42A11NW2014 - Geology Ontario

Transcription

Quantec IP Inc.
42A11NW2014
2.19909
MACDIARMID
010
P.O. Box 580, 101 King Street
Porcupine, ON RON 1 CO
Phone (705) 235-2166
Fax (705) 235-2255
Quantec IP Incorporated
Geophysical Survey
Assessment Report
RECEIVED
the GRADIENT TDIP
DEC B l 'BBH
SURVEY at the PEGG-MEUNIER
CfASS
OfHCl
PROPERTY, MacDfarmid Twp., ON
on behalf of
AUR RESOURCES INC., Val-d'Or, QC RECEIVED
021999
PROVINCIAL RECORDING
OFFICE - SUDBURY
A.M.
QIP QIPQIP DIPQIP
JM Legault
G Kallfa
K Blackshaw
November, 1999
Project P-272
Quantec Geoscience L
TDIP Gradient Survey
: RESOURCES fNC.
;gg-Meunier Property
42A11NW2014
2.19909
MACDIARMID
010C
1.
INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................^
2.
GENERAL SURVEY DETAILS.......................................................................................................-.............^
3.
2.1
LOCATION........................................................................................... .......................................4
2.2
2.3
ACCESS................................................................................. ....................................................5
SURVEY GRID.............................................................................................................................. 5
SURVEY WORK UNDERTAKEN ..^...^^..^^....^..^^.....^.^...^..^^.^.^.^..^^.^^.^^...^ 6
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
GENERALITIES................................................... .........................................................................6
PERSONNEL.......................................................................................................................... .....6
SURVEY SPECIFICATIONS...................................................................... .....................................6
SURVEY COVERAGE........... ............................................................................................... ......7
LINE CUTTING COVERAGE.................................. ................................... .....................................7
INSTRUMENTATION......................................................................................................................^
PARAMETERS............................................................. ................................................................8
MEASUREMENT ACCURACY AND REPEATABILITY...................... ...... ..............................................9
DATA PRESENTATION................................................................................................................... 9
4.
RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION...........................................................................-................................^
5.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS......................................................................,....................... 11
APPENDIX A: S TATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
APPENDIX B: THEORETICAL BASIS AND SURVEY PROCEDURES
APPENDIX C: PRODUCTION LOG
APPENDIX D: INSTRUMENT SPECIFICATIONS
APPENDIX E: TOPOGRAPHICAL AND CULTURAL NOTES
APPENDIX F: LIST OF MAPS
APPENDIX G: MAPS AND SECTIONS
Figure 1: Caber General Location.......................................................................................................4
Figure 2: Gradient Array Layout...........................................................................................................7
Table l: Reconnaissance TDIP Survey Coverage........................... ............................................... .... 7
Table II: Line Cutting Coverage................................ .... ..... ................................................................7
Table III: Iris ELREC 10 Decay Curve Sampling.................................................................................. 8
Table IV: Recommended Drill Targets at Pegg-Meunier................................................................... 12
P-272- November, 1999
Quantec Geoscience Ltd.
AUR RESOURCES INC.
Pegg-Meunier Property
*
QIP Project No:
P272
*
Project Name:
Pegg-Meunier Project
*
Survey Period:
November 5 to November 9 , 1999
*
Survey Type:
Gradient Time Domain Induced Polarization
.
Client:
Aur Resources Inc.
*
Client Address
1876, 3e Avenue
Val-d'Or, QC
J9P 7A9
*
Representatives:
Mr. Roch LeFrancois
*
Objectives:
O
After establishing a survey grid H 9.5 km line-cutting) use IP/Resistivity, to detect and
delineate favourable chargeability end resistivity signatures associated with volcano
genic massive sulphide deposits, in an area of heavy overburden cover, based on
their physical property contrasts - with possibly compositional definition using Spectral
TDIP parameterization. The Gradient array was chosen to provide a high resolution,
deep penetration survsy, in a rapid reconnaissance mode, providing bulk average
mapping extending from surface to 500 metres.
Report Type:
P-272 - November, 1999
Summary interpretative, suitable for assessment
AUR RESOURCES INC.
2.1 LOCATION
*
General Location:
Approx. 20km north-northwest of Timmins
*
Country:
Canada
*
Township:
MacDiarmid Township
*
Province:
Ontario
*
Nearest Major Settlement:
Timmins, ON
*
Mining Claim Numbers:
121S235, 1219235, 12192391
*
NTS Map Reference #e:
42A/11.12
Figure 1: Peaa-Meunier Property General Location.
1 From AUR Resources Claim/Line cutting sketch maps (P272 file, 11/99).
4
Quarrtec Geoscience Ltd.
AUR RESOURCES INC.
Pegg-Meurier Property
2.2 ACCESS
*
Base of Operations:
Apartment in Porcupine.
*
Mode of Access:
4x4 truck north along hwy 655 for approx. 36km, then
west on a gravel road for 15km to power line road, then
south 2km to access the northeast corner of the grid.
2.3 SURVEY GRID
Coordinate Reference System: Local exploration grid (Non UTM referenced)2
Established by:
Quantec IP Inc. - prior to survey execution
Line Direction:
Azimuth 0000(Grid N-S)
Line Separation:
300 metres
Station Interval:
25 metres
Method of Chaining:
Metric, slope distance
2 Note: Grid survey reference used east-west Reid-MacDiarmid Twp. line (near UTM 5395280mN) as BLO+OON and
north-south powerline (near UTM 464040mE) as STN 0+OOE (ref. AUR Pegg-Meunier Claim/Line Location sketch,
P272file, 11/99).
5
AUR RESOURCES INC.
3.1 GENERALITIES
*
Survey Dates:
November 5 to November 9 , 1999
*
Survey Period:
5 days
*
Survey Days (read time):
5 days
*
Weather/Standby Days:
O days
*
Survey Coverage:
120km
3.2 PERSONNEL
*
Project Supervisor:
Kevin Blackshaw, Timmins, ON
*
Project Manager:
Dave Eastcott, Porcupine, ON
*
Geophysical Technicians:
Chris Sawyer, Oakville, ON
Richard Chasse, Kirkland Lake, ON
Eric Hotvedth, Ramore, ON
*
Field Technician:
Roch Michaud, North Bay, ON.
Dale Whalen, South Porcupine, ON
3.3 SURVEY SPECIFICATIONS
*
Array:
Multiple Gradient (see Fig. 2)
*
AB (Tx Dipole Separations):
3400 metres
*
MN (Rx Dipole Separation):
25 metres
*
Line Interval:
300 metres
*
Sampling Interval:
25 metres
*
Total Gradient AB Blocks:
1 blocks (A - see Table l)
*
Gradient Anal Coverage:
2.88 km2
P-272-November, 1999
AUR RESOURCES INC.
GRADIENT ARRAY^. AB s length C,-C2
MN = length PrP7
