James R
McKeen, Wendy
McKelvy, Andrew J
McKenzie, Judith
McKinnell, Ryan Alexander
McMichael, Philip
McNeil, Calum
McNeney, Walton Denver
James
Medeiros, Mike
Mellon, James G.
Merolli, Jessica Lisa
Michèle, Marie
Miguel, Carolina De
Mildenberger, Matto
Millar, Lauren
Miller, Christopher James
Watchel, Minnett Chance
Allen
Mirchandani, Kiran
Mitropolitski, Simeon
Mockler, Patricia
Mondou, Matthieu
Montigny, Éric
Montpetit, Eric
Moore, Aaron Alexander
Morency-Laflamme, Julien
Morgan, Jennifer
128
D12
J1,J5
D14(a),D15(a)
D1,A4(a),D15(b)
F3,F7(b),F8,K12,F15(b)
C4(a)
G2(b)
C7(a)
H5(a)
H14(b)
H14(b)
H6(b),H7(a)
A5(b),A6(e)
D4(a),D15(a)
B14(b)
A6(c)
A1(b),A2(c),F2(a),F3,E5
F4,F15(b)
G1
N7,N15
A5(b)
A4(b)
H5(a)
G12
C1(b)
F15(b)
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
F5(b)
H12(b)
M5,L11(a),N12(a)
B4(a)
A7(a),F7(a)
F12
J1
A4(a)
D5(b)
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
G2(b)
A7(a),F7(a)
E4
D15(b)
F4
D4(b),D15(b)
E14
B14(b)
B4(b)
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Morgan, Matthew
Morissette, Benoît
Munding, Melinda
Mussell, Jennifer
Nadeau, Geneviève
Najem, Tom P
Narine, Shaun Haresh
Nater, John Lloyd
Nath, Nisha K
Nelles, Jen
Nelles, Jennifer
Nenshi, Naheed
Newman, Jacquie
Nikolenyi, Csaba
Noack, Andrea
Noël, Alain
O'Neill, Brenda
Odoom, Isaac
Ohemeng, Frank
Olive, Andrea
Orsini, Michael
Paltiel, Jeremy
Panagiotarakou, Eleni
Papillon, Martin
Paquet, Mireille
Paquette, Jonathan
Pellé, Eleonore
Penner, Devin
Perry, Adam
Phillips, Janet
Piché, Gaëlle Rivard
Pilon, Dennis
Pin, Laura Grace
Pirani, Pietro
Planinc, Emma
Porisky, Alesha
Profeta, Paola
Pruysers, Scott
Puddister, Kate
Quesada, Angelica
Radmilovic, Vuk
Rae, Bob
Rankin, Katharine
Raynauld, Vincent
Rayside, David
Reeve, Iain
C4(a)
E6
J6
G2(b)
K12
C14(a)
A1(a)
A6(e)
L12(b),N12(b)
A11(a)
B7
E11,E12
E4,N11(a)
B1
G2(b)
A6(a),P9,P10
F5(a),N5
C11(a)
K2
D14(b)
A6(a),A11(b),D14(b)
C11(a)
H4(a)
G2(a),P9
E2,B4(a),A5(a)
K2
A14(b)
H11(a)
G2(b)
D1
C1(c),C7(c)
A4(b),A6(b)
E4
C4(b)
H11(b),H15
F5(b)
D5(b)
B1,J11
D14(a)
G5
A14(b)
A6(d),K6
G12
F7(b),F11,F14,A15
D2(b),P9
A4(a),M7
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
129
Reiber, Ryan
Reid, Scott
Reynolds, Travis
Ribaric, Tim
Rice, Jeffrey Lee
Rice, Roberta
Richter-Montpetit, Melanie
Rivas, Althea Maria
Roberge, Ian
Robinson, Andrew M
Robson, Jennifer
Robson, Patrick
Romanow, Jacqueline
Teresa
Rose, Jonathan
Rosenbloom, Danny
Rouillard, Christian
Roussel, Stephane
Roy, Jason
Ruderman, Nick
Russell, Peter
Ryan, Peter Malachy
Rygiel, Kim
Sabin, Jerald
Saffari, Siavash
Saleh, Lena
Salnykova, Anastasiya
Salter, Mark B
Sampert, Shannon
Sancton, Andrew
Sapeha, Halina
Sarrouh, Beesan
Satzewich, Vic
Saunders, Kelly Lynne
Savage, Larry
Savard, Jean-François
Sayers, Anthony
Scabrosetti, Simona
Schertzer, Robert
Schutter, Helder De
Schwartz, Elizabeth
Sealey, Anthony
Séguin, Eve
Seligman, Steven
Sen, Sanjoy
Shamsie, Yasmine
130
D12
M2,M6,J11
F2(a)
D5(a)
C11(c)
G1,J4
C2(a),L12(b),N12(b)
C1(c),C7(c),L11(a)
K12,K2
A14(b)
K12
E1
G2(a)
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
F5(b),F15(b)
D12
K2
C7(a)
F12,F15(b)
F15(b)
A6(d),K6,D15(a)
A15,F15(a)
C2(b),L12(b),N12(b)
D15(d)
B12(b)
L12(a)
B2,B5
C14(b)
F1,L11(b),N11(b)
E4,E11,E12
D11
B7
B4(a)
A12,L12(c)
A1(b),A2(c),G7
K2
B1
D5(b)
A4(a)
H2(b)
E1
F4,B11(a)
B14(a)
C1(b)
J4
B12(b)
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Sharaput, Markus
Sharpe-Harrigan, Melissa
Shaw, Timothy
Sheldrick, Byron
Siegel, David
Siemiatycki, Elliot
Silverman, Stephanie
Jessica
Silvius, Ray
Simmons, Julie
A11(a)
E1,E2,L6(b),N6
C6(c)
A1(b),A2(c),G7,D14(a)
E11,E12
G2(b)
D11
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
C12(b)
A2(a),J14
Simpkins, Reese
Slowey, Gabrielle Ann
Small, Tamara
Small, Tamara A.
Smaz, Monika
Smith, Alison
Smith, Charles
Smith, Charles
Smith, Heather A
Smith, Malinda
Smith, Miriam
Smith, Steven Rathgeb
Smith, Travis
Smith, Trevor Garrison
Smythe, Elizabeth Ann
Snow, Dave
Soderlund, Walter C
Sokolon, Marlene
Soni-Sinha, Urvashi
Sotiriu, Sabrina Elena
Sparling, Rob
Sparling, Robert Alan
Spicer, Zachary
Spicer, Zachary Devon
St-Amour, Nathalie
Staver, Anne
Stephenson, Laura
Stevens, Andrew
Stewart-Harawira, Makere
Stienstra, Deborah
Stokes, Leah C
Stolle, Dietlind
Storm, Elliot
Stritch, Andrew
Tabachnick, David
L2(b),N2,N14(a)
G4,L4
F11
A15,F15(a)
B1
A6(c)
A1(b),A2(c)
J14,D15(c)
C7(a),C14(b)
G7
L6(b),N6,A7(b)
K4,K7,A11(b)
A5(c)
H11(a)
C6(b)
D6,D7(b)
C14(a)
H2(a),H14(b)
G2(b)
B15
H15
H7(b)
L7(a)
E1
B11(a)
D11
F2(b),F6,J11
D15(c)
G1,G5
L7(b),N7
F12
B14(a)
B11(b)
D14(b)
H5(b)
[email protected]
[email protected]@queens
u.ca
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
131
Taber, Nancy
Tait, Victoria Elizabeth
Taylor, Zack
Tessier, Charles
Thibault-Couture, Joanie
Thomas, Mark P.
Thomas, Melanee
Thomas, Paul E.J.
Thomlinson, Neil
Thorn, Adam
Tiessen, Rebecca
Tolley, Erin
Tomiak, Julie
Tomkinson, Sule
Tossutti, Livianna
Tourigny-Koné, Sofia
Tozzo, Brandon J
Tremblay, Arjun
Tseng, Yi-tsui
Tucker, Eric
Tungohan, Ethel
Turcotte, André
Turcotte, Joseph
Turgeon, Luc
Ulrich, Patrick Michael
Uluskaradag, Ozge
Urban, Michael Crawford
VanNijnatten, Debora
Veltmeyer, Henry
Verli, Dorina
Verrelli, Nadia
Vickers, Jill
Vipond, Robert
Viriasova, Inna
Vosko, Leah F.
Vyce, Amanda
Wai, Zuba
Wang, Yongjie
Ward, Ann
Ward, Lee
Waterman, Robert
Way, Laura
Way, Laura Anne
Weiler, Scott
Western, David S.
Westlake, Daniel
132
N4
N4
E14
F12,F4
B2
G2(b)
F12
B1
E5
D4(b)
C7(a)
F1,A5(a),F12
E6
B4(a),D11
E6,E7
F11
C7(b),G6
B2,A6(a),D4(b),D11
G15
G2(b)
N12(a),A14(b)
F7(b)
D5(a)
A6(a),F1
C7(c)
D1,A6(c),D14(b)
C12(a)
P3,C6(b)
G4,L4
H7(b)
A14(a),B15
A5(a)
A7(b)
H7(a)
G2(b)
L6(a)
A14(a)
N14(a)
H4(a)
H7(b)
D1
J14
A1(a)
D12
H6(a)
D15(d)
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Wheeldon, Johannes
White, Graham
White, Steven
Whitehorn, Alan
Whiteside, Heather
Whitworth, Sandra
Whyte, Tanya
Williams, Mark Stephen
Williams, Paul
Wilson, Iain G
Winer, Stanley L.
Winfield, Mark
Winter, Elke
Wipf, Kevin
Wiseman, Nelson
Wisthaler, Verena
Wong, Douglas
Yi-chong, Xu
Young, Robert
Zakaria, Patty
Zanoni, Marc
Zeilinger, Martin J.
Zhu, Yuchao
Zwet, der Arno van
A6(d),K6
J2,J5,A6(e)
F2(a)
A1(b),A2(c)
G14
N4
A2(b),F5(b)
C7(d)
L11(a)
C4(b),D15(d)
D5(b)
D12
B4(a)
D2(b)
A1(b),L1(a),A2(c),A6(b),A7(b)
B6
J2
C7(d)
B15,E6
C6(a),C11(c)
D4(a)
D5(a)
L1(a)
B6
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
133
134
AGENDA / ORDRE DU JOUR
th
e
86 Annual General Meeting / 86 Assemblée générale annuelle
Canadian Political Science Association / Association canadienne de science politique
Welch Hall, D Howse Theatre | Brock University - St. Catharines, Ontario
28 May 2014 / le 28 mai 2014 | 4:05 pm - 5:30 pm / 16 h 05 -17 h 30
TIME
HEURE
4:05 / 16h05
4:10 / 16h10
4:20 / 16h20
4:30 / 16h30
4:35 / 16h35
4:40 / 16h40
4:45 / 16h45
4:55 / 16h55
5:00 / 17h00
5:05/ 17h05
5:15 / 17h15
5:25 / 17h25
5:30/ 17h30
ITEM
SUJET
1. President's Welcome / Mot de bienvenue du Président
2. Approval of the Agenda / Adoption de l'ordre du jour
3. Approval of the 2013 Minutes / Approbation du procèsverbal 2013
4. Business arising from the Minutes / Questions relatives
au procès-verbal
5. Report: President / Rapport : Président
6. Report : Strategic Directions Document / Rapport:
Document sur le Plan stratégique
7. 2014 Electoral Procedure - Election for the Board of
Directors / 2014 Procédure électorale - Élection des
membres du conseil d’administration
8. Report: Nominating Committee / Rapport : Comité de
candidatures
9. Introduction of President / Présentation de la présidente
Jill Vickers (Carleton University)
10. Report: Secretary-Treasurer / Rapport : Secrétairetrésorier
10.a 2015 CJPS Institutional Subscription Fees / Frais
d’abonnements institutionnels à la RCSP 2015
10.b Appointment of auditors / Nominations des
vérificateurs
11. CPSA Certificate of Continuance–Status Bylaw no. 1 /
Certificat de prorogation de l’ACSP –Statut du Règlement
administratif no. 1
12. Report : Executive Director / Rapport : Directrice
générale
13. Report: Ontario Legislature Internship Programme /
