External Tissue Expander for Closing Large Defects of the
Transcription
External Tissue Expander for Closing Large Defects of the
CASE REPORT External Tissue Expander for Closing Large Defects of the Extremities and Trunk Julia Kirschke, Dimitrios Georgas, Michael Sand, and Falk G. Bechara Background: Direct closure is the reconstruction of choice for surface soft tissue defects; however, it may not be suitable for larger defects due to extensive tension. A variety of techniques are available for achieving tension free closure, including skin grafts, skin flaps, and internal or external tissue expansion. Materials and Methods: The external skin expander developed by Blomqvist and Steenfos consists of single tissue expander units that contain an atraumatic needle and two friction stoppers connected via a silicone string. Each device of the expander is inserted under local anaesthesia on each side of the defect at a distance of about 2 cm from each other. Postoperative the silicone strings have to be tightened at least once a day. After about 5 to 10 days a sufficient expansion is achieved and the defect can be closed directly after expander removal. Results: The external tissue expander developed by Blomqvist and Steenfos is an efficient, time-effective, easy-to-handle device that can be inserted under local anesthesia, providing a good functional and satisfactory cosmetic outcome. Due to the comparatively low complication rate, even outpatient treatment is possible. The major drawback of this technique is the possibility of developing uncommon secondary scars under the plastic stoppers. Contexte: La fermeture directe des plaies est la technique privilégiée de reconstruction des pertes de tissu mou superficiel; toutefois, dans les cas de perte importante de substance, il n’est pas possible de procéder de la sorte en raison d’une trop forte tension. Différentes techniques permettent de réaliser des fermetures exemptes de tension, notamment les greffes de peau, les lambeaux cutanés et l’expansion tissulaire interne ou externe. Matériel et méthode: L’expanseur cutané externe, conçu par Blomqvist et Steenfos consiste en des trousses séparées d’expansion tissulaire, qui contiennent une aiguille non traumatisante et deux organes d’arrêt à friction reliés par une attache de silicone. Chaque partie de l’expanseur est introduite sous la peau, sous anesthésie locale, de chaque côté de la perte de substance, à une distance d’environ 2 cm l’une de l’autre. Après l’opération, il faut resserrer les attaches de silicone au moins une fois par jour. Au bout de 5 à 10 jours, l’on obtient une expansion suffisante, et il est possible de procéder à la fermeture directe de la plaie après le retrait du dispositif. Résultats: L’expanseur tissulaire externe, conçu par Blomqvist et Steenfos est un dispositif efficace, temporellement efficient et facile à manipuler, qui peut se glisser sous la peau, sous anesthésie locale, et qui donne de bons résultats tant fonctionnels qu’esthétiques. Il est même possible de réaliser le traitement en ambulatoire en raison de son faible taux de complications comparativement à d’autres techniques. Son principal désavantage est le risque de formation de cicatrices secondaires mais rares sous les organes d’arrêt de plastique. IRECT CLOSURE is the reconstruction of choice for surface soft tissue defects; however, it may not be suitable for larger defects due to extensive tension. A variety of techniques are available for achieving tensionfree closure, including skin grafts, skin flaps, and internal or external tissue expansion.1,2 Tissue expansion works by stretching the adjoining skin, thus recruiting skin from the surroundings, and partly by generating new cutis.3 The technique was first described in 1957 by Neumann to reconstruct ear defects in which local skin was mobilized using a subcutaneously placed rubber D From the Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany. Address reprint requests to: Julia Kirschke, MD, Dermatologic Surgery Unit, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, RuhrUniversity Bochum, St. Josef Hospital, Gudrunstr. 56, 44791 Bochum, Germany; e-mail: [email protected]. DOI 10.2310/7750.2013.13037 # 2013 Canadian Dermatology Association Canadian Dermatology Association | Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery, Vol 17, No 6 (November/December), 2013: pp 423–425 423 Kirschke et al A solution to be used without reaching toxic levels. After anesthesia, each device is passed subcutaneously on each side of the defect approximately 0.5 cm from the wound edge. This is repeated at intervals of about 2 cm with every ETE unit. Finally, the silicone strings are attached to the holding bars. For the best possible cosmetic outcome, these should be placed in different directions from each other. The wound is covered with sterile dressing materials of nongreasy consistency to prevent slippage of the silicone string and subsequent loss of tension. Tension is maintained by pulling the strips gently once or twice a day. This can be executed by the attending physician or the patient after accurate instruction. After about 5 to 10 days, depending on the initial size of the defect and skin tension, the edges of the wound meet each other, allowing the removal of the expander. The defect can then be closed directly with interrupted or continuous sutures placed in multiple layers. A suction drain can be placed under the skin closure to prevent fluid accumulation; alternatively, open drainage is possible (Figure 2). The closure of large tissue defects can be achieved by a variety of techniques, including skin grafts, skin flaps, and skin expanders. Flap procedures require a high degree of surgical skill and experience to ensure a good cosmetic and functional outcome and to minimize possible damage to the vascular system, lymphatic drainage, and surrounding nerves due to the preparation and transfer of the flap. Furthermore, B Figure 1. A, Two of six