A New Standard for Refrigerated Vehicles
Transcription
A New Standard for Refrigerated Vehicles
A New Standard for Refrigerated Vehicles FRIGOBLOCK FK 25 SL FRIGOBLOCK FK 25 The first edition of the German industrial standard DIN 8959 for the technical requirements of insulated vehicle bodies and their refrigeration units was published in 1965. This original edition was then used as the basis for the international ATP-agreement for the cross-border transport of perishable food signed in 1970. In 1981 DIN 8959 was reviewed to take into account the practical experiences gained by the leading temperature controlled vehicle operators, bodybuilders and refrigeration equipment manufacturers. For the first time the refrigeration capacity requirements for multi-drop distribution were laid down. As over the years the 1981 edition proved to reflect quite well the actual conditions of the refrigerated vehicle operators, in 1995, again under the chairmanship of the ATP-testing authority TUV Munich, DIN 8959 was once more redrafted and it now specifies certain criteria in more detail taking into account the technical developments that have taken place since its first review in 1981. FRIGOBLOCK FK 25 L FRIGOBLOCK FK 13 FRIGOBLOCK FK 13L Carrier Supra 950 FRIGOBLOCK FK 12 Thermoking TS 600 Thermoking TS 500 Carrier Supra 850 FRIGOBLOCK FK 11 Thermoking TS 300 Carrier Supra 750 W at 0°C Thermoking TS 200 ATP refrigeration capacities of the most powerful overcab refrigeration machines W at -20°C Carrier Supra 550 FRIGOBLOCK FK 8 Carrier Supra 450 0W 3000 W 6000 W 9000 W 12000 W 15000 W 18000 W 21000 W 24000 W 27000 W FRIGOBLOCK HK 34 SL FRIGOBLOCK HD 25 FRIGOBLOCK HK 25 SL FRIGOBLOCK HK 25 Carrier Ultra FRIGOBLOCK HK 24 Thermoking SL 400 For the first time the DIN 8959 December 95 edition requires to consider the ageing of insulated vehicle bodies in the calculation to ascertain the required refrigeration capacity. For the two following tables an ageing factor of 1,3 for 6 years and of 1,5 for 9 years has been used. This k-value deterioration corresponds to the experiences gained by the various European ATP-test stations with the especially well insulating CFCexpanded foam. However, since the CFC-ban results on ageing so far obtained are indicating that insulation foam blown with non-CFC gases will age even faster. Carrier Vector FRIGOBLOCK HK 25 L FRIGOBLOCK HK 13 Thermoking SL 200 Carrier Maxima 1300 W at 0°C FRIGOBLOCK HK 13 L ATP refrigeration capacities of the most powerful trailer refrigeration machines W at -20°C Carrier Maxima 1000 Thermoking SL 100 0W 3000 W 6000 W 9000 W 12000 W 15000 W 18000 W 21000 W 24000 W 27000 W FRIGOBLOCK UK Limited, Stowe Castle Business Park, Buckingham, MK18 5AB, Tel. +44 (0) 12 80 / 82 49 33, Fax 82 49 34, [email protected], www.frigoblock.com 03.05 FRIGOBLOCK Grosskopf GmbH Postf. 11 02 39, 45332 Essen, Tel. +49 (0) 2 01 / 61 30 1–0, Fax 61 30 1–48, [email protected], www.frigoblock.com The required refrigeration duty for distribution vehicles is now specified in more detail. Factors are laid down for the additional refrigeration requirement caused by the air exchanges when delivering to 2, 3, 4 or 5 customers per hour with door opening times of max. 3 minutes each. In case of a longer door opening time than 3 minutes other factors to compensate for the door opening heat gain and the reduced refrigeration unit run time have to be used. As an example: for one customer delivery per hour with 15 minutes door opening time the factors for five customers per hour with a max, 3 minutes door opening time each are to be applied. contain any reserves for cooling down the body structure, refrigerating warm empty return pallets or roll cages or capacity required to reduce product temperature. The required refrigeration capacity to precool an empty vehicle body is, depending on its design, about 10 to 15 times higher than the wall heat gain shown in the tables. The reduction of the temperature of frozen or deep-frozen products requires 4500 Watts refrigeration per ton and per degree Celsius reduction, that of chilled products above 0°C 8000 Watts per ton and degree Celsius. All forced air transport refrigeration units must be switched-off before the vehicle doors are opened. Failure to follow this important rule will result in additional cold losses and the icingup of the evaporator coil. The specified factors for the remaining run time of the refrigeration unit are to be applied for units with their own dedicated combustion engine as well as for units driven from the vehicle engine. Refrigeration units driven from the vehicle engine – as direct compressor, hydraulic or alternator drive – must supply the required refrigeration capacities at max. 70% of the rated vehicle engine speed. As per the new DIN specification cold holdover systems (eutectics, dry ice, nitrogen) must be sized for a 10 hours delivery day. In the past 4 hours was the accepted standard. During summer even with a ‘state of the art’ loading over 20 to 30 minutes from a non-refrigerated loading area with dockshelters into a precooled vehicle body deep-frozen products will suffer a temperature rise of 2 to 3°C. With open loading into a body that has not been precooled a product temperature rise of about 4 to 6°C can be expected. As shown in the first graph the frequent though short-time door openings in deep-frozen multidrop distribution are causing unavoidable product temperature rises of 5 to 1°C, even in vehicles specified as per DIN 8959. In order to compensate for these product temperature rises the journey should be started with adequate product temperature reserves built-in in the coldstore and after loading by overnight mains standby operation of a sufficiently powerful transport refrigeration unit. Required refrigeration capacities calculated as per DIN 8959 do not 30 wooden pallets 800 x 1200 mm, dry 30 wooden pallets 800 x 1200 mm, wet 30 corner metal reinforcements à 440 Wh = 13.2 kWh à 1900 Wh = 57.0 kWh à l70 Wh = 5.1 kWh Heat content 22 wooden pallets 1000 x 1200 mm, dry à 22 wooden pallets 1000 x 1200 mm, wet à à 22 corner metal reinforcements 600 Wh = 13.2 kWh of return 2600 Wh = 57.2 kWh empties, l80 Wh = 4.0 kWh 27 roll containers, dry 27 roll containers, wet +20°C down 220 Wh = 5.9 kWh 750 Wh = 20.3 kWh to -20°C à à cooling from