Employed - Les données sur le cancer

Transcription

Employed - Les données sur le cancer
EARNINGS AND EMPLOYMENTUNEMPLOYMENT SPELLS FOR
SALARIED AND SELF-EMPLOYED
WORKERS SURVIVING CANCER
Aurélia Tison, Alain
Paraponaris and Bruno
Ventelou
INTRODUCTION
 More cancer survivors are working age adults (Ferlay et al 2013) (Hoffman 2005)
 A growing number of self-employed workers in France thanks to new
reforms (RSI 2011)
 Very few studies on them (Paraponaris et al 2004) (Eischenbaum voline et al 2008) (Sauze 2011)
 What are their financial and professional situations two years after cancer
in comparison to those of employees and to the general population ?
1) Transitions on the labor market
2) Absenteeism and Return to Work
3) Wage losses
FRENCH CONTEXT
Three sickness funds
CNAMTS • Employees
RSI
MSA
• Self-employed
workers
• Farmers
Days’ allowances are not the same
 Employees: 50% to 80% of their wage
with a maximum of 42.77€ per day
(57.03€ if 3 children and more).
 Self-employed workers: 50% of their
annual wage during the last three years
with a maximum per day of 49.82€.
 Waiting days differ which could impact
the length of absenteeism (Pollack).
DATA
CANCER
survey
SelfEmployed
Workers
Professional situation 18
months after in %
Profession
Not
al situation Employed
Employed
in 2010
Employed 88 [84-91] 12 [9-17]
Not
6 [0.8-35] 94 [65-99]
Employed
CANCER
survey
Employed
Workers
Total
100
100
General
survey
SelfEmployed
Workers
Professional situation 18
months after in %
Profession
Not
al situation Employed
Employed
in 2010
Employed 97 [95-98]
3 [2-5]
Not
32 [20-50] 68 [50-80]
Employed
Professional situation 18 months
after in %
Professiona
l situation Employed
in 2010
Not
Employed
Total
Total
General
survey
Employed
Workers
100
100
Professional situation 18
months after in %
Profession
Not
al situation Employed
Employed
in 2010
94.5 [9495]
Employed
88 [86-89]
12 [11-14]
100
Employed
4.5 [5-6]
Not
Employed
2 [1-4]
98 [96-99]
100
Not
28 [25-30] 72 [70-75]
Employed
Total
100
100
ABSENTEEISM
 Significant t test (p = 0.02) : 58 days before taking a sick leave for selfemployed workers in comparison to 41 days for employees.
 Significant chi2 test (p = 0.00) : 41% self-employed workers do not take
any sickness days against 16% employees.
 Cox model
 Significant Hazard ratios less than 1 = self-employed (ref:no), survival>80%(ref:<80%), age
 Significant Hazard ratios more than 1 = diminished working hours (ref:no), reorganization of
work (ref:no), after-effects (ref:no).
RETURN TO WORK
1.00
Kaplan-Meier survival estimates
Significant t test (p=0.00)
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
In mean self-employed workers are
135 days on sick leave before
returning to work in comparison to
203 days for employees.
0
500
1000
analysis time
self_employed = 0
self_employed = 1
1500
RTW is a distinct process for selfemployed workers and employees.
WAGE LOSSES
 Significant t test for the variation of wages between 2012 and 2010
(p = 0.00): -183€ for self-employed against – 31€ for employed workers.
 Linear regression (outcome = wage in 2012 – wage in 2010)
 Significant and positive results:
 high level of study (ref: <bac) 83.61€
 Sigificant and negative results:
 self-employed (ref: salaried) -160€
 participation in the households’earnings (from -221.8€ to -528.9€)
 different job in 2012 (ref: same job)-123.4€
 diminished working hours (ref:no) -243.2€
 chemotherapy (ref:no) -145.6€
ALL
Outcome
variable
(wage)
Mean
Std Error
t
P(t)
Base Line
Control
(2660)
Treated
(1438)
Diff(BL)
Control
(2660)
Treated
(1438)
Diff (FU)
2213.147 1846.785
34.034
29.179
65.03
63.29
0.000
0.000
-366.362
44.829
-8.17
0.000***
2337.583
34.034
68.68
0.000
1798.876
29.179
61.65
0.000
-538.707
44.829
-12.02
0.000***
SE
DID
Follow up
Base Line
Control
Treated
Diff(BL)
Control
Treated
Diff (FU)
Mean
Std Error
t
P(t)
2630.640
232.041
11.34
0.000
1843.237
193.962
9.50
0.000
-787.403
302.430
-2.60
0.010***
2878.721
232.041
12.41
0.000
1659.500
193.962
8.56
0.000
-1.2e+03
302.430
-4.03
0.000***
Mean
Std Error
t
P(t)
Base Line
Control
(2660)
-172.345
63.398
-2.72
0.007***
Follow up
Outcome
variable
(wage)
E
Outcome
variable
(wage)
Diff in diff
Diff in diff
-431.818
427.701