(6 x PrP2 Spread)
GRADIENT ARRAY COVERA.GE AREA
Picture 2: Gradient Array Layout
3.4 SURVEY COVERAGE
*
Reconnaissance Gradient !P:
LINE
0-KKl
3+OOW
6+OQW
9+OOW
12+OOW
M!N EXTENT
3L 0+CO
BL 0+00
BLO+00
BLO+00
BL 0+00
12.0 km (see Table l)
MAX EXTENT
24+OOS
24+OOS
24+OOS
24+OOS
24+OOS
l
TOTAL (m)
2400
2400
2400
2400
2400
12000
Total Covfjrage(tT')
Table f: Reconnaissance TDIP Survey Coverage
3.5 LINE CUTTING COVERAGE
LINE
0+00
3+OOW
6+OOW
9+OOW
12+OOW
15+00 W
18+OOW
MIN EXTENT
TLO+00
TL 0+00
TL 0+00
TLO+00
TL 0+00
TL 12+OOS
TL 12+OOS
MAX EXTENT
24+OOS
24+OOS
24+OOS
24+OOS
33+OOS
33+OOS
33+OOS
Total Coverage(m)
Table H: Line Cutting Coverage
TOTAL (m)
2400
2400
2400
2400
3300
3300
3300
19500
TDIPGradent Survey
AUR RESOURCES INC.
3.6 INSTRUMENTATION
*
Receiver:
IRIS IP-10 (10 channel l Time Domain)
*
Transmitter
Phoenix IPT-2B (15 kW/300-2400 output)
*
Power Supply:
Kohler MG (2cyl / 25 HP) with Westinghouse alternator
(30KVA, 120V, 3 phase, 400Hz)
3.7 PARAMETERS
*
Input Waveform:
O 0625 Hz square wave at 500Xo duty cycle
(4 seconds On/Off)
Receiver Sampling Parameters: IRIS IP-10 Cole-Cole (4 sec.) preset windows
(see Table IV)
Measured Parameters:
1) Chargeability units are in millivolts per Volt. The Total Chargeability is cal
culated (internally, within receiver) over the full integration period of 20 to
3850ms (20 time slices). Fifteen (15) time siices (T6 - Tô) are used for the
calculation of the Cole-Cole decay curve parameters (Tau = time constant, M
= spectral chargeability for fixed C constant of 0.25). This specification was
used to minimize the possibility of early time EM coupling effects from con
taminating the Cole-Cole calculations.
2) Primary Voltage in millivolts and Input Current in amperes for Resistivity cal
culation according to the gradient array geometry factor (Appendix C).
l
Slice
Td
Ti
T?
T3
T4
Ts
T8
T7
Ta
Tn
Tio
Tii
T, z
T,3
T14
Tis
T,B
TIT
T, a
Tl9
TM
Total To
Duration (mseci
20
40
50
60
7f!
80
90
100
110
120
140
160
180
200
220
250
280
320
380
450
530
3850
Start ( msecl
0
20
60
110
170
240
320
410
510
620
740
880
1040
1220
1420
1640
1890
2170
2490
2870
3320
End (msec}
20
60
110
170
240
320
410
510
620
740
880
1040
1220
1420
1640
1890
2170
2490
2870
3320
3850
Table III: Iris ELREC 10 Decay Curve Sampling.
Mid-Point (mspcl
10
40
85
140
205
280
365
460
565
680
810
960
1130
1320
1530
1765
2030
2330
2680
3095
3585
AUR RESOURCES INC.
Pegg-Meurder Property
3.8 MEASUREMENT ACCURACY AND REPEATABIUTY
*
Chargeability:
generally<
0.5 mV/V but acceptable to 1.0 mV/V.
*
Resistivity:
less than 5% cumulative error from Primary voltage
and Input current measurements.
3.9 DATA PRESENTATION
*
Maps:
Reconnaissance Coverage:
.
Posted/contoured plan maps of Total Chargeability,
Apparent Resistivity, Tau and Cole-Cole Chargeability,
and geophysical interpretation (with topographic and
ciaim overlay) at 1:5000 scale (5 maps).
Digital:
Raw data:
Processed data,
IP-10 digital dump file (See Appendix D).
Geosoft .XYZ format.
using the following format:
Column 1 =
Column 2 Column 3 =
Column 4 =
Column ^ =
Line (X Position), in meters
Station (Y Position), in meters
Apparent Resistivity, in Q-m
Total Chargeability, in m V/V
TDIP Spectral Estimates, derived using iPREDCn'
AUR RESOURCES INC.
The gradient-Realsection IP\Resistivity surveys at Pegg-Meunier were designed to detect and de
lineate, at a reconnaissance scale, signatures associated with possible Kidd Creek type volcanogenic
massive sulphide deposits, at investigation depths from surface to 500 metres. The property is wholly
overlain by thick glaciolacustrine overburden -owing to its presence adjacent to the Matagami River to
the west, end is without outcrop exposure - however, geologic compilations indicate it is mainly underlain
by east-westerly trending felsic volcanic pyroclastics and flows, with mafic volcanic intercalations, and
gabbroic intrusives occupying the northern portion of the property (Pyke et a!., Timmins-Kirkiand Lake
Geological Compilation. ODM Map 2205, .1971). DDH evidence from adjacent properties suggest that a
favourable felsic volcanic unit extends through the grid area - although, apparently, mainly indicating
mainly graphitic mineralization on strike (R. Lefrancois, AUR, pers. comm., 11/99). The full extent of pre
vious exploration on the property is not known to the present authors, however, the property is not beiieved to be drill-tested (K. Blackshaw, QIP, pers. comm , 11/99). Compilations do, however, also indi
cate Pb-Zn showings immediateiy east of the property Furthermore, airborne geophysical surveys indi
cate a conductive; horizon associated with the inferred felsite, which, despite the possibility of graphite,
has motivated the present TDIP survey - with its deep penetration and the possibility of spectral charac
terization also being key factors in the choice of the reconnaissance gradient array.
The IP/Resistivity responses at Pegg-Meunier Property are characterized by the presence of
chargeability signatures varying from very weak ^1.5 mV) to moderate (up to 5mvYV) strength, but nev
ertheless very well resolved within a very low chargeability background - consistent with deep and/or
conductive overburden. The strongest and most dominant signature (Axis A - see Interpretation map, in
Appendix G) occurs in the central part of the survey area, between 1450S-1550S, and therefore likely
coincides wilh the expected airborne electromagnetic lineament. It also features a ÔOm strike length
(extending from at least L600W to LO) and remains open to the east. Axis A occurs along the southern
perimeter of an east-westerly trending, thick (200-800m NS) band of high resistivity rocks - also consis
tent with felsic volcanic rocks, as predicted in the geologic model.
Inferred dips tor Axis A, based on chargeability profile asymmetry, are variable - ranging from subvertical to predominantly steeply north-dipping, but possibly also south-dipping to the west. Based on its
low resistivity association, this ESE trending chargeability axis likely corresponds to either stringer to
massive sulphides or, possibly, graphite, or alternatively a disseminate mineralized but strongly clayaltered or faulted unit - however, its relatively weak strength suggesting either a poorly mineralized zone
(if subcropping) or a more strongly mineralized but deeply buried horizon. Furthermore, based on its
broad overall width (*1QO-200m NS) both scenarios are possible - nevertheless, its signature is incon
sistent with a narrow mineralized zone, but rather favours a broad mineralized zone. The three most
anomalous profiles (LO, L3W, L6W) also indicate multiple mineralized horizons - with the weaker linears
on the northern edge (Axis A' and B) whose high to contact-type resistivity associations indicate either
thin and/or more disseminate sulphides (or, alternatively, weak graphite magnetite).
West of L6+OOW (and the creek) Axis A diminishes considerably in strength and becomes less con
ductive - suggesting either an abrupt deepening of the horizon or, more likely, thinning or pinching min
eralization, as corroborated by the unchanged resistivity signature. Elsewhere on the property, the IP
signatures consist of subtle ^1,5x background), narrow ^25m) chargeability highs which are associated
