collaborations internationales et progrès réalisés depuis 10 ans
Transcription
collaborations internationales et progrès réalisés depuis 10 ans
Activité Activités Internationales Et progrè progrès réalisé alisés Paul Lucchese IPHE ILC Chairman Directeur des Nouvelles Technologies de l’Energie au CEA 1 Annual Public funding to Hydrogen and Fuel cells UK Public funding 2006 : 25M€ ? Canada Federal Budget : 50 M€/an States : 15 M€/an Europe FP2 : 8 M€ FP6 : 315 M€ JTI : 940 M€ États-unis Fuel cell support from US Government (2008-2013) DOE DOT DOD : Korea Budget R&D 2007 : 64 M€ China 72 M€ Budget for Fuel cell vehicles Japan 28 years Programme (1993-2020) Total budget: 2,4 G€ Total Hydrogen Fuel Initiative (250 M€/an) Freedom Car Programme (100 M€/an) Solid State Energy Conversion Alliance (SECA) Programme (50 M€/an) 2006 : 420 M€ Hydrogen Fuel Initiative : 960 M€ (2004-2008) Total funding 2007 : ~ 500-600 M€ Germany 2007 France Public funding 2006 : 45 M€ ANR Pan-H : 70 M€ (2005-2008) A2I : 67,6 M€ (project H2E, 7 year) ADEME : ~2,5 M€ (2007) World R&D mondiale Public > 1 300-1400 M€/an Private : 3,5 G€/an Italy Federal level : ~ 110 M€ Lânders : ~ 25 M€ R&D : 500 M€ (20062015) Infrastructure : 1 G€ (2006-2015) National Budget: 45 M€/an Regional Budget: 10 M€/an India 5 M€ (2006-2020) R&D : 0,2 M€ Infrastructure : 4,8 M€ 2 Analyse des programmes nationaux Pays Dépenses publiques nationales Etats-Unis 600M$+ commandes publiques $ Japon 400 M$ Allemagne 110€ Canada 50 à 70 M$ Commission européenne Régions et Evolution local tendance Depuis 2005-2007 100 M$ Financement Et gouvernance Plate forme nationale des parties prenantes +71 % Priorité nationale; road map Plate forme animée DOE Programme DOE; gouvernance Très importante via des commandes de démonstrateurs et petites séries +20% Road map; Pilotage national Important programme sur piles Stationnaires Plate forme 25 M€ +90% Road map Importance Régions Plate forme nationale; 20 M$ +30% Road map; pilotage national Plate forme 50M€/an (FP6) 70M€/an (FP7) +40 % Road map; JTI R&D et déploiement Plate forme HFP Projets Phares ? Italie Espagne UK 45 <20 25 ? +25 % ? ? France 43 M€ dont 20M€ ANR 2M€ ANR : -60 % en 2007 -75 % en 2008 ? A2i: 0 >>10M€/an Plate forme Rôle des investisseurs privés, capital risque et AIM UK (100M€/an ?) Pas de road map Plate forme HYPAC en construction Pas de gouvernance nationale Grandes Entreprises fortes R&D France Tissu R&D fort (Post Grenelle ?) Faiblesse PME 3 Next-Generation Vehicle Fuel Initiative: ~Simultaneous Achievement of Goals in Energy Security, Environmental Conservation and Increased Competitiveness~ ~ 1. Biofuel 2. Clean diesel 1. Biofuel 4. Fuel cells/hydrogencells/hydrogen-fueled society ~ What is a plugplug-in hybrids vehicle?~ vehicle?~ 3. NextNext-generation batteries Bioethanol blended with gasoline, and biodiesel blended with diesel oil Two types of biofuel <Bioethanol> •-Ethanol made by fermenting sugar content of sugarcane or corn •Cost problems and supply instability arising from securing raw materials that can also be consumed as food •-Medium and long-term need to develop cellulose-derived bioethanol made from scrap wood or straw •<Biodiesel> •-Fuel made by synthesizing vegetable oil such as rapeseed and palm oil •-Need to develop hydrogenation technology for commercial use to prevent oxidization (decomposition) Cellulose-derived biofuel Promotion of the development of cellulose-derived biofuel made from raw materials not consumed as food Ethanol fuel Waste wood ・Conversion into sugar using enzymes ・Fermentation using yeast - Clean diesel-powered vehicles are about two times more fuel-efficient than gasoline-powered vehicles, making use of Japan’s diesel oil, which is the cleanest in the world. - Various other types of fuel, such as GTL fuel, can be used for clean diesel vehicles. Share of diesel vehicles About 50% in Europe, almost 0% in Japan 19 90 年 19 92 年 19 94 年 19 