Rapport : Programme de stage à l’Assemblée législative de
l’Ontario
14. Report: Parliamentary Internship Programme / Rapport :
Programme de stage parlementaire
15.Report: Canadian Journal of Political Science / Rapport :
Revue canadienne de science politique
16. CPSA Conferences
16. a Report: 2014 Conference / Rapport : Congrès 2014
16. b Report: 2015 Conference / Rapport : Congrès 2015
16. c 2016 Conference / Congrès 2016 - University of
Calgary
17. Other Business / Autres questions
18. Adjournment / Ajournement
RESPONSIBLE
RESPONSABLE
Alain Noël
Alain Noël
Alain Noël
Alain Noël
Alain Noël
Alain Noël /
Michael Atkinson
Alain Noël
Alain Noël
Alain Noël
Christine
RothmayrAllison
Silvina Danesi
Written/écrit
Written/écrit
Written/écrit
Graham White
Peter Graefe
Cheryl Collier
Jill Vickers
Jill Vickers
Jill Vickers
135
Item 3
Minutes
Annual General Meeting
June 5, 2013, University of Victoria, British Columbia
1.
President's Welcome
Professor Atkinson welcomed the members of the Canadian Political Science Association.
2.
Approval of the Agenda
MOTION
CARRIED
That the agenda be approved as amended
3.
Approval of the 2012 Minutes
MOTION
CARRIED
That the 2012 AGM Minutes be approved.
4.
Business arising from the Minutes
There was no business arising from the minutes.
5.
Report: President
Professor Atkinson referred the membership to his report on the AGM section of the
Conference web site. Professor Atkinson thanked the Executive Committee and the
Board for their work over the past year and particularly around strategic planning for the
CPSA. In particular, Professor Atkinson thanked Professor Reeta Tremblay for her efforts
with the organization.
6.
Report: Planning Session
Professor Atkinson reported on the planning session held in Toronto April 2013.
7.
Report: Nominating Committee
Professor Atkinson reminded the membership of the newly elected board members.
Newly elected Board members:
President-Elect
Jill Vickers (Carleton)
Board Members:
DIRECTORS:
Kelly Blidook (Memorial)
Christopher Cochrane (Toronto)
Patrick Marier (Concordia)
Shannon Sampert (Winnieg)
Neil Thomlinson (Ryerson)
Professor Atkinson also thanked the nominating committee: Kathryn Harrison, François
Petry and Neil Nevitte.
8.
Introduction of President
Professor Atkinson introduced Professor Alain Noël (Université de Montréal) as the new
CPSA President.
Professor Noël presented Professor Atkinson with a plaque and thanked him on behalf of
the Board and membership.
Professor Noël then introduced the President-Elect, Professor Jill Vickers (Carleton) and
asked her to join the Executive at the front of the room.
136
9.
Report: Secretary-Treasurer
Professor Noël invited Professor Rothmayr Allison to present the financial report.
9.a 2014 CJPS Institutional Subscription Fees
Professor Rothmayr Allison called for a motion to increase CJPS Subscription Fees:
MOTION
CARRIED
The Board of Directors, in consultation with Cambridge University Press, proposes the
following fee structure for 2014:
Institutions print and electronic: £102/US$164/CDN$170*
Institutions electronic only: £85/US$137/CDN$142*
*exchange rate of 1.0371 at May 29, 2013 at 12:45 e.g. $1.00 US = $1.04 CDN
9.b Notice of motion of membership fees
Professor Rothmayr Allison called for a motion to address the cost of mailing the
Canadian Journal of Political Science to individual members:
MOTION
CARRIED
That, given the decision to provide members with an electronic version only of the
Canadian Journal of Political Science in order to reduce costs to the Association, CPSA
members who wish to continue to receive a printed copy pay the necessary additional
fees to receive a printed version of the Journal.
Professor Rothrmayr Allison then informed the members that the cost would be set at
$20 and that the SQSP would be informed of this new policy.
9.c Appointment of auditors
Professor Rothmayr Allison asked for a motion to re-appoint McCay, Duff and Company
as the Association auditors.
MOTION
CARRIED
That McCay, Duff and Company be retained as Association auditors for the next fiscal
period.
10.
Adoption of the New By-laws
Professor Noël asked Executive Director Sally Rutherford to inform the membership
about the changes to the CPSA by-laws.
Professor Noël then asked members to pass the following Special Resolution:
MOTION
motion)
CARRIED (only Peter Russell voted against the
BE IT RESOLVED AS A SPECIAL RESOLUTION THAT:
1. The directors of the Canadian Political Science Association are authorized and
directed to make an application under section 297 of the Canada Not ‐ for‐ profit
Corporations Act (NFP Act) to the Director appointed under the NFP Act for a Certificate
of Continuance.
2. The Articles of Continuance (transition) of the Canadian Political Science Association,
substantially in the form submitted to the meeting, are approved.
137
3. The general operating by‐ law of the Canadian Political Science Association (as
amended) is repealed and the new general operating by‐ law is approved.
4. Any one of the officers and directors of the Canadian Political Science Association is
authorized to take all such actions and execute and deliver all such documentation which
is necessary or desirable for the implementation of this resolution.
11.
Report: Executive Director
Professor Noël referred members to the report on the web site.
12.
Report: Ontario Legislature Internship Programme
13.
Report: Parliamentary Internship Programme
14.
Report: Canadian Journal of Political Science
Professor Graham White reported on the status of the CJPS. He referred members to the
report on the web site.
15.
Report: 2013 Conference
Professor Éric Montpetit reported on the success of the conference. Approximately 700
persons registered, exceeding expectations.
16.
Other Business
Professor Vickers submitted the following motion passed by the Women’s Caucus to the
Board of Directors for action.
Motion to Support Accessible and Affordable Childcare at Congress
Whereas in 2013 local organizers chose not to make any childcare arrangements for
Congress until late April, after receiving many letters of protest and a petition with
hundreds of signatures;
Whereas childcare is an equity issue, and the absence of childcare produces adverse
effect discrimination which particularly impacting women and young academics.
We call on the Canadian Federation of Humanities and Social Sciences to mandate that
childcare be a compulsory part of the annual Congress that must be provided (or
contracted) by the host institution. All host institutions should make plans to offer
childcare arrangements at the same time and with the same enthusiasm as other relevant
information about travel, accommodation and registration.
AND
Whereas the childcare that was ultimately contracted for Congress cost $80 per day per
child;
Whereas childcare expenses cannot be funded through tri-council or university based
grants;
Whereas other large organizations in the humanities and social sciences (such as the
Modern Language Association and the Association of American Geographers) already
offer childcare subsidies for their annual conferences;
We call on the CFHSS to develop a subsidy program for graduate students and the
under-waged.
17.
138
Adjournment
Sujet 3
Procès-verbal
Assemblée générale annuelle
Le 5 juin 2013, University of Victoria, Colombie-Britannique
1.
Mot de bienvenue du président
r
Le P Atkinson souhaite la bienvenue aux membres de l’Association canadienne de
science politique.
2.
Approbation de l’ordre du jour
PROPOSITION
Que l’ordre du jour soit approuvé.
ADOPTÉE
3.
Procès-verbal de l’AGA 2012
PROPOSITION
ADOPTÉE
Que le procès-verbal de l’AGA de 2012 soit approuvé.
4.
Questions dérivant du procès-verbal
Aucune.
5.
Rapport du président
r
Le P Atkinson invite les membres à lire son rapport dans la section AGA du site Web du
congrès. Il remercie le bureau de direction et le conseil d’administration pour leur travail
au cours de la dernière année, surtout en matière de planification stratégique. Le
r
re
P Atkinson adresse ensuite des remerciements tout particuliers à la P Reeta Tremblay
