Page 1 Osaka University Knowledg Osaka University Knowledge

Page 1 Osaka University Knowledg Osaka University Knowledge

Title
待兼山論叢 文学編 第25号 SUMMARIES
Author(s)
Citation
Issue Date
待兼山論叢. 文学篇. 25 P.61-P.65
1991
Text Version publisher
URL
http://hdl.handle.net/11094/47863
DOI
Rights
Osaka University
6
1
SUMMARIES
A PersonalViewo
f“
Maihime
”
InContrastwithCrimeαndPunishment
TakatoshiIzuHARA
← −
By comparing t
h
ed
e
t
a
i
l
so
f Mori Ogai
’
s“
Maihime
”with
t
h
o
s
eo
fD
o
s
t
o
e
v
s
k
i
i’
sC
r
i
m
eandP
u
n
i
s
h
m
e
n
t
,i
tcanbes
a
i
dt
h
a
t
t
h
eformerowesmanys
c
e
n
e
si
ni
tt
ot
h
el
a
t
t
e
r
.
Butt
h
en
a
t
u
r
eo
f“
Maihime
”i
sc
o
n
t
r
a
r
yt
ot
h
a
to
fC
r
i
m
eand
P
u
n
i
s
h
m
e
n
t
.Theheroo
fC
r
i
m
eandP
u
n
i
s
h
m
e
n
tcommitsmurder,
b
u
t he r
e
c
o
g
n
i
z
e
sh
i
s own s
i
na
f
t
e
rl
o
n
g
t
i
m
es
u妊e
r
i
n
g
s
. Then
hes
t
a
r
t
st
or
e
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
eh
i
m
s
e
l
f
.Thisn
o
v
e
li
sas
t
o
r
yo
fs
p
i
r
i
t
u
a
l
“
renewal
．
”
“
Maihime
”i
sn
a
r
r
a
t
e
di
nt
h
eformo
fana
u
t
o
b
i
o
g
r
a
p
h
y
. The
h
e
r
oo
f“
Maihime
”i
sd
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
da
sacowardbya
n
o
t
h
e
r“
I
”from
b
e
g
i
n
n
i
n
gt
oe
n
d
. Hed
r
i
v
e
sh
i
sl
o
v
e
rmad. What he d
o
e
si
sa
mentalmurder,buthes
h
i
r
k
e
dt
h
er
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
yf
o
ri
t
.Thenhe
m
i
s
s
e
st
h
echancet
orenewh
i
m
s
e
l
f
.I
nc
o
n
t
r
a
s
twithC
r
i
m
eand
P
u
n
i
s
h
m
e
n
t
，
“
民1aihime”i
sas
t
o
r
yo
f“
d
e
l
a
y
”or“
r
e
g
r
e
s
s
i
o
n
．
”
I
ti
sn
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
yf
o
rMori Ogai t
ow
r
i
t
e such a work, f
o
rhe
i
n
t
e
n
d
e
dt
or
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
tt
h
eg
e
n
e
r
a
l weakness o
ft
h
eJ
a
p
a
n
e
s
ei
n
t
h
ee
a
r
l
yM
e
i
j
ie
r
a
, though he was a man o
fas
t
r
o
n
g mind
h
i
m
s
e
l
f
.
PoemsofCherryBlossombyt
h
eKohko・Shi
sha
NorikoNIINA
I
nt
h
el
a
t
t
e
rh
a
l
fo
ft
h
e Ye
d
op
e
r
i
o
d
, a new p
o
e
t
i
c
so
ft
h
e
Ming and t
h
e Manchu d
y
n
a
s
t
i
e
s was adopted by p
o
e
t
so
ft
h
e
Kohko-shishas
c
h
o
o
li
nY
e
d
o
.U
n
t
i
lt
h
a
tt
i
m
e
,p
o
e
t
sc
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
t
h
e
m
s
e
l
v
e
s bound t
o compose p
o
e
t
r
yi
nt
h
eo
l
d Chinese s
t
y
l
e
andimmitatedt
h
ep
o
e
t
r
yo
ft
h
eg
l
o
r
i
o
u
sT’
angd
y
n
a
s
t
y
.
