Références sur les principes du GAR Blöndal, J.R. (2001), « La
Transcription
Références sur les principes du GAR Blöndal, J.R. (2001), « La
1 Références sur les principes du GAR Blöndal, J.R. (2001), « La procédure budgétaire en Suède », Revue de l’OCDE sur la gestion budgétaire, 1:1. Boston, J. (1994), « Purchasing Policy Advice : the Limits to Contracting Out », Governance, 7:1, janvier. Bouckaert, G. et Halachmi, A. (1996), « The Range of Performance Indicators in the Public Sector : Theory vs. Practice », dans A. Halachmi et G. Bouckaert (dir. publ.) Reengineering and Performance Measurement in Criminal Justice and Social Programmes, Perth, Australie- Occidentale, International Institute of Administrative Sciences. Bouckaert, G. et Ulens, W. (1998), Mesure de la performance dans le service public : exemples étrangers pour les pouvoirs publics belges, Bruxelles, Services Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et Culturelles. Campos, E. et Pradhan, S. (1996), Budgetary Institutions and Expenditure Outcomes : Binding Governments to Fiscal Performance, Policy Research Working Paper 1646, Banque mondiale, Washington, D.C. Carter, N., Klein R. et Day, P. (1992), How Organisations Measure Success : the Use of Performance Indicators in Government, Londres, Routledge. Gianakis, G. (1996), « Integrating Performance Measurement and Budgeting », dans A. Halachmi et G. Bouckaert (dir. publ.) Organisational Performance and Measurement in the Public Sector, Westport, CT., Quorum. Gillibrand, A. et Hilton, B. (1998), « Resource Accounting and Budgeting : Principles, Concepts and Practice – the MoD Case », Public Money and Management, 18:2, avril/juin. Hencke, D. (1998), « Job Centres Fiddled the Figures », Guardian, 8 janvier. Jones, L. et McCaffrey, J. (1997), « Implementing the Chief Financial Officers Act and the Government Performance and Results Act in the Federal Government », Public Budgeting and Finance, 17:1, printemps. Jones, R. (1998), « The Conceptual Framework of Resource Accounting », Public Money and Management, 18:2, avril/juin. 2 Leloup, L., Long, C. et Giordano, J. (1998), « President Clinton’s Fiscal 1998 Budget and Constitutional Paths to Balance », Public Budgeting and Finance, 18:1, printemps. Likierman, A. (1998), « Resource Accounting and Budgeting – Where Are We Now? », Public Money and Management, 18:2, avril/juin. Mayne, J. (1996), Mise en oeuvre de la gestion axée sur les résultats et de la budgétisation axée sur le rendement. Leçons du document publié, document de travail n° 73, Ottawa, Bureau du Vérificateur général du Canada. Miller, G. (1994), « What is Financial Management ? Are We Inventing a New Field Here ? », Public Administration Review, 54:2, mars/avril. Monnier, E. (1992), Évaluations de l’action des pouvoirs publics (2e édition), Paris, Economica. National Audit Office (1995), The Meteorological Office : Evaluation of Performance, HC693, 29 août, Londres, HMSO, Royaume-Uni. Neuby, B. (1997), « On the Lack of a Budget Theory », Public Administration Quarterly, 21:2. OCDE (1995), La gestion publique en mutation. Les réformes dans les pays de l’OCDE, Paris, PUMA/OCDE. OCDE (1997), En quête de résultats. Pratiques de gestion des performances, Paris, PUMA/OCDE. Pollitt, C. (1986), « Beyond the Managerial Model : the Case for Broadening Performance Assessment in Government and the Public Services », Financial Accountability and Management. Pollitt, C. (1997), Looking Outcomes in the Face : the Limits of Government Action, allocution à la Public Service Senior Management Conference, Wellington, NouvelleZélande, 9 octobre. Pollitt, C. et Bouckaert, G. (dir. publ.), (1995), Quality Improvement in European Public Services : Concepts, Cases and Commentary, Londres, Sage. Pollitt, C., Girre, X., Lonsdale, J., Mul, R., Summa, H. et Waerness, M. (1999), Performance or Compliance ? Performance Audit and Public Management Reform in Five Countries, Oxford, Clarendon Press. 