pour toute l’énergie qu’elle a consacrée à l’ACSP.
6.
Rapport sur la séance de planification
r
Le P Atkinson présente son rapport sur la séance de planification qui a eu lieu à Toronto
en avril 2013.
7.
Rapport du Comité des candidatures
r
Le P Atkinson rappelle aux membres qui sont les nouveaux membres du conseil
d’administration.
Nouveaux membres du conseil d’administration :
Présidente désignée :
Membre du CA :
Jill Vickers (Carleton)
CONSEILLERS :
Kelly Blidook (Memorial)
Christopher Cochrane (Toronto)
Patrick Marier (Concordia)
Shannon Sampert (Winnieg)
Neil Thomlinson (Ryerson)
r
Le P Atkinson remercie également les membres du comité des candidatures : Kathryn
Harrison, François Pétry et Neil Nevitte.
8.
Présentation du président
r
r
Le P Atkinson présente son successeur, le P Alain Noël (Université de Montréal).
r
r
Le P Noël remet au P Atkinson une plaque et le remercie au nom du conseil
d’administration et des membres.
r
re
Le P Noël présente ensuite la présidente désignée, la P Jill Vickers (Carleton) et l’invite
à se joindre au bureau de direction à l’avant.
139
9.
Rapport de la secrétaire-trésorière
r
re
Le P Noël invite la P Rothmayr Allison à présenter le rapport financier.
9.a Frais d’abonnement à la RCSP pour les membres institutionnels
re
La P Rothmayr Allison soumet une proposition pour augmenter les frais d’abonnement à
la
RCSP :
PROPOSITION
ADOPTÉE
Le conseil d’administration, avec l’accord de Cambridge University Press, propose la
tarification suivante pour 2014:
• 164 $ US / 170 $* CDN pour un abonnement en format papier ainsi que l’accès en ligne
pour les abonnés institutionnels en Amérique du Nord ; 102 £ pour un abonnement en
format papier ainsi que l’accès en ligne pour les abonnés institutionnels à l’extérieur de
l’Amérique du Nord ;
• 137 $ US/ 142 $* CDN pour un abonnement à l’accès en ligne seulement pour les
abonnés institutionnels en Amérique du Nord ; 85 £ pour un abonnement à l’accès en
ligne seulement pour les abonnés institutionnels à l’extérieur de l’Amérique du Nord.
* Taux de change de 1,0371 le 29 mai 2013 à 12 h 45 (par exemple, 1 $ US = 1,04 $
CDN)
9.b Avis de proposition au sujet de la cotisation
re
La P Rothmayr Allison soumet une proposition en vue de réduire les frais afférents à
l’envoi par la poste de la Revue canadienne de science politique aux membres :
PROPOSITION
ADOPTÉE
Compte tenu de la décision de n’offrir aux membres qu’une version électronique de la
Revue canadienne de science politique afin de réduire les dépenses de l’Association, il
est proposé que les membres de l’ACSP qui souhaitent continuer à recevoir une version
imprimée de la revue paient les frais supplémentaires requis pour recevoir leur version
imprimée de la Revue.
re
La P Rothmayr Allison indique ensuite aux membres que le coût serait de 20 $ et que la
SQSP sera informée de cette nouvelle politique.
9.c Choix des vérificateurs
re
La P Rothmayr Allison propose ensuite que l’association retienne de nouveau les
services de McCay, Duff and Company comme vérificateurs.
PROPOSITION
ADOPTÉE
Que l’Association retienne les services de McCay, Duff and Company comme vérificateur
pour le prochain exercice financier.
10.
Adoption de nouveaux règlements
r
Le P Noël invite la directrice administrative, Sally Rutherford, à informer les membres au
sujet des changements apportés aux règlements de l’ACSP.
r
Le P Noël demande ensuite aux membres d’adopter la résolution spéciale suivante :
PROPOSITION
ADOPTÉE (seul Peter Russell a voté contre)
QU’IL SOIT RÉSOLU À TITRE DE RÉSOLUTION EXTRAORDINAIRE QUE :
140
1. Les administrateurs de l’Association canadienne de science politique soient autorisés et
conduits à présenter au directeur nommé en vertu de la Loi canadienne sur les
organisations à but non lucratif, une demande, en vertu de l’article 297 de cette même loi,
en vue de l’obtention d’un certificat de prorogation.
2. Les statuts de prorogation (transition) de l’organisation, lesquels ont été soumis à la
présente assemblée, soient par les présentes approuvés.
3. Les règlements administratifs existants (tel que modifié) de l’Association canadienne de
science politique sont par la présente abrogés et les nouveaux règlements administratifs
qui ont été soumis à cette assemblée sont approuvés.
4. Tout dirigeant ou administrateur de l’Association canadienne de science politique soit
autorisé à prendre de telles mesures et à signer et à remettre les documents pertinents, y
compris ceux qui sont nécessaires ou souhaitables pour la mise en œuvre de la présente
résolution.
11.
Rapport de la directrice administrative
r
Le P Noël invite les membres à lire ce rapport sur le site Web.
12.
Rapport du directeur du Programme de stage à l’Assemblée législative de l’Ontario
r
13.
Rapport du directeur du Programme de stage parlementaire
r
14.
Rapport au sujet de la Revue canadienne de science politique
r
Le P Graham White fait le point sur la situation de la Revue canadienne de science
politique. Il invite les membres à lire son rapport sur le site Web.
15.
Rapport au sujet du congrès 2013
r
Le P Éric Montpetit fait le point sur le succès remporté par le congrès. Le nombre de
congressistes inscrits s’établit à environ 700, ce qui dépasse les attentes.
16.
Divers
re
La P Vickers présente la proposition suivante qui a été adoptée par le Caucus des
femmes et soumise au Conseil d’administration.
Proposition en vue de la mise en place de services de garde pour enfants accessible et
abordable lors du Congrès des sciences humaines
Attendu qu'en 2013 les organisateurs locaux n’ont pris aucune disposition pour offrir un
service de garde pour enfants au Congrès des sciences humaines avant la fin du mois
d'avril et ce, après avoir reçu un grand nombre de lettres de protestation ainsi qu’une
pétition avec des centaines de signatures,
Attendu que la disponibilité des structures d'accueil pour enfants est une question
d'équité et que l'absence de service de garde pour enfants engendre une discrimination
ayant un effet préjudiciable surtout sur les femmes et les jeunes universitaires,
nous exigeons que la Fédération des Sciences humaines rende ces structures d'accueil
pour enfants obligatoire au Congrès annuel, lesquelles doivent être fournies (ou données
à contrat) par l'établissement hôte.Tous les établissements hôtes devraient prendre les
mesures nécessaires pour offrir des services de garde pour enfants bien avant le
Congrès et annoncer ces informations en même temps et avec le même enthousiasme
que les autres informations pertinentes sur les préparatifs de voyage, l’hébergement et
l'inscription
141
ET
Attendu que les services de garde pour enfants qui ont finalement été donnés à contrat
pour le Congrès coûtent 80$ par jour par enfant,
attendu que les frais afférents à ces services ne peuvent être financés par les trois
conseils de recherche ni par les subventions universitaires,
attendu que d'autres grands organismes de recherche en sciences humaines (telles la
Modern Language Association et l’'Association of American Geographers) offrent déjà
des subventions pour les services de garde lors de leurs congrès annuels,
nous demandons à la FCSH de développer, à l’intention des étudiants diplômés et des
personnes ayant un emploi précaire, un programme de subvention pour les services de
garde pour enfants.
17.
142
Levée de l’assemblée
Item 6
Strategic Directions
MISSION
Our Purpose
Since 1912, the Canadian Political Science Association has facilitated and promoted the study of
politics and governing in Canada. The Association aims to provide a range of services to those
committed to educating Canadians about politics and to conducting academic research on
political topics. We seek to connect students, researchers, practitioners, and teachers to one
another and to international resources for the study of politics and government.
Our Communities
The Association welcomes as members all those with an interest in politics and political science.
We serve members at different stages of their careers as well as various communities, including:







Students;
Teachers of politics and political science in colleges and universities;
Researchers in academic positions;
Government officials who seek to learn about and contribute to the study of politics;
Retired academics;
Consultants, journalists, and political observers who contribute to knowledge and political
debate;
Associations with similar purposes, particularly the Société québécois de science
politique, the International Political Science Association, the British Columbia Political
Science Association, the Prairie Political Science Association and the Atlantic Political
Science Association.
Our Services
In addition to supporting the professional development of our members through the provision of
teaching, research and promotional resources, we aim to nurture this diverse network of
members by fostering dialogue and knowledge dissemination through social media and
interactive forums. We also seek to project the Association externally in the broader political
science community.
The Association currently provides two major services to members: a high quality academic
publication—the Canadian Journal of Political Science—and a large and well-attended annual
academic conference, at which a number of prestigious prizes are awarded recognizing various
types of publications over the previous year. In addition, the Association promotes and represents
the profession in a variety of contexts. It maintains a strong liaison with agencies of government
charged with supporting the academic study of politics; it liaises with other professional
organizations, and it provides managerial oversight to two prestigious legislative internship
programs, the Parliamentary Internship Programme and the Ontario Legislature Internship
Programme. The impressive careers of former interns testify to the role our programs play in
improving the quality of governance in Canada.
143
IMMEDIATE CHALLENGES
These activities, while valuable, may be insufficient to justify the support of continuing members
and other communities in light of a series of developments, some of which are relatively recent,
others longer term. At this time they include:
1. Changes in Scholarly Communication. It is commonplace to observe that the academic
world is full of new forums for debate and new modes of publishing and disseminating
research results. These include everything from “Ted talks” to YouTube videos, blogs and
Twitter feeds. Many of our members are exploring these avenues on their own or in
connection with the institutions in which they work. An organization premised on the need to
promote the work of its members will need to acquire the capacity to reach new audiences
and engage in new forms of advocacy. In addition, as our sister organizations launch new
journals and magazines that provide opportunities for interaction beyond the traditional, our
Association will need to determine if it is realistic to continue to rely on a single publishing
vehicle that is not yet available in open access form.
2. Audience Fragmentation. All academic associations face unprecedented competition for
the attention and devotion of their members. The CPSA is no different. Our members are
able to join or launch a host of organizations, many of them committed, like us, to the study of
politics. The advantages of scale and the ability to draw together a large and diverse
audience remains an attraction for national “umbrella” organizations, but loyalty is
increasingly going to those groups whose agendas are more closely connected to the
research, teaching and career aspirations of their members.
3. Stagnant Membership. It has become evident that the membership levels in the CPSA
fluctuate on an annual basis depending, in large measure, on the location of the annual
Conference. Notwithstanding these fluctuations, membership levels, which are currently
around 1300, appear to have leveled off following a period of growth during the early 2000s.
It is a matter of concern that the majority of members are graduate students whose
membership appears to be more dependent than most on Conference participation. A large
portion of the academic community of political science in Canada exhibits what might be
described as a sporadic allegiance to the Association. The CPSA has only recently begun to
collect information on members that will ultimately help create a more complete profile. As
this work continues, it is worth observing that in the absence of a growing membership base,
our financial situation is likely to stagnate. Recent economies, which have provided the
Association with resources that can be redirected, cannot be duplicated going forward.
4. Inadequate Service to Non-Academic members. The Seidle Report confirmed that nonacademic members are seriously underserved by the CPSA. Their participation in our annual
conference is much appreciated, as is their willingness to support some of our signature
endeavors, such as the internship programs. The Association must take seriously the need to
providing these members with a compelling reason to continue involvement and a means of
doing so on terms that are agreeable to them.
5. Uncertain Identity as a Bilingual Organization. The CPSA has been acutely aware of its
status as a national organization in a country with two official languages and a thriving
political science community that operates in both. The remarkable collaboration between the
SQSP and the CPSA to produce a journal that publishes in English and French is a testimony
to that commitment. On the other hand, the CPSA conducts its normal business almost
exclusively in English and is a bilingual organization only in the sense that key documents are
made available to members in both English and French. The Association needs to ensure
that good relations with the SQSP are maintained and that services provided to the
francophone community are in keeping with what the community can reasonably expect.
6. Government Skepticism. It has become routine for associations in the humanities and
social sciences to engage in increasingly elaborate justifications for public support. Granting
144
councils have made it abundantly clear that support for political science research is
contingent on the profession’s ability to demonstrate how knowledge and expertise in our
community can be made available to non-governmental groups and public agencies engaged
in the policy process. An “eyes down” attitude is at odds with the agenda of the Federation
and SSHRC, both of which are actively engaged in promoting political science research. The
US Senate’s recent decision to exclude most of political science research from NSF support
is a recent reminder of the dangers associated with public indifference and political hostility to
our discipline.
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES
The challenges outlined above paint the picture of an organization whose members, or potential
members, are increasingly diverse in their needs and expectations. To serve such a membership,
the Association will have to branch out from its traditional core activities to embrace new roles.
The fragmentation of the academic discipline, commented on by a number of former presidents of
the Association, is no longer something to lament or resist. On the contrary, to attract new
supporters, including a new generation of students of politics (not all of whom are located in
academic settings) it is time for the Association to embrace the diverse character of the political
science community. This membership base includes those who come to the Association for brief
encounters and specific information as well as those who are deeply invested in the theoretical
and methodological direction of the discipline of political science.
With these observations in mind, the CPSA commits itself to the following strategic objectives and
the organizational arrangements required to achieve them.
1. Foster Research Networks. Political science associations, including the CPSA, have long
been comfortable with recognizing and accommodating sub-groups who take
responsibility for programming under the auspices of the Association. In most
associations these groups are now very important organizational vehicles whose
relationship with national associations is mutually supportive. The CPSA should embark
on a program of active promotion of research groups whose work and activities would be
featured on the Association’s website. These research groups and networks should be
provided with the opportunity to identify leadership for Conference programming and
encouraged to become involved in the Association at the Board level. Standards will
need to be developed to ensure that groups remain active, and provision must be made
for programming in addition to that sponsored by research groups. The additional
organizational energy required to manage research groups will be repaid by energizing
the Association and providing members with the opportunity to take greater ownership of
the content of the Association’s business.
2. Expand and Diversify Membership. The Association requires a campaign to attract new
members from among the thousands of students graduate annually with degrees in
political science. Some of them quickly leave their undergraduate work behind, but others
join occupations in which a relationship with our Association would prove mutually
beneficial. Those teaching in College settings are a particularly important source of
potential members, but only if the CPSA is willing and able to meet their needs as
teachers of politics. Much more attention is required to put helpful materials into the
hands of college instructors and of those who define their relationship to the discipline
largely in terms of teaching and education.
3. Invest in New Communication Vehicles. Notwithstanding POLCAN and mass mailings,
the Association does not have interactive engagement with members. The Association’s
now moribund newsletter struggled to attract the interest of departments of political
science, in part because of inevitable delays in communicating information with a limited
shelf life. There are now many models of political science publications pioneered by sister
associations. The CPSA should investigate the editorial practices and financial
145
underpinnings of these publications with the object of creating at least one new
publication vehicle that would extend the reach of the Association beyond the traditional
membership.
4. Strengthen our Commitment to Serving Teaching Professionals. The world of political
science teaching has changed considerably with the advent of the Internet and the
availability of on-line courses. New entrants to our profession often have technological
expertise that they are willing to share, while more established members are willing to act
as mentors and the source of teaching and learning advice to newcomers. Connecting
those who share a passion for teaching should be among our top priorities and providing
teaching materials that represent the best in traditional and contemporary techniques are
tangible and demonstrable ways in which our Association can add value to the study of
politics in Canada.
December 11, 2013
146
Sujet 6
Orientations stratégiques
MISSION
Notre raison d’être
Depuis 1912, l'Association canadienne de science politique met en valeur et facilite l’étude de la
politique et du gouvernement au Canada. L’Association a pour objectif de fournir une gamme de
services aux personnes qui s’emploient à éduquer les Canadiens au sujet de la politique et qui
mènent des recherches universitaires sur des thèmes politiques. Nous cherchons en outre à
mettre en relation des étudiants, des chercheurs, des praticiens, des professeurs les uns avec les
autres et avec des ressources d’ici et d’ailleurs pour l’étude de la politique et du gouvernement.
Nos communautés
L’Association accueille en tant que membres toutes les personnes qui s’intéressent à la politique
et à la science politique. Nous sommes au service des membres aux divers stades de leur
carrière ainsi qu’au service de diverses communautés, notamment :