Ont
h
eo
t
h
e
rh
a
n
d
,p
o
e
t
swhob
e
l
o
n
g
e
dt
oKohko-shishawrote
poems o
fc
h
e
r
r
y blossom w
h
i
l
et
h
e
yr
e
a
l
i
s
t
i
c
a
l
l
yd
e
p
i
c
t
e
dt
h
e
i
r
a
c
t
u
a
ll
i
f
ei
nt
h
e
i
rpoems. KashiwagiJ
o
t
e
iandOkuboS
h
i
b
u
t
s
u
composed somepoemso
ft
h
i
sk
i
n
d
, admiring t
h
ebeautyo
ft
h
e
b
l
o
s
s
o
m
, which i
s unique t
oJ
a
p
a
n
. Theywere a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d with
t
h
e Kokugakusha, a group o
fs
t
u
d
e
n
t
si
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
e
di
nJ
a
p
a
n
e
s
e
A
n
t
i
q
u
i
t
y
,whot
o
o
kc
h
e
r
r
yblossoma
sasymbolo
ft
h
e
i
rt
h
o
u
g
h
t
.
62
,
e
s
e
n
a
p
a
eJ
h
d by t
i
e poems, Chinese poems d
s
e
n
a
p
a
J
o
n
i
S
e
h
. Butt
e
r
u
t
a
r
e
t
i
el
s
e
n
i
h
eC
h
ft
eo
c
n
e
u
l
f
n
ti
a
e
r
wereunderag
e new
h
tt
a
h
y blossom shows t
r
r
e
h
fc
e poems o
h
ft
eo
c
n
e
t
s
i
x
e
t
n
e
m
i
t
n
e
sgenuines
’
t
e
o
dimportance on ap
e
c
a
l
swhich p
c
i
t
e
o
p
h
t
a
r
y
r
t
e
o
p
l
a
n
i
g
i
r
o
n
a
e
s
o
p
m
o
c
o
t
s
t
e
o
p
e
s
e
n
a
p
a
eJ
s
o
h
dt
e
l
b
a
n
e
.
e
n
eo
s
e
n
i
h
eC
h
ft
no
o
i
t
a
t
i
m
namerei
a
h
rt
e
'
u
s
o
g
garu/Kegasu’and ‘Yogoru/Yo
区e
l Study on ‘
a
c
i
r
o
t
s
i
AH
YukihiroHASHIMOTO
)/
u
r
e
r
o
g
o
y
(
u
r
o
g
o
y
'and‘
u
s
a
g
e
k
/
)
u
r
e
r
a
g
e
k
(
u
r
a
g
e
k
Synonyms '
:
s
g
n
i
n
a
e
rm
i
e
h
r by t
e
h
t
ho
c
a
d from e
e
h
s
i
u
g
n
i
t
s
i
’are d
yogosu
l
a
c
i
s
y
h
p
r“
e
t
t
a
”and the l
s
s
e
n
i
t
r
i
mental d
e former shows “
h
t
.
s
t
x
e
t
n
o
tc
n
e
r
e
f
f
i
nd
ei
l
b
a
e
g
n
a
h
c
r
e
t
n
ti
o
en
r
.Sotheya
”
s
s
e
n
i
t
r
i
d
.
a
d
a
r
a
ak
t
e
r
a
g
e
k
*
/
a
t
e
r
o
g
o
(I) Dorodey
.
o
r
o
k
o
ak
t
e
r
a
g
e
k
/
a
t
e
r
o
g
o
y
(2) Tsumide*
l
i
t
n
tu
n
e
r
a
p
p
ta
o
n mentioned abovewas n
o
i
t
c
n
i
t
s
i
ed
h
But t
yogoru/
' and ‘
u
s
a
g
e
k
/
u
r
a
g
e
k
f‘
. The usage o
s
e
g
e Middle A
h
t
l
o
nc
si
g
n
i
t
i
r
dChinesew
l
eo
h
s on t
e
t
o
n
o・mono (
h
nS
’i
yogosu
h
t
n
e
e
t
n
e
v
e
ys
l
r
a
hand e
t
n
e
e
t
f
i
ef
h
nt
ni
e
t
t
i
r
,w
e
s
e
n
a
p
a
lJ
a
i
u
q
o
l
n between
o
i
t
c
n
i
t
s
i
rd
e
h
t
o
n
e was a
r
e
h
tt
a
h
) shows t
s
e
i
r
u
t
n
e
c
’
yogoru/yogosu
e‘
l
i
h
lw
a
r
e
t
i
‘kegaru/kegasu’l
e synonyms：
s
e
h
t
.
