Organizational robustness in socio
Transcription
Organizational robustness in socio
Organizational Robustness in Socio-technical Systems Study of the social interactions between supervision and maintenance operators of the largest French telecoms operator Ivan Boissières and Eric Marsden Institute for an Industrial Safety Culture Toulouse, France Ivan Boissiè re s & Eric Marsde n Organizational Robustness in Socio-te chnical Systems SRA-Europe confere nce , Se pte mber 2006 1 Context ● Hierarchy in a telecoms network – – – ● Different types of traffic – – ● Individual subscribers connected to a local exchange Local exchanges connected to regional transit exchanges Regional centers connected by a national network circuit-switched calls (more than 40 billion minutes in 2004) packet-switched data Frequent technical perturbations that can affect reliability – – – Hardware and software failures of telecoms switches Communications link malfunctions Traffic spikes Ivan Boissiè re s & Eric Marsde n Organizational Robustness in Socio-te chnical Systems SRA-Europe confere nce , Se pte mber 2006 2 Context Maintenance workers fix failures in a given regional zone ● Supervision workers detect problems by analyzing alarms ● – ● Local, regional and national supervision centers Multiple sources of change – – Technology: mobile traffic, consumer ADSL, increasingly sophisticated telecoms switches Organizational change: privatization, reorganization of supervision activities Ivan Boissiè re s & Eric Marsde n Organizational Robustness in Socio-te chnical Systems SRA-Europe confere nce , Se pte mber 2006 3 Objectives ● Social threats to reliability that result from the dependence on human operators – Key supervision operators can threaten strike action – Social tension between different groups of operators (due to factors such as rivalry or jealousy) can impair productivity – Individual operators can become upset and refuse to cooperate with certain colleagues ● Level of vulnerability depends on organizational design ● Our objective in this study: – characterize the relationships and social interactions between supervision and repair operators – identify factors that contribute positively or negatively to the robustness of the overall socio-technical system Ivan Boissiè re s & Eric Marsde n Organizational Robustness in Socio-te chnical Systems SRA-Europe confere nce , Se pte mber 2006 4 Method ● Five-year study of France Telecom’s supervision and maintenance activities – Visiting 10 of the 20 supervision centers in France, and centers in Argentina and Spain – Structured interviews with 250 employees to characterize their interactions with colleagues – Identify operators’ personal networks, using an egocentric approach Ivan Boissiè re s & Eric Marsde n Organizational Robustness in Socio-te chnical Systems SRA-Europe confere nce , Se pte mber 2006 5 Characteristics of an interaction ● Names of the entities involved ● Type of situation when the interaction arises: crisis situation or nominal activity ● Direction of the interaction (from whom to whom?) ● Type of interaction: information sharing, fault diagnosis, order, friendship … ● Mode of communication: oral, written, or via the information system ● Competencies of each entity used during the interaction ● Frequency of the interaction ● Mean length of each interaction ● Number of people in each entity involved in the interaction ● Functional importance of the interaction, from the interviewee’s viewpoint ● Quality of the interaction (what works/doesn’t work) from the interviewee’s viewpoint Ivan Boissiè re s & Eric Marsde n Organizational Robustness in Socio-te chnical Systems SRA-Europe confere nce , Se pte mber 2006 6 Partial social network cadre expert-soutien supervis-orientation pilotage-maintnce AQF (GPS MT gestion Ren) d'état des sites cg GPS GSR GPS MT resp dep GIL's (zone Nant) GIL (Nant) GPS (zone Nant) hiérarchie DR clientes (PSP Nant) hiérarchie DR Nant carrefour info (zone