-1.01
0.313
Follow up
Treated
(1438)
Diff(BL)
Control
(2660)
Treated
(1438)
Diff (FU)
2213.147 1846.785
34.034
29.179
65.03
63.29
0.000
0.000
-366.362
44.829
-8.17
0.000***
2337.583
34.034
68.68
0.000
1798.876
29.179
61.65
0.000
-538.707
44.829
-12.02
0.000***
Diff in diff
-172.345
63.398
-2.72
0.007***
CONCLUSION & DISCUSSION
 The employment rate from 2010 to eighteen months after is smaller for cancer survivors than for
the general population but no difference between self-employed and employed workers surviving
cancer.
 A difficulty for non-employed workers to find a job after a cancer persists (see Joutard et al 2014).
 Our control group from the labor force survey could contain individuals affected by a chronic
disease.
 Self-employed workers take a longer time to put themselves on sick leave compared to
employees.
 Return to work not only differs by gender as shown in the literature (Marino el al 2013; Malavolti 2004)
but also between self-employed and employed workers.
 Wage losses after cancer are significant and result in a high financial burden for self-employed
cancer survivors (see also Lauzier et al 2008).
 Stratification of the variable self-employed by type of job impossible due to few observations.
REFERENCES
Bradley, C.J., Neumark, D., Barkowski, S., 2013. Does employer-provided health insurance constrain labor supply adjustments to health
shocks? New evidence on women diagnosed with breast cancer. Journal of Health Economics 32, 833–849.
Carlsen, K., Jensen, A.J., Rugulies, R., Christensen, J., Bidstrup, P.E., Johansen, C., Huitfeldt Madsen, I.E., Dalton, S.O., 2013. Self-reported
work ability in long-term breast cancer survivors. A population-based questionnaire study in Denmark. Acta Oncologica 52, 423–429.
Eichenbaum-Voline, S., Malavolti, L., Paraponaris, A., Ventelou, B., 2008. Cancer et activité professionnelle. Revue de l’OFCE 104, 105.
Ferlay, J., Steliarova-Foucher, E., Lortet-Tieulent, J., Rosso, S., Coebergh, J.W.W., Comber, H., Forman, D., Bray, F., 2013. Cancer incidence and
mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries in 2012. European Journal of Cancer 49, 1374–1403.
Hoffman, B., 2005. Cancer survivors at work: a generation of progress. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians 55, 271–280.
Imbens, G.W., Wooldridge, J.M., 2009. Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature 47, 5–
86.
Joutard et al, Continuous-Time Markov Model for Transitions Between Employment and Non-Employment: The Impact of a Cancer Diagnosis,
Annals of Economics and Statistics, No. 107/108 pp. 239-265, 2012
Lauzier, S., Maunsell, E., Drolet, M., Coyle, D., Hebert-Croteau, N., Brisson, J., Masse, B., Abdous, B., Robidoux, A., Robert, J., 2008. Wage
Losses in the Year After Breast Cancer: Extent and Determinants Among Canadian Women. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 100,
321–332.
Levi, F., Lucchini, F., Negri, E., La Vecchia, C., 2000. The decline in cancer mortality in the European Union, 1988–1996. European Journal of
Cancer 36, 1965–1968.
Malavolti L. et al, La reprise du travail après un diagnostic de cancer : un processus distinct entre hommes et femmes, « La vie deux ans après
le diagnostic de cancer », Documentation française, 2004.
Marino, P., Luis Sagaon, T., Laetitia, M., Anne-Gaelle, L.C.-S., 2013. Sex Differences in the Return-to-Work Process of Cancer Survivors 2 Years
After Diagnosis: Results From a Large French Population-Based Sample. Journal of Clinical Oncology 31, 1277–1284.
Paraponaris et al, Chapitre 11 à 14, Comment vit-on après un cancer ? Ressources et Emploi, La vie deux ans après un diagnostic de cancer,
Collection Etudes et Enquêtes, juin 2014.
Paraponaris A. et al, Le maintien dans l’activité et dans l’emploi pour « La vie deux ans après le diagnostic de cancer », Documentation
française, 2004.
Pollak, C., n.d. La couverture du délai de carence des arrêts maladie en France: Déterminants et impact sur l’absentéisme.
Rapport, L’essentiel du RSI, données 2011.
Sauze L., Affections de longues durées et différences de morbidité entre travailleurs salariés et travailleurs indépendants, Pratiques et
Organisation des soins, janvier-mars 2011.

Documents pareils