96 年 19 98 年 20 00 年 20 02 年 20 04 年 Europe 欧州 Japan 日本 Chargin Gasolin g circuit e Buttery engine Development of next-generation batteries will expand the potential of vehicles. Home power supply Use of electricity for daily commuting (Significant cut of oil consumption) Use of gasoline for long weekend drives Next-Generation Vehicle Battery Development Project Budget requested for FY2006: 5 billion yen Advanced battery (2015) Improved battery (2010) Compact electric vehicles for business use Innovative battery (2030) Compact electric Plug-in hybrids vehicles for family use vehicle Standard-sized electric vehicle Targeted battery 1 1.5 7 performance Targeted 1/2 1/7 1/40 battery cost Development of next-generation batteries (improvement in battery performance) 4. Fuel cells/hydrogencells/hydrogen-fueled society 2. Clean diesel 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 3. NextNext-generation batteries Sound promotion of the development of fuel cells, which will be the key for the creation of a hydrogen-fueled society through the transition from “carbon cycle” to “water cycle” Hydrogen supply Common rail system Electronic control of fuel injection systems has made possible cleaner gas exhaust High-pressure pump Injector Electronic control system Open/ close signal Fuel tank * GTL: Gas-to-liquid, fuel made from natural gas Common rail Fuel cell vehicle Hydrogen station Hydrogen vehicles will play an important role in spreading the use of fuel cells and creating a hydrogen-fueled society. Hydrogen vehicles - Powered by way of the combustion of hydrogen instead of fossil fuel (e.g. gasoline) - Producing very clean exhaust that contains almost nothing but water 4 Deux nouveaux laboratoires au Japon “HYDROGENIUS” Technologies de base sécurité de l’Hydrogène “FC3” Mécanismes de base sur les PEMFC Catalyst Electrolyte Membrane Material Transfer at Interface Dr. Jean-Marc Olive University of Bordeaux I, FRANCE (2006.8.16~) Dr. Veronique Doquet Ecole Polytechnique, FRANCE (2007~) 5 International Collaboration on Hydrogen Advanced Fuel Cell Implementing Agreement 6 IPHE Partners Russian Federation USA Canada Iceland IPHE Partners’ Economy: Japan Republic of Korea China India United Kingdom • Over $35 Trillion in GDP, 85% of world GDP • Nearly 3.5 billion people • Over 75% of electricity used worldwide; • > 2/3 of CO2 emissions and energy consumption Australia Brazil Norway European Commission France Germany Italy New Zealand 7 Information Dissemination: Download free at www.ieahia.org Production 20. Hydrogen from Waterphotolysis th 21. 25 Anniversary Report:BioHydrogen In 23. Small-Scale Reformers for On-Site H2 Supply (SSR for H2) Pursuit of the Future 24. Wind Energy and H2 Integration Luzzi / Bonadio / McCann 25.Press Club, High Temperature Processes for H2 Production 2006 Annual Report Released at the National Washington DC, 7-Sep-04 Storage 17. Solid & Liquid State Storage Materials 22. Fundamental and Applied H2 Storage Materials Development Analysis, Safety and Economics 18. Integrated Systems 19. Safety Task 14 Final Report Photoelectrolytic Production of Hydrgoen 8 Avec cet investissement et ces organisations: Quels progrès ? 1- Sur la R&D 2-Sur la démonstration, déploiement 9 Des progrès constants et spectaculaires Depuis 2000: -Quantité Platine divisée par 10 -Réduction très importante des coûts Plaques bipolaires -Epaisseur des membranes divisé par 3 -Durée de vie Membranes: -DOE: X2,5 à 3 (2000h) -Dupont: 5000h -Coût divisé par 10 -Atteinte objectifs coûts SOFC SECA: 400$/kW - Capacité stockage X 2 à 3: -350 bars et 700 bars 10 Exemple au CEA en 2007 Quantité de Pt 0,4 g/kW contre 1,2 g/kW Solutions de rupture - Catalyseurs Pt allié (Co, Cr,…) - Catalyseurs non nobles - Membranes « maison » nanostructurés ultrafines - Oxygène pur (réduction Pt et augmentation perf.) 1200 1000 0,1 g/kW meilleurs industriels 800 Pmax in W/cm² Zone de performances requises pour