with mixed low resistivity, resistive and contact type of resistivity signatures - none of which constitute
exploration targets of significance for VMS sulphides - unless Zn-rich mineralization is expected. Some
may however represent lode-gold targets - particularly those with contact-type and high resistivity signa
tures, which are consistent with trace (2-50Xo) disseminated sulphides within quartz-carbonate altered
shears. Alternatively, these might also represent magnetite or poorly mineralizsd felsites or intrusive
dykes.
Although existing compilations indicate EW to ENE geologic strikes, the present results point to a
mixture of ESE predominant but possibly also NE trends - particularly from the resistivity data. In fact,
several c-shaped patterns also suggest a possible ESE-oriented, antiformal/synformal axis near 10+OOS
10
*,
TDIP Gradent Survey
AUR RESOURCES INC.
- although this may relate to faulting or distortions from geomorphologic/conductive overburden from the
creak beds, which crosscut the survey area. Well defined, but sinuous geoelectric contacts, marking the
transition to less resistive rocks, north of *300S and south of *2000S, suggest possible contacts with
gabbroic intrusives and more mafic volcanic rocks, respectively - agreeing with existing compilations.
Finally, regarding one of the secondary objectives of the survey was to possibly determine the in
ferred "texture" of the observed response, using spectral parameters derived from the TDIP decays - in
particular, the Cole-Cole time-constant T parameter which is, more or less, a primary indicator of the grain
size of the metallic particles that are the source of the measured induced polarization effect. For fine
grained mineralization the critical frequency (Fc3) is highest, consequently the time-constant T is small;
while, for coarse-grained mineralization, Fc is at a lower frequency, consequently the time-constant r is
large. While the Ccle-Cole Time Constant plan map shows a wide range of T values (mainly due to the
effects of noise), Axis A coincides with a well defined, long T value (^00 sec.) indicating coarse grained
mineralization and therefore consistent with graphite - particularly across L9W and L6W. In contrast,
progressively shorter Tau's across LO suggest that the mineralization may become more sulphide rich
with easting. Furthermore, Axis B hosts low T values (-^ sec.) indicating fine-grained texture, which is
consistent with sulphides - B also remains open to the east of the survey area. While it must be empha
sized that while, in the best case, spectral TDIP parameterization is designed to fulfill the objective of
"textural" discrimination of mineralization, rather than composition, these estimates are highly prone to
noise - both geologic and systemic, particularly given the low signal levels obtained at Pegg-Meunier.
On the other hand, rms. coefficient, which quantifies the quality of the fit between the measured decay
curve and the theoretical Cole-Cole one that have been chosen, ranges from 1.5 to M 'K showing a good
fit for the Axis A signature. We conclude that the spectral evidence is providing reasonable indications of
mixed sulphide and graphitic textures - with the metasedimentary source, nevertheless, being the domi
nant response.
The Gradient-Realsection IP results at Pegg-Meunier Property successfully identify geophysical sig
natures relating to the subsurface geology, including, most importantly, chargeability anomalies associ
ated with possible massive sulphide mineralization in the central part of the survey area - as predicted in
the exploration model. This lineament (Axis A) corresponds to a broad (100-200m NS width), strikeextensive ^600m east-west), steeply north-dipping, relatively weak but well defined polarizeable zone
whose moderate strength either relates to a wide-body but weakly mineralized horizon or, alternatively, a
large but more deeply buried and strongly mineralized zone - neither of which can be absolutely ascer
tained based on tho 2D gradient array coverage. Axis A pinches or weakens significantly west of L6W,
but remains open east of LOE - its broadest and strongest response is nevertheless obtained across L3W
between 1350S-1650S. Its characteristic low resistivity signature is consistent with either stringer to mas
sive mineralization or graphite (versus either disseminate sulphides or magnetite) however, its spectral
TDIP parameters (long T MOOsec) best ascribe a coarse-grained texture, analogous to a graphitic source
- particularly its west-central extent. On the other hand, weaker Tau's obtained along its eastern portion
suggest a greater mixture of mixed to fine-grained (i.e. sulphides) textures - particularly for Axis B which
also remains open to the east. This may, however, also be related to the effects of EM contamination of
the measured decays due to the along NS powertine paralleling LO+OOE - in spite of the fact that, other
wise, it has no noticeable effect of the measured chargeabilities and resistivities.
Despite these indications that much of Axis A is graphitic, we must be mindful of the proven limita
tions of spectral TDIP characterization, particularly in low signal/noise environments, as well as those
based solely on single-coverage, gradient array results - particularly with regards to dilution, culture and
3 The critical frequency, which can often be used to described a spectral response, is related with other parameters
by the Cole-Cole Response Equation: Fc - M(2n T (1-m)(172)c
(ref. Pelton et al, 1978; Hallof and Klein, 1982).
11
11
AUR RESOURCES INC.
AB source effects. Therefore, in spite of this spectral evidence, we nevertheless recommend the drilltesting of Axis A-B, on the basis of the otherwise favourable gradient TDIP\Resistivity evidence, along
the three profiles offering the strongest response, as indicated in Table IV:
LINE
STATION
OE
QUALITY
1525S
RESISTIVITY
ASSOCIATION
Low
Moderate
2
Axis A: Possible stringer to massive sulphides
mixed with graphite (mod Tau), with steep north
dip, and 200m NS width. Open to east. Test
with south dipping DDH along with Axis B.
OE.
1400S
High
Weak
3
OE
1338S
Nil
Weak
3
300W
1512S
Low
Moderate
1
300W
1412S
Nil
Moderate
2
600W
1450S
Low
Moderate
2
SOOW
1288S
Nil
Weak
3
Axis A?: Possible narrow, qtz-altered dissemi
nated sulphide (short Tau) or weakly mineralized
felsic ( magnetite ?). DDH test with A.&B.
Axis B: Possible thin stringer sulphide (short
Tau) or weakly clay-altered diss. sulphide zone.
North dip (?) and open to east. DDH with A.
Axis A: Possible graphite (long Tau) or po-rich
massive sulphide, with subvertical dip and up to
300m NS width. Strongest IP response at PM
grid. DDH test from north or south with A'.
Axis A": Possible thin graphite or thin po-rich
sulphide stringers (long Tau). South dip (?).
DDH test with A
Axis A: Possible graphite (long Tau) or po-rich
massive sulphide, with apparent north dip and
up to 250m NS width.. DDH test from north or
south with B'.
Axis B': Possible very thin graphite or
thin/buried po-rich sulphide stringers (long Tau).
South dip (?) - poorly resolved. DDH test with A
PRIORITY COMMENTS