Nant) travaux programmés analyse traf TR/TD cg PSP Nant PSP Nant (brig) resp. exploitation (DR) soutien technique SI (DR) intervention Agences DR c. enregistrement (DR client) cg GIL Paris GIL Paris autres PSP supervision-pilotage cg GPS Paris AR des DR cadre TD GSTD cg GSP Nant GE propres (Nant) autres GE propres AQF (GPS Paris) GSR (PEMS) DT ou UDS GSTR GSP Nant (brig) PSP's Paris CSC (zone Nant) GSN CSPO centr.superv.nation. posit. Superv Traf TR AQ Traf IZAA cadre expert cg GSP Nanc cadres soutien prox cadre expert-soutien (traf) GSP Nanc (brig) CSC (Nanc) cg CSR Traf CENT PSP Nanc autres GSP GE propres cg CSR Blag Traf AMRE SAV OT (Blag) carrefour info Paris carrefour info (zone Nanc) CNG cg autres GSP CSR Blag Traf (brig) Supervision TR Trans posit. SAV ORT travaux programmés (Blag Trans) GSP Toul (brig) autres CSC CSR Blag Trans (brig) GE propres (Toul) cg CSR Blag Trans cd SR (CSR Blag) AQ Traf IU cadre expert-soutien (Blag Trans) OT (supervision) CSC (zone Toul) supervision cg GPS MT Toul AQF GRI GSR cadre (AQF) cg PSP Toul PSP Toul (brig) cadre TD base arrière (PSP Toul) cadre administrateur cadre expert outil doc sup GERS Opérateurs affiliés EBN DUO URN PO Directeurs (DT-DVRN, DVRN, EBN)… chef de département (Administration Rx URN PO) GPS's (PSP Toul) cd Rx UER Toul GEE Agences DR clientes GIL's (zone Toul) Ivan Boissiè re s & Eric Marsde n Organizational Robustness in Socio-te chnical Systems SRA-Europe confere nce , Se pte mber 2006 7 Partial social network cadre expert-soutien supervis-orientation pilotage-maintnce AQF (GPS MT gestion Ren) d'état des sites cg GPS GSR GPS MT resp dep GPS Nantes GILs Nantes GIL's (zone Nant) GIL (Nant) GPS (zone Nant) hiérarchie DR clientes (PSP Nant) hiérarchie DR Nant GILs Paris carrefour info (zone Nant) travaux programmés analyse traf TR/TD cg PSP Nant PSP Nant (brig) resp. exploitation (DR) soutien technique SI (DR) intervention Agences DR c. enregistrement (DR client) cg GIL Paris GIL Paris PSP Nantes autres PSP supervision-pilotage cg GPS Paris AR des DR cadre TD GSTD cg GSP Nant GE propres (Nant) DT ou UDS GSTR GSP Nant (brig) GPS Paris PSP's Paris autres GSPs GSN CSPO centr.superv.nation. Supervision TR Trans posit. SAV ORT AQ Traf IU CSR OT (supervision) Traf GPS Toulouse Ivan Boissiè re s & Eric Marsde n GSP Nancy GSP Nanc (brig) CSR autres CSC travaux programmés (Blag Trans) Toul (brig) TransGSP CSR Blag Traf (brig) (brig) CSRGE propres (Toul) CSRcgBlagCSRTrans Blag Trans cd SR (CSR Blag) CSR Traf cadre expert-soutien (Blag Trans) Provinc CSR CSC (zone Toul) eProv GERS supervision cg GPS MT Toul AQF GRI GSR cadre (AQF) cg PSP Toul PSP Toul (brig) cadre TD base arrière (PSP Toul) cadre administrateur cadre expert outil doc sup GPS's (PSP Toul) GILs Toulouse cadre expert cg GSP Nanc CSC (Nanc) cg CSR Traf CENT PSP Nanc autres GSP GE propres cadres soutien prox cadre expert-soutien (traf) posit. Superv Traf TR AQ Traf IZAA carrefour info (zone Nanc) CNG cg autres GSP CSC (zone Nant) cg CSR Blag Traf AMRE SAV OT (Blag) carrefour info Paris CSR IdF GSP Nantes autres GE propres AQF (GPS Paris) GSR (PEMS) Opérateurs affiliés EBN DUO URN PO Directeurs (DT-DVRN, DVRN, EBN)… chef de département (Administration Rx URN PO) PSP Toulouse cd Rx UER Toul GEE Agences DR clientes GIL's (zone Toul) GILs Organizational Robustness in Socio-te chnical Systems SRA-Europe confere nce , Se pte mber 2006 8 Extrapolated social network GPS889 GPS668 GPS669 GIL667 GIL668 GPS6610 GIL666 GPS667 GPS666 GPS888 GPS887 GPS8810 GPS886 GPS885 GPS665 GIL665 GPS111 GPS112 GIL113 GPS113 GIL114 GPS114 GPS774 GPS663 PSP11 GPS115 GIL115 GPS116 GIL116 GPS118 PSP88 PSP66 GPS664 GIL883 GPS9101 GPS9102 GPS9103 GPS662 GPS661 GIL663 GIL774 GPS772 GIL777 GPS771 GPS773 GPS778GPS775 GIL662 GPS777 GPS1110 GIL117 GPS881GPS884 GPS883 GPS882 GIL775 GIL778 PSP77 GSP8 GIL9104 PSP910 GPS9105 GPS9107 GPS9108 PSP910 GPS9106 GPS9109 GPS91010 GIL9107 GPS779 GPS776 GIL9108 GSP6 GPS119 GPS117 GPS4410 GPS449 GSP7 GSP1 GIL448 