les premières applications automobiles env. 1 g/kW Jalon 2008 GENEPAC 600 LITEN réf. 2007 Electrodes ELAT (standard) 400 1,2 g/kW Industry Jalon 2007 < 0,4 g/kW ! LITEN résultat 2007 200 Conditions d’essais : H2-AIR / 80°C / 1,5 bars / 50% HR 0 100,00 10,00 1,00 Charge en platine en €/kW (à 30€/gPt) 11 Stockage et production 1,5 Kw/Kg( 5,2 %) 1 kW/l system 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Mass of storage tank (Kg) 2006-2007 CEA AL 32l 700 bar 1999 700 bar liner Aluminium 2004 CEA AL Ullit 22l, 350 bars 12 Des progrès spectaculaires sur les systèmes Necar 1 (1994) PEMFC de 50 kW (12 modules), alimentation H2 • Location Honda 2008 – $600/mois, Southern California • 780 km range (Toyota) – 2300 mile road trip, Alaska-California • Flottes véhicules 100(GM) – CA, NY, DC – 1000 vehicles by 2010-2012 • 3l/100 km estimated (Daimler) • 300 km/h record de vitesse avec zéro émission 13 Demonstration world Atlas • • • • Plusieurs centaines de piles vendues (Stationnaires, back up) Plus de 100 stations services Plus de 250 véhicules Les projets de démonstrations passent à la deuxième génération: – Intégration des technologies; infrastructure durable, accès aux premiers marchés; 14 LargeLarge-Scale Stationary Fuel Cell Demonstration Project Provide feedback on various demonstration data, for research and development Step up to mass production and inspection of learning curve Price target: 1.2 million yen/system (in 2008) Application for installation Application METI∙∙NEDO Subsidy NEF Energy suppliers Residences Subsidy Installation decision Hokkaido 3 sites Breakdown of installation (FY2005) Energy supplier 1st stage 2nd stage Osaka Gas Nippon Oil +930 for FY2007 More than 2,000 Number of installation Tokyo Gas 480 500 Japan Energy Idemitsu 400 2nd stage Kyushu Oil +777 for FY2006 Taiyo Oil Toho Gas 300 Tohoku 2 sites Saibu Gas Iwatani Cosmo Oil 1st stage 200 Kinki 76 sites Kamata (LemonGas) Showa Shell Sekiyu Total In FY2005, up to 6 million yen per stationary FC for household is subsidized to the energy supplier. Web site: http://happyfc.nef.or.jp 100 12 0 2002 31 2003 Chugoku 13 sites 33 2004 2005 Kyushu 34 sites Shikoku 13 sites Chubu 32 sites Kanto 307 sites 15 Pilot Projects Initiated Worldwide Hydrogen from hydropower Hydrogen powered three-wheelers Hydrogen from biomass Hydrogen buses Hydrogen from solar energy Hydrogen from renewable energy Hydrogen from wind energy Algiers Azores Portugal Romania China Azerbaijan Turkey India Morocco Libya Algiers Cuba S. Korea Brazil Argentina S. Africa 16 L’Europe de la Recherche H2 Pac s’organise Research Grouping >>> JTI 47 participants SINTE F 1600 R&D people VTT Center for Process Innovation Univ. of Manchester Univ. of Aalborg Univ. of Hertfordshire RISØ E Fundation ITMA Fundation Cidaut INASME CIDETEC T EC N ZBT VITO FZJ Duisbourg AVER CUT DLREC E IM Mainz CNR S ZS CEA, IFP PSI W INPL Poitiers Univ. Montpellie CENER r 2 INTA CIEMA T AIJU Univ. of Turin Politecnic Univ. of Univ. of Turin Alicante NRI Rez Joanneum Technical Univ. of Graz Research CESI/ Univ. of Bologna RICERCA Univ. of Perugia UNIDOICHET CNR ENE A Univ. of Rome- la Sapienza Univ. of Salerno Tubitak CRES 17 Conclusions • Les efforts sur H2 et Pac s’accélèrent partout et sont structurés (national, européen, international) • Les résultats sont là • Les objectifs sont en vue à l’horizon 2015-2020 – Premiers marchés avant • La France a des acteurs industriels et un bon tissu de recherche • Reste: – A ne pas relâcher l’effort: • Un niveau de 80 à 100 M€/an est souhaitable pour rester dans la course • ANR (30 M€ /an est un minimum au regard des autres pays mais aussi autres aspects: • Régions, systèmes démonstrations, – Continuer l’intégration européenne pour concentrer l’effort sur les points forts français – A mettre en place une gouvernance R&D sur l’energie en France – A mettre en place une plate forme réunissant les acteurs H2 pac en France (HYPAC) 18