Table W: Recommended Drill Targets at Pegg-Meunier.
We recommend that these results be combined with the existing geoscientific database and carefully
considered prior to proceeding to drill-testing. We recommend that additional cross-sectional TDIP cov
erage be obtained using pole-dipole or gradient Realsection - the former benefiting from better a TDIP
spectra! characterization (P. Alikaj, Q!P, pers. comm, 08/97), while the latter offers improved depth pene
tration and lateral resolution. Ground magnetics could also prove useful in establishing the graph
ite/sulphide ambiguity. Finally, following drill-testing, we recommend that borehole TEM be routinely used
to both characterize the nature of mineralization intersected in-hole, as well as detected possible off-hole
conductors within a 150-250m radius of the drill-hole.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED
QUANTEC IP INC.
Kevin Blackshaw
General Manager
Gene kallfa
Senior Geophysicist
Jean M. Legault, P.Eng.
Dir. Technical Service-QTS
Porcupine, ON
12
INTERPRETATION PLAN MAP
r
TOTAL CHARGEABILITY (mV/V)
APPARENT RESISTIVITY (ohm-m)
r
r
p
AUR RESOURCES INC.
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
l, JEAN M. LEGAULT, DECLARE THAT:
1.
l am a consulting geophysicist with residence in South Porcupine, Ontario and am presently em
ployed in this capacity wrth Quantec IP Inc. of Waterdown, Ontario.
2.
l obtained a Bachelor's Degree, with Honors, in Applied Science (B.A.Sc.), Geological Engineering
(Geophysics Option), from Queen's University at Kingston, Ontario, in spring 1982.
3.
l am a registered professional engineer, since 1985, with license to practice in the Province of
Ontario (#90534542).
4.
l have practiced my profession continuously since Ma, 1982, in North America, South-America and
North Africa.
5.
l am a member of the Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario, the Northern Prospectors
Association, the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada, and the Society of Explora
tion Geophysicists.
6.
l have no interest, nor do l expect to receive any interest in the properties or securities of Aur Re
sources Inc.
7.
l have reviewed the survey results, helped generate the map products and l assisted in the inter
pretation report. The statements made in this report represent my professional opinion based on
my consideration of the information available to me at the time of writing this report.
Porcupine, Ontario
November, 1999
Jean M. Legault, P.Eng. (ON)
Chief Geophysicist
Dir. Technical Services
Quantec Group
AUR RESOURCES INC.
Pegg-Meunter Property
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
l, GENC KAU.FA, DECLARE THAT:
1.
l am a consulting geophysicist with residence in Toronto, Ontario and am presently employed in
this capacity with Quantec IP Inc. of Waterdown, Ontario.
2.
l obtained a Master's Degree, in geophysics, from the University of Tirana, Albania, in spring 1987.
3.
l have practiced my profession continuously since May, 1987, in North America and Albania.
4.
l have no interest, nor do l expect to receive any interest in the properties or securities of Aur Re
sources Inc.
5.
l have reviewed the survey results, helped generate the map products and l assisted in the inter
pretation report. The statements made in this report represent my professional opinion based on
my consideration of the information available to me at the time of writing this report.
Porcupine, Ontario
November, 1999
Ge/ickallfa)
Senior Geopkiysicist
Technical Services
TDIP GracBent Survey
AUR RESOURCES INC.
THEORETICAL BASIS AND SURVEY PROCEDURES
GRADIENT REALSECTION INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
The "RealSection " survey design uses multiple gradient arrays - with variable depths of investi
gation controlled by successive changes in array size/geometry. The method of data acquisition and the
"RealSection" presentation are based on the specifications developed by Dr. Perparim Alikaj, of the Poly
technic University of Tirana, Albania, over the course of approx. 20 years of application. This technique has
been further developed for application in Canada during the past six years, in association with Mr. Dennis
Morrison, president of Quantec IP Inc.
The Gradient Array measurements are unique in that they best represent a bulk average of the
surrounding physical properties within a relatively focused sphere of influence, roughly equal to the width of
the receiver dipole, penetrating vertically downward from surface to great depths. These depth of penetra
tion and lateral resolution characteristics are showcased when presented in plan, however through the use
of multiple-spaced and focused arrays, the advantages of the gradient array are further highlighted when
the IP/Resistivity data are fully developed in cross-section, using RealSections.
The resistivity is among the most variable of all geophysical parameters, with a range exceeding
106. Because most minerals are fundamentally insulators, with the exception of massive accumulations of
metallic and submetallic ores (electronic conductors) which are rare occurrences, the resistivity of rocks
depends primarily on their porosity, permeability and particularly the salinity of fluids contained (ionic con
duction), according to Archie's Law. In contrast, the chargeability responds to the presence of polarizeable
minerals (metals, submetallic sulphides and oxides, and graphite), in amounts as minute as parts per hun
dred. Both the quantity of individual chargeable grains present and their distribution with in subsurface cur
rent flow paths are significant in controlling the level of response. The relationship of chargeability to metal
lic content is straightforward, and the influence of mineral distribution can be understood in geologic terms
by considering two similar, hypothetical volumes of rock in which fractures constitute the primary current
flow paths. In one, sulphides occur predominantly along fracture surfaces. In the second, the same vol
ume percent of sulphides are disseminated throughout the rock. The second example will, in general, have
significantly lower intrinsic chargeability.
y-axis
-LJ
M
N
x-axis
B
Figure Bf; Gradient array configuration
AUR RESOURCES INC.
Pegg-Meurier Property
Using the diagram in Figure B1 for the gradient array electrode configuration and nomenclature:4, the
gradient array apparent resistivity is calculated:
where:
the origin O is selected at the center of AB
the geometric parameters are in addition to a ^ AB/2 and b s MN/2
X is the abscissa of the mid-point of MN (positive or negative)
Y is the ordinate of the mid-point of MN (positive or negative)
Gradient Array Apparent Resistivity:
VP
pa = K — ohm - metres
where: K = (AM' 1 -AN'1 -BM'1 + BN'1
+y
AN ^
BM ^
Using the diagram in Figure 62 for the Total Chargeability:
Measured
Voltage Line
One half of Transmit Cycle
"Off Time"
l positive
Vs(t)
(10 slices)
7
Time
Line
negative
"On Time"
t (0)
Figure B2: The measurement of the time-domain IP effect
4 From TerrapkisNBRGM, IP-6 Operating Manual. Toronto, 1987.
TDIP Gradent Survey
AUR RESOURCES INC.
the total apparent chargeability is given by:
Total Apparent Chargeability*
Mr = ——tpVp
X J* ' Vs (t) d*
