CLaH Jugements Bibliographie_9 en cours - andreasbucher

Conférence de La Haye – Jugements – Bibliographie
Travaux de la Conférence de La Haye sur la compétence et les jugements étrangers :
Actes et doc. 20/II, 2005 ; JOHN J. BARCELÓ/KEVIN M. CLERMONT (éd.), A Global Law of Jurisdiction and Judgments, Lessons
from The Hague, La Haye 2002 ; SAMUEL P. BAUMGARTNER, The Proposed Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign
Judgments, Tübingen 2003 ; JOHN B. BELLINGER/R. REEVES ANDERSON, Tort Tourism: The Case for a Federal Law on Foreign
Judgment Recognition, Virginia Journal of International Law 54 (2014) p. 501-544 ; VAUGHAN BLACK, Canada and the US
Contemplate Changes to Foreign-Judgment Enforcement, JPIL 3 (2007) p. 1-28 ; ALEGRÍA BORRÁS RODRÍGUEZ, The 1999
Preliminary Draft Hague Convention on Jurisdiction, Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments : Agreements and
Disagreements, RDIPP 40 (2004) p. 5-30 ; RONALD A. BRAND, Jurisdictional Common Ground: In Search of a Global
Convention, in Law and Justice in a Multistate World, Essays in Honour of Arthur T. von Mehren, Ardsley, NY 2002, p. 11-32 ;
IDEM, The 1999 Hague Preliminary Draft Convention Text on Jurisdiction and Judgments : A View from the United States,
RDIPP 40 (2004) p. 31-62 ; IDEM, Challenges to Forum Non Conveniens, New York University Journal of International Law and
Politics 45 (2012-13) p. 1003-1035 ; IDEM, Jurisdictional Developments and the New Hague Judgments Project, in Un
engagement au service du droit international privé, Mélanges en l’honneur de Hans van Loon, Cambridge 2013, p. 89-99 ;
ANDREAS BUCHER, La Dix-huitième session de la Conférence de La Haye de droit international privé, RSDIE 7 (1997) p. 67-127
; IDEM, Vers une convention mondiale sur la compétence et les jugements étrangers, Sem.jud. 122 (2000) II p. 77-133 ; IDEM, La
dimension sociale du droit international privé, Cours général, RCADI 341 (2009) p. 9-526 ; BENEDIKT BUCHNER, Kläger- und
Beklagtenschutz im Recht der internationalen Zuständigkeit, Lösungsansätze für eine zukünftige Gerichtsstands- und
Vollstreckungskonvention, Tübingen 1998 ; STEPHEN B. BURBANK, Jurisdictional Equilibration, the Proposed Hague Convention
and Progress in National Law, AJCL 49 (2001) p. 203-247 ; KEVIN M. CLERMONT, A Global Law of Jurisdiction and Judgments:
Views from the United States and Japan, Cornell International Law Journal 37 (2004) p. 1-26 ; MASATO DOGAUCHI, The Hague
Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters from a Perspective of Japan, Japanese
Yearbook of Private International Law 3 (2001) p. 79-118 ; BÉLIGH ELBALTI, Armonización espontánea de los requisitos para el
reconocimiento y ejecución de decisiones judiciales extranjeras y la necesidad de un convenio global sobre decisiones judiciales,
AEDIPr 11 (2011) p. 229-268 ; DIEGO P. FERNÁNDEZ ARROYO, Acerca de la necesidad y las posibilidades de una Convención
interamericanca sobre competencia judicial en casos de derecho internacional privado, in Liber Amicorum Didier Opertti Badán,
Montevideo 2005, p. 113-155 ; JENS FLEISCHHAUER, Reasons to include authentic instruments in a worldwide Convention on the
Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, IPRax 19 (1999) p. 216-219 ; HÉLÈNE GAUDEMETTALLON, De quelques raisons de la difficulté d'une entente au niveau mondial sur les règles de compétence judiciaire
internationale directe, in Law and Justice in a Multistate World, Essays in Honour of Arthur T. von Mehren, Ardsley, NY 2002,
p. 55-71 ; DAVID GODDARD, Rethinking the Hague Judgments Convention: A Pacific Perspective, YPIL 3 (2001) p. 27-62 ; IDEM,
The Fruits of the Judgments Project, in Un engagement au service du droit international privé, Mélanges en l’honneur de Hans
van Loon, Cambridge 2013, p. 195-205 ; PETER GOTTWALD, Internationale Zuständigkeit kraft "business activities" im geplanten
Haager Übereinkommen über die Zuständigkeit und ausländische Urteile in Zivil- und Handelssachen, in Einheit und Vielfalt des
Rechts, Festschrift für Reinhold Geimer, Munich 2002, p. 231-253 ; FRITZ-RENÉ GRABAU/JÜRGEN HENNECKA, Entwicklung des
weltweiten Zuständigkeits- und Anerkennungsübereinkommens - Aktueller Überblick, RIW 47 (2001) p. 569-572 ; SIMONA
GROSSI, Rethinking the Harmonization of Jurisdictional Rules, Tulane Law Review 86 (2011-12) p. 623-712 ; FRIEDRICH K.
