HHN
Transcription
HHN
German Aviation Research Seminar „The Role of Competition in the Future Airport Industry“ What Defines Low-Cost Airports? Insights from Comparing Passenger Characteristics at the Airports Frankfurt-Hahn and Bremen Prof. Dr. Richard Klophaus Leipzig, November 14, 2003 Prof. Dr. Richard Klophaus © Zentrum für Recht und Wirtschaft des Luftverkehrs (ZFL) Centre for Aviation Law and Business Agenda 4 What defines low-cost airports? 4 Results of passenger inquiries at Hahn (HHN) and Bremen (BRE) Purpose of travel Passenger behavior Service assessment Passenger demographics 4 Directions for further research Prof. Dr. Richard Klophaus © Zentrum für Recht und Wirtschaft des Luftverkehrs (ZFL) Centre for Aviation Law and Business Classifying commercial airports Technical Technical // operational operational e.g. e.g. ICAO ICAO classification classification Ownership Ownership public public // private private // mixed mixed No. No. of of movements movements // passengers passengers Main Main traffic traffic function function Prof. Dr. Richard Klophaus large large // small small hub hub // feeder feeder to to hub hub // point point to to point point © Zentrum für Recht und Wirtschaft des Luftverkehrs (ZFL) Centre for Aviation Law and Business What defines low-cost airports ? A/P A/P regional A/P ? A/P small Lowcost A/P A/P selected by Ryanair A/P secondary A/P Prof. Dr. Richard Klophaus A/P © Zentrum für Recht und Wirtschaft des Luftverkehrs (ZFL) Centre for Aviation Law and Business What defines low-cost airports ? First answers Low Low airport airport charges charges Hahn: Hahn: 4.50 4.50 €€ per per passenger passenger German German average: average: 15 15 €€ per per passenger passenger Low Low capacity capacity costs costs Hahn: Hahn: 44 €€ per per capacity capacity unit unit (passengers (passengers p.a.) p.a.) German German average: average: 40 40 €€ per per capacity capacity unit unit Point Point to to point point traffic traffic e.g. e.g. Hahn Hahn Customer Customer characteristics characteristics Airline Airline customers? customers? (e.g. (e.g. Ryanair) Ryanair) Who Who are are the the passengers? passengers? Hahn Hahn is is aa „low-cost „low-cost airport“! airport“! Prof. Dr. Richard Klophaus © Zentrum für Recht und Wirtschaft des Luftverkehrs (ZFL) Centre for Aviation Law and Business Airport types based on traffic pattern traffic function airport type e.g. hub function hub airport Frankfurt (FRA) feeder to hub feeder airport Bremen (BRE) point to point low-cost airport (?) Frankfurt-Hahn (HHN) Comparing Comparing „hub „hub airports“ airports“ with with „low-cost „low-cost airports“ airports“ predominates! predominates! Prof. Dr. Richard Klophaus New New focus focus on on competition competition between between „feeder „feeder airports“ airports“ and and „low-cost „low-cost airports“! airports“! © Zentrum für Recht und Wirtschaft des Luftverkehrs (ZFL) Centre for Aviation Law and Business Where is „Frankfurt“-Hahn? 120 km Prof. Dr. Richard Klophaus © Zentrum für Recht und Wirtschaft des Luftverkehrs (ZFL) Centre for Aviation Law and Business Some facts about BRE and HHN ... Airport No. of passenger airlines Dominant airline (% of weekly dep.) No. of destinations Main destinations (TOP 5, no. of dep.) Airport type (main traffic function) No. of scheduled flights (per week) No. of passengers (2002) Passenger growth (2002 - 2001) Passenger forecast No. of employees Owner Bremen (BRE) Hahn (HHN) 20 4 LH (49 % ) MUC, FRA, STR, AMS, CDG FR (92 % ) 21 (1 domestic to Berlin-SXF with Volareweb, 20 European) Stansted, Gerona, Bergamo, Pisa, Ciampino, Skavsta, Venedig feeder to hub point to point 260 197 1,693,015 1,450,079 -7% 231% 2010: 3 Mio. 2003: 2,3 Mio. 269 275 Fraport AG 73,07% , State of Rheinland-Pfalz 26,93 % 21 (5 domestic, 16 European) Free Hanseatic City of Bremen First First quarter quarter 2003: 2003: HHN HHN ranks ranks No. No. 10 10 among among Germany‘s Germany‘s passenger passenger airports, airports, BRE BRE is is No. No. 11 11 Prof. Dr. Richard Klophaus © Zentrum für Recht und Wirtschaft des Luftverkehrs (ZFL) Centre for Aviation Law and Business Data collection procedure HHN Data source Data collection technique Primary Sample selection Sample size Prof. Dr. Richard Klophaus Secondary (Wrobel 2002) Survey with standardized questionnaire for all respondants Language of questionnaire Data collection period BRE German and English 07 – 16 May 2003 Nov. 1999 – Apr. 2000 1.) Selection of representative week days and departure times 2.) Random selection of departing passengers 814 1,009 © Zentrum für Recht und Wirtschaft des Luftverkehrs (ZFL) Centre for Aviation Law and Business HHN has a smaller share of business travellers Private or business trip? 17% 43% 83% 57% HHN BRE Private trip Prof. Dr. Richard Klophaus Business trip © Zentrum für Recht und Wirtschaft des Luftverkehrs (ZFL) Centre for Aviation Law and Business HHN has many first-time passengers due to strong growth in passenger numbers How often have you flown from Hahn-Airport until now? 11% 39% 31% 46% 58% 15% HHN BRE never Prof. Dr. Richard Klophaus 1 to 4 times 5 and more times © Zentrum für Recht und Wirtschaft des Luftverkehrs (ZFL) Centre for Aviation Law and Business Only a minority of passengers evaluated A/P alternatives before choosing HHN / BRE Planning this trip, did you consider other airports? 