GPS448 GPS9104 GPS991 GPS447 PSP44 GPS446 GPS445 GSP4 GPS993 GPS994 GPS554 GPS444 CSR Province CSR IDF GSP5 GIL552 GIL553 GSP9 PSP55 GSP2 GSP3 GIL222 GPS221 GIL223 GPS556 GPS224 GPS223 GPS9114 GPS335 PSP22 GPS225 GPS226 PSP33 GPS227 GPS2210 GIL227 GPS228 GIL228 GPS229 GPS997 GPS9910 GPS998 GPS999 GIL998 GIL9113 GPS9111 GPS9112 GPS222 GIL557 GPS557 GPS558 GIL558 GPS559 GPS5510 Ivan Boissiè re s & Eric Marsde n PSP99 GPS996 GPS443 GPS442GPS441 GPS551 GPS555 GPS552 GIL554 GPS553 GPS992GPS995 PSP911 GPS334 GIL335 GIL334 GPS336 GPS337 PSP33 GPS333 GIL337 GPS332 GIL339 GPS338 GIL332 GPS3310 GPS331 GPS9113 PSP911 GPS9115 GPS9116 GPS9117 GPS91110 GPS9118 GPS9119 GIL338 GPS339 Organizational Robustness in Socio-te chnical Systems SRA-Europe confere nce , Se pte mber 2006 9 Analysis ● ● ● Operators produce a strong collective response to manage technological risk – The social network is dense – High level of redundancy in communication paths – Low mean distance between operators Network is plastic: variable-sized groups respond to perturbations – plasticity = standard deviation of the mean number of operators involved in one action – Allows effective handling of crisis situations without introducing excessive overheads during nominal activity Social network is decentralized – Operational supervision and repair activities are mostly transversal between technicians, following functional structure rather than hierarchy – Agents higher in the organizational scale are often at the margins of the social network Ivan Boissiè re s & Eric Marsde n Organizational Robustness in Socio-te chnical Systems SRA-Europe confere nce , Se pte mber 2006 10 Organizational factors that influence cooperation Category Mutual acquaintance Factors seen as promoting cooperation Recognition Solidarity Learning Factors seen as generating conflict Ivan Boissiè re s & Eric Marsde n Meaning People know each other “personally” Recognition that a colleague’s work is useful/legitimate The sense of belonging to the same collective group The possibility of improving one’s skills and competence set Tension Rivalry between groups of operators (due to competition) Organizational change Restructuring of the official hierarchy/organization Institutional communication Top-down information accompanying an organizational change Competence Level of competence required oneself, and of others) Organizational Robustness in Socio-te chnical Systems SRA-Europe confere nce , Se pte mber 2006 (of 11 Analysis ● Operators demonstrate an “organizational intelligence” through their use of social relationships that are built up over time ● This is an important factor in ensuring the socio-technical system’s robustness ● Activity is difficult to characterize and quantify – ● Its importance is generally underestimated by the operators’ managers – ● not mentioned in official handbooks that describe (and prescribe) supervision and maintenance activities “we don’t pay them to chat” This underestimation of an important factor in the system’s robustness is a potential source of vulnerability for the system Ivan Boissiè re s & Eric Marsde n Organizational Robustness in Socio-te chnical Systems SRA-Europe confere nce , Se pte mber 2006 12 Future work ● Dependability analysis applied to social networks – – ● Characterize the fault tolerance mechanisms Predict the most effective use of redundancy Develop techniques to include time in representations of social networks – – Before-after studies Represent the dynamic reconfiguration of the network in response to a perturbation ● The Ivan Boissiè re s & Eric Marsde n dynamics of organizational resilience Organizational Robustness in Socio-te chnical Systems SRA-Europe confere nce , Se pte mber 2006 13 Further information ● Ivan Boissières : [email protected] ● Eric Marsden : [email protected] ● ICSI : www.icsi-eu.org Ivan Boissiè re s & Eric Marsde n Organizational Robustness in Socio-te chnical Systems SRA-Europe confere nce , Se pte mber 2006 14