JUENGER, Eine Haager Konvention über die Urteilsanerkennung?, in Gedächtnisschrift für Alexander Lüderitz, Munich 2000, p.
329-345 ; CATHERINE KESSEDJIAN, Vers une Convention à vocation mondiale en matière de compétence juridictionnelle
internationale et d’effets des jugements étrangers, RDU 2 (1997) p. 675-699 ; IDEM, Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil
and Commercial Matters: the Draft Convention proposed by the Hague Conference on Private International Law, in Forum
internationale, n° 26, La Haye 2000, p. 41-65 ; HÉLÈNE VAN LITH, Uniform Rules for Contract Disputes: Putting Activity-Related
Jurisdiction on the Agenda, NILR 59 (2012) p. 91-118 ; ANDREAS F. LOWENFELD, Thoughts About a Multinational Judgments
Convention: A Reaction to the von Mehren Report, Law&CP 57 (1994) n° 3 p. 289-303 ; ANDREAS F. LOWENFELD/LINDA J.
SILBERMAN (éd.), The Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments, Conference New York University School of Law 1999,
Yonkers, NY 2001 ; ALEXANDER R. MARKUS, Neue Entwicklungen im internationalen Zuständigkeitsrecht, in Zum Gerichtsstand
in Zivilsachen, Zurich 2002, p. 127-145 ; FABRIZIO MARONGIU BUONAIUTI, Forum non conveniens, Facing the Prospective Hague
Convention and E.C. Regulation on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, Rivista di
diritto europeo 1999, n° 1, p. 3-47 ; DAVID MCCLEAN, The Hague Conference’s Judgments Project, in Reform and Development
of Private International Law, Essays in Honour of Sir Peter North, Oxford 2002, p. 255-271 ; IDEM, The Rights of a Fair Trial,
Forum Non Conveniens and the Limits of the Possible, in Un engagement au service du droit international privé, Mélanges en
l’honneur de Hans van Loon, Cambridge 2013, p. 357-369 ; ARTHUR VON MEHREN, Recognition of United States Judgments
Abroad and Foreign Judgments in the United States: Would an International Convention Be Useful ?, RabelsZ 57 (1993) p. 449459 ; IDEM, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: A New Approach for the Hague Conference?, Law&CP 57
(1994) n° 3 p. 271-287 ; IDEM, The Case for a Convention-mixte Approach to Jurisdiction to Adjudicate and Recognition and
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, RabelsZ 61 (1997) p. 86-92 ; IDEM, Enforcing Judgments Abroad: Reflections on the Design
of Recognition Conventions, Brooklyn Journal of International Law 24 (1998) p. 17-28 ; IDEM, The Hague Jurisdiction and
Enforcement Convention Project Faces an Impasse - A Diagnosis and Guidelines for a Cure, IPRax 20 (2000) p. 465-468 ; IDEM,
Drafting a Convention on International Jurisdiction and the Effects of Foreign Judgments Acceptable World-wide: Can the
Hague Conference Project Succeed?, AJCL 49 (2001) p. 191-202, La rédaction d’une convention universellement acceptable sur
la compétence judiciaire internationale et les effets des jugements étrangers: le projet de la Conférence de La Haye peut-il
1
© Andreas Bucher
www.andreasbucher-law.ch
31.1.2015
aboutir?, Rev.crit. 90 (2001) p. 85-99 ; IDEM, Should Plaintiffs or Defendants be Jurisdictionally Preferred ?, in Perspectives on
