performance cpu 2.xlsx - Alternative

Bureautique et Internet
Bureautique et Imagerie
Multimédia et Vidéo
Multimédia avancé ‐ Power‐User
COMPARATIF DES PERFORMANCES DES PROCESSEURS POUR PORTABLES ET PC DE BUREAU
Type de processeur
Intel core 2 duo T7700
Intel core 2 duo T7500
Intel core 2 duo T7600
Intel core 2 duo T7300
Intel core 2 duo T7400
Intel core duo T2700
Intel core duo T2600
Intel core 2 duo T7100
Intel core 2 duo T7200
Intel core duo T2500
amd Turion X2 TL‐60
Intel core 2 duo T5600
Intel core 2 duo T5500
Intel core duo T2400
Intel core duo L7500
amd Turion X2 TL‐56
Intel core duo T2250
Intel core duo L7300
Intel core duo T2300
Intel core duo T2080
Intel core duo L2400
Intel core duo T2050
amd Turion X2 TL‐52
Intel core duo L2300
Intel Pentium M780
Intel Pentium M770
Intel Pentium M760
amd mobile sempron 3800+
Intel Core Solo T1400
Intel Pentium M750
amd mobile sempron 3600+
amd mobile sempron 3500+
amd mobile sempron 3400+
Intel Pentium M740
amd mobile sempron 3200+
Intel core duo U2500
Intel Celeron M450
Intel Core Solo T1300
Intel Celeron M440
Intel Celeron M430
Intel Pentium M730
Intel Celeron M420
Intel Celeron M380
Intel Celeron M410
Intel Pentium M778
Intel Pentium M758
Intel Pentium M773
Intel Pentium M753
Intel Core Solo U1400
Intel Core Solo U1300
www.alternative‐assistance.fr
performances mhz / bus /cache Type de processeur
performances mhz / bus /cache
100
2400/800/4
i core2 Extreme QX6850
100,0
3000/1333/8
91
2200/800/4
i core2 Extreme QX6800
96,9
2933/1066/8
83
2333/667/4
i core2 Extreme QX6700
90,5
2666/1066/8
86,1
2000/800/4
i core 2 Quad Q6600
84,9
2400/1066/8
76,4
2166/667/4
Intel core 2 duo E6850
83,7
3000/1333/4
74,9
2333/667/2
i core2 Extreme X6800
80,7
2933/1066/4
73,5
2166/667/2
Intel core 2 duo E6750
76,9
2666/1333/4
77,1
1800/800/2
Intel core 2 duo E6700
75,8
2666/1066/4
71,2
2000/667/4
amd Athlon 64 X2 6000+
71,0 3000/HT2000/2
68,6
2000/667/2
Intel core 2 duo E6600
70,2
2400/1066/4
66,5 2000/1600/512 Intel core 2 duo E6550
69,7
2333/1333/4
65,8
1833/667/2
amd Athlon 64 X2 5600+
68,2 2800/HT2000/2
63,5
1666/667/2
amd Athlon 64 X2 5400+
67,0 2800/HT2000/1
63,3
1833/667/2
Intel core 2 duo E6420
64,8
2133/1066/4
62,1
1600/800/4
amd Athlon 64 X2 5200+
64,0 2600/HT2000/2
61,2
1800/1600/1
Intel core 2 duo E6400
63,6
2133/1066/2
60,7
1766/533/2
amd Athlon 64 X2 5000+
63,0 2600/HT2000/1
61,6 2500/HT2000/1
59,9
1400/800/4
amd Athlon 64 X2 4800+
58,5
1666/667/2
Intel core 2 duo E4400
60,4
2000/800/2
58,2
1533/533/2
Intel core 2 duo E6320
58,2
1866/1066/4
57,9
1666/667/2
Intel core 2 duo E6300
57,3
1866/1066/2
57,5
1600/533/2
Intel core 2 duo E4300
56,3
1800/800/2
55,7
1600/1600/1
Intel Pentium E2160
55,2
1800/800/1
54,4
1500/667/2
Intel Pentium D940
53,3
3200/800/4
53,9
2266/533/2
amd Athlon X2 3800+
51,7 2000/HT2000/1
51,2
2133/533/2
Intel Pentium D930
50,3
3000/800/4
48,3
2000/533/2
Intel Pentium E2140
49,8
1600/800/1
46,4 2200/1600/512 Intel Pentium 4 661
47,4
3600/800/2
45,6
1833/533/2
amd Athlon 64 4000+
45,8 2400/HT2000/1
45,5
1866/533/2
amd Athlon 64 3800+
45,3 2400/HT2000/512
43,9 2000/1600/256 Intel Pentium D 805
43,6
2666/533/2
43,5 1800/1600/512 Intel Pentium 4 541
43,3
3200/800/1
42,6 1800/1600/256 Intel Pentium 4 640
43,1
3200/800/2
42,4
1733/533/2
Intel Celeron S 440
41,7 2000/800/512
41,4 1600/1600/512 amd Athlon 64 3500+
41,3 2200/HT2000/512
41,4
1066/533/2
Intel Pentium 4 630
40,6
3000/800/2
41,1
2000/533/1
Intel Celeron S 430
38,3 1800/800/512
41
1666/667/2
Intel Celeron D 356
36,0 3333/533/512
40,3
1866/533/1
Intel Celeron D 352
35,0 3200/533/512
39,9
1733/533/1
AMD Athlon 64 3000+
34,4 1800/HT2000/512
39,3
1600/533/2
AMD Sempron 64 3400+
33,9 1800/HT1600/256
37,3
1600/533/1
AMD Sempron 64 3000+
30,3 1600/HT1600/256
37,3
1600/400/1
35,2
1466/533/1
34,9
1600/400/2
‐ matériel conseillé pour son rapport qualité / prix
33,4
1500/400/2
‐ un pc ayant un indice de 50 sera 2x plus lent qu'un PC
31,5
1300/400/2
ayant un indice 100. 30,2
1200/400/2
‐ à indice de performance équivalent, un portable est 30,2
1200/533/2
globalement 33% plus lent qu'un PC de bureau.
27
1066/533/2
tests réalisés par la magazine allemand "CHIP" ‐ www.alternative‐assistance.fr