separately packed sterile units from one ETE unit. One unit consists of one atraumatic needle, one silicone string, and two friction stoppers. B, Detailed view of one friction stopper mounted on a silicone string. balloon.4 However, this technique did not become popular until 1976, when Radovan described an analogous subcutaneous tissue expander made of silicone for breast reconstruction following mastectomy.5 Since then, a variety of expander devices have been developed to generate excess tissue. While searching for an external tissue expansion technique that could be performed while the patient is ambulant under local anesthesia, with a low complication rate and an adequate cosmetic and functional outcome, we came across the external skin expander developed by Blomqvist and Steenfos (ETE, Höjmed AB, Stockholm, Sweden).6 The external tissue expander consists of single tissue expander units that contain an atraumatic needle and two friction stoppers connected via a silicone string (Figure 1). After using aseptic techniques, local anesthesia is infiltrated along the incision line and into the surrounding areas. Due to the large size of the defects, we regularly apply tumescent anesthesia, allowing large amounts of 424 A B C D E F G H Figure 2. A, Preoperative defect embracing the underlying muscle tissue after excision of a squamous cell carcinoma on the upper back. B, Intraoperative photograph after connecting the silicone strings to the holding bars. C, Postoperative result after tightening the silicone strings (the skin expander was thereafter tightened once a day). D, Result 3 days after implantation of the expander. E, Condition after removal of the expander (4 days after implantation) and closure of the defect using an interrupted 2-0 polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) suture to attach the deep dermis to the tension points, a running 3-0 subcuticular polydiaxanone suture, and interrupted vertical mattress sutures using 3-0 nylon (Ethilon) for skin closure. F, Result 5 days after closure of the defect with demarcated pressure marks in the normal skin adjacent to the former defect. G, At the time of suture removal (10 days after defect closure), a central dehiscence was seen but was left to allow secondary healing. H, Follow-up 10 weeks after surgery with good functional and satisfactory aesthetic results. Canadian Dermatology Association | Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery, Vol 17, No 6 (November/December), 2013: pp 423–425 External Tissue Expander for Closing Large Defects these complex and time-consuming procedures often require general anesthesia, which results in higher rates of postoperative complications, longer hospitalization periods, and thus rising health care costs. Split-skin and full-thickness skin grafts are easy and short procedures but result in scars of minor quality and donor-site morbidity.1,6,7 When direct defect closure is not possible, the external tissue expander developed by Blomqvist and Steenfos is an efficient, time-effective, easy-to-handle device that can be inserted under local anesthesia, providing a good functional and satisfactory cosmetic outcome. Due to the comparatively low complication rate, even outpatient treatment is possible, with the accompanying financial benefits to the health system.1,6,7 The expander can be used on excisions up to 400 cm2.6 The price is J200 ($260 US) per package of six units (one unit contains one silicone string and two friction stoppers) plus freight. The expander can even be applied in regions of maximum motion and tension on the wound, as in the upper back near the scapula. Depending on the region affected and defect size, excision of the defect and closure of the wound can be carried out after 5 to 10 days. Patients frequently describe an unpleasant but usually not painful tension following each expansion. Wound dehiscence can occur but can be left for secondary healing without any hesitation in most cases. The major drawback of this technique is the possibility of developing uncommon secondary scars in the normal skin due to the pressure exerted by the plastic stoppers adjacent to the former defect.6,7 Acknowledgment Financial disclosure of authors and reviewers: None reported. References 1. Ger R, Schessel ES. Technique for use of external tissue expansion for reconstruction of head and face defects. Dermatol Surg 2007;33:864– 71, doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.33185.x. 2. Felcht M, Koenen W, Weiss C, et al. Delayed closure of complex defects with serial tightening of loop sutures - clinical outcome in 64 consecutive patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013 Mar 5. [Epub ahead of print], doi:10.1111/jdv.12122. 3. De Filippo RE, Atala A. Stretch and growth: the molecular and physiologic influences of tissue expansion. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109:2450–62, doi:10.1097/00006534-200206000-00043. 4. Neumann CG. The expansion of an area of skin by progressive distention of a subcutaneous balloon; use of the method for securing skin for subtotal reconstruction of the ear. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946) 1957;19:124–30, doi:10.1097/00006534-195702000-00004. 5. Radovan C. Adjacent flap development using an expandable silastic implant. In: Annual Meeting of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons; 1976; Boston. 6. Blomqvist G, Steenfos H. A new partly external device for extension of skin before excision of skin defects. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1993;27:179–82, doi:10.3109/02844319309078109. 7. Fan J, Eriksson M, Nordstrom RE. External device for tissue expansion: clinical evaluation of the skin extender. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1996;30:215–20, doi:10.3109/ 02844319609062818. Canadian Dermatology Association | Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery, Vol 17, No 6 (November/December), 2013: pp 423–425 425