International and Comparative Law, Symposium, Köln 2006, p. 75-89 ; RALF MICHAELS, Two Paradigms of Jurisdiction, Michigan Journal of International Law 27 (2005-06) p. 1003-1069 ; IDEM, Some Fundamental Jurisdictional Conceptions as Applied in
Judgment Conventions, in Conflict of Laws in a Globalized World, Cambridge 2007, p. 29-62 ; PETER NYGH, Declining
Jurisdiction under the Brussels I Regulation 2001 and the Preliminary Draft Hague Judgments Convention: A Comparison, in
Reform and Development of Private International Law, Essays in Honour of Sir Peter North, Oxford 2002, p. 303-334 ; IDEM,
Arthur's Baby: The Hague Negotiations for a World-Wide Judgments Convention, in Law and Justice in a Multistate World,
Essays in Honour of Arthur T. von Mehren, Ardsley, NY 2002, p. 151-172 ; WILLIAM E. O'BRIAN, The Hague Convention on
Jurisdiction and Judgments: The Way Forward, Modern Law Review 66 (2003) p. 491-509 ; MARTA PERTEGAS, Lis pendens,
Lessons from Brussels for a Relaunched Hague Judgments Project?, in Entre Bruselas y La Haya, Liber Amicorum Alegría
Borrás, Madrid 2013, p. 727-741 ; FAUSTO POCAR, The Drafting of a World-Wide Convention on Jurisdiction and the
Enforcement of Judgments: Which Format for the Negotiations in The Hague?, in Law and Justice in a Multistate World, Essays
in Honour of Arthur T. von Mehren, Ardsley, NY 2002, p. 191-197 ; FAUSTO POCAR/COSTANZA HONORATI (éd.), The Hague,
Preliminary Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments, Padoue 2005 ; HAIMO SCHACK, Perspektiven eines weltweiten
Anerkennungs- und Vollstreckungsübereinkommens, ZEuP 1993 p. 306-334 ; IDEM, Entscheidungszuständigkeiten in einem
weltweiten Gerichtsstands- und Vollstreckungsübereinkommen, ZEuP 1998 p. 931-956 ; IDEM, Wiedergänger der Haager
Konferenz für IPR: Neue Perspektiven eines weltweiten Anerkennungs- und Vollstreckungsübereinkommens?, ZEuP 2014 p.
824-842 ; ANDREA SCHULZ, The Hague Project of a Global Judgments Convention and IP Rights : Recent Developments, in
Intellectual Property in the Conflict of Laws, Tübingen 2005, p. 39-56 ; IDEM, The Hague Conference Project for a Global Convention on Jurisdiction, Recognition and Enforcement in Civil and Commercial Matters – An Update, in International Property
and Private International Law – Heading for the Future, Oxford 2005, p. 5-18; LINDA J. SILBERMAN/ANDREAS F. LOWENFELD,
The Hague Judgments Convention – And Perhaps Beyond, in Law and Justice in a Multistate World, Essays in Honour of Arthur
T. von Mehren, Ardsley, NY 2002, p. 121-135 ; MARTINE STÜCKELBERG, Lis pendens and Forum Non Conveniens at the Hague
Conference, Brooklyn Journal of International Law 26 (2001) p. 949-981 ; PETER D. TROOBOFF, Proposed Hague Conference
General Convention on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments - Some Thoughts on Finding Solutions
to Tough Issues, in E Pluribus Unum, Liber amicorum Georges A.L. Droz, La Haye 1996, p. 461-478 ; IDEM, Personal
Jurisdiction and Globalization - Finding Common Ground, in Le 90e anniversaire de Boutros Boutros-Ghali, La Haye 2012, p.
