THE CASIMIR FORCE : THEORY
Transcription
THE CASIMIR FORCE : THEORY
THE CASIMIR FORCE : THEORY-EXPERIMENT COMPARISON Cyriaque Genet? Astrid Lambrecht Serge Reynaud Laboratoire Kastler Brossel UPMC et ENS, Paris “Quantum Fluctuations and Relativity” http://www.spectro.jussieu.fr/Vacuum ? Present address : Huygens Laboratory Leiden University, The Netherlands Casimir 1948 FCas = ECas = FCas ∼ 10−7N h̄cπ 2A 240L4 h̄cπ 2A 720L3 for L = 1µm, A = 1cm2 Harris, Chen, Mohideen 2000 U. California, Riverside Courtesy of U. Mohideen Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) Sphere (100µm) and plate, covered with gold for distances L =100-900nm Experimental precision ∼ 1 % THEORY-EXPERIMENT COMPARISON Theory-experiment agreement at the 1% level when corrections are taken into account ⇒ Plane-sphere geometry ⇒ Imperfect reflection ⇒ Non-zero temperature ⇒ Surface roughness THE FABRY-PEROT CAVITY q Vacuum radiation pressure is different outside h̄ω cos2 θ 2 and inside the cavity h̄ω 2 cos2 θ × g [ω] Airy function of the cavity ¯ ¯ 2ikz L ¯2 ¯ 1 − r1r2e g [ω] = 2 |1 − r1r2e2ikz L| kz = ω c cos θ THE CASIMIR FORCE The Casimir force is the difference between radiation pressures outside and inside the cavity given as an integral over imaginary frequencies (ω = iξ) Z Z h̄A X d2k ∞ F = π p 4π 2 dξ κ 0 rkp 1 [iξ] rkp 2 [iξ] e−2κL 1 − rkp 1 [iξ] rkp 2 [iξ] e−2κL s κ= k2 + ξ2 c2 Regular expression for physical scattering amplitudes F → FCas pour rkp 1rkp 2 →1 THE DRUDE MODEL ε [ω] = 1 − ωP2 ω (ω + iΓ) ηF = λP = 2πc ωP Γ ¿ ωP F FCas 0 10 ηF -1 10 plasma L << l P -2 10 10 -2 -1 10 0 L/l L À λP L ¿ λP 1 10 10 10 2 P → ηF ' 1 → ηF ' 1.193 λL P → → F ∼ F ∼ 1 L4 1 λP L 3 NON-ZERO TEMPERATURE 1 2 µ h̄ω → ¶ 1 + n [ω] h̄ω 2 λT = h̄c kB T , 1 n [ω] = e h̄ω kB T −1 ∼ 7µm at T = 300K 3.0 2.0 ηF 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.1 1.0 10.0 L[µm] L ¿ λT L À λT ηF ∼ 1 L ηF ∼ λT GLOBAL CORRECTION FACTOR 3.0 2.0 T=0K, plasma λP=136nm T=300K, miroirs parfaits T=300K, plasma λP=136nm ηF 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.1 1.0 L[µm] 10.0 PLANE-SPHERE GEOMETRY Proximity Force Approximation (PFA) Z F = F PS (L) = d2r A 2πR A F PP (L (r)) E PP (L) for L ¿ R ROUGHNESS CORRECTIONS 00 PFA : EPP (L) ¡ EPP (L) = EPP (L) + 2 Z 2 2® d k h ←− ρ [k] σ [k] 4π 2 h21 5 4 3 ρ 2 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |k|L • |k| L ≤ 1 ρ [k] ' 1 • |k| L ≥ 1 ρ [k] ' β |k| L PFA sector Long distances L À λP β = 1/3 Short distances L ¿ λP β ' 0.45 10 ® 2®¢ + h2 CONCLUSION Plane-sphere geometry - proximity force approximation Imperfect reflection - measured and compared to theoretical evaluations Temperature - not measured yet : small contribution at short distances Surface roughness - small contribution < 1% within the PFA - deviations from the PFA : surface spectra measurements and general evaluation of the sensitivity factor