des étudiants;
des professeurs de politique et de science politique dans des collèges et des universités;
des chercheurs occupant des postes universitaires;
des représentants de gouvernement qui veulent se familiariser avec l’étude de la
politique et y contribuer;
des professeurs universitaires à la retraite;
des consultants, des journalistes et des observateurs politiques qui contribuent à la
transmission du savoir et aux débats politiques;
des associations ayant des objectifs semblables, comme la Société québécoise de
science politique, l’Association internationale de science politique, la British Columbia
Political Science Association, la Prairie Political Science Association et l’Atlantic Political
Science Association.
Nos services
En plus de soutenir le perfectionnement professionnel de nos membres en leur fournissant des
ressources dans le domaine de l’enseignement, de la recherche et de la promotion, nous avons
pour objectif de veiller à la vitalité de notre réseau diversifié de membres en encourageant le
dialogue et la transmission du savoir par le biais des médias sociaux et de forums interactifs.
Nous voyons aussi à ce que l’Association soit présente au sein de la vaste communauté que
forment les politologues.
L’Association offre actuellement deux principaux services à ses membres : une revue
universitaire de haut calibre – la Revue canadienne de science politique – et un grand congrès,
qui attire un nombre important de participants et dans le cadre duquel plusieurs prix prestigieux
sont décernés en vue de souligner l’excellence de divers types de documents publiés au cours
de l’année précédente. De plus, l’Association met en valeur et représente la profession dans
divers contextes. Elle maintient des liens solides avec des agences gouvernementales chargées
de soutenir, au niveau universitaire, l’étude de la politique, en plus d’entretenir des rapports avec
d’autres organisations professionnelles et d’exercer un contrôle administratif sur le Programme
de stage parlementaire et le Programme de stage à l'Assemblée législative de l'Ontario, qui
bénéficient tous deux d’une réputation enviable. Les carrières impressionnantes d’anciens
147
stagiaires attestent du rôle important de ces programmes quant à l’amélioration de la qualité de la
gouvernance au Canada.
LES DÉFIS IMMÉDIATS
Ces activités, toutes valables qu’elles soient, risquent d’être insuffisantes pour justifier l’appui des
membres actuels et d’autres communautés et ce, à la lumière d’une série de facteurs, dont
certains sont apparus assez récemment et d’autres, il y a plus longtemps. Par exemple :
Des changements dans les modes de communication des résultats de recherche. Il est
banal de faire observer que le monde universitaire regorge de nouveaux forums de
discussion et de nouveaux outils pour la publication et la diffusion des résultats de
recherche. Songeons à « Ted talks », aux vidéos de YouTube, aux blogues et aux fils
Twitter, pour ne citer que ces exemples. Un grand nombre de nos membres explorent ces
avenues par eux-mêmes ou en lien avec les établissements desquels ils relèvent. Une
organisation qui a pour objectif de promouvoir le travail de ses membres doit se donner les
moyens de joindre de nouveaux auditoires et de se mobiliser autrement. De plus, à mesure
que nos organisations sœurs lancent de nouvelles revues savantes et de nouveaux
magazines qui offrent des possibilités d’interaction non traditionnelles, notre Association
devra se demander s’il est réaliste de continuer à compter sur une seule publication qui n’est
pas disponible dans un format de libre accès.
Fragmentation de l’auditoire. Toutes les associations universitaires font face à une
compétition sans précédent pour capter l’attention de leurs membres et les fidéliser. L’ACSP
ne fait pas exception. Nos membres peuvent non seulement se joindre à une foule
d’organisations, dont un grand nombre se consacrent, comme nous, à l’étude de la politique,
mais aussi en lancer de nouvelles. Les associations fédératrices à l’œuvre à l’échelle
nationale ont l’avantage d’attirer un auditoire à la fois vaste et diversifié, mais les groupes
dont les programmes sont plus étroitement liés à la recherche, à l’enseignement et aux
aspirations de leurs membres en termes de carrière ont de plus en plus la cote.
Stagnation dans le nombre de membres. Force est de constater que le nombre de
membres de l’ACSP fluctue d’année en année dans une large mesure en fonction du lieu où
se tient le congrès annuel. Indépendamment de ces variations, le nombre de membres, qui
est actuellement d’environ 1 300, semble plafonner après une période de croissance au
début des années 2000. Il est inquiétant de constater que la majorité des membres sont des
étudiants diplômés dont l’adhésion semble davantage dépendre, en comparaison de la
plupart des autres membres, de leur participation au congrès. Une grande partie des
politologues en poste dans des universités au Canada font preuve de ce qu’on pourrait
décrire comme une allégeance sporadique à l’Association. L’ACSP n’a commencé que
récemment à colliger des données sur les membres, données qui aideront au bout du
compte à établir un profil plus complet. Tandis que ce travail se poursuit, il importe de noter
qu’en l’absence d’un accroissement de notre bassin de membres, notre situation financière
va probablement stagner. Les économies réalisées récemment, qui ont fourni à l’Association
des ressources qu’elle a pu réallouer, ne seront pas possibles dans l’avenir.
Services inadéquats pour les membres hors des universités. Le rapport Seidle a
confirmé que les membres à l’œuvre en dehors des milieux universitaires sont très mal
servis par l’ACSP. Leur participation à notre congrès annuel est plus que bienvenue tout
comme leur volonté de soutenir nos initiatives de prestige, tels les programmes de stages.
L’Association doit avoir à cœur de fournir à ces membres une raison convaincante de
continuer à s’impliquer et une façon de le faire dans des conditions qui sont acceptables
pour eux.
Identité incertaine en tant qu’organisation bilingue. L’ACSP est tout à fait consciente de
son statut d’organisation nationale dans un pays ayant deux langues officielles et une
communauté dynamique de politologues fonctionnant dans ces deux langues. La
148
collaboration remarquable de la SQSP et de l’ACSP dans la production d’une revue savante
qui publie des documents en français et en anglais témoigne de cet engagement. Par
contre, l’ACSP fonctionne presque exclusivement en anglais au jour le jour et n’est une
organisation bilingue que dans la mesure où ses documents clés sont communiqués aux
membres en anglais et en français. L’Association doit veiller à ce que de bonnes relations
soient maintenues avec la SQSP et à ce que les services s’adressant à la communauté
francophone correspondent à ce à quoi elle peut raisonnablement s’attendre.
Scepticisme de la part des gouvernements. Les associations dans le domaine des
sciences humaines doivent de plus en plus s’engager dans des justifications détaillées en
vue d’obtenir des deniers publics. Les organismes subventionnaires ont fait savoir très
clairement que le soutien accordé à la science politique dépend de l’aptitude de la
profession à démontrer comment les connaissances et l’expertise des politologues peuvent
être mises à la disposition de groupes non gouvernementaux et d’organismes publics à
l’œuvre dans le processus d’élaboration des politiques. Une attitude autocentrée ne cadre
pas avec les préoccupations de la Fédération des sciences humaines et le CRSH qui tous
deux travaillent activement à la promotion de la recherche en science politique. La décision
récente du Sénat américain d’exclure la plupart des recherches en science politique des
subventions de la NSF nous rappelle les dangers associés à l’indifférence du public et
l’hostilité politique à laquelle notre discipline est en butte.
OBJECTIFS STRATÉGIQUES
Les défis décrits plus haut dressent le portrait d’une organisation dont les membres actuels ou
potentiels ont des besoins et des attentes de plus en plus diversifiés. Pour servir un tel bassin de
membres, l’Association devra se lancer dans de nouveaux rôles. La fragmentation de la
discipline, dont ont fait état plusieurs anciens présidents de l’Association, n’est plus quelque
chose qu’il faut déplorer ou à laquelle il faut résister. Au contraire, pour attirer de nouveaux
partisans, y compris une nouvelle génération de personnes qui étudient la politique (qui ne sont
pas toutes dans des milieux universitaires), il est temps pour l’Association de tenir compte du
caractère diversifié de la communauté qui gravite autour de la science politique. Notre bassin de
membres inclut ceux qui viennent chez nous pour de brèves rencontres et des informations
particulières ainsi que ceux qui s’investissent à fond dans les facettes théoriques et
méthodologiques de la science politique.
Dans cet esprit, l’ACSP s’engage à poursuivre les objectifs stratégiques suivants et à mettre en
place les mesures organisationnelles requises pour les atteindre.
1. Favoriser la création de réseaux de recherche. Depuis longtemps, l’ACSP, comme
d’autres associations reliées à la science politique, n’hésite pas à reconnaître et à
accueillir des sous-groupes qui prennent l’initiative de créer des programmes sous les
auspices de l’Association. Dans la plupart des cas, ces groupes sont maintenant
devenus des véhicules organisationnels importants dont les relations avec les
associations nationales sont mutuellement enrichissantes. L’ACSP devrait se lancer
dans un programme de promotion active des groupes de recherche et présenter leur
travail et leurs activités sur son site Web. Ces groupes et réseaux de recherche
devraient se voir offrir la possibilité d’identifier des responsables pour la programmation
du congrès et être invités à s’impliquer dans l’Association au sein du conseil
d’administration. Des normes devront être élaborées afin de faire en sorte que les
groupes demeurent actifs; il faudra en outre prendre les dispositions nécessaires pour
une programmation qui viendrait s’ajouter à celle qui est commandité par des groupes
de recherche. L’énergie additionnelle qui sera requise pour la gestion des groupes de
recherche sera récompensée par la dynamisation de l’Association et par le plus grand
sentiment d’appartenance de ses membres.
2. Accroître et diversifier le bassin de membres. L’Association a besoin d’une
149
campagne pour attirer de nouveaux membres parmi les milliers d’étudiants qui
obtiennent leur diplôme chaque année en science politique. Certains d’entre eux
délaissent rapidement le domaine, mais d’autres obtiennent des emplois dans lesquels
il leur serait avantageux – pour eux comme pour nous – d’être en lien avec notre
Association. Les professeurs dans les collèges représentent une source
particulièrement importante de membres potentiels, mais seulement à la condition que
l’ACSP soit prête à répondre efficacement à leurs besoins particuliers. Il faut donc
veiller davantage à fournir du matériel utile aux professeurs dans les collèges et à ceux
qui définissent leur lien à la discipline surtout en termes de formation et d’éducation.
3. Investir dans de nouveaux organes de communication. L’ACSP communique avec
ses membres au moyen de POLCAN et de courriels envoyés à tous, mais elle n’a pas
d’échanges interactifs avec les membres. Le bulletin maintenant moribond de
l’Association a eu du mal à susciter l’intérêt des départements de science politique, en
partie à cause des délais inévitables dans la communication d’information ayant une
durée de vie limitée. Des associations sœurs ont lancé de nouveaux types de
publications en science politique. L’ACSP devrait étudier les pratiques éditoriales de
ces publications ainsi que le soutien financier requis pour créer au moins un nouvel
organe de communication qui permettrait à l’Association d’étendre sa portée au-delà du
bassin de membres traditionnel.
4. Renforcer notre volonté d’être au service des professionnels de l’enseignement.
Le monde de l’enseignement de la science politique a changé considérablement avec
l’avènement d’Internet et des cours en ligne. Les nouveaux venus dans notre
profession ont souvent une expertise technologique qu’ils sont prêts à partager et ceux
qui exercent la profession depuis plus longtemps sont disposés à servir de mentors et à
donner des conseils sur l’enseignement et l’apprentissage aux plus jeunes. La mise en
réseau des personnes ayant une passion pour l’enseignement devrait faire partie de
nos principales priorités tout comme la fourniture de matériel pédagogique représentant
le summum en matière de techniques traditionnelles et contemporaines. Ce sont là des
moyens tangibles et mesurables dont notre Association peut se servir pour valoriser
davantage l’étude de la politique au Canada.
Le 11 décembre 2013
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
Item 10.a
CANADIAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION
ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
28 May 2014 – Brock University
NOTICE OF MOTION OF SUBSCRIPTION FEES TO THE CANADIAN JOURNAL OF
POLITICAL SCIENCE (CJPS)
RATIONALE: The CPSA and SQSP have the following subscription categories for institutional
subscribers to the CJPS for 2014:


Institutions print and electronic: £102/US$164/CDN$170
Institutions electronic only: £85/US$137/CDN$142
The Board of Directors, in consultation with Cambridge University Press, proposes the following
fee structure for 2015:


Institutions print and electronic: £109/US$175/CDN$185
Institutions electronic only: £91/US$147/CDN$156
Sujet 10.a
ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DE SCIENCE POLITIQUE
ASSEMBLÉE GÉNÉRALE ANNUELLE
Le 28 mai 2014 – Brock University
AVIS DE PROPOSITION POUR LES FRAIS D’ABONNEMENT À LA REVUE CANADIENNE
DE SCIENCE POLITIQUE (RCSP)
ARGUMENTAIRE: La tarification pour l’abonnement des membres institutionnels à la RCSP telle
qu’établie par l’ACSP/la SQSP pour 2014 est la suivante:


164 $ US/170 $ CDN pour un abonnement en format papier ainsi que l’accès en ligne
137 $ US/142 $ CDN pour un abonnement à l’accès en ligne seulement pour les
Le conseil d’administration, avec l’accord de Cambridge University Press, propose la tarification
suivante pour 2015:

175 $ US/185 $ CDN pour un abonnement en format papier ainsi que l’accès en ligne

147 $ US/156 $ CDN pour un abonnement à l’accès en ligne seulement pour les
177
Item 15
Canadian Journal of Political Science
2013 End-of-year Report
April 9, 2014
Prepared by Graham White (English Co-editor)
This is the second annual report on the Journal/Revue on behalf of the English editorial
team at Ryerson University and the University of Toronto Mississauga (UTM). Our operation is
funded by generous contributions from the Association, from Ryerson University, from UTM and
from the University of Toronto’s Graduate Department of Political Science. The Journal/Revue is
also supported by a subvention from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of
Canada.
The team – Graham White (UTM), Co-editor; Carolyn Johns (Ryerson), Assistant Editor;
Peter Loewen (UTM), Assistant Editor; and Bryan Evans (Ryerson), Book Review Editor – has
now been in place for nearly two years.
Our efforts have been greatly assisted by the strong work of our Editorial Assistants, Jack
Lucas at UTM and Thomas McDowell at Ryerson and by the highly professional and supportive
staff at Cambridge University Press.
This report covers the English-language component of the Journal/Revue. Information on
the French-language side may be found in the report of French Co-editor, Daniel Salée.
Our previous report mentioned three impending changes that stood to affect the
Journal/Revue. Two have occurred; a third is pending. First, the membership of the Association
approved, at last June’s annual general meeting, a change to the effect that subscription to the
Journal/Revue includes only electronic access; those wishing to receive paper copies are now
required to pay an additional amount. This change has had no effect on the Journal/Revue’s
editorial operations. Second, several months ago, in partnership with Cambridge University
Press, the Journal/Revue adopted a “First View” approach, whereby accepted articles and book
reviews are posted on the Journal/Revue’s web site as soon as they are copyedited.
Finally, SSHRC continues to move towards implementation of open access principles for
academic research. This will likely include the imposition of open access requirements on
journals to which SSHRC provides financial support. Timelines for such a policy change are
unclear. As well, “open access” may take a number of forms. Accordingly it is not yet possible to
determine how the move to open access will affect the Journal/Revue but it is clear that
significant change is in the offing.
As in years past, the biggest challenge in 2013 was reviewer fatigue, in terms of
assessing manuscripts. In 2013, just over half (231 of 452) of the invitations to review
manuscripts resulted in completed reviews. Once a reviewer agreed to assess a manuscript, the
mean time taken to complete a review was 31 days, down somewhat from 37.7 days in 2012.
This figure disguises a wide variation: 25 per cent of reviews completed in 2013 took over 45
days. Since we normally solicit three reviews on each manuscript, a single overdue assessment
can significantly add to the time required to reach a decision.
At the same time, we continue to be impressed and grateful for the time and insight that
reviewers contribute. The typical manuscript review is extensive, thoughtful and helpful to
authors, even in cases where the ultimate editorial decision is negative.
Overall, the data contained in this report present a picture of continuity with previous
178
years’ operations. Various indicators have changed marginally since last year, but no dramatic or
significant changes are evident. Tables 1 to 5 present data on authors, reviewers and
submissions.
Between January 1 and December 31, 2013 the English editorial team received a total of
104 new manuscripts (96 original studies and 8 research notes) including Professor Michael
Atkinson’s Presidential Address. In the four issues of Volume 45 (2013), 28 articles were
published in English, compared with 27 in Volume 44.
The mean number of days from submission to first decision was 70 days for original
submissions, down marginally from 2012 (73 days). For research notes, the first decision took on
average 33 days (47 days in 2012).
Table 1, which shows the geographic source of manuscripts, demonstrates that the
Journal/Revue continues to benefit from strong international attention, with nearly a third of all
submissions coming from outside Canada.
Table 2 presents a breakdown of the articles published in 2013 by the subfields used by
the Association at the annual conference. Categorization of articles is somewhat arbitrary; for
example, all three of the articles included in “Political Behaviour/Sociology” might have been
considered as “Canadian Politics” since the cases and data they examined were largely or
entirely Canadian.
The distribution of the 107 first decisions rendered in 2013 is presented in Table 3. Data
on the final disposition of the 104 submissions received in 2013 are presented in Table 4. (Note
that first decisions would include some manuscripts submitted in 2012, so that the cohorts
examined in these tables are not identical.) The initial rejection rate – 73 per cent – is effectively
the same as in the previous year (75 per cent). Of the 26 ‘R&R’ initial decisions in 2013, 13 were
ultimately accepted, 1 was rejected, and 12 were still awaiting a final decision at the time of
writing.
In terms of decisions on the 104 submissions in 2013, since all but three submissions for
which no final decision had been made at the time of writing had received a ‘revise and resubmit’
first decision, a substantial proportion of them are likely to be accepted. Accordingly, the overall
acceptance rate will likely be in the range of 27 to 30 per cent.
Table 5 presents data on gender for articles published, manuscripts submitted, and
reviewers invited and completed. Eighteen per cent of first authors of 2013 articles were women,
down from 30 per cent in 2012. Women submitted 28 per cent of the new manuscripts in 2013, as
compared with 29 per cent in 2012. The percentage of invitations to review manuscripts that went
to women was essentially unchanged from the previous year: 28 per cent in 2013, 29 per cent in
2012.
Tables 6 to 8 present data on book reviews published in 2013. Last year’s report
highlighted difficulties in soliciting book reviewers. Due to the efforts of the book review team