millivolts per volt
1=1 to 10
where f/, t^ are the beginning and ending times for each of the chargeability slices,
More detailed descriptions on the theory and application of the IP/Resistivity method can be found in
the following reference papers:
Cogan, H., 1973, Comparison of IP electrode arrays, Geophysics, 38, p 737 - 761.
Langore, L., Alikaj, P., Gjovreku, D., 1989, Achievements in copper sulphide exploration in Albania with IP
and EM methods, Geophysical Prospecting, 37, p 925 - 941.
From Telford, et al., Applied Geophysics. Cambridge U Press, New York, 1983.
AUR RESOURCES INC.
PRODUCTION SUMMARY
DATE
DESCRIPTION
05-Nov-99
Establish Tx Dipole
06-NOV-99
Reconnaissance survey
1 .5hr delay due to moose disconnecting AB wire
Line
Win
Max
Total (me
tres)
LO
L300W
0
2400S
2400S
1200S
2400
1200
3600
L300W
L600W
1200S
0
0
2400S
1200
2400
3600
L900W
L1200W
0
2400S
2400S
800S
2400
1600
4000
L1200W
800S
0
800
800
Daily coverage
07-Nov-99
Daily coverage
08-Nov-99
Daily coverage
09-Nov-99
Reconnaissance survey, finish block "A"
Removed AB wire
Daily coverage
Total Survey
12000
AUR RESOURCES INC.
INSTRUMENT SPECIFICATIONS
Phoenix IP Transmitter Model IPT-2B
Power Sources:
Phoenix MG-19 (10KVA, 120V, 3 phase, 400 Hz) motor generator (30KVA,
120V, 3 phase) motor generator Phoenix MG-1, 2 or 3 can also be used,
but will generate 14 the voltage
Output Voltage:
To 1400V in four ranges of resp. 250-375V, 420-630V, 650-975V, 9351400V. Voltage is continuously variable 20% from each nominal step
value.
Output Power
Maximum continuous output power is 10KW. Absolute maximum output
power is 15KW.
Maximum Current:
15 Amps
Ammeter Ranges:
30m A, 100m A, 1A, 3A, 10A and 30A full scale.
Meter Display:
A meter function switch selects the display of current tevel, regulation
status, input frequency, output voltage, control battery voltage or line
voltage
Current regulation:
The change in output current is less than Q.2% for a 1007o change in input
voltage or electrode impedance. Regulation is achieved by feedback to
the alternator of the motor generator unit
Output waveform:
Either DC, single frequency, two frequencies simultaneously, or time
domain (500Xo duty cycle). Frequencies of 0.078, 0.156, 0.313,1.25,2.5
and 5.0 Hz are standard, whereas 0.062, 0.125, 0.25, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 Hz
are optionally available. The simultaneous transmission mode has 0.313
and 5.0 Hz as standard, whereas 0.156 and 2.5 Hz are optional.
Output waveform IPT-2B option:
9 frequencies in binary progression: 1/16 -1/32 -1/16 -1/8 -1/4 -1/2 -1 2
and 4, with variable duty cycle. Selectable to one of four values: 0.25,0.5,
0.75, and 1.NOTE: Duty cycle - 1 is the operation equal to the standard
frequency domain cycling, i.e. Full On, except for a 50m sec. gap at each
half cycle.
Operating Temperature:
-WC to 460"C
Frequency Stability:
iy0 from -400C to -^0C is siandard. A precision time base is optionally
available for coherent detection and phase IP measurements.
Transient Protection:
Current is turned off automatically if it exceeds 150Vo full scale or is less
than 5"X) full scale.
Thermal Protection:
Unit is fan-forced cooled. Thermostat turns transmitter off at 650C and turns back on
at 550C internal temperature.
Dimensions:
46x46x32 cm (18x 18x 13 in)
Weight:
45kg
Shipping Weight
56kg
AUR RESOURCES INC.
Pegg-Meurter Property
INSTRUMENT SPECIFICATIONS:
Iris ELREC 10 Receiver
(From Iris ELREC 10 Operating Manual)
Weather proof case
Dimensions:
Weight:
Operating temperature:
Storage:
Power supply:
Input
Input
Input
Input
channels:
impedance:
over voltage protection:
voltage range:
SP compensation:
Noise rejection:
Primary voltage resolution:
accuracy:
Secondary voltage windows:
Sampling rate:
Synchronization accuracy:
Chargeability resolution:
accuracy:
Battery test:
Grounding resistance:
Memory capacity:
Data transfer
31.0 cm x 21.0 cm x 25.0 cm
9.0 kg (with internal battery)
-300C to 700C
(-300C to 500C)
1 x 12.0 V external battery (30 hr. @ 200C) or
2 x 6.0 V NiCad rechargeable (20 hr. @ 250C) or
10
10 Mohm
up to 1000 volts
10V maximum on each dipole
15 V maximum sum over eh. 1 to 10
Automatic 15 V with linear drift correction
100 dB common mode rejection (for Rs= 0)
automatic stacking
1 nV after stacking
Q.3% typically; maximum 1 over whole
temperature range
up to 20 windows; preset window specs for ColeCole parameter analysis.
10ms
10 ms, minimum 40 jiV
0.1 mV/V
typically Q.6%. maximum 2Vo of reading 1
mV/VforVp> 10mV
manual and automatic before each measurement
0.1 to 100kohm
3200 records, 1 dipole/record
serial link @ 300 to 19200 baud
AUR RESOURCES INC.
Iris Elrec 10 Dump File Format:
Channel: 1 Date: 12/15/1998 08:59:25
Spacing (foot): XP : 13500 li.P: 20400
Rs:
1.61 kohm
M1/5
70.93
50.69
43.96
38.95
34.93
:
:
:
:
:
M6/10
M11/15
31.57
28.69
26.19
24.00
21.99
20.10
18.34
16.71
15.25
13.89
Sp: -2.05 mV
In: 1400.00 mA
Vp: 652.204 mV
Tau: 4.560s
:
:
:
:
:
M6/10
M11/15
69.98
50.36
43.75
38.82
34.86
31.53
28.68
26.20
24.03
22.03
20.15
18.39
16.78
16.32
13.96
XB : 16400
I.AB: 20400
12.63
11.44
10.32
9.23
8.21
Rho: 6645.39 ohm.m
Mg: 16.81 mV/V
Mcc: 1 99.87 mV/V
M1/5
XA: 12900
M16/20
Channel: 2 0316:12/15/199808:59:25
Spacing (foot): XP : 13550 fi.P: 20400
Rs: 2.54 kohm
Sp: -67.1 5 mV
In: 1400.00mA
Vp: 552.303 mV
Tau: 5.378s
D : 50
D : 50
#:
Q:
rms:
20
0.04 mV/V
0.25 "/o
XA : 12900
XB : 16400
M16/20
:
:
:
:
:
12.70
11.52
10.39
9.31
8.28
Rho: 6504.35 ohm.m
Mg: 16.85 mV/V
Mcc: 199.85 mV/V
#:
Q:
rms:
20
0.05 mV/V
0.28 t
I.AB: 20400
AUR RESOURCES INC.
Pegg-Meunter Property
TD1P Grao5errt Survey
LIST OF MAPS
Plan Maps at scale of 1:5000 (with claim/topo overlay):
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Grid C
Posted/Contoured Total Chargeability
Posted/Contoured Apparent Resistivity
Posted/Contoured Time Constant (Tau)
Posted/Contoured Cole Cole Chargeability
Interpretation Plan Map
TOTAL PLANS
#:P272-PLAN-CHG-1
#:P272-PLAN-RES-1
#:P272-PLAN-Tau-1
#:P272-PLAN-Mc-1
# P272-PLAN-INT-1
4
MAPS AND SECTIONS
AUR RESOURCES INC.
Pegg-Meurter Property
Ontario
Declaration d'execution de
travaux devaluation sur
des terrains miniers
Ministere du
Developpemant du Nord
et des Mines
Numero de transaction (a I'usage du bureau)
RIDE
Lo/ sur les mines,
paragraphes 65(2) and 66(3), L.R.0.1990
i i/
is en vertu des paragraphes 65 (2) et 66 (3) de la La sur les mines. Aux termes
revoir les travaux devaluation et a correspondre avec le detenteur du terrain
jistrateur provincial de claims miniers, ministere du Developpement du Nord et
42A11NW2014
Directives :
1.
900
- Si les travaux ont ete executes sur des terres de la Couronne avant I'enregistrement d'un claim,
remplissez la formule 0240.
- Dactylographiez ou ecrivez en lettres moulees a I'encre.
2.19909
MACDIARMID
Titulaire(s) enregistre(s) (Joignez une liste au besoin)
~- *-
Norn
N" de client
AUR RESOURCES INC.
Adresse
1 ADELAIDE STREET EAST, SUITE 2501
N" de telephone
104012
1-416-362-2614
N" de telecopieur
TORONTO, ONT.
Nom
1-416-367-0427
M5C 2V9
N 0 de client
N" de telephone
Adresse
N0 de telecopieur
2.
Type de travaux executes. Cochez K) et decrivez UN SEUL des groupes suivants pour la presente declaration :
I
Travaux geotechniques : prospection, leves, essais