263-275 ; IDEM, Beginning to Rethink Personal Jurisdiction, in Un engagement au service du droit international privé, Mélanges
en l’honneur de Hans van Loon, Cambridge 2013, p. 597-607 ; GUANGJIAN TU, Finding a Proper Nexus for Constructing Specific
(Special) Jurisdiction Regarding Commercial Contract and Tort Cases, JPIL 5 (2009) p. 243-279 ; HANS VAN LOON, The Hague
Conference on Private International Law in a time of Globalisation: New Challenges and New Conventions in the fields of Civil
Procedure and Applicable Law, in Systemwechsel im europäischen Kollisionsrecht, Fachtagung 2001, Munich 2002, p. 193-203 ;
BETH VAN SCHAACK, In Defense of Civil Redress : The Domestic Enforcement of Human Rights Norms in the Context of the
Proposed Hague Judgments Convention, Harvard International Law Journal 42 (2001) p. 141-200 ; ROLF WAGNER, Die
Bemühungen der Haager Konferenz für internationales Privatrecht um ein Übereinkommen über die gerichtliche Zuständigkeit
und ausländische Entscheidungen in Zivil- und Handelssachen, IPRax 21 (2001) p. 533-547 ; GERHARD WALTER, Lis alibi
pendens und forum non conveniens: Von der Konfrontation über die Koordination zur Kooperation, in Festschrift für Ekkehard
Schumann, Tübingen 2001, p. 559-577 ; IDEM, Der Entwurf für ein weltweites Haager Zuständigkeits- und
Vollstreckungsübereinkommen aus Schweizer Sicht, in Einheit und Vielfalt des Rechts, Festschrift für Reinhold Geimer, Munich
2002, p. 1429-1443 ; BORIS WENGER, Binding Gulliver – U.S. Antitrust Jurisdiction and the Hague Convention, in "nur, aber
immerhin", Festgabe für Anton K. Schnyder, Zurich 2002, p. 197-215.
Convention de La Haye sur les accords d'élection de for de 2005 :
Actes et doc. 20/III, 2005 (rapport de T. Hartley et M. Dogauchi) ; BERNARD AUDIT, Observations sur la Convention de La Haye
du 30 juin 2005 relative aux accords d’élection de for, in Vers de nouveaux équilibres entre ordres juridiques, Liber amicorum
Hélène Gaudemet-Tallon, Paris 2008, p. 171-188 ; PAUL BEAUMONT, Hague Choice of Court Agreements Convention 2005:
Background, Negotiations, Analysis and Current Status, JPIL 5 (2009) p. 125-159 ; PAUL BEAUMONT/BURCU YÜRSEL, La reforma
del reglamento de Bruselas I sobre acuerdos de sumisión y la preparación para la ratificación por la UE del Convenio de La Haya
sobre acuerdos de elección de foro, AEDIPr 9 (2009) p. 129-159 ; IDEM, The Validity of Choice of Court Agreements under the
Brussels I Regulation and the Hague Choice of Court Agreements Convention, in Convergence and Divergence in Private
International Law, Liber Amicorum Kurt Siehr, Zurich 2010, p. 563-577 ; MARTIN BLÄSI, Das Haager Übereinkommen über
Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung seiner zu erwartenden Auswirkungen auf den deutschamerikanischen Rechtsverkehr, Frankfurt a.M. 2010 ; RONALD A. BRAND, Forum Selection and Forum Rejection in US Courts:
One Rationale for a Global Choice of Court Convention, in Reform and Development of Private International Law, Essays in
Honour of Sir Peter North, Oxford 2002, p. 51-87 ; IDEM, The Hague Conference Working Group, Draft Text on Choice of Court
Agreements, YPIL 5 (2003) p. 35-51 ; IDEM, U.S. Implementation vel non of the 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court
Agreements, YPIL 12 (2010) p. 107-122 ; IDEM, IDEM, Recognition, Jurisdiction and the Hague Choice of Court Convention, in
Liber Amicorum Kresimir Sajko, Zagreb 2012, p. 177-210 ; IDEM, Implementing the 2005 Hague Convention: The EU Magnet
and the US Centrifuge, in Entre Bruselas y La Haya, Liber Amicorum Alegría Borrás, Madrid 2013, p. 267-276 ; RONALD
BRAND/PAUL HERRUP, The 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, Cambridge 2008 ; RONALD A.