74% 78% 26% 22% HHN BRE yes Prof. Dr. Richard Klophaus no © Zentrum für Recht und Wirtschaft des Luftverkehrs (ZFL) Centre for Aviation Law and Business ,Cheapest flight‘ as the most important reason for flying from HHN What are your reasons for traveling from HahnAirport? (multiple reasons possible) 12% 19% 4% 12% 13% 13% 20% 5% 7% 90% 87% 20% HHN BRE Nearest airport Cheapest flight Best schedule Low parking fee Pleasant atmosphere Other reasons Prof. Dr. Richard Klophaus © Zentrum für Recht und Wirtschaft des Luftverkehrs (ZFL) Centre for Aviation Law and Business Most passengers at HHN rely on private transportation by car to get there How did you get to the airport? 13% 19% 2% 18% 12% 15% 14% 28% 53% 26% HHN Own car Prof. Dr. Richard Klophaus Taken to the airport BRE Local traffic Taxi Other © Zentrum für Recht und Wirtschaft des Luftverkehrs (ZFL) Centre for Aviation Law and Business Passengers at HHN accept much longer ground travel times How long did it take you to get to the airport? 1% 2% 4% 12% 11% 13% 14% 31% 31% 51% 24% 6% ≤ 1/2 hour Prof. Dr. Richard Klophaus HHN ≤ 1 hour ≤ 1 1/2 hours ≤ 2 hours BRE ≤ 3 hours > 3 hours © Zentrum für Recht und Wirtschaft des Luftverkehrs (ZFL) Centre for Aviation Law and Business Evaluation of services offered at HHN: Similar but somewhat weaker compared to BRE Assessment of services Appearance Cleanness Duration check-in Easy orientation Equipment children Handicapped people Friendliness staff Parking space Prices restaurants Reaching the airport Hahn Security personnel Service restaurants Bremen 1,4 1,6 1,8 2,0 2,2 2,4 2,6 2,8 3,0 Average value Prof. Dr. Richard Klophaus © Zentrum für Recht und Wirtschaft des Luftverkehrs (ZFL) Centre for Aviation Law and Business Overwhelming willingness to recommend HHN to others Would you recommend Hahn-Airport as departure airport to others? 4% Yes No 96% Prof. Dr. Richard Klophaus © Zentrum für Recht und Wirtschaft des Luftverkehrs (ZFL) Centre for Aviation Law and Business HHN has a higher share of foreign travellers Residence of respondents 13% 33% 87% 67% HHN BRE Germany Prof. Dr. Richard Klophaus Foreign countries © Zentrum für Recht und Wirtschaft des Luftverkehrs (ZFL) Centre for Aviation Law and Business Surprisingly high share of female passengers at HHN Gender of respondents 48% 65% 52% 35% HHN BRE Female Prof. Dr. Richard Klophaus Male © Zentrum für Recht und Wirtschaft des Luftverkehrs (ZFL) Centre for Aviation Law and Business HHN‘s passengers are younger ... Age structure of respondents 8% 14% 13% 22% 17% 23% 25% 25% 30% 15% 7% 1% HHN BRE 15-19 years 20-29 years 50-59 years > 60 years Prof. Dr. Richard Klophaus 30-39 years 40-49 years © Zentrum für Recht und Wirtschaft des Luftverkehrs (ZFL) Centre for Aviation Law and Business Summary of results 4 Low cost airports have small share of business travellers (< 20 %) 4 Passengers from low-cost airports are attracted by cheap flights, the ones from feeder-to-hub airports by proximity 4 Many passengers of low-cost airports accept long ground travel times 4 Lack of amenities does not hinder passengers to recommend low-cost airports to others 4 Point to point traffic to / from low-cost airports is reflected by relatively high share of foreign travellers 4 Low-cost airports have a balance of male and female passengers 4 Passengers of low-cost airports are younger than passengers of feeder airports Demand Demand for for tailor-made tailor-made airport airport products products // service service packages? packages? Prof. Dr. Richard Klophaus © Zentrum für Recht und Wirtschaft des Luftverkehrs (ZFL) Centre for Aviation Law and Business Directions for further research The presented results aim to stimulate interest within the aviation research community to conduct more conclusive studies Suggested directions: Conjoint Analysis to determine the relative importance of airport attributes for passengers‘ travel decisions (e.g. willingness of passengers to trade longer ground travel times or „bus terminal“ environment for cheaper fares) Comparing data between countries: Do distinctive passenger characteristics exist for all European low-cost airports? Prof. Dr. Richard Klophaus © Zentrum für Recht und Wirtschaft des Luftverkehrs (ZFL) Centre for Aviation Law and Business Thank you for your attention! Prof. Dr. Richard Klophaus Zentrum für Recht und Wirtschaft des Luftverkehrs (ZFL) Centre for Aviation Law and Business Fachhochschule Trier - Umwelt-Campus Birkenfeld Trier University of Applied Sciences Postfach 13 80 D-55761 Birkenfeld Fon: + 49 (67 82) 17 - 12 20 Fax: + 49 (67 82) 17 - 14 54 [email protected] www/prof/klophaus/index.html Prof. Dr. Richard Klophaus © Zentrum für Recht und Wirtschaft des Luftverkehrs (ZFL) Centre for Aviation Law and Business