l
a
i
u
q
o
l
l
o
c
c
i
t
n
a
m
e
es
h
ot
ngaveway t
o
i
t
c
n
i
t
s
i
cd
i
t
s
i
l
y
t
es
h
,t
l
l
ra
e
t
f
A
e coex・
h
tt
a
h
st
ni
o
i
t
c
n
i
t
s
i
fd
s changeo
i
h
ft
to
l
u
s
e
. The r
e
n
o
tcame
n
e
s
e
r
tp
'a
u
s
o
g
o
y
/
u
r
o
g
o
y
' and ‘
u
s
a
g
e
k
/
u
r
a
g
e
k
f‘
eo
c
n
e
t
s
i
.
e
l
b
i
s
s
o
obep
t
αs
fTheFourZo
sPoetry- A Studyo
’
nBlake
Madnessi
MamiHIBINO
s
c
i
t
i
r
sc
i
fh
t most o
u
d a madman, b
e
l
l
a
Blake has been c
s
i
n betweenh
o
i
t
a
l
e
er
h
e on t
u
g
r
oa
et
s
n
e
s
n
o
sn
ti
ti
a
h
et
e
r
g
a
every
h
switht
l
a
e
, however, d
r
e
p
a
. This p
s
s
e
n
d
a
y and m
r
t
e
o
p
tBlakehad
a
h
tt
c
a
ef
h
st
ra
a
sf
ra
o
,f
y
r
t
e
o
sp
’
nBlake
madnessi
thecommentson
a
h
nt
i
a
t
r
e
sc
ti
,i
s
t
s
i
x
damadmane
e
l
l
a
beenc
e
h
gt
n
i
r
e
d
i
s
n
o
c
e
s worth r
ti
,i
s
e
d
i
s
e
.B
y
r
t
e
o
sp
i
nh
madness i
,
y
t
i
n
a
s
n
yofI
r
o
t
s
i
sH
’
t
l
u
a
c
u
o
rF
e
t
f
a
,.
e
c
n
i
fmadness, s
problem o
.
s
e
i
t
i
v
i
t
c
la
a
u
t
c
e
l
l
e
t
n
fi
so
d
l
e
i
sf
u
o
i
r
a
nv
di
e
s
s
u
c
s
i
sd
madness i
d
e
s
u
a
eworldc
v
i
t
c
u
r
t
s
e
sad
e
b
i
r
c
s
e
,Blaked
s
a
o
nTheFourZ
I
6
3
byU
r
i
z
e
n
,t
h
eembodimento
fr
e
a
s
o
n
;m
o
r
e
o
v
e
r
,t
h
ep
o
e
tg
i
v
e
s
him a
s
p
e
c
t
so
fm
a
d
n
e
s
s
.T
h
i
s paper a
n
a
l
y
s
e
st
h
e madness o
f
U
r
i
z
e
ni
no
r
d
e
rt
oshowhowt
h
ep
o
e
tp
e
r
c
e
i
v
e
sr
e
a
s
o
na
sa
n
o
t
h
e
r
form o
fm
a
d
n
e
s
s
. The s
t
u
d
ya
p
p
l
i
e
st
h
ep
s
y
c
h
o
l
o
g
yo
fR
.D
.