et travaux executes en vertu de Particle 18 (reglements)
Travaux physiques : forage, decouverture,
excavation de tranchees et essais connexes
Type de travaux
,
Matiere premiere
11
Valeur totale en dollars *j /(~ -, ^ C
des travaux demandee
' ) ,/^-h "
f
Reference SNRC
•J
du
05
Jour
1 1
| Mois
99
| Annee
Donnees du SPG (si elles sont disponibles)
09
au
Jour
|
99
Mois
| Anne*
Canton/secteur MacDJarmid
Division des mines
N' de plan M ou G
District du
geologue resident
G-3242 7 M-0291
N'oubliez pas :
3.
-^
forcu-pin.*f
tsi*î. - ^.--^
- d'obtenir un permis de travail du ministere des Richesses naturelles, le cas echeant;
- de donner un avis adequat aux titulaires de droits de surface avant le debut des travaux;
- de joindre a la presente I'Etat des couts (formule 0212) dument rempli;
- de fournir une carte illustrant les terrains miniers contigus relies entre eux pour ('affectation des travaux;
- d'inclure deux exemplaires de votre rapport technique.
Personne ou compagnies ayant prepare le rapport technique (Joignez une liste au besoin)
Nom
N0 de telephone
Quantec IP Inc.
1-705-235-2166
Adresse
N0 de telecopieur
P.O. Box 580, 101 King Street, Porcupine, ON PON 1CO
1-705-235-2255
N0 de telephone
Nom
RtutlVED
npr o 8 13S3
Adresse
Nom
Adresse
N0 de telecopieur
N0 de telephone
N0 de telecopieur
PROVINCIAL RECORDING
JiEQSCiBfCEASSESSMEIIL.
Or*FICE-bUUBURY
OFFICE
4.
Rehabilitation
Reserve au ministere
Geophysical survey: gradient TDIP survey
Dates
d'execution
des travaux
D
RECEIVED
Attestation du titulaire enregistre ou du representant
Je soussigne,
Rock Lefran9ois
, atteste par la presente que j'ai une connaissance dii
DEC 0 8 1999
(nom en lettres moulees)
faits exposes dans la presente declaration, car j'ai fait executer les travaux ou j'en ai constate I'exei
leur achevement. J'atteste aussi que, pour autant que je le sache, le rapport ci-annex6 est exact.
Signature du titulaire enregistre' ou du representant
Adresse du representant
1876, 3' Avenue, Val-d'Or, QC J9P7A9
1
, ^y
Date 99-11-30
N 0 de telephone
1-819-874-8941
N 0 de telecopieur
1-819-874-9092
0241F (0397)
Page l de 3
5. Travaux devant etre enregistres et repartis. On ne peut affect e r des travaux qu'a des claims contigus (adjacents) aux
terrain rninier ou des travaux ont ete executes au moment de ('execution des travaux. II faut joindre a la presente formule une
^"
Nombre d'unit6s
Pour les autres
terrains miniers,
indiquez le
nombre
d'hectares.
Num6ro de claim Si les travaux
ont ete executes sur d'autres
terrains miniers admissibles,
indiquez dans cette colonne le
num6ro d'emplacement figurant
sur la carte des claims.
Valeur des
travaux execute's
Sur ce claim
ou sur d'autres
terrains miniers.
-'
LJ7WJ.^(-Jr&L;
Valeur
des travaux
appliquee
a ce claim
Valeur
des travaux
affected
a d'autres claims
s/o
240001
2 825 S
Reserve
Valeur des travaux
qui seront repartis
a une date ulterieure.
p. ex
TB 7827
16 ha
p. ex
1234567
12
0
240001
0
0
p. ex
1234568
2
8 892 S
4 000 S
0
4 892 S
9
9,144.02
691.56
8,452.46
15
9,144.02
1,152.61
7,991,41
26825 S
1
1219235
2
1219236
3
1219238
6
461.04
4
1219239
8
614.72
5
1219240
12
922.09
6
1219241
16
1,229.45
7
1219242
16
1,229.45
8
1219243
6
461.04
9
1219246
4
307.36
10
1219247
16
1,229.45
11
1219249
16
1,229.45
12
1219250
16
1,229.45
13
1219251
16
1,229.45
14
1219253
16
1,229.45
15
1219254
16
1,229.45
*
j
Total de la page 1
Je soussigne,
188
Rock Lefrancois
18,288.04
14,446.02
Suit* sur page suivante
16,443.87
, atteste que, aux termes du paragraphe 7 (1) du
(nom en lettres moulds)
Reglement 6/96 sur les travaux devaluation, les credits de jours de travail mentionnes ci-dessus peuvent etre affectes a des
claims contigus ou appliques au claim ou les travaux ont ete executes.
Signature du titulaire enregistre ou du representant autorisetiar ecrit
/Ljj^^
6.
-tî ~ ^
"-
Date
1999-11-30
Directives concernant la reduction des credits non approuves.
Certains des credits demandes dans la presente declaration pourraient etre reduits. Veuillez cocher ci-dessous (S)
pour indiquer I'ordre dans lequel vous souhaitez que les credits soient reduits :
D
1. Les credits doivent etre reduits en commencant par ceux en reserve, puis selon ('option 2, 3 ou 4, tel
qu'indique.
D
2. Les credits doivent etre reduits en commencant par le demier claim sur-4a tiste; ou n^ : ^ ; y--: ~- ~
El
3. Les credits doivent etre reduits egalement entre tous les claims figurant dans la presente declaration.
D
4. Les credits doivent etre reduits selon I'ordre donne en annexe ou ci-apres (prei
RECORDING
OFFICE-SUDBURY
RECEIVED
RECEIVED
DEC O 81999
DEC O 8 '333
Nota : Si vous n'avez pas choisi d'c )ti
n0 2 si necessaire.
uits en commengant par ceux en reserve, puis selon ('option
R6serv6 au ministere
Cachet recu
Date de I'approbation prevue
Date d'envoi de I'avis
Date d'approbation
Valeur totale du credit approuvg
Enregistrement approuve par le registrateur de claims (signature)
0241F (03/97)
Page 2 de 3
t A,rQ onrpflistres ct repartis. On ne peut affecter des travaux qu'a des claims contigus (adjacents) aux
f
5. Trtvty ^dTs tSvaux on? ete executes au moment de .'execution.des travaux. IIll/aut
joindre a la^resentejorrnule une
terrain mir^..^ _timiM
*
'
Tl'^'S'cJî ,' f
11 ,,ani Ctsue uuiiuyuiic.
IU f t '#is~/. \-*~f i 'kyi^s
carte
pe claim Si les travaux
Numar
ont 6K*3xecul6s sur d'autres
terrrns miniers admissibles,
irT'ûw dans cette colonne le
,ium6ro d'emplacement figurant
irte des claims.
Nombre d'unites
Pour les autres
terrains miniers,
indiquez le
nombre
d'hectares.
Valeur des
travaux executes
Sur ce claim
ou sur d'autres
terrains miniers.
Valeur
des travaux
appllquee
a ce claim
1219255
12
922.09
1219256
2
153.68
18
1219258
4
307.36
19
1219261
2
153.68
20
1219262
2
153.68
21
1219280
9
691 .56
22
1226230
3
230.52
23
1226231
8
614.72
24
1226311
2
153.68
25
1226312
2
153.68
26
1226313
4
307.37
Total de la page 2
50
3,842.02
16
r
17
i
'
Valeur
des travaux
affected
a d'autres claims
\,-
..
Reserve
Valeur des travaux
qui seront repartis
a une date ulterieure.
;- ,:
',.
.,.
27
28
29
30
i-
238
Grand Total des colonnes
Rock Lefrancois
S1 8,288.04
S1 8,288.04
S1 6,443.87
, atteste que, aux termes du paragraphe 7 (1) du
(nom on lettres moulds)
,
,
,
FT lament 6/96 sur les travaux d'evaluation, les credits de jours de travail mentionnes ci-dessus peuvent etre affectes a des }
clafms contigus ou appliques au claim ou les travaux ont ete executes.
Signature du titulaire enregistre ou du representan. ^^ *** J^
^ t c^^
Date
1999-11-30
fi
nirortives concernant la reduction des credits non approuves.
.
pprtain*; des credits demandes dans la presente declaration pourraient etre reduits. Veuillez cocher ci-dessous K)
pour^^ndiquer I'ordre dans lequel vous souhaitez que les credits soient reduits :
D
1 Les credits doivent etre rSduits en commengant par ceux en reserve, puis selon I'option 2, 3 ou 4, tel
qu'indiqu6.
D 2. Les credits doivent etre reduits en commencant par le dernier claim sur la liste; ou
m 3 Les credits doivent etre reduits 6galement rntrf ^m re- k"?^fafo^Tirnnt.rtanc.la p^ct.^ riftâtie^
D
x
4. Les credits doivent etre rdduits selon I'ordre donn6 en annexe ou ci-apres
-Rlfc^T!vD
TfECEIVED
DEC o 8 ;:c3