3 Président du Conseil du Trésor (1997), Rendre compte des résultats 1997, Ottawa, Secrétariat du Conseil du Trésor du Canada. Radin, B. (1998), « The Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) : Hydraheaded Monster or Flexible Management Tool ? », Public Administration Review, 58:4, juillet/août. Reeth, W., van, (1998), Revolutions in Financial Management, proposition de thèse de doctorat, Centre de la gestion publique, Université catholique de Louvain. Rubin, I. (1992), « Budgeting : Theory, Concepts, Methods, and Issues », dans J. Rabin (dir. publ.) Handbook of Public Budgeting, New York, Marcel Dekker. Schick, A. (2001), « L’évolution du rôle des services centraux du budget », La revue de l’OCDE sur la gestion budgétaire, 1:1. Schick, A. (1996), The Spirit of Reform : Managing the New Zealand State Sector in a Time of Change, préparé pour la State Services Commission et le Trésor, NouvelleZélande. Straw, J. (1998), « Resource Accounting and NHS Trusts », Public Money and Management, 18:2, avril/juin. Thompson, F. (1997), « Toward a Regulatory Budget », Public Budgeting and Finance, 17:1, printemps. Vérificateur général du Canada (1997), La communication de l’information sur le rendement dans le Système de gestion des dépenses, chapitre 5, avril, Ottawa, ministre des Travaux publics et des Services gouvernementaux. Vérificateur général du Canada (1997), Vers une gestion axée sur les résultats, chapitre 11, octobre, Ottawa, ministre des Travaux publics et des Services gouvernementaux. Widlavsky, A. (1979), Speaking Truth to Power : the Art and Craft of Policy Analysis, Boston, Little, Brown and Co. Zifcak, S. (1994), New Managerialism : Administrative Reform in Whitehall and Canberra, Buckingham, Open University Press 4 Références sur les politiques de gestion axe sur le résultat. ANGRIST J., BETTINGER E., BLOOM E., KING E., KREMER M. (2001). – Vouchers for Private Schooling in Colombia : Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment. NBER Working Paper n° 8343, Cambridge, Mass. BENNET R.J. (1990). – Decentralization, Local Governments and Markets. Towards Post-Welfare Agenda. Oxford, UK : Clarendon Press. BARDHAN P., MOOKHERJEE D. (1998). – Expenditure Decentralization and The Delivery of Public Services in Developing countries. CIDER, Working Paper C98/104. Boston University. BRYK A.S., THUM Y.M., EASTON J.Q., LUPPESCU S. (1998). – Examining Productivity : Ten-Years Trends in the Chicago Public Schools. Chicago : Consortium on Chicago School Research. CALDWELL B. (1990). – School-Based Decision Making and Management : International Developments. In J. Chapman (eds.), School Based Decision Making and Management, p. 3-26. London, UK : Falmer Press. COX C., LEMAITRE M.J. (1999). – Market and State Principles of Reform in Chile Education : Policies and Results. In D. Leiptziger and G. Perry (eds.), Chile : Recent Policy Lessons and Emerging Challenges. WDI Development Studies Series. Washington D.C. :World Bank. DI GROPELLO E. (1999). – Educational Decentralization models in Latin America. Cepal Review, n° 68, p. 155173. DURU-BELLAT M., MEURET D. (2001). – Nouvelles formes de régulation dans les systèmes éducatifs étrangers : autonomie et choix des établissements scolaires. Revue Française de Pédagogie, n° 135, p. 173-221. DURU-BELLAT M., MONS N., SUCHAUT B. (2004). – Caractéristiques des systèmes éducatifs et compétences des jeunes de 15 ans : l’éclairage des comparaisons entre pays. Rapport pour le Ministère de l’Éducation. Dijon : Iredu. ESKELAND G.S., FILMER D. (2002). – Autonomy, Participation, and Learning in Argentine Schools. Finding and their Implications for Decentralization. Policy Research Working Paper, WPS n° 2766, Washington D.C. : World Bank. GAURI V. (1998) – School Choice in Chile : Two Decades of Educational Reform. Pittsburgh, PA. : University of Pittsburgh Press GORARD S., TAYLOR C. (2002). – 5 Market Forces and Standards in Education : a Preliminary Consideration. Bristish Journal of Sociology of Education, 23, 1, p. 5-18. HOXBY