L
a
i
n
g
,whichg
r
a
s
p
st
h
eproblemo
fmadnessi
nt
e
r
m
so
fr
e
l
a
t
i
o
n
between an i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l and s
o
c
i
e
t
y
. Thep
s
y
c
h
o
l
o
g
ye
n
a
b
l
e
sus
t
or
e
c
o
g
n
i
z
et
h
ep
a
t
h
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
land s
o
c
i
a
la
s
p
e
c
t
so
fmadnessi
n
U
r
i
z
e
n
:f
e
a
ro
fn
o
n
e
x
i
s
t
e
n
c
e
,f
e
a
ro
fo
t
h
e
r
s
,p
o
s
s
e
s
s
i
o
no
ftwo
s
e
l
v
e
s
,p
e
t
r
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
,d
i
v
i
s
i
o
nw
i
t
ht
h
er
e
a
lw
o
r
l
d
, and l
a
c
ko
f
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
.U
r
i
z
e
ni
s very s
i
m
i
l
a
rt
os
c
h
i
z
o
i
di
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
si
n
t
h
i
sr
e
s
p
e
c
t
. The p
a
p
e
rc
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
s why B
l
a
k
es
u
b
v
e
r
t
sr
e
a
s
o
n
andc
l
a
r
i
f
i
e
sB
l
a
k
e
’
sviewo
fm
a
d
n
e
s
s
.
“
Dutchman
”UtterancesandTheirCharacteristics
E
i
i
c
h
iYAMASAKI
Thisp
a
p
e
rd
e
a
l
sw
i
t
hs
o
c
a
l
l
e
d“
Dutchman
”utterances.
C
i〕 I
fhei
sap
o
l
i
c
e
m
a
n
,I
’
m aDutchman.
(
i
i
)I
fC
h
i
c
a
g
oi
si
nI
n
d
i
a
n
a
,I
’
mt
h
eQueeno
fRumania.
T
y
p
i
c
a
l
l
y
,u
t
t
e
r
a
n
c
e
so
ft
h
i
st
y
p
es
h
o
w
:
I
. I
d
i
o
m
a
t
i
cc
o
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
s
.
2
. Thei
n
t
e
r
l
o
c
u
t
o
r
s
’claimsrepeatedastheirantecedents.
3
, F
a
l
s
i
t
yo
ft
h
ea
n
t
e
c
e
d
e
n
t
sandt
h
ec
o
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
s
.
4
. I
n
a
b
i
l
i
t
yt
oc
o
・o
c
c
u
rw
i
t
hq
u
a
s
i
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
s
.
5
. I
n
a
b
i
l
i
t
yt
oc
o・o
c
c
u
rw
i
t
he
v
e
nぴ c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
s
.
6
. U
n
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
yi
ns
u
b
j
u
n
c
t
i
v
emood.
Regarding3a
se
s
s
e
n
t
i
a
l
, wef
o
l
l
o
wt
h
ea
s
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
nt
h
a
tt
h
i
s
t
y
p
eo
fu
t
t
e
r
a
n
c
eu
t
i
l
i
z
e
s modus t
o
l
l
e
n
s (MT) t
oe
x
p
l
o
i
tt
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
se
x
p
r
e
s
s
e
d byt
h
eu
t
t
e
r
a
n
c
e
s
. This a
p
p
r
o
a
c
he
a
s
i
l
y
e
x
p
l
a
i
n
s 4 and 5
,i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
gt
h
e
i
re
x
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
s
.M
o
r
e
o
v
e
r
,t
h
e
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
i
t
yo
fM Ti
nc
o
n
v
e
r
s
a
t
i
o
n
sp
r
o
v
i
d
e
st
h
ef
o
u
n
d
a
t
i
o
nf
o
r2
.
F
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
gt
h
i
sl
i
n
e
, we a
n
a
l
y
z
e 6 by c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
gt
h
e way
u
t
t
e
r
a
n
c
e
so
ft
h
i
st
y
p
ea
r
eu
s
e
di
nc
o
n
v
e
r
s
a
t
i
o
n
. Throught
h
e
f
a
c
tt
h
a
tp
r
o
t
o
t
y
p
i
c
a
lexamplesandn
o
n
p
r
o
t
o
t
y
p
i
c
a
lo
n
e
sa
p
p
e
a
r
t
o behave d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
l
yw
i
t
hr
e
s
p
e
c
tt
ot
h
i
sc
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
， 出e
c
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
a
l
i
t
yo
ft
h
ei
d
i
o
m
a
t
i
ce
x
p
r
e
s
s
i
o
n
si
sc
l
a
r
i
f
i
e
d
, which
h
a
st
e
n
d
e
dt
omake1a
p
p
e
a
rt
obemosts
a
l
i
e
n
t
.