Nota: Si vous n'avez pas choisi d1 paB6l9ttS*6ft5dS|SI8M5Wrejduits en commengant par ceux en reserve, puis selon I'option
n0 2 si n6cessaire.
R6serv6 au mlnlstfere
Cachet reû
Date de {'approbation pr6vue
Date d1 envoi de I'avis
Date d'approbation
Valeur totale du credit approuv6
Enregistrement approuve par le registrateur de claims (signature)
Page 3 de 3
Ontario
Etat des couts aux fins du
credit de jours de travail
Ministere du
Developpemant du Nord
et des Mines
Numero de transaction (a I'usage du bureau)
.CO'1in
Les renseignements personnels contenus dans la presente formule sont recueillis en verlu du paragraphe 6 (1) du Reglement sur les travaux d'evaluation. Aux
lermes de ('article 8 de la Loi sur les mines, le public a acces a ces renseignements, qui serviront a revoir les travaux d'evaluation et a correspondre avec le
detenteur du terrain minier. Adressez loute question sur la collecte de ces renseignements a un registrateur provincial de claims miniers, ministere du
Developpement du Nord et des Mines, 3'etage, 933 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury (Ontario), P3E 6B5.
Unites de travail
Type de travaux
Indiquez le nombre d'heures de travail/jour, de
metres de forage, de kilometres de lignes de
quadrillage, d'echantillons, etc., selon la nature des
travaux.
Cout par unite
de travail
Cout total
Line-cutting
24.0 line-km
Ssoo.oo
S7,200.00
Gradient TDIP survey
12.0 line-km
S812.50
S9,750.00
$75.00
375.00
Couts connexes (p.ex. fournitures, mobilisation et demobilisation).
Mobilisation et demobilisation
Frais de transport
5 day truck charge
Frais de nourriture et d'hebergement
Execution expenses (meals, accommodations, field supplies)
837.43
1507o handling charge
125.61
Valeur totale des travaux
d'evaluation
S1 8,288.04
Calcul des remises pour depot:
1. Les travaux dont le rapport est depose dans les deux ans apres leur date d'execution donnent droit a des credits
a 100 7o de la valeur totale susmentionnee des travaux d'evaluation.
2. Les travaux dont le rapport est depos6 entre deux et cinq ans apres leur date d'execution donnent droit a des credits a
50 7o seulement de la valeur totale des travaux d'evaluation. Si cela s'applique a vos claims, utilisez la formule suivante :
VALEUR TOTALE DES TRAVAUX DEVALUATION-
x 0.50^
Valeur totale des travaux demandee.
Nota:
- Les travaux executes II y a plus de cinq ans ne sont pas admissibles a des credits.
- Le titulaire enregistr6 peut etre tenu de verifier les depenses indiquees dans le present etat des couts dans les 45 jours
suivant une demande de verification, de correction ou de clarification. Le ministre peut rejeter la totality ou une partie des
travaux d'evaluation presentes si le titulaire ne respecte pas cette exigence.
Attestation des couts :
Je soussigne, ^^ ^ - .Rock Lefrangois,
,, attests par la presente que les montants indiques sont aussi exacts
(nom et prenom en lettres moulees)
que possible et que les couts ont et6 engages pour executer les travaux d'evaluation sur les terrains indiques dans la
declaration ci-jointe d'execution. A litre de
i.0 JC
., je suis autoris6 a faire
)C
quez le poste occupe dans I'entreprise vous autorisant d signer)
cette attestation.
0212F (0*97)
OFFICE-suoBunv
RECEIVED
O 2 199!
Signature/
Lu
Date
Ministry of
Northern Development
and Mines
Ontario
Mlnlstere du
Developpement du Nord
et des Mines
April 17, 2000
AUR RESOURCES INC.
2501 - 1 ADELAIDE STREET EAST
TORONTO, ONTARIO
M5C-2V9
Geoscience Assessment Office
933 Ramsey Lake Road
6th Floor
Sudbury, Ontario
P3E 6B5
Telephone: (888) 415-9845
Fax:
(877)670-1555
Visit our website at:
www.gov.on.ca/MNDM/MINES/LANDS/mlsmnpge.htm
Dear Sir or Madam:
Subject: Transaction Number(s):
Submission Number: 2.19909
Status
W9960.00460 Approval After Notice
We have reviewed your Assessment Work submission with the above noted Transaction Number(s). The
attached summary page(s) indicate the results of the review. WE RECOMMEND YOU READ THIS
SUMMARY FOR THE DETAILS PERTAINING TO YOUR ASSESSMENT WORK.
If the status for a transaction is a 45 Day Notice, the summary will outline the reasons for the notice, and any
steps you can take to remedy deficiencies. The 90-day deemed approval provision, subsection 6(7) of the
Assessment Work Regulation, will no longer be in effect for assessment work which has received a 45 Day
Notice. Allowable changes to your credit distribution can be made by contacting the Geoscience Assessment
Office within this 45 Day period, otherwise assessment credit will be cut back and distributed as outlined in
Section #6 of the Declaration of Assessment work form.
Please note any revisions must be submitted in DUPLICATE to the Geoscience Assessment Office, by the
response date on the summary.
If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact LUCILLE JEROME by e-mail at
[email protected] or by telephone at (705) 670-5858.
Yours sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
Blair Kite
Supervisor, Geoscience Assessment Office
Mining Lands Section
Correspondence ID: 14776
Copy for: Assessment Library
Work Report Assessment Results
Submission Number:
2.19909
Date Correspondence Sent: April 17, 2000
Transaction
Number
First Claim
Number
Township(s) l Area(s)
W9960.00460
1219235
MACDIARMID
Assessor: LUCILLE JEROME
Status
Approval After Notice
Approval Date
April 17,2000
Section:
14 Geophysical IP
The 45 days outlined in the Notice dated February 29, 2000, have passed.
Assessment work credit has been approved as outlined on the attached Distribution of Assessment Work Credit sheet.
Correspondence to:
Recorded Holder(s) and/or Agent(s):
Resident Geologist
South Porcupine, ON
Rock Lefrancois
VAL D'OR, QUEBEC, CANADA
Assessment Files Library
Sudbury, ON
AUR RESOURCES INC.
TORONTO, ONTARIO
Page: 1
Correspondence ID: 14776
Distribution of Assessment Work Credit
The following credit distribution reflects the value of assessment work performed on the mining land(s).
Date: April 17, 2000
Submission Number: 2.19909
Transaction Number: W9960.00460
Claim Number
Value Of Work Performed
1219235
7,344.00
1219236
7,344.00
Total: S
14,688.00
Page: l
Correspondence ID:
1 4776
LEGEND
REFERENCES
HIGHWAY AND ROUTE No.
OTHER ROADS
TRAILS
REID TWP
AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITION
M R o - MINING RIGHTS ONLY
SURVEYED LINES
TOWN SH l PS, B AS E L IN ES, ETC.
S R Q -SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY
4M
M + S -MINING AND SURF ACE RIGHTS
T
DMcnption
Ordir Na
Dlti
DllpMltion
Ftt*
li 100573 lj 1224330
.1131091
i1133Q7e
1131109*
t
-
}
f'l31lOST
553085
l
[5530B3 | 5638a6 ]553687
i"""1 "" .i""**" .B
i
jf
'""jj"S r
you; ^^
,
i
j
,-^*
li
f*5"S5409 ' 9964-76 iO@5481
yyoUSf
^,
k
i
-i
*
i
| 99SDr5
i j
~^\ 133077
j
l
ill
553088
i p "~ |r--p"'p--T"T";c~^f"
10
i *
^JT^^
""^ ~ T-f "
îr
r .P
^~
} '.i/înftl
lis ^—f
i f ^\ .i --^y\*
ivKdbii-ii-u-/1
iix1 ^' TUG
1M |l 11311M
ii3H(vi
11133071
R13-3Q78*
^7 113v113^
nj11Uo |113I10 D I11310W
l
986734)95673l|9B54p8 [995477^^548^ ^96oea
l
1966732 l
9B6733
121172St
i
l -1 i pnr"^f~-"7
!
l -HÔfiS '
T ^
l O*J U3Q
"
X
X
^\
LIJ ^'Xi^
lnsma'liaillQ.IISIUB'liaillS , 1133065 t
-t
i
-^
MIMING CLAIMS ETC.
RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAY
UTILITY LINES
NON-PERENNIAL STREAM
t-
- L-
[-p
IP
-*
T