C. (2000). – Does competition among public schools benefit students and taxpayers ? American Economic Review, 90, 5, p. 1209-38. JIMENEZ E., SAWADA Y. (1998). – Do Community-managed schools work ? An Evaluation of El Salvador’s EDUCO Program. World Bank Economic Review, 13, 3, p. 415-441. LEITHWOOD K., MENZIES T. (1998). – Forms and Effects of School-based Management : A Review. Educational Policy, 12, 3, p. 325-346. LITVACK J, SEDDON J. (1999). – Decentralization briefing notes. World Bank Institute Working Paper, Washington, D.C. : World Bank. LOCKEED M., ZHAO Q. (1992). – The Empty Opportunity : Local Control of Secondary Schools and Student Achievement in the Philippines. Working Paper WPS 825, Washington DC : World Bank. LUCAS R. (1988). – On The Mechanics of Economic Development.Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 1, p. 3-42. McEWAN P., CARNOY M. (1998). – Public investments or private schools ? A Reconstruction of Educational Improvements in Chile, processed, Washington, D.C. World Bank MEURET D., PROD’HOM J., STOCKER E. (1995). – Comparer les structures de décision des systèmes éducatifs : un bilan de l’approche quantitative. In OCDE-CERI, Mesurer la qualité des établissements scolaires (p. 33-58). Paris : OCDE-CERI. MURPHY, J. (1991). – Restructuring Schools : Capturing and Assessing the Phenomena. New York : Teachers College Press, Columbia University. MUSGRAVE R.A. (1959). – The Theory of Public Finance. New York : Mc Graw Hill. OATES W. (1972). – Fiscal Federalism. New York : Harcourt Brace. PAES DE BARROS R., SILVA PINTO DE MENDONÇA S. (1998). – The Impact of Three institutional Innovations in Brazilian Education. In W. D. Savedoff (eds.), Organisation Matters : Agency problems in Health and Education. Washington D.C.: Inter-American Development Bank. PANDEY R. (2000). – Getting to Scale: The Story of DPEP in India. A presentation made as part of The Education Ministers Series, Education Reform and Management Group. Washington D.C. : World Bank. 6 PRUD’HOMME R. (1995). – The Dangers of Decentralization The World Bank Research Observer, 10, 2, p. 201-220. RAYWID M.A. (1990). – Rethinking School Governance. In R.F. Elmore (Eds.), Restructuring Schools : The Next Generation of School Reform, p. 152-206. San Francisco CA : Jossey-Bass Inc. RHOTEN D. (2000). – Education Decentralization in Argentina : a “Global-Local Conditions of Possibility” Approach to State, Market and Society Change. Journal of Education Policy, Vol. 15, 6, p. 593-619. RONDINELLI D., NELLIS J., CHEEMA G. S. (1984). – Decentralization in Developing Countries. World Bank Staff Working Paper No. 581, Washington, D.C. : World Bank. SEDDON T., ANGUS L., POOLE M. (1990). – Pressures on the Move to School Based Management. In J. Chapman (Eds.), School Based Decision Making and Management, p. 29-54. London, UK : Falmer Press. TIEBOUT C. (1956). – A pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, p. 416-424 THRUPP M., HAROLD B., MANSELL H., HAWKSWORTH L. (2000). – Mapping the Cumulative Impact of Education Reform: Final Report. New Zealand : University of Waikato. WINKLER D. (1989). – Decentralization in Education : An Economic Perspective, Population and Human Resources Department, Working Paper WPS 143, Washington, D.C. : World Bank. WINKLER D., ROUNDS T. (1996). – Municipal and Private Sector Response to Decentralization and School Choice. Economics of Education Review, 15, 4, p. 365376 WINKLER D., GERSHBERG I. (1999). – Education Decentralization in Latin America : The Effects on the Quality of Schooling. LCSHD Paper Series n° 59. Washington, D.C. : World Bank. WEST L., WONG C. (1995). – Fiscal Decentralization and Growing Disparities in Rural China : Some Evidence in the Provision of Social Services. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 11, 4, p. 70-84 WÖSSMANN L. (2000). – Schooling Resources, Educational Institutions, and Student Performance : The International Evidence. Kiel Working Paper n° 983. Germany : KIWE.