(Review Editor Bryan Evans and Editorial Assistant Thomas McDowell) the Journal/Revue now
has a substantial number of English book reviews awaiting publication
179
Table 1 / Tableau 1
Geographical Location of Authors and Assessors /
Répartition géographique des auteurs et des évaluateurs
New Manuscripts / Nouveaux manuscripts*
er
January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013/1 janvier 2013 au 31 décembre 2013
British Columbia / Colombie-Britannique
Prairies
Ontario
Québec
Atlantic/Atlantique
Territoires / Territoires
USA / É.-U.
Europe
Other / Autre
TOTAL
Published / Publiés
Authors/Auteurs
Submitted / Soumis
Authors/Auteurs
2
1
10
8
2
0
3
2
0
28
8
13
36
7
9
0
16
5
10
104
Assessors
Requested/
Évaluateurs à qui
on a demandé
41
50
183
38
29
1
63
33
14
452
*The numbers in the second and third columns refer to the geographic location of the first author
of each new manuscript. / Les chiffres dans les deuxième et troisièmes colonnes réfèrent à la
région géographique du premier auteur de chaque manuscrit.
Table 2 / Tableau 2
Manuscripts Published by Field / Manuscrits publiés par domaine
er
January 1 –December 31, 2013 / 1 janvier 2013 au 31 décembre 2013
Canadian Politics and Institutions
Politique et institutions canadiennes
International Relations and Canadian Foreign Policy / Relations
internationales et politique étrangère canadienne
Comparative Politics and Institutions
Politique et institutions comparées
Political Behaviour/Sociology / Comportement politique/sociologie
Provincial and Territorial Politics
Politique provinciale et territoriale
Law and Public Policy
Droit et analyse de politiques
Women, Gender and Politics
Race, Ethnicity, Indigenous People and Politics / Race, peuples
TOTAL
180
8
1
2
3
3
2
6
3
28
Table 3 / Tableau 3
First Decisions in 2013 / Décisions initiales en 2013
Total
Rejected without review / Rejetés sans évaluation
Rejected after review / Rejetés après évaluation
Accepted by assessors / Acceptés par les évaluateurs
Revise and resubmit / À réviser et à resoumettre
107
16
62
3
26
Table 4 / Tableau 4
Final Disposition of New Manuscripts Submitted in 2013 / Décision finale au sujet des
nouveaux manuscrits soumis en 2013
Manuscripts Submitted / Manuscrits soumis
Accepted / Acceptés
Withdrawn by authors / Retirés par des auteurs
Withdrawn by editors / Retirés par les directeurs
Under review (as of April 7, 2014) / En cours d’évaluation (au 7 avril 2014)
104
16
58
14
0
1
15
Table 5 / Tableau 5
Gender Distribution of Authors and Assessors in 2013/
Répartition des auteurs et des évaluateurs selon les sexes 2013
Female / Femme
Male / Homme
TOTAL
Authors / Auteurs
Published
/
Submitted /
Publiés
Soumis
5
29
23
75
28
104
Assessors / Évaluateurs
Invited / Invités
Completed / Ayant
terminé leur mandat
62
127
169
325
231
452
Table 6 / Tableau 6
2013 English Book Reviews - Fields / Recensions de livres en anglais en 2013 - Domaines
Canadian Politics and Institutions / Politique et institutions canadiennes
International Relations and Canadian Foreign Policy / Relations internationales et
politique étrangère canadienne
Comparative Politics and Institutions / Politique et institutions comparées
Provincial and Territorial Politics / Politique provinciale et territoriale
Total
2
5
9
2
0
3
2
0
0
7
0
30
181
Table 7 / Tableau 7
Geographical Distribution of Reviewers, 2013/Répartition géographique des
critiques, 2013
Prairies
Ontario
Québec
Atlantic/Atlantique
Europe
Other / Autre
TOTAL
4
2
12
4
2
2
4
30
Table 8 / Tableau 8
Gender Distribution of Reviewers 2013 / Répartition des critiques selon les sexes, 2013
Male / Homme
Female / Femme
TOTAL
182
20
10
30
Sujet 15
Revue canadienne de science politique
Rapport de fin d’année 20-13
Le 9 avril 2014
Préparé par Graham White (codirecteur anglophone)
Voici le deuxième rapport annuel au sujet du Journal, lequel est rédigé au nom de
l’équipe de rédaction anglophone en poste à la Ryerson University et à l’University of Toronto
Mississauga (UTM). Nous bénéficions de généreuses contributions de l’Association canadienne
de science politique, de la Ryerson University, de l’UTM et du département des études
supérieures en science politique de l’University of Toronto. Notre revue reçoit en outre une
subvention du Conseil de recherches en sciences humaines du Canada.
L’équipe – Graham White (UTM), corédacteur, Carolyn Johns (Ryerson), directrice
adjointe, Peter Loewen (UTM), directeur adjoint, et Bryan Evans (Ryerson), responsable des
recensions – est maintenant en place depuis près de deux ans.
Je me dois de souligner ici l’excellent travail de nos adjoints à la rédaction, Jack Lucas à
l’UTM et Thomas McDowell à Ryerson, ainsi que l’aide que nous a apportée le personnel très
compétent et attentionné de Cambridge University Press.
Le présent rapport ne porte que sur le volet anglais de la revue. Des informations sur le
volet français sont contenues dans le rapport du codirecteur francophone, Daniel Salée.
Notre rapport précédent mentionnait trois importants changements à venir qui risquaient
d’avoir une incidence sur la revue. Deux se sont produits; nous attendons de voir ce qui ce qui se
passera pour le troisième. D’abord, les membres de l’ACSP ont approuvé, lors de l’assemblée
générale annuelle de juin, la proposition selon laquelle dorénavant l’abonnement de base à la
revue n’inclut que l’accès électronique; ceux et celles qui désirent recevoir une copie imprimée
doivent maintenant payer un supplément. Ce changement n’a eu aucune incidence sur les
activités de nature rédactionnelle de notre revue. Ensuite, il y a quelques mois, de concert avec
Cambridge University Press, la revue a adopté l’approche « First View », en vertu de laquelle les
articles acceptés et les recensions de livres sont publiés sur le site Web de la revue dès qu’ils ont
été révisés. Enfin, le CRSH continue à s’orienter vers la promotion des principes du libre accès
dans le cas de recherches universitaires, ce qui inclura probablement l’imposition du libre accès
aux revues auxquelles le CRSH accorde un soutien financier. On ne sait pas au juste quand ce
changement de politique sera appliqué ni quelles formes prendra ce « libre accès ». On ne peut
donc pas encore dire comment cela affectera notre revue, mais il est clair qu’un changement
important se profile à l’horizon.
Comme dans les années passées, le plus gros défi en 2013 a été le recrutement des
évaluateurs pour les manuscrits. En 2013, juste un peu plus de la moitié (231 sur 452) des
invitations lancées à de potentiels évaluateurs ont été acceptées et ont donné lieu à une
évaluation. Une fois que la personne avait accepté, il lui fallait en moyenne 31 jours (contre 37,7
jours en 2012) pour terminer son évaluation. Ce chiffre peut par contre varier énormément : 25 %
des évaluations effectuées en 2013 ont pris plus de 45 jours. Comme nous sollicitons
normalement trois évaluations pour chaque manuscrit, une seule évaluation remise en retard
peut grandement allonger le temps requis pour qu’une décision soit prise (voir plus bas).
En même temps, nous continuons à être impressionnés par les observations des
évaluateurs et à être reconnaissants pour le temps qu’ils consacrent à leur tâche. En règle
générale, l’évaluation est exhaustive et pertinente, en plus d’être utile pour les auteurs, même
dans les cas où la décision finale est négative.
183
En gros, les données contenues dans ce rapport brossent un tableau qui s’inscrit dans la