64
eUntersuchungvon
l
l
e
r
u
t
k
u
r
t
DasVergessenHeros Eines
sMeeresundderLiebeWellen“
e
D
,
s,
r
e
z
r
a
p
l
l
i
r
G
Misako Dor
← −
eHandlung
i
tnormalerweised
b
i
e
r
sDramast
e
rd
u
g
i
f
t
p
u
a
DieH
e Entscheidungen voran
r
h
r Tun und i
h
,i
n
e
t
l
a
h
r
r Ve
h
hi
c
r
u
l
<
.
n
i
e
s Dramas bewuBt s
e
nd
o
i
t
a
u
t
i
s
t
k
i
l
f
n
o
rK
e
und muβsich d
e
i
ed
n
i
te
h
c
i
nn
i
d
l
e
rH
e
td
g
a
r
t
r
e
b
l
sHero-Dramai
r
e
z
r
a
p
l
l
i
r
DochG
n
e
t
s
r
se
e
. Nachdem am Ende d
e
l
l
o
eR
d
n
e
b
i
e
r
t
n
a
r
o
Handlung v
e
g
r
o
v
r
e
rh
a
l
zk
t
e
s
e
eundG
b
e
i
nvonL
o
i
t
a
u
t
i
s
t
k
i
l
f
n
o
eK
i
Aktesd
r
e
,d
n
i
r
e
t
s
e
i
r
n Lauf: DieP
e
r
h
eHandlung i
i
, nimmtd
t
s
ni
e
t
e
r
t
r
u
rWeihez
e
r
h
ii
e
eb
d
a
r
e
hg
c
i
ts
b
e
i
l
r
e
,v
t
s
ni
e
t
o
b
r
e
nv
e
b
e
i
zul
njungenMann.
e
n
i
ne
ni
i
r
e
t
s
e
i
r
P
r
u
t
k
u
r
t
rS
e
hd
c
i
l
g
l
i
z
e
nb
i
d
l
e
rH
e
eFunktiond
i
nwird
e
t
h
c
a
r
t
e
B
r
e
hd
c
i
l
t
h
c
i
s
n
i
r BewuBtseinh
h
, daBi
h
c
i
ts
g
i
e
oz
s Dramas, s
e
d
s
e
rEntwicklungd
u
nkeinemZusammenhangz
ni
o
i
t
a
u
t
i
s
t
k
i
l
f
n
o
K
zwirdvon
t
e
s
e
eundG
b
e
i
tzwischenL
k
i
l
f
n
o
: DerK
t
h
e
t
Dramass
s
e
hObjektd
c
i
l
g
i
d
e
tl
s
ei
i
rWeisewahrgenommen; s
e
n
i
e
nk
ri
h
i
e
n
e
g
i
ee
r
h
ei
i
ss
l
:A
t
k
e
j
b
u
sS
e
d
n
l
e
d
n
a
th
h
c
i
hn
c
o
d
e
,j
s
t
k
i
l
f
n
o
K
e
b
s
n
e ganze Umwelt, i
r
h
hi
c
i
e
l
g
u
ez
i
ts
B
i
g
r
e
,v
t
k
r
e
m
e
Liebe b
.ImDrama
t
h
o
r
sd
e
z
t
e
s
e
sG
e
nd
e
t
i
e
evons
i
,d
r
h
a
f
e
eG
i
ed
r
e
d
n
o
s
e ankampfen
s
s
i
n
r
e
d
n
i
eH
i
e gegen d
i
,d
n
e
d
l
e
eH
n
i
e
hk
c
i
ns
e
d
n
i
f
.