BRAND/SCOTT R. JABLONSKI, Forum Non Conveniens, History, Global Practice, and the Future Under the Hague Convention of
Choice of Court Agrements, Oxford 2007 ; PETR BRÍZA, Choice-of-Court Agreements: Could the Hague Choice of Court
2
© Andreas Bucher
www.andreasbucher-law.ch
31.1.2015
Agreements Convention and the Reform of the Brussels I Regulation Be the Way out of the Gasser-Owusu Disillusion?, JPIL 5
(2009) p. 537-563 ; ANDREAS BUCHER, La Convention de La Haye sur les accords d’élection de for, RSDIE 16 (2006) p. 29-62 ;
STEPHEN B. BURBANK, Federalism and Private International Law: Implementing the Hague Choice of Court Convention in the
United States, JPIL 2 (2006) p. 287-309 ; IDEM, A Tea Party at The Hague?, Southwestern Journal of International Law 18 (2012)
p. 101-118; UELI BURI, Haager Konferenz für Internationales Privatrecht: (Haager) Übereinkommen vom 30. Juni 2005
betreffend Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen, sic ! 2006 p. 301-304 ; DIETMAR CZERNICH, Neue Aspekte im österreichischamerikanischen Rechtsverkehr durch das Haager Gerichtsstandsübereinkommen, Wirtschaftsrechtliche Blätter 26 (2012) p. 309314 ; CAROLINE EDSALL, Implementing the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements in the United States : An
Opportunity to Clarify Recognition and Enforcement Practice, The Yale Law Journal 120 (2010) p. 397-406 ; FLORIAN EICHEL,
Das Haager Übereinkommen über Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen vom 30.6.2005, RIW 55 (2009) p. 289-297 ; CRAIG FORREST,
The Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements: the Maritime Exceptions, JPIL 5 (2009) p. 491-516 ; MARTIN FRICKE,
Das Haager Übereinkommen über Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung seiner Bedeutung für die
Versicherungswirtschaft, Versicherungsrecht 57 (2006) p. 476-483 ; RICHARD GARNETT, The Hague Choice of Court
Convention: Magnum Opus or Much Ado About Nothing?, JPIL 5 (2009) p. 161-180 ; TREVOR C. HARTLEY, The International
Scope of Choice-of-Court Agreements under the Brussels I Regulation, the Lugano Convention and the Hague Convention, in
Liber Amicorum Ole Lando, Copenhagen 2012, p. 197-211 ; TREVOR C. HARTLEY, Choice of Court Agreements under the European and International Instruments, The Revised Brussels I Regulation, the Lugano Convention, and the Hague Convention,
Oxford 2013 ; BURKHARD HESS, The Draft Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, External Competencies of the
European Union and Recent Case Law of the European Court of Justice, in Arnaud Nuyts/Nadine Watté (éd.), International Civil
Litigation in Europe and Relations with Third States, Bruxelles 2005, p. 263-284 ; CATHERINE KESSEDJIAN, L'élection de for –
Vers une nouvelle convention de La Haye, in Grenzüberschreitungen, Festschrift für Peter Schlosser, Tübingen 2005, p. 367-381
; IDEM, La Convention de La Haye du 30 juin 205 sur l’élection de for, Clunet 133 (2006) p. 813-850 ; MARY KEYES, Jurisdiction
under the Hague Choice of Courts Convention : Its Likely Impact on Australian Practice, JPIL 5 (2009) p. 181-211 ; THALIA
KRUGER, The 20th Session of the Hague Conference: A New Choice of Court Convention and the Issue of EC Membership,
ICLQ 55 (2006) p. 447-455 ; STEFAN LUGINBÜHL/HEIKE WOLLGAST, Das neue Haager Übereinkommen über
Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen: Aussichten für das geistige Eigentum, GRUR Int. 2006 p. 208-220 ; REID MORTENSEN, The
Hague and the Ditch : The Trans-Tasman Judicial Area and the Choice of Court Convention, JPIL 5 (2009) p. 213-242 ; PETER
ARNT NIELSEN, The Hague Judgments Convention, Nordic Journal of International Law 80 (2011) p. 95-119 ; IDEM, Exclusive
Choice of Court Agreements and Parallel Proceedings, in Un engagement au service du droit international privé, Mélanges en
l’honneur de Hans van Loon, Cambridge 2013, p. 409-420 ; SEBASTIAN OPALKO, Internationale Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen
und Schiedsgerichtsvereinbarungen, Gegenüberstellung des New Yorker Übereinkommens von 1958 mit dem Haager
Übereinkommen von 2005, Hamburg 2010 ; MARTA PERTEGÁS, The Revision of the Brussels I Regulation: A View from the
Hague Conference, in The Brussels I Review Proposal Uncovered, Londres 2012, p. 193-203 ; MARTA PERTEGÁS/LOUISE ELLEN
TEITZ, Prospects for the Convention of 30 June 2005 on Choice of Court Agreements, in Un engagement au service du droit
international privé, Mélanges en l’honneur de Hans van Loon, Cambridge 2013, p. 465-476 ; PETER H. PFUND, Federalism and
U.S. Implementation of PIL Conventions – Implementing the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, in Un
engagement au service du droit international privé, Mélanges en l’honneur de Hans van Loon, Cambridge 2013, p. 477-485 ;
GIESELA RÜHL, Das Haager Übereinkommen über die Vereinbarung gerichtlicher Zuständigkeiten: Rückschritt oder Fortschritt?,
IPRax 25 (2005) p. 410-415 ; MARGHERITA SALVADORI, El Convenio sobre acuerdos de elección de foro y el Reglamento
Bruselas I: Autonomía de la volontad y procedimientos paralelos, AEDIPr 10 (2010) p. 829-844 ; DIANA SANCHO VILLA,
Jurisdiction over Jurisdiction and Choice of Court Agreements: Views on the Hague Convention of 2005 and implications for the
European Regime, YPIL 12 (2010) p. 399-418 ; ANDREA SCHULZ, The Hague Convention of 30 June 2005 on Choice of Court
Agreements, YPIL 7 (2005) p. 1-16, JPIL 2 (2006) p. 243-269 ; IDEM, The Hague Conference Project for a Global Convention on
Jurisdiction, Recognition and Enforcement in Civil and Commercial Matters (the Hague Judgment Project), Electronic
Commerce and Intellectual Property, in Legal Aspects of an E-Commerce Transaction, Munich 2005, p. 293-324 ; DAN JERKER
B. SVANTESSON, The Choice of Court Convention: How Will it Work in Relation to the Internet and E-Commerce, JPIL 5 (2009)
p. 517-535 ; ZHENG SOPHIA TANG, Effectiveness of Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses in the Chinese Courts – A Pragmatic Study,
ICLQ 61 (2012) p. 459-484 ; LOUISE ELLEN TEITZ, The Hague Choice of Court Convention: Validating Party Autonomy and
Providing an Alternative to Arbitration, AJCL 53 (2005) p. 543-558 ; IDEM, Choice of Court Clauses and Third Countries From a
US Perspective : Challenges to Predictability, in International Civil Litigation in Europe and Relations with Third States,
Bruxelles 2005, p. 285-309 ; CHRISTIAN THIELE, The Hague Convention on Choice-of-Court Agreements: Was It Worth the
Effort?, in Conflict of Laws in a Globalized World, Cambridge 2007, p. 63-88 ; JORDI DE LA TORRE, The Hague Choice of Court
Convention and Federal Power over State Courts, Georgetown Journal of International Law 45 (2013) p. 219-254 ; PETER D.
TROOBOFF, Proposed Principles for United States Implementation of the New Hague Convention on Choice of Court
Agreements, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 42 (2009/10) p. 237-251 ; IDEM, Convention on
Choice of Court Agreements, The National Law Journal, July 27, 2009 ; IDEM, Ensuring jurisdiction over treaty party’s
judgments, The National Law Journal, October 1, 2012 ; GUANGJIAN TU, The Hague Choice of Court Convention – A Chinese
Perspective, AJCL 55 (2007) p. 347-365 ; LAURENCE USUNIER, La Convention de La Haye du 30 juin 2005 sur les accords
d’élection de for, Beaucoup de bruit pour rien ?, Rev.crit. 99 (2010) p. 37-81 ; HANS VAN LOON, Quelques aspects de la
mondialisation dans le domaine des conflits de juridictions, Droit international privé, Travaux 2004-2006 p. 227-253 ; ROLF
WAGNER, Das Haager Übereinkommen vom 30.6.2005 über Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen, RabelsZ 73 (2009) p. 100-166 ; ROLF
WAGNER/JAN MICHAEL SCHÜNGELER, Das Haager Übereinkommen vom 30.6.2005 über Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen und die
Parallelvorschriften in der Brüssel I-Verordnung (EuGVVO), ZvglRW 108 (2009) p. 399-434.
3
© Andreas Bucher
www.andreasbucher-law.ch
31.1.2015