continuité par rapport aux activités des années précédentes. Divers indicateurs présentent des
changements mineurs par rapport à l’année dernière – rien de dramatique. Les tableaux 1 à 5
présentent des données sur les auteurs, les évaluateurs et les manuscrits soumis.
er
Entre le 1 janvier et le 31 décembre 2013, l’équipe de rédaction anglophone a reçu
104 nouveaux manuscrits (96 recherches originales et 8 notes de recherche), incluant l’allocution
r
du président, le P Michael Atkinson. Dans les quatre numéros du Volume 45 (2013), 28 articles
ont été publiés en anglais, comparativement à 27 dans le Volume 44.
Le nombre moyen de jours entre la réception du document et la prise d’une première
décision à son sujet a été de 70 jours pour les recherches originales, soit un peu moins qu’en
2012 (73 jours). Pour les notes de recherche, la première décision a été prise en moyenne en 33
jours (contre 47 jours en 2012).
Le tableau 1, qui indique la répartition géographique des manuscrits, montre que la revue
continue à avoir une forte visibilité à l’échelle internationale, près du tiers de tous les manuscrits
ayant été soumis par des auteurs résidant à l’étranger
Le tableau 2 présente la répartition des articles publiés en 2013 en fonction des sousdomaines utilisés par l’Association au congrès annuel. La catégorisation des articles est un peu
arbitraire; par exemple, les trois articles placés dans la catégorie « Comportement
politique/sociologie » auraient pu entrer dans la catégorie « Politique canadienne » puisque les
cas et les données cités dans ces articles étaient largement ou entièrement canadiens.
La répartition des 107 décisions initiales rendues en 2013 est présentée dans le tableau
3. Les décisions finales au sujet des 104 manuscrits reçus en 2013 sont présentées dans le
tableau 4. (À noter : sont incluses dans les décisions initiales des manuscrits soumis en 2012; les
cohortes examinées dans ces tableaux ne sont donc pas identiques.) Le taux de rejet initial, à
savoir 73 %, est effectivement le même que pour l’année précédente (75 %). Dans le cas des 26
décisions initiales « À réviser et à resoumettre » prises en 2013, 13 manuscrits ont été finalement
acceptés, 1 fut rejeté et 12 sont en attente d’une décision finale au moment de la rédaction du
présent rapport.
En termes de décision finales quant aux 104 manuscrits soumis en 2013, étant donné
que les trois pour lesquels aucune décision finale n’a été prise au moment de la rédaction de ce
rapport avaient reçu comme décision initiale « À réviser et à resoumettre », une importante
proportion d’entre eux sera probablement acceptée. Conséquemment, le taux d’acceptation
global devrait se situer entre 27 et 30 %.
Le tableau 5 présente la répartition hommes-femmes pour ce qui est des articles publiés,
des manuscrits soumis et des évaluateurs invités et ayant rempli leur mandat. Dix-huit pour cent
des premiers auteurs des articles de 2013 étaient des femmes, ce qui est une diminution par
rapport à 2012 (30 %). Les femmes ont soumis 28 % des nouveaux manuscrits en 2013,
comparativement à 29 % en 2012. Le pourcentage d’invitations à évaluer des manuscrits qui ont
été envoyées à des femmes demeure essentiellement le même que pour l’année précédente : 28
% en 2013 et 29 % en 2012.
Les tableaux 6 à 8 présentent des données sur les recensions de livres publiées en
2013. Le rapport de l’an dernier soulignait qu’il était difficile de trouver des critiques. Grâce aux
efforts déployés par l’équipe qui s’occupe des recensions de livres (Bryan Evans, responsable
des recensions, et Thomas McDowell, adjoint à la rédaction), nous avons un nombre substantiel
de recensions de livres en anglais à publier.
184
Table 1 / Tableau 1
Geographical Location of Authors and Assessors /
Répartition géographique des auteurs et des évaluateurs
New Manuscripts / Nouveaux manuscripts*
er
January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013 / 1 janvier 2013 au 31 décembre 2013
Prairies
Ontario
Québec
Atlantic/Atlantique
Territoires / Territoires
USA / É.-U.
Europe
Other / Autre
TOTAL
Published / Publiés
Authors/Auteurs
Submitted / Soumis
Authors/Auteurs
2
1
10
8
2
0
3
2
0
28
8
13
36
7
9
0
16
5
10
104
Assessors
Requested/
Évaluateurs à qui
on a demandé
41
50
183
38
29
1
63
33
14
452
*The numbers in the second and third columns refer to the geographic location of the first author
of each new manuscript. / Les chiffres dans les deuxième et troisièmes colonnes réfèrent à la
région géographique du premier auteur de chaque manuscrit.
Table 2 / Tableau 2
Manuscripts Published by Field / Manuscrits publiés par domaine
er
January 1 – December 31, 2013 / 1 janvier 2013 au 31 décembre 2013
Canadian Politics and Institutions
Politique et institutions canadiennes
International Relations and Canadian Foreign Policy / Relations
internationales et politique étrangère canadienne
Comparative Politics and Institutions / Politique et institutions
comparées
Political Behaviour/ Sociology / Comportement politique/sociologie
Provincial and Territorial Politics / Politique provinciale et
territoriale
Race, Ethnicity, Indigenous People and Politics / Race, peuples
TOTAL
8
1
2
3
3
2
6
3
28
185
Table 3 / Tableau 3
First Decisions in 2013 / Décisions initiales en 2013
Total
Accepted by assessors / Acceptés par les évaluateurs
Revise and resubmit / À réviser et à resoumettre
107
16
62
3
26
Table 4 / Tableau 4
Final Disposition of New Manuscripts Submitted in 2013 / Décision finale au sujet des
nouveaux manuscrits soumis en 2013
Manuscripts Submitted / Manuscrits soumis
Accepted / Acceptés
Withdrawn by authors / Retirés par des auteurs
Withdrawn by editors / Retirés par les directeurs
Under review (as of April 7, 2014) / En cours d’évaluation (au 7 avril 2014)
104
16
58
14
0
1
15
Table 5 / Tableau 5
Gender Distribution of Authors and Assessors in 2013/
Répartition des auteurs et des évaluateurs selon les sexes 2013
Female / Femme
Male / Homme
TOTAL
Authors / Auteurs
Published Submitted /
/ Publiés
Soumis
5
29
23
75
28
104
Assessors / Évaluateurs
Completed / Ayant
Invited / Invités
terminé leur mandat
62
127
169
325
231
452
Table 6 / Tableau 6
2013 English Book Reviews - Fields / Recensions de livres en anglais en 2013 - Domaines
Canadian Politics and Institutions / Politique et institutions canadiennes
International Relations and Canadian Foreign Policy / Relations internationales et
politique étrangère canadienne
Comparative Politics and Institutions / Politique et institutions comparées
Provincial and Territorial Politics / Politique provinciale et territoriale
Total
186
2
5
9
2
0
3
2
0
0
7
0
30
Table 7 / Tableau 7
Geographical Distribution of Reviewers, 2013 / Répartition géographique des critiques,
2013
Prairies
Ontario
Québec
Atlantic / Atlantique
Europe
Other / Autre
TOTAL
4
2
12
4
2
2
4
30
Table 8 / Tableau 8
Gender Distribution of Reviewers 2013 / Répartition des critiques selon les sexes, 2013
Male / Homme
Female / Femme
TOTAL
20
10
30
187
188
189

greetings workshop download

Transcription

Documents pareils

1 Books without Boundaries/Livres sans limites Tenth Annual

Books without Borders / Livres sans frontières

Fantu Cheru Senior Research Fellow Nordic Africa Institute in

ENTWURF07 A5 Broschuere Programm Literatures of Canada and

CV - Department of History

Management international - Toulouse Business School

1 CURRICULUM VITAE Name: Brenda Selva LACA LUQUE Date of

école de technologie supérieure

Migration et identités interculturel