55 3090 1 55 3SfS6 1553891
TP
FLOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTS
SUBDIVISION OR COMPOSITE PLAN
RESERVATIONS
ORIGINAL SHORELINE
MARSH OR MUSKEG
Tr"'"jp
- I5l3^llj--- ' - ~
i
f~-
IP
(553037 JS538B9 (553886
553QB9
--
ill
l
/T
MINES
TRAVERSE MONUMENT
V
i. ,— -l — ^ 1,11 — J .v - -i — — LI
l r
l
^ 9954Q4 1995447
1211721
l;-/!" t'fr/*"'""
(996076
'11330BSJ1J33067'
laaspes Jsaeô j 996077 [vi33059 'nsaoBejôe?
|224o||
l-
996071
LOTS, MINING CLAIMS, PARCELS, ETC
UNSURVEYED LINES
LOT LINES
PARCEL BOUNDARY
5M
DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS
f
742653 j 742654
n
F
-t- ^|
1219280
995403 l 98S446 5
T
L -, . - ,.
L- -f
L^-l^t-1' - Hr'-nr -^
r 99540D
\ 995453' W546S j9954MJ f
?
a^T21174T\
1J1iris
MM**\
l 905399
199 546
SUflFACF RIGHTS ONLY
- ~- -f-
MINING RlGHTSONLY .
SUHF-ACt RIGHTS ONLY ,
MINING RIGHTS ONLY
l
l
1219241
J
LICBNCF OF OCCUPATION
.
T
OC
,
ORDER IN COUNCIL
*
CL
1z1"f/1211749
9
O
LEASE SUHfACt t MINING RIGHTS
D43j^ J^ ^
Jcoftft^
S9G042
SYMBOL
PATENT SURF AfE ft MINING RIGHTS
p r*l^
î^Bj^,
tp r fr- p
I P~^
Q.
TYPE OF DOCUMENT
p
l
M
1236143
1219239
RESERVATION
SAN D 4 GR A V b L
996049 l W6D6J 1228759
o
o
1235935
.
.
(J)
NOTE MINIM- PKOHTS \n PAACELB PATCNTrn FRIOB Tn MAY B
1*13
VESTED (M ORIGINAL FATENTEt ftV THE
LANUfi ACT
PSO
IttfO CHAf
3*0 BE C 6J
PUItIC
I2I924
U
o
SCALE 1 INCH - 40 CHAINS
/ooo
1229193
RQQO
tOOQ
2DOO
M
1227697
14 M
NOTES
l
THIB rOWN*HIP LIE* WITH l W THE MUNICIPALITY OF THE ClTr
TIMMIN*
l
' 995443 i
1229194
I2I925I
1219646
M
42A11NW2014
2.19909
MACDIARMID
200
THE INFORMATION THAT
APPEARS ON TUB MAP
HA6 BEEN COMPILED
PROM VARIOUS 80URCE8,
AND ACCURACY IS NOT
GUARANTEED THOSE
WISHING TO STAKE MIN
ING OAIMS SHOULD CON
fttILT WITH THE MINING
RECORDER MINISTRY OF
NORTHERN DEVELOP
MENT AND MINES, FOR AD
DITIONAL INFORMATION
ON THE! STATUS OF THE
LANDS SHOWN
3
O
S
(O f
CO \f
Cst
JITS]
*-*
1 )}
f/
"
-i
r ---*
i
""~^ \ '1 î (cr*rr\)er9233
1235938
l
i
t
t
L VA
^-s
^^^ -
Fi r*
I2M- n^ \V r
II900S8
lJ
(
5M
UNITS
i
j
'i
(
I229J82
'
4M 1
rt i
to l
\ \
\
~'
~l,
} i
\ S,
^
L^
*t
\
J
:
S
AM
f
1 \
1i \
J219254
u
MMR ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT
^ i
TIMMINS
jljl
*^-\
r
7
p
*
MINING DIVISION
\\ ^
jTlIl925flX!
J
JL
2"
IM
PORCUPINE
^19255
(
^
1
^
LANO TITLES/ REGISTRY DIVISION
j
COCHRANE
" H'"""1
1
MiniSlryOf
10
Natural
Branch
V
l
l
l
l
'' X
11
MACDIARMID
I219250
A LOWS M*TT*a4M' NJVEH IfESEPtVGO TO ON T
HVDHO.L O 7009
TOWNSHIP
-————-I
Ontario
JAMIESON
TWP
G-3242
1219235
l 1219236
1219261
1219239
1219280
1219262
1219240 \ J
1219243
M219242
1219238
1219241
1226230
1219249
1219247
1226311
1226231
1219250
1219251
1219258
1219254
1219253
1219256
®rmid Twp
Jamieson Twp.
Jessop Twp.
PEGG-MEUNIER
42A11NW2014
2.19909
MACDIARMID
UTM projection,
NAD-27, Zone 17
APPARENT RESISTIVITY (ohm-m)
Gradient Array
——— AB————
,y—v.
MN
MN
plot points
Scale 1:5000
50
O
50
100
150
!555C^
(metres)
200
250
300
O
CSI
AUR RESOURCES INC.
PEGG-MEUNIER PROPERTY
MacDiarmid Twp., ON
TIME DOMAIN IP SURVEY
Gradient Array (ABs 3400m metres)
APPARENT RESISTIVITY
Transmitter Frequency:
Transmitter Current:
Decay Curve:
Station Interval:
0.0625 Hz (50"70 duty cycle)
9.0 Amps
COLE-COLE Arithmetic
20 Gates (20ms to 3850ms)
25 metres
Qridding Method:
Grid Cell Size:
Contour Interval:
Colour Scale:
2400S 1200W
10 units (2x Manning Filter Applied)
20 levels/log decade
Equal Area Zoning
Survey Date:
Instrumentation:
November, 1999
Rx ~ IRIS / BRGM IP-10
Tx = PHOENIX 1PT-2B (15 kW) * MG-30(30 kVA)
Surveyed A Processed by:
QUANTEC IP INC
Map Qenerated byKB(IOtfmS)
DWG. #: P-272-PLAN-RES-1
COLE-COLE TIME CONSTANT - Tau (sec)
Gradient Array
———AB— -
y —— VK-
1 MN
plot points
Scale 1:5000
50 __100
50
150
200
250
300
^^m
(meters)
AUR RESOURCES INC.
MacDiarmid Twp., ON
Gradient Array (kB= 3400m metres)
COLE-COLE TIME CONSTANT - Tau
0.0625 Hz (StTO duty cycle)
9.0 Amps
Decay Curve;
25 metres
Station Interval:
Gridding Method:
Grid Cell Size:
Bi-Directional
'
nirfgîltafcApplied)
SlevelsAoJ decade
Contour Interval:
Equal Area Zoning
Colour Scale:
Survey Date:
Instrumentation:
November, 1999
Rx = IRIS l BRGM IP-10
Tx = PHOENIX IPT-2B (15 kW) t MG-30(30 kVA)
QUANTEC IP INC
DWG. #: P272-PLAN-TAU-1
COLE-COLE CHARGEABILITY - M (mV/V)
Gradient Array
AB
pMN [
plot points
Scale 1:5000
50
O
50
100
150
-l
l(meters)
200
250
300
AUR RESOURCES INC.
O
^
CS
MacDJarmJd Twp., ON
COLE-COLE CHARGEABILITY - M
0.0625 Hz (S/0% duty cycle)
9.0 Amps
Decay Curve:
25 metres
Station Interval:
Gridding Method:
Grid Cell Size:
Contour Interval:
2400S —
Colour Scale:
1200 W
Bi-Directional
10 units (2x Manning Filter Applied)
5, 20 mV/V
l
J
*C
vJ
s
Area Zoning
Survey Date:
Instrumentation:
Rx = IRIS /BRWH IP-10
Tx = PHOENIX IPT-2B (15 kW) * MG-30(30 kVA)
Surveyed A Processed fay:
QUANTEC IP INC
Map Generated by KB (10/11/99)
DWG. #: P272-PLAN-M-1
TOTAL CHARGEABILITY (mV/V)
,--r
1.8
1700S ~
1.B
!
l
1.5
^
1*
\
l
1.7
C^^^
a9
O.S
1.0
0.8
w
,
s^^V&s'
JS"
^——-**
l
•jtnios
Gradient Array
l
t
AB
- soos
1800S -
^ ,o,
{ifli
MN ^
plot points
- 1900S
Scale 1:5000
50
O
50
100
150
200
250
300
(metres)
O
in
AUR RESOURCES INC.
CSI
MacDiarmtd Twp., ON
TOTAL CHARGEABILITY
0.0625 Hz {5014 duty cycle)
Decay Curve:
9.0 Amps
25 metres
23BOSStation Interval:
Gridding Method:
-2400S
2400S -
1200 W
Grid Cell Size:
Contour Interval:
Colour Scale:
l10 iMs
9 (fttH
O
-Directional
"•V
tj|-Applied)
, 2.5 mV/V
Equal Area Zoning
Survey Date:
Instrumentation:
November, 1999
Rx = IRIS l BHGM IP-10
Tx = PHOENIX IPT-2B (15 kW) * MG-30(30 kVA)
QUANTEC IP INC
Map Generated by KBtW/11/99)
DWG. #: P-272-PLAN-CHG-1
HMD TOWNSHU
x
X
X
\
X
X
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x—v
x
X
- - - -El-
LEGEND
-^fcw, X
a
', —Z—
*"^ '
——
X
X
X
CHARGEABILITY AXES
X
Low Resistivity Association
(Major, Minor Axis)
~—"
Contact Resistivity Association
(Minor Axis)
High Resistivity Association
(Minor Axis)
Moderate IP Anomaly
X".
X,
Jf
,
l
' Eli
Weak IP Anomaly (1-SmV/V)
Resistivity Association to
Chargeability High (Low, Nil or
Contact-type, and High)
Inferred Dip for IP axes
(Dipping, Subvertical)
Recommended DDH Targets
(1st, 2nd Priority)
Higher Resistivity Unit
m x -^y__;
Ei——
—-ji-
Gradient Array
AB
Scale 1:5000
50
100
200
150
250
300
AUR RESOURCES INC.
MacDiarmid Twp., ON
Gradient Array
^ 3400 metres
Transmitter Frequency
Transmitter Curre
Decay Curve:
0.0625 Hz (SIM duty cycle)
9.0 Amps
25 metres
Interpretation by
November, 1999
Rx = IRIS ; BRGM IP-10
Tx s PHOENIX IPT-2B (15 kW) * MG-30(30 kVA)
Surveyed S. Processed by:
QUANTEC IP INC.
Line/Claim Locations and Topographic Information from AUR (11/99)
DWG. #: P272-PLAN-INT-1

42A11NW2014 - Geology Ontario

Transcription

Documents pareils

Revue de presse ANGLAIS Semaine du 31 octobre au 06 novembre

[Descartes e il Seicento 5] Jean-Robert Armogathe, Vincent Carraud

4228 Holland Dr Des Moines, IA 50310 | Home for Sale | Real

Revue de presse ANGLAIS Semaine du 24 au 30 octobre 2011

Imagine you are working for the Scottish Tourist Board and you are

Reported speech

Méribel par Tougnète

Halton Hills Village, Georgetown - FEB 9-16

1 BTS session 2010 Anglais Corrigé indicatif I. COMPRÉHENSION

master de communication internationale - Univ

Evaporative Light Scattering Detectors from Polymer Laboratories