n
e
d
i
e
nl
e
n
h
ri
e
t
n
ru
e
d
o
r
e
e Funktion d
i
td
h
c
i
t Hero n
a
rh
u
t
k
u
r
t
rS
e
hd
c
i
l
t
h
c
i
s
n
i
H
nElemente
e
d
i
e
rb
e
neinemd
tnuri
r
e
i
t
s
i
x
te
s
b
l
e
es
i
.S
r
u
g
i
f
t
p
u
a
H
rBeziehungzum
e
n
i
e
nk
hi
c
o
d
e
tj
h
e
t
,s
e
b
e
i
rL
e
,d
s
t
k
i
l
f
n
o
sK
e
d
eLiebe
i
Bd
u
l
h
c
tzumS
b
i
e
r
h
c
s
e
nb
e
r
u
g
i
f
n
e
b
e
rN
e
. Eined
z
t
e
s
e
G
・
sUnver
l
naucha
r
e
d
n
o
,s
s
e
d
n
e
d
n
i
b
r
e
gV
i
i
e
s
k
c
l
i
l
sg
l
t nur a
h
c
i
n
n
i
e
l
l
ha
c
i
ts
g
i
e
ez
b
e
i
eL
s
e
i
.D
s
e
d
n
e
g
i
t
l
a
w
r
e
b
s und U
e
h
c
i
l
d
i
e
m
,
z
n
e
t
s
i
x
rganzenE
e
r
h
ni
hi
c
i
ts
g
i
e
,z
g
n
u
r
e
d
n
a
r
e
v
s
n
e
s
nHerosW e
i
.
t
k
c
l
i
r
d
e
g
s
u
va
i
t
k
ta
h
c
i
hn
c
o
d
e
tj
s
b
l
e
rs
h
wirdvoni
sde
t
αn
’＇ dansLesCh
“eloignement
’
tl
rapprochement”e
Le“
”
r
u
e
t
c
e
l
e“
−l
自uvre”
“
’
rI
u
ts
n
a
s
s
i
g
edynamismea
αldoror- l
M
e
r
i
a
t
a
r
r
a
en
r-l
u
e
t
a
r
r
a
/len
Naruhiko TERAMOTO
s
e
tl
n
o
ed
s
o
r
np
色mee
, po
r
o
r
o
d
l
a
eM
sd
t
n
a
h
esC
rL
e
t
i
a
r
Pourt
,
n
o
i
t
a
r
r
a
iden
u
l
e
tc
ee
r
u
t
c
e
edel
t
c
a
'
tl
n
o
themesfondamentauxs
e
:l
e
r
v
u
e
ec
t
t
e
l de c
e
i
t
n
e
s
s
e dynamisme e
el
r
i
a
l
c
nous avons e
65
“
rapprochement
”e
tl
'“
e
l
o
i
g
n
e
m
e
n
t
"
, tantM e
n
t
r
el
“
’reuvre”et
s
o
n“
l
e
c
t
e
u
r
"(
t
e
l
sq
u
'
i
l
ss
o
n
tr
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
e
sd
a
n
sl
et
e
x
t
e
)
,t
a
n
t
l
J
t
e
n
t
r
el
en
a
r
r
a
t
e
u
re
tl
en
a
r
r
a
t
a
i
r
e
.I
Is
’
e
s
tc
o
n
f
i
r
m
eq
u
e
,d
’
une
p
a
r
t
,l
e“
rapprochement
”e
s
t mis e
nr
e
u
v
r
e comme e
m
b
r
a
s
s
e
m
e
n
t
,d
i妊u
s
i
o
ndup
o
i
s
o
n
,v
a
m
p
i
r
i
s
m
e
,e
t
,d
’
a
u
t
r
ep
a
r
t
,I
“
’eloigne・
ment
”commep
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
o
ne
to
r
d
r
ed
es
官o
i
g
n
e
r
. Ces deux mouvementsi
n
t
e
r
s
u
p
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
i
r
e
ss
o
n
tc
o
u
p
l
e
sd’
unemani
色r
ee
t
r
o
i
t
e
a
f
i
nd’
i
n
v
i
t
e
rl
en
a
r
r
a
t
a
i
r
e
/
l
e
c
t
e
u
r註 s
et
r
a
n
s
f
o
r
m
e
ren《c
eq
u
'
i
l
l
i
t
．
》